WEBVTT - Magnificent Seven Earnings in the Spotlight

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:10.719
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. This is Bloomberg Business

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Wait inside from the reporters and editors who bring you

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:18.319
<v Speaker 1>America's most trusted business magazine, plus global business, finance and

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week Podcast with Carol Messer

0:00:23.040 --> 0:00:25.800
<v Speaker 1>and Tim Stenebeck from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:30.320
<v Speaker 2>Cheers with Alphabet and Justice soaring in the after hours

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 2>right now, Carol Hire after the company reported earnings up

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 2>as we speak, another thirteen point six percent in the

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 2>after hours right now. This after declaring a dividend, boosting

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:44.519
<v Speaker 2>a buyback, authorizing repurchase of up to an additional seventy

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars it shares first quarter ad revenue coming out

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 2>above expectations first quarter. I also declared it cash dividend

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:53.120
<v Speaker 2>of twenty cents per share.

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 3>All right, so let's get to it. James chalk Mak

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 3>so much to talk about. He's partnering technology analyst at

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 3>Clockwise KAPITALI joins us from my a me. First of all,

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:05.199
<v Speaker 3>Alphabet feels like I can't find anything wrong here, walk

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:07.399
<v Speaker 3>us through. Is this just kind of firing and all

0:01:07.720 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 3>cylinders and if you will, and then just throwing on

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 3>a dividend and then throwing on in an additional buyback.

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, first, thanks for having me. You know, for Alphabet,

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 4>this was a tough one, you know, because we had

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 4>the meta earnings last night. You know, uncertainty as it

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 4>relates to the sustainability of the top line growth metrics,

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:31.479
<v Speaker 4>and obviously Alphabet via Google had you know, uncertainties around

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 4>their search business. And at the same time, you know

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 4>this growth and capex spend, you know, is that going

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 4>to translate over So you know, we were kind of

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 4>debating what to do and and going into the quarter.

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 4>We actually rotated a portion of our Microsoft position to

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 4>triple up our Alphabet position. But thankfully that worked out.

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 4>But for Google, yeah, well yeah, they're both so yeah,

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 4>I mean it worked out.

0:01:55.880 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 5>So why did you do it?

0:01:56.840 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 3>What was it that you saw, James in the in

0:01:59.840 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 3>the Alphabet story that you said you wanted to do that.

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 4>Well, the main thing was the relative valuations. I mean,

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:11.680
<v Speaker 4>the expectations for Microsoft were exceedingly hot and the expectations

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 4>for Alphabet were exceedingly low. And you look at one

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:17.919
<v Speaker 4>trading at twenty two times earnings and the other ones

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 4>at thirty five times earnings. So you know what kind

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 4>of the risk reward is, and especially we had some

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 4>sense of how things might trade if they came in

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:31.080
<v Speaker 4>on a bear kind of narrative, given how Meta traded.

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 4>So it really just boils down to that. But the

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 4>fact that Microsoft was able to exceed those nose bleed

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 4>expectations and the testament to the trends and the force

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:44.520
<v Speaker 4>of trends that we're seeing in the shift of the

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 4>cloud and aai more broadin.

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 2>Hey, I just want to get your thoughts on Snap

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 2>because it's the company you've been covering for years.

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 4>You'd love to ask about that, Eric, through the.

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:56.680
<v Speaker 2>Good and the bad. Well, And the reason I'm asking

0:02:56.720 --> 0:02:59.800
<v Speaker 2>is because shares are up, wow, surging as we speak,

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 2>by more than twenty percent twenty five percent at this point.

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 2>This is after the company reported.

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 3>They are down thirty two here today they are.

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:13.959
<v Speaker 2>That's important context, Chris. The company is seeing second quarter

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 2>revenue from one one point two to three billion to

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:18.639
<v Speaker 2>one point twenty six billion versus estimates of one point

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 2>two one billion dollars. As Carol mentioned, it's been a

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 2>brutal year so far for Snap. How are you reading

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:24.920
<v Speaker 2>into these results and do you still you don't own

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 2>Snap anymore?

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:29.079
<v Speaker 4>Do you No, No, not for a long time.

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 5>You know.

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:32.640
<v Speaker 4>With Snap, you know, they were supposed to be the

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 4>camera company and transformed into you know e exactly what

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 4>they were initially, you know, just messaging in some content initiatives.

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 4>But at the end of the day, you know, I

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 4>think it's really really hard for these niche platforms to

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 4>scale in the manner in which is necessary to provide

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 4>differentiation to advertisers and the return objectives in return enhancements

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 4>on the on that ad spend. So I think that

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 4>the disparity between these niche platforms like a Snap versus

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 4>the likes of Alphabet and Meta will only increase from here.

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 4>The caveat being that you have companies like Pinterest, which

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 4>we used to own but sold, you know, just given

0:04:13.520 --> 0:04:16.279
<v Speaker 4>the fact that they hit our target. You know, I

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 4>have more opportunities because of the engagement that they bring

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 4>that is likely to grow over time versus you know,

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 4>stick to more static rates, which is from the likes

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 4>of Snap.

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 3>All right, we've got to go back to Google. Forgive

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 3>me alphabet. I keep calling it Google, but I mean

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 3>firs Alphabet. I know, I know, up twelve and a

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:37.559
<v Speaker 3>half percent here, folks in the aftermarket. This stock heading

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:40.039
<v Speaker 3>into it had about a twelve percent gain on the

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:42.719
<v Speaker 3>year here in twenty twenty four. The stock was up

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 3>almost sixty percent last year. But you know, when when

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:50.720
<v Speaker 3>you look at Alphabet James, and you look at its

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 3>business lines and its roles, and it's play, whether it's AI,

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:57.280
<v Speaker 3>whether it's still advertising in a big way. You know,

0:04:57.400 --> 0:04:59.479
<v Speaker 3>our own man Deep Singh saying, you know, this company

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:03.600
<v Speaker 3>is all about that engagement that's kind of so valuable,

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:06.279
<v Speaker 3>and that's going to be valuable certainly in terms of

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:09.839
<v Speaker 3>machine learning and gen AI. This is really important stuff.

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean, how do you think about you know, Alphabet

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 3>in kind of its future growth trajectory and kind of

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 3>where it goes from here. I mean, these are this

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 3>is a pretty impressive report, but it's also right appeasing

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 3>investors of saying we're going to throw some cash back

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 3>to you.

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, I mean any anything with respect to returning capital

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 4>to shareholders or you know, getting religion on the cost

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 4>side of their business and utilizing their cash flow for

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 4>more constructive purposes rather than throwing it into black holes,

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 4>which is the way that they have been operating for

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:46.039
<v Speaker 4>as long as I can remember. That being said I

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:48.719
<v Speaker 4>think that the future for Alphabet and Google, you know,

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 4>is still remains a question mark. We don't know, and

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:55.479
<v Speaker 4>I don't think anyone can definitively say what that search

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 4>environment experience is going to look like in the in

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 4>the future, you know, when if you look out five

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 4>years down the road. Now, the good news is, all

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:04.839
<v Speaker 4>of this stuff seems to be like coming at you

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 4>fast right all the AI over the since January of

0:06:08.800 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty three, it's been coming hard and fast. But

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 4>the good news is on the on the behavioral aspect

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 4>and the consumer experience. You know, things have changed with chat,

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 4>GPT and whatnot, but things aren't changing that fast overnight,

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 4>which affords Alphabet time to really figure things out, whether

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 4>it's cannibalistic to their existing search business or not. You know,

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 4>I think we have time, So I think extrapolating too

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 4>much too soon is a risk, you know, so as

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 4>long as they can they have the time, you know,

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:42.479
<v Speaker 4>they might figure it out. They may not, but they might,

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:45.360
<v Speaker 4>But I look into twenty twenty four and twenty twenty five,

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 4>that's it.

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:51.359
<v Speaker 2>Could Critics argue about Alphabet that declaring a dividend and

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 2>boosting a share buyback potentially isn't the best use of

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:59.159
<v Speaker 2>money right now? Perhaps they should be investing more in AI.

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 2>Perhaps they should be investing more and making sure this

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:04.160
<v Speaker 2>search product is bulletproof.

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. I mean they're throwing off tremendous amounts of cash

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 4>as it is, and and they're investing a lot, and

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 4>and you look at the margin disparity versus a meta.

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 4>You know, they have a lot of cushion there, so

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 4>and they're investing, you know, strongly as well. So I

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:31.679
<v Speaker 4>don't think it's mutually exclusive. So long as the ball

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 4>continues to move forward, which is what we need to see,

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 4>and we'll see what the color commentary is on the call.

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 4>I think it'll be okay. I think the longer term

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 4>is where the questions linger. Shorter term, it'll be fine,

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 4>all right.

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 3>So let's go to Microsoft, because it's also the other

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 3>big one that are one of the big ones. After

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 3>the close, it's up about five percent here in the aftermarket.

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 3>This one. Sales and profit beat expectations on robust AI demand.

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 3>That's the headline on our story. So quarterly sales and

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 3>profit climbing more than rejected, lifted by corporate demand for

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 3>Microsoft's cloud and AI offerings. Revenue, as we said, up

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 3>seventeen percent in the third quarter, sixty one point nine

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 3>billion profit two ninety four a share. Analyst on average

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 3>estimated per share earnings of two point eighty three two

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 3>dollars and eighty three cents excuse me, on sales of

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 3>sixty point nine billion. So again outperformance here, and we

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:25.320
<v Speaker 3>know that such an Adella has been really infusing all

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 3>of Microsoft's entire product line with AI technology thanks to

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 3>its partner open Ai. So thoughts on Microsoft, what we

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 3>got here in the quarter, what it tells you about

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:38.199
<v Speaker 3>their business today and going forward.

0:08:39.800 --> 0:08:42.559
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, what's most amazing to me is the fact that

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 4>they're able to maintain the growth rates no matter how

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 4>big their revenue base gets, and the fact that they're

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:53.679
<v Speaker 4>able to deliver the numbers that you just cited and

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:57.199
<v Speaker 4>do so in an efficient way where earnings are continuing

0:08:57.240 --> 0:08:59.680
<v Speaker 4>to grow at the same rate, So it's not a

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 4>there's no contra indicators on and you know, sales versus spending.

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:10.679
<v Speaker 4>So I think that to me, the sustainability is the

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:16.200
<v Speaker 4>biggest and most impressive component of their operations. And and

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 4>most importantly, you know, broadly, I think you can extrapolate

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 4>that the themes on the data center spend and the semiconductors,

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 4>like the nvideos of the world, and the direction of

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 4>corporate enterprise and their appetite for shifting from analog to

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 4>digital is as strong as ever. So I think it's

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 4>a very very good omen for a lot of these

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:41.560
<v Speaker 4>companies and being at the center of it, because you

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 4>can make an analogy that you want in the first inning,

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 4>third inning, or whatever. But I think the main thing

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:51.679
<v Speaker 4>is that the world is going to I think Sam

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:57.319
<v Speaker 4>Altman has this quote that he said, the technological changes

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:03.080
<v Speaker 4>that we've seen over the last five hundred years, No,

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:06.280
<v Speaker 4>the changes over the next fifty years will be greater

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:10.280
<v Speaker 4>than the technological changes over the next last five hundred, right,

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:13.199
<v Speaker 4>you know. So that's the pace of change that we're

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 4>talking and a lot of that's going to come in

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 4>the first decade, and these companies aren't all at the

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 4>epicenter of it.

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:23.080
<v Speaker 3>Just want to point out Azure Microsoft's cloud computing unit

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:25.840
<v Speaker 3>revenue gaining thirty one percent in the quarter, above an

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 3>average prediction of twenty nine percent, so picking up slightly

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:30.560
<v Speaker 3>from the thirty percent growth in the previous period. So

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:32.719
<v Speaker 3>you know, that's a trend line. If you're following it right,

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 3>you want to see I.

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:35.080
<v Speaker 2>Mean, there's a chance we see both of the depending

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 2>on what happens. There's a chance we see both Alphabet

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 2>and Microsoft hit new records tomorrow in today's trade, depending

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 2>on what happens. Okay, I want to talk James just

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 2>a little bit about Microsoft's legacy here and the way

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:51.199
<v Speaker 2>that it's been able to shift and embrace AI. Where's

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:55.199
<v Speaker 2>the most important part of looking at Microsoft's growth moving forward.

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I know, we obviously know Azure is incredibly important,

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 2>but the company has made a huge, huge bet on

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 2>AI with open Ai. Where do you start to see

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 2>that investment and its relationship with open Ai manifest in earnings.

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 4>I think it's going to be, you know exactly, You'll

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:15.560
<v Speaker 4>see it in the Azure business, but more broadly in

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 4>the intelligent cloud segment. I mean, it just continued to

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 4>translate on that front. But it's not just that segment.

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 4>It's going to have It's going to feed into other

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:27.439
<v Speaker 4>parts of their business too, you know, on the subscription

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 4>side of their software services and potentially even gaming and

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 4>uh you know, so there's there's a lot of levers

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 4>I think that will be pulled from that relationship. And

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:42.839
<v Speaker 4>as the world and the corporate enterprise continues to move

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 4>in that direction, more data is going to feed into it,

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 4>which is going to fuel even more efficiency with respect

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:52.560
<v Speaker 4>to the capabilities that they do. And you know, Copilot,

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 4>you know, for instance, is just on the I don't

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 4>want to use saying first ending of that day day

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 4>two of its POTENTI so, and there's a lot of

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 4>money to be paid there that you'll see that I

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 4>don't think is being appreciated at all, virtually at all.

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 2>Right now, these are all different companies, but they're all

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 2>working on AI, and to a certain extent, they're competing

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:15.960
<v Speaker 2>with each other when it comes to that technology. No question.

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 2>Given what we're seeing from shareholders in reaction to Microsoft

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 2>and Alphabet today, and given what we saw today in

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 2>the session from reaction from investors to meta platforms sending

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 2>shares for their worst ten months, what did the two

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 2>companies that reported today get right? Or maybe a better

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 2>way to ask is what did meta platforms get wrong?

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:41.960
<v Speaker 4>What did meta platforms get wrong? I think what they

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 4>got wrong was largely related to the management of the expectations.

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 4>You know, there was no indication around the pace of

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:57.440
<v Speaker 4>investment that's necessary to sustain the kind of growth. I mean,

0:12:57.679 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 4>they talk very qualitatively about this is a big opportunity ahead,

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 4>you know, all the metaverse and YadA YadA, But you know,

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:10.480
<v Speaker 4>there was no pushback whatsoever on the questions and commentary

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 4>with respect to you know, how we should expect the

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 4>pace of investment to ramp to justify and capitalize on

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:22.840
<v Speaker 4>the trends that Zuckerberg talks about. So I think it

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:27.200
<v Speaker 4>was more of an expectation versus reality and mismatch that

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 4>probably could have been better managed.

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:32.680
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's just remind everybody the big earnings after

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:35.559
<v Speaker 3>the close and those that have really outperformed here and

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 3>showing some studying moves to the upside. Microsoft among them.

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 3>That stock, as we mentioned, it is moving up just

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 3>about four point four percent here in the aftermarket, and

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 3>the company coming out sales and profit beating expectations, lifted

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:55.080
<v Speaker 3>by corporate demand for the software maker's cloud and AI offerings.

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 3>We talked about Azure gaining revenue alone, gaining thirty one

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:01.720
<v Speaker 3>percent in the quarter that was above of analyst expectations.

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:06.200
<v Speaker 3>Revenue in the third quarter overall up seventeen percent to

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 3>sixty one point nine billion dollars. Profit was two dollars

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 3>ninety four cents a share. Analysts on average estimated per

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:15.440
<v Speaker 3>share earnings of two eighty three, so below what they

0:14:15.480 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 3>actually came in with, and the estimate for sales was

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 3>sixty point nine so again really hitting out of the

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 3>park when it comes to those estimates. And that is

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 3>certainly one reason why you're seeing the stock or a

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 3>big reason why you're seeing the stocks up. The stock

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 3>of Microsoft, I should say, up at the aftermarket.

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let's worth let's repeat a little bit of what

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 2>we saw from Alphabet the company's first quarter Google AD

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 2>revenue coming in at sixty one point sixty six billion

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 2>versus estimates of sixty point one eight billion, and in

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 2>the company author authorizing a repurchase of up to an

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:48.360
<v Speaker 2>additional seventy billion dollars worth of shares, also declaring a dividend,

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 2>a cash dividend of twenty cents per share. First quarter

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 2>revenue excluding traffic acquisition costs sixty seven point five to

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 2>nine billion, beating estimates of sixty six point oh seven billion.

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 3>To the downside, int Hell shares are down more than

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:05.920
<v Speaker 3>eight percent here, biggest maker of PC processors. Lack luster

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 3>forecast from the company for the current quarter, indicating it's

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 3>really still struggling to kind of find its way back

0:15:12.200 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 3>to the top, if you will. Sales in the second

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 3>quarter will be about thirteen billion. That compares with an

0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 3>average analyst estimate of thirteen point six billion according to

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 3>our data here at Bloomberg. Profit again, the outlook will

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 3>be ten cents a share of minus certain items versus

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 3>a projection of twenty four cents, So that's a pretty

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 3>big miss. We're talking with James Chockmock partner and tech

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 3>analyst over at Clockwise Capital. James, is there's some underlying theme.

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 3>We're not through all the MAGS seven companies. We've got

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 3>what Amazon next week?

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we've gotten video in a while, right.

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 3>So we've got some other plays to get through. But

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 3>is there any themes that you're finding, certainly for the

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 3>investment community when it comes to especially these big tech names,

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 3>the mag seven often who haven't always been so magnificent

0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 3>as of late, what they're saying and kind of their

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 3>impact on the overall market, there's some big takeaway here

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 3>for you.

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 4>I think the biggest takeaway is that the sellers of

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 4>these data center services are the best place to be,

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 4>you know, from Navidia to Dell and the server side,

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 4>like we own VRT which helps with the cooling systems,

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 4>comfort systems, you know. So there's a lot of these

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 4>companies that play into building out the companies that are

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 4>selling to the hyperscalers. I think will continue to be

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 4>in a great position now that as far as the

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 4>Max seven is concerned, I do think, you know, the

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 4>market is still in a state of shoppiness and volatility,

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 4>and I think that's going to last until we have

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 4>better clarity on what the FED is going to do.

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 4>And you saw the GDP numbers today, So there's there's

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 4>mixed messages as to which direction macro is going versus

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:56.359
<v Speaker 4>tech and which one to prioritize, because if you prioritize

0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 4>the economic cycle, then that means valuations are at risk.

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 4>If you prioritiz is the text cycle, that means that

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:05.360
<v Speaker 4>earnings are the focus. And right now we're in this

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:09.840
<v Speaker 4>world where someday's valuations are in focus and other days

0:17:09.880 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 4>earnings like today, Hey, so I think you just got

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 4>to stay nimble at the end of the day.

0:17:14.880 --> 0:17:17.360
<v Speaker 2>Hey, James, last question. Thirty seconds. Here, I'm looking at

0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 2>time US Equity on the Bloomberg terminal. This is the

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 2>clockwise Core Equity and Innovation ETF. It is up this

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:28.199
<v Speaker 2>year a whopping eighteen point three percent, out performing all

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:31.920
<v Speaker 2>the benchmarks. Amazon is your second biggest holding after t

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:36.399
<v Speaker 2>bills make accounting for five percent of the portfolio. We

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 2>got Amazon coming up. Thirty second preview of Amazon.

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:45.480
<v Speaker 4>Amazon, it's the only of the mag seven that we

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 4>feel that we haven't cut exposure to. You know, it's

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:51.160
<v Speaker 4>a five percent or give or take weight, and we're

0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 4>maintaining that. I think the data that you saw from

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 4>Microsoft and today is really to the cloud is a

0:17:57.600 --> 0:18:01.440
<v Speaker 4>very good omen. They're firing across all three other businesses,

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 4>you know, on the on the grocery side, the retail side,

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:07.879
<v Speaker 4>the cloud side, and this is the first time in

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:10.639
<v Speaker 4>a while that you've seen everything going in the right direction,

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 4>and most especially on the margin. So you know, we

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:16.359
<v Speaker 4>like the risk award here. You know, I think next

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:19.160
<v Speaker 4>year you could get the two twenty five. This year

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 4>probably upwards of two hundred, So you know it's one

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 4>that definitely keeping the portfolio for sure.

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:27.120
<v Speaker 3>All Right, we're going to leave it. On that note, Hey, James,

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 3>thank you so much. James. Chuck mack partner and tech

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:32.720
<v Speaker 3>analyst at Clockwise Capital, joining us on Zoom from Miami.

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 3>A lot of names moving here in the aftermarket.

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:40.199
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch US

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern Listen

0:18:43.520 --> 0:18:45.680
<v Speaker 1>on Apple card Play and then brought auto with a

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business app or watch US Live on YouTube.

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 3>All right, we're going to call this an unwelcome combination.

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:56.360
<v Speaker 3>You have Second AMIC gross sliding to an almost two

0:18:56.440 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 3>year low last quarter, while inflation jumped to uncomfortable vels.

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:02.360
<v Speaker 3>John just talking about all of this interrupting a run

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:05.159
<v Speaker 3>of strong demand and muted price pressures that had fueled

0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 3>optimism for that soft landing side, that soft landing tim

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 3>it feels like maybe not going to happen, at least

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:13.160
<v Speaker 3>not for today.

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 2>At least not today. With more on today's data and

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 2>the reaction in the US treasury market. Back with us,

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 2>it's Bloomberg News International Economics and Policy correspondent Michael McKee,

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 2>also Bloomberg News Rates reporter Michael mackenzie. Both here in

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 2>the studio. Michael McKee. I want to start with the

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 2>data on growth and inflation. Just just break it down

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 2>for us and what exactly has folks so concerned.

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:36.639
<v Speaker 6>Well, the number came in worse than forecast and certainly

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 6>down from the fourth quarters three point four We had

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 6>one point six percent growth in the first quarter, But

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 6>it really wasn't as slow as it appears, because at

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:49.240
<v Speaker 6>least as far as people like the FED would be concerned,

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 6>because a lot of it was trade. We imported a

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 6>lot more than we exported, partly because of the strong dollar,

0:19:56.840 --> 0:19:59.400
<v Speaker 6>and it's cheaper to bring in imports, and if imports

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 6>are coming in, it does suggest that retailers and others

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 6>are anticipating this can sell the stuff. Consumer spending two

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:11.400
<v Speaker 6>point five percent, not as bad as it could have been,

0:20:11.800 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 6>down from last quarter, but still reasonably good. Business investments

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:18.960
<v Speaker 6>still strong two point nine percent. Inventory is another problem.

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 6>Inventories weren't as high, but inventories and trade are very volatile,

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 6>so overall, it's not that bad a report. When you

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 6>take out inventories and trade, you get a three point

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:35.200
<v Speaker 6>one percent growth rate, so not too bad. What worried everybody,

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:40.200
<v Speaker 6>and this is mikes people over there is the PCE

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 6>inflation numbers. Now, the government calculates this number quarterly with

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:49.679
<v Speaker 6>average of the three months, and it also does a

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:53.720
<v Speaker 6>month by month, And what ended up happening is a

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:55.920
<v Speaker 6>big jump of three tenths of eight percent in the

0:20:55.960 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 6>year over year numbers for both headline and core core,

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:03.640
<v Speaker 6>particularly concerning people. And so that's what the market's focused

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 6>on and started falling out of bed because of now

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:10.919
<v Speaker 6>we get the monthly We've gotten the monthly figures for

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 6>January and February. We get the monthly figure from March tomorrow,

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 6>and the question is was this a problem all across

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:23.400
<v Speaker 6>the quarter, Was this a problem in January and February

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 6>and they had to revise those numbers, or are we

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 6>going to have a big negative surprise tomorrow.

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:32.000
<v Speaker 3>So if March comes down, we wouldn't be so worried.

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:35.040
<v Speaker 6>We wouldn't be so worried. If March comes in as

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 6>forecast or goes a little bit lower, then you'll watch

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 6>the market's melt up tomorrow.

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 3>Probably well, I don't know if I want to say

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 3>a melt up, but we definitely have seen a move

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 3>up once again in terms of the treasury curve and yields.

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:52.920
<v Speaker 3>So Michael McKenzie come on in on this talked about

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:55.280
<v Speaker 3>talk to us about the rate moves that we saw today.

0:21:56.440 --> 0:21:59.160
<v Speaker 5>It's a classic. You get some whole piece of data,

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:02.919
<v Speaker 5>another whole piece of inflation data in particular, which has

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 5>been the story for all this year. And as Mike's

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:08.119
<v Speaker 5>just said, if you see some relief tomorrow from the

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:11.959
<v Speaker 5>March number, you might get some stability here in treasuries.

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 5>It has been interesting this morning. We did get above

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 5>two five percent of the twos, but the buyers came back.

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:20.120
<v Speaker 5>We're right around that five percent level still. Ten's got

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:22.639
<v Speaker 5>above four. Seventy came back a bit as well. The

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 5>seven year auction nice concession, so they took down a

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 5>forty four billion of seven year notes just now. So

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:31.640
<v Speaker 5>in general, the markets, the Treasury sold over one hundred

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 5>and eighty billion of coupon debt this week twos, fives,

0:22:34.119 --> 0:22:37.119
<v Speaker 5>and seven. There's a lot of supply. The problem is,

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:40.119
<v Speaker 5>of course, if the inflation numbers remained sticky tomorrow and

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 5>it indicates that there is no relief near term, You've

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:47.480
<v Speaker 5>got a refunding coming next week, and that announcement's going

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 5>to keep putting supply on the table, particularly because the

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 5>refunding is quarterly, they set out what they're going to

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 5>sell for the next three months, and I suspect the

0:22:56.080 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 5>three year will be fine. It's the ten year and

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 5>the thirty year, the longer date stuff, and that was

0:23:00.640 --> 0:23:02.960
<v Speaker 5>selling off a lot today as well. So you could

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 5>see a further test coming here of four seventy five

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:09.600
<v Speaker 5>and higher and tens for example, because we're pricing out

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 5>the rate cuts for this year now we're down to

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 5>just one. Must always been invested this morning. You always

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 5>said it was going to be one this year, and

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:19.440
<v Speaker 5>they're feeling pretty cool good about this now and they're

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:22.479
<v Speaker 5>advising you should start scaling into into bonds at these levels.

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 5>But as as she also said to me, don't go

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:27.120
<v Speaker 5>all in at these levels. At the moment, you still

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 5>got it. There's still plenty of time to see just

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 5>how the data turns and how the Fed's going to react,

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 5>particularly next week when Powell gives his press conference. Is

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 5>he actually now going to say potentially there could be

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 5>some changes here and that's where the mark will be

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:41.479
<v Speaker 5>really focused on from here.

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:43.879
<v Speaker 2>Michael McKey jump in on that and what we do

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 2>hear from Fed jo J. Powell with that me meeting

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:46.560
<v Speaker 2>next week.

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:48.960
<v Speaker 6>Well, everybody's gonna be looking for him to maybe put

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:51.359
<v Speaker 6>some time frame on it. He's already said we're not

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:54.479
<v Speaker 6>going to cut rates as soon as people thought, and

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 6>we're waiting for more progress on inflation. I was laughing

0:23:57.640 --> 0:24:01.680
<v Speaker 6>when Michael was talking there because the small I was

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:07.880
<v Speaker 6>looking at the the Fed funds futures and the swaps

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:12.359
<v Speaker 6>rate for when markets think we're going to get rate cuts,

0:24:12.359 --> 0:24:15.119
<v Speaker 6>and they priced everything out until December, and just a

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:18.359
<v Speaker 6>moment ago they priced November back in by a basis point.

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 6>Now it's going back and forth. This is what I

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:24.560
<v Speaker 6>predicted it this morning. It goes back and forth. And

0:24:24.600 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 6>the funny thing is is, okay, people want to make

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:30.199
<v Speaker 6>a bet one way or another, that's fine, But the

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:33.679
<v Speaker 6>Fed doesn't know what it's going to do. And because

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 6>they're data dependent and they're watching this data and it's

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 6>not coming in as they thought, so they have to

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 6>rethink what they want to do and when they want

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:42.639
<v Speaker 6>to do it, and they're just going to wait meeting

0:24:42.680 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 6>by meeting to get a handle on it. So whatever

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 6>the Fed funds futures or swaps say at this point

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 6>isn't necessarily what's going to happen.

0:24:55.080 --> 0:25:00.440
<v Speaker 3>But Michael, are the rate moves and the trader are

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:03.359
<v Speaker 3>they data dependent on? Thinking about what Luzianne Sanders or

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:05.880
<v Speaker 3>Swab said to us yesterday, and she's like, stop focusing

0:25:05.920 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 3>on the debate about what's the Fed going to do?

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 3>When is it gonna cut raise how many rates? Like

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:12.639
<v Speaker 3>just that's not what investors care about, Like, and she

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 3>was tying, what's going on inequity markets is going is

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:18.199
<v Speaker 3>based on what's going on in the rates markets? The

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:21.359
<v Speaker 3>rates market. Are they taking their cues I mean, they

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 3>do take their cues from J. Powell. They also, though

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 3>do from data points, right, they help us understand they do.

0:25:26.800 --> 0:25:29.159
<v Speaker 5>But you've got to remember there's different types of investors.

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:32.359
<v Speaker 5>I mean, the people who are trading is swaps whether

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:34.359
<v Speaker 5>and sort of trading between whether there's going to be

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:38.400
<v Speaker 5>a November cut, December cut, or maybe saying, actually November's

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 5>two close elections, so maybe it's going to be a

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:42.199
<v Speaker 5>September cut, and they'll jump back in there if they

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:44.600
<v Speaker 5>get any kind of relief from the data side. They're

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:49.400
<v Speaker 5>the short term momentum players, longer term investors who you've

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:51.879
<v Speaker 5>been telling us for weeks. God, it's so nice to

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 5>see yields finally getting into that four and a half

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 5>five percent zip code. We didn't have that since two

0:25:56.320 --> 0:26:00.239
<v Speaker 5>thousand and seven. And so their advice is, look, you've

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:02.919
<v Speaker 5>got to start strategically allocating more and more money and

0:26:02.960 --> 0:26:05.720
<v Speaker 5>scale into the bond market as itselves off. The other

0:26:05.760 --> 0:26:07.359
<v Speaker 5>point to make about all this, of course, is that

0:26:08.680 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 5>the market priced in a lot of rate cuts at

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:13.080
<v Speaker 5>the start of this year, in part because Powell made

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 5>the famous pivot in December. Now as the market takes

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:20.120
<v Speaker 5>that out, you're tightening financial conditions. If you keep pushing

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 5>yields higher, you're going to keep tightening financial conditions, and

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:25.960
<v Speaker 5>therefore things will start to slow down again, and then

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:27.639
<v Speaker 5>the market will go back. It's kind of like a

0:26:27.720 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 5>washing machine side.

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:30.719
<v Speaker 2>But that's kind of what we saw in like August

0:26:30.720 --> 0:26:33.200
<v Speaker 2>September Olobra when we saw yields move higher.

0:26:33.280 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 5>Yes, so at the moment, the Treasury Index is on

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 5>course to have its worst month since last February, and

0:26:38.800 --> 0:26:40.439
<v Speaker 5>in fact, it's not that far away from actually being

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 5>the worst month since the dark months of twenty twenty

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:46.200
<v Speaker 5>two when things are really getting rocky. So that shock

0:26:46.320 --> 0:26:48.639
<v Speaker 5>is coming through. Equities will probably take more of a

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:51.639
<v Speaker 5>hit two of yelds keep on going up, because ultimately,

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 5>can this economy live with real yields going towards two fifty?

0:26:56.359 --> 0:26:59.480
<v Speaker 5>I mean, that is debatable, but I think at the

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:03.679
<v Speaker 5>end of the day, as rights keep going, that's going

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:06.120
<v Speaker 5>to actually help slow things down. So ultimately you will

0:27:06.160 --> 0:27:08.359
<v Speaker 5>get some kind of cuts from the FIT. I would

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 5>think if this is the direction of trouble.

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 3>What about the argument that, well, wait a minute, people,

0:27:13.720 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 3>some investors are actually feeling, you know, wealthier that they've

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:20.119
<v Speaker 3>put money and you know, whether it's money markets are

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:22.040
<v Speaker 3>so and so forth, and they're getting some decent returns.

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 3>Or you look at some of these megacap tech companies.

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 3>You've got so much cash on their balance sheet and

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:31.200
<v Speaker 3>they're actually making money. We talked with our Bloomberg intelligence

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 3>team and they said, they're actually making some real money

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:36.640
<v Speaker 3>on all of this. How does that impact things? Well,

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:39.960
<v Speaker 3>in terms of the economic impact and a slow down.

0:27:39.960 --> 0:27:44.360
<v Speaker 6>There's a theory that the fed's high rates are actually economy,

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:47.639
<v Speaker 6>but nobody really at the FED would believe that the

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 6>wealthfair And the fact is that people who have enough

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 6>money to be really making money in the markets aren't

0:27:55.200 --> 0:27:58.600
<v Speaker 6>going to just start spending more because the markets are

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:02.400
<v Speaker 6>going up, they're spending as they do. So I don't

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 6>think there's a lot to that.

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:06.240
<v Speaker 3>What do you say to Michael saying, really yet, the

0:28:06.240 --> 0:28:07.919
<v Speaker 3>two fifty? Can the economy live with that?

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:10.919
<v Speaker 6>It looks like it. I mean, that's the thing that

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:13.160
<v Speaker 6>the Fed is saying at this point is we don't

0:28:13.240 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 6>have to because we have really yield at that level,

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:22.119
<v Speaker 6>and we have very low unemployment, and we have reasonably

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:24.879
<v Speaker 6>strong growth. Inflation is a bit of a problem, but

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 6>we'll see how that goes over the next couple of months,

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 6>so we don't need to react at this point. And

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:33.120
<v Speaker 6>when you go back in history and you look at

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 6>what happened after previous recessions, when the FED started raising

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 6>rates before we got into the Great Financial Crisis and

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:45.080
<v Speaker 6>went to zero, this is not an unusual rate level.

0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:47.480
<v Speaker 6>You know, five and a half is maybe a little

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 6>bit higher than you would have seen, but you're looking

0:28:50.200 --> 0:28:53.880
<v Speaker 6>at four to five percent as a kind of a

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:57.120
<v Speaker 6>normal rate. Now, it's been twenty some years since we've

0:28:57.160 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 6>been there, so people aren't used to that. But the

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 6>how we function with that.

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 2>Is that the feeling that you're getting right now talking

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:06.680
<v Speaker 2>to bond investors that this level of rates is the

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 2>new normal.

0:29:07.760 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, they think it's a return to what we had

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:12.760
<v Speaker 5>before the financial crisis. I mean, the financial crisis was

0:29:12.920 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 5>the biggest economic shot since the Group Depression. You had

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:21.520
<v Speaker 5>the biggest collapse of financial markets and of the banks

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 5>since the depression era. I mean it came what ten

0:29:24.160 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 5>years after the dismantled Class Steagle. So you know, again,

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 5>it takes a long time to recover from those kind

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 5>of huge balance sheet shocks, particularly when it's overlaid with

0:29:33.960 --> 0:29:37.560
<v Speaker 5>a massive housing bubble bursting. So you had both households

0:29:38.080 --> 0:29:40.880
<v Speaker 5>and banks taking a massive hit it. You know, it

0:29:40.880 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 5>took a decade to get through. And then you get COVID,

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:46.560
<v Speaker 5>which is suddenly just is a massive infusion of cash

0:29:46.640 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 5>into the broad economy. And so we now have, you know,

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:53.440
<v Speaker 5>inflation picking up. FED unable to be yet to be

0:29:53.560 --> 0:29:55.960
<v Speaker 5>confident enough that it can start to ease back, to

0:29:56.440 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 5>ease back on those brakes and start cutting rates again,

0:29:59.480 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 5>because they don't of the confidence of inflation is truly

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 5>under control. And it is a tricky period for the

0:30:03.920 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 5>FED because whenever you do see a pickup in inflation,

0:30:06.480 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 5>yes it will come down, but if it remains elevated,

0:30:09.600 --> 0:30:12.360
<v Speaker 5>that means the economy is vulnerable to another inflation shock

0:30:12.400 --> 0:30:14.920
<v Speaker 5>which kicks it back up into gear. But I think

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:18.320
<v Speaker 5>in general bond investors like what they're seeing. They do think, yes,

0:30:18.360 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 5>there's potential for rates to go a bit higher from here,

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 5>but in general they think we're pretty much near the top.

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 5>But it's what it's very difficult to pick a top.

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 5>So this is why a lot of the longer term

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:32.400
<v Speaker 5>investors are just scaling into the market, and in particular

0:30:32.480 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 5>though they are not comfortable about debt beyond ten years.

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 5>And that gets back to the spending that's going on

0:30:38.920 --> 0:30:41.320
<v Speaker 5>in Washington. It gets back to the fact that whilst

0:30:41.400 --> 0:30:44.320
<v Speaker 5>the tax receipts have come in strong this year, that

0:30:44.400 --> 0:30:47.760
<v Speaker 5>will kind of push supply, eases the pressure on supply

0:30:47.840 --> 0:30:51.280
<v Speaker 5>concerns next year and beyond, particularly given however the election

0:30:51.400 --> 0:30:55.320
<v Speaker 5>shakes out, you can have another round of supply, another

0:30:55.400 --> 0:30:57.680
<v Speaker 5>more pressure coming through. And the one thing I will say,

0:30:58.040 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 5>if I look at the ten year and the third

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:03.200
<v Speaker 5>they really haven't truly come back to where we were

0:31:03.200 --> 0:31:04.960
<v Speaker 5>before the financial crisis. Because if you look at the

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 5>very geeky bond model that says what is the risk premium,

0:31:08.640 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 5>it's only still around zero for ten years. That to

0:31:11.760 --> 0:31:13.480
<v Speaker 5>me is a problem because you need to have a

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:16.960
<v Speaker 5>positive risk premium. Partly that'll come about if the curve steepens.

0:31:17.320 --> 0:31:19.440
<v Speaker 5>But if you talk to investors, this is why they're

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:21.960
<v Speaker 5>a bit reticent about ten year and longer debt.

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:24.320
<v Speaker 3>I do wonder we've had a lot of guests. I

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 3>feel like we've come on and just reminded us about

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 3>the importance of US government debt and managing it and

0:31:28.920 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 3>servicing it and the additional issuance that will be needed. Mike,

0:31:33.320 --> 0:31:36.160
<v Speaker 3>I mean, go back, right, how many years that we've

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:38.239
<v Speaker 3>talked about this so much in the past and then

0:31:38.240 --> 0:31:40.760
<v Speaker 3>it kind of went away. But concerns about the cost

0:31:41.400 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 3>of the ballooning government debt and servicing that. How do

0:31:45.160 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 3>you think about that in terms of the economic impact.

0:31:47.640 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 6>Well, the way the FED looks at it is if

0:31:50.920 --> 0:31:54.000
<v Speaker 6>it has an impact on the economy, they might have

0:31:54.080 --> 0:31:56.280
<v Speaker 6>to react, but they really can't do a whole lot

0:31:56.520 --> 0:32:00.160
<v Speaker 6>because the government the fiscal side is not there.

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:00.719
<v Speaker 1>Area.

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 6>We have been talking about the problems of high debt

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:09.560
<v Speaker 6>forever and we've never hit the spot where it really

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:10.959
<v Speaker 6>affects the economy.

0:32:11.520 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:16.800
<v Speaker 6>Economic theory tells you that it will, but we don't

0:32:16.840 --> 0:32:20.120
<v Speaker 6>know where that is, and we don't know how it's

0:32:20.120 --> 0:32:22.880
<v Speaker 6>going to play out. This is the biggest economy the

0:32:22.880 --> 0:32:25.280
<v Speaker 6>world has ever seen. We have our own printing press,

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 6>so there are ways you could deal with it. But

0:32:29.800 --> 0:32:32.960
<v Speaker 6>you know, you don't want inflation to break out because

0:32:33.000 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 6>of that, So there isn't much the Fed can can

0:32:37.360 --> 0:32:40.000
<v Speaker 6>really do. They don't have a context for it because

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:42.720
<v Speaker 6>we haven't had the problem. They just think at some

0:32:42.840 --> 0:32:46.280
<v Speaker 6>point it's unsustainable. Where that point is, we don't know.

0:32:46.440 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 3>That's why I can kind of bring it up. I

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 3>feel like we used to talk about it and then

0:32:49.000 --> 0:32:51.600
<v Speaker 3>it went away. Final thoughts here, Michael just got about

0:32:51.600 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 3>ten to fifteen seconds.

0:32:53.160 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 5>I would think that pal speaking next week probably is

0:32:57.600 --> 0:33:01.000
<v Speaker 5>more important than tomorrow's data. And then I think the

0:33:01.080 --> 0:33:03.520
<v Speaker 5>job's number next week, if we still see a strong

0:33:03.640 --> 0:33:07.840
<v Speaker 5>labor market that's not softening, I think the market could

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 5>probably well take out rad cuts for this year in.

0:33:11.640 --> 0:33:12.040
<v Speaker 6>Wednesday.

0:33:12.080 --> 0:33:13.200
<v Speaker 5>And then you got the refunded but.

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:19.800
<v Speaker 3>Again market I round Michael McKee and Michael McKenzie, great duos.

0:33:21.400 --> 0:33:25.280
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Listen live

0:33:25.360 --> 0:33:28.200
<v Speaker 1>each weekday starting at two pm Eastern not Apple Car

0:33:28.320 --> 0:33:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Play and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:34.560
<v Speaker 1>can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship

0:33:34.640 --> 0:33:39.520
<v Speaker 1>New York station. Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty

0:33:41.720 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Marco Journal.

0:33:45.880 --> 0:33:46.880
<v Speaker 3>How about you let me drive?

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, no, no, no, who's going to drive?

0:33:50.200 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 4>Honey?

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Please, I'll travel.

0:33:53.640 --> 0:33:54.400
<v Speaker 3>I want to drive.

0:33:54.440 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 7>It's a good question.

0:34:01.320 --> 0:34:04.840
<v Speaker 1>This is the drive to the globe for me. Well

0:34:06.520 --> 0:34:07.720
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio.

0:34:07.960 --> 0:34:10.520
<v Speaker 3>All right, everybody, just about eighteen nineteen minutes left in

0:34:10.520 --> 0:34:13.239
<v Speaker 3>today's trading session, getting ready to wrap up the Thursday trade.

0:34:13.320 --> 0:34:16.280
<v Speaker 3>Bounce it around here. But we're definitely, as we keep saying,

0:34:16.320 --> 0:34:19.800
<v Speaker 3>off our worst levels of this session down across the board,

0:34:19.800 --> 0:34:23.120
<v Speaker 3>but nonetheless not as much of a risk off or

0:34:23.200 --> 0:34:25.800
<v Speaker 3>negative tone as much as we saw earlier in the session.

0:34:26.320 --> 0:34:29.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's hear what Melissa Outo has to say about this.

0:34:29.080 --> 0:34:32.680
<v Speaker 2>She's head of TMT research at the fintech firm Visible Alpha.

0:34:32.719 --> 0:34:35.120
<v Speaker 2>It provides it buy and sell side research. She joins

0:34:35.160 --> 0:34:37.759
<v Speaker 2>us here in the Bloomberg Interactive Broker's studio. I want

0:34:37.760 --> 0:34:40.279
<v Speaker 2>to talk tech because that's like your wheelhouse and it's

0:34:40.280 --> 0:34:41.480
<v Speaker 2>a perfect data. Have you on, We.

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:42.919
<v Speaker 3>Really care about it right now in the week.

0:34:43.000 --> 0:34:46.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, first of all, everything's tech now, but you know,

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:48.040
<v Speaker 2>the big tech players are the ones that are reporting

0:34:48.040 --> 0:34:51.000
<v Speaker 2>earnings this weekend next. So we had Meta Platforms yesterday,

0:34:51.080 --> 0:34:55.040
<v Speaker 2>we have Alphabet and Microsoft after the bell today. First

0:34:55.120 --> 0:34:59.200
<v Speaker 2>up is Meta platforms. Is this a selloff over so

0:34:59.560 --> 0:35:00.560
<v Speaker 2>is this like overdone?

0:35:02.000 --> 0:35:04.279
<v Speaker 7>First of all, thanks for having me on and what

0:35:04.440 --> 0:35:07.080
<v Speaker 7>a wild day and the markets to be here speaking

0:35:07.120 --> 0:35:12.239
<v Speaker 7>with you about tech. The backdrop is a jungle at

0:35:12.280 --> 0:35:14.919
<v Speaker 7>the moment. I mean, there's so much happening, both from

0:35:15.160 --> 0:35:18.719
<v Speaker 7>an earnings perspective and from a macro perspective. I think

0:35:19.040 --> 0:35:22.120
<v Speaker 7>to address your question around Meta coming into the quarter,

0:35:22.160 --> 0:35:24.680
<v Speaker 7>based on visible alpha consensus over the past couple of months,

0:35:24.680 --> 0:35:27.800
<v Speaker 7>we didn't see numbers moving that much into the quarter,

0:35:28.440 --> 0:35:32.719
<v Speaker 7>which suggested that consensus was fairly stable. So when they

0:35:32.760 --> 0:35:35.920
<v Speaker 7>came out and said we're actually going to move our

0:35:35.920 --> 0:35:40.360
<v Speaker 7>expense numbers, those expense numbers were actually higher than expectations,

0:35:41.120 --> 0:35:44.840
<v Speaker 7>which the upper the upper range. The market did not

0:35:45.120 --> 0:35:49.200
<v Speaker 7>like that. And it wasn't a one off because Mark

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:54.239
<v Speaker 7>Zuckerberg came out and said this is something longer term

0:35:54.239 --> 0:35:57.279
<v Speaker 7>we're going to be investing for a while. It's going

0:35:57.360 --> 0:36:00.319
<v Speaker 7>to continue, and I think we're What we also heard

0:36:00.360 --> 0:36:04.839
<v Speaker 7>from him was about reality labs. Reality labs also continuing

0:36:04.880 --> 0:36:09.399
<v Speaker 7>to see continued losses, and I think that was one

0:36:09.440 --> 0:36:10.960
<v Speaker 7>area of the business where.

0:36:11.280 --> 0:36:12.359
<v Speaker 1>That's not a surprise though.

0:36:12.400 --> 0:36:14.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's not where it wants to go, but

0:36:14.960 --> 0:36:16.440
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of cost a lot of money and it's

0:36:16.480 --> 0:36:19.280
<v Speaker 2>not like we're walking outside seeing people wearing these headsets around.

0:36:19.960 --> 0:36:23.440
<v Speaker 7>The investment community was probably hoping for a bit more

0:36:23.440 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 7>efficiency and discipline around that area, but he essentially came

0:36:28.239 --> 0:36:30.920
<v Speaker 7>out and said, no, that's not happening. And I think

0:36:31.000 --> 0:36:33.239
<v Speaker 7>those two the combination of those two things. So the

0:36:33.280 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 7>market didn't like it.

0:36:34.239 --> 0:36:36.520
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's interesting, right, and they certainly learned their

0:36:36.600 --> 0:36:39.880
<v Speaker 3>lesson right prior to the year of efficiency, kind of

0:36:39.920 --> 0:36:43.280
<v Speaker 3>get that and then kind of got their act together.

0:36:43.440 --> 0:36:46.040
<v Speaker 3>A stock was often running big time last year, and

0:36:46.040 --> 0:36:47.960
<v Speaker 3>we certainly have seen it move this year. You know,

0:36:48.000 --> 0:36:49.880
<v Speaker 3>our own man Deep Singh saying, you know, there's a

0:36:50.000 --> 0:36:52.239
<v Speaker 3>range there, and so it'll be interesting to see what

0:36:52.280 --> 0:36:54.120
<v Speaker 3>they say about this quarter and whether or not they

0:36:54.120 --> 0:36:56.279
<v Speaker 3>bring in that range and say, all right, so maybe

0:36:56.320 --> 0:36:57.600
<v Speaker 3>it's going to be at the lower end. We got

0:36:57.600 --> 0:36:58.520
<v Speaker 3>the message kind of thing.

0:36:58.600 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 2>But I think what also Mandeep said that really stuck

0:37:00.520 --> 0:37:03.520
<v Speaker 2>with me, Carol, was this idea that imagine the company

0:37:03.520 --> 0:37:06.120
<v Speaker 2>making a fifty billion dollar investment or fifty billion dollar

0:37:06.239 --> 0:37:08.600
<v Speaker 2>purchase of a company right and having nothing to show

0:37:08.640 --> 0:37:10.239
<v Speaker 2>for it, because that's how much money it's going to

0:37:10.280 --> 0:37:10.960
<v Speaker 2>end up spending in.

0:37:11.000 --> 0:37:13.080
<v Speaker 3>This Indeed, it's a lot of money.

0:37:13.200 --> 0:37:16.279
<v Speaker 7>Indeed, it's an incredible amount of money that has not

0:37:16.400 --> 0:37:18.880
<v Speaker 7>really netted much ROI to shareholders.

0:37:19.120 --> 0:37:21.359
<v Speaker 3>So the researcher that you are doing now around Meta,

0:37:21.440 --> 0:37:23.560
<v Speaker 3>what are you saying, you know, what are you saying

0:37:23.600 --> 0:37:25.600
<v Speaker 3>that it's not a buy at this point? Are you

0:37:25.680 --> 0:37:28.680
<v Speaker 3>saying it's a moment where you maybe you take some

0:37:28.840 --> 0:37:31.120
<v Speaker 3>off of your holdings in Meta? Like what is it

0:37:31.120 --> 0:37:32.160
<v Speaker 3>that you are advising?

0:37:33.760 --> 0:37:40.239
<v Speaker 7>The expenses around Meta and its investments in AI are

0:37:40.280 --> 0:37:43.759
<v Speaker 7>going to be significant based on what the company has

0:37:43.760 --> 0:37:49.040
<v Speaker 7>said and what we imagine for our consensus data is

0:37:49.080 --> 0:37:53.400
<v Speaker 7>that there could be some additional upward revisions to expenses

0:37:53.560 --> 0:37:56.759
<v Speaker 7>going forward this year and next year. So that's one

0:37:56.800 --> 0:37:59.960
<v Speaker 7>area of the fundamentals that we're watching very closely.

0:38:00.600 --> 0:38:02.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I want to shift now to what we have

0:38:02.640 --> 0:38:07.640
<v Speaker 2>coming later today Microsoft and Google parent Alphabet, what are

0:38:07.640 --> 0:38:09.760
<v Speaker 2>you seeing consensus over at Visible Alpha.

0:38:12.120 --> 0:38:15.720
<v Speaker 7>It's a very interesting backdrop for both companies right now,

0:38:15.920 --> 0:38:18.560
<v Speaker 7>and I think when we look at similarly coming into

0:38:18.600 --> 0:38:21.400
<v Speaker 7>the quarter, we're not seeing a lot of movement around consensus,

0:38:21.680 --> 0:38:24.440
<v Speaker 7>and that's you know, suggests from a top line and

0:38:24.760 --> 0:38:28.680
<v Speaker 7>an EPs perspective that the market kind of has come

0:38:28.719 --> 0:38:30.360
<v Speaker 7>out and said, Okay, this is what we think is

0:38:30.400 --> 0:38:33.359
<v Speaker 7>priced in. However, when we dig beneath the surface, there's

0:38:33.440 --> 0:38:38.239
<v Speaker 7>different things happening. For example, for the Azure business, the

0:38:38.239 --> 0:38:43.040
<v Speaker 7>Intelligent Cloud operating profit margin has a massive range between

0:38:43.239 --> 0:38:45.720
<v Speaker 7>either forty one percent on the bear side or fifty

0:38:45.719 --> 0:38:48.640
<v Speaker 7>percent on the bull side, which gives us a consensus

0:38:48.680 --> 0:38:53.520
<v Speaker 7>operating profit margin based on Visible Alpha consensus of forty

0:38:53.560 --> 0:38:57.520
<v Speaker 7>five percent. But that's a pretty significant range in terms

0:38:57.560 --> 0:38:59.840
<v Speaker 7>of what that business could deliver, and it's an enormous

0:39:00.000 --> 0:39:04.440
<v Speaker 7>business for Microsoft, as your revenues based on Visible African

0:39:04.440 --> 0:39:07.680
<v Speaker 7>sensus could be anywhere could be around seventy four billion

0:39:07.719 --> 0:39:11.680
<v Speaker 7>dollars this year, ninety four billion dollars next year. And

0:39:11.719 --> 0:39:15.520
<v Speaker 7>I think what we haven't seen is that any movement

0:39:15.560 --> 0:39:18.920
<v Speaker 7>of that, and going into the quarter, I'm wondering what

0:39:19.000 --> 0:39:21.799
<v Speaker 7>sort of commentary Nodella is going to come out with,

0:39:21.880 --> 0:39:26.239
<v Speaker 7>and what's he going to say about the open AI business,

0:39:26.560 --> 0:39:29.960
<v Speaker 7>about the open Ai partnership, about as your Ai, how

0:39:30.000 --> 0:39:33.839
<v Speaker 7>that's ultimately going to start to deliver an ROI and

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:37.480
<v Speaker 7>have a real meaningful business impact on these fundamentals.

0:39:37.960 --> 0:39:41.799
<v Speaker 3>So the consensus data is saying what basically that it's

0:39:41.840 --> 0:39:43.520
<v Speaker 3>going to be hard for them to live up or what.

0:39:43.840 --> 0:39:48.920
<v Speaker 7>There's a lot of debate out there. There's controversy in

0:39:48.960 --> 0:39:51.520
<v Speaker 7>that range because of the significant range of the operating

0:39:51.560 --> 0:39:56.080
<v Speaker 7>profit margin for the intelligent cloud business. It's not it

0:39:56.160 --> 0:39:59.640
<v Speaker 7>means that there could be surprises, and so that's what's

0:39:59.680 --> 0:40:00.960
<v Speaker 7>really interesting, because.

0:40:00.719 --> 0:40:02.719
<v Speaker 3>What you look for is a tight range, right or

0:40:02.840 --> 0:40:05.160
<v Speaker 3>as much or you know, in an ideal thing, it's

0:40:05.200 --> 0:40:08.040
<v Speaker 3>one number basically. I mean, I don't know how often

0:40:08.080 --> 0:40:10.440
<v Speaker 3>that happens. This is your world, how often does that happens?

0:40:10.480 --> 0:40:13.239
<v Speaker 7>It does absolutely happen. So when I look at Microsoft's

0:40:13.239 --> 0:40:16.879
<v Speaker 7>overall revenue, it's in a fairly tight range. But when

0:40:16.880 --> 0:40:19.600
<v Speaker 7>I go beneath the surface and look at the details,

0:40:19.920 --> 0:40:23.279
<v Speaker 7>you know, for example, the intelligent cloud business, the Azure business,

0:40:23.520 --> 0:40:26.359
<v Speaker 7>within the intelligent cloud business, you know those that's where

0:40:26.400 --> 0:40:27.440
<v Speaker 7>you see that nuance.

0:40:28.480 --> 0:40:31.480
<v Speaker 2>How concerned should investors be about what these companies, these

0:40:31.520 --> 0:40:33.319
<v Speaker 2>two companies tell us today about how much money they're

0:40:33.320 --> 0:40:35.120
<v Speaker 2>investing and how much they're spending. Given what we saw

0:40:35.160 --> 0:40:36.600
<v Speaker 2>from Meta, they've.

0:40:36.400 --> 0:40:39.560
<v Speaker 7>Both been spending an outrageous ab out of money.

0:40:39.760 --> 0:40:41.799
<v Speaker 2>Is it going to spook investors the way that Meta

0:40:41.840 --> 0:40:44.120
<v Speaker 2>Platforms did or does Meta have that history of two

0:40:44.200 --> 0:40:46.520
<v Speaker 2>years ago saying Hey, we're throwing in the towel on

0:40:46.600 --> 0:40:49.040
<v Speaker 2>the Facebook product and we're switching totally to the metaphrse,

0:40:49.040 --> 0:40:50.680
<v Speaker 2>So it's sort of a different type of investment.

0:40:50.840 --> 0:40:54.759
<v Speaker 7>I mean, it is one area that we have been

0:40:54.800 --> 0:40:58.040
<v Speaker 7>seeing clear trends in the numbers moving upward, is that

0:40:58.200 --> 0:41:02.319
<v Speaker 7>CAPEX numbers for micro Soft have been steadily increasing over

0:41:02.360 --> 0:41:05.399
<v Speaker 7>the next couple of years. Those estimates continue to creep

0:41:05.520 --> 0:41:09.879
<v Speaker 7>up and have been really since last year, which yeah,

0:41:09.920 --> 0:41:13.640
<v Speaker 7>which implies that, you know, the CAPEX expectations continued to

0:41:13.680 --> 0:41:17.799
<v Speaker 7>be positive, and I think you know that's somewhat correlated

0:41:17.840 --> 0:41:21.640
<v Speaker 7>to what we hear from players like Nvidia.

0:41:21.920 --> 0:41:24.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's interesting, it's just a metric as people are

0:41:24.120 --> 0:41:27.799
<v Speaker 3>building out their AI and all the players in it, right,

0:41:27.960 --> 0:41:30.520
<v Speaker 3>like a different thinking about capex. You need the capital

0:41:30.560 --> 0:41:33.080
<v Speaker 3>expenditors to do it. But is there a point where

0:41:33.120 --> 0:41:34.560
<v Speaker 3>it becomes a little bit like, wait a minute, do

0:41:34.640 --> 0:41:38.560
<v Speaker 3>we really understand are we outspending maybe the potential payoff?

0:41:38.560 --> 0:41:40.359
<v Speaker 3>I guess we're kind of in that Noman's let. I'm

0:41:40.360 --> 0:41:41.560
<v Speaker 3>trying to figure that out right now.

0:41:41.600 --> 0:41:45.560
<v Speaker 7>Indeed, yeah, and I think you also mentioned alphabet. Alphabet

0:41:45.920 --> 0:41:48.840
<v Speaker 7>is also another interesting one. Also, the top line in

0:41:48.920 --> 0:41:52.840
<v Speaker 7>EPs consensus haven't moved much, but again going beneath the

0:41:52.880 --> 0:41:55.920
<v Speaker 7>surface and really interesting movements. Also in their cloud business,

0:41:55.960 --> 0:41:59.200
<v Speaker 7>the Google Cloud operating profit margin based on Visible Ephic

0:41:59.280 --> 0:42:02.399
<v Speaker 7>consensus when for I'm eight point seven percent to seven

0:42:02.400 --> 0:42:05.359
<v Speaker 7>point three percent the past couple of months, and that's

0:42:05.360 --> 0:42:07.480
<v Speaker 7>a pretty big move one hundred and forty basis points

0:42:07.480 --> 0:42:08.879
<v Speaker 7>in the virgin So it.

0:42:08.880 --> 0:42:11.399
<v Speaker 3>Implies that we get to run. We got to run,

0:42:11.440 --> 0:42:13.200
<v Speaker 3>forgive us lots of numbers, but lots of things to

0:42:13.239 --> 0:42:16.080
<v Speaker 3>think about as the earnings come out. Melissa Outro, she's

0:42:16.160 --> 0:42:19.279
<v Speaker 3>head of TMT research at the at Visible Alpha. And

0:42:19.360 --> 0:42:20.400
<v Speaker 3>this is Bloomberg.

0:42:22.200 --> 0:42:26.880
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast available on Apple Spotify,

0:42:27.000 --> 0:42:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday

0:42:30.760 --> 0:42:34.360
<v Speaker 1>afternoons from two to five pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:42:34.400 --> 0:42:37.719
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:42:37.760 --> 0:42:40.839
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:42:40.960 --> 0:42:44.239
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal