WEBVTT - The US Passes the Anti-TikTok Bill

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey there,

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:19.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm an executive producer with iHeart Podcasts and How the

0:00:19.520 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Tech Are You? So I had been working on a

0:00:23.200 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>totally different episode for today, but then yesterday the US

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Senate did what I originally said I thought they wouldn't do,

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>which is that they passed a bill that mandates byte

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Dance the Chinese company must sell its subsidiary TikTok to

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>some other entity that is not identified as a foreign

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:49.199
<v Speaker 1>adversary to the United States or face a ban across

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the nation. That bill is now going to President Biden's

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 1>desk for his signature, which seems to be pretty much forthcoming.

0:00:54.800 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean he said he was going to sign it

0:00:56.240 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 1>into law. In fact, it may have already happened by

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the time I get this episode published, and then that

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 1>means this bill will in fact become law. This is

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>a huge moment in technology, in business, in politics, both

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:13.759
<v Speaker 1>domestic and international, and I figured it would make sense

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:17.039
<v Speaker 1>to kind of go through and talk through this. So

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:21.319
<v Speaker 1>first up, let's talk about byte Edance and TikTok, because

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 1>we've learned some things about byte dance in particular recently

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:30.399
<v Speaker 1>that really have shaped perspectives in very recent weeks. So

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>let's start off with a guy named Jean E. Ming.

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 1>He got his start working for a travel website in

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 1>China called Kuksoon, and he spent a brief period working

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 1>for Microsoft, but then ventured out into the entrepreneurial landscape himself.

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 1>So the traditional story is that he created various apps

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>in an attempt to kind of find one that really stuck,

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>and one of those was a real estate app, not

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 1>too different from what you might see in an app

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>like Zillow right, but this one was called ninety nine

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Fong Fang. That app was not a success. It ended

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:13.639
<v Speaker 1>up eventually going out of business in a couple of years,

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 1>but it would end up being really important to the

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 1>TikTok story for multiple reasons. For one thing, engineers at

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>ninety nine Fong developed tools that were meant to help

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 1>for search as well as recommended real estate listings based

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 1>upon user information, which you know a lot of that

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>sounds fairly standard for a real estate app, but the

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:40.960
<v Speaker 1>story goes Jeong Yi Ming decided that maybe you could

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:46.079
<v Speaker 1>pair a recommendation algorithm that didn't work for real estate,

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 1>but it would work for something like serving someone up

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:52.960
<v Speaker 1>news that you know. You would learn about a user's behavior,

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 1>their interests, the things that are important to them, and

0:02:55.840 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you could aggregate news for those users, and you could

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>match people to content. Essentially, he was just thinking about

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 1>how the best apply recommendation algorithms. How do you judge

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>what someone likes? And then how do you keep them

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 1>at your app by serving them the stuff that makes

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 1>them stay there? How do you make that happen? So

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:19.920
<v Speaker 1>to that end, again, the traditional story goes. Jiang Yiming

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 1>launched a news aggregator app called Totyoo, and he and

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>his former college roommate Leong Rubo decided to found a

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:32.800
<v Speaker 1>company that would sort of be the umbrella corporation for

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the various apps they were developing, and this would become

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Bite Dance. They sought seed money from investors, and then

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 1>a company founded by an American politically conservative mega donor

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 1>enters into the picture. So we're in around twenty twelve

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>at this point ninety nine. Fong really started around two

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 1>thousand and nine. Byte Dance starts around twenty twelve. Now,

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the conservative mega donor is a fellow named Jeff Yas

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I get it. I know tons of

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 1>y'all out there hate politics in your tech stories, but

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately this time we have to include politics because it

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>plays a huge part in what we're talking about. Me

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about a ban on TikTok, a legal ban,

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>so we have to talk about politics, and Yes in

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 1>particular has had a really huge impact on the TikTok story.

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 1>So Yes co founded an investment company called Susquehanna International

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Group with some of his fellow students at the State

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 1>University of New York at Binghampton back in the nineteen seventies.

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 1>And this company would actually become wildly profitable. It would

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 1>become one of the massive investors in the stock market

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 1>here in the United States, and it would turn Yass

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:49.040
<v Speaker 1>into a billionaire in the process. So here we are

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twelve and Susquehanna International Group invests in this

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 1>fledgling Chinese company called Byte Dance, ultimately spending enough to

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 1>purchase a fifteen percent state in the company. And you know,

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 1>that's a healthy chunk of ownership, and today it represents

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:10.160
<v Speaker 1>a truly massive investment considering the stratospheric altitude that Byte

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>dances valuation would reach. So Yas is heavily invested in

0:05:15.400 --> 0:05:19.159
<v Speaker 1>byte Dance, and some argue that the majority of Yas's

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 1>estimated wealth is tied up with this investment. So he

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:27.160
<v Speaker 1>clearly has a huge incentive to protect Byte Dance. That's

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>where his billions of dollars are tied up. Now Moreover,

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the New York Times published a piece not too long

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>ago about some court records that were accidentally made public.

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 1>These records relate to a lawsuit in which some former

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:46.040
<v Speaker 1>ninety nine Fong engineers allege that their work has been

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 1>repurposed to power byte Dances various apps, most notably TikTok,

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and that these engineers were not fairly compensated for the

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 1>use of their work. The court records show that Susquehanna

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:04.840
<v Speaker 1>had invested in ninety nine Fong, So Susquehanna's involvement and

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:10.159
<v Speaker 1>thus Jeff Yass's involvement with Xiang y Ning, TikTok and

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 1>byte Dance has gone much further back than was first known.

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 1>This goes back to two thousand and nine, so Susquehanna

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>apparently invests in ninety nine Fong, but that app, like

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I said, went belly up. And then, according to these

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 1>court documents, Susquehanna essentially created byte Dance and put Xiang

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Yi Ming in charge of it. So, in other words,

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the court records say the origin story for a byte

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Dance is not the same thing as what has been

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 1>generally believed, and that Susquehanna wasn't just a passive investor

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:44.160
<v Speaker 1>in this Chinese company, but actually took a very prominent

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 1>role in the creation of byte Dance itself. Anyway, those

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:51.600
<v Speaker 1>court records were never meant to be made public. They

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 1>should not have been made public. So the court subsequently

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>removed those records from public access, but not before The

0:06:57.680 --> 0:07:00.600
<v Speaker 1>New York Times was able to review them and publish

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:03.280
<v Speaker 1>an article about them. So now let's move on. So

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 1>ByteDance begins to form in twenty twelve. It's based in China,

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 1>and we're still quite a ways out from TikTok at

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 1>this point. TikTok's own history is very convoluted. For one thing,

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 1>it's really the story of a few apps kind of

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 1>merging together Voltron's style to create what we know of

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 1>as TikTok today. One of those apps was called Musical

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>dot l y or Musically and some of y'all might

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 1>even remember that app. I remember it was really big

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>with some of my actor friends back in you know,

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty fifteen or so. This app was originally founded by

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Luyu Yong and Alex Hu in China, and the app

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 1>started off originally that they wanted to create an app,

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>a totally different app, not musically. They wanted to make

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 1>an app that was an educational tool, something that could

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>deliver short informative lectures and such to users. But they

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 1>found that folks didn't want to know learning, so they

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>decided to change directions and they made an app designed

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 1>for very short form video content that you could create

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>and share short form videos or you could browse short

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>form videos, and that these would be you know, less

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 1>than a minute long, somewhere between fifteen seconds and sixty seconds,

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 1>and they included the ability for users to post videos

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 1>with specific music clips. They had a library of music clips,

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>so it was kind of like adding a soundtrack to

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>your video content. And this led to people using Musical

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 1>dot Le to post lip syncing videos. That's really where

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the app took off. It also coincided with a popular

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 1>lip syncing program that was happening in the United States

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>at the time. So again when I say it got

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 1>really popular, the app really got popular in America. In China,

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 1>it actually didn't move the needle very much at all.

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 1>So with the American market going banana for lip syncing videos,

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the founders decided to establish an office in the good

0:08:57.320 --> 0:09:01.560
<v Speaker 1>old US of A. So they did so in Santa Monica, California.

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 1>This is kind of where the heart of TikTok being

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 1>an American company comes in. So they create this office

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 1>in Santa Monica. The app continues to go incredibly popular.

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:15.200
<v Speaker 1>At one point, an estimated half of all US teens

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 1>were using Musically and it became the number one app

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 1>on the iOS app store, so it was a really

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 1>big deal. Meanwhile, back in China, ByteDance was working on

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of a similar app, not the exact same thing

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 1>as Musically, but along the same lines, and they called

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>it dou Yin, which, from what I understand, means shaking

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:39.560
<v Speaker 1>sound and a cursory description of dou Yen makes it

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 1>sound an awful lot like TikTok. It's an app that

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 1>lets users create and browse short form videos, often ones

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 1>that include popular music in the background. Do youan though,

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 1>also allows people to live stream, which you can do

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:55.200
<v Speaker 1>on TikTok now too, or you know, watch a live stream,

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:57.960
<v Speaker 1>not just to do one yourself. And dou Yan also

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 1>has some kind of incredible advanced features that are not

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 1>in TikTok, like being able to search videos based on

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the face of someone who's appearing in the video you're watching,

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:10.680
<v Speaker 1>or being able to purchase goods that are featured in

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>one of those videos just through a couple of presses

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 1>at the screen, or even like to book a stay

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:18.960
<v Speaker 1>in a resort or a hotel that is featured in

0:10:18.960 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a video. And as you would imagine it also as

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 1>a Chinese app, has incredibly tight restrictions on the type

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:29.200
<v Speaker 1>of content that you can post there. Essentially, anything that

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>would bring into question the authority or legitimacy of China's

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 1>government is strictly forbidden. As it would later turn out

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 1>that kind of stuff would sort of be forbidden on

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 1>TikTok as well. We're going to have to come back

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 1>to that in a bit. So in September twenty seventeen,

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 1>byte Dance launches TikTok, which is a sister app to

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:53.440
<v Speaker 1>dou Yin. It's the international version of du Yan and

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 1>as such, it doesn't have all the features and it

0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have all the restrictions that Duyin has. But the

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 1>company had also become aware of Musical Lee and there

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:04.840
<v Speaker 1>was this clear market in America that was just waiting

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 1>for exploitation, and Music Lee had already tapped into it. Right,

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 1>it makes way more sense if we can get musically

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:13.199
<v Speaker 1>and we can get access to that, then we get

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 1>access to those users and we don't have to build

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:19.719
<v Speaker 1>up our audience from scratch. So Byte Dance, through its

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:24.840
<v Speaker 1>subsidiary Totial, makes an offer to acquire Musical Lee in

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:29.079
<v Speaker 1>November twenty seventeen. Now, the price tag was not made public,

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 1>but estimates put it somewhere in the neighborhood of eight

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:34.840
<v Speaker 1>hundred million dollars to one billion smack a Rouse, which

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 1>is a princely sum indeed. Now. At the time, Musical

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Lee released a statement that said the company would continue

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 1>to operate independently in the United States. While, in the

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 1>words of a tech Crunch article, quote taking advantage of

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the distribution in tech that its new parent offers end quote,

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:58.560
<v Speaker 1>in reality, things would get a bit murkier Byte Dance

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 1>intended to leverage the recommendation algorithm that it had developed

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 1>for Totyoo, possibly by taking it from ninety nine Fong,

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:10.960
<v Speaker 1>although the company would dispute this and then incorporate this

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:15.960
<v Speaker 1>recommendation algorithm into the app Musical Lee in order to

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 1>supercharge it and to tap into that massive audience, and

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 1>they decided that it made more sense to fold Musical

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Lee into the company's own efforts to launch TikTok. So

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 1>byt Dance made the call to merge these apps together

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 1>and to drop the Musical Lee name in the process

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:38.439
<v Speaker 1>and instead use the name TikTok. That was a pretty

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 1>gutsy move in America, right because Musical Lee was young,

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 1>but it was firmly established as a brand already, at

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>least for its target audience, So making a change like

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 1>that was risky. And really you could say TikTok was

0:12:52.000 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of the product of three different apps. You had

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Musical Lie, you had Duyen, and you had the original

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:02.080
<v Speaker 1>version of TikTok. The international variant of dou Yen by

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Dance would make great use of its recommendation algorithm on

0:13:06.240 --> 0:13:08.680
<v Speaker 1>the new app, and this is the algorithm that the

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>engineers who worked for ninety nine fond claims came from

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>their work, which is a claim again that Bitedance continues

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:19.320
<v Speaker 1>to dispute as well as Susquehanna International Group they disputed

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 1>as well, that again was found in those court records.

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 1>So TikTok essentially becomes a thing officially in early twenty eighteen.

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, we'll shift over to politics again

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 1>for a bit, because unfortunately that's what this whole mess

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>revolves around. But first, let's take a quick break to

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 1>thank our sponsors. All Right, we're back. Let's plunge on

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 1>into the political bit of this story, and that all

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 1>gets started in China itself. So back in the mid

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty tens, China started to pass laws that were meant

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:10.320
<v Speaker 1>to tighten up national security in various ways, and that

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 1>included stuff like, you know, cybersecurity laws and cracking down

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 1>on digital espionage, you know, that kind of stuff. And

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 1>in twenty seventeen, China passed a law called the National

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Intelligence Law of the People's Republic of China. At least

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>that's the Western translation this law, and the law covers

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of ground actually, but the bit that really

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>sticks out, at least with regard to you know, the

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 1>TikTok mess would really be articles seven and ten. So

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Article seven states that all Chinese citizens and companies and

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 1>organizations are to cooperate in intelligence gathering efforts, and that

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 1>seems to mean that if the Chinese government wants information

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:53.479
<v Speaker 1>on something and a Chinese company has access to this information,

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>that company is obligated to hand it over to the government.

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Article ten says that that goes for you too, two

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 1>companies that are owned by Chinese interests but are actually

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 1>operating overseas. So essentially, the law says it doesn't matter

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 1>if the business practices are outside of China or not.

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 1>If the company that's conducting these matters ultimately is a

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Chinese company, then it is subject to this law, whether

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the business is happening inside China or someplace like the

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 1>United States. Now, how and how frequently the Chinese government

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 1>enforces this law isn't exactly clear, but the implication worries

0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of folks internationally for good reason. You know,

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Chinese companies make a lot of stuff, and a lot

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 1>of that stuff ends up in complex critical systems like

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 1>telecommunications infrastructure, for example. So for that reason, countries like

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the United States began to reconsider the wisdom of allowing

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 1>telecommunications companies to use Chinese components in their various systems,

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 1>out of fear that these companies could end up being

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 1>complicit in spying on America on behalf of China, with

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 1>or without that telecommunications companies, you know, knowledge or active cooperation,

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>just by using these components that could be snooping on stuff.

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 1>So we in the States started to see calls for

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 1>telecommunications companies to remove and replace these Chinese components with

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 1>stuff from other companies, and that got underway. All right,

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>So China passes a law that seems to say any

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Chinese company, et cetera, et cetera, has to comply with

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>government requests to gather and share intelligence. Byte Dance is

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 1>a Chinese company, and TikTok is a byte Dance subsidiary.

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 1>So our seed has been planted. Now let's pop on

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 1>over to the old us of a. In twenty eighteen,

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the US government, led by President Donald Trump, got involved

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 1>in a protracted trade war with China, and the issue

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 1>at hand was really a trade deficit, and to go

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 1>into the history of that would require a whole lot

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>more time and expertise than I have, just do a

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 1>bad job of describing it, but we can summarize it sloppily.

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:07.640
<v Speaker 1>I might add by saying that for a few decades now,

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the United States imports from China drastically exceed its exports

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 1>to China. We're bringing in more stuff from overseas than

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 1>we are selling to overseas customers. So the worry is

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 1>that ultimately this could have a huge negative impact on

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:28.000
<v Speaker 1>American economy and jobs, as well as national security. Whether

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 1>that actually is the case is a lot more complicated,

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>and I frankly would go dizzy trying to suss it

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 1>all out. So Trump's administration sought to reverse the trade

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 1>deficit trends, and in order to do that, his administration

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 1>levied tariffs on Chinese imports. And again, going into whether

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:50.240
<v Speaker 1>or not this was actually a good idea or a

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:52.959
<v Speaker 1>bad idea would require a lot more time and knowledge

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>than I possess, and I don't know ultimately if it

0:17:56.280 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 1>was a good or bad idea, But I do know

0:17:58.040 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>there were a lot of folks who are at least

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:04.160
<v Speaker 1>called experts in the field, who debated that topic amongst themselves,

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know that there's a clear answer anyway.

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:10.120
<v Speaker 1>As you can imagine, the Chinese government was not thrilled

0:18:10.359 --> 0:18:13.639
<v Speaker 1>about this move. The Chinese government responded by saying that

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Trump's actual goal wasn't to correct some sort of unbalanced

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 1>trade playing field, but rather to directly attack China's economic growth.

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:26.159
<v Speaker 1>They're saying, oh, you're not trying to fix things. You

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 1>just don't want us to succeed, so you're attacking us,

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:34.200
<v Speaker 1>which I'm pretty sure is not a really sincere argument,

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:36.920
<v Speaker 1>but that was the one that was put forth. Things

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:40.439
<v Speaker 1>got really complicated from an economic standpoint. But this provides

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:43.199
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good backdrop for what would come next. So

0:18:43.520 --> 0:18:45.639
<v Speaker 1>we get up to the summer of twenty twenty. This

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:48.480
<v Speaker 1>trade dispute has been going on for two years. President

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:53.439
<v Speaker 1>Trump says he wants to ban TikTok. He claimed he

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:55.879
<v Speaker 1>would do this by executive order, and in fact, he

0:18:56.040 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 1>did issue an executive order to force byte Dance to

0:19:02.160 --> 0:19:05.880
<v Speaker 1>either sell TikTok off or face a ban. In fact,

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:07.199
<v Speaker 1>for a while he was just saying he was going

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:09.879
<v Speaker 1>to ban it. That was it, and what no sale

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 1>was just going to be a ban. Byteedance approached Microsoft

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>to potentially buy the US portion of the TikTok business

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:20.639
<v Speaker 1>to kind of spin that off and Microsoft could take

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 1>control of it. But Trump initially rejected that move, but

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft would remain part of the conversation about a potential

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 1>buyout for about another month. Like this was happening in

0:19:30.600 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 1>August of twenty twenty, things would move really fast. By

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 1>September twenty twenty, things got real messy. So again Trump

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 1>says he's going to ban the existence of TikTok in

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:43.639
<v Speaker 1>the United States. And the first time he said that

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 1>was really toward the end of July twenty twenty, but

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 1>then literally just a few days later, Trump reverses his

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:52.119
<v Speaker 1>stance and he says, you know what, I would allow

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 1>for the sale of TikTok to an American company. Maybe

0:19:54.840 --> 0:19:57.199
<v Speaker 1>we don't ban the app, maybe we do allow it

0:19:57.240 --> 0:19:59.920
<v Speaker 1>to get sold as long as it's to an American company,

0:20:00.359 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 1>And he establishes a deadline of September fifteenth, twenty twenty,

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:07.240
<v Speaker 1>and that if a suitable buyer did not emerge by

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that point, he would shut TikTok down with this ban

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:15.119
<v Speaker 1>by executive order. Now why he wanted to ban TikTok,

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:19.119
<v Speaker 1>that's a lot harder to say, because it's hard to

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 1>parse what he was trying to convey. He's difficult to

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:27.880
<v Speaker 1>understand at points. So generally speaking, it seemed that Trump

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:32.919
<v Speaker 1>believed that although TikTok belonged to a Chinese company, it

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 1>was operating in the United States and that was the issue,

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 1>not from a national security point of view. In fact,

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 1>at one point he said, quote, it's a great asset,

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 1>but it's not a great asset in the United States

0:20:46.480 --> 0:20:50.520
<v Speaker 1>unless they have approval in the United States end quote.

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:52.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what that means. I do not know

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>what he was trying to communicate at this point, but

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:58.639
<v Speaker 1>he did seem to feel that the United States was

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 1>owed some money for the success of TikTok, right like,

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 1>based on what I've read and what I've watched that

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 1>was right around that time period. His argument largely boiled

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:14.120
<v Speaker 1>down to, hey, Americans are what pushed TikTok to incredible success,

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 1>so America deserves some of that cheddar Now, I don't

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:21.200
<v Speaker 1>really think that argument holds much water. You know. That's

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 1>like saying to someone that because they were so successful

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:26.720
<v Speaker 1>in the company, the company deserves all the credit. I

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 1>don't think that really makes sense, but that is what

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:32.960
<v Speaker 1>I gathered from the material. I mean, that's based upon

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 1>what Trump himself was saying. So again, this was not

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:40.159
<v Speaker 1>being conveyed in the context of national security. It was

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:43.200
<v Speaker 1>being conveyed and they got big, So I want the money.

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft and Oracle were both in talks to acquire the

0:21:46.960 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 1>US based operations of TikTok from Byteedance, and for a

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 1>while it really did look like something along those lines

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:57.439
<v Speaker 1>was going to happen. But then TikTok filed some legal

0:21:57.560 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 1>challenges to this executive orders. Arguments included an accusation that

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:05.919
<v Speaker 1>Trump's administration failed to produce any evidence that TikTok is

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 1>actually a threat to national security. They're saying like, yeah,

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:12.840
<v Speaker 1>you're saying that the conditions exist for this to be

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:15.399
<v Speaker 1>a threat to national security, but you failed to point

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:18.440
<v Speaker 1>at any actual evidence that it's happening. So just because

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 1>something could happen doesn't mean that you have to ban it. Right, Like,

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 1>any one of you out there could get in your

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:29.679
<v Speaker 1>car and purposefully drive into crowds of people, but that

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:31.479
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean the government has the right to come in

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:33.679
<v Speaker 1>and say, you know what, we revoked your driver's license

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:36.159
<v Speaker 1>because you could do this. Even though you haven't done it.

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:39.120
<v Speaker 1>That's the same sort of thing. Tytuk was saying, Hey,

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:42.200
<v Speaker 1>you can't ban us on the basis of a threat

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:44.879
<v Speaker 1>to national security if you can't prove that we're a

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:48.880
<v Speaker 1>threat to national security. And TikTok would also bring up

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 1>other arguments, saying that this was an unconstitutional move in

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:57.359
<v Speaker 1>the first place, that it violated First and Fifth Amendment rights,

0:22:57.800 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 1>and the ban would get moved moved back, like the

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:04.120
<v Speaker 1>deadline would be moved back a couple of times throughout this,

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and TikTok successfully petitioned a court for an injunction against

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the order to prevent the ban in late September twenty twenty,

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 1>so everything was on hold. Then we get to early

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:19.640
<v Speaker 1>November twenty twenty, where the US held its previous election

0:23:20.080 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 1>and President Trump lost that election, a matter of which

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:31.120
<v Speaker 1>there was some debate. Anyway, this obviously redirected political momentum

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:33.960
<v Speaker 1>at this point. Right the president who would issued this

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:37.840
<v Speaker 1>executive order is no longer going to be president after

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:41.639
<v Speaker 1>January twenty, twenty twenty one, so a lot of the

0:23:41.680 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 1>pressure that had been on TikTok was alleviated. Was now

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the guy who had made the order wasn't going to

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:55.880
<v Speaker 1>be in charge anymore. Biden would ultimately revoke that executive

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 1>order with an executive order of his own that happened

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:00.640
<v Speaker 1>in the summer of twenty twenty one, but he did

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 1>call for an investigation into TikTok to actually determine if,

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 1>in fact there were any threats to national security present.

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:10.399
<v Speaker 1>And things kind of quieted down for at least a

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:13.159
<v Speaker 1>couple of months, right like, there was this investigation that

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:15.760
<v Speaker 1>was going to go on, but otherwise things kind of

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 1>calmed down. But then we get to the end of

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one. That's when we got the Facebook whistleblower event,

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:28.159
<v Speaker 1>where documents from within Facebook now Meta indicated that a

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:31.159
<v Speaker 1>lot of shady stuff was going on at a corporate level,

0:24:31.440 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and it generally raised concerns about social platforms across the spectrum,

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:39.920
<v Speaker 1>which included TikTok. So leaders were starting to raise some

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:43.439
<v Speaker 1>pretty tough questions about how these companies collect, use, and

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 1>protect or failed to protect user information, and the specter

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:54.360
<v Speaker 1>of potential Chinese surveillance resurfaced. Now Over at TikTok, efforts

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:58.359
<v Speaker 1>were underway to distance the company from byteedance, at least

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 1>on surface appearances. So those efforts got the nickname Project Texas.

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:09.119
<v Speaker 1>The whole idea was that TikTok's US operations would flow

0:25:09.240 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 1>through servers that were owned and operated by Oracle, and

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Oracle's an American company that's based in Texas, thus the

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 1>nickname Project Texas. This project had its roots in the

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 1>days when Oracle was in consideration to acquire TikTok's US

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:27.480
<v Speaker 1>operations from byte Dance. Now that never happened, but the

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:30.679
<v Speaker 1>move to silo TikTok's US data from the rest of

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 1>international operations did continue, and the effort really ramped up

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:39.920
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty two. However, subsequent reporting by Fortune revealed

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 1>that several former TikTok employees claimed the efforts were quote

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:49.160
<v Speaker 1>unquote largely cosmetic. One former data scientist at TikTok named

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Evan Turner said that TikTok regularly received direction from byte

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Dance while outwardly posing as being largely independent of their

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:01.160
<v Speaker 1>parent company. So to outward appearances, they were saying, no,

0:26:01.240 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 1>we're completely distinct, we are US based and US operated,

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 1>but then behind the scenes, Bite Dance was very much

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:12.119
<v Speaker 1>pulling the strings. Now. Turner claimed that while he he

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:15.159
<v Speaker 1>regularly had to send reports to byte Dance, and that

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:18.800
<v Speaker 1>these reports included these spreadsheets that had tons of American

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:22.240
<v Speaker 1>user data on them, primarily at least apparently in an

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 1>effort to refine the recommendation algorithm to drive better engagement. So,

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:29.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's not great. It's not great to hear that,

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:32.720
<v Speaker 1>but it's not quite a national security threat, right if

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:35.119
<v Speaker 1>that's in fact, all that was going on was that

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:37.879
<v Speaker 1>this was an effort for engineers back at byte Dance

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 1>to make even more addictive recommendation algorithms. That's not the

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 1>same thing as collecting information for the purposes of surveillance.

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:48.439
<v Speaker 1>But you know, we don't know if that's all that

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 1>was going on. Actually, we don't even know if that

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 1>was going on. That's been under dispute as well. TikTok's

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 1>CEO a man named Shaozi Chu who originates from Singapore,

0:26:59.240 --> 0:27:03.160
<v Speaker 1>which is not, despite what some American politicians appeared to believe,

0:27:03.280 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 1>part of China. He has appeared before Congress and claimed

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:10.399
<v Speaker 1>that TikTok is as American as apple Pie, which I

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:13.240
<v Speaker 1>think is more Canadian than American, but whatever, And he

0:27:13.320 --> 0:27:18.680
<v Speaker 1>has maintained that the company TikTok does not work closely

0:27:18.720 --> 0:27:22.600
<v Speaker 1>with byte Dance, so there's definitely conflicting information going on here.

0:27:22.960 --> 0:27:26.359
<v Speaker 1>He previously served as chief financial officer for a byte Dance,

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 1>so that also raises concerns, right, like, yeah, he's from Singapore,

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:32.960
<v Speaker 1>he's not a Chinese citizen, but he was also the

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:37.199
<v Speaker 1>CFO for byte Dance, a Chinese company that does reserve

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:38.919
<v Speaker 1>a seat on its board for a member of the

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Chinese Communist Party. That in itself is not unusual for

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:46.080
<v Speaker 1>big companies in China. So the fear is that perhaps

0:27:46.119 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 1>he's hiding the real relationship between the parent company and

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:52.359
<v Speaker 1>the subsidiary. In fact, you know, I mentioned earlier that

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 1>law about intelligence in China, and I mentioned that it

0:27:56.359 --> 0:27:59.680
<v Speaker 1>has sections that say, part of the responsibility is that

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 1>China these organizations have to gather intelligence, whether they are

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:07.400
<v Speaker 1>domestic or foreign in operation, but they also are supposed

0:28:07.440 --> 0:28:12.640
<v Speaker 1>to do so in secret. They're not supposed to admit

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:16.120
<v Speaker 1>or reveal that that's in fact happening. So you could

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:18.880
<v Speaker 1>make the argument that, well, of course, he says TikTok

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't gather information on behalf of byte Edance because he

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:26.199
<v Speaker 1>can't because of the nature of the Chinese company, and

0:28:26.240 --> 0:28:29.200
<v Speaker 1>that there's this law that says he cannot say that

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 1>even though he himself is not a Chinese citizen, he's

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of a company that is owned by a

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:37.879
<v Speaker 1>Chinese company. So it gets very complicated. But that's not

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 1>exactly hard evidence of wrongdoing, right. You can't say for

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 1>sure that because this is you know, potentially possible, that

0:28:46.520 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 1>it's really you know, plausible, or that really is happening.

0:28:50.480 --> 0:28:53.960
<v Speaker 1>And TikTok representatives have said that the various allegations that

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:56.959
<v Speaker 1>were made by former employees that were reported on in

0:28:57.000 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Fortune all related to times that itsed before Project Texas

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 1>was fully operational, and that those complaints are no longer relevant,

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 1>that none of that actually applies to the TikTok of today.

0:29:09.920 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 1>So you've got that too. All right, We're gonna have

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:14.760
<v Speaker 1>to take another quick break when we come back. I've

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 1>got a lot more to say about the things that

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:22.560
<v Speaker 1>escalated and eventually led to this legislation that could potentially

0:29:22.640 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 1>ban TikTok, But first let's take another quick break. Okay,

0:29:35.480 --> 0:29:38.479
<v Speaker 1>we're back. So in late twenty twenty two, we had

0:29:38.520 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 1>another scandal involving TikTok and Byte Dance. Forbes published a

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:46.320
<v Speaker 1>piece that said that Byte Dance had used TikTok to

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:50.840
<v Speaker 1>spy on Forbes' journalists, and that Byte Dance essentially had

0:29:50.880 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 1>this list of journalists who were covering byte Dance, and

0:29:54.920 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>they decided to use TikTok to figure out where these

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:01.920
<v Speaker 1>journalists had been going. They wanted to identify their IP

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:06.800
<v Speaker 1>addresses and then track these journalists, and this was supposedly

0:30:07.160 --> 0:30:10.800
<v Speaker 1>in order to figure out who the journalists were meeting

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:14.400
<v Speaker 1>with within Byte Dance to find the source of internal

0:30:14.520 --> 0:30:18.000
<v Speaker 1>leaks from within the company, and they were using TikTok

0:30:18.400 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>as the data gathering tool to do this, which is

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:25.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of like the nightmare scenario. Right here we have

0:30:25.520 --> 0:30:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the smoking gun of byte Dance using access of TikTok

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:36.360
<v Speaker 1>to track people, including American citizens. So Forbes publishes these

0:30:36.360 --> 0:30:40.480
<v Speaker 1>claims and Byte Dance responds by firing or forcing to

0:30:40.600 --> 0:30:44.080
<v Speaker 1>resign the people who were connected to the tracking efforts

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 1>within the company. So, like the guy who supposedly oversaw

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the efforts and his direct boss, they left the company. Now,

0:30:51.320 --> 0:30:54.720
<v Speaker 1>whether this was an indication that the decision to track

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 1>journalists was actually localized to a lower spot on the

0:30:59.200 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 1>corporate higher and thus like executive level you know, c

0:31:03.320 --> 0:31:09.160
<v Speaker 1>suite level leaders had no knowledge of this project, or

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:13.080
<v Speaker 1>if this was like a cover up where you know,

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the people were fired in order to preserve plausible deniability,

0:31:16.960 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but Byte Dance's leadership was essentially saying

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:23.400
<v Speaker 1>this was unacceptable. We didn't approve this. You know, the

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:27.280
<v Speaker 1>executive leadership did not approve this. This was done by

0:31:27.680 --> 0:31:30.640
<v Speaker 1>lower level management. We're dealing with it internally to make

0:31:30.680 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 1>sure it never happens again. But whether that was sincere

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:37.960
<v Speaker 1>or not, it certainly did not win byte Dance or

0:31:37.960 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 1>TikTok any confidence points in the United States. Now, we

0:31:41.680 --> 0:31:44.280
<v Speaker 1>started to see movement in the US as various government

0:31:44.280 --> 0:31:47.880
<v Speaker 1>agencies and college campuses and some other organizations began to

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:51.560
<v Speaker 1>ban TikTok to some extent. So with government agencies, the

0:31:51.640 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 1>usual move was to forbid staff from installing TikTok on

0:31:55.200 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 1>government owned devices, but employees could still have TikTok on

0:31:58.800 --> 0:32:02.360
<v Speaker 1>their personal devices. Personally, I think this is entirely reasonable.

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the same as if you get a

0:32:05.600 --> 0:32:09.560
<v Speaker 1>company issued laptop and they say, hey, don't go installing

0:32:09.640 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Stardu Valley on this thing, because that's not what this

0:32:12.480 --> 0:32:14.960
<v Speaker 1>is for. And I'm like, I think that's totally reasonable.

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:20.360
<v Speaker 1>It's not your computer. It belongs to the corporation or,

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 1>in the case I'm talking about here, to the state

0:32:23.040 --> 0:32:27.480
<v Speaker 1>or federal government, and therefore they do have some authority

0:32:27.560 --> 0:32:29.840
<v Speaker 1>over what should and should not be installed on that

0:32:30.200 --> 0:32:33.520
<v Speaker 1>over at college campuses, the general approach to banning TikTok

0:32:33.680 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 1>was to block TikTok traffic across college servers. So you

0:32:37.240 --> 0:32:41.360
<v Speaker 1>could still access TikTok through cellular data or through some

0:32:41.520 --> 0:32:43.960
<v Speaker 1>other Wi Fi network, You just couldn't do it through

0:32:44.000 --> 0:32:47.440
<v Speaker 1>college operated Wi Fi. So there were, you know, limits

0:32:47.440 --> 0:32:51.760
<v Speaker 1>to these bans. In May twenty twenty three, the state

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 1>of Montana became the first in the United States to

0:32:54.840 --> 0:32:59.120
<v Speaker 1>ban TikTok. The state government argued that TikTok represented a

0:32:59.200 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 1>threat to the private data and security of Montana's citizens,

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:06.160
<v Speaker 1>and that the Chinese government in general was a huge

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 1>threat to national security, and the law stated that app

0:33:09.760 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 1>stores that would continue to offer TikTok to Montana citizens

0:33:13.760 --> 0:33:16.040
<v Speaker 1>could face a fine of up to ten thousand dollars

0:33:16.040 --> 0:33:18.760
<v Speaker 1>per day of violations. The law was due to take

0:33:18.760 --> 0:33:23.040
<v Speaker 1>effect on January one, twenty twenty four. However, in November

0:33:23.160 --> 0:33:27.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty three, a federal judge blocked the law, citing

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:30.080
<v Speaker 1>concerns that Montana could be violating the First Amendment of

0:33:30.120 --> 0:33:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the US Constitution, and the judge argued that it was

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:37.000
<v Speaker 1>not the state of Montana's responsibility to determine matters of

0:33:37.080 --> 0:33:40.440
<v Speaker 1>national security. That is a federal concern, not a state

0:33:40.520 --> 0:33:43.959
<v Speaker 1>level concern, and that further, the move in Montana appeared

0:33:44.000 --> 0:33:48.400
<v Speaker 1>to have a greater connection to xenophobia than a legitimate threat.

0:33:48.480 --> 0:33:52.200
<v Speaker 1>There was no evidence, again shown that TikTok actually did

0:33:52.280 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 1>represent a threat, just this kind of overall vague glegation.

0:33:57.160 --> 0:33:59.680
<v Speaker 1>The First Amendment argument is one that is likely to

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:02.440
<v Speaker 1>come up again, you know, assuming that Biden actually does

0:34:02.480 --> 0:34:05.160
<v Speaker 1>sign this into law, which I believe he will. I mean,

0:34:05.160 --> 0:34:07.720
<v Speaker 1>he said he would as soon as it was announced

0:34:07.720 --> 0:34:09.239
<v Speaker 1>that it had passed the Senate. He said he would

0:34:09.239 --> 0:34:11.319
<v Speaker 1>sign it into law today. So again, by the time

0:34:11.360 --> 0:34:13.880
<v Speaker 1>you hear this, that might already be the case. The

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:18.000
<v Speaker 1>American Civil Liberties Union or ACLU, maintains that a ban

0:34:18.120 --> 0:34:21.480
<v Speaker 1>on TikTok amounts to a violation of the First Amendment.

0:34:21.600 --> 0:34:24.720
<v Speaker 1>So I just can't imagine a world in which TikTok,

0:34:24.719 --> 0:34:26.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of rolls over and says, oh, well,

0:34:26.840 --> 0:34:29.320
<v Speaker 1>we had a good run. That's not going to happen.

0:34:29.400 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously there's going to be a fight on

0:34:31.560 --> 0:34:36.360
<v Speaker 1>this to force further decisions among the judicial branch about

0:34:36.360 --> 0:34:40.880
<v Speaker 1>whether or not this law is constitutional. Anyway, the political

0:34:40.880 --> 0:34:43.279
<v Speaker 1>move to ban TikTok grew in momentum in the back

0:34:43.320 --> 0:34:45.959
<v Speaker 1>half of twenty twenty three and into twenty twenty four.

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:48.960
<v Speaker 1>The House of Representatives passed a bill back in March

0:34:49.280 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 1>that was to force byte Dance to divest itself of

0:34:52.239 --> 0:34:56.040
<v Speaker 1>TikTok the US operations of TikTok within six months or

0:34:56.160 --> 0:34:58.840
<v Speaker 1>face a national ban, which would essentially amount to the

0:34:58.960 --> 0:35:02.280
<v Speaker 1>United States government for seeing app stores and communications networks

0:35:02.280 --> 0:35:04.920
<v Speaker 1>from allowing TikTok traffic in the US kind of a

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 1>grander scale of what we're seeing on college campuses, just

0:35:08.600 --> 0:35:11.920
<v Speaker 1>going across the entire nation. That would not only stop

0:35:12.080 --> 0:35:16.120
<v Speaker 1>new downloads of the app, but also all TikTok transmissions

0:35:16.120 --> 0:35:18.120
<v Speaker 1>in general in the US. Though I suppose you could

0:35:18.160 --> 0:35:21.080
<v Speaker 1>use a VPN and connect to another country, like a

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:23.359
<v Speaker 1>server in another country to get around some of that,

0:35:23.440 --> 0:35:26.439
<v Speaker 1>but it's a bit of a hassle, and I don't

0:35:26.480 --> 0:35:28.960
<v Speaker 1>know what that would do to your recommendation algorithm. Honestly,

0:35:29.000 --> 0:35:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it varies from country to country.

0:35:31.800 --> 0:35:35.800
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, at the time when the House first passed

0:35:35.800 --> 0:35:38.520
<v Speaker 1>this bill, I thought that the US Senate would be

0:35:38.600 --> 0:35:42.800
<v Speaker 1>unlikely to follow suit. The deadline meant that a rapidly

0:35:42.840 --> 0:35:46.040
<v Speaker 1>approaching ban would be really big news at the same

0:35:46.160 --> 0:35:49.480
<v Speaker 1>time as the election cycle, and a TikTok ban is

0:35:49.920 --> 0:35:54.080
<v Speaker 1>really an unpopular move among a significant population of US citizens.

0:35:54.320 --> 0:35:57.439
<v Speaker 1>You know, folks who could potentially vote, assuming that they're

0:35:57.680 --> 0:36:01.360
<v Speaker 1>eighteen or older, or not vote, like just choose not

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:03.520
<v Speaker 1>to vote because they're ticked off. And I think a

0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of senators worried that supporting a bill that would

0:36:07.160 --> 0:36:09.520
<v Speaker 1>be you know, coming into effect right around that time,

0:36:09.520 --> 0:36:13.040
<v Speaker 1>would be political suicide with elections coming up this coming November.

0:36:13.280 --> 0:36:17.520
<v Speaker 1>But then US Senator Maria Cantwell proposed that the House

0:36:17.600 --> 0:36:21.359
<v Speaker 1>amend its approach and extend the deadline to one year

0:36:21.640 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 1>instead of six months. Now. The reason given was that

0:36:24.239 --> 0:36:27.319
<v Speaker 1>one year is a more reasonable timeline for byte Dance

0:36:27.400 --> 0:36:29.560
<v Speaker 1>to secure a buyer for the company, which is true.

0:36:29.600 --> 0:36:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, six months is not much time, but some

0:36:32.200 --> 0:36:35.080
<v Speaker 1>senics were suggesting that another reason for this change would

0:36:35.120 --> 0:36:38.240
<v Speaker 1>be it pushes the effects of the bill out beyond

0:36:38.360 --> 0:36:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the election cycle. Whatever the justification, the US House voted

0:36:42.600 --> 0:36:46.279
<v Speaker 1>to extend that deadline, and then the House lumped the

0:36:46.360 --> 0:36:48.880
<v Speaker 1>TikTok bill in with a bunch of other measures that

0:36:48.960 --> 0:36:52.720
<v Speaker 1>were meant to provide aid to Ukraine and Israel. The

0:36:52.760 --> 0:36:55.920
<v Speaker 1>bundle of bills then passed to the Senate. The Senate

0:36:56.000 --> 0:36:59.280
<v Speaker 1>voted in favor of them, seventy nine in favor, eighteen opposed,

0:36:59.600 --> 0:37:01.719
<v Speaker 1>and by said he would sign the bill into law

0:37:01.760 --> 0:37:05.640
<v Speaker 1>today and the clock started ticking. So some other things

0:37:05.680 --> 0:37:07.960
<v Speaker 1>we do need to consider before we wrap up here.

0:37:08.160 --> 0:37:10.840
<v Speaker 1>While much of the rhetoric around TikTok has centered on

0:37:11.000 --> 0:37:14.719
<v Speaker 1>this threat to national security from an intelligence gathering perspective,

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:17.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, the idea that TikTok could be used to

0:37:17.160 --> 0:37:22.000
<v Speaker 1>spy on America, there's another component that also deserves consideration,

0:37:22.440 --> 0:37:26.920
<v Speaker 1>and that's the foreign control over domestic broadcast operations. So

0:37:26.920 --> 0:37:29.080
<v Speaker 1>if you go all the way back to nineteen thirty four,

0:37:29.160 --> 0:37:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the United States has maintained that it's just not a

0:37:31.680 --> 0:37:35.160
<v Speaker 1>good idea to allow a foreign government or a foreign

0:37:35.200 --> 0:37:41.120
<v Speaker 1>government's representative, like a foreign owned company to have ownership

0:37:41.160 --> 0:37:44.440
<v Speaker 1>of broadcast businesses within the United States. Now, this all

0:37:44.480 --> 0:37:48.080
<v Speaker 1>started with radio licenses. The Communications Act of nineteen thirty four,

0:37:48.200 --> 0:37:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Section three ten A prohibits such a thing with foreign

0:37:52.280 --> 0:37:56.600
<v Speaker 1>governments or its agents and radio licenses. Now, the concern

0:37:56.680 --> 0:38:00.640
<v Speaker 1>is that a foreign controlled communications entity could spread propaganda

0:38:00.680 --> 0:38:04.400
<v Speaker 1>to the US public, potentially threatening national security in the process.

0:38:04.600 --> 0:38:07.920
<v Speaker 1>And so another aspect of this ban on TikTok resides

0:38:08.000 --> 0:38:10.960
<v Speaker 1>in the company's potential role as a means to spread

0:38:11.000 --> 0:38:15.600
<v Speaker 1>messages that benefit China's goals, whether that's to downplay China's

0:38:15.640 --> 0:38:19.799
<v Speaker 1>own involvement in international affairs or to promote certain narratives

0:38:19.800 --> 0:38:23.360
<v Speaker 1>that align with China's own strategies. It can include disrupting

0:38:23.560 --> 0:38:26.800
<v Speaker 1>US elections by attempting to either push people to support

0:38:26.840 --> 0:38:29.720
<v Speaker 1>specific people whom China has deemed as being of greater

0:38:29.800 --> 0:38:33.560
<v Speaker 1>benefit to China itself, or just discouraging people from participating

0:38:33.560 --> 0:38:37.040
<v Speaker 1>in the democratic process at all. It could include shaping

0:38:37.040 --> 0:38:41.279
<v Speaker 1>public opinion on matters ranging from trade to international conflicts,

0:38:41.480 --> 0:38:45.240
<v Speaker 1>including stuff that's going on right now, like between Israel

0:38:45.640 --> 0:38:49.400
<v Speaker 1>and Palestine. And you know, I'm sure a lot of

0:38:49.440 --> 0:38:52.520
<v Speaker 1>y'all out there are aware that China is very much

0:38:52.600 --> 0:38:55.080
<v Speaker 1>using social platforms to do this kind of thing, like

0:38:55.120 --> 0:38:58.080
<v Speaker 1>that's not under dispute. It is happening. But here's the deal.

0:38:58.480 --> 0:39:01.840
<v Speaker 1>China's doing this on platform that include ones that China

0:39:01.960 --> 0:39:05.160
<v Speaker 1>does not have any control over. Agents working on behalf

0:39:05.200 --> 0:39:08.480
<v Speaker 1>of China, either with or without the nation's direct support,

0:39:08.800 --> 0:39:12.359
<v Speaker 1>have used platforms like x formerly known as Twitter, as

0:39:12.400 --> 0:39:16.000
<v Speaker 1>well as Facebook and YouTube and others to spread this

0:39:16.160 --> 0:39:19.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of messaging. And China does not have ownership in

0:39:19.280 --> 0:39:23.880
<v Speaker 1>these companies, but they're still leveraging them to achieve that goal.

0:39:24.080 --> 0:39:27.120
<v Speaker 1>So one could argue that whether China has a stake

0:39:27.160 --> 0:39:31.240
<v Speaker 1>in TikTok or not ultimately is immaterial because the problem

0:39:31.320 --> 0:39:35.480
<v Speaker 1>exists either way, and that problem is much larger than

0:39:35.520 --> 0:39:38.879
<v Speaker 1>who ultimately owns TikTok, which brings us to the whole

0:39:38.880 --> 0:39:42.280
<v Speaker 1>issue of the US's overall terrible lack of data protection

0:39:42.440 --> 0:39:45.720
<v Speaker 1>and privacy laws. But that's a matter for another episode. However,

0:39:46.120 --> 0:39:49.000
<v Speaker 1>we do have to acknowledge that there has been evidence

0:39:49.040 --> 0:39:52.960
<v Speaker 1>of China interfering with how TikTok promotes and shares videos

0:39:53.000 --> 0:39:56.920
<v Speaker 1>relating to sensitive topics in China. Late last year, the

0:39:56.960 --> 0:40:01.359
<v Speaker 1>Network Contagion Research Institute published to report that claimed that

0:40:01.440 --> 0:40:06.640
<v Speaker 1>they analyzed hashtag ratios on TikTok quote across topics sensitive

0:40:06.680 --> 0:40:09.560
<v Speaker 1>to the Chinese government end quote and compare them with

0:40:10.160 --> 0:40:13.560
<v Speaker 1>ones from other social platforms, and they said that they

0:40:13.600 --> 0:40:19.359
<v Speaker 1>found anomalies that could mean quote TikTok systematically promotes or

0:40:19.440 --> 0:40:22.840
<v Speaker 1>demotes content on the basis of whether it is aligned

0:40:22.880 --> 0:40:26.440
<v Speaker 1>with or opposed to the interests of the Chinese government

0:40:26.719 --> 0:40:30.560
<v Speaker 1>end quote. So according to this research, it is possible

0:40:30.719 --> 0:40:33.719
<v Speaker 1>that TikTok is a more active tool for China to

0:40:33.800 --> 0:40:38.840
<v Speaker 1>spread messaging internationally or to suppress messages that it deems sensitive.

0:40:39.080 --> 0:40:42.120
<v Speaker 1>And while China can leverage other platforms to try and

0:40:42.200 --> 0:40:45.759
<v Speaker 1>spread messages, it doesn't have that level of control on

0:40:46.160 --> 0:40:49.960
<v Speaker 1>other platforms beyond TikTok. So you could say that in

0:40:49.960 --> 0:40:55.840
<v Speaker 1>that regard specifically, this is a very China centered problem.

0:40:56.080 --> 0:40:58.359
<v Speaker 1>Now we have to go back to jeff yas So

0:40:58.600 --> 0:41:01.040
<v Speaker 1>back in twenty twenty, Donald's Trump calls for a ban

0:41:01.160 --> 0:41:04.000
<v Speaker 1>on TikTok, and his reasons for doing so are at

0:41:04.120 --> 0:41:06.880
<v Speaker 1>best muddled, But he's really firm on the fact that

0:41:06.920 --> 0:41:10.319
<v Speaker 1>he is gosh darn it gunna ban TikTok. But the

0:41:10.360 --> 0:41:13.200
<v Speaker 1>band gets postponed due to legal challenges, and Trump gets

0:41:13.280 --> 0:41:16.719
<v Speaker 1>voted out and the matter kind of fizzles. Now, as

0:41:16.760 --> 0:41:20.120
<v Speaker 1>we have this new ban that's one backed by Congress

0:41:20.120 --> 0:41:23.439
<v Speaker 1>and two supported by Joe Biden, Trump has spoken out

0:41:23.840 --> 0:41:27.640
<v Speaker 1>against the ban. So why does he oppose a ban

0:41:27.760 --> 0:41:30.800
<v Speaker 1>now when he was calling for one four years ago. Well,

0:41:30.840 --> 0:41:33.479
<v Speaker 1>his reasons for opposing the ban are I would argue,

0:41:33.719 --> 0:41:36.640
<v Speaker 1>equally as muddled as his reasons calling for one in

0:41:36.680 --> 0:41:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the first place. Generally, he seems to say we shouldn't

0:41:39.920 --> 0:41:42.520
<v Speaker 1>ban TikTok because a lot of people happen to like it.

0:41:42.840 --> 0:41:44.840
<v Speaker 1>And I mean that's true, there are a lot of

0:41:44.840 --> 0:41:47.399
<v Speaker 1>people who like TikTok, But I don't know that that's

0:41:47.640 --> 0:41:51.160
<v Speaker 1>the argument you make to oppose a ban, but it's

0:41:51.200 --> 0:41:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the one that he offered. Now he has associated this

0:41:54.280 --> 0:41:56.920
<v Speaker 1>ban with Joe Biden. Like he's not so much saying

0:41:57.400 --> 0:41:59.960
<v Speaker 1>why he thinks the band's a bad idea, he's more

0:42:00.000 --> 0:42:04.280
<v Speaker 1>we are concentrating on saying Biden is the one banning TikTok.

0:42:04.680 --> 0:42:06.920
<v Speaker 1>So really it seems to be a political maneuver. You know,

0:42:06.960 --> 0:42:10.080
<v Speaker 1>TikTok is popular with a lot of people. Biden supports

0:42:10.080 --> 0:42:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the legislation calling for the ban. So Trump wants to

0:42:12.680 --> 0:42:15.359
<v Speaker 1>win the election in November, so you make sure your

0:42:15.440 --> 0:42:19.560
<v Speaker 1>opponent is associated with a really unpopular bill. Never mind

0:42:20.200 --> 0:42:23.200
<v Speaker 1>if you yourself initially called for the very same thing

0:42:23.280 --> 0:42:26.759
<v Speaker 1>four years ago and did so by executive order. But

0:42:26.880 --> 0:42:30.040
<v Speaker 1>another potential reason for Trump's change of heart goes back

0:42:30.080 --> 0:42:33.280
<v Speaker 1>to Jeff Yas. So Jeff Yas is a mega donor

0:42:33.400 --> 0:42:36.840
<v Speaker 1>to conservative campaigns. In fact, he's like the biggest donor

0:42:36.960 --> 0:42:41.120
<v Speaker 1>to GOP campaigns in the United States, and he met

0:42:41.160 --> 0:42:44.960
<v Speaker 1>with Trump back in March of this year. So the

0:42:45.000 --> 0:42:48.960
<v Speaker 1>two people meet, the biggest donor to conservative campaigns in

0:42:49.000 --> 0:42:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the United States and the presidential nominee for the GOP.

0:42:52.920 --> 0:42:57.359
<v Speaker 1>At this point, Trump's tune regarding TikTok changes. Now. I'm

0:42:57.400 --> 0:43:00.799
<v Speaker 1>not saying Trump changed his approach simply cause a guy

0:43:00.920 --> 0:43:05.240
<v Speaker 1>with exceedingly deep pockets, a guy whose wealth is heavily

0:43:05.280 --> 0:43:09.440
<v Speaker 1>dependent upon byte dance, and by extension, TikTok told Trump

0:43:09.600 --> 0:43:12.400
<v Speaker 1>that Trump needs to oppose the ban if he wants

0:43:12.520 --> 0:43:15.319
<v Speaker 1>access to some of that sweet, sweet money. I'm not

0:43:15.480 --> 0:43:18.680
<v Speaker 1>saying that happened. I'm just saying I wouldn't be at

0:43:18.680 --> 0:43:22.240
<v Speaker 1>all surprised if this is a big part of it. Trump,

0:43:22.280 --> 0:43:25.640
<v Speaker 1>as you might know, definitely needs the cash because it

0:43:25.719 --> 0:43:28.719
<v Speaker 1>is way easier to spend other people's money when you

0:43:28.800 --> 0:43:31.560
<v Speaker 1>owe courts hundreds of millions of dollars than it is

0:43:31.600 --> 0:43:34.680
<v Speaker 1>to spend your own money. But yeah, it seems that

0:43:34.760 --> 0:43:37.960
<v Speaker 1>a conservative billionaire who has most of his wealth tied

0:43:38.040 --> 0:43:41.080
<v Speaker 1>up with a Chinese company is spending a lot of time, effort,

0:43:41.160 --> 0:43:44.680
<v Speaker 1>and yes, money to fight off a threat to his fortune,

0:43:45.000 --> 0:43:48.200
<v Speaker 1>and that the beneficiaries of his donations are eager to

0:43:48.239 --> 0:43:51.040
<v Speaker 1>play a part in that. So it all comes down

0:43:51.080 --> 0:43:54.120
<v Speaker 1>to money, and that's kind of where we're at now.

0:43:54.200 --> 0:43:56.279
<v Speaker 1>You might wonder what's my opinion on the whole thing,

0:43:56.360 --> 0:43:59.080
<v Speaker 1>in case it's not obvious, Well, I don't like TikTok,

0:43:59.400 --> 0:44:03.080
<v Speaker 1>but I also so don't necessarily think TikTok represents the

0:44:03.160 --> 0:44:07.719
<v Speaker 1>really huge problem that other people do or rather to clarify,

0:44:08.160 --> 0:44:11.879
<v Speaker 1>I think TikTok is a problem, but it's a subset.

0:44:12.000 --> 0:44:15.680
<v Speaker 1>It's a smaller problem in a much much larger bubble

0:44:16.000 --> 0:44:19.600
<v Speaker 1>that so far has gone largely unaddressed in the United States.

0:44:19.640 --> 0:44:22.480
<v Speaker 1>That unless leaders take a look at the bigger picture

0:44:22.560 --> 0:44:26.200
<v Speaker 1>of data privacy and security and they make some real changes.

0:44:26.480 --> 0:44:30.960
<v Speaker 1>TikTok's ownership or even TikTok's existence is kind of not important,

0:44:31.000 --> 0:44:33.840
<v Speaker 1>at least not from a national security level, because I

0:44:33.880 --> 0:44:37.319
<v Speaker 1>don't really think there's much that TikTok could do that

0:44:37.440 --> 0:44:42.319
<v Speaker 1>other platforms aren't already doing as well, like American platforms,

0:44:42.480 --> 0:44:45.839
<v Speaker 1>and I mean even like American platforms doing things that

0:44:46.000 --> 0:44:50.600
<v Speaker 1>benefit China. So whether that's gathering bookoos of information on

0:44:50.719 --> 0:44:53.960
<v Speaker 1>every single user, as well as people those users interact with,

0:44:54.040 --> 0:44:57.040
<v Speaker 1>whether they're on the platform or not, to the spread

0:44:57.080 --> 0:45:00.680
<v Speaker 1>of propaganda and misinformation, into designing ways to ca attention

0:45:00.840 --> 0:45:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and to hold it potentially to the detriment of users

0:45:03.719 --> 0:45:06.480
<v Speaker 1>and society in general. All that is happening whether you

0:45:06.680 --> 0:45:10.040
<v Speaker 1>snuff out TikTok or you allow it to continue. So

0:45:10.520 --> 0:45:13.279
<v Speaker 1>killing TikTok doesn't fix the problem. It's like putting a

0:45:13.320 --> 0:45:17.080
<v Speaker 1>little band aid on a big, old, gaping wound. Now.

0:45:17.320 --> 0:45:19.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm also not a big fan of the politics around this.

0:45:19.760 --> 0:45:22.040
<v Speaker 1>That might surprise you considering how much time I spent

0:45:22.120 --> 0:45:24.719
<v Speaker 1>on it, but I'm not. I find the whole politics

0:45:24.719 --> 0:45:28.760
<v Speaker 1>thing incredibly distracting because to me, it feels like theater.

0:45:29.080 --> 0:45:31.360
<v Speaker 1>It feels like it's a show that's being put on

0:45:31.560 --> 0:45:34.839
<v Speaker 1>and it's focusing on an easy target. Also, a lot

0:45:34.880 --> 0:45:39.680
<v Speaker 1>of the rhetoric around this starts to feel really xenophobic, Like,

0:45:40.040 --> 0:45:43.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, there are legitimate reasons to worry about China's influence.

0:45:44.080 --> 0:45:47.120
<v Speaker 1>There's no denying that there are good reasons to worry

0:45:47.160 --> 0:45:50.080
<v Speaker 1>about that. However, a lot of the messaging, a lot

0:45:50.120 --> 0:45:53.640
<v Speaker 1>of the speeches, a lot of the conversations that we've seen,

0:45:53.719 --> 0:45:57.560
<v Speaker 1>like the interrogations in Congress when you've got TikTok's CEO

0:45:57.680 --> 0:46:02.280
<v Speaker 1>up there, they come across less about legitimate concerns about

0:46:02.320 --> 0:46:06.759
<v Speaker 1>China and more, you know, kind of racist, and you

0:46:06.800 --> 0:46:10.319
<v Speaker 1>know there's there's obviously fuzzy ground here. Like again, there

0:46:10.320 --> 0:46:14.760
<v Speaker 1>are legitimate concerns, but the way they're being communicated doesn't

0:46:14.760 --> 0:46:17.200
<v Speaker 1>come across as sincere. And then you start to worry

0:46:17.200 --> 0:46:20.800
<v Speaker 1>that this is like watching a pro wrestling show where

0:46:21.080 --> 0:46:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the face is getting the crowd to chant usa usa

0:46:24.920 --> 0:46:30.000
<v Speaker 1>usa against a foreign character. Heel. It's not a good look.

0:46:30.280 --> 0:46:32.399
<v Speaker 1>So again, the whole thing is a mess, and it's

0:46:32.400 --> 0:46:34.719
<v Speaker 1>not ending here. We've got the legal challenges to look

0:46:34.760 --> 0:46:37.680
<v Speaker 1>forward to, so to speak, and the outcome from that

0:46:37.960 --> 0:46:40.920
<v Speaker 1>is far from certain, so I'm sure we will revisit

0:46:41.000 --> 0:46:45.080
<v Speaker 1>this to find out. You know, will the US ban TikTok,

0:46:45.120 --> 0:46:47.760
<v Speaker 1>will TikTok be forced to be spun off and sold

0:46:47.800 --> 0:46:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to American company, or will the whole thing get dismissed

0:46:51.040 --> 0:46:54.840
<v Speaker 1>on constitutional grounds, or will something else entirely happen. I

0:46:54.880 --> 0:46:56.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I'm not going to make any predictions at

0:46:56.960 --> 0:46:59.080
<v Speaker 1>this point because the last one I made was that

0:46:59.080 --> 0:47:01.239
<v Speaker 1>the Senate was not to support this, and I was

0:47:01.320 --> 0:47:04.759
<v Speaker 1>totals wrong about that. So we're dropping it off here.

0:47:05.040 --> 0:47:07.040
<v Speaker 1>But I wanted to give the update and give the

0:47:07.080 --> 0:47:09.359
<v Speaker 1>context and the understanding of all the things that are

0:47:09.360 --> 0:47:12.440
<v Speaker 1>going on, because it is a complicated subject. I hope

0:47:12.719 --> 0:47:15.200
<v Speaker 1>all of you out there are well. I hope you

0:47:15.239 --> 0:47:18.920
<v Speaker 1>are staying sane in this crazy world of ours, and

0:47:18.960 --> 0:47:28.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll talk to you again really soon. Tech Stuff is

0:47:28.480 --> 0:47:33.000
<v Speaker 1>an iHeartRadio production. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the

0:47:33.080 --> 0:47:36.680
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

0:47:36.719 --> 0:47:37.440
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows.