WEBVTT - Bankman-Fried Associates Flip on FTX Founder

0:00:01.840 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Karl Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stanevik. We're here every day bringing you the latest

0:00:06.840 --> 0:00:11.000
<v Speaker 1>news from the world's of business and finance, technology, politics, economics,

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>all harnessing the power of Business Week reporters and editors,

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>not to mention our journalists and analyst in more than

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>one twenty countries. You can download Bloomberg Business Weekend iTunes, SoundCloud,

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:23.320
<v Speaker 1>or Bloomberg dot com. You can also listen to our

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:26.160
<v Speaker 1>radio show at two pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>or stream us live on YouTube and Bloomberg dot com. Alright,

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>if I look at the Bloomberg terminal right now, the

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:36.839
<v Speaker 1>headline right on top is Sam Bankman free released on

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>two hundred fifty million dollar bond in ft X fraud case.

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:43.159
<v Speaker 1>Let's check in with someone on the ground. We have

0:00:43.240 --> 0:00:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Ava Benny Morrison on the phone from the Southern District

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Court of New York in New York City. But we're

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna get to the bill package in just a minute,

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 1>but tell us a little bit about the scene on

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the ground. Good afterday. So at the moment, we're waiting

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:03.279
<v Speaker 1>outside the front doors of the Southern District of New

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>York District Court House in downtown Manhattan. Um. There's dozens

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:12.320
<v Speaker 1>of photographers of cameraman UM, a lot of reporters, all

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:15.319
<v Speaker 1>waiting to Sam Batman free to walk out. In the

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:19.040
<v Speaker 1>last hour, he's been granted um bail. It was a

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>very very stringent bail package. UM. And he was told

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>by the judge that he'll be able to walk out

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>of court today. Um. Once he and his parents signed

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 1>a paper work. Even did was there a plee entered today? No,

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 1>there wasn't a poet entered today. It was the first

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 1>time that he had appeared in court on the US charges, um,

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:40.959
<v Speaker 1>and the court heard that he'll have a chance to

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>enter a plea at a later date. The next court

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 1>date was stepped out for January. So this must be

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 1>some house to parents have it securest million dollar bond.

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Can you explain how that works? Well, it's it's not

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>so much the worth of the house, um, but it

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>is that he will be on the hook and his

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 1>parents will be on the hook for two hundred fifty

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>million dollars if he breaches any of these bail conditions.

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Now there are fifteen bail conditions. He's essentially going to

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 1>have to live in home detention with electronic monitoring in

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:18.520
<v Speaker 1>his parents house in California. Uh and uh they used

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 1>their house um as a surety UM attached to the bond.

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 1>So again, if he tries to flee, if he breaches

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 1>any of these conditions and a warrant is put out

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>for his arrest, the judge warned him actually today UM

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>that he will be UM. You know, he will have

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:40.359
<v Speaker 1>to pay two hundred and fifty million dollars. And I'll

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 1>make the point as well that the prosecutors said that

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 1>this was the largest pre trial bond um in history.

0:02:49.280 --> 0:02:51.920
<v Speaker 1>So Ever, I mean, you've been covering this story every

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>step of the way, and it's just a whirlwind. I mean,

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>it was just ten days ago on December twelve, that

0:02:58.040 --> 0:03:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Sam Bankman Fried was arrest did in the Bahamas. And

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 1>ten days ago we thought that he was going to

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 1>fight extradition. Walk us through how we got there, how

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:11.680
<v Speaker 1>we ended up here at this New York court appearance today.

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 1>You're very right. It has been a wild ride over

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the past ten days. Bankman freed has been living in

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the Bahamas for some time, and it was last Monday

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 1>evening that the behind me in authorities acting on a

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>proditional restaurant from the US. Arrested bankman freed. He was

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 1>accused of orchestrating a year long fraud through FTX and

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 1>FTX hedge fund um aur a meter research. He appeared

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>in court in the Bahamas and he was denied bail,

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 1>and initially he indicated that he would fight extradition to

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the US um but I think there was maybe a

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>bit of an insumption that he would be granted bail

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 1>and he would be able to uh leave, moved back

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 1>into his apartment in the Bahamas and fight extradition from there.

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 1>But he was taken to quite a notorious prison in

0:04:02.720 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the Bahamas, where he has been for more where he

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>was for more than a week. Then he changed his

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 1>mind over the weekend and decided that he was going

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 1>to consent to extradition back to the United States, and

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 1>that played in his favor in the bail hearing today.

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>The prostitutor said that if he hadn't have if he

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:21.840
<v Speaker 1>hadn't had consented be coming back to the United States,

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>then he may not have been getting bail today. He

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:30.479
<v Speaker 1>was flown back from the Bahamas to um White Plains

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 1>north of Manhattan last night. He was escorted by FBI

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:37.440
<v Speaker 1>agents and then appeared for the first time in court today.

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>And another major announcement regarding this case is former Element

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the chief executive officer Caroline Ellison and former ft X

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Chief Technology Officer Gary Wayang. They pleaded guilty to fraud

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:53.599
<v Speaker 1>and we're cooperating with the prosecution. Boy, I didn't see

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 1>that coming give us kind of what we know now.

0:04:57.200 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I think there was a lot of rumor and speculation

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 1>at out who from FTX was co operating or wasn't cooperating.

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Banquetfried had been very vocal about what happened at ft

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 1>X or his version of events ever since it all

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 1>collapsed early last month. He was doing a lot of

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 1>media interviews UM, but his co executives and the people

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:20.919
<v Speaker 1>that are closest to him UM were noticeably quiet. And

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:25.039
<v Speaker 1>the timing on this announcement about UM Ellison and sorry

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 1>about the Caroline Ellison and Gary Wayange pleading guilty was

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 1>really interesting. UM. The prosecutors here in New York waited

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:34.359
<v Speaker 1>until he was on the plane in the custody of

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:37.600
<v Speaker 1>US law enforcement UM and on his way to New

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:41.679
<v Speaker 1>York before they announced that Caroline Ellison and Gary Wang,

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 1>who had been with Banker and Freed from the very

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 1>early stages of ftx UM, had actually been cooperating the

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>SUN and they had both pleaded guilty to fraud charges.

0:05:53.000 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Ellison has pleaded guilty seven charges, Wayang has pleaded guilty

0:05:57.120 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 1>to four, and they have agreed to cooperate with prosecutors.

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:04.159
<v Speaker 1>This is obviously a massive blow for bank and Freed.

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:06.919
<v Speaker 1>Uh and they will be really, really valuable for the

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>prosecution case. Well, that's what I've been wondering what this

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>means for bank Man Freed's defense, because, I mean, during

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 1>his media tour, he was very clear that he it

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:21.479
<v Speaker 1>wasn't necessarily intentional, it was management missteps that at least

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:24.480
<v Speaker 1>is what he was trying to present. But now that

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 1>you have these two, these two very inner circle people,

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:30.159
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how much more inner circle you can

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:33.480
<v Speaker 1>get plead and guilty cooperating. I mean, what does that

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 1>mean for bank man Freed exactly? And during his media

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:42.160
<v Speaker 1>interviews before his arrest, he was attempting to shift the

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:44.720
<v Speaker 1>blame a little bit to Alameda and saying that he

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't have as much oversight over Alameda as he should have,

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 1>and he wasn't quite sure what was going on there,

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>because one of the key issues of this case obviously

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 1>is the use of FTX customer funds um to place

0:06:56.440 --> 0:06:59.600
<v Speaker 1>high respects and prop up Alameda, And so he was

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:03.160
<v Speaker 1>attempt him to sort of put that hedge fund house

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 1>arms lank Um and we sort of got maybe a

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a preview or the argument he might

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 1>put up at a future court case. But Gary Wayang,

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I think will be a difficult witness to get around.

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>He lived with Bankman Freed in the Bahamas. He was

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:24.119
<v Speaker 1>the chief technology officer of ft x UM. He wrote

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the codes that helped establish FTX. He was, you know,

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 1>all accounts working side by side with him. So it

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 1>might be a difficult argument for Bankman Free to make

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 1>that he didn't know what Wayne was up to when

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Wayange has admitted to UM engaging in fraud. So we

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>only have about twenty seconds left with you. But I

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>am curious what should we be watching for next? What's

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>next in the timeline? Uh, well, we're waiting now for

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>bankman Free to walk out of the court house, his

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 1>parents Barbara and Joseph to standford awful professors were um

0:07:57.000 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>here in court. We're waiting for them all to walk work,

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>walk half and then he will have to make his

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 1>way back to California. So I guess we're watching to

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>see as he abides by those bowel conditions. But also well,

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 1>students have their eye on alright, great stuff. That is

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 1>ava Benni Morrison on the phone outside the Southern District

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Court of New York in New York City, giving us

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 1>all the latest on Sam bankman Fried and that FTX

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 1>fraud case. Definitely a lot of moving parts here, these

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 1>sees Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and Tim Stinebeck

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:34.199
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. Well, how about this for an uplifting

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:39.679
<v Speaker 1>uh title? Here? Federal Reserve doesn't care about misery investors

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:42.599
<v Speaker 1>are feeling. And then I read along supporting stock and

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 1>bond markets. That's not the business of the Federal Reserve.

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 1>As I read those two things, I said, this feels

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like a Michael Reagan, you know, piece of writing.

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 1>And sure enough, that's what it is. Joe Weber, editor

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomber Business Week, joins us here in our Bloomberg Inner

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Actor Broker studio, and he said, Mike Reagan, Senior editor

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:02.319
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomer Market Joints is on zoom from New Jersey

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:06.080
<v Speaker 1>with his Maryland Turps sweatshirt. Looks like there we go.

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, Maryland football, are they bowling? Yeah, Maryland has

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 1>they are? Yeah, the Duke's mayonnaise ball, which we of

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 1>course is the most sure, absolutely exactly. All right, Joel,

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>talk to us about kind of what we're doing here

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:24.439
<v Speaker 1>with this column. Here the feder reserves not in the

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:27.679
<v Speaker 1>business supporting stocks and bonds. Yeah, you know, when we

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:31.960
<v Speaker 1>just we're talking about um. The year that's been one

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 1>of the themes has just been how you know, for

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 1>a long time, it felt like there was a punch

0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:39.840
<v Speaker 1>bowl and the FED was there to like host a

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 1>great fun party and everything always went up. And then

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:44.680
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden that punch bowl was taken away

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:49.679
<v Speaker 1>and um some carnadge and suit and obviously um inflation

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 1>being a huge theme of the year, and the FED

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>continuing to raise rates and any sort of uh accommodation

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>that once may have felt like it from the Fed

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 1>is nowhere to be seen. And in fact, that uh

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 1>J pal might look a little bit like a certain

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:10.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, movie poster and from the movie Misery or something,

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:12.679
<v Speaker 1>right right, Mike, that was where we went with the

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 1>art in this one. Yeah, pretty much. You know, it's

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:19.319
<v Speaker 1>interesting in that, you know, you can have this economy

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 1>that on the surfaces is sort of booming. You know,

0:10:22.320 --> 0:10:25.200
<v Speaker 1>we got that GDP print this morning three points percent.

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 1>We've got a unemployment rate that's three point seven percent,

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:33.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, near a fifty some year low. But if

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the inflation picks up like it has this here, it's

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 1>it's an economic uh emergency basically that the FED has

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:44.200
<v Speaker 1>to fight because you know, inflation really can cause maybe

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>less pain less misery than unemployment uh per person that

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:51.319
<v Speaker 1>it affects, but it affects everyone, right, a broader swath

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 1>of the population. So I went back to this, uh

0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorite indexes, the misery index. It's called

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Arthur Oakin, who was a advisor to lb J president

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Lyndon Johnson in the in the sixties. And I love

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 1>it because the math and it's very simple. It's just

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 1>the unemployment rate plus the inflation rate, and the idea being,

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:17.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's either ones elevated you've got problems in

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the economy, um And in this case, it's it's the

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:23.679
<v Speaker 1>inflation that's elevated. So as you put out Joel, you

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 1>know that the markets got used to this, the FED

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:30.199
<v Speaker 1>that would always come to the rescue if the stock

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 1>market or even the bond market was looking wobbly and

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 1>and you know, headed towards a bear market or a

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 1>big drop. And I think there was a tough lesson

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 1>for investors to learn this year that it's not the

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 1>case this time that you know, um, it's it's really

0:11:47.280 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 1>this inflation is causing so much misery for so many

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 1>people that that um, they're willing to really just allow

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the markets to to create this pain for investors this year.

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of misery to go around. To say,

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:03.839
<v Speaker 1>my personal Misery index has a few more components than

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:06.640
<v Speaker 1>just those two, but it's a pretty good give me

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>with the With the next one, it depends heavily on

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 1>the weather, but in any case, yeah, it's going to

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 1>be disgusting tomorrow. But Mike, I do want to push

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 1>back a little bit on the headline. So the Fed

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't care about the misery investors are feeling. But if

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you look from the perspective of financial conditions, in some way,

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 1>they they do care, and they actually like it when

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 1>you think about what they're trying to accomplish, fight with

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:34.200
<v Speaker 1>me a little bit, Yeah right, No, I mean you're

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 1>absolutely right. I would never fight with you, thank you,

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 1>because they're just gonna throw me under the bus there. Well,

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Joel put that in there. Well, that's the thing. You know.

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>The financial conditions are exactly the one tool that the

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 1>FED has at its disposal, and the way, you know,

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the remote control for that tool is is interest. Right,

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:59.200
<v Speaker 1>So if uh, you know, unemployment is their concern, if

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:02.280
<v Speaker 1>inflation is not an issue. As you know, it wasn't

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 1>really an issue for how long they're from you know,

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 1>basically since the global financial crisis in two thousand and

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:11.559
<v Speaker 1>eight all the way up until COVID there there was

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 1>no no real worry about the inflation from Feds. So

0:13:14.400 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 1>they really were focused on that other side of their mandate,

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the the employment situation and trying to make sure the

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:24.559
<v Speaker 1>economy was at full employment. So, um, you know, if

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:28.320
<v Speaker 1>you can keep rates low to keep financial financial conditions

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:32.439
<v Speaker 1>accommodative to the economy, Um, that's what they did for

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:36.520
<v Speaker 1>so long. It kind of lulled the market into thinking, uh,

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, the FED has this unspoken third mandate to

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:42.560
<v Speaker 1>to really prop up the stock and bond markets. Um. Well,

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and doesn't it feel just like the markets like that

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 1>that third rail is like, you know, if you're in

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:50.839
<v Speaker 1>the markets, that's what you really do want. All all

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:52.960
<v Speaker 1>year it felt like that. It was just like, at

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 1>some point here the Fed's gonna cave and it's all

0:13:55.440 --> 0:13:57.839
<v Speaker 1>gonna go our way, and we'll be we'll be ready

0:13:57.840 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>for that moment. And yet that moment simply has has

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 1>not happened this year, and if we look ahead, probably

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 1>not gonna happen for for a while. Still. Yeah, yeah,

0:14:08.720 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I would think I would guess at least not until

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 1>and not in the first half of the year for sure.

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Maybe towards the back half of the year we'll start

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 1>getting some hints and some clues. Um. But yeah, you know,

0:14:18.720 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 1>and to Katie's point, I mean, now they're using that

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 1>tool of financial conditions for the opposite purpose to to

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 1>really cool off the economy, to undergree to cool off

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the job market. Um and inflation. Uh So it's you know,

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 1>it's what they've always said that they do. You know,

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 1>they haven't made it much of a secret or much

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 1>of a mystery, but investors sort of hear what they

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>want to hear, I think, and Um, you know, so

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 1>that this is the year where it was kind of

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 1>a reality check for markets, I think, and that's sort

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 1>of the point of this column is that you know, uh,

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 1>to go back to Arthur Oakan and his his delightfully

0:14:57.720 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>simple index. You know, that's it. Job market and inflation

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:05.800
<v Speaker 1>UH are to him as far as how do you

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 1>gauge sort of whether the nation is miserable or not?

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>And so the FED to to fulfill their mandates from Congress,

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>those are the two inputs they look at. So you know,

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 1>if if it's the unemployment rate that's causing the misery,

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna err on the side of being too accommodative

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 1>to financial conditions and and actually will prop up the

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 1>stock market in the bond market, um to some degree.

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 1>If though it's inflation like we saw this year, Um,

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>they're turning that knob the other way and tightening financial

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 1>conditions to uh to make sure that you know, the

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 1>child market doesn't get too hot, wage growth doesn't get

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 1>too hot and feed into that inflation problem by forcing

0:15:44.080 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 1>companies to raise prices to cover these higher wages. So UM,

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and I think you're right Sol that, Uh, it doesn't

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 1>seem like they'll be turning that knob back the other direction. Uh,

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 1>at least not in the foreseeable future. Again, maybe maybe

0:15:57.600 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 1>they'll start hitting at it later in Alright, great stuff.

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Mike Greagan, senior editor for Bloomberg Markets, joining us on

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Zoom from New Jersey, donning his Maryland terps. Uh, pull

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 1>over there, good stuff. Joe Webber, Editor Bloomberg Business Week.

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Here in a Bloombergan Actor broker studio. You're listening to

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week with Karrol Messer and Tim Stenovic on

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. Well, it's been over an hour, Paul. We

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 1>haven't even talked about Elon Muskat that button on. I know,

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 1>but there's so much going on there. You know. You

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 1>talked to some of these shareholders and the south side

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 1>analysts that have been recommending this company, recommending this technology,

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:43.080
<v Speaker 1>recommending this management team. They're they're understandably upset. Well, let's

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 1>talk to a shareholder now, someone who has been following

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Tesla for a while. His name is Gary Black. He

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 1>is a portfolio manager. Uh. He manages the Future Fund

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>active exchange traded fund. That's my world at cover ETFs.

0:16:56.960 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 1>The ticker there is f F and D Gary joins

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 1>us on the phone from Chicago, and Gary, I'm looking

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:05.160
<v Speaker 1>at your holdings right now. I see Tesla is your

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 1>biggest position by market value. But I don't know, looking

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:11.640
<v Speaker 1>over your notes, you don't seem too pleased with Elon

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Musk right now. Well, it's definitely hurt us this year.

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 1>And I guess you know. Look, we look at Tesla

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and it's got great fundamentals as ev adoption global EVY adoption.

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Right now it's about ten percent global. We think it'll

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:31.920
<v Speaker 1>be by uh, Tesla earnings should explode, and you know,

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>from a fundamental standpoint, we're looking for about seven dollars

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 1>and earnings next year, which kind of puts Tesla about

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:39.360
<v Speaker 1>a I don't know an e tempe, which is about

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:43.120
<v Speaker 1>where the SMP is. But it's growing earnings at a year.

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 1>But it's the noise from Twitter and Ellen tweeting out

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:51.920
<v Speaker 1>his um his political views and all the drama that

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:53.879
<v Speaker 1>is killing the stock right now, and we just have

0:17:54.040 --> 0:17:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to stomach it and wait till that ends. Well, it's

0:17:57.200 --> 0:18:01.680
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting, Gary, I mean, Tesla is theoretically a publicly

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>traded company. There is public shareholders, board of directors. As

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:10.879
<v Speaker 1>a shareholder are you frustrated that no one entity, no

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 1>one person, whether no board is able to rain in?

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:19.639
<v Speaker 1>Mr Musk, I believe that the reason you saw this

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Twitter poll that came out Sunday night where you said

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 1>should I step down from Twitter as CEO? I think

0:18:25.840 --> 0:18:27.399
<v Speaker 1>the board frustrated them to do it. I know very

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:29.879
<v Speaker 1>I've been on two public boards, I've been a CEO.

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 1>I know very few public boards will allow somebody to

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 1>moonlight as a CEO and another company I certainly wasn't

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:37.680
<v Speaker 1>able to do it. And you know, a Twitter, he's

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 1>basically rebuilding it from the ground up. So I've written

0:18:41.680 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 1>letters to the board. I've you know, not been an

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 1>activist because we don't practice that style of management. But

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:49.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm frustrated. I know um Leo Kogowan, who is the

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>third largest individual shareholder after Ellen and Larry Ellison, has

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 1>he voiced his frustrations. Many of us are frustrated. But

0:18:58.320 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, I believe that the board is trying to

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:04.119
<v Speaker 1>pressure Ellen in in a in a nice way, you know,

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:07.320
<v Speaker 1>in a constructive way. I'll say to do the right thing,

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:10.200
<v Speaker 1>which is to step off the Twitter board, bringing a

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:13.359
<v Speaker 1>new CEO and focus on Tesla. Tesla has a clear

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:16.640
<v Speaker 1>path to being a three trillion dollar company because of FSD,

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:19.479
<v Speaker 1>because of ev adoption, because of all the new product

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 1>launches coming like Cybertruck. There's a thirty dollar ev coming

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 1>um and yet it's it's you know, from a stock standpoint,

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:30.159
<v Speaker 1>it's failing miserably because of all the Twitter noise. So

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:32.879
<v Speaker 1>I do believe they're trying to do something about it.

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that that that pol would have just

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 1>showed up out of nowhere on Sunday Unite unless the

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 1>board was pressuring him to step down. Garry, did you

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:44.160
<v Speaker 1>vote in the poll? Of course I voted yes. One

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:46.720
<v Speaker 1>of the debates, one of the debates is, you know,

0:19:46.800 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 1>did Ellen know the results beforehand? I think he viewed

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 1>that he was going to win, I meaning the people

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 1>say no, don't step down, because he was tweeting all

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:56.680
<v Speaker 1>throughout the pole like be careful what you wish for

0:19:57.000 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and nobody can do this. You know, nobody would be

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 1>liot enough to take this job. And you know that's

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 1>partially true because he has vowed to stay on as

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the head of I think software and I don't know

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 1>what he calls it, buts and and you know, look

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 1>if I'm and we can go through the names of

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 1>people who I think could be interested, but if I'm

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 1>one of those people, I don't know if I would

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 1>want to sign up if he's going to be very,

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 1>very involved, and you know, and look what he's done again,

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm voicing my frustration. I'm not knocking the guy because

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:28.920
<v Speaker 1>he's brilliant, but you know, he has basically blamed the

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 1>test of stock price to client underfed raising interest rates.

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 1>That's that that's just not true. If you look at

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:39.159
<v Speaker 1>tests of stock price this year through September, uh they

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:42.119
<v Speaker 1>were actually outperforming Nazdak. They were down twenty five, but

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 1>NASAC was down thirty three. Since October one, um Tesla

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 1>is down fifty two and Nazac is down three. And

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:53.199
<v Speaker 1>you know what has happened in that time is they

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:56.240
<v Speaker 1>missed on third quarterblans because of China. And that's again

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 1>their own vault because they didn't have a thirty thou

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 1>dollar EV one and two he bought where he took

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 1>possession of Twitter and then you know, I made a

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 1>series i'd say mistakes um at at running Twitter, and

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, he he angered a lot of the advertisers

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 1>by saying if you leave, I'm gonna name and shame you.

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 1>That's not the way you treat an advertiser. Um. And

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 1>then there was a there was a constant like constant

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:23.159
<v Speaker 1>action that you know, created a lot of drama, like

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:26.159
<v Speaker 1>when they launched that Twitter blue and you know, they

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:28.879
<v Speaker 1>didn't think it through and people signed up, and then

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 1>you had things like you know, super Mario putting his

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 1>middle finger up. Uh, you know, and if you're an advertiser,

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:38.920
<v Speaker 1>that's what you're most concerned about, product adjacency. So I

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 1>just think the drama's got to stop. And then, you know,

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the third thing is him tweeting out constantly his political beliefs.

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:47.159
<v Speaker 1>That's fine, he can have his political beliefs, but but

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna you're gonna anger the very when you when

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:53.639
<v Speaker 1>you accused people of having woke mind virus and stuff

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 1>words like that, you're basically angering the very people that

0:21:56.800 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to buy get to buy e v s.

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 1>And so the big question that we have and everybody's

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 1>trying to and this is why I think the stock

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:06.960
<v Speaker 1>is getting hammered. Is the testa EV brand taking a

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 1>hit because of all this Twitter drama. And I would

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 1>say I don't believe so. But the more he stays

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:16.879
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter and keeps tweeting out you know stuff, I

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 1>think the more likely is that the EV takes it

0:22:19.640 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 1>hit and it's and it becomes no longer cool to

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:25.440
<v Speaker 1>drive Teslas anymore, becomes almost like, I don't know, it's it's, it's,

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 1>it's it's The people will be embarrassed if he doesn't,

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 1>not at all. So Gary, given that backdrop, who in

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the right mind would take the job at CEO? Do

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 1>you have any thoughts as to I don't know who

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 1>might take that job because they're not even really gonna

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 1>be the CEO. Yeah. Well, look the people who are qualified,

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:47.879
<v Speaker 1>if Ellen would would let them do the job. Cheryl

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Sandberg X Facebook could clearly do it. Um Brett Taylor

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 1>if he's x U CRM salesports dot com he was

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the co CEO. Um, he could do it. Um. Marissa

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Mayer ex Google uh and um um Yahoo could do it.

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:08.200
<v Speaker 1>But you know, you need somebody who really can regain

0:23:08.280 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the trust of advertisers. You need somebody who's proven they

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 1>can monetize a user base. Because Elana said he wants

0:23:15.119 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 1>more user fees and he wants to do more e commerce.

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 1>You need somebody with you know, the tech passion because

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Ellen is not going to hire somebody unless they're technic. Technologically, um,

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:28.760
<v Speaker 1>you know they have good tech skills. You need somebody's

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:31.680
<v Speaker 1>strong financial actiment because the company's got huge debt. And

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>then you need somebody who can lead the troops. And

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>then I would have a six fact. You need somebody

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:39.440
<v Speaker 1>who complements Elon, and Elon respects and shares his vision

0:23:39.480 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 1>and his work ethic. And look, there's there's probably a

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:45.160
<v Speaker 1>handful of people in the world that can do all

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:48.639
<v Speaker 1>those six things, but it can't be somebody who's just

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 1>that you know, there are a lot of names thing

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:53.680
<v Speaker 1>thrown around. Um that's just a tech person, you know

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 1>who has a YouTube podcast and talks about technology, which

0:23:56.680 --> 0:23:58.159
<v Speaker 1>some of the names out there and extent that that's

0:23:58.200 --> 0:24:01.920
<v Speaker 1>just that's crazy. UM won't respect that. So I think

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:04.480
<v Speaker 1>there are people out there, But will Ellen give the

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 1>person enough room to actually make decisions and you know,

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 1>do what they need to do if he's going to

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:12.720
<v Speaker 1>still be in love? I think that's the challenge. And look,

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 1>during the interview process, you can that's what that's what

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:19.639
<v Speaker 1>you figure out. And I've worked for entrepreneurs before the

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:22.240
<v Speaker 1>CEO something you have to figure out will the person

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:24.399
<v Speaker 1>give your room to make decisions or not? And Gary,

0:24:24.480 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 1>just a little bit more of a technical Wall Street question.

0:24:26.840 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Do you have any knowledge of some of these stock

0:24:29.160 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 1>sales from Elon Musk. Were they solely primarily to raise

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 1>cash for to support the debt or were they potentially

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 1>margin calls from investment banks that where he may have

0:24:41.560 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 1>pledged his stock is collateral. No, they weren't margin calls.

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I know that because he doesn't margin himself up that much.

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:52.960
<v Speaker 1>And look there there was seven and a half billion

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:56.400
<v Speaker 1>dollars worth of test. Elon sold seven a half billion

0:24:56.400 --> 0:25:00.360
<v Speaker 1>dollars with the stock since he took over Twitter. Since

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:05.159
<v Speaker 1>October he sold forty one million shares. And what I

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:07.639
<v Speaker 1>gather from both talking to people listening to him on

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:12.159
<v Speaker 1>that that is going into Twitter. It's partly too, some

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:14.239
<v Speaker 1>of the debt, which is very expensive. There's about three

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 1>billions a debt that is um eleven point seven and plus.

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I think you know he's mentioned this. It's burned cash

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 1>at the rate of about three billions while he's cut

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 1>about half the people out. Gary, we only have about

0:25:27.840 --> 0:25:29.119
<v Speaker 1>a minute left with you and I want to get

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:32.400
<v Speaker 1>back to Tesla, And I mean, at a certain point

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:35.440
<v Speaker 1>do you start selling out of Tesla again, It's the

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 1>biggest position in your fund. At what point would that

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:43.119
<v Speaker 1>change if we thought fundamentals had changed, meaning that the

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 1>brand is now no longer in favor and people aren't

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna buy it anymore, we would then we would cut

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:51.440
<v Speaker 1>our estimates, and we would we would sell some. But

0:25:51.680 --> 0:25:54.639
<v Speaker 1>at a hundred and twenty four dollars, the stock is

0:25:54.680 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 1>selling at the same multiple as the SFP five for

0:25:57.160 --> 0:26:00.199
<v Speaker 1>next year on our estimates, and yet it's growing at

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:04.639
<v Speaker 1>a year and I can't in good conscience, you know,

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 1>sell it now? Are you at it? We've been holding

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 1>off because we felt that there still could be some

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:13.920
<v Speaker 1>more you've got window dressing going on. This is more

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:16.080
<v Speaker 1>from a trading standpoint. You know, people who have lost

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Funny tested down six percent this year, you know, do

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 1>not And this is more hedge funds. They do not

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 1>want to show it in one of their top ten positions.

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 1>Institutional managers are so focused on it. But that's something

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:28.680
<v Speaker 1>that we've kind of been waiting for. And look, we'll

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 1>probably get to it at the end of the year.

0:26:30.720 --> 0:26:33.080
<v Speaker 1>All right carry. Unfortunately have to go. We have to

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:35.160
<v Speaker 1>catch up with you next year. That is Gary Black,

0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 1>portfolio manager of the Future Fund Active E t F,

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:47.639
<v Speaker 1>joining us on the phone from Chicago. I'm a journal now,

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:52.680
<v Speaker 1>but you let me drive? Oh no, no, no, no please,

0:26:52.800 --> 0:26:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll do vels. I want to drive. It's a good

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:09.440
<v Speaker 1>question time drive to the clothes on blue Berg Radio.

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:14.240
<v Speaker 1>All right, we are about eighteen minutes away from the

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:17.360
<v Speaker 1>close of trading on this Thursday. Let's get a little

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 1>insight on the auction with Christopher Zooki is founder, chairman

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:24.640
<v Speaker 1>and chief investment officer over at c A Z Investments.

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:28.359
<v Speaker 1>He joins us on Zoom from Houston. Christopher, great to

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 1>have you. It's uh looking like an ugly end to

0:27:31.760 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 1>an ugly year, thinking about three. Do you see any

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:39.880
<v Speaker 1>brighter lights there or is there more pain ahead? Well,

0:27:39.960 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 1>thank you for having me. It's it's tough to be

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 1>in a bad mood when you hear songs like that

0:27:43.960 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 1>in the intro, but then you look at the screen

0:27:46.400 --> 0:27:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and everything is red, so it kind of wakes everybody

0:27:49.200 --> 0:27:51.240
<v Speaker 1>up and makes them a little bit of a reality

0:27:51.320 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 1>of what this year has been. So, you know, we

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 1>do look at two thousand twenty three, much the same

0:27:56.640 --> 0:27:59.240
<v Speaker 1>as we did when we started this year. We talked

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:01.240
<v Speaker 1>about at the begin ending of the year what we

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 1>call the double punch to the gut. When you look

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:06.800
<v Speaker 1>at most major bearer markets, the comprise of two phases.

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:10.880
<v Speaker 1>The first phase is the valuation compression, as everybody goes, oh,

0:28:11.040 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 1>it was way too high. It needs to be lower,

0:28:13.640 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 1>and that first punch hurts. But it's the second punch

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:19.639
<v Speaker 1>to the gut that really really does the damage, because

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:22.880
<v Speaker 1>that is the earnings recession, that is the earnings decline,

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:25.840
<v Speaker 1>and we feel like we're at the beginning of that.

0:28:26.080 --> 0:28:28.119
<v Speaker 1>And whether you talk about Carmacks, you talk about some

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:31.640
<v Speaker 1>of the other names that have not been great, Microns, numbers, etcetera,

0:28:32.000 --> 0:28:34.399
<v Speaker 1>it is clear that we are at the beginning of

0:28:34.520 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 1>this earnings decline, not the end of it. Chris, I

0:28:38.120 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 1>love your resume because it's got some of the names

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 1>that I just love on Wall Street, Potential Securities, Lehman Brothers,

0:28:43.960 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 1>and one of my alma Maters Pain Webber great firms. Unfortunately,

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 1>none of those three around anymore. So I'm not sure

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 1>what that says about you and me, and maybe been

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 1>too long in this business but you know, Chris, you

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:59.200
<v Speaker 1>could take a look at the argument that says, all right,

0:28:59.240 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 1>I've got inflation, I've got light at the end of

0:29:02.880 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the tunnel as it relates to interest rate increases, that's

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:08.360
<v Speaker 1>probably a mid twenty three event. And how much can

0:29:08.480 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 1>earnings risk be? So I got two out of three

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:12.960
<v Speaker 1>things working for me, maybe I should be putting on

0:29:13.120 --> 0:29:15.840
<v Speaker 1>some risk. Here is goe. But you think that earnings

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:18.479
<v Speaker 1>risk opponent is still too much that you don't want

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 1>to get in front of that. I think so you

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:24.200
<v Speaker 1>definitely have to look at the third as the most severe.

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 1>But I'll add a couple to them, all right. And

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 1>to be very very clear, this market right now, you know,

0:29:30.480 --> 0:29:33.840
<v Speaker 1>rallied again for no real reason. It is likely to

0:29:33.920 --> 0:29:36.600
<v Speaker 1>come down, and obviously today is maybe the precursor of

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:39.760
<v Speaker 1>things to come. But what concerns us the most right

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:43.640
<v Speaker 1>now is the consumer. Because most people are not talking

0:29:43.720 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 1>about that. They're talking about the FED, they're talking about rates.

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 1>All those matter tremendously, But the actual economy and what

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:54.960
<v Speaker 1>drives companies earnings plus the GDP. Last time we looked

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:59.000
<v Speaker 1>as the consumer themselves. So those consumers are just now

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:02.240
<v Speaker 1>beginning to field the real impact of rates that have

0:30:02.400 --> 0:30:05.120
<v Speaker 1>come through this year. You know, looked at I think

0:30:05.160 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the number was mortgage payment at the beginning of the

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:11.400
<v Speaker 1>year would buy you a four eight thousand dollar house.

0:30:11.680 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Today it's something like a three dollar house or maybe

0:30:14.760 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 1>even less than that. That is a huge wealth effect

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and a negative wealth effect. Car Max is just a

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 1>great example where everybody and their brother bought a new

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:26.960
<v Speaker 1>car or a used car. I knew to them car

0:30:27.120 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand one with all the stimulus money, and

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 1>now they're like, I maybe I don't need a new

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 1>car that much or a new used car that much,

0:30:35.920 --> 0:30:38.560
<v Speaker 1>So I'm going to delay those purchases. And as we

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:42.840
<v Speaker 1>see that decline of demand and combine that with a

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 1>rising costs that are still there. Inflation maybe peaking, but

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:51.120
<v Speaker 1>margins are still going to compress because expenses are high

0:30:51.440 --> 0:30:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and demand is dropping. Profit margins compressing is usually would

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 1>cause his most major earnings recessions to occur. I want

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:00.640
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the bond mark it a little bit.

0:31:01.000 --> 0:31:03.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, we've been talking a lot about the equity market,

0:31:03.400 --> 0:31:05.760
<v Speaker 1>which hasn't been pretty. Hasn't been too pretty in the

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:09.280
<v Speaker 1>bond market either, But Christopher, I look across Wall street,

0:31:09.320 --> 0:31:12.680
<v Speaker 1>it seems like everyone is a bondable. Do you fall

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 1>on that camp as well. No, we don't, and it's

0:31:16.600 --> 0:31:19.040
<v Speaker 1>because we tend to be a little bit contrarian. We

0:31:19.240 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 1>definitely got more bullish when things in September October probably

0:31:23.600 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 1>went a little bit too far because the FED is

0:31:26.200 --> 0:31:28.600
<v Speaker 1>going to begin to taper and they're going to slow

0:31:28.680 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 1>their rate of increase. But the market right now is

0:31:32.080 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 1>forecasting in you know, by the end of two thousand

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:37.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty three, that the FED is going to cut rates

0:31:37.280 --> 0:31:39.800
<v Speaker 1>as much as a hundred forty basis points. We think

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:43.320
<v Speaker 1>that probably is a little optimistic. It's likely that that's

0:31:43.360 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 1>pushed out into twenty four, etcetera. So if inflation stays

0:31:47.720 --> 0:31:51.560
<v Speaker 1>stubbornly high and the FED does not give an indication

0:31:51.760 --> 0:31:54.640
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to be cutting rates anytime soon, we

0:31:54.800 --> 0:31:56.920
<v Speaker 1>feel like that could be a real bad place for

0:31:57.000 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 1>investors to be. The only exception to that, I'm gonna,

0:32:00.560 --> 0:32:03.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, disagree with myself here for a second, because

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it's important. The only exception of that would

0:32:06.400 --> 0:32:08.720
<v Speaker 1>be if the recession turns out to be a doozy

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 1>technical term, if it really turns out to be bad, well,

0:32:12.640 --> 0:32:14.360
<v Speaker 1>then the long end of the curve is gonna come

0:32:14.400 --> 0:32:16.600
<v Speaker 1>down a lot more, in which case it would make

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:20.840
<v Speaker 1>sense to be bullish long term thirty year bonds, maybe

0:32:20.880 --> 0:32:23.880
<v Speaker 1>even ten years. But realistically, we don't expect it to

0:32:23.920 --> 0:32:26.640
<v Speaker 1>be a GFC type procession. We expect it to be

0:32:26.760 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 1>a serious recession, but not that bad, and so we

0:32:29.480 --> 0:32:31.960
<v Speaker 1>think that the bond market has already adjusted a lot

0:32:32.280 --> 0:32:34.480
<v Speaker 1>to what's likely to occur. So from here the risk

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:37.920
<v Speaker 1>rewards is not very good. So no haven bid necessarily,

0:32:38.880 --> 0:32:41.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. Um, you could see it. If

0:32:41.280 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the recession turns out to be just a draconian type scenario,

0:32:44.400 --> 0:32:46.880
<v Speaker 1>you could see that haven bid, but we feel like

0:32:47.240 --> 0:32:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna be more on the short end. You're just

0:32:49.080 --> 0:32:51.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna see more money flow into you know, two's and

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:54.480
<v Speaker 1>fives and that kind of thing, as opposed to going

0:32:54.560 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 1>out and taking more risk on the tens um. Again,

0:32:58.080 --> 0:33:00.120
<v Speaker 1>if it turns out to be a GFC type and

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:02.719
<v Speaker 1>ten years going to go back to one fifty, well

0:33:02.720 --> 0:33:04.480
<v Speaker 1>then yeah, you want to be long tenures right now,

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:07.400
<v Speaker 1>we just don't think that's likely. That of Churse, we

0:33:07.440 --> 0:33:09.960
<v Speaker 1>know you're in Houston, we know your native Houstonian, you're

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 1>involved in your community. Just give us a sense of

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:14.640
<v Speaker 1>on the ground, how are things in Houston, how's the economy,

0:33:14.680 --> 0:33:17.480
<v Speaker 1>how's the outlook as we come out of this pandemic.

0:33:18.040 --> 0:33:20.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's a it's we're doing really well as

0:33:20.280 --> 0:33:23.120
<v Speaker 1>a city. And it's a combination of how the energy

0:33:23.240 --> 0:33:25.560
<v Speaker 1>markets are certainly a lot more favorable than they've been

0:33:25.600 --> 0:33:28.920
<v Speaker 1>in a while. We also have such a dominant healthcare

0:33:29.320 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh and and fantastic health care facilities you

0:33:32.520 --> 0:33:35.200
<v Speaker 1>know here with the Texas Medical Center and so much

0:33:35.320 --> 0:33:37.880
<v Speaker 1>else that we've done to diversify our city. You know,

0:33:37.960 --> 0:33:40.240
<v Speaker 1>we're dealing with some of the other issues related to

0:33:40.440 --> 0:33:43.560
<v Speaker 1>commercial real estate that everywhere else is right now, but

0:33:43.680 --> 0:33:46.360
<v Speaker 1>not as bad. So when we look at the major

0:33:46.480 --> 0:33:49.400
<v Speaker 1>pockets of the city, we're actually doing really well. Um,

0:33:49.560 --> 0:33:51.920
<v Speaker 1>we've got good job growth. We've got a lot of

0:33:51.960 --> 0:33:54.640
<v Speaker 1>people moving here from other parts of the country. And

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:56.480
<v Speaker 1>so when you have good job growth and you have

0:33:56.640 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 1>new you know, people moving in, it means that our

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:02.680
<v Speaker 1>housing markets are pretty stable and doing okay. And then

0:34:02.720 --> 0:34:06.040
<v Speaker 1>we also have a healthy job market for people that

0:34:06.160 --> 0:34:08.279
<v Speaker 1>want to come here to work. So we welcome you

0:34:08.360 --> 0:34:10.880
<v Speaker 1>to Texas. Good stuff, all right, Christopher, We appreciate you

0:34:10.880 --> 0:34:14.000
<v Speaker 1>taking the time. Christopher's book, founder, chairman and chief investment

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Officer of c A Z Investments, joining us via zoom

0:34:18.080 --> 0:34:21.440
<v Speaker 1>from Houston. He has a cautious outlook, pragmatic outlook, of

0:34:21.480 --> 0:34:23.880
<v Speaker 1>caution outlook, and he says you probably don't want to

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 1>get in front of earnings revisions, downward earning revisions, and

0:34:27.640 --> 0:34:30.320
<v Speaker 1>he thinks we still have more to go for earnings

0:34:30.400 --> 0:34:33.879
<v Speaker 1>next year and beyond. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week.

0:34:34.000 --> 0:34:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com.

0:34:37.640 --> 0:34:39.719
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:34:39.760 --> 0:34:43.120
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or stream us live on

0:34:43.280 --> 0:34:44.879
<v Speaker 1>YouTube and Bloomberg dot com