WEBVTT - IBM Pledges $150B US Investment, Apple Shakes Up AI Unit

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news from the heart of

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>where innovation, money and power collide in Silicon Valley and beyond.

0:00:16.000 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:37.879
<v Speaker 2>Live from New York. This is Blueberg Technology Coming up.

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 3>Four of the Magnificent Seven are set to report earnings

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 3>this week. The giants make up nearly twenty percent waiting

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:45.400
<v Speaker 3>in the S and P five hundred.

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 2>So what's priced in?

0:00:46.960 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 4>Plus?

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 3>IBM plans to invest one hundred and fifty billion dollars

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:52.159
<v Speaker 3>in the US over the next five years with Quantumer

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 3>mainframes made in America.

0:00:54.400 --> 0:00:56.360
<v Speaker 2>And we will be joined by the CEO of Palo

0:00:56.440 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 2>Alto Networks.

0:00:57.680 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 3>He announces a new deal to leverage the AI security opportunity.

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 3>But first we have Meta Microsoft come Wednesday. We then

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:05.760
<v Speaker 3>have Apple Amazon.

0:01:06.120 --> 0:01:08.120
<v Speaker 2>What is priced in? Where have it? Investors in?

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 3>Analysts already started to think about the pull forward for

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:14.399
<v Speaker 3>their fiscal quarter they report because of Taris and what

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:18.160
<v Speaker 3>of the macro economic environment going into the full year

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:21.119
<v Speaker 3>earnings expectations. Ran Vastella can can dig in because Ryan,

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 3>what's so interesting about these numbers the fact that many

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:27.280
<v Speaker 3>analysts just in the lack of clarity, haven't been really

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 3>able to downgrade their expectations.

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely, we're starting to see this in some names, especially

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 5>for twenty twenty six, But for the moment, people are

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:38.480
<v Speaker 5>sort of holding firm with their expectations. We really do

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:41.639
<v Speaker 5>not know what to expect out of results this quarter.

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 5>We really do not know what any company is going

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 5>to say about really anything about the economic environment, about

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 5>their outlooks for the rest of the year. That makes

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 5>it extremely difficult for analysts to know how to sort of,

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 5>you know, peg their expectations their estimates, and in turn

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 5>that means that valuations right now are sort of up

0:01:58.360 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 5>in the air.

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 2>We really do not know what fair value.

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 5>Looks like because it is hard to evaluate these companies

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 5>on a price to earnings basis if there is so

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 5>much uncertainty about the earnings.

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:11.239
<v Speaker 3>I mean, look, we're looking currently at analysts being very

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 3>slow to cut profit estimates on the twelve month earnings

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:17.240
<v Speaker 3>projections for a Meta for example. But Ryan Meta is

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:21.079
<v Speaker 3>going to feel the effects of Chinese companies like Timu

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:25.080
<v Speaker 3>like Shean no longer advertising with them. Potentially we're going

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:27.800
<v Speaker 3>to see a downdraft there. And also they've got hardware

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:29.840
<v Speaker 3>that they have to import from China. Are we going

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 3>to get any signal of what that does to the

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:33.080
<v Speaker 3>bottom line?

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean, I think these kinds of questions are

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:38.120
<v Speaker 5>really what is paramount for investors right now. Obviously, these

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 5>companies have their own sort of individual impacts related to

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 5>tariffs and so forth. A company like Meta, which is

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 5>so heavily reliant on online advertising, it's not going to

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 5>be as direct for them as it will be for

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:51.960
<v Speaker 5>a company like Apple, which is hardware based. So I mean,

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 5>obviously we're going to see different kinds of impacts, different

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:56.960
<v Speaker 5>levels of impact. But I think overall, there's still so

0:02:57.080 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 5>much uncertainty about what the economy is going to look like,

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:02.920
<v Speaker 5>not even a year from now, but even a few

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 5>quarters from now. We are a couple of months from now,

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 5>So again, any kind of clarity investors will get will

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 5>be certainly welcome, But it's hard to know how any

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 5>company can even be too confident about anything right now.

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 3>Alphabet beat last week, and all of these stocks swored

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 3>the previous week as well. Raan Vas Fleastelica pushes us forward.

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 3>We thank you now President Trump's tarrorf announcements. They've roiled

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 3>Washington to Wall Street for nearly a month now. And

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 3>Chinese retail apps you just mentioned them, tea machine, they've

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 3>already started actually passing on the new import taxes onto

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 3>US consumers, onto you and me by hiking up prices. Now,

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 3>China bus far has denied having any trade talks for

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 3>the United States, though President Trump is still hopeful China

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 3>will make a deal eventually.

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 6>They want to make it deal obviously right now they're

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 6>not doing business.

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 7>Well, you know, people talk about going cold Turkey with

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 7>China and.

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 2>Then they just forget about it.

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 7>And we were losing hundreds of billions of dollars a

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 7>year with China.

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 8>And now they're not doing any business with us, you know,

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 8>because not because of them, because of me.

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 5>Because at one.

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 4>Hundred and forty five percent, you can't do business.

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 3>But something's gonna happen.

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 4>That's gonna be possible.

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 3>It begs Mike Shepherd standing by, and look, we all

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:17.839
<v Speaker 3>still doing business with China. Many a consumer is still

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 3>buying from Timu and she In, but they're paying the

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 3>price for it.

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 7>Well, you're right, kra and we are seeing now what

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 7>economists have been warning about for some time in relation

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 7>to the president's tariff policy, and that is that consumers

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 7>would bear the increased costs and economic pain of those

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 7>import levies. We are seeing that the prices are being

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 7>passed along now by Timu and by she In. At

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 7>she In, for instance, some goods, the prices have gone

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 7>up by as much as three hundred percent. And keep

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 7>in mind, Carra, it's not just here in the US

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 7>where the pain is being felt by consumers. The retaliatory

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:57.279
<v Speaker 7>programs by some other trading partners, including Candidate, including China,

0:04:57.520 --> 0:05:01.200
<v Speaker 7>including the EU have increased costs and goods from the

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:03.920
<v Speaker 7>US into those countries. And we saw Tesla over the

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 7>weekend urging consumers to try to tap the pre tariff

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:12.159
<v Speaker 7>inventory before prices went up and before it became too

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 7>late to avoid those increases. So there is a ripple

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 7>effect and corollary effect, not just here in the US,

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 7>but elsewhere around the world.

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:22.039
<v Speaker 2>Cara, extraordinary reporting done.

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 3>They just highlight you mentioned Tesla having to pass on costs.

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:26.839
<v Speaker 2>We've also got here.

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 3>Import tariffs wearing on Tiamo's shopping cart. They look at

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 3>some of the most popular things that people buy on Team.

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:34.240
<v Speaker 3>Apparently it's a fourteen and one power strip with a

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:35.920
<v Speaker 3>surge protection and one touch control.

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 2>Who knew that's the most popular item.

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:40.599
<v Speaker 3>But basically it's doubling in price because of tariffs MIC

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 3>And when we think of an Amazon, for example, Bloomberg

0:05:44.120 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 3>Intelligence thinks Amazon has about seventy percent of its products

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 3>were either offered by Amazon or third party sellers coming

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:51.159
<v Speaker 3>from China.

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 2>This is going to have a long term tail.

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 7>This is going to have a long tail, and it's

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:58.720
<v Speaker 7>not really just going to be sticker shot carro It's

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 7>going to be supply live shock potentially. We've heard from

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 7>a number of economists and experts out there, including the

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 7>chief economists that Apollo who one that we could be

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:11.719
<v Speaker 7>seeing a COVID like shock. Remember this is a crucial

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 7>time of year. You and I were just trying to

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:16.039
<v Speaker 7>get through the end of the school year, maybe for

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 7>our children, but we are all looking ahead. If you're

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 7>a retailer, you're thinking ahead to Christmas to back to school,

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 7>because now is when that inventory is actually planned, it's purchased,

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 7>and it's already shipped. It's usually in the water by

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 7>April to get here in time for back to school

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 7>and for the holidays.

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 4>So there won't be a ripple effect.

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:41.600
<v Speaker 7>And we've already seen a drop in cargo shipments from

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:44.919
<v Speaker 7>the world's second largest economy to the US in the

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 7>wake of these tariffs.

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:46.840
<v Speaker 4>So there is going to.

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 7>Be a lot of pain felt along the supply chain.

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 7>It's not just going to be consumers at the end,

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:55.480
<v Speaker 7>like you and me looking at prices in our Temu

0:06:55.520 --> 0:07:00.360
<v Speaker 7>shopping car, or even on the grocery store or other retailers.

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:02.160
<v Speaker 4>It's going to be in a lot of different places.

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:05.359
<v Speaker 3>And yet many hold out hopes for a deal. But

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:08.480
<v Speaker 3>China pushing that once again that no negotiations are happening.

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 7>Well, that's right, and Scott Besson is indicating that, hey,

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:15.559
<v Speaker 7>you know, the ball is in China's court. We really

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 7>want talks to get underway. And the President indicated even

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 7>at the end of last week during a time when

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 7>Chinese officials were here in Washington for the World Bank

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 7>and IMF meetings, where maybe there was some contact between

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 7>the two sides, but it was informal and if it

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 7>even took place, And for the Chinese, they really want

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 7>something much higher level, they want something launched formally. They

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 7>would like to be speaking regularly with Scott Besson and

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 7>other officials of his port to be able to get

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 7>all of those key points for them, not just tariffs, remember,

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 7>but all the US export restrictions on advanced technology that

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 7>we've been talking about so much.

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 3>Particularly in the semiconductor space. Mike Sheppard, thank you so

0:07:57.800 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 3>much for joining me while coming up. IBM to invest

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and fifty billion dollars in the US over

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 3>the next five years. Why this is blue met technology.

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:26.000
<v Speaker 3>IBM just raising its earlier gains as the market turns

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 3>a little bit lower. It just announced plans to invest

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and fifty billion dollars in the United States

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 3>over the next five years. The latest company, of course,

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 3>that follows the likes of Apple or Eli Lilly pledging

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 3>to increase spending in the country following President Trump's election

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:42.560
<v Speaker 3>and his teriff threats. Let's bring in brody Ford and

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 3>starting on IBM. It seems to be about made in

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 3>America the mainframe quantum compute. How much of an acceleration

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 3>in spending home in the US space is this?

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 9>That is the big question. It's the one that is

0:08:55.400 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 9>so hard to answer looking at a lot of these announcements, right,

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 9>IBM says we're going to spend their billion in R

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 9>and D in the US. We look that they've reported

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:07.199
<v Speaker 9>about thirty three billion in R and D over the

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:09.720
<v Speaker 9>last five years. I believe most of that's in the US.

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 9>So it's hard to say is this an acceleration. Is

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 9>this them you know, putting a pretty bow and spending

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 9>they were going to do anyway? This is the big

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 9>question when we see these announcements from companies like Apple

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:25.119
<v Speaker 9>or Nvidia. What's clear is that as tariffs hit, companies

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:27.959
<v Speaker 9>feel a lot of pressure to say, hey, actually we

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 9>have capabilities in the US and upstate New York. We

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 9>can build your main frames too, And so I think

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 9>that's what we're seeing from IBM today.

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:39.320
<v Speaker 3>Alvin Krishna, the CEO, saying IBM remains the epicenter of

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:42.439
<v Speaker 3>the world's most advanced computing and AI capabilities.

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 2>Now I want to get to AI capabilities.

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 3>Because I'm an interesting story you've been reporting on for

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 3>over in the UK. Nscale, which seems to be a

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 3>startup that is once again a Bitcoin minor turn compute offerer,

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 3>trying to raise money and they're talking about a deal

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 3>with bike Dugs.

0:09:58.280 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:01.079
<v Speaker 9>Nscale is kind of like a or weave where they

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 9>are focused on building these AI specific data centers and

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 9>so they've been fundraised. They looking for a billion or

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 9>two in debt, telling everybody, hey, we are how we

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 9>have this deal with Byteedance for about assign the paper.

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 9>It's gonna be worth two billion dollars. We're gonna give

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:19.199
<v Speaker 9>them all these great GPUs and Bye Dance told us

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 9>that's overstating things. We don't have that much business with them,

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 9>and so these situations are hard, right because GPUs are

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:29.719
<v Speaker 9>a pretty geopolitically sensitive thing. Maybe byte Dance doesn't want

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:32.440
<v Speaker 9>it out there. Maybe in scale is overstating things. I mean,

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 9>it's an interesting instance that shows us how much the

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 9>financing around AI data centers has become very interesting in

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:41.960
<v Speaker 9>the last year.

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 3>And of course they're rather home to in video chips.

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 3>Berdie Ford breaks that down. We thank you, and let's

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 3>talk more about in video chips and competition to them,

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 3>because over in China Huawei apparently the company is set

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 3>to test a new AI processor then it hopes can

0:10:55.920 --> 0:10:57.960
<v Speaker 3>rival those of Nvidia. Now it's all according to reports

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:00.160
<v Speaker 3>on the Wall Street Journal in video trading, the as

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 3>you can see on the day now accelerating losses in

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 3>King talks about this about what's happening over at Intel.

0:11:05.559 --> 0:11:09.079
<v Speaker 3>But first Yan, what is the long term picture of

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 3>Huawei trying to help China become more self sufficient here?

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:14.680
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think what we have to do is because

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 6>it's very difficult to get a clear picture of what

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 6>is going on there and the capabilities of those chips,

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 6>what it is important to do is to take it

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 6>back to what Invidia has said, which is, look, if

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:26.679
<v Speaker 6>we're not allowed to do business there, if we are

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:30.440
<v Speaker 6>restricted from exporting chips to China, they will find a

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 6>way to do their own over time. It's just a

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 6>matter of time. And I think this report is another

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 6>example of efforts being made out there to do that.

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 6>Are they competitive with what Invidia can do? Probably not

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 6>at this point. Are they going to be wonderful? Are

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 6>they going to be good enough?

0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 10>Though?

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:49.080
<v Speaker 6>Is really the key question, And the answer is we'll see.

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 6>But they're probably another step on a path towards that.

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 11>Well.

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 3>In there's a more local competitor who hasn't been much

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 3>of a competitor to in video of late, and that's Intel.

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:02.719
<v Speaker 3>Lit Bhutan written a great Tech Daily report really on

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 3>how is trying to nuance culture over an Intel.

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 2>How has it gone down?

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean he really didn't give any of the

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:14.439
<v Speaker 6>concrete answers that Wall Street wanted in terms of when

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:16.679
<v Speaker 6>are the new products going to arrive, when you're going

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 6>to have outside customers for your factories. What he did

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:22.439
<v Speaker 6>focus on, and what he did give a very specifics on,

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:25.440
<v Speaker 6>was like, Intel's culture is not in a good position,

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:27.680
<v Speaker 6>and these are some of the shocking things that we're

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 6>seeing going on. Frankly, it was pretty brutal. That clearly

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 6>is something that he believes needs to be fixed. But

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 6>as we know, fixing a company culture and getting everybody

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 6>moving in the right direction is important, takes time, and

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 6>what is arguably more important is that you're getting them

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 6>moving in the right direction towards products, towards customer relationships

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 6>that will turn this company around.

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:53.320
<v Speaker 3>We have seen the response to the earnings in King

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 3>Tech in Depth, the newsletter out today.

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:55.839
<v Speaker 2>Go read it.

0:12:55.880 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 3>Thanks so much. Now, as shakeup is underway for Apple's

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:08.600
<v Speaker 3>AI and machine learning divisions, the company has begun to

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:11.200
<v Speaker 3>break up would have been a pretty unified approach for more.

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 2>Blue Meg's Mark German has more.

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 3>You've been writing over the weekend about one particular executive

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 3>they lured away from Google in twenty eighteen, and now

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 3>he's getting some things pulled away from him.

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 12>That's right. So here's the story with Apple. AI serie

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 12>launched in twenty eleven, and by twenty fifteen, twenty sixteen,

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 12>a little bit after that, they really fell behind Google.

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 12>Assistant came online. You had a lot of competitors, including

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:40.359
<v Speaker 12>Alexa from Amazon, and it felt like Apple had squandered

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:42.720
<v Speaker 12>a three four year lead. And at the time, Apple

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:45.520
<v Speaker 12>felt that part of that is because the AI work

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:49.560
<v Speaker 12>at Apple was scattered across the company, right They worked

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:54.440
<v Speaker 12>in silos across different divisions, hardware, software services. So they

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 12>hired John gen Andrea, who was running AI in search

0:13:57.040 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 12>at Google at the time in twenty eighteen. They believe

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:02.520
<v Speaker 12>putting everything in his group with skyrocket their approach to

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:05.200
<v Speaker 12>AI and make them a true player in artificial intelligence

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:05.959
<v Speaker 12>and machine learning.

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:07.840
<v Speaker 4>So far, it hasn't worked out.

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:11.559
<v Speaker 12>We saw how far they've fallen behind compared to Chad Shipt, Google.

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 4>Gemini Copilot.

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 12>So now what they're trying is breaking it up, going

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 12>back to their roots, going back to that Apple functional

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 12>organization and taking pieces of the AI group and re

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 12>scattering them around the company, and that started a few

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 12>weeks ago with Siri. They move Siri from their AI

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 12>division to their software engineering division, which makes sense to

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 12>some extent because Siri is well software. And now what

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 12>they're doing is they're taking the robotics division, which was

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 12>also in the AI organization, and moving that to hardware engineering.

0:14:39.680 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 12>Robotics that is a hardware play at heart, and so

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 12>it makes sense to put that in the hardware engineering division.

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 12>So we'll see how that works out. But to me

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 12>and to many people at Apple, it feels like they're

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 12>preparing for a world without a true AI chief, a

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 12>world where apples back to being completely functionally organized.

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 3>And mark a world where they're about to report earnings

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 3>this week, they're trying to tackle China supply chain, move

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 3>it more to India. Just brace us for what we

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 3>expect on Thursday.

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 12>I think that Apple this is going to be one

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 12>of the more interesting Apple earnings results presentations in a while,

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 12>not because of the numbers that they're going to share,

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 12>not because of the data they're going to be given

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 12>the prepared remarks, but because they have a lot more

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 12>questions they're going to have to answer than usual. Things

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 12>when it comes to AI, of course is going to

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 12>be big on the minds of analysts on the call,

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 12>but also tariffs, also dealing with the Trump administration, dealing

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 12>with innovation questions. So that's going to be really important

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 12>earnings TOOLL to listen to, not because of what they're

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 12>going to come out and say, but because of what

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 12>they're going to be asked and how they're going to respond.

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 12>So I'm actually very much looking forward to that, and

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 12>everyone should stay tuned for our coverage there.

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, we're excited for your reporting on it, Mark German.

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 3>We appreciate all things Apple. And now.

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 2>Meanwhile, in other AI.

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 3>News, enterprise AI platform Writer is launching a new adaptive

0:15:56.480 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 3>reasoning model that it says is cheaper faster than competing lllms.

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 3>It eaches a one million token context window to create

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 3>more comprehensive responses. Mayhabi write as CEO joins us for

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 3>now and tell me about the new model and what

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 3>makes it different.

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 10>Oh hi Caroline, so good to see you. Well that's

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 10>the headline.

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 13>Palmyra x five is out and it is the first

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:24.000
<v Speaker 13>enterprise grade, enterprise ready model built for agentic AI.

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 10>So you got it.

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 13>This is an LM with performance on par with other

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 13>frontier models, but it's radically three x faster, and it's

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 13>four times cheaper, and as of today it's available on

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 13>AWS Bedrock.

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So tell us about how you get that sort

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 3>of cost efficiency. You're offering what sixty cents per one

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 3>million input tokens, you're doing six dollars per million output tokens.

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 3>How do you get to that price point?

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 5>Way?

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:54.119
<v Speaker 13>So it's really important for folks to understand what's required

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 13>to get enterprise grade agentic AI. When we launched our

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 13>AI HQ a few weeks ago, we had one hundred

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 13>plus pre built agents built for the enterprise, and folks

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 13>were asking me, how are you getting this kind of

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 13>efficiency and accuracy with really complex workflows Agents at a Uber,

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:19.440
<v Speaker 13>at a Franklin Templeton, things that were capable of taking

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 13>multiple systems, data from third party and internal research, and

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 13>able to generate really complex work We are able to

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 13>take that full million token prompt and process that context

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:39.119
<v Speaker 13>window in twenty two seconds, firing off multi turn function

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 13>calls in three hundred milliseconds, all while getting this price efficiency.

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 10>It is a.

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:51.119
<v Speaker 13>Combination of breakthrough both algorithmic and data we train this

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 13>model on about a million dollars of GPUs, so also

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 13>incredibly efficient on the training and we passed.

0:17:57.359 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 2>How how is this occurring?

0:17:58.840 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 9>Way?

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 3>Is this the new deep seek trend that we're seeing

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 3>that you just do more and more with this. It's

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:05.879
<v Speaker 3>more about turning to open source. I mean, how have

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 3>you managed to be so efficient?

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 8>Yeah?

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 10>I mean we deep seeked before deep seek.

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:13.679
<v Speaker 13>So this is a one hundred percent synthetic data based

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 13>approach which has the IP friendliness that the enterprise really requires. Algorithmically,

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:26.119
<v Speaker 13>we are doing a very interesting set of techniques around

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:31.439
<v Speaker 13>a hybrid attention mechanism, blending linear and other approaches, and

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 13>we're doing a mixture of experts set of techniques, so

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:40.399
<v Speaker 13>we're only activating the most relevant subnetworks and resulting in

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 13>much lower latency, much more efficiency.

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:46.120
<v Speaker 3>Mate, you talked about some of the very well known

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 3>companies that you currently serve. But to get these sort

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:52.399
<v Speaker 3>of investors and the vanguards of this world to be

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 3>coming on board, how are you making yourself known? I mean,

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 3>are you having to offer this sort of price efficiency?

0:18:57.840 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 2>Is that how you arrives above the noise?

0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:01.400
<v Speaker 3>Because it just feels like there are so many offerings,

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 3>enterprise suited offerings out.

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:03.640
<v Speaker 2>There right now.

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:06.400
<v Speaker 10>It's absolutely so noisy.

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 13>But what we're seeing is folks who don't have results

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:13.159
<v Speaker 13>are understanding that they can't build everything themselves. So in

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 13>addition to enterprise grade frontier lms, we've got an end

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:22.679
<v Speaker 13>to end platform for building, activating, supervising these agents. And

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:26.359
<v Speaker 13>that's how we stand out, Caroline. That entire package is

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:31.199
<v Speaker 13>what results in the incredible roy Forster just reported three

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 13>hundred and thirty three percent ROY on implementing writer for

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:38.640
<v Speaker 13>building and using agents and it's one of the highest

0:19:38.640 --> 0:19:42.199
<v Speaker 13>that they've ever seen. So you're right, right, it's incredibly

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 13>noisy for these enterprises, but CEOs are seeing that their

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:50.879
<v Speaker 13>CEOs are demanding results. And I think this is AI's

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 13>COVID moment, and COVID, you know, you had this explosion

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 13>of collaboration tools because forks, folks had to do it.

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 13>And I think we're going into, you know, the kind

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:06.280
<v Speaker 13>of economic uncertainty that just demands results and writers providing that.

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so really interesting.

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 3>You think that in this potential downturn from a global

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:14.160
<v Speaker 3>GDP perspective, people could be more drawn to your products,

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:14.680
<v Speaker 3>not less.

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 10>Oh one hundred percent.

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:19.200
<v Speaker 13>I mean, we're AI software that builds software, and we're

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:23.720
<v Speaker 13>already seeing it in our customer base executives CEOs who say, look,

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 13>before you ask for more headcount, before you ask for

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 13>more software, I want to see that AI couldn't do

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 13>it better.

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 3>So what about that for your opportunities as we get

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 3>more nervousness, more economic uncertainty. I know that prior to

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:41.920
<v Speaker 3>all of this you were getting other tech startups coming

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:43.639
<v Speaker 3>to you saying, look, I can't keep on doing this,

0:20:43.760 --> 0:20:45.960
<v Speaker 3>my expenses are too high. Would you mind buying me?

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 3>Are there still the M and A opportunities out there

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 3>for you?

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 13>Right now, we're trying to grow organically as fast as possible, Caroline,

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:55.760
<v Speaker 13>we can't keep up with the demand.

0:20:56.280 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 10>I'm with you from our London office.

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 13>We're almost one hundred people here, more than four hundred globally,

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 13>trying to be eight hundred globally as soon as possible.

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:08.800
<v Speaker 13>Folks really need results, and you know they're coming to

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 13>us to be able to really bring AI, especially agen

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:13.600
<v Speaker 13>kic AI to the business.

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 3>Mahavieve, it's always great catching up with you. Thanks for

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:17.159
<v Speaker 3>joining us in London.

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 2>Pano Also our networks.

0:21:26.119 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 3>Manages to fight the narrative of a downward.

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:30.200
<v Speaker 2>Draft in the markets. We're up a quarter percent.

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:33.639
<v Speaker 3>And look, we're seeing the cybersecurity Leader announced it's intent

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:37.880
<v Speaker 3>to acquire protect AI is expanding the company's capabilities in

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:42.119
<v Speaker 3>security basically combating new threats, I mean an explosion in

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 3>artificial intelligence. All of this as we get the CSRSA

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:48.680
<v Speaker 3>conference underway, joining us now Nikesha or a power auto

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 3>network CEO, You've got a lot to announce new security platform,

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:53.160
<v Speaker 3>but let's just go to.

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 2>The new announcement. In terms of M and A.

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 3>You're going to get us an amount that you paid.

0:21:56.600 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 3>I was hearing about up to six hundred and fifty

0:21:58.240 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 3>million dollars.

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:01.679
<v Speaker 4>We're not going to talk about what we paid. Caroline.

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:02.680
<v Speaker 4>Nice to see you.

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:06.159
<v Speaker 8>Like we're again at a technology inflection point. We're all

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:09.120
<v Speaker 8>talking about AI. You had people talking about AAI earlier.

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:11.919
<v Speaker 8>And every time you have a technology inflection point, it

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 8>becomes very important that we are able to come forward

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 8>and provide solutions to our customers so they can securely

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 8>deploy technology. And in that context, we're very exertively and

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 8>aggressively working on both a build and buy strategy to

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:28.960
<v Speaker 8>build perhaps what will be the most important thing over

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 8>the next few years, which is a platform that allows

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:32.880
<v Speaker 8>you to deploy AI securely.

0:22:33.400 --> 0:22:35.920
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so let's talk about build versus by and why

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 3>was this asset protect AI so necessary to go inorganic

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 3>at this moment?

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 8>Well, kind of like if you look at what's going

0:22:42.600 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 8>on in AI you were on before, people talk about LMS,

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:49.399
<v Speaker 8>people talking about deploying AI based applications, People trying to

0:22:49.400 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 8>figure out how to deploy infrastructure, whether it's on prem

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 8>or in the public cloud, with chips set to use,

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 8>which model to use. All these are very important technological

0:22:57.359 --> 0:23:00.440
<v Speaker 8>decisions which are going to underpin the platform forms of

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 8>the future. Now, when you put them together and you

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 8>deploy them, you have to make sure that you're looking

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:08.879
<v Speaker 8>at the security aspect of every one of these things.

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:12.920
<v Speaker 8>Protector AI, after an extensive look around the market, we

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:15.879
<v Speaker 8>found was working on some very interesting topics which are

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 8>complementary to what we've been building. We've been building a

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 8>great run time platform to if we protect our customers

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 8>as the DEPLOYI. Protector I was working on something similar

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:26.200
<v Speaker 8>where they're looking at all the model in the world,

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 8>scanning them to make sure there wasn't bad stuff lurking

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:32.359
<v Speaker 8>in them. So the combination of the two, which we

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 8>will integrate into one platform, actually allows us to be

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 8>more comprehensive and we will offer our customers.

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 3>I just want to get your birds eye perspective here

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:41.880
<v Speaker 3>in a kesh, because no one can push us forward

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 3>as much as you can in many ways to the

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 3>future of agenic KI.

0:23:45.400 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 2>And the fact that where are we to ultimately be

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:48.879
<v Speaker 2>protecting ourselves.

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:53.680
<v Speaker 3>There's demand for traditional, basically farwall endpoint products of security.

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:55.960
<v Speaker 3>How does that shift if you're going from a user

0:23:56.040 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 3>level to an agent level in this moment, that's going to.

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:02.960
<v Speaker 8>The buzzword for RSA Carol, and people are going to

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 8>talk a lot about how do.

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:07.639
<v Speaker 4>You make agents work? I think it's still unclear.

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:10.160
<v Speaker 8>There's a lot of innovation being put out in the market,

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:12.399
<v Speaker 8>whether as the A to A model that an MCP

0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:14.639
<v Speaker 8>Model's all wonderful buzzwords.

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:15.200
<v Speaker 4>We create in our industry.

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:20.520
<v Speaker 8>But as Agendica I've said before to me, Agendici becomes

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 8>real when you start giving AI arms and legs, whether

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:25.880
<v Speaker 8>robotic arms and robotic legs or real arms and legs

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 8>in terms of replacing human beings, and I think that's

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 8>where the question becomes, can I rely on AI to

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 8>accomplish the task without supervision? And that's where things will

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:37.919
<v Speaker 8>get very interesting and very hairy in certain cases. There

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:41.439
<v Speaker 8>it becomes important only to make sure that the agent

0:24:41.520 --> 0:24:44.879
<v Speaker 8>you're giving autonomy to is something that you're very comfortable

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 8>will act within the guardrails that you put out there

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:49.440
<v Speaker 8>for that agent. And then you got to make sure

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:51.879
<v Speaker 8>nobody can take over your agent and hijack it in

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:53.680
<v Speaker 8>a way that can make them do things you don't

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:54.199
<v Speaker 8>want them to do.

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:55.880
<v Speaker 4>So I think that's going to be the next.

0:24:55.720 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 8>Frontier of cybersecurity as we get AI deployed in multiple places,

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:02.680
<v Speaker 8>is how do we give autonomous control to these agents?

0:25:02.720 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 8>How do we give them agency effectively? And can't wait

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 8>for that world to happen, But it's going to be

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 8>a whole new sort of set of opportunities that are

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:12.000
<v Speaker 8>open up for us.

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 3>There are a lot of names trying to make the

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 3>most of this opportunity. A lot of them are the hyperscalers.

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 3>A lot of them in many ways become your competitors

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:22.359
<v Speaker 3>as they add their own security offerings. Where do you

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 3>sit in this whole FRENEMI environment, Well, you know.

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:27.920
<v Speaker 4>As we fascinating Caroline.

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 8>Logically, the cloud providers should have been our competitors and

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:33.760
<v Speaker 8>cloud security. They should have our competitors and endpoints secure,

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 8>but they're not. They're focused on making sure technology gets

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:40.119
<v Speaker 8>deployed as quickly as possible, which is good perhaps for

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 8>their business, not all of their customers. Our job is

0:25:42.880 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 8>to make sure that we stay in lockstep with them

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:48.200
<v Speaker 8>and work with our customers to make sure they can

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 8>deploy technology in a secure fashion. Let's be fair if

0:25:51.760 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 8>our customers have comfort that when they deploy AI, when

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 8>they give autonomous control to AI to do some repetitive

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:01.919
<v Speaker 8>tasks or interesting time, it can be done securely. The

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 8>moment we can provide the underpinning of trusts, the underprinting

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 8>of reliability, the fact that if you deploy with Pollo

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 8>Auto Networks, there is a very high probability that it's

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:12.440
<v Speaker 8>going to be much safer than anything else.

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 4>I think that's where the winning combination happens.

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:17.200
<v Speaker 8>So I don't see this as sort of a competitor

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 8>environment for now with the hyperscalers. I see it as

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 8>an opportunity for us to work together and make sure

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:25.320
<v Speaker 8>we accelerate the adoption of the technology, as opposed to

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 8>have our customers be confused.

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 4>Which way to go.

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:30.119
<v Speaker 3>I mean used to work out Google. You host your

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:32.640
<v Speaker 3>products on Google Cloud. How do you feel about their

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 3>big splashy deal for wiz.

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:38.879
<v Speaker 4>It'll be interesting to watch.

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:41.439
<v Speaker 8>I have lots of conversations with people at Google about it,

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 8>and we don't intend to change how we deploy our products.

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 8>We buy infrastructure from them, and sometimes we see them

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 8>in the market.

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:49.680
<v Speaker 4>Our hope is that our.

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 8>Customers will understand that you want an unbiased product that

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:56.159
<v Speaker 8>can operate effectively on every cloud provider, as opposed to

0:26:56.200 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 8>something that is beholden to a particular cloud provider.

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:01.760
<v Speaker 4>We still need to solve for everybody else.

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 8>Out there, so I think that's our sort of athos.

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 8>We want to be independent. We want to be somebody

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 8>that can deliver the same level and capability or security

0:27:10.119 --> 0:27:12.640
<v Speaker 8>across every platform there is out there, so our customers

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:14.960
<v Speaker 8>don't have to spend time trying to integrate all this

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:18.440
<v Speaker 8>stuff together, which is our entire philosophy around platformization.

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 3>I love following what you're doing in terms of platform offerings, products,

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:25.600
<v Speaker 3>what you're doing in terms of well the latest MNA,

0:27:25.720 --> 0:27:28.440
<v Speaker 3>but I also love following on social and perhaps whether

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:31.200
<v Speaker 3>you wanted to or not, you involved in the AI

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:33.920
<v Speaker 3>debate about whether we're going to get as much CAPEX spend,

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 3>whether infrastructure is reality versus hype.

0:27:36.480 --> 0:27:37.560
<v Speaker 2>Where do you stand on it right now?

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:38.400
<v Speaker 3>Nikesh?

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:42.080
<v Speaker 8>I think if you look around you, everybody is getting

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 8>ready for a very large adoption of AI scenario because

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:49.040
<v Speaker 8>you see tens of billions of dollars being committed by

0:27:49.040 --> 0:27:50.639
<v Speaker 8>people in terms of building infrastructure.

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:51.400
<v Speaker 4>I think that's right.

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 8>I think we may get the sort of the timing

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:57.679
<v Speaker 8>not perfect. You know, you may build too much before

0:27:57.760 --> 0:27:58.680
<v Speaker 8>it's all consumed.

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 4>But I think it's headed in the direction. I think.

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:04.280
<v Speaker 8>Short term, in this twelve to twenty four month timeframe,

0:28:04.320 --> 0:28:06.720
<v Speaker 8>you could see that a lot of the investment that's

0:28:06.720 --> 0:28:09.879
<v Speaker 8>going is going towards innovation. I say, make a smarter model,

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:10.920
<v Speaker 8>make robotics work.

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:13.160
<v Speaker 4>So you need a lot of power.

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:14.639
<v Speaker 8>You need a lot of compute to get to a

0:28:14.640 --> 0:28:18.120
<v Speaker 8>place where these models become extremely useful. Once you get

0:28:18.119 --> 0:28:20.159
<v Speaker 8>to a point where these models are extremely useful, the

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:23.240
<v Speaker 8>question becomes how do I deploy them in my business?

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 8>How do I, as a regular company, regular customer, deploy

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:29.720
<v Speaker 8>these things effectively securely. I think that could take a

0:28:29.760 --> 0:28:33.360
<v Speaker 8>little longer than people think because everybody's experimenting and we're

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 8>not all experts yet.

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:36.440
<v Speaker 4>Now this is something that came about.

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 8>Less than twenty four months ago, so we all have

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 8>to get our muscle understand how this affects our business.

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:43.480
<v Speaker 8>How do I build robotic things that can do stuff

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 8>for me around my enterprise? How do I build AI

0:28:45.680 --> 0:28:46.880
<v Speaker 8>agents that can do stuff for me?

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:47.880
<v Speaker 4>I'm a enterprise.

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 8>Do I build or do I buy from somebody? So

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:52.560
<v Speaker 8>all that stuff will take a little longer to pan out.

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 8>But when it happens, we're going to need all that

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 8>capacity that's being built, and unfortunately, you can't wait to

0:28:58.160 --> 0:29:00.720
<v Speaker 8>build capacity, you have to build it ahead of demands.

0:29:00.760 --> 0:29:04.480
<v Speaker 8>I think I think it's the right direction. Timing's still

0:29:04.480 --> 0:29:05.200
<v Speaker 8>to be figured out.

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:08.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, thanks for sharing your expertise across all the subjects

0:29:08.320 --> 0:29:11.040
<v Speaker 3>and the deal news aqusha Ura go enjoy RSA. We

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:15.840
<v Speaker 3>thank you, Palo Alta Networks CEO. Now next up, talking

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:20.320
<v Speaker 3>tech first stuff, I'm talking about UAE data center developer Kasna. Well,

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:22.360
<v Speaker 3>it's planning a major expansion into Saudi Arabia.

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:22.480
<v Speaker 7>Now.

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:23.640
<v Speaker 2>The company is looking to take.

0:29:23.480 --> 0:29:26.280
<v Speaker 3>Twenty five percent of the market share already identified two

0:29:26.320 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 3>locations for its data centers, directly competing with smaller local

0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 3>and specialized firms, plus German defense startup Arx Robotics. Let's

0:29:34.640 --> 0:29:37.560
<v Speaker 3>raised thirty five million dollars in its latest VC funding round,

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:39.560
<v Speaker 3>and it's the second time in the past year as

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:41.880
<v Speaker 3>the company aims to expand in the United Kingdom. Aarx

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:45.760
<v Speaker 3>Robotics declined to share this new valuation and alphabet after

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 3>its earning is now set to be offering about four

0:29:47.720 --> 0:29:50.400
<v Speaker 3>million dollars in US high grade corporate debt today.

0:29:50.600 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 2>It's according to sources.

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 3>The company is said to be looking to sell the

0:29:53.200 --> 0:29:56.080
<v Speaker 3>bonds in as many as four parts and could mark

0:29:56.080 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 3>the company's first bond sale. This is the way back

0:29:58.200 --> 0:30:00.600
<v Speaker 3>in twenty twenty are coming up. We'll talk to the

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 3>managing partners of FPV about finding product led AI startups

0:30:04.560 --> 0:30:06.680
<v Speaker 3>for their latest fund you will.

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:08.600
<v Speaker 2>There's some news out on Sony.

0:30:08.640 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 3>Could they be spinning out their semiconductor part of the business.

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:13.640
<v Speaker 3>The shares have actually risen on the back of the

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:15.720
<v Speaker 3>news that as the company tries to get more focused.

0:30:15.720 --> 0:30:18.080
<v Speaker 3>Of course it's all about PlayStation and gaming, but they're

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:20.400
<v Speaker 3>also trying to be selling off some of the assets

0:30:20.400 --> 0:30:22.719
<v Speaker 3>that don't mean quite so much to the core business anymore.

0:30:22.760 --> 0:30:35.840
<v Speaker 3>Semiconductor has been One of them is Bloombag Technology, EUIL

0:30:35.880 --> 0:30:38.720
<v Speaker 3>masks XAI. Well, it's in talks to raise roughly twenty

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars in funding for its newly combined AI and

0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:44.080
<v Speaker 3>social media business. According to sources, the deal would value

0:30:44.080 --> 0:30:46.280
<v Speaker 3>the company in over one hundred and twenty billion dollars,

0:30:46.280 --> 0:30:48.240
<v Speaker 3>according to one of the people briefed on the matter. Now,

0:30:48.240 --> 0:30:50.960
<v Speaker 3>if completed, it will be the second largest startup funning

0:30:51.000 --> 0:30:54.120
<v Speaker 3>round of all time behind guess who Open ai And

0:30:54.160 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 3>they're forty billion dollar financing earlier this year, according to

0:30:57.120 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 3>data from Pitchbook. Now, we've got so much when it

0:31:00.400 --> 0:31:02.680
<v Speaker 3>comes to VC. And there's more fundraising news from a

0:31:02.680 --> 0:31:05.760
<v Speaker 3>fund perspective. The venture firm fpv's raised five hundred twenty

0:31:05.800 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 3>five million dollars to fund target product driven startups. Fpv's

0:31:09.880 --> 0:31:12.720
<v Speaker 3>co founders have back companies such as Canva and Flexport

0:31:12.920 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 3>and Peace to Welcome to the show, Pega Abraham and

0:31:15.760 --> 0:31:18.360
<v Speaker 3>Wesley Chan join us. Now, congratulations on the funding round.

0:31:18.360 --> 0:31:20.840
<v Speaker 2>Now we're excited, So tell.

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:23.400
<v Speaker 3>Me Pega first and foremost, how hard how easy was

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 3>it to get the LP's excited in.

0:31:25.000 --> 0:31:26.040
<v Speaker 2>This current environment.

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:29.640
<v Speaker 11>I mean, you know you have we last time around

0:31:29.680 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 11>we raised I think when we announced it was the

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:33.880
<v Speaker 11>seventy five basis points that the FED just raised.

0:31:34.120 --> 0:31:35.240
<v Speaker 2>So we're used to this.

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 11>And our investors are back really long term founders and

0:31:40.200 --> 0:31:44.240
<v Speaker 11>that's what we're focused on. So it wasn't the environment stuff,

0:31:44.240 --> 0:31:46.080
<v Speaker 11>and we're privileged to have raised. But you know, we

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:48.880
<v Speaker 11>had just exceptional bluetrip founders who are really investing for

0:31:48.920 --> 0:31:50.720
<v Speaker 11>the long term, so they're not as distracted by the

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:51.520
<v Speaker 11>short term stuff.

0:31:51.560 --> 0:31:55.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Wesley, we think about how much Canva, for example,

0:31:55.720 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 3>has managed to be an iconic company you found not

0:31:58.560 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 3>on the West coast of America on any US A tool,

0:32:00.920 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 3>but over in Australia.

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:04.360
<v Speaker 2>How do you find teams like that? How do you

0:32:04.400 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 2>replicate the success?

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 14>Yes, so our founders are amazing product driven founders, right,

0:32:09.600 --> 0:32:11.920
<v Speaker 14>so they see other amazing product driven founders.

0:32:11.920 --> 0:32:12.560
<v Speaker 2>That's the secret.

0:32:12.600 --> 0:32:15.160
<v Speaker 14>Like I spent over fifteen years at Google, of which

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:16.840
<v Speaker 14>ten of them I help build the ad system, launch

0:32:16.840 --> 0:32:19.880
<v Speaker 14>Google Analytics, I helped launch Google Voice, I help bring

0:32:19.920 --> 0:32:22.120
<v Speaker 14>Android and help them grow. Like It's one of those

0:32:22.120 --> 0:32:24.160
<v Speaker 14>things that when you've worked on these products that are hundreds,

0:32:24.200 --> 0:32:26.160
<v Speaker 14>if not billions of people use worldwide, you have a

0:32:26.200 --> 0:32:29.960
<v Speaker 14>reputation for building great products that founders gravitate towards. And

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:32.080
<v Speaker 14>so I got the opportunity to meet the Canva founders

0:32:32.080 --> 0:32:34.920
<v Speaker 14>more than a decade ago. They were very excited about

0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:36.360
<v Speaker 14>some of the product work that I did. I help

0:32:36.400 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 14>them build and prioritize some of their features, and they said,

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:41.360
<v Speaker 14>let's work together. And that's what I love doing, is

0:32:41.360 --> 0:32:43.520
<v Speaker 14>spending time with founders that want to build products that

0:32:43.600 --> 0:32:46.080
<v Speaker 14>change the world, that do better whether there's a recession

0:32:46.320 --> 0:32:48.560
<v Speaker 14>or not a recession, and that just stand the test

0:32:48.640 --> 0:32:50.760
<v Speaker 14>of time. And so that's what we do here at.

0:32:50.800 --> 0:32:53.840
<v Speaker 3>FPV, and it's about kind of being the operators alongside them.

0:32:53.920 --> 0:32:56.640
<v Speaker 3>People come to your experience from Google, your experience from Cisco,

0:32:56.840 --> 0:32:59.720
<v Speaker 3>experience from August Stanley and the technology area there pego,

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:02.320
<v Speaker 3>and I'm I'm interested as to what advice you're giving

0:33:02.440 --> 0:33:04.800
<v Speaker 3>to found us right now when none of us really

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:06.480
<v Speaker 3>having any idea with a clarityism.

0:33:06.640 --> 0:33:08.880
<v Speaker 11>No. Look, so one thing is clear, and everyone's like,

0:33:08.920 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 11>what's happening to the market, and one thing it's clear

0:33:10.920 --> 0:33:13.239
<v Speaker 11>it's gonna be whiplash. I mean, we're gonna have a

0:33:13.240 --> 0:33:15.719
<v Speaker 11>few years up, up and down. But we both started

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:18.800
<v Speaker 11>out during the tech bubble burst, and I was CIO

0:33:18.840 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 11>at Morgan Stanley during the financial crisis. There's gonna you

0:33:21.840 --> 0:33:23.560
<v Speaker 11>can't go up to the right all the time. And

0:33:23.600 --> 0:33:26.040
<v Speaker 11>if you're really building for the wrong term, you shouldn't

0:33:26.040 --> 0:33:28.280
<v Speaker 11>get you have to go with the waves, but you

0:33:28.320 --> 0:33:30.600
<v Speaker 11>can't really be building for the next year or the

0:33:30.640 --> 0:33:32.960
<v Speaker 11>next two years. And for the founders that are really

0:33:33.000 --> 0:33:36.400
<v Speaker 11>looking for those ten year plus horizons, it's actually a

0:33:36.440 --> 0:33:39.880
<v Speaker 11>great time because you have to focus. You can't get

0:33:39.920 --> 0:33:43.240
<v Speaker 11>as much distraction, you don't have as much competition.

0:33:42.760 --> 0:33:43.960
<v Speaker 2>Because not everyone can raise.

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:46.240
<v Speaker 11>So if you're a mission driven founder who's really focused

0:33:46.280 --> 0:33:48.960
<v Speaker 11>on really changing the future, this is actually a great

0:33:49.000 --> 0:33:51.640
<v Speaker 11>time to just say laser focus on those big missions.

0:33:51.640 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 11>And if you're not a mission driven founder, look, it's

0:33:53.680 --> 0:33:55.680
<v Speaker 11>gonna be hard. If you're depending on the hype and

0:33:55.720 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 11>the short term stuff. It might not the hype might

0:33:58.880 --> 0:34:01.760
<v Speaker 11>not last on certain things. And so that's what we say,

0:34:01.800 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 11>stay focus. If you have a really big vision and

0:34:04.440 --> 0:34:05.520
<v Speaker 11>you know, work with the times.

0:34:05.600 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you have been the anti hype apostles in

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:10.160
<v Speaker 3>many ways just saying cut through that noise.

0:34:10.200 --> 0:34:12.759
<v Speaker 2>But Wesley, a lot of LPs.

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:14.279
<v Speaker 3>At this moment thought there'd be a little bit of

0:34:14.320 --> 0:34:16.440
<v Speaker 3>hyper our exits around IPOs, but.

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:18.200
<v Speaker 2>That's not happening now.

0:34:18.360 --> 0:34:22.760
<v Speaker 3>How are you helping your current your previous fund bets

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:25.200
<v Speaker 3>be able to give liquidity to that talent.

0:34:25.360 --> 0:34:27.759
<v Speaker 2>How are you helping them sort of march through this?

0:34:27.920 --> 0:34:28.080
<v Speaker 4>Well.

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:30.120
<v Speaker 14>One of the wonderful things about the LPs we found

0:34:30.280 --> 0:34:32.120
<v Speaker 14>is that they're long term thinkers. Right like we have

0:34:32.160 --> 0:34:35.040
<v Speaker 14>blue chip lpiece, most of them are charitable endowments and

0:34:35.080 --> 0:34:38.000
<v Speaker 14>foundations that think, you know, decades, if not like fifty

0:34:38.040 --> 0:34:40.480
<v Speaker 14>years out into the future, and they know in investing us,

0:34:40.600 --> 0:34:42.400
<v Speaker 14>we're not placing the bet for today. We're doing it

0:34:42.440 --> 0:34:44.399
<v Speaker 14>for ten years in the future. That's the liquidity time

0:34:44.440 --> 0:34:47.440
<v Speaker 14>horizon for venture capital. So we're not worried about like

0:34:47.440 --> 0:34:49.920
<v Speaker 14>if things exit tomorrow, ORF things exit next year, obviously

0:34:49.960 --> 0:34:52.120
<v Speaker 14>our LPs would like it, but we worry about if

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:54.120
<v Speaker 14>things are going to be big in ten years. Right,

0:34:54.600 --> 0:34:56.640
<v Speaker 14>they have the option to exit, but if they hold on,

0:34:56.680 --> 0:34:58.319
<v Speaker 14>the add more value and our LPs are okay with

0:34:58.320 --> 0:35:00.160
<v Speaker 14>it because there's such long term thinkers, and we have

0:35:00.239 --> 0:35:01.160
<v Speaker 14>deep pools of capital.

0:35:01.440 --> 0:35:02.400
<v Speaker 10>We want to return.

0:35:02.120 --> 0:35:03.359
<v Speaker 14>Money to them, but we want to do it at

0:35:03.360 --> 0:35:04.680
<v Speaker 14>the right time, and we want to do it when

0:35:04.719 --> 0:35:07.719
<v Speaker 14>things are great. And so the help the companies that

0:35:07.719 --> 0:35:10.480
<v Speaker 14>survived the recessions, the companies that survived the market turmoil,

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:13.040
<v Speaker 14>whether it's tariffs or whether it's crazy world war or

0:35:13.080 --> 0:35:17.000
<v Speaker 14>whatever else, Like they are left and they are the winners,

0:35:17.040 --> 0:35:19.440
<v Speaker 14>and then they have these wonderful exits. Google in two

0:35:19.480 --> 0:35:21.239
<v Speaker 14>thousand and four was dot com crash, right, and then

0:35:21.239 --> 0:35:23.959
<v Speaker 14>like they exited and they became a big market winner.

0:35:24.840 --> 0:35:26.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I worked on the IPO.

0:35:26.040 --> 0:35:28.040
<v Speaker 11>It was like it reopened the market and everyone was

0:35:28.239 --> 0:35:30.440
<v Speaker 11>freaking out that it was never going to come back.

0:35:30.280 --> 0:35:31.120
<v Speaker 2>And they reopened it.

0:35:31.160 --> 0:35:33.200
<v Speaker 11>And then you got you know, several years later after

0:35:33.239 --> 0:35:36.239
<v Speaker 11>the financial crisis worked, they all the salesforce, all these guys.

0:35:36.280 --> 0:35:39.160
<v Speaker 11>So there was great companies built during these times. And

0:35:39.239 --> 0:35:41.640
<v Speaker 11>I think it takes longer to exit, But that's one

0:35:41.640 --> 0:35:43.680
<v Speaker 11>of the benefits we have. Like is it ten years,

0:35:43.719 --> 0:35:47.680
<v Speaker 11>is it twelve years? It doesn't matter for compounding companies. Obviously,

0:35:47.680 --> 0:35:48.840
<v Speaker 11>it's harder for zero growth.

0:35:49.040 --> 0:35:51.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean, everyone thought, cool, you would reopen the market,

0:35:51.360 --> 0:35:54.840
<v Speaker 3>and that was a very udio idiosyncratic kind of a bet.

0:35:55.080 --> 0:35:57.680
<v Speaker 3>But then ultimately the market's moved away from them. What

0:35:57.760 --> 0:36:01.400
<v Speaker 3>reopens us next time? What are we currently seeing value

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:03.399
<v Speaker 3>a crew too? That's the right thing to have, value

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:05.480
<v Speaker 3>a crew too, peck of Look.

0:36:05.239 --> 0:36:08.680
<v Speaker 11>I think when the market's open, I mean, I don't

0:36:08.680 --> 0:36:10.319
<v Speaker 11>know if I can predict the future, but I can

0:36:10.360 --> 0:36:13.759
<v Speaker 11>tell you market's like a bit of stability, So it

0:36:13.840 --> 0:36:15.719
<v Speaker 11>might not be for a bit if we're not having

0:36:16.200 --> 0:36:18.239
<v Speaker 11>if we're not kind of knowing what's happening. I think

0:36:18.280 --> 0:36:20.680
<v Speaker 11>now we have the tear of shock that will smooth out.

0:36:20.800 --> 0:36:22.680
<v Speaker 11>Then people that have been ready for a while will

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:25.759
<v Speaker 11>start saying, okay, we're coming back back in maybe, but

0:36:25.800 --> 0:36:28.400
<v Speaker 11>I think nobody wants to go when the tides are like,

0:36:28.680 --> 0:36:30.480
<v Speaker 11>you know, going up and down at the same time.

0:36:30.480 --> 0:36:33.200
<v Speaker 11>But I think people will have to eventually it becomes normal.

0:36:33.239 --> 0:36:36.160
<v Speaker 11>Maybe this this whiplash is actually normalized, and then people

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:36.680
<v Speaker 11>don't care.

0:36:37.080 --> 0:36:39.439
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Wesley Lin, you're looking for ten yas time

0:36:40.120 --> 0:36:43.760
<v Speaker 3>you're looking at perhaps private market valuations be impacted slightly

0:36:43.800 --> 0:36:45.759
<v Speaker 3>by public markets, But what.

0:36:45.760 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Is the tenure bet? What is currently interesting?

0:36:48.680 --> 0:36:51.319
<v Speaker 3>Now there's going to be incredibly interesting in Tenya's time

0:36:51.320 --> 0:36:52.279
<v Speaker 3>that people aren't thinking about.

0:36:52.480 --> 0:36:54.399
<v Speaker 14>So we have a lot of healthcare AI bets, right,

0:36:54.640 --> 0:36:56.320
<v Speaker 14>and that sounds sort of crazy because a lot of

0:36:56.320 --> 0:36:58.279
<v Speaker 14>people are running away from healthcare in the last couple

0:36:58.320 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 14>of years. But we have companies that are really using

0:37:00.520 --> 0:37:03.040
<v Speaker 14>AI or using machine learning to figure out the next

0:37:03.040 --> 0:37:05.239
<v Speaker 14>generation of drugs. And then we have a company that

0:37:05.320 --> 0:37:07.279
<v Speaker 14>has figured out how to do clinical trials and half

0:37:07.280 --> 0:37:09.839
<v Speaker 14>the time and half the price using AI to find

0:37:09.880 --> 0:37:12.120
<v Speaker 14>better patients. And then they are taking drugs out the

0:37:12.120 --> 0:37:13.880
<v Speaker 14>market themselves because they have this cost of manage.

0:37:14.000 --> 0:37:15.360
<v Speaker 9>These are massive tenure bets.

0:37:15.480 --> 0:37:17.759
<v Speaker 14>The founders are amazing and mission driven, and they're able

0:37:17.800 --> 0:37:20.360
<v Speaker 14>to raise capital and hopefully they'll be around when everybody

0:37:20.360 --> 0:37:21.880
<v Speaker 14>else is getting washed away by the hurricane.

0:37:22.120 --> 0:37:23.040
<v Speaker 2>I think the healthcare bit.

0:37:23.120 --> 0:37:24.919
<v Speaker 11>And I would say also, you know, at the first

0:37:24.960 --> 0:37:27.920
<v Speaker 11>craze of AI, everyone gets excited about it feels like

0:37:28.200 --> 0:37:31.000
<v Speaker 11>not incremental tech, and I think they're really exciting stuff.

0:37:31.280 --> 0:37:33.520
<v Speaker 11>There's no it's kind of like the cloud times. If

0:37:33.560 --> 0:37:36.239
<v Speaker 11>you're building a company and you're not building on aws

0:37:36.360 --> 0:37:38.759
<v Speaker 11>like they're, you're like crazy, So of course you should

0:37:38.800 --> 0:37:41.279
<v Speaker 11>be using AI. But I think it's are you Are

0:37:41.320 --> 0:37:44.320
<v Speaker 11>you working on the big problems and are you working

0:37:44.360 --> 0:37:46.920
<v Speaker 11>on not the incremental things, but they're really big things

0:37:46.960 --> 0:37:49.160
<v Speaker 11>that just weren't possible. And that's the things that happen

0:37:49.239 --> 0:37:51.600
<v Speaker 11>with health, in biotech.

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:51.839
<v Speaker 2>And some of those things.

0:37:51.840 --> 0:37:53.920
<v Speaker 11>It's just things that just weren't possible because now you

0:37:53.960 --> 0:37:54.440
<v Speaker 11>can do it.

0:37:54.680 --> 0:37:56.600
<v Speaker 3>Pega, we go thirty seconds. Are they got to be

0:37:56.600 --> 0:37:58.360
<v Speaker 3>built in the West Coast? Are they going to be

0:37:58.360 --> 0:38:00.400
<v Speaker 3>built globally? Where are you going to find this us?

0:38:00.640 --> 0:38:03.120
<v Speaker 11>I mean we're going to go everywhere wherever great founders

0:38:03.160 --> 0:38:05.799
<v Speaker 11>are and hopefully they come looking for us too. But

0:38:06.200 --> 0:38:08.759
<v Speaker 11>I think there's no denying that the West Coast has

0:38:08.800 --> 0:38:11.640
<v Speaker 11>a lot of the current talent and the uh you

0:38:11.640 --> 0:38:14.920
<v Speaker 11>know in Ai. But I think we're going to go everywhere.

0:38:15.480 --> 0:38:18.080
<v Speaker 3>I get Ebrahimi, we're pleased that you came here along

0:38:18.080 --> 0:38:20.520
<v Speaker 3>with Wesley Shan. Great to have the co founders and

0:38:20.560 --> 0:38:22.960
<v Speaker 3>managing partners of FPV in the studio today.

0:38:23.000 --> 0:38:23.879
<v Speaker 2>We appreciate it.

0:38:24.440 --> 0:38:28.879
<v Speaker 3>Delivery shares over in the UK absolutely surging today, most

0:38:28.960 --> 0:38:32.319
<v Speaker 3>on record of eighteen percent, and this is after the

0:38:32.360 --> 0:38:35.399
<v Speaker 3>British delivery firm disclosed an acquisition offer from door Dash

0:38:35.480 --> 0:38:38.160
<v Speaker 3>which would value Delivery at three point six billion dollars

0:38:38.480 --> 0:38:40.319
<v Speaker 3>the megs Henry Wren has more. As we can see,

0:38:40.360 --> 0:38:44.440
<v Speaker 3>Delivery has currently been a phenomenal days trade up sixteen

0:38:44.480 --> 0:38:47.399
<v Speaker 3>percent is where it closed the market, but it's well

0:38:47.440 --> 0:38:48.800
<v Speaker 3>off the highs of where it used to trade. I

0:38:48.840 --> 0:38:51.360
<v Speaker 3>think it had a seven billion market cap at one point, Henry,

0:38:51.840 --> 0:38:54.360
<v Speaker 3>Why would we see DoorDash want to be buying in.

0:38:55.440 --> 0:38:59.719
<v Speaker 15>Yes, So we really think that the deal, the offer

0:38:59.719 --> 0:39:02.800
<v Speaker 15>from Ordash is something that's long time in the making,

0:39:02.880 --> 0:39:06.799
<v Speaker 15>because according to press reports as early as twenty twenty two,

0:39:07.239 --> 0:39:10.680
<v Speaker 15>there have been already been interest from DoorDash to merge

0:39:10.680 --> 0:39:15.320
<v Speaker 15>with Delivery. Also, DoorDash have this international expansion ambition already

0:39:15.360 --> 0:39:17.840
<v Speaker 15>because in twenty twenty two it made a deal to

0:39:17.920 --> 0:39:22.080
<v Speaker 15>buy a finish food delivery company called Quote at that time,

0:39:22.200 --> 0:39:26.480
<v Speaker 15>so it has demonstrated its ambition to expand overseas. Also,

0:39:26.520 --> 0:39:29.640
<v Speaker 15>in twenty twenty four there was a change on deliver

0:39:29.719 --> 0:39:32.920
<v Speaker 15>Roue side because there was an expiry of a dual

0:39:33.000 --> 0:39:35.480
<v Speaker 15>class sheer structure at that time, so which means that

0:39:36.239 --> 0:39:39.920
<v Speaker 15>CEO and founder Will Shoe no longer held the dominant

0:39:40.280 --> 0:39:44.360
<v Speaker 15>voting power, which paved the way for consolidations or further

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:47.759
<v Speaker 15>mergers down the road. So we think that actually it's

0:39:47.800 --> 0:39:51.120
<v Speaker 15>not very surprising and it's something a long time in

0:39:51.120 --> 0:39:53.040
<v Speaker 15>the making, long time in the making.

0:39:53.160 --> 0:39:56.120
<v Speaker 3>Shares have bounced today, but not up to the highs

0:39:56.160 --> 0:39:58.520
<v Speaker 3>of the full extent of the offer. Henry, and I'm

0:39:58.520 --> 0:40:01.600
<v Speaker 3>interested as to whether there's any concern around the consolidation.

0:40:01.640 --> 0:40:04.360
<v Speaker 3>We're seeing any industry writ large right now because Process

0:40:04.360 --> 0:40:07.800
<v Speaker 3>Group has been making bids for other Delivery Hero for example.

0:40:09.200 --> 0:40:09.439
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:40:09.440 --> 0:40:10.040
<v Speaker 2>Indeed, so.

0:40:11.480 --> 0:40:14.759
<v Speaker 15>For European food delivery stocks, whether we're talking about just

0:40:14.800 --> 0:40:18.160
<v Speaker 15>Eat or deliver Ru or Delivery Hero, it's very clear

0:40:18.200 --> 0:40:20.600
<v Speaker 15>on their share price chot that there have been well

0:40:20.640 --> 0:40:24.319
<v Speaker 15>off their heights about three years ago. The reason is

0:40:24.320 --> 0:40:29.920
<v Speaker 15>pretty clear because those companies they even pumped huge investor

0:40:30.000 --> 0:40:33.200
<v Speaker 15>led cash at that time during the pandemic days.

0:40:32.960 --> 0:40:34.480
<v Speaker 2>And order its numbers were high.

0:40:34.760 --> 0:40:37.960
<v Speaker 15>But now as we come out of the pandemic, people

0:40:38.000 --> 0:40:41.800
<v Speaker 15>dine more into restaurants, so that peak is no longer

0:40:41.840 --> 0:40:45.520
<v Speaker 15>there and those companies have to pivot to profitability, and

0:40:45.560 --> 0:40:48.080
<v Speaker 15>that's why we're seeing low and lower growth. For example,

0:40:48.080 --> 0:40:51.239
<v Speaker 15>for deliver Ru, it's only reporting about seven percent.

0:40:51.080 --> 0:40:53.680
<v Speaker 4>Order growth this quarter and.

0:40:53.880 --> 0:40:57.239
<v Speaker 15>That's the exact reason why we're seeing more consolidations here.

0:40:57.320 --> 0:41:00.600
<v Speaker 15>You mentioned about the process offware for just Eat and

0:41:00.840 --> 0:41:03.879
<v Speaker 15>this deal that we're looking at as well. Because these

0:41:04.200 --> 0:41:08.240
<v Speaker 15>companies they need more competition, they need more deals to ease.

0:41:08.040 --> 0:41:09.960
<v Speaker 2>Up the competition. I have to leave it there. We

0:41:10.040 --> 0:41:11.839
<v Speaker 2>thank you, Henry Rn. That does it for this addition

0:41:11.880 --> 0:41:12.840
<v Speaker 2>of blue Meg technology,