WEBVTT - Short Stuff: Bourgeoisie

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to the Short Stuff. I'm Josh and

0:00:06.400 --> 0:00:09.239
<v Speaker 1>there's chalk and Jerry's sitting in for Dave. So it's

0:00:09.280 --> 0:00:12.639
<v Speaker 1>short stuff. You basic person.

0:00:15.320 --> 0:00:16.280
<v Speaker 2>You calling me bougie?

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no not. I wouldn't do that. I think it's

0:00:20.239 --> 0:00:21.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of a mean thing to say to somebody, at

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:24.920
<v Speaker 1>least in America. In France, they're like, yes, you're right,

0:00:25.000 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 1>thank you. In America, it's a bit of a put down.

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 3>That's right. And that's what we're talking about today, where

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 3>you're talking about a word bourgeois. B oh you r

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 3>G E O I s. Yeah, not to be confused

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 3>with bourgeoisie.

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Correct, Well, yeah, they're very closely related. Bourgeois can mean

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:53.520
<v Speaker 1>a It can be an adjective and a noun. Right,

0:00:53.600 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>If it's a nown, you're talking about one person who

0:00:56.960 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 1>is bourgeois. So that's their behavior where it's the one

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 1>person bourgeoisie as all of the people who are bourgeois.

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:07.040
<v Speaker 1>It's a noun only, okay, everybody. There's gonna be a

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>quiz at the end of this episode.

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:12.320
<v Speaker 3>But if you if you talk to Americans, a lot

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 3>of Americans probably hear bourgeois and they think, oh, fancy

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:18.279
<v Speaker 3>fancy fancy, right, And that is not the case because

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:21.959
<v Speaker 3>bourgeois refers to like you called me, basics or sort

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 3>of a middle class basic individual, yes, or group of individuals.

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Right. But there's a there's a long road between the

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 1>original version of bourgeois that we'll talk about and then

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the American version that it has now and right, smack

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>dab in the middle are the commis, specifically Karl Marx.

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand why Joseph Engles never gets his due

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 1>because he and Marx wrote the Communist Manifesto. But it's

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>always just Karl Marx. Karl Marx, you know, must drive

0:01:57.040 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 1>angles crazy. But in eighteen forty eight they published the

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Communist Manifesto, and in that they adopted the word that

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:09.839
<v Speaker 1>had formerly been middle class people. It wasn't really much

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>of a put down, it wasn't. It was just a

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>useful word for a while. He equated them with the

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:20.079
<v Speaker 1>people who owned the capital that the labor was produced on,

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 1>and decided that they were exploiting the proletariat, the working class. Right,

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 1>that's right.

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:28.520
<v Speaker 3>And he was writing in German, so of course he

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 3>did not say bourgeois. He said bergiar lche Gesellschaft and English.

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Make sureman sound beautiful, Chuck, thank.

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:38.360
<v Speaker 2>You, Donka.

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 3>In America they may translate that as sybil society or

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:45.919
<v Speaker 3>maybe a bourgeois society. But either way you slice it,

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:50.359
<v Speaker 3>what he's saying is the bourgeoisie are are the bad people.

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:53.960
<v Speaker 1>They're the one they're exploitive, They're not actually doing anything.

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:56.360
<v Speaker 1>They just own the stuff that the people are actually

0:02:56.400 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>doing something or using to do the thing that they're doing.

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 1>But really the bourgeoisie are the ones who are making

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:06.799
<v Speaker 1>the money off the working class in their labor right.

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:10.079
<v Speaker 1>So it was not it was not at this at

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>this time, it was not viewed as a very popular

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 1>or it wasn't it wasn't praise. How about that no

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 1>one ever used it for praise by this time and

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 1>when it finally crossed the Atlantic to America around the

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>early twentieth century, the wobbles the industrial workers of the

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:31.520
<v Speaker 1>world who were I believe we talked about them before,

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 1>and they were split between communists and anarchists, and there

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>was a big struggle I think between the two. But

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>regardless of whether you're a communist or an anarchists, at

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the twentieth century. You were not a

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 1>fan of the bourgeoisie. And yeah, so the Wobbleys did

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 1>not like the bourgeoisie either, and then in fact came

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 1>up with a new slang term for him.

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 3>That's right. The slang word was boushois bushwa. And what's weird?

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 3>I think that was an a quote from a nineteen

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 3>seventy article. What's weird, though, is that that word boushwa

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 3>eventually was sort of morphed into a slang for bs,

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 3>like somebody's full of hot air, or bs someone you

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 3>know is full of bushwi.

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Right, we have to thank our friends at the Grammarphobia

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>blog for digging that stuff up.

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:24.279
<v Speaker 2>That's right.

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:27.920
<v Speaker 1>And then so it also kind of morphed in a

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:33.279
<v Speaker 1>new way, kind of the way that we view it today.

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>But a little yeah, I guess it was pretty much

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:39.479
<v Speaker 1>the way we view it today. It first pops up

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 1>in black culture, where it kind of morphed thanks to

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Gladys Knight and the Pips. They had a disco hit

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen eighty called Bougie Bougie.

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 3>And can we hear a snippet?

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:54.039
<v Speaker 1>No, we can't, unfortunately, but if you want to hear

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:56.720
<v Speaker 1>any of the song Boogie Bougie. You can find it

0:04:56.800 --> 0:05:00.279
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube or just about anywhere where you can listen

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to it free and clear. But it's a great song

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>and I strongly recommend people go listen to it.

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:07.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and that would be be o u r g

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 3>I E comma b o u r g i.

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:12.839
<v Speaker 1>E right, and the whole the whole point of the

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 1>song is it's about somebody who comes from the working

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:19.599
<v Speaker 1>class or a poorer background but started to make money

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:21.920
<v Speaker 1>and now they're flaunting it. They have like a new

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 1>car with the sun roof, they have new clothes, and

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:27.839
<v Speaker 1>it was a it was a commentary on them, but

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:30.360
<v Speaker 1>also kind of like a snide one too, like like

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:34.040
<v Speaker 1>these these people are being tacky in a way and

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:36.159
<v Speaker 1>forgetting who they are where they come from.

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:38.840
<v Speaker 3>I guess yeah, it's kind of like that that new

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 3>money old money thing, which is just so.

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, yeah, I say we take a break, chuck.

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I was.

0:05:45.360 --> 0:06:14.160
<v Speaker 2>About to say that nice.

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:05.920
<v Speaker 3>Softly, jaw.

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Soft.

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 3>So if you want to go back to the original bougie,

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:21.839
<v Speaker 3>if you want to go back to France. The original

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 3>meaning is from a French word b o u r g,

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:26.839
<v Speaker 3>which I guess would that be Bourg.

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, kind of like berg on the end of a town.

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:33.160
<v Speaker 3>Okay, and that's like a small town or a small

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 3>market in the Middle Ages. The people that live there

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 3>sort of adopted that name for themselves, so it kind

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 3>of this this word is just morphing and morphing all

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 3>over the place over the years. They were one step

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:47.280
<v Speaker 3>up from like a farming peasant, so they were sort

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 3>of the middle class of the.

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Time, right, which is just the way that it was.

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Again I said, it was like a useful word. It

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:56.359
<v Speaker 1>wasn't like a put down. It wasn't like a compliment.

0:06:56.400 --> 0:07:00.360
<v Speaker 1>It was like you are bourgeois. That's that's that descriptor right,

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 1>very nice. And it wasn't until the seventeenth century, specifically,

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I think in sixteen seventy when Moliere, the French playwright,

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:12.559
<v Speaker 1>came up with a musical comedy he was hilarious called

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Le Bourgeois gentle Gentleumes or the bourgeois Gentleman. And this

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 1>is when it takes bourgeois and makes fun of it.

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 1>It's Moliere was punching down to the middle class and

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 1>essentially doing the exact same thing that Gladys Knight and

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 1>the Pips are doing with bougie bougie they he was

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 1>basically making fun of some middle class social climber who

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>was trying to make a name for himself in French society.

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 3>That's right, and that would be the definition that is

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 3>most sort of thought of today in the twenty first

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 3>century when someone says bougie. Another modern musical example is

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 3>Atlanta's own from the atl Migos. You ever listen to Migos, Oh, yeah,

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 3>it's good stuff. They have a song called bad and

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 3>Bougie in this case spelled b o u j e,

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 3>and it sort of leans back on that what the

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 3>Pips we're talking about? Sort of a new fancy lifestyle.

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Yes, but two things were different. One the Migos made

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 1>their money cooking crack in a crock pot, which is

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 1>a proprietary eponym, and usually there was a oozy in

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the same room too. And two they were proud of

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 1>being bougie and all the new money and tacky like

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 1>ways that they threw it around like that was the thing.

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't. It wasn't a put down. They were like, yeah,

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm bougie. You should have seen the money I had before,

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 1>and now look what I got.

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:40.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, totally.

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:46.560
<v Speaker 1>It is a great song. Yeah, okay, so that's where

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 1>we are today. Bougie it's it's essentially a put down,

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:52.640
<v Speaker 1>depending on whether you've claimed it yourself. If most of

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the time, if you're calling someone bougie in America, you're

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 1>basically saying, like you said at the outset, they're basic,

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>They're They're lifestyle in their life is just kind of

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:05.199
<v Speaker 1>boring and pedestrian, the middle of the road and what's

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:10.959
<v Speaker 1>the point kind of thing. Usually it's from somebody who well,

0:09:10.960 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 1>they're just being mean essentially, right, Yeah, but in France

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 1>it's not the case.

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, in modern France, it does not mean pedestrian. It's

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:27.560
<v Speaker 3>a little more like good, well mannered, well educated. There's

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:32.599
<v Speaker 3>there's like three levels supposedly of a Parisian bourgeois, the

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 3>nobility or people that are kind of close to nobility,

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 3>or the rich or the crime de la creme. You

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 3>have the bourgeois de provence, doctors, attorneys, middle class types,

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 3>and then the petite bourgeois who are you know, shopkeepers, artists,

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, kind of self starting, self employed people.

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and even though there seems to be a bit

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 1>of a hierarchy, to it. They all are. They're behaving

0:09:57.960 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the same way. I think it just depends on how

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 1>much money you have, is what it's really kind of

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>carved out between. But the bourgeois in France is exactly

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 1>what Americans who don't know what bourgeois means think of.

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:17.680
<v Speaker 1>They're correct, but they're just thinking specifically of the French bourgeois.

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah and yeah, I guess that's about it for being

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:25.080
<v Speaker 1>bougie and bourgeois and bourgeoisie and Karl Marx and Joseph

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Engels and Migo's and Gladys Knight and the whole lot

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:28.840
<v Speaker 1>of it.

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 3>Chuck, Well, we'll follow up in ten years and see

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 3>if the definition's changed again.

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Great idea. In the meantime, Short Stuff is out. Stuff

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>You Should Know is a production of iHeartRadio.

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 3>For more podcasts my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:49.679
<v Speaker 3>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.