WEBVTT - How to ‘have it all’

0:00:03.440 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Before Breakfast, a production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Good Morning. This is Laura. Welcome to the Before Breakfast podcast.

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Today's tip is to stop thinking of work and life

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:21.680
<v Speaker 1>as being in opposition. There is enough space in the

0:00:22.280 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 1>sixty eight hours we all have each week to devote

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>plenty of time to anything that matters. By telling ourselves

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>a story of time abundance, it becomes far more possible

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 1>to make work in life fit together. Because I write

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 1>about issues of careers and families, I often use the

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:45.400
<v Speaker 1>phrase work life balance. That's the term that people search for,

0:00:45.880 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>so it makes sense to use it, but I've really

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 1>never liked the phrase. The implication is that work and

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 1>life are on opposite sides of the scale, hence the

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:59.639
<v Speaker 1>balance metaphor, for one to go up, the other must

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 1>go down out. It seems like a zero sum game,

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:05.959
<v Speaker 1>but it really isn't, or at least not within the

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:10.039
<v Speaker 1>categories that people usually care about. Here's the statistic to

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>ponder as we celebrate International Women's Day this weekend. Time

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Diary studies find that women spend more hours working for

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:21.959
<v Speaker 1>pay now than they did in nineteen This makes sense.

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 1>The entrance of women into the paid labor force is

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the major social changes of the last fifty years.

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>But time diary studies find that women are also spending

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:35.760
<v Speaker 1>more hours interacting with their children than they did in

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>nineteen sixty. How is this possible? How can women spend

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:45.559
<v Speaker 1>more hours working for pay and more hours with their kids. Well,

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 1>it turns out that work and childcare are not the

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 1>only thing that women do. In the nineteen sixties, women

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 1>spent quite a bit of time on housework, and this

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 1>number has fallen as hours devoted to child care and

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>work have risen. You can even see this changing emphasis

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 1>reflected in the language. In the nineteen sixties, people talked

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 1>about housewives with the emphasis on the house. Now we

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>talk about stay at home moms. Even the trade offs

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 1>involved with big, demanding careers are often different than the assumption.

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>A few years ago, I wrote a book called I

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Know How She Does It that looked at how successful

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:28.080
<v Speaker 1>women spent their time. I collected time diaries from women

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:30.800
<v Speaker 1>earning over a hundred thousand dollars a year who are

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:35.079
<v Speaker 1>also raising children. I found these women worked, on average

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 1>about forty four hours a week. The average woman with

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:41.359
<v Speaker 1>a full time job who earns about forty dollars a

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>year works somewhere around thirty seven hours a week, and

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>they turned out to be huge financial payoffs to considering

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>careers that require a few extra hours per week on

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the margins. So this seven or so our gap isn't

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 1>nothing between about forty four hours and thirty seven hours,

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>but it didn't require sacrificing much time with kids. In general,

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 1>it came out of leisure time. The people in my

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:08.920
<v Speaker 1>study watched four point four hours of TV a week,

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>which is about eight hours less than the average woman

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:14.799
<v Speaker 1>with kids in a job. And yes, it turns out

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>these hours could be substituted. I found about half the

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:20.800
<v Speaker 1>women I studied worked sometimes after their kids went to

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 1>bed that time frame when a lot of people watch TV.

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 1>In other words, work and family weren't on opposite sides

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:32.679
<v Speaker 1>of the scale. Work and Netflix were on opposite sides

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 1>of the scale, and that's a trade off that a

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of people thought was worth making. Now, none of

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>this is to say that there won't be day to

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 1>day choices or that nobody faces work life conflict. Clearly

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 1>people do, people do all the time. But the bigger

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>issue is that when we tell ourselves stories that work

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 1>and life are naturally in opposition. We start to believe it.

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 1>We lament the volleyball game missed because of a meeting,

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>but not the volleyball game missed because another child has

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>a swim meet at the exact same time. People look

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>at the first scenario and decide they must dial down

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 1>or scale back or opt out. But no one looks

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>at the second hard choice moment and says, you need

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:16.720
<v Speaker 1>to get rid of the other kid. That's the result

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 1>of our stories. So today, think about the work and

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:23.480
<v Speaker 1>life stories you're telling yourself and figure out how you

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 1>can reframe them. So you worked late and missed bedtime

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 1>on Monday and TUESI this week, Well, is that horrible?

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:34.479
<v Speaker 1>Is something amiss? Perhaps? Or you could tell yourself that

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:36.600
<v Speaker 1>there are seven days in a week and you are

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 1>home for five. That sounds fairly balanced, like you're rocking

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 1>it at work and at home. When we reframe our stories,

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 1>we see that not only can people have it all,

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 1>often we already do. In the meantime. This is Laura.

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:56.039
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening, and here's to making the most of

0:04:56.040 --> 0:05:05.719
<v Speaker 1>our time. M Hey, everybody, I'd love to hear from you.

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:08.600
<v Speaker 1>You can send me your tips, your questions or anything else.

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Just connect with me on Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram at

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Before Breakfast pod. That's B the number four, then Breakfast

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>p o D. You can also shoot me an email

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>at Before Breakfast podcast at i heeart media dot com

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 1>that Before Breakfast is spelled out with all the letters.

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much, I look forward to staying in touch.

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Before Breakfast is a production of I heart Radio. For

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:42.839
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from my heart Radio, visit the i heart

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows.