WEBVTT - The Vultures Are Circling Russian Debt

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Karl Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovk. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all purtnising the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analysts in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.479
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Weekend iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com. You

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:25.439
<v Speaker 1>can also listen to our radio show at two pm

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio, or watch us on YouTube

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 1>search Bloomberg Global News. All right, gotta say this story

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:35.240
<v Speaker 1>caught my attention reading in this morning, especially as I

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>keep trying to understand Russian President Vladimir Vladimir Putin's ultimate

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:43.879
<v Speaker 1>intentions and his rational rationalizations for the invasion in war

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 1>with Ukraine. Most would argue there are no rationalizations for

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 1>this um, but it leads us to this Bloomberg Opinion

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>columnist by Leonide Borshitski, who writes about this today. Leonard

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Borshitski is a column this or Bloomberg Opinion. He joins

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 1>us now on the phone from London. The opinion column

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>available on the Bloomberg terminal and blue dot com. Putin's

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 1>new alter ego is Igor Stralkov uh Igor Stralkov Leonard.

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:10.119
<v Speaker 1>It's also known as Igor Ghirkin, his name that he's

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>known by his Stralkov though. Who is he Um? He's

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:22.919
<v Speaker 1>a Russian UM veteran of both the military and special services,

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and he's a historian by education, and he's got a

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 1>UM a pretty long history as a volunteer and all

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 1>sorts of local concerts from Yugoslavia to transm Austria. UM.

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:41.400
<v Speaker 1>He's a you know, a Russian US from nationalistm monarchist,

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>and he Um basically single handed we started the war

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>in eastern Ukraine and two thousand fourteen, according to both

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>himself and many others who were you know, who covered

0:01:56.400 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>those events, m he Um crossed the Russian Ukrainian border

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 1>April from thousand fourteen with a tiny force of about

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:12.000
<v Speaker 1>fifty people and went on very quickly to become the

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 1>defense minister the so called Dominic People's Republic, which is

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>one of these unrecognized stateless in the east of Ukraine

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>that Russia has backed and that Russia is basically waging

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:30.079
<v Speaker 1>this war extensively to defense. Lean, did we know you're

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 1>at an event in London? So we really appreciate you

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:33.919
<v Speaker 1>squeezing in because I really feel like this is such

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 1>an important column to bring to our Bloomberg audience. Why

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>is it that you think it's important that we understand about,

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:44.079
<v Speaker 1>as you termed it, Putin's new alter ego? Is this guy?

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Why is it important that we understand about this guy?

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, are they friends? And how does he ultimately

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:53.080
<v Speaker 1>potentially impact Vladimir Putin, whether in his thinking or in

0:02:53.120 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 1>his actions? Um? Well, he UM still coost motivation UM

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>always had to do with a sort of vision of

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:11.240
<v Speaker 1>an imperial Russia that has never really existed outside of

0:03:11.720 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>UH certain nostalgic literature. UM. And this is the empire

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 1>that uh he has always wanted to put into rebuild.

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 1>And that's what by going into Ukraine into thousand fourteen,

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:32.679
<v Speaker 1>he tried to provoke Russia into doing into invading um

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 1>all of Ukraine, and UH the nexting large parts of

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine that are Russian speaking. And so he had um

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of the ideological way, the ideological foundations of what

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Putting is actually doing. Eight years later, UM, he's uh

0:03:55.440 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of carrying out a plan that Croppo will back

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 1>and fourteen, but that wasn't really accepted. Uh so was

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 1>considered too much of a sort of a romantic French

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>figure for the Kremlin. And the Kremlin was much more

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:19.479
<v Speaker 1>pragmatic back then, and once it's keep working relationship with

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:25.839
<v Speaker 1>the West, didn't want to subject itself to um, you know,

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 1>to to hell Is sanctions, and so the men's deals

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 1>were made in two thousands, fourteen months fifteen um. Now

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:37.440
<v Speaker 1>that it is all out the window and so Putton

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:42.239
<v Speaker 1>has basically gone all out so both Well, that's something

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 1>that really stuck out to me from this column, Leonard.

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>You wrote that the President Putin appears to be past

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:51.440
<v Speaker 1>caring about the open economy. He certainly cares little about

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the fortunes of the wealthiest Russians, those billionaires who have

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:58.360
<v Speaker 1>been sanctioned by the United States, the EU and the UK.

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:03.039
<v Speaker 1>This term though, empire or death. That really stuck out

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>to me. What does that mean to Vladimir Putin? Well,

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>that is it's it's really a new kind of behavior

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>for him. He was always a cautious risk taker. Uh

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 1>he never went far enough to to break off ties

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>um with the with the West. Uh, and to completely

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:33.479
<v Speaker 1>cut off the Rustional League from the West and the

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>rest of the Tienship as well. Um. It's you know,

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 1>it was always seen as a kind of okay, a

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:48.039
<v Speaker 1>strong and maybe that someone with strong authoritarian tendences, maybe

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:54.359
<v Speaker 1>even a dictator, but uh, still a European ruler. You

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 1>could compare him with someone like the Toorban and Hungary

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>or the the Polish nationalists. Uh uh, but this is

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:09.679
<v Speaker 1>no longer true. Um. He has sort of crossed every

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:16.360
<v Speaker 1>read line. He doesn't care about. Um. You know what

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:20.280
<v Speaker 1>people think of him externally, and this is you know,

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:26.119
<v Speaker 1>this is Russia turning inward in one sense and expanding

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 1>militarily in another. Uh, rebuilding the empire, thanking everything on

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:37.279
<v Speaker 1>this on this um um you know, the military advent

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:41.320
<v Speaker 1>right if it certainly feels like defeat is no option. Um.

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Leonid Bressitski, thank you so much, really appreciate you weaning in.

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 1>He is columnist of Bloomberg Opinion, joining us on the

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:51.560
<v Speaker 1>phone from London. A Bloomberg Opinion colonist, he was also

0:06:51.560 --> 0:06:53.920
<v Speaker 1>a founding out of the Russian business deliver. Maatski also

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:57.680
<v Speaker 1>did the recent translation of This Is Bloomberg. You're listening

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Measure and Bloomberg Quick

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Top two stories on

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg in the past sixty minutes. They have to

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 1>do with Apple. Apple working to bring more financial services

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>in house. That's an exclusive, buyer Mark German. Also that

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Apple and Meta giving user data to hackers who fortunately

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 1>go requests also a Bloomberg exclusive. Mark German is a

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 1>technology reporter. He covers all things Apple, Peloton and more.

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 1>He joins us live from the Bloomberg Los Angeles Bureau.

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Mark another day, another exclusive. Grateful to have you with

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 1>us this afternoon. When you say financial services, what do

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 1>you mean when it comes to Apple? What are they

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:36.480
<v Speaker 1>working on? Yes, so Apple's working on a few new

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 1>fintech services. One would be a buy now later service

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 1>to compete with the firm and some of the other companies,

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 1>allowing you to buy something and pay for it over time.

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Other elements of financial services would be their iPhone hardware

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 1>subscription service that they're developing. Um By financial services in

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the house, what means the underlying fintech infrastructure right Apple

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>has been using partners like Golden Sack, some Core Card,

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 1>and green Dot Bank to power their current financial offer offerings,

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:08.680
<v Speaker 1>which is basically Apple pay Um and some of their

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 1>other offerings like a wallet app and the Apple Card.

0:08:11.760 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>And then they're also working to create their own payment processor,

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 1>right that is the very core of credit cards or

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>other fin sech platforms sending transactions to banks for approval. Right,

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 1>So they're going to be bringing that all in the

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 1>house over the long term. What's the endgame mark for

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Apple here? What's what's the big aspirations with this? The

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:32.320
<v Speaker 1>big aspiration is to own the whole widget, right Apple,

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:34.319
<v Speaker 1>as you've seen with their software and their hardware, they

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 1>like to do everything in the house, right, So that's

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 1>owning all the underlying components. Now Apple wants to do

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the same thing with it for their financial services because

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 1>they know how critical that is to the company's future

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 1>and all these other buy now, pay later, debit card,

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 1>all the other things that they're that they're working toward. Okay,

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 1>are they going to alienate some some partners here? Goldman

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Sachs is the company that they work with on the

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:57.599
<v Speaker 1>Apple card, right, Well, you'll see it's probably likely that

0:08:57.600 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>when they expand the Ample cards to other regions, they

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 1>won't be working with Golden Secs. Core Card is their

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:05.120
<v Speaker 1>payment processor for the Apple Card. They probably won't be

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 1>working with them for future fintech products. They'll be using

0:09:08.320 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>their own core processor for that. Uh. And then when

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 1>you see green dot bank for the Apple Cash card

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:15.719
<v Speaker 1>in the US, you'll probably see different partners outside of

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:18.719
<v Speaker 1>the US, right, no, go ahead, I'm sorry. Yeah, I

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 1>don't think those three partners are going to disappear today

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>or in the near term for like the current offerings,

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 1>but for future offerings you'll see new partners. How much

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 1>of this mark too, that was about making the iPhone,

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 1>which come on to be fair is pretty expensive and

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:35.679
<v Speaker 1>making it more accessible to a wider audience. Perhaps you

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:40.319
<v Speaker 1>might pass because of the cost. The definitely the buy now,

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:43.960
<v Speaker 1>pay later and the iPhone hardware subscription service that those

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 1>are both designing to allow people to buy not only

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:49.439
<v Speaker 1>Apple products, but third party products right from third party

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:51.559
<v Speaker 1>merchants to be able to buy products and pay for

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:54.720
<v Speaker 1>them over time in order to drive down the upfront cost.

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>So this is definitely gonna help their revenue, right, this

0:09:57.480 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>is gonna juice revenues. They're gonna be making more per

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 1>customer on an annual basis because of this, and they're

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 1>also going to be driving traffic to more merchants because

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 1>of this. So I think it's a win win for Apple,

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:09.439
<v Speaker 1>for mergency and for consumers. Is it a surprise that

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 1>all that Apples moving further into this, I mean it

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 1>was a big deal when Apple launched the Apple Card

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:16.200
<v Speaker 1>and partner with Golden Sacks toad and did Apple Pay. Yeah,

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. I think over time they like

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 1>to expand their offerings. So when they first entered Apple Pay,

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 1>they said their goal was to replace everything in your wallet,

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 1>and they're doing so much now, from digital i ds

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 1>to this wallet app to Apple Pay, to Apple Cash,

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 1>to peer to peer payments. So it makes a lot

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>of sense to me that they're going to be, you know,

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of spreading their wings here. And I'm interesting interested

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:38.439
<v Speaker 1>to see how well Apple Pay later, this by now

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 1>pay leader service they're working on takes off mark what

0:10:41.640 --> 0:10:42.839
<v Speaker 1>we have you want to get you too, just in

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the last minute that we have you to touch on this.

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Another exclusive about Apple, this one by our colleague William Turton,

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 1>about Apple and Meta giving user data to hackers who

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 1>forged legal requests. Um, what do we know about what

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:58.679
<v Speaker 1>happened here? This is actually fascinating. So right now, if

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:00.679
<v Speaker 1>you're a law enforcement agency, you can reach out to

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Apple or Meta or other companies to get data if

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>you're doing a criminal investigation. And so what these hackers

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:09.319
<v Speaker 1>did is they pretended to be law enforcement. They contacted

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Apple and other companies asking for data on you know,

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 1>random people or random to us, but not random to them,

0:11:16.160 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure, and in some of these cases that data

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:22.720
<v Speaker 1>was actually received. Obviously, this is a big breach, um

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and so great story by William on that I would

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 1>encourage anyone to read that as well. Unbelievable. All right, Um,

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Mark Ivan, thank you so much, So glad we could

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 1>get to the stories we mentioned. The top two stories

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg terminal at this hour has to do

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:42.439
<v Speaker 1>with Mark's exclusive on for j Moore into financial services

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 1>bringing them in house Apple, and then of course on

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 1>that Apple Meta giving out some data from their users

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:53.199
<v Speaker 1>to hack tow hackers, and unbelievable Mark story moving stocks,

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:57.239
<v Speaker 1>payment stocks slumping this afternoon after Mark wrote that story. Yeah, exactly.

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:01.559
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes Tim Stenovic on Bloomberg Radio. This week's international

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 1>cover of Bloomberg business Week magazine. Quite a cover image,

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 1>I might point out as well, about the financial vultures

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 1>tapping into what maybe the opportunity of a lifetime. Here

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:18.079
<v Speaker 1>come the vulture. That's the cover of the international edition

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:20.679
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg Business Week. The story. It's by Eric Schatzker,

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Editor at Large at Bloomberg Bloomberg News. He's with us

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 1>in the Bloomberg INTERACTI Broker Studio. Also joining us remotely

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Joel Webber, editor at Bloomberg Business Week. So, Joel, what

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 1>is the opportunity that some hedge funds are seeing when

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 1>it comes to Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Let me just

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:37.080
<v Speaker 1>say that this is a product of first and foremost

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:40.320
<v Speaker 1>returned to office. So for all of those bosses out

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 1>there wondering why r t O is a thing, is

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:46.439
<v Speaker 1>a product of Eric and I having a brief conversation

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:50.079
<v Speaker 1>about Russian dead and me saying like who is buying stuff? Oh,

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Meaning that the only reason this story came together is

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 1>because you guys physically saw each other in person. Well,

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 1>when Joel and I you know, hang out by the

0:12:56.679 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 1>water cooler, we typically talk about Russian dead I hope

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the and and Eric was like, you know, let me

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:06.600
<v Speaker 1>make some calls and see what we can come up with.

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 1>And and it is a story that I think we've

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 1>all been wondering about, because this stuff is the thing

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 1>that if, if there's ever going to be a buying opportunity,

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Russian debt could be a thing that, as as Eric writes,

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 1>becomes a once in a lifetime thing. But you know,

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 1>really this is a there's a whole morality quandary that

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:29.680
<v Speaker 1>comes into play because it's it's really something that you

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 1>want to profit off of. And the answer is if

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the numbers are probably big enough, yes, right Eric, Hey,

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 1>it's complicated. Um, you definitely do have to get over

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the moral hump um. And then of course you have

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>to do what every credit investor does, which is evaluate

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:49.959
<v Speaker 1>the various scenarios that may unfold and and figure out

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:51.559
<v Speaker 1>whether you're gonna get paid or not one way or

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:53.320
<v Speaker 1>the other, whether you get paid by coupon, whether you

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 1>get repaid in principle, or whether you end up having

0:13:55.880 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 1>to go to court and try to seize assets from somebody.

0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 1>But that you know that standard distressed fair. What makes

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:07.320
<v Speaker 1>this so unusual and perhaps even a maybe I wouldn't

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 1>even say, perhaps a more extreme case than others, such

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:13.560
<v Speaker 1>as say Venezuela or sovereign defaults like Ecuador for example,

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 1>is that this is a product of a hostile invasion.

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 1>We haven't seen anything like this in the Western world,

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 1>as many people have said, since World War Two. And

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 1>that's a whole different calculus than deciding whether you want

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 1>to do business with a dictator, for example, that's what

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>some people think of Nicolas Manduro and Venezuela as or

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 1>whether you want to profit off what other people may

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 1>describe as a humanitarian crisis in a country like Sudan.

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Those are different calculations. This is something altogether unfamiliar well,

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 1>and we know in the financial community though, where there's

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 1>money to be made, you can find people who want

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 1>to tap into that. In your conversations, though, Eric, you know,

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>was it overwhelmingly people like this is an opportunity for us?

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Or were there those who said, I don't even want

0:14:56.560 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>to touch this. Both, Uh, there are more people who

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>are not touching this for a couple of reasons. Then

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 1>there are people who are touching it. The two reasons

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 1>are I just can't go near this, as Hans Humes,

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 1>whom I quote, or distrust. That investor whom I quote

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 1>in the story says, this is just to grotesque for

0:15:14.280 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 1>me um. And there are others who are being told

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 1>by their clients pension funds, for example, or endowments that

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 1>have a principled stance on this issue. I want you

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 1>to sell down Russia right now. It is difficult to

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>find people who are buying Russian debt, which is not

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 1>because they're not buying. It's because they're not talking about

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 1>it and they don't want to be public about it.

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Nobody wants to be public about it. In fact, that

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 1>people whom I spoke to who are buying Russian debt

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 1>would only speak to me on the condition of anonymity

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 1>because they know that there is this public approprium waiting

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 1>out there for them. You know, they're gonna be called vultures,

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna be hanged in the court of public opinion

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 1>at least now. But yet there's still this is a

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 1>there is a textbook, sort of distressed debt playbook here,

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Eric and and when you talk to the people who

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 1>are are skilled at wielding that that playbook. What are

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 1>they what are they exactly looking for? And where are

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 1>they what are they snatching up? What they want is

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>again confidence that this is gonna be money good UM.

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 1>And of course the most extreme scenario in any distressed

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 1>play is do I have to go to court and

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 1>do I have to try to arrest assets from the debtor?

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 1>And in this case, they're looking at Russian companies that

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 1>have significant operations in the West, like Luke Oil, for example,

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 1>We've all seen those gas stations UM, which has assets

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, it has assets in Italy, it

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 1>has assets in Spain, its assets in Bulgaria. Luke Oil

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 1>issued bonds in the Netherlands under British law. So in

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 1>that scenario, and Luke Oil isn't the only one, maybe

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't have to bet on the Russian sovereign, which

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 1>may even to some distressed guys feel distasteful. I can

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 1>buy a Russian corporate and if Luke Oil were to default,

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I can go to a court that's operating under British

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 1>law and I might quite reasonably gain control of some

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:05.400
<v Speaker 1>very valuable assets in the process. Now that's a long

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:08.800
<v Speaker 1>term play. They're clearly hoping to make money in a

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:11.160
<v Speaker 1>different way. Either they just get paid out in big

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:13.959
<v Speaker 1>fat coupons because they bought when the yields were high,

0:17:14.160 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 1>or they get their money back because actually low oil

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:20.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't default. Or perhaps the bonds get re rated because

0:17:20.920 --> 0:17:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the world begins to see things through

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the same lens and the bonds trade up in value,

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 1>And that in fact has been happening. So it's possible

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:31.119
<v Speaker 1>that some of these people who got in in the

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 1>early days of March are already out. You feature a

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:37.280
<v Speaker 1>tweet from Bill Browd or the anti Kremlin activist who said,

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 1>it's like asking if you should buy German equities during

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the Holocaust, So a big no from him. Even though

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:46.439
<v Speaker 1>these folks spoke to you, uh without the on the

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:49.360
<v Speaker 1>condition of anonymity, how do they rationalize there? And they

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:51.360
<v Speaker 1>don't see it quite the same way. It's so interesting,

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:54.720
<v Speaker 1>how you know, the just the arguments in favor of

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the justification, if you will, is very interesting, and you

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 1>can choose to subscriub gribe to it or not. But

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:04.680
<v Speaker 1>for example, as I said, some of them say, I'm

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 1>willing to participate in Russian corporate debt, but I won't

0:18:07.280 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 1>touch Russian sovereign debt. I also won't touch Russian equities

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 1>because being a source of equity capital for the Russian market,

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 1>in their mind, is tantamount to supporting the regime. But

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 1>buying the bonds when all you want is to be

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 1>paid back is different. And it's different as well because

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:29.120
<v Speaker 1>again in their calculus and their rationalization, if you allow

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Russian oligarchs to walk away from their all obligations, who

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:37.439
<v Speaker 1>wins there? Right? That's that's part of Now there's a

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:39.399
<v Speaker 1>counter argument to that. I'm not going to go into it,

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 1>but that's some of the reasoning that gets applied, uh

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 1>to sort of counter if you will, the moral weight

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:50.680
<v Speaker 1>of opposition. Well, this is this week's international cover story.

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Are thanks to Eric Shasker, Editor at large up Bloomberg,

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and of course I thanks to Joe Webber, editor of

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the magazine. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Masser and bloom Burg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio.

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>So chief financial officers, Yeah, they now play a critical

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 1>role in shaping corporate strategy and really positioning organizations to

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:13.919
<v Speaker 1>meet future challenges. Bloomberg's new monthly Program's called Chief Future

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Officer on Bloomberg TV. It profiles these leaders and explores

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the impact they're making on their companies and industries. For

0:19:21.280 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 1>this week's episode, I caught up at Chippotle CFO Jack

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 1>hard Tongue. In this excerpt, he talks about higher costs

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:29.640
<v Speaker 1>and more. You'll also hear from Nicole Miller Regan. She's

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:33.200
<v Speaker 1>a Piper Standard analyst. She too weighs in on the company.

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:35.399
<v Speaker 1>And the other thing I think is to make sure

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 1>you have a strong balance sheet to make sure you

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 1>can weather the storm. And we've had a strong balance sheet.

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:43.640
<v Speaker 1>We've never had debt. We've a always had more cast

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 1>in the balance sheet than we need for our normal

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:48.200
<v Speaker 1>ongoing business. And that has come in you know great,

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:51.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, really handy. Chipotle carries no long term debt

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:56.679
<v Speaker 1>and it's free cash flow almost tripled in When you

0:19:56.720 --> 0:19:58.879
<v Speaker 1>think about the future, how do you take advantage of this?

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 1>And it is the flexibility that that enables. What it

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 1>really affords us is we're going to be able to

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 1>invest in our future no matter what. Like we accelerated

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:11.920
<v Speaker 1>are Open, We accelerated our pursuit of new restaurant sites

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:14.359
<v Speaker 1>during the pandemic when some of the restaurant companies were

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:18.160
<v Speaker 1>laying off their development team. Chipotle not only expanded its

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 1>footprint over the last two years, it reshaped its restaurants.

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:24.800
<v Speaker 1>A ventured to drive through dining that began several years

0:20:24.840 --> 0:20:28.719
<v Speaker 1>ago became a thriving profit center when the pandemic struck.

0:20:29.840 --> 0:20:31.680
<v Speaker 1>The thing that's changed the most is just most of

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:33.880
<v Speaker 1>our restaurants and now have a Chipotle lane. So three

0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 1>years ago we had maybe five or six Chipotle lanes,

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 1>and now we have over three, and of our new

0:20:40.359 --> 0:20:43.159
<v Speaker 1>openings have each pow lane. The sales and our chipot

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:45.959
<v Speaker 1>Land restaurants are higher, and our margins are higher too,

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:49.959
<v Speaker 1>because the digital orders are our highest margin transaction. And

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 1>when you can serve the customer through the spot lane

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 1>without the delivery fees that we pay in the customers pay,

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's a great margin opportunity for us. The

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:01.359
<v Speaker 1>convenience of Chipotle lanes contributed to soaring digital sales in

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:06.879
<v Speaker 1>There was little erosion in even as in restaurant sales

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 1>return to levels. Meanwhile, membership and loyalty programs has boomed,

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 1>giving Chipotle valuable insight into its customers. Omni channel preferences.

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:21.680
<v Speaker 1>What we've seen is that our digital customers, they come

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the most often and they spend the most of its

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 1>time they come. Customer loyalty could face a test if

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:30.920
<v Speaker 1>inflation continues to push higher. Chipotle hiked menu prices roughly

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:36.160
<v Speaker 1>nine Jack Hartung says, it's not just wages and food

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:39.439
<v Speaker 1>costs that are putting on the pressure. It's hitting everything.

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Sitting materials too for our restaurants or a new restaurants

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:44.679
<v Speaker 1>are costing more as well. You guys have had incredible

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 1>pricing power. Is there kind of a tipping point where

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 1>it's like enough? We haven't seen it. Um. Why is that? Jack? Well,

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:55.919
<v Speaker 1>part of it is um. We've over the year has

0:21:55.960 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 1>been slow to raise prices. We've always tried not to

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 1>go to the menu board to raise prices. Whenever we've

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:04.880
<v Speaker 1>had a challenge from a cost standpoint, we'll do other

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:08.160
<v Speaker 1>things to try to find efficiencies somewhere along the line.

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 1>We raise prices. In the second quarter of last year,

0:22:11.640 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 1>we did that just to cover the cost of raising wages.

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:17.639
<v Speaker 1>We raise wages up the fifteen dollars. It was an

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:21.200
<v Speaker 1>average of increase and we raise prices just to cover

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:23.439
<v Speaker 1>the dollar costs of that, so we didn't increase our margins.

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Our margins actually went down, but our profitability stayed the same.

0:22:26.840 --> 0:22:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Our customers actually said, we really applaud what you're doing.

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:31.879
<v Speaker 1>We're fine with a four percent price increase, not a

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:34.479
<v Speaker 1>chicken brito that's thirty cents, but the fact that you

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 1>increase wages to that extent, we like to eat a more.

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Chole CEO Brian Nicol has warned that Chipotle may raise

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 1>prices again if cost pressures intensify. With the cost of

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 1>eating out already at historic levels, consumers may just have

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:51.640
<v Speaker 1>to get used to paying more. The industry is used

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:56.120
<v Speaker 1>to tep in inflation, call it two you know um

0:22:56.560 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 1>level of inflation. They take, you know, a little bit

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:02.919
<v Speaker 1>of price to offset it flows through and margins are

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 1>just naturally restored. The fact of the matter is labor

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 1>was the pressure point. So the industry today is definitely

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 1>sitting on a high single digit price versus what is

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 1>typically a low single digit price inflation or level of

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 1>menu price increase in relative terms. Everyone has to do this.

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:21.879
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I would say, Carol, we we could be

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 1>more patient than others because we own all of our restaurants.

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 1>When you're a franchise organization. When you have franchise z

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:30.360
<v Speaker 1>s that have borrowed to invest in their business, they

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 1>can't necessarily afford to let inflation eat away at their

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>at their ability to pay the debt for very long.

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:38.919
<v Speaker 1>It is full speed ahead when it comes to store growth.

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Chipotle just up to its goal to seven thousand from

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:45.120
<v Speaker 1>six thousand restaurants in the US, thanks in large part

0:23:45.200 --> 0:23:48.879
<v Speaker 1>to strong performance at seeing its smaller towns based on

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:51.359
<v Speaker 1>we're are already in more than a hundred of them.

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Based on the ones that we're in, based on the

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:55.680
<v Speaker 1>results so far with our extraordinary we think there is

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 1>as many as almost a thousand more restaurants. And so

0:23:58.359 --> 0:24:00.639
<v Speaker 1>even though you talking about a small town was you know,

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:04.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe thousand people, the sales volumes are almost the same

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:06.439
<v Speaker 1>as if you you know, we're in a city like

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Chicago or a Chicago subber. But the investment costs are lower,

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the rents are certainly lower, and the operating costs are lower,

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 1>so you end up getting higher margins and higher returning

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Chipolai reaps the full benefit of these returns since it

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 1>owns and operates all its stores, and advantage that's not

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 1>lost on Wall Street. It's extremely unusual, and not only restaurants,

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 1>but from a restaurant stock perspective, to have a large

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 1>cap stock that's growing its unit level economic model, meaning

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the revenues are getting better and the margins are getting

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:41.440
<v Speaker 1>better as growth is accelerating. It's just it's like almost

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 1>unheard of. So there's little reason for Chipotle to begin

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 1>franchising in the United States, but for the chains forty

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:52.960
<v Speaker 1>five international restaurants, Bloomberg Intelligence notes that partnering with local

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:58.960
<v Speaker 1>operators overseas might boost margins and accelerate expansion. We're open

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 1>to the idea of some kind of franchise model. UM.

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, there are areas of the world where it's

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:05.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be harder for us to to own UM

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 1>and to run the businesses ourselves. When their process of

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 1>bringing our digital system to Europe that's going really, really well.

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 1>We've also opened up some alternative sites. It gives us

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 1>great optimism that international is going to be a growth

0:25:17.400 --> 0:25:19.760
<v Speaker 1>vehicle for us, and you know, hopefully not to distemputure.

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 1>And that was Chipotle a CFO Jack Hardtime. You also

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:26.119
<v Speaker 1>heard the voice of Nicole Miller Regan. She's managing director

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 1>of at Pipers Stanley. You can catch the entire interview

0:25:28.600 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and episode of Chief Future Officer That's to night at

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 1>nine pm Wall Street Time on Bloomberg TV and of

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 1>course on our Bloomberg YouTube. Did you eat any chicken burritos?

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:38.119
<v Speaker 1>We did? Will you're out there? So I had some

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Guawk had had a bowl breada ball. I'm jealous right now.

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:44.359
<v Speaker 1>Good stuff. Hey, that's really great. I'm looking forward to

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:46.720
<v Speaker 1>watching it. Thank you. It's really interesting to see the

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:49.240
<v Speaker 1>history that Jack has had with that company pre I

0:25:49.320 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 1>p O and more so catch at pm tonight on

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg TV. Yeah, but you let me drive? Oh no,

0:25:58.600 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 1>no, no no, no, all right please, I'll do the bride revels.

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to drive. It's good question. This is good.

0:26:13.240 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Drive to the clothes un on Bluebird Radio. We are

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:22.440
<v Speaker 1>driving towards the close on this Wednesday, bouncing around a

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:25.640
<v Speaker 1>little bit off our highs of the session, bouncing off

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:29.160
<v Speaker 1>our lows, but really tech stocks in particular Tim taking

0:26:29.200 --> 0:26:31.399
<v Speaker 1>it on the chin down about Charlie mentioned more than

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 1>two points down one point four percent, a little bit

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:34.920
<v Speaker 1>of a reversal than what we saw over the last

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:37.119
<v Speaker 1>four days. Carol four day rally on the sp F.

0:26:37.720 --> 0:26:40.159
<v Speaker 1>So taking a little pause here. Aaron Kennon is co

0:26:40.240 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>founder and at CEO at Clear Harbor Asset Management. Eron

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:46.840
<v Speaker 1>manages at Clear Harbor over one billion dollars in assets.

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:49.440
<v Speaker 1>He joins us down on the phone from Stanford, Connecticut, Aaron,

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:52.360
<v Speaker 1>how are you due? Just fine? Tim, I hope everyone's

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:54.959
<v Speaker 1>well there. Yeah, we're doing well. Thank you. We'll help

0:26:55.040 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 1>us make sense of this market here, because we certainly

0:26:57.080 --> 0:26:59.879
<v Speaker 1>st I'm doing okay, but we don't know. It's a

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:07.239
<v Speaker 1>of environment. Let's be fair, all right, It's true there

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 1>is sort of the dark there. True, but you know,

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 1>to be honest, there is a dark cloud not just

0:27:10.320 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of hanging over international relations, but but

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 1>also we're seeing that play out in the markets as well. Yeah,

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 1>for sure. I mean looking at this market picture is

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:21.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of interesting. You know. We've rallied off of that

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:26.400
<v Speaker 1>early low achieved in in March by call it nine

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:30.120
<v Speaker 1>or Tim and Carol, and we're only down called three

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:32.359
<v Speaker 1>to five percent on the equity side this year, whether

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:34.399
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about the MSc I all World or the

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 1>smp AT. We're in the midst of a war. We

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:39.359
<v Speaker 1>have spiking rates since the beginning of the year. I

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 1>think two's have gone from point seven three percent to

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:45.200
<v Speaker 1>where are they right now? To thirty one and uh

0:27:45.320 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 1>stubbornly high inflation picture along with wages, eye energy. And

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:52.879
<v Speaker 1>yet you know, the equity market has been somewhat resilient.

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:57.720
<v Speaker 1>And I do worry that the ebbing of liquidity that

0:27:57.840 --> 0:28:00.159
<v Speaker 1>we will still very much see this year, that is

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:02.359
<v Speaker 1>to say, higher FED funds rates by more than two

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 1>basis points, is already in the cards. And a disappearance

0:28:06.280 --> 0:28:09.040
<v Speaker 1>of the fiscal stimulus which was extraordinary in two thousand

0:28:09.080 --> 0:28:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and twenty and twenty one. Well, well will eventually come

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:15.919
<v Speaker 1>to the four, into the psyche and into the market

0:28:15.960 --> 0:28:19.400
<v Speaker 1>as it pertains to how investors think about equity valuations. Wait,

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:21.399
<v Speaker 1>so you think that the Fed, in terms of the

0:28:21.440 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 1>moves that we will get this year already factored in

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:25.879
<v Speaker 1>aaron in terms of the equity side. And no, no,

0:28:26.040 --> 0:28:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I I worry that that we've seen this sort of

0:28:29.040 --> 0:28:33.880
<v Speaker 1>shortcovering rally that the equity market um rally from from

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 1>March eight to to date, which has been somewhat significant

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 1>in the midst of all this negative news is is

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:43.239
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a head fake while we are very

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:45.960
<v Speaker 1>much of the view that time in the market is

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 1>more than important than time in the market. Um, you know,

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I think we're heading into stormy or weather over the

0:28:53.600 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 1>next several weeks and perhaps months, and uh, I think

0:28:56.600 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 1>investors are to be prepared for that. What do they

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:01.920
<v Speaker 1>need to do to prepare well? It's interesting, I think

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the sixty forty portfolio, at least year to date hasn't

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 1>worked because you have fixed income that's off actually more

0:29:07.440 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 1>than equities. But I do think we're at a point

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 1>where you've seen a significant rise in yields and the

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:15.239
<v Speaker 1>two year part of the curve, and you've seen ten

0:29:15.320 --> 0:29:18.040
<v Speaker 1>year treasury yields rise as well, And so I think

0:29:18.080 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I think we're probably approaching a point over the next

0:29:21.880 --> 0:29:25.720
<v Speaker 1>couple of months where fixed income probably becomes a little

0:29:25.720 --> 0:29:29.560
<v Speaker 1>more anchored and a little more resilient, particularly if the

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 1>growth profile decelerates in the U. S economy and the

0:29:32.280 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 1>global economy, which is what we expect. So I think

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the the sort of anti fragile asset that has historically

0:29:39.160 --> 0:29:41.720
<v Speaker 1>been fixed income and perhaps gold and a couple of

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 1>other things from time to time may come back into

0:29:44.360 --> 0:29:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the four But we need to see a softening and

0:29:46.960 --> 0:29:49.920
<v Speaker 1>a thawing on the inflation front, in addition to a

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:53.320
<v Speaker 1>reduction in the in the trajectory of growth for that

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:55.960
<v Speaker 1>fixed income as a class to sort of serve as ballast,

0:29:56.000 --> 0:29:59.080
<v Speaker 1>which it hasn't here to date. Well, and I do wonder,

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, Aaron, one of the I feel like every

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 1>day we have this conversation, you know, have stocks bottomed,

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:06.920
<v Speaker 1>have yields topped out? So it sounds to me like

0:30:06.960 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying in terms of yields that maybe we

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 1>have topped out a little bit. Well, I think we're

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 1>certainly well, certainly, I suspect we're closer to the top

0:30:17.080 --> 0:30:19.360
<v Speaker 1>than we are the bottom. And I know that there

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:24.280
<v Speaker 1>are some other prognosticators out there who believe that this

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 1>inflation will remain sticky for not just quarters but perhaps

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 1>years that due to deglobalization and other dynamics that play

0:30:32.280 --> 0:30:35.240
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to be at a significantly higher sort

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 1>of trend inflation rate. And I think if you look

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 1>at long term inflation expectations as defined in the market

0:30:42.440 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 1>through various metrics like inflation break evens and five or

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:50.200
<v Speaker 1>five year floating to fix metrics, even on the Bloomberg terminal,

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:53.800
<v Speaker 1>you'll see that inflation is Yes, it's risen for long

0:30:53.880 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 1>term expectations, but it's still somewhat anchored. And I think

0:30:57.320 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 1>if that holds um, yes, perhaps we slightly higher inflation dynamic,

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:05.240
<v Speaker 1>But the notion that we're going to see runaway inflation,

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's ultimately going to turn the FED from

0:31:08.040 --> 0:31:11.040
<v Speaker 1>moving from an extraordinarily hawkish posture which will see this

0:31:11.120 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 1>here into a slightly more significant, maybe even devish posture

0:31:15.200 --> 0:31:17.360
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and twenty three. When you say inflation

0:31:17.440 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 1>is anchored, you know, some people might be like, what right, Well, no,

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, so so like are you saying that inflation

0:31:28.040 --> 0:31:30.440
<v Speaker 1>is anchored? And I would argue, I mean it's going

0:31:30.480 --> 0:31:32.440
<v Speaker 1>to come down, like it's not going to stay where

0:31:32.440 --> 0:31:35.480
<v Speaker 1>it is. Correct. So if you look at, for example,

0:31:36.120 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 1>spot oil prices today relative to even one year from

0:31:40.200 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 1>now the futures market, there's backwardation. That's the case for

0:31:44.520 --> 0:31:48.480
<v Speaker 1>even a lot of the soft commodities like like wheat, um,

0:31:48.520 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 1>even even natural gas and so um. If you look

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:54.200
<v Speaker 1>at even the supply chain dynamic, which has led to

0:31:54.280 --> 0:31:56.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of inflation. The port of Long Beach, we're

0:31:56.520 --> 0:32:00.240
<v Speaker 1>seeing significant thawing on the supply chain front. There. On

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, we're seeing COVID related problems in Asia

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:07.000
<v Speaker 1>which are leading to supply chain dynamics not not thawing.

0:32:07.080 --> 0:32:09.280
<v Speaker 1>But I think if you look ahead, if you take

0:32:09.320 --> 0:32:11.680
<v Speaker 1>a sort of a more slightly more glass half full

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 1>perspective here, and you look into two thousand, twenty three,

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:17.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty four in a post COVID world, god hope, a

0:32:17.840 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a post war in Ukraine world. I suspect the inflation

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:24.840
<v Speaker 1>picture will improve somewhat dramatically over the next twelve to

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:29.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty four months. Do you think inflation peaks? I do,

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 1>When do we start to see it go down? Well,

0:32:31.960 --> 0:32:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I think the geopolitical uncertainty factor is certainly weighing on

0:32:35.640 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 1>a part of that, which is the the energy component inflation,

0:32:39.000 --> 0:32:44.240
<v Speaker 1>which is about depending on which inflation index you're looking at,

0:32:44.560 --> 0:32:47.200
<v Speaker 1>And then the wage side. In the US, we've had

0:32:47.200 --> 0:32:50.320
<v Speaker 1>an interesting dynamic. The labor participation rate is still not

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 1>backed where it was pre COVID. It is in places

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:56.480
<v Speaker 1>like Canada, for example, but not the US. It's it

0:32:56.560 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 1>improved the last time around. We're gonna see nice doubt

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:02.600
<v Speaker 1>on Friday. Hopefully it indicates further improvement. But part of

0:33:02.640 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the inflation picture is wage concern wage stickiness, which can

0:33:06.840 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 1>impact corporate margins. If labor participation rate increases and continues

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 1>on trend to increase, I think that will probably alleviate

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:18.800
<v Speaker 1>some of those concerns as well. Yeah. Interesting perspective and

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:21.680
<v Speaker 1>feels pretty grounded. Um, Aaron, thank you so much, Really

0:33:21.720 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 1>appreciate Aaron Kennon, co founder in chief executive officer at

0:33:24.200 --> 0:33:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Clear Harvard Asset Management roughly abilion in assets under management

0:33:27.840 --> 0:33:31.200
<v Speaker 1>once again on the phone from Stanford, Connecticut. You know,

0:33:31.240 --> 0:33:33.480
<v Speaker 1>he talks about the ebbing of liquidity. It's something we

0:33:33.480 --> 0:33:35.720
<v Speaker 1>talked about with Abigail at the start, that there's still

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:37.880
<v Speaker 1>some nine trillion inequity out there, but you do wonder

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:40.280
<v Speaker 1>how quickly that gets sucked out of the system. Yeah,

0:33:40.320 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 1>that's a really good question. Um. Also interesting what he

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:46.200
<v Speaker 1>had to say about the rally that we've seen of late. Yeah, exactly,

0:33:46.240 --> 0:33:49.320
<v Speaker 1>we've had quite a bounce back. Thanks for listening to

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, and you can also listen to our

0:33:55.200 --> 0:33:57.840
<v Speaker 1>radio show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or

0:33:57.840 --> 0:34:06.000
<v Speaker 1>watch us on YouTube, Star to Bloomberg, Bone, newsm