1 00:00:00,920 --> 00:00:04,280 Speaker 1: It's time to refresh your yard. During Spring Backyard Days 2 00:00:04,360 --> 00:00:07,440 Speaker 1: at the Home Depot. Get low prices guaranteed on Propang 3 00:00:07,440 --> 00:00:10,080 Speaker 1: grills starting one hundred and seventy nine dollars like the 4 00:00:10,119 --> 00:00:13,200 Speaker 1: Next Grill three burner gas grill, or get fifty dollars 5 00:00:13,200 --> 00:00:16,240 Speaker 1: off of select Weber Spirit Grill and bring big flavor 6 00:00:16,360 --> 00:00:19,760 Speaker 1: to your backyard. Then set the scene with Hampton based 7 00:00:19,800 --> 00:00:22,960 Speaker 1: dring lights that bring it all together. Shop Spring Backyard 8 00:00:23,040 --> 00:00:25,480 Speaker 1: Days for seven days at the hum Depot now through 9 00:00:25,480 --> 00:00:28,600 Speaker 1: May sixth. Exclusions Plassy homeb dot COM's last price match 10 00:00:28,600 --> 00:00:29,200 Speaker 1: for details. 11 00:00:30,160 --> 00:00:33,199 Speaker 2: Hello Next Picture Show listeners, here's a friendly reminder that 12 00:00:33,240 --> 00:00:35,840 Speaker 2: if you enjoy the Next Picture Show, you'll really enjoy 13 00:00:35,880 --> 00:00:38,680 Speaker 2: getting more Next Picture Show. By subscribing to our Patreon, 14 00:00:38,960 --> 00:00:41,360 Speaker 2: you can unlock ad free versions of the podcast for 15 00:00:41,400 --> 00:00:44,200 Speaker 2: three dollars a month, and get bonus episodes on current 16 00:00:44,240 --> 00:00:47,040 Speaker 2: TV movies we don't cover on the podcast and other 17 00:00:47,040 --> 00:00:49,400 Speaker 2: topics for five dollars a month. We have a bonus 18 00:00:49,479 --> 00:00:53,280 Speaker 2: episode up now on Tasha Robinson's Adventures at Fantastic Fest 19 00:00:53,600 --> 00:00:56,240 Speaker 2: and one on the Way about the latest season of Peacemaker. 20 00:00:56,600 --> 00:00:59,720 Speaker 2: To subscribe to our Patreon, please visit patreon dot com 21 00:01:00,360 --> 00:01:04,280 Speaker 2: Next Picture Show. That's Patreon dot com slash Next Picture Show. 22 00:01:06,080 --> 00:01:09,120 Speaker 3: It's very difficult to keep the line between the past. 23 00:01:08,880 --> 00:01:09,399 Speaker 2: And the press. 24 00:01:09,520 --> 00:01:13,800 Speaker 4: You believe that someone out of the past can enter 25 00:01:14,000 --> 00:01:16,160 Speaker 4: and take possession of a living being. 26 00:01:16,240 --> 00:01:18,360 Speaker 2: We may be true with the past, but the past 27 00:01:18,480 --> 00:01:25,680 Speaker 2: is not true with us. Welcome to the Next Picture Show. 28 00:01:25,760 --> 00:01:28,080 Speaker 2: A Movie the Week podcast devoted to a classic film 29 00:01:28,160 --> 00:01:30,000 Speaker 2: and how it shaped our thoughts on a recent release. 30 00:01:30,200 --> 00:01:31,639 Speaker 2: I'm Scott to Buy Us Here with. 31 00:01:31,959 --> 00:01:34,680 Speaker 5: Keith Pepps and Genevieve Koski Dude. 32 00:01:34,480 --> 00:01:37,120 Speaker 2: A Mechanical Failure. Our regular co host, Tasha Robinson is 33 00:01:37,120 --> 00:01:40,200 Speaker 2: currently entering Russian airspace and we have been unsuccessful in 34 00:01:40,240 --> 00:01:42,880 Speaker 2: calling her back, but nevertheless, we have decided to press 35 00:01:42,920 --> 00:01:45,319 Speaker 2: on and invite our friend Jason Bailey to host in 36 00:01:45,360 --> 00:01:48,840 Speaker 2: her place. Jason is a freelance film critic, author, and podcaster. 37 00:01:49,240 --> 00:01:51,840 Speaker 2: You have seen his work in The New York Times, Vulture, Slate, 38 00:01:51,960 --> 00:01:55,520 Speaker 2: Rolling Stone, Crooked, Marquee, and Bloomberg. He currently co hosts 39 00:01:55,680 --> 00:01:58,400 Speaker 2: Guide for the Film Fanatic, a podcast inspired by the 40 00:01:58,440 --> 00:02:01,680 Speaker 2: Great Danny Peery book. He's also the author of several books, 41 00:02:01,960 --> 00:02:06,200 Speaker 2: most recently the biography Gandolfini, Jim Tony, and the Life 42 00:02:06,240 --> 00:02:09,640 Speaker 2: of a Legend. Welcome Jason. You're busy. You sound really busy, Jason. 43 00:02:09,680 --> 00:02:10,560 Speaker 2: This is a lot of stuff. 44 00:02:12,919 --> 00:02:13,160 Speaker 4: You know. 45 00:02:14,800 --> 00:02:17,919 Speaker 6: I've discovered cocaine and I'm fine. I'm getting everything done. 46 00:02:18,360 --> 00:02:20,440 Speaker 6: It's all said. Thank you guys so much for having me. 47 00:02:20,840 --> 00:02:22,799 Speaker 7: It worked out well for Gandolfini, so you. 48 00:02:22,760 --> 00:02:27,400 Speaker 6: Know, it really is such a thrill to come on. 49 00:02:29,160 --> 00:02:32,640 Speaker 6: I love this show. I admire all of you so 50 00:02:32,880 --> 00:02:35,920 Speaker 6: very very much from clearback in the av Club days. 51 00:02:36,120 --> 00:02:36,960 Speaker 6: Thank you for having me. 52 00:02:37,280 --> 00:02:40,040 Speaker 2: Yes, for sure, it's been a long time coming. So 53 00:02:40,040 --> 00:02:43,160 Speaker 2: there was a nice long stretch, especially during the Cold War, 54 00:02:43,600 --> 00:02:46,919 Speaker 2: when the threat of nuclear annihilation heavily clouded the nightmares 55 00:02:46,960 --> 00:02:50,000 Speaker 2: of multiple generations who believe that the world was vulnerable 56 00:02:50,040 --> 00:02:53,640 Speaker 2: to technical or political failures, or more simply the impulses 57 00:02:53,680 --> 00:02:56,760 Speaker 2: of a madman. Those fears seem to have dissipated with 58 00:02:56,760 --> 00:02:59,919 Speaker 2: the breakup of the Soviet Union and the emergence of epidemics, 59 00:03:00,080 --> 00:03:02,920 Speaker 2: climate change, and other threats. But are we any more 60 00:03:02,960 --> 00:03:06,000 Speaker 2: safe from nukes? Now? That's not a question we'll be 61 00:03:06,080 --> 00:03:09,520 Speaker 2: answering directly on our Humble Movie podcast, but it's certainly 62 00:03:09,560 --> 00:03:12,440 Speaker 2: one that our pairing this week has us thinking about. Genevieve. 63 00:03:12,600 --> 00:03:15,239 Speaker 2: Pick up the red phone and please tell our listeners 64 00:03:15,360 --> 00:03:16,600 Speaker 2: what we're talking about this week. 65 00:03:16,800 --> 00:03:19,240 Speaker 5: With her new thriller A House of Dynamite, Catherine Bigelow 66 00:03:19,240 --> 00:03:22,399 Speaker 5: approaches a nuclear scenario with the same docu drama intensity 67 00:03:22,440 --> 00:03:25,280 Speaker 5: as previous films like The hurt Locker, Zero, Dark thirty 68 00:03:25,320 --> 00:03:27,920 Speaker 5: and Detroit. The premise of the movie is simple. A 69 00:03:27,960 --> 00:03:30,760 Speaker 5: single nuclear missile has been launched toward the American Midwest 70 00:03:30,800 --> 00:03:34,079 Speaker 5: by an unknown enemy. The ICBM is initially assumed to 71 00:03:34,120 --> 00:03:35,960 Speaker 5: be a test, but when it's determined to be a 72 00:03:36,000 --> 00:03:39,760 Speaker 5: genuine threat, various high level officials spring into action and 73 00:03:39,800 --> 00:03:43,120 Speaker 5: face an ever more narrowing series of options. This scenario 74 00:03:43,160 --> 00:03:45,520 Speaker 5: more or less mirrors the one in Sidney Lamette's nineteen 75 00:03:45,560 --> 00:03:49,360 Speaker 5: sixty four classic Failsafe, a chillingly realistic thriller about a 76 00:03:49,400 --> 00:03:52,280 Speaker 5: technical error that sends a group of US strategic bombers 77 00:03:52,320 --> 00:03:55,680 Speaker 5: toward Moscow with a nuclear payload. When calling the bomber's 78 00:03:55,720 --> 00:03:58,680 Speaker 5: back becomes impossible, the President in his military brass have 79 00:03:58,800 --> 00:04:01,360 Speaker 5: to consider drastic stuff to prevent a war that will 80 00:04:01,360 --> 00:04:02,640 Speaker 5: annihilate both sides. 81 00:04:02,880 --> 00:04:05,080 Speaker 2: So this week we'll turn back the clock over sixty 82 00:04:05,160 --> 00:04:07,920 Speaker 2: years to see how the fear of nuclear catastrophe is 83 00:04:07,960 --> 00:04:10,960 Speaker 2: expressed in seeing the limits failsafe. Then we'll come back 84 00:04:11,000 --> 00:04:13,520 Speaker 2: next week to discover those fears haven't changed much at 85 00:04:13,520 --> 00:04:16,000 Speaker 2: all in a house of dynamite, which is not the 86 00:04:16,080 --> 00:04:25,640 Speaker 2: Jimmy Walker biopic you may have been expecting. Please join us. 87 00:04:26,680 --> 00:04:29,400 Speaker 8: Hi, I'm John Ray, your friend and jeweler at Shang Company. 88 00:04:29,720 --> 00:04:33,880 Speaker 8: Getting engaged, so friends listen up. Shame Company engagement rings 89 00:04:33,880 --> 00:04:37,080 Speaker 8: are protected with our all inclusive, free lifetime warranty. We 90 00:04:37,160 --> 00:04:40,240 Speaker 8: stand behind the same quality we've offered since nineteen twenty nine. 91 00:04:40,560 --> 00:04:43,159 Speaker 8: Our rings are crafted to last. It's why our warranty 92 00:04:43,240 --> 00:04:45,880 Speaker 8: is the only one that protects your center stone. We 93 00:04:45,920 --> 00:04:50,000 Speaker 8: also cover repairs, resizings, cleanings, and so much more. That's 94 00:04:50,040 --> 00:04:52,680 Speaker 8: money you keep for you and your family because a 95 00:04:52,720 --> 00:04:56,160 Speaker 8: friend always has your back. Shame Company, your friend and jeweler. 96 00:04:56,320 --> 00:04:58,960 Speaker 9: Those a Vindicator bombers of a Strategic Air Command on 97 00:04:59,080 --> 00:05:03,200 Speaker 9: routine patrol. Each plane carries two twenty megaton hydrogen bombs 98 00:05:03,200 --> 00:05:06,520 Speaker 9: designed to detonate over enemy targets at any given moment, 99 00:05:06,640 --> 00:05:08,599 Speaker 9: night or day. Flights of those airplanes are in the 100 00:05:08,640 --> 00:05:15,880 Speaker 9: air set fail safebox open operational days. 101 00:05:17,000 --> 00:05:20,200 Speaker 2: In nineteen sixty four, Columbia Pictures released two black and 102 00:05:20,200 --> 00:05:24,080 Speaker 2: white movies with virtually identical premises. A fleet of American 103 00:05:24,080 --> 00:05:27,680 Speaker 2: bombers with nuclear missiles are incorrectly ordered to drop their 104 00:05:27,680 --> 00:05:30,799 Speaker 2: payload in the Soviet Union, and they cannot be called back, 105 00:05:31,160 --> 00:05:34,279 Speaker 2: leading to awkward conversations between the American president and his 106 00:05:34,360 --> 00:05:38,279 Speaker 2: Soviet counterpart. Both even feature a character named Buck. The 107 00:05:38,320 --> 00:05:41,320 Speaker 2: first of the two was released in late January Stanley 108 00:05:41,360 --> 00:05:44,839 Speaker 2: Kubrick's Doctor Strangelove and inspired send up of Cold War 109 00:05:44,920 --> 00:05:48,359 Speaker 2: tensions that is widely considered the greatest satire in film history. 110 00:05:48,680 --> 00:05:52,800 Speaker 2: The second was released in early October Sidney Lumet's Failsafe, 111 00:05:52,960 --> 00:05:56,320 Speaker 2: which opened to stronger views but tanked at the box office. 112 00:05:56,560 --> 00:06:01,160 Speaker 2: It would have been like releasing Airport after airplane for audiences. 113 00:06:01,520 --> 00:06:04,800 Speaker 2: It was deja vus without the laughs. Yet fail Safe 114 00:06:04,839 --> 00:06:08,200 Speaker 2: deserves to be loved on its own formidable merits. Once 115 00:06:08,200 --> 00:06:11,240 Speaker 2: you get past its similarities to Doctor Strangelove, you can 116 00:06:11,240 --> 00:06:14,160 Speaker 2: pick up on the differences, starting with a commitment to 117 00:06:14,160 --> 00:06:18,120 Speaker 2: its no nuke's message that pursues a frighteningly plausible premise 118 00:06:18,279 --> 00:06:22,760 Speaker 2: to the bleakest imaginable conclusion. Those who argue for deterrence, 119 00:06:22,839 --> 00:06:25,400 Speaker 2: which is to say, the mutual incentive for countries with 120 00:06:25,480 --> 00:06:27,919 Speaker 2: nuclear bombs not to fire on each other, are given 121 00:06:28,000 --> 00:06:31,919 Speaker 2: no quarter. In Failsafe, the argument that triggers American planes 122 00:06:31,960 --> 00:06:34,840 Speaker 2: to move forward with a peremptive strike on Moscow happens 123 00:06:34,839 --> 00:06:38,000 Speaker 2: by accident and cannot be reversed, due ironically to the 124 00:06:38,040 --> 00:06:40,919 Speaker 2: safeguards the military has placed on such a scenario. But 125 00:06:40,960 --> 00:06:43,200 Speaker 2: what's so compelling about the film is that the President 126 00:06:43,360 --> 00:06:46,120 Speaker 2: and his top military officials are quickly forced to consider 127 00:06:46,200 --> 00:06:50,000 Speaker 2: drastic options, from shooting down their own planes at a minimum, 128 00:06:50,040 --> 00:06:53,080 Speaker 2: to offering up the destruction of a major American city 129 00:06:53,160 --> 00:06:55,640 Speaker 2: as a show of good faith just to prevent an 130 00:06:55,680 --> 00:06:59,480 Speaker 2: all out nuclear holocaust. It's one thing for Buck Turgenson 131 00:06:59,520 --> 00:07:02,040 Speaker 2: and doctor Shot Rangelove to talk about ten or twenty 132 00:07:02,120 --> 00:07:05,640 Speaker 2: million dead Americans as getting our hair must. It's quite 133 00:07:05,680 --> 00:07:09,000 Speaker 2: another to look that possibility square on the eye. Much 134 00:07:09,080 --> 00:07:12,040 Speaker 2: like the Kubrick film, fail Safe reserves plenty of contempt 135 00:07:12,040 --> 00:07:15,520 Speaker 2: for the decadence of powerful men throwing such numbers around casually. 136 00:07:16,160 --> 00:07:19,600 Speaker 2: In an early scene in Failsafe, a fervent anti communist 137 00:07:19,600 --> 00:07:22,960 Speaker 2: professor played by Walter Mathau, startled guests at an elite 138 00:07:23,040 --> 00:07:26,160 Speaker 2: soiree with his cavalier language about the possibility of nuclear 139 00:07:26,200 --> 00:07:29,400 Speaker 2: war ending the threat of communism. It's more startling still 140 00:07:29,440 --> 00:07:31,840 Speaker 2: to see him turn up later as an influential voice 141 00:07:31,840 --> 00:07:34,800 Speaker 2: in the middle of a genuine nuclear crisis. Due to 142 00:07:34,800 --> 00:07:38,080 Speaker 2: a series of technical errors, a fleet of six Mockti 143 00:07:38,160 --> 00:07:40,960 Speaker 2: Vindicator bombers are given the signal to fly across the 144 00:07:41,080 --> 00:07:43,920 Speaker 2: Arctic and into the Soviet territory, with the lead bomber 145 00:07:43,960 --> 00:07:47,320 Speaker 2: is to drop two nuclear bombs on Moscow. The planes 146 00:07:47,360 --> 00:07:50,560 Speaker 2: cannot be recalled through radio because past a certain point 147 00:07:50,840 --> 00:07:53,760 Speaker 2: the pilots are trained to ignore voices that the enemy 148 00:07:53,800 --> 00:07:58,600 Speaker 2: could imitate. Several important men convene to consider some grim options. 149 00:07:59,040 --> 00:08:02,080 Speaker 2: These include the present played by Henry Fonda, who brings 150 00:08:02,160 --> 00:08:04,640 Speaker 2: much the same decency and gravity here as he did 151 00:08:04,680 --> 00:08:08,280 Speaker 2: as a skeptical juror in Lumette's debut feature Twelve Angry Men. 152 00:08:08,720 --> 00:08:11,520 Speaker 2: In the War Room, the President communicates chiefly with General 153 00:08:11,560 --> 00:08:14,960 Speaker 2: Bogan played by Frank Overton, who's in charge of Strategic 154 00:08:15,000 --> 00:08:17,720 Speaker 2: Air Command, but there are other influential thinkers in the 155 00:08:17,800 --> 00:08:21,480 Speaker 2: room too, including Air Force Colonel Cassio played by Fritz Weaver, 156 00:08:21,760 --> 00:08:24,240 Speaker 2: who objects vociferously to the order to shoot down the 157 00:08:24,320 --> 00:08:28,400 Speaker 2: US bombers, and Brigadier General Black played by Dan o'hurleyhey, 158 00:08:28,560 --> 00:08:31,480 Speaker 2: who's been haunted by just such a nightmare in his dreams. 159 00:08:31,800 --> 00:08:35,040 Speaker 2: There's also the President's interpreter, Buck played by Larry Hagman, 160 00:08:35,200 --> 00:08:37,280 Speaker 2: who's told to listen as much to the tone of 161 00:08:37,280 --> 00:08:40,240 Speaker 2: the Soviet Premier's voice as to the words he's sang. 162 00:08:40,720 --> 00:08:43,880 Speaker 2: Among the more compelling of Failsafe's themes is the relationship 163 00:08:43,920 --> 00:08:47,480 Speaker 2: between human beings and machines. The whole idea of nuclear 164 00:08:47,520 --> 00:08:49,839 Speaker 2: war is so odious that no one wants to take 165 00:08:49,880 --> 00:08:53,200 Speaker 2: responsibility for triggering one, and so these machines exist as 166 00:08:53,200 --> 00:08:56,040 Speaker 2: a kind of buffer between human beings and the potential 167 00:08:56,080 --> 00:08:59,120 Speaker 2: for mass death. Yet those machines prove as fallible as 168 00:08:59,120 --> 00:09:02,080 Speaker 2: the humans who rely on them. The computer short that 169 00:09:02,120 --> 00:09:04,960 Speaker 2: results in the wrong signal being sent to US bombers 170 00:09:05,200 --> 00:09:08,800 Speaker 2: turns out to be a collaboration between American equipment and 171 00:09:08,840 --> 00:09:12,840 Speaker 2: the Soviet's ability to jam radio communications. By contrast, the 172 00:09:12,840 --> 00:09:16,160 Speaker 2: conversations between the President and the Soviet premiere are quite 173 00:09:16,240 --> 00:09:19,520 Speaker 2: rational and thoughtful, even if the situation leads them both 174 00:09:19,559 --> 00:09:24,400 Speaker 2: to consider the least tragic of unimaginably catastrophic outcomes. The 175 00:09:24,559 --> 00:09:28,319 Speaker 2: ending of Failsafe is uncompromising and bleak, intended to rattle 176 00:09:28,360 --> 00:09:32,320 Speaker 2: audiences out of complacency. Over sixty years later, we seem 177 00:09:32,400 --> 00:09:35,160 Speaker 2: quite a lot more complacent. Even though we might imagine 178 00:09:35,200 --> 00:09:38,680 Speaker 2: the conversation between our current president and his Russian counterpart 179 00:09:39,040 --> 00:09:41,439 Speaker 2: to be far less measured than it is in the movie, 180 00:09:42,080 --> 00:09:45,240 Speaker 2: Failsafe still has the power to shock. We'll see how 181 00:09:45,320 --> 00:09:49,240 Speaker 2: much it rattled us after this. We do not think 182 00:09:49,280 --> 00:09:52,319 Speaker 2: we have much of a check. I know. 183 00:09:54,080 --> 00:10:00,160 Speaker 4: You assume, and yet this was nobody's fault. I don't agree. 184 00:10:01,360 --> 00:10:06,720 Speaker 4: No human being did wrong. No one is to be blamed. 185 00:10:06,960 --> 00:10:10,000 Speaker 4: We're to blame both of us. We let our machines 186 00:10:10,040 --> 00:10:17,440 Speaker 4: get out of hands. It was an accident. Two great 187 00:10:17,480 --> 00:10:20,400 Speaker 4: cities may be destroyed, millions of innocent people killed. What 188 00:10:20,440 --> 00:10:22,720 Speaker 4: do we say to the mister chairman, accidents will happen. 189 00:10:23,080 --> 00:10:31,080 Speaker 4: I won't accept that. Yes, all I know is that 190 00:10:31,720 --> 00:10:33,760 Speaker 4: as long as we have we all I know is 191 00:10:33,760 --> 00:10:36,840 Speaker 4: that men are responsible. We're responsible for what happens to 192 00:10:36,920 --> 00:10:40,000 Speaker 4: us today. We had a taste to the future. Do 193 00:10:40,080 --> 00:10:42,000 Speaker 4: we learn from her to run the way we have? 194 00:10:43,080 --> 00:10:45,960 Speaker 4: What do we do, mister chairman, what do we say 195 00:10:46,000 --> 00:10:46,480 Speaker 4: to the dead? 196 00:10:46,920 --> 00:10:49,560 Speaker 2: Let's start with the question suggested by the end of 197 00:10:49,600 --> 00:10:53,400 Speaker 2: my keynote sixty years later. Are you rattled by the 198 00:10:53,480 --> 00:10:55,280 Speaker 2: experience of watching Failsafe? 199 00:10:55,600 --> 00:10:59,200 Speaker 6: I mean, I definitely am. I find this picture to 200 00:10:59,280 --> 00:11:05,400 Speaker 6: be so nerve jangling and so unnerving, and partly because 201 00:11:05,840 --> 00:11:08,920 Speaker 6: of you know, we mentioned the sort of docu drama 202 00:11:08,960 --> 00:11:12,200 Speaker 6: immediacy that Bigelow is using, and I think that is 203 00:11:12,240 --> 00:11:15,280 Speaker 6: a pretty direct lift from what's happening here. I mean, 204 00:11:15,320 --> 00:11:18,719 Speaker 6: part of the reason that this film is so upsetting 205 00:11:19,080 --> 00:11:23,600 Speaker 6: is because it seems so immensely credible, because it seems 206 00:11:24,280 --> 00:11:29,960 Speaker 6: eavesdropped upon, because there's a sort of a hypnotic hyper 207 00:11:30,080 --> 00:11:34,839 Speaker 6: logic to it, like nothing that happens stretches credibility. You 208 00:11:35,000 --> 00:11:37,959 Speaker 6: understand all of the small pieces, all the sort of 209 00:11:38,040 --> 00:11:42,000 Speaker 6: nuts and bolts of how something like this could occur 210 00:11:42,559 --> 00:11:47,200 Speaker 6: and how it would be reacted to, all the way 211 00:11:47,520 --> 00:11:50,920 Speaker 6: up to and including the ending, which I'm sure we'll 212 00:11:50,960 --> 00:11:53,640 Speaker 6: talk about in greater depth, but is one of the 213 00:11:53,640 --> 00:11:56,840 Speaker 6: most sort of merciless endings I think that's ever been 214 00:11:57,440 --> 00:12:01,640 Speaker 6: attached to a major studio release, at least to my knowledge. 215 00:12:01,880 --> 00:12:04,040 Speaker 10: Yeah, I very much was unsettled by it, and I 216 00:12:04,120 --> 00:12:07,920 Speaker 10: realized that my previous exposure to this film, I think 217 00:12:08,000 --> 00:12:10,280 Speaker 10: I personally kind of went to the same reaction as 218 00:12:10,280 --> 00:12:12,320 Speaker 10: the American public in the sixties where I saw Doctor 219 00:12:12,360 --> 00:12:15,040 Speaker 10: Strange Love. I love Doctor Strange Love, and then I 220 00:12:15,040 --> 00:12:16,840 Speaker 10: always thought of this as sort of like the lesser, 221 00:12:17,360 --> 00:12:20,760 Speaker 10: you know, square companion piece that I think I watched 222 00:12:20,800 --> 00:12:23,000 Speaker 10: in history class, and I'm not sure I went back 223 00:12:23,000 --> 00:12:25,960 Speaker 10: to it since sin and boy did it really work 224 00:12:26,000 --> 00:12:28,520 Speaker 10: on me this time though it was It was for 225 00:12:28,559 --> 00:12:30,760 Speaker 10: all the reasons you laid out, plus, like you know, 226 00:12:31,040 --> 00:12:34,560 Speaker 10: I just Lumette is just so good at like bringing 227 00:12:34,640 --> 00:12:37,520 Speaker 10: the immediacy of his television background to this really but 228 00:12:37,640 --> 00:12:40,120 Speaker 10: with these really cinematic compositions, like it's kind of the 229 00:12:40,120 --> 00:12:43,000 Speaker 10: best of both worlds. So in this film, I thought 230 00:12:43,000 --> 00:12:46,480 Speaker 10: it's remarkable, and the performances too, were fantastic. 231 00:12:46,760 --> 00:12:49,520 Speaker 5: Yeah, this is my first time with this film, and 232 00:12:49,920 --> 00:12:54,080 Speaker 5: I saw it after The Big Low, which I kind 233 00:12:54,120 --> 00:12:58,360 Speaker 5: of regret because they are so kind of similar than 234 00:12:58,440 --> 00:13:01,880 Speaker 5: their setup that it's kind of hard not to compare 235 00:13:02,520 --> 00:13:05,800 Speaker 5: what this is doing to the more immediate to my 236 00:13:06,000 --> 00:13:10,520 Speaker 5: experience feeling House of Dynamite. You know, so sort of 237 00:13:10,240 --> 00:13:14,520 Speaker 5: the Cold War context of this movie, it places it 238 00:13:15,000 --> 00:13:18,160 Speaker 5: somewhat of a remove you know, just on a narrative level, 239 00:13:18,240 --> 00:13:21,480 Speaker 5: And not that that narrative is any less distressing being removed, 240 00:13:21,480 --> 00:13:25,320 Speaker 5: because as this pairing shows, these are these fears have 241 00:13:25,679 --> 00:13:29,480 Speaker 5: not gone away. So the question was, like, was the 242 00:13:29,520 --> 00:13:33,800 Speaker 5: experience or was I rattled by watching this after sort 243 00:13:33,800 --> 00:13:36,760 Speaker 5: of the experience of House of Dynamite, I was almost 244 00:13:36,800 --> 00:13:42,240 Speaker 5: like relieved for the certainty of this, of this narrative. 245 00:13:42,440 --> 00:13:45,360 Speaker 5: I won't get more into it than that at this point, 246 00:13:45,720 --> 00:13:50,000 Speaker 5: but just the fact that it had a clear arc 247 00:13:50,120 --> 00:13:54,559 Speaker 5: to it I found comforting after the big olow that said, 248 00:13:54,960 --> 00:13:57,400 Speaker 5: all of the filmmaking of it does have that sort 249 00:13:57,440 --> 00:14:01,559 Speaker 5: of like really close claustrophobic immediate feeling right from the 250 00:14:01,720 --> 00:14:04,960 Speaker 5: very beginning with the dream of the Matador and that 251 00:14:05,320 --> 00:14:08,360 Speaker 5: squealing sound that the high pitch squealing sound might be 252 00:14:08,400 --> 00:14:12,120 Speaker 5: what sticks with me most about this movie and just 253 00:14:12,200 --> 00:14:18,240 Speaker 5: such a simple, unfussy choice that is so effective. And 254 00:14:18,640 --> 00:14:22,880 Speaker 5: also the Walter Mathou character is just so upsetting on 255 00:14:23,280 --> 00:14:28,200 Speaker 5: different levels. But the obviously the performance is great as 256 00:14:28,280 --> 00:14:29,840 Speaker 5: are many others in this film. 257 00:14:30,080 --> 00:14:33,920 Speaker 10: The Mathol character is precursor to like all the sort 258 00:14:33,960 --> 00:14:37,160 Speaker 10: of like you know, public intellectuals and chattering class types, 259 00:14:37,160 --> 00:14:39,840 Speaker 10: who is like, why does anyone listen to these people 260 00:14:40,160 --> 00:14:41,560 Speaker 10: like you so much? 261 00:14:41,600 --> 00:14:43,360 Speaker 7: Without naming names, he's just so much. 262 00:14:43,240 --> 00:14:46,520 Speaker 10: Like like there's people to pop up and have a 263 00:14:46,600 --> 00:14:49,560 Speaker 10: say and whatever's going on, And was like why why? 264 00:14:49,960 --> 00:14:51,920 Speaker 10: But I think I think part of why that is 265 00:14:51,920 --> 00:14:54,680 Speaker 10: so is you can see he is charismatic. I mean, 266 00:14:54,760 --> 00:14:57,720 Speaker 10: he's he's talking about nuclear wars, apparently quite erotic for 267 00:14:57,760 --> 00:15:01,920 Speaker 10: some of his listeners. But also but you can see 268 00:15:02,160 --> 00:15:04,920 Speaker 10: the confidence with someone like that carries himself. You can 269 00:15:04,960 --> 00:15:07,040 Speaker 10: see how that like that kind of confidence can take 270 00:15:07,120 --> 00:15:09,480 Speaker 10: a whole nation and a whole globe into some very 271 00:15:09,480 --> 00:15:10,480 Speaker 10: bad places. 272 00:15:10,800 --> 00:15:11,120 Speaker 7: Yeah. 273 00:15:11,240 --> 00:15:15,520 Speaker 6: Yeah, I really was struck by the way that Mathou 274 00:15:16,240 --> 00:15:21,200 Speaker 6: uses volume, or doesn't use it, the extent to which 275 00:15:21,240 --> 00:15:24,800 Speaker 6: he never, through the course of this thing, really raises 276 00:15:24,840 --> 00:15:27,200 Speaker 6: his voice in any kind of a meaningful way, and 277 00:15:27,240 --> 00:15:29,120 Speaker 6: that he's one of those people that, in fact, when 278 00:15:29,160 --> 00:15:32,800 Speaker 6: other people raise their voice, he gets quieter and more calm. 279 00:15:33,240 --> 00:15:38,160 Speaker 6: And there's something about that way of carrying yourself that 280 00:15:38,240 --> 00:15:41,160 Speaker 6: is that that really can can come off as borderline 281 00:15:41,240 --> 00:15:44,160 Speaker 6: sociopathic when you're talking about some of the things that 282 00:15:44,200 --> 00:15:45,320 Speaker 6: he's talking about, you. 283 00:15:45,240 --> 00:15:48,840 Speaker 2: Know, yeah, I mean just that incredible arrogance. And I 284 00:15:48,840 --> 00:15:51,240 Speaker 2: think that I think Keith makes a good point about 285 00:15:51,320 --> 00:15:56,080 Speaker 2: that particular type of elite. And you know, we see 286 00:15:56,080 --> 00:15:59,520 Speaker 2: it all the time where there's this profound disconnect between 287 00:16:00,080 --> 00:16:04,040 Speaker 2: what they're talking about and the lived experience of human beings. Right, 288 00:16:04,080 --> 00:16:06,320 Speaker 2: It's like, you know, you can you can toss around 289 00:16:06,440 --> 00:16:10,640 Speaker 2: numbers so casually at a dinner party and shock people 290 00:16:10,800 --> 00:16:13,520 Speaker 2: a little bit, but it's not there's nothing. It's almost 291 00:16:13,560 --> 00:16:15,920 Speaker 2: like a game, you know. And I think that the 292 00:16:15,960 --> 00:16:18,040 Speaker 2: movie really kind of sets it up that way, and 293 00:16:18,080 --> 00:16:21,760 Speaker 2: then and then brings you into the dreadful, you know, 294 00:16:22,240 --> 00:16:25,560 Speaker 2: inescapable logic of something like this actually happening, Like Okay, 295 00:16:25,840 --> 00:16:28,280 Speaker 2: what if we can't reach these planes? What then? Okay, 296 00:16:28,600 --> 00:16:31,400 Speaker 2: what's that scenario about it? Okay, so what we need 297 00:16:31,480 --> 00:16:33,280 Speaker 2: is then try to shoot down the planes. What do 298 00:16:33,360 --> 00:16:36,240 Speaker 2: we tell our counterparts and how can we aid them? 299 00:16:36,240 --> 00:16:38,480 Speaker 2: And try to shoot Ley's planes? And then when you 300 00:16:38,520 --> 00:16:41,080 Speaker 2: get to the to the worst case scenario of just 301 00:16:41,120 --> 00:16:43,600 Speaker 2: like we can't stop this one from going through this 302 00:16:43,640 --> 00:16:46,640 Speaker 2: is going to happen. What next? How do we prevent 303 00:16:46,680 --> 00:16:50,000 Speaker 2: something really a world annihilating from happening? And then you 304 00:16:50,040 --> 00:16:52,360 Speaker 2: have to make those choices. And I think that you know, 305 00:16:52,400 --> 00:16:54,880 Speaker 2: the way that this the logic that this film kind 306 00:16:54,920 --> 00:16:57,040 Speaker 2: of traps you in and then it brings you right 307 00:16:57,080 --> 00:17:01,080 Speaker 2: to the very end, that really startling conclusion. I think 308 00:17:01,080 --> 00:17:03,080 Speaker 2: it is and it's why I opened the with this 309 00:17:03,200 --> 00:17:05,640 Speaker 2: question about being rattle. I think I think the purpose 310 00:17:05,680 --> 00:17:07,880 Speaker 2: of this movie is is just to absolutely just shake 311 00:17:07,960 --> 00:17:11,080 Speaker 2: people up in a massive way, and I think it's 312 00:17:11,160 --> 00:17:13,920 Speaker 2: hugely successful in doing that because you know, what can 313 00:17:13,960 --> 00:17:16,320 Speaker 2: happen is what what I think has happened, you know, 314 00:17:16,520 --> 00:17:18,520 Speaker 2: since the end of the Cold War, which is this 315 00:17:18,720 --> 00:17:23,439 Speaker 2: false feeling of complacency even though nuclear weapons have gotten 316 00:17:23,640 --> 00:17:26,280 Speaker 2: you know, I think are you know, there's more of them, 317 00:17:26,280 --> 00:17:28,960 Speaker 2: and there are more more hands and people people who 318 00:17:29,080 --> 00:17:31,760 Speaker 2: we should have no faith in, you know, have access 319 00:17:31,800 --> 00:17:34,800 Speaker 2: to to them. And it's you know, it's not like 320 00:17:35,119 --> 00:17:37,480 Speaker 2: the scenario that that people had night nightmares about in 321 00:17:37,560 --> 00:17:40,320 Speaker 2: nineteen sixty four has not changed. And so I think 322 00:17:40,320 --> 00:17:42,800 Speaker 2: that I think it was It's fun, it's fun, it's 323 00:17:42,920 --> 00:17:45,439 Speaker 2: very uh, it's it's it's. 324 00:17:45,880 --> 00:17:48,160 Speaker 5: It's all hypotheses, of course, but it's fun to play 325 00:17:48,200 --> 00:17:50,920 Speaker 5: around with, right. 326 00:17:51,280 --> 00:17:53,600 Speaker 2: It's just, you know, it is it's still riveting to 327 00:17:53,600 --> 00:17:55,119 Speaker 2: watch this film. I mean, I have I have strong 328 00:17:55,160 --> 00:17:57,600 Speaker 2: memories of seeing it as well with my dad. It 329 00:17:57,680 --> 00:18:00,480 Speaker 2: and Doctor Strangelove. I watched both, watch them the films 330 00:18:00,560 --> 00:18:03,600 Speaker 2: with my dad and I and I recall, you know, 331 00:18:04,080 --> 00:18:07,320 Speaker 2: not feeling like the Kubrick had really sort of blunted 332 00:18:07,359 --> 00:18:10,119 Speaker 2: the experience of Lulu Mett. But it kind of does 333 00:18:10,240 --> 00:18:11,919 Speaker 2: kind of lead me to this question, which is that, 334 00:18:12,119 --> 00:18:15,080 Speaker 2: given it's all of its similarities to Strange Love, what 335 00:18:15,440 --> 00:18:17,760 Speaker 2: kind of sets it this fail safe apart? You know, 336 00:18:18,720 --> 00:18:21,200 Speaker 2: you know, what kind of makes it a film worth 337 00:18:21,240 --> 00:18:22,760 Speaker 2: considering on its own merits? 338 00:18:23,119 --> 00:18:25,479 Speaker 6: I mean, I think that ending, you know, which is 339 00:18:25,520 --> 00:18:29,880 Speaker 6: not obviously the ending of Strange Love, is no more 340 00:18:29,880 --> 00:18:35,359 Speaker 6: of a happy ending, but the absurdity with which it 341 00:18:35,440 --> 00:18:40,200 Speaker 6: is handled, you know, the overall tone of that conclusion. 342 00:18:40,840 --> 00:18:43,680 Speaker 6: You know, it's grim, but it's also funny. And this 343 00:18:43,760 --> 00:18:47,720 Speaker 6: shit is just grim. This is you know, I've only 344 00:18:47,760 --> 00:18:50,320 Speaker 6: seen it a couple of times. I saw it, I 345 00:18:50,359 --> 00:18:52,520 Speaker 6: believe the first time when Criterion brought it out a 346 00:18:52,560 --> 00:18:55,800 Speaker 6: few years ago. And then rewatched for this. So I've 347 00:18:55,840 --> 00:18:59,800 Speaker 6: seen it infrequently enough that I was shocked again by 348 00:18:59,840 --> 00:19:04,080 Speaker 6: the ending, by the fact that we are so used 349 00:19:04,119 --> 00:19:09,320 Speaker 6: to movies pulling their punches that we are sort of 350 00:19:09,440 --> 00:19:14,760 Speaker 6: conditioned to wait for the miracle, that we are not 351 00:19:15,040 --> 00:19:18,439 Speaker 6: used to movies that will literally end with the bomb 352 00:19:18,480 --> 00:19:22,520 Speaker 6: dropping and like cut to black, and that does pack 353 00:19:22,720 --> 00:19:27,600 Speaker 6: a genuine punch, especially also comparatively to the fact that, 354 00:19:27,680 --> 00:19:30,800 Speaker 6: like we've seen, even if you've only seen Strange Love 355 00:19:30,880 --> 00:19:34,240 Speaker 6: a handful of times, you've seen that ending many more, 356 00:19:34,320 --> 00:19:37,440 Speaker 6: like it pops up in montages, it pops up in 357 00:19:37,520 --> 00:19:41,080 Speaker 6: Kubrick documentaries, like we've sort of gotten used to that 358 00:19:41,800 --> 00:19:44,760 Speaker 6: in a way that we haven't gotten used to the 359 00:19:44,880 --> 00:19:49,640 Speaker 6: sort of bluntness and starkness and scariness of the closing 360 00:19:49,680 --> 00:19:50,639 Speaker 6: frames of this one. 361 00:19:50,680 --> 00:19:51,400 Speaker 7: I just realized. 362 00:19:51,440 --> 00:19:55,000 Speaker 10: Also, it's pretty directly, pretty obviously the inspiration for the 363 00:19:55,000 --> 00:19:59,320 Speaker 10: famous Daisy's ad Lnda B. Johnsone oh yeah, anti goldwater 364 00:19:59,400 --> 00:20:02,760 Speaker 10: thing and with a countdown and a freeze frame on 365 00:20:02,800 --> 00:20:04,919 Speaker 10: a girl. Yeah, so it lived on. 366 00:20:05,280 --> 00:20:09,280 Speaker 5: Yeah, I mean, I think just the layer of satire, absurdity, 367 00:20:09,359 --> 00:20:11,600 Speaker 5: however you want to characterize it. On the Strangelove just 368 00:20:12,400 --> 00:20:17,399 Speaker 5: allows a certain level of remove. I mean, it's entertainment value, 369 00:20:17,600 --> 00:20:23,040 Speaker 5: and this movie is like not really striving to entertain. 370 00:20:23,119 --> 00:20:25,760 Speaker 5: In fact, I think like through that scene, that the 371 00:20:25,800 --> 00:20:28,760 Speaker 5: dinner party scene in Matthou's character, it's kind of like 372 00:20:28,800 --> 00:20:33,200 Speaker 5: even interrogating the idea of being entertained by a scenario 373 00:20:33,400 --> 00:20:37,159 Speaker 5: like this. So I think that again is part of 374 00:20:37,200 --> 00:20:41,480 Speaker 5: why the ending hits so differently from that very iconic 375 00:20:41,640 --> 00:20:44,159 Speaker 5: ending of Strange Love, which is in a way the 376 00:20:44,160 --> 00:20:48,119 Speaker 5: same ending. But you know, it's literally like Hootin and 377 00:20:48,160 --> 00:20:54,760 Speaker 5: hollerins through Annihilation, and there's no such tonal barrier I 378 00:20:54,760 --> 00:20:59,359 Speaker 5: guess to the experience here. You're just kind of experiencing it, 379 00:20:59,440 --> 00:21:01,520 Speaker 5: you know, necessarily being entertained by it. 380 00:21:01,640 --> 00:21:04,840 Speaker 2: So I think the other element here brings me sort 381 00:21:04,880 --> 00:21:07,160 Speaker 2: of my enough. Next question is that, you know, doctor 382 00:21:07,200 --> 00:21:11,720 Speaker 2: Strange Love, that whole scenario is kind of instigated by 383 00:21:11,840 --> 00:21:14,920 Speaker 2: a madman, if I recall, right, and so we can 384 00:21:14,960 --> 00:21:19,680 Speaker 2: sort of point to a human flaw in creating this crisis. 385 00:21:19,800 --> 00:21:23,560 Speaker 2: What I think is so compelling about about fail Safe 386 00:21:23,560 --> 00:21:26,320 Speaker 2: and certainly something I think that's what we're talking about, is 387 00:21:26,560 --> 00:21:30,399 Speaker 2: how deep it goes into the relationship between people and 388 00:21:30,480 --> 00:21:34,919 Speaker 2: these machines that are designed both as safeguards and I 389 00:21:34,960 --> 00:21:37,240 Speaker 2: think as a buffer kind of of just like I 390 00:21:37,760 --> 00:21:41,240 Speaker 2: am not cannot be held responsible for this level of destruction, 391 00:21:41,320 --> 00:21:43,720 Speaker 2: and so I am going to put these machines in 392 00:21:43,720 --> 00:21:46,480 Speaker 2: place that are going to automate it, and it keep 393 00:21:46,560 --> 00:21:48,800 Speaker 2: my you know, Paul prints all over these you know, 394 00:21:48,840 --> 00:21:51,920 Speaker 2: from getting on these decisions. I mean, what do you 395 00:21:51,960 --> 00:21:53,240 Speaker 2: all think of that piece of it? 396 00:21:53,600 --> 00:21:56,280 Speaker 5: I mean it's not just that, but it's also the 397 00:21:56,359 --> 00:22:00,960 Speaker 5: element of these soldiers being trained to a certain point 398 00:22:01,320 --> 00:22:05,800 Speaker 5: not respond to or take human orders, you know, Like 399 00:22:05,880 --> 00:22:08,560 Speaker 5: this is maybe the like the best use I can 400 00:22:08,600 --> 00:22:12,560 Speaker 5: think of of a wailing wife in a movie, you know, 401 00:22:12,720 --> 00:22:17,720 Speaker 5: a hysterical wife figure, but like just building to that 402 00:22:17,800 --> 00:22:21,840 Speaker 5: moment where this pilot cannot be called back by a human, 403 00:22:21,960 --> 00:22:26,320 Speaker 5: you know, because of a mechanical error. It really underlines 404 00:22:26,720 --> 00:22:31,840 Speaker 5: how I guess divorced technology makes us from our humanity 405 00:22:32,040 --> 00:22:34,680 Speaker 5: and a very in a way that I had never 406 00:22:34,760 --> 00:22:38,080 Speaker 5: considered before. Like obviously that is not a new notion 407 00:22:38,359 --> 00:22:44,080 Speaker 5: in film or life, but this particular scenario and the 408 00:22:44,119 --> 00:22:46,919 Speaker 5: way it played out is, like I said, one that 409 00:22:46,960 --> 00:22:48,560 Speaker 5: I hadn't encountered before. 410 00:22:49,119 --> 00:22:51,639 Speaker 2: I mean, The dramatic impact of that scene with a 411 00:22:51,680 --> 00:22:54,200 Speaker 2: wife is so powerful that I that I that I 412 00:22:54,600 --> 00:22:57,600 Speaker 2: did feel somewhat guilty of having the thought like just 413 00:22:57,720 --> 00:23:02,160 Speaker 2: say something that only the two, only two, you know, 414 00:23:02,320 --> 00:23:05,239 Speaker 2: like some detail from your first date or something like 415 00:23:05,280 --> 00:23:06,400 Speaker 2: what please like. 416 00:23:06,520 --> 00:23:08,960 Speaker 10: Uh, you know, just yes, but she kind have been compromised, 417 00:23:09,000 --> 00:23:12,120 Speaker 10: as Scott you don't, you know, I mean right. 418 00:23:13,680 --> 00:23:14,680 Speaker 2: Goes to that. 419 00:23:14,920 --> 00:23:18,520 Speaker 5: Yeah, and and like that hits harder than ever in 420 00:23:18,560 --> 00:23:22,240 Speaker 5: our current day, what with you know, AI and surveillance 421 00:23:22,640 --> 00:23:25,399 Speaker 5: and all that, you know, like it does. It's the 422 00:23:25,400 --> 00:23:28,760 Speaker 5: the context is different, but the truth of the matter 423 00:23:28,840 --> 00:23:29,440 Speaker 5: is still there. 424 00:23:29,720 --> 00:23:32,359 Speaker 2: Yeah, that's true, and I and I And as a 425 00:23:32,440 --> 00:23:35,960 Speaker 2: dramatic effect, it is certainly powerful of this, of of 426 00:23:36,280 --> 00:23:40,359 Speaker 2: having the having finally gotten this guy's wife on the 427 00:23:40,400 --> 00:23:44,000 Speaker 2: line and her just you know, desperate please is this 428 00:23:44,160 --> 00:23:47,760 Speaker 2: is so it's so chilling to watch, you know, give it, 429 00:23:47,800 --> 00:23:50,199 Speaker 2: given just the momentum that the film has at this 430 00:23:50,440 --> 00:23:52,720 Speaker 2: at that point and where things are at, where it's 431 00:23:52,760 --> 00:23:56,160 Speaker 2: just that the finality of this kind of last desperate 432 00:23:56,200 --> 00:24:00,600 Speaker 2: plea really chilling. So again, I was thinking there there 433 00:24:00,720 --> 00:24:03,440 Speaker 2: might be another approach to try to convince the pilot, 434 00:24:03,480 --> 00:24:07,359 Speaker 2: but I also recognized that that would make a bad movie. 435 00:24:07,400 --> 00:24:09,840 Speaker 2: And I don't want, I don't want, I don't want 436 00:24:09,880 --> 00:24:12,160 Speaker 2: to be here. I don't want to be the human 437 00:24:12,200 --> 00:24:16,080 Speaker 2: being responsible for making the bad movie. 438 00:24:16,920 --> 00:24:20,680 Speaker 6: Can I ask this just a genuine curiosity question without 439 00:24:20,720 --> 00:24:22,879 Speaker 6: getting into the weeds of the thing. You know, the 440 00:24:22,920 --> 00:24:25,800 Speaker 6: fact that these films were released, This and Strange Love 441 00:24:25,800 --> 00:24:30,560 Speaker 6: were releasing such close Proximity Colombia as part of sort 442 00:24:30,560 --> 00:24:32,760 Speaker 6: of the wrangling between the two of them, and there 443 00:24:32,840 --> 00:24:35,879 Speaker 6: was copy you know, there was a copyright question or 444 00:24:36,040 --> 00:24:40,680 Speaker 6: plagiarism question ended up buying. You know, they were making 445 00:24:41,080 --> 00:24:44,640 Speaker 6: Strange Love. They picked up the rights to Fail Safe, 446 00:24:44,640 --> 00:24:47,919 Speaker 6: which had been an independent production, and Kubrick insisted that 447 00:24:47,960 --> 00:24:50,919 Speaker 6: Strange Love was released first, So it comes out in 448 00:24:51,000 --> 00:24:53,960 Speaker 6: January sixty four. Fail Safe comes out in October sixty four. 449 00:24:54,200 --> 00:24:56,359 Speaker 6: Strange Love is a big hit and Fail Safe is not, 450 00:24:57,119 --> 00:25:01,320 Speaker 6: mostly the theory being because people had already seen the 451 00:25:01,320 --> 00:25:04,800 Speaker 6: satirical take on this material and that sort of deflated 452 00:25:05,359 --> 00:25:08,720 Speaker 6: the dramatic take. Do you all think it would have 453 00:25:08,760 --> 00:25:11,840 Speaker 6: done better and or Strange Love would have done worse 454 00:25:12,000 --> 00:25:15,280 Speaker 6: if the order of the release had been altered. If 455 00:25:15,520 --> 00:25:16,960 Speaker 6: this film had come out first. 456 00:25:17,760 --> 00:25:21,520 Speaker 2: Yes, I suspect I suspect absolutely fail Safe would have 457 00:25:21,560 --> 00:25:24,400 Speaker 2: had a much better chance at success than it did because. 458 00:25:24,960 --> 00:25:26,160 Speaker 7: Would have been fine though. 459 00:25:26,359 --> 00:25:30,320 Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, that's my question. Yeah, yeah, I put it 460 00:25:30,320 --> 00:25:32,040 Speaker 2: in the keynote. It was like it was like, this 461 00:25:32,160 --> 00:25:35,320 Speaker 2: is like if Airplane had come out before Airport, you 462 00:25:35,320 --> 00:25:38,280 Speaker 2: know what I mean, Like Airport would have totally totally 463 00:25:38,280 --> 00:25:41,520 Speaker 2: flopped if Airplane had come out first. You know, So 464 00:25:41,640 --> 00:25:45,240 Speaker 2: it is, uh, I think it's probably comparable here. I mean, obviously, 465 00:25:45,320 --> 00:25:47,960 Speaker 2: who knows what audience is in nineteen sixty four or 466 00:25:48,000 --> 00:25:50,080 Speaker 2: thinking and wanted from a movie. But you know, if 467 00:25:50,119 --> 00:25:53,120 Speaker 2: you think think of film, yeah with some pretty recognizable 468 00:25:53,160 --> 00:25:57,080 Speaker 2: stars and you know, really good reviews, is you know, 469 00:25:57,080 --> 00:25:59,280 Speaker 2: an important subject is coming out, maybe this is maybe 470 00:25:59,400 --> 00:26:01,320 Speaker 2: would have a you know, a better chance than it had. 471 00:26:01,520 --> 00:26:01,879 Speaker 7: Yeah. 472 00:26:01,960 --> 00:26:04,200 Speaker 6: The comparison that I had sort of thought of was 473 00:26:04,280 --> 00:26:07,399 Speaker 6: of in ninety six when Independence Day came out in 474 00:26:07,400 --> 00:26:10,960 Speaker 6: the summer and then Mars Attacks came out in December, 475 00:26:12,000 --> 00:26:14,600 Speaker 6: and so it almost sort of felt like a satire 476 00:26:14,640 --> 00:26:17,360 Speaker 6: of this this big hit that had like just come out. 477 00:26:17,359 --> 00:26:20,040 Speaker 6: But then the satire didn't do very well, So I'm 478 00:26:20,080 --> 00:26:22,480 Speaker 6: not sure how that would have yeah. 479 00:26:22,760 --> 00:26:25,680 Speaker 5: I mean, obviously this is a hypothetical week and not 480 00:26:25,680 --> 00:26:28,680 Speaker 5: not Safe and Share. But my instinct is that fail 481 00:26:28,760 --> 00:26:32,280 Speaker 5: safe would have performed better than it did, but probably 482 00:26:32,320 --> 00:26:35,800 Speaker 5: still not at the level of Strange Love. And I 483 00:26:35,840 --> 00:26:39,480 Speaker 5: think Strangelove probably still would have been fine, just kind 484 00:26:39,480 --> 00:26:43,359 Speaker 5: of to go back to that entertainment value element, you know, 485 00:26:43,520 --> 00:26:46,840 Speaker 5: like it like Strangelove. I wouldn't go so far to 486 00:26:46,880 --> 00:26:50,600 Speaker 5: call it a crowd pleaser, but it's definitely like more 487 00:26:50,720 --> 00:26:53,920 Speaker 5: of that than fail Yeah. Yeah, you know, and you've 488 00:26:53,920 --> 00:26:56,639 Speaker 5: got you know, Sellers doing all his roles, you know, 489 00:26:58,040 --> 00:27:01,600 Speaker 5: so you know, I think that you know, is probably 490 00:27:01,880 --> 00:27:04,640 Speaker 5: more of a draw than Henry Fonda, as great as 491 00:27:04,640 --> 00:27:08,760 Speaker 5: he is. So there's it's just if Strange Love just 492 00:27:08,840 --> 00:27:12,359 Speaker 5: feels like more of a pack him in the theaters. Uh, 493 00:27:12,840 --> 00:27:14,840 Speaker 5: you know, endeavor no, but. 494 00:27:14,760 --> 00:27:17,200 Speaker 7: I mean, not to get two side talk, but does it. 495 00:27:17,320 --> 00:27:18,640 Speaker 10: I mean, it's kind of weird to me that there's 496 00:27:18,640 --> 00:27:20,600 Speaker 10: a moment when Strange Love, as great as it is, 497 00:27:20,640 --> 00:27:23,720 Speaker 10: it was on the public's wavelength the same like you know, 498 00:27:24,240 --> 00:27:28,520 Speaker 10: a humor wavelength as a movie going public. But it 499 00:27:28,640 --> 00:27:31,200 Speaker 10: was when we're better you know, better world forward, I guess. 500 00:27:31,280 --> 00:27:33,479 Speaker 10: But but it is It is odd to me that 501 00:27:33,480 --> 00:27:35,320 Speaker 10: that was that was the hit of these two. 502 00:27:35,960 --> 00:27:38,719 Speaker 2: We have a little more discussion we want to do 503 00:27:38,920 --> 00:27:42,200 Speaker 2: about fail Safe, but we're gonna take a quick break 504 00:27:42,280 --> 00:27:43,679 Speaker 2: and we'll be back after that. 505 00:27:50,600 --> 00:27:53,840 Speaker 3: Tomorrow morning. Is knocking stock your fridge? Now? How about 506 00:27:53,880 --> 00:27:56,520 Speaker 3: a creamy mocha Frappe China drink or a sweet Manilla 507 00:27:56,920 --> 00:28:00,200 Speaker 3: smooth caramel maybe, or a white chocolate mocha which, whatever 508 00:28:00,280 --> 00:28:04,199 Speaker 3: you choose, delicious coffee wights find Starbucks, Rapportina Drinks wherever 509 00:28:04,240 --> 00:28:05,720 Speaker 3: you buy your groceries. 510 00:28:10,080 --> 00:28:12,199 Speaker 2: And we're back. Just a couple more questions I have 511 00:28:12,240 --> 00:28:15,520 Speaker 2: for you all, A few more questions about Failsafe. One 512 00:28:15,520 --> 00:28:17,640 Speaker 2: has to do with just the setting of the film 513 00:28:17,680 --> 00:28:19,480 Speaker 2: and the style of the film. You know, this is 514 00:28:19,480 --> 00:28:22,760 Speaker 2: a film that takes place largely in these small, hidden 515 00:28:22,840 --> 00:28:26,320 Speaker 2: rooms where the decisions get where big decisions get made, 516 00:28:26,840 --> 00:28:28,680 Speaker 2: the room where it happens as I guess, if we 517 00:28:28,720 --> 00:28:30,320 Speaker 2: want to call it that. What do you think of 518 00:28:30,359 --> 00:28:34,879 Speaker 2: the strategy cinematically? And how does Lumett make that work? 519 00:28:35,440 --> 00:28:38,200 Speaker 6: Yeah, I mean I feel like it's obviously it's a 520 00:28:38,240 --> 00:28:41,840 Speaker 6: really conscious decision on his part, partly, like you say, 521 00:28:41,880 --> 00:28:44,680 Speaker 6: because of his background sort of working in the golden 522 00:28:44,720 --> 00:28:48,720 Speaker 6: age of television and the sort of limited location work 523 00:28:48,760 --> 00:28:52,440 Speaker 6: that they could do on those live TV plays. The decision, 524 00:28:52,520 --> 00:28:55,720 Speaker 6: I think to stay inside those rooms and to keep 525 00:28:55,800 --> 00:29:00,640 Speaker 6: it that claustrophobic is incredibly effective. What I kept thinking about, 526 00:29:00,720 --> 00:29:04,640 Speaker 6: and I didn't I meant to revisit making movies and 527 00:29:04,760 --> 00:29:06,960 Speaker 6: just kind of ran out of time. I don't recall 528 00:29:07,080 --> 00:29:11,080 Speaker 6: him getting into the specifics of this production, but I 529 00:29:11,200 --> 00:29:14,080 Speaker 6: kept thinking about the stuff that's in that book, about 530 00:29:14,360 --> 00:29:18,880 Speaker 6: the almost mathematical precision of his shooting strategy for Twelve 531 00:29:18,920 --> 00:29:22,680 Speaker 6: Angry Men, the extent to which he had sort of 532 00:29:22,960 --> 00:29:26,760 Speaker 6: made a camera plot for the thirds of the movie, 533 00:29:26,760 --> 00:29:30,000 Speaker 6: the three acts, if you will, to what lenses he 534 00:29:30,080 --> 00:29:34,240 Speaker 6: was using and how those created claustrophobia and the sort 535 00:29:34,240 --> 00:29:37,760 Speaker 6: of height of the camera in each of those sections. 536 00:29:38,040 --> 00:29:41,600 Speaker 6: And I didn't see sort of obvious markers of that 537 00:29:41,720 --> 00:29:44,560 Speaker 6: kind of plotting, but I found myself with that in mind, 538 00:29:44,800 --> 00:29:50,160 Speaker 6: extremely aware of what he's doing in terms of camera movement, 539 00:29:50,560 --> 00:29:56,360 Speaker 6: camera blocking, steady but not showy zooms, sort of the 540 00:29:56,480 --> 00:29:58,680 Speaker 6: push in on Fonda when he's trying to order the 541 00:29:58,720 --> 00:30:01,080 Speaker 6: plane back from like a tight close up to an 542 00:30:01,120 --> 00:30:06,320 Speaker 6: even tighter close up. He's so conscious of composition and 543 00:30:06,640 --> 00:30:10,720 Speaker 6: of the effect that these compositions have on the overall 544 00:30:10,800 --> 00:30:15,400 Speaker 6: claustrophobia visually of the story, and I think throughout those 545 00:30:15,400 --> 00:30:18,200 Speaker 6: decisions are really really impactful. 546 00:30:18,560 --> 00:30:21,480 Speaker 10: Yeah, and the idea that everything is taking place in 547 00:30:21,520 --> 00:30:24,440 Speaker 10: these these you know, these far flung locations, but it's 548 00:30:24,480 --> 00:30:28,080 Speaker 10: all heading towards the same crisis. I think that's really 549 00:30:28,160 --> 00:30:31,640 Speaker 10: effective as well. That even people don't see each other, 550 00:30:31,680 --> 00:30:33,479 Speaker 10: often don't even talk to each other, but they're all 551 00:30:33,560 --> 00:30:36,560 Speaker 10: kind of contributing to the same problem. Although it's not 552 00:30:36,560 --> 00:30:38,040 Speaker 10: even the right way to put it, though, it's like 553 00:30:38,040 --> 00:30:40,960 Speaker 10: they're all stuck in the same impossible situation. 554 00:30:41,480 --> 00:30:42,000 Speaker 2: Mm hmmm. 555 00:30:42,280 --> 00:30:45,280 Speaker 5: And also, like within what you were saying, Jason, just 556 00:30:45,320 --> 00:30:49,000 Speaker 5: about the blocking and the staging of just I knows 557 00:30:49,040 --> 00:30:52,040 Speaker 5: how populated a lot of these scenes are, you know, 558 00:30:52,280 --> 00:30:55,120 Speaker 5: really a strategic air command, Like you have just so 559 00:30:55,280 --> 00:30:59,280 Speaker 5: many sort of lower ranking folks kind of in the background. 560 00:30:59,520 --> 00:31:02,320 Speaker 5: One of them gets pulled up front for a pretty 561 00:31:02,720 --> 00:31:06,320 Speaker 5: harrowing moment, but it's not quite the same in terms 562 00:31:06,360 --> 00:31:09,640 Speaker 5: of crowdedness. But you know, the president and the translator 563 00:31:09,680 --> 00:31:13,520 Speaker 5: being in this room together, like there's different types of 564 00:31:13,680 --> 00:31:17,600 Speaker 5: character populating the same space, and that creates a sort 565 00:31:17,640 --> 00:31:21,960 Speaker 5: of inherent almost like audience, you know, within the space, 566 00:31:22,120 --> 00:31:25,680 Speaker 5: and kind of different angles from which to consider what's happening, 567 00:31:25,840 --> 00:31:28,880 Speaker 5: or different characters in which to project you know, you're 568 00:31:28,880 --> 00:31:32,680 Speaker 5: watching what's happening. So yeah, just the dynamism of the 569 00:31:33,400 --> 00:31:36,920 Speaker 5: characters populating the space I think also contributes on like 570 00:31:36,960 --> 00:31:38,240 Speaker 5: a storytelling level. 571 00:31:38,280 --> 00:31:38,720 Speaker 7: Very much so. 572 00:31:38,840 --> 00:31:41,400 Speaker 6: And I was really aware this time of how from 573 00:31:41,560 --> 00:31:44,960 Speaker 6: just the perspective of lighting that it gets darker as 574 00:31:45,280 --> 00:31:48,120 Speaker 6: the movie gets grimmer, even though it's getting deeper, like 575 00:31:48,240 --> 00:31:51,440 Speaker 6: into the day into daylight. That really jumped out. There's 576 00:31:51,480 --> 00:31:55,560 Speaker 6: this incredible shot of Fonda and Hagman in that small 577 00:31:55,640 --> 00:31:58,680 Speaker 6: room towards the end, as things are really getting bleak, 578 00:31:58,760 --> 00:32:02,480 Speaker 6: where they're facing each other and it's it's so dark 579 00:32:02,520 --> 00:32:06,280 Speaker 6: that it's almost like silhouettes, two silhouettes facing each other, 580 00:32:06,680 --> 00:32:10,880 Speaker 6: and then he does these like slow camera dollies from 581 00:32:10,960 --> 00:32:15,120 Speaker 6: profile to straight on in that sequence, Like, I know, 582 00:32:15,600 --> 00:32:17,880 Speaker 6: you're not supposed to notice those sorts of things. They're 583 00:32:17,920 --> 00:32:20,000 Speaker 6: not supposed to call attention to themselves, and I'm sure 584 00:32:20,040 --> 00:32:22,040 Speaker 6: they didn't the first time I saw it, but this 585 00:32:22,120 --> 00:32:25,040 Speaker 6: time I was. I was just so aware of his 586 00:32:25,320 --> 00:32:29,760 Speaker 6: brilliance at finding ways to keep the film visually dynamic. 587 00:32:30,160 --> 00:32:32,760 Speaker 6: Even when it's just like a couple of people in 588 00:32:32,880 --> 00:32:37,760 Speaker 6: a really dull room, you are still fully visually engaged 589 00:32:37,760 --> 00:32:38,719 Speaker 6: in those sequences. 590 00:32:38,960 --> 00:32:41,600 Speaker 2: Yeah, I was going to say what everyone else has 591 00:32:41,640 --> 00:32:45,760 Speaker 2: already said, really about the differences between I guess vibe 592 00:32:45,760 --> 00:32:47,840 Speaker 2: and those two different rooms in the room, the room 593 00:32:47,880 --> 00:32:50,400 Speaker 2: where you have the president and his interpreter, and then 594 00:32:50,440 --> 00:32:53,040 Speaker 2: you have the room in Strategic Air Command, which is 595 00:32:53,200 --> 00:32:56,280 Speaker 2: everyone else. Because there is this sense of quiet, of 596 00:32:56,280 --> 00:33:00,920 Speaker 2: intimacy between the presidents interpreter. I think often about the 597 00:33:01,480 --> 00:33:03,720 Speaker 2: water that they're pouring for each other and kind of 598 00:33:03,760 --> 00:33:06,600 Speaker 2: like the you know, they're they're the presence is coaching 599 00:33:06,600 --> 00:33:09,640 Speaker 2: as interpreter through this situation, and the mood there is 600 00:33:09,640 --> 00:33:13,360 Speaker 2: is calm, rational, obviously tense as well. But then you 601 00:33:13,400 --> 00:33:16,280 Speaker 2: get in the other room and it's it's contentious, you know, 602 00:33:16,480 --> 00:33:19,440 Speaker 2: because you have all these different voices and there are 603 00:33:19,800 --> 00:33:23,520 Speaker 2: decisions being made that really put people at odds in 604 00:33:23,560 --> 00:33:26,680 Speaker 2: a in a very intense, intense fashion. So I like 605 00:33:26,720 --> 00:33:29,560 Speaker 2: the dynamic that the contrast between those two rooms. And 606 00:33:29,560 --> 00:33:33,400 Speaker 2: then I think the other thing strategically is that because 607 00:33:33,440 --> 00:33:35,320 Speaker 2: so much of the film takes place in these rooms 608 00:33:35,600 --> 00:33:39,400 Speaker 2: that when Lumett finally breaks out of them and gives 609 00:33:39,440 --> 00:33:41,720 Speaker 2: you shots of New York City and then gives you 610 00:33:41,760 --> 00:33:44,200 Speaker 2: that ending, it's like, Oh, this is what it actually means. 611 00:33:44,360 --> 00:33:46,640 Speaker 2: Like this, all this abstracts, all this stuff that seemed 612 00:33:46,640 --> 00:33:49,400 Speaker 2: to abstract to us before, all this scenario, the scenario 613 00:33:49,480 --> 00:33:51,680 Speaker 2: that's been painted to us. Let's just show you, like 614 00:33:51,800 --> 00:33:54,600 Speaker 2: what Let's give you like a really authentic, you know, 615 00:33:55,440 --> 00:33:58,720 Speaker 2: city lament street street scene. Let's give you street scenes 616 00:33:58,760 --> 00:34:00,920 Speaker 2: in New York. Then you're gonna really feel it all 617 00:34:01,080 --> 00:34:03,080 Speaker 2: and all all of these streets that you're going to 618 00:34:03,200 --> 00:34:05,680 Speaker 2: visit in one way, you're going to visit another way 619 00:34:05,680 --> 00:34:07,200 Speaker 2: at the end of the movie, in the in that 620 00:34:07,240 --> 00:34:10,200 Speaker 2: succession of final shots. And I think it just makes 621 00:34:10,480 --> 00:34:13,719 Speaker 2: makes it so much punchier not to have to have 622 00:34:13,800 --> 00:34:17,040 Speaker 2: no real time in the real world until you get 623 00:34:17,080 --> 00:34:18,279 Speaker 2: to that point right to. 624 00:34:18,400 --> 00:34:20,319 Speaker 10: Ills feel like we are a little bit robbed of 625 00:34:20,520 --> 00:34:22,839 Speaker 10: Larry Hagman dramatic performances. 626 00:34:23,040 --> 00:34:26,120 Speaker 7: Just this movie. 627 00:34:26,239 --> 00:34:29,920 Speaker 6: He's so good in this movie, Keith. He is incredible 628 00:34:29,920 --> 00:34:32,719 Speaker 6: in this and oh oh, and the thing that I 629 00:34:32,840 --> 00:34:38,399 Speaker 6: love most about that performance is that halting way that 630 00:34:38,440 --> 00:34:42,800 Speaker 6: he speaks when he's translating, Like it's maybe the first 631 00:34:42,800 --> 00:34:45,640 Speaker 6: time I've ever seen a performance by an actor playing 632 00:34:45,640 --> 00:34:49,560 Speaker 6: a translator where it actually sounds like he's hearing this 633 00:34:49,680 --> 00:34:52,840 Speaker 6: stuff for the first time and repeating it as quickly 634 00:34:52,840 --> 00:34:55,759 Speaker 6: as possible while still trying to listen. Like the incredible 635 00:34:55,840 --> 00:34:59,000 Speaker 6: multitasking of translation, which I can't even wrap my head 636 00:34:59,000 --> 00:35:01,720 Speaker 6: around as somebody who only speaks one language and barely 637 00:35:01,760 --> 00:35:06,480 Speaker 6: speaks it well. That the way that he dramatizes just 638 00:35:06,640 --> 00:35:12,279 Speaker 6: the sound of someone translating is so credible, is so authentic, 639 00:35:12,560 --> 00:35:14,160 Speaker 6: it's tremendous performance. 640 00:35:14,520 --> 00:35:16,360 Speaker 7: While putting in his own interjection, it's like kind of 641 00:35:16,360 --> 00:35:19,759 Speaker 7: interpreting the tone and everything too. Yeah, that's really good. 642 00:35:20,040 --> 00:35:21,680 Speaker 10: The only thing distracted me is I did it at 643 00:35:21,680 --> 00:35:26,200 Speaker 10: certain point realize that Henry Fonds delivery to the on 644 00:35:26,239 --> 00:35:28,200 Speaker 10: the phone when he's talking a little louder than normal, 645 00:35:28,640 --> 00:35:30,879 Speaker 10: it's basically what David Lynch is doing when he's. 646 00:35:30,760 --> 00:35:34,000 Speaker 7: Playing Gordon Cole in that anyone else. 647 00:35:34,920 --> 00:35:41,799 Speaker 11: Yeah, Yeah, My inappropriate reference point was there is that 648 00:35:42,000 --> 00:35:44,640 Speaker 11: it's a very cool shot the sort of forced perspective 649 00:35:44,680 --> 00:35:47,120 Speaker 11: on the phone when Fonda first goes to call the 650 00:35:47,200 --> 00:35:49,880 Speaker 11: Russian premiere, Like all I could think of when it 651 00:35:49,960 --> 00:35:52,880 Speaker 11: when I saw that shot was the shot in top secret. 652 00:35:55,040 --> 00:35:56,280 Speaker 7: That it's a giant. 653 00:35:55,880 --> 00:35:59,440 Speaker 6: Phone, which was not the thing I should have been 654 00:35:59,440 --> 00:36:01,040 Speaker 6: thinking about it that particular moment. But it's not. 655 00:36:01,880 --> 00:36:04,799 Speaker 5: Your brain was just dying for a little bit of levity. Yeah, 656 00:36:05,440 --> 00:36:09,799 Speaker 5: it's a pressure release velve. Before we leave the conversation 657 00:36:09,960 --> 00:36:13,439 Speaker 5: about sort of these small phlaostrophobic spaces of this film, 658 00:36:13,440 --> 00:36:15,440 Speaker 5: I think we also need to talk about the plane 659 00:36:16,080 --> 00:36:22,040 Speaker 5: cockpits briefly or just like a note that, and within that, 660 00:36:22,080 --> 00:36:24,520 Speaker 5: we have like an early scene with the pilots like 661 00:36:24,600 --> 00:36:26,799 Speaker 5: kind of it. I think they're playing pool, you know, 662 00:36:27,040 --> 00:36:30,959 Speaker 5: so we get this introduction to them in this sort 663 00:36:30,960 --> 00:36:35,000 Speaker 5: of real world, sort of off duty scenario. You know, 664 00:36:35,080 --> 00:36:39,720 Speaker 5: it's not quite analogous to showing us like the people 665 00:36:39,760 --> 00:36:42,560 Speaker 5: on the streets of New York right before they're annihilated, 666 00:36:42,600 --> 00:36:46,120 Speaker 5: but it does kind of serve to give us a 667 00:36:46,160 --> 00:36:50,279 Speaker 5: look at these characters as people before they move into 668 00:36:50,320 --> 00:36:52,319 Speaker 5: this part of the movie where they're they're soldiers and 669 00:36:52,320 --> 00:36:55,560 Speaker 5: they're they're sacrificed basically, you know. The one of the 670 00:36:55,560 --> 00:36:59,319 Speaker 5: more harrowing parts of this movie to me was when 671 00:36:59,520 --> 00:37:02,840 Speaker 5: the decision is made to send fighters, send US fighters 672 00:37:02,880 --> 00:37:06,359 Speaker 5: after the bombers to try and take them down before 673 00:37:06,360 --> 00:37:09,120 Speaker 5: they enter Russian airspace, and it's done so with the 674 00:37:09,160 --> 00:37:12,160 Speaker 5: knowledge on everyone's part that they don't have enough fuel 675 00:37:12,239 --> 00:37:14,440 Speaker 5: to do it. It's probably not going to work, and 676 00:37:14,480 --> 00:37:15,960 Speaker 5: they're all just going to fall into the sea and 677 00:37:16,040 --> 00:37:18,719 Speaker 5: kind of one by one we watched them disappear from 678 00:37:18,719 --> 00:37:21,120 Speaker 5: the board and fall into the sea, and you know, 679 00:37:21,160 --> 00:37:25,080 Speaker 5: we're experiencing that scene mostly on the big board, you know, 680 00:37:25,160 --> 00:37:28,840 Speaker 5: as little triangles. Yeah, but because I think the film 681 00:37:28,920 --> 00:37:32,759 Speaker 5: does that early work of you know, establishing like these 682 00:37:32,760 --> 00:37:35,560 Speaker 5: are people, they're not just like pilots in a cockpit 683 00:37:35,719 --> 00:37:41,840 Speaker 5: carrying out orders robotically, it makes that scenario even harder 684 00:37:41,880 --> 00:37:44,279 Speaker 5: to endure than it maybe would be without it. 685 00:37:44,960 --> 00:37:48,000 Speaker 10: I did find the use of those early sixties electronic 686 00:37:48,320 --> 00:37:51,480 Speaker 10: screens and stuff really effective too, and and just the 687 00:37:51,560 --> 00:37:53,799 Speaker 10: like sort of the pong level graphics which I didn't 688 00:37:53,800 --> 00:37:56,400 Speaker 10: even know where existed that they made this movie. But 689 00:37:56,560 --> 00:37:58,480 Speaker 10: just but as you the moment you're talking about when 690 00:37:58,480 --> 00:38:01,480 Speaker 10: things just kind of disappear, you know what it is, 691 00:38:02,080 --> 00:38:04,160 Speaker 10: and it's it's it's chilling, Like it's like the one 692 00:38:05,080 --> 00:38:07,480 Speaker 10: reminds me it's probably a lift in some ways inspired 693 00:38:07,480 --> 00:38:08,719 Speaker 10: by this, but like it reminds me of like the 694 00:38:08,719 --> 00:38:11,439 Speaker 10: one really effective scene of clear and Present danger where 695 00:38:11,440 --> 00:38:14,359 Speaker 10: you have like this satellite view and you just see 696 00:38:14,440 --> 00:38:16,880 Speaker 10: like sort of silently these little dots limit any one another, 697 00:38:16,880 --> 00:38:21,240 Speaker 10: but they're obviously real people. You know, it's an interesting technique. 698 00:38:21,480 --> 00:38:22,040 Speaker 5: So is there. 699 00:38:21,960 --> 00:38:25,719 Speaker 2: Anything, uh that should be said about some of these performances, 700 00:38:25,760 --> 00:38:28,560 Speaker 2: because there's some pretty major ones here. You do have 701 00:38:28,719 --> 00:38:31,680 Speaker 2: Henry Fonda, you know, who has played presidents in the past. 702 00:38:31,840 --> 00:38:37,960 Speaker 2: Uh uh he he he he's here. You've got Walter Matthols, professor, 703 00:38:38,000 --> 00:38:40,440 Speaker 2: who's kind of on the opposite end of the spectrum. 704 00:38:40,560 --> 00:38:43,920 Speaker 2: And then and then you have some interesting civilians, particularly 705 00:38:44,239 --> 00:38:47,840 Speaker 2: Dan O'Hurley he as Brigadier General Black, who is the 706 00:38:47,840 --> 00:38:51,000 Speaker 2: guy that we begin in the movie on and in 707 00:38:51,160 --> 00:38:53,560 Speaker 2: the movie on. So maybe we should start talking about him, 708 00:38:53,960 --> 00:38:57,120 Speaker 2: because it seems pretty significant that that that rather than 709 00:38:57,200 --> 00:39:00,160 Speaker 2: starting with the say the president, that were with this 710 00:39:00,160 --> 00:39:02,320 Speaker 2: this guy, who's where he is on the pecking order. 711 00:39:02,239 --> 00:39:04,640 Speaker 5: And I don't think we even like know where he 712 00:39:04,760 --> 00:39:07,200 Speaker 5: is on the pecking order who he is, you know, 713 00:39:07,320 --> 00:39:12,799 Speaker 5: like we're introduced to his nightmare before we're introduced to him, 714 00:39:13,160 --> 00:39:17,400 Speaker 5: and I think that choice like how the film begins, 715 00:39:17,600 --> 00:39:20,160 Speaker 5: which threw me so hard. I have to say, like, 716 00:39:20,239 --> 00:39:22,719 Speaker 5: having not seen this film before, I'm you know, but 717 00:39:22,840 --> 00:39:24,800 Speaker 5: knowing what it was about going into it, I was 718 00:39:24,880 --> 00:39:28,239 Speaker 5: like Matador, like, you know, I was like trying to 719 00:39:28,360 --> 00:39:32,120 Speaker 5: like figure out the connection, and it came together quite 720 00:39:32,200 --> 00:39:34,560 Speaker 5: elegantly by the end. But yeah, just the nightmare and 721 00:39:34,560 --> 00:39:37,560 Speaker 5: then going into this very domestic scene, you know, of 722 00:39:38,320 --> 00:39:40,319 Speaker 5: him and his wife and still not knowing who this 723 00:39:40,400 --> 00:39:43,120 Speaker 5: person is or why I'm supposed to care about him. 724 00:39:43,520 --> 00:39:46,480 Speaker 5: But I think doing it that way it just kind 725 00:39:46,520 --> 00:39:49,120 Speaker 5: of takes all the characters down to a human level, 726 00:39:49,239 --> 00:39:51,960 Speaker 5: you know, like outside of their rank, and this is 727 00:39:52,000 --> 00:39:56,200 Speaker 5: a scenario that affects everyone kind of regardless of rank, 728 00:39:56,520 --> 00:39:59,520 Speaker 5: unless maybe you're the president and a bunker or whatever, 729 00:39:59,560 --> 00:39:59,799 Speaker 5: you know. 730 00:40:00,520 --> 00:40:04,800 Speaker 6: But yeah, a lot of incredible just faces in this movie. 731 00:40:04,840 --> 00:40:08,439 Speaker 6: This is a movie with a lot of lived in, 732 00:40:08,960 --> 00:40:13,760 Speaker 6: personality filled faces. It's also sort of insane to see 733 00:40:14,160 --> 00:40:18,920 Speaker 6: dom delauise a young and me basically playing a dramatic role. 734 00:40:19,120 --> 00:40:21,879 Speaker 6: That's both of those are quite unexpected. 735 00:40:22,440 --> 00:40:24,719 Speaker 5: I did not even catch that. I did not even 736 00:40:24,880 --> 00:40:27,600 Speaker 5: catch that's who it was until just now looking at 737 00:40:27,600 --> 00:40:30,120 Speaker 5: that and say, wait what Now I know exactly who 738 00:40:30,160 --> 00:40:30,480 Speaker 5: it was. 739 00:40:31,000 --> 00:40:36,360 Speaker 7: And Boss Hog from Dukes of Hazzard also a room. 740 00:40:36,160 --> 00:40:39,640 Speaker 6: Face for lovers of eighties garbage. Right here, you've got 741 00:40:39,680 --> 00:40:42,919 Speaker 6: boss Hog and Delauise in this thing. Fonda, I think 742 00:40:43,000 --> 00:40:45,640 Speaker 6: is just tremendous. Like there's a reason he's playing a 743 00:40:45,680 --> 00:40:48,839 Speaker 6: president because he has such There's not a lot of 744 00:40:48,920 --> 00:40:54,320 Speaker 6: room in a momentum bas narrative like this for sort 745 00:40:54,360 --> 00:40:59,480 Speaker 6: of character development or even establishment, and he really is 746 00:40:59,520 --> 00:41:02,080 Speaker 6: someone it's like, oh, yeah, he's the president. Okay, fine, 747 00:41:02,160 --> 00:41:02,560 Speaker 6: let's go. 748 00:41:02,840 --> 00:41:03,160 Speaker 2: Yeah. 749 00:41:03,280 --> 00:41:05,879 Speaker 6: The thing that that that I kept thinking about while 750 00:41:05,880 --> 00:41:09,520 Speaker 6: I was watching him in this film. Again, sorry to 751 00:41:09,920 --> 00:41:12,640 Speaker 6: keep going back to the Loumette book. The thing I 752 00:41:12,800 --> 00:41:15,319 Speaker 6: always think about now from that book whenever I see 753 00:41:15,320 --> 00:41:19,239 Speaker 6: Henry Fonda in almost anything, was you know, he's a 754 00:41:19,320 --> 00:41:24,080 Speaker 6: he's a tremendously gilt you know, he's emotionally connected, he's 755 00:41:24,600 --> 00:41:28,120 Speaker 6: a natural on screen. He was also a really gifted 756 00:41:28,280 --> 00:41:31,920 Speaker 6: technical actor. And the thing I always remember from making 757 00:41:31,960 --> 00:41:36,920 Speaker 6: movies is Lumette writing about the inky light. Does anybody 758 00:41:37,000 --> 00:41:40,880 Speaker 6: else remember this from that book, that that he had 759 00:41:41,360 --> 00:41:45,080 Speaker 6: like that he always made sure that any cinematographer that 760 00:41:45,120 --> 00:41:49,080 Speaker 6: he worked with had this little like pin light that 761 00:41:49,160 --> 00:41:53,160 Speaker 6: they could use on him in close ups that they 762 00:41:53,200 --> 00:41:57,279 Speaker 6: would shine like sort of directly into his eye and 763 00:41:57,320 --> 00:42:00,560 Speaker 6: it would reflect his eyes. It would make a really 764 00:42:00,680 --> 00:42:03,160 Speaker 6: nice reflection and also if he needed to be a 765 00:42:03,160 --> 00:42:07,920 Speaker 6: little misty eyed, it would help create that. And while 766 00:42:07,960 --> 00:42:11,320 Speaker 6: I'm watching the scene where he's giving the order to 767 00:42:11,440 --> 00:42:16,000 Speaker 6: kill his wife and child, I was like thinking in 768 00:42:16,040 --> 00:42:18,319 Speaker 6: the back of my oh, yeah, there's the inky light. 769 00:42:18,360 --> 00:42:22,680 Speaker 6: He's using the inky light in this scene to great effect. 770 00:42:24,040 --> 00:42:27,400 Speaker 2: That's cool. Yeah, no, I mean that's a very memorable 771 00:42:27,600 --> 00:42:30,960 Speaker 2: shot too, And yeah, I know exactly what you're talking about. 772 00:42:31,239 --> 00:42:33,680 Speaker 2: I think the other thing too about Henry Fonder, because 773 00:42:33,920 --> 00:42:37,080 Speaker 2: he gives us gravity and credibility to this role, is 774 00:42:37,120 --> 00:42:40,680 Speaker 2: that is that I think strategically having the president be 775 00:42:41,239 --> 00:42:44,480 Speaker 2: kind of a best case scenario president, it makes the 776 00:42:44,480 --> 00:42:47,239 Speaker 2: film more effective because because here, here, here's a guy 777 00:42:47,280 --> 00:42:51,160 Speaker 2: who I think is negotiating this his way through this 778 00:42:51,320 --> 00:42:55,879 Speaker 2: situation with as much care and integrity as possible, and 779 00:42:55,960 --> 00:42:58,600 Speaker 2: he can't stop it, you know. I think that's I 780 00:42:58,600 --> 00:43:01,880 Speaker 2: think that's that's kind of of makes the film's point 781 00:43:01,920 --> 00:43:04,799 Speaker 2: a little stronger, and it kind of reinforces to bring 782 00:43:04,840 --> 00:43:08,799 Speaker 2: it back to to Dan o'hurlehee's character, it reinforces that 783 00:43:09,160 --> 00:43:12,080 Speaker 2: idea of inevitability because that's really where where we're at 784 00:43:12,120 --> 00:43:14,680 Speaker 2: with that character, which is which is this guy having 785 00:43:14,719 --> 00:43:18,000 Speaker 2: a nightmare that he knows is going to happen, you know, 786 00:43:18,120 --> 00:43:20,680 Speaker 2: like this is this that that that, and that he's 787 00:43:20,719 --> 00:43:24,000 Speaker 2: in this job to prevent from happening for as long 788 00:43:24,040 --> 00:43:28,680 Speaker 2: as possible. But when it actually occurs, like it, there's 789 00:43:28,719 --> 00:43:30,880 Speaker 2: that there's that air of like, Okay, this is this 790 00:43:31,000 --> 00:43:33,439 Speaker 2: was going to this is going to be a thing 791 00:43:33,520 --> 00:43:36,920 Speaker 2: like this, this is something I had nightmares about and uh, 792 00:43:37,040 --> 00:43:40,080 Speaker 2: clearly something he's thought about and and and was going 793 00:43:40,120 --> 00:43:43,000 Speaker 2: to happen and it was not avoidable. And so it 794 00:43:43,080 --> 00:43:45,160 Speaker 2: kind of makes it as a chilling on that and 795 00:43:45,680 --> 00:43:48,879 Speaker 2: just the unstoppability of it, just the unstoppability of this, 796 00:43:49,000 --> 00:43:50,600 Speaker 2: of this happening once it's set into motion. 797 00:43:51,239 --> 00:43:53,799 Speaker 5: Just on the fond of tip, I was realizing that 798 00:43:54,239 --> 00:43:57,000 Speaker 5: this movie came out just a few months after The 799 00:43:57,040 --> 00:44:00,759 Speaker 5: Best Man, which we covered on this podcast alongside of 800 00:44:00,760 --> 00:44:06,000 Speaker 5: Conclave and which Fonda plays another sort of man of 801 00:44:06,040 --> 00:44:11,960 Speaker 5: integrity who makes a tough decision and sacrifice at the end, 802 00:44:12,080 --> 00:44:15,880 Speaker 5: you know, and he's not exactly a president, but certainly 803 00:44:15,960 --> 00:44:20,600 Speaker 5: you know, in that same space. So it's just interesting 804 00:44:20,680 --> 00:44:23,279 Speaker 5: timing that we get to, you know, these roles that 805 00:44:23,320 --> 00:44:25,319 Speaker 5: are kind of echoes of each other in the same year. 806 00:44:26,239 --> 00:44:30,719 Speaker 2: Audiences, we rely on your recall of our previous episodes 807 00:44:30,760 --> 00:44:37,440 Speaker 2: so much. This happens literally every week of just like, guys, 808 00:44:37,440 --> 00:44:41,880 Speaker 2: we did this already. 809 00:44:41,280 --> 00:44:43,080 Speaker 5: I will admit it, did. I did have to go 810 00:44:43,120 --> 00:44:45,319 Speaker 5: in check. Was like, wait, best man or wrong Man? 811 00:44:45,400 --> 00:44:51,440 Speaker 5: I can't a lot of rhymes in Fonda's filmography to 812 00:44:51,480 --> 00:44:53,040 Speaker 5: make sure you're talking about the right movie. 813 00:44:53,920 --> 00:44:59,880 Speaker 2: Yeah. Well, we will continue talking about Henry Fonda and 814 00:45:00,840 --> 00:45:04,560 Speaker 2: nuclear disaster and all that late later on in our 815 00:45:04,960 --> 00:45:08,040 Speaker 2: next week when we bring in a House of Dynamite. 816 00:45:08,080 --> 00:45:11,239 Speaker 2: But for now, we'll pause this discussion and come back 817 00:45:11,280 --> 00:45:25,920 Speaker 2: with feedback. Now it's time for feedback. But before we 818 00:45:25,960 --> 00:45:27,359 Speaker 2: get to it, we want to give a shout out 819 00:45:27,400 --> 00:45:30,640 Speaker 2: to Film Spotting. The Next Picture Shows Mothership podcast hosted 820 00:45:30,680 --> 00:45:33,920 Speaker 2: by Adam Kempinar and Josh Larsen. As we record this, 821 00:45:34,160 --> 00:45:36,480 Speaker 2: Josh and Adam have released an episode in tribute to 822 00:45:36,480 --> 00:45:38,960 Speaker 2: the late Robert Redford, and they're working on an episode 823 00:45:39,000 --> 00:45:42,160 Speaker 2: next week on Kelly Reichert's new movie The Mastermind, which 824 00:45:42,160 --> 00:45:45,400 Speaker 2: I saw today and quite enjoyed. So that's my preview 825 00:45:45,440 --> 00:45:50,359 Speaker 2: of that film. As for feedback, we would usually spend 826 00:45:50,400 --> 00:45:53,879 Speaker 2: this time sifting through listener emails or voicemails, but we're 827 00:45:53,920 --> 00:45:56,240 Speaker 2: a little short this week. And since we've been talking 828 00:45:56,640 --> 00:45:59,680 Speaker 2: a lot about Lumet lately, and we happen to have 829 00:45:59,760 --> 00:46:02,080 Speaker 2: Jason and the author of Fun City Cinema on the 830 00:46:02,120 --> 00:46:04,600 Speaker 2: podcast today, I thought we would open up the floor 831 00:46:04,719 --> 00:46:09,200 Speaker 2: from some for some Lumet recommendations. Let's start. We'll start 832 00:46:09,200 --> 00:46:11,520 Speaker 2: with you, Jason. I am shouting you out. He made 833 00:46:11,520 --> 00:46:14,520 Speaker 2: some films New York, about New York, just about you know, 834 00:46:14,520 --> 00:46:16,440 Speaker 2: He's made some films just to have that kind of 835 00:46:16,480 --> 00:46:18,560 Speaker 2: grit to them. Is there anything you had in mind? 836 00:46:18,600 --> 00:46:18,799 Speaker 4: There? 837 00:46:19,080 --> 00:46:22,480 Speaker 6: Absolutely no. I really do consider Lumet like you know 838 00:46:22,520 --> 00:46:27,840 Speaker 6: that the holy Trinity of New York filmmakers are, you know, Scorsese, 839 00:46:27,960 --> 00:46:32,319 Speaker 6: Spike and Sydney like. I think he's as recognizable in 840 00:46:32,360 --> 00:46:35,720 Speaker 6: the work as they are. I think he his love 841 00:46:35,840 --> 00:46:39,040 Speaker 6: for the city is so ever present in all of 842 00:46:39,080 --> 00:46:42,200 Speaker 6: the films that he shot here and shot really a 843 00:46:42,360 --> 00:46:46,560 Speaker 6: nice wide variety of types of movies in New York, 844 00:46:47,080 --> 00:46:50,200 Speaker 6: dipped into a lot of different genres. The ones that 845 00:46:50,239 --> 00:46:53,280 Speaker 6: I specifically wanted to talk about and sort of recommend 846 00:46:53,760 --> 00:46:57,600 Speaker 6: are sort of a mixture of known and less heralded, 847 00:46:58,239 --> 00:47:02,400 Speaker 6: which is the sort of the core tet of NYPD 848 00:47:02,520 --> 00:47:08,799 Speaker 6: corruption pictures that he made between nineteen seventy three and 849 00:47:08,960 --> 00:47:13,040 Speaker 6: nineteen ninety seven, so that would be serproco obviously, the 850 00:47:13,120 --> 00:47:17,000 Speaker 6: sort of the established, known, beloved classic of the Bunch, 851 00:47:17,320 --> 00:47:20,520 Speaker 6: Prince of the City, which is one that has sort 852 00:47:20,520 --> 00:47:22,879 Speaker 6: of didn't really hit at the time, but has sort 853 00:47:22,920 --> 00:47:27,960 Speaker 6: of gained in reputation and respect as the years have passed. 854 00:47:28,440 --> 00:47:31,560 Speaker 6: And then the two sort of less discussed, lesser knowns 855 00:47:31,960 --> 00:47:35,160 Speaker 6: nineteen nineties Q and A with Timothy Hutton and a 856 00:47:35,719 --> 00:47:39,440 Speaker 6: fierce Nick Nolty performance, and then the Last of the 857 00:47:39,440 --> 00:47:43,719 Speaker 6: Bunch nineteen ninety seven's Night Falls on Manhattan, which coincidentally 858 00:47:43,880 --> 00:47:49,880 Speaker 6: enough an early pre sopranos James Gandelfini performance, so that 859 00:47:49,920 --> 00:47:51,960 Speaker 6: one gets to tie into both of the books, and 860 00:47:52,000 --> 00:47:56,359 Speaker 6: I think it's a really fascinating opportunity to watch a 861 00:47:56,400 --> 00:48:00,920 Speaker 6: filmmaker revisit themes that are clearly of interest to him 862 00:48:00,960 --> 00:48:03,319 Speaker 6: and of import to him at sort of different points 863 00:48:03,360 --> 00:48:05,640 Speaker 6: in his career. You see the sort of evolution of 864 00:48:05,640 --> 00:48:08,720 Speaker 6: his thinking, the evolution of his filmmaking, getting to see 865 00:48:09,040 --> 00:48:12,560 Speaker 6: a lot of different actors sort of playing in that space. 866 00:48:13,280 --> 00:48:16,480 Speaker 6: I think these are all terrific movies. I really think 867 00:48:16,960 --> 00:48:19,120 Speaker 6: Night Falls on Manhattan it's a movie that holds a 868 00:48:19,160 --> 00:48:20,960 Speaker 6: real special place in my heart. It may have been 869 00:48:21,000 --> 00:48:24,080 Speaker 6: the first Luet movie I saw in a theater, just 870 00:48:24,280 --> 00:48:26,520 Speaker 6: by virtue of when it came out in ninety seven. 871 00:48:27,040 --> 00:48:29,520 Speaker 6: I was really taken with it. At that time, I 872 00:48:29,640 --> 00:48:32,480 Speaker 6: had only seen Surpiico of this bunch, so it sort 873 00:48:32,480 --> 00:48:34,920 Speaker 6: of compelled me to go check out the other pictures 874 00:48:34,960 --> 00:48:38,920 Speaker 6: as well. And then this one just got finally a 875 00:48:39,040 --> 00:48:41,359 Speaker 6: really nice Blu Ray release. I want to say about 876 00:48:41,360 --> 00:48:44,800 Speaker 6: a year ago from Arrow, I think it's a phenomenal movie. 877 00:48:44,800 --> 00:48:47,719 Speaker 6: I think Andy Garcia is tremendous in it. Great Ian 878 00:48:47,760 --> 00:48:51,960 Speaker 6: home performance again, a wonderful Gandelfini turn, and an unbuilt 879 00:48:52,040 --> 00:48:55,080 Speaker 6: Richard Dreyfus doing some really interesting work as a sort 880 00:48:55,120 --> 00:48:58,279 Speaker 6: of civil liberties attorney. It's worth seeking. 881 00:48:58,000 --> 00:49:00,840 Speaker 2: Out that's one I've actually never seen me just because 882 00:49:00,920 --> 00:49:03,120 Speaker 2: its reputation is I mean, it's not certainly doesn't have 883 00:49:03,120 --> 00:49:06,080 Speaker 2: a terrible reputation, but it is not usually mentioned among 884 00:49:06,120 --> 00:49:07,879 Speaker 2: his greatest I mean the ones of the other ones 885 00:49:07,920 --> 00:49:10,560 Speaker 2: you mentioned, I mean those are all, you know, pretty 886 00:49:10,600 --> 00:49:12,920 Speaker 2: well established as great films. I think Parts of the 887 00:49:12,960 --> 00:49:15,000 Speaker 2: City is truly. 888 00:49:15,520 --> 00:49:18,319 Speaker 6: Yeah, it's a monster. It's a monster. No, I mean 889 00:49:18,360 --> 00:49:20,399 Speaker 6: I think I think at the time it came out, 890 00:49:20,719 --> 00:49:23,360 Speaker 6: because it was sort of in that realm, it was 891 00:49:23,400 --> 00:49:26,719 Speaker 6: compared unfavorably to those movies, And I don't think it 892 00:49:26,800 --> 00:49:29,120 Speaker 6: is the equivalent of any of them, but I certainly 893 00:49:29,120 --> 00:49:32,640 Speaker 6: think it's worth watching and thinking about in the same 894 00:49:32,680 --> 00:49:33,040 Speaker 6: sort of. 895 00:49:32,960 --> 00:49:35,920 Speaker 2: Breath for sure, for sure, Keith, did you have anything 896 00:49:35,960 --> 00:49:36,480 Speaker 2: in mind? 897 00:49:36,840 --> 00:49:39,839 Speaker 10: Yeah, I have a lou Matt New York film they 898 00:49:39,920 --> 00:49:42,719 Speaker 10: just caught up with by coincidence before we turned into 899 00:49:42,760 --> 00:49:46,960 Speaker 10: a full time to do that podcast called The Anderson 900 00:49:47,000 --> 00:49:52,080 Speaker 10: Tapes nineteen seventy one, which is it stars Sean Connery 901 00:49:52,120 --> 00:49:53,799 Speaker 10: as a safe cracker who gets out of jail after 902 00:49:53,800 --> 00:49:57,759 Speaker 10: ten years and immediately reconnects with his girlfriend played by 903 00:49:57,800 --> 00:50:00,520 Speaker 10: Diane Cannon. I guess Sean Connery if you're going to 904 00:50:00,560 --> 00:50:01,960 Speaker 10: wait ten years for anybody. 905 00:50:01,600 --> 00:50:03,360 Speaker 7: I guess he's the one. 906 00:50:03,560 --> 00:50:07,520 Speaker 10: But he basically sets about robbing an entire apartment building, 907 00:50:08,120 --> 00:50:09,879 Speaker 10: which is it's a which is kind of a fun 908 00:50:09,880 --> 00:50:12,680 Speaker 10: setup for the film anyway, although film kind of takes 909 00:50:12,680 --> 00:50:16,000 Speaker 10: a dark turn toward the end. But what sets it 910 00:50:16,080 --> 00:50:22,719 Speaker 10: apart is this really early seventies interest in surveillance techniques 911 00:50:22,760 --> 00:50:25,600 Speaker 10: and recording and just sort of like this early like 912 00:50:25,640 --> 00:50:28,719 Speaker 10: electronic stuff, and it's it's really prescient in a lot 913 00:50:28,719 --> 00:50:32,399 Speaker 10: of ways of where the surveillance state was going. It's 914 00:50:32,440 --> 00:50:34,960 Speaker 10: it's really worth your time. I don't it's not entirely successful, 915 00:50:34,960 --> 00:50:38,080 Speaker 10: but but it's definitely definitely worth a look. And it's 916 00:50:38,120 --> 00:50:40,440 Speaker 10: a couple of things going for it. It's it's the 917 00:50:40,520 --> 00:50:43,440 Speaker 10: last appearance by Margaret Hamilton, who's the wicked Witch of 918 00:50:43,440 --> 00:50:45,120 Speaker 10: the West, so we say goodbye to her, but we 919 00:50:45,160 --> 00:50:47,200 Speaker 10: say hello. I think even gets I think he even 920 00:50:47,200 --> 00:50:50,520 Speaker 10: gets an introducing credit in the beginning to a young 921 00:50:50,520 --> 00:50:52,439 Speaker 10: actor played a character known as the Kid. 922 00:50:52,800 --> 00:50:54,439 Speaker 7: That men's name is Christopher. 923 00:50:54,120 --> 00:50:57,319 Speaker 10: Walking, So it's a very early, almost unrecognizable yeah, just 924 00:50:57,320 --> 00:50:59,319 Speaker 10: for walking performance. But the other thing is it's got 925 00:50:59,360 --> 00:51:04,040 Speaker 10: a really cool quincy Jones score that's like occasionally interrupt 926 00:51:04,080 --> 00:51:08,040 Speaker 10: it quite jarringly by these electronic noises to to that 927 00:51:07,800 --> 00:51:11,440 Speaker 10: that that I don't even know if they're Jones's creation 928 00:51:11,880 --> 00:51:14,120 Speaker 10: or if they're kind of, you know, dropped into the 929 00:51:14,160 --> 00:51:17,040 Speaker 10: score as as like sort of the the electronic noises 930 00:51:17,040 --> 00:51:20,000 Speaker 10: of the surveillance equipment. But it's quite jarring in a 931 00:51:20,000 --> 00:51:23,640 Speaker 10: way that that's unpleasant but effective. So yeah, that's my pick. 932 00:51:23,920 --> 00:51:25,920 Speaker 2: I wanted to slip I wanted to slip in something 933 00:51:25,960 --> 00:51:30,799 Speaker 2: that doesn't get recommended very often, and someone got got 934 00:51:30,880 --> 00:51:34,320 Speaker 2: somewhat mixed reviews when came out, but I really like 935 00:51:34,400 --> 00:51:37,479 Speaker 2: it and wanted to defend it. It's a late film 936 00:51:37,520 --> 00:51:40,279 Speaker 2: of his, that's Find Me Guilty, a film that he 937 00:51:40,320 --> 00:51:43,560 Speaker 2: made in two thousand and six, you know, shooting on video, 938 00:51:44,400 --> 00:51:48,040 Speaker 2: released by via Freestyle Releasing. You know, not not one 939 00:51:48,040 --> 00:51:51,000 Speaker 2: of your more high profile City Lamit performances, but it 940 00:51:51,080 --> 00:51:55,279 Speaker 2: has this incredible lead performance by Vin Diesel in a 941 00:51:55,480 --> 00:51:59,879 Speaker 2: very amusing wig. He is based on truth, is based 942 00:51:59,920 --> 00:52:02,560 Speaker 2: on true story of what is I guess, the longest 943 00:52:03,280 --> 00:52:07,960 Speaker 2: mafia trial in American history, and and a lot of 944 00:52:08,000 --> 00:52:10,600 Speaker 2: the a lot of like the dialogue is taken straight 945 00:52:10,600 --> 00:52:13,239 Speaker 2: from the transcripts. But what's interesting about it is that 946 00:52:13,800 --> 00:52:17,840 Speaker 2: Vin Diesel plays a guy who is one of nineteen 947 00:52:18,360 --> 00:52:22,440 Speaker 2: Jersey mobsters who are on trial for racketeering. But what 948 00:52:22,560 --> 00:52:26,279 Speaker 2: sets him apart is that he is that he gets 949 00:52:26,400 --> 00:52:29,080 Speaker 2: rid of his lawyer and decides to defend himself in 950 00:52:29,120 --> 00:52:32,520 Speaker 2: an open court. And it is just. It is very, 951 00:52:32,640 --> 00:52:35,760 Speaker 2: very funny and just. It is, as you might imagine, 952 00:52:35,840 --> 00:52:38,239 Speaker 2: quite a bit of disorder in the court as a 953 00:52:38,239 --> 00:52:41,279 Speaker 2: result of him defending himself. And I think it's it's 954 00:52:41,320 --> 00:52:44,000 Speaker 2: got I think it is a fun movie that doesn't 955 00:52:44,040 --> 00:52:47,080 Speaker 2: get mentioned enough. I mean, obviously Lumett got to end 956 00:52:47,120 --> 00:52:49,800 Speaker 2: his career with, you know, a film that many of 957 00:52:49,880 --> 00:52:52,919 Speaker 2: us think is great, that's Before the Devil Knows You're Dead. 958 00:52:53,120 --> 00:52:55,239 Speaker 2: But you know, if you've seen Before the Devil Knows 959 00:52:55,280 --> 00:52:57,480 Speaker 2: You're Dead and you've seen some other a lot of 960 00:52:57,480 --> 00:53:01,439 Speaker 2: other Lumette films, and you're a little curious, I'm just saying, 961 00:53:01,440 --> 00:53:03,719 Speaker 2: find me guilties out there, that's all I'm just gonna put. 962 00:53:03,760 --> 00:53:05,480 Speaker 2: I'm just gonna say it's there for you. 963 00:53:05,760 --> 00:53:09,279 Speaker 6: Yeah, Scott, we we have swapped recommendations because that's one 964 00:53:09,320 --> 00:53:12,360 Speaker 6: of the last Loumets I haven't seen so based on 965 00:53:12,880 --> 00:53:15,879 Speaker 6: based on your recommendation, I'm gonna check that one out. 966 00:53:16,120 --> 00:53:21,000 Speaker 2: Cool, I'm glad, but again with caveat little absolutely, but 967 00:53:21,760 --> 00:53:23,520 Speaker 2: do see I think it's I think it's a little 968 00:53:23,520 --> 00:53:24,919 Speaker 2: bit underregarded. 969 00:53:25,840 --> 00:53:26,000 Speaker 7: Well. 970 00:53:26,040 --> 00:53:28,920 Speaker 2: We always appreciate when our listeners share their thoughts and 971 00:53:28,920 --> 00:53:32,520 Speaker 2: the recommendations. And if you all have some lut films, 972 00:53:32,600 --> 00:53:35,440 Speaker 2: Lesser City, Lumet films, little gems, he made so many 973 00:53:35,480 --> 00:53:36,560 Speaker 2: of them, you can share them. 974 00:53:36,640 --> 00:53:39,600 Speaker 7: There's a lot of films, so many sent in filmography. 975 00:53:40,400 --> 00:53:43,160 Speaker 2: If you feel so inclined, we can feature your response 976 00:53:43,200 --> 00:53:45,399 Speaker 2: on a future episode. To reach us, you can leave 977 00:53:45,440 --> 00:53:48,080 Speaker 2: a short voicemail at seven seven three two three four 978 00:53:48,239 --> 00:53:51,000 Speaker 2: nine seven three zero or email us at comments at 979 00:53:51,120 --> 00:53:53,440 Speaker 2: next Picture Show dot net. You can also send a 980 00:53:53,480 --> 00:53:55,960 Speaker 2: recorded message to our email address if you want to 981 00:53:55,960 --> 00:53:58,160 Speaker 2: make sure you get the wording just right, which is 982 00:53:58,200 --> 00:54:00,200 Speaker 2: something I would need to do. There's no chance, no 983 00:54:00,320 --> 00:54:03,360 Speaker 2: chance I would just can cold call a voicemail a 984 00:54:03,400 --> 00:54:07,800 Speaker 2: voicemail line and get anything right. So I say, pre record, 985 00:54:08,040 --> 00:54:11,000 Speaker 2: send that secker and make it perfect. You know, hire producers. 986 00:54:11,000 --> 00:54:11,719 Speaker 2: What do you need to do? 987 00:54:12,360 --> 00:54:16,040 Speaker 5: Uh that you don't have to, We'll take we'll take. 988 00:54:16,080 --> 00:54:18,799 Speaker 5: We'll take any feedback of an equality. You know, we 989 00:54:19,880 --> 00:54:25,320 Speaker 5: don't be intimidated by scuss demand of high production value. 990 00:54:25,719 --> 00:54:28,160 Speaker 2: It's true. We'll, we'll, we'll. I'm sure you'll do a 991 00:54:28,239 --> 00:54:30,920 Speaker 2: fine job. Listeners. That's it for this episode of The 992 00:54:30,920 --> 00:54:33,239 Speaker 2: Next Picture Show. In our next episode, we'll talk about 993 00:54:33,239 --> 00:54:35,680 Speaker 2: a house of Dynamite before returning to fail Safe and 994 00:54:35,719 --> 00:54:38,400 Speaker 2: discussing how they relate to one another. Look for that 995 00:54:38,440 --> 00:54:41,799 Speaker 2: episode next Tuesday on your podcatcher of choice. For ad 996 00:54:41,800 --> 00:54:44,520 Speaker 2: free versions of the podcast and extra content, find us 997 00:54:44,560 --> 00:54:47,759 Speaker 2: on Patreon at patreon dot com slash Next Picture Show. 998 00:54:48,080 --> 00:54:50,680 Speaker 2: You can find us at Next pictureshow dot net and 999 00:54:50,719 --> 00:54:53,239 Speaker 2: on blue Sky at the Next Picture Show. If you 1000 00:54:53,280 --> 00:54:56,160 Speaker 2: want to keep track of when new episodes drop until 1001 00:54:56,239 --> 00:54:59,280 Speaker 2: next week. Remember, if your job gives you a recurring 1002 00:54:59,360 --> 00:55:04,160 Speaker 2: nightmare about bullfighting, consider updating your LinkedIn page.