WEBVTT - Rahm Emanuel’s Recipe for America is Getting ‘Back to Basics’

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:11.600
<v Speaker 2>I believe the moment the American dream becomes unaffordable and

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 2>inaccessible is exactly when our democracy becomes unstable.

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:26.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm Stephanie Flanders, head of Government and Economics at Bloomberg,

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:29.479
<v Speaker 1>and this is Trump Economics, the podcast that looks at

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the economic world of Donald Trump, how he's already shaped

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the global economy, what on earth is going to happen next?

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>And this week it's a conversation with Rahm Emmanuel, a

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 1>longtime Washington operator. He's also been White House chief of

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 1>staff for Congressman mayor of Chicago, and President Biden's ambassador

0:00:49.800 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>to Japan, and now, by all accounts, he's thinking about

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 1>running for president. We're recording this on Thursday, the thirtieth

0:00:56.440 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 1>of October, and any one of those parts of his

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:01.640
<v Speaker 1>resume would give me plenty of reason to have Ram

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and Manuel on the show. But I'm going to focus

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>here on the alternative to Trumpanomics that the Democrats need

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>to offer to have a chance of retaking power in

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:13.399
<v Speaker 1>the next few years. The root cause of the fraught

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>state of American politics, Rahm says, is that the American

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>dream has become unaffordable, out of reach for the majority

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>of families. Democrats need to confront that head on, But

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 1>how in a country that no longer seems to be

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>able to countenance tax increases? For example? He also thinks

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>President Trump's China policies have been costly and wrong. The

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 1>President is now back from his Asia tour, but how

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 1>exactly would the former ambassador to Japan have done things differently,

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 1>especially now that China seems, if anything, to have gained

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the upper hand. So that's plenty, But given his very

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>close association with Chicago, I also can't help wondering what

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Rama Manual thinks about the way that American cities have

0:01:56.840 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>been thrust to the center of President Trump's efforts to

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 1>pumme up Democrats, ordering troops to Portland, Los Angeles, Washington,

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and Chicago and threatening to withhold funding for New York,

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:11.800
<v Speaker 1>for example. Partly it's about stoking confusion and chaos in

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>traditional Democratic strongholds, but there's a sense in which the

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:19.519
<v Speaker 1>President is also trying to weaponize a divide between rural

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 1>and urban parts of America that's been building for a

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>while and has not necessarily been good for Democrats. Rami

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Manuel I've talked far too much, but you can hear

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:32.359
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot I'd like to hear you talk about.

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:33.959
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for joining trump andomics.

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, thanks for having me.

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>We will get onto your vision for an anti trumpnomics.

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, economic policies that can get Democrats elected. But

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 1>first that issue about cities. I mean, Democrats have to

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 1>navigate what President Trump is doing and threatening right now

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>to do in American cities. What's the smart way to

0:02:58.720 --> 0:02:59.360
<v Speaker 1>respond to that.

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, let me push back on one thing in that introduction.

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 2>It's not about an anti Trump. Everything I'm trying to

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:08.960
<v Speaker 2>do is about being a pro American. Fair enough, it's

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:11.680
<v Speaker 2>a very different flavor. It's not just a critique. But

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 2>I think the American people I don't I'm not usually

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 2>a glass half full kind of guy, actually know what

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 2>we're doing right now is fundamentally wrong to the future.

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 2>I think if you think about twenty twenty eight in

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 2>the presidential but also about what you want to do

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 2>with it, this is about who can articulate about fighting

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 2>for America, not just fighting against Trump. If you look

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 2>at what I've talked about on education, housing, a national

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 2>industrial policy, these are all about fighting for America not

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 2>fighting against Trump.

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 1>That's a fair point.

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 2>B to the core question about cities. This is a

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 2>political strategy as well as it is anything else. Now, look,

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 2>there's both a good and a bad. Thirty of the

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 2>largest metropolitan areas in America are seventy five percent of

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 2>all your GDP. I used to joke as mayor of

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 2>the City of Chicago, the metropolit the Chicago area is

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 2>the twenty first largest economy in the world. We could

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 2>join the g twenty. It's not that exciting. I've been

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 2>to the meetings. I wouldn't go, but that's how big

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 2>the Chicago economy is. Now. If you want to compete

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 2>and win, you don't bash the economic engines of your country.

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 2>The negative side of that is, well, there's a concentration

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 2>of economic growth and possibility. It's also to concentrate it.

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:27.599
<v Speaker 2>This is an attempt which is all part of Donald

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:31.720
<v Speaker 2>Trump's strategy. It's reliant dealing with our common challenges, divisions

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 2>and drive them. He said it, so you're not looking

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 2>for me to interpret. Goes to a funeral for Charlie Kirk.

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:41.239
<v Speaker 2>I hate my enemies, goes to Iowa, says democrats hate America.

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:43.280
<v Speaker 2>You and I are doing this interview the same day

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:45.040
<v Speaker 2>that they announced that they're going to create a unit

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 2>within the deal with civil disobedience in cities. So to me,

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 2>this is about division, This is about his politics, and

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:54.920
<v Speaker 2>it has nothing to do with helping strengthen America.

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:58.359
<v Speaker 1>On the cities, certainly the leaders don't feel that what

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:02.160
<v Speaker 1>they needed was troops. But when there is a sort

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 1>of lack of trust there that the president is taking

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 1>advantage of that, when the big cities cry foul and

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>say we need help with this, but we don't want

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>help with that, there is a lack of sympathy out

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:17.919
<v Speaker 1>in the broader country.

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think I start from a different perspective. The

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:26.279
<v Speaker 2>American people prefer order versus disorder. Under Joe Biden, the

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 2>disorder was an uncontrolled border that looked way out of

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:32.479
<v Speaker 2>control with people bring and the federal government looked like

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:36.479
<v Speaker 2>it didn't give a rats here. Donald Trump has moved

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:39.719
<v Speaker 2>the disorder from the border into himself. If you think

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 2>for a moment, the American people who don't live in

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:44.840
<v Speaker 2>Chicago or don't live in Portland, like the fact that

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 2>people are wearing chemical masks, shooting tear gas at fellow

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 2>residents of the city of Chicago or Portland or I

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 2>disagree with your political assessment. Now do I think over

0:05:56.560 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 2>the last twenty years the urban elite have rubbed people's

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 2>faith seeing that they are superior. Well, I've been talking

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 2>about that for the last twenty years, and you all

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:08.479
<v Speaker 2>have finally caught up that we were walking around. I

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 2>can't say it on your podcasts, but like that we

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:16.360
<v Speaker 2>were superior on a host of things economically and culturally,

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:19.119
<v Speaker 2>and we had a disdain for the way other people

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:22.479
<v Speaker 2>live their lives. That's a different issue. Then you have

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 2>what's coming to you. Then we're we have every right

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 2>to throw tear gas?

0:06:25.520 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Are you?

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:28.480
<v Speaker 2>And I would argue that's not Stephanie, work with the

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:31.920
<v Speaker 2>American people are I'll back that up with data.

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:33.600
<v Speaker 1>And just on a practical level. This is the last

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>one on this. No one's going to listen to the

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:38.719
<v Speaker 1>economic prescriptions of the Democrats. If the president has succeeded

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:42.479
<v Speaker 1>in fostering the idea that there is a crisis on

0:06:42.560 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 1>American streets, even if he has created that crisis, even

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 1>if he's fermented that violence, if it's there, he could

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 1>well be successful in sort of making people feel that

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:55.039
<v Speaker 1>there was a crisis that needed special measures.

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:59.719
<v Speaker 2>Quote unquote, let me get it this way, dear my view,

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 2>Democrats hate what he's doing. Independent voters, swing voters, on

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 2>affiliated voters by either party are uncomfortable with an untethered,

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 2>unchecked Donald Trump. So the more that corporate America, the

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 2>Supreme Courts, and the repose in Congress play complicit to this,

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 2>this is not going to work. And I have enough

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 2>data to show that that that's exactly what's happened in

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 2>every election since twenty twenty four. All the skills and

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 2>qualities that you think make Donald Trump appealing politically work

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 2>against it in government.

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So the economic diagnosis that you would have that

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>you think would be a winning strategy and indeed good

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:41.559
<v Speaker 1>for America in the next few years. Yeah, that comes

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 1>to No, you're right when I say anti trumpenomics, I

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>just mean it's just a neat phrase. I actually do mean,

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>what's a better economic strategy, what's your diagnosis, what's your

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>cure everything?

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm being a jerk, that's all right.

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Your reputation, your reputation precedes you.

0:07:56.760 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, But the new thing is I'm aware now that

0:07:59.000 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm okay.

0:07:59.880 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 1>The first step that's at least the first step.

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 2>Well one is I believe the moment the American Dream

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 2>becomes unaffordable and inaccessible is exactly when our democracy becomes unstable.

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 2>It's not a coincidence. That is housing gets out of reach,

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 2>college education gets out of reach. People aren't saving for

0:08:17.240 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 2>their retirement, their one illness away from Chapter eleven bankruptcy,

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 2>and only ten percent of the American people have access

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 2>to it or their kids have access to the American dream.

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 2>Where you associate with the American dream is when you

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 2>have all the politics of resentment and instability in the

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:34.679
<v Speaker 2>political system. So to me, both good economics as well

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 2>as good politics restore the confidence and the accessibility of

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:41.199
<v Speaker 2>the American Dream. Starts with home ownership. I would just

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 2>say this upfront, and Amy and I became empty nesters.

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:48.959
<v Speaker 2>The idea that we can get a mortgage for retirement

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:52.839
<v Speaker 2>home is insane. You have young families trying to start

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 2>off on the American Dream. They can't get a down

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:58.200
<v Speaker 2>payment or a mortgage for their first home, and I,

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 2>in my position in life, get a mortgage deduction, which

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 2>means other people are covering my butt. This is crazy,

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:06.719
<v Speaker 2>and there's things you can do along the way. I've

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:10.959
<v Speaker 2>worked on on healthcare, I've worked on retirement security as

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:12.679
<v Speaker 2>mayor of the City of Chicago. If you've got to

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 2>be average, we made community college free. Seventy five percent

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 2>of the kids that took it with a first in

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 2>their family now and to finish high school, but to

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 2>go to college. To me, there's a serious of things

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 2>you could do where the building blocks of the American

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:28.080
<v Speaker 2>dream become affordable again. Over the last thirty years. It

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 2>did not happen over Tunald Trump. All of us accepted it.

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 2>The ladder got pulled up. Everything from home ownership to

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 2>college education, to retirement security, to healthcare. The ladder got

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 2>pulled up, and we were comfortable as long as our

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 2>kids were comfortable. And everybody has a right to be

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 2>pissed off. And as I jokingly say, paranoid people have

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 2>enemies too. This system is rigged against your success. You're

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:55.200
<v Speaker 2>not paranoid. And I've spent a good time in my

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 2>career trying to undrig the system. I'm now for rigging

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 2>it on. Behalf of the family that work hard, play

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:04.199
<v Speaker 2>by the rules. Number two. This is a passion of mine.

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 2>But I happen to think It's also true if you

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:09.439
<v Speaker 2>go back through the five great periods of economic growth

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 2>in American history, there's one constant education reform and education

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 2>accessibility Langrand College's GI bill universal high school education. The

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:21.480
<v Speaker 2>idea that we got a report card two thirds of

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 2>our kids cannot do reading a mathic grade level, and

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 2>now the president, not a governor, has spoken up is

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:29.960
<v Speaker 2>a crisis. Our kids are failing and our adults are

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 2>failing their kids. Three Which is the kind of goose

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 2>that lays the golden egg. Your research universities that are

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 2>the envy of the world. You said, declared war on cities.

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 2>You're declaring war on the golden goose. Get back AI, semiconductors, biotech, etc.

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:53.079
<v Speaker 2>Take the quantum, Take all the twelve major areas that

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:58.200
<v Speaker 2>China's declared war out America and fundamentally fund them to

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 2>where we go back to four percent of our GDP

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 2>is in research dollars on the public sector side, not

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 2>counting private into the core technologies that are going to

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:13.000
<v Speaker 2>determine who owns the future. And we have a great

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 2>resource need to be reformed, a great resource that we've

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 2>decided to declare war on. Ala Harvard mit Ala Stanford, etc.

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 2>Rather than invest in it. Fourth, what can't be aied

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 2>out or outsourced, etc. Fundamentally invest in America's modernization of

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:40.200
<v Speaker 2>its infrastructure. Fifth, as it relates to illegal immigrants, there's

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 2>no wall high enough that I'm not for, and there's

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 2>no enforcement at the workplace that I'm not for, including

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 2>the employers that hire people illegally. Now, let's reform our

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 2>legal immigration so it reflects the twenty percentury. No firing people,

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 2>want to come to this country, want to get a

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 2>green carried, want to become Americans. Is self inflicted rules,

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:04.080
<v Speaker 2>you're illegal, you cross illegal. As a guy that created

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:09.319
<v Speaker 2>Operation Gatekeeper for President Clinton, forget about it. Illegal is illegal.

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:13.200
<v Speaker 2>The guiding principles for immigration reform or a nation of

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 2>emigrants and a national laws or respect both. I probably

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 2>left a ton of stuff out. It's another five. I

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 2>think that those are the five things I would do

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 2>to get America out of neutral movement.

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Your point about the universities, because it overlaps with something

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 1>we said before. My colleague Shawn Donn a very great

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 1>peace about this. We underestimate how much universities have been

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 1>part of the economic revival of a lot of big

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 1>cities that had been and de industrialized and other things.

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:42.640
<v Speaker 1>So it's also it's kind of hurting his President Trump's

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 1>industrialization and agenda. I mean, what he's doing to universe.

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't I don't mean to cut you off, but

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:50.200
<v Speaker 2>it would not be in a manual I did. But

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 2>take a look at the President did a conference in

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 2>western Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh area about AI and the data. So

0:12:56.520 --> 0:12:59.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, you look twenty years ago, fifteen years ago,

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 2>we talked about the de industrialization of America and because

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 2>of energy production Carnel emailon in Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh,

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:12.079
<v Speaker 2>and you look at what they've done in the investment.

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 2>You can take an old steel plant and make it

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 2>a data center or a producer of major kind of electricity.

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 2>And now you have known the reindustrialization but the economic

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:24.960
<v Speaker 2>opportunity for that area that twenty years ago you would

0:13:24.960 --> 0:13:27.000
<v Speaker 2>not be writing about. You'll be talking about the jobs

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 2>and the factories that are losing. And you can't talk

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 2>about the revitalization of Pittsburgh or emails not mention at

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 2>least in the first three fattuses, or the University of

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:38.600
<v Speaker 2>Pittsburgh for that matter.

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:41.079
<v Speaker 1>So you could revive a lot of that research. That

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the core government funding research is not actually a big

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 1>money in the scheme of things, but education, reforming education,

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:51.480
<v Speaker 1>and transforming infrastructure that is big money. In the case

0:13:51.480 --> 0:13:53.840
<v Speaker 1>of infrastructure, it was actually done, I mean an ex

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 1>generational supposedly, certainly the biggest in a long time. Infrastructure

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 1>bill passed by President didn't seem to move the needle.

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 2>Two things. One to say, I want to get back

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:07.199
<v Speaker 2>to this because it relates. I happen to think robotics

0:14:07.280 --> 0:14:10.560
<v Speaker 2>is going to be essential to the future. Carnegie Mellon

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 2>leads the country. My guest lecture at MITEAM just got canceled,

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 2>but there's no doubt that Carnegie Mellon leads it. You

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:20.800
<v Speaker 2>could make Carne Mellon the core of your funding at

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 2>the federal government for robotics. With University of Ohio, Michigan

0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 2>and mik you could do a consortium and say, Okay,

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 2>here's going to be what the guaranteed stream, here's where

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 2>we want to see you invest. You've got to bring

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 2>public private dollars in and we want to see X,

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 2>Y and Z. Now they did do stuff on infrastructure,

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:39.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, Donald Trump, I will say this in his

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 2>first term called it for Infrastructure week every week. Now

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 2>the new thing for his infrastructures canceling projects rather than

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 2>promoting them, and nobody's called it out. He's decided not

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 2>to invest in America's competitiveness, but to literally cut it off.

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 2>But there's things that have to be done, not just

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 2>in rural but in small town America, both on the

0:14:57.840 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 2>infrastructure and the education. You look at it a small

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 2>town in America, A community college, a hospital, unfortunately a prison.

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:09.360
<v Speaker 2>Those are the economic opportunities, and we need to make

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 2>the investments, both in the infrastructure and the workforce that

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 2>make that an attractive place. Would a data center, a

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 2>new production of alternative energy or old energy?

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 1>But are you going to need money? I mean, on

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 1>that you might be able to get some private funding.

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 1>But on the education, I mean you are talking about

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 1>some costly interventions in the economy to make the American

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>dream more affordable. How are you going to do it?

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 2>Well? Yes and no. I'm going to be going down

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 2>in a couple months to Mississippi. They have a what's

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 2>called the Mississippi Miracle. They went from forty ninth on

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 2>reading toninth. Now, either they did really well or basically

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 2>everybody else did really bad. They did it over a decade,

0:15:52.040 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 2>so you can basically redirect it and get better results

0:15:56.160 --> 0:16:00.160
<v Speaker 2>and not continue to spend money on failure. Now it

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 2>relates to spending other types of infrastructure. There's a trillion

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 2>dollars there. Spend it, make it, and force it out.

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 2>Democrats got so preoccupied with the rule making they never

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 2>got the results.

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:30.120
<v Speaker 1>The criticism of Democrats is they didn't get stuff done.

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 1>And we know, one of the things that's been a

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of distinguishing feature of President Trump ever since he

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of came more onto the scene in New York

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 1>in the nineties was this sort of sense of you know,

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to get stuff done. I'm going to get

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 1>this ice open that had been closed for a long

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 1>time because the city was stupid. And you sound like

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 1>you just constantly wanting to go back to that that

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you're channeling and reminding people of all the times that

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 1>you've got things done. One of the things that you

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>helped to get done was actually quite a kind of

0:16:56.920 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 1>historic deficit reduction plan in the first Clinton administration, which

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>seems almost inconceivable. Now, how would you do that just practically,

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:07.640
<v Speaker 1>because we certainly haven't seen that for a long time,

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:08.679
<v Speaker 1>including under Biden.

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:12.920
<v Speaker 2>Three things. One, the budget gets balanced and he doesn't

0:17:12.920 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 2>get enough of them applause. Because George Herbert Walker Bush

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 2>forty one showed leadership and broke his promise and raised taxes,

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:24.639
<v Speaker 2>got elected saying read my lips, and he got unelected

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:27.400
<v Speaker 2>in nineteen ninety two because he broke in ninety one.

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 2>Bill Clinton comes in in nineteen ninety three building on

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:34.439
<v Speaker 2>that progress. That's fair, and in ninety three there's no

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 2>Republican support, passes the deficit reduction and raises.

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Revenue and raises taxes on the higher earners.

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 2>And you could argue that that piece because it wasn't

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 2>felt economically like it did in the second term or

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:49.399
<v Speaker 2>in the back end of the first term, et cetera.

0:17:50.320 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 2>Starts the deficit on a massive reduction. Interest rates get

0:17:54.320 --> 0:18:00.119
<v Speaker 2>also massively cut. Third, underappreciated, totally separate is the the

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:03.639
<v Speaker 2>Internet boom in productivity is just taking off. So you

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 2>had a kind of the cocktail of ninety one, ninety

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 2>three and Internet all together lead to this now the

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:16.440
<v Speaker 2>Dirty Little Secret. And I can tell you an anecdote

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:19.200
<v Speaker 2>from it. The Dirty Little Secret was in by nineteen

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 2>ninety seven, the budget was going to be balanced, whether

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:24.159
<v Speaker 2>you had a balanced budget agreement. I stood in the

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:27.399
<v Speaker 2>back of Erskine Bowl's chief of staff's office with Bob Rubin,

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:30.639
<v Speaker 2>and Bob was against this. He was against a balanced

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 2>budget agree because I see no reason to do this.

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:35.239
<v Speaker 2>It's going to be balanced. I said, Bob. There's an

0:18:35.240 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 2>old rule in Chicago from Richard J. Day. When you

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 2>see a parade, get your Brittanna, get in front of it.

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:43.040
<v Speaker 2>And I said, we're going to get political credit in

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 2>the same way that the Berlin Wall was going to

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 2>come down. Whether George Bush did anything so that happened,

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:51.640
<v Speaker 2>that's a build up. The answer to your question, I'd

0:18:51.920 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 2>passed immediately a rule in Congress, and Congress were passing

0:18:56.200 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 2>never can interest on the debt exceed defense a budget? Oh?

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Is that the Neil Ferguson rule. He's credited with saying

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>that's when you stop being a great power.

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Read the article very persuasive. So here's what Republicans like

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:10.200
<v Speaker 2>defense spending. I'm all for it because I actually think

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 2>it's important as a detern to China. So here's the rule.

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 2>Never can interest on the debt exceed your defense budget.

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 2>And once you create that discipline like ram Rudman Hollings

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 2>did in the past, you will start to see deficit reduction.

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Or you'll start to see a president that's trying very

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 1>hard to increase defense spending faster than the debt bills

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 1>going up and also push down interest rates by taking

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>control of the federal reserve. I mean, that's what it

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:34.919
<v Speaker 1>also incentivizes.

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:38.440
<v Speaker 2>Also, it could be the way to force the Congress

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:41.679
<v Speaker 2>deal with unlike some people that talked about deficit reduction

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 2>but never did Bowl Simpson actually deal with revenue.

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Anyone sensible looking at the budget, looking at a six

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:50.439
<v Speaker 1>percent of GDP budget deficit in a booming economy. It's

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 1>booming in terms of the level of unemployment and other things, right,

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Anyone looking at that would say there has to be

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 1>a tax increase in America's future. But anyone looking at

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Congress for the asked well for a long time, would

0:20:01.760 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 1>say there was no chance of that. And looking at

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:06.760
<v Speaker 1>any presidential candidate, frankly.

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:09.119
<v Speaker 2>That's why I think Republics haven't done anything on tariffs.

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:12.200
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump has raised taxes on everybody. It just calls

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 2>the terraffs.

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well, that gets us very quickly. We're going to

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:15.920
<v Speaker 1>run out of time. But I do want to ask

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:18.360
<v Speaker 1>you about the China policy. And one of the difficult

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 1>things about pivoting away from Donald Trump's China policy is actually,

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 1>and Jason Furman pointed this out on the podcast a

0:20:24.240 --> 0:20:26.920
<v Speaker 1>few weeks ago, that you will have those tax revenues

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 1>coming in better or worse from Donald Trump's tariffs that

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 1>are non negligible and quite hard to just say goodbye to.

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:35.680
<v Speaker 2>True.

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 1>So what are you going to do? What is the

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:39.440
<v Speaker 1>China strategy under your plan?

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 2>First of all, the idea that it's down to tariffs

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:45.600
<v Speaker 2>is not no disrespect is it's more complicated. On't mean

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 2>to say that we're our podcast. It's slightly more than

0:20:48.359 --> 0:20:51.679
<v Speaker 2>a thirty seconds answer. There's a couple of things. I

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:56.880
<v Speaker 2>think forty percent of our imports into the country, our

0:20:56.920 --> 0:21:01.439
<v Speaker 2>products are going to our own manufacturing capacity. Take the

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:05.440
<v Speaker 2>tariffs off of those, you're actually killing manufacturing jobs, not enhancing.

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 2>There's nothing you've done to enhance America's competitiveness on the

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:13.600
<v Speaker 2>industrial base by taxing or putting a tariff on a

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:19.359
<v Speaker 2>product that goes into our own ultimate assembly and manufacturer. Two,

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:22.639
<v Speaker 2>you have to be more strategic, and it relates to China.

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 2>It's not just about tariffs. I happen to think what

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 2>the President just did is a failed effort. Dealing with

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 2>China is both with military, geostrategic, political, and economic understand fundamentally,

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 2>which America has been late to the game. The Chinese

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 2>Party leadership and President Jip specifically decided in twenty twelve

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:47.199
<v Speaker 2>that America is not a strategic competitor, but a strategic adversary.

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 2>They actually do need to do harm to us. I

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:53.639
<v Speaker 2>think President Trump has been naive to think that he

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 2>can get along with Putin and g They actually are

0:21:56.560 --> 0:22:00.159
<v Speaker 2>trying to put our head under and he doesn't appreciate that,

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:04.439
<v Speaker 2>understand that, or is responding to the threat level. Third,

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:08.359
<v Speaker 2>both from the universities and science and technology to the

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 2>training of a workforce that has to actually have an

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 2>education to compete and win at any level. Fourth, investing

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:18.919
<v Speaker 2>in the capabilities of america twenty first century infrastructure to

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:23.479
<v Speaker 2>move twenty first century economy from data to trucks and

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:27.440
<v Speaker 2>everything between. And then fifth on the tariffs all they

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 2>do for you as it relates to China, as we

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 2>kind of figure out how to move away is you

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:36.920
<v Speaker 2>have to decide where your choke points are and fundamentally

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 2>invest in them. That's what the whole critical minerals and

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:44.680
<v Speaker 2>magnet production is about. That there is take a deep

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 2>research look at the supply chain, every choke point that exists,

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:51.399
<v Speaker 2>understand we're behind, and then invest in it over the

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:55.280
<v Speaker 2>next five years. Now g is upfront about this, don't

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 2>be naive, and you have to be understand. He wants

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:01.959
<v Speaker 2>a dominant China where everybody's dependent on China and China's

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 2>independent of everybody else, and we have to move with

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:09.199
<v Speaker 2>a strategy where America is integrated with everybody else and

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 2>everybody else is dependent on us.

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:14.119
<v Speaker 1>We have I mean as a nation actually since the

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:16.200
<v Speaker 1>second Kids administration. I mean that same year that we

0:23:16.240 --> 0:23:18.720
<v Speaker 1>had a budget surplus two thousand was also the time

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 1>that we were negotiating to have him China into the WTO.

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:26.640
<v Speaker 1>We have leaned into being deeply dependent on China, much

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:30.879
<v Speaker 1>more dependent than we perhaps needed to be. When you

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:33.440
<v Speaker 1>talk about extricating it, I think it's Donald Trump's learning.

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty hard to say, oh, we'll get divorced in

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:37.119
<v Speaker 1>ten years time, and I'm really firm about that. But

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:39.680
<v Speaker 1>what we've got to live together in the meantime.

0:23:39.840 --> 0:23:42.199
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, I mean, I don't know, you, step, I

0:23:42.200 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 2>know a lot of divorced people that live in the

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:44.879
<v Speaker 2>same house, just separate rooms.

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 1>It's also saying, as you just said, that there are

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:52.200
<v Speaker 1>sworn enemy, that they are determined to destroy us. But

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 1>by the way, can we have you know, can we

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:54.880
<v Speaker 1>have another bit of mineral earth?

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:57.359
<v Speaker 2>One of the things I learned being ambassador of Japan.

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:00.199
<v Speaker 2>What they say is not what they mean. You got

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:04.040
<v Speaker 2>to find it. But she tells you the world is

0:24:04.080 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 2>to be dependent on China, and China is to be

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 2>free of the world independent. He's very upfront. Now, either

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:13.119
<v Speaker 2>you can say, oh, that's just for domestic consumption or

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 2>act as that threat intents. Now, I believe the big

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 2>mistake of the last twenty to twenty five years was

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 2>allowing business interests to control our national securities related to China.

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 2>They were not a voice at the table. They were

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 2>the voice at the table, and they should have been

0:24:32.440 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 2>slapped and put in their place. And that was a

0:24:36.960 --> 0:24:41.160
<v Speaker 2>huge mistake. And when g said and the Chinese leadership said,

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 2>we're going to replace America and we're going to do X,

0:24:45.359 --> 0:24:48.160
<v Speaker 2>Y and Z, as it relates to the world's dependence

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:52.879
<v Speaker 2>on China. That's a big opportunity. And when China decides

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 2>to crush your steel industry, you're a luminum industry, your

0:24:56.080 --> 0:25:00.159
<v Speaker 2>auto industry. That's an opportunity for America. Come into the

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 2>rescue of South Africa, Brazil, Mexico. They are doing things

0:25:05.320 --> 0:25:08.400
<v Speaker 2>in their industrial manufacturing because the President g is leaning

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 2>so hard on the dominance of manufacturing for its economy

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 2>because other parts of it are failing. That's our opportunity.

0:25:16.200 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 1>And that kind of suspicion of globalization, or at least

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the globalization that was dominated by the sort of business

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:26.479
<v Speaker 1>interests of America as opposed to other things. That's going

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 1>to outlive President Trump.

0:25:28.880 --> 0:25:30.440
<v Speaker 2>Do you think what's gonna be with us for the

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:35.119
<v Speaker 2>next thirty years. Look, globalization was a success if you

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:37.359
<v Speaker 2>had what you and I have and our kids have.

0:25:37.520 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't know whether they are kids are okay. I

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:43.400
<v Speaker 2>have three kids. They're the twenties to the armed forces,

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:45.120
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. They all went to good schools and they're

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 2>all on their way doing well, et cetera. That was

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 2>the success. The opportunities of globalization were not equally shared

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:55.439
<v Speaker 2>and the risks associated with globalization were not equally shared.

0:25:56.000 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 2>Globalization wasn't a mistake, it's what we didn't do, and

0:25:59.080 --> 0:26:01.359
<v Speaker 2>we were aware of that was the mistake.

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:04.119
<v Speaker 1>You do sound like and you've made no secret that

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 1>you are someone who's thinking about running for president, and

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:09.359
<v Speaker 1>some would argue that you've already decided. But if there

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 1>is a question in your mind, what's your biggest question

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:14.360
<v Speaker 1>in thinking about running, regardless of whether you know obviously

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the primary process will be what it is, But in

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 1>terms of actually being a candidate, what's the question that

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:20.639
<v Speaker 1>you need to resolve in your mind.

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:25.959
<v Speaker 2>To those that don't know, Squat, it's not actually a business.

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 2>That's a professional decision. It's a very personal decision. I've

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:33.439
<v Speaker 2>lived a full life. I'm the son and the grandson

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 2>of two immigrants. My kids are now on their way.

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 2>They're making their own path, their own journey, their own success,

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 2>their own failure, and they're incredibly supportive of me. But

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:46.680
<v Speaker 2>I have to make a decision I run for president.

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:48.919
<v Speaker 2>What does that do to their lives? It's not going

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:51.720
<v Speaker 2>to be the same. So look, I know my professional

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:55.800
<v Speaker 2>I figure that out. How to restore the primacy of

0:26:55.800 --> 0:26:58.480
<v Speaker 2>the American dream to the American people. So it's not

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:02.199
<v Speaker 2>just Stephanie and romskits. What does it take? Because I

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 2>think it both has an economic and a political souve.

0:27:05.480 --> 0:27:08.480
<v Speaker 2>And then there's a personal thing. And you know, my

0:27:08.600 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 2>greatest teacher was my mother and father, and I take

0:27:11.880 --> 0:27:14.200
<v Speaker 2>being a parent very seriously. I know we're not supposed

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 2>to talk about it.

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:18.239
<v Speaker 1>I know, talking about politicians talking about their kids all

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the time, I wouldn't worry about it.

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I think, yeah, But I've been around them longer

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 2>than you have. So that's the decision I'm going to make,

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:27.159
<v Speaker 2>and it's going to something I'm gonna make with my

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:28.480
<v Speaker 2>children and my wife.

0:27:28.760 --> 0:27:30.800
<v Speaker 1>If you do run, is your strategy to just not

0:27:30.880 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 1>let anyone else get a word in?

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:34.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's that's a habit that's been true for everything

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:39.280
<v Speaker 2>I was trying to image in a debate. I was

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:42.159
<v Speaker 2>trying to be economical with you, which is why, you

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:45.160
<v Speaker 2>know Henry Kissingder once said, do you have any questions.

0:27:44.800 --> 0:27:47.640
<v Speaker 1>For my answers? Quite say, rom Emanuel, thank you so.

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:49.640
<v Speaker 2>Much, Thank you very much, appreciate it.

0:27:57.040 --> 0:27:59.639
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to Trumponomics from Bloomberg. It was hosted

0:27:59.640 --> 0:28:01.959
<v Speaker 1>by me, Stephanie Flanders, and I was joined by the

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:05.360
<v Speaker 1>former White House Chief of Staff and Mayor of Chicago,

0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 1>among other things, rahmim Manuel. Trumponomics was produced by Samasadi

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:12.439
<v Speaker 1>and Moses And with help from Amy Keene, and the

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:18.399
<v Speaker 1>sound design was by Blake Maples and Kelly. Gary Sage.

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Bowman is Bloomberg's head of podcasts and please to help

0:28:22.119 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 1>others find this show, Trumpanomics, please rate it and review

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:26.919
<v Speaker 1>it highly. Wherever you listened,