WEBVTT - Chadwick Moore - Tucker Carlson Has Big Plans

0:00:11.697 --> 0:00:14.937
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to The Buck Sexton Show podcast, make sure

0:00:14.977 --> 0:00:17.977
<v Speaker 1>you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app or

0:00:18.017 --> 0:00:19.897
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts.

0:00:20.217 --> 0:00:23.777
<v Speaker 2>Hey, everybody, welcome to the Buck Sexton Show. On this episode,

0:00:23.817 --> 0:00:28.817
<v Speaker 2>we have our friend Chadwick Moore. Chad is an author.

0:00:29.257 --> 0:00:33.977
<v Speaker 2>He is the author of The Upcoming Tucker, a book

0:00:34.017 --> 0:00:37.817
<v Speaker 2>about Tucker Carlson, a biography of the man himself. He

0:00:37.857 --> 0:00:41.897
<v Speaker 2>also writes for The Spectator and other cool places. Mister Chadwick,

0:00:41.937 --> 0:00:43.697
<v Speaker 2>good to have you back on the program, sir.

0:00:44.177 --> 0:00:45.657
<v Speaker 1>Hey always good to be here, Buck.

0:00:46.217 --> 0:00:48.657
<v Speaker 2>So you know, I remember they used to tell us

0:00:48.697 --> 0:00:52.297
<v Speaker 2>some story that there was like once when I was

0:00:52.297 --> 0:00:54.217
<v Speaker 2>working in the government, that there was like one State

0:00:54.257 --> 0:00:57.817
<v Speaker 2>Department analyst. I think maybe this is totally urban legend

0:00:57.857 --> 0:00:59.417
<v Speaker 2>from the the community, but this is what they used

0:00:59.417 --> 0:01:03.177
<v Speaker 2>to say. There's like one State Department guy who and

0:01:03.217 --> 0:01:05.297
<v Speaker 2>there's usually a million of them on everything, who was

0:01:05.337 --> 0:01:07.897
<v Speaker 2>covering East Tmoor. And if you remember, there was a

0:01:07.937 --> 0:01:10.257
<v Speaker 2>time back in the East t Moore there was a

0:01:10.297 --> 0:01:11.897
<v Speaker 2>you know, a conflict and I think it was a

0:01:11.897 --> 0:01:13.737
<v Speaker 2>genocide And think is that horrible? And I'm like it

0:01:13.817 --> 0:01:15.737
<v Speaker 2>was the one guy he was right at the place

0:01:15.857 --> 0:01:18.897
<v Speaker 2>right at the time. I mean, Tucker is a very

0:01:18.977 --> 0:01:22.017
<v Speaker 2>very well known name across the board. But to be

0:01:22.057 --> 0:01:24.537
<v Speaker 2>writing the book on the guy who becomes the center

0:01:24.577 --> 0:01:27.137
<v Speaker 2>of the cable news universe for no longer being on

0:01:27.217 --> 0:01:29.777
<v Speaker 2>cable news must be quite a trip. I mean, you

0:01:29.857 --> 0:01:33.577
<v Speaker 2>kind of are the analyst on the issue in cable

0:01:33.577 --> 0:01:34.737
<v Speaker 2>news right now, which is Tucker.

0:01:34.737 --> 0:01:38.897
<v Speaker 1>What was that like, Yeah, it was a trip to

0:01:38.937 --> 0:01:41.177
<v Speaker 1>be I mean, well, it was well, just you know,

0:01:41.217 --> 0:01:43.577
<v Speaker 1>we started this over a year ago working on this book,

0:01:43.617 --> 0:01:47.417
<v Speaker 1>and I had submitted my manuscript in March, only two

0:01:47.457 --> 0:01:49.457
<v Speaker 1>months after my deadline, which is pretty good for a book,

0:01:49.897 --> 0:01:51.937
<v Speaker 1>and we were going through the edding process. We were

0:01:51.937 --> 0:01:55.457
<v Speaker 1>already done with it, and I had the day that

0:01:55.537 --> 0:01:57.257
<v Speaker 1>he so I was on Tucker's last show that we

0:01:57.257 --> 0:01:58.857
<v Speaker 1>didn't know was gonna be his last show, which was

0:01:58.897 --> 0:02:02.617
<v Speaker 1>April twenty first, and that day I actually had a

0:02:02.617 --> 0:02:05.057
<v Speaker 1>phone call with him scheduled for my final phone call.

0:02:05.097 --> 0:02:07.737
<v Speaker 1>I had literally five questions laid out, like did I

0:02:07.737 --> 0:02:11.417
<v Speaker 1>get this right? Can you explain this more? And he

0:02:11.497 --> 0:02:13.137
<v Speaker 1>had a flight that was delayed and he was like,

0:02:13.177 --> 0:02:15.177
<v Speaker 1>I'm so sorry. Can we reschedule this for Monday? And

0:02:15.177 --> 0:02:17.497
<v Speaker 1>I said sure, I'll text you Monday morning. And then

0:02:17.537 --> 0:02:20.497
<v Speaker 1>Monday morning, I saw I got the news like everyone

0:02:20.497 --> 0:02:22.177
<v Speaker 1>else did. I saw on Twitter that his show was

0:02:22.217 --> 0:02:25.017
<v Speaker 1>got pulled off the air. So, you know, of course,

0:02:25.457 --> 0:02:28.337
<v Speaker 1>my publisher, my editor calls me. Almost sounded like he

0:02:28.377 --> 0:02:30.017
<v Speaker 1>was in tears, like what are we going to do?

0:02:30.057 --> 0:02:33.857
<v Speaker 1>What is going on? And it was of course I

0:02:33.897 --> 0:02:35.937
<v Speaker 1>texted Tucker. Didn't hear back for a few days because

0:02:36.097 --> 0:02:38.937
<v Speaker 1>everyone in the world was texting him. But you know,

0:02:39.057 --> 0:02:40.777
<v Speaker 1>after we kind of the dust settled a bit and

0:02:40.817 --> 0:02:42.257
<v Speaker 1>we thought about it for a minute. We were like,

0:02:42.697 --> 0:02:45.217
<v Speaker 1>this doesn't really change anything about the book. We just

0:02:45.257 --> 0:02:48.297
<v Speaker 1>have to go back and change a tense from present

0:02:48.337 --> 0:02:50.657
<v Speaker 1>to past tense when we talked about his Fox two show.

0:02:50.857 --> 0:02:52.177
<v Speaker 1>And then also we need to add to the book.

0:02:52.217 --> 0:02:54.777
<v Speaker 1>So I got to interview him twice since the show

0:02:54.897 --> 0:02:56.897
<v Speaker 1>was taken off the air, and added two new chapters

0:02:56.937 --> 0:02:59.257
<v Speaker 1>to the book. Because it was a book, you know,

0:02:59.297 --> 0:03:01.377
<v Speaker 1>about his life and who he is as a person

0:03:01.497 --> 0:03:04.497
<v Speaker 1>and as a man, and just what his world's like.

0:03:04.577 --> 0:03:07.417
<v Speaker 1>So I suppose with the book, nothing really much had

0:03:07.417 --> 0:03:10.177
<v Speaker 1>to change. We just had to add to it. But

0:03:10.257 --> 0:03:13.137
<v Speaker 1>it's I guess it's kind of a trip that yes,

0:03:13.257 --> 0:03:15.777
<v Speaker 1>this did happen right as we were getting ready to

0:03:15.897 --> 0:03:18.857
<v Speaker 1>announce the book. I mean we were The original publication

0:03:18.937 --> 0:03:20.777
<v Speaker 1>date was May thirty first, so we've had the public

0:03:20.777 --> 0:03:24.417
<v Speaker 1>push it back to July eighteenth now. But yeah, it's

0:03:24.457 --> 0:03:27.497
<v Speaker 1>been it's been pretty wild. Now.

0:03:28.017 --> 0:03:30.217
<v Speaker 2>What can you tell us about I mean, there's so

0:03:30.297 --> 0:03:31.737
<v Speaker 2>much stuff that I want to ask you, but I

0:03:31.737 --> 0:03:33.817
<v Speaker 2>don't see Unlike I know when people used to ask

0:03:33.857 --> 0:03:36.017
<v Speaker 2>me questions when I when I came out of government,

0:03:36.177 --> 0:03:37.537
<v Speaker 2>It's like, don't ask me the questions you know I

0:03:37.537 --> 0:03:39.537
<v Speaker 2>can't answer because that's no fun because I'm just going

0:03:39.617 --> 0:03:41.217
<v Speaker 2>to not answer them. So I'm trying to ask you

0:03:41.257 --> 0:03:43.537
<v Speaker 2>things that I know you'll be able to answer without

0:03:43.657 --> 0:03:45.497
<v Speaker 2>you know, either spilling too much of what would be

0:03:45.537 --> 0:03:48.337
<v Speaker 2>in the book. But also I know you're having a

0:03:48.377 --> 0:03:52.937
<v Speaker 2>lot of conversations probably these days that are certainly non

0:03:52.937 --> 0:03:55.537
<v Speaker 2>attribution and maybe even off the record and effect about this.

0:03:56.297 --> 0:04:00.297
<v Speaker 2>What do we know about why Fox made the decision

0:04:00.337 --> 0:04:02.777
<v Speaker 2>that they did at this point in time? Like what

0:04:02.977 --> 0:04:03.497
<v Speaker 2>is known?

0:04:06.097 --> 0:04:09.177
<v Speaker 1>Well, there's nothing we can say with absolute certainty because

0:04:09.217 --> 0:04:12.377
<v Speaker 1>there's no documentary of this. But what is known, I

0:04:12.377 --> 0:04:15.737
<v Speaker 1>think we can say with a relative amount of fact

0:04:16.057 --> 0:04:21.657
<v Speaker 1>is that it was something to do with the dominion situation,

0:04:22.017 --> 0:04:24.017
<v Speaker 1>all right. It was as a result of the of

0:04:24.057 --> 0:04:26.617
<v Speaker 1>the deafamation suit and the settlement. Now, whether it was

0:04:26.657 --> 0:04:29.337
<v Speaker 1>a condition in the settlement or not, we don't know.

0:04:29.937 --> 0:04:33.097
<v Speaker 1>My sources told me that it was. That these are

0:04:33.177 --> 0:04:36.097
<v Speaker 1>more than one source who I believe would know, and

0:04:36.257 --> 0:04:38.897
<v Speaker 1>these are people who've not misled me before, and I

0:04:38.937 --> 0:04:40.657
<v Speaker 1>don't have any reason to believe they would mislead me

0:04:40.697 --> 0:04:42.657
<v Speaker 1>now or that they have any reason to lie or

0:04:42.697 --> 0:04:45.137
<v Speaker 1>make this up. That is what I was told. Now,

0:04:45.577 --> 0:04:47.897
<v Speaker 1>if you'd ask to me what my theory would have been,

0:04:47.937 --> 0:04:49.857
<v Speaker 1>I never would have said that to be the case,

0:04:49.897 --> 0:04:52.217
<v Speaker 1>that it was, that it was a conditioned settlement. Dominions

0:04:52.257 --> 0:04:56.057
<v Speaker 1>of course denied this. Fox has denied this. That's what

0:04:56.137 --> 0:04:58.897
<v Speaker 1>I was told. My theory would have been that it

0:04:58.937 --> 0:05:03.737
<v Speaker 1>was essentially Rupert Murdoch someone at Fox Fox Management wanting

0:05:03.777 --> 0:05:06.737
<v Speaker 1>to make an example out of Tucker Carlson, because everyone

0:05:06.777 --> 0:05:09.817
<v Speaker 1>I talked to at Fox, all the producers of former

0:05:09.857 --> 0:05:12.977
<v Speaker 1>ten current people who work there, have all told me

0:05:13.017 --> 0:05:15.777
<v Speaker 1>the same thing about this, and they when asked, this

0:05:15.817 --> 0:05:18.057
<v Speaker 1>makes no sense. Why would Fox News take the ratings

0:05:18.097 --> 0:05:20.257
<v Speaker 1>juggernaut off the air, and everyone says the same thing.

0:05:20.297 --> 0:05:22.697
<v Speaker 1>They say, management is literally stupid. This is just what

0:05:22.737 --> 0:05:24.817
<v Speaker 1>they say to me. And that the fact that they

0:05:24.857 --> 0:05:28.337
<v Speaker 1>didn't understand that Tucker had a brand that was as powerful,

0:05:28.337 --> 0:05:31.097
<v Speaker 1>if not more powerful, than the entire network. They sort

0:05:31.137 --> 0:05:34.817
<v Speaker 1>of thought, well, we lost big talent before Bill O'Reilly, Megan, Kelly,

0:05:34.897 --> 0:05:38.257
<v Speaker 1>Lou Dobbs, Glenn Beck, and we were always fine. So

0:05:38.297 --> 0:05:40.377
<v Speaker 1>people told me they didn't really understand the fact that

0:05:40.457 --> 0:05:43.777
<v Speaker 1>Tucker Carlson isn't really seen as just a talk show host.

0:05:43.817 --> 0:05:46.137
<v Speaker 1>He's really seen as a political movement, and he was

0:05:46.177 --> 0:05:48.817
<v Speaker 1>bringing so many people to cable news and to Fox

0:05:48.817 --> 0:05:51.057
<v Speaker 1>that normally wouldn't be there, to the point where he

0:05:51.097 --> 0:05:53.777
<v Speaker 1>was almost artificially extending the life in relevance of cable

0:05:53.777 --> 0:05:56.697
<v Speaker 1>news all on his own. So my gut would have

0:05:56.737 --> 0:05:58.617
<v Speaker 1>told me that it was someone trying to make an

0:05:58.617 --> 0:06:01.457
<v Speaker 1>example out of him to get everyone in line at Fox,

0:06:01.697 --> 0:06:04.777
<v Speaker 1>because he did not push those those theories about the

0:06:04.817 --> 0:06:07.137
<v Speaker 1>voting machines being rigged at all. In fact, he pushed

0:06:07.177 --> 0:06:10.537
<v Speaker 1>against them quite strongly. Other Fox personalities that did push

0:06:10.577 --> 0:06:12.897
<v Speaker 1>those theories are still on the air, they still have jobs.

0:06:13.257 --> 0:06:15.577
<v Speaker 1>That's what my gut would have told me, I had

0:06:15.577 --> 0:06:17.857
<v Speaker 1>sources tell me something else. So that's sort of where

0:06:17.897 --> 0:06:19.617
<v Speaker 1>we're at. But I think we can safely say it

0:06:19.697 --> 0:06:21.737
<v Speaker 1>had something to do with the Diminian situation.

0:06:22.617 --> 0:06:27.897
<v Speaker 2>Does Fox recognize what people are starting to say that

0:06:27.937 --> 0:06:32.537
<v Speaker 2>Fox bud lighted itself with this move? Now that might

0:06:32.577 --> 0:06:35.897
<v Speaker 2>be a bit extreme, but what do you see? What

0:06:35.937 --> 0:06:36.497
<v Speaker 2>do you think?

0:06:37.497 --> 0:06:40.937
<v Speaker 1>Well, just percentage wise, the numbers are worse than bud Light,

0:06:40.977 --> 0:06:43.097
<v Speaker 1>I mean bud Light. We had these great visuals everywhere,

0:06:43.257 --> 0:06:45.537
<v Speaker 1>like the empty store, the empty shelves, and bud Light

0:06:45.537 --> 0:06:48.137
<v Speaker 1>being still given away for free. But Fox's numbers are

0:06:48.297 --> 0:06:51.297
<v Speaker 1>bud Lights down like twenty five percent in sales. Fox's

0:06:51.337 --> 0:06:54.017
<v Speaker 1>numbers are down like sixty two percent in the key

0:06:54.017 --> 0:06:57.657
<v Speaker 1>demographic and forty percent or thirty seven percent year over

0:06:57.777 --> 0:06:58.537
<v Speaker 1>year from last year.

0:06:58.697 --> 0:07:00.897
<v Speaker 2>Is at a percentage just in the eight o'clock hour.

0:07:01.057 --> 0:07:02.657
<v Speaker 2>Is that across primetime.

0:07:02.257 --> 0:07:05.657
<v Speaker 1>That's across that's across all primetime, that's across the entire network. Actually,

0:07:06.057 --> 0:07:09.737
<v Speaker 1>and Tucker was number one in the key demographic in

0:07:09.777 --> 0:07:12.177
<v Speaker 1>all of cable, which is a twenty five to fifty

0:07:12.177 --> 0:07:14.337
<v Speaker 1>four year old demographic. Here's also number one in twenty

0:07:14.337 --> 0:07:16.497
<v Speaker 1>five to fifty four year old democrats in all of

0:07:16.577 --> 0:07:19.097
<v Speaker 1>cable more Democrats at that age watched his show than

0:07:19.097 --> 0:07:23.737
<v Speaker 1>any other cable news show, So percentage wise, it's pretty bad.

0:07:23.817 --> 0:07:25.817
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't know, if you know it's a

0:07:25.857 --> 0:07:28.777
<v Speaker 1>similar situation to bud Light. People say because it's an

0:07:28.777 --> 0:07:32.257
<v Speaker 1>example of Fox News betraying their customer, betraying their base,

0:07:32.337 --> 0:07:35.097
<v Speaker 1>their their core audience. I mean, people are really taking

0:07:35.137 --> 0:07:38.857
<v Speaker 1>this seriously. And you know, it almost seems like now

0:07:38.897 --> 0:07:40.657
<v Speaker 1>because Fox has done a lot of things to really

0:07:40.737 --> 0:07:44.777
<v Speaker 1>annoy and piss off its audience, and most prominently, I'm

0:07:44.817 --> 0:07:47.777
<v Speaker 1>thinking before this, I'm thinking of calling They called Arizona

0:07:47.937 --> 0:07:50.577
<v Speaker 1>quite early for Joe Biden. But it seems like a

0:07:50.577 --> 0:07:52.657
<v Speaker 1>lot of people would continue to watch Fox, or at

0:07:52.737 --> 0:07:55.777
<v Speaker 1>least Tucker and kind of give the network a pass.

0:07:55.817 --> 0:07:58.377
<v Speaker 1>I don't think a lot of people were misled about

0:07:58.377 --> 0:08:00.017
<v Speaker 1>what kind of a company News Corp. Is. They know

0:08:00.057 --> 0:08:03.457
<v Speaker 1>it's a big, globalist, multinational corporation. They probably weren't happy

0:08:03.537 --> 0:08:05.057
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of their investors and the things that

0:08:05.097 --> 0:08:07.097
<v Speaker 1>News Corp. Is up to, But perhaps they would give

0:08:07.137 --> 0:08:09.937
<v Speaker 1>News Corp a pass because they allowed Tucker Carlson to speak,

0:08:10.417 --> 0:08:12.817
<v Speaker 1>and you know, they must a lot of people must thought, well,

0:08:12.897 --> 0:08:14.537
<v Speaker 1>they let this guy say the things he does, they

0:08:14.537 --> 0:08:16.617
<v Speaker 1>can't be that bad now that they've gotten rid of

0:08:16.657 --> 0:08:20.577
<v Speaker 1>him in such a mysterious and unceremonious way. I don't

0:08:20.577 --> 0:08:23.497
<v Speaker 1>think those people are coming back. It's been uh, you know,

0:08:23.777 --> 0:08:26.857
<v Speaker 1>over it's been six weeks now and they haven't returned.

0:08:28.297 --> 0:08:31.497
<v Speaker 2>I've never seen anything like it, certainly in the in

0:08:31.577 --> 0:08:34.217
<v Speaker 2>the TV news business. I don't know if anyone could

0:08:34.257 --> 0:08:37.297
<v Speaker 2>point to something similar in the past. It's obviously different

0:08:37.297 --> 0:08:40.777
<v Speaker 2>than the departure of both Bill Arelly and Megan Kelly. Right,

0:08:40.937 --> 0:08:44.017
<v Speaker 2>Fox wanted Megan to today, she decided to leave. Bill

0:08:44.217 --> 0:08:47.617
<v Speaker 2>had to go, and nobody really, even in the audience

0:08:47.657 --> 0:08:51.617
<v Speaker 2>I think, blamed Fox for that. I don't I don't remember.

0:08:51.657 --> 0:08:52.857
<v Speaker 2>There are a lot of being like, oh my god,

0:08:52.897 --> 0:08:55.137
<v Speaker 2>how could you fire him based on the facts of

0:08:55.177 --> 0:08:56.977
<v Speaker 2>the case as it was at the time, despite the

0:08:56.977 --> 0:09:00.017
<v Speaker 2>fact that he was had big ratings. This feels very

0:09:00.137 --> 0:09:02.937
<v Speaker 2>very different, and and it also, you know, as I

0:09:02.977 --> 0:09:05.417
<v Speaker 2>sit here and speak to you, there's all this reporting

0:09:05.497 --> 0:09:08.897
<v Speaker 2>over Fox sending a cease and desist letter for Tucker

0:09:08.937 --> 0:09:13.977
<v Speaker 2>to stop posting video of himself that is a monologue

0:09:14.017 --> 0:09:18.777
<v Speaker 2>but you know, it's on Twitter. To me, this is

0:09:18.817 --> 0:09:21.617
<v Speaker 2>starting to feel a little bit like do you remember

0:09:21.657 --> 0:09:26.177
<v Speaker 2>when some of the record recording companies record companies were

0:09:26.217 --> 0:09:29.097
<v Speaker 2>suing like fourteen year old kids for downloading stuff on

0:09:29.177 --> 0:09:33.057
<v Speaker 2>Napster and everybody was like, he really can't, Like, you're

0:09:33.097 --> 0:09:35.577
<v Speaker 2>not helping yourself with this one. And I mean, I

0:09:35.737 --> 0:09:38.937
<v Speaker 2>you know the season desist letter to me and that's

0:09:38.977 --> 0:09:42.177
<v Speaker 2>now public record, and that's not going to help with

0:09:42.217 --> 0:09:44.137
<v Speaker 2>bringing back the audience. It feels like I just don't

0:09:44.217 --> 0:09:45.057
<v Speaker 2>understand the move.

0:09:46.777 --> 0:09:49.097
<v Speaker 1>It's really strange, And you're right, and I love that

0:09:49.177 --> 0:09:52.857
<v Speaker 1>Napster comparison in the same thing too. So what I

0:09:52.897 --> 0:09:56.137
<v Speaker 1>was told when Tucker announced he's doing a show on Twitter,

0:09:56.177 --> 0:09:58.257
<v Speaker 1>the reason why they were doing Twitter is that Twitter

0:09:58.337 --> 0:10:01.017
<v Speaker 1>is not included and is noncompete. So I've not seen

0:10:01.057 --> 0:10:03.777
<v Speaker 1>Tucker's contract, but that's what I was told by people

0:10:03.777 --> 0:10:05.897
<v Speaker 1>who would know, and that's why I decided to go

0:10:05.937 --> 0:10:08.297
<v Speaker 1>to Twitter. But also, you know, if you look at

0:10:08.297 --> 0:10:10.937
<v Speaker 1>that season's assist that Fox sent, it's almost like they're

0:10:10.977 --> 0:10:13.737
<v Speaker 1>implying that he Oh, the language they use was that

0:10:13.777 --> 0:10:17.097
<v Speaker 1>he's rendering services. Well, he's not being paid by Elon Musk.

0:10:17.097 --> 0:10:19.417
<v Speaker 1>He's not making money on Twitter, so I don't legally,

0:10:19.417 --> 0:10:21.937
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that counts as rendering services in a

0:10:22.017 --> 0:10:25.377
<v Speaker 1>legal sense. Secondly, you know, everyone on Fox is allowed

0:10:25.417 --> 0:10:27.777
<v Speaker 1>to have a Twitter account and give their opinions on

0:10:28.217 --> 0:10:30.697
<v Speaker 1>the current political issues of the day on Twitter. So

0:10:31.377 --> 0:10:34.177
<v Speaker 1>you could argue, is Fox doing anything but that? I'm sorry,

0:10:34.217 --> 0:10:36.377
<v Speaker 1>is Tucker doing anything but that? If he's just putting

0:10:36.417 --> 0:10:38.497
<v Speaker 1>out videos giving his political opinions of the day not

0:10:38.497 --> 0:10:40.897
<v Speaker 1>making any money off of it, we don't know. But

0:10:41.137 --> 0:10:43.697
<v Speaker 1>he is currently still an employee of Fox News, and

0:10:43.777 --> 0:10:46.217
<v Speaker 1>he's still getting paid to not have a show, And

0:10:46.257 --> 0:10:49.777
<v Speaker 1>the Ceasons Assist letter makes it seem as though Fox

0:10:49.817 --> 0:10:51.777
<v Speaker 1>would like to keep him off the air, and that

0:10:51.897 --> 0:10:54.537
<v Speaker 1>is to keep him silent until his contract runs up,

0:10:54.577 --> 0:10:57.417
<v Speaker 1>which is after the next presidential election. Now that's strange,

0:10:57.417 --> 0:11:00.697
<v Speaker 1>and that's bizarre, especially for a company that's made such

0:11:00.697 --> 0:11:03.057
<v Speaker 1>a rallying cry out a free speech in both censorship

0:11:03.057 --> 0:11:06.017
<v Speaker 1>by the government and by private corporations. They have, you know,

0:11:06.017 --> 0:11:09.457
<v Speaker 1>a segment on every day probably about some corporation trying

0:11:09.457 --> 0:11:13.017
<v Speaker 1>to silence one and yet here they are silencing probably

0:11:13.097 --> 0:11:16.417
<v Speaker 1>the most influential and effective conservative voice in the country.

0:11:17.657 --> 0:11:20.777
<v Speaker 2>Let's come back in a second here with Chad's book,

0:11:20.857 --> 0:11:24.297
<v Speaker 2>Tucker and Chadwick. I want to know what you learned

0:11:24.297 --> 0:11:26.977
<v Speaker 2>about Tucker for this but that people might not know, right,

0:11:27.017 --> 0:11:28.817
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we know him from the TV presence, but

0:11:29.577 --> 0:11:31.617
<v Speaker 2>want to see what you can tell us about what

0:11:31.697 --> 0:11:34.817
<v Speaker 2>the man behind the show is really like. So we'll

0:11:34.817 --> 0:11:36.977
<v Speaker 2>get to that in just a second. For everybody out there,

0:11:36.977 --> 0:11:38.577
<v Speaker 2>you know, you just need to do some things in

0:11:38.617 --> 0:11:41.817
<v Speaker 2>life that are very you know, adult things to do.

0:11:42.817 --> 0:11:45.697
<v Speaker 2>You know, you gotta well not just brush your teeth.

0:11:45.697 --> 0:11:47.297
<v Speaker 2>I mean that's pretty basic. But you know you've got

0:11:47.297 --> 0:11:49.577
<v Speaker 2>to prepare for the future and financially, and that means

0:11:49.817 --> 0:11:52.417
<v Speaker 2>having a life insurance policy. Especially you've got a husband

0:11:52.497 --> 0:11:54.817
<v Speaker 2>or a wife, you got kids. You want to prepare

0:11:54.857 --> 0:11:59.337
<v Speaker 2>for your financial future just in case nothing happens. Now

0:11:59.497 --> 0:12:01.777
<v Speaker 2>is a good time to future proof your family's finances

0:12:01.857 --> 0:12:05.297
<v Speaker 2>by getting good life insurance, and policy Genius gives you

0:12:05.337 --> 0:12:07.937
<v Speaker 2>a smarter way to find and buy it. Policy Genius

0:12:07.977 --> 0:12:11.177
<v Speaker 2>was built to modernize the life insurance industry. Their technology

0:12:11.217 --> 0:12:13.697
<v Speaker 2>makes it easy to compare life insurance quotes from America's

0:12:13.737 --> 0:12:16.217
<v Speaker 2>top insurers and just a few clicks to find your

0:12:16.257 --> 0:12:19.337
<v Speaker 2>lowest price. With policy Genius, you can find life insurance

0:12:19.337 --> 0:12:21.697
<v Speaker 2>policies that start at just twenty five dollars per month

0:12:21.777 --> 0:12:24.897
<v Speaker 2>for a million dollars of coverage. Some options offer coverage

0:12:24.897 --> 0:12:27.697
<v Speaker 2>in as little as a week and avoid unnecessary medical exams.

0:12:27.977 --> 0:12:30.417
<v Speaker 2>Policy Genius has licensed agents who can help you find

0:12:30.417 --> 0:12:32.497
<v Speaker 2>the best fit for your needs. They work for you

0:12:32.617 --> 0:12:35.057
<v Speaker 2>and not the insurance companies. There are no added fees

0:12:35.097 --> 0:12:37.937
<v Speaker 2>and your personal details are private. Your loved ones deserve

0:12:37.937 --> 0:12:40.377
<v Speaker 2>a financial safety net. You deserve a smarter way to

0:12:40.417 --> 0:12:44.337
<v Speaker 2>find and buy it. That's Policygenius. Go to policygenius dot com.

0:12:44.777 --> 0:12:48.737
<v Speaker 2>That's policygenius dot com and get set up today. Get

0:12:48.737 --> 0:12:50.657
<v Speaker 2>those insurance quotes. See how much you could say just

0:12:50.697 --> 0:12:52.657
<v Speaker 2>get this done. I just got it done recently myself.

0:12:53.297 --> 0:12:53.617
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:12:54.057 --> 0:12:57.497
<v Speaker 2>Also, please subscribe to the channel here if you're watching

0:12:57.577 --> 0:12:58.977
<v Speaker 2>this for the first time, We're gonna have more great

0:12:58.977 --> 0:13:01.737
<v Speaker 2>interviews with the folks like Chad and talk to me

0:13:01.737 --> 0:13:03.377
<v Speaker 2>about all the important issues you care about. So please

0:13:03.377 --> 0:13:06.417
<v Speaker 2>subscribe and also comment below. Send me some comments what

0:13:06.497 --> 0:13:09.817
<v Speaker 2>you think chat What do you to learn about Tucker

0:13:09.817 --> 0:13:11.257
<v Speaker 2>from doing a book on him that you didn't know

0:13:11.297 --> 0:13:12.737
<v Speaker 2>before and that people should.

0:13:12.497 --> 0:13:17.297
<v Speaker 1>Know well, you know, he's I knew. I don't think

0:13:17.377 --> 0:13:20.137
<v Speaker 1>many cable nuts hosts really deserve a biography or or

0:13:20.297 --> 0:13:22.617
<v Speaker 1>would be a really interesting one to read, honestly, but

0:13:22.697 --> 0:13:25.017
<v Speaker 1>I kind of always knew, you know, just kind of

0:13:25.017 --> 0:13:27.977
<v Speaker 1>getting known that he was a very interesting and interesting

0:13:28.017 --> 0:13:32.297
<v Speaker 1>guy and a very I think emotionally and intellectually rich guy.

0:13:32.337 --> 0:13:35.057
<v Speaker 1>And he I certainly discovered that, you know, the most

0:13:35.057 --> 0:13:38.097
<v Speaker 1>important things in his life are definitely his relationship with

0:13:38.097 --> 0:13:40.297
<v Speaker 1>his wife and his kids. And his wife, Susie, had

0:13:40.297 --> 0:13:42.297
<v Speaker 1>been together since they were fifteen years old, which is

0:13:42.297 --> 0:13:44.657
<v Speaker 1>pretty amazing, and they just have one of the most

0:13:44.697 --> 0:13:46.977
<v Speaker 1>loving and wonderful relationships I've ever seen. You know. They

0:13:47.057 --> 0:13:48.577
<v Speaker 1>welcomed me to stay in their home while I was

0:13:48.617 --> 0:13:52.657
<v Speaker 1>writing this book, and they were just it was so

0:13:52.697 --> 0:13:55.097
<v Speaker 1>great to see that side of him. But you know,

0:13:55.177 --> 0:13:59.057
<v Speaker 1>it's it's he comes from a very interesting childhood and background.

0:13:59.097 --> 0:14:02.017
<v Speaker 1>His dad, Dick Carlson's a journalist who's on television as well.

0:14:02.777 --> 0:14:07.897
<v Speaker 1>And Tucker's mother, Lisa Lombardi, she was this California heiress

0:14:07.977 --> 0:14:11.617
<v Speaker 1>and she abandoned his family. She abandoned her children and

0:14:11.617 --> 0:14:13.297
<v Speaker 1>her husband when he was six years old, and Tucker

0:14:13.337 --> 0:14:15.777
<v Speaker 1>never saw her again, so that's sort of an interesting

0:14:15.817 --> 0:14:18.457
<v Speaker 1>thing to delve into. She died in twenty eleven without

0:14:18.497 --> 0:14:20.737
<v Speaker 1>him ever seeing her again after he was six years old,

0:14:21.257 --> 0:14:23.737
<v Speaker 1>and just kind of learning about the history of his

0:14:24.457 --> 0:14:27.337
<v Speaker 1>family on both sides. His father was an orphan. There's

0:14:27.377 --> 0:14:29.937
<v Speaker 1>this sort of long line of abandonment and dysfunction that

0:14:30.057 --> 0:14:33.017
<v Speaker 1>went back generations, and you really see how Tucker has

0:14:33.937 --> 0:14:37.177
<v Speaker 1>organized his life and relationships to really end that and

0:14:38.017 --> 0:14:40.057
<v Speaker 1>to put a stop to that. You know, that was

0:14:40.097 --> 0:14:42.817
<v Speaker 1>a wonderful thing to see. It's also he's just hilarious.

0:14:42.977 --> 0:14:44.777
<v Speaker 1>It's just you can just sit around and talk to

0:14:44.817 --> 0:14:47.257
<v Speaker 1>him for hours and he can talk about anything. So

0:14:47.417 --> 0:14:49.337
<v Speaker 1>for a biographer and for a writer like me, he's

0:14:49.377 --> 0:14:51.777
<v Speaker 1>an absolute dream subject. You just sit down and let

0:14:51.817 --> 0:14:53.497
<v Speaker 1>him rip and you want to get all of it

0:14:53.577 --> 0:14:56.777
<v Speaker 1>down because it's so hilarious and delightful and entertaining. So

0:14:56.817 --> 0:14:58.377
<v Speaker 1>that was a pleasure, you know, just the level to

0:14:58.417 --> 0:15:00.977
<v Speaker 1>which he was so open. He just allowed me into

0:15:00.977 --> 0:15:05.297
<v Speaker 1>his life and didn't think twice about it and trusted me.

0:15:05.817 --> 0:15:07.457
<v Speaker 1>And you know, he's not seen a word of the book,

0:15:07.457 --> 0:15:10.697
<v Speaker 1>nor is he asked to. I'm an independent biographer, so

0:15:10.737 --> 0:15:13.737
<v Speaker 1>that was a really really wonderful to see and experience,

0:15:13.817 --> 0:15:15.297
<v Speaker 1>you know, I always heard he was sort of like that,

0:15:15.337 --> 0:15:17.097
<v Speaker 1>but to actually experience it was really great.

0:15:17.337 --> 0:15:19.857
<v Speaker 2>Just one thing that I always remember about when Tucker

0:15:19.937 --> 0:15:21.977
<v Speaker 2>was doing his show in DC, and I lived in

0:15:22.057 --> 0:15:25.377
<v Speaker 2>DC for a short while about to eighteen months. Uh,

0:15:25.577 --> 0:15:27.297
<v Speaker 2>and I so occasionally I would I would, I know,

0:15:27.337 --> 0:15:29.097
<v Speaker 2>you've been a guest in a show tons of times.

0:15:29.137 --> 0:15:31.497
<v Speaker 2>I used to do a show from time to time,

0:15:31.657 --> 0:15:34.697
<v Speaker 2>and sitting with him on set, it's funny because a

0:15:34.697 --> 0:15:36.977
<v Speaker 2>lot of that and this isn't a knock on anyone

0:15:36.977 --> 0:15:38.737
<v Speaker 2>else and how they do things, but a lot of

0:15:38.737 --> 0:15:40.537
<v Speaker 2>the hosts, when you're either right about to start the

0:15:40.577 --> 0:15:42.737
<v Speaker 2>segment or you know, you're in a break between segments,

0:15:43.137 --> 0:15:44.857
<v Speaker 2>they're just very you know, they have their papers and

0:15:44.857 --> 0:15:46.217
<v Speaker 2>they're like, you know, okay, this is what we're gonna

0:15:46.257 --> 0:15:48.297
<v Speaker 2>talk about. They're very Tucker's sitting there, He's.

0:15:48.137 --> 0:15:49.897
<v Speaker 3>Just like, I mean, did you see that guy? And

0:15:50.057 --> 0:15:52.097
<v Speaker 3>like this guy is you know, and like he's he's

0:15:52.177 --> 0:15:55.177
<v Speaker 3>talking to you right before you're about to be on air,

0:15:55.217 --> 0:15:58.017
<v Speaker 3>before three million people are watching. He's talking to you

0:15:58.097 --> 0:16:00.097
<v Speaker 3>like you're like you're sitting next to him at a bar,

0:16:00.617 --> 0:16:02.577
<v Speaker 3>or you're in a boat fly fishing with him or

0:16:02.617 --> 0:16:04.897
<v Speaker 3>whatever and he's just letting it rip and then camera

0:16:04.937 --> 0:16:05.937
<v Speaker 3>and he just goes right.

0:16:05.937 --> 0:16:07.817
<v Speaker 2>But it's you know what I mean, Like other people

0:16:07.817 --> 0:16:09.257
<v Speaker 2>are like, okay, so like this is we're gonna end

0:16:09.337 --> 0:16:10.937
<v Speaker 2>up like reading the prompt and they're all focused and

0:16:10.937 --> 0:16:13.417
<v Speaker 2>they're all you know, they're all in the Ron Burgundy mode.

0:16:13.497 --> 0:16:17.057
<v Speaker 2>Tucker's sitting there like, you know, I never really played lacrosse,

0:16:17.057 --> 0:16:19.377
<v Speaker 2>Like that's interesting, like starts talking about stuff.

0:16:20.297 --> 0:16:22.857
<v Speaker 1>It's so true. I mean that I actually described that

0:16:22.937 --> 0:16:24.737
<v Speaker 1>exact scene in the book because I would sit and

0:16:24.737 --> 0:16:27.017
<v Speaker 1>watch his show and there would always be these local

0:16:27.057 --> 0:16:29.297
<v Speaker 1>people who would come in and watch, just like little

0:16:29.337 --> 0:16:31.497
<v Speaker 1>like you know, guys who lived in the area, like

0:16:31.537 --> 0:16:34.097
<v Speaker 1>little ladies every night, and he'd just be sitting there,

0:16:34.097 --> 0:16:36.097
<v Speaker 1>cutting up, chatting blah blah. Then suddenly could even even

0:16:36.097 --> 0:16:38.137
<v Speaker 1>welcome to the carl Sin tonight and you're like, whoa, whoa,

0:16:38.177 --> 0:16:41.257
<v Speaker 1>he just went live. Wow, okay every single time, You're

0:16:41.297 --> 0:16:43.897
<v Speaker 1>totally right, that's exactly how it is. And then commercial

0:16:43.937 --> 0:16:47.937
<v Speaker 1>break he's just like chatting, having a great time, and yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:16:47.937 --> 0:16:49.977
<v Speaker 1>it's it's really kind of a fun thing to be

0:16:50.017 --> 0:16:51.377
<v Speaker 1>a part of it to witness for sure.

0:16:51.737 --> 0:16:53.577
<v Speaker 2>Well, can you tell us I want to I want

0:16:53.577 --> 0:16:57.217
<v Speaker 2>to get to what he's planning to do Chadwick next,

0:16:57.377 --> 0:17:00.417
<v Speaker 2>and then I've got some It is Pride month, as

0:17:00.457 --> 0:17:02.377
<v Speaker 2>you may be aware, I want to ask you some

0:17:02.497 --> 0:17:05.777
<v Speaker 2>questions about how that's plying out in a bunch of

0:17:05.777 --> 0:17:08.457
<v Speaker 2>different ways, corporate America, politically and otherwise. We'll get to

0:17:08.497 --> 0:17:13.257
<v Speaker 2>that in a second. Comput are like supercomputers these days.

0:17:13.257 --> 0:17:14.937
<v Speaker 2>I mean compared to what I grew up with, and

0:17:14.977 --> 0:17:17.377
<v Speaker 2>I remember the little floppy disk going in there. I mean,

0:17:17.457 --> 0:17:19.457
<v Speaker 2>right now you're walking around with a smartphone in your hand.

0:17:19.577 --> 0:17:24.057
<v Speaker 2>You have more computing power than the entire NATO Alliance

0:17:24.057 --> 0:17:26.177
<v Speaker 2>would have had thirty years ago. I mean, it's crazy

0:17:26.217 --> 0:17:30.657
<v Speaker 2>what's changed, right. They got a lot of stuff computers, laptops,

0:17:30.697 --> 0:17:33.697
<v Speaker 2>whatever you're carrying around with you, smartphones, But like any

0:17:33.737 --> 0:17:35.657
<v Speaker 2>item that you own, they can break and fail, and

0:17:35.697 --> 0:17:37.697
<v Speaker 2>if that happens, it's generally going to be at the

0:17:37.697 --> 0:17:40.697
<v Speaker 2>most inconvenient time. So do yourself a favor and back

0:17:40.737 --> 0:17:42.537
<v Speaker 2>up the data you have on your computer while it's

0:17:42.577 --> 0:17:46.457
<v Speaker 2>working so perfectly right now. The company I rely on

0:17:46.497 --> 0:17:49.737
<v Speaker 2>for this is Iedrive. Their online cloud based backup storage

0:17:49.737 --> 0:17:52.297
<v Speaker 2>systems are second to none. You download their data and

0:17:52.337 --> 0:17:54.617
<v Speaker 2>then schedule how often you want to regularly back up

0:17:54.657 --> 0:17:57.177
<v Speaker 2>the data that's on your computer. Once you've done that,

0:17:57.217 --> 0:17:59.857
<v Speaker 2>then anytime you need to reobtain the data on your computer,

0:18:00.137 --> 0:18:02.457
<v Speaker 2>you can go online from a different computer and start

0:18:02.497 --> 0:18:06.177
<v Speaker 2>to reclaim your most recent download. I Drives backup have

0:18:06.417 --> 0:18:09.737
<v Speaker 2>military grade encryption. It's secure and only you can access

0:18:09.737 --> 0:18:12.017
<v Speaker 2>it with your password. Not to mention, I Drive, as

0:18:12.017 --> 0:18:14.257
<v Speaker 2>PCMAGS winner eight years in a row, has the best

0:18:14.257 --> 0:18:17.697
<v Speaker 2>cloud backup solution for everyone consumers and businesses. Plans start

0:18:17.697 --> 0:18:20.017
<v Speaker 2>at less than seven dollars a month. Use my name

0:18:20.097 --> 0:18:22.977
<v Speaker 2>buck as the promo code at checkout for ninety percent

0:18:23.057 --> 0:18:25.937
<v Speaker 2>off for the first year. To just go to iDrive

0:18:26.057 --> 0:18:29.777
<v Speaker 2>dot com use promo code buck. Plans started less than

0:18:29.817 --> 0:18:31.497
<v Speaker 2>seven dollars a month, but with promo code buck, you

0:18:31.537 --> 0:18:34.737
<v Speaker 2>got ninety percent off that first year. iDrive dot Com

0:18:34.857 --> 0:18:38.377
<v Speaker 2>use promo code buck. All right, what's next? For What's

0:18:38.417 --> 0:18:39.497
<v Speaker 2>next for Tucker.

0:18:41.017 --> 0:18:43.577
<v Speaker 1>Well a legal battle. It looks like with Fox News

0:18:44.257 --> 0:18:48.417
<v Speaker 1>they're lawyering up. What I suspect is that they might

0:18:48.457 --> 0:18:51.097
<v Speaker 1>have their sites on launching their own media company their

0:18:51.137 --> 0:18:53.697
<v Speaker 1>own channel like I don't know, like The Blazer, Daily

0:18:53.737 --> 0:18:58.777
<v Speaker 1>Wire or something like that. There was actually so funny enough,

0:18:59.057 --> 0:19:00.857
<v Speaker 1>it was sort of common knowledge around Fox for a

0:19:00.857 --> 0:19:03.217
<v Speaker 1>while that they were looking at starting a Tucker Carlson

0:19:03.297 --> 0:19:06.817
<v Speaker 1>channel within Fox News. And once again, how you know,

0:19:07.057 --> 0:19:09.857
<v Speaker 1>short sighted perhaps management was they at the end of

0:19:09.897 --> 0:19:12.017
<v Speaker 1>it decided no, no, no, We're just gonna give you

0:19:12.057 --> 0:19:14.497
<v Speaker 1>two shows on Fox Nation. Fox Nation is the future,

0:19:14.537 --> 0:19:16.657
<v Speaker 1>and that's how it's going to be. I'm not sure

0:19:16.657 --> 0:19:19.817
<v Speaker 1>how Fox Nation is doing since Tucker got canned, but

0:19:20.217 --> 0:19:22.137
<v Speaker 1>this has sort of been something that his producers have

0:19:22.297 --> 0:19:23.577
<v Speaker 1>been looking at to do for a while, so I

0:19:23.617 --> 0:19:26.177
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be surprised if that's the direction that he went. Uh.

0:19:26.297 --> 0:19:28.217
<v Speaker 1>They've told me that they're in no way committed to

0:19:28.217 --> 0:19:30.297
<v Speaker 1>staying on Twitter. They're going to test it out see

0:19:30.297 --> 0:19:34.137
<v Speaker 1>how they like it, but they don't feel committed to

0:19:34.137 --> 0:19:35.857
<v Speaker 1>staying there. And now, of course there's obviously the legal

0:19:35.897 --> 0:19:36.897
<v Speaker 1>issues right now.

0:19:38.137 --> 0:19:41.777
<v Speaker 2>And I have to say my sense of this. I mean,

0:19:41.777 --> 0:19:44.017
<v Speaker 2>there's what I there's what I have heard from people,

0:19:44.057 --> 0:19:47.057
<v Speaker 2>and there's what I've read. Is it Tucker has opened

0:19:47.137 --> 0:19:49.337
<v Speaker 2>has he openly said that he's willing to walk away,

0:19:49.377 --> 0:19:51.097
<v Speaker 2>that Fox doesn't have to pay him. He just wants

0:19:51.137 --> 0:19:54.257
<v Speaker 2>to walk away and let bygones be bygones, and they

0:19:54.297 --> 0:19:56.977
<v Speaker 2>won't let him. Is that the state of affairs right

0:19:56.977 --> 0:19:58.297
<v Speaker 2>now with regard to the next step.

0:19:59.577 --> 0:20:02.697
<v Speaker 1>I believe that's what he has said. I'm not sure

0:20:02.737 --> 0:20:06.897
<v Speaker 1>the exact quote, but it's like these Fox contracts and

0:20:06.897 --> 0:20:09.177
<v Speaker 1>again I haven't seen his can be so onerous that

0:20:09.457 --> 0:20:11.577
<v Speaker 1>it's like they won't even allow him to do that.

0:20:11.817 --> 0:20:14.217
<v Speaker 1>And I believe there's some sort of I can't remember

0:20:14.257 --> 0:20:15.857
<v Speaker 1>what the clause is, but something like well, if you

0:20:15.857 --> 0:20:17.697
<v Speaker 1>go somewhere else, you can start paying us or something

0:20:17.737 --> 0:20:21.337
<v Speaker 1>like that. So, I mean, who knows how how restrictive

0:20:21.337 --> 0:20:23.937
<v Speaker 1>his contract is. This contract, though, was never as restrictive

0:20:23.977 --> 0:20:25.817
<v Speaker 1>as some Fox people. You can just tell by looking.

0:20:25.897 --> 0:20:28.257
<v Speaker 1>Because some Fox people they can't have their image or

0:20:28.297 --> 0:20:31.657
<v Speaker 1>voice appear anywhere, like no podcasts, they can't give speeches

0:20:31.737 --> 0:20:34.137
<v Speaker 1>things like that without you know, getting permissions from Fox.

0:20:34.337 --> 0:20:36.177
<v Speaker 1>That was never the case with Tucker Carlson. He could

0:20:36.257 --> 0:20:38.177
<v Speaker 1>kind of do ever he wanted and the pier where

0:20:38.217 --> 0:20:38.577
<v Speaker 1>he wanted.

0:20:39.457 --> 0:20:43.777
<v Speaker 2>Hmmm. Interesting. Well, I think that the future of the

0:20:43.937 --> 0:20:47.457
<v Speaker 2>digital platforms that are out there is very bright, and

0:20:47.497 --> 0:20:50.257
<v Speaker 2>I think that. I mean, I'll speak from the uh

0:20:51.097 --> 0:20:54.857
<v Speaker 2>from the personal perspective here. I have cut my cable

0:20:54.937 --> 0:20:59.657
<v Speaker 2>cord for the first time, actually, and the only thing

0:21:00.017 --> 0:21:01.977
<v Speaker 2>is funny. I mean, I really, I'll admit, this is

0:21:02.057 --> 0:21:03.657
<v Speaker 2>the only thing that I was really using because I

0:21:03.657 --> 0:21:07.217
<v Speaker 2>don't watch professional sports really like maybe tennis, you know,

0:21:07.457 --> 0:21:09.697
<v Speaker 2>during the US Open or something, but I really don't

0:21:09.697 --> 0:21:11.937
<v Speaker 2>watch sports. The only thing that I would watch with

0:21:11.977 --> 0:21:15.617
<v Speaker 2>my cable subscription was Fox News at eight o'clock. I

0:21:15.617 --> 0:21:17.457
<v Speaker 2>would watch. I usually have time for the whole show,

0:21:17.457 --> 0:21:19.177
<v Speaker 2>but I would watch his monologue and that was it.

0:21:19.457 --> 0:21:21.497
<v Speaker 2>So I'd watched the first fifteen minutes, give or take.

0:21:22.017 --> 0:21:26.137
<v Speaker 2>And since he let and I've cut my cord to

0:21:26.217 --> 0:21:28.697
<v Speaker 2>cable and I sit here and I say, I don't

0:21:28.697 --> 0:21:30.577
<v Speaker 2>miss it at all. And I don't think that business

0:21:30.577 --> 0:21:32.977
<v Speaker 2>model is sustainable long term anymore. So I don't know

0:21:32.977 --> 0:21:35.977
<v Speaker 2>what that means for cable news. CNN is obviously in

0:21:36.177 --> 0:21:37.817
<v Speaker 2>total disarray as well.

0:21:39.777 --> 0:21:42.817
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah for sure, now like Newsmax is beating CNN

0:21:42.857 --> 0:21:46.697
<v Speaker 1>in some time slots less I saw. It does seem

0:21:46.737 --> 0:21:50.257
<v Speaker 1>like a medium that has lasted longer than anyone would

0:21:50.337 --> 0:21:55.097
<v Speaker 1>expect it to have and it's diminishing returns. I've been

0:21:55.257 --> 0:21:57.617
<v Speaker 1>hearing from years people say that NewsCorp wanted to dump

0:21:57.697 --> 0:22:00.137
<v Speaker 1>Fox and wanted to sell it eventually. This is just

0:22:00.297 --> 0:22:02.657
<v Speaker 1>maybe just chatter, I don't know, because it is diminishing

0:22:02.657 --> 0:22:04.897
<v Speaker 1>returns on cable even though they were number one. And

0:22:04.977 --> 0:22:07.337
<v Speaker 1>of course you can't sell a product like that if

0:22:07.377 --> 0:22:09.937
<v Speaker 1>you have your most famous host is someone who says

0:22:10.537 --> 0:22:14.297
<v Speaker 1>controversial or provocative, as Tucker Carlson. So I've heard those

0:22:14.297 --> 0:22:18.337
<v Speaker 1>sort of rumblings for a long time. Who knows, but yeah,

0:22:18.497 --> 0:22:20.977
<v Speaker 1>it's it's amazing that it still exists in the form

0:22:21.017 --> 0:22:22.057
<v Speaker 1>that it does to begin with.

0:22:22.177 --> 0:22:24.577
<v Speaker 2>One thing I do find troubling though, is that with

0:22:24.777 --> 0:22:29.097
<v Speaker 2>the let's let's say the cable cord cutting does accelerate

0:22:29.257 --> 0:22:31.337
<v Speaker 2>the way that people have been saying, and that I

0:22:31.457 --> 0:22:35.137
<v Speaker 2>do believe it's happening even faster than what the projections

0:22:35.137 --> 0:22:40.697
<v Speaker 2>three four, five years ago anticipated. But YouTube is so powerful, Chad,

0:22:41.217 --> 0:22:47.577
<v Speaker 2>and YouTube is ideologically where Twitter was before Elon bought it.

0:22:47.617 --> 0:22:50.417
<v Speaker 2>And that's what I think people haven't necessarily if you know,

0:22:50.417 --> 0:22:52.417
<v Speaker 2>if you're not really active on YouTube, you don't watch

0:22:52.497 --> 0:22:56.257
<v Speaker 2>much there. That's becoming the single I mean, it is

0:22:56.337 --> 0:22:59.057
<v Speaker 2>the most single powerful digital video platform. But I think

0:22:59.097 --> 0:23:02.777
<v Speaker 2>it's becoming a replacement for a lot of people for

0:23:02.817 --> 0:23:06.857
<v Speaker 2>where they get their news specifically, and they are a

0:23:06.857 --> 0:23:08.817
<v Speaker 2>bunch of damn communists running that place. I don't know

0:23:08.817 --> 0:23:09.937
<v Speaker 2>what we're supposed to do about it.

0:23:11.697 --> 0:23:13.817
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, that's a good point, I mean, and thankfully

0:23:13.857 --> 0:23:17.137
<v Speaker 1>there's some Well what's happening with Twitter is is what

0:23:17.177 --> 0:23:19.857
<v Speaker 1>the show is supposed to be on is Elon's launching.

0:23:20.417 --> 0:23:22.937
<v Speaker 1>This is what Tucker's producers told me, that he's launching

0:23:22.977 --> 0:23:26.137
<v Speaker 1>a video service that's meant to compete with YouTube. I

0:23:26.137 --> 0:23:28.017
<v Speaker 1>always told the name is supposed to be X Video

0:23:28.057 --> 0:23:31.177
<v Speaker 1>because everything's being branded under X, like SpaceX and X Corp.

0:23:31.297 --> 0:23:33.657
<v Speaker 1>Is now what owns Twitter? That sounds like like a

0:23:33.697 --> 0:23:36.137
<v Speaker 1>dirty site to me, But so maybe it'll change a name.

0:23:36.177 --> 0:23:37.537
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, or maybe that's a part of the troll.

0:23:37.857 --> 0:23:41.217
<v Speaker 1>But allegedly what Tucker's show is eventually going to be

0:23:41.297 --> 0:23:44.857
<v Speaker 1>on is this YouTube competitor that's run through Twitter. So

0:23:45.097 --> 0:23:48.577
<v Speaker 1>hopefully that could maybe help with the free speech issues

0:23:48.617 --> 0:23:51.097
<v Speaker 1>and ideological problems of YouTube and made me really put

0:23:51.097 --> 0:23:51.817
<v Speaker 1>a dent in them.

0:23:52.017 --> 0:23:53.857
<v Speaker 2>I like rumble, and I know people be shouting at

0:23:53.857 --> 0:23:56.017
<v Speaker 2>me right now, Like what about Rumble? Like that's fine.

0:23:56.897 --> 0:24:01.737
<v Speaker 2>You know YouTube is in arm of Google, which is

0:24:01.737 --> 0:24:05.817
<v Speaker 2>a subsidiary of Alphabet. I mean, it's like the most

0:24:05.857 --> 0:24:09.457
<v Speaker 2>powerful company in the world, right as much as like

0:24:09.657 --> 0:24:11.617
<v Speaker 2>as much, which I think Rumble is great and I

0:24:11.697 --> 0:24:13.657
<v Speaker 2>do and I love it. They're free speech over there,

0:24:13.697 --> 0:24:16.857
<v Speaker 2>and that's great. Like it's not Google Alphabet. You know

0:24:16.897 --> 0:24:19.497
<v Speaker 2>it's not. You know it's so anyway, I just think

0:24:19.537 --> 0:24:21.297
<v Speaker 2>we got it. We got to sort of stay focused

0:24:21.297 --> 0:24:22.977
<v Speaker 2>on what reality is here. I want to ask you

0:24:22.977 --> 0:24:25.257
<v Speaker 2>a couple of pride questions, Chad. We come back in

0:24:25.297 --> 0:24:28.897
<v Speaker 2>a second, but first up, you know, the towels you

0:24:28.977 --> 0:24:31.137
<v Speaker 2>have are probably a little worn, right. It's one of

0:24:31.177 --> 0:24:33.697
<v Speaker 2>the things you don't think to change that often. And

0:24:33.817 --> 0:24:36.577
<v Speaker 2>let me tell you, having great towels it's just such

0:24:36.577 --> 0:24:39.217
<v Speaker 2>a nice thing because it feels better you're using them

0:24:39.217 --> 0:24:42.377
<v Speaker 2>every day. They're if they're more absorbent, if they're softer

0:24:42.457 --> 0:24:44.177
<v Speaker 2>to the touch, but if they're also more durable so

0:24:44.217 --> 0:24:46.737
<v Speaker 2>you get more value out of them, it's win all around, right.

0:24:47.137 --> 0:24:50.337
<v Speaker 2>Mike Lindell's My towels are the best. The six piece

0:24:50.377 --> 0:24:53.297
<v Speaker 2>towel set is phenomenal made with us a cotton very

0:24:53.337 --> 0:24:56.177
<v Speaker 2>absorbent but still provides that soft feel that you know

0:24:56.257 --> 0:24:57.977
<v Speaker 2>you have when you go like a fancy hotel, but

0:24:58.017 --> 0:25:00.217
<v Speaker 2>you can have that at home with the six piece

0:25:00.257 --> 0:25:02.857
<v Speaker 2>towel set. Set comes with two bath, two hand towels

0:25:02.897 --> 0:25:05.857
<v Speaker 2>and two washcloths. Typically retailing for ninety nine to ninety eight.

0:25:06.137 --> 0:25:07.737
<v Speaker 2>For a short time, you can get this set for

0:25:07.817 --> 0:25:09.977
<v Speaker 2>twenty five dollars when you go to my pilo dot co.

0:25:10.337 --> 0:25:13.937
<v Speaker 2>Use promo code buck that's promo code buc k when

0:25:13.977 --> 0:25:17.137
<v Speaker 2>you go to my pillow dot com seventy percent plus

0:25:17.137 --> 0:25:21.337
<v Speaker 2>in savings. Six piece towel set twenty five dollars amazing value.

0:25:21.897 --> 0:25:24.417
<v Speaker 2>Get it today, sixty day money back guarantee and a

0:25:24.537 --> 0:25:27.137
<v Speaker 2>ten year warranty. Just go to my pillow dot com

0:25:27.177 --> 0:25:29.937
<v Speaker 2>click on the radio listener special square. Get this clearance

0:25:29.977 --> 0:25:32.777
<v Speaker 2>price of twenty five dollars dollars on the for the

0:25:32.777 --> 0:25:35.697
<v Speaker 2>towel set, enter promo code bucket MyPillow dot com get

0:25:35.737 --> 0:25:38.217
<v Speaker 2>the six piece towel set. Also look for other great specials.

0:25:38.257 --> 0:25:45.537
<v Speaker 2>All right, Chad, the Biden White House flies the Pride

0:25:45.617 --> 0:25:49.017
<v Speaker 2>flag over the weekend and says, you know something like

0:25:49.057 --> 0:25:52.697
<v Speaker 2>America is a nation of pride, which I guess is

0:25:52.697 --> 0:25:55.577
<v Speaker 2>like a play on words or a double on taunder

0:25:55.657 --> 0:25:59.737
<v Speaker 2>or whatever. What do you think? What do you think

0:25:59.737 --> 0:26:01.257
<v Speaker 2>when you see this? Because for a lot of people,

0:26:01.297 --> 0:26:04.857
<v Speaker 2>I know, the sentiment starts to feel like is there

0:26:04.937 --> 0:26:07.017
<v Speaker 2>Does anyone understand there can be too much of a

0:26:07.057 --> 0:26:08.377
<v Speaker 2>celebration of anything?

0:26:10.737 --> 0:26:14.577
<v Speaker 1>Right? Yeah, Well it's a little grotesque, isn't it. And

0:26:14.617 --> 0:26:18.497
<v Speaker 1>it's fact that that new weirdo pride flag with the

0:26:18.617 --> 0:26:21.737
<v Speaker 1>chevrons on it, which I think it's actually like a

0:26:22.257 --> 0:26:24.577
<v Speaker 1>flag of like division. It's not really a unity flag.

0:26:24.617 --> 0:26:26.977
<v Speaker 1>It even looks like a divisive flag. It looks, you know,

0:26:27.057 --> 0:26:29.817
<v Speaker 1>violent and evil, and it's also one that is meant

0:26:29.857 --> 0:26:32.497
<v Speaker 1>to divide the community. I mean, it's all trans focused

0:26:32.497 --> 0:26:34.977
<v Speaker 1>and race focused and it's such the most bizarre thing ever.

0:26:36.057 --> 0:26:38.537
<v Speaker 1>And so even flying that flag is strange. But then,

0:26:38.577 --> 0:26:41.017
<v Speaker 1>of course Biden in his tweet about it, I mean,

0:26:41.057 --> 0:26:44.457
<v Speaker 1>obviously he's not the one tweeting, but then makes the

0:26:44.977 --> 0:26:46.737
<v Speaker 1>needs to make the case that we're standing up for

0:26:46.777 --> 0:26:49.737
<v Speaker 1>transgender children or whatever. If he couldn't be even more

0:26:49.817 --> 0:26:52.457
<v Speaker 1>creepy and disgusting when you see that flag, Now, that's

0:26:52.497 --> 0:26:54.177
<v Speaker 1>all you can think about. All you can think about

0:26:54.217 --> 0:26:57.017
<v Speaker 1>is what they're doing to kids, the stuff in schools,

0:26:57.137 --> 0:27:00.697
<v Speaker 1>the transing of kids. It's disgusting. It's not like even

0:27:00.857 --> 0:27:03.217
<v Speaker 1>like the little innocent rainbow like Okay, we're gonna, like,

0:27:03.417 --> 0:27:05.617
<v Speaker 1>you know, let an identity group have their day at

0:27:05.617 --> 0:27:09.337
<v Speaker 1>the White House. It seems a little more sinister than that.

0:27:09.497 --> 0:27:12.177
<v Speaker 1>And and also like at this point has absolutely nothing

0:27:12.177 --> 0:27:15.577
<v Speaker 1>to do with like what gay rights or recognition. It's

0:27:15.577 --> 0:27:19.577
<v Speaker 1>all about this bizarre queer critical theory ideology. That's what

0:27:19.617 --> 0:27:21.577
<v Speaker 1>that flag is. It has nothing to do with individual

0:27:21.617 --> 0:27:25.497
<v Speaker 1>people or rights or or anything of that nature.

0:27:25.937 --> 0:27:29.377
<v Speaker 2>Is there is there a growing sense in some quarters

0:27:30.537 --> 0:27:37.017
<v Speaker 2>within the gay community, Chad, that this activists it seems

0:27:37.057 --> 0:27:44.137
<v Speaker 2>like all in stance on trans hormones and surgery for

0:27:44.617 --> 0:27:50.017
<v Speaker 2>minors and drag queens story hour like, and there's always

0:27:50.017 --> 0:27:56.137
<v Speaker 2>this harnessing of gay rights to this issue, as though

0:27:56.177 --> 0:27:58.297
<v Speaker 2>these are the same issues that I'm sitting here, and

0:27:58.297 --> 0:28:00.777
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, look, I'm not in any of these communities

0:28:00.897 --> 0:28:03.617
<v Speaker 2>so to speak, but they're not the same issue.

0:28:04.617 --> 0:28:09.057
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, it's I mean, there's I mean this is

0:28:09.177 --> 0:28:11.177
<v Speaker 1>perhaps anecdotal. Well, I guess the only way you can

0:28:11.577 --> 0:28:13.737
<v Speaker 1>quantify this with data is if you look at the

0:28:13.777 --> 0:28:15.897
<v Speaker 1>gay how gay votes to increase for Donald Trump in

0:28:15.897 --> 0:28:19.017
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty to twenty sixteen, which it double to nearly

0:28:19.057 --> 0:28:22.017
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent in twenty twenty compared to about fifteen percent

0:28:22.097 --> 0:28:24.777
<v Speaker 1>in twenty sixteen for Donald Trump. So I think you're

0:28:24.777 --> 0:28:27.457
<v Speaker 1>seeing not only this what's happening with the sort of

0:28:27.577 --> 0:28:33.577
<v Speaker 1>lgbtqiias two S plus plus whatever being just solely focused

0:28:33.577 --> 0:28:36.937
<v Speaker 1>on gender ideology and queer theory and this radical kids stuff,

0:28:37.137 --> 0:28:39.177
<v Speaker 1>but you're also seeing a coincide at the time where

0:28:39.217 --> 0:28:42.097
<v Speaker 1>gay people are growing up, they have their rights, so

0:28:42.097 --> 0:28:44.697
<v Speaker 1>they're con turned with kitchen table issues, and so you know,

0:28:44.737 --> 0:28:47.137
<v Speaker 1>they're watching this wacky stuff happening on the left and

0:28:47.177 --> 0:28:49.737
<v Speaker 1>then maybe they're thinking, eh, you know, like maybe I

0:28:49.777 --> 0:28:52.537
<v Speaker 1>want lower taxes, maybe I want safe streets. Fifteen percent

0:28:52.617 --> 0:28:55.177
<v Speaker 1>of same sex couples now have at least one child

0:28:55.257 --> 0:28:57.817
<v Speaker 1>at home, compared to thirty eight percent of straight couples.

0:28:58.057 --> 0:28:59.497
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I think you're seeing a move. I think

0:28:59.497 --> 0:29:00.937
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing a big division of this. I think you're

0:29:00.937 --> 0:29:03.377
<v Speaker 1>seeing a lot of gay people who are are leaving

0:29:03.497 --> 0:29:06.977
<v Speaker 1>the left and the Democrat Party based on they're getting

0:29:06.977 --> 0:29:10.337
<v Speaker 1>older the Republican Party no longer really cares about this stuff,

0:29:10.337 --> 0:29:13.337
<v Speaker 1>and they're also watching this insanity that's happening on the

0:29:13.377 --> 0:29:16.977
<v Speaker 1>left and these really horrible things that are being done

0:29:17.017 --> 0:29:19.457
<v Speaker 1>and committed in the name of them and in their identity.

0:29:20.017 --> 0:29:24.457
<v Speaker 2>What is I hear this term used a lot, and

0:29:24.657 --> 0:29:27.897
<v Speaker 2>just just in Layman's terms, right, what is queer theory?

0:29:28.097 --> 0:29:28.777
<v Speaker 1>Like? What is that?

0:29:28.857 --> 0:29:30.297
<v Speaker 2>Even I hear it talked about.

0:29:30.657 --> 0:29:32.057
<v Speaker 1>What is it? What is it? What does it mean?

0:29:32.777 --> 0:29:34.497
<v Speaker 1>I mean if I tried to unpack it, I would

0:29:34.617 --> 0:29:36.537
<v Speaker 1>have an aneurysm. But you can think of it as

0:29:36.737 --> 0:29:40.857
<v Speaker 1>like like critical race theories, gender cousin. You know, it's

0:29:40.897 --> 0:29:44.217
<v Speaker 1>like it's like an academic philosophy about essentially, you know,

0:29:44.377 --> 0:29:48.857
<v Speaker 1>gender being a social construct and then you know sexuality, which.

0:29:48.897 --> 0:29:52.537
<v Speaker 2>Its tiers of tiers of oppression within it is that

0:29:52.617 --> 0:29:56.377
<v Speaker 2>it's like intersectionality, but gender not race, Yes.

0:29:56.137 --> 0:29:57.817
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yeah, And when you think of it, and one

0:29:57.817 --> 0:30:00.057
<v Speaker 1>of the main arguments is that gender is absolutely not real.

0:30:00.097 --> 0:30:02.497
<v Speaker 1>It's completely made up and people are born blank slates

0:30:02.537 --> 0:30:04.737
<v Speaker 1>and they're all conditioned to a certain way, which if

0:30:04.737 --> 0:30:07.577
<v Speaker 1>that's true, that like negates the whole argument of what

0:30:07.657 --> 0:30:09.977
<v Speaker 1>a homosexual is, which is somebody whose same sex attract

0:30:10.137 --> 0:30:12.377
<v Speaker 1>because queer theory literally says there's no such thing as

0:30:12.377 --> 0:30:16.297
<v Speaker 1>sex or gender. So it's it's not it's it's a

0:30:16.337 --> 0:30:19.177
<v Speaker 1>bizarre Marxist theory that has been that has co opted

0:30:19.257 --> 0:30:22.697
<v Speaker 1>the gay rights movement and the massive infrastructure the gay

0:30:22.737 --> 0:30:25.137
<v Speaker 1>rights movement has built over the last few decades, the

0:30:25.177 --> 0:30:27.817
<v Speaker 1>amount of money that those organizations have, it's been co

0:30:27.897 --> 0:30:32.657
<v Speaker 1>opted by this strange academic gender theory. That's that's absolute

0:30:32.937 --> 0:30:33.617
<v Speaker 1>just Marxism.

0:30:33.737 --> 0:30:37.017
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, Chad as a gay man, like, what

0:30:37.017 --> 0:30:39.417
<v Speaker 2>what is the like the gay the gay rights movement?

0:30:39.457 --> 0:30:41.977
<v Speaker 2>I mean, yeah, you can always argue that there's you know,

0:30:42.057 --> 0:30:45.577
<v Speaker 2>there are you know, perceptions can change or whatever in society,

0:30:45.657 --> 0:30:48.737
<v Speaker 2>But in terms of like as a legal matter, what

0:30:48.817 --> 0:30:50.937
<v Speaker 2>are the other what are the other gay rights that

0:30:50.977 --> 0:30:53.377
<v Speaker 2>the gay rights movement is supposed to be fighting for? Right,

0:30:53.537 --> 0:30:56.217
<v Speaker 2>it almost feels like there's this there's this army of

0:30:56.297 --> 0:30:59.377
<v Speaker 2>activists that have to find a war to fight, and

0:30:59.417 --> 0:31:03.057
<v Speaker 2>so transgenderism becomes that war because the other war what

0:31:03.097 --> 0:31:03.697
<v Speaker 2>are they fighting?

0:31:04.657 --> 0:31:07.057
<v Speaker 1>Well, and even ironically, and you're correct about that, and

0:31:07.057 --> 0:31:09.417
<v Speaker 1>there are any rights that we don't have, but ironically,

0:31:09.457 --> 0:31:11.897
<v Speaker 1>these people who talk nothing about violence, and they start

0:31:11.977 --> 0:31:13.937
<v Speaker 1>and they talk about if you don't use someone's pronoun

0:31:13.977 --> 0:31:17.097
<v Speaker 1>and you're literally killing them or you're helping insmit suicide

0:31:17.177 --> 0:31:19.177
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. Well, you know, there are places in the

0:31:19.177 --> 0:31:22.537
<v Speaker 1>world where they could cause play as heroes and activists,

0:31:22.537 --> 0:31:23.817
<v Speaker 1>and they're not in the United States. They're in the

0:31:23.857 --> 0:31:27.377
<v Speaker 1>sixty something nations. It still criminalize homosexuality, especially those that

0:31:27.457 --> 0:31:29.977
<v Speaker 1>will put gays to death. You know, places like Iran,

0:31:30.017 --> 0:31:35.177
<v Speaker 1>in Afghanistan, and by the way, in Afghanistan during the

0:31:35.177 --> 0:31:39.057
<v Speaker 1>American occupation, you couldn't put gay people to death. As

0:31:39.097 --> 0:31:41.737
<v Speaker 1>soon as Joe Biden's disastrous pull out, what's one of

0:31:41.777 --> 0:31:45.097
<v Speaker 1>the first things that Taliban did. They reinstated the death

0:31:45.097 --> 0:31:48.017
<v Speaker 1>penalty for homosexuality. So there are places in the world

0:31:48.057 --> 0:31:50.137
<v Speaker 1>where these people could go and maybe try to have

0:31:50.177 --> 0:31:53.017
<v Speaker 1>a difference and actually do humanitarian work. Instead they try

0:31:53.057 --> 0:31:57.177
<v Speaker 1>to focus on dismantling systems here and pushing everyone and

0:31:57.737 --> 0:32:00.617
<v Speaker 1>mutilating experimenting on children for some sick reason.

0:32:00.817 --> 0:32:03.337
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, Chadwick, we'll continue to talk to you about

0:32:03.337 --> 0:32:07.497
<v Speaker 2>this and more. When does Tucker the book come out?

0:32:07.737 --> 0:32:10.057
<v Speaker 1>It is available for pre order now anywhere you get

0:32:10.097 --> 0:32:12.217
<v Speaker 1>your books, so you go to tuckerthbook dot com and

0:32:12.257 --> 0:32:14.537
<v Speaker 1>then it comes out July eighteenth, So if you order

0:32:14.577 --> 0:32:16.977
<v Speaker 1>it now, you'll get that bookshipped to you on July eighteenth.

0:32:17.777 --> 0:32:19.657
<v Speaker 2>I mean, since you're doing a podcast with me, I

0:32:19.697 --> 0:32:22.457
<v Speaker 2>want to sign a copy. Obviously i'll buy it. Obviously

0:32:22.457 --> 0:32:24.617
<v Speaker 2>i'll buy it because I like to support the author.

0:32:24.737 --> 0:32:26.417
<v Speaker 2>But you got to sign it for me, all right, deal?

0:32:26.857 --> 0:32:27.937
<v Speaker 1>Of course thatunds.

0:32:27.977 --> 0:32:29.977
<v Speaker 2>Good Bye man, thank you, and good work. We'll talk soon.

0:32:30.177 --> 0:32:30.697
<v Speaker 1>Thanks man,