WEBVTT - Colin Cowherd Podcast - TNF Reaction, McVay’s Coaching Mismatch, Sharp or Square

0:00:01.520 --> 0:00:07.440
<v Speaker 1>The volume. Listen. We've all had fender benders in our life.

0:00:07.520 --> 0:00:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it's even more serious. People between the ages of

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:14.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty five and thirty four, in fact, have the highest

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:19.079
<v Speaker 1>amount of drivers involved in car crashes. Be careful, but

0:00:19.160 --> 0:00:21.800
<v Speaker 1>even if it's somebody else's mistake, you can lean on

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Morgan and Morgan. If you've ever been injured, check out

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Morgan and Morgan. It's the nation's largest injury law firm,

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>one hundred offices and over eight hundred lawyers with over

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 1>fifteen billion that to be billion dollars recovered with over

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>three hundred thousand clients. Morgan and Morgan has a proven

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>track record of fighting for you to get full and

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>fair compensation. Fighting for people for over thirty five years.

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Starting for an entire football franchise as a rookie quarterback

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:56.640
<v Speaker 1>is hard. Submitting an injury claim with Morgan and Morgan

0:00:56.840 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 1>is easy. If you're ever injured, check out Morgan and Morgan.

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Their fee is free unless they win. For more information,

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:06.039
<v Speaker 1>go for the people dot com slash Colin or dial

0:01:06.120 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 1>pound law. That's pound five to nine from your cell phone.

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:13.039
<v Speaker 1>That's for the people dot com slash Colin or pound

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Law five to nine from your cell. This is a

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:24.320
<v Speaker 1>paid advertisement, all right. Instant reaction on the Rams throttling

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 1>got a little close at the end due to a

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 1>block punt and a secondary lapse. And the Rams defense

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 1>is a bunch of kids. You can beat them deep

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 1>down the field, and the Saints did late in the game.

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:37.679
<v Speaker 1>But kind of a coaching mismatch, I thought. Once the

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:40.199
<v Speaker 1>Saints went for it at the end of the half

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 1>instead of pinning the Rams deep. Rams had three timeouts left,

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 1>they held, march down the field, scored ten point Rams

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>lead at half. Felt like the ballgame to me. You know,

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>there were two games this week on the docket that

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I really really liked. One of them I talked about

0:01:57.280 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>this on FS. One was the Rams tonight four three

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 1>and a half against Derek Carr and the Saints. McVeigh

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>in a short week has won six of seven games.

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Offensive coaches on a short week can be really really

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 1>good against defensive coaches. They can do little tweaks with

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:19.799
<v Speaker 1>their quarterback and their offense. An offensive culture, I think

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:23.080
<v Speaker 1>always has a bit of an advantage on a short week,

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:25.520
<v Speaker 1>especially if you're playing at home and McVeigh is six

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>and one in these spots now seven and one. And

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:30.640
<v Speaker 1>also I don't think Dennis Allen's a very good coach.

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>The last two weeks I've watched McVeigh work Ron Rivera

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 1>of the Commanders. Commanders late game situational football was embarrassing,

0:02:40.000 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 1>and I thought Dennis Allen's halftime move right before half

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 1>was a swing and a miss. So you know, I

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:50.639
<v Speaker 1>go on and on about this, but McVeigh is having

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 1>an unbelievable year. If you watch all the motions and

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:57.520
<v Speaker 1>all the shifting and all the manipulation on virtually every play,

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Saints lineup. They don't use motion. I mean most of

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the time they don't use motion. They line up. They

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>don't put the defense in conflict. It's much easier for

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:09.960
<v Speaker 1>a defense to just line up, see what you're doing,

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 1>and go. The Rams are using shifts and motions and

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>these multiple sets where you've got three receivers, jumbo sets.

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 1>It puts a lot of conflict and a lot of

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>decision making. Throw in some motion. The Niners with Kyle

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Shanahan lead the league in motion, along with Miami with

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 1>an offensive coach, and the Rams with an offensive coach.

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>It is checkers and chess and McVeigh McDaniel, Andy Reid, Shanahan.

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a different looking sport. I mean, it's a different

0:03:43.440 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 1>looking sport. So and mcveigh's had his way two and

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>oh against defensive coach Pete Carroll, one to oh against

0:03:49.560 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Ron Rivera, want to oh against Dennis Allen, two and

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>oh against Arizona. He lost earlier in the year when

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the Rams were kind of beat up to Mike Tomlin

0:03:57.200 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers, but since Thanksgiving Matt Staff fourteen touchdowns, one

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 1>pick and a passer rating of over one fourteen. And

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, one of the things that jumps

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>out to me is that McVeagh and less Need the

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>GM really work hand in hand, and that's really really important.

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 1>I remember when Jim Harball was with the Niners with

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Trent and Balky, and they couldn't stand each other. And

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:21.840
<v Speaker 1>there's some situations in the NFL where the gms and

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the coaches aren't close. Mickey Loomis and Sean Payton when

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>they were in New Orleans were best friends. Really matters.

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:33.279
<v Speaker 1>But you know, less Need and McVeigh mcvay's got a

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>great sense for offense. They find Puka Nakua in the

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:40.280
<v Speaker 1>fifth round, and they also go get here's a prime

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 1>example of an offensive culture. So dots and the interior

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 1>offensive lineman for the Rams. They pick him up in

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 1>a trade on the interior the online from the Steelers.

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Steelers weren't going to start Dotson the guard. He's now

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:58.679
<v Speaker 1>the fourth highest readed guard in the NFL with Sean McVay.

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:02.279
<v Speaker 1>Steelers wen't going to start. And I go on and

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 1>on about this, but McVeigh is the preparation, the in

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>game management. And I think a lot of times that

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:12.719
<v Speaker 1>the media beats up on coaches for some clock stuff

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 1>late in games. It's fast moving, it's fluid. Nobody's perfect.

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 1>But I'll take the offensive guys over the defensive guys

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 1>every time. And I also think one of the advantages

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the Rams have because they don't have good special teams.

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 1>They're not a super Bowl team in my opinion. They're

0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 1>a team that can go. They'll probably end up getting

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 1>into the playoffs and facing Detroit in Detroit, and I

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:37.479
<v Speaker 1>would probably take the Lions. They have more experience, they

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:40.040
<v Speaker 1>have a dominant offensive line. Jared Goff is very good

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:42.479
<v Speaker 1>at home when he gets on his spot and not rushed,

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:44.480
<v Speaker 1>and the Rams pass rush can be a little hit

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:48.159
<v Speaker 1>and miss. Their special teams aren't good, their secondaries young

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:50.600
<v Speaker 1>got torched over the top a couple of times tonight,

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:53.360
<v Speaker 1>first half and second half. That's what Rams games are.

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:56.039
<v Speaker 1>But they've scored at least twenty seven points, I think,

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 1>in four straight games. And I thought they should have

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>beaten the Ravens. It was go either way game. But

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:03.720
<v Speaker 1>we'd seen other teams in the NFC go out to Baltimore,

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Detroit and Seattle and get smoked. The Rams went out

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 1>there and went toe to toe with Baltimore, a really

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:11.719
<v Speaker 1>good football team. So I just think you're looking at

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>a Rams team that has made over the last six weeks.

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>They are a completely different football team. A lot of

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:20.599
<v Speaker 1>it is on offense. The special teams weren't good early

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 1>are not good now. Their secondary's okay, it's okay now.

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:27.600
<v Speaker 1>It's the offensive improvement. Guys have gotten healthy. Stafford's getting

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 1>time to throw. Kyra and Williams the running back, small

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 1>guy but very powerful and shifty. And mcveigh's offense is

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:39.560
<v Speaker 1>really a ball control offense. You know, you think McVeigh,

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:43.159
<v Speaker 1>you know you think these offensive coaches. You know, it's big,

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:45.919
<v Speaker 1>over the top plays, It really isn't with McVeigh. He

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 1>was at his best when Gurley was in his prime,

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 1>and now Williams in his prime. That's really when he's

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:53.160
<v Speaker 1>at his best when he can rely on a fifteen

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 1>to eighteen carry running back. And also Cooper Cup's a

0:06:57.080 --> 0:06:59.799
<v Speaker 1>big receiver. Puka Nakou is a big receiver. He uses

0:06:59.839 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 1>though highly effectively. So I really like what I saw

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 1>with the Rams tonight. Again, it was one of my

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 1>favorite picks of the week. This and the Cowboys over

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins. They get a scheduling break now. The Rams

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 1>get ten days to prepare for the New York Giants,

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 1>So that's an advantage the Giants because they're on Thursday.

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Then they go to New York. Ten days for offensive

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 1>coaches is a big advantage. The Giants have a game,

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>big underdogs to the Philadelphia Eagles who are desperate for

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 1>a win, so a very physical in division game for

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the Giants, and then the Rams get four extra days

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 1>to prep on a roll very confident. Didn't see a

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of injuries Tonpe Stafford's getting good protection, but it

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 1>was a work of art over the last month. If

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>you watch the Rams DeMarcus Robinson, there's another guy they

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 1>just picked up. It took about six to eight weeks.

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>McVeigh gets him into the system. Now he's valuable. Poka

0:07:56.200 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Nakua rookie. He was great from the very beginning. Cooper

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Cup healthy is become a very very deep receiving core.

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Then it was one of the primary concerns going into

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the season, and then you hit on Pooka and then

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, Robinson becomes a vital player. He

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 1>will always a hard work where he played with Baltimore,

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:18.679
<v Speaker 1>twitchy athletic. He was very good in the first half.

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:22.240
<v Speaker 1>So it is all rolling for the Rams. Now they're hot.

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 1>It was a coaching mismatch to get a scheduling break,

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and they feel like a playoff team. The team's on

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the bubble. The Saints, okay, Now the Rams have an

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 1>edge over them and the Seahawks. Rams have beaten them twice,

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 1>so things are very very good. One other LA note,

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>very very interesting. Keep your eye on the Dodgers with

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the potential massive another massive signing tonight. Instant reaction. Let's

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 1>talk to Chad Millman Sharper Square. I got a story

0:08:52.160 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I gotta tell you. Hello, Chad Milman, Sharper Square, I'm

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of a heater. I don't want to brag about it.

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, how much of a heater?

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:10.679
<v Speaker 1>Four straight winning weeks four and one. Last week I

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>had a little bit of an early Denver Bronco, Sean Payton,

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson September slump. But shit is rolling downhill now.

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm like McVeigh and Stafford and Puka Nakua.

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 2>Here's the thing. No matter how successful you are and

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 2>whatever field you're in, Yeah, when you're winning bets, it

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 2>just like the whole day is brighter. And I say

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 2>that like it just it doesn't matter how much you're

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 2>wagering on it. You just feel good. Last week we

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:46.080
<v Speaker 2>do our podcast on Sunday nights at seven point thirty.

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Normally I am biting fingernails and sweating until seven twenty

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 2>nine because I don't know how our day is going

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 2>to end because of all the games that matter so much.

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:59.840
<v Speaker 2>Last week we were so locked in at seven o'clock.

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 2>I was doing dishes because like it was like I

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 2>was done, it was over, and it just it felt lovely.

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>It does. There's nothing better. By the way, before we

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 1>get into our picks. I'm not a spender.

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't.

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I've never had a second car. Most of my car

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 1>has been used. I'm not a country club guy.

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 2>Second houses, however, those are investments.

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not a spender. But I and my wife,

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>So I gotta tell you a funny story. So once

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:33.959
<v Speaker 1>a year I take my wife to Beverly Hills for

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:36.199
<v Speaker 1>a couple of nights before Christmas and we go look

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 1>at the lights, We have a lovely dinner, and we

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 1>just have fun. It's really a neat weekend for us.

0:10:42.720 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>And so on Friday, I said, you know, I'm gonna

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:49.079
<v Speaker 1>make an effort here. We're gonna go out tonight. I'm gonna,

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:51.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, go get a nice pair of like, you know,

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 1>slacks or something. And and so I go to this

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:57.960
<v Speaker 1>store and I don't know, you know, it's it's uh,

0:10:58.120 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's Beverly Hills. You know there's no Target there, right,

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>so I know.

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 2>Also there's no price tags on any of the clothes.

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 1>No, no, So I go buy a pair, a couple

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:13.559
<v Speaker 1>pair of jeans. And they're nice jeans. I mean they're

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 1>not LEVI five oh one nice, but they're nice. Right,

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 1>So I go and buy jeans, and then I buy

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 1>a couple of shirts, and you know we've done well.

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not somebody who sits at a grocery store and

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, or a restaurant counts the check. I've done well, whatever,

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:31.320
<v Speaker 1>So I put it in my pocket. You know the

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:36.960
<v Speaker 1>check salesman's great. But on my phone, like five minutes

0:11:37.000 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>after I buy in my AMEX card, it pops up.

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>So I'm walking across the street. I spent thirteen hundred

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:52.199
<v Speaker 1>dollars for a pair of jeans. No, bro, I haven't

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:56.559
<v Speaker 1>thrown up since I was like seven. I was convulsing

0:11:56.640 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>at the intersection. I My wife started laughing. She thought

0:11:59.760 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>it was the funniest thing ever. She's like, you're sick

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 1>to your stomach. I'm like sick to my stomach. I

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 1>can't do anything. This weekend, We're going to the waffle house.

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll fly with Lana. I'm not eating.

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:12.079
<v Speaker 2>Are they stitched in gold?

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I haven't taken them off. I sleep and getting every

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:18.079
<v Speaker 1>goddamn penny out of those things. I told my wife,

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm wearing those six times a week for ten years

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 1>to get the money back.

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 2>They're gonna be the most comfortable jeans you've ever had,

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 2>even if they're terrible.

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 1>So my wife looks at the tag and and my

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 1>wife kind of knows this stuff, and she goes, oh

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Jesus blank. She calls her daughter. She goes, Colin just

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:41.600
<v Speaker 1>pair bought a pair of jeans. Guess who he bought

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:44.320
<v Speaker 1>them from? She names it, and I can hear my

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 1>stepdaughter howling laughing. She's like, how much it cost?

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:48.800
<v Speaker 2>A thousand?

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:53.840
<v Speaker 1>And like, uh so there, ladies. And you know my

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 1>takeaway is I'll get used out of them.

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm fine.

0:12:56.960 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 1>But do you know there are people that do that

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:00.760
<v Speaker 1>every day. They go shop there every.

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:08.600
<v Speaker 2>Every day. Yeah. I once did that before, like and it.

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:11.440
<v Speaker 2>I went to Barney's. I had to go to a

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 2>wedding and I knew at the wedding Barney's. I knew

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 2>at the wedding. I knew at the wedding that the

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 2>girl who was best friends with my girlfriend in college

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 2>was going to be there. And I wanted to look

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 2>as good as I could. I was gonna be with Stacy.

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:27.840
<v Speaker 2>I wanted to look as good as I could because

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 2>I knew she was going to report back. So I

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 2>go to Barney's. I buy this suit. It's like perfect

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 2>off the rack. It was well north to thirteen hundred dollars.

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:43.960
<v Speaker 2>I had no business buying this suit because I was

0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 2>not making thirteen hundred dollars. And I buy it. I'm

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:51.439
<v Speaker 2>feeling good. My wife is making fun of me. She's like,

0:13:51.480 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 2>you're an idiot. We get to the wedding. The my

0:13:56.160 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 2>ex girlfriend's best friend bailed on the wedding, never showed up.

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 2>I got this suit. I looked amazing. I never. I've

0:14:05.600 --> 0:14:07.840
<v Speaker 2>decided since then, I cannot spend a lot of money

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 2>on clothes.

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well I don't look good in clothes. I don't,

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 1>so you know stuff you don't.

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:18.680
<v Speaker 2>I wear Colin. I wear my my hoodie from the

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 2>Volume podcast network. That's what I wear. That's all I

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 2>need so much, And I think, but by the way,

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 2>I might have gotten this for free.

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 1>You and I have similarities. We've done well. We love gambling.

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>We have both have our wives look like sisters. They're

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 1>both beautiful, beautiful, beautiful, red haired, beautiful women. Tolerant women, yes,

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and we are adverse to big spending. Although I do

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 1>look you probably like I like nice vacation. All spend

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:54.240
<v Speaker 1>I tell my kids education and experiences all tell that.

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:56.720
<v Speaker 1>You know what's not on that list?

0:14:57.120 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 2>Jeans No, No, definitely not when when when my wife

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 2>was an architecture school and I was working at ESPN,

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 2>the magazine, and I was making not a lot of money,

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 2>and we were living in New York City and we

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 2>had just gotten married. And my wife, who grew up

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 2>on Staten Island, her mom was a teacher, her dad

0:15:21.160 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 2>was an architect. Very lovely lifestyle, but it was not

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 2>like an extravagant lifestyle, right. I got the credit card

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 2>after we got married, and we're spending together now and

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 2>she's an architecture school and she had spent like four

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 2>hundred dollars on a pair of jeans. I'm like, what

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 2>is going on here? And she's like, I just needed

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 2>the genes. They just they were things that I needed

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 2>in that moment. Sure I could. I didn't want to

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 2>argue with it because it was still early in our life.

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 1>I used to be when I used to be a

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 1>hoarder and kind of a financial horder, like you know

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>x y, I would laugh. She's like, you're going to

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 1>be the richest dead guy ever. And then I met Anne,

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 1>and Anne has certain needs and she needed me to spend,

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 1>which is fine because she's beautiful and it makes me

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 1>really happy. But yeah, things have changed. All right, let's

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 1>go so good week. I'm gonna give you the stuff

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and I almost know where you're gonna go with these

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I feel so I'm gonna take the Steelers plus two

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 1>at the Bengals. Pittsburgh gets a second look at a

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 1>backup quarterback. They're a desperate team, veteran coach, great as

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 1>an underdog, they are a cornered animal. Steelers plus two

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Sharper square.

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 2>Totally sharp. This was a two and a half. It

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 2>got bumped down. Look, you have a couple of advantages.

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 2>One no Jamar Chase. Two buying or selling very high

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:53.080
<v Speaker 2>in the Bengals, buying very low on the Steelers. Three

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 2>no Dj Reader And that is a huge deal in

0:16:56.560 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 2>the middle of the defensive line for the Bengals. Not

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:02.119
<v Speaker 2>only is he great again, it's the run. He's phenomenal

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 2>against the past. So you're really going to be limiting

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 2>your pass rush capabilities against Mason Rudolph. And don't think like,

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:11.200
<v Speaker 2>all right, we're going from Kenny Pikett to Mitch Trubisky

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 2>to Mason Rudolph. He's been all the same. They're all

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:17.439
<v Speaker 2>the same. They're the same quarterback and then you just

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:21.119
<v Speaker 2>mentioned the most important thing. Mike Tomlin. Mike Tomlin as

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 2>a dog, most profitable coach the past twenty years, Mike

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:27.199
<v Speaker 2>Tomlin as a dog at home, Mike Tomlin as a

0:17:27.240 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 2>dog in the division, Mike Tomlin as a dog late

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 2>in the year, Mike Tomlin as a dog off a

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:35.679
<v Speaker 2>loss of more than seven. Like every category, it starts

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 2>at sixty percent and gets up to ninety percent. No

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:43.040
<v Speaker 2>joke against the spread. So yes, the wise guys, they're

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 2>going to be on the steers.

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not getting the best number at Peckham. I thought

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:48.680
<v Speaker 1>it was one of the bets of the year. I'll

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:51.200
<v Speaker 1>take Dallas plus one and a half at the Dolphins.

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:54.720
<v Speaker 1>I have a theory very good teams who are physically

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 1>humiliated on big TV games come back the following week.

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:03.719
<v Speaker 1>It's not just losing, it's being humiliated, physically pushed around.

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:06.639
<v Speaker 1>And Dallas is a physical team. Miami's not.

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:07.439
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 1>I do think they generate since Week five a very

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:12.879
<v Speaker 1>nice pass for us. That's a Fangio defense. But I

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 1>think Dallas has something to prove. I think they were embarrassed.

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 1>I think they're a good football team. I'm going to

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:20.679
<v Speaker 1>take Dallas to win by about a touchdown plus one

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and a half here Sharper square.

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:24.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the wise guys are on the Cowboys. This opened

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 2>it too. It's been bet down. There's places where it's

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:31.639
<v Speaker 2>one you mentioned pick them as well, like it would

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:34.440
<v Speaker 2>not surprise me and some of the rumblings I've heard

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 2>in the market from professional betters if Dallas ended up

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:40.159
<v Speaker 2>as the favorite in this game. So I will say

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 2>it's very important you get Dallas as an underdog if

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 2>you like them, because the trends start to work against

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:47.679
<v Speaker 2>you if they become the favorite in terms of covering.

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 2>So you want to get them at the plus number.

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 2>But for all the reasons you said, like, there are

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 2>a lot of trends that will back up the idea

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:56.639
<v Speaker 2>that when you are a team that has been blown

0:18:56.680 --> 0:18:58.880
<v Speaker 2>out and then you are going on the road again

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:02.719
<v Speaker 2>as an underdog, you are the team that people should

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:06.800
<v Speaker 2>be backing. So in agreement so far, two for two

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:07.640
<v Speaker 2>Kyle Cowhart.

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 1>The number has been bumped up. All of our odds

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:13.680
<v Speaker 1>provided by Draft Kings. I'm talking to Chad Milman CCO

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Action Network Patriots plus seven at the Broncos Weather could

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 1>be crappy. Seven's a lot of points Denver. Can Nicholan

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>dime you. Bailey Zappi is okay, He's not great. But

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:28.360
<v Speaker 1>my takeaway is this is a low scoring, ugly, crappy

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:31.160
<v Speaker 1>weather game. At six, I would probably stay away. At seven,

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I would take New England. That's a lot of points

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 1>in lousy weather. We've had huge rain through southern California.

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:40.399
<v Speaker 1>It's all moving into the mountains Denver, Colorado. Over the

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 1>next two to three days, Patriots plus seven sharper square sharp.

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 2>Ish like, there's a lot better games on the board.

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:53.200
<v Speaker 2>There's not a huge edge with the Patriots at plus seven.

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:59.159
<v Speaker 2>The challenge for this game is that the Broncos prior

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:02.880
<v Speaker 2>to last week had been living off of turnover. Yes,

0:20:03.280 --> 0:20:06.439
<v Speaker 2>that's how they were winning these games. Right, stuff always

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:10.399
<v Speaker 2>even out, It always evens out, except they're playing Bailey Zappi.

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:14.159
<v Speaker 2>So what is the formula for winning for the Broncos.

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:18.119
<v Speaker 2>They're playing bad quarterbacks and getting turnovers. So what are

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:21.199
<v Speaker 2>they getting they're getting? I would argue Bailey Zappi is

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:26.639
<v Speaker 2>not a good quarterback in bad weather, in altitude, in

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 2>a hostile situation. This is Taylor made to be a

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 2>turnover masterpiece for the Denver Broncos. Look at what happened

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 2>last week with the Chiefs. Right, the Patriots were in

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:42.760
<v Speaker 2>position to keep that game close. They come out of

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 2>the locker room. Bailey Zappi second throw, he's rolling out,

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:50.879
<v Speaker 2>throws it directly to a Chiefs defensive back like doesn't

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:54.439
<v Speaker 2>even There's not even a Patriots receiver there. And that

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 2>is going to happen two or three times in a game,

0:20:57.200 --> 0:20:58.879
<v Speaker 2>and a couple of those times, at least one of

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:00.919
<v Speaker 2>those times, the Broncos are going to the ball, and

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:02.960
<v Speaker 2>that's going to be the way the game changes. I

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:05.320
<v Speaker 2>would not be comfortable betting the Patriots in the spot.

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:06.680
<v Speaker 2>I would bet the under though.

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 1>All Right, one more dog Ravens plus five and a

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:12.439
<v Speaker 1>half at the Niners. They're a bit beat up, but

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Harbaugh's an underdog. NFC teams facing for the first time

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson. Now, the Niners have excellent linebackers, Twitchy Fred Warner.

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:27.159
<v Speaker 1>They should be able to be more than competent against Lamar.

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:29.159
<v Speaker 1>But if you've never faced him and you don't have

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:32.320
<v Speaker 1>anybody in practice to duplicate it, it can be an avalanche.

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Five and a half is a silly number. This is

0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 1>a very close, physical game, hard to run on the Ravens.

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking the points all day here. I think it's

0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 1>a good game. I like the Niners. Five and a

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 1>half seems almost disrespectful Sharper square.

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:47.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so the wise guys are on the Ravens. Here,

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 2>I will say I'm conflicted. I'm conflicted because a I've

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 2>got a decent sized bet on Christian McCaffrey at twenty

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 2>five to one to win the MVP. And let's face it,

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:01.919
<v Speaker 2>this is the v people, right, you got Rock Purty

0:22:02.200 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 2>at about minus two hundred, you got Lamar Jackson at

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:07.640
<v Speaker 2>about three to one, and depending on the book, you've

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:10.720
<v Speaker 2>got Christian McCaffrey is the third shortest odds or Dak

0:22:10.760 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 2>Prescott or Dak Prescott's third shortest, and McCaffrey is four shortest.

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 2>So in my heart of hearts, what I'm hoping for

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 2>is Christian McCaffrey is dominant, and that the Niners win

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:26.159
<v Speaker 2>the game, and that the next two weeks it's just

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:28.919
<v Speaker 2>a coronation for Christian McCaffrey, and I win my Christian

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 2>McCaffrey twenty five to one MVP bet. The problem is

0:22:32.880 --> 0:22:36.440
<v Speaker 2>that everything you just said Lamar Jackson against the NFC.

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:40.439
<v Speaker 2>That's not a sort of quirky to take sixteen and

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 2>one anomaly. It's because there's nobody like Lamar Jackson that

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:48.160
<v Speaker 2>these NFC teams can prepare when they are playing him

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 2>number two. There are like some concerns. I haven't seen

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 2>the injury reports from today, but look, I'msted and Hargrave

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:56.760
<v Speaker 2>on the defensive line for the Niners. When they were

0:22:56.760 --> 0:23:00.640
<v Speaker 2>missing last week, the Cardinals gained nearly four hundred, right,

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:03.400
<v Speaker 2>and they kept it close. So, and we also don't

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:05.040
<v Speaker 2>know about Leonore is he going to be playing in

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:08.640
<v Speaker 2>the defensive backfield. When he started to play that defensive

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 2>backfield was much better. So I do think there are

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 2>some concerns, but I generally think the wise guys are

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 2>looking at this and saying, the public is so high

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 2>in the Niners, And there are reasons to be high

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 2>in the Niners. Right. They are undefeated when Deebo, Samuel

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:24.440
<v Speaker 2>and Trent Williams are playing, and they are beating teams

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:27.399
<v Speaker 2>by double digits, they are a legit team. I do

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:30.159
<v Speaker 2>believe the Niners will win the Super Bowl, and I

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 2>do believe we will look back on this team and

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:35.199
<v Speaker 2>think it is historically great for the past generation with

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 2>the combination of Kyle Shanahan. Who you think this? I

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 2>think this. A lot of people who cover football think this.

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:43.720
<v Speaker 2>He's a brilliant coach who has had bad injury luck

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 2>and not exactly the perfect people for what is an

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:50.160
<v Speaker 2>incredible system. And I think he has that. He's had

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:53.159
<v Speaker 2>luck on his side for health. But I think this

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:55.320
<v Speaker 2>week the Ravens are probably going to be the sharp side.

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, Tampa Bay, Let's go to some favorites minus

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:03.000
<v Speaker 1>one and a half. C J. Bether probably plays Jacksonville's

0:24:03.000 --> 0:24:05.200
<v Speaker 1>in a funk. Trevor Lawrence is banged up. I don't

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:07.679
<v Speaker 1>think he's been healthy in three weeks. We have to

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:12.439
<v Speaker 1>be honest about this. Baker Mayfield, with weapons and reasonable protections,

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the best quarterback in his division. He plays with a

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:18.359
<v Speaker 1>great deal of confidence and emotion. I think he feels

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:20.679
<v Speaker 1>really good right now. Todd Bowles is letting him kind

0:24:20.680 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 1>of control the offense. I knows they're a favorite. I

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 1>tend to like dogs, but CJ. Bethard is an average

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 1>average backup. I'm gonna take the Buck Sharper square.

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 2>No real consensus on what side is the right side here.

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 2>The Bucks were two and a half point underdogs when

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 2>this game opened, before we had the insight on Trevor Lawrence.

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:48.480
<v Speaker 2>I will say what's interesting here. Baker Mayfield no joke.

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:53.680
<v Speaker 2>He was elite against the Green Bay Packers, like I think.

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:56.520
<v Speaker 2>He was twenty one of twenty eight north of three

0:24:56.600 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 2>hundred yards, four touchdowns, and all season long, the wise

0:24:59.760 --> 0:25:03.159
<v Speaker 2>guys have been backing the Bucks, and the Bucks have

0:25:03.240 --> 0:25:07.879
<v Speaker 2>been one of those teams where for three quarters they're amazing,

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:11.680
<v Speaker 2>but there'll be four or five drives in the game

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:15.399
<v Speaker 2>where Mike Evans drops a ball or Baker throws a pick,

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 2>and like it just puts the game a little bit

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:21.080
<v Speaker 2>out of reach for them. But they've generally played really,

0:25:21.119 --> 0:25:24.240
<v Speaker 2>really well. So I can't fault you for liking Baker

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:27.160
<v Speaker 2>in this spot. It's a scary spot because you're also

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:30.480
<v Speaker 2>backing Baker after he was just as good as he's

0:25:30.560 --> 0:25:34.880
<v Speaker 2>ever been, I know. But with CJ. Bether, yeah, you're

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 2>taking a short home favorite.

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:38.639
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's go to games. I want you to

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:44.360
<v Speaker 1>talk me into So I have two rules in life.

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Number one, don't do math no winners. Number two, always

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:54.679
<v Speaker 1>take a team favored by four because the odds makers

0:25:54.680 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 1>are telling you, we'd rather do three. That's what we

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:00.479
<v Speaker 1>want to do. We can't. This team's better ram tonight.

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 1>They're just better than the Saints. It'll be a coaching mismatch.

0:26:03.520 --> 0:26:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Now it's down at three and a half. But at four,

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was a great bet Bears minus four

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:11.160
<v Speaker 1>to four and a half. I have been betting best

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 1>quarterback in games. But I think eber Flus is coaching

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:17.879
<v Speaker 1>for his job. I don't think Arizona's guy's coaching for

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:20.920
<v Speaker 1>a job. I think Justin Field is playing for his job.

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:25.639
<v Speaker 1>This is a big game, a dome team going to

0:26:25.760 --> 0:26:30.119
<v Speaker 1>crappy weather. It'll be it won't be a blizzard. The

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:33.439
<v Speaker 1>weather is kind of unseasonably mild in the Midwest. But

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I think the urgency and intensity here. Also remember last

0:26:37.720 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 1>year how teams after they played the Niners like all lost.

0:26:41.359 --> 0:26:44.560
<v Speaker 1>We're not tracking it this year as much, and the

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:47.199
<v Speaker 1>numbers aren't the same, but when you play, when you

0:26:47.200 --> 0:26:51.480
<v Speaker 1>play San Francisco, there are repercussions. They're a really physical team.

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:56.240
<v Speaker 1>I think Arizona played spirited football. It's a really bad roster.

0:26:56.440 --> 0:26:59.400
<v Speaker 1>The Bears aren't a bad roster. I want to take

0:26:59.480 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Chicago Sharper Square.

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 2>Aw Square. The wise guys are on the Cardinals. The

0:27:05.359 --> 0:27:06.919
<v Speaker 2>game was at four and a half, it got that

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:09.920
<v Speaker 2>down to four. I'd actually take it one step further.

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:12.359
<v Speaker 2>I don't think Ebra Fluis is playing for his job.

0:27:12.400 --> 0:27:15.679
<v Speaker 2>I think he's auditioning for his next coordinator job. I

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:18.360
<v Speaker 2>think Justin Fields is auditioning for the next team he's

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:21.960
<v Speaker 2>going to play on. I think that as a Bears fan,

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 2>we saw what we saw last week against the Browns

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 2>in that second half where Justin Fields was like seven

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 2>of nineteen for sixty yards, and that offense was not

0:27:34.119 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 2>able to execute. And at some point that's on the

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 2>quarterback and his inability to find the right receivers and so,

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 2>and on the coach for coaching a defense that gave

0:27:45.320 --> 0:27:47.520
<v Speaker 2>up the game to Joe Flacco and had a ten

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:50.239
<v Speaker 2>point lead. There's a stat that we had that we

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 2>were talking about on the favorite podcast, The Bears. I

0:27:53.280 --> 0:27:57.440
<v Speaker 2>think this season, or or of only the last two seasons,

0:27:57.760 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 2>have had ten point leads in the fourth quarter six times.

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 2>They're three and three. Everybody else in the league the

0:28:03.600 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 2>past two seasons something like ninety three and one. Literally,

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:11.440
<v Speaker 2>it's like a ninety three percent win rates. So there's

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:14.160
<v Speaker 2>a lot of issues with that Bears team. I think

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:17.200
<v Speaker 2>that what we got in the Cardinals is a team

0:28:17.200 --> 0:28:19.600
<v Speaker 2>that is just always going to be undervalued. And I

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 2>don't think if you look at the market, there's going

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:23.960
<v Speaker 2>to be any professional better who says, oh, yeah, I'm

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:26.639
<v Speaker 2>comfortable betting the Bears as more than a field goal favorite,

0:28:26.640 --> 0:28:28.679
<v Speaker 2>which is why the line moved down. Also, don't forget

0:28:28.960 --> 0:28:33.680
<v Speaker 2>Kyler Murray against the spread on the road fifteen and five.

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 2>So you're talking about a guy who was very good

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:37.920
<v Speaker 2>at covering the spread, and by the way, he also

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:41.720
<v Speaker 2>covered it last weekend that number was bouncing around. So

0:28:42.720 --> 0:28:46.400
<v Speaker 2>I like what. I like what Kyler Murray can do here?

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 2>All right?

0:28:47.480 --> 0:28:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Finally, dumpster dive. What's something that I would probably be

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:55.360
<v Speaker 1>appalled with, but you think is pretty tasty. I mean

0:28:55.680 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 1>you all say this, I thought about Eagles minus twelve,

0:28:58.800 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 1>they're bound to win.

0:29:01.000 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think look in any other scenario, you're looking

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 2>at Raiders plus ten against the Chiefs, you're looking at

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 2>Giants plus twelve against the Eagles. I'm not going to

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:16.520
<v Speaker 2>ask you to do those things. I'm not going to

0:29:16.560 --> 0:29:18.240
<v Speaker 2>do those things this week. I think there's a lot

0:29:18.280 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 2>of wonkingition in those games, and I think professional betters

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 2>are sort of divided on really betting those numbers. They're

0:29:24.640 --> 0:29:28.479
<v Speaker 2>not really looking to do it. Can I interest you

0:29:28.840 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 2>in the Atlanta Falcons minus one? Yeah?

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 1>But by the way MacIntyre's on this, he's like, that's

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the sharp side this week.

0:29:38.240 --> 0:29:40.720
<v Speaker 2>It is. I mean, look that number I bet. I

0:29:40.760 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 2>bet Atlanta at plus two and a half. And I

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 2>know what I said. I said, you got to be

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 2>wary of those games that bounce from the one side

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 2>as the underdog is now the favorite. But the Colts

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:54.160
<v Speaker 2>are really kind of frauds. And I don't like Shane Steichen.

0:29:55.160 --> 0:29:56.960
<v Speaker 2>He should be getting votes for Coach of the Year

0:29:57.440 --> 0:29:59.880
<v Speaker 2>what he has done with that team, what he's done

0:29:59.920 --> 0:30:03.160
<v Speaker 2>with Gardner Minshew, who I think had won two games

0:30:03.160 --> 0:30:06.480
<v Speaker 2>as a starter before this season, Like he has put

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:08.280
<v Speaker 2>them in a position. But also you've got to think

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:11.720
<v Speaker 2>about the teams they've beaten during the streak that they've

0:30:11.720 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 2>been on have not been very good. And now, if

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:16.959
<v Speaker 2>you want to talk about a coach who is coaching

0:30:16.960 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 2>for his job, you're talking about Arthur Smith, and he's

0:30:20.280 --> 0:30:23.240
<v Speaker 2>putting Taylor Heineke back in there. Also because the Colt's

0:30:23.280 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 2>defense is just trash, like they can't really stop the run.

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 2>They were good before Grover Stewart went on his ped suspension.

0:30:29.720 --> 0:30:31.480
<v Speaker 2>They haven't been good since they're in the middle of

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 2>transitioning that defense. It's just not a very good defense,

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 2>so I think. And also the Falcons offensive line, which

0:30:38.240 --> 0:30:41.600
<v Speaker 2>was really injured. They had many players who were out

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 2>or questionable heading into the game against the Panthers back

0:30:46.120 --> 0:30:49.040
<v Speaker 2>at home on turf, Arthur Smith is going to have

0:30:49.080 --> 0:30:51.360
<v Speaker 2>to be as creative as he possibly can to keep

0:30:51.400 --> 0:30:54.280
<v Speaker 2>this team in the hunt. I like the Falcons here.

0:30:54.360 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 2>There's one more that I like, probably not worth your time.

0:30:58.240 --> 0:31:04.640
<v Speaker 2>It's a corner team game. Are you ready? Tennessee Titans

0:31:05.360 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 2>y plus two and a half? Yeah?

0:31:06.880 --> 0:31:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, the way Seattle won, people fall in love with

0:31:09.680 --> 0:31:12.760
<v Speaker 1>their They really have some really fun young athletes. But

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Vrabel at home, they're getting what three? What is it now?

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:19.200
<v Speaker 2>Two and a half? Did it move to three? I

0:31:19.200 --> 0:31:20.239
<v Speaker 2>haven't even noticed? Did it?

0:31:21.000 --> 0:31:21.960
<v Speaker 1>It may have moved to three.

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:26.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm checking right now. If it did, all the better

0:31:26.400 --> 0:31:30.720
<v Speaker 2>then go get go get that three, because that's that's

0:31:30.760 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 2>the game that the wise guys love and I know

0:31:32.680 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 2>it sounds.

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:36.480
<v Speaker 1>They like Tennessee plus two and a half. That's the

0:31:36.640 --> 0:31:43.800
<v Speaker 1>that's they love it, love it. Why explain love so.

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 2>On the team that just had the dramatic win in

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:53.280
<v Speaker 2>prime time by the team that just had the devastating loss.

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:58.200
<v Speaker 2>Mike Vrabel as an underdog. He's twenty six and twenty

0:31:58.200 --> 0:32:02.080
<v Speaker 2>eight straight up as an underdog, right Like, this is

0:32:02.120 --> 0:32:05.840
<v Speaker 2>a guy who just wins when he is counted out

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:09.160
<v Speaker 2>and his team is not supposed to win, let alone

0:32:09.160 --> 0:32:11.720
<v Speaker 2>in the amount of time that he covers as an underdog.

0:32:11.800 --> 0:32:13.880
<v Speaker 2>Him and Tomlin are the two guys that wise guys

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 2>love to cover. They love to cover in these exact spots,

0:32:18.280 --> 0:32:21.120
<v Speaker 2>like to bet on in these exact spots. So yeah,

0:32:21.160 --> 0:32:24.760
<v Speaker 2>the wise guys are digging themselves. Some Tennessee Titans.

0:32:26.160 --> 0:32:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Chad Millman, Happy Holidays CEO Action Network ALLLDGS provided by Draftking.

0:32:30.200 --> 0:32:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Great talking to you, buddy.

0:32:31.320 --> 0:32:33.960
<v Speaker 2>Great seeing you too, brother. Happy Holidays to you and

0:32:34.000 --> 0:32:34.880
<v Speaker 2>the entire crew.

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:37.680
<v Speaker 1>The volume