WEBVTT - SEC to Demand More Transparency From China

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovk. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all purtnising the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. We continue to be reminded

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 1>by many headlines that we are still in a health crisis,

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:40.240
<v Speaker 1>a health pandemic, and among the headlines that we're really

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>watching out for and monitoring today, as we had Israel

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 1>lowering the minimum age for boosters to thirty from forty,

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 1>German Chancellor Angela Merkel coming out saying measures currently in

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 1>place to curb the virus remained sufficient, even as infection

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>numbers tied to the spread of the Delta varritor on

0:00:55.800 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the rise and the number of UK workers going to

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the office that's increasing. We're tracking that really closely, and

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 1>then traffic on China's typically busy streets that has shown

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>some signs of recovery after the country quashed a resurgence

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 1>in COVID cases. And there's also a study out saying

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 1>India may face an unprecedented six hundred thousand new infections

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 1>a day if the nation fails to boost the pace

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 1>of shots. So that's some of the key headlines. I

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:23.039
<v Speaker 1>also want to point out that Dr Anthony Faucci, of course,

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:25.759
<v Speaker 1>one of the voices that we've turned to increasingly, of course,

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:29.760
<v Speaker 1>over the course of the pandemic is White House COVID

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 1>advisor Dr Anthony Faucci. He had some comments on MSNBC

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:37.120
<v Speaker 1>earlier today on what a third vaccine may mean. Listen up.

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>So we may not have to get a variant specific boost.

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:46.320
<v Speaker 1>We're preparing for it, we're doing clinical trials with it.

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 1>But the data that we've seen right now indicate that

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>we may be able to get a good response that

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 1>covers the boosts by the original VEXX, that covers the

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>variance excuse me, by the by the original vaccine that

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 1>we got. I believe it's entirely conceivable that this third

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>dose superimposed upon the two doses of MODERNA and FISA

0:02:11.000 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 1>very well may allow for a rather prolonged period of protection.

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 1>And that, of course is Dr Anthony Fauci, White House

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 1>COVID Advisor, speaking earlier on MSNBC. And what's interesting is

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>there have been many from the medical community thinking that

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 1>we might need to get a COVID booster shot every year,

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 1>just like many of us get a flu shot. So

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>that comment from Dr faucing that observation could maybe change

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:37.919
<v Speaker 1>things going forward. All of this happening when we've got

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>cases topping two hundred twelve point seven million deaths passing

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:44.799
<v Speaker 1>four point four million. These are global numbers. And as

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>for the vaccine, more than four point nine billion doses

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>have been administered so far. Alright, So a lot going on,

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 1>and we know it's not a straight line when it

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 1>comes to moving beyond this crisis. Back with us as

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Dr Vino Pali, He's founder and CEO of My Doctor,

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Urgent k are also the chief COVID vaccine officer at

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:04.360
<v Speaker 1>My Doctor with us once again on the phone in

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:06.839
<v Speaker 1>New York City. Dr Paley, good to have you back

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:09.800
<v Speaker 1>here on Bloomberg Radio. How are you and give us

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 1>an update on the COVID cases that you are seeing currently.

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Hi Carol, great to be a view, Yes, doing great. Uh, definitely,

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:23.360
<v Speaker 1>COVID case of been going up with the Delta variant.

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:26.839
<v Speaker 1>We're in New York City, will be a very diverse population.

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Although we have very good vaccination numbers in New York City,

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 1>we still have a certain percentage of people who are

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:37.600
<v Speaker 1>not vaccinated. So we are seeing these cases both in

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the y are in in the claim the origin care

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>is anything different from the first or second or third

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>way that we've seen of COVID cases as a result

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>of the variant. The Delta variant is something different. So

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Delta VATAN definitely presents a little bit different presence with

0:03:57.160 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 1>more flue license and school license and um. And of

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>course it's highly contagious as we know. Unlike the first

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 1>two of the Alpha variant. Maybe you saw a loss

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>of smell and taste, you don't see as much with

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the Delta variant. But definitely it's a little bit different

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 1>presentation and it affects more severely and unvaccinated folks. How

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 1>do you well, First of all, I want to ask

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 1>you demographics. I know some of the things that we've

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 1>seen it's been younger individuals. I'm curious if you're seeing

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:28.680
<v Speaker 1>some of that as well. I also read something I

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>think it was yesterday about pregnant women in some areas

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:35.359
<v Speaker 1>because they haven't gotten the vaccine UM leading to some

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:40.920
<v Speaker 1>really serious outcomes. Right, So, so, so we do know that,

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 1>uh for first, let me talk about the pregnant folks.

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>We do know that COVID affects pregnant people differently that

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 1>at the higher risk of severe illness, hospitalizations, going on

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:58.839
<v Speaker 1>a ventilator, or even UH directors for death. UM. You

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:03.160
<v Speaker 1>know that from initial data. We also know that COVID

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>causes pe term UH, pe term labor um and other

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:15.040
<v Speaker 1>adverse events. So vaccinating pregnant women is definitely helpful and

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:18.360
<v Speaker 1>there is no safety issues that we have seen from

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the data that we have so far. So currently CDC

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 1>is recommending pregnant folks get vaccinated and even UM mothers

0:05:26.920 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>of our best meeting their infant should get vaccinated. Let's

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 1>talk about younger, young younger folks that you ask Carold. Definitely,

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:40.159
<v Speaker 1>the hospitalization and hospitalizations have gone up, infection grades have

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 1>gone up in younger folks now, so I think it's

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>a perfect timing to vaccinate children, you know, especially truland

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:51.920
<v Speaker 1>over as CDC has recommended, So we need to move

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:55.919
<v Speaker 1>forward with vaccinating children as well. A lot of paper

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 1>parents are hesitancy wanted to look at data now that

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:03.360
<v Speaker 1>stas a group of FISER vaccine. I think the parents

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 1>should be encouraged to vaccinate their cares well. And how

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:09.040
<v Speaker 1>do you see the FDA full approval of the FISER

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 1>by in tech vaccine. How do you see that may

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:15.840
<v Speaker 1>be really helping the situation and encouraging those who may

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:18.159
<v Speaker 1>be decided not to get the vaccine as of yet

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:19.840
<v Speaker 1>to maybe go out and get it. Are you seeing

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 1>any signs of it um impacting the number of people

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:28.279
<v Speaker 1>getting that vaccine. I think it's definitely going to persuade people,

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 1>people who are hesitantly, you know, as we know that

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:35.279
<v Speaker 1>thirty of unvaccinated folks in surveys up said that they

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>would get the vaccine. Fau A grouse to vaccines completely,

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:45.359
<v Speaker 1>not just emergency authorization, So so I think that should

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:48.279
<v Speaker 1>persuade more people to come forward. And in our own

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 1>clinics we're seeing people making more appointments to get vaccines. Now, yeah,

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I feel like it's it's and I know I think

0:06:56.960 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Dr Facci made some comments I was reading in earlier

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 1>today about expectations for the Maderna vaccine to get FDA

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>full approval, and I think the J and J vaccine

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 1>as well. Can you, with any uh confidence, look ahead

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 1>to six months, eight months or something and say it

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 1>will feel a lot more normal It does already compared

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 1>to a year ago, obviously, But I just wonder what

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of visibility do you feel like you have when

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>you look out at what we've come through, where we

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 1>are today, and where we might be going. I think

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:36.480
<v Speaker 1>we'll definitely we're definitely going in the right direction. In

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 1>adding these appear of food vaccines with more modern engage

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 1>coming out in a few months or probably end up

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>in September October. I think it's going to boost more

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 1>confidence and people getting vaccinated. Uh. I think as we

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 1>increase numbers in terms of vaccination, we should be able

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>to see less number of case and hopefully we'll get

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 1>back to some semblance of normalcy. But at the same time,

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I think we shouldn't forget some of the public health measures,

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 1>especially in large gatherings schools, where you should still continue

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 1>to wear masks and protect yourself, and I think combining

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 1>all these measures with the vaccination is definitely I think

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have a pasty outlock. We're talking with

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Dr Polly, He's founder and CEO at my Doctor Urgent

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Care with us on the phone in New York City.

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Dr Polly, you are on the front line. You're seeing

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:35.439
<v Speaker 1>COVID cases, You're seeing treatment, You're seeing the trends as

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:37.560
<v Speaker 1>they go up and they go down depending on where

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:40.199
<v Speaker 1>we are in this health crisis. You've also gone out

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:44.559
<v Speaker 1>to communities to talk to people who are among the unvaccinated.

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Tell me about some of those experiences and whether or

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 1>not you're able to to to to, you know, convince

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 1>people to to actually get the vaccine. Absolutely. You know,

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:59.960
<v Speaker 1>vaccine hesitancy and vaccine lest information has been another epidemic

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 1>that we're dealing within this pandanic So we do to

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 1>go out into the community talk to folks. I know,

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:11.440
<v Speaker 1>especially in New York City, you have several African American folks,

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Hispanic folks who are very healthy tom to get vaccine,

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:17.119
<v Speaker 1>and we have several examples where we have to continuously

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 1>go and educate them about the safety and efficacy. UM

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 1>So we we've we've definitely seen positive impact of that

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:27.840
<v Speaker 1>and people coming to the clinic and making appointments and

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:32.200
<v Speaker 1>getting vacant. There's still a small percentage who are on

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the who are still on the boarder whether to get

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>vaccine or not. And I hope the fd a fluel

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 1>in a fluing booster shock might help them with their

0:09:44.200 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>confidence in getting vaccination. Yet yeah, no, And I am

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 1>curious about you know, when people is it just when

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 1>they say this is why I'm not getting it. Is

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>it because the approval or is there something else going on? Uh,

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:59.320
<v Speaker 1>in terms of their thinking and they're how they're coming

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 1>to conclude 's about the vaccine when you have those conversations,

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 1>some people were waiting for their proval. But there's there's

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:11.680
<v Speaker 1>a small fraction of people that you know, don't believe

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 1>that COVID actually exists, and that's kind of sad. And

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I think there's so much misinformation about that on social

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 1>media that is somewhat difficult to combat. But hopefully tide

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 1>will turn over and people um will see the truth

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>and and the scientific facts that you're presenting, and hopefully

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 1>they will also be converted. But I think what we

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 1>need is the majority of the population to be vaccinated

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 1>to get to that herd immunity. Uh. And hopefully you know,

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:48.079
<v Speaker 1>other countries are able to vaccinate their own people so

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 1>we can prevent mutake further mutations of the squireus. Interestingly enough,

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>uh and not surprising, we've seen the debate about masks

0:10:57.240 --> 0:11:01.720
<v Speaker 1>still playing out, especially among the names school systems, especially

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 1>at schools start to Some have already reopened, specially in

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the South, but as they opened here in the Northeast

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 1>as well, South Carolina's second larger school system, they inserted

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 1>them their self itself into the center of that debate

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 1>last week when it voted by a landslide to mandate

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 1>face masks, so they defied the state's ban on such measures.

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:22.840
<v Speaker 1>As the delta spread continued in the South. What are

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:26.720
<v Speaker 1>you anticipating as we are fully back to schools in

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the fall, especially among many kids who are not yet vaccinated,

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 1>should we expect to see an uptick in cases? Carol?

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to tellious sciences with us right, masking just

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:47.079
<v Speaker 1>based on scientific back So definitely of schools or parents

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:54.320
<v Speaker 1>or teachers don't follow these masking mandates or recommendations, well, definitely,

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:57.840
<v Speaker 1>do you see uptake in schools and certain communities and

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>certain states like the states who are men sing um um.

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 1>I think people need to understand vaccination alone is not

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 1>going to solve the problem. Especially vaccines are not a

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 1>group for kids below twelve years, so so we really

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>need to follow other public help measures, especially masking. You know,

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting, I'm thinking where I was a year ago

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:24.199
<v Speaker 1>and how things were feeling, and you know, we were

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 1>coming up the summer where things started to feel better,

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 1>and then we all of a sudden came into the

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 1>fall in the winter and we knew things got worse again.

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Are we in a different place twelve months later because

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 1>of the vaccine? I think we your but will be

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 1>in a better place probably next year once we get

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the majority of people vaccinated. You know, you're right, You're

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>absolutely like Hett when you said you know things were

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 1>getting better, but also said I think we be a

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 1>somewhat prematurely. We drew some of the public health measures. Uh.

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:04.440
<v Speaker 1>All this mixing up vaccinated and unvaccinated folks and the

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 1>deltivating is coming in change the entire dynamic. But I

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:10.319
<v Speaker 1>think that the good news right now is two things.

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 1>The approval of fighter vaccine and the booster vaccine. So

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I think we will be in a we will definitely

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:20.680
<v Speaker 1>be in a better place, um like fun next summer,

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 1>right next summer. Uh. And I am curious to what

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:26.840
<v Speaker 1>you think about You know, we kicked this off earlier.

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 1>We mentioned Dr Anthony Faucci, obviously a go to voice

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 1>throughout this pandemic, and talking about a third vaccine and

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:35.320
<v Speaker 1>what it may mean, and that I think we were

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Dr Paley believing that we would be needing to get

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 1>a booster perhaps every year, just like we get a

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:45.960
<v Speaker 1>flu shot to deal with COVID specifically, and Anthony Fauci,

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:48.719
<v Speaker 1>Dr Anthony Fauci now saying maybe we don't need that,

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:51.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe that that third booster shot will do enough to

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 1>boost our immunity for a longer period of time. What

0:13:56.120 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 1>are the conversations that you're having among your medical pers uh,

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and what you're seeing and reading? How do you how

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 1>do you think about that? So? So I think so

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the question is the void is schoosed to do and

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:13.600
<v Speaker 1>it's basically dropping off the immunity that we've already gotten

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:18.239
<v Speaker 1>from two shots. So it's adding additional layer and probably

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, expanding it to further a few more months

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 1>or hopefully to uh near completely here. So it all

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 1>depends on what this virus is going to do. I think,

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 1>what conditions are going to present to this virus. If

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 1>it's mutates into a different variant or more virial and

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 1>more contagious medium, of course we will need a booster,

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 1>and we might even need a mutation specific booster. So

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 1>right now, the current vaccines that we have are very

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 1>effective against delta variant. But let's say, for you know,

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 1>if things are not done right, uh, you know, with

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 1>all these masking mandates, if you're not calling public health measures,

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 1>if not enough people are vaccine needed, the virus will

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:05.800
<v Speaker 1>have chance to mutate more and become more virulent, and

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 1>then of course we'll have to then think about actional booster.

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 1>But time will tell. I don't think we can predict

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 1>right now if you need it nearly vaccine or not.

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully I hope that's not the case and we should

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 1>hopefully we'll be done with this thing sooner. But if not,

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, we'll, you know, we'll look at the data,

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:27.800
<v Speaker 1>We'll look at science and see if you'll need any

0:15:27.840 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 1>more early shots are not. The worst gar scenario would

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>be to have to you know, to to have shots

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>like to you know, every year, probably not as uh,

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, as much needed as possible. Hopefully we can

0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 1>prevent that. But let's see fingers crossed on that one. Hey,

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 1>one last question. I think the expectation was that we

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 1>were going to go through the entire Greek alphabet when

0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 1>it came to variants, is that still to common? And

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:57.360
<v Speaker 1>could we still get a variant that's even worse than

0:15:57.400 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the delta variant? I think they are still looking at

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 1>a couple more variants. Uh there was delta delta plus

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>variant we mentioned, and then the Ganda variant. But I

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 1>think they are not variants of concern at this point,

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 1>but they're still they're they're still being looked at by

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 1>scientists all over the world, and you're looking at from CDC.

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 1>So I think we won't go through the entire week alphabet, right, Uh,

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, I know, I hope not. But but there

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>are variants that they're looking at, but they're not as

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 1>new Ryland or as contagious as of now. All right,

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of leave it on that note. A deep deep

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 1>dive into the COVID headlines on this Tuesday, August dr

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 1>you know PAULI, thank you so much. He is founder

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 1>in chief executive officer of my Doctor Urgent Care, on

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the phone from New York City. I want to mention

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 1>one other headline involving COVID. The effectiveness of vaccines among

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 1>frontline workers declined to sixty six percent after the delta

0:16:56.280 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 1>variant became dominant, compared with nine before it a rose.

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 1>This is according to report from the CDC, the Centers

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:07.680
<v Speaker 1>for Disease Control and Prevention. This is Bloomberg Business Week

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:15.399
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. You are listening to Bloomberg Business Well, the

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 1>headlines continue to come out regarding the crisis in Afghanistan.

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 1>As we mentioned, we are waiting some comments from President Biden,

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 1>expected to make them from the White House at any moment.

0:17:26.200 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Get that update, will take you there live when it begins.

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Many though, many aspects to this story we know that,

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 1>including how the Afghan war is turning a U. S

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:38.479
<v Speaker 1>Military startup into a unicorn. So let's get into that story.

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:40.640
<v Speaker 1>It's featured in the new issue of Business Week out

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:42.680
<v Speaker 1>later this week, online at business week dot com and

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg Terminal. It's also among our most read

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 1>stories on the Bloomberg Today. So here to tell us

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 1>more is Bloomberg Business Week Technology editor Joshua Brucetein. He

0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:53.399
<v Speaker 1>is on the phone in New York City. Hey, Joshua,

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:55.679
<v Speaker 1>good to have you here with us. So who is

0:17:55.720 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 1>this company? Thanks Carol. The company is called Field dot

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Ai UM and it was started by a former Navy

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 1>seal who served in Afghanistan and elsewhere overseas and was

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>trying to solve a problem that was pretty specific to

0:18:13.080 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 1>those deployments, which was entering buildings and contested areas. UM

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:22.440
<v Speaker 1>he built a type of drone, a small drone that

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:24.920
<v Speaker 1>they would send into buildings in advance that would map

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the space and send video to troops outside, flying autonomously

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 1>in buildings um and that would allow them to enter

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:36.119
<v Speaker 1>if you know, if there were no enemy combatants inside. UM.

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:39.920
<v Speaker 1>So Shield has, as you said, has become a unicorn.

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:44.119
<v Speaker 1>It's just raised about two million dollars and bought several

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 1>other technology companies in an attempt to move beyond that

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:51.000
<v Speaker 1>specific application and start doing things more relevant to the

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 1>type of wars America might fight in the future. Specifically,

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:58.720
<v Speaker 1>against UM enemies like UM, I should say rivals like

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 1>China and Russia. So what are those? Because I have

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:04.679
<v Speaker 1>to say to be fair and is it sounds so simple, right,

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:06.880
<v Speaker 1>and it makes sense and it sounds so logical, right. Yeah,

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 1>let's throw drone drones into kind of basically map out

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the space and check out the security. So where else

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:16.399
<v Speaker 1>can they take this? Yeah? I think the idea here

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 1>UM for SHIELD is that they could take the UM

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 1>autonomous software they've been developing for this one application and

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 1>apply it to other things, maybe trying to have UM

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 1>communication between semi autonomous fighter jets they are patrolling a

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:38.119
<v Speaker 1>coast UM or UM or you know, networks, networks of

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 1>vehicles both small and large. It's sort of open ended

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:43.719
<v Speaker 1>at this point, I think, UM, and they're really just

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 1>trying to look at, you know, where the U. S.

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Military is trying to take artificial intelligence, which is one

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 1>of the big questions UM, you know for the pentic

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 1>on itself. Yeah, I was gonna say, how comfortable are

0:19:55.880 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 1>they with this? It's interesting. I think one of the

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:04.159
<v Speaker 1>one of the aspects of having these small drones that

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:07.440
<v Speaker 1>are surveys that we're serving in a relatively low stakes environment,

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 1>just you know, sending video from one side of a

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:13.400
<v Speaker 1>wolf to another. Is that they slowly started to build

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 1>up some trust within the military for using these things

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 1>in UM in bigger, more complicated and frankly more dangerous situations. UM.

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:25.639
<v Speaker 1>But I think that you know, there isn't full trust

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:27.720
<v Speaker 1>in these sort of systems is in the military, just

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 1>like you know, anyone who's looking at relying on artificial

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 1>intelligence is still questioning like is this stuff really going

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:35.879
<v Speaker 1>to work all the time when it matters well? And Joshua,

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:39.119
<v Speaker 1>I wonder how much of their success right now is

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 1>military contracts? Is it all of it? Yeah? Right now,

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Shield only does military contracting UM. Interestingly, they said to

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:53.440
<v Speaker 1>me that they were interested in potential commercial applications. I

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:56.359
<v Speaker 1>think those are mostly around mapping and also maybe working

0:20:56.640 --> 0:21:01.159
<v Speaker 1>UM on domestic law enforcement, which is an interesting and

0:21:01.240 --> 0:21:04.399
<v Speaker 1>somewhat controversial spin on pretty much on a lot of

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:08.879
<v Speaker 1>military hardware and end systems that you know, maybe police

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 1>de wartments and states we want to use UM some

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:16.440
<v Speaker 1>of them, some of the surveillance type capabilities that they're building. Obviously,

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 1>that's probably going to be a big fight in some

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 1>of the cities where they would be trying to do that.

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:23.199
<v Speaker 1>It does sound you know, we had a conversation with

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the Raytheon CEO, Greg Hayes. He joined us here on

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week on radio and TV, and we talked about,

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:30.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of where things are going, certainly on

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the defense side. He talked about things about hypersonic weapons

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 1>which are super fast, um, but also using AI in

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:40.720
<v Speaker 1>different things when it comes to aerospace and and obviously

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 1>that leads to military a slow problem. You know, maybe

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a slow process, but it does sound like this

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 1>is a company that, if they are on the cutting edge,

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 1>could stand to benefit longer term. Yeah. I think that

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:55.880
<v Speaker 1>this is the shift that a lot of smaller technology

0:21:55.880 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 1>companies that have basically not been able to get any

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:02.639
<v Speaker 1>sort of foothold within in the Pentagon. See. Um, if

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 1>we're moving towards software systems that aren't the historic competence

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:09.919
<v Speaker 1>of the large defense contractors, then maybe there's room for

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:14.200
<v Speaker 1>new players, especially as you know the U. S. Military

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 1>is trying to do things that hasn't done before. Um.

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I think it's a sort of wide

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 1>open space. No, it's interesting and well and I love

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the stats that you conclude. I mean you say that

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 1>this company got about seventeen million in military contracts. Sounds

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 1>like a pretty decent contract. But as you say, the

0:22:29.359 --> 0:22:33.439
<v Speaker 1>Pentagon's budget regularly exceeds seven hundred billions, So this is

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 1>just a fleck of dust, right in terms of their

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:40.080
<v Speaker 1>overall spending. Yeah, Like you're not even buying a single

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:42.680
<v Speaker 1>fighter jet for that kind of money. So there's a

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a it seems like a lot, but

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 1>it's not much. I'm curious, UM, talk to me because

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 1>you're writ about a little bit about the background of

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 1>this company too, and I think about juxtaposing that against

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:59.200
<v Speaker 1>what's been going on in Afghanistan. Well, the company, UM,

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the company, as I said, sort of got its start

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:04.639
<v Speaker 1>in these wars that the United States has been fighting

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 1>since nine eleven UM in both Afghanistan and Iraq. Um

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:11.879
<v Speaker 1>they've also been their their technology has been used in Syria.

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 1>And you know, as the United States has spent the

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 1>last two decades sending UM people overseas to fight in

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 1>these situations, they've discovered they've discovered a lot of a

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:25.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of new problems and challenges and you know, so

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:28.639
<v Speaker 1>they just kind of built a technology that was specifically

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 1>aimed at those um at those situations, and now we're saying,

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, what else can we do with this right?

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 1>And and the individuals who are involved in either founding

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 1>or co founding the company, or senior executives in the company,

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, these are people who and individuals who know

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:46.879
<v Speaker 1>people who are trying to get out of Afghanistan or

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 1>hopefully got out by this time. Other Americans. Yeah. Absolutely.

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I talked to a number of of Shield employees over

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the last um week or two, and a lot of

0:23:56.840 --> 0:24:00.399
<v Speaker 1>them were spending a lot of time texting people I knew,

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 1>calling people they knew, trying to get friends out. I know.

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:05.399
<v Speaker 1>I talked to one of the people I talked to

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>just sent me a textas morning saying that a family

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:10.199
<v Speaker 1>that they knew had managed to get out of the country.

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:12.199
<v Speaker 1>And I think that looms pretty large for them at

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the moment. You cover this world, you cover high tech

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:18.360
<v Speaker 1>tech overall. I'm going to be catching up with Kathy

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Would a little bit later on who is all about

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:23.639
<v Speaker 1>disruption innovation? And I do wonder and I've got to

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:26.199
<v Speaker 1>maybe put this question to her as well. But for

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:28.520
<v Speaker 1>something like the military that has been so entrenched in

0:24:28.560 --> 0:24:33.399
<v Speaker 1>certain ways, but increasingly uber high tech. I mean, it

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:35.680
<v Speaker 1>seems like this is also an area where we'll see

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:38.480
<v Speaker 1>and continue to see a lot of innovation, a lot

0:24:38.520 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 1>of disruption in terms of how we fight wars. We've

0:24:41.520 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 1>already seen it. We talked about kind of how they

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:46.720
<v Speaker 1>are much more akin to playing a video game. Things

0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:49.719
<v Speaker 1>have changed dramatically, But my gut says, and based on

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 1>some of the reporting that you do and others, that

0:24:52.080 --> 0:24:53.800
<v Speaker 1>there's still a lot more to come in terms of

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:57.399
<v Speaker 1>disruption of the military. Yeah. I think that this is

0:24:57.560 --> 0:25:01.399
<v Speaker 1>this is one of the big strate egict priorities of

0:25:01.440 --> 0:25:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the military. UM. And there's a lot of tension UM

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:08.040
<v Speaker 1>that's going to come with those developments. Um. You know,

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean people in defense circles talk about AI is

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the next big arms race. You know, China is trying

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:19.679
<v Speaker 1>to build things that will combat US capabilities and vice versa. UM. Also,

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the use of artificial intelligence raises all sorts of ethical

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 1>questions UM that people are going to have to sort

0:25:26.960 --> 0:25:29.240
<v Speaker 1>out and get comfortable with, or maybe not get comfortable

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 1>with and decide not to do some of these things. UM.

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 1>So I think that we're going to be talking about

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and debating these issues for years to come. Yeah, that

0:25:37.800 --> 0:25:40.440
<v Speaker 1>that absolutely makes sense. Hey this company, okay, you said,

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:43.719
<v Speaker 1>I think because of its latest funding round round ten

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:47.200
<v Speaker 1>million from investors, including disruptive technology advisors. So that puts

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the company with a valuation of what in a quarter billion?

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Is it also very possible that this becomes a takeout

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:57.920
<v Speaker 1>play for a military company or other I mean, I

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:01.159
<v Speaker 1>guess it's a possibility. Whenever you talk to um, you know,

0:26:01.240 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 1>a rising startup that's just raised a lot of money.

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 1>You asked me that question, and they tell you that

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:09.640
<v Speaker 1>it will never happen, and um, sometimes it happened. Yeah,

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:11.720
<v Speaker 1>fair enough, fair enough. Hey listen, it's a great story

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:14.439
<v Speaker 1>and certainly relevant to everything that's going on. Joshua Brewsting,

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 1>He's Technology editor Bloomberg Business Week. On the phone in

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:25.719
<v Speaker 1>New York City. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with

0:26:25.840 --> 0:26:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio.

0:26:31.000 --> 0:26:33.639
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week on this Tuesday, August.

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 1>My co Hostim Stenovic is off today. I'm Carol Masser

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:40.920
<v Speaker 1>in our Interactive Broker studio. So out on the Bloomberg

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:43.919
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg exclusive. The SEC will demand that the more than

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:47.399
<v Speaker 1>two fifty Chinese companies trading in US markets better and

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 1>form investors about political and regulatory risks. So let's gettle

0:26:52.000 --> 0:26:53.880
<v Speaker 1>bit more on this story. Or Ben Baine is financial

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:57.480
<v Speaker 1>regulations reporter at Bloomberg News. He covers the SEC. He

0:26:57.600 --> 0:27:00.160
<v Speaker 1>joins us on the phone from Washington, d CF. We're

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 1>sitting down for an exclusive interview with SEC Chair Gary Ginstler. Hey, Ben,

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:06.399
<v Speaker 1>good to have you here with us. Tell us a

0:27:06.400 --> 0:27:10.399
<v Speaker 1>little bit about that conversation. Yeah, thanks so much, good afternoon. Yeah, So,

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 1>as you said, I mean, we we we we really

0:27:12.880 --> 0:27:16.919
<v Speaker 1>learned a lot about UM Chair Gary Ginstler's plan for

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:20.960
<v Speaker 1>dealing with an issue that's really um festered here in

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Washington UM for almost two decades. UM part of this

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:29.480
<v Speaker 1>goes back to a two thousand two law that required

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:32.720
<v Speaker 1>UM companies the publicly trade United States in New York,

0:27:32.840 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 1>essentially to allow inspectors from Washington to look at their

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:43.200
<v Speaker 1>financial audits and UM China. UM has refused to allow

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 1>access to US inspectors. And this has been an issue

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:50.440
<v Speaker 1>that has now you know, really gone through several administrations,

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:54.159
<v Speaker 1>multiple SEC chairs, and what we saw at the end

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 1>of the Trump administration was really bipartisan push in Congress

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 1>even to kind of look at is wonky UM you

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 1>know issue about financial audits in kind of the broader

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:08.680
<v Speaker 1>scope of U. S. China relations, and the law was

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 1>passed in December that basically put the SEC in charge

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:18.000
<v Speaker 1>of making sure that Chinese companies UM and they're audit firms,

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 1>are allowing American inspectors to UM, you know, to to

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:24.959
<v Speaker 1>review those work papers. The concern is really UM, you know,

0:28:25.000 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 1>that some of the financials may not be UM, you

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:30.760
<v Speaker 1>know what what they say they are UM. And also

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:32.359
<v Speaker 1>there's a lack of disclosure. If you think back to

0:28:32.440 --> 0:28:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Luck in Coffee. I think that was kind of the

0:28:34.320 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 1>example that a lot of people will point to. There's

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 1>a separate issue that a SEC chair Gary Gensler, has

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 1>really been raising over the past five weeks or so,

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 1>and you really wanted to great detail with us today

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 1>when we spoke with him, and that is about the

0:28:49.320 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 1>structure of these Chinese firms. A lot of of the

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:57.239
<v Speaker 1>Chinese companies and Hong Kong based companies that UM are

0:28:57.280 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 1>actually listed here in New York are not retually the

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:03.960
<v Speaker 1>operating companies that are listing shares, but rather they're shell

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:06.800
<v Speaker 1>companies which are often based in the Cayman Islands. So

0:29:06.880 --> 0:29:10.720
<v Speaker 1>what the SEC chair essentially is saying is that American

0:29:10.760 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 1>investors need to know a lot more about that corporate structure.

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 1>There's concerns about how the financials um situation really works out,

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 1>how does money flow back and forth? And are people

0:29:20.720 --> 0:29:23.440
<v Speaker 1>really aware that they're actually, you know, holding a share

0:29:23.440 --> 0:29:26.000
<v Speaker 1>of of of a shell company and not actually a

0:29:26.000 --> 0:29:29.080
<v Speaker 1>company that's that's based in mainland China or or in

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong. Yeah, I mean, right, clarification, transparency. This law though,

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:37.720
<v Speaker 1>or this requirement only as powerful as the punishment given

0:29:37.840 --> 0:29:41.200
<v Speaker 1>if ignored. What's the punishment if Chinese companies And we're

0:29:41.240 --> 0:29:44.360
<v Speaker 1>talking about the likes of what Ali Baba Bay do you?

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean the big Chinese companies who could say tough,

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:50.480
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to do it so and and and

0:29:50.480 --> 0:29:53.720
<v Speaker 1>and thus far, that's exactly what what they've said, um

0:29:54.000 --> 0:29:56.720
<v Speaker 1>and and and it's not that the companies are themselves

0:29:56.720 --> 0:30:00.680
<v Speaker 1>saying that, you know, they're they're they're not thumbing their knows,

0:30:00.720 --> 0:30:04.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're basically saying, look, we can't do this

0:30:04.360 --> 0:30:08.239
<v Speaker 1>because the government in Beijing, UM won't let us do that.

0:30:08.320 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 1>There's national security grounds are often cited as a reason

0:30:11.200 --> 0:30:15.720
<v Speaker 1>for not um for audit firms not allowing US inspectors

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:18.000
<v Speaker 1>to look at the work papers. It's a very good

0:30:18.040 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 1>point about what the um, what the consequences are, and

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:25.080
<v Speaker 1>what Congress did UM last December when they passed this

0:30:25.160 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 1>new law. Which is why this issue has kind of

0:30:27.960 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 1>come to the forefront now, is they basically said that

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 1>if this isn't, if inspector is not allowed to look

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:38.440
<v Speaker 1>at these work papers to essentially review the financial audits,

0:30:38.480 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 1>these companies could be delisted from US stock exchanges within

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:46.240
<v Speaker 1>three years. UM. When we when we discussed that with

0:30:46.720 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 1>char Gensler, UM, you know, he very much indicated to

0:30:49.960 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 1>us that you know, he's his agency, the SEC is

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 1>full speed ahead on on what you know Congress laid

0:30:57.320 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 1>out in in that timeframe. So UM, you know essentially

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:04.720
<v Speaker 1>where you know we could see over the next uh

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:07.440
<v Speaker 1>let's say three years. UM. You know some pretty some

0:31:07.480 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty significant repercussions if if things don't change those financial

0:31:11.320 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 1>audits that already happens for a d r s of

0:31:14.040 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 1>European companies trading here in the US, any other foreign companies.

0:31:17.240 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 1>That's automatic. So what the SEC and and and there's

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a there's a quasi governmental agency UM known by its

0:31:26.560 --> 0:31:28.800
<v Speaker 1>acronym as the PC would be here in Washington, which

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:31.920
<v Speaker 1>is overseen by the SEC. They essentially oversee the auditors.

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:34.560
<v Speaker 1>And over the course of you know, almost two decades

0:31:34.600 --> 0:31:36.600
<v Speaker 1>of what they've done is basically go around the world

0:31:36.680 --> 0:31:40.200
<v Speaker 1>to more than four dozen UM countries and they've reached

0:31:40.200 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 1>agreements with these regulators that you know, essentially the American

0:31:45.720 --> 0:31:48.200
<v Speaker 1>inspectors will be able to look at these work papers.

0:31:48.960 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 1>The two holdouts of note are China and Hong Kong.

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 1>So when you talk about European countries, yes, there was

0:31:56.640 --> 0:32:00.200
<v Speaker 1>UM some issues that have recently been resolved with a

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 1>few of them, but for the most part, yes, I

0:32:02.760 --> 0:32:06.240
<v Speaker 1>mean in Europe this this happens, uh, you know, companies

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:09.960
<v Speaker 1>from elsewhere in the world. American inspectors are able to

0:32:10.000 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 1>take a look at these work papers. It's worth kind

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:15.120
<v Speaker 1>of going to I mean, this isn't American inspectors essentially

0:32:15.440 --> 0:32:17.480
<v Speaker 1>going to a company and asking to see all of

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 1>their financial records. This is one of the big accounting firms,

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 1>for example, that does a financial audit. They have work papers,

0:32:25.120 --> 0:32:28.200
<v Speaker 1>and the law requires that American inspects are able to

0:32:28.240 --> 0:32:31.080
<v Speaker 1>look at those work papers. It's interesting too though that

0:32:31.160 --> 0:32:34.080
<v Speaker 1>he said, um that firms could be delisted as soon

0:32:34.080 --> 0:32:37.880
<v Speaker 1>as four if they failed to comply. I mean, that's

0:32:37.920 --> 0:32:42.080
<v Speaker 1>a fairly large runway. Just got about forty seconds left. Yeah,

0:32:42.240 --> 0:32:45.480
<v Speaker 1>it it does, Um, it does. It is. It is

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a long runway in um, you know, in in kind

0:32:49.080 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 1>of calendar terms. But if you think about the size

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:57.000
<v Speaker 1>of some of these companies and the extent that these

0:32:57.520 --> 0:33:02.200
<v Speaker 1>firms have investors in the US retail investors but but

0:33:02.280 --> 0:33:06.960
<v Speaker 1>also pension funds, but also very large institutional investors across

0:33:07.000 --> 0:33:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street and really, um, you know, across the country,

0:33:10.440 --> 0:33:13.320
<v Speaker 1>it's not actually that long. Because if one of these

0:33:13.360 --> 0:33:16.560
<v Speaker 1>companies is delisted and and they do have they do

0:33:16.640 --> 0:33:18.720
<v Speaker 1>have to you know, American investors do have to pull back.

0:33:19.120 --> 0:33:22.680
<v Speaker 1>That's a pretty significant process. Um. So I think, yes,

0:33:22.720 --> 0:33:24.480
<v Speaker 1>it seems like, you know, hey, three years, that's a

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:27.960
<v Speaker 1>long time, But in terms of actually was involved, it's not.

0:33:28.080 --> 0:33:30.600
<v Speaker 1>You look at something like a bay Do, black Rock, Vanguard,

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:33.240
<v Speaker 1>State Street, Tiro. I mean, these are some of the

0:33:33.240 --> 0:33:36.840
<v Speaker 1>big investors, institutional investors we know in these names. So

0:33:37.040 --> 0:33:39.680
<v Speaker 1>that's a really good point, Ben Bain, great reporting. Check

0:33:39.680 --> 0:33:42.960
<v Speaker 1>out Ben's exclusive. It is on the Bloomberg terminal. He

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:52.239
<v Speaker 1>is financial regulations reporter right here at Bloomberg News a journal. Now,

0:33:52.360 --> 0:33:57.400
<v Speaker 1>bet you let me drive. Oh no, no, no no, non, please,

0:33:57.480 --> 0:34:07.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll do the run. I want to drive destrib the

0:34:07.400 --> 0:34:18.799
<v Speaker 1>good question, dry job. This is the drive to the globe. Thanks,

0:34:18.840 --> 0:34:22.239
<v Speaker 1>We'll try us Dawn on Bloomberg Radio. All right, just

0:34:22.239 --> 0:34:24.360
<v Speaker 1>about ten a half minutes left in today's trading session.

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:26.759
<v Speaker 1>As Charlie said, we're getting a late day fade. We're

0:34:26.800 --> 0:34:29.520
<v Speaker 1>definitely off our highs of the session, speaking of highs

0:34:29.600 --> 0:34:32.880
<v Speaker 1>earlier today, whilst Fargo out saying that thanks to Steller

0:34:32.960 --> 0:34:35.720
<v Speaker 1>US corporate earnings, the SMP five should rise by another

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:37.960
<v Speaker 1>eight percent through the end of the year. That percentage

0:34:37.960 --> 0:34:39.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe a little bit off at this point because of

0:34:40.560 --> 0:34:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the fade, meaning we could end up with a maybe

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:48.520
<v Speaker 1>close to sup in the benchmark for their target. We've

0:34:48.520 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 1>got the SNP at eight seven as we speak back

0:34:51.600 --> 0:34:54.279
<v Speaker 1>with us. As managing director and senior portfolio manager over

0:34:54.320 --> 0:34:57.560
<v Speaker 1>at Wells Fargo Asset Management, she's Margie Patel, six hundred

0:34:57.560 --> 0:35:00.160
<v Speaker 1>four billion in assets under management. She's with us once

0:35:00.200 --> 0:35:03.319
<v Speaker 1>again on the phone from Boston, Markie, nice to have

0:35:03.480 --> 0:35:06.840
<v Speaker 1>you here. Your team at Wells Fargo coming out with

0:35:06.880 --> 0:35:10.240
<v Speaker 1>a pretty bullish call on the S and P. Five hundred.

0:35:10.600 --> 0:35:13.480
<v Speaker 1>How do you see the market trade? Well, I think

0:35:13.520 --> 0:35:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the market is going to continue to go up for

0:35:16.120 --> 0:35:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the year because fundamentals are great. Second quarter,

0:35:19.800 --> 0:35:22.440
<v Speaker 1>which we just wrapped up, was a very good Uh,

0:35:22.480 --> 0:35:26.320
<v Speaker 1>no sign of margin pressure anywhere. Good signs to fundamental demand.

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:29.719
<v Speaker 1>Consumers in good shape, business has lots of money. Um,

0:35:29.880 --> 0:35:32.040
<v Speaker 1>So that just says even though we fit highs, there's

0:35:32.080 --> 0:35:34.640
<v Speaker 1>no reason why we shouldn't continue to even if the

0:35:34.680 --> 0:35:39.080
<v Speaker 1>FED pulls off the gas pedal. Well, that's a question

0:35:39.200 --> 0:35:42.359
<v Speaker 1>we should see next week at Jackson Hole. Uh what

0:35:42.440 --> 0:35:45.360
<v Speaker 1>they say, But really they're they're kind of in a

0:35:45.440 --> 0:35:48.439
<v Speaker 1>position that makes it difficult. On the one hand, their

0:35:48.480 --> 0:35:51.560
<v Speaker 1>primary goal is to get the full employment or some

0:35:51.680 --> 0:35:54.960
<v Speaker 1>millions off that and on the other hand, um, it

0:35:55.040 --> 0:35:58.719
<v Speaker 1>doesn't look like inflation is requiring them to start to

0:35:58.760 --> 0:36:01.960
<v Speaker 1>remove liquidity because they say it's temporary, and here and

0:36:01.960 --> 0:36:04.520
<v Speaker 1>there there are signs it looks as if the inflation

0:36:04.600 --> 0:36:08.879
<v Speaker 1>searche is coming coming down. So they may well talk

0:36:08.920 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot and not do anything for the rest of

0:36:10.719 --> 0:36:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the year. I mean, this is basically fundamentals right. What

0:36:13.640 --> 0:36:16.000
<v Speaker 1>you're saying is that and we expected to bounce back

0:36:16.040 --> 0:36:18.360
<v Speaker 1>after the lows that we saw a year ago and

0:36:18.400 --> 0:36:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the impact of the pandemic, we expected companies to bounce back.

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:23.879
<v Speaker 1>Is there something more, though significant that says it's not

0:36:23.920 --> 0:36:26.840
<v Speaker 1>just about the pandemic bounce back at this point, it's

0:36:26.920 --> 0:36:30.960
<v Speaker 1>more of a sustainable growth play. Yes, it is because

0:36:31.080 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 1>corporations are in great shape. Uh. They have lots of

0:36:34.120 --> 0:36:37.600
<v Speaker 1>liquidity on their balance sheet that they could buy back stock,

0:36:37.760 --> 0:36:41.439
<v Speaker 1>race dividends, make acquisitions. They have chosen at this point

0:36:41.480 --> 0:36:43.440
<v Speaker 1>mostly to keep their powder dry, so they have a

0:36:43.480 --> 0:36:48.239
<v Speaker 1>lot of flexibility. Consumer savings is also a recordize, and

0:36:48.520 --> 0:36:51.759
<v Speaker 1>employment keeps improving, and so it's it's very difficult to

0:36:51.800 --> 0:36:54.800
<v Speaker 1>see much that could go wrong in famous last words,

0:36:54.800 --> 0:36:57.879
<v Speaker 1>but things will as if corporations should continue to raise

0:36:57.920 --> 0:37:03.280
<v Speaker 1>earnings and consumers which continue to have the awarewithal to spend. Uh.

0:37:03.440 --> 0:37:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Is it getting the overheated I don't think so, because

0:37:08.719 --> 0:37:12.719
<v Speaker 1>one because the said has it seems of rather permanently

0:37:12.760 --> 0:37:18.320
<v Speaker 1>anchored rates near zero, So that assures that there's liquidity trading,

0:37:18.360 --> 0:37:21.560
<v Speaker 1>liquidity planning of liquidity in the banks if they had

0:37:21.600 --> 0:37:24.720
<v Speaker 1>loan demand. And uh so, no, I don't think it's

0:37:24.560 --> 0:37:29.960
<v Speaker 1>a it's overheated. And because corporate profits arising, profit margins

0:37:29.960 --> 0:37:32.880
<v Speaker 1>are very good, there's no reason why we shouldn't sustain

0:37:33.400 --> 0:37:37.239
<v Speaker 1>these relatively high um price earnings ratios high compared to

0:37:37.239 --> 0:37:40.080
<v Speaker 1>this history. But then the quality of corporate earnings are better,

0:37:40.200 --> 0:37:43.400
<v Speaker 1>so that seems not overheated. What do you mean quality

0:37:43.400 --> 0:37:46.440
<v Speaker 1>of corporate earnings are better. Well, if you look at

0:37:46.480 --> 0:37:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the if you look at the companies that are actually

0:37:48.920 --> 0:37:51.560
<v Speaker 1>producing positive cash flow in their earnings, and the whole

0:37:51.560 --> 0:37:54.799
<v Speaker 1>standard pores. It's much harder than it's been at other

0:37:54.880 --> 0:37:59.799
<v Speaker 1>times market peaks where we've had pe speaking um, particularly

0:37:59.800 --> 0:38:05.080
<v Speaker 1>in the technology sector UM compared to say the Internet boom,

0:38:05.080 --> 0:38:08.880
<v Speaker 1>where many companies have no earnings. Now there are most

0:38:08.880 --> 0:38:12.160
<v Speaker 1>of the companies have sustainable earnings and earnings are growing

0:38:12.239 --> 0:38:15.080
<v Speaker 1>very rapidly. Uh if one of the main sectors has

0:38:15.160 --> 0:38:17.600
<v Speaker 1>been leading in the market. All right, So you said

0:38:17.760 --> 0:38:21.320
<v Speaker 1>positive creation of positive cash flow is higher sustainable earnings

0:38:21.320 --> 0:38:24.279
<v Speaker 1>at earnings growth. I mean those are things, especially the

0:38:24.280 --> 0:38:26.720
<v Speaker 1>cash flow that you can't really kind of play around

0:38:26.719 --> 0:38:29.440
<v Speaker 1>with right, that's right, that's what at the end of

0:38:29.480 --> 0:38:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the day, that really what counts. And then what sort

0:38:31.680 --> 0:38:33.840
<v Speaker 1>of a pe multiple you want to put on that

0:38:34.280 --> 0:38:37.680
<v Speaker 1>of course, uh, maybe be determined by market sentiment, But

0:38:37.760 --> 0:38:40.479
<v Speaker 1>until we see a sea change in the FED, which

0:38:40.520 --> 0:38:43.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't look very likely, I think it's more the same. Well,

0:38:43.640 --> 0:38:45.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's interesting market. I love talking with someone

0:38:45.800 --> 0:38:47.800
<v Speaker 1>like you, and forgive me because I've been watching markets

0:38:47.800 --> 0:38:49.400
<v Speaker 1>for a long time too. I'm not looking to age

0:38:49.560 --> 0:38:51.719
<v Speaker 1>you or me or anybody, but we've seen a lot

0:38:51.719 --> 0:38:54.799
<v Speaker 1>of market cycles. And I kind of smile when people

0:38:54.840 --> 0:38:57.400
<v Speaker 1>say will make it a comparison to the tech bubble,

0:38:57.400 --> 0:39:00.319
<v Speaker 1>because this doesn't feel like the tech bubble. I mean,

0:39:00.400 --> 0:39:03.120
<v Speaker 1>what is truly different about the run up that we

0:39:03.280 --> 0:39:05.719
<v Speaker 1>have seen in stocks, because we know stocks and go up,

0:39:05.719 --> 0:39:07.600
<v Speaker 1>stocks and go down. But it does feel like these

0:39:07.640 --> 0:39:10.640
<v Speaker 1>cycles happen much more quickly that any of the froth

0:39:10.719 --> 0:39:13.399
<v Speaker 1>gets out of the market pretty quickly. Well, I think

0:39:13.440 --> 0:39:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the big differences. We really don't seem to be in

0:39:16.640 --> 0:39:19.560
<v Speaker 1>a cyclical market anymore. It seems as if we're in

0:39:19.640 --> 0:39:23.360
<v Speaker 1>a secular advance because if you think back all the

0:39:23.400 --> 0:39:25.680
<v Speaker 1>business cycles we've had out have been caused when the

0:39:25.719 --> 0:39:28.319
<v Speaker 1>FED slams on the brakes, they see something they don't like,

0:39:28.680 --> 0:39:32.319
<v Speaker 1>they restrict liquidity, we have a recession, interest rates go up,

0:39:32.719 --> 0:39:35.440
<v Speaker 1>then they flood the system of money again, and then

0:39:35.480 --> 0:39:38.520
<v Speaker 1>we have a cyclical rebound. We don't have that. We

0:39:38.560 --> 0:39:43.520
<v Speaker 1>have more secular easing of money, keeping interest rates near zero.

0:39:43.880 --> 0:39:46.720
<v Speaker 1>So that really there, I don't see an economic cycle

0:39:46.760 --> 0:39:49.600
<v Speaker 1>per se driven by what the Fed has done, all right.

0:39:49.800 --> 0:39:53.399
<v Speaker 1>Having said that, Having said that, the other flip side

0:39:53.400 --> 0:39:55.240
<v Speaker 1>of this story, and I'd be remiss are Lisa Bronway

0:39:55.320 --> 0:39:57.200
<v Speaker 1>is writing about this so well in terms of the

0:39:57.239 --> 0:39:59.120
<v Speaker 1>gaps that are out there that if you're in the

0:39:59.160 --> 0:40:03.120
<v Speaker 1>equity market, are your in financial markets, you know you

0:40:03.200 --> 0:40:05.120
<v Speaker 1>have come out pretty well on the other side of

0:40:05.160 --> 0:40:07.600
<v Speaker 1>this pandemic or as we as things start to improve.

0:40:07.840 --> 0:40:10.400
<v Speaker 1>But for many Americans that's not the case. And that

0:40:10.520 --> 0:40:15.759
<v Speaker 1>to me speaks to general wealth, general wellness of a society,

0:40:15.800 --> 0:40:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and this is really a global society issue that's got

0:40:19.560 --> 0:40:23.160
<v Speaker 1>to be a problem at some point already. Is to

0:40:23.200 --> 0:40:25.680
<v Speaker 1>be fair, yes, and there's a lot of talk about

0:40:25.719 --> 0:40:31.440
<v Speaker 1>getting the Federal Reserve more involved in creating income equality,

0:40:31.840 --> 0:40:36.359
<v Speaker 1>and ironically, by their very actions they have promoted the opposite. Uh,

0:40:36.400 --> 0:40:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the near zero interest rates have allowed money to flow

0:40:39.640 --> 0:40:42.960
<v Speaker 1>to those wealthy investors with lots of cash to put

0:40:42.960 --> 0:40:46.160
<v Speaker 1>into the market, wealthy investors who can make investments in

0:40:46.239 --> 0:40:49.920
<v Speaker 1>real estate, fine art, commodities, things like that. So ironically,

0:40:50.440 --> 0:40:55.040
<v Speaker 1>you actually, by having a zero interest rate policy exacerbated

0:40:55.560 --> 0:40:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the income inequality or wealth inequality by having more flow

0:40:59.360 --> 0:41:01.480
<v Speaker 1>to those who have a long liquid assets that they

0:41:01.520 --> 0:41:04.640
<v Speaker 1>can take advantage. The FED we talked about a little

0:41:04.640 --> 0:41:08.040
<v Speaker 1>bit again, You're not anticipating anything big out of Jackson Hall.

0:41:08.680 --> 0:41:13.879
<v Speaker 1>Just talk, just talk. So at this point, I mean,

0:41:13.920 --> 0:41:17.040
<v Speaker 1>what is the risk to the current trading environment. It

0:41:17.400 --> 0:41:21.759
<v Speaker 1>sounds like you're all in bullish and it drives with

0:41:21.840 --> 0:41:24.680
<v Speaker 1>what we heard from the Wells Fargo team about upping

0:41:24.719 --> 0:41:28.839
<v Speaker 1>the forecast for the spire. Well, I think that for

0:41:28.880 --> 0:41:30.799
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the year, it looks like growth looks

0:41:30.840 --> 0:41:34.759
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. And the only UM question might be as

0:41:34.800 --> 0:41:39.360
<v Speaker 1>we get into do we see a deceleration and growth

0:41:39.920 --> 0:41:43.680
<v Speaker 1>UM from the Really the actions of the failed to

0:41:43.800 --> 0:41:47.839
<v Speaker 1>keeping rates at zero to have sort of UM distorted

0:41:47.920 --> 0:41:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the the capital returns and could we see the economy

0:41:52.640 --> 0:41:55.920
<v Speaker 1>slow down from UM? You know, it's four percent to

0:41:56.239 --> 0:42:01.080
<v Speaker 1>three one and a half percent in two, and then

0:42:01.120 --> 0:42:03.799
<v Speaker 1>people might say, oh, well, now we need to revaluate

0:42:03.880 --> 0:42:07.399
<v Speaker 1>the pe ratios. They need to come down even though

0:42:07.400 --> 0:42:10.640
<v Speaker 1>we'renings look like they're moderating. So that's that's what I think.

0:42:10.880 --> 0:42:14.520
<v Speaker 1>But that looks like that's a twenty two potential issue. Alright,

0:42:14.520 --> 0:42:17.640
<v Speaker 1>So pushing that some a bit. Hey, Margie, thank you

0:42:17.680 --> 0:42:20.520
<v Speaker 1>so much. Market patal she's managing director senior portfolio manager

0:42:20.560 --> 0:42:23.560
<v Speaker 1>at Wells Fargo Asset Management, six hundred four billion in

0:42:23.680 --> 0:42:26.840
<v Speaker 1>assets under management, joining us once again on the phone

0:42:26.880 --> 0:42:31.000
<v Speaker 1>from Boston. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download

0:42:31.040 --> 0:42:34.319
<v Speaker 1>the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com, and

0:42:34.360 --> 0:42:36.080
<v Speaker 1>you can also listen to our radio show at two

0:42:36.080 --> 0:42:39.000
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on YouTube.

0:42:39.120 --> 0:42:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Search to Bloomberg Global News