WEBVTT - S03 Special Episode: Richard MacLean Smith Q & A and Book Reviews

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:03.000
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing better than feeling comfortable in your own shoes,

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>and that doesn't mean flopping down on the couch with

0:00:05.280 --> 0:00:08.640
<v Speaker 1>bunny slippers. Maybe you're a parent raising a little rock star,

0:00:09.119 --> 0:00:11.959
<v Speaker 1>or a tech nomad working from anywhere and jumping from

0:00:11.960 --> 0:00:14.920
<v Speaker 1>one thing to the next. Whoever you are, all Birds

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>wants you to be comfortable in your actual shoes too.

0:00:17.720 --> 0:00:21.279
<v Speaker 1>They're wool runners, pipers, and loungers are designed for a

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>level of coziness that makes you feel like you can

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:26.479
<v Speaker 1>do anything. You might even forget you're wearing them, and

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>their shoes are so stylish they go perfectly without wear

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:32.960
<v Speaker 1>whatever I want attitude. Alberts is all about loving mother

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 1>nature too, because no one wants to leave a bad footprint.

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Each shoe is carefully crafted from natural materials that tread

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 1>lightly on our planet, from ZQ certified Marino wool to

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:46.880
<v Speaker 1>a bouncy midsole made from sweet Foam, the world's first

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:50.959
<v Speaker 1>carbon negative EVA material made from sugarcane. So get comfortable

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 1>in your shoes. Get to know the wool runners, pipers

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>and loungers at Alberts dot com. That's alll bi rds

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Hello and welcome to Unexplained Extra, or this

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 1>special edition of Unexplained Extra, I should say with me

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Richard McClane Smith. So this week, as you may be aware,

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>I announced that I would do a one off sort

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:28.640
<v Speaker 1>of question and answer episode to coincide with the upcoming

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 1>release of the book Unexplained. In light of that announcement,

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I had a number of people asking me what were

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the books that had inspired me or the show, So

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I just thought, rather than putting up a list on

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>social media, why not just talk about them. And I've

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>been overwhelmed with the response, So thank you all so

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 1>much for getting in touch and given me your questions.

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I've managed to condense it down to about fifteen or so,

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:56.639
<v Speaker 1>I think. Apologies if I haven't included yours on the show.

0:01:56.960 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 1>So just a couple of quick, easy ones to start

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>off with. Few people had asked me about the music,

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 1>So the music and the show I composed that myself

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>and you can hear quite a large part of it

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 1>on the Unexplained SoundCloud. So if you wanted to hear that,

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 1>you could go to SoundCloud dot com forward slash Unexplained

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Podcast I think is the address and you can find

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 1>it there. And the other question that quite a few

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:22.520
<v Speaker 1>of you are asking, was is the book going to

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>be an audiobook as well? And will I be narrating it?

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:27.959
<v Speaker 1>And the answer to that is yes, I will be.

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:30.799
<v Speaker 1>And so at the moment, the book is due out

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 1>in the UK October twenty fifth, and we are sort

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:37.920
<v Speaker 1>of talking about getting it distributed in the US and

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Canada as well, So I think just watch this space

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>on that one. So let's begin. I had quite a

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 1>few questions in a similar vein to this one, so

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll just take one, which is from Conan, who asks

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:54.080
<v Speaker 1>have you ever had a personal supernatural experience? So the

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 1>short answer to that is no, But something that I

0:02:57.240 --> 0:03:00.160
<v Speaker 1>might talk about in more depth later on in the

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:03.800
<v Speaker 1>question is that I suppose you could also say that

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:08.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe I have, but I wasn't aware that it was supernatural.

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 1>But I think what I do find fascinating, though, is

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 1>that I have heard from lots of people, and from

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 1>people that I would consider to be perfectly rational and

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 1>intelligent people who claim that they have seen things that

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I might have previously dismissed. So I suppose that just

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:32.079
<v Speaker 1>leaves me wondering what it was exactly that was seen

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 1>or what was experienced So next one from Lee Britain.

0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Have you had an opportunity to meet with anyone directly

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>involved with any of the events that you've mentioned. If so,

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>who was the most convincing I have, Actually, I've not.

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 1>I haven't in person. I have over the phone or

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>on Skype or email. I've spoken to people that have

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 1>been at the center of some of these stories, and

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean they've all been convincing. I mean and in

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>fact that the sort of thread that runs through the

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 1>more really was that none of them were absolutely convinced

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 1>that what had been experienced was supernatural or paranormal, but

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I'd say they had an interest in that as a

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:18.279
<v Speaker 1>as a potential or a possibility in the main, I

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 1>guess I don't think they were making up what they

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 1>think they experienced. Did that make sense? So the next question, again,

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 1>this is one that I had quite a few questions

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>in a sort of that were similar in one way

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:35.479
<v Speaker 1>or another. So let's just take Steve. Steve asks of

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 1>all the podcasts you have researched, which if you found

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the most disturbing, Which is the most scariest. So this

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 1>is a difficult one. The ones that were disturbing and

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:47.039
<v Speaker 1>scary I think I would have to say, are the

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 1>ones that involved the most sort of traumatic outcomes or events.

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:52.479
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of the time, I mean a lot

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:55.359
<v Speaker 1>of the time, these stories, as terrifying as they might be,

0:04:55.440 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 1>they don't, you know, they don't result in somebody dying

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 1>or being killed. And except for one which I told

0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>in the first season, which was about you might know

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>it's called Demons in Suburbia, which was a story about

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:12.600
<v Speaker 1>a man called Michael Taylor who had quite tragically and

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 1>dramatically been affected in one way or another by an

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>exorcism that was practiced on him, and the consequence of

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>that was that he murdered his wife in quite horrific circumstances.

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:28.039
<v Speaker 1>So I don't have much more to say on that

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>because I don't I'm not so familiar with the case

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and life of Michael Taylor that I would be able

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>to comment possibly about the reasons and wise awarefores of

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 1>what happened. But that was certainly the one that I think,

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 1>as a story alone, was the most disturbing. Okay, so

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:47.600
<v Speaker 1>not particularly related to the last few questions, but let's

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 1>do the first book anyhow. So this book's been a

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 1>huge influence on me I think, not just for the show,

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 1>not for the way I write, or for the way

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I certainly would like to write or aspire to write.

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>It's a book that was reckoned mended to me quite

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:03.799
<v Speaker 1>a while ago as a sort of it was recommended

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 1>as a travel book, but I think the intention wasn't

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:08.840
<v Speaker 1>to reduce it in such a way. But that's how

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I remember it anyhow, and so when I read it,

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:14.720
<v Speaker 1>it opened up into so many other things that I

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 1>hadn't been expecting. So the book is called The Rings

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:22.720
<v Speaker 1>of Saturn's by W. G. Sibald. Superficially, the book presents

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>as an account of one man's journey through Suffolk, the

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Suffolk Coast, particularly in East Anglia in the United Kingdom.

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 1>But quite quickly it becomes apparent that there was quite

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:36.680
<v Speaker 1>a bit more going on. So you find yourself being

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 1>taken on this extraordinary, very melancholic journey into the workings

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 1>of Sibald's mind. I think the way he sort of

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 1>touches upon the things that the landscape inspires in him

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>in a sort of ruminations and his thoughts as as

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:57.719
<v Speaker 1>he's making this journey, and from that you get sort

0:06:57.760 --> 0:07:02.599
<v Speaker 1>of taken on this extraordinary sort of epic trip through

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>lots of different waypoints and connections that are being triggered

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>as as he's making his way through the countryside, and

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 1>it's become quite a sort of major touchdone I think

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 1>of modern psychogeographic writing. So I mean, I'm sure there

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 1>are lots of different opinions on this out there as

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 1>to the you know, the quality of it in compare

0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 1>in comparison to other books, but I would say that

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly become one of the better known sort of

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 1>examples of this sort of writing. Just the expanse of

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 1>information alone that throughout the book is quite extraordinary. It's

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 1>a sort of domino effect. He has sort of way

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 1>of exploding information from one thing, connecting from one thing

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 1>to the next. And actually a very sort of brief note,

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I would say, at one point he talks about Joseph

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:57.679
<v Speaker 1>Conrad being in lower stuff, I think, and he draws

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 1>a connection there between that as the beginning of a

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 1>journey that's endpoint was essentially the horrors of colonialism, and

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 1>so another book I would say to sort of very

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>briefly recommend that has been quite a big inspiration on

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>me and in some ways unexplained is Joseph Comrade's Heart

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 1>of Darkness. And so with this book, I think what

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I've drawn from it in terms of unexplained is just

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the sort of the sense of the horror of humanity

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>really and what human beings are capable of. And I'm

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 1>not quite sure this is explored in the book, but

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the sort of idea that human beings don't perpetrate evil

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:39.560
<v Speaker 1>acts that there's no such thing as evil in that respect,

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:43.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean that humanity is all of it. So for

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 1>me personally, I don't think there's a moral arbiter that

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:49.719
<v Speaker 1>dictates what is and what isn't evil. There's nobody is

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:53.440
<v Speaker 1>making that judgment on our behalf. We do that ourselves.

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Of course, we can as a society decide together which

0:08:57.480 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>things we determined to be wrong or bad or unpalatable

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:04.680
<v Speaker 1>or criminal. And as a sort of slight extension to

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 1>that point, I think the certainly the kind of setting

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 1>and the locations and many of the things that are

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 1>occurring in Heart of Darkness are based on true stories

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 1>and true things that happened, and I think the sort

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:19.320
<v Speaker 1>of ultimate true horror really is that, And I think

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I tend to find this quite often, is that the

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>reality of the stories. If you if you read the

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 1>actual stories about what took place under King Leopold the

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Second of Belgium, who was the spearheading this colonial campaign,

0:09:32.520 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 1>the fact is you find that it's almost impossible to

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 1>come up with the reality of the terrible things that

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>were happened. You know that the real story is even worse.

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 1>So let's try and come back a bit from that,

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:48.440
<v Speaker 1>because I think I don't know if I can take

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 1>that any any darker. So let's get back to questions.

0:09:52.160 --> 0:09:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's starting to get a sense now of

0:09:55.200 --> 0:09:59.839
<v Speaker 1>where Unexplained comes from. So is a message from Elizabeth.

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 1>So what determines what catches your interest? Is it mostly

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:05.440
<v Speaker 1>what intrigues you or more about how easy you find

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 1>to communicate the story? Well, I think what catches my

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 1>interest first and foremost, especially because of the nature of

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the show and it being based on ideas that are

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 1>unexplained and remained to this day unexplained. The key thing

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:23.600
<v Speaker 1>is is having a story that's not too easy to debunk,

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:26.559
<v Speaker 1>I suppose, or having a story that's not that doesn't

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 1>present itself too obviously as being a hoax. So I

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>suppose the best stories for me are the ones that

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:38.079
<v Speaker 1>sort of really stretched that suspension of disbelief as far

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 1>as possible. So sometimes I find that that will supersede

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 1>whether I personally am into that kind of story, and

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 1>as well, A lot of the time I find that

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 1>digging a bit deeper into the story, it will sort

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 1>of reveal itself to be actually more interesting and more

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 1>fascinating than I had first imagined. Okay, I've got quite

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 1>a few questions here about how I got involved in

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:07.560
<v Speaker 1>doing this, and what I was before unexplained and all

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:10.200
<v Speaker 1>that sort of stuff. So without giving too much away,

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:14.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to destroy the illusion completely, but I have,

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I think, for quite some time, been trying to write,

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 1>and you know, get somewhere doing that, and it's a

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:25.080
<v Speaker 1>case really of just discovering an outlet where I could

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 1>write something and it actually becomes something. A lot of

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the time, you know, if you're writing any form of writing,

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 1>really you're trying to get through some kind of gateway

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:38.440
<v Speaker 1>to get into something that legitimizes what you're doing and

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:41.080
<v Speaker 1>also gets what you're doing out there. So whether it's

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 1>to be published or to have an article printed in

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:46.599
<v Speaker 1>a magazine, or to have a TV show commission or

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:48.319
<v Speaker 1>something like that, you know, if you're very if you're

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 1>very lucky, and so those things to take time, and

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 1>they take a lot of effort, and they require you

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:57.560
<v Speaker 1>to be you're at the whim of somebody else's taste.

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think Explained really started as a combination of

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 1>having that ambition, but also the fascination with these stories

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 1>and not being quite sure what to do with them,

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:13.640
<v Speaker 1>and then discovering the podcast and what the podcast was.

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:16.200
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I think that's something we're a lot

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 1>more familiar with now, but a few years ago, you know,

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:20.719
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of I didn't really understand it in the

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>way that I do now, and I could craft it

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 1>myself and put it up myself and all that sort

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. The show was kind of born, and it

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>evolved a bit in the process of, you know, understanding

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:37.120
<v Speaker 1>what a podcast can be and all that sort of stuff.

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 1>And and I've been completely overwhelmed by the fact that

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:43.559
<v Speaker 1>that anybody listened to it at all. So I mean,

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>this is a great chance to thank you all again.

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Anybody who listens to the show has supported the show

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:52.560
<v Speaker 1>for the incredible kind words and you know, and the

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:57.840
<v Speaker 1>encouragement that I've been given. Yeah, it's been extraordinary. And

0:12:57.920 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 1>just to finish that point off, ru Howe asks, or

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Ruhu says, I'm presuming you do it all in a dark,

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 1>wood paneled, book lined room, sitting in a leather armchair

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 1>with a pipe and a bottle of single malt. And

0:13:11.080 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the answer is yes, of course, that's exactly how I

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>do it. Rue also asks, is the cover picture of

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 1>reference to Twin Peaks? I think in many ways you

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 1>could probably say everything I do as a reference to

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Twin Peaks. So although that wasn't actually wasn't thinking of

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:28.959
<v Speaker 1>Twin Peaks when I chose it, But yes, of course,

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean subconsciously absolutely, it's probably where I've I've found

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 1>that I've got that idea from. So Christopher asks, my

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 1>question is do you have trouble sleeping at night or

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 1>going about your daily life having made podcasts on such

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 1>other worldly material? So I would say yes, So, yes,

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:50.679
<v Speaker 1>I do. I do because I am always thinking about

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the story or the next story, and invariably because of

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the subject matter it, Yeah, it becomes it's very easy

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:01.439
<v Speaker 1>for your imagination to run wild. So on that note,

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:03.719
<v Speaker 1>and I think this is the more seamless transition to

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the next book. So the next book that has inspired me,

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and Unexplained is actually a collection of stories, but primarily

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the one called Don't Look Now, which I'm sure many

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 1>of you will be familiar with, the Daphne Demurier short story,

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 1>which was later made into a brilliant film by Nicholas Rogue.

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 1>And so this really inspires me. And there's another book

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 1>as well I will talk about sort of in tandem

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 1>with this one, which is Joe Lindsay's Picnic Hanging Rock.

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>So there are lots of reasons why I love both

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:38.960
<v Speaker 1>these books, but I suppose we should we could start

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 1>with tone. So this is something I think I've probably

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 1>quite deliberately, in one way or another, try to replicate

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 1>in Unexplained, which is to create the idea of the

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of sense of a world that's familiar and real

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 1>and genuine and kind of scrutable, but then have this

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 1>air of something else, the possibility of something else, something

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 1>more enigmatic and and sort of intangible and you know,

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 1>magical in a way. I think you know, whether that

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 1>be spooky or terrifying magic or not. And I think

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 1>more than any other book that I've certainly read, these

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 1>these both these stories do that in an incredible ways,

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and I think picnicer Hanging Rock is. It's probably more

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 1>enigmatic since it's so essentially if you're not familiar with

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the story it's it was set I think in nineteen hundred,

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:37.960
<v Speaker 1>on Valentine's Day in nineteen hundred, some girls from a

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 1>school are taken on a trip through the outback in Australia,

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:43.200
<v Speaker 1>in Victoria, I think, in the state of Victoria and

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Australia to a sort of strange natural landmark known as

0:15:49.800 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Hanging Rock, which I've actually been to and it is

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 1>just as a sort of specials as sort of portrayed

0:15:56.520 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 1>in the book. But so anyway, a couple of these

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 1>schoolgirls going and as well as their teacher. I think

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I might have the wrong but they go missing and

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 1>there's no explanation, and I can't tell you much more

0:16:09.480 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 1>to give anything away, but it's incredibly mysterious, beautifully portrayed story,

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 1>and it's very sort of hypnotic that of course goes

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 1>into all sorts of other things about sort of adolescent

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>awakening and all sorts of things like that. So thoroughly

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 1>recommended anyway, whether you like ghost stories or not. It's

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 1>not actually imperative to enjoy the story, so we don't look.

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Now it's a sort of similar thing, but I think

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 1>there's more the sort of supernatural paranormal stuff going on,

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 1>which is particularly compelling because it's done in this way

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 1>where it's not sort of hysterical and so strange that

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 1>it's off putting or distracting. It's sort of to Maurier

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>and sort of merges them into the world that we

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 1>think we know in such a way that I don't

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 1>think has been I don't think has been bettered actually,

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, read those books. So back to the questions.

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I had a couple quite similar from Malcolm and Tom

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:14.159
<v Speaker 1>who asked do you have your own conclusions to the

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:17.399
<v Speaker 1>stories your research? And Tom asks are there any that

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you truly believe have answers that lie beyond known science?

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:24.199
<v Speaker 1>So these are good questions actually in relation to the

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 1>nature of the show, And you know, my kind of

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 1>thinking behind putting it together, and that really is that

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I know this might sound strange, but I don't. Going

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 1>back to Malcolm's question, do I have my own conclusions

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:39.200
<v Speaker 1>to the stories? I actually don't dwell on that too much.

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I think what makes them interesting is that they that

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:45.359
<v Speaker 1>they are these sort of open mysteries and unanswered questions

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 1>that then in turn invite new questions. And you know,

0:17:49.600 --> 0:17:52.919
<v Speaker 1>I think we're when you allow these stories to just

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of be, rather than try and interrogate them too much.

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that is where they sort of come most

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 1>alive and and provoke the most sort of interesting discussion.

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 1>And I think this is something I've tried to do

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 1>as well that I hope comes across, which is that

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:09.880
<v Speaker 1>it's not that that doesn't mean that the story has

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:13.360
<v Speaker 1>to be the ghost wasn't real, or it wasn't really

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:16.040
<v Speaker 1>a poltergeist or whatever, and that that's the end of

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the story. You know that if you were to that,

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 1>if we were able to conclude once and for all

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:23.879
<v Speaker 1>that no, this didn't happen, and this is actually what happened,

0:18:24.000 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and you have that sort of full fact laid out

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 1>in front of you, I think even if that were

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:30.359
<v Speaker 1>the case, I don't think that would be the end

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 1>of the story. Often say that I think even if

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:37.359
<v Speaker 1>it were to be proven once and for all that

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 1>God didn't exist, I think people would still believe in it,

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 1>or believe in her or him or however where you

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 1>hold the divine, and I think that in itself is

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of equally as fascinating as to whether there's a

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 1>definitive answer or not. Kind of draws me on to

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 1>my next question, which is from m who talks about

0:18:57.320 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 1>how I sometimes use the mysterious and the fourteen as

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 1>a lens to explore deeper historical and sociological themes, And

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:08.400
<v Speaker 1>is there any other literature that you are drawing on

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:12.359
<v Speaker 1>that specifically looks into the sociology of fear about the

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:16.639
<v Speaker 1>mysterious and the paranormal. So I don't specifically, but that

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 1>would be certainly be a very interesting thing to look

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:24.040
<v Speaker 1>at how people's fears maybe not manipulated, but we're sort

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:27.680
<v Speaker 1>of concentrated around specific ideas of the time or things

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:29.720
<v Speaker 1>that have happened in the time, and certainly today you

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:32.119
<v Speaker 1>can see the ways in which people's fears are stoked

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:36.160
<v Speaker 1>and manipulated by the media. And so one very good

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 1>documentary you can watch all about that is called The

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Power of Nightmares by Adam Curtis, which I thoroughly recommend

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 1>you want to learn a bit more about that. So

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:48.399
<v Speaker 1>the next book is Straw Dogs by the philosopher John Gray,

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:52.359
<v Speaker 1>not the same John Gray, who wrote Men Are from Mars,

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Women Are from Venus, a very different John Gray and

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 1>not the film is not the films draw Dogs. So

0:19:57.320 --> 0:20:02.440
<v Speaker 1>this is an entire thing on its own, straw Dogs

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 1>by John Gray. And the subtitle is Thoughts on Humans

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 1>and Other Animals. And I think when I read this book,

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 1>it was the first time I sort of really started

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 1>to understand and look a bit more broadly on the

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 1>human race and what it is to be human and

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:21.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of picking apart the delusion that we have about

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 1>who we are and our sort of deluded sense of

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:28.440
<v Speaker 1>separateness from the natural world, and the way we sort

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 1>of position ourselves apart from other animals. In fact, frequently

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:35.719
<v Speaker 1>you will often hear people say talk about humans and

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:38.680
<v Speaker 1>animals almost as if we're not part of that group.

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 1>So it goes into I mean, there's a lot more,

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:46.480
<v Speaker 1>way more than I can sort of expound on here,

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:50.560
<v Speaker 1>but I would, yes, just thoroughly recommend it. It's well

0:20:50.560 --> 0:20:53.720
<v Speaker 1>worth reading, and you know, I think it's it's a

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 1>complicated point about whether we need to be more aware

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 1>of the damage we do of the delusions that we

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:03.920
<v Speaker 1>have as human beings. I mean, you could also argue

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:08.120
<v Speaker 1>that into the being deluded. That is also a natural

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of form of existence in a way, but it

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:15.480
<v Speaker 1>certainly doesn't hurt to kind of think more broadly about

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 1>about that and what that means, and what that means

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:21.360
<v Speaker 1>for the way that we think of ourselves and think

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 1>of others as well. So next question is from Daniel,

0:21:26.119 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 1>what advice would you give to other creative types who

0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:31.360
<v Speaker 1>want to create cool stuff like you? Well, thank you

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:34.200
<v Speaker 1>first of all for calling Unexplained cool. That's very kind.

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:37.879
<v Speaker 1>But also I would just say as well that I

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:41.919
<v Speaker 1>think everybody is creative. Everybody is a creative type. We

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:44.680
<v Speaker 1>all in our own ways can be creative or find

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:48.399
<v Speaker 1>ways to be creative. But that being said, of course

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I think you know what you mean, So I would say,

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously it depends on what it is you're

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:57.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to create. But if we're talking about writing, for example,

0:21:57.240 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 1>and of course Unexplained as a podcast, but really what

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>it's based on is writing and storytelling and having a

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:09.400
<v Speaker 1>sense of how to engage an audience. I don't know

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 1>to what degree I'm especially successful at doing that or not,

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:15.959
<v Speaker 1>but I think if I've learned anything, really, it's understanding

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 1>structure and the structure of storytelling. And I think when

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:21.439
<v Speaker 1>I was starting out, when I was much younger, and

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:24.679
<v Speaker 1>I had ambitions of writing and aspirations of doing all

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 1>sorts of things with that, I didn't really understand why

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:30.440
<v Speaker 1>it was important in the way that I do now,

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 1>and which is really that it's not that you need

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 1>to follow rules and you need to kind of adopt

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:41.679
<v Speaker 1>certain techniques. It's just more that having an understanding of

0:22:41.720 --> 0:22:44.399
<v Speaker 1>them is it gives you such a head start in

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:48.440
<v Speaker 1>terms of approaching a blank page, which is as most

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:50.919
<v Speaker 1>people who write, I imagine will tell you, is the

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:55.119
<v Speaker 1>kind of the worst bit is that initial getting something

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 1>down and having something to work with. And so I

0:22:57.800 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 1>think just understanding structure and how to tell a story

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and reading up on that sort of thing can be really,

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:07.080
<v Speaker 1>really beneficial. And of course once you know it and

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:10.000
<v Speaker 1>you understand why certain things work the way they do,

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:13.119
<v Speaker 1>then you can play around with it and you can

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 1>dismiss it out of hand. I think. I mean, that's

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:18.679
<v Speaker 1>basically the point is that it's better to know something

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 1>and ignore it than to not be aware of it.

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I think in this sense not always the case, absolutely

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 1>not always the case, but from my experience anyway, I

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:32.360
<v Speaker 1>think that has been helpful, and to that end, I

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 1>will recommend a couple of books that I think as

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:37.680
<v Speaker 1>a writer really helped me. So one is Wide for

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:41.679
<v Speaker 1>Story by Lisa Kron, which is really just an introduction

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:45.879
<v Speaker 1>into how to kind of hook a reader into your story,

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:49.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's just very sort of clear. It's very very

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 1>clear and easy to read, and again it's things you

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 1>can sort of take or discard at your own sort

0:23:55.000 --> 0:24:00.639
<v Speaker 1>of discretion. And in a similar vein another book that

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I found quite isful was Writing the TV Drama Series

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:06.439
<v Speaker 1>by Pamela Douglas, And as you can tell from the title,

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 1>obviously this is specifically for TV drama, but I think

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:12.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the same rules apply to whatever kind

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:16.399
<v Speaker 1>of narrative writing you are trying to do. That's what

0:24:16.440 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to do. And lastly, just quickly, another book

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 1>that I've really helped me starting out was a book

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>called How to Write a Novel by the author John Brain,

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:29.040
<v Speaker 1>who is most well known for a book he wrote

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 1>called Room at the Top. And so again it's you

0:24:33.920 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 1>might not be wanting to write a novel specifically, but

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:38.720
<v Speaker 1>it just has a lot of kind of really great

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:41.960
<v Speaker 1>lessons and ideas about how to get started and how

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:44.160
<v Speaker 1>to really just start tackling the thing that you're trying

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:46.760
<v Speaker 1>to do. And it's a big you know, writing anything is,

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:52.399
<v Speaker 1>it's difficult, so it mainly requires practice and and the

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:54.399
<v Speaker 1>other thing, of course, it's just reading and watching and

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:56.399
<v Speaker 1>listening to as much as you can and sort of

0:24:56.400 --> 0:24:59.520
<v Speaker 1>taking that in and trying to absorb it. So onto

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the next questions, So Samantha asks, do you believe in

0:25:02.720 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the existence of beings not in our realm? In light

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:08.879
<v Speaker 1>of your extensive research over the past years and putting

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:12.040
<v Speaker 1>together Unexplained podcast and your new book, have you been

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:15.119
<v Speaker 1>swayed one way or another in this belief? So I

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:17.159
<v Speaker 1>think this goes back a little bit to the earlier

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:21.119
<v Speaker 1>questions about what I what conclusions I've drawn myself from

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:24.879
<v Speaker 1>some of these stories. And I think the key word

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:28.399
<v Speaker 1>here is believe. So you know, it's something that comes up,

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 1>particularly with supernatural paranormal and you know, just stories in

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 1>general of that kind, which is the sort of notion

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 1>of belief and what you believe in and what you

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 1>believe is possible. So I think for me, there was

0:25:42.280 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 1>a quote and I can't remember who says it who

0:25:44.040 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 1>said it? Rather what it was to do with having

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:52.480
<v Speaker 1>seen a particular supposed paranormal event, and in the response

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 1>was that I didn't say it was possible, I said

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 1>it happened. And I think that's really the approach to

0:25:57.600 --> 0:26:00.240
<v Speaker 1>take to the stories, which is that I've known reason

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to disbelieve the anecdotal evidence that's being presented, so I

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:07.880
<v Speaker 1>take it at face value. And you know that might

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 1>be silly or gullible or ignorant, but the point is

0:26:10.800 --> 0:26:14.360
<v Speaker 1>really that is to display the things as they occurred,

0:26:14.480 --> 0:26:16.400
<v Speaker 1>or as we're sort of led to believe they occurred,

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 1>without interrogating that too much. But going back to the

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:23.480
<v Speaker 1>question so about belief, Well, really the thing is that

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:26.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I have seen or come across anything

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:31.919
<v Speaker 1>that was that would convince me of a parallel or

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:37.480
<v Speaker 1>supernatural thing being real actually having taken place. But you know,

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I equally haven't seen anything that would that can say

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 1>once and for all that it hasn't either, So within that,

0:26:43.680 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't I couldn't possibly commit something being

0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:48.359
<v Speaker 1>real and until there was there was evidence enough for

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:50.640
<v Speaker 1>that to be a certainty. And of course the thing

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:54.119
<v Speaker 1>is in actual life, the things that we consider to

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:57.600
<v Speaker 1>be real and absolutely true. You know, it's rare to

0:26:57.640 --> 0:27:00.240
<v Speaker 1>find that sort of certainty too if you if you

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 1>start interrogating things, you get start to get a bit

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 1>closer and down and dirty with things. You find that

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the things that we do think are true and real

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:10.840
<v Speaker 1>aren't in fact as true and real as we might

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 1>think they are, which is also I think a big

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:17.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of theme of the show. So Jeff asks, were

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:20.480
<v Speaker 1>there any potential episodes that you nixed because the subject

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 1>matter creeped you out too much? So no, absolutely not.

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 1>I think the creepier the better, I would say. Which

0:27:27.320 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 1>brings me to my next book recommendation, or rather book

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:32.920
<v Speaker 1>that has inspired and explained. So this is a writer

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 1>that will be familiar to many people who listen to

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the show. This is HP Lovecraft. Lovecraft is a complicated

0:27:41.000 --> 0:27:46.919
<v Speaker 1>writer to sort of admire, ostensibly because I think it's

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:50.240
<v Speaker 1>quite well documented that he was he was quite racist,

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 1>and he had a sort of fear of I think

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:57.359
<v Speaker 1>what he was anti Semitic, and also but had a

0:27:57.400 --> 0:28:01.959
<v Speaker 1>particularly repugnant attitude towards anybody who wasn't white, and I

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:05.560
<v Speaker 1>think primarily to Americans who were black. So why that

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:08.880
<v Speaker 1>becomes particularly complicated in terms of his stories, is that

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:13.359
<v Speaker 1>that fear that he had of this otherness, of what

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:17.040
<v Speaker 1>he perceived to be this otherness, as what I would say,

0:28:17.080 --> 0:28:21.960
<v Speaker 1>as ignorant and appalling as that was, it was that

0:28:22.119 --> 0:28:26.520
<v Speaker 1>fear that he used that was obviously very visceral to him,

0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:29.359
<v Speaker 1>that was then sort of imbued in the text and

0:28:29.440 --> 0:28:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the language that he used in his sort of horror stories.

0:28:32.560 --> 0:28:35.400
<v Speaker 1>So in many ways, the reason why they're so compelling

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 1>is because that fear was so real to him, and

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 1>so of course that makes it incredibly odd and complicated

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:47.240
<v Speaker 1>and strange when you're reading these stories. Sort of knowing

0:28:47.280 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 1>that fear is the foundation on which these stories are

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:55.080
<v Speaker 1>built and constructed, you know, that is a complicated thing.

0:28:55.280 --> 0:28:57.200
<v Speaker 1>That is a complicated thing to kind of hold that

0:28:57.240 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, but separating the story from that,

0:29:00.640 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 1>what remains are incredibly gripping, horrifying stories and there, and

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 1>they're particularly horrifying because they you can sort of feel

0:29:07.440 --> 0:29:10.760
<v Speaker 1>that sense of terror person I find it something is

0:29:10.800 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 1>writing quite dense, and it can feel sometimes a bit

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 1>of a troll to get through, but always within it

0:29:17.760 --> 0:29:21.720
<v Speaker 1>this sort of extraordinary imagination of other worlds that are created.

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:24.400
<v Speaker 1>And what I find most compelling about it is that

0:29:24.520 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the that unlike lots of other stories of this kind

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:30.959
<v Speaker 1>of ilk where you're encouraged ultimately to think that there

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:34.680
<v Speaker 1>was some kind of psychological catalyst that was provoking these stories,

0:29:34.720 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 1>but with Lovecraft, a lot of the time it's actually,

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're you're invited to think that the horror

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:43.400
<v Speaker 1>is real. It's not imaginary. That these creatures, you know,

0:29:43.520 --> 0:29:48.520
<v Speaker 1>are existing in their own sort of autonomous way, whether

0:29:48.560 --> 0:29:51.040
<v Speaker 1>they be in another realm or under the sea, sort

0:29:51.080 --> 0:29:57.320
<v Speaker 1>of subterranean things. And so that I find that particularly compelling.

0:29:58.640 --> 0:30:00.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean the book I have if to me at

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the moment, it's a collection of his stories. This is

0:30:02.520 --> 0:30:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Lovecraft The Call of Clulu or Cthulu, a few different

0:30:07.480 --> 0:30:10.520
<v Speaker 1>ideas on how to say that, and other weird stories.

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 1>And if I had to pick one for any of

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:18.280
<v Speaker 1>you who haven't read him before, let's go for The

0:30:18.320 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Shadow over Innsmouth. This is actually one of his longer stories,

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:26.400
<v Speaker 1>but plot wise and the revelation that you will discover

0:30:26.480 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 1>on reading it, I think it's it's certainly for me anyway,

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 1>it's one of his best. We'll wrap this up with

0:30:33.600 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 1>a couple more questions, Andrew asks. He says, there's probably

0:30:37.720 --> 0:30:39.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people asking this, but actually you are

0:30:39.640 --> 0:30:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the only one, so thank you. It's a good question.

0:30:43.000 --> 0:30:45.320
<v Speaker 1>If you could know the definitive answer to just one

0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:48.760
<v Speaker 1>unexplained mystery, what would it be and why? So again,

0:30:48.800 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 1>going back to the previous questions, I don't feel the

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 1>need necessarily to know the answer, but I think the

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:59.120
<v Speaker 1>one I would most like to know would be the Lightkeepers,

0:30:59.160 --> 0:31:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the Lighthousekeepers rather from I think episode eight of the

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 1>first season, which was called When the Light Fades. I think,

0:31:05.680 --> 0:31:07.640
<v Speaker 1>as some other people have asked me, what was my

0:31:07.680 --> 0:31:09.760
<v Speaker 1>own personal favorite, I think that for me is my

0:31:09.840 --> 0:31:13.920
<v Speaker 1>favorite one so far. And the reason why I'd like

0:31:13.960 --> 0:31:16.880
<v Speaker 1>to know that is because I think anything that involves,

0:31:17.800 --> 0:31:21.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, missing people, missing individuals, I think there's something

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:25.280
<v Speaker 1>inherently and obviously terribly tragic about that. For anyone that's

0:31:25.280 --> 0:31:28.800
<v Speaker 1>been left behind and not knowing what has happened to

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:32.120
<v Speaker 1>a loved one that has disappeared, I think is you know,

0:31:32.200 --> 0:31:35.840
<v Speaker 1>in some ways, almost more horrific than the finding out

0:31:35.920 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 1>that they might have been killed. So Deepmar asks, what

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:45.600
<v Speaker 1>is the appeal of the unexplained in general for you especially,

0:31:45.680 --> 0:31:47.680
<v Speaker 1>is it even a good idea to concern oneself with

0:31:47.800 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that? Wouldn't it be healthier not to do that? Well,

0:31:51.760 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 1>so I know where you're coming from in terms of

0:31:54.920 --> 0:31:56.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think if you, if you're someone who

0:31:56.880 --> 0:31:59.400
<v Speaker 1>might dismiss all these stories out of hand, then it

0:31:59.440 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 1>seems a bit a bit of a nonsense to even

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of give them the light of day or the

0:32:05.800 --> 0:32:08.360
<v Speaker 1>darkness of night as it were, or you know, to

0:32:08.400 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 1>give them any sort of sense of credibility whatsoever. And

0:32:11.160 --> 0:32:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I think, again, I think that maybe going back to

0:32:14.280 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 1>something I said earlier, I think that attitude has its

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:21.240
<v Speaker 1>own ignorance in a way. I think everything can have

0:32:21.360 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 1>a potential worth. You know, I don't again, it doesn't

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:27.600
<v Speaker 1>necessarily have to be that that we commit to the

0:32:27.640 --> 0:32:32.280
<v Speaker 1>supernatural paranormal explanation, But I think all these stories have

0:32:32.400 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 1>something in them, certainly from a human perspective. There are elements,

0:32:36.600 --> 0:32:38.240
<v Speaker 1>There are lots of things within these stories that can

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:41.800
<v Speaker 1>throw up all sorts of questions and ideas and things

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 1>that go way sort of above and beyond and transcend

0:32:45.160 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the basic kind of question of whether these things really

0:32:48.280 --> 0:32:50.680
<v Speaker 1>happened or what the actual explanation was, and whether that

0:32:50.720 --> 0:32:55.480
<v Speaker 1>explanation is something beyond what we currently know or are

0:32:55.520 --> 0:32:59.240
<v Speaker 1>aware of as being possible in our world or our reality,

0:32:59.680 --> 0:33:02.960
<v Speaker 1>which brings me to my next book recommendation, which is

0:33:03.880 --> 0:33:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Ways of Seeing by John Burger. John Berger was a

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I think primarily or professionally. His sort of title I

0:33:11.640 --> 0:33:14.320
<v Speaker 1>suppose was art critic, but he's much more than that,

0:33:14.400 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 1>and he's written on lots of different subjects, but I

0:33:16.520 --> 0:33:18.360
<v Speaker 1>think Ways of Seeing is probably what he was best

0:33:18.400 --> 0:33:21.600
<v Speaker 1>known for, so this book. Funnily enough, I won this

0:33:21.760 --> 0:33:24.480
<v Speaker 1>when I was about nine or ten years old. I

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:26.920
<v Speaker 1>think I did. I'm a bit hazy on this, but

0:33:26.960 --> 0:33:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I think I won this when I took part in

0:33:30.280 --> 0:33:35.080
<v Speaker 1>something called the Spaghetti Bridge building competition, which is exactly

0:33:35.160 --> 0:33:38.320
<v Speaker 1>as it sounds. When I was at school. I think

0:33:38.400 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 1>our class got put forward for this, and the team

0:33:41.600 --> 0:33:45.280
<v Speaker 1>I was in, myself and two others, we came third

0:33:46.120 --> 0:33:48.320
<v Speaker 1>in a national competition, so I was very proud of myself,

0:33:48.880 --> 0:33:51.600
<v Speaker 1>but I think really it might have had something to

0:33:51.640 --> 0:33:53.480
<v Speaker 1>do with the fact that one of my team members

0:33:53.600 --> 0:33:56.400
<v Speaker 1>is dad's was an architect, and I think he might

0:33:56.440 --> 0:34:00.960
<v Speaker 1>have helped plan the bridge. Anyway, we came third, and

0:34:01.720 --> 0:34:03.880
<v Speaker 1>one of the things I won as a sort of

0:34:03.960 --> 0:34:05.920
<v Speaker 1>nine or ten year old. This was this book Ways

0:34:05.920 --> 0:34:08.200
<v Speaker 1>of Seeing by John Berger, which I was far too

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:11.200
<v Speaker 1>young to appreciate at the time. I don't think I

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:17.319
<v Speaker 1>even read this till late teens, early twenties, but I'm

0:34:17.320 --> 0:34:21.000
<v Speaker 1>glad I did because basically, and there's a bit of

0:34:21.160 --> 0:34:23.000
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a theme here, I suppose developing with

0:34:23.080 --> 0:34:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Unexplained in general, which is that all the book is

0:34:25.640 --> 0:34:27.960
<v Speaker 1>really trying to teach you is that there are different

0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:30.680
<v Speaker 1>ways to see the world, that there are many different perspectives.

0:34:31.520 --> 0:34:35.640
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's something that's become just in mainstream,

0:34:35.840 --> 0:34:39.280
<v Speaker 1>everyday kind of conversation. I think it's something we're becoming

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:43.000
<v Speaker 1>more aware of now and are interrogating more and more,

0:34:43.880 --> 0:34:46.479
<v Speaker 1>this idea that there's there's not one way to hold

0:34:46.480 --> 0:34:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the world, or that there's no you know, there's not

0:34:48.760 --> 0:34:51.520
<v Speaker 1>one version of history, there's not one version of the truth.

0:34:52.320 --> 0:34:55.840
<v Speaker 1>I think more kind of potently, and so yeah, this

0:34:55.920 --> 0:34:58.880
<v Speaker 1>is a book really that kind of establishes that in

0:34:59.200 --> 0:35:01.960
<v Speaker 1>a very sort of simplistic and powerful way. And you know,

0:35:02.000 --> 0:35:04.439
<v Speaker 1>by looking at art specifically and the ways in which

0:35:04.520 --> 0:35:09.280
<v Speaker 1>we as individuals can sort of interpret the same piece

0:35:09.320 --> 0:35:14.160
<v Speaker 1>of work in different ways, but also how the way

0:35:14.239 --> 0:35:19.000
<v Speaker 1>that work is or art is interpreted differently throughout the years. So,

0:35:19.040 --> 0:35:22.080
<v Speaker 1>for example, anybody looking at a painting that was that

0:35:22.239 --> 0:35:24.759
<v Speaker 1>was made four hundred years ago is not going to

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:28.359
<v Speaker 1>have the same context that you might have had had

0:35:28.400 --> 0:35:32.200
<v Speaker 1>you looked at it when it was first painted, and

0:35:32.280 --> 0:35:34.879
<v Speaker 1>so the effect of that piece of art is kind

0:35:34.920 --> 0:35:38.320
<v Speaker 1>of distorted in some way. So the effect of that painting,

0:35:38.360 --> 0:35:41.080
<v Speaker 1>that piece of art that it has on the viewer

0:35:41.239 --> 0:35:44.480
<v Speaker 1>is is changed by not only the sort of context

0:35:44.520 --> 0:35:47.480
<v Speaker 1>of the time that it's being observed, but also by

0:35:47.760 --> 0:35:51.879
<v Speaker 1>what the viewer brings to the observation. So I think

0:35:51.920 --> 0:35:54.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a quote I can't remember again, I think it

0:35:54.560 --> 0:35:56.200
<v Speaker 1>was freud l I don't know this for sure, but

0:35:56.440 --> 0:36:00.439
<v Speaker 1>who said something like you cannot analyze something about taking

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:03.480
<v Speaker 1>into account the mechanism through which it is observed. And

0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it plays again into this sort of a

0:36:05.640 --> 0:36:09.239
<v Speaker 1>whole notion that you might hear sometimes people say, sort

0:36:09.239 --> 0:36:11.399
<v Speaker 1>of consciousness makes up the world, you know. I don't

0:36:11.400 --> 0:36:14.799
<v Speaker 1>know the degree to which that might be true absolutely,

0:36:14.840 --> 0:36:16.640
<v Speaker 1>but I think, you know, there is an element of truth,

0:36:16.680 --> 0:36:19.120
<v Speaker 1>and that's certainly that a lot of the time when

0:36:19.160 --> 0:36:22.080
<v Speaker 1>you what you're seeing in the world and the way

0:36:22.120 --> 0:36:25.400
<v Speaker 1>that you respond to the world is not because of

0:36:25.440 --> 0:36:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the truth of what that world is, but how you

0:36:28.080 --> 0:36:30.600
<v Speaker 1>interpret that. So in that way, you kind of are

0:36:30.719 --> 0:36:33.280
<v Speaker 1>making up the world. You know, for better or worse.

0:36:33.560 --> 0:36:36.040
<v Speaker 1>You are kind of constructing the world in your head

0:36:36.080 --> 0:36:38.879
<v Speaker 1>as much as the information from that world is being

0:36:39.080 --> 0:36:43.600
<v Speaker 1>fed to you, if that makes sense. So just time

0:36:43.680 --> 0:36:46.880
<v Speaker 1>for one final question, which is from Peter and Morgan,

0:36:47.360 --> 0:36:50.920
<v Speaker 1>who ask both of us are still dying to know

0:36:51.200 --> 0:36:54.720
<v Speaker 1>why there is such an unexplained ghostly gap between McClean

0:36:54.840 --> 0:36:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Smith in the phrase Richard McClean Smith. It is a

0:36:59.040 --> 0:37:02.960
<v Speaker 1>very good question. I think it just came out like that,

0:37:03.000 --> 0:37:04.880
<v Speaker 1>and I've sort of felt I had to stick to

0:37:05.000 --> 0:37:06.960
<v Speaker 1>it ever since. But it's now kind of taken on

0:37:07.000 --> 0:37:09.720
<v Speaker 1>a life of its own where even if I try

0:37:09.760 --> 0:37:13.759
<v Speaker 1>to close the gap, it feels like I'm sort of

0:37:13.800 --> 0:37:18.319
<v Speaker 1>dishonoring the original version in some ways, so I've tried

0:37:18.360 --> 0:37:21.319
<v Speaker 1>to keep it quite consistent. I've also joked about how

0:37:21.520 --> 0:37:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I think I should get a T shirt made which

0:37:24.200 --> 0:37:27.200
<v Speaker 1>just says Richard McClain on the front and then Smith

0:37:27.239 --> 0:37:31.600
<v Speaker 1>on the back. I don't know if I'm quite narcissistic

0:37:31.719 --> 0:37:36.600
<v Speaker 1>enough to do it. We'll see. So yeah, thank you

0:37:36.640 --> 0:37:38.960
<v Speaker 1>so much for listening. Thank you even more for sending

0:37:38.960 --> 0:37:41.799
<v Speaker 1>in your questions and for all your interests that you've

0:37:41.840 --> 0:37:44.799
<v Speaker 1>shown in the show. Again, I can't thank you enough

0:37:45.200 --> 0:37:48.759
<v Speaker 1>for all the support and kind words, and I hope

0:37:48.800 --> 0:37:51.920
<v Speaker 1>you enjoy it going forward. As I mentioned before, I

0:37:51.960 --> 0:37:54.800
<v Speaker 1>will put the list of books up on social media,

0:37:54.840 --> 0:37:58.440
<v Speaker 1>so Twitter, Facebook, and I'll probably add a few more

0:37:58.440 --> 0:37:59.920
<v Speaker 1>in there that I didn't think I had time to

0:38:00.120 --> 0:38:03.120
<v Speaker 1>talk about this time around. Very very difficult trying to

0:38:03.120 --> 0:38:05.440
<v Speaker 1>compile a small list of books. There have been so

0:38:05.480 --> 0:38:08.359
<v Speaker 1>many that have inspired me, and also films and TV

0:38:08.440 --> 0:38:11.560
<v Speaker 1>shows that have inspired me immensely, and music too, so

0:38:11.800 --> 0:38:13.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe there are more lists to be made at a

0:38:13.920 --> 0:38:16.839
<v Speaker 1>later date. Anyway. That's yeah, I think that's it for now.

0:38:17.440 --> 0:38:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Once again. The book will be out on October twenty fifth,

0:38:20.360 --> 0:38:23.360
<v Speaker 1>and I'm actually going to be doing some live speaking

0:38:23.360 --> 0:38:26.560
<v Speaker 1>events which I'll be putting up on my website soon

0:38:26.800 --> 0:38:29.239
<v Speaker 1>if anyone's interested in coming along to that. Thank you

0:38:29.360 --> 0:38:31.879
<v Speaker 1>very much again for listening to the show. I will

0:38:31.920 --> 0:38:34.879
<v Speaker 1>be back next Tuesday with episode eight of season three,

0:38:35.000 --> 0:39:15.880
<v Speaker 1>So until then. Now it's time to take care of yourself,

0:39:16.320 --> 0:39:20.040
<v Speaker 1>to make time for you. Teledoc gives you access to

0:39:20.080 --> 0:39:23.280
<v Speaker 1>a licensed therapist to help you get back to feeling

0:39:23.280 --> 0:39:27.040
<v Speaker 1>your best. Speak to a licensed therapist by phone or

0:39:27.120 --> 0:39:30.320
<v Speaker 1>video any time between seven a m. To nine pm

0:39:30.360 --> 0:39:34.880
<v Speaker 1>local time, seven days a week. Teledoc Therapy is available

0:39:34.880 --> 0:39:38.839
<v Speaker 1>through most insurance or employers. Download the app, or visit

0:39:38.960 --> 0:39:43.680
<v Speaker 1>teledoc dot com Forward slash Unexplained podcast today to get started.

0:39:44.120 --> 0:39:47.920
<v Speaker 1>That's t e l a d oc dot com slash

0:39:48.000 --> 0:39:49.239
<v Speaker 1>Unexplained podcast