WEBVTT - Free Picks for EVERY Week 12 NFL Game (Ep. 391)

0:00:01.080 --> 0:00:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in everybody to Betting Pros. It's time to place

0:00:03.360 --> 0:00:06.360
<v Speaker 1>your bets. It's me Joey p Joe Pizapeta and happy

0:00:06.440 --> 0:00:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Thanksgiving week everybody. It's week twelve. That means we've got

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:12.400
<v Speaker 1>wall to wall football every day of the week. You

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>want games on Thursday, and we'll give you game on Thursday.

0:00:14.320 --> 0:00:16.680
<v Speaker 1>About Black Friday, we want a Black Friday game, Sure

0:00:16.680 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>we'll get you that. We'll get you games on Sunday, Monday.

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Everything forget it, all the football, all the food, all

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the leftovers, everything you can handle them, of course, to

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 1>help me break it all down as Pat fitz Morris,

0:00:25.560 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 1>my Patty Cakes and of course Sam Hopping as well

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the mad scientists in the data lab. A little break

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>from the NBA and all the other things to do

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>and talk a little football here for Sam. And don't

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>forget everybody. We're still giving away free stuff. So if

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:41.519
<v Speaker 1>you want a premium upgrade to Betting Pros, now is

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:43.519
<v Speaker 1>the time to do it. Make sure you drop your

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 1>comments below, subscribe to the channel. Click that belt it

0:00:46.520 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>goes dings. You know every time a piece of content drops,

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>and if you're the big winner, that's how we're going

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>to notify you, so subscribe. Like the show. Be nice,

0:00:54.400 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 1>it's Thanksgiving, drop a little comment, and you can always

0:00:57.280 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>give us a review as well. That's always appreciated. If

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 1>you're listening to the podcast wherever you get your pods,

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>drop a nice five star review. It's the holiday scenes

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's time to do nice things. And let's start,

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:10.760
<v Speaker 1>boys with the Thanksgiving games, because we've got some fun

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:13.399
<v Speaker 1>ones here. The Green Bay Packers coming off a big victory.

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I know you two very excited, and let me start

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>there because I am angry. I promised that I would

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>lose my mind here on the show about the Chargers

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:25.400
<v Speaker 1>last week, boys, I said, I'm confident in the Chargers,

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 1>and I felt dirty and wrong, and I was wrong.

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:31.479
<v Speaker 1>It sucked. I'm mad. I'm mad at Brandon Staley, I'm

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 1>mad at the Chargers. I'm mad at the city of

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:36.479
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles, the whole thing. It was terrible, no good.

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>But the Green Bay Packers were good enough. They are

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:41.319
<v Speaker 1>going to be underdogs though when they go to Detroit.

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:44.199
<v Speaker 1>Troit's now eight and two after another big victory against

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the Bears at home. This one's in Detroit. Seven and

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 1>a half is the number here on the Detroit side.

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Forty six and a half over is the consensus line

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>you're getting on betting pros, and plus two eighty five

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>for the upset. Sam let's start with you on this

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 1>one here, because I already got to talk to fits

0:01:56.880 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 1>about the Packers more this morning on our FP show.

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk to you about the Packers. What

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>you saw. Obviously, Aaron Jones highly unlikely to play in

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 1>this game. I think we can all agree on that.

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 1>So what does this mean here for this number of

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the seven and a half? And do you put any

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of stock in what Andrew Erickson's been saying for

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 1>a few weeks now, which is ford Field might as

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 1>well be called Corsfield.

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:22.919
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if I understand that reference, but as

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 2>far as.

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 1>The baseball reference, it means a lot of scoring. There

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:28.839
<v Speaker 1>you go. I found the one spot there, the one

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>sport here where Sammy is not is up to speed.

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 2>Right. This is human, but it was pretty far out

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 2>of left field, and I wasn't quite quite expecting it.

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 2>But in any case, the Aaron Jones interest injury is interesting.

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:47.080
<v Speaker 2>I think the way that Green Bay wins this game

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:49.639
<v Speaker 2>is attacking the lines through the air. That's part of

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 2>the probably the weakest part of their defense, and I

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 2>think that's honestly good because aj Dillon might be the

0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 2>only running back available for the Packers in this game.

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 2>Their third string running back also got injured on Sunday.

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 2>But I do think that Detroit, especially after the lesson

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 2>inspiring outing from Jared Goff with three interceptions, is going

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 2>to lean into the run, which has been a struggle

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 2>for green Bay to stop. They allow a five point

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:23.800
<v Speaker 2>three percent explosive rush rate this year, which is the

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 2>fourth worst in the league. Detroit has a negative ten

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 2>percent pass right over expectation in two of their last

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 2>three games. Detroit, I think has the coaching advantage in

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 2>this game, so I expect Detroit to just sort of

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 2>play a little easier run the ball with Montgomery and

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 2>Gibbs and come away with this. If they're going to limit,

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 2>if they're able to limit green Bay to a couple

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 2>of three and out drives and then just pound the

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 2>clock by running the ball, then I expect Detroit to

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 2>be able to cover this. I had Detroit min Is

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 2>state for my numbers that it's at seven and a

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:00.920
<v Speaker 2>half right now, So I'm I'm leaning Detroit.

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm on the Detroit lean as well. Pat, how

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 1>about you. I just feel like Detroit sort of smells

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 1>that they can win this division and lock things up,

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and this is a big game for them in order

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>to really solidify them at the top of that North.

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 2>Oh.

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 3>If I was going to bet Detroit, and I'm kind

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 3>of leaning that way myself, I would want him at seven.

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 4>Man, I do not like seven and a half.

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:22.279
<v Speaker 3>So you know, it's funny if you look at Massy

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:23.599
<v Speaker 3>Peabody rankings, which.

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 4>Are a very useful tool for betters.

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 3>By the way, Massy Peabody had the Alliance as being

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 3>not quite three points better than the Packers on a

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:36.599
<v Speaker 3>neutral field as of going into week eleven, So it

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 3>seems like based on that there might be value on

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 3>the Packers. I don't really buy it. I think what

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:44.599
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to do is play the over Joe. You

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:47.159
<v Speaker 3>made the cores field reference it might be apt here,

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 3>and especially the way this game sets up, the Packers

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 3>are going to have to lean on their passing game.

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 3>With no Aaron Jones a forty five and a half,

0:04:56.160 --> 0:04:58.360
<v Speaker 3>it seems kind of a high total for the Packers,

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:01.599
<v Speaker 3>who are slow paced and not exactly explosive on offense,

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:03.719
<v Speaker 3>but they're gonna be forced to throw, and we know

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 3>they don't defend the run well and the Lions might

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 3>be able to just run it down their throat. So yeah,

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:12.920
<v Speaker 3>over is my leaning here, not real interest in either side.

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>And then numbers already jumping up to forty six and

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:17.719
<v Speaker 1>a half and some spots. Still okay with that one.

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:19.719
<v Speaker 3>Just yeah, I think so I'd played up to forty

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:21.479
<v Speaker 3>all right, six and a half forty seven.

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:23.280
<v Speaker 4>Maybe let's get.

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:25.039
<v Speaker 1>To the next one here, the Dallas Cowboys seven and

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:27.720
<v Speaker 1>three are hosting the Washington Commanders who lost to the Giants.

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 1>God what, let's not even get to that. Let's let's

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:33.279
<v Speaker 1>talk about instead. The numbers, of course is double digits

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:35.719
<v Speaker 1>minus eleven here for the Dallas Cowboys at home minus

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:38.360
<v Speaker 1>one ten. The consensus line of betting pros is forty

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half plus four to twenty five for

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the Washington upset. I know we always get Sam Howell

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:45.280
<v Speaker 1>plays up and down to the competition. This is one

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>of the play up to the competition. So pat do

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 1>you think he plays up to the competition and somehow

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>keeps this within the eleven or do you think the

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys continue at home to just look like an offensive juggernaut,

0:05:56.640 --> 0:05:59.280
<v Speaker 1>which they have here ever since the buye.

0:05:59.040 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 4>The Ladder Joe.

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:03.480
<v Speaker 3>I think the Cowboys have done really well against lesser competition.

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 3>They are four and one against the spread against teams

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:10.279
<v Speaker 3>who they've been favored by at least six points against,

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 3>and that doesn't even even include their forty to nothing

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 3>shall lacking of the Giants in Week one, where they

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 3>were only favored by three and a half. So yeah,

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I'm I'm gonna bet the Cowboys here to

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 3>you know, put Washington away. I mean, Washington showed their

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:27.599
<v Speaker 3>true colors against the Giants. They were just terrible in

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:31.159
<v Speaker 3>Week eleven. And it seems like this total is pretty

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:33.720
<v Speaker 3>tall too, because I'm not sure if the Commanders are

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:36.160
<v Speaker 3>going to do their part to push this game over

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 3>against that Dallas defense. And I mean, by the way,

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:42.159
<v Speaker 3>like the total jump from forty seven and a half

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 3>on Sunday night to forty eight and a half on

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:49.840
<v Speaker 3>Monday morning, Like I don't understand that. So like I

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:54.280
<v Speaker 3>like the under a lot, I like getting that extra point. Yeah,

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:58.480
<v Speaker 3>unless Dallas puts up a forty burger on the Commanders,

0:06:58.480 --> 0:06:59.719
<v Speaker 3>I don't see this one going over.

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:02.160
<v Speaker 1>That's the question, like if do they put up thirty five?

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 1>If they put up thirty five, Sam to me, I

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 1>think the forty eight and a half as well within range.

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 1>I think the Washington do their part in that. But

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 1>is there a certain aspect of this game that has

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 1>you interested in the early value?

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 2>Definitely taking Dallas with the points. They have six wins

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 2>this year by at least twenty points, which is just absurd.

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 2>Washington had did have six turnovers against the Giants this

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 2>past week, which is why I am now knocked out

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 2>of the survivor league that I was in. The Washington

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 2>rushing defense has played pretty decent lately. They haven't allowed

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 2>a success rate over forty percent since week eight. The

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 2>problem is Dallas is throwing a ton. They have a

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 2>sixty four point two percent neutral script pass right over

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 2>the last four weeks. Dak is just dealing. He is

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 2>going to carve up this Washington secondary more than the

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 2>turkey is going to be carved up in the kitchen.

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 1>There you go, all right, let's go to the night

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 1>game here San Francisco looking great. They're to go on

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the road at seven and three. There seven point favorites

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>there in Seattle. Now Gino Smith unlikely to play probably

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 1>in this game at this point, dealing with that Tricep

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 1>injury and that tough loss there to the Rams. Forty

0:08:11.080 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 1>two and a half is the number at minus one

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 1>ten the consensus line of VP for the Seattle upset,

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 1>it's plus two to fifty. Sam, do we see the

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>forty nine ers just continue to roll because it feels

0:08:20.920 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 1>like coming out of that buy this is a rejuvenated

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco team and that pass rush now with Bosa

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 1>and Chase on either side, is pretty ferocious. And Seattle

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:33.200
<v Speaker 1>not only down Gino but also probably down Kenneth Walker

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 1>too for the foreseeable future.

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this one's got a lot of injury things to

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 2>keep an eye on over the next couple of days.

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:43.239
<v Speaker 2>I really hope we get Gino in this game. Otherwise

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 2>that trip to fan is probably going to hit a

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:48.320
<v Speaker 2>little harder than normal. Early in the.

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Evening, Sammy's got jokes today, Pat I means he is ready,

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>he has done, he is ready for a break.

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 2>Well when I mean this is the week to get

0:08:56.679 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 2>the Thanksgiving puns in, so you got to take advantage.

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 2>But I think doing your part, I think Gino might

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 2>actually play in this game, given that he came back

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 2>in the last drive of the game against Los Angeles

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 2>this past week. That said, I love San Francisco minus

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 2>six and a half here.

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I've seen the number move to seven here in

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of spots already. I'm still comfortable. I think

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>they win this game by double digits. Pat like, this one,

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 1>to me is one of the best early lines of

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the week. I want to jump on it right now

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:26.560
<v Speaker 1>because whether Gino plays or not, he's not one hundred percent,

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 1>So I just believe in San Francisco right now. What

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>are your thoughts?

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and these teams played three times last season, Joe

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 3>and the forty nine Ers won all three in the

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 3>average margin victory was fifteen points six points, so I

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 3>could not possibly take Seattle here. And I kind of

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:46.319
<v Speaker 3>like the over based on the hope largely that Gino

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:48.959
<v Speaker 3>does play. I mean, I think both of these teams

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:51.720
<v Speaker 3>are maybe a little better on offense than they are

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 3>on defense. The forty nine Ers are first in offensive

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:58.960
<v Speaker 3>DVA the Seahawks eleventh, and in defensive DVA the forty

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 3>nine Ers are tenth the Hawks twentieth. So I think

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 3>we're gonna get points in this game if Gino plays,

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:06.720
<v Speaker 3>and maybe even if it's Drew Locke.

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Don't forget tomorrow, everybody. We've got a Thanksgiving special Andrew

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Erickson myself breaking down all the games and the Black

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Friday Game as well, for not only the games in

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 1>between the betting stuff, we've got the prop stuff. We're

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna do all of it here our favorite parlays of

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the day too. To enjoy the Thanksgiving games and have

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 1>a little action there on the side. And of course

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>the Black Friday Game a new tradition here. We'll see

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 1>how this one goes. And of course the league has

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:34.719
<v Speaker 1>to give us more Jets, because if there's one thing

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I can't get enough of, it's standalone New York football.

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Between the Jets and Giants. One of those two teams

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:42.320
<v Speaker 1>has got to be a standalone game, right, So let's

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:44.959
<v Speaker 1>talk about it. The Jets obviously underdogs, because well, Zach

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Wilson is horrible and the Jets offense is future. They

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>are eight point underdogs against the Miami Dolphins. Forty one

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 1>is the number for this one. The Jets on the

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 1>money lines plus three hundred. Pat Look, I'm taking the

0:10:56.360 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins here, this isn't double digits because they're giving respect

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 1>to the Jets defense. But I don't want to give

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the Jets too much respect. I think this eight is

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>so comfortable. I think Miami wins this one by ten

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>or more. Your thoughts in this contest.

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 3>I totally get it, Joe. The last time we wrote

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 3>off the Jets for lack of offense, they rebounded in a

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 3>pretty big way. Like in weeks two and three, the

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 3>Jets put up ten points against Dallas, ten points against

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 3>the Patriots. Then in Week four they hung tough with

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 3>the Chiefs and lost twenty three to twenty covered easily,

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 3>and then they won three straight, beating the Broncos, Eagles,

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:33.560
<v Speaker 3>and Giants. The one thing the Jets do really well

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 3>is blanket wide receivers, and if they are able to

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:39.200
<v Speaker 3>keep Tyreek Hill and Jalen Waddle under wraps, maybe they

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 3>can cover this number. So I'm kind of not interested

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 3>in either side.

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:45.960
<v Speaker 4>I don't know. Dolphins just feels like a little bit

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:46.960
<v Speaker 4>of a trap to me, Joe.

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 3>I just can't shake that feeling, and like this game

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:54.320
<v Speaker 3>could conceivably play under forty one and a half or

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:55.559
<v Speaker 3>forty one or whatever.

0:11:55.559 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 4>It's at now.

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:58.599
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting POV. Yeah, like using POV, Sam, what do

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 1>you think about that potentially on the under of this game,

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 1>because I mean, you know the Jets are going to

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 1>do their part there, like you know that's going to happen.

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:09.559
<v Speaker 1>So if they are a little lackluster or if they

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 1>are a little bit you know, slow here in the

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:14.680
<v Speaker 1>shorter week preparation wise, what do you make of maybe

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the under being the best play in this game?

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Sam, Yeah, I think it's certainly in play. Again, there's

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 2>some injury concerns here. Mackai Becton got hurt. I think

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:29.960
<v Speaker 2>the Jets have now already used thirteen different offensive line combinations,

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 2>which is not good folks. So I think that is

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 2>going to contribute to things. The Miami defense has been

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 2>improving quite a bit as well. They allowed as success

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 2>rate over fifty percent in three of the four first

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:44.960
<v Speaker 2>four weeks of the season, but they have allowed just

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 2>two games over a forty percent success rate since Week five,

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 2>so they're getting better. Jalen Ramsey being there helps a ton.

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 2>Vic Fangio sort of leaning into that role as well.

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:03.200
<v Speaker 2>We've seen Miami with a couple of injuries as well,

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 2>Devon a Chan I'm sure if he's going to be

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 2>able to return. Tyreek Hill left the game but did

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:13.560
<v Speaker 2>come back, so that is something to monitor. It seems

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:18.319
<v Speaker 2>like he's going to play this week. But the Jets

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:22.440
<v Speaker 2>defense is I think they showed a little bit of

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 2>some holes against the Bills this past week. And the

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 2>Dolphins I think are as good of, if not a

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:34.720
<v Speaker 2>better offense than the Bills right now. So the under

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:39.679
<v Speaker 2>is a little scary, but I understand the logic behind it.

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 1>All right, fair enough, let's go to the next one here,

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and this is gonna be a fun game. This is

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 1>basically a playoff game. We're going to jump into the

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Houston tech and six and four hosting the Jaguars, So

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>this one's practically a pick him on betting pros. Right now.

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:56.079
<v Speaker 1>You've got Jacksonville's one point favorites forty seven is the number,

0:13:56.200 --> 0:13:58.079
<v Speaker 1>and you've got Houston at minus one oh five is

0:13:58.080 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the best spot you can get it right now on

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the money line, Sam, are you ready to put your

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 1>faith in the Houston Texans at home in a big spot,

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 1>in a big game that really will determine their faith

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:10.440
<v Speaker 1>or is it time for the Jaguars to just start

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:13.600
<v Speaker 1>handling their business after a shaky middle of the season.

0:14:13.640 --> 0:14:16.960
<v Speaker 2>Here for them, this is I mean, this is going

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 2>to be a fascinating game. I'm really excited for this one.

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 4>This.

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 2>If the Texans win, they have the front seat in

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 2>winning the AFC South, Which if you had said that

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 2>three months ago, people would have been laughing at you.

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 2>But c J. Straud this past week did show that

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 2>he is human. He had probably his worst half of

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 2>football through three interceptions on Sunday. Meanwhile, Trevor Lawrence had

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 2>probably his best game of the season so far, I

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:48.480
<v Speaker 2>believe through four touchdown passes at least accounted for four.

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't have a lean on this one. I think Texas,

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 2>excuse me, the Texans. I made them as a half

0:14:57.720 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 2>point favorite, so basically a pick them here. I slightly

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 2>lean towards the Texans just because they are at home again.

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 2>You're buying them sort of with a little bit of

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 2>depressed value after the lackluster offensive performance. But this one,

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 2>I think I might lean towards the under on this

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 2>one as well. Jacksonville plays pretty slow, they do rush

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 2>the ball a little bit, and they're bad at rushing

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 2>the ball. As well, so I lean towards the under

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 2>and hoping for a great game.

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, Pat, your thoughts, This should be in theory

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 1>one to watch this week. This is definitely a game

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 1>that has massive playoff implications and obviously for this Division two,

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 1>as Sam laid it out, you know, if Houston handles

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 1>their business, their schedule is a bit more favorable. So

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the pressure I think is on the Jaguars. How do

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 1>you think they respond?

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? Fun matchup for sure, Joe.

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 3>The Jaguars are one of my favorite bets of the week,

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 3>and since since the beginning of October they have covered

0:15:57.240 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 3>in six of seven games, failing only to do so

0:16:00.960 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 3>in that blowout loss to the forty nine ers coming

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 3>out of their buy. So I think the Texans have

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 3>just been slightly overvalued in the betting market for weeks.

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 4>And I get it.

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean they are fun as can be, but I

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 3>think the spreads have sort of overcooked the numbers on

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 3>the Texans a little bit. So, like I think they're

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 3>getting maybe two points a week that they probably shouldn't

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 3>be getting. So I think the Jags are of value here.

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 3>I think the Jags are going to win straight up.

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 3>They're the better team, and yeah, I think there's a

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 3>lot of value on them this week.

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Okay, fair enough here, let's go to the next one.

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Here on the slate, we've got the Pittsburgh Steelers somehow

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 1>at six and four and the Joe Burrow lists Cincinnati

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Bengals this one right now, the Pittsburgh Steelers are favored

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 1>by one. That's where the spread's at minus one ten.

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 1>You've also got thirty four and a half as the

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 1>over under for this one minus one oh five for

0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals to win. Now, we'll see how the Bengals respond.

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Without Joe Burrow, I know, no one really holding their

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:04.359
<v Speaker 1>breath with excitement. Pat, I'm just running right to the

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 1>under on this one, thirty four and a half. I mean,

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:08.800
<v Speaker 1>with the way these two offenses might be looking, I

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:10.920
<v Speaker 1>think that one still might be safe. What do you think?

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:14.879
<v Speaker 3>Yes, thank you Joe for validating that opinion. Like a

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:18.639
<v Speaker 3>lot of these games this week with super low totals,

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, yeah, I'll take the under.

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 4>I can see it.

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:24.359
<v Speaker 3>And this one opened with the Bengals favored by one point,

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 3>which was just astonishing. As miserable as the Kenny Pickett

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:31.919
<v Speaker 3>Matt Canada experience has been for Steelers fans, like, how

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 3>could the Bengals open as a favorite with Jake Browning

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 3>at quarterback? So man morale and the Bengals locker room

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 3>just can't be real high at the moment after losing

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 3>Joe Burrow for the rest of the season and knowing

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 3>that any title aspirations you had are pretty much out

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:48.159
<v Speaker 3>the window.

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:50.399
<v Speaker 4>So I kind of like the Steelers here, and I

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:51.680
<v Speaker 4>definitely like the under.

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Sam, what do you like in this contest?

0:17:56.080 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 2>I feel like Pittsburgh is the move here just given

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:03.160
<v Speaker 2>their defense, but I do not trust Kenny Pickett at all.

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Benjamin Solak from The Ringer posted a clip of all

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:10.119
<v Speaker 2>of Kenny Pickett's throws past the line of scrimmage this

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:15.400
<v Speaker 2>past week, and it was forty four seconds of tortress

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 2>video football. You know, there might be this whole Jake Browning,

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, first start, does he catch Pittsburgh off guard

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 2>type stuff? I think, you know, whether t Higgins is

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 2>back in this game could make that a difference there too.

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:38.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm staying away. I'd rather not look at their enough.

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:40.439
<v Speaker 1>I still think that that under is I mean, especially

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 1>because the Kenny Picketts leough I think the under is

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 1>safe here. This is neither of these teams are offensive

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:49.119
<v Speaker 1>juggernauts at this point in their season. The Carolina Panthers

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 1>also not necessarily an offensive juggernaut. They're one to nine.

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 1>They are three and a half point underdogs heading to Tennessee,

0:18:55.000 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 1>which feels about right here. Thirty seven is the number

0:18:57.520 --> 0:18:59.919
<v Speaker 1>plus one fifty eight for the Panthers to get a VIC.

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:02.199
<v Speaker 1>Now you're getting some value here, Sam on the money line.

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to the Carolina Panthers in this game,

0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:06.959
<v Speaker 1>the question is do you have enough faith of them

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:08.920
<v Speaker 1>to go and win a road game here in Tennessee?

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee obviously with Levis, you know, it's been kind of

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:13.439
<v Speaker 1>spinning its wheels a little bit. What do you make

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 1>out of this contest? Any early value in europeon this one?

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 2>Again, I don't see a ton of early value in

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 2>Frank Reich took back play calling for the Panthers, and

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 2>it once again did not look great. They rushed the

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:29.680
<v Speaker 2>ball a ton, seemed like they were sort of hiding

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:34.400
<v Speaker 2>Bryce Young the well Leves shine has worn off a bit.

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 2>I think Tennessee will be able to just run the

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:42.399
<v Speaker 2>ball with Derrick Henry give him twenty five carries and

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 2>sort of salt away this game. So I like the

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 2>under for that reason. I think again, two of these

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:53.439
<v Speaker 2>teams with some less than inspiring offenses are not going

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 2>to be able to move the ball a ton and

0:19:56.960 --> 0:20:00.440
<v Speaker 2>just aren't able to score. So I prefer under on

0:20:00.840 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 2>this one. Don't really have a lean on either side.

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:07.680
<v Speaker 1>The under certainly seems like the safest Betpat.

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:10.399
<v Speaker 3>Another total under forty that I'm going to bet the

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 3>under on. Yes, I like that here, not interested in

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 3>either side. I mean, if you forced me to, I

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 3>would probably lay the points and take the Titans at home.

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:21.159
<v Speaker 4>The Panthers are just so bad. But I'm not going

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 4>to touch either side. Like I don't want to. I

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:24.640
<v Speaker 4>don't want to have to watch this game.

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Joe, fair enough, I understand. Moving on to the next

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 1>game here, you've got the Atlanta Falcons and New Orleans

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Saints coming off Buys. Another big Indivision game here where

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:35.479
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see if Atlanta's going to make their

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 1>move into this division. Conversation. They are four and six,

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:41.119
<v Speaker 1>the New Orleans Saints are five and five. They are

0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:44.440
<v Speaker 1>in the driver's seat, Pat. They are right now, believe

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 1>it or not. The Atlanta Falcons are one point favorites

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:49.400
<v Speaker 1>at home. Forty two and a half is the number,

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:52.680
<v Speaker 1>minus one ten is the consensus. So it's basically just

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:55.359
<v Speaker 1>a pick up situation. And I gotta be honest with you.

0:20:55.400 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I understand it's the health of Derek Carr that's really

0:20:57.640 --> 0:21:00.640
<v Speaker 1>in question here, But is the early value to jump

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 1>on the Saints here? Regardless?

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:03.400
<v Speaker 4>It probably is, Joe.

0:21:03.600 --> 0:21:06.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I've I've sworn off betting Saints games because

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 3>that team has vexed me so much this season and

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 3>taken so much of my money. But in a couple

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:15.400
<v Speaker 3>of pools where we have to pick every game, I'm

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 3>gonna I'm gonna pick the Saints. If Derek Carr is

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:22.159
<v Speaker 3>quarterbacking the Saints, I'll be real tempted to actually bet

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:24.920
<v Speaker 3>it and get back on Saints games, which you know

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 3>I'll probably regret later. If it's Jameis Winston at quarterback,

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 3>I will have to reassess.

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:35.479
<v Speaker 1>Okay, uncertainty, Sam when it comes to the quarterback situation

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:38.359
<v Speaker 1>with the Saints. But does that provide any potential value

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 1>here or are you confident perhaps that Jamis Winston if

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 1>he isn't he playing his game can go out there

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:44.920
<v Speaker 1>and win a road game in Atlanta.

0:21:46.160 --> 0:21:49.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm not playing this right now, but depending on who

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 2>the quarterback is for New Orleans changes how I would

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:56.120
<v Speaker 2>play this later in the week. If it is going

0:21:56.160 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 2>to be Derek Carr, then I'd probably take New Orleans

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:03.199
<v Speaker 2>with the points, depending on what that ends up at.

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:06.200
<v Speaker 2>If it's plus one, then I'll take that, But if

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 2>it is Jamis Winston, I probably prefer taking the Saints

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 2>on like some alternate spreads like minus five and a

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 2>half minus six and a half, because his range of

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 2>outcomes is just going to be so much wider than

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:22.840
<v Speaker 2>Derek cars where if he plays really well, they're i think,

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:27.160
<v Speaker 2>going to take care of the Falcons easily. But there's

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:31.440
<v Speaker 2>also a situation in which he turns into thirty interception

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:35.679
<v Speaker 2>Jamis and just is not even able to get close

0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 2>to that plus one. So that's the way I'm playing

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 2>that game later on this week. Wants to get some

0:22:41.720 --> 0:22:43.960
<v Speaker 2>more news about the quarterback situation.

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay, New England is going to travel to New York

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 1>to take on the Giants. The Patriots are three and

0:22:50.119 --> 0:22:52.800
<v Speaker 1>a half point favorites. It feels like a lot talk

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:55.399
<v Speaker 1>about uncertainty when it comes to the quarterback position, is

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 1>it going to be Bailey's appy? Probably, but again we're

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:00.480
<v Speaker 1>still waiting on official word for that. Thirty four is

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:02.640
<v Speaker 1>number for this one plus one fifty for the Giants

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 1>on the money line. Sam, call me crazy here, but

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:10.359
<v Speaker 1>I thought that I'm believing in Tommy DeVito. But this

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 1>line feels a little weird to me. It feels as

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 1>though we're giving the Patriots still a little too much

0:23:15.119 --> 0:23:17.840
<v Speaker 1>credit for the team that they are. Do you think

0:23:18.000 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 1>going on the road here, this is the correct line?

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 1>What did you have this game at. I'm fascinated because

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 1>it seems like the value is of the Giants money

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 1>line right now.

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 2>I had this as Giants minus one. I mean, okay,

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't and that was more of a like, neither

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:36.359
<v Speaker 2>of these teams should be favored. I'm just giving the

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 2>Giants a little bit of credit for being at home,

0:23:39.840 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 2>and obviously New England is coming off of the buye

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 2>with their previous game in Germany. But there just does

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 2>not seem like any reason why the Patriots should be

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 2>favored on the road really against anyone, I mean, let

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:58.399
<v Speaker 2>alone three and a half points, Like it's it's too

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:01.120
<v Speaker 2>much for me. I told youlast week that there wasn't

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 2>a spread high enough for me to bet on Tommy

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 2>DeVito against Washington. But three and a half at home,

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 2>I think I give me the Giants. Like it sounds gross,

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:16.879
<v Speaker 2>but yeah, no, I think it's I think it's right now.

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:18.720
<v Speaker 2>Giants on the money line are giants with the number

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 2>three and a half. Give me the money line. I

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 2>mean again, you're playing into the variants a little bit

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:30.359
<v Speaker 2>there and hoping that they are able to, you know,

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:33.280
<v Speaker 2>get some lucky bounces go their way again. Obviously, I

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 2>mentioned earlier in the show that they had six turn

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 2>takeaways against Washington, and I don't expect that to get

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:42.680
<v Speaker 2>happened against New England. But I think their offense is

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 2>good enough to keep this somewhat close and not completely

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:49.400
<v Speaker 2>blow it out of the way.

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Pat, two thirds of us are already in on the Giants.

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:54.920
<v Speaker 1>You want to join us here on our island.

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:57.439
<v Speaker 4>Oh Joe. So this is game number three that has

0:24:57.520 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 4>a total of under forty. We're rounding third.

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to touch third base and bet the under

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 3>here for sure, and I am not going to bet

0:25:06.560 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 3>either side. I mean, this is interesting, Like Bailey Zappi,

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:15.160
<v Speaker 3>Are you laying three and a half points to anyone

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 3>with a backup quarterback starting for one of the worst

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:22.920
<v Speaker 3>editions of the Patriots we've seen in many years? Not

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 3>like not that I think going from Mac Jones to

0:25:26.960 --> 0:25:30.680
<v Speaker 3>Bailey Zappi is anything but a lateral move. Still like I,

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:33.920
<v Speaker 3>I just like I don't understand it. If I were

0:25:34.160 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 3>forced to bet this, I would bet the Giants. I

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:38.359
<v Speaker 3>think I want the points in a game that I

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:41.119
<v Speaker 3>think is going to be an absolute rock fight. H

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 3>three and a half looks pretty inviting. So man another, yeah,

0:25:46.160 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 3>I like, I just don't want to bet it because

0:25:48.040 --> 0:25:50.639
<v Speaker 3>I I don't want to put any trust in the.

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 4>No kidding under. Let's go under big time.

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I feel you, brother. Let's get to the Cleveland Browns.

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Here at the Denver Broncos. Broncos who played inspired last

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 1>few weeks, but that Cleveland defense continues to just drag

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 1>this team into relevance and they're in the playoff picture

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 1>right now at seven and three. So pat this one

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 1>is minus two and a half. Denver is favorite at home, understandably,

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 1>so is questions about this Cleveland offense moving forward and

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 1>who's playing quarterback this week, we'll find out. Thirty six

0:26:26.800 --> 0:26:29.680
<v Speaker 1>and a half is the consensus line plus one ten

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:32.880
<v Speaker 1>on the Cleveland Browns to win this game. Cleveland continues

0:26:32.920 --> 0:26:35.320
<v Speaker 1>to find ways to win games. Pat is this the

0:26:35.359 --> 0:26:36.359
<v Speaker 1>next one on their list?

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:37.920
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, Joel.

0:26:38.040 --> 0:26:40.160
<v Speaker 3>I have no interest in betting either side on this one,

0:26:40.240 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 3>but we are sliding into home played here with the

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:48.000
<v Speaker 3>fourth and final under bats of the totals under forty.

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 3>I think I might parlay all these, Joe take.

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:53.919
<v Speaker 1>I I mean, if we get one of those bonus

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:56.639
<v Speaker 1>bets there, Yeah, like a ten dollars bonus bet, just

0:26:56.760 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>throw that bad.

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:01.120
<v Speaker 3>Four legs parlay on those low under because those games

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 3>are gonna be hideous, and I don't think we're gonna

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:06.040
<v Speaker 3>see much like who breaks this which which one of

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:08.480
<v Speaker 3>those games is the high scoring affair that ruins the

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:11.560
<v Speaker 3>four leg parlay. I don't think it's gonna be Browns Broncos.

0:27:12.000 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean Dorian Thompson Robinson averaged three point eight yards

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 3>on his what forty one forty three pass attempts yesterday?

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:25.360
<v Speaker 3>Like the Broncos defense has been better and the Browns

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 3>defense is great, Like, I don't think the Broncos are

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:29.800
<v Speaker 3>gonna move the ball on the Brons. This game is

0:27:29.840 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 3>gonna be hideous. I just again, it's gonna be close.

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to bet either.

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:36.439
<v Speaker 1>Side sam any early value on.

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:39.280
<v Speaker 2>This one for you. I mean, I think this is

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:42.880
<v Speaker 2>a similar situation to the game we had talked about

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:47.400
<v Speaker 2>previously of the Giants and Patriots. We've got a low

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 2>total team getting a couple of points here. I think

0:27:51.320 --> 0:27:55.720
<v Speaker 2>teasing both the Browns and the Giants out six points

0:27:56.000 --> 0:28:00.360
<v Speaker 2>is a phenomenal bet in my opinion. Again, You're you're

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:03.320
<v Speaker 2>getting so many points in these low total games that

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:07.399
<v Speaker 2>there's a pretty good chance of both of those covering.

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:09.879
<v Speaker 2>So I think that's the way I want to play this.

0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:15.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't think the Browns' offense is in as dire

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:19.879
<v Speaker 2>dire streets is that it's made out to seem. They

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 2>signed Joe Flacco to their practice squad, which we'll see

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 2>if if he's able to do something or plays this week.

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:28.240
<v Speaker 2>I think if he does, then I'd probably take the

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:32.120
<v Speaker 2>Browns on the money line. But this is, again, I think,

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 2>a perfect Tiaser opportunity.

0:28:34.760 --> 0:28:37.080
<v Speaker 1>All Right, we'll see what opportunities you want in the

0:28:37.240 --> 0:28:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Arizona Cardinals Rams game. This one's in Arizona. They are

0:28:41.160 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 1>one point underdogs at home. Forty four and a half

0:28:43.400 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 1>is the number you can get minus one ten on

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the Rams right now, minus one oh eight on the

0:28:48.000 --> 0:28:52.080
<v Speaker 1>money line of the Cardinals. Sam. With Cooper Cup likely

0:28:52.160 --> 0:28:55.160
<v Speaker 1>out for this one, it feels like maybe there's an

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to take advantage of the situation where the Rams

0:28:58.680 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 1>are coming off victory. Not a great football team, Let's

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 1>not make any bones about that, nor are the Cardinals.

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 1>So is it a pick? Do you have a pick

0:29:06.600 --> 0:29:07.720
<v Speaker 1>that you want to take right now?

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:12.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't really. I mean, Matthew Stafford got a little

0:29:12.600 --> 0:29:15.280
<v Speaker 2>banged up in this game as well, he did play

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:21.200
<v Speaker 2>through that injury. I don't know, Like in these sort

0:29:21.240 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 2>of situations, like it's just pretty high total, I'm probably

0:29:24.560 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 2>gonna take the team in the Arizona Cardinals that have

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more variance. I think. I don't see

0:29:32.040 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 2>the Rams as what I think two and a half

0:29:35.880 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 2>points better than the Cardinals, which is sort of what

0:29:39.480 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 2>you make it if you use one and a half

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 2>points for home field advantage. Again, the Cooper Cup potentially

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:49.640
<v Speaker 2>missing could be huge. Obviously, they played pretty well earlier

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 2>this year without him. But Arizona is I think on

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:58.920
<v Speaker 2>offense playing pretty decently. Again, Kyler getting more into the

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:03.320
<v Speaker 2>groove here could help them. I don't remember how all

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:08.800
<v Speaker 2>of these NFC West matchups work with one coach having

0:30:08.880 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 2>the edge over other coaches. But obviously Cliff Kingsbury is

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 2>not in town anymore, so that may not matter. But

0:30:17.240 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 2>I like the Cardinals on the money line here at home?

0:30:21.400 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, your thoughts on this one, pat, the Arizona

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Cardinals hosting the Rams.

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:30.680
<v Speaker 3>Jonathan Gannon's team has been overachieving for most of the season,

0:30:30.920 --> 0:30:33.680
<v Speaker 3>and this is a pretty plucky team with Kyler Murray

0:30:33.800 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 3>at quarterback. I don't think the Rams should be road

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:40.320
<v Speaker 3>favorites against any team except maybe for the absolute dregs

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:43.640
<v Speaker 3>of the league, the Giants the Panthers. I think the

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 3>Cardinals are above that, and so yeah, I like the

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:52.480
<v Speaker 3>Cardinals here. You know, money line on the Cardinals looks

0:30:52.480 --> 0:30:54.840
<v Speaker 3>pretty good to me. And this total was at forty

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 3>six and a half on Sunday night and it's dropped

0:30:57.040 --> 0:31:00.120
<v Speaker 3>two points. I think I actually like the over this

0:31:00.200 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 3>bigger number. Maybe the drop was caused by like confirmation

0:31:05.000 --> 0:31:07.240
<v Speaker 3>that Cooper Cup is probably not going to play, but

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:10.200
<v Speaker 3>I think we knew that already, and you know, maybe

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:14.680
<v Speaker 3>some doubt about Matthew Stafford's well being, but I think

0:31:14.680 --> 0:31:16.840
<v Speaker 3>we're going to see put some points in this game.

0:31:16.920 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 3>So I kind of like the over here.

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think the over is actually the way I

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:24.520
<v Speaker 1>would approach this one too. But I'm kind of leaning

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 1>where you guys are, which is, you know, maybe the

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Cardinals feel like a little bit of a leave it

0:31:28.200 --> 0:31:30.160
<v Speaker 1>or not a safer play here at home. Next one

0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 1>is interesting. I kind of want to see how the

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Eagles play tonight in Monday Football before I approach this one. Personally.

0:31:35.880 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I am in on the Eagles. I've talked about them

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:39.000
<v Speaker 1>being on the money line this week. I think they

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 1>just need this game more than Kansas City does to

0:31:41.640 --> 0:31:43.680
<v Speaker 1>prove something. They are eight and one, they are three

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:45.400
<v Speaker 1>and a half point favorites. They're at home against the

0:31:45.440 --> 0:31:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo Bills new offensive coordinator. Obviously, they looked pretty good

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:50.480
<v Speaker 1>against the Jets, but again, they get a lot of

0:31:50.480 --> 0:31:53.959
<v Speaker 1>opportunities pat because the Jets continue to struggle to move

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the football, which means they give it to you and

0:31:56.200 --> 0:31:58.320
<v Speaker 1>say here, you take it, I don't want it. Forty

0:31:58.360 --> 0:32:00.800
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half is the number pretty high. If

0:32:00.800 --> 0:32:02.600
<v Speaker 1>you like the Bills for the upset plus one fifty,

0:32:02.640 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 1>that's certainly in play. So any early leans when it

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:08.560
<v Speaker 1>comes to this one, because this is certainly a match

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:10.920
<v Speaker 1>between two of the better teams in the NFL. Do

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 1>you think there's any value to be had on the

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:13.720
<v Speaker 1>betting side.

0:32:13.520 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 4>Pat, Yeah, not just an early lean.

0:32:15.160 --> 0:32:18.120
<v Speaker 3>Joe, I've already bet the Bills on this game, taking

0:32:18.240 --> 0:32:19.880
<v Speaker 3>three and a half, and maybe I should have waited.

0:32:19.920 --> 0:32:22.360
<v Speaker 3>Maybe this goes up if the Eagles really lay it

0:32:22.440 --> 0:32:24.840
<v Speaker 3>to the Chiefs tonight, But then again, it could go

0:32:24.960 --> 0:32:29.920
<v Speaker 3>the other way if things go sideways. So yeah, I mean,

0:32:30.160 --> 0:32:32.600
<v Speaker 3>like Joe, like you, I am betting the Eagles on

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 3>the money line against the Chiefs, and that's kind of

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:38.480
<v Speaker 3>part of this. Maybe this game against the Bills is

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:41.040
<v Speaker 3>a letdown spot for the Eagles after their big Monday

0:32:41.120 --> 0:32:44.760
<v Speaker 3>night game against the Chiefs, hugely important game. Meanwhile, the

0:32:44.800 --> 0:32:47.800
<v Speaker 3>Bills are fighting for their playoff lives and are about

0:32:47.840 --> 0:32:52.160
<v Speaker 3>to begin a murderous stretch of schedule. Eagles bye week,

0:32:52.640 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 3>then the Chiefs, then the Cowboys. I think the Bills

0:32:55.680 --> 0:32:57.640
<v Speaker 3>are going to be laser focused for this one, and

0:32:57.720 --> 0:32:59.840
<v Speaker 3>I was really encouraged by what they showed us in

0:32:59.840 --> 0:33:02.680
<v Speaker 3>a must win game against the Jets. They've had some

0:33:02.800 --> 0:33:05.000
<v Speaker 3>trouble with the Jets in recent meetings, and they just

0:33:05.240 --> 0:33:10.600
<v Speaker 3>completely destroyed the New York Jets in Week eleven. So

0:33:10.760 --> 0:33:13.320
<v Speaker 3>I like how sharp the Bills offense look like with

0:33:13.440 --> 0:33:16.440
<v Speaker 3>Tom Joe Brady calling the plays.

0:33:17.320 --> 0:33:20.000
<v Speaker 4>So give me the Bills and the points in Philadelphia.

0:33:21.120 --> 0:33:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Sam your thoughts on Bill's Eagles.

0:33:25.080 --> 0:33:27.640
<v Speaker 2>I've gone back and forth about four times in the

0:33:27.720 --> 0:33:31.400
<v Speaker 2>time that Pat was talking. He made some really good points.

0:33:31.440 --> 0:33:36.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, like, it's incredible what firing an offensive coordinator

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:39.880
<v Speaker 2>can do to make the best offense in the league

0:33:39.960 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 2>the best offense in the league. It's pretty incredible there.

0:33:43.520 --> 0:33:47.960
<v Speaker 2>But it's one of those things where I think Josh

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 2>Allen is the slightly better quarterback, so getting three and

0:33:50.800 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 2>a half points with him and that's not too you know,

0:33:55.600 --> 0:33:59.320
<v Speaker 2>downplay how well Jalen Hurts has played this year. But

0:33:59.800 --> 0:34:04.400
<v Speaker 2>the only thing I think for me not taking Philadelphia

0:34:04.520 --> 0:34:07.040
<v Speaker 2>right now is their game on Monday Night. You know

0:34:07.400 --> 0:34:10.120
<v Speaker 2>what happens if there is an injury, because then it's

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:15.840
<v Speaker 2>all the Bills. And I think the Eagles defense, especially

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:19.080
<v Speaker 2>through the air, has been pretty suspect of late. They

0:34:19.200 --> 0:34:22.839
<v Speaker 2>are thirty second in passing success right over the last

0:34:22.960 --> 0:34:27.200
<v Speaker 2>four weeks, and if the Bills do come out throwing,

0:34:27.880 --> 0:34:31.080
<v Speaker 2>then they're gonna, i think, continue to have a ton

0:34:31.120 --> 0:34:33.440
<v Speaker 2>of success. So I'm not talking to myself into it.

0:34:33.600 --> 0:34:34.960
<v Speaker 2>Let's go Bills plus three and a half.

0:34:36.200 --> 0:34:39.919
<v Speaker 1>All right, there you go. Kansas City Chiefs are going

0:34:40.000 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 1>to go to Las Vegas for this week and they

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:44.919
<v Speaker 1>are nine and a half point favorites on the road.

0:34:45.360 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Forty four is the number Las Vegas on the upset

0:34:48.040 --> 0:34:50.680
<v Speaker 1>for the money lines plus three fifty. Now, Sam, when

0:34:50.760 --> 0:34:53.960
<v Speaker 1>it comes to this, obviously, the Raiders have played much

0:34:54.040 --> 0:34:56.200
<v Speaker 1>better football since getting rid of their coach. The problem

0:34:56.320 --> 0:34:59.920
<v Speaker 1>is Ken, a rookie quarterback, keep pace with Patrick Mahome.

0:35:00.239 --> 0:35:02.239
<v Speaker 1>That's the big question. It's one thing to keep pace

0:35:02.280 --> 0:35:06.239
<v Speaker 1>with Zach Wilson, Tommy Devido. I know this one that

0:35:06.320 --> 0:35:08.840
<v Speaker 1>we just had against Miami didn't exactly go quite in

0:35:09.000 --> 0:35:10.880
<v Speaker 1>terms of the blowout people were anticipating. So do you

0:35:10.920 --> 0:35:13.160
<v Speaker 1>take anything out of that? Is the Raiders the right

0:35:13.239 --> 0:35:15.560
<v Speaker 1>play here at home to cover this nine and a

0:35:15.600 --> 0:35:18.200
<v Speaker 1>half or do you think the Kansasity Chiefs just kind

0:35:18.239 --> 0:35:20.640
<v Speaker 1>of introduce them to what it really looks like to

0:35:20.719 --> 0:35:21.720
<v Speaker 1>be the class of the AFC.

0:35:23.640 --> 0:35:26.760
<v Speaker 2>This is another really tough one because my head says

0:35:27.280 --> 0:35:30.440
<v Speaker 2>take the Raiders, my heart says take the Chiefs, and

0:35:30.840 --> 0:35:34.600
<v Speaker 2>I say the Raiders because Antonio Pierce has that team

0:35:35.040 --> 0:35:39.680
<v Speaker 2>running the ball a ton, especially with the know O'Connell,

0:35:40.320 --> 0:35:42.880
<v Speaker 2>and I do think that the way to attack Kansas

0:35:42.920 --> 0:35:47.320
<v Speaker 2>City's defense is on the ground. They have a forty

0:35:47.360 --> 0:35:50.279
<v Speaker 2>five point eight percent success rate allowed on the ground

0:35:50.320 --> 0:35:53.920
<v Speaker 2>over the last four weeks, which is thirtieth overall. I

0:35:54.040 --> 0:35:57.560
<v Speaker 2>do think that if again the Raiders are able to

0:35:57.719 --> 0:36:01.520
<v Speaker 2>slow this game down and keep it under that forty

0:36:01.560 --> 0:36:04.400
<v Speaker 2>four and a half point total, that they'll have a

0:36:04.480 --> 0:36:09.160
<v Speaker 2>good chance to cover this. Max Crosby is playing out

0:36:09.239 --> 0:36:11.920
<v Speaker 2>of his mind. I mean, he is playing incredibly this

0:36:12.120 --> 0:36:16.600
<v Speaker 2>season and is a one man wrecking crew on that defense.

0:36:16.719 --> 0:36:22.040
<v Speaker 2>So I slightly lean towards the Raiders and it feels

0:36:22.200 --> 0:36:26.480
<v Speaker 2>super gross to fade Patrick Mahomes in that situation, But

0:36:27.040 --> 0:36:29.560
<v Speaker 2>especially for the Raiders at home with the Chiefs coming

0:36:29.600 --> 0:36:33.680
<v Speaker 2>off of a Monday night football game, I think the

0:36:33.800 --> 0:36:36.440
<v Speaker 2>Raiders could keep it closer than people expect.

0:36:37.440 --> 0:36:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah see, I'm kind of where you are Sam, that's

0:36:39.719 --> 0:36:41.520
<v Speaker 1>my early lean right now on this one. I actually

0:36:41.560 --> 0:36:43.560
<v Speaker 1>would like to, you know, if Kansas City does take

0:36:43.600 --> 0:36:45.560
<v Speaker 1>care of the Eagles, perhaps this one goes to double

0:36:45.600 --> 0:36:48.640
<v Speaker 1>digits and then maybe we're talking if it's eleven or twelve,

0:36:49.040 --> 0:36:50.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe then you really want to jump in on the

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Raiders and maybe wait this one out. I'm of that mind.

0:36:53.080 --> 0:36:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I want to wait and see first. Pat, what are

0:36:54.680 --> 0:36:55.080
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts?

0:36:55.320 --> 0:36:58.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so this was like right before I got in

0:36:58.200 --> 0:37:01.840
<v Speaker 3>the show, Joe, it was ten on DraftKings. So Chiefs

0:37:01.840 --> 0:37:04.120
<v Speaker 3>savored by ten. Look, and the Raiders are two and

0:37:04.239 --> 0:37:06.240
<v Speaker 3>one straight up in three to zero against the spread.

0:37:06.360 --> 0:37:10.040
<v Speaker 3>Since Antonio Pierce took over as head coach, I cannot

0:37:10.080 --> 0:37:12.200
<v Speaker 3>take the Raiders in this game when the quarterback matchup

0:37:12.200 --> 0:37:16.400
<v Speaker 3>as Patrick Mahomes against Adelaide Stevenson High School graduate Aidan O'Connell.

0:37:17.760 --> 0:37:20.160
<v Speaker 3>But at the same time, I do not want to

0:37:20.160 --> 0:37:24.120
<v Speaker 3>bet the Chiefs in a potential letdown spot coming off

0:37:24.200 --> 0:37:26.319
<v Speaker 3>that big game against the Eagles on a short week

0:37:26.360 --> 0:37:29.840
<v Speaker 3>of rest, against a team that's playing its best football

0:37:29.920 --> 0:37:32.720
<v Speaker 3>this season. So I'm just I'm staying away from this game.

0:37:33.600 --> 0:37:37.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, before we get onto the night games. I

0:37:37.239 --> 0:37:39.719
<v Speaker 1>somehow for the first time ever missed a game here

0:37:39.840 --> 0:37:42.719
<v Speaker 1>on this show. So let's circle back real quick. It's

0:37:42.719 --> 0:37:44.399
<v Speaker 1>not the most exciting game, but it is a game.

0:37:44.440 --> 0:37:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Tipa Bay Buccaneers Indianapolis Colts minus one and a half

0:37:47.640 --> 0:37:49.400
<v Speaker 1>here on the Colt side at home. Forty two and

0:37:49.440 --> 0:37:51.360
<v Speaker 1>a half is the number plus one ten on the

0:37:51.440 --> 0:37:52.960
<v Speaker 1>money line for the Bucks.

0:37:53.040 --> 0:37:53.279
<v Speaker 2>Pat.

0:37:53.480 --> 0:37:54.719
<v Speaker 1>That's where I want to go. I'm want to go

0:37:54.840 --> 0:37:57.200
<v Speaker 1>right to the Bucks. They've been competitive. They had a

0:37:57.239 --> 0:37:58.759
<v Speaker 1>lot of shots against the forty nine ers and they

0:37:58.800 --> 0:38:00.799
<v Speaker 1>just kept falling short and four. But the foury nine

0:38:00.840 --> 0:38:03.040
<v Speaker 1>ers defense played very well, so I want to give

0:38:03.040 --> 0:38:05.880
<v Speaker 1>them some credit to I like the Bucks here in

0:38:06.040 --> 0:38:08.640
<v Speaker 1>this game on the road plus one ten. What are

0:38:08.680 --> 0:38:09.120
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts?

0:38:09.320 --> 0:38:11.759
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know, Joe on Sunday Night, I always try

0:38:11.800 --> 0:38:13.759
<v Speaker 3>to guess what the lines and totals are going to

0:38:13.800 --> 0:38:15.800
<v Speaker 3>be for these games before I actually look at what

0:38:15.880 --> 0:38:20.400
<v Speaker 3>they are, and I guessed correctly. For Bucks Colts, I

0:38:20.440 --> 0:38:24.120
<v Speaker 3>guess that means there's no value whatsoever. I yeah, I

0:38:24.320 --> 0:38:26.279
<v Speaker 3>just like, I don't want to bet either side on

0:38:26.360 --> 0:38:29.680
<v Speaker 3>this one. The total looks spot on also, so I'm walking.

0:38:29.440 --> 0:38:30.960
<v Speaker 1>On any early value on this one.

0:38:31.760 --> 0:38:34.960
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, give me the Colts. The only reason I

0:38:35.080 --> 0:38:37.400
<v Speaker 2>pointed out that you skip this one is because it's

0:38:37.440 --> 0:38:39.359
<v Speaker 2>one of my favorite of the week. I just think

0:38:40.000 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 2>there's such a massive coaching advantage for Shane Stikeen and

0:38:44.239 --> 0:38:48.200
<v Speaker 2>the Colts over Todd Bowles and the Bucks. Like especially

0:38:48.320 --> 0:38:51.719
<v Speaker 2>coming off of the buye Jonathan Taylor is starting to

0:38:52.160 --> 0:38:55.560
<v Speaker 2>get into a groove. They're giving him a bigger workload.

0:38:56.480 --> 0:38:59.759
<v Speaker 2>I love the Colts in this spot. I think again

0:39:00.880 --> 0:39:03.759
<v Speaker 2>taking some alternate spreads with them as well, because you're

0:39:03.800 --> 0:39:07.879
<v Speaker 2>leaning a bit into some variance with Gardner Minshew, who

0:39:07.920 --> 0:39:10.040
<v Speaker 2>has been a little bit all over the place. But

0:39:11.000 --> 0:39:13.400
<v Speaker 2>I like the over in this game as well. The

0:39:13.480 --> 0:39:18.360
<v Speaker 2>Colts have played exceptionally fast. They are leaving ten to

0:39:18.400 --> 0:39:22.239
<v Speaker 2>twelve seconds on the playclock for every play. Teams that

0:39:22.280 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 2>are facing the Colts too, are playing super up tempo

0:39:25.840 --> 0:39:29.080
<v Speaker 2>as well, so I think both of these offenses are

0:39:29.480 --> 0:39:31.839
<v Speaker 2>good enough to continue to move the ball. As long

0:39:31.840 --> 0:39:36.600
<v Speaker 2>as there aren't some deep red zone turnovers by either team,

0:39:36.840 --> 0:39:39.840
<v Speaker 2>then this total is going to go well above the

0:39:39.920 --> 0:39:41.000
<v Speaker 2>forty two and a half points.

0:39:42.200 --> 0:39:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Sunday Night football, the Los Angeles Chargers will be home

0:39:44.719 --> 0:39:46.839
<v Speaker 1>against the Ravens, and I hope the Ravens take out

0:39:46.880 --> 0:39:50.000
<v Speaker 1>my frustrations on the Chargers. For me, I'm choosing a

0:39:50.120 --> 0:39:53.440
<v Speaker 1>champion game of throne style and my champion is Lamar Jackson.

0:39:54.040 --> 0:39:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Staley was not happy after this press conference, nor

0:39:56.440 --> 0:39:58.239
<v Speaker 1>should he be. You can tell things are getting a

0:39:58.239 --> 0:40:00.480
<v Speaker 1>little tight, little frustrating there, and I'm going to advantage

0:40:00.480 --> 0:40:02.920
<v Speaker 1>of it. Look, Baltimore Ravens are only four point favorites

0:40:02.960 --> 0:40:04.719
<v Speaker 1>here in this game. I think it should be more.

0:40:04.840 --> 0:40:06.279
<v Speaker 1>I just do forty six and a half is the

0:40:06.360 --> 0:40:08.400
<v Speaker 1>number plus one sixty five on the money line for

0:40:08.560 --> 0:40:11.719
<v Speaker 1>the Los Angeles Chargers. Sam, I want the Baltimore Ravens

0:40:11.760 --> 0:40:12.920
<v Speaker 1>of this game. I want to lock this one in

0:40:13.000 --> 0:40:15.719
<v Speaker 1>now because I think more people, excuse me, more time

0:40:15.719 --> 0:40:17.600
<v Speaker 1>people have to think about this one, the more they're

0:40:17.640 --> 0:40:20.040
<v Speaker 1>going to realize that that's a value here on Baltimore.

0:40:20.120 --> 0:40:20.880
<v Speaker 1>But what are your thoughts?

0:40:21.680 --> 0:40:25.640
<v Speaker 2>I agree, losing Mark Andrews in the Thursday night game

0:40:25.719 --> 0:40:28.560
<v Speaker 2>last season really sucks, but they are going to come

0:40:28.640 --> 0:40:32.200
<v Speaker 2>off some extended time having played on Thursday nights, so

0:40:32.280 --> 0:40:35.279
<v Speaker 2>I think it gives them some time to regroup to

0:40:36.239 --> 0:40:39.200
<v Speaker 2>get Isaiah likely in the other tight ends a little

0:40:39.239 --> 0:40:42.960
<v Speaker 2>bit more chemistry as well. And this Charger's defense is

0:40:43.080 --> 0:40:45.560
<v Speaker 2>just so so bad. I mean, they allowed Jordan Love

0:40:45.640 --> 0:40:48.880
<v Speaker 2>to have his first three hundred yard passing game and

0:40:49.680 --> 0:40:53.399
<v Speaker 2>it just it just doesn't look better in any week.

0:40:53.560 --> 0:40:56.799
<v Speaker 2>I mean that did Ravens have a coaching advantage here too.

0:40:56.960 --> 0:41:00.759
<v Speaker 2>Brandon Staley has not sort of been the the plus

0:41:00.840 --> 0:41:03.880
<v Speaker 2>ev guy that we have seen in the past, and

0:41:05.440 --> 0:41:08.920
<v Speaker 2>the Ravens defense is still incredible, I think, So give

0:41:09.000 --> 0:41:10.560
<v Speaker 2>me the Ravens with the points here.

0:41:11.560 --> 0:41:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Pat your thoughts, Ravens or Chargers.

0:41:14.320 --> 0:41:15.480
<v Speaker 4>Let's make it unanimous.

0:41:15.920 --> 0:41:17.880
<v Speaker 3>I do like the Ravens too, and some of the

0:41:18.000 --> 0:41:22.719
<v Speaker 3>ratings systems have the Ravens is about eight points better

0:41:22.960 --> 0:41:26.000
<v Speaker 3>on a neutral field, and let's face it, Chargers home

0:41:26.040 --> 0:41:29.719
<v Speaker 3>games basically are a neutral field, So I think there's

0:41:29.840 --> 0:41:32.440
<v Speaker 3>value on the Ravens here, all right.

0:41:32.560 --> 0:41:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Next one's not on a neutral field at all. This

0:41:34.440 --> 0:41:37.239
<v Speaker 1>one's in Minnesota. The last one Monday night football, So

0:41:37.560 --> 0:41:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Josh Dobbs unfortunately came up a little bit short this

0:41:40.200 --> 0:41:43.480
<v Speaker 1>past Sunday night, So Monday maybe redemption story. They are

0:41:43.560 --> 0:41:46.040
<v Speaker 1>three and a half point favorites against the Bears. That

0:41:46.080 --> 0:41:49.120
<v Speaker 1>feels about right. Forty five is the number that feels

0:41:49.120 --> 0:41:51.160
<v Speaker 1>about right plus one fifty four of the Bears and

0:41:51.200 --> 0:41:54.919
<v Speaker 1>the upset. Now, the Bears had that game right there

0:41:55.120 --> 0:41:57.440
<v Speaker 1>towards the end with the Detroit Lions, they let it

0:41:57.480 --> 0:41:59.360
<v Speaker 1>slip through their fingers. So do you think that the

0:41:59.440 --> 0:42:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Bears having to go on the road two weeks in

0:42:01.360 --> 0:42:04.200
<v Speaker 1>a row, this time to Minnesota, another tough in division contest,

0:42:04.239 --> 0:42:05.719
<v Speaker 1>do you think they fall short again? Pat?

0:42:06.520 --> 0:42:08.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I sort of like the Bears here, Joe, I

0:42:09.000 --> 0:42:11.840
<v Speaker 3>don't know if they win. Probability ever crested ninety percent

0:42:11.960 --> 0:42:14.000
<v Speaker 3>in that game against the Lions. I'm guessing it probably

0:42:14.080 --> 0:42:17.080
<v Speaker 3>did at one point because it, like the Lions found

0:42:17.120 --> 0:42:20.160
<v Speaker 3>out just how dangerous this Bears team can be. And

0:42:20.360 --> 0:42:24.440
<v Speaker 3>the Bears are defensive overachievers. They have turned into one

0:42:24.440 --> 0:42:27.560
<v Speaker 3>of the best run defenses in the league, which is

0:42:27.920 --> 0:42:31.200
<v Speaker 3>someone unexpected. And like, I don't think they're terrible in

0:42:31.280 --> 0:42:33.600
<v Speaker 3>the back end either, Like they lack a little bit

0:42:33.640 --> 0:42:36.040
<v Speaker 3>of a pass rush of the Montes. Sweat has helped

0:42:36.040 --> 0:42:39.239
<v Speaker 3>in that regard, and now with Justin Fields back, they

0:42:39.400 --> 0:42:43.719
<v Speaker 3>are explosive on offense too. Like not a great running game,

0:42:44.239 --> 0:42:47.240
<v Speaker 3>but Fields can run and he can make it happen

0:42:47.480 --> 0:42:49.399
<v Speaker 3>like we saw it on that play where he threw

0:42:49.440 --> 0:42:51.600
<v Speaker 3>the long touch on pass to DJ Moore where he

0:42:52.400 --> 0:42:56.600
<v Speaker 3>like pass rush was coming, he eluded it and bought

0:42:56.760 --> 0:43:00.759
<v Speaker 3>himself some time and DJ Moore got open deep. So

0:43:02.000 --> 0:43:04.360
<v Speaker 3>I like the Bears in the points here against the Vikings,

0:43:04.400 --> 0:43:07.040
<v Speaker 3>who you know, might still be stinging a little bit

0:43:07.080 --> 0:43:10.160
<v Speaker 3>from one that got away from them against the Broncos.

0:43:11.160 --> 0:43:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Sam, I think that forty five is very much in

0:43:13.000 --> 0:43:15.000
<v Speaker 1>play on the overside of this game too, because of

0:43:15.080 --> 0:43:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the playmaking ability of fields. And you know, we've seen

0:43:17.760 --> 0:43:20.879
<v Speaker 1>Dobbs just pretty good work here early on, and only

0:43:20.960 --> 0:43:22.680
<v Speaker 1>more time he has this offense, the better it is.

0:43:22.800 --> 0:43:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Ty Chandler getting his work too as well in that backfield.

0:43:25.680 --> 0:43:27.400
<v Speaker 1>It was not just a Madison backfield. But what are

0:43:27.440 --> 0:43:30.359
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts on the Bears and Vikings on Monday Night?

0:43:31.680 --> 0:43:38.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think obviously the loss for Minnesota could make

0:43:38.239 --> 0:43:42.160
<v Speaker 2>it so that Justin Jefferson returns in this game as well.

0:43:42.280 --> 0:43:44.840
<v Speaker 2>Had they won, I think they might have just waited

0:43:45.280 --> 0:43:50.239
<v Speaker 2>another week going into the buy to just let him rest.

0:43:50.440 --> 0:43:53.560
<v Speaker 2>Even more so, if they get him back, I think

0:43:54.640 --> 0:43:59.520
<v Speaker 2>Joshua Dobbs will be able to take this one to home.

0:43:59.600 --> 0:44:03.759
<v Speaker 2>I mean the Bears are just not this sounds weird,

0:44:03.800 --> 0:44:06.600
<v Speaker 2>but like they're not a winning team, like Matt Eberflus

0:44:06.719 --> 0:44:11.000
<v Speaker 2>is just not coaching a great team. And they're playmakers,

0:44:11.040 --> 0:44:13.839
<v Speaker 2>I think are sort of making up for his play

0:44:13.880 --> 0:44:19.080
<v Speaker 2>calling deficiencies on the field. So I three and a

0:44:19.080 --> 0:44:21.480
<v Speaker 2>half points, though I think is a little bit too much.

0:44:21.760 --> 0:44:25.799
<v Speaker 2>That's exactly what I made it prior to looking at

0:44:25.840 --> 0:44:29.440
<v Speaker 2>the line, so the over could be in play. But

0:44:29.840 --> 0:44:33.600
<v Speaker 2>I would love if Justin Jefferson was in before making

0:44:33.640 --> 0:44:34.000
<v Speaker 2>that play.

0:44:35.040 --> 0:44:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Ah See, I want to get it now just in

0:44:37.000 --> 0:44:39.040
<v Speaker 1>case he's in. Locking in because I feel good about

0:44:39.040 --> 0:44:41.840
<v Speaker 1>it now. Jefferson would make me feel even better. And

0:44:41.920 --> 0:44:43.840
<v Speaker 1>also what makes you feel good is not just betting

0:44:43.840 --> 0:44:45.759
<v Speaker 1>on football, but also betting on basketball. And if you

0:44:45.800 --> 0:44:48.880
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen it already, check out Fast Break Bets, the

0:44:49.040 --> 0:44:51.640
<v Speaker 1>ultimate source for NBA betting insights. You can join Matt

0:44:51.640 --> 0:44:54.880
<v Speaker 1>and Mody every single Wednesday, every single Friday, eleven am Eastern,

0:44:54.960 --> 0:44:58.040
<v Speaker 1>exclusively right here on our Betting Pros channel. Get ready

0:44:58.080 --> 0:45:00.239
<v Speaker 1>with the hottest picks and the juiciest odds for the

0:45:00.280 --> 0:45:02.360
<v Speaker 1>day's NBA matchup. So make sure you subscribe to the

0:45:02.360 --> 0:45:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Betting Pros channel and check him out every single Wednesday

0:45:05.200 --> 0:45:08.480
<v Speaker 1>and Friday eleven am Eastern right here on Betting Pros.

0:45:08.520 --> 0:45:11.600
<v Speaker 1>And don't forget our NFL contest is still going Bettingpros

0:45:11.640 --> 0:45:14.040
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash NFL Contest, or just join on the

0:45:14.080 --> 0:45:17.240
<v Speaker 1>community tab the NFL Contest. We're giving a weekly prizes,

0:45:17.280 --> 0:45:20.759
<v Speaker 1>monthly prizes at JSN Autograph Jersey. So many prizes for

0:45:20.880 --> 0:45:23.200
<v Speaker 1>all of you. And of course we've got a lot

0:45:23.239 --> 0:45:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of football still to come here and we're gonna have

0:45:25.120 --> 0:45:27.960
<v Speaker 1>you covered all week long, all season long, so make

0:45:28.000 --> 0:45:30.000
<v Speaker 1>sure you subscribe and click that bell to thet goes

0:45:30.040 --> 0:45:33.239
<v Speaker 1>ding for notifications for our Betting Pros channel. That'll do

0:45:33.280 --> 0:45:34.759
<v Speaker 1>it for us, but the story of the game goes

0:45:34.800 --> 0:45:37.839
<v Speaker 1>on for Sam and Pat. I'm Joey P. We'll see

0:45:37.880 --> 0:45:41.000
<v Speaker 1>you next time. Kids. Thanks for listening to the Betting

0:45:41.040 --> 0:45:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Pros podcast. If you love the show, the best freeway

0:45:44.239 --> 0:45:46.600
<v Speaker 1>to support us is by leaving a positive review on

0:45:46.719 --> 0:45:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts or Spotify. Follow us on x and TikTok

0:45:50.280 --> 0:45:53.919
<v Speaker 1>at Betting Pros and Instagram at Betting Pros NFL. Also

0:45:54.040 --> 0:45:56.920
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to our YouTube channel at YouTube dot com slash

0:45:56.960 --> 0:45:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Betting Pros