WEBVTT - Pandemic Wage and Hour Cuts Could Become Permanent If Crisis Persists

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:04.240
<v Speaker 1>It's Tuesday. Je I'm Oscar Emiras from the Daily Dive

0:00:04.320 --> 0:00:09.240
<v Speaker 1>podcast in Los Angeles, and this is reopening America. When

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:11.720
<v Speaker 1>looking at the economic toll the pandemic has inflicted on

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the country, many people are focused on job losses and

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>unemployment benefits, but another thing to look out for is

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>wage cuts. Many Americans who kept their jobs have seen

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 1>temporary hour and pay cuts that could become permanent or

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 1>paved the way for more layoffs. Megan Casella, economics reporter

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 1>at Politico, joins us for these widespread wage cuts. Thanks

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>for joining us, Megan, thanks for having me. We continue

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>to monitor the economy as we go through the coronavirus pandemic.

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that a lot of people are

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:46.840
<v Speaker 1>focused on is job losses and people getting unemployment benefits.

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:48.960
<v Speaker 1>But another thing we should be keeping an eye on

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:52.519
<v Speaker 1>also are wage cuts. A lot of people have taken

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>cuts to their pay throughout this thing, thinking, you know,

0:00:55.800 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 1>it might be a short term solution. But the pandemic

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>continues on and on and on, and there's a worry

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of these pay cuts could be permanent.

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Megan tell us about this, please, This is a trend

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:09.680
<v Speaker 1>that we're starting to see, and there's your federal data

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>on this. Really federal data actually shows that wages are rising,

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>but that's only because low wage workers are just unfortunately

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>losing their jobs. And so what we're starting to see

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 1>now is economists putting out different studies and estimates, and

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:23.679
<v Speaker 1>likely at least four million, maybe up to seven million

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>workers have taken cuts to their pay over the past

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 1>several weeks a couple of months now, likely because their employer,

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, looked at their balance sheets and said, maybe,

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 1>as a way to preserve jobs, we're just going to

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>have everybody take a ten percent cut or twenty percent cut,

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 1>whatever it might have been. The issue, though, is that

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 1>now you know that trend is growing. For one, it

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>tends to be a really rare move in the US

0:01:45.720 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>because employers know that employees obviously hate wage cuts. It's

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>bad for morale, it can be bad for productivity. But

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>now that these shutdowns are really lasting longer than many

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 1>of us anticipated in March and April, that they might

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 1>either become permanent at least last for you know, another

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>several months, perhaps through the end of the year, or

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>that they might lead to layoffs because if if an

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 1>employer in April said that I need to cut income,

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:11.679
<v Speaker 1>and now you know they're in really dire straits and

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 1>need another move, another way to save money. The only

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:17.399
<v Speaker 1>step left really is to probably lay off some markers.

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 1>And you look at it from the perspective of both sides.

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:23.680
<v Speaker 1>The employee their business tells them, hey, we need to

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 1>cut your pay just to make it through. You say, okay,

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 1>I have no other option. I probably am not going

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 1>to be able to find another job that will pay

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 1>me the same and this is going to be short terms,

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>so you agree to it. And then as you mentioned

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>just right now, for the employer, they're gonna go with

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>this option, hopefully before they start firing people flowing laying

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>people off. So they both kind of feel like they

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:46.079
<v Speaker 1>have no other option but to do this. And you

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:48.359
<v Speaker 1>look at what the effect is going to be, smaller paychecks,

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:52.960
<v Speaker 1>less spending, the recession that's going on would be extended.

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>So this is a really bad final around because you know,

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:57.800
<v Speaker 1>for the reasons you just sent it, it shows that

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 1>employees feel that they have no better option in as

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 1>you said, and the New York Federal Reserve actually put

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 1>out a survey this past week Americans now feel they

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 1>have a less than fifty percent chance of being able

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 1>to find a job within three months if they lost

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 1>their job today, And that's a more than sixteen percentage

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>point jobs to a year ago. So it really you know,

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:17.359
<v Speaker 1>these employees in many cases probably feel lucky that they

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:19.239
<v Speaker 1>have a job and they say, Okay, I'll take this

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:22.640
<v Speaker 1>pay cut because it means I can keep working and

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:25.359
<v Speaker 1>hopefully it's temporary. But we just don't know where things

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:27.800
<v Speaker 1>go from here, and it's a worrisome trent for sure.

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 1>And these cuts generally hit more people in white collar industries.

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I know the job losses tend to be more low

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 1>income workers, but these tend to be on the other

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>side of things. One of those studies I mentioned was

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>put up by some Federal Reserve economists and economists at

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the University of Chicago, and they found the three fourths

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>of the cut in pay fell within the top of

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>a wage earner. So on one hand, that's someone of

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>a good thing, you could say. You could say these

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 1>are workers who are more able to weather the cut

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>to their income and might have more wealth to hear

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 1>them through, or might not be as dependent on their

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>full paychecks. But on the other hand, these workers are

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>also the ones that tend to be more shielded from

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:08.640
<v Speaker 1>an economic recession. And so if these workers in the

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 1>top four percent are already feeling something like a pay cut,

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 1>but also really, you know, so something worrying about the

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:16.479
<v Speaker 1>depths of the recession and damage to the labor market

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:19.480
<v Speaker 1>as well. What are some of the companies that are

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 1>going through this? I know my company i Heeart Media

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 1>did something similar to this, A lot of people took

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 1>cuts in you know quarter two and quarter three type

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 1>of thing. Uh, what are some of the other companies

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>that are doing this? So it tends to be pretty

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>widespread and among smaller companies there's no way of totally

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:38.360
<v Speaker 1>judging it, but some really big companies have taken part

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 1>as well. So I spoke with one economist, Julia Coronado,

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:45.040
<v Speaker 1>who tracked US based companies with market caps greater than

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 1>one billion, so really, really, you know, major companies, and

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:51.440
<v Speaker 1>she found that of the ones that were providing details

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>on earnings calls for two percent were announcing that they

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 1>were reducing pay between April and July. So some of

0:04:57.560 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 1>those on there are lift the rides sharing app announcing

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 1>reductions for all salaried employees, and other companies were focusing

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 1>their reductions just on their top executives or maybe their

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 1>board best buying gaps both did that. So some major

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 1>names we're doing this, but also you know, we do

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 1>that just anecdotally. We know that sort of mom and

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:17.920
<v Speaker 1>pop shops and smaller companies and restaurants and things were

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 1>doing this as well. And so now what's the outlook.

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing cases rise. This thing is not going to

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 1>be over for some time still. I note in the

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 1>article there was you know, a number of American households

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:31.599
<v Speaker 1>expecting to lose income over the next month. That's according

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:33.480
<v Speaker 1>to a a recent survey. That number is beginning to rise.

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>So what can we be expecting soon likely expecting the

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>trend to just increase. I know those University of Chicago economists,

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 1>for example, are in the process of updating their paper.

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:47.239
<v Speaker 1>They're seeing some of those trends really continue and spread

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 1>it the longer that this goes on. And we also

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 1>know that even you know, regardless of what governments do

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and whether governors decided to actually impose regulations, we know

0:05:56.680 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 1>that consumers change their spending habits just based on their

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>own fear of the virus and so as cases rise,

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>regardless of whether there's actual shutdown restrictions in place, we

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>know that as long as the virus is raging the

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>way that it is now, consumers are going to stay inside.

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>They're going to be spending less money, which of course

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 1>is good from a public health perspective that they're not

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:18.159
<v Speaker 1>going out as much, but bad from an economic perspective

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of these businesses and just can't get

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 1>back on their feet. And you know, the worrying thing

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:26.159
<v Speaker 1>is just maybe companies were able to hang on for

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>a few months, especially smaller businesses, but larger ones as well,

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>And so the longer that this goes on, particularly with

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>no end in sight, really it just becomes harder and

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:38.160
<v Speaker 1>harder to really lean on your savings or maybe you've

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 1>got a loan from the government, but it was short term.

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:43.600
<v Speaker 1>It just becomes harder to really hang on without income

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 1>coming in that you're really depending on. Megan Casella, economics

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 1>reporter at Politico, Thank you very much for joining us.

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for having me. I'm Oscar Ramirez

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 1>and this has been reopening America. Don't forget effort. Today's

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>big news stories. You can check me out on the

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Daily Dive podcast every Monday through Friday. To follow us

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>in I Heart radio or wherever you get your podcasts,