Speaker 1: Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio, the George
Speaker 1: Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong, Joe Getty arm Strong and
Speaker 1: Jack Kietie and he Armstrong and Jetty.
Speaker 2: We have dealt with it such that to your point,
Speaker 2: we now as of today, as of our visit, have
Speaker 2: lower undocumented immigrants and illegal immigration than Trump when he
Speaker 2: left office. That's true, but we need a permanent solution.
Speaker 2: And now she had done that bipartisan mor.
Speaker 3: Do you wish you'd done those executive orders in twenty
Speaker 3: twenty two, twenty twenty three.
Speaker 1: I think we did the right thing.
Speaker 4: Oh that was on some of these I think we
Speaker 4: do need the question to make for them to make sense.
Speaker 4: That was to the question of you know, you've been
Speaker 4: there for four years, why didn't you do this stuff?
Speaker 3: But one of the well and did you hear right
Speaker 3: in the middle did you hear it, Jack or did
Speaker 3: you miss it? She said, we need a final solution. Now,
Speaker 3: who's hitler? I mean, the coverage on the lefty media
Speaker 3: is that's stupid.
Speaker 4: Why don't we do it? That's a one hundred percent fair.
Speaker 4: But so this one is getting a lot of attention.
Speaker 4: This is from the CNN Towne Hall last night. That
Speaker 4: didn't make much news. I didn't watch all of it,
Speaker 4: and I didn't watch the analysis afterwards. But David axelrod Old,
Speaker 4: campaign guy from Obama's orbit, is on the panel all
Speaker 4: the time at CNN, and he two quotes from him.
Speaker 4: When she doesn't want to answer a question, she goes
Speaker 4: to word salad city that we all know that that's
Speaker 4: absolutely true. Good for him for pointing it out. And
Speaker 4: you do not want to relate to the people in
Speaker 4: front of you. She didn't do a lot of that.
Speaker 4: You do want to relate to the people in front
Speaker 4: of you, She didn't do a lot of that. So
Speaker 4: I don't know if anything moves the neatle at this point.
Speaker 4: But anyway, here's this one's getting some attention.
Speaker 2: So I take my role and responsibility as an elected
Speaker 2: leader very soon.
Speaker 1: Okay, we need the question. Can you back it up with?
Speaker 3: Yeah?
Speaker 1: I know, I'm a big fan of having the question.
Speaker 1: We don't have any idea what she's talking about. Which
Speaker 1: clip is that? Michael, that's forty two two?
Speaker 3: Can I find my sheet that's all coming apart on
Speaker 3: the sheet?
Speaker 1: What it is?
Speaker 4: Does anybody have that?
Speaker 1: Yeah? Yeah? Does it say?
Speaker 3: I take my role seriously. I may not the quick
Speaker 3: answer or want to research it.
Speaker 1: So it was, yeah, it was about about that.
Speaker 4: It was the question was on the topic of and
Speaker 4: that she's been digging for this a lot of If
Speaker 4: you could ask about policies a lot and you don't
Speaker 4: have any policy answer, how come you don't have answers
Speaker 4: to a lot of these quest questions for little Andy Cooper.
Speaker 2: So I take my role and responsibility as an elected
Speaker 2: leader very seriously, and I know the impact it has
Speaker 2: on so many people I may never meet, and that
Speaker 2: is why I engage and bring folks around. So I
Speaker 2: may not be quick to have the answer as soon
Speaker 2: as you ask it about a specific policy issue sometimes
Speaker 2: because I'm going to want to research it. I'm going
Speaker 2: to want to study it. I'm kind of a nerd sometimes,
Speaker 2: I confess, And some might call that a weakness, especially
Speaker 2: if you're you know, in an interview or just kind
Speaker 2: of you know, being asked a certain question and just
Speaker 2: expect to have the right answer right away. But that's
Speaker 2: how I that's how I work.
Speaker 1: How about that? That's astounding.
Speaker 4: I know, with twelve days to go before the presidential election.
Speaker 1: At this point in her career at this point in
Speaker 1: her career, when you're asked you know and we're not.
Speaker 4: It's not like remember when they did the gotch you
Speaker 4: question with Bush way back in the day, is like,
Speaker 4: who's the president of some African country you've never heard of?
Speaker 1: And rush that I don't know to you? I mean,
Speaker 1: and I was like, oh, we didn't know.
Speaker 4: No on questions like what's your economic policy or what
Speaker 4: should we do about the border, and she has no answer,
Speaker 4: and and so she's.
Speaker 1: Saying, hey, I'm not I don't. I don't, I don't.
Speaker 1: I don't just jump into an answer right away. I
Speaker 1: need to study it. I'm a nerd that way, you know.
Speaker 4: I'm not the kind of person that might have an
Speaker 4: answer just strike off the top of their head. Are
Speaker 4: you kidding me? Are you kidding? That's unbelievable? Or they
Speaker 4: you know, what would you do differently than Biden? Who
Speaker 4: is She was asking that last night and still has
Speaker 4: no answer.
Speaker 3: Yeah, you're not applying for medical school, You're applying to
Speaker 3: be chief surgeon of the United States of America. So
Speaker 3: standing there in the operating room and the nurses are
Speaker 3: saying what should we do? Doctor, and saying, I don't
Speaker 3: rush into medical procedures. I'm kind of a nerd. I
Speaker 3: need to study them. There's so many veins, there are
Speaker 3: these arteries. I'm kind of a nerd that way. No, No,
Speaker 3: this is this is not school. This is the head job.
Speaker 3: That's pathetic.
Speaker 1: I think she's she's nervous.
Speaker 5: A while back, I had speculated that the last was
Speaker 5: out of nervousness because she had kind of curbed it
Speaker 5: for a while there. She laughed at the end of
Speaker 5: that clip when she called herself a nerd.
Speaker 4: I think you're right, because I've known people like that.
Speaker 4: That's their go to is to laugh when they don't
Speaker 4: know what else to do. And it's kind of weird
Speaker 4: until you get to figure out that that's what they're doing.
Speaker 3: Why the hard hitting brute Anderson cooper with a when
Speaker 3: you get asked about policy, you just don't have any.
Speaker 1: Well, I'm kind of a nerner Wow.
Speaker 4: Yeah, And again, we've never been big fans of the
Speaker 4: you know, debates where they make it like jeopardy and
Speaker 4: you have to know what percentage of this or that
Speaker 4: happened or whatever not that. But you're running for president
Speaker 4: and so you need to have an overall foreign policy,
Speaker 4: economic policy, all that sort of stuff, and she never
Speaker 4: answers any of those questions, and so she's saying, well,
Speaker 4: I don't just you know, throw an answer off the
Speaker 4: top of my head.
Speaker 1: I need to study these things, and yeah, that's what
Speaker 1: you were supposed to do.
Speaker 3: Like weeks ago, months ago. What are your underlying principles
Speaker 3: even do you have any of those? My principles haven't changed.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's there.
Speaker 3: You change your policies one hundred and eighty degrees? What
Speaker 3: does that even mean?
Speaker 4: Yeah, I haven't changed my values. Was the answer to
Speaker 4: the do you believe in are you four fracking or not?
Speaker 4: And that still hasn't really been nailed down.
Speaker 1: Isn't that wild?
Speaker 6: Though?
Speaker 1: I can't believethet so the answer this has got to
Speaker 1: be the final You've been saying this for a long time,
Speaker 1: but this has got to be the final judgment on this.
Speaker 1: The reason she's not doing more stuff is she can't,
Speaker 1: and her handlers know it, and everyone knows it, and
Speaker 1: everyone knows it, and they're only putting her out there
Speaker 1: now because they're losing. And I got to do something.
Speaker 3: I read a mildly interesting piece by Karl Rove before
Speaker 3: the show today where he was going through a variety
Speaker 3: of if Trump loses, it'll be because blank. If Kamaler loses,
Speaker 3: it'll be because of blank, and then he lists several
Speaker 3: different reasons. It was decent enough analysis, but I honestly
Speaker 3: think the number one reason, and this heartens me slightly
Speaker 3: about the American voter. If Kamala Harris loses, the number
Speaker 3: one reason will be because she gave no reason, no
Speaker 3: cause to vote for her.
Speaker 1: All she had was I'm not Trump. Yeah.
Speaker 4: I think admittedly is not nothing, but that's not enough. Yeah,
Speaker 4: I think she has I think they have gone with
Speaker 4: the Trump is so awful just to I think the
Speaker 4: idea is a generic Democrat would be Trump, which all
Speaker 4: Poles showed, and she was trying to be a generic Democrat.
Speaker 4: But maybe being a generic doesn't work. You gotta be
Speaker 4: some generic Democrat.
Speaker 3: But then there's Cipher, there's puppet, there's Manchurian candidate, there's
Speaker 3: empty vessel, and she's come off as the emptiest of vessels.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 4: I thought that was the most shocking answer of the night.
Speaker 4: The Well, the reason I don't have answers is I
Speaker 4: need to study it.
Speaker 1: I'm we're twelve days out at this point.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's shocked. This is the worst election in American history.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I think that's absolutely true. I don't know.
Speaker 3: Well, some claim this is the most election of our lifetimes.
Speaker 2: This is the most election of our lifetime.
Speaker 3: This is the most discouraging, humiliating, disconcerting, discouraging, disorienting, depressing.
Speaker 1: Did I say depressing? Might have?
Speaker 3: Well, if I did, it's double depressing election that will
Speaker 3: ever occur or certainly has.
Speaker 1: Anyway, what are you gonna do? What are you gonna do?
Speaker 3: You're gonna You're gonna sit there weeping bitter tears with
Speaker 3: not running down your nose at the cards you've been dealt?
Speaker 3: Or are you gonna play the best you can and
Speaker 3: then move on? I'm I'm for a choice number two. Okay,
Speaker 3: all right, white peers not on your sleeve, you know
Speaker 3: the rest of you.
Speaker 4: I like when you roll around in despair for a
Speaker 4: while and then you go with the pell yourself up
Speaker 4: by your boot scratch. And if people aren't, you know,
Speaker 4: ready to quick which from despair to optimism as you are,
Speaker 4: there's something wrong with you. There's not running down your face, right,
Speaker 4: there's fineless conards.
Speaker 1: You were in to spare five minutes ago. Then you
Speaker 1: turned it around with me. Oh did you hear this?
Speaker 3: Speaking of just sad, the Biden administration has just announced
Speaker 3: another round of loan forgiveness, a student loan forgiveness for
Speaker 3: public sector workers, folks, can you think of a synonym
Speaker 3: for public sector workers? That's right, government employees. The most
Speaker 3: important constituency voting for the government is the government at
Speaker 3: this point.
Speaker 1: This is the nightmare scenario that.
Speaker 3: Kept Washington and Madison.
Speaker 1: Jefferson up at night. Well, we'll see if it works
Speaker 1: or not. Oh, I got an idea.
Speaker 4: I am going to go get go to the mall
Speaker 4: to day and get a Dodger's hat. I keep saying,
Speaker 4: I gotta get it done because the World Series starts
Speaker 4: on Friday.
Speaker 1: Right, I'm gonna bet heavily, heavily on the Yankees' a
Speaker 1: binary choice. It's just like the presidential election.
Speaker 4: You're either gonna be for the Yankees or the Dodgers,
Speaker 4: or are you gonna opt out like a coward.
Speaker 1: You gotta choose one. I'm going Dodgers.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I'm going to cast my rooting for the Kansas
Speaker 3: City Royals as a protest route. Oh, I see, like
Speaker 3: the Little Royals, the Libertarian Royals candidate exactly, it's gonna
Speaker 3: be odd, you know, and gatherings watching the World Series.
Speaker 3: Funny how, somehow I got on a thing of it
Speaker 3: explaining who RFK Junior is to my kids last night
Speaker 3: and got to recount the bear in the park and
Speaker 3: the cutting the head off the whale and putting it
Speaker 3: on the van a different things.
Speaker 1: Uh is Trump going to actually make him the surgeon general?
Speaker 3: I thought he was a sort of weird made up
Speaker 3: office of healthy eating.
Speaker 1: That would be fine as long as he's mostly ignored.
Speaker 3: I don't know if he like helps us understand all
Speaker 3: the sugar that Americans fine, that's fine, refined carbs and
Speaker 3: stuff like that, that would be good. Yeah, the federal
Speaker 3: government ought to have no role in that, but you know,
Speaker 3: here we are.
Speaker 1: That that do you like? Like?
Speaker 4: Like Trump said the other night at the Al Smith dinner,
Speaker 4: he's got some good ideas. He's also got some really
Speaker 4: wacky ideas. So, uh, maybe we'll listen to a par
Speaker 4: a while fair enough? Yeah, what what do you have
Speaker 4: to tease tease something?
Speaker 3: Uh?
Speaker 1: You what am I years? You're dancing monkey? Uh? Well?
Speaker 3: An example of presentism at allegedly the top university in
Speaker 3: the country, the new one that is just absolutely idiotic.
Speaker 1: The educated idiots.
Speaker 3: Also Hesbola down but not out hitting back against Israel.
Speaker 3: Are you gonna tell us about that dude who is
Speaker 3: trying to qualify for the LPGA, the Ladies Professional Golf Tournament.
Speaker 3: That's a great idea in just a few minutes. A
Speaker 3: gender bending madness update that is astounding.
Speaker 1: That is part of it.
Speaker 3: The other part of it is giant ten million dollars
Speaker 3: study paid for by your tax dollars about whether the
Speaker 3: hormone treatments for confused adolescents help them or hurt them. Well,
Speaker 3: the powers that be did not like the results of
Speaker 3: that study, so they're just kind of trying to cover
Speaker 3: it up.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I hadn't heard this golfer version of this story.
Speaker 4: That's something we got all on the way. Stay here, Armstrong, Hey.
Speaker 7: Denny Denny's And now is that they're closing one hundred
Speaker 7: and fifty locations and no longer requiring all the restaurants
Speaker 7: to be open. Twenty four to seven customers heard and like, well,
Speaker 7: I guess I'll be taking my parking lot and murders elsewhere.
Speaker 4: Good day to you, sir, how about the growl of
Speaker 4: the audience. A lot of Denny's won't be open twenty
Speaker 4: four hours anymore.
Speaker 1: Oh, where are you going to Denny's at three in
Speaker 1: the morning? Really? Why do you? Oh, I'll tell you what.
Speaker 1: Late a late late night Denny's.
Speaker 3: Ron.
Speaker 1: Oh, that's a good time, though. I love being at
Speaker 1: those kind of diners late at night after a big night.
Speaker 1: That's fun time.
Speaker 3: Any laughs, many laughs were had, many ill advised calories
Speaker 3: taken in.
Speaker 4: Oh yeah, good times. So we're we're in the last
Speaker 4: twelve days of the election. Things have gotten ugly and
Speaker 4: they're only going to get uglier, according to everybody who's
Speaker 4: paying attention, and so had a twenty four hour news
Speaker 4: cycle of Trump's a deranged fascist.
Speaker 1: We got more on that coming up later. This just out.
Speaker 4: Second gentleman Doug m Hoff's ex speaks out about the
Speaker 4: alleged twenty twenty twelve assault at the conn Film Festival.
Speaker 4: Now this story dropped what a couple weeks ago, But
Speaker 4: now she's speaking out and there's an interview with her,
Speaker 4: and she's on the record out there saying she was
Speaker 4: embarrassed and humiliating when he slapped her. So hard, she
Speaker 4: spun around, blah blah blah. So they're gonna say some
Speaker 4: whoever is pushing this story, which I don't. I don't
Speaker 4: know if I believe it doubted or not. I haven't
Speaker 4: really taken a position, but whoever's behind it, they're trying
Speaker 4: to get another wave of it going here in the
Speaker 4: final days, it would look like. You know, what makes
Speaker 4: me think it's probably legit is well the facts, you know,
Speaker 4: heavy drinking late at night, but also the fact that
Speaker 4: there's absolutely no tie into Kamala Harris. So as an
Speaker 4: October surprise, it's kind of a weird one.
Speaker 1: That's a's an excellent question right there.
Speaker 4: If you were certain that he had slapped her and
Speaker 4: spun her around, would it make a difference on voting
Speaker 4: for Kamlos. I guess you'd expect her to say something
Speaker 4: about it and see how she handles it.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, it's not like completely without significance or troubling aspect,
Speaker 3: but it's it's not very closely tied.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 4: It's interesting just from a human standpoint, it's quite possible.
Speaker 4: I don't know what happened, but just throw this out
Speaker 4: as a for instance, maybe he did that he's as
Speaker 4: horrified as anybody that he did that. He's never done
Speaker 4: anything like that since then, and Kamala Harris has never
Speaker 4: seen that side of him. This might be as shocking
Speaker 4: to her as anyone.
Speaker 1: Those things are possible. Yeah, she could be like, what
Speaker 1: you did?
Speaker 3: What?
Speaker 1: When?
Speaker 5: How?
Speaker 3: On the other hand, I think it was bright part
Speaker 3: that ran down the list of all the women who were.
Speaker 1: Howling.
Speaker 3: Believe all women at us just a couple of years
Speaker 3: ago who now are.
Speaker 1: Like nothing to see here, folks. Let's keep moving so
Speaker 1: often visually.
Speaker 3: Always when people are shouting about their principles, they don't
Speaker 3: have those principles. They're pretending to have those principles because
Speaker 3: it gets them what they're looking for.
Speaker 1: At that moment.
Speaker 3: You find somebody who has actual principles, hang with them.
Speaker 3: They're a rare bird. Indeed, you're absolutely right, they're for
Speaker 3: a cup of coffee.
Speaker 4: If you were out having drinks with a co worker
Speaker 4: and ask her on a date your career was.
Speaker 1: Over, you're some sort of monster.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and now this, but now, if you're a Democrat,
Speaker 3: you can slap a woman hard in the face as
Speaker 3: long as you're a Democrat.
Speaker 1: We just yeah, there are other issues to discussion.
Speaker 4: I do remember Halpern saying several weeks back that there
Speaker 4: are more dug Amma Hofs store shoes that could drop
Speaker 4: true or not, that are bubbling around.
Speaker 1: Out there, and maybe.
Speaker 4: That seems like a bad October surprise going after the
Speaker 4: VP's husband.
Speaker 1: What.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's part of the reason I think it's probably
Speaker 3: semi or legit. I think it's probably legit. I'm not
Speaker 3: sure it has any significance. You know, I was talking
Speaker 3: about various scenarios where a person did something loathsome or
Speaker 3: said something loathsome, but their policies in this dangerous twenty
Speaker 3: first centrally century world were so clearly better than the
Speaker 3: other person's. You know, given the stakes, you've got to
Speaker 3: vote for the good policies, even if you have to
Speaker 3: hold your nose. And if I thought Kamala Harris's policies
Speaker 3: were good, I would not let Doug M Hoff's alleged
Speaker 3: slappings affect my vote one iota.
Speaker 1: Honestly, but probably shouldn't.
Speaker 3: I think her policies are loathsome, incidentally are conveniently enough,
Speaker 3: and I'm anti slapping women under any circumstances.
Speaker 4: So we've done swimming women's volleyball. Now we're getting into
Speaker 4: golf with the transitor bending madness update. The golf is
Speaker 4: not the important part, damn it.
Speaker 1: Say what.
Speaker 4: The Wall Street Journal pull out today registered voters. Trump's
Speaker 4: leading forty seven five nationally.
Speaker 1: If he's up two points among registered vote if he's
Speaker 1: actually up to he wins in a landslide. Correct. We'll
Speaker 1: see you're not familiar with this.
Speaker 3: Because the two giant coastal states and some of the
Speaker 3: smaller ones will vote so overwhelmingly Democrat that gives kind
Speaker 3: of an artificial lead. And if they don't have that lead,
Speaker 3: then forget it. Yeah, amazing gender bending madness update here friends,
Speaker 3: an important one.
Speaker 1: This one is of great evigance.
Speaker 3: You may recall us talking about the Cash Report for
Speaker 3: Great Britain, in which a long, detailed, extremely thorough look
Speaker 3: into all of the data that's available and all of
Speaker 3: the practices of the sex change crazed, incredibly irresponsible medical establishment.
Speaker 3: None of it could be substantiated by standard scientific methods
Speaker 3: in terms of outcomes and well outcomes. That's the key thing.
Speaker 3: None of it is scientifically supportable. It is ideology and
Speaker 3: profit preying on poor, confused kids.
Speaker 4: I don't want to derail this, like I regularly do things.
Speaker 4: But does anybody know what the ground zero is on this?
Speaker 4: What launched this whole Thing's patient? I mean, is there
Speaker 4: a person or a movement.
Speaker 1: Or it has to do? Well? It's straight out of the.
Speaker 4: Critical theory crawd. I know, but what I know? But
Speaker 4: how did it get started? You know, three years ago
Speaker 4: or whenever it started? How did it catch hold?
Speaker 1: Anyway?
Speaker 4: Yeah, somebody you have to write a book on that
Speaker 4: when this is all over someday, which I hope it
Speaker 4: will be soon.
Speaker 1: Yeah, Well, cynical theories.
Speaker 3: The Lindsey and Pluckrows fabulous book goes into radical gender
Speaker 3: theory and how it's an expression of neo Marxism.
Speaker 1: But I assume they believe that for decades. I wonder
Speaker 1: why I caught hold.
Speaker 3: All of a sudden it's reached critical mass in the
Speaker 3: teachers colleges and then the universities in general, in the
Speaker 3: same way the critical race theory and radical queer theory
Speaker 3: and the rest of the radical theories has.
Speaker 1: It's just it though, all those flowers.
Speaker 3: Of evil bloomed at once because they finally got critical.
Speaker 1: Masks of evil bloomed at once what a nice spring.
Speaker 1: So here is a massive scoop.
Speaker 3: And Jesse Sengal, who's he writes for a number of publications,
Speaker 3: doesn't really matter who he was, But he was tweeting
Speaker 3: the other day that many of us have wondered why
Speaker 3: Johannah Olsen Kennedy's team, which received ten million dollars of
Speaker 3: your tax money in national institution health funding, has not
Speaker 3: published its study on puberty blockers, and it now is
Speaker 3: clear that they quashed the results because they didn't like them. Now,
Speaker 3: I'm gonna get into some of the specific verbiage, but
Speaker 3: a situation Jesse points out in which a researcher can
Speaker 3: ask for money from the federal government to run a study,
Speaker 3: run the study, and then not release the results because
Speaker 3: they weren't what she wanted is a situation in which
Speaker 3: federal funding for science is fundamentally broken. The New York Times,
Speaker 3: for all of its sins, has been very good on
Speaker 3: the gender bending madness story, particularly as it relates to
Speaker 3: confused adolescents, children or gay boys who get butchered and
Speaker 3: fed powerful chemicals because they feel effeminate and the activists
Speaker 3: convince them, well, you're actually a girl, or the autistic
Speaker 3: children who just know they don't fit in, they're not happy,
Speaker 3: and they're not comfortable in their own skin, and the
Speaker 3: activists convinced them you're actually the other sex, and they
Speaker 3: allowed themselves to be mutilated as confused adolescents.
Speaker 1: That this is m jeehot. I will fight it until
Speaker 1: I am dead.
Speaker 4: Yeah, anytime should actually get some sort of journalism prize
Speaker 4: for having the guts to be where they are. That
Speaker 4: I listened to a podcast with Schulzberger or whatever his
Speaker 4: name is that runs the thing, and they've they've they've
Speaker 4: gotten huge pushback on all their coverage of this over
Speaker 4: the years.
Speaker 3: They've had long, in depth interviews with so called detransitioners,
Speaker 3: generally confused adolescent girls who got whisked down this pipeline
Speaker 3: of activist mayhem and realized later.
Speaker 1: My problem wasn't that I'm a dude.
Speaker 3: My problem was that I'm unhappy, that I was sexually abused,
Speaker 3: that I was afraid of puberty, that I'm autistic, et cetera. Anyway,
Speaker 3: so from the New York Times, US study on puberty
Speaker 3: blockers goes unpublished because of politics, doctor says. The leader
Speaker 3: of the long running study said that the drugs did
Speaker 3: not improve mental health in Sheldon with gender distress, and
Speaker 3: that the finding might be weaponized by opponents of the care.
Speaker 1: How do you like that? Wow?
Speaker 3: So cancer drug tested turns out it doesn't cure cancer
Speaker 3: and it really hurts the patients it's given to.
Speaker 1: Well, we wouldn't.
Speaker 3: Want to publish that study because opponents of this drug
Speaker 3: might weaponize it.
Speaker 1: Wow, that is a blank? Does that mean that is
Speaker 1: some sort of weird clinging to your ideology despite the facts?
Speaker 2: Man?
Speaker 1: That is really interesting.
Speaker 3: So the doctor and again this is a zene Garashi
Speaker 3: in the New York Times, and congratulations and well done madam.
Speaker 3: The doctor Johann Olson Kennedy began the study years ago
Speaker 3: as part of a broader, multimillion dollar federal project on
Speaker 3: transgender youth. She and college recruited ninety five children from
Speaker 3: across the country gave them puberty blockers, which stave off
Speaker 3: permanent physical changes blah blah blah that could exacerbate their
Speaker 3: gender distress known as dysphoria, which activists gave to them.
Speaker 3: By the way, the researchers followed the children for two
Speaker 3: years to see if the treatments improved their mental health.
Speaker 3: An old their Dutch study had found that it would.
Speaker 3: That study has been debunked fifty times. It's a load
Speaker 3: of crap anyway, But the American trial did not find
Speaker 3: a similar trend. Doctor Olsen Kennedy said in a wide
Speaker 3: ranging interview puberty blockers did not lead to mental health improvements.
Speaker 3: She said, mostly because the children were already doing fine
Speaker 3: when the study began. They're in really good shape when
Speaker 3: they come in, They're in really good shape after two years.
Speaker 3: Wait a minute, writes The New York Times. That conclusion
Speaker 3: seemed to contradict seemed an earlier description of the group,
Speaker 3: in which doctor Olson Kennedy herself and her colleagues noted
Speaker 3: that at least one quarter the adolescents were depressed or
Speaker 3: suicidal before treatment. Oh and now it's that they were
Speaker 3: all fine going in, they're all find going out. That's
Speaker 3: so interesting, so asked why they haven't published the data this.
Speaker 1: Doctor Olson Kennedy said.
Speaker 3: The finding might fuel the kind of political attacks that
Speaker 3: have led to the bands of youth gender treatments in
Speaker 3: more than twenty states, one of which will soon be
Speaker 3: considered by the Supreme Court. I don't want our work
Speaker 3: to be weaponized. It has to be exactly on pointed
Speaker 3: that takes time.
Speaker 4: Wow, back to your cancer analogy, cancer drug analogy. Well,
Speaker 4: if this comes out, people might pull the cancer drug
Speaker 4: off the shelves because it not only doesn't work, it
Speaker 4: makes things worse. Yeah, and it should guess pulled off
Speaker 4: the shelves or quest unquote weaponized.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's worthwild worth mentioning doctor Earles and Kennedy again,
Speaker 3: this from The New York Times is one of the
Speaker 3: country's most vocal advocates of adolescent gender treatments, and has
Speaker 3: served as an expert witness in many legal challenges to
Speaker 3: the state bans. She said she was concerned the studies
Speaker 3: results could be used in court to argue that quote,
Speaker 3: we shouldn't use blockers because it doesn't help them, referring
Speaker 3: to transgender adolescents. Umm, because that's exactly what your study found.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 3: I have a feeling that will show up in court
Speaker 3: that way. I wish I had this handy. I'm going
Speaker 3: to characterize it. A couple of brave, brilliant women have
Speaker 3: made similar points in interviews I've seen, And this is
Speaker 3: rough stuff. So you become convinced by radical gender theory
Speaker 3: that you're confused adolescent, perhaps a victim of sexual assault, abuse, autistic, depressed,
Speaker 3: a misfit whatever. They come to you, having been indoctrinated
Speaker 3: in schools and say, hey, I think I'm actually a guy.
Speaker 3: And you hear that if you don't go along with it,
Speaker 3: if you don't subscribe to gender affirming care, which is
Speaker 3: an Orwellian term if one ever existed, never use that term.
Speaker 3: If you don't go along with it, your child will
Speaker 3: commit suicide. It cannot imagine the anguish.
Speaker 4: Right I was going to bring that up. Man who
Speaker 4: got that started? With no evidence that no, no, no,
Speaker 4: you have to go along with it. Immediately they'll commit suicide.
Speaker 4: So you're just you're you're forcing a young kid to
Speaker 4: commit suicide if you don't go along with it.
Speaker 3: Yeah, if you want your kid to commute suicide, mutilate
Speaker 3: them for life. Oh anyway, But anyway, and the point
Speaker 3: that's made by some of these gals who I've found
Speaker 3: very influential, and we will dig up the tape because
Speaker 3: I think it's around. They made the point, if you
Speaker 3: get convinced of this stuff, and it's astounding to me
Speaker 3: that anybody does, but people do, and I just have
Speaker 3: to accept it. If you get convinced of this stuff,
Speaker 3: and you consent to your child being drugged and mutilated
Speaker 3: in this way, their bodies change for the rest of
Speaker 3: their lives, they will never have children, et cetera. The
Speaker 3: mountain you have to climb emotionally and morally to say
Speaker 3: I was wrong, I permitted this, I even promoted it
Speaker 3: is extremely difficult for human beings to do. You have
Speaker 3: to admit to a monstrous act. And if you are
Speaker 3: one of these activists like doctor what's her name Olsen
Speaker 3: Kennedy that we've been quoting, and you've been promoting this,
Speaker 3: and you have allowed and encouraged the mutilation of not hundreds,
Speaker 3: but thousands of children, you have become a monster.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I don't does that ever happen?
Speaker 4: Has anybody ever made a big mistake even close to
Speaker 4: that big in their lives and then decided I was
Speaker 4: completely wrong? I mean that that would be I think
Speaker 4: they got to be They got to be so crazy
Speaker 4: to start with, even go down that road.
Speaker 3: I would agree, I would agree completely, But can you
Speaker 3: imagine the mount Everest? You would have to climb as
Speaker 3: this doctor Olsen Kennedy to say I've.
Speaker 1: Been wrong all along?
Speaker 3: This thing is a horrifying experiment we've conducted unconfused children.
Speaker 3: I don't think it's doable, right, it's too far away.
Speaker 3: You can't depend on these people to recant. I mean,
Speaker 3: this woman got ten million dollars to do this study.
Speaker 3: The study turns out, no, it doesn't help kids at all,
Speaker 3: and it hurts them, and she says, well, we can't
Speaker 3: release it because it might be weaponized. That is a
Speaker 3: perfect example of a woman who's gone so far down
Speaker 3: the road and becomes such a monster in spite of
Speaker 3: the own evidence that she found. She can't make that journey,
Speaker 3: which I get.
Speaker 1: Yeah, oh yeah, oh yeah.
Speaker 3: Anyway, on a somewhat lighter note, we'll post that article
Speaker 3: from the New York Times at Armstrong and getty dot com.
Speaker 1: So there's this.
Speaker 4: Remember in California, they make it so your kid trying
Speaker 4: to change at school or the school's convince them, and
Speaker 4: they keep it a secret from you as a parent.
Speaker 1: Right, Yeah, that's right.
Speaker 3: If your adolescent and is undergoing that mental health crisis,
Speaker 3: California schools will keep it a secret from you.
Speaker 1: In fact, they're bound by law to do that. Wow,
Speaker 1: that is unspeakable evil.
Speaker 3: Anyway, and you see the articles people are leaving California
Speaker 3: because of high housing.
Speaker 1: Prices, right, Okay, racism or something.
Speaker 3: So On a lighter note, there's this fella who had
Speaker 3: his genitals removed and has been taking hormones in an
Speaker 3: effort to appear to be a woman who wants to
Speaker 3: be on the Ladies Professional Golf Association Tour and has
Speaker 3: now reached a stage that is quite close to earning
Speaker 3: an LPGA card.
Speaker 1: It hasn't happened yet.
Speaker 4: So he was a pretty successful boy golfer, A good
Speaker 4: player like Division two, Division III quality player me real good.
Speaker 1: To play Division two college golf, you'd be pretty good.
Speaker 3: Yeah, but you're as far from playing the big tour
Speaker 3: as I am from being an Olympic sprinter.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's just it will not happen. I would
Speaker 1: need to know that well, I would fully understand one
Speaker 1: hundred yards of the other competitors. Certainly. Be funny, you
Speaker 1: might be a full one hundred yards.
Speaker 4: You start down and you just lay there in the
Speaker 4: blocks and you lose my full one hundred yards.
Speaker 1: Yeah no, I was eiged, like roll forward event or something.
Speaker 1: I have my pride anyway.
Speaker 3: So a total of two hundred and forty six women
Speaker 3: will be competing in this week's LPGA qualifying series in
Speaker 3: the hopes of getting into the final final opportunity to
Speaker 3: be in the LPGA. Two hundred and seventy five women
Speaker 3: golfers sent a letter to the LPGA expressing concern over
Speaker 3: a transgender player competing and getting an LPGA card. Two
Speaker 3: hundred and seventy five. Now, the LPGA, which is of
Speaker 3: course a target for activists, well, you know, let me
Speaker 3: read you just a tiny bit of the letter. No,
Speaker 3: we don't have time doing. It's a very reasoned, measured letter.
Speaker 3: I almost want him to make the tour just to
Speaker 3: draw attention and help make a point that we need
Speaker 3: to make national.
Speaker 1: Worldwide right.
Speaker 3: And they make the point that even if you get
Speaker 3: your genitals removed and then take hormones in an effort
Speaker 3: to appear like a woman, you still have an enormous
Speaker 3: advantage physically, you know, muscles, bones, lungs.
Speaker 1: It's there.
Speaker 3: And it's a very well written, very measured letters, I said,
Speaker 3: from two hundred and seventy five golfers. But the LPGA
Speaker 3: is afraid of the activists, so they will not do anything.
Speaker 4: Wow, that's gonna be something that'll get a lot of
Speaker 4: attention for this plight that we've gotten ourselves into.
Speaker 1: You follow your dream sir, and we wish you luck. Yeah. Wow?
Speaker 1: What is what is he? They? What do they look like?
Speaker 1: Like a big beefy woman?
Speaker 3: Yeah?
Speaker 1: Yeah, I wondered about that.
Speaker 4: Any comments on any of this text line four one
Speaker 4: five two nine five k FTC. So this was on
Speaker 4: yesterday's date in two thousand and one that this ad
Speaker 4: hit the airwaves.
Speaker 6: We are introducing a product today and that product is
Speaker 6: called iPod.
Speaker 1: What is iPod?
Speaker 6: iPod is an MP three music player, has CD quality music,
Speaker 6: and it plays all of the popular open formats of
Speaker 6: digital music. The coolest thing about iPod your entire music
Speaker 6: library fits in your pocket.
Speaker 1: And this is what the front of it looks like. Boom,
Speaker 1: that's iPod. I hadn't have one right here in my pocket,
Speaker 1: and effect there it is right there.
Speaker 4: So Steve Jobs introducing the iPod, which of course had
Speaker 4: to have a role in leading to the iPhone, similar
Speaker 4: sort of sized device and all that sort of thing.
Speaker 4: I never had one. They were too expensive for me.
Speaker 4: But somehow one of my kids brought up the idea.
Speaker 1: Of a mixtape.
Speaker 4: Last night they'd seen it referenced on various TV shows,
Speaker 4: and I was explaining to them what a wonder that
Speaker 4: was when, for the first time ever, you could have
Speaker 4: a bunch of different songs from different albums and different
Speaker 4: artists and one spot that you could listen to, like
Speaker 4: the way you have playlists, because they all have playlists
Speaker 4: on their watch or they don't have phones yet, but
Speaker 4: in their watch they got a playlist their favorite songs.
Speaker 4: Just just the wonder that was so fantastic and it
Speaker 4: was fun to, you know, give them to friends. Oh yes, whatever, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Speaker 4: And my kids live in the world where you dial
Speaker 4: up whatever song you ever think of, ever ever recorded
Speaker 4: in a second, which is pretty cool.
Speaker 5: Yes, Katie, I remember the days of when you would
Speaker 5: make somebody a mix CD and it was like an
Speaker 5: awesome gift to give them.
Speaker 4: Yeah, absolutely, yea, yeah, these are some songs that I
Speaker 4: think you would really like that mean a lot to me,
Speaker 4: and you kind of have a bond between them as fantastic.
Speaker 5: I had one of those binders in my car that
Speaker 5: had like Katie's Angry Mix, Katie's Loves Mix, Katie's Mix
Speaker 5: Mix Mix, and it was all the same songs.
Speaker 1: Just in different order. Wow, that's hilarious. That is really funny.
Speaker 4: We mentioned this a little bit earlier in the hour,
Speaker 4: but I just saw the New York Post to cover
Speaker 4: headline worst Gentleman talking about Doug m Hoff and how
Speaker 4: his girlfriend has come forward. His ex girlfriend came forward
Speaker 4: and says he slapped her. So instead of first gentleman,
Speaker 4: worst gentleman, he hic. Post is really good with ika
Speaker 4: word playing upon, aren't they? Oh they're the best. Yeah,
Speaker 4: we got one minute left. I don't even have time
Speaker 4: to get into this. We will later. A bunch of
Speaker 4: opinion pieces in the New York Times today about the
Speaker 4: problem or not, depending on who you are are, the
Speaker 4: fact that people don't have kids anymore.
Speaker 1: It's a problem. They got a number of opinion writers
Speaker 1: in the New York Times.
Speaker 4: It's not necessarily a bad thing, what the human species disappears.
Speaker 1: I mean, I guess not, but kind of weird to
Speaker 1: look at it that way.
Speaker 3: Or for various financial political reasons, the powers that bee
Speaker 3: will flood this country with anybody willing to come to
Speaker 3: prop up you know, the economy and the welfare state. Yeah,
Speaker 3: that's a bit of a problem. It's sure as Hella challenge.
Speaker 4: Sech def Austin talking more about all the North Korean
Speaker 4: truth going to Russia. What's going on with that South
Speaker 4: Korea is sending arms to Ukraine when they heard that news.
Speaker 4: It's getting more World warry all the time. When you
Speaker 4: got those things going on, I would say we got
Speaker 4: to check in on the election. Though the closing argument
Speaker 4: from the Harris campaign is really something that's an hour
Speaker 4: three Armstrong and Getty