WEBVTT - Jony Ive and the Transformation of Apple

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Be there and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

0:00:16.960 --> 0:00:20.439
<v Speaker 1>and how the tech are You? So? On Monday, I

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 1>published an episode about Johnny I've's journey to Apple and I've,

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 1>if you don't know, is a designer famous for his

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>influence at Apple. He had a hand in the look

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and aesthetic at the company for twenty years, and recently

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>he and Apple have cut ties. So we're going to

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 1>continue his story in this episode. But this is really

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 1>not just an episode about Johnny I've and his influence.

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:50.879
<v Speaker 1>It's really an episode that's about Apple in its transition

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 1>from a company that was in serious trouble to one

0:00:54.800 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>that became a tastemaker. Like this is the period in

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:06.399
<v Speaker 1>which Apple itself underwent a massive transformation. So while I

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>is going to take a crucial part of that story,

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:12.400
<v Speaker 1>it's going to require us to talk about some other

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:16.039
<v Speaker 1>stuff too. Now where we left off, I was in

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>a really delicate position. He had recently been promoted to

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Apple's director of Industrial Design. This was just five years

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>after he had joined Apple. He joined Apple as a designer,

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the ninth member of the design team. Five years later,

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the outgoing director of industrial design recommended I've for the job.

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:40.039
<v Speaker 1>So this was a really remarkable journey. I mean, that's

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 1>a short amount of time to go from entering in

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>as a basic member of a team to becoming the

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 1>leader of that team. I've came into Apple in the

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>early nineties, which was a period where co founder Steve

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Jobs was effectively banished from Apple. I talked about that

0:01:57.040 --> 0:02:00.080
<v Speaker 1>in the last episode, and you know, Jobs at or

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 1>he had been pushed to the side. In the mid eighties,

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 1>he left Apple and founded a different computer company called

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Next Big End, Little E, Big X, Big T. This

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 1>company would end up designing computers meant for the educational sector,

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 1>at least primarily, but the computers were really expensive and

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 1>they had a fairly limited suite of software. Because you know,

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:28.640
<v Speaker 1>software developers aren't likely to dedicate the time and resources

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:31.640
<v Speaker 1>to make stuff for a platform that doesn't have a

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 1>very large install base. It just doesn't make sense. You're

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:36.919
<v Speaker 1>never going to make back the investment you made in

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 1>order to make the thing in the first place. So

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 1>it would just make more sense as a developer to

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>create software for computers that a lot of people use,

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 1>instead of an upstart company that's trying to muscle its

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 1>way into a pre existing market. And over at Apple,

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:55.240
<v Speaker 1>things had become pretty rocky, in no small part due

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:57.400
<v Speaker 1>to the chaos going on with the team that was

0:02:57.440 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 1>responsible for building the next generation of the Macintosh operating system.

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>That whole project had ballooned out of control with feature

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:10.360
<v Speaker 1>creep and internal struggles within the team, and so the

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 1>then CEO Gil Emilio moved to acquire the Next Computer Company,

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:19.919
<v Speaker 1>and the idea was that while Next wasn't getting much

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 1>traction in the market, it's operating system was really good

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:26.640
<v Speaker 1>and it could serve as the next generation of the

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>mac operating system, and the internal build of the next

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 1>mac os at Apple could be set aside for the

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 1>time being. Maybe it could be rescued and fixed. But

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Emilio felt that in the state that it was in

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 1>within Apple, it just wasn't going to be ready for

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the market, so he decided to acquire Next and use

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 1>that operating system instead. So Apple acquires Next, and then

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jobs came back to Apple, initially as an advisor,

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>but within short order he became the interim CEO. And

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>then eventually the permanent CEO, and Jobs was not happy. Actually,

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 1>if you read up on various stories of Apple's history,

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of tales about Jobs not being happy,

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 1>and part of that was the fact that Jobs, as

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>standards were at the tippy tippy top, and when products

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:25.360
<v Speaker 1>failed to meet his standards, he got mad. Jobs had

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>come back to Apple and hated what he saw. Apple

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 1>was producing so many different models of Macintosh computers because

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the previous leaders thought the way to address the issues

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Apple had was to expand the product line by making

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 1>a ton of different Macintosh models. But it got to

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the point where the company's own sales team had trouble

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:53.039
<v Speaker 1>explaining why one model would be more suitable for a

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 1>specific customer over any other model. If your sales team

0:04:57.160 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>can't say, oh, based upon your needs, this what you

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>should get, then you know you're in trouble. So the

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>message was buddled, the products were confusing, and Jobs was enraged,

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:14.799
<v Speaker 1>and he wasn't shy about voicing his opinions. Now, i've

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 1>as the head of industrial design, was really concerned for

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 1>his team. Jobs was particularly angry about the direction of

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Apple's design team. He said that he felt the quote

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>unquote sex had been taken out of the products that

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:32.279
<v Speaker 1>they no longer had the appearance of something people wanted

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 1>to interact with, and word got around that Jobs was

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:38.839
<v Speaker 1>planning on looking outside Apple to find someone in design

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>to come in and realign the company and to lead

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 1>that team, meaning I would be out of a job.

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:49.240
<v Speaker 1>So I've talked with his team, and they even discussed

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the possibility of creating their own design firm if the

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:56.359
<v Speaker 1>whole department should find itself sacked. But I've advised his

0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>colleagues to wait and see what Jobs would do, and

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the team created a kind of showcase within the design department.

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:06.719
<v Speaker 1>So I've knew it was just a matter of time

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 1>before Jobs would make his way to the design department

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and see exactly how things had gone totally wrong, at

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>least in Jobs's mind. And I've wanted to showcase the

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:20.480
<v Speaker 1>work his team had created with designs that the company

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 1>had not accepted. These are these were ideas that no

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:27.919
<v Speaker 1>one else in Apple had approved, So they put on

0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>display a lot of the more radical designs that had

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:34.719
<v Speaker 1>failed to find their way through Apple's bureaucratic process. And

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>sure enough, when Jobs did come down and take a

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 1>look at the design department. He was impressed by what

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:44.040
<v Speaker 1>he saw. The things that he was looking at from

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the team, they weren't at all representative of the actual

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 1>products the Jobs had found so boring and uninspired. According

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:55.159
<v Speaker 1>to Trip Michael, the author of After Steve, a book

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:59.159
<v Speaker 1>that I used extensively in my research here, Jobs turned

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:02.720
<v Speaker 1>to I've and essentially he said, you haven't been very effective,

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:06.279
<v Speaker 1>have you. I am paraphrasing because Jobs could use a

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of what uh Mr Spock would call colorful metaphors

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 1>in his language. What Jobs meant was that I've and

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:20.559
<v Speaker 1>his team were astounding designers. They were creating amazing work,

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 1>but they weren't adept at getting that work accepted by

0:07:25.040 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 1>leadership at Apple. And that's, you know, a big component

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 1>of being a department head. It's not enough to be

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 1>an effective manager. A leader has to have vision and

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>a way to communicate that vision to others and get

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>buy in to get them to support that vision. So

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:42.679
<v Speaker 1>a leader has to be able to convince other people

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>to try new things, or at the very least come

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 1>to the table and negotiate a way forward. I've was

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>unquestionably a great designer, but it might have been that

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>he was not yet a great leader, at least in

0:07:56.040 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 1>that sense. But then Jobs also felt that the previous

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:04.320
<v Speaker 1>regime at Apple was rife within competence, and so while

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Jobs gave I've a little bit of a hard time,

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>it was clear that he placed almost all the blame

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 1>on Apple's previous leadership, that the company had become so

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 1>weighed down by people afraid to take risks, or more

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>interested in competing directly against the ensconced PC market rather

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 1>than creating a compelling alternative, that they were incapable of

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 1>listening to I've and his team, and so really the

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 1>fault was on them more than it was on i've.

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 1>And the good news was that Jobs saw this and

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 1>felt that the design team was doing great work, that

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:42.320
<v Speaker 1>they were brilliant and innovative. So Jobs knew that the

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>department was the right group of people to make his

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 1>vision of what Apple could be into a reality, and

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>this began the working relationship that would develop into a

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 1>fierce friendship between Jobs and I've. And it also meant

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Jobs would end his search for a new head of design,

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:02.079
<v Speaker 1>so i was safe in his job. Jobs and I've

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:07.960
<v Speaker 1>bonded over a shared fascination with the form of products,

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 1>and and by form, I really actually mean a bunch

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 1>of different things, not just the physical shape, although that

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:18.120
<v Speaker 1>is a huge part of it. I've was actually really

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:22.320
<v Speaker 1>obsessed with materials. He would carefully go through each and

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 1>every sample of various materials to determine what was right

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:30.960
<v Speaker 1>for any given project. He had in his mind specific

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 1>effects that the materials should pull off, whether it was

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:39.959
<v Speaker 1>a shiny metal surface or a very smooth curve of

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:44.679
<v Speaker 1>glass or a pebbled leather cover. And Jobs was very

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 1>much the same way. So the two spent ages talking

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>about different materials and what was possible with each one,

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 1>or what limitations existed with them, and how to find

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 1>a solution to meet those limitations or you know, in

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 1>most cases is with I've, if he found fault in

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:04.439
<v Speaker 1>a material, he was far more likely to just reject

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the material outright and find something better that met his expectations,

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 1>even if it meant scouring the entire world to find

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:14.559
<v Speaker 1>what he wanted. And Jobs wasted no time. Once he

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>returned to the leadership role, he gave the Newton program

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the Acts in n I talked about the Apple Newton

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 1>in the last episode that was a little less than

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 1>six years after the Apple Newton had debuted, and that

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:30.200
<v Speaker 1>was an attempt to create a new product line, but

0:10:30.720 --> 0:10:36.440
<v Speaker 1>because of some real limitations with the hardware and more

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:39.440
<v Speaker 1>more over, the software, it did not work. It was

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 1>a failure. But Steve Jobs didn't just acts products. He

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 1>acted entire layers of management. Jobs essentially laid off the

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:53.680
<v Speaker 1>general managers overseeing the various business units within Apple. In fact,

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:56.960
<v Speaker 1>he did that in a single day, like it was

0:10:57.040 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 1>an armageddon, where he laid off, you know, legions of

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 1>general managers, and that probably contributed to some people at

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Apple using the phrase getting jobs as a way of

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 1>saying you got fired. Apple had created silos of departments,

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 1>so little feudal states, each with its own leader that

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:21.079
<v Speaker 1>was largely cut off from the other departments, and Jobs

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>knocked those silos down. He essentially reorganized the entire company

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>into a more cohesive and collaborative operation. Now the teams

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 1>would still have leaders, you know, like I've was leader

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 1>of the designers for industrial design, and these would be

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 1>people who had deep expertise in whatever field it was

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 1>that they were representing. So they were people who could

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 1>manage others, but they also knew how to do the

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 1>stuff that the team was doing. You know that the

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 1>team they were managing was doing. Jobs said, One really

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 1>big mistake that he and Wozniak made way back in

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the seventies was to bring in people who are really

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:01.960
<v Speaker 1>adept at business, but they didn't know how computers worked,

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 1>and that that disconnect led to all sorts of trouble

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 1>down the line. And then Jobs gave I've a critical assignment.

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Jobs knew that the company needed to launch a product

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 1>that would put it back in the minds of consumers.

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:21.440
<v Speaker 1>They needed to capture the rebellious and innovative spirit of

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the company in its early days. Jobs also saw how

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the Internet was playing an increasingly important role in well everything,

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and so he wanted Apple to create a desktop computer

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 1>with the express purpose of being a machine that would

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:41.600
<v Speaker 1>work well with the Internet. Jobs also wanted to ditch

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:45.080
<v Speaker 1>some traditional features found on most personal computers of the day.

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 1>For example, he didn't want this new computer to have

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 1>a floppy disk drive, something that was standard on other

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:55.840
<v Speaker 1>machines at the time. He also wanted to ditch serial boards, which,

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>if you're not familiar, were used as a communication interface

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:02.200
<v Speaker 1>with computers. They could connect with other peripherals right and

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 1>send information to and receive information from those peripherals. Jobs

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 1>instead wanted to incorporate USB technology in this new Apple computer,

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 1>and he also gave Ive's team one other directive. He

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:21.599
<v Speaker 1>wanted the design for this computer to be quote joyful

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>end quote, and I've and his team would take on

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 1>that challenge. We're gonna take a quick break. When we

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 1>come back, we'll talk more about this project and how

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:35.960
<v Speaker 1>it really helped turn things around for Apple. But first

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:47.320
<v Speaker 1>these messages. So Johnny I've and his team got this

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 1>assignment from Steve Jobs, and they got to work. Uh,

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 1>they had the parameters and then pretty much a blank

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 1>canvas that they could use where they could create the

0:13:56.679 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 1>next generation of consumer Macintosh computers. It would be called

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the iMac. And yeah, this was the beginning of Apple

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 1>using that lower case I in front of its various

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 1>product names. The iMac would be the first of those

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 1>those products, the first major one anyway. So the team

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 1>led by Johnny I've decided that the computer should be

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:23.359
<v Speaker 1>innovative but not threatening. So I needed to look futuristic,

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 1>but it also needed to look accessible. It couldn't be

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 1>something where you're like, oh, that looks cool, but I

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 1>don't want to touch it. So one big point of

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>inspiration was the cartoon The Jetsons. You know, Meet George

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Jetson and so on. Well, the Jetsons lived in a

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 1>world that was simultaneously futuristic and also anchored in the

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 1>aesthetic of the nineteen fifties. While the iMac wouldn't look

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 1>like it came straight out of the nineteen fifties, they

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>did have elements of the familiar along with the novel. Now,

0:14:57.240 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the original iMac was not a flat screen computer like

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 1>later models would turn into. It was an all in

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 1>one computer that looked like a very colorful CRT monitor.

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Before the iMac, the team had created a laptop prototype

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 1>that had translucent plastic built into the body of the computer,

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and I've decided he wanted to incorporate that element into

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 1>the iMac design. I've presented his ideas to Jobs, and

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Jobs rejected a lot of them, but one that Jobs

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:32.960
<v Speaker 1>really liked was a sketch that I've showed him, and

0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I've described it as a computer that looks as though

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:39.000
<v Speaker 1>it was about to jump off the desk and go

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>do something, and that really resonated with Jobs. So I've

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>returned to his team with Jobs as input, and they

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 1>refined that design. They began to move more in that

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 1>specific direction, and they created a model. The Jobs like

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 1>so much they would actually take that to other departments

0:15:56.600 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 1>in order to show it off to them. The team

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 1>chose a polycr abinate shell for the computer for a

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 1>couple of reasons. One, it's a very strong material, so

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 1>it's it's resilient, but also it can hold a tinted

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 1>color really effectively. It doesn't fade over time, at least

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 1>not rapidly, so so it would hold whatever color you

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 1>wanted to give it. And as for those colors, they

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:25.920
<v Speaker 1>initially created computer shells that were either orange or purple,

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 1>or a bluish greenish color that would end up being

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>called Bondie blue. The process to make the shells was expensive,

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 1>both because of needing to make the polycarbonate translucent, and

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 1>also the process itself was sort of a customized one.

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 1>They couldn't rely on existing manufacturing processes. It all had

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 1>to be built from scratch in order to mass manufacture these. Now,

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 1>this meant that it would cost Apple sixty dollars per

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 1>unit per per computer case, just the case, not the internals,

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and that was much more expensive than typical computer case was. However,

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I was very happy to find out that Steve Jobs

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:10.920
<v Speaker 1>wasn't really concerned about manufacturing costs because Steve Jobs saw

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the need to bring customers back to Apple as well

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 1>as to attract new customers to the company, and he

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:19.639
<v Speaker 1>thought it was going to be shortsighted to worry about

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 1>production costs and that this was really going to be

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 1>a swing for the fences kind of product. A we

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 1>need a home run, so we're gonna swing as hard

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:34.240
<v Speaker 1>as we can. So because the case was translucent, I've

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and his team worked with other departments to figure out

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 1>how the circuitry layout that would be in the computer

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 1>underneath would be visible and attractive. They wanted it to

0:17:45.000 --> 0:17:49.120
<v Speaker 1>look sophisticated and not messy, So this was another consideration

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:52.359
<v Speaker 1>that really set Apple apart. It would also be the

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 1>foundation for the types of computer rigs that are are

0:17:55.400 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 1>very popular today. There are a lot of computer cases

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:01.800
<v Speaker 1>out there that have trend his parent glass panels so

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:04.400
<v Speaker 1>that you can see the interior right. You can see

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the the fans and the various components, many of them

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 1>decked out with L E. D s and that's the

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of rig that gamers prefer these days, and I

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 1>feel that we can thank Apple in particular, and specifically

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Johnny I've and his team for setting us down that

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of pathway. I feel like the iMac was sort

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:28.119
<v Speaker 1>of an early example of that aesthetic that extends all

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the way down to today. Obviously, the shapes are very

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:35.200
<v Speaker 1>different today than the iMac was, but there are those

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 1>those elements I feel that have carried through. When it

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 1>came time to unveil the iMac, things nearly went pear shaped.

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 1>One of the components the Jobs really wanted in this

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:50.879
<v Speaker 1>computer's design was a c D slot so that users

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 1>could just insert a compact disc into the slot. It

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 1>would go into the computer and then they could, you know,

0:18:56.400 --> 0:19:00.080
<v Speaker 1>load information from the c D. So he wanted it

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:02.119
<v Speaker 1>to be a little slit in the computer and to

0:19:02.160 --> 0:19:04.880
<v Speaker 1>be as unobtrusive as possible. But when it came time

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 1>to actually unveil the design and Jobs looked at the

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:12.440
<v Speaker 1>prototype that he was going to show off. He saw

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 1>that the iMac had a c D tray that would

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 1>extend out from the computer. You would put the CD

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 1>into the tray and then retract the c D tray

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 1>back into the computer and he was furious. But when

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:32.679
<v Speaker 1>he was lashing out super angry that the thing he

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:35.879
<v Speaker 1>wanted wasn't part of the iMac, he was told the

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 1>problem was the technology he wanted in the computer didn't

0:19:39.640 --> 0:19:42.879
<v Speaker 1>exist yet. No one had built a working version of

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:46.439
<v Speaker 1>what he was envisioning, and that, you know, that was

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the issue. Johnny. I've actually stepped up to talk Steve

0:19:50.560 --> 0:19:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Jobs down, Johnny. I've said, you know what you're thinking

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>of right now, that's the next one of these, that's

0:19:56.840 --> 0:20:00.119
<v Speaker 1>the next iMac. We can't do it yet, but ex

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:04.679
<v Speaker 1>generation we will. However, we have to ship this version.

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:08.960
<v Speaker 1>And remarkably, Johnny Ives approach really worked. It calmed down

0:20:09.000 --> 0:20:13.399
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jobs and he went on to rehearse what the

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 1>presentation that would unveil the iMac would become. And you

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 1>can actually watch that presentation online. This was done way

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:24.439
<v Speaker 1>back in so if you do find a copy of

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:27.439
<v Speaker 1>it that there are copies on YouTube. The video quality

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:30.679
<v Speaker 1>is pretty bad, but it is late nineties and you

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:34.680
<v Speaker 1>can watch as Jobs calls the iMac quote the excitement

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:38.919
<v Speaker 1>of the Internet, the simplicity of Macintosh end quote. Jobs

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 1>then goes on to essentially slam the competition, saying that

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:48.240
<v Speaker 1>consumer computers that are on the market are all slow

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 1>and ugly, that they have lousy displays, and if they

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 1>have any networking capability in them at all, it's pretty limited.

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 1>So he was really trying to set up how the

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:02.160
<v Speaker 1>iMac would contrast with what he was claiming to be

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the status quo. And the technical specs on the iMac were,

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, they were impressive for the time, but you

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:11.920
<v Speaker 1>would laugh at them now because Jobs talks about having

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 1>a ton of memory in this computer, which was thirty

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 1>two whole megabytes worth, and that the processor ran it

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:21.399
<v Speaker 1>up blistering two three mega hurts. That processor was the

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 1>G three power PC processor, by the way, that's why

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 1>this computer is sometimes referred to as the iMac G three,

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:32.679
<v Speaker 1>because that was the processor that powered it. But he

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:36.360
<v Speaker 1>really wanted to focus on the impact of industrial design

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:39.879
<v Speaker 1>of the computer, and that's really what we want to

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 1>talk about. Two. We don't want to I'm not going

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 1>to run down all the technical specs because that's not

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 1>really what these episodes are about. We're talking about the

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:51.159
<v Speaker 1>aesthetic of Apple. So when Jobs revealed the iMac, the

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:54.400
<v Speaker 1>crowd could only see the front of the machine. Initially

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 1>they could just see the face of the iMac right,

0:21:57.160 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>it looked like a sleek, rounded computer, so instead of

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 1>sharp corners, that had rounded corners. And while they could

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:09.880
<v Speaker 1>only see one face of the computer initially, they went

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 1>ahead and went banana. And then Jobs brought in a

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:17.640
<v Speaker 1>camera that could you know, the camera operators could circle

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the iMac and the feed was sent live to movie

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:25.880
<v Speaker 1>screens that were in the presentation hall, so everyone could

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:29.440
<v Speaker 1>see the translucent plastic along the sides and the back

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:33.320
<v Speaker 1>of the computer. Um and Jobs showed off how the

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:35.959
<v Speaker 1>iMac had a handle as well in the back, like

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:39.760
<v Speaker 1>along the top, and that was a design factor that

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Johnny I've had suggested because he thought it looked cool.

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:46.359
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't practical. People weren't going to be carrying around

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:50.679
<v Speaker 1>their iMac computers everywhere, but it was something that just

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 1>made it look like you wanted to get your hands

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 1>on it. That was the whole point of it. So

0:22:57.200 --> 0:23:01.640
<v Speaker 1>this was not a practical component added into the design.

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 1>It was one at least not practical in the sense

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:06.679
<v Speaker 1>of physically practical. It was practical in the sense of

0:23:06.760 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 1>marketing because it was another thing that made you want

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:13.680
<v Speaker 1>to pick one of these things up and purchase it. Right.

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 1>So Jobs agreed to that design change, even though it

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:19.720
<v Speaker 1>meant that the production costs of the case of the

0:23:19.720 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 1>computer would be even higher because it would require a

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 1>special approach to make this handle that's incorporated into the

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 1>case itself. Jobs would end up saying it looks like

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 1>it came from another planet, a good planet, one that

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 1>has better designers, which huge accolades for Johnny. I've right

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:43.200
<v Speaker 1>saying that Johnny Ivan his team were better than all

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the other designers on Earth. Now, the IMAX solved a

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:50.200
<v Speaker 1>ton of issues. For one thing, the all in one

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:53.399
<v Speaker 1>design meant that Apple could actually ship an iMac in

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:57.199
<v Speaker 1>a single box that contained the computer, the keyboard, and

0:23:57.240 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the mouse. More on the mouse in the second there

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 1>were no components to connect apart from the keyboard and

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 1>mouse to the computer, right, So you didn't have to

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:08.439
<v Speaker 1>connect speakers to it, you didn't have to connect the

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:12.480
<v Speaker 1>monitor to the tower. All of that was integrated. It

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:17.639
<v Speaker 1>was one thing, So that really simplified the setup process Apple,

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and to make sure that the customer wouldn't need to

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 1>install any software or do anything complicated, they wanted it

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 1>to work out of the box. Like this was the

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 1>beginning of that idea of it just works, although that

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:33.639
<v Speaker 1>wasn't how Steve Jobs described it yet he would later

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 1>describe Apple products as it just works. That would become

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:39.919
<v Speaker 1>one of kind of the mottos of the company. So

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:42.640
<v Speaker 1>all you really had to do was take the iMac

0:24:42.680 --> 0:24:45.640
<v Speaker 1>out of the box, plug it in, turn it on,

0:24:45.840 --> 0:24:48.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, have the keyboard and mouse connected, and you

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 1>were good to go. They really simplified the process of

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:53.919
<v Speaker 1>connecting to the Internet as well and doing so well

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 1>using a really attractively designed computer case. And it really

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 1>was a showcase for ives work and his team's work.

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:07.199
<v Speaker 1>Their collaboration on each design element got the spotlight. And

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:10.439
<v Speaker 1>like I said, the iMac was a watershed product for Apple.

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:13.440
<v Speaker 1>The company had been in danger of bankruptcy due to

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 1>mismanagement of the previous regime, and Apple and Jobs both

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 1>needed a slam dunk hit or a grand slam hit

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:27.160
<v Speaker 1>if you prefer, and the iMac delivered. Now, I did

0:25:27.240 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 1>mention the computer mouse that was one part of the

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 1>iMac that was not a slam dunk. The computer mouse

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 1>for the iMac was small and it was circular in shape,

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 1>not like egg shaped or oblong like your typical computer mouse,

0:25:42.400 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 1>but more like almost like a perfect circle, and it

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 1>also had a very short chord. So it was very

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:52.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty to look at. It had the same translucent polycarbonate

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:57.879
<v Speaker 1>plastic and had the same color features as the parent

0:25:57.960 --> 0:26:01.399
<v Speaker 1>iMac that it came with, But the mouse itself was

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 1>awkward to use. The size and the shape meant it

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:07.199
<v Speaker 1>was a little challenging to keep things on track, because

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:10.879
<v Speaker 1>if the mouse rotated even a little bit under your hand,

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 1>then it meant whenever you moved the mouse, the cursor

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:15.679
<v Speaker 1>was going to go in the direction you had not

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:20.680
<v Speaker 1>intended it to go on um and the cable length

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 1>also meant it could get a little hard to use

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:25.439
<v Speaker 1>as well. It could, you know, limit you. And so

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:29.879
<v Speaker 1>this particular mouse, which would gain the derogatory nickname the

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:34.679
<v Speaker 1>hockey Buck, wasn't lauded like the iMac was. It was

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:37.960
<v Speaker 1>very pretty, but it was not practical, and this would

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 1>not be the last time that I've and his team

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:43.719
<v Speaker 1>would design something that would be criticized as emphasizing form

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 1>over function. But the iMac it became the fastest selling

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:52.879
<v Speaker 1>computer in Apple's history. At that point. The company moved

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred thousand units by the end of its first

0:26:56.040 --> 0:27:00.240
<v Speaker 1>year in existence. More importantly, it marked a reverse soul

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:05.400
<v Speaker 1>of Apple's fortunes. So for two years, essentially the company

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 1>had been reporting massive losses. It had been operating in

0:27:09.320 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the red, but the IMAX popularity gave Apple a profitable

0:27:14.440 --> 0:27:18.159
<v Speaker 1>quarter in early and then it was off to the races.

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 1>The company that so many people had shrugged off as

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:24.920
<v Speaker 1>having lost its way appeared to be not just back

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 1>on track, but leagues ahead of the competition. And it

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:34.119
<v Speaker 1>was largely thanks to Ive's design team that tam was

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:38.399
<v Speaker 1>already hard at work on another product, one similar in

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 1>many ways to the iMac, and this was the eye Book,

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:45.200
<v Speaker 1>which was a nod to the iMac and the intended

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:48.760
<v Speaker 1>purpose to serve as a computer that could quickly connect

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:52.400
<v Speaker 1>to the Internet. So this was a clamshell laptop computer

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:55.720
<v Speaker 1>that also featured rounded corners, so you didn't have these

0:27:55.720 --> 0:27:59.879
<v Speaker 1>sharp corners of your typical laptop. It also featured colorful

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:05.280
<v Speaker 1>rubber accents that bordered a polycarbonate white plastic case to

0:28:05.359 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 1>give it kind of a whimsical appearance. There are elements

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 1>of translucent plastic in that case as well, and a

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:15.639
<v Speaker 1>lot of the design elements that made the IMAX so

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:20.119
<v Speaker 1>compelling found their way into the Eyebook design. By the

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 1>time Steve Jobs is ready to unveil this new computer

0:28:23.680 --> 0:28:27.440
<v Speaker 1>in nine, a year after the iMac had come out,

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:31.679
<v Speaker 1>the crowd was already on board. You should really watch

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 1>this presentation, the Eyebook unveiling presentation, to see how the

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 1>cult of Apple was off to a big start. Even

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 1>as early as nine, the crowd had not even seen

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:48.120
<v Speaker 1>a single image of the laptop. But as soon as

0:28:48.200 --> 0:28:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Jobs revealed that Apple had a new consumer laptop to

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 1>show off after referencing the incredibly popular iMac, he was

0:28:55.880 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 1>already getting crazy amounts of applause. He got even more

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:03.360
<v Speaker 1>when he revealed that the name of the laptop was Eyebook,

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:05.920
<v Speaker 1>and he still hadn't actually shown off the ding dang

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 1>darn thing. Because Apple was known as using this naming

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 1>convention of power in front of its professional grade hardware,

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 1>so a power Mac was meant for professionals, whereas the

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 1>iMac was meant as a consumer product. Well, the professional

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 1>grade horrible Mac computer was called a power book. So

0:29:29.640 --> 0:29:32.680
<v Speaker 1>he said, since we have the iMac, this is going

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 1>to be the Eyebook, and that alone got a huge

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 1>ovation from the crowd. I mean, it really was bonkers,

0:29:41.120 --> 0:29:44.440
<v Speaker 1>and Jobs had to have been flying high. His audience

0:29:44.640 --> 0:29:47.640
<v Speaker 1>was already on his side. He didn't have to win

0:29:47.720 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 1>them over. They were providing him a ton of energy.

0:29:51.200 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 1>So he then went through the technical specs of the laptop,

0:29:54.440 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 1>which again not really important for this podcast, so I'm

0:29:57.440 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 1>not going to go through them, And then he finally

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:03.520
<v Speaker 1>showed off the design. And when he did, he showed

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 1>off this tangerine colored, rubber accented laptop, so like, all

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the color parts are rubber that overlay the white polycarbonate plastic.

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 1>And it was a nice nod to Ive's past I

0:30:18.560 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 1>think because in case you don't remember from the last episode,

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Johnny I've came to Apple after he had been working

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 1>at a design consultancy firm called Tangerine. Even the Apple

0:30:29.800 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 1>logo on the front was tangerine and color against the

0:30:34.040 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 1>white polycarbonate plastic on the back. You had the entire

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:43.120
<v Speaker 1>bottom of the laptop coated in this, you know, tangerine

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 1>shaded rubber, except for the Apple logo which was in white.

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:53.000
<v Speaker 1>So very nice little accent nods. Jobs continued with the presentation,

0:30:53.080 --> 0:30:56.800
<v Speaker 1>even though you can hear the audience roaring like he

0:30:56.920 --> 0:31:01.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't pause for them too a shout out their their

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:05.120
<v Speaker 1>joy at seeing this, and they would roar again when

0:31:05.200 --> 0:31:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Jobs revealed that the computer had a handle near the

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:10.400
<v Speaker 1>hinge of the laptop, which would let you carry the

0:31:10.440 --> 0:31:12.760
<v Speaker 1>laptop like a briefcase, which just goes to show we

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 1>were easier to please way back in. He also showed

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:19.640
<v Speaker 1>how the laptop didn't have a latch, so it wouldn't

0:31:19.760 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 1>latch closed and you wouldn't have to press anything in

0:31:22.480 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 1>order to open it. Uh, the hinge was had enough

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:28.520
<v Speaker 1>tension in it to keep the laptop closed under normal conditions.

0:31:29.000 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 1>He also showed how the communication ports didn't have covers,

0:31:31.640 --> 0:31:34.200
<v Speaker 1>which made them easier to access. You can really see

0:31:34.240 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 1>ives influence here, his desire to make the products something

0:31:37.040 --> 0:31:39.760
<v Speaker 1>that you would want to use, and trying to avoid

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:44.400
<v Speaker 1>any components that would make that experience frustrating. Jobs announced

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:47.760
<v Speaker 1>that the Eyebook would be available in the colors tangerine

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:51.840
<v Speaker 1>or blueberry upon their first release. Later on, Apple would

0:31:51.840 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 1>include a couple of other colors. They had Indigo, graphite,

0:31:55.440 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and key line. I never owned an Eyebook, but I

0:31:58.560 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 1>have to say that the color and do signs really

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:04.160
<v Speaker 1>actually do look super inviting. I mean, I know that

0:32:04.240 --> 0:32:07.720
<v Speaker 1>my phone is technically more advanced than those computers are,

0:32:08.080 --> 0:32:11.400
<v Speaker 1>but still I kind of would like a Tangerine eyebook

0:32:11.480 --> 0:32:14.080
<v Speaker 1>because it's just really pretty. And that goes to show

0:32:14.120 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 1>how i'vean his team were geniuses. They tapped into something

0:32:18.600 --> 0:32:20.640
<v Speaker 1>really powerful. They were able to come up with an

0:32:20.640 --> 0:32:24.680
<v Speaker 1>aesthetic that had an instant appeal, and I've, with his

0:32:24.760 --> 0:32:28.520
<v Speaker 1>tendency towards simplicity and minimalism, kept his team from adding

0:32:28.520 --> 0:32:33.960
<v Speaker 1>in superfluous or distracting features or embellishments. Now we're gonna

0:32:34.000 --> 0:32:36.240
<v Speaker 1>take another quick break. When we come back, i'll talk

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:42.480
<v Speaker 1>about and I've designed product that sadly did not see

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the kind of success that the iMac and eyebook would.

0:32:45.720 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 1>But we'll do that after these messages. So I don't

0:32:56.360 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 1>want to give the impression that Johnny I've was incapable

0:33:00.800 --> 0:33:04.240
<v Speaker 1>of failure. We already saw that the IMAX mouse was

0:33:04.360 --> 0:33:07.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of a misstep that people didn't really like using it.

0:33:07.960 --> 0:33:10.160
<v Speaker 1>And if you don't like using a product, that's a

0:33:10.320 --> 0:33:12.920
<v Speaker 1>that's a huge design problem. Right. It can look as

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:16.240
<v Speaker 1>gorgeous as anything, but if people don't like using it,

0:33:16.240 --> 0:33:20.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a failure. Well, ivan Apple did turn out a

0:33:20.680 --> 0:33:25.320
<v Speaker 1>few misfires. The eyebook and iMac were both really well

0:33:25.720 --> 0:33:31.400
<v Speaker 1>performing products, but one that wasn't was the power Mac

0:33:31.440 --> 0:33:35.200
<v Speaker 1>G four Cube, which had a G four processor in it,

0:33:35.240 --> 0:33:36.960
<v Speaker 1>which is what gave it its name, just as the

0:33:37.000 --> 0:33:41.600
<v Speaker 1>iMac G three would be called that well. The power

0:33:41.680 --> 0:33:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Mac G four Cube was meant for professional users because

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:48.000
<v Speaker 1>it had the power designation right, so it was more

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 1>powerful and included more features than what you would find

0:33:50.880 --> 0:33:55.680
<v Speaker 1>in consumer Macintosh computers, and also had a hefty price

0:33:55.720 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 1>tag to go along for the ride. The design of

0:33:58.920 --> 0:34:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the power Cube was incredibly striking, because, as the name

0:34:03.040 --> 0:34:06.280
<v Speaker 1>tells you, the computer's form factor was that of a

0:34:06.360 --> 0:34:09.920
<v Speaker 1>cube rather than a tower. However, I should mention it

0:34:09.960 --> 0:34:13.359
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a perfect cube and measured seven point seven by

0:34:13.400 --> 0:34:17.240
<v Speaker 1>seven point seven by nine point eight inches or twenty

0:34:17.280 --> 0:34:21.680
<v Speaker 1>by twenty by twenty five centimeters. Further, the cube had

0:34:21.760 --> 0:34:26.799
<v Speaker 1>a housing that was made of clear acrylic glass, and

0:34:27.000 --> 0:34:30.480
<v Speaker 1>i've's team chose that design because it gave the computer

0:34:30.760 --> 0:34:34.240
<v Speaker 1>this sort of illusion of hovering just above the desk

0:34:34.360 --> 0:34:37.440
<v Speaker 1>it would sit on because the bottom of the case

0:34:37.560 --> 0:34:42.000
<v Speaker 1>of this acrylic case would uh hold up the computer

0:34:42.160 --> 0:34:45.719
<v Speaker 1>a couple of inches. The computer had no internal fan

0:34:45.920 --> 0:34:49.360
<v Speaker 1>inside it to dissipate heat. Instead, it relied on a

0:34:49.480 --> 0:34:52.440
<v Speaker 1>grill in the top of the computer case that allowed

0:34:52.480 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 1>heat to escape passively. It also didn't have a physical

0:34:56.160 --> 0:35:00.399
<v Speaker 1>power button. Instead, it had a touch sensitive button that

0:35:00.480 --> 0:35:02.440
<v Speaker 1>as soon as you made contact with it, would power

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:05.960
<v Speaker 1>on the computer or would make a power down computer

0:35:06.040 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 1>go to sleep, which was a problem some people had

0:35:08.600 --> 0:35:12.759
<v Speaker 1>where they would accidentally graze this touch sensitive button and

0:35:12.840 --> 0:35:16.200
<v Speaker 1>turn their working computer into sleep mode, and that was frustrating.

0:35:16.960 --> 0:35:21.040
<v Speaker 1>The cubic form factor placed other limitations on this computer,

0:35:21.320 --> 0:35:24.799
<v Speaker 1>namely in order to fit all the components into that

0:35:24.960 --> 0:35:27.920
<v Speaker 1>small space, and meant Apple would not be able to

0:35:27.920 --> 0:35:32.640
<v Speaker 1>include expansion slots, so you couldn't expand out the capabilities

0:35:32.719 --> 0:35:34.799
<v Speaker 1>of the computer beyond what it could do out of

0:35:34.840 --> 0:35:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the box. The trail list CD slot that jobs had

0:35:38.600 --> 0:35:41.319
<v Speaker 1>wanted for the iMac would find its way into the

0:35:41.360 --> 0:35:45.480
<v Speaker 1>G four Cube and Johnny I've relished the challenge of

0:35:45.600 --> 0:35:49.160
<v Speaker 1>creating a form factor of a computer that was unique

0:35:49.239 --> 0:35:52.840
<v Speaker 1>among PCs. And while the design meant Apple had to

0:35:52.920 --> 0:35:57.480
<v Speaker 1>make some massive compromises, Johnny Ivan his team did manage

0:35:57.520 --> 0:36:00.719
<v Speaker 1>to get it all working, and the process really solidified

0:36:00.760 --> 0:36:05.279
<v Speaker 1>a shift in Apple's operations. The design team would now

0:36:05.400 --> 0:36:10.319
<v Speaker 1>have a much larger influence in product development than it

0:36:10.400 --> 0:36:13.240
<v Speaker 1>had ever had before because Jobs was such a huge

0:36:13.320 --> 0:36:18.040
<v Speaker 1>ally for industrial design. While the physical appearance of the

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Cube was striking, it failed to find a real market.

0:36:22.280 --> 0:36:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Critics said that Jobs actually didn't identify a target market

0:36:26.160 --> 0:36:30.040
<v Speaker 1>for the device, and that the lack of features, paired

0:36:30.080 --> 0:36:33.000
<v Speaker 1>with a high sticker price meant that most folks in

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:35.719
<v Speaker 1>the market for a more powerful Mac We're gonna go

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:39.800
<v Speaker 1>with a more traditional PowerMac computer, not the Cube. Also,

0:36:39.920 --> 0:36:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the injection molding fabrication process for the Cube's case sometimes

0:36:45.200 --> 0:36:48.839
<v Speaker 1>had errors which introduced flaws like cracks in the clear

0:36:48.840 --> 0:36:53.480
<v Speaker 1>acrylic case, so some customers were frustrated that it wasn't

0:36:53.600 --> 0:36:57.000
<v Speaker 1>up to the standards of the previous models. Where you know,

0:36:57.080 --> 0:37:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Johnny I was known for going and inspecting the manufacturing

0:37:01.520 --> 0:37:04.680
<v Speaker 1>process to make absolutely certain that the design he created

0:37:05.080 --> 0:37:08.160
<v Speaker 1>would come out flawlessly. This was a case where that

0:37:08.280 --> 0:37:12.239
<v Speaker 1>did not happen, at least in some instances. Leading up

0:37:12.239 --> 0:37:15.600
<v Speaker 1>to the Cube's release, Apple had enjoyed nearly three full

0:37:15.680 --> 0:37:21.160
<v Speaker 1>years of profitability, but the Cube underperformed drastically, and Apple

0:37:21.239 --> 0:37:25.120
<v Speaker 1>said that poor Cube sales led to a ninety million

0:37:25.120 --> 0:37:28.320
<v Speaker 1>dollar shortfall for the company just won the cube alone.

0:37:29.239 --> 0:37:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it was a hundred eighty million dollars less

0:37:32.120 --> 0:37:35.880
<v Speaker 1>than what they had projected total, so the Cube accounting

0:37:35.880 --> 0:37:39.719
<v Speaker 1>for about half of that shortfall, and so that was

0:37:39.760 --> 0:37:42.400
<v Speaker 1>a pretty tough quarter, and it was another reminder that

0:37:42.520 --> 0:37:47.760
<v Speaker 1>leaning more on form over function can sometimes have negative consequences.

0:37:48.239 --> 0:37:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Now we'll say that despite the poor sales, the presentation

0:37:52.239 --> 0:37:55.439
<v Speaker 1>the Jobs gave in order to introduce the cube went

0:37:55.480 --> 0:38:00.600
<v Speaker 1>over like gangbusters, so that initial excitement didn't progress into

0:38:00.640 --> 0:38:04.200
<v Speaker 1>sales unfortunately. But it was another case where the cold

0:38:04.239 --> 0:38:07.359
<v Speaker 1>of Apple was in full display. Jobs came out and

0:38:07.400 --> 0:38:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the crowd went gaga for the presentation once they saw

0:38:11.000 --> 0:38:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the design of the cube, particularly when Steve Jobs turned

0:38:15.360 --> 0:38:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the case upside down and revealed that there was a

0:38:17.960 --> 0:38:22.840
<v Speaker 1>handle on the underside of the computer and by unlocking

0:38:22.880 --> 0:38:27.799
<v Speaker 1>the handle, he could pull out the internals of the

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:31.480
<v Speaker 1>computer in one smooth motion. You didn't have to fiddle

0:38:31.640 --> 0:38:34.600
<v Speaker 1>with with screws or anything like that and remove a panel,

0:38:34.640 --> 0:38:37.560
<v Speaker 1>You just lifted it straight out of the case. I

0:38:37.600 --> 0:38:41.520
<v Speaker 1>will say that was an amazing design choice, like something

0:38:41.560 --> 0:38:45.440
<v Speaker 1>that made it super easy to access the internals, really

0:38:45.480 --> 0:38:48.760
<v Speaker 1>really cool. It's just unfortunate that because of the form factor,

0:38:49.600 --> 0:38:51.120
<v Speaker 1>there wasn't a whole lot you could do, Like you

0:38:51.160 --> 0:38:54.880
<v Speaker 1>couldn't really slot in expansion cards into it or anything

0:38:54.920 --> 0:38:59.280
<v Speaker 1>because there wasn't the space for it. But the design

0:38:59.480 --> 0:39:04.680
<v Speaker 1>choice to make that a feature super cool, now it

0:39:04.800 --> 0:39:08.759
<v Speaker 1>just didn't sell well. So it was a kind of

0:39:08.800 --> 0:39:12.120
<v Speaker 1>a black mark on Johnny i'ves record at that point,

0:39:12.440 --> 0:39:14.560
<v Speaker 1>not that it was entirely his fault, I mean it

0:39:14.600 --> 0:39:18.800
<v Speaker 1>was it was a company wide failure, right because again,

0:39:18.840 --> 0:39:21.319
<v Speaker 1>the decision to go with that form factor placed so

0:39:21.360 --> 0:39:24.360
<v Speaker 1>many limitations and restrictions on the rest of the teams

0:39:25.040 --> 0:39:29.440
<v Speaker 1>that it was pretty much impossible to create something that would,

0:39:30.080 --> 0:39:33.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, go toe to toe with the other more powerful,

0:39:33.360 --> 0:39:38.560
<v Speaker 1>professional level computers that Apple was creating and also justify

0:39:38.719 --> 0:39:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the very high price tag. So a lot of people said,

0:39:42.120 --> 0:39:46.960
<v Speaker 1>it's more like a very expensive toy rather than a

0:39:47.120 --> 0:39:52.360
<v Speaker 1>computer that justifies the high price. However, it was the

0:39:52.360 --> 0:39:56.280
<v Speaker 1>next big product line that would really push Apple into

0:39:56.440 --> 0:39:59.400
<v Speaker 1>a new trajectory. It was the product line that I

0:39:59.560 --> 0:40:03.719
<v Speaker 1>argue really saved Apple and put it on a pathway

0:40:03.719 --> 0:40:11.319
<v Speaker 1>to becoming ridiculously uh successful. The product wouldn't come out

0:40:11.440 --> 0:40:16.000
<v Speaker 1>till two one, and the first really breakthrough model of

0:40:16.040 --> 0:40:19.960
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't emerge until two four. I am, of course

0:40:20.320 --> 0:40:24.480
<v Speaker 1>talking about the iPod. Now, I have done episodes on

0:40:24.520 --> 0:40:26.479
<v Speaker 1>the iPod before, so we're not going to go through

0:40:27.200 --> 0:40:29.719
<v Speaker 1>all of that. I will say it was not the

0:40:29.760 --> 0:40:33.400
<v Speaker 1>first MP three player. It was Apple's first MB three player,

0:40:33.520 --> 0:40:36.360
<v Speaker 1>but it wasn't the first in the world. So Apple

0:40:37.280 --> 0:40:40.439
<v Speaker 1>is very rarely first to market with a technology that's

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:44.280
<v Speaker 1>not really the company's m oh, that's not what it does. Instead,

0:40:44.360 --> 0:40:48.759
<v Speaker 1>Apple is known for designing top of class examples of

0:40:48.800 --> 0:40:53.360
<v Speaker 1>technologies that someone else has already created. So no, iPod

0:40:53.480 --> 0:40:55.640
<v Speaker 1>was not the first MP three player. It was just

0:40:56.200 --> 0:40:59.439
<v Speaker 1>the first one that would become a runaway success, though

0:41:00.000 --> 0:41:01.560
<v Speaker 1>as I said, it took a bit of time for

0:41:01.600 --> 0:41:04.520
<v Speaker 1>that to happen. Now, the first model of the iPod

0:41:04.600 --> 0:41:07.799
<v Speaker 1>had some features that the company would quickly drop. For

0:41:07.880 --> 0:41:11.880
<v Speaker 1>one thing, it had a mechanical method for scrolling through songs.

0:41:12.680 --> 0:41:14.759
<v Speaker 1>If you looked at the face of the iPod, you

0:41:14.760 --> 0:41:20.640
<v Speaker 1>would see there was this circular device that's on the

0:41:20.680 --> 0:41:23.919
<v Speaker 1>face of the iPod. Underneath the screen and you would

0:41:23.920 --> 0:41:26.840
<v Speaker 1>put your thumb on this and you would physically turn

0:41:27.440 --> 0:41:30.240
<v Speaker 1>this circle. It was a scroll wheel in other words,

0:41:30.800 --> 0:41:34.200
<v Speaker 1>and you would use it to click through playlists or songs.

0:41:34.320 --> 0:41:38.400
<v Speaker 1>You can scroll through menus this way. Um. But it

0:41:38.480 --> 0:41:42.680
<v Speaker 1>physically would turn on its axis. So it had this

0:41:42.760 --> 0:41:48.680
<v Speaker 1>tactile uh feature that other iPods would lack in the future,

0:41:49.080 --> 0:41:53.040
<v Speaker 1>probably because this was a mechanical point of failure. Although

0:41:53.520 --> 0:41:57.800
<v Speaker 1>there's something really satisfying I think of turning a mechanical component.

0:41:58.160 --> 0:42:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we've seen plenty of fidget devices that are

0:42:01.719 --> 0:42:04.320
<v Speaker 1>that's all they are, right, They're just a little physical

0:42:04.440 --> 0:42:07.920
<v Speaker 1>things that you can play with in order to, you know,

0:42:08.960 --> 0:42:13.120
<v Speaker 1>burn off some excess energy. And the original iPod had

0:42:13.160 --> 0:42:17.200
<v Speaker 1>one of those mechanical elements to it. Uh. Sadly, I

0:42:17.239 --> 0:42:20.120
<v Speaker 1>guess well, I guess it depends on your perspective. In

0:42:20.120 --> 0:42:22.360
<v Speaker 1>my view. Sadly, they would get rid of that in

0:42:22.440 --> 0:42:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the future versions of the iPod. But surrounding this scroll

0:42:26.120 --> 0:42:29.960
<v Speaker 1>circle were four buttons that made up a perimeter around

0:42:30.040 --> 0:42:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the circle, and these buttons had controls like play and pause,

0:42:34.520 --> 0:42:37.359
<v Speaker 1>and rewind and fast forward, that kind of thing. Now,

0:42:37.400 --> 0:42:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the original iPod could hold about a thousand songs, and

0:42:40.200 --> 0:42:42.720
<v Speaker 1>it lacked a few things that really prevented this first

0:42:42.719 --> 0:42:46.480
<v Speaker 1>generation from becoming a superstar. For one thing, it didn't

0:42:46.480 --> 0:42:50.160
<v Speaker 1>have a USB port. Instead, it had a FireWire port,

0:42:50.600 --> 0:42:54.160
<v Speaker 1>which really limited how you would be able to use it. Also,

0:42:54.160 --> 0:42:56.640
<v Speaker 1>there was no compatible software that you could run on

0:42:56.719 --> 0:43:00.200
<v Speaker 1>a PC to interact with an iPod, so it that

0:43:00.280 --> 0:43:03.040
<v Speaker 1>if you wanted an iPod, you had to have an

0:43:03.080 --> 0:43:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Apple computer in order to make it work. And those

0:43:06.080 --> 0:43:09.320
<v Speaker 1>limitations kept the original iPod from becoming the success it

0:43:09.360 --> 0:43:12.440
<v Speaker 1>would later be, but it did show the direction of

0:43:12.480 --> 0:43:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the company and it set the tone for moving forward.

0:43:15.800 --> 0:43:19.400
<v Speaker 1>The next generation of the device ditched the mechanical wheel.

0:43:19.520 --> 0:43:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Instead it had a touch sensitive wheel so capacity of

0:43:23.440 --> 0:43:28.280
<v Speaker 1>touch instead of mechanically turning a circle around. But physically

0:43:28.440 --> 0:43:31.200
<v Speaker 1>it resembled the first generation. It was not a huge

0:43:31.239 --> 0:43:35.160
<v Speaker 1>departure in design. Uh the mechanical wheel was gone, but

0:43:35.239 --> 0:43:37.239
<v Speaker 1>the layout of the device was pretty much the same.

0:43:37.280 --> 0:43:39.560
<v Speaker 1>There were a couple of other minor changes of the

0:43:39.560 --> 0:43:43.279
<v Speaker 1>FireWire port then had a cover instead of it being

0:43:43.280 --> 0:43:45.800
<v Speaker 1>open like it was in the first generation of the iPod,

0:43:46.360 --> 0:43:49.239
<v Speaker 1>and ives team would take a larger departure with the

0:43:49.320 --> 0:43:53.560
<v Speaker 1>third edition of the iPod, the entire interface became touch based.

0:43:54.160 --> 0:43:57.000
<v Speaker 1>There was not yet a touch screen, but there were

0:43:57.280 --> 0:44:02.520
<v Speaker 1>touch buttons instead of mechanical buttons. Two access all the controls.

0:44:03.080 --> 0:44:06.280
<v Speaker 1>IVES team moved the control buttons above the touch wheel

0:44:06.480 --> 0:44:09.120
<v Speaker 1>rather than around the perimeter of it, and the team

0:44:09.160 --> 0:44:12.640
<v Speaker 1>would continue to make adjustments to the iPods design, including

0:44:12.680 --> 0:44:15.239
<v Speaker 1>the creation of spinoff products. You know, you had the

0:44:15.280 --> 0:44:19.440
<v Speaker 1>iPod Mini, which only lasted two generations, and you had

0:44:19.440 --> 0:44:23.759
<v Speaker 1>the iPod Nano, which was the replacement for the iPod Mini,

0:44:23.880 --> 0:44:26.480
<v Speaker 1>so was an even smaller version of the iPod, and

0:44:26.560 --> 0:44:29.239
<v Speaker 1>then later on you had the iPod Shuffle as well.

0:44:29.600 --> 0:44:31.759
<v Speaker 1>We'll probably touch on those a little bit in the

0:44:31.800 --> 0:44:34.240
<v Speaker 1>next episode that we won't go into as much detail

0:44:34.320 --> 0:44:36.920
<v Speaker 1>as we have for the you know, i amac and

0:44:37.000 --> 0:44:40.359
<v Speaker 1>eyebook and the Cube for example, so we're gonna leave

0:44:40.360 --> 0:44:43.040
<v Speaker 1>it off here, and in our next episode we'll talk

0:44:43.040 --> 0:44:47.160
<v Speaker 1>about how the iPod design would influence Apple's direction and

0:44:47.200 --> 0:44:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the general public's perception of the company. I mean, we

0:44:50.280 --> 0:44:53.880
<v Speaker 1>call them podcasts because we named it after the iPod.

0:44:54.680 --> 0:44:59.080
<v Speaker 1>That's how definitive a product that became. And we'll talk

0:44:59.120 --> 0:45:04.279
<v Speaker 1>about ives role in creating this kind of momentum. Then

0:45:04.320 --> 0:45:07.080
<v Speaker 1>we'll also talk about other products, the big one obviously

0:45:07.160 --> 0:45:12.239
<v Speaker 1>being the iPhone and how that design ended up just

0:45:12.560 --> 0:45:19.479
<v Speaker 1>cementing Apple's place as a tastemaker in consumer electronics. And

0:45:19.520 --> 0:45:23.440
<v Speaker 1>then we'll also talk about the various things that played

0:45:23.480 --> 0:45:29.680
<v Speaker 1>a part in I've becoming less enamored of Apple and

0:45:29.880 --> 0:45:33.520
<v Speaker 1>ultimately his decision one to leave the company as an employee,

0:45:33.880 --> 0:45:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and then too to essentially cut ties with Apple by

0:45:37.560 --> 0:45:41.920
<v Speaker 1>not extending the contract that his design firm had established

0:45:41.960 --> 0:45:45.200
<v Speaker 1>with the company. Those will be things we'll talk about

0:45:45.239 --> 0:45:48.399
<v Speaker 1>in the next episode in this series. I hope you're

0:45:48.480 --> 0:45:51.600
<v Speaker 1>enjoying these episodes. If you have suggestions for topics I

0:45:51.600 --> 0:45:54.680
<v Speaker 1>should cover in future episodes of tech Stuff, please reach

0:45:54.680 --> 0:45:56.879
<v Speaker 1>out and tell me. You can do that in one

0:45:56.920 --> 0:45:59.600
<v Speaker 1>of two ways. One way is to download the free

0:45:59.719 --> 0:46:03.560
<v Speaker 1>i art radio app, navigate to the tech Stuff podcast page,

0:46:03.880 --> 0:46:07.120
<v Speaker 1>use that little microphone icon to record a voice message

0:46:07.200 --> 0:46:09.480
<v Speaker 1>up to thirty seconds in length, and let me know

0:46:09.560 --> 0:46:12.200
<v Speaker 1>through there, Or you can reach out on Twitter. The

0:46:12.280 --> 0:46:15.880
<v Speaker 1>handle for the show is text Stuff hs W and

0:46:15.960 --> 0:46:25.280
<v Speaker 1>I'll talk to you again really soon. Yeah. Text Stuff

0:46:25.400 --> 0:46:28.560
<v Speaker 1>is an i Heart Radio production. For more podcasts from

0:46:28.560 --> 0:46:32.319
<v Speaker 1>my Heart Radio visit the I heart Radio app, Apple podcasts,

0:46:32.440 --> 0:46:34.440
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.