WEBVTT - The Making of MAGA

0:00:06.280 --> 0:00:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Trillions. I'm Joel Webber and I'm Eric bel Tunis. Eric.

0:00:11.880 --> 0:00:14.520
<v Speaker 1>One of our favorite guests so far has been Rachel Evans,

0:00:14.680 --> 0:00:17.960
<v Speaker 1>who's a reporter in Bloomberg News who covers et F

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>s and Rachel went on a little bit of a

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:24.280
<v Speaker 1>field trip for us. We outsourced an episode we did.

0:00:24.520 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>This is an easy one, um and I like it

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of our conversation so far have been

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:33.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty broad or we've covered several tickers. This is really

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:36.879
<v Speaker 1>drilling down into one particular ETF and it goes to

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the story of how somebody launches an e t F.

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:41.840
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's kind of a deep dive into two

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 1>things at once. And Rachel, which et F is this?

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:49.160
<v Speaker 1>This is the MAGA fund MAGA That's that is a ticker,

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:51.839
<v Speaker 1>right it is? And I know there's probably a lot

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 1>of people they're triggered right about now. But before you

0:00:54.800 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>tune out, this is the make America Great against slogan

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 1>and uh connected with Trump. But before you tune out,

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>this is an e t F I think a little

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 1>ahead of its time. It is basically what's called partisan investing,

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>and I know it might not be where we want

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 1>things to go, but it's kind of where things are going,

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:14.199
<v Speaker 1>and it's sort of trying to divide the stock market

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:16.399
<v Speaker 1>into left and right, and this one is on the

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 1>right side, and you sort of have E s G

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 1>is more on the left side. And Rachel, this was

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 1>really your idea. What was it about MAGA that resonated

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:27.040
<v Speaker 1>with you? Why did you want to do this episode?

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:29.679
<v Speaker 1>I think it's always interesting when someone comes onto the

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 1>E t F scene and it's doing something completely different.

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>We hadn't seen anything political in the way of E

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:38.679
<v Speaker 1>t F s until this MAGA fund came out. It

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:40.960
<v Speaker 1>was really the first to kind of actually propose a

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>strategy in which you buy companies that are donating to

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Republican candidates. That struck me as a really interesting strategy

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and I was kind of curious to see whether it

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 1>worked and exactly how that idea came about. I think

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 1>this is a great E t F to drill down too.

0:01:55.560 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 1>I actually the ticker to me was just Grand Slam

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 1>home run, and that doesn't matter with these type of

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 1>niche E t F s. I have to think this

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 1>guy might be located down south that where did you

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:08.360
<v Speaker 1>have to go to interview him? You wouldn't be wrong.

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:10.359
<v Speaker 1>So this involved me getting up at a very very

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 1>early hour to get a flight down to Dallas Fort Worth.

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>So how Lambert who has set up point Bridge Capital,

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 1>he runs the MAGA Fund to give it its full name,

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 1>it's actually the point Bridge gop stock Tracker e t F,

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>but MAGA is somewhat more catchy. So I met him

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:28.359
<v Speaker 1>at his offices in downtown Fort Worth. It's a nice

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:31.120
<v Speaker 1>little town. Actually, it's quite sort of historic. There's a

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 1>nice old center. You've got a kind of old courthouse

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 1>that's quite pretty, lots of kind of shops and restaurants around.

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 1>But I obviously chose the worst day to go down

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 1>to Texas. It was cold, it was wet, it was windy.

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Wasn't exactly great timing on my part. And when did

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:48.240
<v Speaker 1>he launch the e t F? So the fund started

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:52.639
<v Speaker 1>in September UM of twenty seventeen, so we have now

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 1>had just over six months of performance to to evaluate um.

0:02:56.600 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 1>So it seemed like a good time to go down

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and see how that fund started life and how it's

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:07.360
<v Speaker 1>been doing since its launched. This weekend is the man

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>who made MEGA, so I'm here to see how Lambert

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>on thank you. How looks the consummate conservative professional think

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>open neck shirt, chinos and a plaid blazer and blonde

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:31.239
<v Speaker 1>hair wants slightly long and swept back, a look not

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 1>dissimilar to President Trump's good to see you again again

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 1>for coming down, Thank you for having me appreciated Hope.

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 1>His office in downtown Fort Worth has a similar vibe.

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 1>It's all black, leather and chrome, with a picture of

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 1>his daughter set on the table next to an award

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>for best e t F ticker from this year's e

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>t F dot Com Awards. I started by asking him

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>to take me back to the beginning and tell me

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 1>how he had first come up with the idea for

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>political investing. I was sitting at my desk here in

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the office that run. I was watching the news, and

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>that morning Target had come out and announced that they

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 1>were going to allow anyone of any gender to use

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:23.599
<v Speaker 1>the dressing rooms and restrooms at their facilities. So how

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 1>are they identified for that day? They could they could

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 1>change in the dress rooms. And I saw this and

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:30.279
<v Speaker 1>I was like, Ah, that's going to be very negative

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:32.839
<v Speaker 1>for a Target stock. People were upset about it. I've

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 1>got two daughters, we shop at Target. I mean, they're

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna go buy swimsuits at Target, They're gonna change in

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:40.799
<v Speaker 1>the dressing room. It's kind of a weird scenario. This morning,

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 1>a petition against the retail giant Target is gaining a

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of momentum. Nearly eight and fifty thou people have

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 1>already signed a boycott pledge by the American Family Association

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:54.920
<v Speaker 1>over targets bathroom policy. People are boycotting Target, and they

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 1>don't realize they own it in their mutual funds. Once

0:04:57.839 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 1>President Trump won and I started seeing more of what

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 1>was going on politically as far as corporate America, you know,

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of moved into that mode of how do I,

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:13.479
<v Speaker 1>how do I capitalize for investors their ability to invest

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 1>in companies that have their political views. Once you come

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:20.039
<v Speaker 1>up with this idea and exchange trade of funds seemed

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>like the natural solution that The reason I thought the

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 1>E t F approach was the best way for it

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:28.920
<v Speaker 1>was because it's the most scalable in my mind. Clients

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>don't have to have an account at Point Bridge Capital.

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 1>They can have an account at Schwab, they can have

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 1>AG account TD maror Trade. They can have an account

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:38.359
<v Speaker 1>at ubs basically or wherever they have a brokerage account,

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 1>they can purchase it. How's idea to turn his political

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 1>views into a fund wasn't new, per se. Values based

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 1>investing has been a rail for years for folks who

0:05:47.960 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 1>want to avoid energy producers, tobacco companies, or weapons manufacturers

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>for example. You might have heard these types of strategies

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 1>called e s G short for Environmental, social and governance

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>or socially responsible, and these types of products have become

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>all the rage in recent years. But How saw a

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 1>gap in the market for investors with a different set

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>of values, a conservative set of values. He wasn't coming

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 1>at this cold. How has been involved in Republican politics

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:19.240
<v Speaker 1>more than a decade, most recently running a superpack for

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Ted Cruise's tilt at the presidency in twenty sixteen, a

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>battle that President Trump and his margas slogan ultimately one.

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 1>There were the SG funds, and those e SG funds

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:35.039
<v Speaker 1>are typically mostly left. There's nothing out there from the

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:38.599
<v Speaker 1>from the conservative or Republican side. But through my work

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 1>in politics, I realized, you know what really matters is

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the money in politics. So that's really what I are

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 1>to do, is see, well, where are they giving their money,

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:51.039
<v Speaker 1>because that's really what's determining how people are getting elected

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 1>and whether people are getting elected, and so that's really

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>what sorry. I was like, I'll follow the money and

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:59.479
<v Speaker 1>see what that leads to. Thus began a series of

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 1>phone call to find out what it would take to

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:04.720
<v Speaker 1>realize his funds and how he would get approval from

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the regulators for something known as exemptive relief. So I

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 1>just started calling people and saying, you know, and learning

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 1>how to do it. There are different types of incubators

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>out there that can that are kind of turn key

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 1>approaches to launching e t s. And I basically just

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>learned that market through conversations with people, and I realized

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 1>that really what I wanted to do was get my

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 1>own exemptive relief. And then basically I created a timeline.

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 1>I have a white board over here where I put

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 1>up on the white board. Okay, what do I need

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>to do first? I mean, if you want to walk,

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 1>we can walk over to the white board and show

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 1>you the white board. So this is the the white

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 1>boarder which he sketched out kind of the process to market, right,

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and then I made I made decisions on kind of

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 1>you can see these are all you know, you've got

0:07:56.720 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 1>us bank, You've got cbo how lined up the custodian

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 1>spoke with market makers and authorized participants to make sure

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:05.240
<v Speaker 1>that the fund would trade smoothly on in exchange and

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 1>that investors could put their cash in and get it

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:11.239
<v Speaker 1>out again. But one crucial ingredient was still missing, something

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 1>we talk a lot about on this show. The ticker.

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I decided I knew I wanted the ticker to be MAGA,

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 1>so I called up my contact at cbo E and said, hey,

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 1>you know I need to reserve this ticker. Well, they

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>tell me that ticker is already taken. So I was like, oh,

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:33.959
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think they're going to use it, so

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:36.480
<v Speaker 1>let me let me check with them. Sure enough they were.

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 1>They said yeah, we're not going to use this ticker.

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 1>And I figured they would probably say, hey, you know,

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:44.400
<v Speaker 1>give us some money and you can have the ticker.

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:47.320
<v Speaker 1>But they didn't do that, so it was pretty nice.

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 1>It was pretty quick. Actually, within a day or so

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:52.320
<v Speaker 1>we exchanged emails. They're like, yeah, we're fine to release it.

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 1>They felt like the ticker might be a little too

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:58.720
<v Speaker 1>a little too hot, but you didn't obviously, like when

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>did you first think that MARGA, that's the ticket for

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 1>me obviously after President Trump won the election. That's a

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 1>campaign slogan, and I just thought that that that ticker

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>would be an interesting way to let the public know

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:14.960
<v Speaker 1>that this is a Republican e t F. Were you

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 1>trying to come up with other alternatives that were up fitted?

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I was, And in fact another alternative was GOP and

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 1>that ticker was taken as well, and that ticker had

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>only been taken if I recall, maybe just a few

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 1>weeks before before I had called about it, so that

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 1>ticker was gone, and so I was like, wow, this

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 1>is um, this could be a problem because I know tickers.

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Tickers are really important in the t F world. People

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:39.960
<v Speaker 1>don't really care what the names are. It's all about

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:42.319
<v Speaker 1>the ticker. So you know, I'll say, well, the names

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 1>that you know the point Bridge GP, stock Track or

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 1>e t F, but the tickers MAGA. So that's what

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:49.680
<v Speaker 1>That's the way you need to think about it. All told,

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:52.360
<v Speaker 1>it took about seven months from making his first calls

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:56.559
<v Speaker 1>to starting the fund. Texas based point Bridge Capital was

0:09:56.679 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 1>launching its first e t F and it's investing in

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 1>GOP friendly company. Just understand that you go What about

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and fifty companies, with all of which are

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>sympathetic to Republican causes is brilliant conversation. So how's the

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 1>fund doing well? It's report card, It's somewhat mixed. The

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 1>fund has thirty nine million dollars in assets. That's not nothing,

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 1>but it's somewhat below the million dollars the e t

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:33.840
<v Speaker 1>f s typically need to break even. It ended seventeen

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 1>with strong returns, but those have lagged somewhat this year.

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 1>It's easy to see why when you look at Margot's holdings.

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Remember these are all companies that donate to Republican candidates,

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:48.080
<v Speaker 1>and drilling down, you can see that the portfolio is

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>heavily tilted towards oil and gas companies. This means that

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:55.439
<v Speaker 1>the fund thrives when energy does well, but it also

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 1>suffers when the sector struggles. The opposite is true of technology,

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 1>in which the and is very underweight. But Margaret also

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 1>owns some companies that might give conservatives pause. Berkshire Hathaway

0:11:07.960 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and Goldman Sachs, both one by CEOs that have expressed

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 1>socially liberal views in the past, are also in the mix.

0:11:14.920 --> 0:11:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I asked how how investors react when they learned that

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>these companies are part of the Market Fund. You know,

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 1>you can have a CEO that's a Democrat, you can

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 1>have a CEO that's that's a big liberal, and they

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 1>can spout off about things. Lloyd blanklynd talking about Donald

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Trump's Twitter doesn't affect things as much as Goldman sacks

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>pack giving money to Republican candidates. So I'll take the

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I'll take the dollars given all day long over an

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:44.440
<v Speaker 1>interview where he criticizes somebody. So I think companies say

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 1>things publicly and then they do things differently than what

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:52.320
<v Speaker 1>they're saying publicly. I found this argument particularly interesting. On

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the one hand, it makes a lot of sense. Money

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 1>is something far more tangible than talk. But it also

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 1>seems to contradict one of Hall's pitches to possible buyers, namely,

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the companies like Target, for example, damage their share price

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:09.200
<v Speaker 1>when they express liberal political views. Using his methodology, the

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>fund still owns some of these companies. It also made

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:15.720
<v Speaker 1>me wonder how much you can tell about companies ideology

0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:18.720
<v Speaker 1>from the dollars it donates. To dig into this further,

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I turned to Michael you Seem, a professor of management

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:25.680
<v Speaker 1>at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School, who researches leadership

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and decision making. His business giving ideologically driven that as

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 1>you want to support parties that say advocate policies you

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 1>want yourself or is it access driven? You want access

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>to individuals who especially are in positions of chairs of

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 1>House and Senate committees and most top executive money it

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:53.200
<v Speaker 1>was long gone to the Republican Party, no surprise there,

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:56.679
<v Speaker 1>but there are periods where more than half of the

0:12:56.760 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 1>pack money over which they preside actually goos two Democrats.

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:06.080
<v Speaker 1>There's also the cost. The fund charge is seventy two

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 1>basis points or seven dollars and twenty cents for every

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:13.280
<v Speaker 1>one thousand dollars invested. That's significantly higher than the average

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 1>of forty nine basis points for e t f s

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 1>in the US. So why might an investor decide it's

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:21.679
<v Speaker 1>the right product for them? To find out? I spoke

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 1>to another academic, Mayor Stateman, who specializes in behavioral finance

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:30.839
<v Speaker 1>at Santa Clara University. In finance, we have a tendency

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>to separate the production of returns from their consumption. That is,

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 1>we say, first, make the most money. However, whatever it takes,

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 1>then use it to buy stuff to satisfy you or

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 1>to support the causes that you want. And and that

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:54.839
<v Speaker 1>is silly, because finance just just made itself very narrow

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and saying the goal must be getting the highest return,

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:05.199
<v Speaker 1>because like the expressive and emotional benefits of being true

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 1>to their values, not just pretending to be true to

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 1>their values. I asked, how about this motivation, whether it

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 1>could be one of the reasons people buy his fund.

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure how much people are making investments bit

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 1>necessarily based on being part of a club, but I

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 1>mean i'd certainly be happy for that. And I think that,

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, friends do tend to talk to each other

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 1>at cocktail parties, Hey what are you buying? What are

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 1>you looking at? From a you know, investment standpoint, So

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 1>hopefully we'll get to the point where that's a topic

0:14:33.760 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 1>that comes up. I'd certainly welcome it. Why do you

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>think people get more upset about politics these days, that

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 1>polarization is a positive thing or a negative thing. Well,

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think necessarily polarization is a good thing. I

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 1>think it's great for people have different views. I wish

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 1>people would then be able to still be friends and

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and have the different views, right, So I guess I asked,

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 1>because I mean, is there a argument there that you know,

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 1>something like the Marga Fund is sort of capitalizing on

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 1>that polonization. I don't know that. I would say it's

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 1>capitalizing on it. I'd say it's giving it investors a

0:15:10.440 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 1>vehicle that they haven't had as a way to invest

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 1>based on things based on political views. So capitalizes and

0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 1>necessarily the right word for it, I'd say it's more

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 1>trying to keep create an opportunity for people to do

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 1>something that they don't have. Did you know there are

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of company who heavily support liberal politicians like

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Hillary by donating millions to Democrats. There's now a way

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 1>to invest without owning these stocks. How Lambert and his

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 1>company point Bridge Capital created the first. Now that his

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 1>fund is up and running, How's main focus is on

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 1>making investors aware of it in that he has a

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 1>different approach to many of the larger firms, taking spots

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 1>on conservative talk radio for example. And of course the

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 1>ticker is MAGA. MAGA m A g A Go to

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 1>invest politically dot com and learn about MAGA and lets

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 1>you own the top One thing I'm doing differently than

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 1>most E T F s is I'm not trying to

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 1>go out and have a bunch of wholesalers hit the

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 1>different brokers houses. I think mine, mine is going to

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 1>be driven more by investors calling up and saying I

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 1>want to buy this, versus necessarily their advisor calling them

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 1>and saying, hey, you should buy this. You know, I've

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 1>had someone say to me. I think they said to me, yeah,

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's a that's a really interesting niche product.

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, well, you know, it's really not niche. Since

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 1>sixty million people voted for Donald Trump, you know, so

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a big market out there. Certainly found some high

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 1>profile support among House political colleagues since President Trump's intuguration.

0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I know Don JR. Now, so I didn't know him prior,

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 1>but we've become acquainted and I don't know, I guess

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 1>we could say we're friends. What does he think of

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the margarite TF? Oh he likes it. Yeah, he told

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:52.200
<v Speaker 1>me he likes it, like he loves the idea, and

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a fan. How about your whole boss

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 1>head craze. He likes it, he likes the idea. I

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 1>don't know if he's bought it. I'm you know, I'm

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to call up, you know, his wife. His

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:05.960
<v Speaker 1>wife's in the investment field. So I think I need

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to talk to Heidi and say, hey, you need to

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:10.399
<v Speaker 1>look into this a little more. Have you put your

0:17:10.400 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 1>money into it? Oh? Yes, you know all of my

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:15.919
<v Speaker 1>liquid retirement is in it. My mother's in it, my

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:19.679
<v Speaker 1>wife's in it. There was just one final thing I

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 1>needed to know before leaving, how and for worth? Do

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 1>you have the hat? I have a I'll tell you

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 1>what I have. I have a maggot e t F hat.

0:17:28.760 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I'll show it to you before we leave. But I

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 1>do have a red hat that I that I've made

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 1>up that says magat et f on it. It's kind

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 1>of your own, that's my own. It's my own brand

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 1>of the of the hat. Yes, not the Trump happened,

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 1>not the actual Trump hat. But in fair I'm not

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 1>a big slogan guy. I don't have a I don't

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>have a Ted Cruise had either. I don't have I

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't do a lot of the slogan stuff. Now you're

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 1>in the business, I know now I need to I

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 1>know I've had to revamp my thoughts on that Rachel,

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 1>what do you think the biggest takeaways for you were?

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 1>The biggest takeaway from me was really just that this

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 1>isn't a very interesting idea that that kind of, you know,

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you can try and invest in a

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 1>way that aligns with your political values I thought was

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:16.399
<v Speaker 1>a really novel concept. I'm not sure whether it's something

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:20.359
<v Speaker 1>that um I necessarily think is a great development for

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the world per se in that I think, you know,

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:25.680
<v Speaker 1>when you look at where things are politically these days,

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:28.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, we have so much polarization between right and left,

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and whether the right and left talk to each other

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 1>enough anymore, I think is an area for debate. I

0:18:34.080 --> 0:18:36.720
<v Speaker 1>do wonder whether you know, when you get into investing

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 1>politically as well as kind of donating politically or going

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 1>to rallies, whether that kind of takes that polarization one

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:46.360
<v Speaker 1>step further. But I think the idea about investing according

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:49.920
<v Speaker 1>to your political values as well as you know, maybe

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>your morals or or know whether you think that energy

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 1>stocks are going up, or whether the government's going to

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:56.959
<v Speaker 1>build roads in your your town, I think that's an

0:18:56.960 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 1>interesting idea. I mean, the part that interests me a

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit. It's just that if if you want to

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:04.200
<v Speaker 1>build it, you can build it. And if it works,

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>it works, and if it doesn't, it doesn't. And like

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>if somebody wants to invest in that, they can invest

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 1>in that. But here's this guy who had an idea,

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:11.160
<v Speaker 1>anyone out and did it right. I mean, that's when

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 1>you can look at the e t F marketplace. It's

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:15.919
<v Speaker 1>a democracy. It's not something that necessarily you have to

0:19:16.000 --> 0:19:17.879
<v Speaker 1>kind of be coming from a black rock or a

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:20.639
<v Speaker 1>vanguard to get success. If you have an idea and

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 1>you go through the right kind of process, you can

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 1>see your fund realized and then it's up to the

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:27.639
<v Speaker 1>marketplace whether it succeeds. I'm a little more bullish on

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the ETF then I think most people for two reasons. One,

0:19:30.880 --> 0:19:34.480
<v Speaker 1>if this thing starts to become something that Sean Hannity

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 1>or the conservative crowd starts talking about, you know, every

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 1>time somebody on the left says something bad, they want

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:41.359
<v Speaker 1>to boycott the other side. This is a way to

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 1>act with your dollars. And if it starts making its

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:47.160
<v Speaker 1>way in conservative circles, that's half the country as an audience.

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 1>The second thing is this is heavy energy and industrials

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and has no tech. If the fang stocks crumble, they've

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:56.920
<v Speaker 1>had a few like hits, but they're back if they crumble.

0:19:57.359 --> 0:20:00.400
<v Speaker 1>This thing has a lot of stocks that are more

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:03.119
<v Speaker 1>on the value side, and if it starts to outperform

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:05.879
<v Speaker 1>and ripped past the SMP five hundred, it could it

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:09.320
<v Speaker 1>could get assets just because it's outperforming. So it's got

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:12.440
<v Speaker 1>a couple of things that could garner assets that are

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 1>legitimate in my opinion. Yeah, that's one thing that that

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:17.120
<v Speaker 1>how mentioned to me is that when he ran kind

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:18.919
<v Speaker 1>of back tests on on this fund and kind of

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:21.440
<v Speaker 1>how it performed in the past, I can pleasantly surprised

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 1>to find that it didn't really correlate with the SMP

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 1>five hundred, which when obviously you're using the SMP five

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:29.159
<v Speaker 1>hundred as your base universe, you'd expect that potentially to

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 1>be more overlapped there. But it seemed that, you know,

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 1>there is either outperformance or under performance. It's not really

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:36.920
<v Speaker 1>just tracking the SMP. At the beginning we talked about

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 1>how E s G sort of on the left side

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:40.240
<v Speaker 1>of the map and MAGA might be on the right.

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 1>It really shows in the numbers. If you look, there's

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:45.600
<v Speaker 1>only eight percent overlap between the two big E S

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 1>G t F S and MAGA. That is not a

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:51.159
<v Speaker 1>lot considering they're both large caps. I personally think of E.

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 1>S G went and sort of called itself liberal values.

0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:56.119
<v Speaker 1>I think it might get off the ground faster and

0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 1>just recognize that's its audience anyway. But anyway, this is

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 1>ascinating to see if the stock market continues to get

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:06.119
<v Speaker 1>divided via politics. Pretty crazy also that somebody had the

0:21:06.200 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 1>ticker and relinquished it. You don't know who actually had

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the ticker. Wasn't the guy who There's another issuer who

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 1>has GOP and dem how to tell me, and he

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:18.639
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't name names, But I mean, it's it's interesting that

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:21.320
<v Speaker 1>you pick on that because for my understanding of it,

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:23.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you have a t f issuers out

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 1>there that are pondering different ideas and come up with,

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:28.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, a three or four even five less kind

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:32.120
<v Speaker 1>of word that seems like it might encapsulated investment thesis,

0:21:32.320 --> 0:21:34.200
<v Speaker 1>you can go out and you can reserve that ticker

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:36.400
<v Speaker 1>with the exchanges for a certain period of time. Yeah,

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:39.360
<v Speaker 1>just seems like the land grab somebody has just got

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:41.439
<v Speaker 1>to be land grabbing this like dot com era you

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:44.640
<v Speaker 1>are else? Yeah, I remember back where Bill Gross first

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:46.639
<v Speaker 1>came out. His e t F was t r x

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:49.679
<v Speaker 1>T or something really bad, and eight months later he

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 1>got bonded, which was smart. Maga. I'm a little shocked,

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:55.479
<v Speaker 1>just because partisan investing is very new. I we were

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 1>just talking before we started, how I remember two years

0:21:58.280 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>ago this kind of thing just would have entered my

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 1>head in covering ets as an option. Even right now,

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 1>nobody was doing this. We're talking about this kind of thing.

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it really wasn't until this past selection where

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:10.640
<v Speaker 1>it's become more obvious. In a way. I think it's

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:12.680
<v Speaker 1>a good point. I mean, I think society generally has

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:15.719
<v Speaker 1>become more political. If you look at the news stories

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 1>that you know, we as reporters are covering on a

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 1>daily basis, so much of the stock market moves are

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 1>driven by politics these days. You know, you can't really

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 1>write a story without incorporating something that President Trump or

0:22:27.840 --> 0:22:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the Cabinet or Congress has said or done, because it's

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 1>impacting how the markets move on a much greater level,

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:37.399
<v Speaker 1>I think, in this administration than than some of the

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:40.320
<v Speaker 1>ones immediately previous. So when it comes to politics being

0:22:40.359 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 1>part of our daily lives, it's more and more present, Rachel,

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Just love the fact that you're

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 1>with us in and doing cool stuff like this. Thanks

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 1>joining us only, Thanks happening. Thanks for listening to Trillions.

0:22:57.800 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Until next time. You can find us on the Bloomberg term, rnol,

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, Apple Podcasts, and whoever else you want

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:06.679
<v Speaker 1>to listen to us. We'd love to hear from you.

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:11.680
<v Speaker 1>We're on Twitter. She's at Rachel Evans Underscore Inn Why

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm at Joel Weber Show. He's at Eric Falcunas. Trillions

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:22.359
<v Speaker 1>is produced by Magnus Hendrickson. Francesco Leady is the head

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:25.920
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Podcasts. Bye.