WEBVTT - Wicked Problems

0:00:03.080 --> 0:00:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to stuff to blow your mind from housetop works

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:23.160
<v Speaker 1>dot com. The next order of business, if it pleases

0:00:23.200 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 1>your Highness, is the issue of continued vandalism of the

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 1>castle's east wall more graffiti. Well, what does it say

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 1>this time? The details are not important, your majesty, but

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:38.839
<v Speaker 1>suffice to say that that the work criticized certain royal

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>policies as well as the the Royal beard, the royal

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:45.239
<v Speaker 1>the royal beard. Well, I never well, what are we

0:00:45.240 --> 0:00:47.640
<v Speaker 1>doing to combat the problem. We solve the west wall

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:51.239
<v Speaker 1>graffiti issue, yes, my lord, but but we're working to

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 1>implement a constant God presence anti vandalism spikes and erratic

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 1>paint scheme is aline. Well it worked here before, it'll

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 1>work this. I'm well, yes, my Lloyd, but these solutions

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 1>merely prevent the physical vandalism of a particular stretch of

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 1>the wall at any given time. This is but a

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>tame or a benign problem, you know, Uh, the overall

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:17.039
<v Speaker 1>issue of vandalism with the Kingdom. It's a it's a

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>wicked problem, a problem sorcery. Fetch the witch. I'm to general, No, no, no, no,

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:26.559
<v Speaker 1>my Lloyd. Not so escery, not pervasiveness, complexity. We're talking

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:30.759
<v Speaker 1>about a public policy issue here, one with roots and economics, law, religion,

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:33.320
<v Speaker 1>and other areas. We can't simply pull up the weed,

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 1>because the roots are tangled throughout the soil, and indeed,

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 1>treating one underlying cause is likely to disrupt other areas

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:44.559
<v Speaker 1>of royal interest, alienate supporters, or force us to face

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 1>unflattering facts about ourselves. The royal beard is above reproach. Certainly,

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 1>my lord, Certainly, a finer beard has never been grown

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 1>in God's creation, no question there. But what is in

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 1>question is the very nature of the problem. Is it

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>the mere physical act of vandalism? Is it the perception

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:08.519
<v Speaker 1>of the crown, poverty, a lack of religion or education.

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 1>This is a wicked problem. Yes, my would the wickedest.

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 1>By the pricking of my thumbs, something wicked this way comes. Hey,

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>welcome to stuff to blow your mind. My name is

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Robert Lamp and my name is Christian Seger. And as

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 1>you can guess from our little audio play at the

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>beginning there, we are talking today about wicked problems. Yeah,

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 1>this is a fascinating sort of overview topic. Um that,

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:46.800
<v Speaker 1>and I wasn't really familiar with this terminology Yeah, I

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:49.239
<v Speaker 1>wasn't either. I actually stumbled across this a couple of

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:53.360
<v Speaker 1>days ago. In particular, I was one of the resources

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:56.680
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to talk about today about mains sort

0:02:56.680 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>of political science approach to wicked problems popped up on

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 1>my radar and I read that and I thought, Wow,

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 1>this is a really interesting way for us to sort

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 1>of approach science for the show. And it's it's a

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>way that we don't usually talk about science, right, like

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 1>science podcasts usually have, like such a reverence for the

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>institution of science. Science is the great problem solved, or

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:19.640
<v Speaker 1>it's the thing upon which we have built everything we

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 1>hold dear, It is the it is humanity's backbone in

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>a way. In a lot of ways, science is treated

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 1>in the same way as religion is by some people, right,

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Like I know plenty of people who aren't religious, but

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>they turned to science as having the answers and and

0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 1>and it's definitive for them, right. Uh. And this is

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 1>a really interesting way to approach that because it gets

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>into the deeper complexities of using science as a way

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>to solve the world's problems. Yeah, And it gets into yeah,

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 1>it basically deals with our inability or certainly are difficulties

0:03:54.200 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 1>with tackling complex problems, complex issues, um, throughout our our culture. Yeah, exactly.

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna try to approach you know, we're gonna

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 1>tell you what a wicked problem is, first of all.

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 1>But the way that we're going to try to approach

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>it here is sort of on this scale. There are

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>macro wicked problems which we're gonna talk about, which are

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:18.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of like our large scale societal ills, I guess.

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:20.839
<v Speaker 1>And then we're gonna talk about it in a relation

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to science and the science community. And then we're gonna

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 1>bring it down to the human level and talk about it, uh,

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:29.840
<v Speaker 1>you know in the way that it's most applied in theory,

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:34.040
<v Speaker 1>which is in the workplace. Uh. And it's the model

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>of wicked problems is used, uh basically as like a

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 1>management technique. And you should probably should probably also take

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 1>a moment to discuss its ties to Boston area dialect. Yeah,

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:47.600
<v Speaker 1>so okay, this is worth mentioning. And we played around

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of the audio play I'm from New

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>England originally. Uh, And you know, most people probably don't

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 1>notice that because I tried not to affect my accent

0:04:56.160 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 1>on the air, but Whenever the word wicked is the

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:03.159
<v Speaker 1>into something, it might seep out a little bit here there,

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:06.480
<v Speaker 1>so you might hear me losing some rs here there,

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 1>or changing the way I pronounced things. As we're going through,

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:12.039
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna try to try to hold it together. Well.

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 1>I I admit that when I was reading the material,

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I would about this, and reading some of the papers,

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:21.359
<v Speaker 1>I would come to the phrase wicked problems, and I

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:24.159
<v Speaker 1>would often hear hear it spoken in my head in

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the voice of Julianne Moore's character and thirty Rock, which

0:05:26.920 --> 0:05:30.919
<v Speaker 1>he played the Boston She did a great job with that. Yeah,

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:34.720
<v Speaker 1>it's it's either Julianne Moore or like uh, Mark Wahlberg

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>in The Departed, like doing his his best Dorchester accent. Okay, so,

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:44.359
<v Speaker 1>wicked problem? What is it? You're probably wondering what the

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:46.720
<v Speaker 1>heck are we talking about? We sort of introduced you

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 1>to the basic idea throughout that little uh the play

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>that we enacted. But here's the breakdown. A wicked problem

0:05:53.760 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 1>is a social or cultural problem that's difficult to solve

0:05:57.360 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 1>because of incomplete or contra dictory knowledge uh and usually

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the number of people that are involved in the interconnected

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 1>nature of this problem is part of other problems, right,

0:06:08.800 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 1>so they're all connected. Uh, and often it's just written

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 1>off as too cumbersome to be something to bother with.

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>So this is gonna seem familiar to all of you

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 1>as especially uh citizens in the United States as we

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>are in the middle of a crazy the presidential cycle. Uh,

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 1>and all of these things are coming up and are

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>frequently being talked about with you know, in my opinion,

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 1>very little concrete answers because they're wicked problems, right yeah.

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's basically a standard aspect of politics. Nobody's

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 1>getting up there and stumping and campaigning and saying, uh

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:43.920
<v Speaker 1>on the on the topic of poverty. This is a

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>complex issue and we probably will not be able to

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 1>solve it. We're gonna throw our best minds at it.

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:51.279
<v Speaker 1>But every time we try and fix it, we're probably

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>going to change the problem. Nobody's saying that. People are

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 1>saying I have a plan I have or I'm gonna

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>throw some really uh you know, classy people at it

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 1>to fix it. Uh. Nobody nobody is is campaigning um

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 1>on a platform of wicked problem. But I think like

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the more mature approach and probably for some candidates maybe

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 1>once they're in office. The approach is, hey, look like

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 1>these are problems that are so big we will never

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 1>solve them, right, but we we can if we can

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of understand them on a larger level like that

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 1>and use that framework, then we can approach them in

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>a different way that's healthier and maybe can make them better.

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Maybe not solve them, but make them better. So we're

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>talking about poverty, sustainability, equality, health wellness, racism, are failing

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>education systems, terrorism, you name it. All that stuff falls

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>under sort of the rubric of wicked problems or multi

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>headed snake monsters in the swamp. Go back to our

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 1>hydro episode, because even the hydra, of course, the idea

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:53.320
<v Speaker 1>of being that you every time you chop up ahead

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>two or more grown its place. Even Hercules, son of

0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 1>a god, took on this task, and the best he

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 1>could do was limited to one undying head and just

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of hide head under a rock, which is perhaps

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 1>a telling metaphor for like, even the best attempts to

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>tackle a wicked problem, all you can really do is

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 1>like clear cut and barry and and hope that people

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 1>forget that this was a problem. I guess I think

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the hydro metaphor is gonna work well throughout this is

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm not quite sure what order we're gonna

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 1>release season, but yeah, so, Uh we also talked to

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 1>this week about hydros on a different episode, and hydras

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>are a great example for it, because you you can't

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 1>solve the hydro problem, right, you could at least the

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 1>mythic one. Yeah, you cut off one head, two more

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 1>heads grow to replace it, right, and so you But

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 1>I think maybe like the angle of wicked problems is

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 1>knowing what the two heads are that are going to

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:49.440
<v Speaker 1>grow to replace it. Yeah, we're trying, yea, trying to

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 1>figure it out, or certainly just being being conscious of

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the fact that complex problems are complex, that that the

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>that many of the issues that are are not going

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 1>to be easily tackled, and you're not gonna be able

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 1>to solve them with a quick application of this policy

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:12.960
<v Speaker 1>or that policy. Uh, it's all you, That's why they

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:16.479
<v Speaker 1>are wicked. And not to mention, you know, the theoretical

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 1>applications within the workplace. You know, I'm assuming most of

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:23.080
<v Speaker 1>you out there listening have jobs or have had a job,

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:26.440
<v Speaker 1>and know the frustrations that go along with that, and

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 1>really you can use the wicked problem model at that

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:32.959
<v Speaker 1>level too, and I find uh that it gives like

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:34.840
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a sense of freedom and relief

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 1>when you think about it that way, the frustration of

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 1>employment issues. Yeah, and I think it's also important to

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:43.719
<v Speaker 1>remember that the wicked problem is in contrast to a

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 1>tame or benign problem. The tamer benign problem is often

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:51.080
<v Speaker 1>just a simple, uh, mathematical problem, you know, like, what's

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 1>what's two plus two? Well, there's an answer to that,

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's four. Um an engineering problem. What's the how

0:09:56.520 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 1>do we build this thing so that it doesn't collapse?

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 1>There's an answer, it can achieved. You have a you

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 1>know what the mission is when you go into try

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 1>and solve it, and then you solve it. Um. We

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:11.079
<v Speaker 1>love questions like that, and it's easy to look to

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 1>wicked problems and and try to solve them like that,

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 1>to want them to be solved like that. I've I've

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 1>read you know, that's one of the reasons that the

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 1>zombie um motif is so popular the zombie apocalypse, because

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:29.040
<v Speaker 1>in the zombie apocalypse, all problems become tame or benign.

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Zombie comes what do you do you shoot it in

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the head, you can cut its head off, you kill it. Right,

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 1>those are relatively easy to solve problems, and it makes

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the relevance of the wicked problems go away, right Yeah,

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, your better zombie h fiction has wicked

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>problems in it as well. I feel like you look

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:51.199
<v Speaker 1>at like Walking Dad, they're attempting to to to graft

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:54.439
<v Speaker 1>in wicked problems into the narrative. But at heart, the

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 1>very sort of video game or Donna the Dead level,

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:00.680
<v Speaker 1>it's all about tame benign problems. I was talking to

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 1>a friend about this yesterday as I was researching it

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>and saying, like, this is pretty fascinating stuff. You ever

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 1>heard of this? And he hadn't, But he said, uh,

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 1>well you know, and he may be like kind of

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:10.960
<v Speaker 1>a broaden the scale of it, but he didn't look

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 1>at the research. He said, Well, life's a wicked problem,

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:14.959
<v Speaker 1>isn't it. Like when you come down to it, the

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 1>human body is a wicked problem because no matter what

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 1>we do uh to the human body, no matter how

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:23.199
<v Speaker 1>well we exercise, no matter what we eat that's healthy,

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>something's always gonna pop up that we can't control. Right, Yeah,

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean that the self the mind is a wicked

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 1>problems problem. I think back to you know, the old

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>sound of music track. How do you solve a problem

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:41.080
<v Speaker 1>like Maria? It's kind of a goofy reference point, but

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:43.679
<v Speaker 1>how do you how do you solve a problem like Maria?

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 1>How do you solve a problem like like the individual,

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 1>like the self? Like that is a a complex situation,

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 1>is not just you know, an A plus B equals

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:55.960
<v Speaker 1>see equation going on there. We spend our whole lives

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to solve this unsolvable problem. Yeah, and so the

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:02.560
<v Speaker 1>interesting thing out the wicked problem, I guess paradigm are

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 1>as a as a Slavo says, peredigma is is that

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's the key to it is that is

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:13.440
<v Speaker 1>learning to approach it that way and to say, okay,

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:16.720
<v Speaker 1>well that's an that's unsolvable, right, That's not a thing

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:19.560
<v Speaker 1>that can be fixed by its very nature. But there's

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 1>ways to mitigate it, there's ways to approach it differently,

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:26.960
<v Speaker 1>and having that very position put you in a better position,

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I guess to approach it. Right. So one major proposal

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 1>that keeps coming up, and in fact, uh, if you

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 1>google wicked problems, one of the first things that comes

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>up is a website for a book called Wicked Problems

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 1>that's by a design educational facility in Austin, Texas, and

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the whole books available for free. Actually you can read

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 1>it online on the web where you can buy it

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:50.439
<v Speaker 1>and print. But they basically say, look like, the way

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 1>to approach this is through strategic design, and it's a

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:58.719
<v Speaker 1>combination of using empathy, abductive reasoning, and rapid prototyping. Those

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>are the ways that they sort of think about. You know,

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:04.600
<v Speaker 1>let's let's approach these first of all acknowledge that they're

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 1>a wicked problem, but then you approach it afterwards. And so,

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, just as a reminder, because I had to

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 1>remind myself. Abductive reasoning is that it is the opposite

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 1>of deductive logic. Right, where there's a premise that leads

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 1>to a conclusion with a solution, right, there's two premises

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 1>lead to a conclusion in staid, Abductive is that the

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 1>premise doesn't guarantee any solution, and in fact you have

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:29.440
<v Speaker 1>to work from inference and it's the most simple solution

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 1>that's inferred that usually leads to some kind of uh,

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:35.560
<v Speaker 1>not a solution in this case, betterment, I guess that

0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense in terms of what we're talking about here,

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 1>because one of the big problems is just even defining

0:13:40.520 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 1>what the problem is. You know, you look at something

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 1>like like poverty. Someone says, hey, we have a problem.

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 1>There's poverty, and you say, well, what is the problem?

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Is it that people are poor because of the job situation?

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:56.199
<v Speaker 1>Is is it more cultural? Uh? Is it? Does it

0:13:56.280 --> 0:13:57.599
<v Speaker 1>have to do with our laws? Does it have to

0:13:57.600 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>do with enforcement of said laws? You know that there's

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:02.920
<v Speaker 1>some of one of those things like try to solve

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the laws, and maybe it makes another thing worse, right, Like, um,

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:08.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to think of an example, but I keep

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 1>coming back to like the interconnectedness of hunger and poverty.

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 1>And then like I saw a really good in one

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:16.960
<v Speaker 1>of the articles about wicked problems. It was a really

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 1>good example of why poverty is such a wicked problem.

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Like we think of it like, oh, we'll solve that.

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 1>We've got this problem of poverty connected to people being hungry,

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, we've got a problem of

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 1>obesity in our society as well, And how are those

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 1>things connected? You know, Yeah, I've been thinking about this

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 1>food thing a lot recently, because I'm currently watching Michael

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Pollan's latest documentary series on Is on Netflix, and it

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 1>has to do with cooking and where cooking comes from

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and then how the industrialization of food preparation preparation has

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 1>changed everything. Um. So you you you see this situation

0:14:51.000 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 1>where like one side is trying to make things easier,

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to correct problems, but that ends up creating other

0:14:56.520 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 1>problems as well. Yeah. See, so it's it's actually really

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 1>interesting how easily this can be applied. I go back

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 1>to when I was in grad school. I had a

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 1>professor who basically referred to stuff like this as like

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the model fits type analysis. Right. So you've got this

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:13.120
<v Speaker 1>model and you put it on top of something you're

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>like does it fit? Okay, but then you've got to

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 1>go beyond that and sort of synthesize them, you know what,

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 1>what you've learned from it, and analyze and go further. Um,

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 1>but let's start at the beginning. So where did this

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 1>idea come from? Like or the origin of wicked problems? Right? Like?

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 1>It just didn't it? Well, we've certainly had them forever.

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 1>But but in terms of thinking about that exactly. Yeah, Well,

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the origination of the term is generally attributed to a

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 1>pair of Berkeley professors in the nineteen seventies, Horst W. J. Riddle,

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Professor of the Science of Design the University of California,

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Berkeley and Melvin M. Weber, Professor of City Planning, Berkeley. Uh.

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 1>And then occasionally you see people giving credit to philosopher

0:15:57.640 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and system science and see West Churchman largely for popular

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 1>popularizing or modernizing it. But but basically it comes down

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 1>to Riddle and Webber in particular. Riddle and web Webber

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 1>really dove into the topic in the nine paper Dilemmas

0:16:13.560 --> 0:16:16.600
<v Speaker 1>in a General Theory of Planning, published a published in

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Policy Sciences. Yeah, I uh for this episode. I went

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:24.920
<v Speaker 1>through and read that, and there were certainly many things

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 1>that were relevant to the discussion we're gonna have today,

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 1>But it was so grounded in the American politics of

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the early seventies that there's a lot of stuff that

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 1>was like WHOA, okay, but it was interesting too write

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 1>to be able to look back at. Well, it kind

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 1>of gets down to one of one of the things

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:41.920
<v Speaker 1>that will discuss that they point out about wicked problems,

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 1>if it every wicked problem is different, to the point

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 1>that if you're talking about wicked problems like just in

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the shadow of a particular area, if you're thinking if

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about wicked problems generally, but really in the

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 1>back of the mind, we're thinking about a specific wicked

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 1>problem that colors your your definition of what a wicked

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 1>problem is. Now, I do want to read part of

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 1>a quote here from them where they really get into

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the whole idea of why why they choose the word wicked,

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:14.640
<v Speaker 1>which tends to inspire of evil yea or or Bostonian inflection.

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:17.439
<v Speaker 1>They said that they show they referred to the problems

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:22.360
<v Speaker 1>as wicked. Quote not because these properties are themselves ethically deplorable.

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 1>We use the term wicked in a meaning akin to

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 1>that of malignant, in a contrast to benign or vicious

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:34.240
<v Speaker 1>like a circle, or tricky like a leprechn um. I

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:37.640
<v Speaker 1>love that we're able to always bring back monsters into it. Yeah,

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:41.639
<v Speaker 1>they and more of a it's a it's a fairy

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:44.479
<v Speaker 1>folk with it's an unnatural creature, So I think it

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:48.240
<v Speaker 1>counts um and they brought it up, not us says

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:50.879
<v Speaker 1>that door tricky like a lepricn, or aggressive like a

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 1>lion in contrast to uh, you know a lamb, we

0:17:54.680 --> 0:17:58.120
<v Speaker 1>do not mean to personify these properties of social systems

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 1>by implying malicious intent. But then you may agree that

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:04.879
<v Speaker 1>it becomes morally objectionable for the planner to treat a

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 1>wicked problem as though it were a tame one, or

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 1>to tame a wicked problem prematurely, or to refuse to

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:16.320
<v Speaker 1>recognize the inherent wickedness of social problems. And so that

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:18.720
<v Speaker 1>right there, that last bit is what I think gets

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 1>to the heart of what maybe the connection is today

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 1>is the refusal to recognize what this is right for

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 1>what it is. And that brings us back to that

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 1>political analogy of everything that's going on right now. Now,

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 1>whatever candidate you support or whatever candidate you don't support,

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 1>all of them are up there. That's the inherent nature

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>of the political system. Right when you're running for office,

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:44.400
<v Speaker 1>you pretend like you have all the answers, uh, and

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:46.679
<v Speaker 1>all of them are are are basically running on a

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 1>platform where they're like, Oh, that problem, I have the

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 1>answer to that. Yeah, that problem, I have the answer

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to that. But for me, I'm anti hydra elect me

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and I have don't worry, I have a plan. I'm

0:18:56.560 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna bring some very classy people to exterminate that high

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's worse than that, right, Like, you can't, man,

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 1>how refreshing would it be to have a candidate come

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 1>up and just be like, well, look like the problems

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:13.880
<v Speaker 1>that we're facing are so chaotic and so complex that

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 1>we as human beings are just not equipped to be

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 1>able to solve all of them. Well, there's your problem.

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:21.159
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't sound like a politician, that doesn't sound like somebody,

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:23.639
<v Speaker 1>it's like it's like some kind of philosopher or something.

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:26.160
<v Speaker 1>And we just shove that off in a corner and say, well,

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:29.359
<v Speaker 1>that's that's not authoritative enough for what we need. Yeah,

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 1>actual contemplation of the wicked problems either comes after you're

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 1>elected or it falls to the people who are charged

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 1>with fixing things by the elected indivision. Yeah, that's absolutely true.

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>And the very idea that you can't formulate a definition

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:46.919
<v Speaker 1>of what a wicked problem is is actually part of

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:51.120
<v Speaker 1>what Riddle and Weber came up with as their ten characteristics.

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 1>So the bulk of their article was these characteristics that

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:59.120
<v Speaker 1>they lay down, and they basically say, look, these are

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 1>not criteria a test to determine what the wickedness is,

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 1>but their insights to help you to decide if the

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 1>problem you're facing is wicked. So let's go through these briefly,

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and I'll note for those about you out there counting,

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:14.200
<v Speaker 1>there's actually eleven here in our list, and that's because

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:18.119
<v Speaker 1>Riddle and Webber. I keep going to call him Horsed

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:21.879
<v Speaker 1>because that's his first name. Riddle and Weber came up

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:24.679
<v Speaker 1>with ten. But then over the years, as people have

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:27.359
<v Speaker 1>written more about this and applied it to various things,

0:20:27.600 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 1>they've come up with their own and so they're basically

0:20:30.359 --> 0:20:32.119
<v Speaker 1>the same, but I tried to sort of merge them

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:35.119
<v Speaker 1>together here for for the purpose of the podcast. So

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:37.439
<v Speaker 1>I'll start with the first one, which is that wicked

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 1>problems have no definitive formulation. They are all different and

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:44.280
<v Speaker 1>they can't contribute to solving one another in any complete way.

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:47.720
<v Speaker 1>You can't write a well defined statement of these problems.

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 1>And this is a direct quote from the article by

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Riddle and Webber. The process of formulating the problem and

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:57.359
<v Speaker 1>of conceiving a solution are identical, since every specification of

0:20:57.359 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the problem is a specification of the direction in which

0:21:00.520 --> 0:21:03.720
<v Speaker 1>a treatment is considered. Yeah, I think one example that

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:06.720
<v Speaker 1>comes to mind. Here is the war on drugs, right,

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 1>like epidemic is a problem, and then it falls to heaven,

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 1>how do you define the problem and then go after

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:16.120
<v Speaker 1>it if you end up approaching it from a purely

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, law enforcement, right when you brand it as

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:23.880
<v Speaker 1>a war and you have chosen the direction and uh yeah,

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 1>and then it's easy for us to look back now,

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 1>look back at the eighties now and go, oh, why

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 1>did we brand it as a war on drugs? Right?

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 1>But at the time it seemed like a solution to

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 1>a problem to them. Yeah, yeah, I mean hindsight twenty

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:39.399
<v Speaker 1>on that. But then but then once you've employed that strategy,

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:43.239
<v Speaker 1>you have changed the problems we'll discuss. So number two.

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Wicked problems involve many stakeholders, all of whom have different

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>ideas about what the problem is and what its causes are.

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:53.399
<v Speaker 1>This again, in think of any any portion of the

0:21:53.440 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 1>world where there's a lot of conflict, like my mind

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>instantly goes to, uh, at least a couple of different

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:02.679
<v Speaker 1>corners in the Middle East. I think of Israel and Palestine.

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I think of the current situation in Syria. You have

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 1>different stakeholders that are involved at different levels who who

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:13.120
<v Speaker 1>want different things out of this, but they want them

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:17.199
<v Speaker 1>in the name of solving the amorphous problem here totally

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and at the micro level, I think we're all familiar with,

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, being in a kind of work situation or

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:24.639
<v Speaker 1>involved in any organization. Maybe it's not work, maybe it's

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:28.880
<v Speaker 1>your I don't know, you're you're housing organization that governs

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the apartment complex you you're in. But you have all

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:36.119
<v Speaker 1>these different stakeholders. Everybody's got their own subjective position on

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 1>these things, right, and they all have different goals too,

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 1>um So that ultimately, even just recognizing that goes a

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:46.679
<v Speaker 1>long way towards making things a little bit better. All right,

0:22:46.680 --> 0:22:49.479
<v Speaker 1>this is number three. It might be impossible to measure

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 1>any kind of success with the wicked problem given their interconnectedness.

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 1>The search for solutions will never stop. There's a very

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 1>hydra portion of the argument here, because any any time

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 1>you you actually try and solve a complex problem, you

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 1>have to what extent is your solution creating new problems,

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 1>um and then not addressing other areas that are all

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:16.920
<v Speaker 1>a part of the same issue. So, for instance, poverty,

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 1>if you're just if you're just trying to solve the problem,

0:23:21.000 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the wicked problem of poverty by looking at jobs. That's

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:28.400
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna that's gonna help some people. That is gonna

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 1>help everyone, is gonna erase poverty. No, okay, the fourth one.

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 1>There are no true or false solutions to wicked problems,

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:39.119
<v Speaker 1>only good or bad subject It's all subjective, right, um,

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 1>And everyone's judgments will differ, and the solutions can only

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:46.439
<v Speaker 1>be described as in that good bad paradigm or and

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:49.120
<v Speaker 1>this is from the Riddle and Webber thing, but what's

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:53.120
<v Speaker 1>probably better to describe it as is better or worse? Right,

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:56.480
<v Speaker 1>things got better or things got worse, not they're good

0:23:56.480 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 1>now they're bad now? Yeah, Like I I think back

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 1>to the War on drugs. Like you can imagine someone saying, hey,

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 1>we applied this solution to the wicked problem. And then

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:07.240
<v Speaker 1>someone says, well, you put a lot of these people

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:09.480
<v Speaker 1>had drugs and they're in prison. Now they're off the streets.

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:12.679
<v Speaker 1>That's good, right. And then someone might say, well, it

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:17.120
<v Speaker 1>also means that our prison population is extremely overloaded with

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 1>these low level offenders. That's bad. They say, that's bad, right,

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:22.880
<v Speaker 1>And the two things are like it's like a scale.

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 1>It's like this like situation where you've got all these

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 1>different scales that are attached to one another, and anytime

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 1>you move one little thing, everything shifts a little bit. Yeah,

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 1>it's like seating on an airplane. It's like, all right,

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:38.120
<v Speaker 1>they move their chair back, that's bad. I move mind back,

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:40.640
<v Speaker 1>that's good. But now the person behind me is uncomfortable,

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and now the person beside me, and it gets everything

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:46.560
<v Speaker 1>gets out of whack, and everybody's miserable and there's nothing

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:50.919
<v Speaker 1>you can do about it. The domino effective misery. Yeah, alright.

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Number five, there's no template to follow when tackling a

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 1>wicked problem. There's no way to determine right away if

0:24:57.480 --> 0:25:02.160
<v Speaker 1>a if A solution is working. So yeah, this gets

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 1>into just the problem of this is where we come

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 1>back to the example you mentioned earlier where they mentioned

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 1>rapid prototyping, which I guess would work in with certain

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:15.440
<v Speaker 1>types of wicked problems, but certainly larger issues out there,

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:19.960
<v Speaker 1>like how do you rapid prototype towards you know, dealing

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 1>with crime, or dealing with poverty, or dealing with hunger,

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 1>or or or or any number of what we could

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:28.520
<v Speaker 1>problems that pop up. It's especially on that scale it's

0:25:28.600 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 1>especially difficult. Uh, we'll talk a little bit more about

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:34.360
<v Speaker 1>I think what they meant by rapid prototyping, but it's

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:37.920
<v Speaker 1>essentially uh, the gist is that, like, rather than come

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:40.960
<v Speaker 1>up with one solution to approach a problem with and

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 1>then see if that works, and then if it doesn't,

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 1>then come up with another solution and keep trying them

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 1>over and over again, they recommend coming up with multiple

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:51.959
<v Speaker 1>solutions and trying them all at once. But you know

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:57.200
<v Speaker 1>there's problems with that too, so not rapid in succession. Yeah,

0:25:57.240 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 1>I believe they were like scatter shot exactly. That's the

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:08.440
<v Speaker 1>shotgun method like that, Okay. Uh. The number six is

0:26:08.480 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 1>there's always more than one explanation for a wicked problem,

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 1>and you can see that inherent in the examples that

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 1>we've just mentioned as well. Yeah, number seven, Every wicked

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:20.040
<v Speaker 1>problem is a symptom of another wicked problem and there's

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:23.679
<v Speaker 1>no single root cause. So back to the interconnectedness and

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the hydra nature of it, right, And this one, this one,

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I think is one of the most important of their

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 1>their ten characteristics here, specifically for us here it's stuff

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:35.399
<v Speaker 1>to blow your mind. They say there's no way to

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:41.600
<v Speaker 1>scientifically test wicked problem strategies because they're all human inventions,

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:44.400
<v Speaker 1>they are outside of nature. Right, So when we're thinking

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:47.959
<v Speaker 1>about all these problems, like, let's go back to the hydra, right, Like,

0:26:48.160 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the hydra is a natural being that we are learning

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:52.920
<v Speaker 1>to understand by looking at through that. We're talking about

0:26:52.920 --> 0:26:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the biological biological hydra, right, and we now understand how

0:26:57.240 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 1>it's mouth opens because we looked very close slee at

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:07.440
<v Speaker 1>it with uh light microscope. But poverty is a human invention.

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Uh so, so how do we look at that with

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:13.920
<v Speaker 1>a microscope? Yeah, I mean the mythological hydra is of

0:27:14.000 --> 0:27:17.440
<v Speaker 1>human creation changes every time you tell it exactly. Yeah,

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:19.679
<v Speaker 1>you can't. So many of these problems you can't just

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:22.359
<v Speaker 1>apply physics, and so you can't just apply look at

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 1>it from a fluid dynamics standpoint and try and figure

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 1>it out. Maybe that can be helpful in some cases

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:31.840
<v Speaker 1>in figuring out a part of the problem if it's applicable,

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:36.639
<v Speaker 1>but but probably not. Number nine. Solutions to wicked problems

0:27:36.640 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 1>are usually one shot efforts that minimize trial and error efforts.

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:43.919
<v Speaker 1>Every implemented solution has quant consequences that cannot be undone

0:27:43.960 --> 0:27:47.720
<v Speaker 1>and this is where we get to um the fact

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:50.159
<v Speaker 1>that every time you try and solve the wicked problem,

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:52.959
<v Speaker 1>you change the problem, and now you have a slightly

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:55.800
<v Speaker 1>different problem you have to deal with. It's not like

0:27:55.840 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 1>a mathematical equation where you like you figure out what

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:01.919
<v Speaker 1>X is right like every time in these situations, if

0:28:01.960 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 1>you figure out what X is, then like it changes

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:06.640
<v Speaker 1>what the definition of all the other numbers are the

0:28:06.680 --> 0:28:09.359
<v Speaker 1>original equation. It's kind of like this this Rubik's cute

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:11.800
<v Speaker 1>that is on the table in the podcast chamber we're

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:14.359
<v Speaker 1>we're recording right now. It's like if I try, I'm

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:17.400
<v Speaker 1>trying to solve this thing, but every time I move it,

0:28:17.560 --> 0:28:20.159
<v Speaker 1>I cannot move it back to where it was. And

0:28:20.200 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm just I'm just lost every time because each time

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I try to solve it, it is a new problem

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:29.119
<v Speaker 1>that I never get a second shot. It's solving the

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 1>same problem. The rubikscube is a great metaphor for wicked problems.

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:42.240
<v Speaker 1>That would be maybe the Lament configuration. Okay, every wicked

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 1>problem is unique. This is number ten. There is no precedent.

0:28:45.720 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 1>So what this means is essentially that you can't look

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:51.720
<v Speaker 1>back to any previous wicked problem that you've tried to

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 1>make better as like a template to say Okay, well,

0:28:54.880 --> 0:28:56.720
<v Speaker 1>let's try the same thing that we tried with that

0:28:56.960 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 1>here and see if it works. Because they're so totally

0:28:59.240 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 1>unique that there's no there's no model to work from.

0:29:03.320 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 1>At number eleven, this is an interesting one. Designers attempting

0:29:06.360 --> 0:29:09.520
<v Speaker 1>to address a wicked problem must be fully responsible for

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:13.880
<v Speaker 1>their actions. Yeah, so this one, Um, I don't know

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:16.240
<v Speaker 1>that I had trouble with it as much as just that, like,

0:29:16.520 --> 0:29:19.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's essentially a mission statement by the authors

0:29:19.760 --> 0:29:22.480
<v Speaker 1>here saying like, okay, so if you're going to approach

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:28.480
<v Speaker 1>this from a design policy standpoint, you have to own it. Yeah,

0:29:28.840 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and certainly, I mean this seems like it it is,

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 1>or at least certainly should be just part of the

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, any political attempt or military attempt or what

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:43.959
<v Speaker 1>have you to to tackle any kind of socioeconomic wicked problem.

0:29:44.040 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Is that. Yeah, anything you do, you should be held accountable.

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 1>But as we often see that accountability here doesn't always

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:55.760
<v Speaker 1>spread to everyone in the scenario. It's also important to

0:29:55.840 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 1>note here, like we can say though, that not all

0:29:58.600 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>hard to solve problem is are wicked. Only those that

0:30:02.000 --> 0:30:04.160
<v Speaker 1>have an indeterminate scope and scale. So let's go back

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 1>to the Rubik's cube. Right, that's a hard to solve problem,

0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 1>but it cannot. Yeah, well, you have a clear objective

0:30:10.640 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 1>to like, how do you solve this thing? Will you

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:14.960
<v Speaker 1>get I'll know it's solved when I have all the

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 1>same colors on the same side. So, like wicked problems,

0:30:18.160 --> 0:30:20.760
<v Speaker 1>you don't know at what point do you know it's solved.

0:30:21.440 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 1>And there's also no instant feedback because the effects of

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to to to implement changes, say you know in society, Um,

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the you're not gonna get instant to feedback. You're gonna

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:36.280
<v Speaker 1>get feedback rolling in in waves over years, decades to come,

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:38.520
<v Speaker 1>like like we were just mentioning with the war on drugs,

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:41.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot easier for us now, uh, you know,

0:30:41.440 --> 0:30:44.560
<v Speaker 1>thirty plus years later to say that seems like a

0:30:44.600 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 1>silly approach, or at least the branding approach to it.

0:30:46.720 --> 0:30:50.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to criticize the methodology necessarily. All Right,

0:30:50.280 --> 0:30:52.840
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna take a quick break and when we come back,

0:30:53.040 --> 0:30:56.960
<v Speaker 1>we will discuss macro wicked problems, wicked problems in science,

0:30:56.960 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 1>and micro wicked problems. All right, we're back. So we've

0:31:08.360 --> 0:31:12.280
<v Speaker 1>been talking about wicked problems and how that it's a

0:31:12.320 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 1>framework that we can sort of apply almost to anything. Right, Like,

0:31:15.880 --> 0:31:17.560
<v Speaker 1>as I was saying before, I had a friend who

0:31:17.600 --> 0:31:19.160
<v Speaker 1>was like, well, you can talk about the human body

0:31:19.160 --> 0:31:22.360
<v Speaker 1>as being a wicked problem, but um, let's take a

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:25.600
<v Speaker 1>look at sort of the definition that it was originally

0:31:25.640 --> 0:31:28.520
<v Speaker 1>assigned for. And what I'm calling for the purposes of

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 1>this episode macro wicked problems, which are the things The

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:35.400
<v Speaker 1>best example I can think of to tie this to

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:39.200
<v Speaker 1>is the current political campaign, right, So uh, and maybe

0:31:39.240 --> 0:31:41.920
<v Speaker 1>you're not American, but you're probably familiar with all the

0:31:42.000 --> 0:31:44.640
<v Speaker 1>zan nous that's going on in our political process right now,

0:31:44.920 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 1>or maybe wherever you're from, you I can't imagine that

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:51.120
<v Speaker 1>politics are all that much different. It's the same friend

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:54.520
<v Speaker 1>who mentioned the human body thing had recently traveled to

0:31:54.600 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Ghana and he was like, yeah, you know, over there,

0:31:57.320 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 1>there was an election cycle in process while I was

0:31:59.680 --> 0:32:03.120
<v Speaker 1>visiting there, and it was the same as it is here.

0:32:03.280 --> 0:32:06.520
<v Speaker 1>It's just on a different level. So what we're talking

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:09.480
<v Speaker 1>about here are the stances of where these you know,

0:32:09.520 --> 0:32:12.920
<v Speaker 1>these various politicians, I think that they have the one

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:16.760
<v Speaker 1>single answer to solve a problem that society is basically

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, arguing over right, the budget and economy, civil rights,

0:32:21.160 --> 0:32:26.240
<v Speaker 1>rights of corporations, uh, crime, drugs, we've mentioned those already. Education,

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:32.680
<v Speaker 1>how we use energy and oil, the environment, uh, foreign policy,

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:37.360
<v Speaker 1>free trade, how we reform our government. That one alone, Wow,

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:39.720
<v Speaker 1>what a tangled mess that would be. Yeah, I mean,

0:32:40.560 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 1>did you mention climate change and the climate changes at

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the end here? Yeah, that's a big one, because I

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:49.160
<v Speaker 1>mean that one, it's all the definitions are talking about

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 1>multiple stakeholders. Yeah, I mean that one. That one fits

0:32:52.600 --> 0:32:55.760
<v Speaker 1>most of the criteria we've been discussing, especially multiple stakeholders,

0:32:55.800 --> 0:32:59.480
<v Speaker 1>different views on what what success means and what the

0:32:59.560 --> 0:33:01.800
<v Speaker 1>root cause is and what the problem is to begin with,

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:05.760
<v Speaker 1>gun control, same thing, right, It's such a complex issue.

0:33:05.800 --> 0:33:08.680
<v Speaker 1>It's not just you know, it's always interesting to try

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 1>to bring it down to a personal level. But you know,

0:33:10.480 --> 0:33:13.480
<v Speaker 1>like I've I have friends who own guns and love

0:33:13.520 --> 0:33:17.080
<v Speaker 1>their guns and are very uh very much wants to

0:33:17.160 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 1>keep their guns and are against gun control. And it's

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:23.960
<v Speaker 1>not for them. It's it's not like a connected to

0:33:24.000 --> 0:33:26.480
<v Speaker 1>crime at all. Right, they don't see that. But then

0:33:26.520 --> 0:33:29.720
<v Speaker 1>there's the wicked problem of the connections between gun control

0:33:30.200 --> 0:33:33.280
<v Speaker 1>and crime and drugs and education. You see, you see

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:35.200
<v Speaker 1>how they they all kind of span together. Oh yeah,

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean on the gun control issue. And we see

0:33:37.520 --> 0:33:39.560
<v Speaker 1>it time and time again, Like the issue comes up

0:33:39.960 --> 0:33:43.200
<v Speaker 1>and you know, one side says, oh, what's it's not

0:33:43.240 --> 0:33:45.440
<v Speaker 1>a it's not a gun issue, it's a mental health issue.

0:33:45.480 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I just say, well, if you take all the guns away,

0:33:47.960 --> 0:33:50.480
<v Speaker 1>you're still not people are still going to kill each other.

0:33:50.560 --> 0:33:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean it goes back and forth with people. Uh

0:33:53.720 --> 0:33:56.200
<v Speaker 1>people are arguing, and that the one thing that's becoming

0:33:56.200 --> 0:33:59.360
<v Speaker 1>clear is that we don't even have a full graphs.

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Like the problem it's self is as a morphous and

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:05.120
<v Speaker 1>and just and shapeless, and all that these different voices

0:34:05.160 --> 0:34:07.480
<v Speaker 1>are doing are all they're doing is trying to give

0:34:07.520 --> 0:34:11.480
<v Speaker 1>shape to the problem. Yeah, exactly when you can't. Uh So,

0:34:11.560 --> 0:34:13.480
<v Speaker 1>a couple of really quick other ones, right that you're

0:34:13.520 --> 0:34:16.120
<v Speaker 1>going to be hearing about, or you're probably currently hearing about,

0:34:16.120 --> 0:34:20.560
<v Speaker 1>homeland security, immigration, that's a big one, Jobs, social security,

0:34:20.600 --> 0:34:25.879
<v Speaker 1>tax reform. Technology. Just just like this kept coming back

0:34:25.920 --> 0:34:28.400
<v Speaker 1>to me because we work in the digital media industry

0:34:28.600 --> 0:34:32.120
<v Speaker 1>and it changes so quickly that it's interesting to see

0:34:32.160 --> 0:34:38.000
<v Speaker 1>how both policymakers and business people try to adapt with it.

0:34:38.080 --> 0:34:41.640
<v Speaker 1>And it's it's it's impossible to sort of predict the

0:34:41.680 --> 0:34:45.719
<v Speaker 1>wave of how it's gonna progress, right, Um, and then

0:34:45.760 --> 0:34:48.480
<v Speaker 1>there's of course the good old war and poverty ones.

0:34:48.920 --> 0:34:52.719
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, these are all huge issues that affect all

0:34:52.800 --> 0:34:55.239
<v Speaker 1>of us. And I think like, based on the definition

0:34:55.600 --> 0:34:58.080
<v Speaker 1>that we set up for you before the break, you

0:34:58.120 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 1>can see how these are all wicked problems. All right,

0:35:01.239 --> 0:35:04.720
<v Speaker 1>we've already discussed with the problem of trying to apply

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:09.200
<v Speaker 1>science to wicked problems that it's not uh an A

0:35:09.280 --> 0:35:13.200
<v Speaker 1>plus B equalcy scenario. It's not like saying, oh, how

0:35:13.200 --> 0:35:14.959
<v Speaker 1>do we get people to the moon? That's a hard

0:35:15.000 --> 0:35:18.279
<v Speaker 1>problem to solve. We solved it because we knew what

0:35:18.360 --> 0:35:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the problem was, and we knew what the destination was,

0:35:21.719 --> 0:35:25.560
<v Speaker 1>and we knew how to know that we had succeeded. Yeah,

0:35:25.600 --> 0:35:29.160
<v Speaker 1>that's absolutely true. And so the this is actually the

0:35:29.200 --> 0:35:32.480
<v Speaker 1>impetus for us talking about wicked problems here today is

0:35:32.520 --> 0:35:35.440
<v Speaker 1>there was a great article earlier in the week that

0:35:35.480 --> 0:35:37.920
<v Speaker 1>came out from the bangor Daily News, and it was

0:35:37.960 --> 0:35:41.000
<v Speaker 1>written by a woman named Linda Silka, and she is

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:44.320
<v Speaker 1>a social and community psychologist at the University of Maine,

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:49.080
<v Speaker 1>and basically she was addressing how Maine as a state

0:35:49.360 --> 0:35:53.160
<v Speaker 1>is coming together and trying to approach their wicked problems

0:35:53.200 --> 0:35:58.600
<v Speaker 1>in a different way, uh, using science basically, And she says,

0:35:59.360 --> 0:36:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and this is this is the key here, This is

0:36:01.080 --> 0:36:03.239
<v Speaker 1>why I thought this really connected well to our show.

0:36:03.560 --> 0:36:07.040
<v Speaker 1>She argues, Look, there's this popular culture image of science

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:10.640
<v Speaker 1>where there's a lab coded researcher and they prove a

0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:15.359
<v Speaker 1>brilliant idea and h then you know they've solved it, right,

0:36:15.400 --> 0:36:20.200
<v Speaker 1>They've solved a problem, or they've given humanity more knowledge

0:36:20.239 --> 0:36:23.840
<v Speaker 1>about a thing the hydra. Right we we when we

0:36:24.000 --> 0:36:29.560
<v Speaker 1>discussed the actual hydra and its anatomy in the previous episode,

0:36:29.840 --> 0:36:32.319
<v Speaker 1>the way that we talked about it, I had that

0:36:32.400 --> 0:36:34.960
<v Speaker 1>in my head. I'm I'm imagining that some of our

0:36:35.000 --> 0:36:37.680
<v Speaker 1>listeners did, too, of people in lab coats looking at

0:36:37.719 --> 0:36:42.200
<v Speaker 1>hydras under microscopes and going, ah, we solved it right. Yeah.

0:36:42.400 --> 0:36:46.320
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we encountered this occasionally with with listeners

0:36:46.320 --> 0:36:49.680
<v Speaker 1>and readers stuff about your mind, because there's that vision.

0:36:49.719 --> 0:36:53.640
<v Speaker 1>But but science also involves getting it wrong, getting a

0:36:53.640 --> 0:36:56.080
<v Speaker 1>wrong a lot like. That's how we helped define what

0:36:56.120 --> 0:36:59.480
<v Speaker 1>we know and what direction research is going by making mistakes,

0:37:00.040 --> 0:37:03.880
<v Speaker 1>mistakes that you you can you can't necessarily make in

0:37:04.000 --> 0:37:08.400
<v Speaker 1>tackling a wicked problem. Yeah. I mean so like for

0:37:08.480 --> 0:37:10.120
<v Speaker 1>some of the things that we work on here at

0:37:10.120 --> 0:37:12.680
<v Speaker 1>how stuff works, this comes up again and again where

0:37:13.400 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 1>we're tasked with answering how X works, right, and there

0:37:19.320 --> 0:37:24.680
<v Speaker 1>isn't always an answer it the uh very often, especially

0:37:24.680 --> 0:37:27.200
<v Speaker 1>like when Joe and I are writing for our general

0:37:27.200 --> 0:37:30.760
<v Speaker 1>science video show brain Stuff. The answer is, well, science

0:37:30.800 --> 0:37:34.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't know yet, but here's what we do know, right,

0:37:34.440 --> 0:37:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and there. I can't tell you how many times we've

0:37:36.960 --> 0:37:40.000
<v Speaker 1>seen answers in the comments on social media or YouTube

0:37:40.080 --> 0:37:41.839
<v Speaker 1>or something where people are like, well, why did you

0:37:41.880 --> 0:37:45.880
<v Speaker 1>even bother to make this because science doesn't have the answer,

0:37:46.239 --> 0:37:49.400
<v Speaker 1>And I think, well, the the the importance is like, well,

0:37:49.640 --> 0:37:52.160
<v Speaker 1>when we cover what we do know, then we're able

0:37:52.160 --> 0:37:54.520
<v Speaker 1>to sort of approach it differently, right, Yeah, I mean

0:37:54.520 --> 0:37:56.879
<v Speaker 1>it kind of gets down into that area too of

0:37:57.200 --> 0:37:59.400
<v Speaker 1>this is something science doesn't know, but here are some

0:37:59.520 --> 0:38:03.719
<v Speaker 1>theories is to how it might work. That's just that's

0:38:03.719 --> 0:38:08.680
<v Speaker 1>is how we feel our way out exactly forward. Um. So,

0:38:08.760 --> 0:38:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Silko's argument is that this lab coded research myth is

0:38:12.320 --> 0:38:15.680
<v Speaker 1>becoming outdated and that we need to make efforts to

0:38:15.960 --> 0:38:21.040
<v Speaker 1>ensure that research can help solve the societal challenges we have,

0:38:21.480 --> 0:38:23.520
<v Speaker 1>like wicked problems, like all the things that we were

0:38:23.560 --> 0:38:26.000
<v Speaker 1>just defining. But she's looking at it very much from

0:38:26.000 --> 0:38:28.720
<v Speaker 1>a main perspective because she's working at the University of Maine.

0:38:29.120 --> 0:38:31.399
<v Speaker 1>So she says, in order to solve these science needs

0:38:31.400 --> 0:38:34.239
<v Speaker 1>to be approached in a more complex way. There needs

0:38:34.280 --> 0:38:39.239
<v Speaker 1>to be interaction between scientists, decision makers and citizens. And

0:38:39.280 --> 0:38:41.719
<v Speaker 1>you may have heard about this discussed elsewhere. Some people

0:38:41.800 --> 0:38:44.719
<v Speaker 1>label it as citizens science. I know a couple of

0:38:44.760 --> 0:38:46.600
<v Speaker 1>years ago I went to south By Southwest and that

0:38:46.680 --> 0:38:48.560
<v Speaker 1>was like the big term that was being thrown around.

0:38:48.560 --> 0:38:51.640
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people were creating apps that allowed everybody

0:38:51.640 --> 0:38:53.520
<v Speaker 1>to be a citizen scientist and to go out and

0:38:53.520 --> 0:38:56.680
<v Speaker 1>gather data with their their phones by like taking pictures

0:38:56.680 --> 0:38:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and then it would upload to a particular scientists laboratory

0:39:00.000 --> 0:39:02.600
<v Speaker 1>have various efforts to say everybody, like everybody take pictures

0:39:02.640 --> 0:39:05.400
<v Speaker 1>of whale sharks the encounter and looking to a database.

0:39:05.760 --> 0:39:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Everyone used a screen saver that enables Setty to search

0:39:09.000 --> 0:39:11.799
<v Speaker 1>for intelligent lot. The library that I used to work

0:39:11.840 --> 0:39:15.399
<v Speaker 1>at was part of the World Community Grid that contributed

0:39:15.480 --> 0:39:19.279
<v Speaker 1>basically whenever the computers were uh in sleep mode, they

0:39:19.280 --> 0:39:25.480
<v Speaker 1>were contributing their processing power towards solving scientific problems. Uh

0:39:25.520 --> 0:39:28.880
<v Speaker 1>so yeah. So her argument is essentially that all of

0:39:28.960 --> 0:39:31.640
<v Speaker 1>us need to know about the issues, and all of

0:39:31.719 --> 0:39:34.080
<v Speaker 1>us need to be involved because we all have important

0:39:34.200 --> 0:39:37.439
<v Speaker 1>roles to play. And she says, let's move away from

0:39:37.480 --> 0:39:40.640
<v Speaker 1>what is called the loading doc approach to science, and

0:39:40.680 --> 0:39:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the metaphor for that loading doc approach to science goes

0:39:43.520 --> 0:39:46.760
<v Speaker 1>like this. You've got a scientist and they're basically acting

0:39:46.840 --> 0:39:50.319
<v Speaker 1>like a factory that produces widgets, right, and they're not

0:39:50.360 --> 0:39:53.239
<v Speaker 1>producing widgets for any particular person. Then they just put

0:39:53.280 --> 0:39:55.560
<v Speaker 1>those widgets on the loading dock and they wait for

0:39:55.600 --> 0:39:58.040
<v Speaker 1>somebody to come along and go, oh, that's something I

0:39:58.080 --> 0:40:00.719
<v Speaker 1>have a use for and take it away right. Um,

0:40:00.800 --> 0:40:04.080
<v Speaker 1>And I see this, you know, having worked in academia previously.

0:40:04.400 --> 0:40:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Of course, like the way that that system is set up. Uh,

0:40:07.239 --> 0:40:10.480
<v Speaker 1>it's not always necessarily working conjunction to solve a problem.

0:40:10.640 --> 0:40:12.520
<v Speaker 1>More often it's kind of like I need to get

0:40:12.520 --> 0:40:17.040
<v Speaker 1>published that I can get right. Uh So, instead of

0:40:17.040 --> 0:40:20.319
<v Speaker 1>the loading doc procedure, she says, we should create a

0:40:20.400 --> 0:40:23.640
<v Speaker 1>product that is useful to people who actually need it.

0:40:23.680 --> 0:40:26.960
<v Speaker 1>So science should try to work together to figure out

0:40:27.040 --> 0:40:29.439
<v Speaker 1>the poor and the hungry issues that we've been talking about,

0:40:29.960 --> 0:40:33.360
<v Speaker 1>or something that doesn't require people to necessarily have full

0:40:33.520 --> 0:40:36.880
<v Speaker 1>access to the set of complications that are involved in

0:40:36.920 --> 0:40:39.200
<v Speaker 1>scientific research. Essentially, I think what they mean by that

0:40:39.320 --> 0:40:42.920
<v Speaker 1>is like, you don't have to have a PhD. Right, Um,

0:40:43.040 --> 0:40:46.960
<v Speaker 1>So we already have really scared science resources, as we

0:40:47.040 --> 0:40:49.360
<v Speaker 1>know from all the stuff that we cover for the

0:40:49.440 --> 0:40:51.439
<v Speaker 1>show and for the other stuff that we work on here.

0:40:51.719 --> 0:40:54.480
<v Speaker 1>How do we focus our solutions for the right kind

0:40:54.520 --> 0:40:58.080
<v Speaker 1>of stakeholders? While in Maine, she says, researchers are trying

0:40:58.080 --> 0:41:01.680
<v Speaker 1>to tackle this problem differently and specifically so that the

0:41:01.680 --> 0:41:05.719
<v Speaker 1>way that they address sustainability. So they're bringing together shellfish

0:41:05.800 --> 0:41:10.360
<v Speaker 1>harvesters with their policy makers and biologists and economists to

0:41:10.400 --> 0:41:13.719
<v Speaker 1>all discuss the issues surrounding What I would assume is

0:41:13.800 --> 0:41:19.960
<v Speaker 1>you know of farming shellfish for for food industry. Another

0:41:20.000 --> 0:41:24.400
<v Speaker 1>example she gave was solving the decline in mains blueberry crops,

0:41:24.680 --> 0:41:27.360
<v Speaker 1>which they see as also being connected to the collapse

0:41:27.680 --> 0:41:31.040
<v Speaker 1>of their pollinator be population. Now, I don't know how

0:41:31.080 --> 0:41:34.040
<v Speaker 1>many times in different forms are shows here at how

0:41:34.080 --> 0:41:36.719
<v Speaker 1>stuff works. We've talked about colony collapse disorder. It's something

0:41:36.760 --> 0:41:39.480
<v Speaker 1>that's on a lot of people's radar, but this is

0:41:39.520 --> 0:41:42.400
<v Speaker 1>an interesting way to approach it, that it's not just Okay,

0:41:42.440 --> 0:41:45.080
<v Speaker 1>that's a science issue we need to solve, but also, hey,

0:41:45.080 --> 0:41:47.279
<v Speaker 1>we've got these blueberries over here that are important to

0:41:47.280 --> 0:41:51.160
<v Speaker 1>our economy. What does that mean for this you know? Uh?

0:41:51.200 --> 0:41:55.279
<v Speaker 1>And then ultimately her she says, there's also scientists who

0:41:55.280 --> 0:41:58.000
<v Speaker 1>are going to argue against this, so be prepared for

0:41:58.040 --> 0:42:01.160
<v Speaker 1>a backlash. And there's lots of scientists who claim that

0:42:01.239 --> 0:42:04.600
<v Speaker 1>anyone who doesn't have formal training, they won't do any

0:42:04.600 --> 0:42:07.520
<v Speaker 1>good research, right, They're not going to be capable of

0:42:07.800 --> 0:42:11.319
<v Speaker 1>contributing to the discipline. It's what in academia is often

0:42:11.360 --> 0:42:15.000
<v Speaker 1>referred to as the siloing effect, right where everybody puts

0:42:15.040 --> 0:42:17.640
<v Speaker 1>themselves in little silos and they sort of have their

0:42:17.719 --> 0:42:20.120
<v Speaker 1>their beefdoms that they want to fight over control full

0:42:20.160 --> 0:42:22.880
<v Speaker 1>of her well, in Nane, this is exactly how the

0:42:22.880 --> 0:42:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the Arrowhead facility opened up, that rift into the Todash

0:42:25.760 --> 0:42:28.920
<v Speaker 1>darkness exactly. It's you know what, like the Mists would

0:42:28.920 --> 0:42:31.440
<v Speaker 1>not have happened if we just approached things as a

0:42:31.440 --> 0:42:34.440
<v Speaker 1>wicked problem. I know, all those people in that grocery store. Man. Yeah,

0:42:34.560 --> 0:42:36.480
<v Speaker 1>it was a tough time. You know what, That's a

0:42:36.480 --> 0:42:39.120
<v Speaker 1>good uh segue for us to bring it down where

0:42:39.239 --> 0:42:41.200
<v Speaker 1>we've been up. We've been up in the outer space

0:42:41.200 --> 0:42:44.239
<v Speaker 1>of todash darkness, talking about the macro version of this,

0:42:44.360 --> 0:42:46.480
<v Speaker 1>talking about the science version of it. Let's bring it

0:42:46.480 --> 0:42:50.840
<v Speaker 1>down to the micro level, right. Uh. We've all worked

0:42:50.880 --> 0:42:54.560
<v Speaker 1>for organizations, presumably right in our current society. That's how

0:42:54.680 --> 0:42:57.399
<v Speaker 1>we can afford the devices that we have to listen

0:42:57.440 --> 0:43:00.400
<v Speaker 1>to podcasts on. Yeah, even if you don't have to

0:43:00.760 --> 0:43:03.920
<v Speaker 1>work for an organization, you're probably having to come in

0:43:03.960 --> 0:43:06.879
<v Speaker 1>contact with organizations. You know. If that alone, hit man,

0:43:06.960 --> 0:43:09.400
<v Speaker 1>you still have to work for the mafia. Yeah, it's true.

0:43:09.719 --> 0:43:12.600
<v Speaker 1>It's true. So what we found when we were looking

0:43:12.600 --> 0:43:15.680
<v Speaker 1>at the wicked problem thing is, yeah, it's being applied

0:43:15.920 --> 0:43:19.600
<v Speaker 1>in the science aspect up in Maine. But by and large,

0:43:19.760 --> 0:43:22.160
<v Speaker 1>almost all the research that was showing up for me

0:43:22.719 --> 0:43:26.239
<v Speaker 1>was management stuff or business review type magazines. And the

0:43:26.280 --> 0:43:30.040
<v Speaker 1>big one that I looked to was a piece by

0:43:30.160 --> 0:43:33.239
<v Speaker 1>John Camillis that was in the Harvard Business Review in

0:43:33.239 --> 0:43:37.760
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight. Uh And basically, uh, he studied

0:43:37.800 --> 0:43:41.160
<v Speaker 1>strategic planning at twenty two different companies. Then he looked

0:43:41.200 --> 0:43:44.560
<v Speaker 1>in depth at seven of them, and he finally zoned

0:43:44.600 --> 0:43:47.600
<v Speaker 1>in specifically on DuPont Pharmaceuticals, which has come up on

0:43:47.640 --> 0:43:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the show before. I don't I can't remember at the

0:43:50.000 --> 0:43:52.600
<v Speaker 1>top of my head was Alexander Shulgan who worked for DuPont.

0:43:53.239 --> 0:43:55.960
<v Speaker 1>It was somebody like It wasn't, Yeah, I think it

0:43:56.680 --> 0:44:00.480
<v Speaker 1>might have been shun Um. It wasn't really no, right,

0:44:00.760 --> 0:44:02.799
<v Speaker 1>So he finally he zoned in on DuPont to kind

0:44:02.800 --> 0:44:06.040
<v Speaker 1>of see how that company drew up its strategies to

0:44:06.160 --> 0:44:09.279
<v Speaker 1>deal with uncertainty, and he used all of these to

0:44:09.360 --> 0:44:13.919
<v Speaker 1>come up with ways to talk about taming problems within

0:44:13.960 --> 0:44:19.439
<v Speaker 1>the workplace, the ones that can't be solved, the wicked problems. So, yeah,

0:44:19.480 --> 0:44:23.319
<v Speaker 1>camillisit basically makes the same argument that those guys made

0:44:23.320 --> 0:44:26.719
<v Speaker 1>back in the early seventies, but in terms of companies, right,

0:44:26.760 --> 0:44:29.759
<v Speaker 1>So he says, companies are faced with constant, wicked problems

0:44:29.760 --> 0:44:33.840
<v Speaker 1>in their increasingly complex and violent environment. So you're looking

0:44:33.880 --> 0:44:38.160
<v Speaker 1>at changing the way that we look at strategic planning processes,

0:44:38.160 --> 0:44:41.920
<v Speaker 1>which are very traditional. They don't address wicked problems in

0:44:41.960 --> 0:44:46.160
<v Speaker 1>any way. So in fact, the actual processes that are

0:44:46.360 --> 0:44:49.480
<v Speaker 1>used to approach the problems may and sell it may

0:44:49.520 --> 0:44:53.680
<v Speaker 1>in fact be wicked problems themselves. Right every time you yeah,

0:44:53.719 --> 0:44:57.120
<v Speaker 1>every time you change the structure of the business, potentially

0:44:57.160 --> 0:44:59.560
<v Speaker 1>new wicked problem. Right. Yeah. I'm thinking of like every

0:44:59.600 --> 0:45:03.239
<v Speaker 1>time like a company goes through a reorganization, right, or

0:45:03.239 --> 0:45:06.880
<v Speaker 1>a restructuring pivots, Yes, the pivoting, which is something we

0:45:06.920 --> 0:45:11.960
<v Speaker 1>hear about quite often. Um yeah, or uh you know,

0:45:12.400 --> 0:45:15.160
<v Speaker 1>big surprise. This piece was written eight years ago, and

0:45:15.200 --> 0:45:18.400
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't seem like policymakers and companies have really acknowledged

0:45:18.440 --> 0:45:22.440
<v Speaker 1>it yet. You know, I've I've worked here for three years.

0:45:22.440 --> 0:45:26.279
<v Speaker 1>I've worked in the public sector, in academia and in libraries.

0:45:26.320 --> 0:45:28.359
<v Speaker 1>I used to work for a publishing company before this,

0:45:28.440 --> 0:45:31.880
<v Speaker 1>and then long ago, I was a graphic designer working

0:45:31.960 --> 0:45:36.040
<v Speaker 1>in a sort of direct marketing world, and I didn't

0:45:36.040 --> 0:45:39.080
<v Speaker 1>see it. Any of those businesses a sort of recognition,

0:45:39.200 --> 0:45:44.399
<v Speaker 1>recognition of the like organizational principle of the wicked problem. Um.

0:45:44.440 --> 0:45:46.560
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know, I don't know. Maybe they're out there.

0:45:46.600 --> 0:45:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to hear it. If some of you out

0:45:48.160 --> 0:45:52.080
<v Speaker 1>there listening work for a company that thinks about running

0:45:52.120 --> 0:45:54.239
<v Speaker 1>the company in such a way let us know, because

0:45:54.280 --> 0:45:56.399
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like it would be, I don't know, sort

0:45:56.400 --> 0:45:59.080
<v Speaker 1>of heavenly place to work at. Um. Well even know,

0:45:59.120 --> 0:46:01.440
<v Speaker 1>one of the issues is that I feel like a

0:46:01.520 --> 0:46:05.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of workplaces and I'm and i'm speaking you know,

0:46:06.160 --> 0:46:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm speaking to it to My history with with various

0:46:08.120 --> 0:46:11.960
<v Speaker 1>employers over the years is that, um it's one thing

0:46:12.000 --> 0:46:15.120
<v Speaker 1>to to have a meeting about a problem, to try

0:46:15.120 --> 0:46:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and to find that problem in a way that's that's good. Like,

0:46:18.080 --> 0:46:20.960
<v Speaker 1>that's how you should approach wicked problems, is to not

0:46:21.360 --> 0:46:24.040
<v Speaker 1>just throw out solutions willy nilly and see what happens.

0:46:24.160 --> 0:46:26.000
<v Speaker 1>You should discuss it. You should try and get figure

0:46:26.000 --> 0:46:27.759
<v Speaker 1>out what are some of the route issues here, what

0:46:27.800 --> 0:46:30.840
<v Speaker 1>are the different viewpoints. But a lot of times in

0:46:30.840 --> 0:46:33.719
<v Speaker 1>a corporate environment, like that's all that gets done. Like

0:46:34.200 --> 0:46:37.239
<v Speaker 1>you have those meetings, the results are are are typed up,

0:46:37.440 --> 0:46:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and the wicked problem UM summary winds up on somebody's desk.

0:46:42.320 --> 0:46:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Maybe there are some recommended solutions, Maybe some of those

0:46:45.040 --> 0:46:48.480
<v Speaker 1>get implemented, maybe the safer ones get implemented. But does

0:46:48.800 --> 0:46:53.120
<v Speaker 1>does anything ultimately change? Maybe not. Yeah, that's actually interesting

0:46:53.120 --> 0:46:57.960
<v Speaker 1>because Camillus, you know, one of his recommendations is essentially uh,

0:46:58.239 --> 0:46:59.480
<v Speaker 1>right at the top, he says, well, you got to

0:46:59.520 --> 0:47:03.000
<v Speaker 1>involve your stakeholders and document everybody's opinions and then make

0:47:03.040 --> 0:47:05.960
<v Speaker 1>sure that everybody's communicating about what those opinions are. And

0:47:05.960 --> 0:47:07.840
<v Speaker 1>that's what you just described. But you're right, in a

0:47:07.920 --> 0:47:11.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of situations just kind of stops there, right, Um,

0:47:11.040 --> 0:47:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Like there, there isn't the action part that comes after it. Um.

0:47:15.640 --> 0:47:18.239
<v Speaker 1>And he he actually came up with his own five

0:47:18.400 --> 0:47:21.359
<v Speaker 1>system symptoms based off of all these other people came

0:47:21.400 --> 0:47:23.880
<v Speaker 1>up with and they're fairly similar. Um, you know, we

0:47:23.920 --> 0:47:26.440
<v Speaker 1>get the same thing with there's many stakeholders. They all

0:47:26.440 --> 0:47:29.000
<v Speaker 1>have different values and different priorities. Of course, you see

0:47:29.000 --> 0:47:31.680
<v Speaker 1>that in the workplace, right like some managers of some

0:47:31.760 --> 0:47:34.760
<v Speaker 1>departments have their own values and priorities while another manager

0:47:34.800 --> 0:47:37.879
<v Speaker 1>and another tier above them into the side of them,

0:47:37.880 --> 0:47:40.680
<v Speaker 1>has a different set of priorities. It is not necessarily

0:47:40.719 --> 0:47:43.560
<v Speaker 1>being communicated clearly or in the worst situations, you're you're

0:47:43.560 --> 0:47:45.680
<v Speaker 1>one of those employees who find yourself with two or

0:47:45.680 --> 0:47:48.759
<v Speaker 1>more bosses, figure out who am I listening to what

0:47:48.920 --> 0:47:51.840
<v Speaker 1>and what is the priority? And just like the larger

0:47:51.880 --> 0:47:57.040
<v Speaker 1>macro problems, you know, they've got complex, tangled roots their problem.

0:47:57.760 --> 0:48:00.239
<v Speaker 1>It's difficult to come to grips with and every time

0:48:00.280 --> 0:48:03.440
<v Speaker 1>you try to approach it it changes. I'm thinking like

0:48:03.440 --> 0:48:05.640
<v Speaker 1>like I'm thinking of previous workplaces I've been at, where

0:48:05.680 --> 0:48:08.600
<v Speaker 1>like there's been a problem employee, right, and it's just

0:48:08.640 --> 0:48:11.920
<v Speaker 1>like a person that everybody knows is a problem, and

0:48:12.400 --> 0:48:15.000
<v Speaker 1>you go the simple solution is just fire that person.

0:48:15.239 --> 0:48:18.080
<v Speaker 1>But like in certain atmospheres, you can't just do that, right,

0:48:18.120 --> 0:48:21.480
<v Speaker 1>because there's repercussions to that as well that subsequently tangle

0:48:21.600 --> 0:48:26.200
<v Speaker 1>and lead to other problems too. I have unfortunately seen

0:48:26.239 --> 0:48:30.200
<v Speaker 1>that many many workplaces. Um again, they have no precedent,

0:48:30.560 --> 0:48:33.480
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing to indicate what the right answer is, right,

0:48:33.520 --> 0:48:36.120
<v Speaker 1>there's no Like I love how we we all think

0:48:36.160 --> 0:48:38.919
<v Speaker 1>of HR human resources is being like, oh, well they've

0:48:38.960 --> 0:48:41.319
<v Speaker 1>got the answer, right, Like there's a handbook they go

0:48:41.360 --> 0:48:43.239
<v Speaker 1>to school for that. So clearly there's there's gotta be

0:48:43.280 --> 0:48:45.080
<v Speaker 1>a way to approach this in a particular way that

0:48:45.120 --> 0:48:49.520
<v Speaker 1>has the answer. But I don't necessarily know that that's true. Yeah,

0:48:49.560 --> 0:48:50.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean you get to say that they have a

0:48:51.000 --> 0:48:53.200
<v Speaker 1>they have a system, they may have a guide, they

0:48:53.200 --> 0:48:56.160
<v Speaker 1>may have a way to discuss a problem that arises,

0:48:56.280 --> 0:48:59.360
<v Speaker 1>but ultimately the the I mean, we've all heard of

0:48:59.400 --> 0:49:03.520
<v Speaker 1>situations with people we know where the the HR solution

0:49:03.680 --> 0:49:07.960
<v Speaker 1>is not the best solution. Yeah, certainly, certainly. Yeah. Um.

0:49:08.280 --> 0:49:10.600
<v Speaker 1>And it's interesting too because, like my wife has worked

0:49:10.600 --> 0:49:12.640
<v Speaker 1>at all different kinds of companies as well too. I

0:49:12.640 --> 0:49:14.880
<v Speaker 1>feel like between the two of us over the last

0:49:14.920 --> 0:49:18.400
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years, we've had like this very broad spectrum of

0:49:18.480 --> 0:49:20.680
<v Speaker 1>types of places to work at, and yet like we

0:49:20.719 --> 0:49:23.080
<v Speaker 1>see the same problems that all of them, you know, Yeah,

0:49:23.120 --> 0:49:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, in a way, it comes down to what

0:49:24.760 --> 0:49:28.719
<v Speaker 1>was the famous Reagan quote about government, about government isn't

0:49:28.760 --> 0:49:31.160
<v Speaker 1>the solution of the problems? Government is the problem? Which

0:49:31.600 --> 0:49:33.319
<v Speaker 1>is you know, I think going a bit too far,

0:49:33.400 --> 0:49:37.279
<v Speaker 1>but it does tie in to the basic idea that

0:49:37.600 --> 0:49:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the body that tries to fix a wicked problem, be

0:49:40.719 --> 0:49:44.360
<v Speaker 1>it you know, a large sweeping macro problem, more micro problem,

0:49:44.400 --> 0:49:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the body that tries to fix something almost inevitably messes

0:49:47.400 --> 0:49:50.200
<v Speaker 1>it up or messes it up for some people. Yeah,

0:49:50.239 --> 0:49:53.040
<v Speaker 1>it's like it's almost like you have to figure out, like, Okay,

0:49:53.480 --> 0:49:55.719
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna mess this up, But is the mess that's

0:49:55.719 --> 0:49:57.719
<v Speaker 1>going to be left afterwards better than the mess that

0:49:57.760 --> 0:50:00.279
<v Speaker 1>we have, Yeah, what is my relationship to the mass?

0:50:00.520 --> 0:50:02.759
<v Speaker 1>Want to be like I know, like you know, I

0:50:02.800 --> 0:50:05.400
<v Speaker 1>know it's gonna be messy, but can I live with

0:50:05.440 --> 0:50:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the mass. So let's quickly go through Camillis's solutions, which

0:50:10.080 --> 0:50:12.279
<v Speaker 1>are beyond just like what you described, which is the

0:50:12.280 --> 0:50:15.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of Yeah, everybody sit around and talk about a thing.

0:50:15.120 --> 0:50:16.560
<v Speaker 1>We'll write it down and we'll put it in a

0:50:16.600 --> 0:50:20.399
<v Speaker 1>document somewhere and file it away. Um, does this sound

0:50:20.480 --> 0:50:25.080
<v Speaker 1>familiar for anybody out there? Define what your corporate identity is? Right?

0:50:25.239 --> 0:50:29.120
<v Speaker 1>What what are the company's values? What is it competent at?

0:50:29.200 --> 0:50:31.799
<v Speaker 1>And what are its aspirations. I can't tell you how

0:50:31.800 --> 0:50:35.760
<v Speaker 1>many places I've worked for that, uh that those aren't

0:50:35.760 --> 0:50:38.360
<v Speaker 1>clear to all the employees. And yet like it seems

0:50:38.400 --> 0:50:41.800
<v Speaker 1>like something that should just be relatively simple, right, even

0:50:41.840 --> 0:50:44.279
<v Speaker 1>like when we see like fictional versions of companies and

0:50:44.360 --> 0:50:52.240
<v Speaker 1>thinking like I'm thinking of what's the evil company in RoboCop? Uh? Yeah, yeah,

0:50:52.480 --> 0:50:54.919
<v Speaker 1>Like that's a perfect example. Like the people who worked

0:50:54.960 --> 0:50:57.319
<v Speaker 1>there seemed to pretty much have an idea of what

0:50:57.400 --> 0:51:00.560
<v Speaker 1>its values were, what they were good at building killer robots,

0:51:00.960 --> 0:51:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and what its aspirations were, which is basically taken over

0:51:03.960 --> 0:51:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the city of Detroit. Right, But you find in a

0:51:06.040 --> 0:51:09.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of situations that there's there's like a vague sort

0:51:09.200 --> 0:51:14.320
<v Speaker 1>of anxiety inducing uh, amorphous nous to what the company

0:51:14.360 --> 0:51:16.840
<v Speaker 1>you work for is doing. Right, Yeah. I mean meanwhile,

0:51:16.960 --> 0:51:19.600
<v Speaker 1>you go to like a your average kindergarten class and

0:51:20.120 --> 0:51:23.920
<v Speaker 1>generally the rules are on the wall, right exactly. That

0:51:23.920 --> 0:51:25.600
<v Speaker 1>would be great if we had that like on the

0:51:25.640 --> 0:51:29.200
<v Speaker 1>refrigerator or something at all different corporations, like here's what

0:51:29.280 --> 0:51:34.760
<v Speaker 1>it is, it's written in kran There's also, of course,

0:51:34.800 --> 0:51:37.439
<v Speaker 1>like what Robert was mentioning earlier, you got to take

0:51:37.480 --> 0:51:39.399
<v Speaker 1>action on things. And this connects to what we were

0:51:39.440 --> 0:51:42.640
<v Speaker 1>talking about with the rapid prototyping. So instead of thinking

0:51:42.680 --> 0:51:46.680
<v Speaker 1>through every option that's available before choosing a single one,

0:51:47.120 --> 0:51:51.240
<v Speaker 1>they recommend what Camillis does in particular, experimenting with multiple

0:51:51.320 --> 0:51:55.200
<v Speaker 1>strategies that seem like they're feasible, uh, and launch innovative

0:51:55.200 --> 0:51:59.440
<v Speaker 1>pilot programs. And this is interesting to me because this

0:51:59.520 --> 0:52:01.640
<v Speaker 1>is something actually at how stuff works. We've heard a

0:52:01.680 --> 0:52:03.879
<v Speaker 1>lot in the last i'd say two years maybe, which

0:52:03.920 --> 0:52:07.600
<v Speaker 1>is don't be afraid to fail, right, And there's a

0:52:07.600 --> 0:52:09.759
<v Speaker 1>At first I had trouble struggling with that and now

0:52:09.760 --> 0:52:11.799
<v Speaker 1>I sort of see, oh okay, so this is that

0:52:11.840 --> 0:52:14.640
<v Speaker 1>approach that I don't know that rapid prototyping is the

0:52:14.719 --> 0:52:18.120
<v Speaker 1>right term. The way I've often heard it described as

0:52:18.160 --> 0:52:22.240
<v Speaker 1>the whole fail, fail quickly, and fail often, you know, yeah,

0:52:22.600 --> 0:52:25.120
<v Speaker 1>which is try a bunch of different things, which is

0:52:25.160 --> 0:52:27.600
<v Speaker 1>you know sort of that's okay, then we know not

0:52:27.680 --> 0:52:30.120
<v Speaker 1>to do that one approach. Yeah, Yeah, Like generally a

0:52:30.200 --> 0:52:32.399
<v Speaker 1>b testing is is uh is that it's a great

0:52:32.400 --> 0:52:33.880
<v Speaker 1>way to do this. You just roll it out for

0:52:33.920 --> 0:52:35.279
<v Speaker 1>some people and you show them a you show them

0:52:35.320 --> 0:52:37.200
<v Speaker 1>be figure out what works, and you go with that

0:52:37.239 --> 0:52:39.720
<v Speaker 1>and you do this and you know, with without having

0:52:39.760 --> 0:52:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to invest much more time and money in testing the product,

0:52:45.080 --> 0:52:47.120
<v Speaker 1>and you bring it back to the macro level for

0:52:47.160 --> 0:52:49.719
<v Speaker 1>a second here, and you go, oh wow, Like, there's

0:52:49.760 --> 0:52:52.880
<v Speaker 1>no way that governments can act this way, right, because

0:52:52.880 --> 0:52:55.360
<v Speaker 1>if they're just like, well, we'll just try twenty different

0:52:55.400 --> 0:52:57.440
<v Speaker 1>things and if nineteen of them fail, at least we'll

0:52:57.440 --> 0:53:00.600
<v Speaker 1>have found one thing that works. There's plenty of people

0:53:00.600 --> 0:53:02.800
<v Speaker 1>out there who go, what about all my tax dollars

0:53:02.800 --> 0:53:05.239
<v Speaker 1>that were just spent on the nineteen things that didn't work? Right?

0:53:05.680 --> 0:53:10.439
<v Speaker 1>So there's an inherently a wicked problem there as well well,

0:53:10.719 --> 0:53:12.680
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of them a lot of a lot

0:53:12.680 --> 0:53:14.680
<v Speaker 1>of businesses or maybe maybe have a lot more in

0:53:14.719 --> 0:53:20.400
<v Speaker 1>common with dictatorships as opposed to a democratic republic. So

0:53:21.440 --> 0:53:22.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a little more a little a little

0:53:22.960 --> 0:53:25.880
<v Speaker 1>more complicated on on the macro level life well, spinning

0:53:25.920 --> 0:53:30.080
<v Speaker 1>off your dictatorship metaphor. It's kind of interesting because dictators

0:53:30.320 --> 0:53:35.440
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily have this one particular communication orientation that Camillis recommends,

0:53:35.520 --> 0:53:39.080
<v Speaker 1>and I like this. Uh, it really stems out of

0:53:39.120 --> 0:53:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the basic necessity of all kinds of human communication, and

0:53:43.600 --> 0:53:47.240
<v Speaker 1>it is to adopt what's called a feed forward orientation.

0:53:47.640 --> 0:53:51.160
<v Speaker 1>So when you're trying to solve problems, don't just use

0:53:51.400 --> 0:53:57.520
<v Speaker 1>feedback for communicating with your organization about what the problems

0:53:57.520 --> 0:54:00.959
<v Speaker 1>are and how to tame them, because feed back rely

0:54:01.239 --> 0:54:05.360
<v Speaker 1>solely on the past and what happened, while wicked problems

0:54:05.400 --> 0:54:08.560
<v Speaker 1>all arise out of an unclear future, right, So remember

0:54:08.560 --> 0:54:12.680
<v Speaker 1>that that indeterminable scope that they have, um, so you

0:54:12.719 --> 0:54:17.200
<v Speaker 1>really need to envision that that future that's that's unclear

0:54:17.239 --> 0:54:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and try to envision what you'd like it to be.

0:54:19.640 --> 0:54:21.960
<v Speaker 1>So this gets back to the aspirations of what of

0:54:21.960 --> 0:54:26.399
<v Speaker 1>who you're working for, and then communicate what that organization

0:54:26.640 --> 0:54:29.799
<v Speaker 1>wants its future to look like to everybody involved in

0:54:29.840 --> 0:54:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the organization. You know, it's interesting because some of these

0:54:32.200 --> 0:54:36.640
<v Speaker 1>ideas regarding the corporate environment, they have spilled over into

0:54:36.680 --> 0:54:41.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of family management uh scenarios there. For instance, in

0:54:41.760 --> 0:54:44.960
<v Speaker 1>my family, UM, me and my wife and my son,

0:54:45.360 --> 0:54:48.279
<v Speaker 1>we try and have a weekly meeting, and at the

0:54:48.320 --> 0:54:53.280
<v Speaker 1>weekly meeting, everybody has to has to discuss what worked

0:54:53.360 --> 0:54:55.520
<v Speaker 1>during the week, what didn't work during the week, what

0:54:55.600 --> 0:54:58.200
<v Speaker 1>they would like to change in the coming week, as

0:54:58.200 --> 0:54:59.799
<v Speaker 1>well as like what we would like to eat in

0:54:59.800 --> 0:55:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the coming and things like that, uh and that. But

0:55:02.520 --> 0:55:04.600
<v Speaker 1>that approach is based on some of the principles that

0:55:04.640 --> 0:55:08.080
<v Speaker 1>have been bouncing around in the corporate world for the

0:55:08.080 --> 0:55:11.080
<v Speaker 1>past ten years or so. Yeah, that is an interesting approach.

0:55:11.120 --> 0:55:14.799
<v Speaker 1>And essentially what we're talking about here is just open communication,

0:55:14.960 --> 0:55:18.000
<v Speaker 1>which surprisingly, you know, for human beings, which like one

0:55:18.000 --> 0:55:20.680
<v Speaker 1>of our greatest assets is our ability to communicate with

0:55:20.719 --> 0:55:23.279
<v Speaker 1>one another. We're not so good at at at doing

0:55:23.320 --> 0:55:26.000
<v Speaker 1>it in these kind of situations where we're tackling these

0:55:26.120 --> 0:55:28.160
<v Speaker 1>real world, big problems. Yeah, I mean, we did a

0:55:28.160 --> 0:55:30.600
<v Speaker 1>workbook uh for it where we had to. We even

0:55:30.640 --> 0:55:32.880
<v Speaker 1>had to come up with our own essentially our corporate

0:55:32.920 --> 0:55:35.839
<v Speaker 1>identity for like, what our what's our motto? What are

0:55:35.880 --> 0:55:39.960
<v Speaker 1>our values? I bet Bastion had a giraffe in there somewhere. Um,

0:55:40.040 --> 0:55:42.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, he was not he was not super helpful

0:55:42.280 --> 0:55:46.920
<v Speaker 1>in the crafting the of of this particular document. But

0:55:47.000 --> 0:55:49.759
<v Speaker 1>that sounds like good advice for for any you know,

0:55:50.160 --> 0:55:53.319
<v Speaker 1>uh family unit. You know, so you know, who are

0:55:53.360 --> 0:55:55.719
<v Speaker 1>we what what are we trying to do here? What's

0:55:55.719 --> 0:55:58.279
<v Speaker 1>this little family? You know, let's get out of the

0:55:59.120 --> 0:56:01.120
<v Speaker 1>moment to moment ing and just think a little a

0:56:01.160 --> 0:56:03.840
<v Speaker 1>little broader. Yeah, I like that. That's cool. Well, it

0:56:03.880 --> 0:56:05.719
<v Speaker 1>sounds like that you can take that and you can

0:56:05.760 --> 0:56:08.240
<v Speaker 1>extrapolate it out words and apply it on the work level.

0:56:08.440 --> 0:56:10.640
<v Speaker 1>You're can apply it on the science level, and then

0:56:10.640 --> 0:56:12.600
<v Speaker 1>you can apply it on the sort of macro scale

0:56:12.680 --> 0:56:15.720
<v Speaker 1>level that we've been talking about. So that really gets

0:56:15.719 --> 0:56:18.360
<v Speaker 1>at the gist of wicked problems we weren't able to.

0:56:18.480 --> 0:56:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, obviously it's much denser than what

0:56:21.920 --> 0:56:23.840
<v Speaker 1>we talked about today, and I feel like this is

0:56:23.880 --> 0:56:26.319
<v Speaker 1>maybe a little denser than most stuff to blow your

0:56:26.360 --> 0:56:29.120
<v Speaker 1>mind episodes are. But you know, we we at least

0:56:29.120 --> 0:56:31.680
<v Speaker 1>covered the surface of this is what they are, this

0:56:31.760 --> 0:56:33.360
<v Speaker 1>is how they apply to the real world that we

0:56:33.400 --> 0:56:36.200
<v Speaker 1>exist in and science. Yeah, and I have no doubt

0:56:36.280 --> 0:56:39.359
<v Speaker 1>that we will refer back to wicked problems in the

0:56:39.400 --> 0:56:43.520
<v Speaker 1>future as we tackle other other topics, be they you know,

0:56:43.760 --> 0:56:47.920
<v Speaker 1>ultimately scientific or or more likely cultural. So, those of

0:56:47.960 --> 0:56:51.680
<v Speaker 1>you out there listening, uh, let us know. I'm really curious.

0:56:52.080 --> 0:56:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm always curious to see what our audience has to

0:56:54.600 --> 0:56:57.600
<v Speaker 1>say about our episodes, but in this instance, in particular,

0:56:57.760 --> 0:56:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to see what you think about the theory

0:56:59.640 --> 0:57:02.520
<v Speaker 1>of wicked problems, how it's applicable in your life, or

0:57:02.560 --> 0:57:04.600
<v Speaker 1>how you could see it being applicable maybe on a

0:57:04.680 --> 0:57:07.400
<v Speaker 1>larger scale. Or those of you out there, we know

0:57:07.440 --> 0:57:08.799
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people who listen to the show are

0:57:08.840 --> 0:57:12.480
<v Speaker 1>graduate students or actual scientists working in laboratories. How it

0:57:12.480 --> 0:57:15.960
<v Speaker 1>affects the work that you're doing. Yeah, indeed, and how

0:57:16.000 --> 0:57:19.360
<v Speaker 1>do you personally tackle wicked problems? I don't think about

0:57:19.400 --> 0:57:22.440
<v Speaker 1>them because they're they're wicked problems that that exist. Uh,

0:57:22.520 --> 0:57:24.360
<v Speaker 1>you know within a country. There we could problems that

0:57:24.400 --> 0:57:27.840
<v Speaker 1>exist within a family. Uh, how do you dance around

0:57:27.880 --> 0:57:30.840
<v Speaker 1>those and define them? So usual places to reach out

0:57:30.880 --> 0:57:32.800
<v Speaker 1>to us and let us know your thoughts on these things.

0:57:33.040 --> 0:57:36.200
<v Speaker 1>We've got Facebook, we're on Twitter, we are on Tumbler,

0:57:36.840 --> 0:57:39.840
<v Speaker 1>we're even on Instagram. Now we're gonna start posting to

0:57:39.960 --> 0:57:42.920
<v Speaker 1>that soon and you can start seeing pictures of things

0:57:43.000 --> 0:57:46.280
<v Speaker 1>that we're taking and of us, and probably images I

0:57:46.280 --> 0:57:49.720
<v Speaker 1>would assume of the podcast episodes that were distributing as well. Yeah,

0:57:49.760 --> 0:57:51.919
<v Speaker 1>we'll blow the mind on there. I think currently there's

0:57:51.960 --> 0:57:54.920
<v Speaker 1>just one picture of me with a third ey Oh okay,

0:57:54.960 --> 0:57:57.520
<v Speaker 1>well that's a good place to start. Uh. And then,

0:57:57.600 --> 0:57:59.720
<v Speaker 1>of course, how else could they reach out to us

0:57:59.720 --> 0:58:01.920
<v Speaker 1>to just discussed their wicked problems. Oh, just get in

0:58:01.920 --> 0:58:04.200
<v Speaker 1>touch with us the old facting way. Email us at

0:58:04.280 --> 0:58:15.800
<v Speaker 1>below the mind at how stuff works dot com for

0:58:15.960 --> 0:58:18.240
<v Speaker 1>more on this and thousands of other topics. Is it

0:58:18.360 --> 0:58:42.320
<v Speaker 1>how stuff works dot com