WEBVTT - Michael Tracey - Is Ukraine a Massive Blunder?

0:00:11.657 --> 0:00:14.937
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to The Buck Sexton Show podcast, make sure

0:00:14.937 --> 0:00:17.977
<v Speaker 1>you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app or

0:00:17.977 --> 0:00:21.297
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts. Hey, everybody, welcome to another

0:00:21.337 --> 0:00:25.257
<v Speaker 1>episode of The Buck Sexton Show. I have Michael Tracy

0:00:25.337 --> 0:00:28.897
<v Speaker 1>with me now. He is a journalist with really interesting

0:00:28.897 --> 0:00:31.977
<v Speaker 1>opinions on foreign policy, a perspective you're gonna want to hear,

0:00:32.737 --> 0:00:36.737
<v Speaker 1>specifically on Ukraine. And he also has a great substack,

0:00:37.337 --> 0:00:40.337
<v Speaker 1>Michael Tracy substack. O check it out. You can follow

0:00:40.417 --> 0:00:45.617
<v Speaker 1>him on Twitter. Mister Tracy, coming to us Live alf Deutschland.

0:00:45.897 --> 0:00:48.257
<v Speaker 1>So I know you're over in Germany right now. Let

0:00:48.297 --> 0:00:51.417
<v Speaker 1>me let me start there. Actually, what's the feeling in

0:00:51.497 --> 0:00:59.537
<v Speaker 1>Germany about the largest war in Europe in eighty years? Yeah? Well,

0:00:59.777 --> 0:01:03.697
<v Speaker 1>first off, greetings, I would do a German greeting, but

0:01:03.897 --> 0:01:08.537
<v Speaker 1>I'm just so pathetic at even adopting like basics of

0:01:08.697 --> 0:01:12.857
<v Speaker 1>the linguistic context that I was supposed to be in.

0:01:13.737 --> 0:01:16.577
<v Speaker 1>And in part because you know, coming to this conference

0:01:16.737 --> 0:01:19.497
<v Speaker 1>with this was the Munich Security Conference that just concluded

0:01:19.657 --> 0:01:23.257
<v Speaker 1>in here in Munich where I am now, and like

0:01:23.377 --> 0:01:25.497
<v Speaker 1>so it's all these people flying in from all over

0:01:25.577 --> 0:01:28.057
<v Speaker 1>the place, so there's not really an expectation that you

0:01:28.137 --> 0:01:30.617
<v Speaker 1>have to acclimate it all to the local customs. So

0:01:30.817 --> 0:01:34.017
<v Speaker 1>nobody really expects that you're going to speak German, and

0:01:34.057 --> 0:01:37.857
<v Speaker 1>they probably wouldn't anyway, frankly, but it was even less

0:01:37.857 --> 0:01:41.097
<v Speaker 1>of a burden to do so this time for this trip,

0:01:42.017 --> 0:01:44.057
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of embarrassing because now I feel like

0:01:44.097 --> 0:01:46.417
<v Speaker 1>an arrogant American. When we have more time, I'll tell

0:01:46.457 --> 0:01:49.177
<v Speaker 1>you when I went to a Swedish counter terrorism conference

0:01:49.177 --> 0:01:53.377
<v Speaker 1>and ended up partying late night at a nightclub with Danish,

0:01:53.417 --> 0:01:56.897
<v Speaker 1>Swedish and I think Finnish federal police. So you know,

0:01:57.057 --> 0:02:00.457
<v Speaker 1>fun things could happen in that part of the world. Okay,

0:02:00.497 --> 0:02:02.497
<v Speaker 1>so how do they feel or what's the sort of

0:02:02.537 --> 0:02:05.177
<v Speaker 1>tenor or what's the just general sense that you can

0:02:05.217 --> 0:02:06.897
<v Speaker 1>pick up from the conference. Well, first of all, I

0:02:06.937 --> 0:02:12.057
<v Speaker 1>should disclose that the whole system that this conference had

0:02:12.097 --> 0:02:16.777
<v Speaker 1>set up for press was quite peculiar, and you'd almost

0:02:16.817 --> 0:02:20.377
<v Speaker 1>get a sneaking suspicion that they didn't really particularly want

0:02:20.417 --> 0:02:23.097
<v Speaker 1>the press to have full access to the conference that

0:02:23.177 --> 0:02:26.937
<v Speaker 1>they could make inferences about what the tenor was. So

0:02:27.857 --> 0:02:29.457
<v Speaker 1>just let me explain it to you real quick, because

0:02:29.497 --> 0:02:31.977
<v Speaker 1>this is amazing and no journalists who I spoke to

0:02:32.017 --> 0:02:36.097
<v Speaker 1>at this conference had ever seen or experience anything like

0:02:36.137 --> 0:02:40.057
<v Speaker 1>it or even heard of it. So as best I

0:02:40.097 --> 0:02:42.897
<v Speaker 1>can tell, it's like an unprecedented thing, at least for

0:02:42.897 --> 0:02:47.497
<v Speaker 1>this particular conference, and maybe just you know, conferences of

0:02:47.537 --> 0:02:49.497
<v Speaker 1>this sort writ large, with this being you know, a

0:02:49.737 --> 0:02:53.457
<v Speaker 1>pre him and security conference for the you know, basically,

0:02:53.497 --> 0:02:55.977
<v Speaker 1>you know, the rules based international order. So you have

0:02:56.017 --> 0:02:58.137
<v Speaker 1>to sign up ahead of time to get a press credential,

0:02:58.217 --> 0:03:02.657
<v Speaker 1>which is standard. But once you arrive and our issue

0:03:02.697 --> 0:03:06.257
<v Speaker 1>the press credential, you can't just then waltz in to

0:03:06.337 --> 0:03:09.097
<v Speaker 1>the venue as you might anticipate, right. You have to

0:03:09.137 --> 0:03:15.857
<v Speaker 1>go to a press sort of monitor or a selection

0:03:15.897 --> 0:03:18.457
<v Speaker 1>of staff who have this booth or this room setup,

0:03:19.057 --> 0:03:20.977
<v Speaker 1>and in order to get into the main venue, which

0:03:21.017 --> 0:03:23.697
<v Speaker 1>is a hotel right in the center of the old

0:03:23.697 --> 0:03:27.297
<v Speaker 1>city of Munich. In order to get into the hotel,

0:03:27.817 --> 0:03:32.497
<v Speaker 1>you then you have to declare a specific purpose or

0:03:32.537 --> 0:03:35.857
<v Speaker 1>a specific destination or a specific task for why you're

0:03:35.977 --> 0:03:39.497
<v Speaker 1>entering the hotel number one and then number two. You

0:03:39.577 --> 0:03:42.577
<v Speaker 1>also have to be escorted the entire time. They actually

0:03:42.617 --> 0:03:45.737
<v Speaker 1>call it an escort system, that you're in the hotel

0:03:45.817 --> 0:03:48.897
<v Speaker 1>by one of these like twenty year old German guys

0:03:49.257 --> 0:03:54.257
<v Speaker 1>who they have lined up ready to accompany journalists as

0:03:54.297 --> 0:03:58.537
<v Speaker 1>like a chaperone or a babysitter, and you know, you

0:03:58.537 --> 0:04:00.897
<v Speaker 1>could try to lose them. I've heard of instances where

0:04:00.977 --> 0:04:03.177
<v Speaker 1>like journalists where it's able to sneak away and like

0:04:04.017 --> 0:04:06.177
<v Speaker 1>you know, hide in the bathroom or something to have

0:04:06.217 --> 0:04:08.457
<v Speaker 1>a bit of free access. But you know, they were

0:04:08.497 --> 0:04:13.897
<v Speaker 1>pretty you know, uh insistence on making sure that you

0:04:14.017 --> 0:04:18.377
<v Speaker 1>never left their site, and it was very odd. Um,

0:04:18.737 --> 0:04:24.937
<v Speaker 1>definitely not the embodiment of press freedom that you would

0:04:24.977 --> 0:04:27.857
<v Speaker 1>expect based on the rhetoric of these people, where they're

0:04:27.857 --> 0:04:33.137
<v Speaker 1>always talking about how we have to stand up for

0:04:33.297 --> 0:04:37.777
<v Speaker 1>liberal values and defend the rules based in international order

0:04:37.817 --> 0:04:42.017
<v Speaker 1>because we cherish principles like you know, freedom of the press,

0:04:42.057 --> 0:04:45.137
<v Speaker 1>whereas these authoritarian countries they cracked down the press, which

0:04:45.377 --> 0:04:49.017
<v Speaker 1>you know is true in certain respects, but that tends

0:04:49.057 --> 0:04:53.097
<v Speaker 1>to kind of obscure how you know, Also the high

0:04:53.097 --> 0:04:58.617
<v Speaker 1>minded liberal order countries or entities can engage in a

0:04:58.657 --> 0:05:02.577
<v Speaker 1>bit of chicanery themselves in that respect. Um, but that

0:05:02.657 --> 0:05:05.337
<v Speaker 1>just a little bit of a sort of ephemera of

0:05:05.417 --> 0:05:11.617
<v Speaker 1>people are curious. So how giants as how freaked out

0:05:11.617 --> 0:05:13.817
<v Speaker 1>of the Germans about the war in Ukraine right now,

0:05:13.937 --> 0:05:16.457
<v Speaker 1>or rather, what's the opinion of the Germans about the

0:05:16.457 --> 0:05:24.617
<v Speaker 1>war in Ukraine. Well, so there is a new or

0:05:24.737 --> 0:05:29.537
<v Speaker 1>Newish Defense Minister who came into office in January. His

0:05:29.697 --> 0:05:36.257
<v Speaker 1>name is Pistorius and he entered that position right around

0:05:36.257 --> 0:05:40.137
<v Speaker 1>the time when there was that whole hubbub about whether

0:05:40.337 --> 0:05:44.937
<v Speaker 1>Germany would send these leopard tanks to Ukraine. And then

0:05:45.017 --> 0:05:48.697
<v Speaker 1>there had to be a deal struck between the Biden

0:05:48.697 --> 0:05:53.617
<v Speaker 1>administration and German Chancellor Shoals for the US to at

0:05:53.697 --> 0:05:58.337
<v Speaker 1>least pledge in theory to send m one Abram's battle tanks,

0:05:58.337 --> 0:06:01.297
<v Speaker 1>whereas in the meantime so as to enable in the

0:06:01.297 --> 0:06:07.137
<v Speaker 1>meantime Germany to send these leopard tanks. And you know,

0:06:07.217 --> 0:06:09.817
<v Speaker 1>just going based on the rhetoric of the of the

0:06:10.137 --> 0:06:12.817
<v Speaker 1>new Defense minister and also the Foreign Minister, which is

0:06:13.177 --> 0:06:20.457
<v Speaker 1>a woman who's from the Green Party Babback, they're getting

0:06:21.377 --> 0:06:25.457
<v Speaker 1>almost very conspicuously strident in their rhetoric because you would expect,

0:06:26.977 --> 0:06:32.417
<v Speaker 1>in ordinary circumstances Germany to be among the more resistant

0:06:32.537 --> 0:06:36.377
<v Speaker 1>countries in one of these like transatlantic coalitions, so it

0:06:36.377 --> 0:06:40.137
<v Speaker 1>would be the US, the UK, you know, maybe the

0:06:40.177 --> 0:06:42.457
<v Speaker 1>Baltic States and Poland and so forth, at least in

0:06:42.497 --> 0:06:47.097
<v Speaker 1>the context of Ukraine being most strident and most aggressive

0:06:47.177 --> 0:06:50.497
<v Speaker 1>in pushing certain measures that they would like to take

0:06:50.537 --> 0:06:54.697
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the conflict with Russia, whereas Germany and

0:06:54.937 --> 0:06:58.097
<v Speaker 1>you know, to some extent France would be more wary,

0:06:58.537 --> 0:07:01.257
<v Speaker 1>right given for a variety of historical reasons. Also, you know,

0:07:01.297 --> 0:07:04.497
<v Speaker 1>Italy and so forth would be in that category. But

0:07:04.657 --> 0:07:07.417
<v Speaker 1>what's notable now, and this is sort of a break

0:07:07.417 --> 0:07:09.457
<v Speaker 1>with precedent or a break with what have been the

0:07:09.497 --> 0:07:13.377
<v Speaker 1>more convention expectation, is the rhetoric is hardening even with

0:07:13.457 --> 0:07:18.857
<v Speaker 1>the German officials like Pistorius, the Defense Minister gave it

0:07:19.417 --> 0:07:21.537
<v Speaker 1>speech or declared at one of his appearances at this

0:07:21.577 --> 0:07:26.497
<v Speaker 1>conference that Ukraine must win. He gave like a maximalist

0:07:26.617 --> 0:07:29.697
<v Speaker 1>declaration as to what must happen militarily in the war

0:07:29.977 --> 0:07:34.297
<v Speaker 1>for victory to be achieved, which is beyond the kind

0:07:34.337 --> 0:07:37.537
<v Speaker 1>of declarations that you would have gotten even maybe just

0:07:37.577 --> 0:07:43.217
<v Speaker 1>six months ago from the German government. And in terms

0:07:43.297 --> 0:07:47.137
<v Speaker 1>of the woman who's the Foreign minister, Babback, she's been

0:07:47.217 --> 0:07:52.337
<v Speaker 1>one of the most hardcore advocates of accelerating the kind

0:07:52.337 --> 0:07:55.337
<v Speaker 1>of interventionist policy in Ukraine from the outset, which is

0:07:55.337 --> 0:07:59.097
<v Speaker 1>ironic because she's a member of the ruling coalition as

0:07:59.137 --> 0:08:03.617
<v Speaker 1>a Green Party member. So the Green Party is one

0:08:03.857 --> 0:08:07.137
<v Speaker 1>faction within the ruling coalition of Schulz Right, and so

0:08:07.337 --> 0:08:10.897
<v Speaker 1>they have Green Party members that get appointed to positions

0:08:10.937 --> 0:08:15.697
<v Speaker 1>of state such as Foreign Minister. And she's been agitating

0:08:15.737 --> 0:08:19.457
<v Speaker 1>for months and months and months for Shoals to be

0:08:19.777 --> 0:08:24.537
<v Speaker 1>more assertive and more you know, antagonistic toward Russia essentially.

0:08:24.817 --> 0:08:26.897
<v Speaker 1>And why is that ironic? Well, first of all, the

0:08:26.897 --> 0:08:30.177
<v Speaker 1>Green Party is kind of what have what most people

0:08:30.177 --> 0:08:33.697
<v Speaker 1>probably would have thought for a year ago, the Dovish

0:08:33.817 --> 0:08:37.537
<v Speaker 1>Party right, like the peace nick crunchy party, where you

0:08:37.577 --> 0:08:40.217
<v Speaker 1>know they'd rather like strum an acoustic guitar and sing

0:08:40.257 --> 0:08:45.977
<v Speaker 1>Kumbaya than do anything even related whatsoever to the military. Um.

0:08:46.017 --> 0:08:49.897
<v Speaker 1>But they're among the most strident now. And why think

0:08:49.937 --> 0:08:51.817
<v Speaker 1>that is? And if you look at their wait, why

0:08:51.897 --> 0:08:56.817
<v Speaker 1>is it's interesting? Yeah? Um? Why is it? Yeah? It's

0:08:56.817 --> 0:08:58.977
<v Speaker 1>a good question. And it also relates to why the

0:08:58.977 --> 0:09:01.857
<v Speaker 1>Democratic Party is so unified. That was my next question.

0:09:01.937 --> 0:09:05.177
<v Speaker 1>There's a more dissension and among the Republicans even though

0:09:05.177 --> 0:09:08.377
<v Speaker 1>they're like there's definitely a majority support for the policy,

0:09:08.457 --> 0:09:12.177
<v Speaker 1>but there's a little bit more dissension, right, Yeah, because

0:09:12.217 --> 0:09:16.857
<v Speaker 1>I think it has to do with this with the

0:09:16.897 --> 0:09:21.377
<v Speaker 1>ideological contours of the war that have been imparted onto it.

0:09:22.017 --> 0:09:25.097
<v Speaker 1>Or they look at the conflict, meaning just the generic

0:09:25.777 --> 0:09:30.777
<v Speaker 1>liberal kind of mainline opinion, especially within elite circles. They

0:09:30.817 --> 0:09:34.977
<v Speaker 1>look at the conflict in Ukraine and they heighten like

0:09:35.057 --> 0:09:37.937
<v Speaker 1>the cosmic significance of it to the point where they're

0:09:37.977 --> 0:09:42.937
<v Speaker 1>imbuing it with these dimensions of some sort of you know,

0:09:44.257 --> 0:09:53.617
<v Speaker 1>apocalyptic battle between authoritarianism and democracy, or fascism and liberalism,

0:09:53.777 --> 0:09:58.457
<v Speaker 1>or one of these like grand ideological crusades. Right. That's

0:09:58.497 --> 0:10:01.337
<v Speaker 1>why they're always invoking World War Two. That's why World

0:10:01.377 --> 0:10:04.537
<v Speaker 1>War two, now more than at any point that I've

0:10:04.537 --> 0:10:09.017
<v Speaker 1>been alive anyway, is the most potent analogy and kind

0:10:09.057 --> 0:10:14.617
<v Speaker 1>of conferring moral salience. Yeah. This is a good versus

0:10:14.657 --> 0:10:16.977
<v Speaker 1>evil conflict, is the basics of it. This is this

0:10:17.097 --> 0:10:19.977
<v Speaker 1>is the the good guy, the bad guy, the cowboy

0:10:19.977 --> 0:10:21.697
<v Speaker 1>and the white hat, the cowboy and the black hat.

0:10:21.737 --> 0:10:25.857
<v Speaker 1>Putin is Hitler, Right, That's that's how this is lined up. Yeah,

0:10:25.897 --> 0:10:30.657
<v Speaker 1>And they also then can relate that to their domestic

0:10:30.777 --> 0:10:35.177
<v Speaker 1>political foes, right, because you know in the US, I

0:10:35.177 --> 0:10:38.417
<v Speaker 1>don't have to tell you it's not just a it's

0:10:38.457 --> 0:10:44.657
<v Speaker 1>not just the determination to stop Putin that's informing the

0:10:44.657 --> 0:10:47.617
<v Speaker 1>fury with which a lot of Democrats approaches this ue.

0:10:47.657 --> 0:10:50.457
<v Speaker 1>It's that it also they also view it as connecting

0:10:50.537 --> 0:10:57.297
<v Speaker 1>or you know, intersecting with their domestic struggle against insurrectionists

0:10:57.617 --> 0:11:02.697
<v Speaker 1>and fascists and you know, white nationalists and so forth,

0:11:02.737 --> 0:11:07.017
<v Speaker 1>because Trump was seen as this colluder of Putin's right,

0:11:07.057 --> 0:11:12.577
<v Speaker 1>and so Putin was depicted starting in twenty and sixteen. Really,

0:11:12.577 --> 0:11:15.897
<v Speaker 1>and Hillary Clinton, believe it or not, initiated this, or

0:11:15.897 --> 0:11:17.377
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why you wouldn't believe it. I'm sure

0:11:17.377 --> 0:11:19.937
<v Speaker 1>you would. She sort of initiated this conception of Putin

0:11:20.377 --> 0:11:22.377
<v Speaker 1>that was sort of new circle of twenty and sixteen

0:11:22.417 --> 0:11:26.097
<v Speaker 1>that he wasn't just this you know, revanchist Russian former

0:11:26.257 --> 0:11:28.777
<v Speaker 1>KGB agent who we had to be suspicious of, right

0:11:28.777 --> 0:11:33.737
<v Speaker 1>he was also this like exporter of right wing authoritarianism

0:11:34.257 --> 0:11:40.857
<v Speaker 1>and trying to undermine liberal democracy by subverting the rules

0:11:40.897 --> 0:11:46.017
<v Speaker 1>based international order to demodeological interventions. To democrats, there is

0:11:46.057 --> 0:11:50.097
<v Speaker 1>a Putin Trump axis of evil, if you will, I

0:11:50.097 --> 0:11:52.417
<v Speaker 1>mean this is what this is what they've created over

0:11:52.457 --> 0:11:55.497
<v Speaker 1>the years of the Trump over the Trump presidency, and

0:11:55.537 --> 0:11:57.657
<v Speaker 1>now it's extended. And I do remember with some of

0:11:57.657 --> 0:12:01.617
<v Speaker 1>the not just hyperbole, but the outright fabrications from the

0:12:01.657 --> 0:12:05.617
<v Speaker 1>Trump from the Trump era about Russia and putin specifically,

0:12:06.057 --> 0:12:08.297
<v Speaker 1>some people, and I believe you were among them, if

0:12:08.297 --> 0:12:11.337
<v Speaker 1>I remember from your Twitter, were learning, Hey, maybe just

0:12:11.457 --> 0:12:17.577
<v Speaker 1>creating Russia as this almost cartoonishly evil country that is

0:12:17.657 --> 0:12:21.577
<v Speaker 1>trying to destroy America from within and with fate, whether

0:12:21.577 --> 0:12:23.657
<v Speaker 1>it's be a Facebook or democracy. Maybe this will have

0:12:23.697 --> 0:12:26.377
<v Speaker 1>long term foreign policy implications. I think we're actually already

0:12:26.377 --> 0:12:28.897
<v Speaker 1>seeing some of those foreign policy implications right now, and

0:12:29.297 --> 0:12:31.097
<v Speaker 1>I want to return to that in a second. And

0:12:31.177 --> 0:12:34.737
<v Speaker 1>also the notion of this doesn't stop till Russia loses

0:12:34.977 --> 0:12:37.577
<v Speaker 1>what does that actually look like? But I want to

0:12:37.577 --> 0:12:39.577
<v Speaker 1>take a moment for our sponsor here, because if you're

0:12:39.577 --> 0:12:42.697
<v Speaker 1>a Team Mobile subscriber, they're investigating a data breach that

0:12:42.817 --> 0:12:46.177
<v Speaker 1>expose a sensitive personal information of thirty seven million customers

0:12:46.457 --> 0:12:48.937
<v Speaker 1>right after the New year. Cyber Hackers grab data without

0:12:48.977 --> 0:12:52.657
<v Speaker 1>notice could include customer names, emails, billing addresses, and phone numbers.

0:12:52.897 --> 0:12:55.897
<v Speaker 1>If exploited, cyber criminals can use this information to commit

0:12:56.017 --> 0:12:58.857
<v Speaker 1>online identity theft. If your own info is involved, how

0:12:58.897 --> 0:13:00.857
<v Speaker 1>will you know about this? That's why you need LifeLock.

0:13:01.337 --> 0:13:05.017
<v Speaker 1>Lifelocks online identity theft protection includes monitoring the web twenty

0:13:05.057 --> 0:13:07.977
<v Speaker 1>four seven for irregular activities and new account openings in

0:13:08.017 --> 0:13:11.217
<v Speaker 1>your name. They see unusual activity, I'll give you an alert,

0:13:11.457 --> 0:13:13.657
<v Speaker 1>and if you happen to become a victim of identity theft,

0:13:13.857 --> 0:13:17.217
<v Speaker 1>they will have a dedicated US based LifeLock restoration specialist

0:13:17.257 --> 0:13:19.897
<v Speaker 1>assigned to you to fix it. It's important to understand

0:13:19.897 --> 0:13:22.977
<v Speaker 1>how cybercrime and identity theftter affecting our lives. No one

0:13:23.017 --> 0:13:26.417
<v Speaker 1>can prevent all identity thefter monitor all transactions at all businesses,

0:13:27.057 --> 0:13:29.177
<v Speaker 1>but it is easy to help protect yourself with LifeLock.

0:13:29.217 --> 0:13:30.817
<v Speaker 1>I've relied on them for years. I've been a customer

0:13:30.857 --> 0:13:33.737
<v Speaker 1>for many years. Now join now. Save up to twenty

0:13:33.817 --> 0:13:36.457
<v Speaker 1>five percent off your first year with LifeLock when you

0:13:36.497 --> 0:13:39.697
<v Speaker 1>go to LifeLock dot com and use promo code buck

0:13:39.737 --> 0:13:43.177
<v Speaker 1>That's twenty five percent off with promo code bucket LifeLock

0:13:43.257 --> 0:13:46.537
<v Speaker 1>dot com or just call this number one eight hundred LifeLock.

0:13:46.657 --> 0:13:49.697
<v Speaker 1>That's one eight hundred LifeLock. All right, Michael, back back

0:13:49.697 --> 0:13:55.377
<v Speaker 1>to this a few things. I feel like we're being

0:13:55.457 --> 0:13:58.297
<v Speaker 1>told a lot of contrary because because I really want

0:13:58.337 --> 0:14:02.457
<v Speaker 1>to drill down into the what the strategy is that

0:14:02.537 --> 0:14:04.857
<v Speaker 1>kin make a quick Can I make a quick point

0:14:04.857 --> 0:14:07.017
<v Speaker 1>about the ideological dimensions that I wanted to make, and

0:14:07.057 --> 0:14:08.977
<v Speaker 1>then we'll move on to the other stuff before I forget.

0:14:09.297 --> 0:14:12.537
<v Speaker 1>I think it's like setting. Sorry to interrupt, but in

0:14:12.617 --> 0:14:15.537
<v Speaker 1>terms of forward, go for it. What do you got?

0:14:16.977 --> 0:14:19.497
<v Speaker 1>Usually I'm just free flowing nonsense out of my mouth

0:14:19.497 --> 0:14:21.857
<v Speaker 1>and people have to tell me to study every so often. Therese,

0:14:21.897 --> 0:14:24.497
<v Speaker 1>I'll just ramble for hours on in terms of the

0:14:24.497 --> 0:14:28.057
<v Speaker 1>ideological dimension right, I think the whole the reason why

0:14:28.257 --> 0:14:31.217
<v Speaker 1>liberals are and even leftists some degree like you would

0:14:31.217 --> 0:14:33.457
<v Speaker 1>associate with a Green Party, have been so enlivened by

0:14:33.497 --> 0:14:38.297
<v Speaker 1>this conflict is because it fits so perfectly into their

0:14:38.377 --> 0:14:43.657
<v Speaker 1>pre existing sort of ideological warfare that they were already

0:14:43.657 --> 0:14:46.497
<v Speaker 1>waging even if there had been no invasion last February. Right,

0:14:46.977 --> 0:14:49.137
<v Speaker 1>But that's not the full story, right, That just one

0:14:49.577 --> 0:14:52.777
<v Speaker 1>component as to why the consensus around this issue is

0:14:52.817 --> 0:14:59.177
<v Speaker 1>so intractable. You also have other factions of ideological consensus

0:14:59.377 --> 0:15:02.857
<v Speaker 1>as represented for example by Poland or the government of Poland,

0:15:02.857 --> 0:15:06.217
<v Speaker 1>where you have a socially conservative party in power, the

0:15:06.297 --> 0:15:10.217
<v Speaker 1>Law and Justice Party, rather rather conservative country overall all,

0:15:10.297 --> 0:15:13.737
<v Speaker 1>at least relative to the rest of Europe, and they're

0:15:13.777 --> 0:15:17.497
<v Speaker 1>among the most vehement, if not the most vehement, in

0:15:17.617 --> 0:15:21.297
<v Speaker 1>terms of supporting the more and more aggressive measures in

0:15:21.497 --> 0:15:26.217
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine and being really beating the drum harder and harder.

0:15:26.257 --> 0:15:28.577
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's where Biden is right now, right where

0:15:28.577 --> 0:15:31.457
<v Speaker 1>he just gave his speech. So that that I think

0:15:31.497 --> 0:15:35.497
<v Speaker 1>that fervor that Poland exhibits kind of comes from a

0:15:35.497 --> 0:15:38.337
<v Speaker 1>different ideological angle. But again, the reason why the consensus

0:15:38.337 --> 0:15:41.537
<v Speaker 1>is so potent is because you have like different interlocking

0:15:41.737 --> 0:15:48.097
<v Speaker 1>ideological schools of thought that can become equally sort of

0:15:48.977 --> 0:15:53.177
<v Speaker 1>vigorous in their support for this particular cause. So you

0:15:53.177 --> 0:15:55.457
<v Speaker 1>asked me just to answer quickly, what is like the

0:15:55.497 --> 0:15:59.577
<v Speaker 1>tenor at this security conference, because obviously I was able

0:15:59.577 --> 0:16:02.617
<v Speaker 1>to do stuff and talk to people and whatever, notwithstanding

0:16:02.617 --> 0:16:07.177
<v Speaker 1>the ridiculous press restrictions. I would just summarize it as

0:16:09.217 --> 0:16:14.417
<v Speaker 1>it's like an ideology overload, Like it's people overdosing on

0:16:14.777 --> 0:16:18.537
<v Speaker 1>these ideological intoxicants that they've been hopped up on for

0:16:18.577 --> 0:16:21.897
<v Speaker 1>a year from whatever particular direction where to the point

0:16:21.897 --> 0:16:24.657
<v Speaker 1>where they almost can't be reasoned with in many respects,

0:16:25.977 --> 0:16:30.017
<v Speaker 1>and they're just full steam ahead toward a particular end

0:16:30.057 --> 0:16:32.497
<v Speaker 1>goal that they can't quite articulate. I have theories as

0:16:32.497 --> 0:16:34.217
<v Speaker 1>to what the end goal actually is. Maybe we'll get

0:16:34.257 --> 0:16:37.537
<v Speaker 1>to it. But yeah, that's just basically how I would

0:16:37.537 --> 0:16:45.377
<v Speaker 1>answer it. It's just this really strong, to say, to

0:16:45.377 --> 0:16:49.177
<v Speaker 1>put it mildly, fervor that has overtaken this like Western

0:16:49.377 --> 0:16:53.617
<v Speaker 1>so called security establishments, such that they're really radicalizing rapidly

0:16:53.937 --> 0:16:56.377
<v Speaker 1>in a whole variety of areas, even once that are

0:16:56.377 --> 0:17:01.897
<v Speaker 1>just tangentially related to Ukraine, like they essentially institutionally endorsed

0:17:01.897 --> 0:17:05.097
<v Speaker 1>regime change in Iran as well at this conference. And

0:17:05.137 --> 0:17:08.057
<v Speaker 1>then there's this whole China issue that is kind of

0:17:08.857 --> 0:17:12.937
<v Speaker 1>trending in the same direction. So it's um, yeah, no, no,

0:17:12.977 --> 0:17:17.017
<v Speaker 1>it's so I want you to tackle this for me.

0:17:19.217 --> 0:17:21.897
<v Speaker 1>You have. On the one hand, in Wall Street Journal

0:17:21.897 --> 0:17:26.457
<v Speaker 1>recently editorial said, not only should we give them, meaning Ukraine,

0:17:26.897 --> 0:17:29.777
<v Speaker 1>another ninety billion or whatever whatever they need, we should

0:17:29.777 --> 0:17:32.577
<v Speaker 1>just send the F sixteens now because why wait, because

0:17:32.617 --> 0:17:37.217
<v Speaker 1>we're just this whole incremental game, what's the point. And

0:17:38.017 --> 0:17:41.057
<v Speaker 1>on the one hand, you have them saying effectively this

0:17:41.137 --> 0:17:45.537
<v Speaker 1>national security apparatus, that Western national security apparatus that the

0:17:45.617 --> 0:17:48.537
<v Speaker 1>US is leading, and obviously NATO's as the other big

0:17:48.537 --> 0:17:52.097
<v Speaker 1>component of it, saying or making it seem at least

0:17:52.097 --> 0:17:55.657
<v Speaker 1>like there's really no real risk here of anything getting

0:17:55.937 --> 0:17:58.417
<v Speaker 1>going really bad for US. And yet on the other

0:17:58.497 --> 0:18:01.937
<v Speaker 1>side you have Zelenski saying, if China is support if

0:18:02.017 --> 0:18:05.777
<v Speaker 1>China does for Russia what we are doing for Ukraine,

0:18:05.977 --> 0:18:08.177
<v Speaker 1>and even a fraction of what we're doing for Ukraine,

0:18:08.617 --> 0:18:13.457
<v Speaker 1>Zelenski said, that will start World War three. Well, how

0:18:13.577 --> 0:18:16.337
<v Speaker 1>is one in an escalation to World War three and

0:18:16.377 --> 0:18:18.897
<v Speaker 1>the other has no risk of anything bad happening. That's

0:18:18.897 --> 0:18:21.857
<v Speaker 1>what That's what I'm wondering. How they can make sense

0:18:21.857 --> 0:18:26.377
<v Speaker 1>of this for me? Right, I don't know exactly what

0:18:26.457 --> 0:18:30.177
<v Speaker 1>Zelenski meant by that, because he could have meant it

0:18:30.217 --> 0:18:35.737
<v Speaker 1>in a sort of more superficial sense, and that if

0:18:35.977 --> 0:18:39.337
<v Speaker 1>China did become a bonified co belligerent in the sense

0:18:39.377 --> 0:18:42.417
<v Speaker 1>that it was furnishing Russia with armaments that it would

0:18:42.417 --> 0:18:44.857
<v Speaker 1>be using Ukraine, it would sort of just expand the

0:18:44.897 --> 0:18:48.577
<v Speaker 1>geographical remit of the conflict to where you could say

0:18:48.617 --> 0:18:51.057
<v Speaker 1>it's now a global conflict. Is that what he meant

0:18:51.057 --> 0:18:53.737
<v Speaker 1>by World War three? Or does he say that? Or

0:18:53.817 --> 0:18:55.377
<v Speaker 1>is he suggesting if there's gonna be some like you know,

0:18:55.417 --> 0:18:58.297
<v Speaker 1>Pacific Theater opened up in the war, and it's going

0:18:58.377 --> 0:19:02.217
<v Speaker 1>to be something more recognizable as But even either one

0:19:02.217 --> 0:19:08.297
<v Speaker 1>of those would be right. It's escalatory, that's the point. Yeah, exactly, exactly. Well,

0:19:08.297 --> 0:19:10.577
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think there's a conventional wisdom now that's

0:19:10.617 --> 0:19:15.497
<v Speaker 1>congealed around the idea of escalation or whether there's risk

0:19:16.217 --> 0:19:19.777
<v Speaker 1>in kind of ramping up these weapons provisions and going

0:19:19.817 --> 0:19:22.377
<v Speaker 1>further and further with the tactics employers. Remember, it's not

0:19:22.417 --> 0:19:25.017
<v Speaker 1>just the weapons. People don't I think, fully appreciate this

0:19:25.137 --> 0:19:27.857
<v Speaker 1>or appreciate this enough. It's such that the US is

0:19:28.897 --> 0:19:33.457
<v Speaker 1>dispatching this endless supply of weaponry in an unprecedented like

0:19:33.537 --> 0:19:37.777
<v Speaker 1>you know, arms funneling operation that as soon as March

0:19:37.817 --> 0:19:41.057
<v Speaker 1>of last year dwarfed the most recent precedent, which had

0:19:41.057 --> 0:19:45.057
<v Speaker 1>been under Terry Truman in terms of unarmed supply operation

0:19:45.217 --> 0:19:49.177
<v Speaker 1>in Europe. Now it's like, I guess, you know, it

0:19:49.177 --> 0:19:51.617
<v Speaker 1>just has no precedent at all. Really, that we can

0:19:51.777 --> 0:19:55.017
<v Speaker 1>reasonably sort of invoke to kind of contextualize what this

0:19:55.097 --> 0:19:58.417
<v Speaker 1>mission is. But it's not just the weapons themselves, it's

0:19:58.457 --> 0:20:02.977
<v Speaker 1>this it's the operational coordination of the warfare itself that

0:20:03.097 --> 0:20:10.337
<v Speaker 1>the US is first and foremost undertaking in Ukraine. Remember

0:20:10.337 --> 0:20:15.617
<v Speaker 1>when Ukraine launched its counter offenses last August and September,

0:20:15.977 --> 0:20:18.777
<v Speaker 1>right where that that were more successful than maybe people thought,

0:20:18.857 --> 0:20:21.697
<v Speaker 1>and they took back a fair amount of land around

0:20:21.737 --> 0:20:27.497
<v Speaker 1>you know, Kharkiev, and then later her song. It was

0:20:27.537 --> 0:20:31.377
<v Speaker 1>reported in the New York Times and elsewhere. Shortly thereafter that,

0:20:32.497 --> 0:20:36.257
<v Speaker 1>the US generals literally were involved in the process of

0:20:36.377 --> 0:20:39.897
<v Speaker 1>drawing up the war plans themselves. Right, So it wasn't

0:20:39.937 --> 0:20:44.857
<v Speaker 1>just we send Ukraine a couple of Javelin missiles and

0:20:44.897 --> 0:20:47.497
<v Speaker 1>hope for the best, you know, and you know, wish

0:20:47.537 --> 0:20:52.497
<v Speaker 1>them good luck in coming up with tactical plans. No,

0:20:52.617 --> 0:20:56.417
<v Speaker 1>the US is intimately evolved in creating and formulating and

0:20:56.457 --> 0:21:00.417
<v Speaker 1>then executing those tactical practical plans because some of the

0:21:00.897 --> 0:21:05.417
<v Speaker 1>systems were giving them also require require US training and

0:21:05.417 --> 0:21:09.097
<v Speaker 1>an active monitoring and assistance. So some of these weapons

0:21:09.457 --> 0:21:11.577
<v Speaker 1>hand someone in ak and say go shoot the enemy.

0:21:11.617 --> 0:21:14.217
<v Speaker 1>That's one thing you give them a Patriot missile battery,

0:21:14.897 --> 0:21:17.697
<v Speaker 1>there has to be US training and US support for

0:21:17.737 --> 0:21:22.497
<v Speaker 1>that to actually function, right, right, I mean one of

0:21:22.497 --> 0:21:26.057
<v Speaker 1>the reasons that the Biden administration had cited as to

0:21:26.137 --> 0:21:28.657
<v Speaker 1>why they were not going to send those Patriot batteries

0:21:28.697 --> 0:21:31.497
<v Speaker 1>that he announced in December. But when they were asked

0:21:31.497 --> 0:21:34.177
<v Speaker 1>about this, meaning when Pentagon officials were asked about this,

0:21:35.217 --> 0:21:37.777
<v Speaker 1>you know, last March or so, would the US entertain

0:21:37.817 --> 0:21:42.297
<v Speaker 1>the idea of sending Patriot batteries to Ukraine, it was

0:21:42.337 --> 0:21:48.857
<v Speaker 1>dismissed as just a nonstarter because to operate those Patriot batteries,

0:21:48.937 --> 0:21:54.737
<v Speaker 1>these Pentagon officials said, would require US forces on the ground,

0:21:54.817 --> 0:21:56.977
<v Speaker 1>and we don't want US forces on the ground. That's

0:21:56.977 --> 0:22:00.177
<v Speaker 1>what Biden says, is the red line that the United

0:22:00.177 --> 0:22:02.177
<v Speaker 1>States is not going to cross policy wise. And then

0:22:02.297 --> 0:22:05.897
<v Speaker 1>sure enough, you know, like nine months later, the Patriot

0:22:05.937 --> 0:22:09.697
<v Speaker 1>batteries are deployed. Now, who knows who's going to be

0:22:10.137 --> 0:22:14.417
<v Speaker 1>rating those. I mean, do I doubt that Ukrainian soldiers

0:22:15.217 --> 0:22:21.417
<v Speaker 1>can garner the knowledge necessary to at least in part

0:22:21.497 --> 0:22:23.857
<v Speaker 1>operate the missiles. No, I don't necessarily doubt that, but

0:22:23.897 --> 0:22:26.017
<v Speaker 1>I don't know for sure. You and I and nobody

0:22:26.057 --> 0:22:29.577
<v Speaker 1>knows what the actual operational ratement will be in the

0:22:29.617 --> 0:22:36.737
<v Speaker 1>management and opera and execution of those well to be

0:22:37.057 --> 0:22:39.177
<v Speaker 1>what they're set up from my previous life and our

0:22:39.177 --> 0:22:41.377
<v Speaker 1>patriots system, someone has to train them, and to your point,

0:22:41.377 --> 0:22:43.017
<v Speaker 1>they could learn how to do it themselves, but there

0:22:43.017 --> 0:22:46.897
<v Speaker 1>has to be active assistance in that phase of getting

0:22:46.897 --> 0:22:49.777
<v Speaker 1>them up to speed so they can operate what is

0:22:49.817 --> 0:22:53.577
<v Speaker 1>a complicated and very expensive weapons system. Is it your perception?

0:22:54.217 --> 0:22:58.457
<v Speaker 1>I feel like the biggest um, the biggest debate right now,

0:22:58.577 --> 0:23:02.737
<v Speaker 1>or maybe maybe the center of the problem is absent

0:23:02.937 --> 0:23:07.777
<v Speaker 1>US troops in Ukraine. I think the perception of the

0:23:07.857 --> 0:23:13.017
<v Speaker 1>national security apparatus is Putin won't do anything to us

0:23:13.177 --> 0:23:17.457
<v Speaker 1>or to escalate unless we actually send in troops. Therefore,

0:23:17.977 --> 0:23:22.017
<v Speaker 1>why not send F sixteens? Abrahamstad like the whole all

0:23:22.057 --> 0:23:24.737
<v Speaker 1>of it, Just go with all of it? Are they right?

0:23:27.897 --> 0:23:30.937
<v Speaker 1>You know? I think that that logic is actually coherent,

0:23:31.097 --> 0:23:35.017
<v Speaker 1>meaning I wouldn't endorse that logic necessarily. But if you

0:23:35.057 --> 0:23:39.377
<v Speaker 1>do believe, say that it is true that Putin will

0:23:39.417 --> 0:23:45.897
<v Speaker 1>not escalate short of some sort of more overt, unambiguous,

0:23:45.897 --> 0:23:50.657
<v Speaker 1>direct US military intervention, then they have a point when

0:23:50.697 --> 0:23:53.017
<v Speaker 1>they're saying it doesn't make a whole lot of sense

0:23:53.137 --> 0:23:59.297
<v Speaker 1>to deploy these different weapons systems so incrementally and haltingly, right,

0:23:59.337 --> 0:24:02.697
<v Speaker 1>because you're saying that that's all under the escalation threshold,

0:24:02.777 --> 0:24:04.817
<v Speaker 1>So why not just do it all at once rather

0:24:04.857 --> 0:24:09.177
<v Speaker 1>than yeah, you know, dither for for months now. I

0:24:09.177 --> 0:24:11.977
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's necessarily an accurate assessment. But if that

0:24:12.097 --> 0:24:15.737
<v Speaker 1>is your assessment, then at least it's internally coherent to

0:24:16.057 --> 0:24:18.897
<v Speaker 1>make that argument. But my question is, do you think

0:24:18.937 --> 0:24:22.977
<v Speaker 1>that's an accurate assessment? Well, I don't think there's really

0:24:23.017 --> 0:24:25.857
<v Speaker 1>a basis to believe it's accurate. Here here's the conventional

0:24:25.857 --> 0:24:28.377
<v Speaker 1>wisdom that seems to have emerged around this question of

0:24:28.497 --> 0:24:30.737
<v Speaker 1>escalation and so called red lines, which I hate because

0:24:30.737 --> 0:24:33.177
<v Speaker 1>it's a cliche, and I guess I just hate all cliches,

0:24:33.217 --> 0:24:36.497
<v Speaker 1>but this one in particular because it like obscures the

0:24:36.497 --> 0:24:39.857
<v Speaker 1>gravity of the subject matter in a lot of ways.

0:24:40.297 --> 0:24:43.457
<v Speaker 1>They think that because there's there, you know, conventional wisdom

0:24:43.497 --> 0:24:46.977
<v Speaker 1>now among people who will always want to escalate anyway,

0:24:47.017 --> 0:24:48.777
<v Speaker 1>So they were going to try to like fashion whatever

0:24:48.857 --> 0:24:51.777
<v Speaker 1>arguments they could to justify that. But those people now

0:24:51.817 --> 0:24:55.897
<v Speaker 1>have like settled on this sort of circumstantial argument, or

0:24:55.937 --> 0:24:58.657
<v Speaker 1>this argument based on what's happened so far in the conflict,

0:24:58.657 --> 0:25:00.457
<v Speaker 1>where they're saying, look, you know, back in the fall,

0:25:01.177 --> 0:25:05.697
<v Speaker 1>there was that period in October where Putin seemed to

0:25:05.897 --> 0:25:11.217
<v Speaker 1>allude to the idea of potentially using the Russian nuclear

0:25:11.257 --> 0:25:13.217
<v Speaker 1>arsenal for some sort of reprisal. He didn't make a

0:25:13.217 --> 0:25:17.417
<v Speaker 1>direct threat, but you know, there's a clear allusion to it.

0:25:17.417 --> 0:25:19.137
<v Speaker 1>It was in actually the speech that he gave him

0:25:19.137 --> 0:25:22.417
<v Speaker 1>September twenty first, when he announced the annexation of those

0:25:22.577 --> 0:25:28.817
<v Speaker 1>four new oblasts, right. And so then you know, Russia

0:25:28.817 --> 0:25:34.017
<v Speaker 1>annexes the Oblasts, they have these so called referenda, which

0:25:34.377 --> 0:25:36.857
<v Speaker 1>I don't think necessarily would hold up to scrutiny if

0:25:36.857 --> 0:25:39.417
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to sort of decipher what it means to

0:25:39.417 --> 0:25:42.137
<v Speaker 1>have a free, fair election. They're under older occupation. That's

0:25:42.177 --> 0:25:44.257
<v Speaker 1>sort of a separate issue. But so then no, Russia

0:25:44.337 --> 0:25:50.297
<v Speaker 1>then formally declares that those four Oblasts are part of Russia, right,

0:25:50.297 --> 0:25:57.177
<v Speaker 1>and they also assert that the Russian nuclear arsenal can

0:25:57.217 --> 0:26:00.697
<v Speaker 1>be used in the event that parts of Russia are

0:26:00.737 --> 0:26:03.377
<v Speaker 1>existensionally threatened. Now you have parts of Russia that are

0:26:03.377 --> 0:26:07.337
<v Speaker 1>in a hot war zone. So theoretically based on what

0:26:07.537 --> 0:26:11.817
<v Speaker 1>is understood to be there nuclear doctrine, although who knows

0:26:11.817 --> 0:26:13.817
<v Speaker 1>what the actual nuclear doctrine is. I mean mean, people

0:26:13.817 --> 0:26:16.097
<v Speaker 1>just kind of pontificate somehow. There are more people in

0:26:16.337 --> 0:26:19.057
<v Speaker 1>the United States, like on CNN who are experts on

0:26:19.097 --> 0:26:22.217
<v Speaker 1>the Russian nuclear doctrine in the American doctrine. I don't

0:26:22.257 --> 0:26:27.177
<v Speaker 1>know how that came about. Yeah, but it is true

0:26:27.217 --> 0:26:29.977
<v Speaker 1>that those territories were incorporating to Russia, and you could

0:26:29.977 --> 0:26:33.977
<v Speaker 1>make like a theoretical argument if you're Russia, that the

0:26:34.097 --> 0:26:38.577
<v Speaker 1>nuclear nuclear use is warranted to defend those oblasts. They

0:26:38.617 --> 0:26:42.417
<v Speaker 1>think that meaning these national security types and whoever would

0:26:42.457 --> 0:26:45.137
<v Speaker 1>be of the sort that would populate like Immuniq security

0:26:45.177 --> 0:26:47.897
<v Speaker 1>conference there. They've convinced themselves that because or as they're

0:26:47.897 --> 0:26:52.817
<v Speaker 1>claiming to be convinced that because Putin's red line was

0:26:52.857 --> 0:26:55.937
<v Speaker 1>crossed in that the United States didn't back off from

0:26:55.937 --> 0:27:01.497
<v Speaker 1>like Zappariga, Oblast and whatever when he annext them and

0:27:01.537 --> 0:27:04.417
<v Speaker 1>made them part of Russia, that that means his whatever

0:27:04.497 --> 0:27:08.177
<v Speaker 1>red lines he suggests that he has, or that might

0:27:08.177 --> 0:27:12.217
<v Speaker 1>even postulated that he has, they're they're not really there,

0:27:12.297 --> 0:27:15.857
<v Speaker 1>and it's just all a bluff and so that gives

0:27:15.937 --> 0:27:18.897
<v Speaker 1>us license. These people say to themselves, just press on

0:27:19.057 --> 0:27:23.057
<v Speaker 1>even more aggressively forward because we know that Putin really

0:27:23.137 --> 0:27:25.297
<v Speaker 1>is all talk. Now, I think that that makes no sense,

0:27:26.177 --> 0:27:34.577
<v Speaker 1>because Putin not doing a nuclear reprisal just because one

0:27:34.697 --> 0:27:37.977
<v Speaker 1>so called red line wasn't crossed doesn't mean he wouldn't

0:27:37.977 --> 0:27:39.937
<v Speaker 1>do it for an additional one. Like one doesn't that

0:27:40.097 --> 0:27:41.977
<v Speaker 1>one thing doesn't lead to the other there in the

0:27:41.977 --> 0:27:44.937
<v Speaker 1>logical construction, it's just like an assumption or a conjecture.

0:27:45.977 --> 0:27:49.137
<v Speaker 1>And second, you don't even know I mean, these people

0:27:49.137 --> 0:27:50.737
<v Speaker 1>don't even know what a red line is. I mean

0:27:50.777 --> 0:27:52.937
<v Speaker 1>they use that term because Obama said it once at

0:27:52.937 --> 0:27:56.257
<v Speaker 1>a press conference in twenty twelve regarding Syria, and then

0:27:56.257 --> 0:28:00.577
<v Speaker 1>it just became this like constantly invoked cliche that really

0:28:00.617 --> 0:28:05.377
<v Speaker 1>has no tangible content to it other than what people

0:28:06.537 --> 0:28:11.417
<v Speaker 1>are speculating might be like the point of no return

0:28:11.497 --> 0:28:15.737
<v Speaker 1>for a certain world in like military and national security

0:28:15.777 --> 0:28:19.417
<v Speaker 1>analysis circles. It is used all the time. And when

0:28:19.457 --> 0:28:22.177
<v Speaker 1>they talk about war gaming, which is another thing, by

0:28:22.217 --> 0:28:27.057
<v Speaker 1>the way, that doesn't I've partaken in war games in

0:28:27.097 --> 0:28:30.057
<v Speaker 1>my past life, I've seen and the problem with war

0:28:30.137 --> 0:28:31.697
<v Speaker 1>games is not a game, and so you have no

0:28:31.737 --> 0:28:34.337
<v Speaker 1>idea how the war is actually going to go, gives you,

0:28:34.377 --> 0:28:38.457
<v Speaker 1>at best a very rough approximation of how conventional force

0:28:38.577 --> 0:28:43.737
<v Speaker 1>on force would react if the following dependent variables are

0:28:43.737 --> 0:28:47.497
<v Speaker 1>all true. That I'll said on even just the redlines issue.

0:28:48.057 --> 0:28:52.177
<v Speaker 1>The notion that there is an axiomatic where that there's

0:28:52.217 --> 0:28:57.377
<v Speaker 1>a dogmatic and immediate response that you would get from

0:28:57.417 --> 0:28:59.977
<v Speaker 1>an action independent of everything everything else going on, I

0:28:59.977 --> 0:29:02.097
<v Speaker 1>think that is it is a problematic way of thinking

0:29:02.137 --> 0:29:04.537
<v Speaker 1>about it, right. I mean they could say, well, redline

0:29:04.537 --> 0:29:07.017
<v Speaker 1>as if someone goes to take the capital city or something. Well,

0:29:07.097 --> 0:29:09.017
<v Speaker 1>I mean certain red lines are so obvious you don't

0:29:09.057 --> 0:29:10.937
<v Speaker 1>need to say them. And others I think would be

0:29:11.017 --> 0:29:15.177
<v Speaker 1>more situational, which brings us back into Ukraine and what

0:29:15.297 --> 0:29:19.617
<v Speaker 1>Putin is willing to do here in order to see

0:29:19.657 --> 0:29:21.537
<v Speaker 1>this thing through, which I think, by the way, is

0:29:21.977 --> 0:29:24.777
<v Speaker 1>he'll see it through with whatever he can, however he can.

0:29:25.777 --> 0:29:28.657
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to ask you go ahead, sorry, I was

0:29:28.657 --> 0:29:30.417
<v Speaker 1>just gonna make a quick a quick point on that,

0:29:30.577 --> 0:29:33.457
<v Speaker 1>and the certainty that these people have meaning like this

0:29:33.857 --> 0:29:37.897
<v Speaker 1>conventional nat SEC community, who I think probably the one

0:29:37.937 --> 0:29:41.177
<v Speaker 1>demographic on Earth that I can most confidently say is

0:29:41.217 --> 0:29:46.017
<v Speaker 1>just full of crap almost twenty four to seven and

0:29:46.217 --> 0:29:50.897
<v Speaker 1>almost universally with so few exceptions that like, they don't

0:29:50.897 --> 0:29:53.017
<v Speaker 1>even really factor into whether you can just declare them

0:29:53.137 --> 0:29:57.337
<v Speaker 1>universally full of crap. One thing that they don't factor

0:29:57.377 --> 0:30:00.017
<v Speaker 1>into this whole newfound certain city that they have about

0:30:00.137 --> 0:30:08.097
<v Speaker 1>Putin's decklessness or how he's really just you know, feinting

0:30:08.257 --> 0:30:11.257
<v Speaker 1>when he suggests that there could be lines, is we

0:30:11.337 --> 0:30:17.297
<v Speaker 1>have plentiful evidence that there have been escalatory tit for

0:30:17.497 --> 0:30:21.937
<v Speaker 1>tat exchanges between the United States and Russia that have

0:30:22.817 --> 0:30:26.177
<v Speaker 1>heightened the intensity of the conflict. Right and here, let's

0:30:26.817 --> 0:30:28.817
<v Speaker 1>just to give one example. And when I say the

0:30:28.897 --> 0:30:33.137
<v Speaker 1>US and Russia, you know, I'm including Ukraine within the

0:30:33.217 --> 0:30:36.777
<v Speaker 1>US side of that dichotomy because Ukraine only exists as

0:30:36.777 --> 0:30:41.617
<v Speaker 1>a state right now because of the sponsorship of US,

0:30:42.617 --> 0:30:46.217
<v Speaker 1>and not even just the military portion of the Ukrainian

0:30:46.257 --> 0:30:50.017
<v Speaker 1>state either the civil state as well, like the USA.

0:30:50.137 --> 0:30:53.057
<v Speaker 1>I d is just paying all the state pensions and

0:30:53.297 --> 0:30:56.657
<v Speaker 1>benefits of state employees in Ukraine. But that's side issue.

0:30:57.457 --> 0:31:02.057
<v Speaker 1>But when Ukraine, remember it did that truck bombing attack

0:31:02.177 --> 0:31:08.297
<v Speaker 1>on the Kirch Bridge in Crimea in October, which was

0:31:08.337 --> 0:31:13.137
<v Speaker 1>odd because or odd the standpoint of it had certain

0:31:13.417 --> 0:31:18.977
<v Speaker 1>kind of classical markers of what we've come to believe

0:31:19.257 --> 0:31:21.497
<v Speaker 1>would constitute a terrorist attack. But of course it wasn't

0:31:21.497 --> 0:31:25.297
<v Speaker 1>called that at all in Western media because that would

0:31:25.697 --> 0:31:30.457
<v Speaker 1>impune Ukraine and can't do that because you know, the

0:31:30.577 --> 0:31:33.617
<v Speaker 1>high principle always is to be a partisan for one

0:31:33.617 --> 0:31:35.897
<v Speaker 1>of the warring parties rather than be you know, truthful

0:31:35.937 --> 0:31:38.737
<v Speaker 1>about stuff. Sends to be the case with warfare, at

0:31:38.817 --> 0:31:43.657
<v Speaker 1>least as I have observed it when that happened, which

0:31:43.697 --> 0:31:52.377
<v Speaker 1>is obviously a fairly adventurous or audacious act on the

0:31:52.497 --> 0:31:57.697
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine Special forces part given the kind of centrality of

0:31:57.777 --> 0:32:00.697
<v Speaker 1>CRIMEA to like what seems to be Putin's sort of

0:32:00.737 --> 0:32:05.857
<v Speaker 1>conception of his sort of historical epoch as leader of Russia,

0:32:05.897 --> 0:32:09.377
<v Speaker 1>and that bridge is one that he personally oversaw the

0:32:09.417 --> 0:32:13.777
<v Speaker 1>construction of and opened it relatively recently. Once that happened,

0:32:14.257 --> 0:32:17.577
<v Speaker 1>Russia did escalate in turn. So that was an escalation

0:32:17.617 --> 0:32:19.177
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that it opened up sort of a

0:32:19.257 --> 0:32:25.657
<v Speaker 1>new sphere of warfare and a new newly audacious sort

0:32:25.657 --> 0:32:29.857
<v Speaker 1>of tactic of warfare. And then Russia did the same

0:32:29.977 --> 0:32:35.217
<v Speaker 1>in that it reciprocally then began what became a months

0:32:35.257 --> 0:32:42.337
<v Speaker 1>long campaign of bombing civilian infrastructure in Ukraine, the electrical

0:32:42.377 --> 0:32:46.977
<v Speaker 1>grids and whatever. It was not even not even ambiguous

0:32:47.017 --> 0:32:50.497
<v Speaker 1>if that was portrayed by Russia as at least in

0:32:50.537 --> 0:32:53.937
<v Speaker 1>part retaliation for the truck bombing on the bridge. Right,

0:32:54.097 --> 0:32:58.537
<v Speaker 1>So when people in these national security cliques say that, oh,

0:32:58.577 --> 0:33:01.457
<v Speaker 1>the red lines are all of bluff, we've you know,

0:33:01.577 --> 0:33:04.697
<v Speaker 1>Putin has belied with his actions, any idea that we

0:33:04.697 --> 0:33:07.457
<v Speaker 1>should be concerned about this in terms of esculatory potential.

0:33:07.977 --> 0:33:10.777
<v Speaker 1>What they I think willfully or I think there or

0:33:11.337 --> 0:33:13.337
<v Speaker 1>even though either they willfully ignore it or they're so

0:33:13.417 --> 0:33:16.497
<v Speaker 1>ideologically intoxicated that they can't bring themselves to even be

0:33:16.497 --> 0:33:20.737
<v Speaker 1>able to perceive it anymore, what they're not mentioning is

0:33:20.777 --> 0:33:24.217
<v Speaker 1>that there is a huge array of evidence that there

0:33:24.337 --> 0:33:31.857
<v Speaker 1>is this kind of center synergetic esculatory dynamic in Ukraine

0:33:32.257 --> 0:33:35.377
<v Speaker 1>where we do we can anticipate that Russia will escalate

0:33:35.897 --> 0:33:39.617
<v Speaker 1>given escalatory behavior that you know us, the US does,

0:33:39.737 --> 0:33:42.777
<v Speaker 1>or that Ukraine does in tandem with the US. So

0:33:42.857 --> 0:33:45.417
<v Speaker 1>that dynamic exists. It's just a point of like how

0:33:45.497 --> 0:33:48.457
<v Speaker 1>high does the escalatory ladder reach to the point where

0:33:48.497 --> 0:33:53.097
<v Speaker 1>it becomes something truly kind of clismics such as nuclear use.

0:33:53.777 --> 0:33:57.497
<v Speaker 1>I want to come back to the very important, I

0:33:57.537 --> 0:34:01.577
<v Speaker 1>would argue central question of is this all from the

0:34:01.697 --> 0:34:05.057
<v Speaker 1>US perspective and what the Bide administration has done to

0:34:05.097 --> 0:34:07.737
<v Speaker 1>this point a massive blunder. But hold that for a second.

0:34:07.737 --> 0:34:09.297
<v Speaker 1>I want to come back to it. I want to

0:34:09.337 --> 0:34:11.737
<v Speaker 1>talk about the Tunnel Towers Foundation for a second. Born

0:34:11.857 --> 0:34:13.537
<v Speaker 1>from the tragedy of nine to eleven, the tone of

0:34:13.577 --> 0:34:16.537
<v Speaker 1>the Towers Foundation has been honoring America's heroes ever since.

0:34:16.897 --> 0:34:19.657
<v Speaker 1>The Foundation honors fallen and severely injured heroes in their

0:34:19.657 --> 0:34:22.897
<v Speaker 1>families with mortgage free homes. This year alone, hundreds of

0:34:22.897 --> 0:34:25.537
<v Speaker 1>gold Star on fallen first responder families with young children

0:34:25.737 --> 0:34:28.457
<v Speaker 1>and our nation's most severely injured veterans and first responders

0:34:28.457 --> 0:34:31.777
<v Speaker 1>are receiving homes. More than five hundred homeless veterans received

0:34:31.817 --> 0:34:35.097
<v Speaker 1>housing and services last year. More than fifteen hundred receiving

0:34:35.137 --> 0:34:38.057
<v Speaker 1>houses and services this year. This coming Memorial Day, all

0:34:38.137 --> 0:34:39.977
<v Speaker 1>the brave men and women law since nine to eleven

0:34:39.977 --> 0:34:42.297
<v Speaker 1>in the War on Terror are having their names read

0:34:42.337 --> 0:34:44.297
<v Speaker 1>aloud in a Tune of the Towers ceremony in our

0:34:44.337 --> 0:34:47.137
<v Speaker 1>nation's capital, to the tune of the Towers nine eleven institute.

0:34:47.137 --> 0:34:50.337
<v Speaker 1>The foundation is educating kids in kindergarten through twelfth grade

0:34:50.337 --> 0:34:53.417
<v Speaker 1>about our nation's darkest day. Joined talleth the Towers on

0:34:53.417 --> 0:34:56.377
<v Speaker 1>its mission to do good. Please help America to never

0:34:56.417 --> 0:34:59.537
<v Speaker 1>forget its greatest heroes. Join me in donating eleven dollars

0:34:59.577 --> 0:35:01.377
<v Speaker 1>a month the tunne of the Towers at t twot

0:35:01.617 --> 0:35:05.897
<v Speaker 1>dot org. That's t the number two t t twot

0:35:06.097 --> 0:35:10.377
<v Speaker 1>dot org. All right, mister Michael Tracy, Is this a

0:35:10.417 --> 0:35:14.977
<v Speaker 1>massive blunder in the making the US role in the

0:35:15.097 --> 0:35:18.457
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine Russia War? Or is this something that can drag

0:35:18.537 --> 0:35:21.697
<v Speaker 1>on and it will just be another budget item that

0:35:21.817 --> 0:35:28.257
<v Speaker 1>some people complain about but eventually no real consequences. Well,

0:35:28.257 --> 0:35:33.737
<v Speaker 1>I guess it depends on what the desired outcome is

0:35:33.857 --> 0:35:38.257
<v Speaker 1>or what objective is being pursued. Because given the objective

0:35:38.297 --> 0:35:42.177
<v Speaker 1>that was articulated around when the war started, or at

0:35:42.257 --> 0:35:46.017
<v Speaker 1>least in the first several months, you could make an

0:35:46.097 --> 0:35:50.137
<v Speaker 1>argument that far from being a blunder, it's actually been

0:35:50.217 --> 0:35:57.577
<v Speaker 1>a grand success in that when Lloyd Austin and Anthony

0:35:57.657 --> 0:36:02.097
<v Speaker 1>Blincoln first made their triumphant entrance into Ukraine after the

0:36:02.097 --> 0:36:06.057
<v Speaker 1>war started in April, Austin made a comment that became

0:36:06.177 --> 0:36:11.217
<v Speaker 1>fairly well known and widely remarked where he said that

0:36:11.257 --> 0:36:14.457
<v Speaker 1>one of the chief aims of US policy in Ukraine

0:36:14.537 --> 0:36:18.497
<v Speaker 1>was not merely to enable Ukraine to achieve victory on

0:36:18.537 --> 0:36:24.537
<v Speaker 1>the battlefield, but to quote weak in Russia. And unless

0:36:24.537 --> 0:36:28.257
<v Speaker 1>you think the Secretary of Defense is just off his

0:36:28.417 --> 0:36:34.777
<v Speaker 1>rocker and freelancing without any sort of authorization or without

0:36:35.097 --> 0:36:39.257
<v Speaker 1>commenting on a policy ambition that really does exist, I

0:36:39.337 --> 0:36:41.217
<v Speaker 1>think it was fair at the time and still fair

0:36:41.257 --> 0:36:45.097
<v Speaker 1>now to believe him when he says that is a

0:36:45.137 --> 0:36:48.417
<v Speaker 1>goal of US policy. Right. And there was also a

0:36:48.457 --> 0:36:52.457
<v Speaker 1>column that was published by Neil Ferguson and Bloomberg in

0:36:52.497 --> 0:36:56.657
<v Speaker 1>March of last year where he claimed to have overheard

0:36:56.737 --> 0:37:00.617
<v Speaker 1>a Biden administration official blabbing at some function where the

0:37:00.697 --> 0:37:04.977
<v Speaker 1>official blurted out that the whole point of this Ukraine

0:37:05.017 --> 0:37:08.297
<v Speaker 1>interventions policy was to quote bleed Russia dry, Right, which

0:37:09.537 --> 0:37:13.977
<v Speaker 1>then kind of gives a little bit more explanatory power

0:37:14.097 --> 0:37:18.017
<v Speaker 1>to why certain decisions have gone the way they have. Right.

0:37:18.297 --> 0:37:21.057
<v Speaker 1>So we talked before about the people who are complaining

0:37:21.057 --> 0:37:25.257
<v Speaker 1>about the laxity of the deployment of different weapons systems, right,

0:37:25.257 --> 0:37:28.537
<v Speaker 1>they want it done faster, and they don't want any

0:37:28.657 --> 0:37:32.377
<v Speaker 1>sort of more hindrances in terms of which styles of

0:37:32.377 --> 0:37:35.697
<v Speaker 1>weapons can be sent. Well, if your whole object is

0:37:35.737 --> 0:37:38.257
<v Speaker 1>to just bleed, rush, or dry, then maybe your idea

0:37:38.297 --> 0:37:42.017
<v Speaker 1>would be to just prolong the conflict and escalate it

0:37:42.097 --> 0:37:45.617
<v Speaker 1>incrementally and gradually, rather than dumping everything into the war

0:37:45.697 --> 0:37:47.657
<v Speaker 1>zone at once, because the idea is just to have

0:37:47.897 --> 0:37:52.137
<v Speaker 1>Russia burn its resources and eventually weaken it to the

0:37:52.137 --> 0:37:56.297
<v Speaker 1>point that something can be done in terms of potentially

0:37:56.337 --> 0:38:02.577
<v Speaker 1>fostering regime change or some other resolution. So yeah, in

0:38:02.777 --> 0:38:06.577
<v Speaker 1>terms of a blunder from a more i guess substantive perspective,

0:38:06.617 --> 0:38:09.537
<v Speaker 1>so kind of doing away with like whatever framework the

0:38:09.577 --> 0:38:16.217
<v Speaker 1>actual advocates of the intervention have adopted for themselves that yeah, yeah,

0:38:16.257 --> 0:38:22.577
<v Speaker 1>well yeah, or like what is what will reduce the

0:38:22.617 --> 0:38:26.977
<v Speaker 1>incidents of just mass death and suffering and destruction. I

0:38:27.017 --> 0:38:28.857
<v Speaker 1>always get a kick out of these people who have

0:38:28.977 --> 0:38:36.057
<v Speaker 1>been hardcore champions of US interventionist foreign policy, because in

0:38:36.177 --> 0:38:39.657
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine they've gotten their way. I mean, they always erect

0:38:39.737 --> 0:38:44.937
<v Speaker 1>these boogeyman of isolationists as though everybody's kind of, you know,

0:38:46.017 --> 0:38:48.417
<v Speaker 1>chomping at the bit. These isolationists are all chopping at

0:38:48.417 --> 0:38:52.297
<v Speaker 1>the bit to just undercut US policy because they're they're

0:38:52.337 --> 0:38:55.777
<v Speaker 1>so sinister and they have such outside influence, whereas I mean,

0:38:55.817 --> 0:39:00.377
<v Speaker 1>there's no isolationist. Isolationism is not the policy of the

0:39:00.497 --> 0:39:03.977
<v Speaker 1>US is following in Ukraine right now, Certainly the interventionists

0:39:03.977 --> 0:39:06.057
<v Speaker 1>have gotten their way. I mean, there's a massive, sprawling,

0:39:06.137 --> 0:39:09.737
<v Speaker 1>multidimensional intervention as of as we speak in Ukraine, and

0:39:09.777 --> 0:39:12.057
<v Speaker 1>it's going on for a year, and it's escalating pretty

0:39:12.137 --> 0:39:18.057
<v Speaker 1>much by the week. But they'll they'll sort of posture

0:39:18.697 --> 0:39:21.337
<v Speaker 1>as having the moral high ground. Right, So the people

0:39:21.337 --> 0:39:25.217
<v Speaker 1>who maybe are skeptical of intervention in US foreign policy,

0:39:25.297 --> 0:39:31.337
<v Speaker 1>they're morally blighted, they're sinister, they have ulterior motives, maybe

0:39:31.337 --> 0:39:36.177
<v Speaker 1>they're paid by Russia whatever, or doing propaganda or spreading disinformation.

0:39:36.177 --> 0:39:38.257
<v Speaker 1>Whereas the people who are champions of this policy, they

0:39:38.257 --> 0:39:41.257
<v Speaker 1>have the moral high ground, they understand the stakes. They're

0:39:41.337 --> 0:39:44.897
<v Speaker 1>like humanitarians of some kind. Meanwhile, look at the fruits

0:39:44.937 --> 0:39:47.057
<v Speaker 1>of the policy that they've been voted for the past year.

0:39:47.537 --> 0:39:51.097
<v Speaker 1>The German intelligence services, at least it's reported by Drshpiegel

0:39:51.137 --> 0:39:58.577
<v Speaker 1>a few weeks ago, said that there are hundreds of bodies,

0:39:58.897 --> 0:40:03.497
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of dead Ukrainian soldiers piling up every day in

0:40:03.537 --> 0:40:06.497
<v Speaker 1>the war as of at least late January, and then

0:40:06.657 --> 0:40:09.217
<v Speaker 1>also a heck of a lot of Russian casualties apparently,

0:40:09.257 --> 0:40:12.577
<v Speaker 1>although we don't know the precise figures. Let's just I

0:40:12.617 --> 0:40:16.017
<v Speaker 1>don't know, give a ballpark estimate of I don't know,

0:40:16.737 --> 0:40:19.297
<v Speaker 1>six hundred, seven hundred. If there's at least one hundred

0:40:19.337 --> 0:40:21.497
<v Speaker 1>a day right just on the Ukraine side, then like

0:40:21.537 --> 0:40:26.017
<v Speaker 1>a lower tier estimate would be like a thousand killed

0:40:26.017 --> 0:40:29.857
<v Speaker 1>in action a week, right, something like that. You have

0:40:29.977 --> 0:40:34.257
<v Speaker 1>the you have the moral standing or you you presume

0:40:34.337 --> 0:40:37.337
<v Speaker 1>yourself to have the moral standing to pontificate about the

0:40:37.417 --> 0:40:41.377
<v Speaker 1>humanitarian virtue that you embody by your advocacy of this

0:40:41.737 --> 0:40:46.057
<v Speaker 1>interventionist position when the results of it are a thousand,

0:40:46.377 --> 0:40:51.737
<v Speaker 1>like twenty year olds blown to bits every week. I

0:40:51.777 --> 0:40:56.177
<v Speaker 1>don't really I'm not sure that you have the really

0:40:56.497 --> 0:41:01.297
<v Speaker 1>the right to be pontificating, as I just jump in

0:41:01.337 --> 0:41:04.857
<v Speaker 1>really quickly here, because if it were either a Democrat

0:41:04.857 --> 0:41:07.457
<v Speaker 1>interventionist or there are, as you point out at the

0:41:07.497 --> 0:41:10.817
<v Speaker 1>beginning of our discussion, the right, there's more or dissent

0:41:10.977 --> 0:41:13.497
<v Speaker 1>about this issue than on the left. I don't I

0:41:13.537 --> 0:41:16.777
<v Speaker 1>do not see any Democrat pundits of any platform or

0:41:16.857 --> 0:41:20.337
<v Speaker 1>standing a considerable platform who are opposed to what's going

0:41:20.377 --> 0:41:22.577
<v Speaker 1>on in Ukraine. I do see, you know, Tucker Carlson,

0:41:22.617 --> 0:41:26.737
<v Speaker 1>for example, very prominently is a skeptic of what's going

0:41:26.777 --> 0:41:29.337
<v Speaker 1>on with US intervention in Ukraine. But the people that

0:41:29.377 --> 0:41:32.657
<v Speaker 1>aren't skeptics, what they would say to you, Michael, is Okay, yeah,

0:41:32.737 --> 0:41:35.257
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of casualties going on, but if we

0:41:35.257 --> 0:41:38.697
<v Speaker 1>weren't giving the Ukrainians to fight, it would be an

0:41:38.697 --> 0:41:44.337
<v Speaker 1>invasion by Putin with genocide and tyranny and even more casualties.

0:41:44.377 --> 0:41:46.377
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I don't subscribe to this theory. I'm

0:41:46.377 --> 0:41:49.697
<v Speaker 1>just saying, what do you what is your response to

0:41:49.737 --> 0:41:55.617
<v Speaker 1>what would clearly be their attack at that point of view, Well, right,

0:41:55.657 --> 0:41:57.977
<v Speaker 1>they have to immediately resort to conjuring up one of

0:41:57.977 --> 0:42:04.017
<v Speaker 1>these counterfactual scenarios and make everybody really intimidated by this

0:42:04.097 --> 0:42:07.537
<v Speaker 1>hypothetical prospect of you know, mass genocide or you know,

0:42:07.937 --> 0:42:11.057
<v Speaker 1>who are doing a blitzkrieg throughout the rest of East

0:42:11.377 --> 0:42:13.737
<v Speaker 1>of Europe, or one of these other more you know,

0:42:15.097 --> 0:42:19.537
<v Speaker 1>extreme scenarios that they conveniently don't have to ever prove

0:42:19.817 --> 0:42:23.537
<v Speaker 1>are true, because they're intentionally bringing up a counter factual

0:42:23.617 --> 0:42:27.337
<v Speaker 1>that can't be proven or disproven, whereas I have the

0:42:27.417 --> 0:42:29.977
<v Speaker 1>luxury of looking at the facts on the ground and

0:42:30.017 --> 0:42:31.897
<v Speaker 1>what has actually been done and what is in the

0:42:31.937 --> 0:42:36.017
<v Speaker 1>observable record, and what can be empirically verified. And that's

0:42:36.057 --> 0:42:37.857
<v Speaker 1>the fruits of the policy that they've promoted. I mean,

0:42:37.897 --> 0:42:40.057
<v Speaker 1>they're they're the ones who have been chanting stand with

0:42:40.137 --> 0:42:44.777
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine for a year, waving flags, demanding escalations in weapons

0:42:44.817 --> 0:42:52.137
<v Speaker 1>provision and just being general advocates of the overall sort

0:42:52.137 --> 0:42:56.297
<v Speaker 1>of policy framework that's been employed in Ukraine by the US.

0:42:57.097 --> 0:43:03.377
<v Speaker 1>And yet somehow the mass death and destruction and economic

0:43:03.457 --> 0:43:10.377
<v Speaker 1>turmoil and you know, basically just total obliteration of Crans

0:43:10.457 --> 0:43:16.057
<v Speaker 1>state capacity and so on, none of that they bear

0:43:16.097 --> 0:43:21.577
<v Speaker 1>any responsibility for, because they'll claim, oh, what do you mean,

0:43:21.737 --> 0:43:23.977
<v Speaker 1>it's all just Russia. Now, of course, Russia is a

0:43:24.097 --> 0:43:27.097
<v Speaker 1>belligerent in the war. They're fighting the war. They're responsible

0:43:27.297 --> 0:43:30.577
<v Speaker 1>for the warfare that they undertake. Right, But this idea

0:43:30.657 --> 0:43:35.817
<v Speaker 1>that the United States hasn't pursued a policy explicitly that

0:43:36.337 --> 0:43:41.017
<v Speaker 1>was intended to facilitate the intensification of warfare. And then

0:43:41.137 --> 0:43:44.097
<v Speaker 1>we see intensified warfare on the battlefield and the casualties

0:43:44.137 --> 0:43:48.377
<v Speaker 1>associated with that. And there's no culpability at all or

0:43:48.497 --> 0:43:51.817
<v Speaker 1>no responsibility that is borne by the United States for it.

0:43:51.817 --> 0:44:00.217
<v Speaker 1>It's just a deflections. They are understandably resistant to being

0:44:01.017 --> 0:44:04.617
<v Speaker 1>called to account for the ramifications of what they promoted,

0:44:04.697 --> 0:44:08.177
<v Speaker 1>because what they what those ramifications are, we can see

0:44:08.217 --> 0:44:11.897
<v Speaker 1>with our own eyes. It's the ad miseration of Ukraine

0:44:11.937 --> 0:44:15.377
<v Speaker 1>and and with no end in sight. Well, that's that's

0:44:16.817 --> 0:44:18.337
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that I would be so smug if

0:44:18.337 --> 0:44:21.017
<v Speaker 1>I were in their position to somehow act like you've

0:44:21.057 --> 0:44:25.177
<v Speaker 1>been morally vindicated or tactically vindicated, or indicated in some

0:44:25.217 --> 0:44:32.057
<v Speaker 1>other sense. Given what seems like a rapidly expanding disaster,

0:44:33.017 --> 0:44:36.057
<v Speaker 1>where do you see it going? Because right now it

0:44:36.177 --> 0:44:40.137
<v Speaker 1>sounds like it very much sounds like this, because Biden

0:44:40.177 --> 0:44:42.817
<v Speaker 1>has said it, We're in it until the end, whatever

0:44:42.857 --> 0:44:46.297
<v Speaker 1>it takes, whatever it costs. That is the explicit policy

0:44:46.417 --> 0:44:49.537
<v Speaker 1>of the Biden White House and and really of the

0:44:49.577 --> 0:44:51.617
<v Speaker 1>of the uniparty. If there is such a thing and

0:44:51.617 --> 0:44:54.177
<v Speaker 1>a natural security there there really is, I think almost

0:44:54.177 --> 0:44:57.457
<v Speaker 1>more than anywhere else a uniparty um. That is the

0:44:57.497 --> 0:45:01.417
<v Speaker 1>position and Vladimir Putin is not backing off of this.

0:45:01.457 --> 0:45:03.657
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anyone believes he's going to back off

0:45:03.697 --> 0:45:06.337
<v Speaker 1>of this, even if they have another one hundred thousand

0:45:06.377 --> 0:45:11.897
<v Speaker 1>casualties this year. So where do you see it going? Well,

0:45:12.697 --> 0:45:14.897
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the fretting among if you want to

0:45:14.897 --> 0:45:16.377
<v Speaker 1>call at the uniparty, or at least you know, the

0:45:16.737 --> 0:45:21.137
<v Speaker 1>sort of mainline consensus of the national security operators who

0:45:21.137 --> 0:45:24.817
<v Speaker 1>were the most sort of art enthusiast for this gambit.

0:45:25.737 --> 0:45:29.297
<v Speaker 1>The main fretting that they do, it seems as regards

0:45:29.377 --> 0:45:33.977
<v Speaker 1>the ultimate outcome of the war is they're concerned that,

0:45:34.057 --> 0:45:35.857
<v Speaker 1>you know, Kevin McCarthy is all of a sudden going

0:45:35.897 --> 0:45:39.057
<v Speaker 1>to become an anti war activist and decide to cut

0:45:39.097 --> 0:45:45.057
<v Speaker 1>off aid to Ukraine, which was always such a ridiculous concept.

0:45:45.137 --> 0:45:48.097
<v Speaker 1>It was kind of manufactured as this mid term election

0:45:49.057 --> 0:45:51.697
<v Speaker 1>talking point by you know, Democrats and the media who

0:45:51.737 --> 0:45:54.977
<v Speaker 1>wanted to like paint McCarthy and the Republicans as somehow

0:45:54.977 --> 0:45:58.337
<v Speaker 1>stooges of Putin, and it wasn't actually in accordance with

0:45:58.377 --> 0:46:02.217
<v Speaker 1>anything McCarthy had ever really said or espoused. He made

0:46:02.217 --> 0:46:05.097
<v Speaker 1>one fleeting comment about how supposedly the Republicans don't want

0:46:05.097 --> 0:46:07.737
<v Speaker 1>to give Ukraine a blank check anymore. But you know,

0:46:07.777 --> 0:46:10.417
<v Speaker 1>everybody pretty much agrees with that statement, or he says

0:46:10.457 --> 0:46:15.177
<v Speaker 1>they do, Democrats and Republicans alike. I mean, Marco Rubio says, oh,

0:46:15.297 --> 0:46:17.297
<v Speaker 1>of course, we don't want to give Ukraine to blank check,

0:46:17.377 --> 0:46:19.937
<v Speaker 1>but we have to still send them tons of military equipment.

0:46:20.057 --> 0:46:21.537
<v Speaker 1>So like everybody can just claim that they're not in

0:46:21.537 --> 0:46:23.457
<v Speaker 1>favor of blank check. It didn't mean anything when McCarthy

0:46:23.497 --> 0:46:26.337
<v Speaker 1>said it. I mean he was actually criticizing Biden early

0:46:26.337 --> 0:46:30.017
<v Speaker 1>on in the war, starting last March or so, for

0:46:30.177 --> 0:46:34.777
<v Speaker 1>not being aggressive enough in sending, for example, or facilitating

0:46:34.817 --> 0:46:37.177
<v Speaker 1>the transfer of those MiG jets early on that Poland

0:46:37.177 --> 0:46:41.217
<v Speaker 1>wanted to deploy. And McCarthy was a critic of Biden

0:46:41.337 --> 0:46:45.777
<v Speaker 1>from a hawkish perspective on the war as at least

0:46:45.777 --> 0:46:50.617
<v Speaker 1>an earlier juncture, as have been the core leadership of

0:46:50.657 --> 0:46:53.377
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party, and that both the House and Senate

0:46:53.617 --> 0:46:58.817
<v Speaker 1>at least tophonic Steve Scalise, Kevin McCarthy all hardcore Ukraine

0:46:58.857 --> 0:47:01.577
<v Speaker 1>interventionist hawks. Now maybe they sort of like modulate their

0:47:01.657 --> 0:47:05.057
<v Speaker 1>rhetoric in certain contexts, given that they know there's a

0:47:05.177 --> 0:47:09.217
<v Speaker 1>bit more consternation about that position within elements of the

0:47:09.297 --> 0:47:12.817
<v Speaker 1>Republican colition, but doesn't change the fundamental policy that they're

0:47:12.857 --> 0:47:16.697
<v Speaker 1>still clear and on the record as in support of

0:47:16.857 --> 0:47:20.177
<v Speaker 1>same within with the Senate, with you know, Mitch McConnell,

0:47:20.297 --> 0:47:24.097
<v Speaker 1>John Thune, Rick Scott, etc. McConnell was here, as you

0:47:24.177 --> 0:47:26.777
<v Speaker 1>might know, at the Munich Security Conference with his blue

0:47:26.777 --> 0:47:30.657
<v Speaker 1>and white striped tie saying that look what you should

0:47:30.657 --> 0:47:33.057
<v Speaker 1>and he was right about this. What McConnell said was

0:47:33.057 --> 0:47:35.337
<v Speaker 1>because of course all these people at who want to

0:47:35.337 --> 0:47:37.217
<v Speaker 1>ask him questions of this event, they're all asking like,

0:47:37.217 --> 0:47:42.217
<v Speaker 1>what can you do to make sure that the the

0:47:42.217 --> 0:47:45.377
<v Speaker 1>the you know, Maga isolation as Republicans don't get their

0:47:45.377 --> 0:47:49.657
<v Speaker 1>way and the House Republicans and Senate Republicans make sure

0:47:49.697 --> 0:47:54.257
<v Speaker 1>that aid continues to flow uninhibited. He'll always he'll say

0:47:54.297 --> 0:47:56.217
<v Speaker 1>a variation of or he started saying, a variation of

0:47:56.217 --> 0:47:58.497
<v Speaker 1>a one that I think is actually just true. Whether

0:47:58.537 --> 0:48:00.777
<v Speaker 1>it's good or bad as another question, but he said

0:48:00.817 --> 0:48:06.217
<v Speaker 1>it's true. He said, don't really fixate on the handful

0:48:06.297 --> 0:48:09.217
<v Speaker 1>of sort of eccentric personalities, like especially in the House,

0:48:09.257 --> 0:48:12.377
<v Speaker 1>who get a lot of airtime, or forget about like

0:48:12.417 --> 0:48:15.897
<v Speaker 1>the social media chatter on this or the media commentary

0:48:16.337 --> 0:48:20.897
<v Speaker 1>TV commentary. Look at who the Republicans actually have impositions

0:48:21.057 --> 0:48:25.377
<v Speaker 1>of legislative power in the Congress, and he's right. The

0:48:25.377 --> 0:48:28.817
<v Speaker 1>heads of the three main committees that would be overseeing

0:48:29.417 --> 0:48:37.217
<v Speaker 1>the drafting of any any forthcoming Ukraine AID legislation are

0:48:37.337 --> 0:48:40.497
<v Speaker 1>among the most ardent hawks in either party on the subject.

0:48:40.537 --> 0:48:44.057
<v Speaker 1>Mike McCall, Mike Turner, etc. On the you know, the

0:48:44.057 --> 0:48:48.257
<v Speaker 1>Foreign Relations Committee, the Armed Services Committee, the actual committee chairs.

0:48:48.257 --> 0:48:54.057
<v Speaker 1>So people who would be exerting power over the formulation

0:48:54.137 --> 0:48:59.577
<v Speaker 1>of this procedurally in the House, they're all even they're

0:48:59.617 --> 0:49:03.897
<v Speaker 1>in that crowd that criticized Biden for not being hawkish enough. Okay,

0:49:04.937 --> 0:49:07.817
<v Speaker 1>So in terms of where the whole conflict is going,

0:49:07.897 --> 0:49:10.377
<v Speaker 1>I think that whole side of it, meaning people are

0:49:11.217 --> 0:49:16.777
<v Speaker 1>always cautioning or pointing out the specter of somehow Republicans

0:49:17.697 --> 0:49:21.217
<v Speaker 1>becoming an anti war caucus and cutting off the provision

0:49:21.257 --> 0:49:26.137
<v Speaker 1>of AID. I don't think that's a particularly realistic possibility,

0:49:26.217 --> 0:49:28.057
<v Speaker 1>or I don't at least don't see much evidence that

0:49:28.097 --> 0:49:30.577
<v Speaker 1>anybody should let that sort of dictate how they understand

0:49:30.617 --> 0:49:32.577
<v Speaker 1>what the trajectory of the war is, because it seems

0:49:32.577 --> 0:49:34.737
<v Speaker 1>like there's every reason to believe it'll just kind of

0:49:34.937 --> 0:49:37.897
<v Speaker 1>the status quo will continue in that respect, Where do

0:49:37.937 --> 0:49:42.057
<v Speaker 1>I see it going? I mean, you know, I'm hesitant

0:49:42.057 --> 0:49:46.937
<v Speaker 1>to answer that question in a speculative sense because that

0:49:46.977 --> 0:49:50.057
<v Speaker 1>always makes people look bad. Like we had. There's this

0:49:50.097 --> 0:49:53.697
<v Speaker 1>talking point that goes around now where we're told everybody believed,

0:49:53.777 --> 0:49:56.297
<v Speaker 1>or people will say and even like the Polish president

0:49:56.337 --> 0:50:00.697
<v Speaker 1>said it last night introducing Biden in Warsaw, and like

0:50:00.737 --> 0:50:02.977
<v Speaker 1>Alexei Navalni I saw saying, and everybody says it, it's

0:50:02.977 --> 0:50:04.737
<v Speaker 1>just like a matter of like just it's an article

0:50:04.737 --> 0:50:06.857
<v Speaker 1>of faith. It's part of like the war mythology. Now

0:50:06.897 --> 0:50:11.497
<v Speaker 1>that everybody believed somehow that Kiev would fall within three days,

0:50:11.497 --> 0:50:13.937
<v Speaker 1>and they were all wrong, because Ukraine showed how we're

0:50:13.937 --> 0:50:17.177
<v Speaker 1>sourceful it is and how bold its fighters are and

0:50:17.537 --> 0:50:19.617
<v Speaker 1>warded off the Russian menace heroically, and that's why we

0:50:19.697 --> 0:50:24.657
<v Speaker 1>then have to have this indefinite commitment of perpetual warfare

0:50:24.657 --> 0:50:28.937
<v Speaker 1>provision to Ukraine. Right, So I think that coal narrative

0:50:29.017 --> 0:50:31.857
<v Speaker 1>is a bit of a misnomer. And let's like, you know,

0:50:31.897 --> 0:50:34.937
<v Speaker 1>cleverly constructed war propagandic because everybody did not quote believe

0:50:34.977 --> 0:50:37.977
<v Speaker 1>that there was one briefing that Mark Milly gave in

0:50:38.217 --> 0:50:42.657
<v Speaker 1>early February where he suggested that Russia could or may

0:50:43.617 --> 0:50:48.817
<v Speaker 1>sees Kiev Kiev in one of several possible scenarios, and

0:50:48.817 --> 0:50:52.057
<v Speaker 1>then that was just extrapolated into oh, everyone unbelieved that

0:50:52.137 --> 0:50:54.897
<v Speaker 1>this was going to be happening with absolute certainty, which

0:50:54.937 --> 0:50:57.017
<v Speaker 1>was again not the case. But you can see why

0:50:57.137 --> 0:51:00.337
<v Speaker 1>Ukrainians or pro Ukraine advocates would want to hype that

0:51:00.897 --> 0:51:03.457
<v Speaker 1>as supposedly what happened, because it kind of gives their

0:51:04.337 --> 0:51:09.777
<v Speaker 1>endeavor this like heightened purpose and it's like this animating

0:51:10.337 --> 0:51:14.417
<v Speaker 1>sort of force for their argumentation. Here's what I can say,

0:51:14.497 --> 0:51:16.857
<v Speaker 1>is happening. I've rather almost try to figure out what

0:51:16.977 --> 0:51:18.937
<v Speaker 1>is happening then what may happen six months from now,

0:51:18.977 --> 0:51:23.377
<v Speaker 1>because I don't freaking know what is very unpredictable. Well,

0:51:23.417 --> 0:51:28.897
<v Speaker 1>what is happening is because you have this Western security establishment,

0:51:29.257 --> 0:51:31.217
<v Speaker 1>so to say, And I hate even using the word

0:51:31.257 --> 0:51:33.737
<v Speaker 1>West or Western in this context without scare quotes, because

0:51:33.777 --> 0:51:36.337
<v Speaker 1>it's such like a ridiculous conceit or the West, what

0:51:36.377 --> 0:51:38.257
<v Speaker 1>does that even mean? I mean, it's so sort of

0:51:38.537 --> 0:51:43.657
<v Speaker 1>annoying and self aggrandizing. What is happening is you do

0:51:43.737 --> 0:51:48.617
<v Speaker 1>see a hardening of the ideological zeal of the core

0:51:48.737 --> 0:51:55.337
<v Speaker 1>decision makers who are party to the development of the

0:51:55.537 --> 0:52:02.897
<v Speaker 1>just policy orientation of these security and state apparatus. Is

0:52:05.257 --> 0:52:08.937
<v Speaker 1>Biden being a chief example. I mean, I actually think

0:52:08.977 --> 0:52:14.377
<v Speaker 1>people under rate the significance of Biden's sincerely felt ideological

0:52:14.417 --> 0:52:17.137
<v Speaker 1>convictions on this. Like people think that Biden is just

0:52:17.217 --> 0:52:20.857
<v Speaker 1>senile and or his interest in Ukraine is all about

0:52:20.857 --> 0:52:23.417
<v Speaker 1>how like he wanted Hunter to get like sixty thousand

0:52:23.457 --> 0:52:25.977
<v Speaker 1>dollars a month from the Barisma board. That's like an

0:52:26.377 --> 0:52:31.697
<v Speaker 1>ancillarily related dimension of Biden's relationship with Ukraine. But I

0:52:31.737 --> 0:52:33.737
<v Speaker 1>am inclined really to take on his word when he

0:52:33.817 --> 0:52:39.097
<v Speaker 1>makes these incredibly zealous statements about how awesomely important he

0:52:39.297 --> 0:52:41.777
<v Speaker 1>views the conflict to be, and it would be consistent

0:52:41.817 --> 0:52:45.217
<v Speaker 1>with what his foreign policy views and what his emphasis

0:52:45.257 --> 0:52:48.297
<v Speaker 1>has been in public life as a member of the

0:52:48.337 --> 0:52:51.337
<v Speaker 1>Senate going back decades and then as Vice president. This

0:52:51.417 --> 0:52:53.977
<v Speaker 1>is bright within his ballywick as something that he thinks

0:52:54.097 --> 0:52:59.337
<v Speaker 1>is actually extraordinarily existentially civilizationally important. You can pull up

0:52:59.377 --> 0:53:01.577
<v Speaker 1>clips of him in the nineties, like being the person

0:53:01.657 --> 0:53:03.777
<v Speaker 1>that Bill Clinton and then later in the two thousands,

0:53:03.777 --> 0:53:07.937
<v Speaker 1>George W. Bush designated to usher through NATO expansion in

0:53:08.177 --> 0:53:11.697
<v Speaker 1>the Senate. You know, so while he might not have

0:53:11.737 --> 0:53:16.017
<v Speaker 1>been like a long time zealous, he might have been

0:53:16.057 --> 0:53:17.897
<v Speaker 1>like it have been a long time audiologue with regard

0:53:17.897 --> 0:53:21.697
<v Speaker 1>to like Afghanistan, right, which is why he allowed for

0:53:21.897 --> 0:53:25.257
<v Speaker 1>or you know, ordered the withdrawal in twenty twenty one.

0:53:26.497 --> 0:53:29.297
<v Speaker 1>In terms of Europe and um, you know, Soviet Union

0:53:29.337 --> 0:53:31.377
<v Speaker 1>and slash Russia relations in the United States, this is

0:53:31.417 --> 0:53:35.417
<v Speaker 1>something that he actually, you know, been deeply, seemingly ideologically

0:53:35.417 --> 0:53:37.657
<v Speaker 1>invested in for a long time. So I'll take him

0:53:37.657 --> 0:53:40.977
<v Speaker 1>at his word on that. And that's actually all the

0:53:41.017 --> 0:53:45.697
<v Speaker 1>more reason to presume that the commitment is going to

0:53:45.777 --> 0:53:48.857
<v Speaker 1>be indefinite, or at least there's no reason to think

0:53:48.897 --> 0:53:51.297
<v Speaker 1>that the current trajectory will change. And what is the

0:53:51.297 --> 0:53:58.577
<v Speaker 1>current trajectory. It's these escalatory spirals that are hit for

0:53:58.657 --> 0:54:04.617
<v Speaker 1>tat and have this center just a sort of relationship

0:54:04.657 --> 0:54:06.937
<v Speaker 1>with one another between the US, slash Ukraine and Russia.

0:54:07.257 --> 0:54:12.017
<v Speaker 1>That although people, I thought people claim that the red

0:54:12.057 --> 0:54:14.097
<v Speaker 1>lines were never crossed and Putin was bluffing right as

0:54:14.097 --> 0:54:16.497
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about before, We're at a point. Now,

0:54:16.537 --> 0:54:18.937
<v Speaker 1>I mean if I if I told you a year

0:54:18.937 --> 0:54:20.137
<v Speaker 1>and a half ago, or if you told me a

0:54:20.177 --> 0:54:22.457
<v Speaker 1>year and a half ago, right, that the US would

0:54:22.497 --> 0:54:28.377
<v Speaker 1>be essentially functionally effectively in a hot war with Russia

0:54:28.457 --> 0:54:33.137
<v Speaker 1>in that you have this incredibly intense operational involvement in

0:54:33.177 --> 0:54:37.817
<v Speaker 1>the actual combat that the US's engineering. You have the

0:54:37.857 --> 0:54:43.217
<v Speaker 1>weapons provision, the diplomatic side of it, the economic subsidy,

0:54:43.217 --> 0:54:45.177
<v Speaker 1>and so forth. If you had told me that and

0:54:45.257 --> 0:54:48.137
<v Speaker 1>given me some examples of like what this has manifested

0:54:48.137 --> 0:54:50.937
<v Speaker 1>as like, for example, in December of last year, there

0:54:50.977 --> 0:54:54.897
<v Speaker 1>was a drone strike three hundred miles inside Russia, Okay,

0:54:55.497 --> 0:55:01.617
<v Speaker 1>on an air base that housed part of Russia's strategic

0:55:01.857 --> 0:55:07.617
<v Speaker 1>nuclear fleet. Ukraine did another audacious act and did a

0:55:07.697 --> 0:55:10.657
<v Speaker 1>drone strike on that base. Now that's the US sponsoring

0:55:10.857 --> 0:55:14.177
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine's ability to do that. Whatever direct operational world the

0:55:14.257 --> 0:55:16.817
<v Speaker 1>US might have had in that particular action sort of

0:55:17.137 --> 0:55:19.777
<v Speaker 1>beside the point. It's only because of the US sponsorship

0:55:19.777 --> 0:55:21.577
<v Speaker 1>of the Ukraine military you can do anything at all.

0:55:21.897 --> 0:55:26.417
<v Speaker 1>Right now, if you had told me that that happened, right,

0:55:27.457 --> 0:55:36.617
<v Speaker 1>or that the US would be declaring through the words

0:55:36.617 --> 0:55:40.937
<v Speaker 1>of the President that nuclear apocalypse. Mr Biden said this

0:55:41.297 --> 0:55:47.737
<v Speaker 1>in October. Nuclear apo apocalypse is a greater threat than

0:55:47.737 --> 0:55:52.257
<v Speaker 1>at any time since the Cuban missile crisis, or you

0:55:52.257 --> 0:55:55.937
<v Speaker 1>had told me just a dozen or more other insane

0:55:56.017 --> 0:55:59.697
<v Speaker 1>things that are that exemplified this conflict, I mean even

0:55:59.737 --> 0:56:01.697
<v Speaker 1>just a few weeks ago or two weeks ago or so.

0:56:01.897 --> 0:56:06.857
<v Speaker 1>The Washington Post reported that when the Ukraine military fires

0:56:06.857 --> 0:56:10.337
<v Speaker 1>any rocket attacks on any at any Russian tar good,

0:56:11.337 --> 0:56:15.417
<v Speaker 1>that every single time, or virtually every single time, the

0:56:15.537 --> 0:56:19.217
<v Speaker 1>United States is effectively firing the rocket in that it's

0:56:19.257 --> 0:56:24.257
<v Speaker 1>providing such precise and granular real time intelligence that it's

0:56:24.337 --> 0:56:28.657
<v Speaker 1>essentially a second party to the actual conduct of the

0:56:28.657 --> 0:56:32.857
<v Speaker 1>strike through a base that the US has on the

0:56:32.897 --> 0:56:36.017
<v Speaker 1>periphery of Ukraine somewhere somewhere in one of these other

0:56:36.057 --> 0:56:38.897
<v Speaker 1>countries like Romania or Poland. I mean, that's that's insane.

0:56:38.937 --> 0:56:41.697
<v Speaker 1>That's like direct war with Russia. Okay, So people don't people,

0:56:41.737 --> 0:56:44.537
<v Speaker 1>but people have been habituated or they've been acclimated to

0:56:44.937 --> 0:56:49.017
<v Speaker 1>how jarring and insane that is over the last year

0:56:49.057 --> 0:56:51.817
<v Speaker 1>because of the way that they've approached this issue policy wise, mean,

0:56:51.857 --> 0:56:56.497
<v Speaker 1>the bind administration, Congress, etc. They've done the escalations incrementally.

0:56:56.897 --> 0:56:58.817
<v Speaker 1>The war first started, supposedly, it was like this limited

0:56:58.897 --> 0:57:01.937
<v Speaker 1>humanitarian aid mission with a couple of rifles and javelins,

0:57:01.937 --> 0:57:04.617
<v Speaker 1>and that was it. Now we're furnishing Ukraine and entirely

0:57:04.657 --> 0:57:07.737
<v Speaker 1>new military with F sixteens potentially, or at least that

0:57:07.777 --> 0:57:10.897
<v Speaker 1>we know now, Abram's tanks and Patriot bat reason everything else.

0:57:10.937 --> 0:57:15.137
<v Speaker 1>It's like, it's not Michael. We got to leave it there,

0:57:15.177 --> 0:57:18.017
<v Speaker 1>Michael Tracy. Everybody check out his substack. Michael will have

0:57:18.057 --> 0:57:19.737
<v Speaker 1>you back with more time to talk about this and

0:57:19.817 --> 0:57:22.257
<v Speaker 1>other subjects too. Thanks for being here on the show Man.

0:57:22.297 --> 0:57:24.977
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate you all right, enjoyed it. Thanks