WEBVTT - The Latest On Inflation, Crypto Records, And Market Bubbles

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets podcast

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>called Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com Slash podcast. Let's get over to UM.

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Lisa ericson right now, Senior VP and co headed Public Markets,

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the Public Markets Group at US Bank Wealth Management, Lisa, UM,

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 1>I wonder what you think as we look at inflation

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 1>numbers that are either shockingly high like the p p

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:41.559
<v Speaker 1>I number yesterday, or even higher than expected like the

0:00:41.600 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>cp I number today, does that concern you, Well, absolutely mad.

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 1>It's something that we're keeping an eye on, and while

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 1>our base cases that some of those inflationary pressures do

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>come down over the remainder of this year and into

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>UM certainly, the fact that we've got a pretty broad

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:07.279
<v Speaker 1>based basket of goods that are contributing to the inflation number,

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that it's taking some time for both

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the labor market and the supply chains to adjust is

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>something that we want to keep our eyes on right, tins.

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Inflation is so broad based. I'm wondering what concerns you

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the most. Energy is a really easy thing to point out,

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:26.759
<v Speaker 1>and you think about the ripple effects for but are

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 1>there places that are maybe less obvious that we should

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:35.199
<v Speaker 1>also be concerned about. Yeah, well, I think to your point,

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 1>it's it's really two things. So one is just the

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:41.839
<v Speaker 1>fact that it's really across the broader base. So while

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:45.320
<v Speaker 1>you have some areas like energy that can be more

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 1>volatile over time, what you see is, you know, over

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the last few months is really looking at the basket

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>of goods. It's not just some of the areas that

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 1>historically can fluctuate some as much, but also some of

0:01:57.840 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the stickier types of I think that are increasing. So

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>that really is a concern, and I think, um, you know,

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the other issue is how much that then begins to

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 1>affect inflation expectations going forward. And as we look at it,

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>what we see is that there are some elevation in

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:20.640
<v Speaker 1>inflation expectations over the next couple of years as a result. Um,

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>but you know, over the longer term, what we see

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:26.680
<v Speaker 1>is that those are trending down. So again, um, you know,

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:28.640
<v Speaker 1>that's The other thing I think we really want to

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:31.799
<v Speaker 1>watch is not just where the basket goes right now,

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>but how that's affecting the expectations going forward. What do

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 1>you expect in terms of the SMP right now? Um,

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>we're I think up about year to date. Last year

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:48.960
<v Speaker 1>was a good seventeen percent gain, the year before that

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:55.360
<v Speaker 1>was almost Do we can we really move much further higher? Yeah?

0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Great question that. Well, we're still optimistic on the US

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:01.680
<v Speaker 1>equity market and the SMPS five. And the reason why is,

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:04.079
<v Speaker 1>you know, overall, if you look at it, we've got

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:07.800
<v Speaker 1>a pretty nice context. Despite what some of the worries

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>we are talking about with respect to inflation. If you

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>step back and look at the indicators underpinning growth, for example,

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>you know they're universally as strong, and we see the

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:21.360
<v Speaker 1>trend of movement of those indicators as continuing to be

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>positive when we measure across a broad range. And you

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>know that's also being reflected in corporate earning. So, as

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>we all know, third quarter earnings reports came in very nicely,

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and that again was across the board as opposed to

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 1>being limited to a couple of sectors. So you've got

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the fundamental support there for the market, I think to

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 1>your point, you know, as we move into the question

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:47.120
<v Speaker 1>is really going to be you know how that continues

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 1>to play out, you know, as some of the initial

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>reopening spurt comes off, and then again as we've been

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 1>talking about with the trajectory of what's going to happen

0:03:57.360 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 1>with inflation, there's been so much talk about bubbles lately,

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean all year really, and then we've kept on

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>charging higher. You know, Matt and I were looking at

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the screens. Just the Rivian IPO today is set for

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>a very healthy pop as it starts to trade, and

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:17.159
<v Speaker 1>so we're unhealthy depending on how you look. Yeah, depending

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 1>that was our big debate, do you pop or not? Um?

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>And so that's the thing. Are you worried about valuations?

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 1>If everybody is so constructive here, at what point do

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 1>you start to get concerns that things are worth so

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:34.279
<v Speaker 1>much more than they're actually earning. Yeah. No, that's a

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 1>great point, and you know, valuations is something to keep

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:39.280
<v Speaker 1>an eye on. But as we look at it, I

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 1>think just the current low level of interest rates really

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 1>actually makes valuations in what we would call the high

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 1>side off fair but not excessive. So if you just

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:53.160
<v Speaker 1>look again at history and how much, uh, you know,

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>earning yields are pricing over where interest rates are now,

0:04:57.160 --> 0:05:01.719
<v Speaker 1>we actually see that they're above average, meaning that stocks

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>are actually giving you a nice premium in terms of

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the potential return relative to fixed income um compared to

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:13.039
<v Speaker 1>that spread historically. So again it's something we want to

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 1>keep an eye on. But in an environment like today,

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 1>where again you see both the macro indicators as well

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 1>as what's going on with corporate operations and earnings coming

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 1>in very nicely, those valuations can be more easily justified. Lisa,

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>great to get some time with you, Thanks so much

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:32.719
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. Lisa ericson their senior VP and co

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:37.600
<v Speaker 1>head of the Public Markets Group at US Bank Wealth Management.

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's get over right now to David Kat's, chief investment

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:48.280
<v Speaker 1>officer and President Matrix Asset Advisors. Have been talking a

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>lot about inflation today, David, and we did see a

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:55.080
<v Speaker 1>higher print than anticipated on the cp I. What's your

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:59.160
<v Speaker 1>take so short term, there's no question inflation has picked

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:02.040
<v Speaker 1>up to a very eating full level. We don't think

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:04.360
<v Speaker 1>it's going to go away, but we do think it's

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 1>going to trend lower starting in early two and we

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:11.279
<v Speaker 1>think it will get down to a manageable level. So

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:14.280
<v Speaker 1>we're looking for inflation to stabilize somewhere under like three

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:17.400
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent. We don't think it's ultimately going

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>to derail the financial markets, but it does mean that

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 1>we do think bond rates should be going up and

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and the Feds next move at some point we'll be

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:31.279
<v Speaker 1>moving rate higher. Well, how do you play the smp

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:35.039
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're not seeing major losses here, even on

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:38.159
<v Speaker 1>its second day of declines after a very steady rally.

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>What are you buying? How do you how do you

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:42.160
<v Speaker 1>deal with this for the rest of the year. So so,

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>we've been pretty bullish about stocks this year in light

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 1>of the most recent run up. We would not be

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 1>throwing new money into the market basically because the market

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>is pretty fully valued. However, there are a lot of

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:56.720
<v Speaker 1>very good businesses that haven't done nearly as well as

0:06:56.760 --> 0:06:59.599
<v Speaker 1>the overall market, that are selling it fifteen or less

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 1>times earnings, and we think there in lies the opportunity,

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 1>so we think you want to be selective. Lots of

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:07.919
<v Speaker 1>very good businesses out there. Um, you know, companies like

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 1>an am Gen or Beckton Dickinson haven't done a lot

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 1>but the businesses are doing well, very attractive valuations. UH

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 1>five serve in the technology and financial space as a

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 1>very strong company. They have an activist involved. Yet the

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:24.680
<v Speaker 1>stock is down for the year. We think that easily

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 1>as like twenty or thirty percent upside. Zimmer is a

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 1>knee and hip replacement company. They just had a fairly

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 1>mediocre quarter. Part of it was because of the COVID

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 1>pick up. As COVID comes under control again, we think

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a great reopening play. Um. So there are definitely

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 1>opportunities out there, but we would not get involved with

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the things that are really hot. We don't think now

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>is a great time to be throwing money at the

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicle area or the battery area because we think

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those areas are very fully priced. Well.

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Even with that said, you see Rivan today poised for

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 1>a really healthy pop if you could get syndicate. I

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 1>hope you got it right. I mean, you know that

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 1>those retail traders are also going to be loving that today.

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, how do you feel about a lot of

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>these moonshot projects that are kind of happening in the

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 1>world right now. At the end of the day, it

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 1>does certainly seem like there's a whole generation of investors

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 1>ready to jump on them. So it's a little bit

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 1>worrisome to us. The that market has been exceptionally hot,

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 1>and right now the electric vehicle car companies and batteries

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 1>are assuming that everybody that's involved is going to be successful,

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 1>and not only successful, but wildly successful. That's simply not

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:40.959
<v Speaker 1>going to be the case. So yes, the stocks and

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>open up very richly. We think it's not going to

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:46.719
<v Speaker 1>be a great investment over the next one or two

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:49.959
<v Speaker 1>years because it's fully priced. We look at companies um

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:53.199
<v Speaker 1>like Zoom or Peloton that had all of this excitement

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:55.439
<v Speaker 1>a year ago. Those stocks are down by half to

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>three quarters. We think it's not a great time to

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:01.439
<v Speaker 1>be speculum lative in the market right now. For the

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 1>short term, it's gonna feel good, but we really believe

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 1>that ultimately the music is going to stop and a

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of people are getting involved with companies that they're

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 1>not paying attention to valuation and they're going to get hurt.

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 1>What about companies. I mean, for example, everyone's bid up

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Tesla to make it a trillion dollar company, and meanwhile,

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 1>uh Ford Motor Company is worth eighty billion. You know,

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 1>General Motors is worth eighty five billion. Folkswagen, which has

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 1>invested a ton into um the electric business is still

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 1>only worth a hundred and forty billion. Do you like

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 1>any of those legacy players. So, so that's a great point.

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Right now. Testla sells for the exact same valuation as

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the entire automobile industry, and we just

0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's sustainable on the Tesla side. Uh. In

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 1>terms of the other companies, um, the question is do

0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:59.840
<v Speaker 1>you want to own an automobile company because more electric

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 1>vehicles any of these companies make the less um oil

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 1>um cars, you know, the regular combustion cars they're gonna

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 1>be selling. So that is a zero sum game. In

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 1>terms of the automobile industry. The one that we are

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 1>most comfortable with right now is Toyota. We think they're

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be a winner in electric vehicles down the

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 1>road and hybrid vehicles, and you're not paying a whole

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 1>lot for it. But we think there are lots of

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 1>other errors to make money in the market, and we're

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>not spending a great deal of time on the auto sector.

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:30.839
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin is at a record Do you think that it's

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:35.719
<v Speaker 1>an inflation hedge. We don't, um, you know, we're we're

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:37.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of old school, and old school hasn't been that

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 1>helpful of late. But we like to have things on

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:43.439
<v Speaker 1>a fundamental basis. We like intrinsic value, and when you

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:47.320
<v Speaker 1>look at bitcoin, there's not a lot of intrinsic value there. So, uh,

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>this is one that we're also pretty wary about. We

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 1>don't think it ends well. Um, so we would not

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:55.200
<v Speaker 1>be putting money. And we we do believe there are

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people that are throwing money in, uh,

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:00.200
<v Speaker 1>simply because of fear of missing out. Everybody's talking about

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 1>how wealthy they became. Uh, so they're throwing money in.

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:05.440
<v Speaker 1>And once that bubble verse, we think it can go

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>down a lot. And what we'd say is, look at

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>what happened during the Internet bubble of the late nineties.

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:14.080
<v Speaker 1>A number of the businesses simply went out of business,

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 1>like an E Toys, but a number of great companies

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 1>like Microsoft, Cisco, Intel, Um, we're all about a half

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 1>to three quarters lower ten years later. So when things stop,

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 1>valuation matters. David, thanks so much for joining us. David Katz,

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 1>President and Chief investment Officer over at Matrix Asset advisors.

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Let me just quickly take a look at what we're

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 1>seeing in terms of prices. Bitcoin trading up one percent

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and change three dollars up to sixty eight thousand, five

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred and nineteen, just around the record high. We also

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 1>have ether trading or ethereum Um I guess ether is

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:56.679
<v Speaker 1>the is the right way to call it? Trading up

0:11:56.679 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>one percent and change about forty nine a coin to

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:01.720
<v Speaker 1>forty nine. Let's bring in someone who knows for sure.

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Mike mcgloan, senior commodity strategist with Bloomberg Intelligence. Um, I guess,

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 1>uh these highs? What what's behind this rise that we've seen.

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Is it just excess liquidity? Is it concern about inflation?

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:23.079
<v Speaker 1>Is it has China? Have China and Jamie Diamond and

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 1>trashing Bitcoin again? What's going on here? Mike hey Man, Well,

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the the key thing is it's actually much more simpler

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:33.199
<v Speaker 1>to that than that. It's all the above. It's one

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 1>of those points. Now it's November, we only have two

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 1>months left than the year. There's a lot of cash

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 1>on the side. Bitcoins one of the best performing assets

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 1>on the planet, and a theorium is two and it's

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:45.719
<v Speaker 1>got fundamental independents that are increasing in improving. So I

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 1>think that's what you've seen now is typically it is

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the best time of year. It's at sixty eight thousand

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:52.080
<v Speaker 1>right now. I think it's heading towards a hundred thousands.

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:54.840
<v Speaker 1>The questions when and the key the question I asked

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 1>is what's going to keep it down? Now? Today was

0:12:56.640 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the key key barometer to that. You know, CPI printed

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 1>high and expected, Bitcoin was down and Dye it popped

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 1>right up. Gold was down and it popped up. You

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 1>mentioned silver and earlier segment popped up. But Bitcoin is

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's the one with the vig it's potential

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:12.839
<v Speaker 1>upside for the future. So I look at this as

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is a market that's had a substantial correction.

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:19.239
<v Speaker 1>Demand and adoption are increasing, it's becoming part of every portfolio,

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 1>and supplies declining. What makes that go lower? At this stage,

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:25.319
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty strong and I don't see overbought indications yet.

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 1>So it's interesting because while the bitcoin, ether other coins

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:34.439
<v Speaker 1>are definitely up today, it's not everything. Guys. She was

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 1>down and that was one of the I just wanted

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 1>to mention it here because I don't think you're seeing

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:44.319
<v Speaker 1>everything moving lockstep necessarily anymore. Well so, no, thanks for

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 1>mentioning that Sheba in you is down, and that's a

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:50.440
<v Speaker 1>speculation machine that most of us hope will just get

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:52.200
<v Speaker 1>it over with and go by and go back, just

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:54.559
<v Speaker 1>like those kind of went back. It's just a machine

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 1>for speculation. And then you have pure infrastructure building in

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin and there, and they're just in the world a

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:04.559
<v Speaker 1>better place. She believe it was for speculators clearly undisputable.

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:07.479
<v Speaker 1>And then things like a Theorium there, every single cryptodology,

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the most widely traded Cryptosis and Planet, most of them

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:13.080
<v Speaker 1>traded in theory platforms. And then you have Bitcoin becoming

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>global digital collateral. So to me, that's what's happening. The

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 1>inflation heads. I don't really think it's so much there yet.

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 1>It will be when it gets to the higher plateau.

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I see bitcoin in theorum right now in that price

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 1>discovery stage, and it's just that time of year. Well,

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>there's boy. Technicals are good, fundamentals are good. Where does

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 1>it end up the year? That's kind of the quick

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>key question we're all asking ourselves, what do you think

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 1>about finance? Um c Z is pretty cool to interview.

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 1>We have him on the network. Sometimes. He actually used

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to work at Bloomberg. Um. He's got to be one

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 1>of the richest people in the world now and he

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 1>has his own coin that's one of the biggest. C

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Z is just an edge vacational machinal. Every time he speaks,

0:14:56.440 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I shut up and I listened. The key thing I

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 1>think he repped resents Matt is there's a lot of very,

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 1>very wealthy young people in the space, and they have

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 1>a major inclination to make the world a better place.

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Don't underestimate that. That's the key thing I got out

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 1>of bitcoin. Everybody here wants to make a world a

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 1>better place, and they have the facility, capacity and money

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 1>to do it in this space. And now that the

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 1>US is counting China by accepting and um properly regulating cryptos,

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 1>they have a major platform. So to me, this is

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 1>a bull market. No many questions when and where do

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 1>you jump on? And I think that's what every money

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 1>manager in the planet is saying. Okay, I might as

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 1>well get off zero, and I think that's what's happening.

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 1>The greater risk is being on zero with allocations to

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 1>cryptos in bitcoins, Okay, help me out here. Because of

0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 1>this inflation hedge aspect of this. You know, crypto people

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 1>so many inherently um you know with skeptical of the Fed.

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Do you can you poke a hole in the inflation

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 1>hedge theory? Well, I think the key things can always

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 1>look at it. You can't hold gold anymore without having

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>some bitcoin and the theorum in that bucket because bitcoins

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 1>clearly replacing it. Now as far as you measure inflations

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 1>use the currency debasement. Let's look at this month so far.

0:16:05.400 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 1>On the month, bitcoins about about ten percent right now,

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 1>goals up about four and and crudels down one person.

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I think by this time next year, the key, the bigger,

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 1>bigger risk will be deflationary trends. And I pointed out

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 1>clearly because it's measured on a twelve month basis. The

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg because of crypto and I'm sorry, I'm sorry. The

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Command Index just reaching all time high twelve months

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and now it's a real high bar to beat. So

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and you just measure on a twelve month basis, deflationary

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>trends will kick back in if also needs a little

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 1>wobble in the stock market, and you'll see those deflation

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 1>near trends come back and the FED will have to ease.

0:16:38.000 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 1>And that's what bitcoin is. It's no one's project, no

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 1>one's liability. Declining supply, increasing demand. Even goal has elastic supply,

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin doesn't have that, and people understanding WHOA Okay, I

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 1>might as well get some allocation to this. So the

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 1>inflation argument, I think it's coming, but be wonderful if

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 1>we get true inflation and real demand pull right now.

0:16:57.360 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 1>To me, this is the kind of when you hear

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 1>headlines like to that that's where you back the peak

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 1>A year from now. I fully predict we're gonna have

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 1>more problems with deflationary trends. What when do we know that? Um,

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 1>you know mom and pop, either retail mom and pop

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 1>or institutions have fully embraced crypto. Because these are I

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:20.159
<v Speaker 1>think two things we're still waiting for. Snelly and I

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:24.359
<v Speaker 1>spoke with the conservative fund manager earlier who is just

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 1>not down to clown because he thinks there's too much volatility. Absolutely,

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 1>there will be less alto when there's greater depth than

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:33.399
<v Speaker 1>the market reaches a higher plateau. So that's one key

0:17:33.400 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>thing is probably're gonna miss a big monoch appreciation. The

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 1>answer to that question, Matt, is very simple. When we

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:41.399
<v Speaker 1>have wide dissemination of an e t S or e

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 1>t S that track a broad index attracts the crypto market,

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:47.399
<v Speaker 1>that's where we're going. It's a matter of time. The

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 1>SEC knows it. If they're truly on to protect investors,

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 1>they need to approve an e t F to tracts.

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:54.879
<v Speaker 1>A spot index attracts a spot markets, not you know,

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin and SAM and index. That's the proper. That's why

0:17:57.359 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>we hate most almost everybody in the planet. Tracks stocks

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:02.120
<v Speaker 1>go through NT. You have two tracks, an index. We'll

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:04.119
<v Speaker 1>get there. It's going to be many years, will be

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>many bumps on the road, But until then, I don't

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 1>think we're gonna have anything but a bull market that

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 1>has dips. Alright, Mike mcglogan, thanks very much for joining us.

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Mike mcglonan their senior commodity strategist with Bloomberg Intelligence talking

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 1>to us about KRYP Bloomberg Opinion informed perspectives and expert

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>data driven commentary on breaking news. Alright, time for Bloomberg Opinion.

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:31.239
<v Speaker 1>We have our debt markets columnists Brian Hippata in the

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:38.200
<v Speaker 1>studio today at the Interactive Brokers Um complex inside one

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Lexington Avenue, the mother Ship as we call it. He's

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:45.159
<v Speaker 1>writing about the FED ignoring a key bubble risk for

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:48.959
<v Speaker 1>the stock market or maybe can I say bubbles plural? Brian,

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Sure you can say that crypto, but they're not saying it. No,

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 1>they don't use the word bubble. No, I mean they

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 1>don't say bubble. They didn't say that may even though

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:01.360
<v Speaker 1>they flagged a lot of financial stabild be concerns. And

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the thing they don't really talk about a lot is

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:06.119
<v Speaker 1>real yields. And that is something that you just see

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 1>written about over and over, talked about over and over.

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:11.640
<v Speaker 1>You see real rates hit record lows and there's basically

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 1>no choice but to to buy risky assets because your

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 1>alternative is that you buy fixed income, you buy treasuries,

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and you get a negative inflation adjusted yield. It doesn't

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:22.199
<v Speaker 1>seem worth it to a lot of people. And what

0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 1>pops the bubble? I mean, that's a good question. I mean,

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I think right now you're seeing inflation go up tremendously

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 1>uh and you're seeing stocks barely off there they're all

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:35.440
<v Speaker 1>time highs. So it's not clear what exactly happens the

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:38.440
<v Speaker 1>FEDS reaction function, right now is to just look through

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:42.199
<v Speaker 1>this inflation keep keep their Fed funds rate at at

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>record lows. UM it's at the lowest since the nineteen

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 1>seventies when you adjusted for inflation the Fed funds rates.

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 1>So so rates are staying really low, and it's going

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:53.400
<v Speaker 1>to be a question of whether the Fed blinks, whether

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 1>they flinch under political pressure. I think, uh to to

0:19:57.080 --> 0:20:00.040
<v Speaker 1>do something to to slow inflation down. Next year's the

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 1>crucial midterm elections. After all, the seventies were bad. By

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the way, Sinale, for those of you who weren't there,

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna remind you that's when the Mustang turned from

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 1>a boss muscle car into an embarrassment. Plus we had

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 1>incredible inflation. There were uh, you know, people parked around

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the block waiting to get gasoline. Oil prices went nuts,

0:20:22.960 --> 0:20:25.919
<v Speaker 1>and as Greg Jarrett was just saying, his mortgage was

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 1>like four yeah, I mean because the Fed had to

0:20:29.400 --> 0:20:31.119
<v Speaker 1>raise rates, right, and now you get a mortgage for

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 1>three basically, So, uh, nominal rates are still extremely low,

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 1>and that does raise this risk that if you can't

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 1>get anything in fixed income, you have to go to

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:44.159
<v Speaker 1>the stock market. Some of these statistics that I cited

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:47.119
<v Speaker 1>from them from the FED Zone data is that you

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:49.239
<v Speaker 1>look at people who are sixty to seventy four, even

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:52.240
<v Speaker 1>though seventy five and older, and stockholdings have never before

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:55.160
<v Speaker 1>been such a core part of their portfolio because after

0:20:55.200 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 1>a decade of near zero interest rates, uh, you just

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 1>can't count on fixed income anymore, even even if you're

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:03.680
<v Speaker 1>in retirement. Well yeah, I mean the other thing about

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 1>this too, is that the market is already expecting some

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 1>like they're they're they're planning for rate hikes next year. Right,

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:11.439
<v Speaker 1>That's what's the plan. Right. But the thing is, what

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:14.639
<v Speaker 1>about this idea that Mary Daily had brought up to

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:17.480
<v Speaker 1>our own Mike McKee a little bit earlier, This idea

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 1>that we're still in COVID this is going to be transitory.

0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean that seems to be the parting line from

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 1>most beneficials. But how do you know that? Yeah? I

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:30.159
<v Speaker 1>mean one of the things, Um, I don't think this

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:32.320
<v Speaker 1>is spoiling anything because I tweeted about it. If I

0:21:32.320 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 1>do have a column coming out pretty soon, I mean,

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:37.879
<v Speaker 1>you look at um this idea that uh the inflation

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:41.720
<v Speaker 1>guy on Twitter um basically came out and said, um,

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking for an outlier in this inflation data and

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I can't find one, and that's a scary thing. And

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:49.959
<v Speaker 1>the idea that it's just COVID and that things are

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:52.119
<v Speaker 1>just going to come out right, that's the scale, not

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the length. Yeah, I mean, I think the question is

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:57.639
<v Speaker 1>is can you just blame used cars again? Um, some

0:21:57.680 --> 0:21:59.920
<v Speaker 1>people might try to, but I think it's starting to

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:03.679
<v Speaker 1>feel as if there's more broad based price pressure. And

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 1>you look at the New York Fed statistics on consumer

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:10.119
<v Speaker 1>expectations for inflation. Three year inflation expectations still at a

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 1>series high. One year expectations still going up over five

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 1>percent now, Um, so it's getting baked into the cake

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit here. Uh, in terms of inflation expectations.

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:21.880
<v Speaker 1>The Fed has talked about how they wanted to get

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 1>inflation expectations up because they want to be able to

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 1>conduct monetary policy about the zero lower abound, and they're there,

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:30.120
<v Speaker 1>and yet we're still at zero. And so I think

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the question has to become at a certain point, why

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 1>is zero the baseline for the Fed funds rate? And

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>that all comes back to the real yields when you

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 1>see them so deeply negative, that's because the Fed funds

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:43.480
<v Speaker 1>rate is held at stare not expected to go out.

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, real wage growth is even more of a

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:50.160
<v Speaker 1>problem because inflation is growing at a faster pace than

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 1>wages are. So you know, even if this is transitory,

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:57.440
<v Speaker 1>if it all stops at the same time, the stuff

0:22:57.480 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 1>that I need is still cost is costing more than

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:04.119
<v Speaker 1>what I'm getting paid, and that's going to continue to

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:07.119
<v Speaker 1>increase unless they can turn it around. The problem that

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 1>that I have is I don't see what the FED

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:13.920
<v Speaker 1>can do about inflation that's caused by supply constraints. Monetary

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:16.880
<v Speaker 1>policy doesn't help, right, I mean, the question ultimately has

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 1>to be is it the Fed's job to constrain demand? Right?

0:23:20.080 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 1>If you have demand at a super elevated level and

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:24.920
<v Speaker 1>supply is not what they want to there? Right, that's

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the surgeon who declares his job of success because the

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 1>patient is dead. In some ways, yes, but in stuff

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:33.919
<v Speaker 1>I said that, right, Well, you know, I think I

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 1>get it. I don't want to really think about surgeons

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 1>killing anyone, but but I but I think I get it.

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:42.399
<v Speaker 1>But the point is is if demand is running so hot,

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:46.560
<v Speaker 1>should the FED cut back a little bit? And John

0:23:46.600 --> 0:23:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Powell said that current inflation is not at all consistent

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 1>with price stability, and price stability is one of the

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Fed's mandates from Congress. Boring for just a second here,

0:23:56.800 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you're a saver, you're getting decimated unless

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:03.400
<v Speaker 1>you're investing in serious eyes savings bonds which are linked

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 1>to inflation and give a seven point one interest rate,

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:09.920
<v Speaker 1>which we which our wealth team wrote about recently. Well,

0:24:09.960 --> 0:24:12.680
<v Speaker 1>how many people are actually doing that? Not a lot? Yeah,

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 1>And that's what I'm coming down to also, Right, if

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:18.439
<v Speaker 1>you are in our generation, if you're a millennial or

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Gen Z and interest rates are this low, and even

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 1>with the rate hike, they're not you know, you're not

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:26.399
<v Speaker 1>going to get a fourteen percent mortgage anytime soon. So

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 1>what what to make of that? Of this new environment? Yeah,

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:32.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's goes back to the stock You know,

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:33.879
<v Speaker 1>you want to call it a bubble, you don't want

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 1>to call it a bubble, But ultimately more people are

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 1>invested in stocks than ever before. And the reason why

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 1>it seems to be because there is no alternative to

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:47.360
<v Speaker 1>use the often used enough phrase, right, I mean, but when,

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:48.960
<v Speaker 1>but when it comes down to it, if the FED

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 1>is concerned about elevated asset prices, elevated stock prices. It's

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:58.679
<v Speaker 1>because its policies have pushed people into those various instruments,

0:24:58.800 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and as a result, it's policy is also dictated by

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the stock market to a greater extent. You saw what

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>happened in eighteen There was a big decline at the

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 1>end of the year, and pal pivoted in January immediately

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and went to rape cuts. Um. So there is this

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 1>feeling of the push and pull and it feels tenuous,

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:20.240
<v Speaker 1>but people don't really know what else they can do,

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:25.479
<v Speaker 1>and so you've got this situation that feels uh, feels tenuous. Um.

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:27.480
<v Speaker 1>And there's really no other way to put it, all right, Brian,

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:29.680
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. Brian Jrpota there rights

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:33.439
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast.

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:45.159
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Matt Miller three. Put on ball Sweeney

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast. You

0:25:47.840 --> 0:25:50.200
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio.