WEBVTT - Microsoft's Chips and Starlink's 2024 IPO

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:05.080
<v Speaker 1>From Marhart where Innovation of Money and Power Collie in

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley, NBN. This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:24.160
<v Speaker 1>and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm Caroline Heindel Bloomberg's world headquarters in New York and

0:00:28.720 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 2>I met Ludlow in San Francisco.

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:32.919
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology coming.

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 2>Up Microsoft, it unveils its first custom designed AI and

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 2>cloud chips. Will discuss what the move means for the

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:40.200
<v Speaker 2>company and its.

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 4>Competitors, and SpaceX planning to spin off its Starlink unit

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 4>for a public listing as soon as late twenty four.

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:49.480
<v Speaker 4>Will bring you the details from our scoop as Elon

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 4>Musk denies the reporting.

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 2>And we'll break down what do you expect from the

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 2>meeting between President Biden and she in San Francisco, as

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 2>well as what it means for tech's cities future. But

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 2>let's have a quick check in on these markets, because

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 2>we're just calming down after a rampant rally that we've

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 2>seen in the world of stocks, but still holding onto gains.

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:09.320
<v Speaker 2>On the nawdslack we're up a tenth of a percent

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 2>tense that's called it, and in notable we're seeing gains

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:14.320
<v Speaker 2>over in China, whether or not we're seeing the fuel

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 2>feed over from the US into China, but also some

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 2>of the economic data coming in strong when it comes

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 2>to retail, when it comes to the consumer there and

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 2>notably around some of the companies have been reporting their earnings.

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 2>Of course, we see ten Cent beat, we see JD

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:29.039
<v Speaker 2>de Coom beat in terms of their earnings, and therefore

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 2>we push ahead to what's happening with Ali Baba so

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:32.480
<v Speaker 2>green on the screen in China. We're looking at the

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 2>ten year yield just managing to rise up quite a

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 2>lot today though remember after we've seen really yields come

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 2>crashing down as many anticipate that the Federal Reserve is

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 2>done with its hiking cycle, an indeed many a central

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 2>bank around the world move Honestly, what's happening in terms

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 2>of the world a bitcoin actually, for once, we're getting

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 2>a bit of a bid. Having yesterday been relatively calm,

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 2>We're at thirty six three hundred and eighty three. We're

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 2>up more than two point two on the day.

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 5>Ed.

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 2>What have you've got in the.

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 4>Micro Yeah, the story that's broken in the last hour

0:01:57.080 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 4>is Microsoft unveiling its first kind of custom sill and

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 4>it's two chips. In fact, Maya is the AI accelerator

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 4>for both training and inference, and then you have Cobalt,

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 4>which sees Microsoft moved into kind of the more generic

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 4>server design chip space. It's interesting who it's impacted that

0:02:14.600 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 4>the news didn't really move the needle. For Microsoft, We're

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:18.800
<v Speaker 4>softer three tenths of one percent. I would say that

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 4>in the last thirty minutes or so, declines on Innvidia

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 4>have accelerated. We're going to look a bit closer to

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:26.360
<v Speaker 4>VideA in just a second. But I would point out

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 4>that Maya the AI accelerator, it's kind of looking at

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 4>the specs not the same.

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 3>As your H one hundred.

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:35.079
<v Speaker 4>It's more general use on both the training and inference

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 4>side rather than that kind of high spec H one hundred.

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:40.360
<v Speaker 4>But it's interesting to see the market play out the

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 4>fact that Invidia is down this Wednesday's session. Well, I'm

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 4>very sorry to say, Caroline, that the record equalling streak

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 4>for Nvidia is over as it stands. If we close

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:52.960
<v Speaker 4>in the red, Nvidia snaps those ten straight days of gains,

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:56.520
<v Speaker 4>which matched its longest streak of winds going back to

0:02:56.560 --> 0:03:00.519
<v Speaker 4>December twenty sixteen, and eleventh day of gains have been

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 4>a new record for video. So much momentum though about

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 4>what they're doing in new chips for China, the H

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 4>one hundred is still pretty much the only game in

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 4>town when you're training those foundation models with billions and

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:14.639
<v Speaker 4>billions of parameters. But what does this Microsoft mean news mean?

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:17.680
<v Speaker 4>For kind of more general AI, Let's bring in Richie Juluria,

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 4>Managing director and software exit research analysts at RBC Capital Markets,

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:25.679
<v Speaker 4>currently has an outperformed rating on shares of Microsoft a

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 4>three hundred and ninety dollars price target. Richie, you kind

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 4>of heard my explanation and my reaction to both.

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 3>Myra and Cobolt. What is yours?

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 6>Yeah? And then thanks so much for having me really

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 6>appreciate it.

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 7>I'm actually here in New York at our RISI's low

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 7>tech confer concreates and as he can imagine Generator VII

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 7>front and center and all our conversations and look, one

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 7>of the themes that we hear from a lot of

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 7>companies is it is prohibibly expensive to do generative right,

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 7>not just the training, but the inferencing, trying to add

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 7>domain extra keys connecting all these different systems and so

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:00.920
<v Speaker 7>what I think Microsoft brings here is they can help

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 7>themselves and other companies overcome this big GPU sort this

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 7>out there. As you said, respects aren't quite the same

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 7>exactly as an A one hundred. But I think what's

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:13.840
<v Speaker 7>what's interesting is you don't necessarily need only eight hundreds

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 7>to do all your training, especially if you're thinking about

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 7>you know, more domain specific models or trying to do

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:22.040
<v Speaker 7>some you know, additional tooling on top of TPT for

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 7>or LAMA too, and so this creates I think, more

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:30.800
<v Speaker 7>accessibility for large language models, for you know, software companies,

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:34.040
<v Speaker 7>for industry companies to enbridge generate b I without seeing

0:04:34.040 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 7>a huge cost drag.

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:37.600
<v Speaker 6>So I'm really excited to see this news.

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 7>This is something that we suspected for a long time,

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 7>but I think it is ultimately going to make ANYI more.

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 2>Accessible TSMC, I think making the chips sort of behind

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 2>from a technology perspective. But I'm interested in rich as

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:52.159
<v Speaker 2>to what this does mean for competitors. Amazon has already

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:55.040
<v Speaker 2>been doing this, Alphabet's Google has already been doing this

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 2>with their cloud provisions. Does it who does it impact?

0:04:58.000 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 2>It feels like maybe Intel's the one to be watching.

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, Look, I think it impacts everyone, right, I think,

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:06.160
<v Speaker 7>you know, we're gonna have to see how this specs

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 7>between a WUSS chips and GCPS chips and Microsoft chip compare.

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 7>But Microsoft has already this kind of pole position as

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:18.239
<v Speaker 7>being the leader when it comes to enterprise generative AI,

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 7>and I think there's only bolts that that companies now

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 7>that they can go to Microsoft and they may not

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:25.719
<v Speaker 7>need to go to someone like Oracle that has excess

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 7>GPU capacity. They can stick with Microsoft because now Microsoft

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 7>has the capacity, given they's some of the ability to

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 7>develop this in house. So this is probably I think

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 7>positive for Microsoft. Probably it's going to be you know,

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 7>as you said, there are absolute direct complications for Intel,

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:45.800
<v Speaker 7>for AMD, for others within the chip space, But overall,

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 7>I think.

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 6>This is just going to be positive for Microsoft and OI.

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 4>It's so interesting to see what some of these names

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:54.239
<v Speaker 4>and trading right now. Intel's up two percent in the session.

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 4>Krror makes such a good point that this battle ground

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 4>seems like the lower end of the ex elerate A market.

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 4>I'm looking specifically at Microsoft though, right, Richie, That's why

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 4>we're here. It's down two tents of what at percent

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 4>is kind of like a muted reaction. Does that signal

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 4>that this just isn't a game changer for Microsoft's cloud business, Like,

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 4>why is there not a more significant reaction in the

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 4>stock heare.

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, look, I think people are the jury is still

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:24.559
<v Speaker 7>out right. As you correctly pointed out, these specs aren't

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:27.720
<v Speaker 7>exactly up to the top of the line GPUs from Nvideo,

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:31.480
<v Speaker 7>and you know, given Microsoft's pace of innovation, perhaps investors

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:34.840
<v Speaker 7>we were expecting something like that. I think Microsoft will

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:36.599
<v Speaker 7>eventually get there. I think they've shown they have the

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:39.720
<v Speaker 7>ability to innovate and move very quickly, and that might

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 7>explain why.

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:41.720
<v Speaker 6>There's maybe a little bit of media reaction.

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 7>I'll also say, beyond the chips, some of the product

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 7>announcements we've seen so far out of Big Night may

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 7>not be as exciting as people were hoping to see.

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 6>I think on in my view.

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:54.159
<v Speaker 7>There's a lot of exciting stuff that we're already seeing.

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 7>And you know, obviously this keynote is about to kick off.

0:06:57.240 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 7>I think we're going to.

0:06:57.800 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 6>See a lot more.

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 7>So I wouldn't be surprised as as the conference and

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 7>the date goes on, Microsoft stock actually moves up, assuming

0:07:04.000 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 7>that they continue to make you know, I think announced

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 7>with that excite people. Gives some stats around M three

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 7>sixty five adoption. I really like that they've rebranded being

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 7>Enterprise Chat as Microsoft Copilot. I think that makes it

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 7>a much more digestible, kind of straightforward value proposition, and

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 7>I think this just opens up a lot of innovation

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 7>from Microsoft.

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 2>We see as we do anticipate what Satya is going

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 2>to say on stage, it is interesting that it looks

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:32.040
<v Speaker 2>like it's the price that is becoming front and center.

0:07:32.080 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 2>Now we have that with open Ayes Developers Day as well.

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 2>It all seemed to be suddenly a bit of a

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 2>race to offer more and accessibility and GPTs and chats.

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 2>As we're seeing more more assistance, but with a cheaper

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 2>price point, a new lower price for clients. For example

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 2>of Microsoft three six y five copilot product for the

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 2>office software and the sales copilot. Is it going to

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 2>be a bit of a rush down? Onds do you

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 2>think in the price point of all of these.

0:07:58.560 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 6>I actually don't think so.

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 7>In fact, I would argue, I mean, going to open

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 7>Ai twenty dollars a month is actually too cheap for

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 7>what you're getting out of chatting PG four Assuming you're

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 7>a power user, which I would consider myself to be

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 7>one of those. For Microsoft Copilot, the name of the

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 7>game here is not about lowering the price. It's about

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 7>adding new features and adding new capabilities. And so now

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 7>you know, with the announcements today what you used to

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 7>call being at a price chat now is Microsoft Copilot

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 7>is part of that thirty dollars per user per month

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 7>that was in the M through sixty five steed that

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 7>got released earlier this month. You also have connectivity of

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:36.319
<v Speaker 7>ent through sixty five Copilot too, systems of record like

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 7>service now on workday and so to me, as long

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:43.080
<v Speaker 7>as Microsoft continues to grow what is included in that

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 7>s few in that thirty dollars per user per month,

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 7>I think people are going to be able to justify

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 7>that price pretty easily. And look, look no further than

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 7>getthub Copilot. Get up Copilt has been a you know,

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:57.320
<v Speaker 7>the most mature enter a product for Microsoft.

0:08:57.640 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 6>It's been you know, I think a slam dunk in chef.

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 7>You look at the metrics in terms of developing productivity,

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 7>new code generation, and I wouldn't be surprised if we

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 7>start to see the same out of M through six

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 7>SOL code Pilot as it continue to innovate, you know,

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:12.559
<v Speaker 7>maybe you know, for an Excel junkie like me, we'll

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 7>get an Excel copilot that makes my life of building

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:18.959
<v Speaker 7>financial models and doing data analysis a lot easier over

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 7>the next year. So really the name of the game

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:22.960
<v Speaker 7>is going to be innovation and adding more features, not

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 7>lowering price.

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:26.320
<v Speaker 4>Okay, I just want to jump in and point out

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:29.680
<v Speaker 4>that the open ai is going to be testing the

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:31.960
<v Speaker 4>Azure and Maya one hundred, and the relationship is so

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:35.440
<v Speaker 4>interesting because open ai relies on Microsoft not just for

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 4>cash but compute credits. They also like rely on Nvidia

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:41.839
<v Speaker 4>the badge of honor of the h one hundred. It's complicated,

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 4>but it's going to be interesting to see in the

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 4>end who's going to win the computing ward just wanted

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 4>to say, yeah.

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:48.839
<v Speaker 2>A lot of friends or a frenemies, and a lot

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 2>of deal making. I mean, we heard earlier this week

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 2>that someone when I'm still banking on Microsoft, perhaps injecting

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 2>more money as it.

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:56.320
<v Speaker 3>Goes forwards and grows.

0:09:56.600 --> 0:09:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Richie, Julia, it's so great. We'll let you get back

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:01.720
<v Speaker 2>to the conference go into all the conversations around untender

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 2>to AI. We thank you for the LBC Capital Markets.

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 2>China's President Hijingping has touchdown in San Francisco for APEX,

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 2>where he's expected to sit down with the US President

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Joe Biden. Today. Joining us now is Blomberg's Amory Holden,

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 2>and it was three pm local time that we saw

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:26.440
<v Speaker 2>these pictures of him exiting his plane. Of course, Treasury

0:10:26.480 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 2>Secretary Ellen there to help greet as well as Gavin Newsom. Amri.

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:32.200
<v Speaker 2>There is a whole lot widing on this, and a

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 2>whole lot of protection as well going on. Yeah, there's

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:35.439
<v Speaker 2>a lot of protection.

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 8>I can tell you that it took a while actually

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 8>to get to where I'm standing right now. A ton

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 8>of security in San Francisco, and Ed can attest to

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 8>that as well. But this is a high stakes meeting

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 8>and it's actually happening outside of San Francisco proper, at

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:49.680
<v Speaker 8>an estate a little bit more relaxed feel, has sixteen

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:52.199
<v Speaker 8>acres of gardens. It kind of is reminiscent of when

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 8>Xi Jinping came during the Obama administration and they met

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:59.840
<v Speaker 8>in Palm Springs and really lived physically. They were rolling

0:10:59.840 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 8>off their sleeves to get to work. So for the

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 8>Biden administration, we heard from President Biden before he departed

0:11:05.559 --> 0:11:07.960
<v Speaker 8>the White House to San Francisco yesterday, talking about the

0:11:07.960 --> 0:11:10.680
<v Speaker 8>fact that he just wants to get relationships to a

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:12.959
<v Speaker 8>normal correspondence, to be able to pick up the phone

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:15.439
<v Speaker 8>during times of conflict, to make sure that their militaries

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 8>go back to normal communication, a normal dialogue, a normal

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:22.559
<v Speaker 8>cadence of that dialogue that we saw really just ripped

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 8>apart following former Speaker Nancy Pelosi's visit to Taiwan last summer.

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 8>And for Shijingpeng, he's obviously dealing domestically with an economy

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 8>that hasn't bounced back as some were hoping following the pandemic,

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 8>a property market that is dismal at the moment, and

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 8>a very high youth unemployment rate this summer is at

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 8>twenty percent now was the last time we saw the data.

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:46.959
<v Speaker 2>So for Shijingping, this is a moment of potentially trying.

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 8>To open up some more goodwill on the economic front,

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 8>not just with President Biden, but also this evening when

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:54.320
<v Speaker 8>he meets with chief executive officers, right.

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 4>I mean, we've heard from sources that you know, the

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:58.960
<v Speaker 4>who's who of tech execs are trying to get into

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:02.840
<v Speaker 4>that dinner. The aim is to thaw relationships, particularly on

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:06.680
<v Speaker 4>the economic side, right, amh. But the battleground here is

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 4>that the US has these technology export curves on China

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:12.679
<v Speaker 4>in the context of AI and chips. Is that going

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 4>to be a factor here, Well, this.

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 8>Is something that Shijingping would love to get rid of.

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 8>But we already heard from the Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen,

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 8>and we heard from President Biden himself, and Biden Yesterudary

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:24.960
<v Speaker 8>was saying how it is in the US interest if

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 8>an average Chinese citizen is able to go out and

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 8>have a working wage and make a decent living. But

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:34.600
<v Speaker 8>Biden was very clear he will not move economically if

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 8>it impedes US national security interest. So those export controls,

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 8>those penalties, those types of sanctions, they're not going anywhere

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:42.800
<v Speaker 8>anytime soon.

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:46.080
<v Speaker 4>All right, Bloomberg's Amory Horden will be on the ground

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 4>at APEC all week. We will continue to bring you

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 4>that reporting. Thank you so much. Let's get more and

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:54.839
<v Speaker 4>bring in doctor Oriana Skyla Mastro, a Center Fellow at

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 4>the Freeman's Folly Institute for International Studies at Stanford University, DODR.

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:04.600
<v Speaker 4>Mastro also for of Upstart. How China became a great power.

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:08.680
<v Speaker 4>Welcome to the program, Dr Mastro. You heard a Marie

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:13.320
<v Speaker 4>set out the discussion points between Biden and g For you,

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 4>what is the most significant point of discussion between those

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 4>two leaders.

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think both sides are saying the fact that

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 9>they're even meeting to discuss anything is the biggest takeaway.

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 9>We are facing a bunch of issues right now, security, economic,

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 9>that as the two most powerful countries in the world,

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 9>the United States and China, need to be able to

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 9>collaborate and talk about.

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:35.199
<v Speaker 5>These issues together.

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 9>And if we don't have routine and sustain and predictable

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:42.960
<v Speaker 9>visits between the two leaders, this becomes increasingly difficult and

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 9>it's hard to sustain anything that they might even agree

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 9>to add this visit. And so really what I'll be

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 9>looking for is not only the types of topics that

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 9>they're going to discuss and what's on the agenda for

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 9>whether or not they actually have any sort of frank exchange.

0:13:57.120 --> 0:14:01.199
<v Speaker 2>I'm interested to dig into really the perfect points around

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 2>your book that's forthcoming, the idea that through they've built

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 2>up China in particular, it's built up this power, whether

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 2>it be militarily, whether it be economically, whether it be

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 2>entrepreneurially in many ways, but you sort of outline how,

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 2>and it's through strategic emulation, through exploitation, through entrepreneurship. And

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm interested in from the tech perspective whether all this

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 2>tip for tat that we continue to see, particularly when

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 2>it's limitations to access to chips, for example, just is

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 2>going to be the normal? Would that be your policy recommendation.

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think the prediction would be that China is

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 9>going to be somewhat entrepreneurial and its approach to this

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 9>tech competition. In many cases, when I talk to investors,

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 9>they often express some frustration with the economic decisions that

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 9>China makes at home. But as I lay out in

0:14:44.120 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 9>the book, party control is one of the main factors

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:50.119
<v Speaker 9>that decides for China which strategy they're going to pursue.

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 5>And a lot of times they can't emulate what the.

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 9>United States is doing because it doesn't it's not conducive

0:14:56.600 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 9>for their domestic political system at home, so they have

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 9>to go another route. Sometimes that route is relatively ineffective,

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 9>like we see with soft power and perhaps the speed

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 9>at which the Renman b is becoming a reserve.

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 5>Currency without loosening capital controls that's going to be difficult

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 5>for China, but.

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 9>I have no doubt that as they face these new challenges,

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 9>they're going to try to think of new ways to

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 9>exploit their own competitive advantages gaps in the international system,

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 9>for example, and standards and other areas that are important

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 9>for technology to still try to get ahead.

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 4>Dodr Mashtro Corporate America, according to our reporting, is doing

0:15:34.040 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 4>everything it can to get into that room and have

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 4>dinner with President G. You heard us outline earlier in

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 4>the program about the technology export curves in place. Do

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 4>you think that g can have any kind of leverage

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 4>he can use the interest of technology CEOs in meeting

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 4>him to go to Biden and say, look, everyone wants

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 4>to do business here.

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 9>I am highly doubtful that that would work, honestly speaking,

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 9>not only from the US restricted but also from the

0:16:00.960 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 9>Chinese perspective. With Chijenping, power is more important than prosperity.

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 9>There's many decisions that we have seen him make that

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:12.240
<v Speaker 9>if economic prosperity with a number one priority, he would

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 9>have done something completely different. I think the COVID zero

0:16:14.760 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 9>policy is a perfect example of that, and the same

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 9>for the United States national security now Trump's all things.

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 9>The Chinese military has been modernizing at a pace and

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 9>a speed and at a level that it now presents

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 9>a threat to the United States, and so we can

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 9>no longer turn a blind eye to certain technologies that

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 9>can be dual use.

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 5>And so perhaps those.

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 9>Leaders will get into the room and have a very

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 9>pleasant meeting with Chigenping. But I don't think he's going

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 9>to change his approach to technology control at home. That

0:16:46.960 --> 0:16:50.760
<v Speaker 9>is important for his own control over the country, and

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 9>it's not going to convince the United States to put itself.

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 5>At risk for the sake of economic prosperity.

0:16:57.440 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 2>We have seen such a change in supply chains. It's

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 2>been focused through COVID, whether or not it's been the

0:17:03.320 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 2>geopolitics at play. Ultimately the corporates that you speak to

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:08.720
<v Speaker 2>about this, is that just going to be the narrative

0:17:08.760 --> 0:17:10.879
<v Speaker 2>going forward? We are going to see more of a

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:12.119
<v Speaker 2>bifurcation or not.

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 9>Well, I really hope it doesn't get to that level

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 9>of a complete bifurcation in two different blocks. I was

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 9>in China two weeks ago having a dialogue with the Chinese,

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 9>and they have the often.

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 5>Retort that the United States is trying to contain them.

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:27.439
<v Speaker 9>You know, US policy and limited export controls is no

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 9>way a containment of China, and I hope we don't

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:34.359
<v Speaker 9>move in that direction because our economies are quite interdependent.

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 9>But I think what we're seeing is a lot of

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:40.840
<v Speaker 9>leaders understand that de risking is important, whether it's supply

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 9>chains for the United States so we can continue to.

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 5>Fight wars if we have to, or for leaders that

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:48.919
<v Speaker 5>might have manufacturing hubs within China.

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:51.919
<v Speaker 9>It is important to have a plan B because this

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 9>is not the Cold War. The United States and China

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:57.639
<v Speaker 9>have some conflicting interests, and it's possible.

0:17:57.359 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 5>That the two sides find themselves at blows.

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 2>Doctor Rianna Skylo Mastro fascinating me. Thank you so much

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 2>of Stanford University, and of course much more. Meanwhile, coming up,

0:18:07.280 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 2>let's talk a little bit about the private markets. SpaceX

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 2>considering spinning off its Starlink unit to a public company

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:17.159
<v Speaker 2>as soon as twenty twenty four. Well, guess who's behind that,

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:19.680
<v Speaker 2>reporting One Ed Ludlow. We'll speak about it in a minute.

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:22.240
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:39.560
<v Speaker 4>Okay, Bloomberg reporting this morning SpaceX is discussing an IPO

0:18:39.680 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 4>for its Starlink satellite business. As soon as the end

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 4>of next year twenty twenty four, on robust demand. Elon

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:50.280
<v Speaker 4>Musk responded almost immediately after we published that story in

0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 4>response to a user on x, the platform formerly known

0:18:52.600 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 4>as Twitter, saying false.

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:54.640
<v Speaker 3>That's all.

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 4>He said, without elaborating. Let's bring in bloombo Ryan Gord,

0:18:57.600 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 4>who is one of the reporters that report this story

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 4>with me. Right, let's go over the mechanics of what

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:03.159
<v Speaker 4>we know.

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:06.159
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, that's right, Ed. Obviously, great to share a byline

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 10>with you. It's the technology. But last night we reported

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 10>that this morning, even though we reported that SpaceX has

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 10>started discussing a potential of public offering for Starlink as

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:20.920
<v Speaker 10>soon as the end of next year, it has started

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 10>to move the satellites satellite Company's assets into a wholly

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 10>owned subsidiary that would eventually be spun off in an IPO.

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:29.520
<v Speaker 3>Obviously, you just mentioned that.

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 10>The Mask himself said this morning that you know this

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 10>reporting was false. But you know, we just say that,

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 10>of course, no final decisions have been made, and that

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 10>SpaceX could opt to attain the unit. But you know,

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:43.119
<v Speaker 10>this is something that I think Musk has, as we know,

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 10>spoken about over some times sort of hinted at this

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 10>at various occasions.

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:50.400
<v Speaker 3>He has said that, you.

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:52.880
<v Speaker 10>Know, in twenty twenty one, as far back as twenty

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:56.200
<v Speaker 10>twenty one, that starlink with list shares once it could

0:19:56.240 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 10>make predictions reasonably well about cash flow. Of course, on

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 10>the and he said that starlink had reached cash flow

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:06.200
<v Speaker 10>break even. So for all of the posturing and the gesturing,

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 10>I think, you know, it's interesting that you know, we

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 10>put out the support yesterday this morning, I keep saying,

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:15.360
<v Speaker 10>and you know, yeah, we'll see.

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:17.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the reporting takes a little bit of time. Ryan,

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm interested in, ed, is what an about turn this

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 2>actually sort of is. I mean, it's not that long

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:26.119
<v Speaker 2>ago since we used to discuss well, concerns around just

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:29.240
<v Speaker 2>trying not to get bankrupt basically in starlink. But what

0:20:29.400 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 2>fueled its sudden.

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:34.359
<v Speaker 4>Growth, Well, it's consistent with what we reported, right, must

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 4>saying that it has reached cash flow break even, but

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:39.399
<v Speaker 4>that reporting last week. Starlink could bring in ten billion

0:20:39.440 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 4>dollars a revenue next year. That would make it the

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 4>vast majority of SpaceX revs overall. And it's working. You know,

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 4>if you look at a map of where Starlink's deployed

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 4>around the world. It is widespread. It offers connectivity satellite

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 4>based internet for people around the world that have not

0:20:55.920 --> 0:20:58.439
<v Speaker 4>been able to get access to fast feed internet before.

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 4>The demand is there, and we know that the rollout

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:04.119
<v Speaker 4>has been careful and slow because there's a regulatory component,

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:07.639
<v Speaker 4>but there is demand for this and it's the centerpiece

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 4>of SpaceX's future, right the cash cow.

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:12.119
<v Speaker 3>The musters will take us to Mars.

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 2>And just think how slow competitors have been there, like

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:18.399
<v Speaker 2>Amazon Stalls cautiously going through it with Project Kuiper, but

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:20.879
<v Speaker 2>not coming anytime soon. In terms of the pace that

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 2>we've really seen from SpaceX. We want to thank you

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:26.040
<v Speaker 2>for all of your bylines. There are another couple Gillian

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 2>and Esteban on.

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 3>It as well.

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 2>Great reporting, Ryan Geld, We thank you, Anadin of course.

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:40.680
<v Speaker 4>And Ludlow, Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology.

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:42.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm Ed Ludlow in San Francisco.

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm parent I had in New York. Let's get to

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:45.159
<v Speaker 2>you a quick check on these markets. Halfway through this

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 2>training day, we are managing to sustain some sort of

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 2>gains in the Nasdaq and the Nasdaq one hundred. We're

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:52.119
<v Speaker 2>currently up about a tenth percent. Now, remember we were

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 2>up more than two percent on this benchmark yesterday, so

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:56.960
<v Speaker 2>just cooling after the rampant growth. We've got a little

0:21:56.960 --> 0:21:58.920
<v Speaker 2>bit of a Goldilock scenario going on with the data

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:01.879
<v Speaker 2>once again today. Retail sales are calling a little bit,

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:04.479
<v Speaker 2>but still looking resilient into the holiday period. And that

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:07.640
<v Speaker 2>PPI number those producer price is actually showing some pullback.

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 2>That inflationary anxiety dialing down will market it sells off,

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:13.639
<v Speaker 2>but the Golden dragon over of course, then thea's that

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:17.920
<v Speaker 2>golden dragon really showing some fuel and buying of Chinese

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:20.640
<v Speaker 2>related companies that are traded here in the United States.

0:22:20.640 --> 0:22:22.720
<v Speaker 2>We're up three and a half percent after we have

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 2>beat some ten cent JD dot Com in particular, we

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 2>all look at Ali Baba also. Of course, there's still

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:30.200
<v Speaker 2>hope that we might see some stimulus going into the

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Chinese economy. Big day for US and China. Of course,

0:22:32.560 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 2>from a geopolitical perspective, Bitcoin currently up two point three percent.

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 2>Go into the individual movers though on the day, and

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 2>we do want to highlight some of the individual idiosyncratic

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:42.679
<v Speaker 2>news coming from well, the likes of JD dot Com

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 2>with its numbers doing well We're up more than seven percent.

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 2>All eyes on Alibaba for after the bell. I'm looking

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:48.879
<v Speaker 2>at Amazon down by one point eight percent, and this

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 2>is related to what's happening with Microsoft. Potentially Microsoft now

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:54.399
<v Speaker 2>going in with its own chips making sure that its

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 2>supply chain is under control when it comes to AI

0:22:56.520 --> 0:22:59.439
<v Speaker 2>related chips, those in data centers. Amazon has already been

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:01.480
<v Speaker 2>doing that. Who is alphabet as of course Google and

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:03.719
<v Speaker 2>many of the cloud providers. Amazon just down by one

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 2>point seven percent. Maybe that's also about the retail data

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:09.639
<v Speaker 2>that just showed a little bit of calling so appetite

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:11.639
<v Speaker 2>for some retail related names in China not so much

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:13.959
<v Speaker 2>here in the United States. But then while we're going

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:16.400
<v Speaker 2>to be going into where some of these companies heil from,

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:18.440
<v Speaker 2>we're all talking about Silicon Valley day in, day out.

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 2>From a geopolitical perspective, we talk about San Francisco on

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 2>the day as well.

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 4>So there's a spotlight on this city this week because

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 4>of APEX. But I want to bring you another story

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:29.119
<v Speaker 4>that was in Bloomberg BusinessWeek this morning. Michael Moritz, the

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:32.919
<v Speaker 4>prominent venture investor who became known basically for making early

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 4>investments in Google LinkedIn PayPal, Yahoo. That was during the

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 4>years where he was a partner at SCA Capital. Moritz

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:43.359
<v Speaker 4>is now focusing on investing his time and money in

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 4>remaking San Francisco, a city that he thinks has lost

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:50.480
<v Speaker 4>its way. Moritz has lived there here for four decades

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 4>and is dedicated get this, carry more than three hundred

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:57.680
<v Speaker 4>million dollars since twenty twenty to both social and political

0:23:57.720 --> 0:24:01.119
<v Speaker 4>causes in this city, basically funding hundreds of nonprofits in

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:03.119
<v Speaker 4>different advacy advocacy groups.

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 3>The spotlights here in SF.

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 2>It is the spotlight is also on ultimately the remaking

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 2>of the city. Particularly as we keep talking about generative

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:13.440
<v Speaker 2>of ai is, Suddenly it becomes more of a hub

0:24:13.520 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 2>cerebral value as we talk about it, the scale of

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:18.679
<v Speaker 2>appetite for a rental space. We're going to have so

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 2>much of this conversation throughout the show. Let's keep talking

0:24:21.040 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 2>about San Francisco's future and revival right now when Natalie

0:24:23.800 --> 0:24:27.440
<v Speaker 2>is sendover, executive director of the Urban Land Institute San Francisco,

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 2>a network of cross disciplinary real estate land news experts

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 2>which is working towards this exact goal, this rejuvenation. Maybe

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:38.919
<v Speaker 2>it's a pr effort, maybe it's a reality effort that

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:42.399
<v Speaker 2>people haven't been coming back to San Francisco proper in

0:24:42.520 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 2>terms of the office space. What was it, thirty percent

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 2>of office space just unleashed as it stands. Is that

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 2>changing at all?

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 11>Natalie, Yeah, thank you for inviting me. I think you know,

0:24:56.240 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 11>you and I recently brought together a group of national

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:02.399
<v Speaker 11>experts from around the country to talk about just that

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 11>downtown revitalization and you know, what can be the future

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:10.160
<v Speaker 11>for San Francisco. And what was interesting is we had

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:12.480
<v Speaker 11>all of these folks come in from around the country

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 11>expecting this horrid environment and really they were surprised. They

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 11>were like, it's not that bad. And you know, with

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 11>every crisis comes opportunity. And I really do think coming

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:24.440
<v Speaker 11>out of the recommendations from this panel, there really is

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:28.639
<v Speaker 11>a lot of opportunity for downtown San Francisco, particularly thinking

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:31.359
<v Speaker 11>about how we can diversify the mix of uses to

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:33.399
<v Speaker 11>really make it a great neighborhood.

0:25:34.600 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 4>Natalie, good morning. You're over in Oakland. I'm here in

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 4>San Francisco. I just want to go back on what

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:41.879
<v Speaker 4>you just said. So earlier this year, ULI convened this

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:44.960
<v Speaker 4>group of people and you basically showed them San Francisco,

0:25:45.440 --> 0:25:48.480
<v Speaker 4>and they were pleasantly surprised. I understand on the health

0:25:48.520 --> 0:25:51.479
<v Speaker 4>and state of this city. I sawed this week by

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 4>speaking to the mayor and said, look, everyone is asking

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 4>how you were suddenly able to clear up the city

0:25:57.320 --> 0:26:00.080
<v Speaker 4>in a week because the president is in town and

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 4>the president of China is in town. To be very clear,

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 4>your findings well before APEC were that San Francisco is

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 4>making improvement.

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 11>Yes, absolutely, And I think that the narrative around San

0:26:13.040 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 11>Francisco and the doom loop is really a narrative that

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 11>isn't quite accurate. I think the city has actually been

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:21.159
<v Speaker 11>hard at work at making changes.

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:22.200
<v Speaker 12>For a while now.

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 11>Particularly, you know, our work has been focused on the

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 11>financial district of downtown San Francisco, and that's where our

0:26:28.800 --> 0:26:32.680
<v Speaker 11>panelists spent their time, and there was really a general

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 11>consensus that it felt pretty clean and safe.

0:26:36.640 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 12>You know, there was some activity on the street.

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:41.000
<v Speaker 11>It obviously wasn't exactly like it was in the pre

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:44.119
<v Speaker 11>pandemic days. You know, there's still some work to be

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 11>done on the kind of gateways and the connectors to

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 11>the financial district of downtown San Francisco. But I do

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:53.440
<v Speaker 11>think that the city has been hard at work making

0:26:53.480 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 11>some changes well in advance of Apec coming to town.

0:26:56.359 --> 0:26:59.400
<v Speaker 11>Apec coming to town, just like any city when they're

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 11>going to have a glow spotlight on them, are going

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:07.160
<v Speaker 11>to go through some you know, more extreme measures.

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 12>To clean up the city. And I think that's only

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:10.200
<v Speaker 12>a good thing for San Francisco.

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 2>Everyone loves a bit of chadenfreude. Everyone loves to sit

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:16.959
<v Speaker 2>in one city and bad mouth another. And I am

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:19.119
<v Speaker 2>interested though. It was but a few months ago that

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 2>I was in San Francisco walking across that very street

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 2>that we just saw in the imbook Idea, and I'm

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:27.720
<v Speaker 2>afraid there were still so many signs of such sadness.

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 2>People still very much living on the street, a lot

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:32.879
<v Speaker 2>of what people call tense city. How is there a

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:36.439
<v Speaker 2>long term, ultimate fix to that, and how do we

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 2>start to see some of the areas of focus really

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 2>feel rejuvenated, not only on Market Street, but more broadly

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:44.400
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to art, to culture and and really

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:45.480
<v Speaker 2>what makes the city thrive.

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, absolutely, I think that when we're talking about downtown,

0:27:49.800 --> 0:27:52.400
<v Speaker 11>the financial district in particular, you know, it's really been

0:27:52.480 --> 0:27:56.120
<v Speaker 11>a single use district. It's been commercial office and catering

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 11>to people from the nine to five. So I think

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:00.440
<v Speaker 11>the first step there and this is what our analysts

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 11>found as we really need to think about diversifying this area,

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 11>which you know, bringing in residential is you know, one

0:28:07.359 --> 0:28:12.679
<v Speaker 11>piece of that puzzle. But conversion isn't a silver bullet.

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 11>All of these buildings can't be turned to housing. But

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 11>you know it will help not only with our housing crisis,

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 11>but to diversify the area in downtown. But you can't

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:23.720
<v Speaker 11>just fill a bunch of these office spaces with the

0:28:23.720 --> 0:28:24.440
<v Speaker 11>housing units.

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:27.360
<v Speaker 3>Call of a day, Well, NATSI I just reflect.

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 4>Look, I am a resident of San Francisco and I

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:33.119
<v Speaker 4>work in San Francisco, and you know a lot of

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 4>the doom loop discussion that is not universally the experience

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 4>that everyone lives here. Right, there's a lot that's good

0:28:38.400 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 4>about the city. But you just made a point and

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:43.719
<v Speaker 4>diversify and the navy that you hood you're talking about

0:28:44.080 --> 0:28:47.720
<v Speaker 4>Uber salesforce X, the company formerly known as Twitter, it

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:50.040
<v Speaker 4>is still largely tech or it's vacant.

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 3>Is AI changing that?

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:54.240
<v Speaker 11>You know, I'm not an expert on what's going to

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 11>happen with AI. I know there's a lot of hope

0:28:56.200 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 11>for AI there is still You know, San Francisco has

0:28:59.440 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 11>been the text center of the world for a number

0:29:02.920 --> 0:29:03.240
<v Speaker 11>of years.

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:04.440
<v Speaker 12>I don't think that's going to change.

0:29:04.480 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 11>I think that AI will likely be interested in coming

0:29:06.600 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 11>to San Francisco, but I also think other things and

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 11>other types of businesses need to come to San Francisco,

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:15.160
<v Speaker 11>and the city is working on figuring out how to

0:29:15.200 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 11>incentivize those other types of businesses to be interested as well.

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:21.520
<v Speaker 12>And it's not only these big companies.

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 11>We're also talking about San Francisco locally made businesses to

0:29:25.240 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 11>support the arts and culture, as you said earlier, and

0:29:28.680 --> 0:29:29.640
<v Speaker 11>bring them to downtown.

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:33.080
<v Speaker 4>All right, Natalie Sandobal, executive director of the Urban Land

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:35.080
<v Speaker 4>Institute San Francisco, Thank you so much.

0:29:35.360 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 3>Let's stick with this city.

0:29:36.560 --> 0:29:41.560
<v Speaker 4>Another fixture of San Francisco's landscape is all has been robotaxis,

0:29:41.600 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 4>and until recently it was the only city in the

0:29:43.840 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 4>world that had two robotaxis operate in twenty four to

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 4>seven and charging a fair to the public. But some

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:54.720
<v Speaker 4>issues led to cruises permit being removed, and now hundreds

0:29:54.760 --> 0:29:58.480
<v Speaker 4>of emails between Cruz and the city's police department give

0:29:58.560 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 4>us a window into the relation ship between those two groups,

0:30:01.680 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 4>ranging from contentious to the collaborative. I want to bring

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:07.680
<v Speaker 4>in Junior Love who, Julia Love, who did such a

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 4>deep dive on these documents and emails?

0:30:11.080 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 3>What have you found out?

0:30:13.280 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 13>Well, this was really a fascinating glimpse into the relationship

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 13>between CRUSE and the San Francisco Police Department at a

0:30:20.200 --> 0:30:24.680
<v Speaker 13>really pivotal time for the service, and SFPD raised some concerns.

0:30:24.760 --> 0:30:31.520
<v Speaker 13>There were multiple times when the vehicles disrupted crime scenes, barrelings,

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 13>or caution tape. There were also and there was also

0:30:35.600 --> 0:30:38.240
<v Speaker 13>an incident in which First Lady Jill Biden was visiting

0:30:38.280 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 13>the city and the vehicles got confused by the motorcade

0:30:41.760 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 13>and disrupted its path. So some new windows into the

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:48.840
<v Speaker 13>bumps on the road that we have been seeing for

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:53.360
<v Speaker 13>some time now with CRUSE. There were also some signs

0:30:53.400 --> 0:30:57.120
<v Speaker 13>though that the police does have an interest in the

0:30:57.240 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 13>data that CRUZ obtains. They wrote to CRUZ multiple times

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 13>expressing an interest in obtaining its footage after the vehicles

0:31:06.240 --> 0:31:11.440
<v Speaker 13>were spotted near crime scenes, and CRUZ did appear to

0:31:11.480 --> 0:31:15.320
<v Speaker 13>be upholding its practice of making the officers get warrants.

0:31:15.400 --> 0:31:18.080
<v Speaker 13>But I think it just understores that this is a

0:31:18.160 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 13>multifaceted relationship it is.

0:31:20.560 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 2>And one that well the police also have with alphabets

0:31:23.720 --> 0:31:27.640
<v Speaker 2>weimo and I'm sure there are plenty of back and

0:31:27.680 --> 0:31:31.760
<v Speaker 2>forth and sometimes celebration le relationships and other other times

0:31:31.840 --> 0:31:36.120
<v Speaker 2>more difficult intense relationships. Ultimately, does this shine a light

0:31:36.200 --> 0:31:39.000
<v Speaker 2>on any way in which we'll see Cruz back in

0:31:39.040 --> 0:31:41.920
<v Speaker 2>San Francisco, They remain in Phoenix or amazing in Austin.

0:31:42.280 --> 0:31:44.400
<v Speaker 2>Is it going to come back to the city, Well,

0:31:44.440 --> 0:31:44.840
<v Speaker 2>I think it.

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:50.120
<v Speaker 13>The emails show just how hard Cruse worked to maintain

0:31:50.320 --> 0:31:55.560
<v Speaker 13>a good relationship with SFPD despite these troubles that arose,

0:31:56.040 --> 0:31:59.400
<v Speaker 13>and experts tell me that that relationship really will be

0:31:59.480 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 13>the key to Cruz returning to San Francisco. SFPD won't

0:32:04.480 --> 0:32:07.440
<v Speaker 13>be the one that ultimately restores its PERI meant to

0:32:07.520 --> 0:32:11.240
<v Speaker 13>operate in the state, But police really do help shape

0:32:11.920 --> 0:32:16.520
<v Speaker 13>locals of view of a company, and so if Cruz

0:32:16.680 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 13>can earn the trust of SFPD, then that is a

0:32:20.280 --> 0:32:24.000
<v Speaker 13>step toward earning the trust of everyday San Franciscans.

0:32:24.880 --> 0:32:27.360
<v Speaker 2>And of course, Ed you were just with the mayor

0:32:27.960 --> 0:32:29.960
<v Speaker 2>London Reed talking about how they have to work to

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:33.720
<v Speaker 2>regain trust, so notable that that is certainly an effort

0:32:33.760 --> 0:32:36.239
<v Speaker 2>they are on with the city Julia Love, thank you

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:39.120
<v Speaker 2>so much for that reporting. Meanwhile, coming up, but we're

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:42.040
<v Speaker 2>going to take a look at an aviation company archer

0:32:42.160 --> 0:32:45.040
<v Speaker 2>from self driving cars. Now we're looking at getting in

0:32:45.080 --> 0:32:47.400
<v Speaker 2>the air and how the CFO is doing finances through

0:32:47.400 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 2>the pre revenue phase. It's coming from blumas Leita's chief

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 2>financial officer. Episode coming up tonight, gust who's in it

0:32:53.480 --> 0:33:15.360
<v Speaker 2>as well. This is Bluemotechnology time now for talking tech.

0:33:15.400 --> 0:33:17.880
<v Speaker 2>First up, open Ai has had to press pause on

0:33:17.920 --> 0:33:21.680
<v Speaker 2>accepting new users for its paid chatchpt plus service due

0:33:21.720 --> 0:33:24.800
<v Speaker 2>to overwhelming demand. A scording to the CEO, Sam Altman,

0:33:24.840 --> 0:33:27.200
<v Speaker 2>who's put in on a post on Tuesday to marsw

0:33:27.240 --> 0:33:29.480
<v Speaker 2>open aied tools and services rose after the company, of

0:33:29.480 --> 0:33:32.800
<v Speaker 2>course introduced new features and upgrades as first ever Developer

0:33:32.880 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 2>Day that was last week and from APEC to the

0:33:37.360 --> 0:33:41.480
<v Speaker 2>Singapore Fintech Festival. In just well an hour after delivering

0:33:41.480 --> 0:33:45.160
<v Speaker 2>a speech in California, the Philippine President Ferdinand Macross Junior,

0:33:45.480 --> 0:33:49.440
<v Speaker 2>appeared halfway across the globe in Singapore using a hologram

0:33:49.680 --> 0:33:51.920
<v Speaker 2>that takes me back. He was the first of all's

0:33:51.960 --> 0:33:55.920
<v Speaker 2>only speaker to tap into that technology. Plus Byte Dance

0:33:56.080 --> 0:33:59.960
<v Speaker 2>is considering selling Shanghai Moonton technology. It's the gaming studio

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 2>behind popular game like mobile Legends. Bang Bang So also

0:34:02.880 --> 0:34:05.440
<v Speaker 2>say Bike Dancer Quad Moonton in twenty twenty one on

0:34:05.480 --> 0:34:08.280
<v Speaker 2>a valuation of about four billion dollars, but is now

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:10.920
<v Speaker 2>looking to streamline its operation focus more on the core

0:34:11.000 --> 0:34:14.600
<v Speaker 2>businesses and of course e commerce. Meanwhile, ed, well, you've

0:34:14.600 --> 0:34:16.239
<v Speaker 2>got something on the future technology too.

0:34:16.960 --> 0:34:19.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I've kind of been up in the air sort of. Archer,

0:34:19.880 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 4>the Eve Toll Company is getting ready to bring its

0:34:22.600 --> 0:34:25.000
<v Speaker 4>aircraft to market in twenty twenty five. That's when the

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:28.120
<v Speaker 4>FAA has said it will begin to allow limited operation

0:34:28.280 --> 0:34:31.800
<v Speaker 4>of those vehicles as air taxis. In the latest episode

0:34:31.800 --> 0:34:34.400
<v Speaker 4>of Bloomberg's Chief Future Officer, I took a look at

0:34:34.400 --> 0:34:37.120
<v Speaker 4>their air taxi called Midnight and a chat with Archer's

0:34:37.120 --> 0:34:41.320
<v Speaker 4>CFO Mark Mesler, chief Commercial Officer Nikhil Goel, and CEO

0:34:41.360 --> 0:34:42.760
<v Speaker 4>and founder Adam Goldsein.

0:34:42.840 --> 0:34:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Have a listen to this all right, this is it.

0:34:48.160 --> 0:34:50.080
<v Speaker 3>This is inside Midnight Welcome.

0:34:50.320 --> 0:34:54.879
<v Speaker 4>The design is four passenger seats front road, back row

0:34:55.440 --> 0:34:57.040
<v Speaker 4>and one pilot.

0:34:57.440 --> 0:34:58.680
<v Speaker 3>How after all.

0:34:58.560 --> 0:35:03.920
<v Speaker 4>This time did you arrive that configuration four passengers one pilot.

0:35:04.120 --> 0:35:05.600
<v Speaker 3>Our goal is to be the Uber Vier.

0:35:05.680 --> 0:35:07.759
<v Speaker 14>But when I was at Uber, we took all the

0:35:07.840 --> 0:35:10.440
<v Speaker 14>data of Uber trips going back and forth all over

0:35:10.440 --> 0:35:12.839
<v Speaker 14>the world, and what we figured out was that four

0:35:12.880 --> 0:35:15.959
<v Speaker 14>passengers was the optimal configuration to do one thing, which

0:35:16.000 --> 0:35:18.280
<v Speaker 14>is lower the cost per passenger for these trips.

0:35:18.400 --> 0:35:20.520
<v Speaker 15>So we understand what the cost of the aircraft is,

0:35:20.680 --> 0:35:22.719
<v Speaker 15>we understand what the cost of the pilot is, we

0:35:22.800 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 15>understand what the cost of the repair and maintenance of

0:35:25.560 --> 0:35:28.320
<v Speaker 15>this is, we understand battery costs. All of that feeds

0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:30.920
<v Speaker 15>into our unit level economic model and it does show

0:35:30.920 --> 0:35:34.640
<v Speaker 15>that pricing ad ride sharing prices allows us to make

0:35:35.360 --> 0:35:36.640
<v Speaker 15>an economic profit on the.

0:35:38.120 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 16>Back at Archer headquarters, I actually got to fly midnight. Okay,

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:46.720
<v Speaker 16>not for real virtually in the company's E simulator. Training

0:35:46.760 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 16>pilots is another hurdle the EV tool industry will have

0:35:50.120 --> 0:35:53.400
<v Speaker 16>to clear how much burden are you going to take

0:35:53.480 --> 0:35:54.800
<v Speaker 16>in the training process?

0:35:55.320 --> 0:35:57.480
<v Speaker 3>You know, why does that fall to Archer? And if

0:35:57.480 --> 0:35:58.960
<v Speaker 3>it does, what does it look like for you?

0:35:59.000 --> 0:36:02.200
<v Speaker 15>Guys think we are going to be training our own pilots.

0:36:02.280 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 15>This is our own technology. I think eventually as we

0:36:05.080 --> 0:36:08.160
<v Speaker 15>look to scale and we're always talking about unlocking scale.

0:36:08.440 --> 0:36:11.080
<v Speaker 15>We could look to partners to help us do some

0:36:11.160 --> 0:36:13.680
<v Speaker 15>of the training early on. Pilot training will be a

0:36:13.680 --> 0:36:16.640
<v Speaker 15>critical part of our own operations.

0:36:16.800 --> 0:36:19.640
<v Speaker 17>The simulators really help you get a sense for how

0:36:19.680 --> 0:36:23.120
<v Speaker 17>easy the vehicles are to fly. In fact, what we

0:36:23.280 --> 0:36:28.880
<v Speaker 17>found is people with less flying experience are actually better

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:31.560
<v Speaker 17>at flying these planes because you don't have to unlearn

0:36:31.920 --> 0:36:32.439
<v Speaker 17>as much.

0:36:32.520 --> 0:36:33.279
<v Speaker 3>Does that include me?

0:36:33.880 --> 0:36:34.560
<v Speaker 6>That includes you?

0:36:34.760 --> 0:36:37.879
<v Speaker 17>So within five minutes you were able to take off,

0:36:38.800 --> 0:36:42.800
<v Speaker 17>fly around the island of Manhattan and land successfully. And

0:36:42.880 --> 0:36:45.000
<v Speaker 17>that's your first time you've ever been a simulator and

0:36:45.040 --> 0:36:46.480
<v Speaker 17>that's pretty incredible.

0:36:48.719 --> 0:36:51.040
<v Speaker 4>And I landed it safely. You can catch the full

0:36:51.080 --> 0:36:54.000
<v Speaker 4>episode A Chief Future Opposite tonight at nine point thirty

0:36:54.040 --> 0:36:55.600
<v Speaker 4>pm East in time, a lot of.

0:36:55.520 --> 0:37:05.680
<v Speaker 2>Fun investment managers are releasing, of course, they're so called

0:37:05.680 --> 0:37:08.800
<v Speaker 2>thirteen F filings for the third quarter as the quad

0:37:08.840 --> 0:37:10.920
<v Speaker 2>by the SEC, and the findings give us kind of

0:37:10.960 --> 0:37:13.200
<v Speaker 2>a taste of view into what these managers have been

0:37:13.200 --> 0:37:16.040
<v Speaker 2>buying or they've been selling. Tuning us now as Hemapalma

0:37:16.040 --> 0:37:18.120
<v Speaker 2>bunting Berg News and Porter covering hedge funds, who's really

0:37:18.160 --> 0:37:21.680
<v Speaker 2>given us a beautiful roundup of Ultimately where the bets

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:24.799
<v Speaker 2>were placed. Its backward looking, but some notable standouts.

0:37:24.880 --> 0:37:27.600
<v Speaker 18>Yes, So I would say one of the standouts is Meta.

0:37:28.040 --> 0:37:30.640
<v Speaker 18>We've seen kind of across the board buying. If we

0:37:30.680 --> 0:37:33.560
<v Speaker 18>look at the Tiger cubs, which are typically the hedge

0:37:33.560 --> 0:37:36.439
<v Speaker 18>funds that are focusing on the tech stocks and quite

0:37:36.520 --> 0:37:38.719
<v Speaker 18>keen on the rotation in that space. So if we

0:37:38.760 --> 0:37:41.799
<v Speaker 18>look at loan Pine Capital, they started a brand new

0:37:41.800 --> 0:37:46.200
<v Speaker 18>position in Meta and it's actually now their largest long

0:37:46.280 --> 0:37:50.000
<v Speaker 18>holding the firm. They bought about two point seven million

0:37:50.040 --> 0:37:53.239
<v Speaker 18>shares at about eight hundred million dollar valuation at the

0:37:53.320 --> 0:37:56.800
<v Speaker 18>end of the last quarter, so they took a pretty chunky,

0:37:56.840 --> 0:37:59.240
<v Speaker 18>sizable steak. If we look at some of the other funds,

0:37:59.239 --> 0:38:03.600
<v Speaker 18>Tiger Global, Viking, CO two, they all increase their steak

0:38:03.600 --> 0:38:06.680
<v Speaker 18>in Meta. It's now Tiger Global's biggest holding, and it's

0:38:06.760 --> 0:38:08.200
<v Speaker 18>CO two's second biggest holding.

0:38:09.000 --> 0:38:12.200
<v Speaker 4>It's it's the most wonderful time of the year thirteen

0:38:12.239 --> 0:38:15.719
<v Speaker 4>out filings for so many But on the other side

0:38:15.760 --> 0:38:17.640
<v Speaker 4>of the table you just mentioned them, Tiger Global.

0:38:17.960 --> 0:38:19.480
<v Speaker 3>That's kind of a name that we jump on. What

0:38:19.520 --> 0:38:19.960
<v Speaker 3>do we learn.

0:38:20.440 --> 0:38:24.120
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, so Tiger Global, they increase their steak in see

0:38:24.160 --> 0:38:27.160
<v Speaker 18>the Internet consumer company. They bought a ten more of

0:38:27.200 --> 0:38:29.920
<v Speaker 18>that stock, up to about eleven million shares of it,

0:38:30.320 --> 0:38:33.279
<v Speaker 18>and it's a company that's really struggled. Their stock price

0:38:33.280 --> 0:38:36.040
<v Speaker 18>has struggled over the past quarter, so it looks like

0:38:36.080 --> 0:38:38.400
<v Speaker 18>the company may have the firm may have bought the

0:38:38.440 --> 0:38:41.759
<v Speaker 18>dip on that believing in the projections of how that

0:38:41.800 --> 0:38:45.200
<v Speaker 18>company may look, but taking advantage of the share price.

0:38:45.520 --> 0:38:48.719
<v Speaker 18>Another interesting thing with Tiger Global is you'll remember that

0:38:48.760 --> 0:38:51.160
<v Speaker 18>they've been a long term investor in JDA dot Com.

0:38:51.200 --> 0:38:52.360
<v Speaker 2>They got into JDA.

0:38:52.120 --> 0:38:56.200
<v Speaker 18>Dot com well before it went public, and they've cut

0:38:56.239 --> 0:38:59.279
<v Speaker 18>their steak in the shares of JDA dot com by

0:38:59.320 --> 0:39:02.000
<v Speaker 18>about half, even more than half, and that bills on

0:39:02.040 --> 0:39:05.440
<v Speaker 18>them cutting even the quarter before last, So we do

0:39:05.600 --> 0:39:09.040
<v Speaker 18>see a bit of a trend there reducing that stake

0:39:09.239 --> 0:39:10.360
<v Speaker 18>even though buying more c.

0:39:11.280 --> 0:39:13.279
<v Speaker 2>Interesting as you see, it's not performed well all yet

0:39:13.280 --> 0:39:15.920
<v Speaker 2>to day, but JD dot Com popping after its earnings,

0:39:15.920 --> 0:39:18.520
<v Speaker 2>so maybe they want to be longer a little bit

0:39:18.520 --> 0:39:21.120
<v Speaker 2>at the moment at least, or real being shorter on

0:39:21.160 --> 0:39:24.360
<v Speaker 2>the day. What about those people generally sold out of

0:39:24.520 --> 0:39:27.280
<v Speaker 2>was jdcolm the theme for example? What were the other names?

0:39:27.800 --> 0:39:30.080
<v Speaker 18>So we saw some rotations If we look at Viking,

0:39:30.120 --> 0:39:34.080
<v Speaker 18>they sold about thirteen stocks entirely Netflix and Ali Baba,

0:39:34.160 --> 0:39:39.320
<v Speaker 18>but then also bought fifteen others. With Viking, they bought Workday, Amazon,

0:39:39.320 --> 0:39:42.840
<v Speaker 18>and United Parcel. Those are now their top three biggest holdings.

0:39:43.239 --> 0:39:46.520
<v Speaker 18>So you do see a lot of rotations across the portfolio.

0:39:46.680 --> 0:39:51.160
<v Speaker 18>Sometimes you see aggregated buying and like a meta, we

0:39:51.200 --> 0:39:53.040
<v Speaker 18>haven't seen a whole lot of other selling in JDA

0:39:53.040 --> 0:39:57.040
<v Speaker 18>dot com. But each fund sort of has their own

0:39:57.040 --> 0:40:00.440
<v Speaker 18>specific way that they look at the way that they

0:40:00.520 --> 0:40:01.160
<v Speaker 18>approach tech.

0:40:01.920 --> 0:40:04.719
<v Speaker 4>Wow, all right, bloom Oh, I'm sorry, Carry I'll jump in.

0:40:04.719 --> 0:40:06.839
<v Speaker 4>But you know, thirty and f's you get a sense

0:40:06.880 --> 0:40:09.000
<v Speaker 4>of what do people like or not like on a

0:40:09.040 --> 0:40:11.439
<v Speaker 4>long term basis. And these are the guys deploying big

0:40:11.480 --> 0:40:13.640
<v Speaker 4>sums of capital. Thank you so much for the Bloomberg's

0:40:13.800 --> 0:40:16.200
<v Speaker 4>Heema Palmer has come back to San Francisco. The commercial

0:40:16.239 --> 0:40:19.360
<v Speaker 4>real estate market is having a moment. While it's struggled

0:40:19.360 --> 0:40:22.239
<v Speaker 4>more than any other US major city to recover from

0:40:22.239 --> 0:40:25.959
<v Speaker 4>the pandemic, AI's startups have been breathing new life into

0:40:25.960 --> 0:40:26.600
<v Speaker 4>the city's market.

0:40:26.680 --> 0:40:29.000
<v Speaker 3>Let's go to Bloombergs preor and who's been writing about

0:40:29.000 --> 0:40:29.800
<v Speaker 3>this this morning.

0:40:30.280 --> 0:40:32.120
<v Speaker 4>What does the data tell us, Like, we know that

0:40:32.239 --> 0:40:35.759
<v Speaker 4>AI is a thing, new companies being founded, but from

0:40:35.760 --> 0:40:38.359
<v Speaker 4>a square footage perspective, something real is happening here.

0:40:39.680 --> 0:40:42.600
<v Speaker 19>AI companies have added more than a million square feet

0:40:42.680 --> 0:40:45.760
<v Speaker 19>of office space this year, and real estate agents telling

0:40:45.800 --> 0:40:48.319
<v Speaker 19>me are telling me that every day they're touring when

0:40:48.360 --> 0:40:51.400
<v Speaker 19>different companies looking at more and more office space. Clearly,

0:40:51.440 --> 0:40:54.560
<v Speaker 19>in this industry, in the sub industry, within tech, people

0:40:54.600 --> 0:40:57.960
<v Speaker 19>feel a need to be in person at least several

0:40:58.000 --> 0:40:59.560
<v Speaker 19>days a week, if not most of the days of

0:40:59.560 --> 0:40:59.920
<v Speaker 19>the week.

0:41:00.200 --> 0:41:02.520
<v Speaker 2>And some of the names, like was it anthropic taking

0:41:02.560 --> 0:41:06.839
<v Speaker 2>over Saxony Company h Q, it would feel like we've

0:41:06.880 --> 0:41:11.160
<v Speaker 2>got other key AI names just building out secondary headquarters

0:41:11.200 --> 0:41:14.040
<v Speaker 2>in SS even if it's not their first. But what

0:41:14.120 --> 0:41:16.640
<v Speaker 2>about turning space to be fit for them? We were

0:41:16.640 --> 0:41:18.839
<v Speaker 2>hearing what Ed was having a conversation with the mayor

0:41:18.880 --> 0:41:21.720
<v Speaker 2>of San Francisco about making more space for AI labs.

0:41:23.080 --> 0:41:25.120
<v Speaker 19>That's right, And what's interesting is actually a lot of

0:41:25.120 --> 0:41:29.040
<v Speaker 19>these AI companies are not clustering downtown necessarily, or they're

0:41:29.080 --> 0:41:33.520
<v Speaker 19>not necessarily attached to being specifically downtown. So open AI

0:41:33.760 --> 0:41:37.480
<v Speaker 19>is in the Mission District and a lot of companies

0:41:37.520 --> 0:41:40.120
<v Speaker 19>have sprouted up kind of near their office in the Mission.

0:41:40.400 --> 0:41:44.000
<v Speaker 19>There's a part of town that's getting termed Area AI.

0:41:44.160 --> 0:41:47.120
<v Speaker 19>It's sort of the eastern part of the Mission, a

0:41:47.120 --> 0:41:50.439
<v Speaker 19>little bit of Soma and Petrero Hill, and that part

0:41:50.480 --> 0:41:52.879
<v Speaker 19>of town is actually seeing a number of offices crop

0:41:53.000 --> 0:41:55.000
<v Speaker 19>up and a number of companies sort of clustering there.

0:41:55.120 --> 0:41:57.319
<v Speaker 19>Maybe it's the Open AI effect, right, wanting to be

0:41:57.360 --> 0:41:59.360
<v Speaker 19>close to the center of gravity in this industry.

0:42:00.400 --> 0:42:02.520
<v Speaker 2>And it's a great story. People should go read it.

0:42:02.560 --> 0:42:05.080
<v Speaker 2>We thank you so much. Meanwhile, look that does it.

0:42:05.239 --> 0:42:07.320
<v Speaker 2>From this edition of Bluebog Technology.

0:42:07.719 --> 0:42:10.239
<v Speaker 4>Go out tell everyone about the podcast. Wherever you get

0:42:10.280 --> 0:42:14.000
<v Speaker 4>yours Bloomberg, Apple, Spotify from SF in New York.

0:42:14.320 --> 0:42:18.600
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology.