WEBVTT - Ten-Year Yield Could Fall Before Rising, Bianco Says

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.040
<v Speaker 1>P and L is brought to you by proper Cloth,

0:00:02.120 --> 0:00:05.120
<v Speaker 1>a leader in men's custom shirts, with proprietary smart sized

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>technology and top rated customer service. Ordering a custom shirt

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.680
<v Speaker 1>has never been easier. Visit proper cloth dot com to

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:19.920
<v Speaker 1>order your first custom shirt today. Welcome to the Bloomberg

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:22.599
<v Speaker 1>P and L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox. Along with my

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:25.759
<v Speaker 1>co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we bring you the

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for you and your money,

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>whether at the grocery store or the trading floor. Find

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg P and L Podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud and

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. Bonds what to do with the

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:47.600
<v Speaker 1>bond market, We've got Jim Bianco. James Bianco is the

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:52.479
<v Speaker 1>president of Bianco Research, joining us from Chicago. Boy, you know,

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Jim Bianco, I think of the bond market continues the

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 1>way it's going, they're not gonna be any people in

0:00:56.840 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the bond market much longer. No, I think they're in

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the sleeping You guys were talking about that. Yeah, they

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 1>got their blankets, you know, they pull it up, they

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:08.479
<v Speaker 1>get that little pillow out from Tim. I'm so glad

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 1>that you could join us. I don't know if you

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 1>saw that the Feds Jim Bullard came out today and

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:16.280
<v Speaker 1>said that there's no need to discuss the Fed's balance sheet.

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>People have been talking about when the Federal stopped reinvesting,

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>what they get from their four point five trillion dollars

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>of investments that they're holding. Um, what's your take on this?

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that they're going to have to talk

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 1>about it given the amount of money that they're receiving

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 1>from bonds being paid out and maturing. Yeah, I think

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>they're going to have to talk about it. Um, the

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 1>feds balance sheet has got trillions of dollars of Treasury

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:45.039
<v Speaker 1>securities on it. In simple terms, the bond market believes

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>that all those bonds that are on the Fed's balance

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>sheet are permanently out of circulation. They're never going to

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>come back into circulation. So Bullet is saying, and what

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Bill Dudley has said and some others have said, be

0:01:57.640 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 1>very very careful when you talk about reintroduced those bonds

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 1>back into the market, because then you could have a

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 1>shock in the market if they believe that. We have

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 1>to make room and private accounts now you know, banks

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 1>and and endowments and trusts inspectative accounts for trillions of

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 1>dollars of securities which are locked away, which we think

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 1>is forever in the Fed's balance sheet, can be very disruptive.

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>To date, I don't think the market has listened much

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 1>to that conversation because it's not going to until the

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>two big architects of the balance sheet, Bill Dudley and

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Janet yell And speak on the subject. And they haven't.

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 1>And now that Bullard has come out on the other side,

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:37.080
<v Speaker 1>it's going to reinforce that idea that man, that's just

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Fed talk. We don't really have to listen to it.

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you think we have to listen to it? I mean,

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:45.520
<v Speaker 1>aren't the mandates for the FED. Price stability and employment

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:49.359
<v Speaker 1>has nothing to do with protecting people against bond losses. Right?

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Price stability is another word for inflation. Since two thousand nine,

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>when the recession ended, the Great Recession ended, what have

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:59.359
<v Speaker 1>we not had is inflation. So when the FED has

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 1>this giant sheet and they run these extreme policies, they're

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 1>allowed to get away with it, if you will, because

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 1>we haven't had inflation. Now you get Donald Trump being elected,

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and you see consumer confidence at the seventeen year high,

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>you see business optimism at forty year high. You see

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 1>all of these numbers going through the roof, the stock

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>markets at a new high, and there's talk of reflation,

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 1>and part of that reflation talk is inflation as opposed

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>to real growth. Maybe now, for the first time in

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>seven years, eight years, we might actually get a pulse

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 1>out of inflation, and it might force the Fed to

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>have to deal with that. Up until now, they could

0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 1>just discuss ignore, you know, you know, trying out smart

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>everybody about it, but they didn't have to do anything

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 1>about it. But if we get inflation, they do have

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 1>to start thinking about it. Jim, I don't know if

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>you caught this, but yesterday Black Rocks Larry Fink was

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 1>talking about his outlook on the bond market, and he

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:53.559
<v Speaker 1>said that he actually thinks that there's a higher likelihood

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>of the ten year Treasury yelled going down from here,

0:03:57.160 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 1>possibly going below two, rather than rising. So it sort

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:03.280
<v Speaker 1>of goes against this idea that we're actually going to

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 1>see some inflation. I actually do agree with that. I

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 1>think that the problem is, and this gets into the

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 1>technicals of the bond market, I think we're going to

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>see a bump up in inflation and I think that

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 1>by two eighteen we're going to see higher yields. Now,

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>that is the most consensus thing you can say, so

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 1>much so that almost everybody in the bond market is

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 1>positioned for that. So if the market does go to

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 1>three percent by the by the spring of next year,

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 1>everybody makes money. And it was we found with contrarian opinion.

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:33.719
<v Speaker 1>When everybody's lined up one way in the market, it

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 1>tends to go the other way. So that's why I

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be surprised if we do go below two percent.

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Like Larry said, first question, that idea that there's going

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:44.479
<v Speaker 1>to be inflation, and then we have the big rise

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:48.240
<v Speaker 1>of rates after that going and you know, finding out

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 1>that Yett was there. It's just the problem is everybody's

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>positioned for it right now, and usually when that happens,

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the market has a tendency to go the other way.

0:04:56.920 --> 0:04:59.599
<v Speaker 1>So if every if everyone's wrong and the market goes

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the other way, who's going to suffer the biggest losses?

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 1>And will this be something that everyone's talking about how

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:06.839
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of hurt going on. Yeah, I think

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 1>that you know right now, if you were to look

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 1>at who is the biggest bet on rates going to

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 1>three percent. It's the more speculative hedge fund accounts by

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 1>some of the measures in the futures market. And uh

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:23.359
<v Speaker 1>they have the biggest short position ever ever in the

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>in the bond market, betting on higher rates because they

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 1>think Trump is going to bring back a reflation. They're

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:33.160
<v Speaker 1>on the firing line that they're going to be the

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:36.160
<v Speaker 1>most hurt by some kind of a fall in interest

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:39.040
<v Speaker 1>rates as opposed to arise. Jim, how long can they

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:42.039
<v Speaker 1>hold that position until the leverage starts to hurt? Oh?

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that if you start pushing rates down, you know,

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:52.160
<v Speaker 1>run under say twenty We're around two thirty four right now,

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 1>right and we were at highest to sixty in mid December,

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 1>so we're halfway there. I think that that's when the

0:05:57.440 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>pain threshold will start to kick in, and then as

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>you go underneath two it really kick in. Well, I

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:05.479
<v Speaker 1>thought about the spread though. I'm looking at the spread.

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's say the two ten uh spread one point one

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:13.160
<v Speaker 1>seven on the two year and the as you just said,

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the tenure two point three eight, so one, you know,

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 1>one one versus two and a quarter, right, I think

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 1>that you know, as you were to push the tenure

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 1>down to two twenty or maybe down to two, you

0:06:26.279 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 1>would see the YEO curve spread you write it's one seventeen,

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:33.159
<v Speaker 1>probably continue to narrow two and that would not bold

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 1>well for financial stocks. And they've actually hit a little

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:39.480
<v Speaker 1>bit of turbulence yere recently because a wider spread they

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 1>borrow shortland long benefits them and a narrow spread would

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:45.279
<v Speaker 1>hurt them. So if if everybody's two lined up for

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:47.160
<v Speaker 1>three percent rates, which would be good for the banks,

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:49.479
<v Speaker 1>and we wind up going to two, they could stumble

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 1>in that environment as well. Okay, so let's say what

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:54.599
<v Speaker 1>what happens that you just said, Let's say it plays

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 1>out or all of a sudden, you've got yields on anten,

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>your treasury is plunging against everybody's senses. Mortgage rates do

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:04.719
<v Speaker 1>you think that they could continue to rise despite this

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 1>or they also fall in tandem? I mean, are they

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 1>basically linked at the hip at this point? Um? No,

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 1>I think mortgage rates would there. They would fall on

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 1>an absolute basis, but I would agree with you that

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:19.679
<v Speaker 1>the spread would white. They would not fall as much

0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>as treasuries would fall. Uh, So they wouldn't the couple

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>all the way that one would go up in the

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>other would would go down. And and I think that

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the reason that mortgage rates would fall is one thing

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the FED is working off of. There is the mortgage

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>holdings are really working off their balance sheet fast. That

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 1>means they're more in private sector. If we do get

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 1>a reflation and that does get a bump up in

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>housing starts and in refinancing, you could seem demand for

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>mortgages and that could also keep their rates um higher

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>than they would from a treasury, So you could see

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the widening spread. That's really interesting. So even if we

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 1>see treasury yields decline, borrowing costs for people who are

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 1>looking to borrow money to by a house might stay elevated.

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much, Jim Bianco, always a pleasure speaking

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 1>with you, President and founder of Bianco Research, longtime veteran

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 1>of the bond market. Expecting that just like Larry Fink

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 1>of Black Rock thinks possibly it's more likely for tenure

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 1>treasure yields to fall before they rise. We've been talking

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot about the anti globalist trend, uh the populist

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 1>wave that we've seedwash over really the entire world. We

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 1>haven't heard as much about what this will do for travel,

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:50.559
<v Speaker 1>But now we have someone who can give us some insight.

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Alex Sosiah, chief executive officer of Apple Leisure Group, which

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 1>is based in Philadelphia. Alex, do you have a sense

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 1>that people will try novel less internationally given the populist

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>backdrop in sort of the anti globalist sentiment that we've seen. Yeah,

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 1>thank you. I I am concerned about that. What we

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>see the trends in the short term is that we

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 1>have stronger numbers for Americans traveling outside of the country,

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 1>particularly to Mexico and the Caribbean, versus a year ago

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 1>for traveling within this year, but it could be affecting

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:26.719
<v Speaker 1>soon if the territory continues to be the one to

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 1>protect protectionism and uncertainty of what's going on in the

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:31.560
<v Speaker 1>airports and stuff like that. So, yeah, it is a

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 1>concern that we have, although the big trends still shows

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 1>very positive. Well, you've been doing this for what thirty

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 1>more than thirty years? Can you sort of run down

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:43.959
<v Speaker 1>for us the destinations where you think investments at least

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 1>in the actual infrastructure of hospitality our best our best

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 1>looked at, whether it is Mexico, Costa Rica, Panama, where

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 1>would you look. Yeah, well, that's the places that we're looking,

0:09:55.720 --> 0:09:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that we're investing. And indeed, the places that you mentioned

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:02.960
<v Speaker 1>now that we are UH totally focused on on resorts,

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 1>and on the resorts, the most profitable destinations happen to

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>be the ones that have the biggest connectivity, the best

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 1>natural resources, are lowest payroll, and and and and the

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:16.320
<v Speaker 1>avocation of tourism, particular to certain American tourism, the American

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 1>tourism UM oriented destinations are the most profitable ones. And yes,

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the beaches in Mexico and Country Amaya, Loscaos, Portoa, that

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:26.320
<v Speaker 1>all those are great places. But also in the Caribbean

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:30.319
<v Speaker 1>there's great there. There are great opportunities at Jamaica, UH

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:33.319
<v Speaker 1>Talks and Cacos. Domerican Republic is growing very rapidly and

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:37.680
<v Speaker 1>with great returns. And and then we see opportunities in

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Central America, not just in contact in Costa Rica that

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:42.080
<v Speaker 1>it's been there for a longer period of time, but

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:45.840
<v Speaker 1>now we see emerging places in UH in Panama as well,

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 1>hopefully so Nicaragua. And then we go south place like Colombia,

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 1>it's also growing very rapidly with good returns and and

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 1>good respond and great customer satisfaction Alex. In addition to

0:10:57.600 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>some of the protection as to rhetorict that we've globally,

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 1>there also is this feeling that generally people are feeling

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 1>better about their economic wherewithal, particularly in the United States.

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Are you seeing that sort of trickle into plans for

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>more expensive vacations or just more vacation plans in general. Yes,

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:20.439
<v Speaker 1>of course we see that that that that of course

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>helps a lot. People are feeling better. The prices of

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 1>flying outside of the United States in general is is

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>cheaper than before. We have a tropic about four to

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 1>the destination that we work with versus a year ago.

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 1>So I think that the Americans are seeing more value

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 1>for the morning one side and the other side. They

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:42.680
<v Speaker 1>are comfortable with their um with the with the overall economy,

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:45.559
<v Speaker 1>and I think that obviously helps the people to travel

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:48.560
<v Speaker 1>and we seek that. We see the number of new

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:52.600
<v Speaker 1>passports issuing in the United States now at fifteen million

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 1>per year, about fifty percent or those so seven point

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 1>seven seven point five million are reissuing passports renewals. But

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the other side point five our brand new passports. So

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 1>in ten years you're talking about almost eighty million new

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 1>passports in the United States, and it's still only forty

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 1>percent of the population. We still have sixty percent of

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 1>population in the United States without passports. So I do

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 1>see a big trend of people getting passports, getting passports

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 1>of course to travel outside of the country. And the

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 1>biggest region that it's utilize for the utilization of those

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 1>passports is a Mexican and Caribbean. So I see a

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 1>big growth, a big trends traveling internationally. It's becoming more

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:31.560
<v Speaker 1>for everyone, more a commodity. But within those experienced travelers,

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 1>certainly they're spending more money and looking more sophistication. There's

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:37.320
<v Speaker 1>also much better product. Well, when you talk about product,

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:39.199
<v Speaker 1>alex I wonder if you could tell us is there

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity for an investor in Mexico. Are there hotel

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 1>projects that are looking for investors that maybe have been

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:51.240
<v Speaker 1>stymied because of the change or the parent change in

0:12:51.360 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 1>policy because of the Trump administration. I don't, I don't.

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that because of the Trump administration has

0:12:57.520 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 1>slowed down any of the projects that are down there.

0:12:59.520 --> 0:13:03.080
<v Speaker 1>But certainly there's always an opportunity for American investors to

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 1>go and invest in in places in Mexico or you know,

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:10.559
<v Speaker 1>or in other destinations in the Caribbean. In this case, Uh,

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:13.599
<v Speaker 1>the American investors. In the case of our company, we

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:17.960
<v Speaker 1>just had KKR and CASEL investing big time in our company. Uh,

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 1>they're being very shy so far. The Americans have not

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 1>very active in this In this sector is mainly dominant

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 1>by regional and local investors as well as European investors.

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 1>So there's not so much activity so far for the

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:34.199
<v Speaker 1>for the for the for the U S investors and

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 1>particularly for the U S banks to participate in the

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 1>leisure sector. On the hospitality in Mexico. But I see

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:43.319
<v Speaker 1>a lot more appetite and a lot more oppenness of

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:45.680
<v Speaker 1>going and compete and start investing there. So I don't

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 1>see any projects slowing down. H. But what I do

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:51.480
<v Speaker 1>see is a create opportunity to spit that up. We

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 1>gotta leave it there. I want to thank you very much,

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Alex Dosiah. He's the chief executive of Apple Leisure Group

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 1>P and L is brought to you by proper Cloth,

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:12.840
<v Speaker 1>a leader in men's custom shirts. At proper cloth dot com,

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 1>ordering custom shirts has never been easier. Create your custom

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 1>shirt size, by answering ten easy questions, select from over

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 1>five fabrics to suit your personal taste. Shirts start from

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 1>eighty five dollars and are delivered in just two weeks

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 1>with proper Cloths perfect fit guarantee. Remakes are completely free

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 1>and expert staff are standing by to help. For premium quality,

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 1>perfect fitting shirts, visit proper cloth dot com Custom shirts

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>made Smarter. You know who did some innovation. Theresa May,

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. She innovated by convincing

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the Parliament to uh pass her plan to exit the

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 1>europe Pian Union. It comes with a catch, though. Let's

0:15:03.960 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 1>stay a little bit more into that with Sarah Jane Mahmoud,

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 1>government analyst with Bloomberg Intelligence in London. So, Sarah, can

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 1>you first just give us a rundown on what exactly

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Parliament past giving Theresa May the ability to go ahead

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 1>and start the process of excuting the European Union. Hi? There, Yes, sure,

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:27.800
<v Speaker 1>And so yesterday and MP's in the House of Commons

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 1>passed the bill that gives Raiser May permission to activate

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Article fifty of the Lisbon Treaty, effectively kickstarting exit talks

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 1>for Brexit with EU leaders and however she doesn't have

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 1>a free pass as yet because the bill now goes

0:15:43.720 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 1>to the House of Lords. I'm who from the twentieth

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:50.200
<v Speaker 1>of February will start considering whether or not Traiser May

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 1>can activate Article fifty by the end of March as

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 1>she wants to. What is the outlook for the House

0:15:56.360 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 1>of Lords vote? Um, Well, the House of Lords um

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 1>mainly opposed to activating Article fifty and to Brexit. However,

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 1>as they're an unelected body, they would be unlikely to

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 1>block the bill itself, but they could take their time

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 1>to consider it and make possible amendments, for example, make

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the activation of Article fifty contingent on the government considering

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 1>staying in the European Economic Area or securing continued access

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to the EU Single Market for UK based financial services companies.

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 1>So in other words, um, this might become a pretty thorny,

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:37.200
<v Speaker 1>sticky issue. Just because this means that Theresa May can

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 1>start the process, it doesn't necessarily mean that it will

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 1>speed it up by any means, and it sort of

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>remains to be seen whether Parliament will work with her

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 1>on some kind of constructive basis to get through a

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>plan that is palatable for for everybody involved exactly. I mean,

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 1>it's likely that the House of Lords will ultimately pass

0:16:56.360 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the bill allowing the government to activate Article fifty um.

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 1>And it's also likely that because tres and May wants

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 1>to activate Article fifty start exit talks of the leaders

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 1>by the end of March, a self imposed deadline. Um.

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I think ultimately she wants to do this during the

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:17.120
<v Speaker 1>next European Council meeting that's set for March the ninth, UM.

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 1>So she's hoping that the bill will get approval before them. Sarah,

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, just assooming out a little bit as as

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:29.439
<v Speaker 1>a member as somebody who lives in London. How has

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the conversation changed. I mean, when you go out to dinner,

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:35.119
<v Speaker 1>you go to the pub, is everybody still talking about

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Brexit and Brexit negotiations? So people still care? Are they

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:40.919
<v Speaker 1>paying close attention to all of these machinations or are

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 1>they kind of separating themselves from it, kind of assuming

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:46.880
<v Speaker 1>that things are going to keep going. I mean, I think,

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:49.440
<v Speaker 1>to be honest, there is a lot of Brexit fatigue

0:17:49.600 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>at the moment um in professional and social circles. But

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 1>a key issue looking at the financial services sector is

0:17:56.640 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 1>whether or not banks fund managers, insurers, payment service providers

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 1>and more. M can continue to access the EU market

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:08.920
<v Speaker 1>at once the UK exits the EU, which gift RAISU

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 1>may can activate Article fifty by the end of March. UM.

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:15.360
<v Speaker 1>It would be likely the UK would leave the European

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Union around about April two thousand and ninety. What are

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:22.120
<v Speaker 1>people in London worried about losing their jobs? I think

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:25.680
<v Speaker 1>that there is a big concern that many financial institutions

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>are likely to move their operations into another EU member state. UM.

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:36.159
<v Speaker 1>But I guess until there's more clarity, until Article fifty

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:40.919
<v Speaker 1>is activated and negotiations start taking place, UM, there's just

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of uncertainty here. How does passporting relate directly

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:50.400
<v Speaker 1>to the sales that financial companies currently enjoy? Okay, So

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>under the passporting regime, the companies financial services companies that

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 1>are based in the UK, regardless of where they are incorporated. UM,

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:02.639
<v Speaker 1>they have free access to over twenty seven European countries,

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:06.119
<v Speaker 1>and they're allowed to establish a branch or provide cross

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:10.639
<v Speaker 1>border services without needing local authorization in every single country,

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:13.120
<v Speaker 1>and they generally only have to comply with one rule

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 1>book rather than up to twenty eight for example, um

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:20.879
<v Speaker 1>Tresa May's plan is basically a hard Brexit, which means

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>to leave the EU without continued access to the Single Market,

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 1>or rather continued membership of the Single Market. Um So

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:33.160
<v Speaker 1>with that passporting rights would be lost and financial services

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>companies that have their base in the UK would need

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 1>to seek alternative ways to access the EU market. Now,

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the white paper that the government published last week didn't

0:19:42.080 --> 0:19:45.399
<v Speaker 1>really give any clarity on what special deal they're looking

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:49.160
<v Speaker 1>to to make with EU leaders, and similarly EU leaders

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 1>won't really show their cards and they won't indicate what

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:55.200
<v Speaker 1>they might be able to offer the UK until Article

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:57.880
<v Speaker 1>fifty is activated. I want to thank you very much

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:01.200
<v Speaker 1>for your insight in your time. Sarah Mahmwood is a

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:05.200
<v Speaker 1>government analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence based in London. Of course,

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:08.919
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence providing unique in real time research in a

0:20:09.000 --> 0:20:12.560
<v Speaker 1>variety of industries and also government as well as market

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:15.720
<v Speaker 1>factors that affect business. Just type B I go on

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg to get all of that Bloomberg Intelligence research.

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:22.119
<v Speaker 1>You know, every time I see that a bank or

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:25.200
<v Speaker 1>firm is moving their operations out of London elsewhere in

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:28.359
<v Speaker 1>the in the United the European Union or the U S.

0:20:28.400 --> 0:20:30.359
<v Speaker 1>I have to think, is this because of Brexit? Is

0:20:30.359 --> 0:20:32.880
<v Speaker 1>this become of Brexit? But perhaps perhaps it's just people

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:34.880
<v Speaker 1>are sitting and waiting. I guess we'll have to say

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 1>it could be. I want to call on Sharudi sing,

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 1>our agriculture Companies reporter for Bloomberg News, joining us from Chicago. Sharudi,

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm wonder if you could describe for US an industry

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 1>that many people may not know the details of but

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 1>are the recipient of. This is the meat packing industry,

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and uh, maybe you could give us the sort of

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:13.879
<v Speaker 1>rundown on how a steak actually arrives on the plate

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 1>of a diner and how that is connected to foreign policy. Sure, absolutely,

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:23.640
<v Speaker 1>so good to be with you. Um, the meat industry

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 1>in the US UM employs a lot of different people,

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:31.480
<v Speaker 1>and um, it's it's a long supply chain that starts

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 1>with a farmer that you're talking specifically about steak. You've

0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:38.639
<v Speaker 1>got farmers who raise cows and calves. Those cattle go

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>onto feed lots, and then those cattle that are battened

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 1>up at feed lots then eventually go to the meat

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 1>packing plants. And the meat packing plants are where we

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>have a number of different types of workers. They're one

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 1>of the larger segments is the immigrant population. Particularly over

0:21:57.520 --> 0:22:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the last few decades, the immigrant workers increased um and

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 1>more recently, in the last decade or so, we've seen

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:09.199
<v Speaker 1>refugees become a fixture in these plants. So, shrewd I

0:22:09.240 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 1>was just looking at your story and you say that

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 1>immigrants hold more than one third of these jobs in

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the United States and wondering, shrewdly from your sources, what

0:22:18.800 --> 0:22:22.720
<v Speaker 1>are you hearing as far as what recent immigration policies

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and proposals, what effect they would have on their business? Well,

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 1>right now, I think a lot of the companies are

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:33.119
<v Speaker 1>monitoring the situation that when we talk to some of

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the industry groups, um, they're telling us that they want

0:22:36.200 --> 0:22:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the administration to really um consider what ramifications the policy

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:44.959
<v Speaker 1>changes would have on businesses as well as the foreign

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:47.679
<v Speaker 1>born workers. Well, I wonder if you could get the

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 1>details for us in terms of the companies affected, Tyson,

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:58.960
<v Speaker 1>for example, Cargil, j B S. Are they all exposed equally. Well,

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:01.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, one area that we looked at was Fort

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Morgan in Colorado, where Cargill has a large beef plant,

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and that is an area where UM, there are a

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of immigrants and a lot of UM refugees that

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 1>are working in that particular plant where there are these

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 1>people from. Just to give us as much detail as

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 1>you have, sir, so, Cargill actually told us that about

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:22.359
<v Speaker 1>twelve percent of the employees at the Fort Morgan beef

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:26.160
<v Speaker 1>plant come from East Africa. UM. And a lot of

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 1>these workers have come for a variety of different reasons,

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 1>but UM. You know, one of the ways that they

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:36.439
<v Speaker 1>can find employment UM in the US through placement agencies,

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 1>has been at these plants. And over the last decade,

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Cargill and other meat packers have relied on or had

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 1>turned to refugees as a source of UM a labor

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 1>pool basically, and UM. Even so, Cargill has told us

0:23:52.880 --> 0:23:55.919
<v Speaker 1>that it is still a challenge to be able to

0:23:56.000 --> 0:23:58.440
<v Speaker 1>fully staff those plants. And just to give you a

0:23:58.480 --> 0:24:01.199
<v Speaker 1>little bit of an idea, Cargil Fort Morgan plant in

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Colorado UM starts workers at an hourly wage about fourteen

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:10.680
<v Speaker 1>dollars and nineties cents, and that's about higher than Colorado's

0:24:10.720 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 1>minimum wage, and they offer health care and benefits. But UM,

0:24:14.320 --> 0:24:17.399
<v Speaker 1>it's still a challenge for Cargill to fully staff that plant.

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 1>So UM to play devil's advocate, somebody could say, well,

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the reason why they can't find enough people to fill

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 1>those jobs is because it's a difficult job and it's

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 1>one that people aren't drawn to you unless they're paid

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:31.920
<v Speaker 1>substantially more. And you know, there's a question of would

0:24:31.960 --> 0:24:36.640
<v Speaker 1>they be paying even higher wages and employing a sort

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:42.160
<v Speaker 1>of broader range of people if they didn't have access

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:45.920
<v Speaker 1>to people who were escaping war zones. I mean, I'm

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:48.199
<v Speaker 1>just wondering, is that is that really what's going on here?

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Because before two six, right, they there were a lot

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 1>of illegal immigrants UM that these plants employed, and after

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 1>a crackdown, they turned to refugees. So one person we

0:24:58.800 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 1>talked to who tracks refugew resettlement program really carefully, she

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 1>actually suggested that maybe the meat packers UM could draw

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:11.200
<v Speaker 1>for Native born applicants for these particular jobs and these

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:14.000
<v Speaker 1>meat packing plants if they raised their wages. And then

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:16.440
<v Speaker 1>she even acknowledged that, you know, that could potentially lead

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:19.240
<v Speaker 1>to higher prices for consumers, but she said, you know,

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:22.480
<v Speaker 1>I'd be happy to eat less meat. Well, I want

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 1>to thank you very much for being with us A

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Sharudi Sing is our Agriculture Companies reporter, joining us from Chicago.

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:37.359
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast.

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews at iTunes, SoundCloud,

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:45.920
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Pim Fox. I'm

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 1>out there on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm out there

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:52.120
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one before the podcast.

0:25:52.200 --> 0:26:00.119
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio. M

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 1>P and L is brought to you by proper Cloth,

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 1>a leader in men's custom shirts with proprietary smart sized

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:11.920
<v Speaker 1>technology and top rated customer service. Ordering a custom shirt

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:14.879
<v Speaker 1>has never been easier. Visit proper cloth dot com to

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:16.880
<v Speaker 1>order your first custom shirt today