WEBVTT - Anthology of Horror, Volume 4

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:05.280
<v Speaker 1>My Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind production of

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>My Heart Radio. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind.

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick. And

0:00:17.520 --> 0:00:21.080
<v Speaker 1>it's still Halloween season, so we're going into the anthology territory.

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:24.200
<v Speaker 1>That's right. We have a long tradition here on Stuff

0:00:24.200 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 1>to Blow Your Mind of taking short spooky stories around

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 1>this time of year, uh, snipping them out of their host,

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:32.960
<v Speaker 1>drying them, and then stuffing them with science to create

0:00:33.000 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 1>an informative and entertaining Halloween sausage. We did this for

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>a few years based on creepy pasta stories, and then

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>we kind of felt like that well was running a

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 1>little dry, so we turned to an even richer and

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>deeper treasure trove of horror fiction, and that is horror

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>and sci fi anthology series. Uh. A lot of these

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>are shows that aired on TV. A lot of them

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>are also films that feature, you know, several different stories

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 1>in an anthology format, and there's just a tremendous amount

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>out there. We're We're talking the likes of the Twilight Zone,

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 1>The Outer Limits, Tales from the Dark Side, Tales from

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the Crypt Monsters, Black Mirror, and just so many many more. Uh.

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Plus there's a highly popular Simpsons Treehouse of horror episodes,

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 1>as well as various against cinematic horror anthology, such as

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>The Vault of Horror. So this is gonna be volume four,

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>and then we're gonna do volume five this year. We

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>did volume one in two thousand eighteen, we did volumes

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 1>two and three and twenty nineteen, so we're continuing the tradition.

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 1>And uh and again, yeah, I just have to say,

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:37.759
<v Speaker 1>there's just so much out there in terms of horror

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and sci fi anthology television. Uh. And then there's this

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>an additional ton of horror and sci fi anthology cinema.

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 1>So once again this year I found myself just combing

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 1>through contenders that I had either forgotten about, was half

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 1>aware of, or just had flat never heard of. Like

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>like a lot in horror especially, I feel like the

0:01:56.640 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>horror anthology genre tends to feel like low hanging route.

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>But but the kicker is that when well done, there's

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>nothing else quite like it. Well, yeah, I think that's true.

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's almost an ancient memory aspect to a

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:11.919
<v Speaker 1>horror anthology because it feels like people sitting around a

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:15.520
<v Speaker 1>campfire going around the circle, each taking a turn to

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:18.920
<v Speaker 1>tell a story. Yeah, and uh, like the literary short

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:22.959
<v Speaker 1>story provides wonderful opportunities that full length or episodic mediums

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>don't provide. Like a lot of times, you can really

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:29.079
<v Speaker 1>put a particular idea in the forefront, you can put

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:32.359
<v Speaker 1>a particular twist in the forefront. Uh. And it can

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 1>work better than it would if you tried to build

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 1>an entire you know, uh TV series around this or

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:41.919
<v Speaker 1>an entire feature leath length film around us. I was

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>actually just thinking the other day about the good things

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 1>about having a short format for horror, because we watched

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 1>a new horror movie that came out this year. It

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:55.360
<v Speaker 1>was a Shutter original film called Host. It was like

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 1>a Zoom horror movie. It takes place entirely on Zoom,

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 1>but the characters do a say once and there's demonic

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>shenanigans and the movie is about an hour long. And

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I thought that worked fantastically because it's, you know, it's

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 1>not a super deep film. It's not especially like thoughtful

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:16.040
<v Speaker 1>or interesting, but just for an excellent little boo frolic,

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 1>an hour is a perfect length. Uh And and I

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 1>wish more horror movies would just kind of embrace that

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and say, no, we're not going to be as long

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 1>as it's supposed to be. We're not gonna pad this

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:30.119
<v Speaker 1>out to eighty six minutes. We're gonna be an hour long.

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if it's good enough for Attack of the

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Crab Monsters, an hour run time is good enough for you. Yes, yeah, yeah,

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I definitely thought about that when I watch when I

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 1>watched for the first time, Frankenstein and Bride of Frankenstein,

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 1>like just shorter format, but nan they got everything in.

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, if you're a horror director out there, don't

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 1>worry about patting it out. I mean, if your movie

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>is only fifty four minutes long, I think that's great. Now.

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned zoom based horror earlier. In a bit later

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 1>on in the episode, we're gonna discuss an episode of

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the nine nineties revival of the Outer Limits. I want

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 1>to mention that there this is not the episode we're

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna be talking about, but there is an episode called

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 1>dead Man Switch that's that's extremely good, and it has

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 1>to do with individuals humans that are put into uh

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 1>separate bunkers during an alien invasion and each one is

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:24.839
<v Speaker 1>functioning as a dead man switch for the planetary defense system.

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:27.159
<v Speaker 1>But the fun thing about it is all these people

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 1>are solely communicating with each other via this like you know,

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 1>closed network television, basically a zoom scenario. Uh So it's

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>a it's a very interesting piece to watch during this

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 1>time of increased zoom meetings, etcetera. All right, well, let's

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:47.600
<v Speaker 1>just jump right in here to our first selection. This

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 1>is from the Night two horror anthology film creep Show.

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Uh this is the Lonesome Death of Jordi Verrel. Alright,

0:04:57.000 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>so sidebar before we get started on the plot. This

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 1>segment stars Stephen King in the flesh. He's the actor

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>in it. So I've got to ask what are your

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 1>favorite Stephen King acting spots and and I'll announce mine.

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:14.480
<v Speaker 1>He's got a cameo in a movie called Sleepwalkers. If

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 1>you've never seen it, I think it came out in

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the eighties or early nineties, and it is about shape

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:26.160
<v Speaker 1>shifting cat demon things that suck the life essence out

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of young women. And then I think they can turn invisible,

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 1>they can like look like different things, and their weaknesses

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 1>that if they're attacked by cats they die. But anyway,

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 1>in Sleepwalkers, there is an amazing scene that features a

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:46.360
<v Speaker 1>cameo by Stephen King as a perturbed cemetery caretaker who

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 1>is angry that that perverts keep coming into his cemetery

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 1>at night. But it also contains cameos by Toby Hooper

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and Clive Barker. Oh, I love it when we have

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>scenes like that, and that's a fitting like Grizzly cameo

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:06.040
<v Speaker 1>for for Stephen King. Um, because I remember, probably during

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 1>like the height of my my, my young obsession with

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Stephen King novels. Uh, the TV series Golden Years came out,

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:18.600
<v Speaker 1>which I don't think is anybody's favorite of Stephen King project.

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they ever finished it. You know, it

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>went maybe a season, maybe less in a season, but

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:28.280
<v Speaker 1>I remember there being oh, it's like a goodness, I'm

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:30.479
<v Speaker 1>having a hard time he remembering what the gist of

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>it was a man aging rapidly I think, or aging backwards,

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:37.839
<v Speaker 1>one of the two. Um. It had. One of the

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 1>best things about it was it had David Bowie's Golden

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:43.679
<v Speaker 1>Years as the theme music. But there's a scene where

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:47.039
<v Speaker 1>Stephen King shows up as a as a bus driver

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and at the time I was like, this is amazing

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that's Stephen. He's the author and he's the bus driver. Um.

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Of course he would go on to have so many

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>more interesting cameos and things. Um. For instance, I never

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:01.160
<v Speaker 1>saw this, but he has pretty wacky one in the

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 1>TV version of The Shining he's this band leader, like

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 1>this really um energetic band, big band leader with a

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>pencil thin mustache. He looked fabulously greased back hair, got

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 1>a pencil mustache. That that is not a good look

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>for Stephen King. I don't know, you know, he's he

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of has the like the face for for facial hair.

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Though he can make most of it work. I feel

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 1>it kind of works. He does better full beard, I

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>mean full beard. He looks appropriately shaggy and kind of

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 1>right early with the pencil mustache, he looks like maybe

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>he would be the guy who would be discovered in

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 1>the cemetery. Now, in terms of just his acting roles,

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 1>go like things where he's not just a cameo but

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 1>he's actually playing a bit part. He had a really

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 1>fun one in the biker drama Sons of Anarchy. Uh

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>several years back. He played a guy who makes bodies disappear.

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>So he's you know, just kind of this stern but

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 1>creepy guy in a in a basement that will uh

0:07:57.280 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, make that make that body disappear when you

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 1>need it to end. He insists on listening to eighties

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>music while it happens. Well, I've never seen that either,

0:08:05.880 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 1>but but I'll have to look it up. All right, Well,

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 1>let's get into two creep show here. So creep show

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 1>for anyone who's not familiar with it, with Stephen King

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and George Ramiro's tribute to pre code horror comics of old.

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I think I may have covered the crate in a

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>in a previous episode. I'm not sure, but it has

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>some wonderful segments, but they're all like sort of mean,

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>uh grizzly uh segments that are you know, very much

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 1>in the vein of classic tales from the Crypt and

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 1>so forth, where uh there are bad people that do

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>bad things and get their come up. It's usually in

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:43.439
<v Speaker 1>grizzly ways with a little bit of gallows humor thrown in.

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:45.959
<v Speaker 1>And like we said, not only is this written by

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Stephen King, but this segment also stars the author as well. Again,

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:53.840
<v Speaker 1>it's the Lonesome Death of Jordy veryl and it's a

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>little bit the Color out of Space and a little

0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:59.440
<v Speaker 1>bit the Blob. It's about a redneck who comes in

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 1>contact with space goo. Uh. Then after coming in contact

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 1>with space goo, some sort of alien plant or plant

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 1>like organism takes over his body. And then he makes

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the terrible mistake of climbing into a hot bath to

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:18.120
<v Speaker 1>ease his discomfort. The alien plant infection overtakes him and

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 1>he ends up following papahanming Way into the sunset. Then

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:24.960
<v Speaker 1>we hear on the t V that rainy weather is

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 1>moving in which will spread, no doubt, spread the alien

0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:31.320
<v Speaker 1>plants even wider across the Earth. You know, this connects

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>to several other horror stories, uh in interesting ways. One

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:38.319
<v Speaker 1>that I didn't think of until just now is the

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 1>way that it connects to, especially the late nineteen seventies

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 1>remake of Invasion of the Body Snatchers, which is very

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:49.679
<v Speaker 1>good and which characterizes the spores that come down and

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 1>possess the humans and turn them into the replicants. Uh.

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:57.439
<v Speaker 1>They're very plant like. I mean, obviously they're not from Earth,

0:09:57.520 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 1>so they're not exactly of the Kingdom of the Plants,

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 1>but there's clearly a similarity with plants and an affinity

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 1>for plants among the aliens, and the ending of the

0:10:07.240 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Jordy Viril segment makes me think very much of the

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 1>beginning of the Invasion of the Body Snatchers Remake, because

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:17.839
<v Speaker 1>in the opening credits to The Body Snatchers Remake, there

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>is this sequence that just kind of shows these filaments

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>almost blowing in the wind, and it accomplishes a very

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 1>sinister visual connotation without any words or any explanation, just

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 1>of the idea of biological material kind of drifting and

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 1>through through the air, through space, carried on currents of

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 1>various kinds. Yeah, and of course the weakenings instantly think

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:47.199
<v Speaker 1>to other sort of plant based horror properties, such as

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the Day of the Triffids, which we've mentioned on here before.

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>That's a big one about plant plant like aliens overtaking

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the earth or troll too. That's right, that's right. So

0:10:57.720 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>this Jordy Viral episode, it is the question for me,

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>are there any plants that can grow on or in

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:08.720
<v Speaker 1>the human body under sort of normal circumstances, Because obviously,

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>like a dead body filled with dirt, you could grow

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:13.440
<v Speaker 1>some some plants, and that if you had some sort

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 1>of somehow I had an outfit that had like lots

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:19.680
<v Speaker 1>of dirt pockets you could grow grow that way. Also

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:23.960
<v Speaker 1>wanted to you know, avoid discussing bacteria and fungi, sticking

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 1>to just good old plants, which again seems more in

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 1>line with the plant like organisms that we're dealing with

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>in this short um. And we're not counting things that

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:36.840
<v Speaker 1>might look like plants but are in fact tumors or

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 1>what have you. So for the most part, plants don't

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 1>want to be on us or inside us, unless, of course,

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 1>their seeds are traveling on our hair or garments, or

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 1>if their seeds are traveling through our digestive systems. Otherwise,

0:11:50.320 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 1>there's just not much of an in game going on

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>with the inside of the human body or even like

0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 1>on the exterior of the human body. Uh, you know,

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 1>seeds need to get in the dirt. But sometimes things

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:06.960
<v Speaker 1>go wrong, as horribly wrong. As reported in by the

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 1>BBC and various other outlets, a man named Ron vet

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:13.839
<v Speaker 1>and I believe uh had been battling emphysema, and he

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:17.840
<v Speaker 1>underwent an X ray as his condition worsened. The doctors

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 1>then discovered that a p had gone down the wrong um,

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, the wrong pipe and sprouted in the warm,

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:28.840
<v Speaker 1>moist environment of the patient's lung. It had only grown

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 1>a half an inch long, but you know, still it

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:35.320
<v Speaker 1>was enough to cause some concern. Surgeons removed it. Uh

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:37.680
<v Speaker 1>and uh, we should stress here that what was happening

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 1>is that the P was sprouting as if it were

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 1>under the soil reaching up for sunlight. Thus it grew

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 1>in the darkness of a human body as if it

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 1>were going to sprout out of the body and find

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the sun. Now an energy terms, it couldn't keep growing

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>like that forever, right, because eventually it would need sunlight

0:12:56.880 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 1>in order to supply new energy. But of course, a P,

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 1>like many other uh you know, like the yolk of

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 1>an egg or something, has some chemical energy built into

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:10.479
<v Speaker 1>it that can propel that initial sprouting from the dark place. Uh. Fortunately,

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:13.560
<v Speaker 1>it would probably eventually not be able to find sunlight,

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 1>but it still would, I guess, be some kind of

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 1>gross thing in your lung. So it's a good thing

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>they took it out. But in the spirit of of

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 1>making the familiar strange, I think we should dwell for

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:27.000
<v Speaker 1>a minute on the idea of seeds using bodies such

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 1>as human bodies for dispersal. We don't dwell on this

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 1>as a parallel to any kind of botanical body horror

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:36.200
<v Speaker 1>because it just seems so normal. Well, yeah, you know,

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:38.600
<v Speaker 1>sometimes you just eat fruit with seeds in it. But

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>this is really kind of strange the more you think

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 1>about it. So, of course, there are evolutionary pressures on

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:47.960
<v Speaker 1>plants that caused them to find methods of seed dispersal,

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 1>not just to produce seeds of for a new generation

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:54.079
<v Speaker 1>of plants, but to try to get them physically away

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 1>from the parent and uh. And this is because like

0:13:57.040 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the can share genes of the parent and offspring plant,

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:02.559
<v Speaker 1>it's don't want to be forced to compete directly with

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 1>one another for resources. And these resources would include soil space, water,

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 1>nutrients in the soil, access to sunlight. If you can

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:14.319
<v Speaker 1>get the kids out of the house, that's good because

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 1>then you're not fighting over food. And competition of this

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 1>kind can be reduced by dispersing seeds, and nature of

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 1>course has lots of ingenious solutions for this. We've talked

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 1>about some on the show before. For example, you know

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 1>all the different structures the parachute or wing like structures

0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:33.440
<v Speaker 1>that seeds sometimes sprout in order to ride on the

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>wind to or to drift, like the like the filaments

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 1>in in Invasion to the body snatchers. Then there were

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 1>even exploding seed pods like you would find on the

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>sandbox tree or Hera crepitans, And so this is a

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 1>tree that has thorns all over its trunk. I think

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I've read somewhere that it's called the monkey Can't Climate tree,

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 1>and it produces seed pods that look kind of like

0:14:56.880 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>tiny pumpkins, and they explode in their right literally explodes

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 1>in ballistic propulsion of seeds up to distances of like

0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 1>a hundred meters away according to some reports. But also,

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned earlier, a lot of seeds rely on

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 1>animals to be dispersed, and this is known as zoo cory.

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 1>So there's epizoo cory, which is the transport of seeds

0:15:18.280 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 1>on the outside of the animal. So you think of

0:15:20.240 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 1>like the burrs that get stuck on a dog's fur,

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 1>stuck to your socks. One example of this is the

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 1>burdock plant, which was apparently the inspiration behind the invention

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 1>of velcrow, invention of the loop and fastener system. But

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 1>then there's also, of course what's known as indo zoo

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Corey the transport of seeds inside of the animal, and

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 1>this usually involves creating a tasty, fruiting body containing the seed,

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 1>waiting to get eaten, traveling around inside an animal's digestive system,

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>then being released in the animals species to grow in

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 1>a new place. And so if you eat some tasty blackberries,

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 1>you are, in a way, Jordi varrel, you are the

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 1>moost of this plant that is using your digestive system,

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 1>using and your your legs, your mobile body in the

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>dispersal of seeds as part of its reproductive cycle. In fact,

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 1>there are even some seeds that are somewhat obligate in

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:17.040
<v Speaker 1>this way. They need to be primed to grow inside

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 1>an animal's digestive system. Blackberries would be an example, which

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 1>I think usually needs some time in a bird's gizzard

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 1>before they will grow. But all the stories you read

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 1>of like okay, well you know, my cousin knows a

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 1>guy who swallowed a watermelon seed and it grew a

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 1>watermelon inside his stomach, that that's not true. I could

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 1>not find any evidence that anything like that ever happens.

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 1>But while it's unlikely that you would grow a plant

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>from a seed in your body while you are alive.

0:16:46.960 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Could it happen after you're dead? Again? You mentioned earlier

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Rob that if a seed was maybe in your pockets,

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 1>in your pockets were full of soil, it could grow

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 1>out of that. But could it actually grow from inside

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 1>your body? Well, I could not find a verified example

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:05.399
<v Speaker 1>of this. I found a disputed claim about a fig

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:08.679
<v Speaker 1>tree that grew out of a murdered man's stomach in

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:11.720
<v Speaker 1>a cave in Cyprus. But it looks like that that

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:15.920
<v Speaker 1>account is has has generally been refuted. But I was

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 1>reading an article that talks about that that rumored story

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 1>in Life Science by Laura Geigel, and the author here

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 1>consulted a soil science professor from Oregon State University named j. Knohler,

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:29.719
<v Speaker 1>and it was Nhler's opinion that such a thing is

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:34.240
<v Speaker 1>actually plausible. He said that seeds can sometimes emerge from

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 1>dead animals, so he imagines they could likewise emerge out

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 1>of a dead human um. But he said it wouldn't

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:43.160
<v Speaker 1>have to be in their stomach. It could actually grow

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>from any part of the dead person's digestive tract. It

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 1>could be in their large intestine, small intestine, and the

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 1>way it breaks down would work like this. So you'd

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 1>have a dead, decaying body all around the plant seed

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 1>that would sort of help it out with nutrients, very

0:17:58.040 --> 0:18:01.920
<v Speaker 1>possibly with the third party of ungus involved. So microscopic

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 1>fungi in the soil would help decompose the dead body breakdown,

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:08.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, the fungus would break down fats and proteins

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:13.119
<v Speaker 1>into simpler constituent nutrients, and then the fungus would share

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 1>these nutrients with nearby plants, possibly even seeds that are

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:20.960
<v Speaker 1>among the decaying organic material of the body in a

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 1>symbiotic relationship. So they would exchange simple sugars that the

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 1>plant produces for these nutrients that they're getting from decomposing

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:31.720
<v Speaker 1>the body. But I wanted to think about another way

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 1>of possibly framing infection by an alien plant, apart from

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:38.920
<v Speaker 1>directly becoming the host or substrate of the plant itself,

0:18:39.680 --> 0:18:43.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's the idea of infection via a plant vector.

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Or to put it as a question, would you let

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 1>a zucchini flower cough in your mouth? And I was

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 1>looking around for for answers to this question can you

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:56.399
<v Speaker 1>get infected from a plant? And I found an article

0:18:56.680 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 1>by a plant pathologist and diagnostician at iowas a University

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:05.120
<v Speaker 1>named Dr. Lena Rodriguez Salamanca, and she said that sometimes

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:08.479
<v Speaker 1>her lab receives questions from the public, including the question

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:11.159
<v Speaker 1>of can I catch and infectious disease from a plant.

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:15.160
<v Speaker 1>The answer is in most cases no. You know, pathogens

0:19:15.240 --> 0:19:17.920
<v Speaker 1>that are specialized to infect plants, and of course there

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:20.400
<v Speaker 1>are many of these. Plants can be infected by fungi,

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:24.200
<v Speaker 1>by viruses, by bacteria, just like animals can. But usually

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>a pathogen that is specialized for one kingdom of life

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 1>is not just going to jump, you know, from that

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:31.919
<v Speaker 1>one into another kingdom of life and infected. It is

0:19:31.960 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 1>not adapted to that. But there are cases of a

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 1>few known opportunistic pathogens that will make this jump, and

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 1>this is especially true for people with compromised immune systems.

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 1>So one example is an infectious bacterium known as a

0:19:47.920 --> 0:19:53.240
<v Speaker 1>pseudominous erugenosa, and Rodriguez Salamanca says that it can cause

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:57.399
<v Speaker 1>a weak soft rot on plants such as lettuce, and

0:19:57.440 --> 0:19:59.879
<v Speaker 1>this bacterium has been known to jump the kingdom barrier

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 1>sometimes infect people with compromised immune systems. This can lead

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:07.159
<v Speaker 1>to infections of the urinary tract, of the lungs, the

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:11.199
<v Speaker 1>blood and wounds including burns, but for most people it

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:14.160
<v Speaker 1>does not represent a threat. But then there are other ones.

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:18.119
<v Speaker 1>For example, there is a fungal infection caused by the

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:23.440
<v Speaker 1>fungus Sporothrix shanky i, which thrives on the dead thorns

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>of a rose stem, and this has given rise to

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the name rose pickers disease or rose handler's disease. So

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 1>if you're handling a rose and you, you know, get

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:35.679
<v Speaker 1>pricked by one of these dead thorns that has the

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:39.160
<v Speaker 1>fungal infection, or get a scratch, this way, the fungus

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 1>can get into your scan, potentially into your lymph system.

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 1>And apparently you can also inhale spores of this fungus

0:20:45.320 --> 0:20:48.359
<v Speaker 1>and this can cause all kinds of problems infections of

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the skin, of course, but of the eyes, the lungs,

0:20:51.119 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the nervous system, bones, and joints. And then finally she

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:59.359
<v Speaker 1>mentions that there are infectious agents of plants that can

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 1>produce set candary byproducts that are harmful to humans, and

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>she gives the example of fungi that attack corn. The

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:10.679
<v Speaker 1>phrase she used specifically is ear rots, which is a

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:15.120
<v Speaker 1>new sort of words quick for me. But this includes

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the genus Fusarium and these fungi produced secondary microtoxins, including

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:27.680
<v Speaker 1>quote few Monison's z ralinone and the aptly named vomitoxin, which, yes,

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 1>that that is what it sounds like. And of course

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:32.200
<v Speaker 1>these are byproducts that can affect you in all kinds

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 1>of ways. She talks about how most of the things

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:38.359
<v Speaker 1>like this, like like Aspergillis flavius also is a is

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 1>a contaminant that you could find in grains that produces

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 1>secondary microtoxins. A lot of these things that produce these

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 1>secondary microtoxins that can harm you would be found specifically,

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 1>not in like leafy plants like let us, but on grains.

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 1>And she she mentions, you know, you don't need to

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 1>be too worried because like grain producers monitor for the

0:21:57.800 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 1>presence of these organisms. So yes, it is in fact

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:05.360
<v Speaker 1>possible for a human to catch a disease from a plant,

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:07.679
<v Speaker 1>much in the same way that we could catch a

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:11.640
<v Speaker 1>disease from a mosquito or a bat, but fortunately it's

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 1>not very common. All right, with that, we're gonna go

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:16.880
<v Speaker 1>ahead close the book on Ajority Veril and I think

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:19.120
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna go and take our first break, but when

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 1>we come back, we will unlock another entry in horror

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 1>anthology history than all right, we're back. Is it time

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:31.879
<v Speaker 1>to go to the Outer Limits? Yeah, let's go to

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the Outer Limits. Uh. So I mentioned that we would

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:37.399
<v Speaker 1>be looking at an episode from the nineties revival of

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the Outer Limits. UM not to be confused with the

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 1>original series from the from the nineteen sixties. Uh. This

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:48.879
<v Speaker 1>is a series that ran through two thousand and two. Now,

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 1>I watched a few of these on TV back in

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the day, but via Amazon Prime Watch Party, we've been

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 1>watching an episode a week with a couple of friends,

0:22:58.119 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and I have to say, the nineties Outer Limits has

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>everything I love. You've got really cool sci fi concepts,

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 1>you have great monster makeup, a little nineties cheesiness, uh

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 1>sprinkled in there, and some really fun performances as well,

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 1>sometimes by people you've you've never heard of, but oftentimes

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:18.199
<v Speaker 1>by people that went on to have uh you know,

0:23:18.280 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 1>key roles in in various sci fi properties or uh

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:25.159
<v Speaker 1>you know they did they did additional television work, so

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 1>you never know who you're gonna get. Like, for instance,

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I haven't watched this yet, but there's an episode where

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Gary Busey shows up playing a televangelist. There's a one

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 1>where Michael Ironside shows up playing a mutant. Uh, it's

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:40.440
<v Speaker 1>is you just never know who's going to be in there. Yeah,

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:43.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of oh that guy in it. Yeah. Basically,

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 1>name an actor who is doing TV during this period

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 1>of time, and there's a great chance that they were

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 1>on an episode of The Outer Limits. So during the

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:54.359
<v Speaker 1>Outer the nineties Outer Limits run they did a hundred

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and fifty two episodes. That's compared to forty nine episodes

0:23:57.119 --> 0:24:00.359
<v Speaker 1>from the original nineteen sixties series. And again I certainly

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:03.920
<v Speaker 1>haven't watched them all, but this is a really good

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>one we're gonna be talking about. It's an episode that

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:08.480
<v Speaker 1>is probably a bit heavy handed, as these sort of

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:12.480
<v Speaker 1>things tend to be. Um, but this is also rather pronounced,

0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 1>as it was essentially a n commentary about climate change denihalism.

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 1>That's very early. Yeah, yeah, you know, earlier than say

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 1>an Inconvenient Truth and um and the like. But we'll

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:26.480
<v Speaker 1>get into something like the basic where it fits into

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:31.160
<v Speaker 1>the basic timeline of of climate change understanding here shortly.

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:33.680
<v Speaker 1>But but first of all, just so everyone can find

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:35.639
<v Speaker 1>it if you're interested in watching it, it's titled to

0:24:35.760 --> 0:24:38.919
<v Speaker 1>Tell the Truth, and it was written by Lawrence Myers

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:44.119
<v Speaker 1>and directed by Neil Fernley. It stars Gregory Harrison as

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Dr Larry Chambers. You may remember Gregory Harrison from various

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:50.320
<v Speaker 1>TV shows. I think he's like like on Trapper, John

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:53.679
<v Speaker 1>m D or something. Um and uh, you know various

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:58.160
<v Speaker 1>other shows. Uh, a kind of a soap opera vibe. Yeah, yeah,

0:24:58.200 --> 0:25:01.239
<v Speaker 1>definitely and uh and and in this he plays a

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 1>terraforming botanist on the off world colony of Janice five.

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:08.159
<v Speaker 1>And I love how perfectly on the nose that the

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:11.200
<v Speaker 1>title is, I mean the name of the colony and

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:13.679
<v Speaker 1>our planet is because this is an episode that is

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 1>concerned with truth, denial and the mistrust of information. Yes,

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and it has characters whose faces change and who are

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 1>not what they seem. Yeah. So here's the deal. The

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Janice five colony is going pretty well. It has a

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 1>bright future, but doctor Chambers is concerned by some of

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:33.919
<v Speaker 1>the geologic evidence. Geologic evidence that includes the remnants of

0:25:33.920 --> 0:25:38.400
<v Speaker 1>an extinct shape shifting alien civilization. But five years ago

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 1>he got it really wrong. He predicted cyclo cyclical catastrophe. Uh,

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and he thought it was gonna be a volcanic catastrophe,

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:48.480
<v Speaker 1>but then this didn't come to fruition. Now he's come

0:25:48.520 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 1>to believe that the cyclical threat that is facing this

0:25:51.680 --> 0:25:54.359
<v Speaker 1>planet is actually solar and that in another and then

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:57.880
<v Speaker 1>another devastating solar storm is just on the horizon, so

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 1>he urges that the colony be moved or even evacuated. Yeah,

0:26:02.040 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a great fake out beginning where a couple of

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 1>characters appear to be looking out a window and then

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 1>they see the sky it fills with these shimmering auroras

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:13.359
<v Speaker 1>and that turns into fire everywhere, and you you think, oh, no,

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 1>are our main character is going to be killed right

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:18.159
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning. But though it turns out it is

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 1>a simulation they're looking at. But I was wondering why,

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:26.280
<v Speaker 1>why if they're simulating the future of the climate or

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 1>their simulating solar activity, does it create a video display

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 1>of what it's simulating, would happen? I don't. I guess

0:26:34.640 --> 0:26:38.120
<v Speaker 1>it's just a robust simulation um package they have there. Yeah,

0:26:38.240 --> 0:26:41.399
<v Speaker 1>that's a really good simulation. Usually simulation spit out like

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 1>some numbers. This one does it full like I'll give you,

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you a movie. So I mean I guess

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 1>it's all about you know, creating something you know, visual

0:26:52.119 --> 0:26:54.040
<v Speaker 1>that of course the audience can get into, but also

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 1>these colonists, because even sympathetic members of the colony have

0:26:58.960 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 1>their doubts about dot your Chambers. After all, he got

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 1>it wrong once before. And then there's this added detail

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:07.239
<v Speaker 1>that he recently lost his wife and then even went

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 1>missing for a couple of weeks in the in the wilderness.

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 1>So this there's this lingering question can he be trusted?

0:27:12.880 --> 0:27:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Is he acting out of sort of just nihilistic hatred

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:19.919
<v Speaker 1>for the colony? Plenty of and also just plenty of

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:22.199
<v Speaker 1>the colonist who don't want to go through all of

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:25.359
<v Speaker 1>this again, and the higher ups also have a lot

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:28.480
<v Speaker 1>invested in the situation. One thing I think this episode

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 1>models extremely well is that when the care so Dr.

0:27:33.160 --> 0:27:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Chambers is trying to convince these characters that his simulation

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:39.960
<v Speaker 1>is correct, and when characters find the implications of his

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 1>conclusions unpalatable, like well, they don't want to have to

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 1>move or you know whatever, it's not in their interests

0:27:45.600 --> 0:27:48.680
<v Speaker 1>to try to evacuate. Most of the substance of their

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:51.640
<v Speaker 1>disagreement is not really about what he's saying, but it's

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 1>about him as a person, So they say, like, you've

0:27:54.520 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 1>got a psychological reason that you would make all this

0:27:57.600 --> 0:27:59.600
<v Speaker 1>stuff up, you know that they start like talking about

0:27:59.640 --> 0:28:03.160
<v Speaker 1>his personal history and attacking his character and saying, who

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:06.399
<v Speaker 1>is this guy? Can we really trust him? Very reminiscent

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 1>of how similar debates in reality play out. But also

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 1>I've just got to say one of my favorite parts

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:16.840
<v Speaker 1>of this episode was the repeated threatening visits from this

0:28:16.880 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 1>guy named Fenton, who has just really got it out

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:22.679
<v Speaker 1>for Dr Chambers. He seems to be a neighbor of

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:26.679
<v Speaker 1>his who is some kind of security employee. Uh, but

0:28:26.800 --> 0:28:31.920
<v Speaker 1>he he looks basically like a diminutive evil ken bone. Yeah.

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:34.359
<v Speaker 1>I loved Finton in this because he's I mean, he

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 1>he works, he's a gain a character, but he also

0:28:37.280 --> 0:28:39.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's not particularly threatening and he does he

0:28:39.880 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 1>also has a great toady vibe to him, Like, I'm

0:28:42.320 --> 0:28:46.280
<v Speaker 1>totally buying that in this off world colony where where

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 1>it's later explained that you know a lot of people

0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:51.960
<v Speaker 1>go here that didn't have a shot at ascending uh

0:28:52.040 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 1>into the uh you know, into into higher levels back

0:28:56.040 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 1>on Earth, like this is their shot, and you totally

0:28:58.800 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 1>buy Finton as a guy who you know, probably wouldn't

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 1>be head of security or a major security player anywhere else,

0:29:04.200 --> 0:29:07.479
<v Speaker 1>but here on on Janice five, he's got a shot. Well,

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 1>even on Janice five, he's not the head of security.

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 1>He answers to the guy with the beard. I can't

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:14.800
<v Speaker 1>remember what that guy's name is, but yeah, he's he's

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:17.480
<v Speaker 1>some kind of cop or something. But it was just

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 1>really funny how he repeatedly shows up to be like

0:29:20.720 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 1>this threatening figure, but he's this cute little nerd. Now. Um,

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the key individual here, like the key antagonist I guess

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:33.720
<v Speaker 1>you would would call him, is the head of the colony,

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Franklin Murdoch, and he's played by the terrific William Atherton.

0:29:39.640 --> 0:29:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Now Atherton is best known for playing Uh. First, there

0:29:43.440 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 1>was a character in die Hard named Thornburgh, but most

0:29:47.320 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 1>famously I think he played Walter Peck in four Ghostbusters.

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:57.760
<v Speaker 1>He he was just a perfect nineteen eighties weasel. Yeah.

0:29:57.760 --> 0:30:02.240
<v Speaker 1>He has a special knack, I think for playing arrogant bureaucrats.

0:30:02.280 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 1>So in die Hard he's a sleazy, opportunistic reporter and

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 1>in uh in Ghostbusters he plays the villainous e p

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:15.360
<v Speaker 1>a agent. Yeah, yeah, which is which is is always

0:30:15.360 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 1>weird now when I rewatch Ghostbusters to think about Ghostbusters,

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:21.240
<v Speaker 1>because yeah, he has just played as like a straight

0:30:22.080 --> 0:30:24.280
<v Speaker 1>villain or at least a sub villain in the film,

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 1>despite representing the you know now in battled US Environmental

0:30:28.240 --> 0:30:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Protection Agency, which is there too, especially in the film,

0:30:33.000 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 1>like he's acting to protect New York City from environmental

0:30:37.560 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 1>damage from from things like unlicensed nuclear accelerators and and

0:30:42.720 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 1>this containment system that even Egon describes as something that

0:30:46.560 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 1>can't be turned off without quote dropping a bomb on

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the city. I mean, I think there are a couple

0:30:52.000 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 1>of ways you could read. Of course, I love Ghostbusters

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and the character is very funny. You could read it

0:30:57.160 --> 0:30:59.960
<v Speaker 1>as that the politics of the movie are conservative. That's

0:31:00.160 --> 0:31:02.680
<v Speaker 1>one another way of reading it is just that like

0:31:02.760 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 1>this is a comedy where the protagonists are are dangerously

0:31:06.760 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 1>irresponsible people, and that that's sort of true. Yeah, yeah,

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean certainly, like if you really analyze the character

0:31:14.080 --> 0:31:17.560
<v Speaker 1>of Peter bankman, um, you know, how how likable is

0:31:17.600 --> 0:31:21.040
<v Speaker 1>he really? Uh? But you know, Bill Murray, he makes

0:31:21.040 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 1>it work, Yeah he does. He does now again now, now,

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Peck and Ghostbusters is definitely an arrogant jerk I don't

0:31:28.640 --> 0:31:31.960
<v Speaker 1>want to get past that point. And Atherton brings some

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 1>of that same energy to this performance, but this time

0:31:35.520 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 1>he is definitely the face of anti environmental forces. Uh,

0:31:40.440 --> 0:31:43.360
<v Speaker 1>and I think he's he's actually well presented here. Instead

0:31:43.360 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 1>of being just a pure money grubbing heel, Murdoch is

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 1>presented as being someone who opposes Chambers for several reasons. So,

0:31:52.560 --> 0:31:54.960
<v Speaker 1>first of all, Murdoch has a position of power and

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:58.080
<v Speaker 1>importance here on the colony that he would never have

0:31:58.160 --> 0:32:00.600
<v Speaker 1>achieved on Earth. He has this this really nice little

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 1>monologue where he talks about it. I think he's talking

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:04.720
<v Speaker 1>is he He's not talking to Fenton, He's talking to

0:32:04.720 --> 0:32:09.320
<v Speaker 1>another character Will mention in a little bit. Also, Murdoch,

0:32:09.480 --> 0:32:12.280
<v Speaker 1>like all the other colonists, has in an economic stake

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:15.840
<v Speaker 1>in the colony's success, but he also stresses that this

0:32:15.920 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 1>does not rank above the importance of his own life.

0:32:18.840 --> 0:32:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Murdoch seemingly quite authentically in one of these things, proclaims

0:32:22.600 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 1>that also Janice five is his home and he doesn't

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:28.200
<v Speaker 1>want to leave it. So he has that, um, you know,

0:32:28.240 --> 0:32:32.280
<v Speaker 1>tying him to the current situation. And then finally he

0:32:32.280 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 1>he is concerned that is convincing his chambers. Maybe he

0:32:36.680 --> 0:32:40.200
<v Speaker 1>has been wrong before and he might be wrong again

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 1>for very human reasons. I mean, this episode, actually, like

0:32:44.800 --> 0:32:49.160
<v Speaker 1>you're suggesting, raises a lot of very interesting and legitimate

0:32:49.240 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 1>real life concerns about saying how to communicate scientific conclusions

0:32:53.200 --> 0:32:56.960
<v Speaker 1>that would motivate action in the real world, because there

0:32:56.960 --> 0:32:58.840
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of difficulties there. But I mean, one

0:32:58.880 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 1>of the difficulties I think is that science, unlike most

0:33:02.920 --> 0:33:08.440
<v Speaker 1>other epistemological methods, is very upfront about uncertainty. So like

0:33:08.520 --> 0:33:11.240
<v Speaker 1>it builds in the fact that, like, you know, I'm

0:33:11.280 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 1>trying to tell you that this is a conclusion with

0:33:13.840 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 1>x probability instead of just saying, like, here's how it is.

0:33:17.600 --> 0:33:20.440
<v Speaker 1>And it turns out that even though that is probably

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the best method that you can use for actually figuring

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:27.840
<v Speaker 1>out what's true, it is not particularly convincing to motivate

0:33:27.920 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 1>people to do things that they don't want to do otherwise,

0:33:31.600 --> 0:33:33.800
<v Speaker 1>because it's like, oh, wait a minute, you're acknowledging you're

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:36.560
<v Speaker 1>not certain, then you know, how can how can we

0:33:36.680 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 1>make all these costly decisions on the basis of your conclusion? Yeah, yeah,

0:33:40.400 --> 0:33:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like there's a there's a line in there

0:33:42.400 --> 0:33:44.240
<v Speaker 1>where one of the columns is saying, you're asking us

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:46.920
<v Speaker 1>to ruin our lives again, like you've already done it

0:33:46.960 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 1>once before, and now you're asking to do it again

0:33:49.520 --> 0:33:52.280
<v Speaker 1>and and and we can't even be certain about it.

0:33:52.880 --> 0:33:56.920
<v Speaker 1>As a brief aside about the scientific premise of the episode,

0:33:57.040 --> 0:34:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I was interested in Chambers suggest gen that, so what

0:34:01.720 --> 0:34:04.560
<v Speaker 1>happens on on Janice five on the planet is that

0:34:04.840 --> 0:34:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Chambers believes every one thousand years, basically the planet is

0:34:09.160 --> 0:34:13.959
<v Speaker 1>sterilized and nearly all life is wiped out by solar activity.

0:34:13.960 --> 0:34:16.279
<v Speaker 1>That that just bombards the surface of the planet with

0:34:16.360 --> 0:34:20.560
<v Speaker 1>radiation and uh and and you know, wipes everything clean,

0:34:20.680 --> 0:34:23.280
<v Speaker 1>and then life has to bounce back. And I was wondering,

0:34:23.640 --> 0:34:26.520
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, how would it be possible for complex

0:34:26.560 --> 0:34:29.440
<v Speaker 1>life to even evolve on such a planet? And I

0:34:29.520 --> 0:34:30.960
<v Speaker 1>was trying to I was trying to make it work.

0:34:31.080 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 1>One way I thought of is well, maybe years are

0:34:33.680 --> 0:34:36.600
<v Speaker 1>longer on Janice five than they are on Earth. So

0:34:36.640 --> 0:34:39.759
<v Speaker 1>a thousand years is actually a much longer period. Uh

0:34:39.880 --> 0:34:41.920
<v Speaker 1>So I was looking at you know, what, what's a

0:34:42.040 --> 0:34:44.800
<v Speaker 1>what's a planet that has a really long orbital period

0:34:44.840 --> 0:34:48.160
<v Speaker 1>in our Solar system? Neptune takes a hundred and sixty

0:34:48.200 --> 0:34:51.200
<v Speaker 1>five years to orbit the Sun. So if Janice is

0:34:51.239 --> 0:34:54.680
<v Speaker 1>like Neptune, then a thousand Janie years would be a

0:34:54.760 --> 0:34:58.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred and sixty five thousand Earth years. But the crazy

0:34:58.280 --> 0:35:00.360
<v Speaker 1>thing is that's still the blink of an eye and

0:35:00.440 --> 0:35:03.360
<v Speaker 1>evolutionary time. Uh. And sometimes it can be hard to

0:35:03.360 --> 0:35:05.719
<v Speaker 1>put that in perspective. But if you consider it like this,

0:35:05.800 --> 0:35:09.879
<v Speaker 1>so uh, the if the evolution of life on Earth

0:35:09.960 --> 0:35:12.000
<v Speaker 1>fits into you know, we don't know exactly when the

0:35:12.000 --> 0:35:15.480
<v Speaker 1>first cells arose or or the chemical evolution that gave

0:35:15.560 --> 0:35:17.839
<v Speaker 1>rise to the first cells happened, but if you put

0:35:17.880 --> 0:35:21.040
<v Speaker 1>it in basically the last four billion years, more than

0:35:21.160 --> 0:35:25.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty four thousand periods of a hundred and sixty five

0:35:25.640 --> 0:35:29.919
<v Speaker 1>thousand years could fit into that. So it makes you think, well,

0:35:30.000 --> 0:35:32.640
<v Speaker 1>if you're going to take this premise seriously that somehow

0:35:32.719 --> 0:35:37.239
<v Speaker 1>complex life evolves on a planet that is sterilized every

0:35:37.280 --> 0:35:41.719
<v Speaker 1>thousand years or so, either that sterilization has to be

0:35:41.760 --> 0:35:44.560
<v Speaker 1>taken into account in the biology of the life that evolves,

0:35:44.560 --> 0:35:48.279
<v Speaker 1>like it goes dormant somehow to avoid the sterilization. Uh.

0:35:48.320 --> 0:35:51.239
<v Speaker 1>And that possibility, I think is raised in the episode,

0:35:51.840 --> 0:35:55.640
<v Speaker 1>or it evolves at rates that are that are unthinkable

0:35:55.719 --> 0:35:59.120
<v Speaker 1>given the kind of evolution we understand here on Earth. Yeah,

0:35:59.200 --> 0:36:02.440
<v Speaker 1>that's interesting, you know, it's it's a very thoughtful show,

0:36:02.600 --> 0:36:05.520
<v Speaker 1>even with its occasional hoke nous, you know, and and

0:36:05.640 --> 0:36:09.799
<v Speaker 1>necessary leaps in you know, in the fantastic Um. But

0:36:09.800 --> 0:36:12.000
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, it's interesting to think about the idea of

0:36:12.040 --> 0:36:15.640
<v Speaker 1>say comparing it to the organisms that that depend on

0:36:15.840 --> 0:36:20.440
<v Speaker 1>cyclical forest fires. Uh, it's just part of the environment

0:36:20.560 --> 0:36:22.920
<v Speaker 1>that they live in. That's a very good point of comparison.

0:36:22.920 --> 0:36:25.319
<v Speaker 1>And actually a similar idea comes up in the Three

0:36:25.320 --> 0:36:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Body Problem by c Chin Lou. Oh. Yeah, that's right,

0:36:28.520 --> 0:36:31.759
<v Speaker 1>in the simulation that they're working with, right, with the

0:36:33.200 --> 0:36:36.640
<v Speaker 1>world with multiple suns, right, the ideas that they're they're

0:36:36.760 --> 0:36:41.240
<v Speaker 1>unpredictable times when the environmental conditions of their home planet

0:36:41.320 --> 0:36:46.719
<v Speaker 1>become basically unsurvivable and the aliens have to disappear, have

0:36:46.840 --> 0:36:49.760
<v Speaker 1>to sort of like go into a hibernation or dehydration

0:36:49.880 --> 0:36:53.160
<v Speaker 1>state in order to just like ride out the uninhabitable

0:36:53.200 --> 0:36:56.880
<v Speaker 1>period and then re emerge once the planet becomes less hostile.

0:36:57.239 --> 0:36:59.600
<v Speaker 1>So this is the basic set up for the the episode.

0:36:59.600 --> 0:37:01.600
<v Speaker 1>And I want stress here, by the way, when this

0:37:01.680 --> 0:37:05.200
<v Speaker 1>is where the audio realm uh Janice five the name

0:37:05.200 --> 0:37:07.960
<v Speaker 1>of the colony. This is this is not Janice like

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the uh as in Janet or anything. This is the

0:37:11.520 --> 0:37:16.880
<v Speaker 1>two faced got And so that's sort of the yeah.

0:37:17.280 --> 0:37:19.600
<v Speaker 1>So from anyway, anyway, from here, the episode, you know,

0:37:19.680 --> 0:37:22.040
<v Speaker 1>takes a couple of I thought really satisfying twists and

0:37:22.080 --> 0:37:24.239
<v Speaker 1>turns that I don't want to spoil too much in

0:37:24.280 --> 0:37:25.960
<v Speaker 1>this episode in case you want to want to see

0:37:26.000 --> 0:37:28.200
<v Speaker 1>it for yourself, and I recommend you do. But let's

0:37:28.200 --> 0:37:30.600
<v Speaker 1>just say that some folks are accused of being shaped

0:37:30.600 --> 0:37:34.720
<v Speaker 1>shifting aliens that survived uh, you know, like they living

0:37:34.760 --> 0:37:37.400
<v Speaker 1>in the depths of the earth or something um. And

0:37:37.440 --> 0:37:40.520
<v Speaker 1>we're forced to wonder if Chambers will be proven right

0:37:40.719 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 1>or wrong and what it will mean for the people

0:37:43.080 --> 0:37:46.280
<v Speaker 1>of the colony. Now again, this episode is an obvious

0:37:46.280 --> 0:37:48.680
<v Speaker 1>treatment on the of the dangers of climate change and

0:37:48.719 --> 0:37:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the role that climate change denialism plays in our society.

0:37:52.719 --> 0:37:56.960
<v Speaker 1>To put everything in an historical framework, the greenhouse effect

0:37:57.040 --> 0:38:01.760
<v Speaker 1>was described by French physicist Joseph four in eighteen twenty four.

0:38:02.360 --> 0:38:05.560
<v Speaker 1>BBC has a nice breakdown of key moments after that

0:38:05.760 --> 0:38:09.880
<v Speaker 1>in a Brief History of Climate Change, which brings up everything.

0:38:09.920 --> 0:38:12.480
<v Speaker 1>It brings up everything through because you know, that's that's

0:38:12.480 --> 0:38:14.880
<v Speaker 1>when the timeline came out. But it's a nice handy

0:38:15.120 --> 0:38:18.879
<v Speaker 1>reference point for some of the stuff we're talking about here.

0:38:19.239 --> 0:38:21.279
<v Speaker 1>But they hit a few key points. From the later

0:38:21.280 --> 0:38:26.279
<v Speaker 1>twentieth century, U S scientist Wallace Brocker put the term

0:38:26.360 --> 0:38:29.760
<v Speaker 1>global warming in the title of a science paper, popularizing

0:38:29.760 --> 0:38:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the term, and in nineteen eighty seven the Montreal Protocol

0:38:33.640 --> 0:38:36.400
<v Speaker 1>came into effect to protect the ozone layer, and in

0:38:36.520 --> 0:38:40.640
<v Speaker 1>nine eight the inter Governmental Panel on Climate Change formed

0:38:40.880 --> 0:38:44.279
<v Speaker 1>to colate and assess the evidence. And of course the

0:38:44.320 --> 0:38:48.160
<v Speaker 1>i p c C continues to collect and assess the

0:38:48.320 --> 0:38:51.760
<v Speaker 1>evidence on on the state of climate change even today.

0:38:51.960 --> 0:38:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I think their most recent major update and report was

0:38:55.600 --> 0:39:00.080
<v Speaker 1>in furteen. It was the fifth Assessment Report, and it

0:39:00.360 --> 0:39:02.759
<v Speaker 1>paints a pretty dire picture. Now. One thing that this

0:39:02.960 --> 0:39:05.440
<v Speaker 1>BBC timeline also points out, and this is something that

0:39:05.520 --> 0:39:08.479
<v Speaker 1>Carl Sagan wrote about in The demon Haunted World as well.

0:39:09.040 --> 0:39:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Margaret Thatcher gave a speech to the u N in

0:39:11.520 --> 0:39:16.000
<v Speaker 1>nine and urged a global treaty stating quote, we are

0:39:16.040 --> 0:39:18.839
<v Speaker 1>seeing a vast increase in the amount of carbon dioxide

0:39:18.840 --> 0:39:21.640
<v Speaker 1>reaching the atmosphere, and then She goes on to to

0:39:21.800 --> 0:39:25.120
<v Speaker 1>point out that the future changes will quote likely be

0:39:25.320 --> 0:39:29.759
<v Speaker 1>more fundamental and more widespread than anything we have known hitherto.

0:39:30.239 --> 0:39:33.319
<v Speaker 1>And as Sagan pointed out, Thatcher, no matter what else

0:39:33.680 --> 0:39:36.960
<v Speaker 1>you know think about her in her politics, was is

0:39:37.239 --> 0:39:39.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the few heads of state we can point

0:39:39.560 --> 0:39:42.120
<v Speaker 1>to that had a science background. She was a research

0:39:42.200 --> 0:39:45.600
<v Speaker 1>chemist with a chemistry degree from Oxford. A weird thing

0:39:45.600 --> 0:39:49.520
<v Speaker 1>to remember. Yeah, in in the demon Haunted World, Sagan

0:39:49.640 --> 0:39:52.680
<v Speaker 1>brings us up because he's talking about science and politics

0:39:53.080 --> 0:39:56.600
<v Speaker 1>where they meet, and the idea here is that Margaret Thatcher,

0:39:57.000 --> 0:40:00.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, whatever else her her politics might mean, or

0:40:00.160 --> 0:40:02.280
<v Speaker 1>whatever you know, other details regarding her place in history,

0:40:02.800 --> 0:40:07.600
<v Speaker 1>she perhaps had an advantage in understanding these dire warnings

0:40:07.640 --> 0:40:12.080
<v Speaker 1>coming from the scientific community because of her own scientific background. Yeah,

0:40:12.120 --> 0:40:15.280
<v Speaker 1>that's interesting. I mean, it is not all that common

0:40:15.400 --> 0:40:19.600
<v Speaker 1>to see world leaders, major political leaders, coming from a

0:40:19.640 --> 0:40:23.759
<v Speaker 1>scientific background, I think, doesn't I think Angela Merkel has

0:40:23.760 --> 0:40:26.480
<v Speaker 1>a scientific one of the few other ones you can

0:40:26.480 --> 0:40:28.520
<v Speaker 1>easily point to. Yeah, but I was trying to think

0:40:28.560 --> 0:40:31.200
<v Speaker 1>of other examples and it come up very very short.

0:40:32.040 --> 0:40:35.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that is interesting, and I'm not saying necessarily

0:40:35.280 --> 0:40:37.800
<v Speaker 1>that one needs to be a scientist to be a

0:40:37.840 --> 0:40:40.440
<v Speaker 1>political leader. I mean that that also seems like a

0:40:40.880 --> 0:40:45.520
<v Speaker 1>unreasonable demand. And it's not necessarily true that scientific careers

0:40:45.520 --> 0:40:47.359
<v Speaker 1>would provide all of the kind of skills you need

0:40:47.440 --> 0:40:49.880
<v Speaker 1>to be a good political leader. But it seems like

0:40:49.920 --> 0:40:52.040
<v Speaker 1>it would be good to have at least a higher

0:40:52.040 --> 0:40:56.040
<v Speaker 1>proportion of people with scientific backgrounds involved in politics. I mean,

0:40:56.760 --> 0:40:59.840
<v Speaker 1>it's strange to just like look at the professional backgrounds

0:40:59.840 --> 0:41:03.799
<v Speaker 1>of people who become politicians and notice how uniform it

0:41:03.920 --> 0:41:05.520
<v Speaker 1>is most of the time. I mean, at least in

0:41:05.520 --> 0:41:09.839
<v Speaker 1>the United States, politics is overwhelmingly dominated by lawyers and

0:41:09.920 --> 0:41:13.920
<v Speaker 1>people from business. You kind of wonder how different our

0:41:13.960 --> 0:41:17.280
<v Speaker 1>politics might be if there was a more representative sample

0:41:17.320 --> 0:41:19.920
<v Speaker 1>of people from other fields, of people from the sciences,

0:41:19.960 --> 0:41:23.480
<v Speaker 1>of teachers, of labor. Leader. Isn't so forth that all

0:41:23.560 --> 0:41:26.719
<v Speaker 1>like became political leaders. Also, Yeah, I mean, at the

0:41:26.800 --> 0:41:30.799
<v Speaker 1>very least, you want leaders who listen to trusted scientists.

0:41:31.400 --> 0:41:34.040
<v Speaker 1>You you know, you want scientists to um and uh

0:41:34.080 --> 0:41:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and scientifically minded people to be in positions to speak

0:41:37.000 --> 0:41:39.719
<v Speaker 1>to scientific topics and then have that be a part

0:41:40.080 --> 0:41:43.279
<v Speaker 1>of the you know, the upper political consideration. And I

0:41:43.280 --> 0:41:45.520
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's a controversial statement to make on a

0:41:45.600 --> 0:41:49.399
<v Speaker 1>science podcast. Um, but let's come back to this Outer

0:41:49.480 --> 0:41:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Limits episode. So this came out in which curiously and

0:41:53.440 --> 0:41:55.879
<v Speaker 1>this you know, I don't know what degree this is, Uh,

0:41:56.080 --> 0:41:59.760
<v Speaker 1>this is actually um, you know, essential, but it's curiously

0:41:59.880 --> 0:42:03.640
<v Speaker 1>the same year that the rate of average global surface

0:42:03.640 --> 0:42:08.000
<v Speaker 1>warming began a slowing trend that lasted till now. As

0:42:08.040 --> 0:42:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Rebecca Lindsay points out on climate dot Gov, this really

0:42:11.600 --> 0:42:14.480
<v Speaker 1>just meant that quote the rate of average global surface

0:42:14.480 --> 0:42:18.680
<v Speaker 1>warming from two thousand and twelve was slower than it

0:42:18.760 --> 0:42:21.600
<v Speaker 1>had been for two to three decades leading up to it,

0:42:22.000 --> 0:42:26.520
<v Speaker 1>but the big picture of long term warming continued unchanged. Still,

0:42:27.040 --> 0:42:30.440
<v Speaker 1>climate change deniers at the time took took what climate

0:42:30.520 --> 0:42:34.160
<v Speaker 1>scientists described as a temporary pause or hiatus as proof

0:42:34.200 --> 0:42:38.680
<v Speaker 1>that quote global warming stopped in Oh yeah, I remember

0:42:38.680 --> 0:42:41.680
<v Speaker 1>seeing that claim a lot floating around on the internet. Yeah,

0:42:41.960 --> 0:42:44.720
<v Speaker 1>so again, that might just be pure you Obviously, this

0:42:44.719 --> 0:42:48.600
<v Speaker 1>this episode was probably written uh prior to ninety eight,

0:42:48.600 --> 0:42:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know what the exact production history on

0:42:50.480 --> 0:42:53.160
<v Speaker 1>on the script was that it might just be you know,

0:42:53.280 --> 0:42:56.280
<v Speaker 1>pure coincidence that had happened exactly that year, but maybe

0:42:56.280 --> 0:42:58.879
<v Speaker 1>not who knows. I would tend to think coincidence because

0:42:58.920 --> 0:43:02.440
<v Speaker 1>I doubt people. I mean, climate change was not as

0:43:02.520 --> 0:43:05.760
<v Speaker 1>much of a salient issue or political controversy at the time,

0:43:06.000 --> 0:43:08.800
<v Speaker 1>and there wasn't the same like period data to latch

0:43:08.840 --> 0:43:11.880
<v Speaker 1>onto and denying it yet. Yeah, but the idea of

0:43:11.920 --> 0:43:14.879
<v Speaker 1>calling it a pause or hiatus could be really kind

0:43:14.880 --> 0:43:16.920
<v Speaker 1>of misleading. I mean it seems like, actually, what I

0:43:16.960 --> 0:43:19.760
<v Speaker 1>was just talking about goes both ways. It would be good,

0:43:19.800 --> 0:43:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I think, to have more scientists involved in political leadership,

0:43:23.560 --> 0:43:25.879
<v Speaker 1>but it would also probably be good to have more

0:43:26.000 --> 0:43:31.160
<v Speaker 1>people who are experienced with rhetoric and messaging involved in science. Yeah,

0:43:31.160 --> 0:43:33.680
<v Speaker 1>because I mean that honestly. Yeah, that that's kind of

0:43:33.719 --> 0:43:36.680
<v Speaker 1>confusing terminology to throw out there. And and even if

0:43:36.680 --> 0:43:38.920
<v Speaker 1>you don't have an agenda, if you don't have, uh,

0:43:38.960 --> 0:43:40.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, a dog in the hunt, and of course

0:43:40.960 --> 0:43:43.960
<v Speaker 1>this will discuss everybody has a dog in this particular hunt. Um,

0:43:44.239 --> 0:43:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, you can see how you might misinterpret that.

0:43:46.760 --> 0:43:51.239
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, Yeah, this was the idea was pushed by

0:43:51.239 --> 0:43:53.400
<v Speaker 1>some that this means, oh, well, global warming has stopped,

0:43:53.480 --> 0:43:55.960
<v Speaker 1>like it's over. Uh, you were freaking out over nothing.

0:43:56.200 --> 0:43:59.400
<v Speaker 1>This despite that global warming is a human cause condition

0:43:59.680 --> 0:44:03.719
<v Speaker 1>still saw two thousand twelve as the warmest fifteen year

0:44:03.800 --> 0:44:07.400
<v Speaker 1>period on record at that time, with greenhouse gases climbing

0:44:07.440 --> 0:44:10.760
<v Speaker 1>to new record highs, the oceans were warming, sea levels

0:44:10.760 --> 0:44:13.600
<v Speaker 1>were rising, ice was melting. Now, as we've discussed on

0:44:13.640 --> 0:44:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the show before, part of this comes down to a misunderstanding,

0:44:17.760 --> 0:44:22.200
<v Speaker 1>willful or otherwise, on how science functions. Science is not

0:44:22.280 --> 0:44:25.200
<v Speaker 1>a tool that works or doesn't work, and then maybe

0:44:25.239 --> 0:44:27.759
<v Speaker 1>cast aside like a crooked drill bit or something that

0:44:27.800 --> 0:44:31.160
<v Speaker 1>needs to be replaced. The part in to tell the

0:44:31.200 --> 0:44:34.920
<v Speaker 1>truth about Chambers having gotten it wrong before certainly smacks

0:44:34.960 --> 0:44:39.120
<v Speaker 1>of the common climate denialism mantra of but what about

0:44:39.160 --> 0:44:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the warnings of the new ice Age and other such criticism, right,

0:44:42.760 --> 0:44:46.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a lot wrong with with that approach, obviously,

0:44:46.760 --> 0:44:50.000
<v Speaker 1>ranging from the treating uh, you know, of all science

0:44:50.040 --> 0:44:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and scientists, regardless of area focus is kind of a

0:44:53.000 --> 0:44:56.120
<v Speaker 1>monolith like, oh, you know, this is what science is doing.

0:44:56.200 --> 0:44:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Is what the scientists are doing. And I found a

0:44:57.880 --> 0:45:01.360
<v Speaker 1>scientist that says otherwise, because that also gets into the

0:45:01.440 --> 0:45:05.040
<v Speaker 1>cherry picking and uh, you know, assuming that air and

0:45:05.120 --> 0:45:08.759
<v Speaker 1>recalibration are not part of the scientific process. One of

0:45:08.800 --> 0:45:11.759
<v Speaker 1>the real difficulties with scientific communication is that you can

0:45:11.960 --> 0:45:15.000
<v Speaker 1>always make a kind of confusing reference to the past.

0:45:15.200 --> 0:45:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Like you can find controversy on essentially any issue. Uh.

0:45:19.920 --> 0:45:23.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's no scientific issue I can think of

0:45:24.080 --> 0:45:27.600
<v Speaker 1>where through through the entire history of the awareness of

0:45:27.640 --> 0:45:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the issue, all scientists have had it right and been

0:45:30.680 --> 0:45:33.560
<v Speaker 1>on the same page about it. So if you're interested

0:45:33.600 --> 0:45:37.919
<v Speaker 1>in generating the the idea of confusion or controversy about

0:45:37.920 --> 0:45:41.919
<v Speaker 1>any particular scientific conclusion, and you want to make references to, well,

0:45:42.000 --> 0:45:44.480
<v Speaker 1>when have people said different things about this issue in

0:45:44.520 --> 0:45:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the past, you can always find something like that. And

0:45:46.840 --> 0:45:51.440
<v Speaker 1>in some cases issue scientific consensus about issues develops and

0:45:51.560 --> 0:45:54.080
<v Speaker 1>changes very rapidly. I mean, I think about the ways

0:45:54.160 --> 0:45:58.480
<v Speaker 1>that um for example, current recommendations about how best to

0:45:58.520 --> 0:46:02.680
<v Speaker 1>battle the coronavirus out UH masks and social distancing and

0:46:02.680 --> 0:46:06.000
<v Speaker 1>all that stuff. People who are kind of people who

0:46:06.000 --> 0:46:09.759
<v Speaker 1>are opposed to following the current best guidelines about those

0:46:09.800 --> 0:46:12.799
<v Speaker 1>things will make reference to what people were saying in

0:46:12.840 --> 0:46:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the earliest weeks of the of the pandemic. You remember this, right, Like,

0:46:17.560 --> 0:46:21.680
<v Speaker 1>like initially scientific guidelines were not recommending people wear masks.

0:46:21.760 --> 0:46:25.160
<v Speaker 1>That changed very quickly. We did a very early episode

0:46:25.400 --> 0:46:29.080
<v Speaker 1>where we about the coronavirus, where we we we mentioned that,

0:46:29.440 --> 0:46:31.600
<v Speaker 1>though I should also point out that we also drove

0:46:31.640 --> 0:46:34.120
<v Speaker 1>home that you know we're recording this on such and

0:46:34.160 --> 0:46:37.520
<v Speaker 1>such date, at such and such point in this pandemic.

0:46:38.120 --> 0:46:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Be aware that that, you know, everything may change as

0:46:41.640 --> 0:46:44.239
<v Speaker 1>this story develops. It can be a really frustrating thing.

0:46:44.280 --> 0:46:46.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean. The evidence now for the effectiveness of mask

0:46:46.960 --> 0:46:49.279
<v Speaker 1>wearing too slow the spread of the virus is very good.

0:46:49.360 --> 0:46:52.080
<v Speaker 1>It comes from multiple kinds of studies. Studies looking at

0:46:52.080 --> 0:46:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the effects of mask mandates at the population level, studies

0:46:55.560 --> 0:46:58.239
<v Speaker 1>looking at the effects of physical barriers on the propagation

0:46:58.239 --> 0:47:01.160
<v Speaker 1>of droplets and aerosols, and can rolled environments, how it

0:47:01.200 --> 0:47:04.160
<v Speaker 1>spreads between hamsters and things like that. The bottom line

0:47:04.200 --> 0:47:05.960
<v Speaker 1>from all of this research up to now is that

0:47:06.000 --> 0:47:08.040
<v Speaker 1>there's very good reason to wear a mask if you

0:47:08.080 --> 0:47:10.160
<v Speaker 1>go out in the public setting or anywhere near people

0:47:10.160 --> 0:47:13.960
<v Speaker 1>outside your household. But no matter how much evidence accumulates

0:47:13.960 --> 0:47:16.440
<v Speaker 1>in that column, there's always going to be this historical

0:47:16.480 --> 0:47:19.200
<v Speaker 1>reference point where people can say, hey, wait a minute,

0:47:19.280 --> 0:47:22.000
<v Speaker 1>like the experts weren't saying that at the beginning of March,

0:47:23.160 --> 0:47:25.960
<v Speaker 1>So how can we be sure that they're right. Now,

0:47:26.040 --> 0:47:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Why is what scientists are saying about the coronavirus or

0:47:28.680 --> 0:47:31.319
<v Speaker 1>about climate or anything now better than what they were

0:47:31.320 --> 0:47:34.040
<v Speaker 1>saying in the past. And it can seem confusing, But

0:47:34.200 --> 0:47:36.600
<v Speaker 1>for the most part, the answer is actually pretty simple,

0:47:36.920 --> 0:47:39.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's that now we have better evidence. There's more evidence,

0:47:39.960 --> 0:47:44.080
<v Speaker 1>more relevant evidence, better quality evidence. That's the difference. Yeah,

0:47:44.080 --> 0:47:47.399
<v Speaker 1>this makes me think about the fact that science can

0:47:47.440 --> 0:47:51.960
<v Speaker 1>be very susceptible to political weapons when those weapons are

0:47:52.040 --> 0:47:55.359
<v Speaker 1>leveled at it, because science, science is ultimately this thing

0:47:55.440 --> 0:47:59.120
<v Speaker 1>that is that is taking place and analyzing, you know,

0:47:59.200 --> 0:48:02.799
<v Speaker 1>the fun mineral aspects of the larger world, the cosmos,

0:48:03.160 --> 0:48:08.160
<v Speaker 1>whereas politics is very much a condition of of social dynamics.

0:48:08.480 --> 0:48:11.759
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, these political weapons, these singers and

0:48:11.760 --> 0:48:14.839
<v Speaker 1>and got your points and basically anything that might be

0:48:15.000 --> 0:48:18.560
<v Speaker 1>used from by one political opponent against another, like those

0:48:18.600 --> 0:48:20.480
<v Speaker 1>are things that are designed to work within a social

0:48:20.480 --> 0:48:22.839
<v Speaker 1>context for the most part, into a certain extent, within

0:48:22.920 --> 0:48:27.680
<v Speaker 1>illegal context. But but sciences is like the world beyond

0:48:28.200 --> 0:48:32.479
<v Speaker 1>this domed colony of of law and society. And I wonder,

0:48:32.560 --> 0:48:34.279
<v Speaker 1>now that I've said that out loud, I wonder if

0:48:34.280 --> 0:48:36.680
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of the the beauty of this, uh, this

0:48:36.719 --> 0:48:40.120
<v Speaker 1>setting in this outer Limits of episode, because the people

0:48:40.120 --> 0:48:42.799
<v Speaker 1>in the colonists are literally living inside a bubble of

0:48:42.840 --> 0:48:45.760
<v Speaker 1>their own construction, uh, you know, of their own design,

0:48:46.160 --> 0:48:51.000
<v Speaker 1>and trying to evaluate threats that exist outside, like literally

0:48:51.040 --> 0:48:55.440
<v Speaker 1>outside the sphere of their immediate domain. All right, we're

0:48:55.440 --> 0:48:57.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna take a quick break. We'll be right back with more.

0:49:01.080 --> 0:49:04.520
<v Speaker 1>And we're back now, of course in this Outer Limits episode. Um,

0:49:04.560 --> 0:49:07.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, as as as we we've pointed out before,

0:49:07.800 --> 0:49:09.839
<v Speaker 1>there's this stark difference between what's going on with Dr

0:49:09.920 --> 0:49:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Chambers and what's going on with us, because well, it's

0:49:13.239 --> 0:49:15.840
<v Speaker 1>just in the show, it's just Dr Chambers preaching to

0:49:15.920 --> 0:49:18.880
<v Speaker 1>a crowded room and making a case with difficult evidence.

0:49:18.920 --> 0:49:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Though climate change data is certainly complex, but but in

0:49:21.960 --> 0:49:26.120
<v Speaker 1>our world it is a case of overwhelming scientific consensus. Um,

0:49:26.760 --> 0:49:30.279
<v Speaker 1>it's especially as far as climate scientists are concerned. Yeah,

0:49:30.280 --> 0:49:32.279
<v Speaker 1>there's no doubt about that. I mean, we've talked about

0:49:32.320 --> 0:49:35.400
<v Speaker 1>the consensus on this issue and and the studies measuring

0:49:35.440 --> 0:49:37.840
<v Speaker 1>it in previous episodes. I think we talked about that

0:49:37.880 --> 0:49:40.319
<v Speaker 1>in one of the episodes we recorded after you came

0:49:40.360 --> 0:49:42.960
<v Speaker 1>back from the World Science Festival in the previous year.

0:49:43.000 --> 0:49:47.000
<v Speaker 1>And we discussed one of the panels about science communication

0:49:47.080 --> 0:49:49.560
<v Speaker 1>and about climate change. But yeah, there's no doubt at

0:49:49.600 --> 0:49:53.000
<v Speaker 1>all that almost all climate scientists are people with expertise

0:49:53.000 --> 0:49:55.640
<v Speaker 1>in the relevant fields, are on the same page with

0:49:55.719 --> 0:49:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the broad strokes of climate change. It is a problem,

0:49:59.120 --> 0:50:02.080
<v Speaker 1>it is major threatening, It is caused in large part

0:50:02.160 --> 0:50:05.080
<v Speaker 1>by the products of human industry. And yet it can

0:50:05.120 --> 0:50:08.040
<v Speaker 1>certainly feel at times like it's just one doctor Chambers

0:50:08.080 --> 0:50:09.960
<v Speaker 1>pleading with the rest of the colony because there is

0:50:10.200 --> 0:50:13.799
<v Speaker 1>significant and UH and and dangerous lack of commitment to

0:50:13.840 --> 0:50:16.920
<v Speaker 1>combating the problem, especially in the United States, and a

0:50:16.960 --> 0:50:20.640
<v Speaker 1>great deal of anti science and anti climate science worldview

0:50:21.200 --> 0:50:24.360
<v Speaker 1>UH is often found here, especially in places of significant

0:50:24.360 --> 0:50:29.560
<v Speaker 1>political power. Yeah, the anti science sentiment is extremely dangerous,

0:50:29.840 --> 0:50:33.319
<v Speaker 1>Like just this year in we've seen the results in

0:50:33.440 --> 0:50:38.160
<v Speaker 1>real time um uh with the coronavirus as failure to

0:50:38.160 --> 0:50:41.160
<v Speaker 1>listen to scientists and take advisories about mask wearing and

0:50:41.200 --> 0:50:45.160
<v Speaker 1>social distancing seriously have led to outbreaks and surges that

0:50:45.239 --> 0:50:48.680
<v Speaker 1>have cost human lives first and foremost, but also cost

0:50:48.760 --> 0:50:51.560
<v Speaker 1>time and money. Uh. You know, it can still be

0:50:51.640 --> 0:50:54.680
<v Speaker 1>difficult to gauge such threats, but it's certainly a more

0:50:54.719 --> 0:50:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I think readily understandable situation compared to climate change, which

0:50:58.600 --> 0:51:01.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the issues. There is again complex

0:51:01.120 --> 0:51:05.960
<v Speaker 1>climate science dealing with you know, longer periods of time

0:51:06.520 --> 0:51:09.440
<v Speaker 1>uh as opposed to everything happening within the space of

0:51:09.440 --> 0:51:11.920
<v Speaker 1>a few months. Though at the same time, we are

0:51:11.960 --> 0:51:16.200
<v Speaker 1>also living in a time of dangerous climate alteration, as

0:51:16.200 --> 0:51:20.319
<v Speaker 1>we endure rising seas, intense hurricanes, and increased droughts and

0:51:20.360 --> 0:51:24.440
<v Speaker 1>heat waves. It's perhaps more pronounced now than ever before.

0:51:25.000 --> 0:51:28.040
<v Speaker 1>And and not everyone has their head in the sand. Certainly,

0:51:28.080 --> 0:51:31.240
<v Speaker 1>According to a report from the Yale Program on Climate

0:51:31.280 --> 0:51:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Change Communication and George Mason University's Center for Climate Change Communication,

0:51:36.040 --> 0:51:39.759
<v Speaker 1>almost six and ten Americans are either alarmed or concerned

0:51:39.880 --> 0:51:42.440
<v Speaker 1>by global warming, which the authors pointed out as being

0:51:42.440 --> 0:51:46.560
<v Speaker 1>a major shift. As for the rest, though well, researchers

0:51:46.560 --> 0:51:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and thinkers have been exploring these questions for years. Again,

0:51:49.080 --> 0:51:50.840
<v Speaker 1>we have a we have we have passed episodes to

0:51:50.880 --> 0:51:53.800
<v Speaker 1>get into this a bit. Why do we deny the evidence?

0:51:54.160 --> 0:51:58.400
<v Speaker 1>You know? Why why deny um climate change? Now? Certainly

0:51:58.440 --> 0:52:02.040
<v Speaker 1>there's much to be said for how unpleasant the reality is.

0:52:02.719 --> 0:52:05.240
<v Speaker 1>No one wants to be a part of a problem

0:52:05.280 --> 0:52:09.400
<v Speaker 1>like this, or to dwell on a future of massy stabilization, relocation,

0:52:09.560 --> 0:52:13.360
<v Speaker 1>and extinction. We as humans are in many ways just

0:52:13.440 --> 0:52:16.640
<v Speaker 1>poorly wired to deal with threats of this magnitude and scale.

0:52:17.160 --> 0:52:19.759
<v Speaker 1>We're better with the short term. Uh, you know, but

0:52:19.760 --> 0:52:21.680
<v Speaker 1>but but what are what are we ultimately to do?

0:52:22.280 --> 0:52:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I Mean, one of the things we've talked about in

0:52:24.040 --> 0:52:27.840
<v Speaker 1>previous episodes about this is the idea that identity protective

0:52:27.880 --> 0:52:33.480
<v Speaker 1>cognition plays in why people respond negatively to climate science.

0:52:34.000 --> 0:52:35.959
<v Speaker 1>And this is the thing that we should be sympathetic about.

0:52:36.000 --> 0:52:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, everybody engages in identity protective cognition. Everybody engages

0:52:40.200 --> 0:52:43.239
<v Speaker 1>in forms of motivated reasoning on various issues to try

0:52:43.280 --> 0:52:46.839
<v Speaker 1>to protect their their picture of the integrity of their

0:52:46.880 --> 0:52:50.719
<v Speaker 1>self and how they fit into a social system. So uh,

0:52:50.960 --> 0:52:53.960
<v Speaker 1>And this is one of the dangers of scientific issues

0:52:54.000 --> 0:52:58.840
<v Speaker 1>becoming politicized is that once an issue becomes politicized, the

0:52:58.920 --> 0:53:03.760
<v Speaker 1>social and identity connotations of the sides of that issue

0:53:04.280 --> 0:53:07.759
<v Speaker 1>become more relevant than the evidence does. And unfortunately, this

0:53:07.800 --> 0:53:10.239
<v Speaker 1>can happen really rapidly with issues that don't happen to

0:53:10.280 --> 0:53:14.319
<v Speaker 1>have any particular like political values or implications attached to

0:53:14.360 --> 0:53:17.440
<v Speaker 1>them inherently. I mean, there are examples. I was just

0:53:17.480 --> 0:53:20.280
<v Speaker 1>thinking about, how do you remember how at some point

0:53:20.320 --> 0:53:25.040
<v Speaker 1>this year, suddenly it became a political issue with a

0:53:25.120 --> 0:53:30.200
<v Speaker 1>political valence whether or not hydroxy chlora quinn was an

0:53:30.239 --> 0:53:34.080
<v Speaker 1>effective therapeutic for COVID nineteen, which when you step back

0:53:34.080 --> 0:53:36.600
<v Speaker 1>and think about that, that's it's like crazy that that

0:53:36.760 --> 0:53:40.760
<v Speaker 1>is not an issue that really has any particular political implications.

0:53:40.800 --> 0:53:45.200
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't implicate any fundamental values. It just happened to

0:53:45.360 --> 0:53:49.440
<v Speaker 1>get politicized because of who was talking about it, what ways,

0:53:49.480 --> 0:53:51.560
<v Speaker 1>and you know how that was appearing in the media.

0:53:52.360 --> 0:53:54.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, if Donald Trump had come out and said it,

0:53:54.600 --> 0:53:57.160
<v Speaker 1>said that it was not effective, it could have been

0:53:57.200 --> 0:54:00.839
<v Speaker 1>politicized in exactly the opposite way. So, you know, it's

0:54:00.840 --> 0:54:03.719
<v Speaker 1>like weird, how how totally contingent things like this can be.

0:54:04.120 --> 0:54:09.560
<v Speaker 1>But unfortunately, once a scientific question gains political connotations, it

0:54:09.600 --> 0:54:12.239
<v Speaker 1>can be very hard to take them off. Just kind

0:54:12.239 --> 0:54:15.160
<v Speaker 1>of stuck there. And people don't want to believe in

0:54:15.280 --> 0:54:18.200
<v Speaker 1>things that they think of as beliefs inappropriate for a

0:54:18.280 --> 0:54:22.040
<v Speaker 1>person such as themselves, you know, and and so that

0:54:22.160 --> 0:54:24.480
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the real dangers. I mean, the best

0:54:24.520 --> 0:54:27.720
<v Speaker 1>thing to do about science is to try to prevent

0:54:27.880 --> 0:54:32.319
<v Speaker 1>scientific questions from acquiring a political connotation to begin with,

0:54:32.480 --> 0:54:34.600
<v Speaker 1>you have to do your best to try to make

0:54:34.640 --> 0:54:38.040
<v Speaker 1>sure that, uh that a a scientific message or the

0:54:38.080 --> 0:54:41.920
<v Speaker 1>communication of a scientific conclusion is not associated with anybody

0:54:41.920 --> 0:54:46.239
<v Speaker 1>of any particular political affiliation. But that can be very

0:54:46.320 --> 0:54:49.960
<v Speaker 1>hard to do. Yeah, absolutely, I mean it like issues

0:54:50.000 --> 0:54:53.360
<v Speaker 1>can be asymmetrically politicized, right. All all it takes is

0:54:53.440 --> 0:54:57.920
<v Speaker 1>basically one major political figure to to decide to make

0:54:57.960 --> 0:55:01.400
<v Speaker 1>a scientific question a politicize this issue, and you know

0:55:01.440 --> 0:55:03.600
<v Speaker 1>they can usually do it. But again, in all this

0:55:03.760 --> 0:55:07.360
<v Speaker 1>communication is key, you know. And uh and and a

0:55:07.440 --> 0:55:09.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of this episode of the Outer Limits is about

0:55:09.360 --> 0:55:13.279
<v Speaker 1>like trying to communicate, um, the nature of science to

0:55:13.360 --> 0:55:16.719
<v Speaker 1>people that have their doubts, uh, that are denying what's

0:55:16.760 --> 0:55:20.840
<v Speaker 1>going on. Uh. So I looked at a paper for

0:55:20.880 --> 0:55:23.799
<v Speaker 1>a little more in this titled Understanding and Countering the

0:55:23.840 --> 0:55:27.399
<v Speaker 1>Motivated Roots of Climate change Denial, is by Gabriel Long

0:55:27.600 --> 0:55:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Parodi and uh Irena Fagina, published earlier this year in

0:55:32.680 --> 0:55:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Current Opinion and Environmental Sustainability. The paper focuses on communication

0:55:37.560 --> 0:55:41.600
<v Speaker 1>approaches to reach climate change deniers in peer viewed studies

0:55:41.600 --> 0:55:43.560
<v Speaker 1>from the past two years. With a special focus on

0:55:43.560 --> 0:55:46.880
<v Speaker 1>what the authors described as people engaged in quote motivated denial.

0:55:47.400 --> 0:55:50.560
<v Speaker 1>This means the people in question have access to the facts,

0:55:50.600 --> 0:55:53.480
<v Speaker 1>but they still deny them. On some level. They make

0:55:53.480 --> 0:55:56.680
<v Speaker 1>a choice to deny the science and cling to another

0:55:56.760 --> 0:55:59.759
<v Speaker 1>view of reality that flies in the face of scientific consensus.

0:56:00.040 --> 0:56:02.919
<v Speaker 1>But it's easier to accept. Yeah, And again, to be fair,

0:56:02.960 --> 0:56:05.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously I think people should accept the scientific

0:56:05.360 --> 0:56:08.040
<v Speaker 1>consensus on climate change, but I think a lot of

0:56:08.040 --> 0:56:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the people who deny it are not doing so, like

0:56:10.640 --> 0:56:14.000
<v Speaker 1>out of a conscious perversity, thinking like I won't accept

0:56:14.040 --> 0:56:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the facts. I mean, the fact is that motivated reasoning

0:56:17.080 --> 0:56:21.320
<v Speaker 1>changes how facts appear to us. Things that are perfectly

0:56:21.360 --> 0:56:25.120
<v Speaker 1>reasonable to believe just suddenly don't seem plausible to you

0:56:25.239 --> 0:56:28.759
<v Speaker 1>because of motivations you have. Yeah. Yeah, because I mean,

0:56:28.760 --> 0:56:33.920
<v Speaker 1>in one hand, there's the responsibility of what human infoke.

0:56:33.960 --> 0:56:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Climate change means. It means accepting your part of the problem,

0:56:37.440 --> 0:56:39.880
<v Speaker 1>and then it also means accepting that the problem threatens

0:56:39.960 --> 0:56:42.799
<v Speaker 1>much of the stability and normalcy that you hold dear.

0:56:43.280 --> 0:56:45.879
<v Speaker 1>And furthermore, you may feel the need to speak out

0:56:45.920 --> 0:56:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and act and so forth, And it can be easier,

0:56:49.560 --> 0:56:52.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, on on some level, to simply live in

0:56:52.120 --> 0:56:56.319
<v Speaker 1>denial like that is an easier mental construct, uh to

0:56:56.320 --> 0:56:58.880
<v Speaker 1>to erect in the mind, as opposed to dealing with

0:56:58.920 --> 0:57:02.360
<v Speaker 1>all of these additional change changes, uh to the the

0:57:02.360 --> 0:57:05.759
<v Speaker 1>world you've grown accustomed to. Now. Chambers does end up

0:57:05.800 --> 0:57:08.200
<v Speaker 1>being accused of being an alien shape shifter at one

0:57:08.239 --> 0:57:12.600
<v Speaker 1>point in this Outer Limits episode, but he never reverses

0:57:12.640 --> 0:57:15.600
<v Speaker 1>this charge on the colonists, which is which which is

0:57:15.600 --> 0:57:17.680
<v Speaker 1>worth worth noting, especially because it ties in a little

0:57:17.680 --> 0:57:20.040
<v Speaker 1>bit into what um The authors here in the study

0:57:20.400 --> 0:57:22.120
<v Speaker 1>discussed that I think they would agree that this was

0:57:22.160 --> 0:57:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the right move. One of the key points to say

0:57:25.640 --> 0:57:29.439
<v Speaker 1>the aliens right, well, yeah, essentially not to say say, oh,

0:57:29.760 --> 0:57:31.800
<v Speaker 1>climate change denire is you're a bunch of aliens. There's

0:57:31.800 --> 0:57:34.280
<v Speaker 1>something wrong with you. You're you're you're broken in some way.

0:57:34.320 --> 0:57:36.640
<v Speaker 1>You know that. That's That's one of the key points

0:57:36.640 --> 0:57:39.480
<v Speaker 1>and climate change communication, uh, they point out, is to

0:57:40.360 --> 0:57:44.880
<v Speaker 1>is not to dismiss deniers outright, but to acknowledge their

0:57:44.920 --> 0:57:49.160
<v Speaker 1>opinions and beliefs. And they they acknowledge that this can

0:57:49.200 --> 0:57:52.720
<v Speaker 1>be difficult, obviously, but they point to four different strategies

0:57:53.080 --> 0:57:57.160
<v Speaker 1>that that seem to show promise and or seem to work. Okay,

0:57:57.200 --> 0:57:59.840
<v Speaker 1>what are the strategies all right? The first is reef

0:58:00.000 --> 0:58:03.280
<v Speaker 1>fraiming solutions to climate change as ways to uphold the

0:58:03.280 --> 0:58:07.520
<v Speaker 1>social system and work towards its stability and longevity. Now

0:58:07.560 --> 0:58:09.680
<v Speaker 1>in the Outer Limits, Chambers does this, of course, by

0:58:09.680 --> 0:58:11.920
<v Speaker 1>pointing out that if they don't act, the stability of

0:58:11.920 --> 0:58:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the colony will be threatened. Um. If if he could have,

0:58:15.800 --> 0:58:19.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, actually had an honest discussion with Murdoch, he

0:58:19.320 --> 0:58:21.800
<v Speaker 1>might have told him, Look, this will ruin your prospects

0:58:21.880 --> 0:58:25.280
<v Speaker 1>of profits from the colony. It will endanger your power.

0:58:25.360 --> 0:58:28.520
<v Speaker 1>It's going to threaten this home that you hold dear. Uh,

0:58:28.560 --> 0:58:30.800
<v Speaker 1>you know this is this is a threat to all

0:58:30.840 --> 0:58:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the things we we value here. Yeah. So I think

0:58:34.880 --> 0:58:38.240
<v Speaker 1>this is saying, like, you know, to be factual in

0:58:38.320 --> 0:58:41.360
<v Speaker 1>representing what the threats are, but to emphasize the kinds

0:58:41.400 --> 0:58:44.760
<v Speaker 1>of threats that are particularly salient to people with the

0:58:44.760 --> 0:58:48.720
<v Speaker 1>political identity who are more likely to deny climate change. So,

0:58:49.080 --> 0:58:51.160
<v Speaker 1>to use a Simpsons example, if you were trying to

0:58:51.200 --> 0:58:54.200
<v Speaker 1>convince members of the Simpsons family not to make a

0:58:54.200 --> 0:58:57.120
<v Speaker 1>foolish investment in a tobacco farm, you might appeal to

0:58:57.200 --> 0:58:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Homer in particular by saying if you do that, you're

0:58:59.600 --> 0:59:02.080
<v Speaker 1>not going to have a budget for beer or to

0:59:02.080 --> 0:59:04.640
<v Speaker 1>pay the cable bill, right, you know, like you you

0:59:04.920 --> 0:59:08.480
<v Speaker 1>single out the issues that are actually most salient to people. Yeah.

0:59:08.720 --> 0:59:11.959
<v Speaker 1>I think a good example of this is we we

0:59:11.960 --> 0:59:14.080
<v Speaker 1>we we see this in the realization, for instance, that

0:59:14.160 --> 0:59:17.160
<v Speaker 1>climate change is a national security issue as well as

0:59:17.160 --> 0:59:21.040
<v Speaker 1>a purely environmental one. Yeah. Yeah, it's not just about

0:59:21.080 --> 0:59:24.040
<v Speaker 1>saving the earth or saving the environment, but safeguarding things

0:59:24.120 --> 0:59:27.120
<v Speaker 1>like our supply chains, etcetera. So um so yeah, one

0:59:27.160 --> 0:59:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of the ideas here is don't just the idea of

0:59:30.080 --> 0:59:31.880
<v Speaker 1>like we need to save the planet, like you know,

0:59:31.960 --> 0:59:34.600
<v Speaker 1>that's going to carry with it. I mean that's true,

0:59:35.040 --> 0:59:37.360
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, but but but that how does it

0:59:37.400 --> 0:59:40.800
<v Speaker 1>need to be tweaked to to to meet the world

0:59:40.880 --> 0:59:43.440
<v Speaker 1>view of the person on the other side. And that

0:59:43.480 --> 0:59:46.560
<v Speaker 1>gets into the second piece of advice they have, and

0:59:46.560 --> 0:59:50.520
<v Speaker 1>that's reducing the ideological divide by incorporating the purity of

0:59:50.560 --> 0:59:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the earth rather than how we harm or care for it.

0:59:53.800 --> 0:59:55.800
<v Speaker 1>So this is more about putting I guess you could say,

0:59:55.800 --> 0:59:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the hopeful spin on it and emphasizing our ability to

0:59:58.800 --> 1:00:03.520
<v Speaker 1>make changes and perhaps even our responsibility to to look

1:00:03.560 --> 1:00:06.200
<v Speaker 1>after the earth that is going to fall in line

1:00:06.240 --> 1:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>with various religious world views, rather than just the shame

1:00:10.480 --> 1:00:13.240
<v Speaker 1>point of realizing that we've done a lot of harm

1:00:13.600 --> 1:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>and that we need to change our ways. Now the

1:00:15.800 --> 1:00:18.120
<v Speaker 1>author is going to point out to other areas one

1:00:18.760 --> 1:00:22.800
<v Speaker 1>number three, rather having conversations about the scientific consensus around

1:00:22.800 --> 1:00:26.280
<v Speaker 1>climate change with trusted individuals. Now, I think that's easier

1:00:26.320 --> 1:00:29.880
<v Speaker 1>said than done. Um Uh, take outer limits for example,

1:00:30.040 --> 1:00:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Chambers is mistrusted. Uh and you know who who else

1:00:33.480 --> 1:00:35.040
<v Speaker 1>are you going to talk to here? If you cherry

1:00:35.080 --> 1:00:39.160
<v Speaker 1>pick you're trusted individuals? Um? You know that can those

1:00:39.160 --> 1:00:43.000
<v Speaker 1>trusted individuals can include climate deniers or people with without

1:00:44.040 --> 1:00:46.960
<v Speaker 1>perhaps with sometimes with a scientific background, but not a

1:00:46.960 --> 1:00:50.520
<v Speaker 1>scientific background in climate science. I mean, I think this

1:00:50.560 --> 1:00:52.320
<v Speaker 1>ties in very much to what I was just talking

1:00:52.320 --> 1:00:56.000
<v Speaker 1>about with identity protective cognition, Like you don't want to

1:00:56.040 --> 1:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>embrace the belief that you see as antithetical to people

1:00:58.720 --> 1:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>in your social group who have the kind of integrity

1:01:01.760 --> 1:01:03.720
<v Speaker 1>that you value, and so yeah, I think one of

1:01:03.760 --> 1:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the best and most important ways to get around this

1:01:06.360 --> 1:01:09.120
<v Speaker 1>is to show, hey, people like you, people who you

1:01:09.280 --> 1:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>socially identify with, they they also agree with the scientific

1:01:13.640 --> 1:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>consensus here. And then the fourth point they bring up

1:01:16.760 --> 1:01:19.920
<v Speaker 1>is encouraging people to explosively discuss their values and stands

1:01:19.960 --> 1:01:23.760
<v Speaker 1>on climate change prior to engaging with climate information. So

1:01:23.880 --> 1:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the idea with this one is that quote self affirmation

1:01:27.360 --> 1:01:31.200
<v Speaker 1>is challenged when people face climate change because it requires

1:01:31.200 --> 1:01:33.960
<v Speaker 1>them to consider their contribution to the problem, which can

1:01:34.000 --> 1:01:38.200
<v Speaker 1>threaten their sense of integrity and trigger self defense. And finally,

1:01:38.400 --> 1:01:40.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, they say, you want to stress solutions that

1:01:40.520 --> 1:01:42.680
<v Speaker 1>match in individual's values and don't threaten their sense of

1:01:42.720 --> 1:01:44.880
<v Speaker 1>identity or their way of life. And now, of course,

1:01:44.880 --> 1:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>if we as we've discussed before, this also underlines the

1:01:47.320 --> 1:01:50.400
<v Speaker 1>horror of politicization of climate change and the attempt to

1:01:50.440 --> 1:01:53.400
<v Speaker 1>try and uh and bake in climate change denial into

1:01:53.400 --> 1:01:57.040
<v Speaker 1>a political worldview. Once something like this becomes politicized, it's

1:01:57.080 --> 1:02:01.360
<v Speaker 1>difficult to unpoliticize it. Yeah, he'sa Freeman wrote an excellent

1:02:01.400 --> 1:02:04.120
<v Speaker 1>piece on COVID and climate denialism for The New York

1:02:04.120 --> 1:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Times earlier this month that touches on the work of

1:02:06.960 --> 1:02:10.920
<v Speaker 1>John Cook, research assistant professor at the Center for Climate

1:02:10.960 --> 1:02:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Change Communication at George Mason University and founder of the

1:02:14.120 --> 1:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>website skeptical science. Um Cook argues that ideology and tribalism

1:02:20.680 --> 1:02:24.000
<v Speaker 1>tend to come before facts and people's beliefs about climate change,

1:02:24.280 --> 1:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>and that means a lot of the power here falls

1:02:26.360 --> 1:02:30.080
<v Speaker 1>to people of influence within an ideology, and that means

1:02:30.440 --> 1:02:35.240
<v Speaker 1>that leadership is crucial to overcoming climate change denialism. And again,

1:02:35.320 --> 1:02:37.880
<v Speaker 1>isn't that what we see in this Outer Limits episode.

1:02:38.000 --> 1:02:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Murdoch is the leader of the colony, and while he

1:02:40.880 --> 1:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>admits that he actually briefly you believes Chambers, or at

1:02:44.320 --> 1:02:47.440
<v Speaker 1>least entertains the idea that Chambers may be correct, he

1:02:47.680 --> 1:02:50.680
<v Speaker 1>otherwise works against him at every turn, and the people

1:02:50.840 --> 1:02:54.280
<v Speaker 1>look to Murdoch. Uh. Furthermore, Murdoch is a sort of

1:02:54.280 --> 1:02:56.959
<v Speaker 1>head of state in the off world. Colony. Doesn't only

1:02:57.080 --> 1:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>argue against rationally against Chambers, he all so ultimately engages

1:03:01.280 --> 1:03:05.160
<v Speaker 1>in more underhanded tactics, including the use of disinformation. Yeah,

1:03:05.160 --> 1:03:09.080
<v Speaker 1>they try to personally discredit Chambers with with attacks on

1:03:09.280 --> 1:03:12.640
<v Speaker 1>his what I would say, his character, but attacks on

1:03:12.720 --> 1:03:16.040
<v Speaker 1>his biology. Yeah, I would say character and biology is

1:03:16.360 --> 1:03:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the first character and then ultimately biology itself. Um. If

1:03:20.840 --> 1:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>we look to our current situation in October twenty with

1:03:24.760 --> 1:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>with COVID and climate change. It's it's kind of interesting

1:03:27.200 --> 1:03:31.080
<v Speaker 1>how to tell the truth forecast our current leadership situation.

1:03:31.720 --> 1:03:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Um so so so again, this is one of those episodes.

1:03:35.000 --> 1:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Even though it came out in the nineties, it's still

1:03:37.320 --> 1:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>is very relevant today. According to cook Um however, only

1:03:41.800 --> 1:03:44.960
<v Speaker 1>ten percent of Americans are outright dismissive of the science

1:03:44.960 --> 1:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>on climate change, and that seems to correl correlate well

1:03:47.840 --> 1:03:50.360
<v Speaker 1>with the twelve percent of Americans who are not concerned

1:03:50.400 --> 1:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>about COVID. Friedman writes, quote, this means, he said, referring

1:03:54.840 --> 1:03:57.840
<v Speaker 1>to Cook, the solution lies, uh, not in persuading those

1:03:57.880 --> 1:04:00.520
<v Speaker 1>already steeped in science denial, but in not sculating the

1:04:00.560 --> 1:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>other nine of the public from scientific disinformation. He likened

1:04:04.800 --> 1:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>the challenge to eradicating polio, an incurable disease that was

1:04:08.400 --> 1:04:11.760
<v Speaker 1>all but eliminated in the United States through vaccinations. In

1:04:11.800 --> 1:04:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the case of climate and COVID, he said that means

1:04:14.800 --> 1:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>using facts and research combined with vivid analogies to explain

1:04:18.840 --> 1:04:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the techniques used to mislead the public. And this is

1:04:22.480 --> 1:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that cook does through skeptical science,

1:04:25.120 --> 1:04:26.920
<v Speaker 1>which if you want to check out the website it's

1:04:26.920 --> 1:04:30.919
<v Speaker 1>just skeptical science dot com. Uh. He provides useful real

1:04:30.960 --> 1:04:35.040
<v Speaker 1>world analogies to counter climate denial arguments, and he also

1:04:35.080 --> 1:04:38.960
<v Speaker 1>wrote an illustrated book titled Cranky Uncle Versus Climate Change,

1:04:39.280 --> 1:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>How to Understand and respond to Climate science Deniers. You know,

1:04:43.240 --> 1:04:45.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to end on too dark a note here,

1:04:45.200 --> 1:04:48.680
<v Speaker 1>but but I do seriously worry about because as as

1:04:48.720 --> 1:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>difficult as it is to prevent scientific issues from becoming

1:04:52.280 --> 1:04:55.560
<v Speaker 1>politicized in the first place, when you're just dealing with leaders,

1:04:55.600 --> 1:04:58.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, trying to make sure that like major media

1:04:58.320 --> 1:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>figures and politicians don't start injecting political valences and trying

1:05:04.200 --> 1:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>to get people to align politically around something that's not

1:05:07.000 --> 1:05:09.280
<v Speaker 1>really a political issue. It is just a scientific question

1:05:09.360 --> 1:05:14.360
<v Speaker 1>with a factual answer. Um. That's hard enough. It seems

1:05:14.400 --> 1:05:17.520
<v Speaker 1>like nowadays things are going to be even harder than that,

1:05:17.600 --> 1:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>because you essentially have the distributed capability through the Internet

1:05:22.560 --> 1:05:25.800
<v Speaker 1>and virality and social media to do the same thing

1:05:25.840 --> 1:05:28.920
<v Speaker 1>to politicize issues. I mean, I already see worrying signs

1:05:28.960 --> 1:05:32.200
<v Speaker 1>of how sort of like emerging out of the depths

1:05:32.280 --> 1:05:36.120
<v Speaker 1>of the Internet, you'll get weird conspiracy theories politicizing whatever

1:05:36.240 --> 1:05:40.880
<v Speaker 1>vaccine we end up with for for COVID nineteen Yeah, yeah, exactly, um,

1:05:41.160 --> 1:05:43.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, and to to a wonderful extent, like one

1:05:43.680 --> 1:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>of the great things about a show like The Outer

1:05:45.600 --> 1:05:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Limits is that essentially it's always about people having conversations

1:05:50.560 --> 1:05:55.360
<v Speaker 1>about uh, you know, science, fictional threats, and and and

1:05:55.360 --> 1:05:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and and given that in a short format you have

1:05:58.080 --> 1:06:01.240
<v Speaker 1>to boil everything down to a simple area like two

1:06:01.240 --> 1:06:03.640
<v Speaker 1>people trapped in a room or in this case, uh,

1:06:03.680 --> 1:06:07.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, one scientist speaking to the community in this colony.

1:06:08.040 --> 1:06:10.360
<v Speaker 1>But of course, in reality, we have a far more

1:06:10.400 --> 1:06:14.040
<v Speaker 1>complicated communication system. There's a greater number of players involved,

1:06:14.240 --> 1:06:18.480
<v Speaker 1>there are different communications systems involved, uh networks, the way

1:06:18.520 --> 1:06:22.360
<v Speaker 1>that different voices become um uh you know, more pronounced

1:06:22.360 --> 1:06:24.880
<v Speaker 1>in our culture, it's it's it's it's far more complicated

1:06:24.920 --> 1:06:28.960
<v Speaker 1>than what we have in the Jan's five example. But

1:06:28.960 --> 1:06:32.600
<v Speaker 1>but I think it works nicely to still as as

1:06:32.640 --> 1:06:35.360
<v Speaker 1>an example of the the sorts of problems that we

1:06:35.440 --> 1:06:37.760
<v Speaker 1>encounter as humans. I mean, I guess we've sort of

1:06:37.760 --> 1:06:40.280
<v Speaker 1>been saying that one of the best outcomes, if we

1:06:40.280 --> 1:06:43.680
<v Speaker 1>could enact it with scientific issues that have political ramifications,

1:06:43.760 --> 1:06:46.120
<v Speaker 1>is to not allow them to become politicized in the

1:06:46.160 --> 1:06:49.160
<v Speaker 1>first place. But if that's not really possible, you know,

1:06:49.200 --> 1:06:53.080
<v Speaker 1>if you can't prevent issue people from trying to politicize issues,

1:06:53.840 --> 1:06:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I think the question is what does the mental vaccine

1:06:57.280 --> 1:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>against the politicization of scientific issues look like? How do

1:07:01.280 --> 1:07:05.120
<v Speaker 1>you best plant that sort of like, uh, that meme

1:07:05.320 --> 1:07:08.720
<v Speaker 1>or that seed in somebody's brain that will grow into, uh,

1:07:09.000 --> 1:07:11.920
<v Speaker 1>grow into a sort of mental immune system that rejects

1:07:11.960 --> 1:07:15.440
<v Speaker 1>these politicizations of scientific issues when it encounters them. That,

1:07:15.720 --> 1:07:18.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, so people know how to recognize when it's

1:07:18.440 --> 1:07:21.800
<v Speaker 1>happening and stop it before it infects them. Yeah, that

1:07:21.960 --> 1:07:24.680
<v Speaker 1>is the That is the the ongoing problem that we're

1:07:24.680 --> 1:07:27.240
<v Speaker 1>continuing to struggle with. And this is the point where

1:07:27.240 --> 1:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>we would have the narrator of the Outer Limits jump

1:07:30.360 --> 1:07:33.560
<v Speaker 1>back in and nicely summarize the struggle that we've just

1:07:33.600 --> 1:07:36.640
<v Speaker 1>witnessed on the screen. But of course, the fallible humans

1:07:36.720 --> 1:07:41.919
<v Speaker 1>failed in their attempt. Yeah, alright, We're gonna go ahead

1:07:41.960 --> 1:07:46.920
<v Speaker 1>and close out this volume of the Anthology of Horror,

1:07:47.160 --> 1:07:51.600
<v Speaker 1>but we will be back with part five, Volume five,

1:07:52.120 --> 1:07:56.600
<v Speaker 1>when we will explore even more episodes from TV and

1:07:56.760 --> 1:08:00.960
<v Speaker 1>film horror sci fi anthology history and discuss some of

1:08:01.000 --> 1:08:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the science and culture surrounding them. In the meantime, if

1:08:04.280 --> 1:08:05.840
<v Speaker 1>you would like to check out other episodes of Stuff

1:08:05.840 --> 1:08:07.640
<v Speaker 1>to Blow Your Mind, you can find us wherever you

1:08:07.680 --> 1:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>get your podcast, wherever that happens to be. We just

1:08:09.960 --> 1:08:12.040
<v Speaker 1>asked that you rate, review, and subscribe if you have

1:08:12.120 --> 1:08:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the power to do so, and if you want to

1:08:13.880 --> 1:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>find us just really quickly, you can just go to

1:08:16.080 --> 1:08:17.679
<v Speaker 1>stuff to Blow your Mind dot com. That will shoot

1:08:17.720 --> 1:08:20.160
<v Speaker 1>you over to the I Heart page for our website,

1:08:20.280 --> 1:08:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and if you so desire, there's a toggle there for

1:08:23.280 --> 1:08:25.160
<v Speaker 1>our store and it it just takes you to a T

1:08:25.240 --> 1:08:27.120
<v Speaker 1>shirt store where you can buy a shirt with a

1:08:27.160 --> 1:08:29.639
<v Speaker 1>monster or our logo on it. I think they're trying

1:08:29.640 --> 1:08:33.439
<v Speaker 1>to move those petrifying Gaze shirts which have a wonderful design.

1:08:33.840 --> 1:08:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, my my son, my son did that one.

1:08:35.880 --> 1:08:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I know, I know, he bought one, so yeah, we're

1:08:39.080 --> 1:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>well I bought one for him, so somebody bought one.

1:08:41.400 --> 1:08:43.439
<v Speaker 1>But it's me. Uh, if you want to buy one too,

1:08:44.040 --> 1:08:46.680
<v Speaker 1>you can get it on everything. A sticker. You know

1:08:47.240 --> 1:08:50.559
<v Speaker 1>what a shirt bags. There's no talent, it's good stuff.

1:08:50.560 --> 1:08:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Face mask you can get a face mask with our

1:08:52.439 --> 1:08:55.320
<v Speaker 1>logo on them. We're in a monster renaissance, huge things.

1:08:55.320 --> 1:08:58.320
<v Speaker 1>As always to our excellent audio producer Seth Nicholas Johnson.

1:08:58.560 --> 1:09:00.160
<v Speaker 1>If you would like to get in touch with us

1:09:00.200 --> 1:09:02.599
<v Speaker 1>with feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest

1:09:02.680 --> 1:09:04.760
<v Speaker 1>topic for the future, just to say hello, you can

1:09:04.800 --> 1:09:07.400
<v Speaker 1>email us at contact and Stuff to Blow your Mind

1:09:07.520 --> 1:09:17.400
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of

1:09:17.400 --> 1:09:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio. For more podcasts for My heart Radio,

1:09:20.240 --> 1:09:22.920
<v Speaker 1>visit the i Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

1:09:22.960 --> 1:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>you're listening to your favorite shows.