WEBVTT - The SxSW Roundup Show

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by Toyota. Let's go places. Welcome to

0:00:07.360 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Forward Thinking. He there, and welcome to Forward Thinking, the

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.120
<v Speaker 1>podcast that looks to the future and says, all right,

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 1>this one goes out to our producer Noel. I woke up.

0:00:21.480 --> 0:00:24.480
<v Speaker 1>I saw a Texas dawn light shining in your eyes.

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm Jonathan Strickland, I'm La, and I'm Joe McCormick. So

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>you guys went on a trip, didn't you? Boy, how

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't go on the trip? Where did you go? We

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>went to south By Southwest Interactive in beautiful Austin, Texas. Yes,

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I shared a Airbnb house with several other of the

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 1>guys here at how Stuff Works, So Nolan I both

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:50.560
<v Speaker 1>know the joys of sleeping in a large living room together.

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>It was it was being a little bit sarcastic here

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>at the top, but but no, but it was. I mean,

0:00:56.760 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>it was an amazing, wonderful trip. It was overwhelming most

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>of the time. Now, a lot of our listeners may

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:05.679
<v Speaker 1>already understand, but just brief rundown, what is south By Southwest?

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 1>South By Southwest? First of all, you have to know

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>that south By Southwest itself is an enormous festival that

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>takes over downtown Austin, Texas for a little bit more

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>than a week, and it has three not just music, No,

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:19.119
<v Speaker 1>it's not just music. It has three primary elements. It's

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:22.039
<v Speaker 1>gotten music that's that's a big one. It's got film

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>that's a big one. And it has Interactive, which is

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:29.119
<v Speaker 1>the youngest of the three elements to join this conference. Uh,

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and Interactive is really, when you get down to it,

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 1>anything vaguely techy. Lots of Internet based companies, but over

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 1>the years we've seen more and more companies that are

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>tangential to Internet startups join in the fun and create

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 1>amazing experiences. There are tracts of panels that you can

0:01:50.000 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>go to to learn more about certain subjects, but there's

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>also just a ton of other stuff going on. So,

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 1>for example, you could walk around downtown Austin and never

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 1>go to a panel ever, but hit all the installations,

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 1>exhibits and parties that are They are kind of supplemental

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>to the official track program. Yeah, a lot of the

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>really big tech companies have a presence there. A lot

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>of them are kind of kind of wooing everyone involved,

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:17.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, put putting their very best marketing face forward,

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:19.920
<v Speaker 1>and and there are so many people who are in

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:23.359
<v Speaker 1>the industry who are either on panels or just hanging

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 1>out having amazing conversations about about digital culture and and

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>just what it's like like, like what this new world

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:34.080
<v Speaker 1>that's Internet based is like around us. Yeah, there's a

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:37.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of networking going on its south by Southwest, and

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean that literally people are are networking together and

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:45.279
<v Speaker 1>create sometimes creating brand new projects just through their conversations

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 1>they're having there. So it's, uh, it's it's a party atmosphere,

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:52.640
<v Speaker 1>but there's also a lot of talk, real serious talk

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:56.519
<v Speaker 1>around innovation and being more effective. And uh, I got

0:02:56.560 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 1>to go to three panels while I was there, so

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I want to to kind of talk about those panels

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>because they tie in directly to themes we've discussed here

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:06.639
<v Speaker 1>on Forward Thinking quite a few times. Now. Please keep

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 1>in mind the three panels I saw, they were all

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>part of the same track of programming, which was the

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Intelligent Future track kind of kind of our sweet spot,

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 1>ah yeah, which is just one of what maybe like

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 1>a dozen tracks that were going on just an interactive

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:24.800
<v Speaker 1>and there were hundreds of panels available just in Intelligent

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 1>may maybe maybe another dozen, we'll we'll say in dozens

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:30.800
<v Speaker 1>of panels available intelligent futures of the course of the

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 1>five days of Interactive And that's an addition to hundreds

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 1>and hundreds of more panels going on throughout that week

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 1>and throughout the film segmented throughout the music segments. So

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 1>also there are unofficial events as well, like there are

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 1>discussions that didn't require a badge for you to go

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and check out. So in other words, what what I'm

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 1>doing is, I'm giving you all the caveats to suggest

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>this is not the only thing that was talked about

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>south By Southwest. This was the stuff I was personally

0:03:57.080 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>able to go see. But that being said, the stuff

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I saw it was pretty amazing. So I wanted to

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 1>start with the first panel I saw. This was Saturday

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 1>morning in the morning, as I recall, looking forward to

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 1>rush hour. No, I don't think they have a nine

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:17.159
<v Speaker 1>thirty on Saturdays. They do, I've witnessed it personally. I

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 1>think downtown Austin was as surprised as you are by

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 1>this information. Yeah, actually was a pretty full panel too.

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:24.039
<v Speaker 1>That was the other thing that surprised me because I

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:26.720
<v Speaker 1>had always heard that because of the party atmosphere of

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>south By Southwest the morning panels were not very well attended,

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>but that was not the case in this one. It's

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:35.080
<v Speaker 1>called looking forward to Rush Hour, not the movie Future

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:39.279
<v Speaker 1>of Transit, So UH. The panel I saw featured Dan

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Dorley and Chip Walters, both of whom work for Altuit Design,

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:46.240
<v Speaker 1>which is a company that does UH industrial and product design,

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:50.159
<v Speaker 1>and they are both designers, and so they kind of

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 1>split the panel into two major UH subjects. Um Dan

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:59.279
<v Speaker 1>Dorley took the microphone first and talked about the future

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:03.280
<v Speaker 1>of car is and UH. One of the things they

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>really focused on, no big surprise, happened to be autonomous cars.

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 1>This is something we've obviously talked about several times here

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:14.599
<v Speaker 1>at Forward Thinking, but at south By Southwest autonomous cars

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 1>are pretty much we're pretty much talked about as an

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 1>inevitable future. Not will autonomous cars become a thing, but

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:24.479
<v Speaker 1>it was more like when are they going to be

0:05:24.680 --> 0:05:28.159
<v Speaker 1>the thing? I think that's been our consensus as well.

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I agree, I agree. Yeah, it's just one of those

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>where you go there and everyone's talking about like it's

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 1>already here, almost like we're to be fair, it looks

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:39.080
<v Speaker 1>like we're right on the cusp, right, it's just gonna

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:41.720
<v Speaker 1>take a little bit more work for us to see

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the first really truly autonomous vehicles available for some form

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>of commercial purpose. It may not be for a personal vehicle,

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>but we'll get more to that a little bit. So.

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:56.160
<v Speaker 1>He also talked about how autonomous cars have the potential

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 1>to drastically change car design and more in the future.

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:03.839
<v Speaker 1>For one, obviously there's not necessarily a need for human controls,

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 1>so this hasn't completely shaken out yet. Right. There's some

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>designs for autonomous vehicles that include things like your traditional

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:14.040
<v Speaker 1>steering wheel and other controls, some of which might fold

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>away when you go into autonomous mode. But there are

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>other companies like Google that advocate for a complete lack

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>of human controls uh basically because it improves safety. The

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 1>idea being that if you're driving down the street and

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 1>you've got a friend seeing in the passenger's seat, you

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>don't want your friend reaching over suddenly grabbing the steering

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 1>wheel and giving it a strong jerk to the right right. Well,

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:39.280
<v Speaker 1>you same thing. You don't want to have an autonomous

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:41.719
<v Speaker 1>system in control of the car and then have a

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 1>human try and rest control from that, especially if if

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:47.719
<v Speaker 1>brain power wise, your friend is for example, a small

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>child or extremely inapriated like that's probably how the technology

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:56.920
<v Speaker 1>and Google's cars would see us humans samely inebriated children. Yes, yeah,

0:06:56.960 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly how how they would see us. And and

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:01.160
<v Speaker 1>for good re in I mean, you're talking about the

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 1>system that has planned out what it's going to do,

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:07.279
<v Speaker 1>and if you introduce what appears to be random noise

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>into that, you have just put what was at least

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 1>in theory a safe system, uh into and and turned

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 1>it into one that's not safe. So that was one

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 1>of the points you made. Also said that if you

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 1>don't have human controls, it means you can completely redesign

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the interior of cars. And we haven't really talked about

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>this on forward Thinking, but when you think about it,

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>that's true. You could have an interior of a car

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 1>not look anything like cars do right now. We've seen

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>some artist depictions of this where all the seats are

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 1>facing inward, where it's more like almost like a conference room,

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 1>like there's a table in the center and your back

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 1>is to the windshield. There there's still some practical considerations

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 1>to think of around, like like motion sickness. I would

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:52.800
<v Speaker 1>not personally be excited about riding backwards in a car, well,

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 1>you know what you always said, in the back of

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the car, and then you don't even have to you know,

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 1>you're still facing for it or there. I've seen some

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 1>designs where it's a swivel version where the front Yeah. No,

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 1>I totally get it because I I also if I'm

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 1>sitting backward for too long in any kind of moving vehicle,

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I feel a little a little green around the gills.

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 1>But you can also create more displays for things like entertainment.

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:21.920
<v Speaker 1>You can have a lot of other options. You can

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>have workstations if you want to do work while you're

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 1>in the car. Also could make you really motion sick

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 1>if you're not used to that sort of thing. But

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:33.199
<v Speaker 1>interesting alternatives to what we have often thought of as

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the traditional, uh interior of of a car also pointed out.

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Doorally pointed out that autonomous cars are safer than human drivers,

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>and once there are enough autonomous cars on the road,

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 1>you can really change what is standard car design. For example,

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 1>you don't need to build in huge crumple zones if

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:55.240
<v Speaker 1>all the cars on the road or the vast majority

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:58.440
<v Speaker 1>of them are autonomous, because the likelihood of any kind

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 1>of crash on that level is so low, which means

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 1>you're using less material to make your cars. That's less wasteful.

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 1>You can be more efficient with the material you're creating.

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 1>It also means that the cars themselves weigh less. And

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 1>presuming that these cars are also electric, which I think

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 1>most people just assume that's the future that's gonna be

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 1>it electric in one way or another, it means that

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:23.839
<v Speaker 1>you can preserve battery life. You know, their battery doesn't

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 1>have to put out as much electricity to move a

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 1>lighter car as it would a heavier car. You know,

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty simple stuff. But his point was that the implications

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 1>of autonomous cars go well beyond you don't have to

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:44.079
<v Speaker 1>drive anymore. Um. He also brought up the idea of

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 1>a universal chassis, So, in other words, you create a

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 1>base for your vehicles that is common across all the

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 1>lines of vehicles you make. You might have to extend

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>it a bit for certain vehicles, like the chassis that

0:09:57.440 --> 0:09:59.560
<v Speaker 1>you might use for a compact car. Obviously you would

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:01.319
<v Speaker 1>have to to a little bit for it to be

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 1>like a pickup truck. But you can start with the

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 1>same basic foundation and this allows you to uh to

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 1>rapidly build various different vehicle types on demand, possibly because

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>he also brought up the potential for three D printed cars.

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:20.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah and and yeah, right, any anytime that you can

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:24.440
<v Speaker 1>streamline the manufacturing process. Here, you're saving time and energy, yes,

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's both of those are non trivial. Right, We've

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 1>talked about money. But yeah, yeah, yeah, time, energy and money.

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:34.320
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's the it's the trio that's everyone's wanting to,

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:38.959
<v Speaker 1>uh really crack. We actually saw this concept championed in

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 1>person orally. When I say we, I mean a crew

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 1>from mouse Stuff Works did. I went to c E.

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 1>S And you might remember I talked about Faraday Futures

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:48.559
<v Speaker 1>f F zero one race car concept. It was a

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 1>super crazy looking race car, but it was really just

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 1>an eye catcher for Faraday Future to talk about their approach,

0:10:56.080 --> 0:11:00.120
<v Speaker 1>which takes this idea of let's start with a basic

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:05.319
<v Speaker 1>foundation that is very easily modifiable, and then we can

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:10.199
<v Speaker 1>create all sorts of different vehicles using this same chassis,

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:16.079
<v Speaker 1>and that reduces production cost dramatically, and ultimately it means

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 1>that these types of vehicles will be less expensive to

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:23.840
<v Speaker 1>make and therefore, at least in theory, less expensive to purchase. Uh.

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 1>As well as other implications. So he also talked about

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:30.320
<v Speaker 1>you could get to a point where you could design

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 1>your own vehicle. Yeah, like like on the flip side,

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, instead of being less customized your could you

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 1>could get something very customized. Right, So you you got

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 1>like your basic chassis where essentially that that is unchangeable

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 1>to some degree, But then you can sit there and

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:48.839
<v Speaker 1>decide how your car should look. You can become a

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:54.439
<v Speaker 1>car designer using some form of three D manipulation software.

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Should have should have that grimlin on the front like

0:11:57.360 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the truck and maximum overdrive you I mean, I guess

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you could do that. I was thinking that you could

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 1>go crazy like Homer Simpson when he had the chance

0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 1>to design his own car, like you need a horn everywhere,

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:11.079
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing. Um. So, but you could actually

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 1>design your own unique vehicle that nobody else in the

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:18.319
<v Speaker 1>world will have. Uh. And there are even some companies

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 1>right now that are experimenting with this. Now. Granted, this

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:23.480
<v Speaker 1>is super high end, so you've got to have a

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of money to be able to do this sort

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 1>of thing. Also, you obviously need to have some some

0:12:30.800 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 1>skill in design to make this, uh, something that's both

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:38.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a practical and attractive or if not practical,

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 1>at least safe. Right. So, but but it's an interesting

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:44.839
<v Speaker 1>notion that we could get to a level of customization where,

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:48.720
<v Speaker 1>at least for some businesses, you don't you know, people

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 1>will ask, well, what kind of cars that? Oh, it's

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 1>my car. I made it. There is no other like it.

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty amazing. Uh. And then the second half of

0:12:56.559 --> 0:13:01.199
<v Speaker 1>the talk discussed the hyperloop. Right, yeah, this was Chip

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Walters who took this concept and ran with it. So

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 1>he was talking about how when Ellen Musk or Elon Musk,

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I usually say Ellen, but I've heard both, was talking

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:15.960
<v Speaker 1>about hyper loop. His idea was that he wanted to

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:19.319
<v Speaker 1>make the the designs that he and his engineers had

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 1>come up with available for other companies to play with

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to turn this idea into a potential reality, and out

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>to it. Design was one of the companies that actually

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 1>took on that challenge. So first, Walter's explained the differences

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:38.080
<v Speaker 1>between their approach to creating a capsule for the hyper

0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:40.720
<v Speaker 1>loop and the one that was outlined in the initial

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:45.520
<v Speaker 1>documents that Musk released, and so uh. In Musk's version,

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the ideas that a capsule would travel at a top

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 1>speed of more than seven hundred miles per hour one

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:55.680
<v Speaker 1>thousand seven kilometers per hour. But Walter said that when

0:13:55.880 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 1>their engineers started working on this and started crunching the numbers,

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 1>they decided that it was probably better to design a

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 1>top speed of between three or fo three to four

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 1>kilometers prower as the top speed. Not that the seven

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 1>hundred would have been impossible, but this would be more

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 1>achievable from an engineering standpoint. It's more practical for a

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 1>couple of different reasons. One about you know, the amount

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 1>of energy you would need to uh push something up

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 1>to that that top speed. Another would be how long

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 1>you would want the acceleration to last, because obviously, if

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you have a short period of acceleration, you create a

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 1>huge amount of force that the people writing the capsule

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 1>will feel. So you want to decrease that amount, and

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 1>you want the acceleration be nice and gentle, so that

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 1>it's not something that everyone's concentrating on, like they're suddenly

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 1>pressed back in their seat and can't move forward at all.

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Um And he also pointed out that this caused some

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 1>other issues because if you're moving at a quote unquote

0:14:57.640 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 1>slower speed, then your trip is going to take longer, right,

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Like a trip from San Francisco to l A will

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>take longer. The original hyper loop design has that trip

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 1>lasting about half an hour. Well, if you're going half

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 1>that speed, you're talking about at least an hour to

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 1>get from point A to point B, which is still incredible,

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:18.120
<v Speaker 1>but it you know, you might need to go the

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 1>bathroom in an hour. You might be all right for

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>half an hour, you might even be all right for

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 1>an hour, but for longer travel times you have to

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 1>start thinking, all right, well, now we've got to build

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 1>in something that wasn't in the initial approach, which is lavatories,

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 1>and that's just one of those practical considerations you have

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 1>to make. Um So I thought that was really interesting

0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 1>that he talked about that. Uh. He also mentioned that

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the design they created had retractable wheels, so a normal

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 1>operation you actually have air bearings. It's like an air

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 1>sled almost inside you know, the hyperloop In case you've forgotten,

0:15:52.440 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 1>it's an enclosed like tunnel like track that's elevated above

0:15:56.720 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the ground, but it's it's a vacuum tube or near vacuum.

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 1>It's actually very low air pressure, so not a true

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 1>vacuum that a capsule or several capsules actually can move through.

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 1>And each capsule uses compressed air to rise up above

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the surface of the enclosed track and fly on down

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 1>at at high speeds. And you're able to go at

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 1>those high speeds because you have very low friction, very

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 1>low air resistance, and that helps. But you not you

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>might need wheels if the air system breaks down. Yeah,

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 1>it's it's the most practical. If you know, some something happens,

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to have to wait for like helicopters

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to come get everybody off the trade or something like that. Yeah,

0:16:40.800 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 1>you're inside a solid capsule, inside a tunnel that is

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 1>elevated above the ground. You might start feeling a wee

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 1>bit anxious if it stops moving and you have no

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:54.280
<v Speaker 1>idea when it will start again. So they have these

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 1>retractable wheels in their design that would deploy if the

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 1>if the air sled was to stop working, and then

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 1>they could just wheel to the next exit point. And

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 1>I think he said, and I could be wrong about this,

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 1>but I'm pretty sure he said that in their design

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:10.879
<v Speaker 1>they made it a requirement that there should be an

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:14.399
<v Speaker 1>exit point every ten miles along the track, so it

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 1>would drive all using its wheels to the next extraction

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:21.960
<v Speaker 1>point essentially, and you would exit the chamber or the

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:25.640
<v Speaker 1>you would exit the capsule into the the track, uh

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 1>and then climb out from there. UH. So that was

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 1>also interesting. He also talked about the fact that there

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:37.119
<v Speaker 1>would be multiple classes of capsule layouts, so sort of

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 1>like how you have different classes of seats in an airplane,

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:43.399
<v Speaker 1>you would have different classes of seats in a hyperloop. UM.

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 1>He first explained that Musks design allowed for two different

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 1>sizes of capsules, one that would be smaller and one

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:51.359
<v Speaker 1>that would be larger, and they chose to go with

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:54.680
<v Speaker 1>a larger one for two reasons. One, the smaller one

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>created a real feeling of claustrophobia when you think about

0:17:58.359 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>how small it was, um. And to the larger one

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:06.480
<v Speaker 1>would allow for you to have a car stored in

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 1>one of the capsules. So the idea being that if

0:18:10.359 --> 0:18:12.879
<v Speaker 1>you were trying to go from San Francisco de l A,

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:15.479
<v Speaker 1>but you needed to have your car once you got

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>l A, it could transport the car as well. UM

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 1>and so uh. They showed off some of the or

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:25.879
<v Speaker 1>he showed off some of the artists renderings of what

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 1>these different capsule interiors would look like. So the top

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 1>of the line had the fewest number of seats, so

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:36.400
<v Speaker 1>each person was given the most space possible. And this

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:38.919
<v Speaker 1>is one where you might, Lauren, you might have to

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 1>have claim a specific chair because because the four seats,

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 1>they would all the two two pairs of seats would

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:48.639
<v Speaker 1>face in towards each other. And you could have like

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 1>a fold away tray er table that you could lay

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 1>out to act as a workstation. But again it's almost

0:18:55.000 --> 0:18:58.720
<v Speaker 1>like a conference table. Now. The difference here, of course,

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 1>is that you can't you can't see the outside. There's

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 1>no window for you to look at, which is which

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>is a huge part of right. So uh it's also

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:13.399
<v Speaker 1>something that some people might find create some anxiety, but

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:15.679
<v Speaker 1>I'll talk more about their solution to that in just

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 1>a second. So that was the most roomy of it

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:23.160
<v Speaker 1>could be, but I'll get to it. Uh So next

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:25.919
<v Speaker 1>was a business class style capsule which had sort of

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 1>roomy ish seats. What you could think of it like

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:34.119
<v Speaker 1>kind of the the comfort economy seats and some airlines.

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:37.200
<v Speaker 1>And then you had your economy class or standard class,

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:39.679
<v Speaker 1>which you know, you pack them in like sardines. And

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 1>uh it looked like the you know again, in the renderings,

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 1>it looked like the width of the capsule was about

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the same as a small commercial jet. So maybe one

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 1>that has like two seats on one side and one

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 1>seat on the other, something along those lines, or maybe

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:58.320
<v Speaker 1>two and two. But that's about as many as you

0:19:58.320 --> 0:20:02.679
<v Speaker 1>could pack, just because the limitations on the size the

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 1>interior size of the capsule UM. And here's how they

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 1>tried to combat the feeling that you're just in a

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, like like essentially an elevator that you can't

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 1>get out of for half an hour or an hour.

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 1>They in their design they expect that the walls would

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:25.679
<v Speaker 1>be very high quality displays and you could display something

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 1>on the walls that could be uh it could even

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:31.919
<v Speaker 1>be in motion, like it could be a video, not

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:35.439
<v Speaker 1>just a static picture, so that you have something to

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 1>look at besides just you know, the people sitting around you.

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:41.359
<v Speaker 1>And in the examples they had, they had one that

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:44.719
<v Speaker 1>looked like you were flying over clouds like you were

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 1>in a jet um with with no obstruction, like it

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:51.199
<v Speaker 1>like the whole thing is just open because you know,

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 1>there are no windows the whole side of the wall

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:56.200
<v Speaker 1>as a screen. There was another one where it made

0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 1>it look like it was a giant aquarium. So it's

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 1>really cool, but you know, again it was just sort

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 1>of conceptual. There's they don't have one built. Um, so

0:21:05.320 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I thought that was pretty interesting. And they also said

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 1>that because of their design, because they're not a jet,

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to have the capsule accelerate to top

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:18.159
<v Speaker 1>speed right away. You can take a lot of time

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 1>and have it continuously accelerate at a lower rate, thus

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:26.200
<v Speaker 1>creating less of a of a force upon the people

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 1>inside the capsule. That's obviously important if you're if you're

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:32.280
<v Speaker 1>one of those people who's sitting with your back facing

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the front of the capsule, and if it were to

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 1>accelerate quickly, you would be bent forward right. You wouldn't

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:40.400
<v Speaker 1>be pressed back in your seat, you would be folded up.

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:43.879
<v Speaker 1>So you want to make sure that that accelerative force

0:21:44.119 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 1>is not so strong as to create discomfort in the passengers. Yeah,

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:52.920
<v Speaker 1>nobody wants to unintentionally head desk. That's not that's not fun. No,

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Intentional head desks are are comedic. Unintentional ones are tragic.

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:00.679
<v Speaker 1>So um. He also mentioned a thing that I never

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 1>thought about before, so clearly, these these tracks are not

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be a straight line. You're not gonna have

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 1>a straight line from San Francisco de l A. There's

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:11.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna be some curves. But then you think, well, curves,

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:15.239
<v Speaker 1>when you change direction, that's an acceleration, right, because it's

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:18.200
<v Speaker 1>a velocity thing, it's got a vector. Uh, So how

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 1>do you change the direction without having that star trek effective?

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Everyone being jostled around inside the capsule whenever? It's because

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:27.199
<v Speaker 1>you can't even see when it turns coming up right,

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 1>because you're inside a solid capsule. And they said, well,

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the way it works is it banks. Uh The actual

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:37.919
<v Speaker 1>capsule will roll up the side of the wall that

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the curved wall of the tunnel, and because of that,

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:46.239
<v Speaker 1>the G force will continuously be pulling you downwards, not

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 1>pulling you left or right, because it has this banking ability.

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Same sort of thing that if you had a race

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 1>track with banked turns, those g forces are pulling you

0:22:55.760 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 1>down more than they're they're pulling you off to the side.

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:01.400
<v Speaker 1>So if you've ever been on a road that has

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 1>like a banked turn, you know it feels a lot

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 1>different than if you're just going around a flat curve.

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 1>To the left or right where you're being pulled to

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 1>one side or the other. And I thought, well, that's

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 1>really interesting. I never thought of that, that these these

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:18.680
<v Speaker 1>capsules are essentially kind of uh, they're not They're not

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 1>always perpendicular to the ground sometimes. I mean, they're never

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be parallel to the ground. You're never gonna

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:28.040
<v Speaker 1>have a turn that's gonna be that that intense, but

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 1>they're going to, you know, they allow some sway. And

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I thought that was a really clever idea. One other

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 1>thing that they brought up that I thought was interesting

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:38.600
<v Speaker 1>I didn't put it in my notes here is that

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:41.919
<v Speaker 1>as they were talking about this future of autonomous cars

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and um uh and the hyper loop, is that with

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the autonomous cars, you suddenly have the capability of allowing

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 1>more people access to mobility, which is great, but that

0:23:56.200 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 1>also means it potentially could mean more miles driven by vehicles,

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:05.200
<v Speaker 1>So we might actually see a net increase in the

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:08.879
<v Speaker 1>number of miles driven by vehicles on the roads. So

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:11.359
<v Speaker 1>we might see more cars on the road in the

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 1>future because autonomous cars will give more mobility and independence

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:18.679
<v Speaker 1>to people who previously had no access to that, like

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the elderly children, people who have visual impairments, right Exactly.

0:24:24.480 --> 0:24:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I have a friend who when she has to take

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 1>her medication, she cannot drive because she is prone to epilepsy. So,

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:33.479
<v Speaker 1>but she might be able to do that in an

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:37.240
<v Speaker 1>autonomous vehicle. So that raises more questions about what will

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 1>traffic be like in the future. And now, if autonomous

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:43.119
<v Speaker 1>cars are super smart, it might end up being all right,

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 1>because they'll make more efficient use of the infrastructure than

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:49.560
<v Speaker 1>human drivers would. But we don't know that for sure, right,

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:52.240
<v Speaker 1>That's something that we can't say for sure right now. Yeah,

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and this, this conversation actually leads us into these Well,

0:24:55.840 --> 0:24:58.119
<v Speaker 1>it was technically the third panel that you went to, right,

0:24:58.200 --> 0:24:59.879
<v Speaker 1>but it's a but it's a tied end concept. This

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:02.879
<v Speaker 1>second panel that we're going to discuss today robot cars

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and sharing road rage or smooth sailing. Yeah, so because

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 1>we're about smooth rage, that sounds like it's a type

0:25:11.359 --> 0:25:14.679
<v Speaker 1>of music. I love smooth rage at any rate. This

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 1>would be as Lauren was saying, this was the third panel.

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I saw that, David, because it ties directly into the

0:25:18.920 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 1>what I just talked about, we said to tackle it next. Uh.

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:24.359
<v Speaker 1>This panel focused on the future of autonomous cars in

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the concept of the shared car UH and The panelists

0:25:28.040 --> 0:25:33.680
<v Speaker 1>included Frederick Sue of NATO, Shad Laws from Renault and

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:36.160
<v Speaker 1>and Nissan. He specifically works for Renault, but he says

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 1>that in the United States, like that's one of the

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:40.640
<v Speaker 1>places where the brand Renault is not known, but their

0:25:40.680 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 1>partner brand Nissan, everyone knows. And then Mark Platchen from

0:25:44.760 --> 0:25:48.639
<v Speaker 1>bmw UH and Mark Platsch was actually a substitute. Marian

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 1>wou of ge Ventures was supposed to be on the panel,

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:54.719
<v Speaker 1>but she got sick unfortunately just before south By Southwest.

0:25:55.320 --> 0:25:58.160
<v Speaker 1>So NATO I mentioned with Frederick Sue, you might wonder

0:25:58.200 --> 0:26:00.040
<v Speaker 1>what that company is. It's a company that may It

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 1>is an app that coordinates a mobile device, several cameras,

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:07.719
<v Speaker 1>and a data infrastructure of driving information to improve fleet management. UH.

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:10.919
<v Speaker 1>It measures driving skill. So if you have like a

0:26:12.160 --> 0:26:15.560
<v Speaker 1>a company like Uber and you want to UH find

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 1>out if a driver is actually appropriate for your business,

0:26:18.040 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 1>you could install this system and see how well they drive.

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:25.680
<v Speaker 1>UM as well as I can turn a regular car

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 1>into a smart car, so you can think of it

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:30.960
<v Speaker 1>as as sort of an aftermarket smart car upgrade, and

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:34.360
<v Speaker 1>you would mount a camera essentially it goes right over

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:37.359
<v Speaker 1>where you're right behind where your rear view mirror is,

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 1>so it doesn't block your view. Uh. And that coordinates

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:44.359
<v Speaker 1>with an app running on a mobile device and also

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the obviously the infrastructure of the app. So he was

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:49.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of the moderator Sue was. And according to Sue,

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the typical American car spends nine six percent of its

0:26:54.200 --> 0:27:00.159
<v Speaker 1>life part. Uh, we're only driving our cars four of

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the entire time that they are active, and that, Uh,

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it's pretty easy to say that's inefficient. That's

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:09.720
<v Speaker 1>not an efficient use of the technology. It matters, especially

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:11.720
<v Speaker 1>in cities where you gotta find a place to keep

0:27:11.760 --> 0:27:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the cars, right, Yeah, especially cities where parking is a premium,

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:18.280
<v Speaker 1>things like New York City. That would be a big one, right.

0:27:18.760 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 1>So uh. They also only use about two percent of

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:25.439
<v Speaker 1>all the energy they expand to move a person from

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:29.400
<v Speaker 1>point A to point B. The other are that's used

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:33.520
<v Speaker 1>for other stuff, either overcoming in efficiencies or moving the

0:27:33.600 --> 0:27:35.920
<v Speaker 1>vehicle itself, but not you know, it's when you take

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the factor of the person out of it. So only

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 1>two percent of the energy that the vehicle is using

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 1>is actually doing what you needed to do, which is

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:46.880
<v Speaker 1>get a person from one point to another, and that's

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's also inefficient. So he was talking also

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 1>about how electric cars could be UH an advantage to this,

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:56.639
<v Speaker 1>you could, uh with with the improvement of things like

0:27:56.840 --> 0:27:59.959
<v Speaker 1>battery technology and the simplified drive train of electric car,

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:05.040
<v Speaker 1>you improve the efficiency of the overall system. UH. There's

0:28:05.040 --> 0:28:07.639
<v Speaker 1>still arguments to be made about how the electricity has

0:28:07.640 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 1>produced and all of that, but that that was not

0:28:10.320 --> 0:28:13.640
<v Speaker 1>what he was focusing on. UH. He introduced the concept

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:18.920
<v Speaker 1>of ACES, which stands for autonomous, connected, electric and Sharing,

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:20.879
<v Speaker 1>and he had these set up in a in a

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 1>slide in four corners, and then he showed related concepts

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:27.560
<v Speaker 1>between each of the elements to explain how these all

0:28:27.600 --> 0:28:30.760
<v Speaker 1>fit together in the car of the future. So all

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 1>of those elements are important for cars of the future,

0:28:33.320 --> 0:28:36.119
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of the projected models incorporate all four

0:28:36.359 --> 0:28:39.160
<v Speaker 1>into one approach. So in other words, you don't necessarily

0:28:39.160 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 1>have to have a future with autonomous cars, or electric cars,

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 1>or shared cars or connected cars, but most of the

0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:47.920
<v Speaker 1>projected models have all four of those playing at least

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 1>some role. UH. And he said that the autonomous car

0:28:51.360 --> 0:28:54.360
<v Speaker 1>era will be akin to another industrial revolution with massive

0:28:54.400 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 1>disruption across multiple industries beyond personal transportation, including shipping, so

0:28:59.280 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 1>like the trucking and stry um and the airline industry.

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Because if you're able to get a cheap ride in

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:10.959
<v Speaker 1>an autonomous car to take you to your destination and

0:29:11.000 --> 0:29:13.959
<v Speaker 1>it's less expensive than an airplane ticket and you're not

0:29:14.040 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 1>as concerned about getting there in the least amount of time,

0:29:18.200 --> 0:29:23.040
<v Speaker 1>that could be incredibly disruptive of incredibly um uh hard

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:26.080
<v Speaker 1>for the airline industry to handle. It may become a

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 1>very different business uh in five to ten years or

0:29:30.480 --> 0:29:33.720
<v Speaker 1>forty if we want to go with our usual number. So,

0:29:33.760 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 1>according to laws, the safety benchmark for manually driven cars

0:29:37.040 --> 0:29:41.480
<v Speaker 1>is less than one fatality for every one million kilometers traveled.

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:44.880
<v Speaker 1>And he says most nations meet this or exceed this

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:49.200
<v Speaker 1>already today. And he was making this point to say, uh,

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:51.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, talking about making the argument that au Thomas

0:29:51.480 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 1>cars need are are safer than manually driven cars. His

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 1>point was manually manually driven cars are already really safe

0:29:59.320 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 1>because when you take this benchmark and you look at

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the world, almost all the nations already meet it. Uh

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 1>So in the US it's one point eight fatalities per

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 1>one hundred million vehicle miles traveled. Because it's the United

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 1>States and we use miles not kilometers. So remember that

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 1>a mile is one point six kilometers, So actually, even

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:22.320
<v Speaker 1>though it's one point eight fatalities, it's actually less than

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 1>one fatality per hundred million kilometers driven. But not all

0:30:26.160 --> 0:30:30.040
<v Speaker 1>states are equal. According to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety,

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Wyoming leads the state states in fatalities per hundred million

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 1>miles driven at one point five nine, and Massachusetts is

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 1>on the low end at point five seven or one

0:30:40.600 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred million miles traveled. So I appreciate Laws this point

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 1>that manually driven cars are already remarkably safe. However, that

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 1>being said, it's very easy to kind of think of

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:55.400
<v Speaker 1>that in a statistics point of view. But when you

0:30:55.400 --> 0:30:57.880
<v Speaker 1>start looking at hard numbers and you realize that in

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:03.440
<v Speaker 1>el s people died in the United States due to

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:08.280
<v Speaker 1>car accidents, that to me is more powerful than less

0:31:08.280 --> 0:31:11.520
<v Speaker 1>than one per million kilometers dravel. Well, it means we

0:31:11.600 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 1>do a lot of car driving. Yeah, yeah, We've got

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:16.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of cars on the road and we were

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 1>driving a lot. So in my mind, the safety argument

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 1>is still a very relevant one. Laws was kind of saying, well,

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:28.080
<v Speaker 1>until autonomous cars proved that they are safer than manually

0:31:28.160 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 1>driven cars, which are already really safe, it's a non issue.

0:31:32.000 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that based upon early results, it's hard to

0:31:37.040 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 1>argue autonomous cars are less safe. There at least as

0:31:40.960 --> 0:31:44.000
<v Speaker 1>safe from what we've seen so far, keeping in mind

0:31:44.080 --> 0:31:46.360
<v Speaker 1>is still very early days, and maybe there will be

0:31:46.520 --> 0:31:48.960
<v Speaker 1>a case. I hope there's not, but maybe there'll be

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 1>a case that shows that they are not as safe

0:31:52.160 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and we still have a ways to go. Pletschin actually

0:31:55.080 --> 0:31:58.560
<v Speaker 1>introduced what he called the three ps that are necessary

0:31:58.640 --> 0:32:03.160
<v Speaker 1>for a fleet based them to work, which are proximity, prevalence,

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:07.160
<v Speaker 1>and price. So you want proximity in the sense that

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you want to you want cars on demand to be

0:32:09.360 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 1>close to you, right. You don't want to have to

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 1>wait twenty five minutes for the car to get to

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:15.440
<v Speaker 1>you to pick you up unless you've scheduled it for

0:32:15.480 --> 0:32:17.920
<v Speaker 1>that amount of time. If you call a car, you

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:21.800
<v Speaker 1>want to be there pretty quickly. Uh. The prevalence is

0:32:21.840 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 1>that you need to have enough cars in the area

0:32:24.480 --> 0:32:27.360
<v Speaker 1>to meet demand. So if if there's a car that's

0:32:27.360 --> 0:32:29.360
<v Speaker 1>two minutes away, that's awesome, But if it just so

0:32:29.400 --> 0:32:31.360
<v Speaker 1>happens that's one of three cars in the city and

0:32:31.360 --> 0:32:33.280
<v Speaker 1>you just lucked out. That's not gonna do you good

0:32:33.520 --> 0:32:36.680
<v Speaker 1>in in the long run, right And then price, obviously,

0:32:36.720 --> 0:32:40.240
<v Speaker 1>you need it to be competitive and affordable. Right now,

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 1>according to Platchin, the average price per mile for services

0:32:44.560 --> 0:32:48.360
<v Speaker 1>like Uber and Lift is about, you know, excusing surge pricing,

0:32:48.720 --> 0:32:52.920
<v Speaker 1>is about a dollar a mile. But he thinks that

0:32:53.160 --> 0:32:56.680
<v Speaker 1>using autonomous technology you can start to and with the

0:32:56.760 --> 0:33:00.120
<v Speaker 1>economy of scale, you can get that down to be

0:33:00.200 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 1>fifty cents per mile or maybe even as as little

0:33:02.800 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 1>as twenty five cents per mile, which suddenly makes it

0:33:05.640 --> 0:33:09.480
<v Speaker 1>a much more accessible means of transportation for a larger

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:13.160
<v Speaker 1>amount of the population. As for the shared nature of cars,

0:33:13.520 --> 0:33:15.240
<v Speaker 1>uh Law said, there are a lot of different models

0:33:15.280 --> 0:33:17.880
<v Speaker 1>out there, and not all of them follow that fleet

0:33:18.440 --> 0:33:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of service cars that we've talked about, right, So we've

0:33:21.520 --> 0:33:23.640
<v Speaker 1>talked about how autumas cars might mean that we don't

0:33:23.640 --> 0:33:26.560
<v Speaker 1>own one of these as a personal vehicle. Rather we

0:33:26.640 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 1>all rely on shared services. So one alternative he mentioned,

0:33:30.880 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and he said there were multiples, but this was the

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:34.840
<v Speaker 1>only example he gave, was imagined that you have sort

0:33:34.840 --> 0:33:37.800
<v Speaker 1>of a communal car where you and other households have

0:33:37.880 --> 0:33:41.600
<v Speaker 1>all joined up together and essentially invested in a single vehicle,

0:33:41.640 --> 0:33:45.080
<v Speaker 1>so you own like one sixth of a car. That

0:33:45.120 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 1>sounds like a horrible idea. I also think that because

0:33:48.840 --> 0:33:51.080
<v Speaker 1>how can you ever guarantee that the car will be

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:55.600
<v Speaker 1>available when you need it unless everyone's schedule is slightly

0:33:55.720 --> 0:34:00.680
<v Speaker 1>offset with each other never changes. Yeah, I can't imagine that.

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:03.200
<v Speaker 1>That just sounds awful. I mean, it's it makes a

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 1>lot more sense to me to do the widespread shared

0:34:05.880 --> 0:34:09.600
<v Speaker 1>car network issue. Yeah, I agree, you call a car. Yeah. Now,

0:34:09.640 --> 0:34:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Plash and mentioned there are some This was actually in

0:34:12.120 --> 0:34:16.880
<v Speaker 1>response to an audience question about, well, what about privacy,

0:34:16.960 --> 0:34:19.279
<v Speaker 1>what about the fact that people use their cars like

0:34:19.320 --> 0:34:21.360
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of clutter in in a lot in

0:34:21.400 --> 0:34:24.440
<v Speaker 1>some people's cars. Not everyone keeps their car pristine. A

0:34:24.440 --> 0:34:26.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of people have stuff that they rely upon stored

0:34:26.960 --> 0:34:29.960
<v Speaker 1>in their cars so it's easy to access and they

0:34:30.000 --> 0:34:32.759
<v Speaker 1>don't have to carry it everywhere. And he said, yeah,

0:34:32.800 --> 0:34:36.480
<v Speaker 1>that's a problem because obviously in the shared economy approach

0:34:36.520 --> 0:34:38.239
<v Speaker 1>you can't do that. It's like going in a taxi cab.

0:34:38.280 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 1>You don't want to leave anything behind because you will

0:34:40.040 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 1>never see it. Again, but that means you can't rely

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:46.000
<v Speaker 1>on having stuff close at hand, just stored away in

0:34:46.040 --> 0:34:48.840
<v Speaker 1>your mobile storage unit, which is your car. So you

0:34:48.880 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 1>could argue that even though your car is parked it's time,

0:34:52.480 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 1>if it's also acting as a storage unit, then it

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:57.600
<v Speaker 1>has a little more added utility, right, and you lose

0:34:57.680 --> 0:34:59.879
<v Speaker 1>that in the shared version. He said, there's not really

0:34:59.880 --> 0:35:01.759
<v Speaker 1>a get solution for that, although if you get the

0:35:01.760 --> 0:35:05.080
<v Speaker 1>price down low enough, he says, you could have your

0:35:05.120 --> 0:35:08.120
<v Speaker 1>stuff in another car and just call it on demand

0:35:08.200 --> 0:35:09.920
<v Speaker 1>and it comes and brings it to you. And I thought,

0:35:10.160 --> 0:35:12.560
<v Speaker 1>so you want to double or triple the number of

0:35:12.600 --> 0:35:15.880
<v Speaker 1>cars out there. That seems like that would be a

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:18.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of money and a lot of of expended energy

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:22.600
<v Speaker 1>for a what I would argue a trivial benefit. But

0:35:22.719 --> 0:35:25.319
<v Speaker 1>it was an interesting thing to hear about. So in

0:35:25.400 --> 0:35:30.120
<v Speaker 1>both of the the autonomous car panels I saw, there

0:35:30.120 --> 0:35:32.080
<v Speaker 1>were people who were saying, listen, I don't think that

0:35:32.160 --> 0:35:34.520
<v Speaker 1>personal ownership is going to go away. I don't think

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:36.719
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to get to a point where the

0:35:36.760 --> 0:35:41.399
<v Speaker 1>government will outlaw manually driven, personally owned vehicles. But one

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:44.239
<v Speaker 1>guy said it may turn into something like horse ownership

0:35:44.600 --> 0:35:48.000
<v Speaker 1>that few people actually own a car. There will be somewhere,

0:35:48.000 --> 0:35:50.520
<v Speaker 1>there will be use cases where a car is necessary,

0:35:50.640 --> 0:35:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Like in I would argue again in rural areas, it

0:35:54.680 --> 0:35:57.000
<v Speaker 1>makes more sense to have a manually driven, personally owned

0:35:57.080 --> 0:36:01.359
<v Speaker 1>vehicle than a car sharing service. Um. And also if

0:36:01.360 --> 0:36:02.840
<v Speaker 1>you want to do things like off roading, if you

0:36:02.840 --> 0:36:05.920
<v Speaker 1>want to do recreational driving, obviously you would need to

0:36:05.960 --> 0:36:09.760
<v Speaker 1>have your own manually driven car, or or own seven

0:36:09.800 --> 0:36:11.720
<v Speaker 1>own a fleet of them and allow people to rent them,

0:36:11.840 --> 0:36:14.400
<v Speaker 1>or just or just hobbyists, which I suppose is a

0:36:14.400 --> 0:36:17.880
<v Speaker 1>word that's more often applied to car enthusiasts than to

0:36:18.040 --> 0:36:20.759
<v Speaker 1>horse enthusiasts. But you know, there are plenty of people

0:36:20.760 --> 0:36:22.560
<v Speaker 1>out there who just like horses a whole bunch and

0:36:22.600 --> 0:36:25.240
<v Speaker 1>want to have one. And you know, for like Scott

0:36:25.280 --> 0:36:27.319
<v Speaker 1>Benjamin not with the horses, with the car thing, like

0:36:27.360 --> 0:36:29.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure would you would have to. You would have

0:36:29.760 --> 0:36:32.399
<v Speaker 1>to pry his car away from his cold dead hands. Yeah.

0:36:32.400 --> 0:36:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm going to talk to Scott later this

0:36:34.920 --> 0:36:37.000
<v Speaker 1>week and I'm going to drop some bombs on him

0:36:37.000 --> 0:36:39.759
<v Speaker 1>to find out how he reacts. Well, I'll be nice

0:36:39.760 --> 0:36:42.400
<v Speaker 1>to Scott to him. One thing that occurs to me

0:36:42.480 --> 0:36:44.840
<v Speaker 1>is that there are some people for whom they really

0:36:44.960 --> 0:36:47.880
<v Speaker 1>need the car to be a mobile storage unit, for example,

0:36:47.960 --> 0:36:51.320
<v Speaker 1>for the work they do. Like if you are a plumber,

0:36:51.560 --> 0:36:53.600
<v Speaker 1>or if you are you know, anybody who has a

0:36:53.640 --> 0:36:56.839
<v Speaker 1>set of tools or materials in your truck that you

0:36:57.000 --> 0:37:00.400
<v Speaker 1>use at various places that you go, that's seems like

0:37:00.560 --> 0:37:03.000
<v Speaker 1>you pretty much need to have your own vehicle. Yeah,

0:37:03.120 --> 0:37:06.040
<v Speaker 1>unless you have unless you have some sort of of

0:37:06.160 --> 0:37:09.160
<v Speaker 1>plumbing business that's large enough to have its own fleet

0:37:10.080 --> 0:37:14.200
<v Speaker 1>of dedicated vehicles that are outfitted with the right tools.

0:37:14.239 --> 0:37:16.440
<v Speaker 1>But that ends up meaning that you would you couldn't

0:37:16.480 --> 0:37:20.480
<v Speaker 1>have independent contractors anymore. And I can't imagine that that's

0:37:20.480 --> 0:37:21.880
<v Speaker 1>going to be a case, at least not until we

0:37:21.880 --> 0:37:25.239
<v Speaker 1>get the plumber robots, which they don't. You know, they'll

0:37:25.239 --> 0:37:27.520
<v Speaker 1>have all the tools just stored away and then they

0:37:27.560 --> 0:37:30.760
<v Speaker 1>just hover over to your place and and they hoover

0:37:30.920 --> 0:37:34.319
<v Speaker 1>out the pipes, or maybe in the future, instead of

0:37:34.360 --> 0:37:36.680
<v Speaker 1>calling a plumber, people just call a car and then

0:37:36.760 --> 0:37:39.839
<v Speaker 1>use the bathroom in the car. There was also talk

0:37:39.920 --> 0:37:41.719
<v Speaker 1>about the fact that there there would need to be

0:37:41.760 --> 0:37:45.880
<v Speaker 1>systems to maintain the exactly and that would just do

0:37:45.920 --> 0:37:47.879
<v Speaker 1>a scan and anything that pops up on the scan

0:37:47.920 --> 0:37:51.160
<v Speaker 1>and say time to go back to HQ. Oh never mind.

0:37:51.200 --> 0:37:53.440
<v Speaker 1>I didn't need to go anywhere. I was trying to

0:37:53.520 --> 0:37:57.040
<v Speaker 1>trans transition, however, to by making the plumber robot thing

0:37:57.080 --> 0:37:59.879
<v Speaker 1>to the last panel I saw, right, yeah, yeah, which

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:03.880
<v Speaker 1>is not about transit. No, it's about robots. It wasn't plumbers,

0:38:04.080 --> 0:38:06.000
<v Speaker 1>it was not about plumbers. It's not about the future.

0:38:07.560 --> 0:38:10.759
<v Speaker 1>It's called The panel was called one Robot Doesn't Fit

0:38:10.960 --> 0:38:15.440
<v Speaker 1>All uh. And this one featured four people, UH, product

0:38:15.440 --> 0:38:19.440
<v Speaker 1>designer nure Kim Uh, the executive director of Interaction Design

0:38:19.440 --> 0:38:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Research at Stanford University UH, Wendy Jew and then former

0:38:23.920 --> 0:38:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Google X User Experience researcher Leila Takayama. And finally the

0:38:28.640 --> 0:38:33.400
<v Speaker 1>c IO of Fellow Robotics Fafadu, Rena Tonga. And this

0:38:33.480 --> 0:38:36.359
<v Speaker 1>was a fascinating panel. I will let me go ahead

0:38:36.360 --> 0:38:38.480
<v Speaker 1>and say this right off the top. I couldn't hear

0:38:38.520 --> 0:38:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Rena Tonga very well. He he was. He's a soft

0:38:41.120 --> 0:38:45.400
<v Speaker 1>spoken guy, and my hearing is bad. But it was

0:38:45.400 --> 0:38:50.680
<v Speaker 1>a great panel. All the women were phenomenal, enthusiastic and

0:38:50.760 --> 0:38:54.480
<v Speaker 1>incredibly knowledgeable, and every question that was asked was a

0:38:54.520 --> 0:38:57.760
<v Speaker 1>good one, and every answer was really great. I wish

0:38:57.840 --> 0:38:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I could have shot video of it, but you can't

0:38:59.760 --> 0:39:02.560
<v Speaker 1>at off myself West, So this is as close as

0:39:02.560 --> 0:39:05.360
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna get if you weren't actually there. So the

0:39:05.400 --> 0:39:08.840
<v Speaker 1>panel mostly focused on how big a challenge it is

0:39:08.880 --> 0:39:13.279
<v Speaker 1>to design robots. Um and Takeyama pointed out that it's

0:39:13.360 --> 0:39:16.200
<v Speaker 1>much easier to design a single purpose robot, something that

0:39:16.480 --> 0:39:19.040
<v Speaker 1>is meant to do one thing and one thing only,

0:39:19.040 --> 0:39:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and you can you can design everything about that robot

0:39:21.840 --> 0:39:25.080
<v Speaker 1>to dedicate it toward that task. That is much easier

0:39:25.080 --> 0:39:27.640
<v Speaker 1>than building a general purpose robot. This is something we've

0:39:27.680 --> 0:39:29.799
<v Speaker 1>talked about on the show before. Yeah, and tuky I'm

0:39:29.800 --> 0:39:32.120
<v Speaker 1>actually went ahead and said, like, the more stuff you're

0:39:32.760 --> 0:39:35.880
<v Speaker 1>robot does, the crappier it performs. That was essentially the

0:39:35.920 --> 0:39:38.399
<v Speaker 1>way she said it too, which was awesome. Uh and

0:39:38.440 --> 0:39:42.160
<v Speaker 1>her her example because each panelist was asked to name

0:39:42.160 --> 0:39:45.200
<v Speaker 1>what their favorite robot was, and her favorite robot was

0:39:45.320 --> 0:39:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Mo from Wally and Mo was the little tiny just

0:39:49.000 --> 0:39:51.840
<v Speaker 1>as Mo and it tries to scrub. It's a cleaner robot.

0:39:51.840 --> 0:39:54.520
<v Speaker 1>It just scrubs dirt off of things. And there are

0:39:54.520 --> 0:39:57.080
<v Speaker 1>times in the film when when Mo is critical to

0:39:57.120 --> 0:40:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the mission. Yes, and she loves Mo. She says, Mo

0:40:00.719 --> 0:40:03.879
<v Speaker 1>knows what its purposes and that is what Moe does.

0:40:04.040 --> 0:40:06.560
<v Speaker 1>That is all MO does, and Mode does it with efficiency,

0:40:07.000 --> 0:40:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's why I love this character. So that was

0:40:09.640 --> 0:40:12.399
<v Speaker 1>really very endearing. They actually showed a clip from the film,

0:40:12.800 --> 0:40:16.160
<v Speaker 1>but Takiyama and you both talked about how as a

0:40:16.239 --> 0:40:17.960
<v Speaker 1>human it can be really difficult to tell what a

0:40:18.040 --> 0:40:21.200
<v Speaker 1>robot is doing, particularly if the robot is in a

0:40:21.360 --> 0:40:25.600
<v Speaker 1>mapping mode where it's it's examining its environment, but it's

0:40:25.640 --> 0:40:29.160
<v Speaker 1>not directly acting on anything at the moment, you might

0:40:29.200 --> 0:40:32.160
<v Speaker 1>just think it's being idle. Right, there's no necessarily there's

0:40:32.200 --> 0:40:35.800
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily an outward indication that anything is going on. Besides,

0:40:35.840 --> 0:40:38.600
<v Speaker 1>it's just sitting there all right, unlike a human person,

0:40:38.680 --> 0:40:40.520
<v Speaker 1>who you know, if they're trying, if you humans trying

0:40:40.520 --> 0:40:41.920
<v Speaker 1>to figure out where to go next. They might be

0:40:41.960 --> 0:40:44.000
<v Speaker 1>looking around. They might be checking a map. They might

0:40:44.000 --> 0:40:46.279
<v Speaker 1>be just standing with their head tilted in a in

0:40:46.280 --> 0:40:50.040
<v Speaker 1>a perpetually confused manner. They may be looking around in

0:40:50.120 --> 0:40:52.719
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of you know, a panic, hoping that

0:40:52.760 --> 0:40:54.600
<v Speaker 1>they can find help. There's at least some sort of

0:40:54.680 --> 0:40:59.920
<v Speaker 1>visual indication that something's going on. Uh, so uh, Takiyama

0:41:00.000 --> 0:41:02.480
<v Speaker 1>actually told a really funny story about that. Well, first,

0:41:02.520 --> 0:41:05.040
<v Speaker 1>first I should mention that, um, that Jews point was

0:41:05.080 --> 0:41:08.240
<v Speaker 1>that there's also an issue where there's a trust barrier.

0:41:08.560 --> 0:41:11.000
<v Speaker 1>If you don't know what the robot is doing, it's

0:41:11.000 --> 0:41:14.480
<v Speaker 1>hard for you to trust the robot, right you If

0:41:14.520 --> 0:41:18.680
<v Speaker 1>you suspect the robot might be doing something on the sly,

0:41:19.160 --> 0:41:21.279
<v Speaker 1>then it's gonna make you feel nervous. And she brought

0:41:21.360 --> 0:41:24.480
<v Speaker 1>up the example of Amazon Echo. This actually ended up

0:41:24.480 --> 0:41:28.120
<v Speaker 1>being an interesting discussion because, uh, fava dude didn't think

0:41:28.160 --> 0:41:31.000
<v Speaker 1>of Echo as being a robot, but Jews said, no,

0:41:31.160 --> 0:41:33.760
<v Speaker 1>it totally is a robot. It's doing work on behalf

0:41:33.800 --> 0:41:36.399
<v Speaker 1>of humans. It's doing it in the background. Sure, there's

0:41:36.440 --> 0:41:40.640
<v Speaker 1>not a physical body moving around, but it is an

0:41:40.719 --> 0:41:44.920
<v Speaker 1>artificially intelligent construct that's doing work on behalf of humans.

0:41:45.440 --> 0:41:48.880
<v Speaker 1>And uh, it doesn't necessarily fit the traditional definition of robot,

0:41:48.920 --> 0:41:51.000
<v Speaker 1>but still doing what a robot does. Sure, it's still

0:41:51.000 --> 0:41:55.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a robot. Yeah, it's at least it's at least

0:41:55.200 --> 0:41:57.839
<v Speaker 1>Lauren just hits some air quote. Yes, it's at least

0:41:57.920 --> 0:42:00.759
<v Speaker 1>the back end of of a robe addic system. It

0:42:00.840 --> 0:42:04.520
<v Speaker 1>just lacks the physical body to move around. Doesn't need

0:42:04.600 --> 0:42:06.319
<v Speaker 1>it for what it does. They just need to give

0:42:06.320 --> 0:42:12.160
<v Speaker 1>it a single wheel. Yeah. Well. One of the things

0:42:12.160 --> 0:42:15.399
<v Speaker 1>that she pointed out is that it's impossible to tell

0:42:16.040 --> 0:42:21.080
<v Speaker 1>when an Amazon Echo is really listening in because because

0:42:21.120 --> 0:42:23.879
<v Speaker 1>you can, you can use voice commands to activate it. Right,

0:42:24.239 --> 0:42:26.680
<v Speaker 1>you say alexa, and it wakes up. And by the way,

0:42:26.719 --> 0:42:28.879
<v Speaker 1>if you have an Amazon Echo and I just woke

0:42:28.880 --> 0:42:33.399
<v Speaker 1>it up, I'm sorry anyway. Because it's listening, you don't

0:42:33.400 --> 0:42:36.359
<v Speaker 1>know if it's spying, if it's recording, if it's transmitting.

0:42:36.440 --> 0:42:39.520
<v Speaker 1>That makes people nervous. It creates a trust issue. She says,

0:42:39.520 --> 0:42:41.560
<v Speaker 1>there needs to be some sort of system built in

0:42:42.080 --> 0:42:46.200
<v Speaker 1>to make people feel better, like they know what's happening. Alexa,

0:42:46.360 --> 0:42:51.320
<v Speaker 1>order ten thou drinking straws man, Yes, okay so. Taka

0:42:51.360 --> 0:42:55.959
<v Speaker 1>Yama also demonstrated how this barrier barrier could create real

0:42:56.120 --> 0:42:59.399
<v Speaker 1>engineering issues. She used a concrete example from her own

0:42:59.480 --> 0:43:02.080
<v Speaker 1>past and told a story about how she used to

0:43:02.120 --> 0:43:05.359
<v Speaker 1>work in an office building where engineers were working on

0:43:05.480 --> 0:43:08.520
<v Speaker 1>robots uh and and testing them out all the time,

0:43:08.680 --> 0:43:11.040
<v Speaker 1>which meant there are robots just cluttering up the hallway

0:43:11.400 --> 0:43:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and there's a particular hallway that her office was off

0:43:13.600 --> 0:43:16.400
<v Speaker 1>of that often was used for robot testing, and she said,

0:43:16.040 --> 0:43:18.560
<v Speaker 1>I got to the point where I hated the things

0:43:19.000 --> 0:43:20.600
<v Speaker 1>because I had to try and find a way to

0:43:20.640 --> 0:43:23.240
<v Speaker 1>get around them while doing my day to day stuff.

0:43:23.840 --> 0:43:26.400
<v Speaker 1>And she talked about how in some cases the robots

0:43:26.480 --> 0:43:28.759
<v Speaker 1>might be standing in front of a door, and what

0:43:28.800 --> 0:43:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the robots are actually doing is mapping out the door.

0:43:30.920 --> 0:43:34.200
<v Speaker 1>They're looking at the door's dimensions. They're identifying what is

0:43:34.200 --> 0:43:36.359
<v Speaker 1>the handle, what is the mechanism for the handle, how

0:43:36.360 --> 0:43:38.279
<v Speaker 1>do you operate it? Does the door open inward or

0:43:38.280 --> 0:43:41.080
<v Speaker 1>does it open outward? These are things that we humans

0:43:41.160 --> 0:43:43.279
<v Speaker 1>can figure out very quickly by looking at a door,

0:43:43.480 --> 0:43:46.640
<v Speaker 1>right and if we if we don't figure it out properly,

0:43:46.680 --> 0:43:48.920
<v Speaker 1>if we pull when it's a push door, we figure

0:43:48.960 --> 0:43:52.240
<v Speaker 1>that out and then change our behavior and move on. Robots,

0:43:52.280 --> 0:43:55.359
<v Speaker 1>that's not necessarily the case, uh, And it could take

0:43:55.440 --> 0:43:57.879
<v Speaker 1>hours for a robot to do all the mapping before

0:43:57.880 --> 0:43:59.799
<v Speaker 1>it's able to take an action. And she talked about

0:44:00.000 --> 0:44:02.879
<v Speaker 1>tim where she passed between the robot and a door

0:44:02.920 --> 0:44:05.400
<v Speaker 1>in order to get around it, and immediately engineers were

0:44:05.480 --> 0:44:07.359
<v Speaker 1>running around the corner screaming at her, like what did

0:44:07.360 --> 0:44:10.319
<v Speaker 1>you do we you just ruined two hours of work

0:44:10.800 --> 0:44:13.600
<v Speaker 1>because I don't know. The robots just sitting there, it's

0:44:13.640 --> 0:44:17.279
<v Speaker 1>not doing anything. How am I supposed to know it's

0:44:17.400 --> 0:44:20.680
<v Speaker 1>doing something when it's just sitting there. All For me,

0:44:20.760 --> 0:44:23.560
<v Speaker 1>it's just an obstacle that's in my way. And so

0:44:23.640 --> 0:44:27.480
<v Speaker 1>that's what kind of got her thinking about creating robots

0:44:27.520 --> 0:44:31.839
<v Speaker 1>that have some form of expression. And the benefit is

0:44:31.880 --> 0:44:35.399
<v Speaker 1>not to the robot necessarily, at least not directly, but

0:44:35.480 --> 0:44:39.120
<v Speaker 1>more to humans for human robot interactions. Yeah, I've read

0:44:39.160 --> 0:44:42.440
<v Speaker 1>about these concepts before. One of them is is it

0:44:42.520 --> 0:44:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the Baxter robot that does this where it has eyes?

0:44:46.480 --> 0:44:48.359
<v Speaker 1>And it's not so much like you say, it's not

0:44:48.440 --> 0:44:51.000
<v Speaker 1>for the robot, because the robot can see anyway with

0:44:51.040 --> 0:44:54.080
<v Speaker 1>its cameras, but it has eyes that are displayed on

0:44:54.120 --> 0:44:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the screen so that the person can tell what the

0:44:57.239 --> 0:45:01.239
<v Speaker 1>robot is looking at. Yes, and that's that's exactly what

0:45:01.280 --> 0:45:03.719
<v Speaker 1>Takeyama and you were both arguing for. They're saying, this

0:45:03.800 --> 0:45:08.160
<v Speaker 1>is absolutely critical to build meaningful human robot interactions that

0:45:08.200 --> 0:45:13.040
<v Speaker 1>are effective and not distracting or destructive. And so she said, well,

0:45:13.040 --> 0:45:15.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, she created a paper. She worked with a

0:45:15.400 --> 0:45:18.719
<v Speaker 1>guy from Pixar to create a series of animations to

0:45:18.920 --> 0:45:22.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of get people's reactions to various scenarios in which

0:45:22.160 --> 0:45:24.640
<v Speaker 1>a robot might react or not react. And she said,

0:45:24.920 --> 0:45:26.919
<v Speaker 1>what if you had a robot that's standing there looking

0:45:26.960 --> 0:45:29.160
<v Speaker 1>at a door. It's mapping things out, just as the

0:45:29.239 --> 0:45:33.240
<v Speaker 1>situation was in her real past, but it occasionally reaches

0:45:33.360 --> 0:45:35.399
<v Speaker 1>up and sort of makes a scratching motion at its

0:45:35.400 --> 0:45:38.400
<v Speaker 1>head like it's thinking. She said, well, that's an indication

0:45:38.400 --> 0:45:41.240
<v Speaker 1>that it's actually doing something. It's not just sitting idle,

0:45:41.280 --> 0:45:43.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not just trying to charge itself or something, and

0:45:44.040 --> 0:45:46.840
<v Speaker 1>that that would give an indication to the human Oh,

0:45:47.080 --> 0:45:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I should skirt around the other side, because this robot

0:45:50.160 --> 0:45:52.000
<v Speaker 1>is actually trying to do something. I don't know what

0:45:52.120 --> 0:45:54.720
<v Speaker 1>it is, but it's clear it's it's occupied with something.

0:45:55.440 --> 0:45:59.279
<v Speaker 1>Um And she also talked about creating a series of

0:45:59.320 --> 0:46:04.040
<v Speaker 1>animations indicate a robot's reaction to either succeeding at a

0:46:04.080 --> 0:46:07.279
<v Speaker 1>task or failing at it. And again, it's not for

0:46:07.320 --> 0:46:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the robots benefit, it's for the people around the robot.

0:46:10.120 --> 0:46:12.560
<v Speaker 1>And she gave a very simple example again of opening

0:46:12.560 --> 0:46:15.319
<v Speaker 1>a door. So imagine that you have a robot and

0:46:15.480 --> 0:46:17.960
<v Speaker 1>it uh it tries to open a door, but for

0:46:18.000 --> 0:46:20.360
<v Speaker 1>some reason is incapable of doing so. Maybe it's grip

0:46:20.440 --> 0:46:22.080
<v Speaker 1>is at the wrong point on the handle and it

0:46:22.160 --> 0:46:25.320
<v Speaker 1>slips right off. She said. If you have a robot

0:46:25.320 --> 0:46:28.399
<v Speaker 1>that does it but doesn't react to the failure, then

0:46:28.440 --> 0:46:31.760
<v Speaker 1>people just think of it as a dumb robot. Yeah. Yeah,

0:46:31.600 --> 0:46:34.520
<v Speaker 1>you don't know that the robot knows that it fails exactly. Yeah,

0:46:34.560 --> 0:46:36.600
<v Speaker 1>you just think that the robot just went through. It's

0:46:36.600 --> 0:46:39.279
<v Speaker 1>almost like if someone were remote controlling it and they

0:46:39.360 --> 0:46:42.040
<v Speaker 1>just missed a little bit, and they're like, oh, well,

0:46:42.160 --> 0:46:44.239
<v Speaker 1>all right, it's just a dumb thing. It doesn't have

0:46:44.280 --> 0:46:46.560
<v Speaker 1>any intelligence of its own, so you need to give

0:46:46.560 --> 0:46:50.640
<v Speaker 1>it sadness. Yes, yes, And so the Pixar animator did

0:46:50.680 --> 0:46:52.440
<v Speaker 1>this thing, and it kind of looked a little not

0:46:52.600 --> 0:46:55.120
<v Speaker 1>exactly like Wally, but you know, kind of similar in

0:46:55.160 --> 0:46:58.160
<v Speaker 1>that it had an articulated head and had arms and uh,

0:46:58.440 --> 0:47:00.759
<v Speaker 1>kind of a blocky body. In the anime, it's very

0:47:00.760 --> 0:47:04.319
<v Speaker 1>simple animation where the robot reaches forward that the hand

0:47:04.400 --> 0:47:07.080
<v Speaker 1>slips off the handle, and then the robot SAgs a

0:47:07.160 --> 0:47:09.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit like it's shoulder like what well, the block

0:47:10.040 --> 0:47:12.560
<v Speaker 1>essentially SAgs down a bit as if it's disappointed in

0:47:12.600 --> 0:47:17.560
<v Speaker 1>itself slightly deflates. Yeah, And the people that she talked to,

0:47:17.680 --> 0:47:20.880
<v Speaker 1>after they viewed the various animations they were supposed to

0:47:20.960 --> 0:47:25.200
<v Speaker 1>rank how intelligent they thought each robot was. The interesting

0:47:25.239 --> 0:47:28.719
<v Speaker 1>thing was they thought the robots that failed but indicated

0:47:28.760 --> 0:47:31.759
<v Speaker 1>they understood that they failed. In other words, they made

0:47:31.760 --> 0:47:35.080
<v Speaker 1>this expression were more intelligent than robots that succeeded but

0:47:35.160 --> 0:47:38.600
<v Speaker 1>showed no no response at all. So there are also

0:47:38.680 --> 0:47:41.440
<v Speaker 1>were success ones, and my favorite was a success one

0:47:41.440 --> 0:47:44.680
<v Speaker 1>where the robot opens up a door and then immediately

0:47:44.800 --> 0:47:47.280
<v Speaker 1>like like they had a little column that represented a person.

0:47:47.480 --> 0:47:50.080
<v Speaker 1>So the robot opens up a door and immediately turns

0:47:50.200 --> 0:47:52.480
<v Speaker 1>its head to the person and looks down, looks up

0:47:52.520 --> 0:47:55.160
<v Speaker 1>and and and perks up as if to say, look

0:47:55.200 --> 0:47:59.520
<v Speaker 1>what I did. And everyone in the audience went, uh.

0:47:59.640 --> 0:48:04.520
<v Speaker 1>These are very simplistic representations too. They weren't like like

0:48:04.600 --> 0:48:07.399
<v Speaker 1>realistic or true to life or anything. So I thought

0:48:07.440 --> 0:48:10.399
<v Speaker 1>this was fascinating, This idea of designing robots for human

0:48:10.480 --> 0:48:16.160
<v Speaker 1>robot interaction, again taking human psychology into account, because often

0:48:16.200 --> 0:48:20.040
<v Speaker 1>from the roboticist side, they're looking at a functionality approach, right,

0:48:20.080 --> 0:48:22.280
<v Speaker 1>they need to find a way to make a robot

0:48:22.320 --> 0:48:24.000
<v Speaker 1>be able to do the thing it's designed to do.

0:48:24.120 --> 0:48:26.080
<v Speaker 1>But if that robot is designed to interact within a

0:48:26.160 --> 0:48:28.960
<v Speaker 1>human environment, part of what it has to do is

0:48:29.000 --> 0:48:32.560
<v Speaker 1>interact with humans. It's usually the trickiest part. Yeah, I

0:48:32.600 --> 0:48:36.600
<v Speaker 1>believe there is a human Robot Interactions lab here in Atlanta,

0:48:36.760 --> 0:48:40.319
<v Speaker 1>Georgia Tech in there. Yeah, you've spoken to people there. Yeah,

0:48:40.360 --> 0:48:43.160
<v Speaker 1>it's it's really interesting. I mean, there's and there's so

0:48:43.200 --> 0:48:46.080
<v Speaker 1>many different ways of creating this. There were some great

0:48:46.120 --> 0:48:49.480
<v Speaker 1>questions at that panel. One guy asked, because he worked

0:48:49.480 --> 0:48:54.359
<v Speaker 1>in a company, either it makes industrial robots or they

0:48:54.520 --> 0:48:57.800
<v Speaker 1>use industrial robots. I can't remember precisely, but he said,

0:48:58.400 --> 0:49:00.520
<v Speaker 1>what do you think about what are ways that we

0:49:00.520 --> 0:49:04.120
<v Speaker 1>can design industrial robots so that they create a a

0:49:04.480 --> 0:49:06.799
<v Speaker 1>a warning that people can pick up on and not

0:49:06.920 --> 0:49:10.000
<v Speaker 1>just dismiss. And they were saying, yeah, it's really tricky

0:49:10.120 --> 0:49:14.480
<v Speaker 1>because if you create an expression that becomes uh that

0:49:14.560 --> 0:49:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the people associate with being human. There's also the danger

0:49:18.239 --> 0:49:21.600
<v Speaker 1>of dismissing something like you might dismiss a person who

0:49:21.719 --> 0:49:24.640
<v Speaker 1>you don't think is really an authority figure telling you, hey,

0:49:24.719 --> 0:49:26.759
<v Speaker 1>don't do that, and you're like, well, they don't even

0:49:26.760 --> 0:49:28.759
<v Speaker 1>know what they're talking about, and they said, this is

0:49:28.760 --> 0:49:31.520
<v Speaker 1>actually a really hard problem to solve because you want

0:49:32.040 --> 0:49:35.799
<v Speaker 1>to create the safest possible response. But you right now

0:49:35.920 --> 0:49:38.520
<v Speaker 1>people don't agree on what that actually is. I would

0:49:38.520 --> 0:49:40.800
<v Speaker 1>say that what you should do is, when you're designing

0:49:40.880 --> 0:49:44.680
<v Speaker 1>dangerous industrial robots, you should design them to look scary.

0:49:44.960 --> 0:49:47.920
<v Speaker 1>You should specifically design them, like hire people to design

0:49:48.000 --> 0:49:50.480
<v Speaker 1>them so they look like angry monster and maybe have

0:49:50.600 --> 0:49:54.640
<v Speaker 1>like like circular saws on the shoulder they're just constantly rotating. Well, no,

0:49:54.719 --> 0:49:57.359
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily make them more dangerous than they already are,

0:49:57.400 --> 0:50:00.160
<v Speaker 1>but to make them look like a scary creature show

0:50:00.320 --> 0:50:05.799
<v Speaker 1>Reach for the Stars man, come on, maybe like like

0:50:06.000 --> 0:50:09.399
<v Speaker 1>edgeless circular saws, so they're not actually more dangerous, they

0:50:09.440 --> 0:50:13.160
<v Speaker 1>just look and have them just roar and breathe fire

0:50:13.239 --> 0:50:14.719
<v Speaker 1>every now and then. I think if you make it

0:50:14.800 --> 0:50:21.320
<v Speaker 1>make a really obnoxious sound. Actually, instead of making them scary,

0:50:21.400 --> 0:50:24.120
<v Speaker 1>just make them annoying, like like like a field of

0:50:24.440 --> 0:50:28.000
<v Speaker 1>urkle bots, like putting together. Everybody want to hug r B.

0:50:28.440 --> 0:50:31.960
<v Speaker 1>That's actually I'm thinking of what's the what's the little

0:50:32.080 --> 0:50:35.360
<v Speaker 1>robot in the Borderland's game. I'm thinking of that what

0:50:35.480 --> 0:50:37.759
<v Speaker 1>clap trap. Make it like clap trap, where you know,

0:50:37.920 --> 0:50:39.640
<v Speaker 1>after you're around it for thirty seconds, you're like, I

0:50:39.680 --> 0:50:43.040
<v Speaker 1>would rather be anywhere else but here. Um. It was

0:50:43.120 --> 0:50:45.799
<v Speaker 1>a really cool conversation. I'm glad I got a chance

0:50:45.840 --> 0:50:47.080
<v Speaker 1>to go to that panel, and in fact, I have

0:50:47.120 --> 0:50:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to thank Lauren for that, because I originally had a

0:50:49.040 --> 0:50:50.759
<v Speaker 1>different panel on my schedule and she said, well, why

0:50:50.760 --> 0:50:52.279
<v Speaker 1>don't we just switch it out for this other one?

0:50:52.640 --> 0:50:54.440
<v Speaker 1>And it was totally the right call. It was a

0:50:54.520 --> 0:50:56.120
<v Speaker 1>much better well, I don't know it was a much

0:50:56.160 --> 0:50:58.480
<v Speaker 1>better panel because because he didn't see the other one,

0:50:58.560 --> 0:51:02.799
<v Speaker 1>but it was a very formative and entertaining panel, So

0:51:03.480 --> 0:51:05.879
<v Speaker 1>huge props to all of the people and south By

0:51:05.880 --> 0:51:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Southwest who who did these panels. Is really interesting stuff

0:51:09.520 --> 0:51:11.839
<v Speaker 1>and um, and it was great to kind of get

0:51:11.880 --> 0:51:14.520
<v Speaker 1>that that view of the future. I think in all

0:51:14.600 --> 0:51:19.160
<v Speaker 1>cases it was more optimistic than otherwise, which again kind

0:51:19.160 --> 0:51:21.600
<v Speaker 1>of speaks to me. So I'm really glad that we

0:51:21.640 --> 0:51:23.440
<v Speaker 1>had the opportunity to go there and that I had

0:51:23.480 --> 0:51:26.439
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity to sit down on some of these panels. Yeah,

0:51:26.680 --> 0:51:29.760
<v Speaker 1>it was a really exciting conference overall. I definitely recommend

0:51:29.800 --> 0:51:33.120
<v Speaker 1>if if people are interested as well, probably many of

0:51:33.160 --> 0:51:36.239
<v Speaker 1>you are. And uh in hearing industry experts talk about

0:51:36.280 --> 0:51:38.080
<v Speaker 1>these kind of things, and you know, there's a lot

0:51:38.080 --> 0:51:41.399
<v Speaker 1>of marketing involved too, I think, But but it's it's

0:51:41.400 --> 0:51:43.960
<v Speaker 1>really it's really lovely getting to actually talk to these people.

0:51:44.120 --> 0:51:46.360
<v Speaker 1>It is and uh, of course there are tons of

0:51:46.400 --> 0:51:51.200
<v Speaker 1>other things that are awesome about the surrounding event, like

0:51:51.320 --> 0:51:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the tacos, which I will talk about at lant How

0:51:54.160 --> 0:51:56.000
<v Speaker 1>many how many tacos did you eat while you were there?

0:51:56.040 --> 0:51:59.439
<v Speaker 1>Did you have account a total taco? Only had five?

0:51:59.480 --> 0:52:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I think I think guy might be like the like

0:52:01.160 --> 0:52:06.399
<v Speaker 1>the loss the loss leader in taco consuming. Actually wait, wait,

0:52:06.440 --> 0:52:09.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, I had nine. I forgot I've got about

0:52:09.400 --> 0:52:13.680
<v Speaker 1>the two airport tacos. I actually had three, like immediately

0:52:13.719 --> 0:52:15.879
<v Speaker 1>upon landing. I'm not sure. I'm not sure why that

0:52:16.840 --> 0:52:20.440
<v Speaker 1>they are addictive. Well at any rate, uh, I do

0:52:20.560 --> 0:52:23.440
<v Speaker 1>recommend checking out south By Southwest if you get the opportunity.

0:52:23.480 --> 0:52:25.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a pretty it's pretty expensive to get a badge,

0:52:25.440 --> 0:52:27.719
<v Speaker 1>but there are a lot of things against surrounding the

0:52:27.719 --> 0:52:30.680
<v Speaker 1>conference if you're if you're not able to afford the

0:52:30.719 --> 0:52:32.919
<v Speaker 1>direct conference, there are a lot of opportunities to talk

0:52:32.960 --> 0:52:37.360
<v Speaker 1>to super smart people in all different fields of music,

0:52:37.440 --> 0:52:40.839
<v Speaker 1>film interactivity, and there's a there's a lot of areas

0:52:40.960 --> 0:52:43.239
<v Speaker 1>that you can get into with a guest pass, which

0:52:43.280 --> 0:52:46.000
<v Speaker 1>is basically just like an online registration process you do,

0:52:46.120 --> 0:52:47.480
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to go through, you don't have to

0:52:47.480 --> 0:52:50.600
<v Speaker 1>pay any money for it, right, So definitely check it out.

0:52:50.800 --> 0:52:52.879
<v Speaker 1>And hey, check out some of the videos that are

0:52:52.880 --> 0:52:55.960
<v Speaker 1>coming out on now dot house to works dot com. Yeah,

0:52:56.120 --> 0:52:58.239
<v Speaker 1>and also our YouTube channel. You can you can find

0:52:58.280 --> 0:53:00.520
<v Speaker 1>them with Google. I'm sure we've got quite a few, right.

0:53:00.560 --> 0:53:03.440
<v Speaker 1>We've got something about Thomas Car's future of transit. You

0:53:03.520 --> 0:53:05.520
<v Speaker 1>did one about that, right, and I get I did

0:53:05.600 --> 0:53:09.359
<v Speaker 1>uh one about robots um and some other stuff too. Yeah, well,

0:53:09.440 --> 0:53:12.800
<v Speaker 1>we've got a ton of amazing video. Our crew worked

0:53:12.920 --> 0:53:16.920
<v Speaker 1>their butts off to get all around Austin and shoot

0:53:16.920 --> 0:53:19.279
<v Speaker 1>those and edit those in a timely manner. So check

0:53:19.320 --> 0:53:21.880
<v Speaker 1>that out. Also, if you have any questions or suggestions

0:53:21.920 --> 0:53:25.320
<v Speaker 1>for future episodes, send us a message. Our email address

0:53:25.520 --> 0:53:29.200
<v Speaker 1>is f W Thinking at how Stuff Works dot com.

0:53:29.400 --> 0:53:31.759
<v Speaker 1>Or drop us a line on Twitter or Facebook. At

0:53:31.760 --> 0:53:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Twitter we are f W Thinking. Just search fw Thinking

0:53:35.000 --> 0:53:36.880
<v Speaker 1>and Facebook's little search bar we'll pop right up. You

0:53:36.920 --> 0:53:39.000
<v Speaker 1>can leave us a message and we will talk to

0:53:39.040 --> 0:53:47.960
<v Speaker 1>you again really soon. For more on this topic in

0:53:48.000 --> 0:54:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the future of technology, I'll visit forward thinking dot Com,

0:54:02.040 --> 0:54:04.880
<v Speaker 1>brought to you by Toyota. Let's Go Places,