WEBVTT - Denial to Delay: How Fossil-Funded University Research Lays the Foundation for Fossil-Friendly Policy

0:00:05.760 --> 0:00:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome, Mollitasted, our senior reporter editor, extraordinary. Thank you. You

0:00:12.320 --> 0:00:16.279
<v Speaker 1>have been looking into fossil fuel funding in universities in

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:19.280
<v Speaker 1>lots of different ways. But there's some news recently on

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:20.479
<v Speaker 1>this front. What's happening.

0:00:21.000 --> 0:00:24.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so there's been a lot of movement on a

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 2>conversation that I feel like has been going on, both

0:00:28.560 --> 0:00:31.479
<v Speaker 2>officially and unofficially for several years.

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 2>One of the more interesting things that happened this month

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 2>is a team of researchers released a literature review, which

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:41.879
<v Speaker 2>sounds kind of boring, but basically what they did is

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 2>they said to themselves, Okay, you know, in order to

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:48.839
<v Speaker 2>move forward in researching fossil fuel funding in universities, we

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:51.199
<v Speaker 2>need to figure out what we know first, right, So

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 2>they basically did what's called in academia literature review, which

0:00:55.880 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 2>is you look at all the literature on a topic

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 2>and you kind of come to some conclusions about it.

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:04.399
<v Speaker 2>And what's interesting about this literature review is that, you know,

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 2>even though activists and folks in universities, folks concerned about

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 2>the climate, have been talking about fossil fuel funding in

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:17.039
<v Speaker 2>academia for a really long time, the researchers found that

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:21.040
<v Speaker 2>there's actually not that many peer reviewed articles about it.

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 2>There's not that much peer reviewed research about what all

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 2>of this oil money is doing to academic research. Yeah,

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 2>which is kind of crazy because like the parallels here

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 2>that they drew were conflict of interest studies on bias

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 2>in research are really prevalent. When it comes to other

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:47.040
<v Speaker 2>industries like tobacco pharmaceuticals, you can find hundreds of peer

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 2>reviewed articles on this topic like what happens when an

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:54.279
<v Speaker 2>industry funds research. Those discussions have been going on for decades,

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 2>but there's there's just not a lot with fossil fuel funding,

0:01:58.280 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 2>and a lot of it is really recent. They found

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 2>seven peer reviewed articles in their search, and only a

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 2>few of them were before twenty twelve, so you know,

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:11.920
<v Speaker 2>there's a real dearth of peer reviewed research on this topic.

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:15.080
<v Speaker 2>So to complete their literature review, what they did was

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:18.680
<v Speaker 2>they use what they call gray literature, which is reports

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:24.800
<v Speaker 2>from NGOs, reports from journalists, you know, articles about what

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:28.639
<v Speaker 2>fossil fuel funding is doing and moving through universities, and

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:31.680
<v Speaker 2>reports from students too, which are a really valuable part

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 2>of this conversation, and they use that to kind of

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 2>bulk out the literature review and found that there's a

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 2>lot of really valuable work going on to understand how

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 2>this industry is shaping policy at the top levels of university.

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:48.399
<v Speaker 2>But there's also like still a lot more that especially

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 2>folks involved in academia can do. Academia needs to kind

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:54.960
<v Speaker 2>of turn the mirror towards itself in a sense and

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 2>really take a much closer look at how this industry

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:01.520
<v Speaker 2>is shaping what's going on inside of it.

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Yes, exactly. I think it just sort of helps to

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>have this report as like a official accounting of where

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>this stuff is at now totally as we're looking towards

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:16.799
<v Speaker 1>getting more information and figuring out more speaking of which

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I know there are also student reports coming out. Yeah,

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:23.640
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, there's a batch of new research that's coming

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:24.360
<v Speaker 1>on this stuff.

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah so what actually and that sort of ties into

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 2>the literature review. So I was talking to one of

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 2>the researchers, Jeffrey Supran, and you know, he really emphasized

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 2>that again, a lot of their literature review came from

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 2>students on campus noticing stuff about how their university takes

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 2>fossil fuel money, and you know, there's no replaceable way

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 2>of doing research on a campus that's quite like being

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 2>on the campus and being in the campus culture and

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 2>understanding the way a school works, whether you work there

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 2>or you're a student there, or you're an a lum

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 2>Those are really the front lines of understanding this kind

0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 2>of stuff. And so there's been a push from a

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 2>group called the Campus Climate Network. They have gathered students

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 2>on a couple of different universities across the US and

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 2>some international groups as well, and the first batch of

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 2>their reports on how fossil fuel money is working throughout

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 2>their specific universities were also released in September, and these

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 2>students put a lot of really interesting numbers on a

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 2>problem that doesn't have a lot of numbers right now.

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 2>I think the last real accounting was Data for Progress

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 2>estimated back in twenty twenty three that five fossil fuel

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 2>companies had donated I think seven hundred million to a

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:45.280
<v Speaker 2>group of US universities over the past decade, and they

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 2>said that was almost certainly an undercount, and really turns

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:51.159
<v Speaker 2>out it was. So One number that really shocked me

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 2>was students at Columbia really buckled down and combed their

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 2>universities public facing documents like stuff they could obtain publicly.

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:01.159
<v Speaker 2>This isn't any sort of pea into the inner workings

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 2>of Columbia. They just sat down and they did the work.

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 2>They expanded the reach a little bit to not just

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 2>five major fossil fuel companies, but a variety of different

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 2>fossil fuel influences, and by their calculations, Columbia has taken

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 2>I think more than thirty seven million since two thousand

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 2>and five in fossil fuel funding, which includes an environmental

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 2>health professorship endowed by a descendant of Hesse, the guy

0:05:26.920 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 2>who started HESS. So there is an environmental health field

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:34.279
<v Speaker 2>of study that is being funded by like the Hess Foundation,

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:39.279
<v Speaker 2>which I found particularly ironic, but yeah, it really goes

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:41.279
<v Speaker 2>to show. And I think in the Data for Progress

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 2>report the number they put on Columbia was five million,

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 2>and you know, it really goes to show like when

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:49.840
<v Speaker 2>you are familiar with how your school works and where

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 2>to look for these things, it can be insanely beneficial

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:57.040
<v Speaker 2>in figuring out where the money is coming from and

0:05:57.080 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 2>what it's going.

0:05:57.680 --> 0:06:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Towards totally, which is a perfect segway into the other

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 1>thing that we're going to talk about in this episode,

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 1>which is like, I know, beautiful smooth transition, but like

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the students are amazing because they know where to look

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:13.480
<v Speaker 1>for things, and they also like catch with some things

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 1>on campus that they're kind of like, wait a minute,

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:19.239
<v Speaker 1>that seems weird. And the other great place to look

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 1>for information on this stuff because again, a lot of

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:27.000
<v Speaker 1>these schools do not disclose all of their funding, and

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:31.160
<v Speaker 1>with the private schools in particular, you can't get at

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:33.599
<v Speaker 1>it through public records requests. You have to talk to

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 1>people and figure it out. And one of the best

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 1>sources on that stuff is actually other professors at those

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:44.600
<v Speaker 1>schools too, because in a lot of cases, people who

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 1>are working at these campuses and are working on climate stuff,

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:52.360
<v Speaker 1>for example, are not super happy about the fact that

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 1>other people are taking fossil fuel money. Like actually, I

0:06:55.920 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 1>had an interesting conversation with Mark Jacobson at Stanford about

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:03.719
<v Speaker 1>this and how much some of his colleagues there have

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:07.039
<v Speaker 1>been ponying up to the fossil fuel money trough.

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 4>There's a lot of fossil fuel funding and institutes like

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:15.559
<v Speaker 4>at our university we have these institutes that are funded

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 4>largely by fossil fuels. We have even in our new

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 4>school sustainability, what's the number one flagship research project? That

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 4>they're promoting. It's carbon capture besides Stanford Princeton and MIT

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 4>or culprits and pushing carbon capture, direct air capture, blue

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 4>hydrogen electro fuels. So these four technologies are really pushed

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 4>by the fossil fuel industry, and the fossil fuel industry

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 4>is funding universities.

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>And you had an interesting conversation with Craig Calendar, who's

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>a professor at UC San Diego, both about what he's

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>seen there but also they passed some interesting new policies recently.

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Craig's doing some really interesting work and under his

0:07:57.800 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 2>and other folks on his committee's leadership kind of pioneering

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 2>the next step forward in talking.

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:05.679
<v Speaker 1>About this kind of stuff.

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 2>He teaches the philosophy of science, so this is like

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 2>kind of right up his alley, and you know, he

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 2>got on the Academic Senate Committee and they started wrestling

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:14.560
<v Speaker 2>with this question of like, Okay, what do we do

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 2>about fossil fuel money in our university, in the UC

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 2>system in general, what are the best policies to kind

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 2>of start tackling this. And so back in the early

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 2>two thousands, lots of schools joined on this bandwagon to

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 2>ban tobacco money for specifically medical or health research, and

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 2>a lot of these schools still have those policies in place. Surprisingly,

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 2>that policy actually failed, that you see, but they did

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 2>put on this other policy where you would need a

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 2>special review of tobacco money by the chancellor, and so

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:49.080
<v Speaker 2>they said, okay, what if we do that for fossil

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 2>fuel money? And that was basically he said. They told

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 2>me that was kind of dead on arrival. There's all

0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 2>sorts of concerns about academic freedom. I think late in

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:01.559
<v Speaker 2>this conversation some times is when you bring this up,

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 2>it's you know, I think people who are working at

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:09.559
<v Speaker 2>research centers and at universities think that you're accusing them

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 2>of like knowingly conspiring with oil and gas companies, which

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:16.560
<v Speaker 2>is absolutely like, that's far and away not the case.

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 2>But there is research showing that when you take money

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 2>from an industrial funder or corporate funder, that does like

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 2>set the tone of your research, whether you sort of

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:28.439
<v Speaker 2>realize it or not. You know, it doesn't mean that

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:30.719
<v Speaker 2>you're emailing BP every day to update them on your

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 2>progress and destroying the climate, but it does mean that

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:37.719
<v Speaker 2>if he is paying for something, then they want that

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 2>research done for a specific reason.

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Right, shout out to Doug Allmond and his team at

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 1>YES and their nature piece.

0:09:45.440 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that piece is so good and really highlights you know,

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 2>and he being at Colombia is also really interesting, especially

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 2>given this new student report telling some of the money involved.

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:58.199
<v Speaker 2>But anyway, so Craig and the committee sort of regrouped

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:00.680
<v Speaker 2>and they were like, all right, so going to get

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:03.840
<v Speaker 2>a special review from the chancellor. Why don't we just

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:08.960
<v Speaker 2>like beef up transparency disclosures around this. And I think

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people I've talked to, and Amy, I'm

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 2>sure you had this experience too, Like people you talk

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:17.559
<v Speaker 2>to about this are like shocked that that's not required,

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 2>but like they're really there's so few.

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Disclosure requirements for this stuff.

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 2>It is mind blowing. There's no federal policy, state policies,

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 2>nothing in the state. You know, most universities have some

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 2>sorts of ethics stuff, but like a lot of them

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:36.319
<v Speaker 2>don't require you to talk about where you take money from.

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 1>And there's this really interesting thing. So like the last

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:43.560
<v Speaker 1>time I wrote about this stuff was around the Data

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:46.080
<v Speaker 1>for Progress report and the Holy School that gave me

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:49.880
<v Speaker 1>like a full accounting of their funding from fossil fuel

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:54.079
<v Speaker 1>companies was Berkeley, and when I asked them about what

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>they thought of this push to try to ban fossil

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 1>fuel funding of research, they were like, well, I don't

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 1>think we could do that without getting sued. And I said,

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:06.080
<v Speaker 1>but what about you know, which is the thing people

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 1>always say is like, well we did it with the

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>tobacco industry and they were like yeah, but that was

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:14.320
<v Speaker 1>pre Citizens United. So that's super interesting how that stuff

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:18.239
<v Speaker 1>details with this idea that like it's part of academic

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 1>freedom to allow people to take money from wherever. And

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 1>something Craig said to me and I'm sure repeated to

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 1>you as well, is that like even when they talk

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:33.560
<v Speaker 1>about transparency and disclosure, people will argue that it could

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:36.960
<v Speaker 1>impact or have like a chilling effect on academic freedom. Yes,

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>people have to disclose where their funding is coming from.

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:43.320
<v Speaker 1>And I'm kind of like I kind of feel okay

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 1>with that show, Like if you know what I mean,

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 1>it's like if somebody ooh, like this money is going

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 1>to make me look bad, or it's like, you know,

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:55.680
<v Speaker 1>they're worried that they will be criticized for taking money

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 1>from somewhere I don't know. To me, I'm kind of

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>like I don't know, it just seems like where there's smoke,

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 1>there's fire on that one.

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 2>But totally. But it's also you know, and and yeah,

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 2>we talked about you know, he was like a lot

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 2>of the standards you think of this stuff come from

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 2>conversations around pharmaceutical products and like ethics around disclosure in

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 2>the pharmaceutical industry, and those conversations were like really heated

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:26.320
<v Speaker 2>a couple of decades ago, and people were defending writing

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 2>an op ed in favor of a drug while being

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:31.960
<v Speaker 2>paid for the company that manufactures that drug and saying

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 2>that's academic freedom.

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>So our conversations.

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 2>Around yeah, yeah, yeah, Like so that was a hot

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:41.680
<v Speaker 2>button issue back in I think he said the eighties.

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:43.959
<v Speaker 2>So I think that one thing I took away from

0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 2>him is that our definition of academic freedom, both culturally

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 2>and in universities is subject to debate. I think most

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 2>people now would say that it's it's important to disclose

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 2>if you're getting paid by a drug company to promote

0:12:57.000 --> 0:13:00.960
<v Speaker 2>a drug. But there's also this issue it's not just

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 2>citizens united, but like increasingly universities and research have been

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 2>just so privatized over the past couple of decades.

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 1>That's a really important point. Like I know, I looked

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 1>at this a while ago, and I think it's probably

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>only gotten worse. But the proportion of research funding that

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 1>comes from the private sector has just been growing exponentially

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:28.080
<v Speaker 1>over the past couple decades. So you have corporate donors,

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 1>then you have high net worth individuals donating and they

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:36.520
<v Speaker 1>have specific agendas oftentimes too, and then you know, donor

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 1>advised funds have become a major donor to universities as well,

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 1>which is where you get a lot of like the

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 1>coke money, but also lots of other hidden industry interests

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 1>as well. So definitely, Yeahkes, there's a lot going on.

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 2>So Craig and his fellow faculty members on the Sundate

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:59.560
<v Speaker 2>Committee formed is this policy that says, look, you can

0:13:59.600 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 2>take money from fossip, fel industries. That's fine, you just

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 2>have to disclose it, like you have to be really

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 2>clear about where it's from and what it's going towards.

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Which is so reasonable and a really high margin right.

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:14.439
<v Speaker 2>Right nine percent in may percent of the vote, So clearly,

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, I think these conversations are are, perhaps for

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 2>folks on campuses, difficult to have with your peers who

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 2>might be taking money from a corporation and doing what

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 2>probably is like valuable research, but you know, having the

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 2>conversations around just how low of a barred disclosure is

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 2>and how much good actually just being forthcoming about where

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 2>the money is coming from can help address some of

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 2>the issues and honestly also just open up a dialogue

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 2>about like what's the purpose of taking this money? So

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 2>that measure is with the chancellor right now, so like

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 2>we still don't know if it's going to pass. In

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 2>the meantime, UCSD is actually all of their students are

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 2>being required to take climate change courses. It's a new

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 2>as of the semester and new curriculum requirement for everyone there,

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 2>which is like really cool. But like I think just

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 2>having people on campuses who are starting these conversations is

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 2>going to be some of the most important steps forward

0:15:11.800 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 2>in even just like learning more about this stuff and

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 2>figuring out where we're at with regards to to trust

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 2>feel money in universities.

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and like where feels comfortable to draw the lines

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 1>because I feel like you and I were talking about

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 1>this before that like there's a certain amount of this

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 1>stuff that does seem kind of innocuous, you know, it's

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of like, oh, they like funded a scholarship here,

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 1>or they funded uh, you know whatever. But then I

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 1>also am like, well, maybe I've just had that stuff

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>normalized so much that it seems fine. But there's influence

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 1>there too, And I agree like just really like talking

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 1>like just figuring out as a society, okay, how because honestly,

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, oil companies were like amongst the first to

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:57.840
<v Speaker 1>actually be major private donors to universities, and they did

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:00.040
<v Speaker 1>cotton on really quickly. Like there was I found and

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 1>a speech that a Standard Oil New Jersey guy gave

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 1>in the fifties, which is like there was this huge

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:09.320
<v Speaker 1>influx of private money into universities because they changed the

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 1>tax code in the US, right and they made it

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 1>a write off, right, which it wasn't before. So like

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the companies were starting to do more donations because it

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 1>was like, oh great, it's a tax write off. But

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 1>this guy who was at Standard Oil was like, no,

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 1>you guys are missing the much bigger value, which is

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>that like this is going to help us shape how

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 1>people view the economy and public policy, and it's going

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>to be the thing that's going to help us push

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 1>back against statism.

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 5>This is like, you know, so like they were really

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 5>really early, and I feel like I don't know that

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 5>there's been enough of a larger cultural conversation about how

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 5>much it's grown and how we feel about it.

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't like when I was at school, I remember

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 1>there was a huge push around public private partnerships and

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:01.600
<v Speaker 1>like commercializing the research that was coming out of universities,

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:04.400
<v Speaker 1>and like it was kind of all upside right. It's like, oh, well,

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 1>like researchers, you know, don't just want their stuff sitting

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>in a lab somewhere. Companies are looking for new ideas.

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a win win, you know, and they're just hasn't

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:18.159
<v Speaker 1>necessarily been enough about like okay, but what are the downsides?

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 2>You know?

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:19.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I think it's going to get even murkier,

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:24.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, as oil companies shift from like you know,

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:28.200
<v Speaker 2>they're not doing explicit deny. No one's doing explicit denial anymore,

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:30.880
<v Speaker 2>Like no one is denying that this problem is here,

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:35.919
<v Speaker 2>but they are adopting different tactics to make sure that

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:39.440
<v Speaker 2>they stay in business, which is a different conversation, right,

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:43.879
<v Speaker 2>And so what where is the I find this topic

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 2>really endlessly fascinating because I think that a lot of uh,

0:17:48.760 --> 0:17:51.360
<v Speaker 2>disinformation reporting has a hard ethical line, right which it's

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 2>like this company is spreading disinformation, but like now it's like, okay,

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 2>so BP wants to stay in business and one of

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:02.120
<v Speaker 2>the things they're doing is like funding research at universities

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:04.119
<v Speaker 2>that will help them stay in business, and.

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Like what do we do about that?

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 2>It's an interesting ethical question or you know, I think

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:11.480
<v Speaker 2>Doug Almond in that paper, that twenty twenty two paper,

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 2>there's a bunch of recommendations that he has, which include like,

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 2>when someone from a research center that is funded by

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:22.920
<v Speaker 2>oil and gas money testifies in front of lawmakers, they

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 2>should disclose the funding to their research center, which seems

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:30.679
<v Speaker 2>really simple, but I can imagine a lot of people

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:33.719
<v Speaker 2>would be extremely upset to have to do that. And

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 2>so you know, like where where are these ethical aligns?

0:18:37.119 --> 0:18:40.239
<v Speaker 2>Like what are we going to start accepting when it

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 2>comes to money in research and what is going to

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 2>be onerous to the total general Totally.

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I've had so many conversations with people who either run

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 1>or work at centers that are heavily fossil fuel funded

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 1>or even exclusively fossil feel funded at universities, and they're

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:02.679
<v Speaker 1>line of thinking, and I think this is pretty common

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>across a lot of these campuses. Is this idea that

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 1>but we're taking it to research solutions, So it's fine.

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:15.400
<v Speaker 1>We're not taking it to fund a petroleum engineering department,

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 1>like that would be bad. But what we're doing is

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:21.879
<v Speaker 1>actually taking their money to look into solutions. But you know,

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I had a conversation with a guy at one place

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:26.880
<v Speaker 1>who you know, was kind of like, what's like, what's

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the problem with that if it's for not fossil fuel

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 1>development or whatever? And I was like, well, I mean,

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 1>what are you researching at your center? And he's like, oh,

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 1>like mostly mostly hydrogen, but like good hydrogen, green hydrogen,

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 1>and carbon capture. And I was like, okay, well, like

0:19:44.440 --> 0:19:48.479
<v Speaker 1>would would those be the research focuses of your center

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 1>absent the fossil fuel funding, right? And he was like

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:56.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. And I'm like, that's that is where

0:19:56.400 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the big question lies.

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:02.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, yeah, I think that's a great that's a

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:07.160
<v Speaker 2>great question, and like, yeah, I think I think that's

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 2>something that you know, I'm glad that, like people on

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:14.359
<v Speaker 2>campuses are starting to talk about this, And honestly, it's

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:15.160
<v Speaker 2>funny because.

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:17.479
<v Speaker 1>Talk about it, because yeah, I'm like, I don't know,

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe they would be maybe we do need more money

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 1>in those things. And like, you know, the other thing

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 1>too is that like people will be like, well, where

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:25.200
<v Speaker 1>else is the money gonna come from?

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 6>Right?

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 1>It's not like there's some big pot of you know,

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:32.959
<v Speaker 1>no strings attached money just waiting to fund research. And

0:20:33.400 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 1>when I've asked students about that, they're kind of like, well, a,

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm okay with less research if it means less bias

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 1>in the research. And I'm like, okay, good, you know,

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:45.679
<v Speaker 1>interesting to think about, yes. But also, and I mean

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:48.359
<v Speaker 1>I think about this with with respect to the fossil

0:20:48.359 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 1>fuel industry all the time in general, like why do

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:54.120
<v Speaker 1>they have to be in charge of how that money

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 1>gets spent? That's the piece where I'm like, Okay, well

0:20:57.440 --> 0:21:00.399
<v Speaker 1>what if they can donate, but they can't have any

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 1>influence right for the most part, is not a thing

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:08.360
<v Speaker 1>that they are interested in doing. No, almost every thing

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 1>I've ever seen or talk to someone about or whatever,

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 1>there are strings attached. It's like, well, we only want

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:18.440
<v Speaker 1>to fund research on X, Y Z, or we want

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>to have a say in the research projects that are chosen,

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:24.639
<v Speaker 1>or yeah, we want to have a person who works

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 1>at that center, or you know, it's like there's there

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:30.639
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of ways that they end up having

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 1>influence if they spend the money, and like you know,

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 1>they don't really make big donations without that. Yeah about

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:40.360
<v Speaker 1>the strings attached.

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:45.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Craig compared compared this to like, you know, everyone's

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:47.440
<v Speaker 2>doing it, but no one wants to show their hand

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:49.640
<v Speaker 2>in poker, Like no one wants to be the guy

0:21:49.640 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 2>who goes first. And right. I do think, like, you know,

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:56.960
<v Speaker 2>if if that is a condition for accepting money, then

0:21:57.080 --> 0:21:59.680
<v Speaker 2>like defend it, you know, like make sure like make

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 2>sure or you have the guardrails in place so that

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 2>it's like we are taking money for this specific project

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:07.440
<v Speaker 2>and we think this is actually a good thing and

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:10.160
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna like put your say it with your whole chest.

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 2>Is kind of where I'm at with this, you know. Yeah,

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 2>Like if you think it's if you think having an

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:19.479
<v Speaker 2>oil executive sit on the board of a center that

0:22:19.640 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 2>is doing this kind of research is a good thing,

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 2>then why don't you publicize the guardrails you're you're putting

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 2>in place to make sure that the research is you know,

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 2>not biased. Why don't you, like I hate to be

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:36.639
<v Speaker 2>like a investigative reporter, a stereotype, but like sunlight is

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 2>the best disinfective, just put it out there, make sure

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:42.560
<v Speaker 2>everything is really public, which is the opposite of what's

0:22:42.600 --> 0:22:43.880
<v Speaker 2>happening right now.

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, totally awesome. All right, coming up,

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Molly talks to Jeffrey Suprin and Craig Calendar and we

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 1>get into a lot more details on this stuff that's

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 1>all coming up after this quick break. I'm Amy Westervelt,

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and this is drilled. Let's start at the beginning.

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:13.199
<v Speaker 2>So the first piece of research you guys have is

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:17.320
<v Speaker 2>two thousand and three, right, It's the New Economics Foundation Report,

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 2>And like I got to tell you, like I looked

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 2>it up and I was pretty not surprised, but it

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:27.440
<v Speaker 2>sounded like something that could have been written yesterday, right,

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 2>And like a lot of the tenets of what people

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 2>who study this stuff they were right there. And you

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 2>do the math, and there are like kids in college

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 2>now who were born after that report came out, Right,

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:43.600
<v Speaker 2>So you know, this stuff has been out there for

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 2>a while. How has the research around it grown and changed?

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 2>And was it the nature of academia to sort of

0:23:49.960 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 2>sit on topics for a while? Until someone kind of

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:56.479
<v Speaker 2>lights a fire under someone's ass or is it the

0:23:56.480 --> 0:23:58.879
<v Speaker 2>circular nature of this kind of discussion, or like, what

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 2>kind of prevented this from catching on quicker in the literature,

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 2>do you think?

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 7>I mean so, I think this our findings are a

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:10.680
<v Speaker 7>bit of an interesting needle to thread in terms of

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 7>communicating them, because on the one hand, what we found

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 7>is that civil society, right like non academic researchers have

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 7>been warning about this for quite some time, right since,

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:26.720
<v Speaker 7>as you said, the early two thousands. So part of

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:29.639
<v Speaker 7>the story is that there has been quite a significant delay,

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:32.359
<v Speaker 7>like on the order of a decade or more in

0:24:32.440 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 7>terms of an uptake on this topic by academics who

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:39.119
<v Speaker 7>are doing more scholarly, peer reviewed research. So on the

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:42.040
<v Speaker 7>one hand, this is a story about sort of an

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:47.639
<v Speaker 7>intransigence and the delayed serious attention being paid on it.

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 7>But on the other hand, I think what we find

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 7>is that there has already been enough research, both the

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 7>gray literature and the peer of viewed literature to substantiate

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 7>that there already is an emerging consensus around the idea

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 7>that this is a big, threatening problem that should be

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 7>taken more seriously. But yeah, I guess, like specifically on

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:10.640
<v Speaker 7>this question of how it's evolved and why it hasn't

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 7>evolved quicker academically, I think you could ask almost the

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 7>same question about why supply side climate research very broadly

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:25.200
<v Speaker 7>has only taken off in the last few years, and

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:30.200
<v Speaker 7>for anyone listening who isn't very familiar, supply side academic

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:34.880
<v Speaker 7>literature basically refers to putting fossil fuel production and supply

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 7>front and center rather than just consumer demand and the

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:42.560
<v Speaker 7>associated greenhouse gas mission. So it's about looking at the

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 7>top end of the pipeline rather than the bottom end,

0:25:47.119 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 7>to use like an oil industry.

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:53.119
<v Speaker 2>Metaphorprint versus the people who are actually like selling the

0:25:53.160 --> 0:25:54.640
<v Speaker 2>shoes kind of yeah.

0:25:54.520 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, yeah, yeah yeah, and and and and it's really

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:02.480
<v Speaker 7>by some kind of fortune, I suppose, over almost exactly

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 7>the span of my academic career on this topic, that

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:10.879
<v Speaker 7>that transition has happened. And I've actually, i think written

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 7>a few articles about and definitely some Twitter threads like

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 7>about why this has happened. And I think it's a

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:23.399
<v Speaker 7>confluence of multiple factors, perhaps foremostly activism that has really

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:27.680
<v Speaker 7>you know, especially I'm thinking of the fossil fuel divestment movement,

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:32.679
<v Speaker 7>the Blockadia campaigns, things that really put front and center

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:37.639
<v Speaker 7>fossil fuels and fossil fuel producers and their political complicity

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 7>as much as anything through lobbying and disinformation and so on.

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:43.440
<v Speaker 7>And I think going along with that has been things

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 7>like the economics the warnings of carbon bubbles and stranded

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 7>fossil fuel assets, increasing public health research about the direct

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:54.480
<v Speaker 7>public health harms and fossil fuels, and frankly the economics

0:26:54.480 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 7>of renewables that has increasingly made fossil fuels economically more expensive.

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 7>And so I think it's a number of those factors

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:06.280
<v Speaker 7>that will come together. I would say also it's about courage.

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:09.359
<v Speaker 7>Like I wrote a piece back in like I don't

0:27:09.359 --> 0:27:14.359
<v Speaker 7>know twenty sixteen, seventeen or so in Huffington Post saying

0:27:14.400 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 7>like higher education needs to be braver when it comes

0:27:17.359 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 7>to addressing the climate crisis. And part of that was

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:23.400
<v Speaker 7>about a campaign we were running to try to get

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:26.160
<v Speaker 7>the American Geophysical Union, which is the world's largest earth

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:30.800
<v Speaker 7>science organization, to reject funding from Exomobile. And at the

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 7>same time we were campaign for fossil fuel Divestment MIT

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 7>and students were doing us around the world, and we

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:39.119
<v Speaker 7>were very conscious that the very universities we were asking

0:27:39.320 --> 0:27:42.359
<v Speaker 7>to take climate action were also taking hundreds of millions

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:46.120
<v Speaker 7>of dollars from David Cooch and other fossil fuel interests.

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:49.720
<v Speaker 7>And so I think that there's just been this generational

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:52.639
<v Speaker 7>shift too, in terms of like no longer feeling like

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 7>we have time to waste, in terms of, you know,

0:27:55.440 --> 0:27:57.639
<v Speaker 7>I'm going to get tenure and be really safe before

0:27:57.680 --> 0:28:00.919
<v Speaker 7>I start to address this topic. Although constentity, that is

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:05.880
<v Speaker 7>what has happened to me. But that is purely kind

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:08.359
<v Speaker 7>of coincidence, because you know, like I've been, I've been

0:28:08.400 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 7>writing publicly but in a non academic way about this

0:28:11.840 --> 0:28:14.840
<v Speaker 7>since like twenty sixteen, seventeen, but it's just taking a

0:28:14.840 --> 0:28:16.720
<v Speaker 7>long while to get our ducks in a row because

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:20.400
<v Speaker 7>academics are like, you know, psychhiding cats. But yeah, I mean,

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 7>I think it's just taken a moment for the sort

0:28:24.560 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 7>of the realization that this is a big deal, like

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:32.160
<v Speaker 7>when I testified in the Senate, like very recently, and

0:28:32.680 --> 0:28:35.640
<v Speaker 7>I think perhaps the most interesting documents that came out

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:39.720
<v Speaker 7>of that joint how Senate investigation were the revelations these

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 7>internal oil industry memos showing how strategic and intentional. Their

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 7>infiltration of academia and their weaponization of those relationships has

0:28:48.680 --> 0:28:50.680
<v Speaker 7>been and a lot of people were coming up to

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:53.560
<v Speaker 7>me afterwards and being like, Oh, this whole like academia

0:28:53.600 --> 0:28:56.600
<v Speaker 7>thing actually seems kind of important, And I was like, yeah,

0:28:56.640 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 7>like this is what we've been saying for a while.

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 7>So I don't know, it's just a I guess it's

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:03.680
<v Speaker 7>just the way things happen that sometimes things take a

0:29:03.720 --> 0:29:06.280
<v Speaker 7>moment for people to cotton onto them.

0:29:06.440 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:08.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, actually, now that you're saying it, it's like

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people I know who are doing activism

0:29:10.360 --> 0:29:12.600
<v Speaker 2>in two thousand and nine, twenty ten, like you know,

0:29:12.760 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 2>they grew up and like furthered in their careers, and

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 2>it does seem like academia is more rife with people

0:29:18.680 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 2>who came from a different perspective on this and who

0:29:21.960 --> 0:29:25.440
<v Speaker 2>might have actually had experience on the front lines of

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:29.080
<v Speaker 2>activism versus just coming at this from like an academic perspective.

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 6>You know.

0:29:30.120 --> 0:29:33.000
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, exactly, I think. And that's kind of the general

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 7>trend that we observed that essentially activists and advocates and

0:29:36.560 --> 0:29:40.720
<v Speaker 7>civil society in general has been on the leading edge

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 7>of addressing this and recognizing this problem, and it still is. Frankly,

0:29:45.360 --> 0:29:48.360
<v Speaker 7>it's still frankly the student at activists at places like

0:29:48.400 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 7>Campus Climate Network leading the charge back in twenty twelve

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:55.800
<v Speaker 7>twenty thirteen. Like when we were organizing around fossil fueled

0:29:55.840 --> 0:30:01.320
<v Speaker 7>divestment at MIT, we were explicitly conscious of the fact

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:04.240
<v Speaker 7>that there was also this funding problem. But I guess

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:07.280
<v Speaker 7>alan naive approach was, well, let's solve one problem at

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 7>a time, and we thought, you know, once a MITS divested,

0:30:10.200 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 7>then we'll get onto addressing the funding issue. Unfortunately they

0:30:14.720 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 7>never divested. But actually I just the students miit just

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:20.680
<v Speaker 7>reached out to me the other day and in a

0:30:20.720 --> 0:30:23.480
<v Speaker 7>couple of weeks their graduate student union has a referendum

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:27.360
<v Speaker 7>vote on whether the university should take fossil fuel funding.

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:31.280
<v Speaker 7>So there is a new generation, you know, working on this.

0:30:31.440 --> 0:30:33.400
<v Speaker 2>That ties into my next question, which is folks in

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:35.960
<v Speaker 2>the climate world love the tobacco industry.

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Analogy with good reason.

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 2>Right, and now everyone I've interviewed on the university funding

0:30:41.120 --> 0:30:44.040
<v Speaker 2>aspect brings up the tobacco conversation. And in the early

0:30:44.080 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 2>two thousands, it seems like a lot of the conversation

0:30:46.160 --> 0:30:49.920
<v Speaker 2>around tobacco funding policies was coming from academics and public

0:30:49.920 --> 0:30:53.880
<v Speaker 2>health groups and not the kind of grassroots students and

0:30:53.960 --> 0:30:56.600
<v Speaker 2>frontline folks that we're talking about here. And it does

0:30:56.640 --> 0:31:00.480
<v Speaker 2>seem like as a result, a lot of you university

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:05.120
<v Speaker 2>is very explicitly decided to stop taking tobacco funding or

0:31:05.200 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 2>really put guardrails on other types of funding. No one

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 2>has really been able to do that with fossil fuel

0:31:11.320 --> 0:31:14.760
<v Speaker 2>funding yet, Like, why do you think the response from

0:31:14.880 --> 0:31:17.280
<v Speaker 2>universities to this movement has been so limited?

0:31:17.280 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Have we just not given them enough time?

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 2>Or is it the nature of the request is thornier

0:31:22.480 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 2>than when it comes to you know, pharmaceuticals or tobacco.

0:31:25.800 --> 0:31:28.040
<v Speaker 2>What are some of the sticking points that you've noticed

0:31:28.160 --> 0:31:29.880
<v Speaker 2>in this work and the rest of your work.

0:31:30.360 --> 0:31:32.200
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean, in a way the questions above my

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 7>pay grade. Ultimately, it's university leaders themselves who have to

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:38.800
<v Speaker 7>explain the decision making. I would, you know, to give

0:31:38.840 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 7>them the benefit of the doubt. It has in some

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:46.600
<v Speaker 7>cases been a relatively recent push, you know, like on

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:49.600
<v Speaker 7>the order of a few years by students and faculty

0:31:49.960 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 7>trying to get universities to cut these ties. But in

0:31:52.800 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 7>other cases, I mentioned the American Geo Physical Union. We

0:31:55.720 --> 0:31:58.240
<v Speaker 7>ran a year long campaign and we wrote a whole

0:31:58.280 --> 0:32:03.000
<v Speaker 7>report proving that the EXON sponsorship of the AGU conference

0:32:03.160 --> 0:32:06.760
<v Speaker 7>violated the organization's own by laws. And this is an

0:32:06.840 --> 0:32:12.959
<v Speaker 7>organization of for and by Earth scientists, you know. And

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:16.600
<v Speaker 7>the only way the funding relationship ended was because in

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 7>the end, after like more than a decade or two,

0:32:19.200 --> 0:32:22.160
<v Speaker 7>Exon actually cut their tires. And my only presumption is

0:32:22.160 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 7>that it ended up being on net worse pr than

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 7>good pr for them that we were running this campaign,

0:32:28.600 --> 0:32:34.200
<v Speaker 7>So there is a measurable sort of recalcitrants from universities

0:32:34.240 --> 0:32:37.840
<v Speaker 7>to act on this. And you know, our reports specifically

0:32:37.840 --> 0:32:41.040
<v Speaker 7>shines a spotlight on the failure to disclose like a

0:32:41.080 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 7>failure of transparency to even just provide data on who

0:32:46.320 --> 0:32:48.959
<v Speaker 7>is funding and how much are they funding, let alone

0:32:48.960 --> 0:32:52.640
<v Speaker 7>you know, what are the terms of these these contractual agreements.

0:32:52.840 --> 0:32:55.600
<v Speaker 7>And all the evidence that we have uncovered points to

0:32:55.680 --> 0:32:58.719
<v Speaker 7>the fact that these relationships are and these contracts are

0:32:58.800 --> 0:33:02.320
<v Speaker 7>sometimes really problem in terms of the control that they

0:33:02.400 --> 0:33:05.760
<v Speaker 7>hand to the fossil fuel funders. As far as universities

0:33:05.760 --> 0:33:12.560
<v Speaker 7>are concerned, this is a significant source of revenue and

0:33:12.600 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 7>they obviously I remember once a board member at MIT

0:33:15.520 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 7>telling us it's not so much an issue of should

0:33:19.720 --> 0:33:21.680
<v Speaker 7>they take money from A or should they take money

0:33:21.720 --> 0:33:23.880
<v Speaker 7>from be. They just want to take money from everywhere,

0:33:24.000 --> 0:33:28.160
<v Speaker 7>you know, like anywhere they can find it. And I

0:33:28.160 --> 0:33:31.280
<v Speaker 7>think we're sympathetic as scholars to the fact that funding

0:33:31.720 --> 0:33:35.720
<v Speaker 7>is tight and federal funding has been falling in part

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:37.920
<v Speaker 7>as a result of the politics that the oil industry

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:40.280
<v Speaker 7>has been lobbying in favor of for decades. So there

0:33:40.360 --> 0:33:43.600
<v Speaker 7>is a circularity to all this. So we're not saying

0:33:43.640 --> 0:33:47.960
<v Speaker 7>it's easy and necessarily the immediate response has to be

0:33:48.120 --> 0:33:51.240
<v Speaker 7>just like cutt ale ties overnight. You know, if people

0:33:51.280 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 7>make that response, that's like saying, oh, you're saying we

0:33:54.080 --> 0:33:57.240
<v Speaker 7>should end fossil fuel use tomorrow. It's like it's a

0:33:57.320 --> 0:34:02.480
<v Speaker 7>very reductive oversimplification of raising of concerns and the proposal

0:34:02.520 --> 0:34:06.040
<v Speaker 7>that we, as you said, do more. There are dozens

0:34:06.040 --> 0:34:10.160
<v Speaker 7>and dozens of safeguards that you can impose between doing

0:34:10.200 --> 0:34:13.880
<v Speaker 7>nothing and cutting the ties. And I have another paper

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:17.120
<v Speaker 7>coming out where we really elaborate all those in detail,

0:34:17.160 --> 0:34:20.880
<v Speaker 7>based on the history of tobacco but also pharmaceuticals and

0:34:20.960 --> 0:34:25.480
<v Speaker 7>junk food. I myself have really taken most insight from

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:28.400
<v Speaker 7>those other disciplines where there has been an awful lot

0:34:28.480 --> 0:34:31.600
<v Speaker 7>of scholarship proving that these conflicts of interest often lead

0:34:31.640 --> 0:34:32.120
<v Speaker 7>to bias.

0:34:32.600 --> 0:34:35.799
<v Speaker 2>That's something I sort of noticed in the spring when

0:34:36.360 --> 0:34:39.200
<v Speaker 2>both the documents came out, and then concurrently there were

0:34:39.239 --> 0:34:41.880
<v Speaker 2>all of those campus protests where they were really calling

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:45.480
<v Speaker 2>out the campus ties to like Lockheed and Razeon and

0:34:45.600 --> 0:34:49.560
<v Speaker 2>defense contractors. And I saw a lot of not in

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:51.319
<v Speaker 2>response to the FOSSi Field documents, but a lot of

0:34:51.400 --> 0:34:55.000
<v Speaker 2>university kind of folks who sided with the universities saying, well,

0:34:55.000 --> 0:34:57.759
<v Speaker 2>there's no way to just cut off all funding altogether, right,

0:34:57.880 --> 0:34:59.840
<v Speaker 2>Like where else are we going to get the money?

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:03.799
<v Speaker 2>And I'm glad you mentioned the safeguards because one thing

0:35:03.840 --> 0:35:06.360
<v Speaker 2>that I think is difficult is like there's just no

0:35:06.440 --> 0:35:08.480
<v Speaker 2>way to tell a lot of the time what the

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:11.600
<v Speaker 2>money is going to be used for, Like if Exxon

0:35:11.719 --> 0:35:14.560
<v Speaker 2>is building a dance hall versus if it's funding studies

0:35:14.560 --> 0:35:18.400
<v Speaker 2>on renewable energy. Right, and either a group of students

0:35:18.480 --> 0:35:22.080
<v Speaker 2>or some faculty who want to either do research in

0:35:22.360 --> 0:35:26.560
<v Speaker 2>academic discipline on this or start some sort of group

0:35:26.600 --> 0:35:29.080
<v Speaker 2>on campus, what can they do to kind of root

0:35:29.120 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more down into how funding is used

0:35:32.120 --> 0:35:34.480
<v Speaker 2>at their university, what tools are available to their disposal.

0:35:34.680 --> 0:35:37.600
<v Speaker 7>Well, it's actually interesting you asked that question. If I

0:35:37.719 --> 0:35:40.480
<v Speaker 7>was a little more prepared, i'd have like a perfect response.

0:35:40.560 --> 0:35:46.160
<v Speaker 7>But we are actually in the process of trying to launch,

0:35:46.280 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 7>essentially a global survey to pool all of these insights

0:35:50.200 --> 0:35:54.520
<v Speaker 7>from different campuses, and a lot of this information, probably

0:35:54.560 --> 0:35:56.920
<v Speaker 7>most of it is not on the internet, right, Like

0:35:57.280 --> 0:36:00.239
<v Speaker 7>I can tell you that grad students who go to

0:36:00.280 --> 0:36:03.760
<v Speaker 7>the careers for MIT, at least in my day, Exon

0:36:03.920 --> 0:36:06.000
<v Speaker 7>was a recruiter and they would hand out little stress

0:36:06.000 --> 0:36:08.560
<v Speaker 7>reliever squeezy toys in the shape of an oil barrel

0:36:08.560 --> 0:36:09.520
<v Speaker 7>with the company logo on.

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:10.360
<v Speaker 6>That's crazy.

0:36:10.400 --> 0:36:13.239
<v Speaker 1>They were the shape of an oil barrel. That's insane.

0:36:13.400 --> 0:36:15.040
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I have a photo of it. There was another

0:36:15.400 --> 0:36:18.399
<v Speaker 7>any the Italian oil company sent us like a ten

0:36:18.480 --> 0:36:23.560
<v Speaker 7>thousand dollars custom made horse size toy in the shape

0:36:23.600 --> 0:36:26.200
<v Speaker 7>of the company logo, and it sat in my office

0:36:26.239 --> 0:36:28.560
<v Speaker 7>and we would would ride it like a horse like

0:36:28.600 --> 0:36:33.000
<v Speaker 7>it was like it was it's like so eccentric. So

0:36:33.480 --> 0:36:36.480
<v Speaker 7>like anything you can imagine exists, you know, like students

0:36:36.480 --> 0:36:40.400
<v Speaker 7>that either Camebridge rugs. So I can't remember engineering students

0:36:40.400 --> 0:36:43.480
<v Speaker 7>being required to wear hard hats with the BP logo

0:36:43.560 --> 0:36:46.239
<v Speaker 7>on things like that, you know, like and so I

0:36:46.280 --> 0:36:49.680
<v Speaker 7>think one simple answer is that they should get in

0:36:49.760 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 7>touch like people who want to be involved, because actually

0:36:52.600 --> 0:36:57.680
<v Speaker 7>we are looking for information, and you, as a student

0:36:57.840 --> 0:37:01.360
<v Speaker 7>or a professor at your specific universe, have a unique

0:37:01.360 --> 0:37:04.759
<v Speaker 7>insight into not just the financial ties, but the non

0:37:04.840 --> 0:37:07.759
<v Speaker 7>financial ties, like these weird things that you see and hear.

0:37:09.080 --> 0:37:12.799
<v Speaker 7>Sometimes you will know about the dollar values of contracts

0:37:12.840 --> 0:37:15.880
<v Speaker 7>because they're spoken about on campus, but they're not on

0:37:15.960 --> 0:37:19.640
<v Speaker 7>any official database that the university releases. And we're developing

0:37:19.640 --> 0:37:23.440
<v Speaker 7>the infrastructure to pool all of these insights and give

0:37:23.480 --> 0:37:27.160
<v Speaker 7>us some better statistics on these phenomena. Campus Climate Network,

0:37:27.160 --> 0:37:30.200
<v Speaker 7>which was formerly known as Fossil Free Research, is the

0:37:30.239 --> 0:37:34.160
<v Speaker 7>foremost use led organization campaigning to cut these fossil fuel

0:37:34.160 --> 0:37:37.080
<v Speaker 7>ties at universities. For transparency sake, I should note that

0:37:37.120 --> 0:37:40.279
<v Speaker 7>I'm on the advisory board of Campus Climate Network, and they,

0:37:40.320 --> 0:37:43.160
<v Speaker 7>I'm sure would love for people to reach out, you know,

0:37:43.360 --> 0:37:45.680
<v Speaker 7>anything from providing information all the way up to helping

0:37:45.760 --> 0:37:48.880
<v Speaker 7>launch a new campaign. As another university they're looking to

0:37:48.960 --> 0:37:53.000
<v Speaker 7>help coordinate and facilitate that work. So I think those

0:37:53.040 --> 0:37:55.680
<v Speaker 7>are a couple of the ways at the individual level

0:37:55.760 --> 0:38:00.000
<v Speaker 7>scholars can inform themselves better about the science of comfort

0:38:00.280 --> 0:38:02.840
<v Speaker 7>of interest, and that runs all the way through to

0:38:02.880 --> 0:38:07.240
<v Speaker 7>the responsibility of universities as we discussed, but also journals

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:11.000
<v Speaker 7>implementing better protective measures. Frankly, there are things that politicians

0:38:11.000 --> 0:38:13.799
<v Speaker 7>can do, even at the national level, And as I said,

0:38:14.080 --> 0:38:16.360
<v Speaker 7>we're almost ready to publish a sort of kind of

0:38:16.360 --> 0:38:20.000
<v Speaker 7>comprehensive guidebook if you like, on all those different measures.

0:38:20.280 --> 0:38:22.520
<v Speaker 2>You're totally right where it's like just being in a

0:38:22.560 --> 0:38:24.920
<v Speaker 2>place and being in the culture of a place is

0:38:25.000 --> 0:38:28.000
<v Speaker 2>like way more important than what anyone can do kind

0:38:28.000 --> 0:38:30.440
<v Speaker 2>of from the outside. On the journals thing, I was

0:38:30.440 --> 0:38:34.759
<v Speaker 2>talking to Craig Calendar, he's one of the uses, and

0:38:34.800 --> 0:38:39.800
<v Speaker 2>he told me that pharmaceutical journals have much more regulations

0:38:39.840 --> 0:38:44.319
<v Speaker 2>on disclosing conflicts of interest than energy journal He said

0:38:44.320 --> 0:38:48.200
<v Speaker 2>that like most climate and energy journals don't really require

0:38:48.360 --> 0:38:51.600
<v Speaker 2>the types of disclosures that pharmaceutical journals do. Is that

0:38:51.680 --> 0:38:52.600
<v Speaker 2>something you've seen.

0:38:53.600 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, that's broadly correct. The measures in place for public

0:38:58.200 --> 0:39:02.920
<v Speaker 7>health researchers all levels from you know, disclosures they have

0:39:02.960 --> 0:39:06.799
<v Speaker 7>to make internally within their universities. Yeah, through to disclosures

0:39:06.800 --> 0:39:10.600
<v Speaker 7>they have to make with the journals are much tighter

0:39:10.880 --> 0:39:14.000
<v Speaker 7>when it comes to research that in any way touches

0:39:14.040 --> 0:39:17.040
<v Speaker 7>on areas that tobacco or pharmaceuticals or others might get

0:39:17.040 --> 0:39:20.520
<v Speaker 7>involved in. And in comparison, climate and energy research right

0:39:20.560 --> 0:39:24.000
<v Speaker 7>now is the world West. I think it's certainly something

0:39:24.080 --> 0:39:28.000
<v Speaker 7>that there is already a blueprint in place with safeguards

0:39:28.000 --> 0:39:31.640
<v Speaker 7>against tobacco and pharmaceutical funding to mitigate most of this,

0:39:31.880 --> 0:39:34.440
<v Speaker 7>and so we don't have to reinvent a lot of wheels.

0:39:34.640 --> 0:39:36.960
<v Speaker 7>In many cases, we can just implement these things. So

0:39:37.000 --> 0:39:41.080
<v Speaker 7>it's all about simply compelling those impositions of power and

0:39:41.120 --> 0:39:44.000
<v Speaker 7>decision making to do so. And that's kind of the

0:39:44.040 --> 0:39:47.920
<v Speaker 7>point of this paper is to basically ask the question

0:39:47.960 --> 0:39:51.520
<v Speaker 7>of what do we know already? Because often the first

0:39:51.560 --> 0:39:54.120
<v Speaker 7>step to solving a problem is recognizing there is one,

0:39:54.520 --> 0:39:58.320
<v Speaker 7>and so bringing all of our current knowledge together allowed

0:39:58.360 --> 0:40:01.279
<v Speaker 7>us to realize that although yes, there are many many

0:40:01.320 --> 0:40:06.840
<v Speaker 7>details that need to be further scrutinized, broadly speaking, a

0:40:06.880 --> 0:40:08.919
<v Speaker 7>lot of this thinking has been done when it comes

0:40:08.960 --> 0:40:12.360
<v Speaker 7>to other industries, and so I think that you know,

0:40:12.400 --> 0:40:15.520
<v Speaker 7>we see this as essentially putting university leaders on notice

0:40:15.920 --> 0:40:18.839
<v Speaker 7>that the existing research is clear that this has been

0:40:18.880 --> 0:40:23.560
<v Speaker 7>a massive elephant in the climate and energy policy research realm,

0:40:24.120 --> 0:40:27.400
<v Speaker 7>and they need to start taking it seriously, starting with

0:40:27.520 --> 0:40:31.160
<v Speaker 7>just acknowledging the science of conflicts of interest, because right

0:40:31.200 --> 0:40:34.440
<v Speaker 7>now they basically do the opposite, and they actively solicit

0:40:34.600 --> 0:40:36.840
<v Speaker 7>and encourage this kind of oil industry funding.

0:40:37.040 --> 0:40:38.200
<v Speaker 6>The actual opposite.

0:40:38.840 --> 0:40:42.200
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, the actual opposite.

0:40:46.440 --> 0:40:49.759
<v Speaker 2>So let's get started with the basics. How did you

0:40:49.880 --> 0:40:54.680
<v Speaker 2>get involved in this specific issue given that your academic

0:40:54.719 --> 0:40:57.920
<v Speaker 2>background isn't exactly climate change.

0:40:58.440 --> 0:41:02.239
<v Speaker 6>So I got into this because, yeah, I thought, I

0:41:02.239 --> 0:41:05.040
<v Speaker 6>I've taught environmental ethics for about twenty or thirty years,

0:41:05.520 --> 0:41:09.440
<v Speaker 6>but also I'm a philosopher of science and of philosters

0:41:09.440 --> 0:41:12.640
<v Speaker 6>of science. One sort of thing we look at is methodology,

0:41:12.880 --> 0:41:17.560
<v Speaker 6>and then of course bias, and so you know, those

0:41:17.640 --> 0:41:20.480
<v Speaker 6>two interests sort of collided. At one point a long

0:41:20.480 --> 0:41:23.640
<v Speaker 6>time ago, I co taught a course with Naomi Erski's

0:41:24.239 --> 0:41:28.480
<v Speaker 6>who's the author of Merchants of Doubt and the movie

0:41:28.520 --> 0:41:32.080
<v Speaker 6>Merchants of Doubt, and so this had been on my

0:41:33.080 --> 0:41:37.560
<v Speaker 6>radar for a long time. Then you know, I got

0:41:37.800 --> 0:41:41.560
<v Speaker 6>recruited to the Campus Climate Change Committee, which is the

0:41:41.600 --> 0:41:47.320
<v Speaker 6>only standing academic senate committee in the UC system devoted

0:41:47.360 --> 0:41:51.640
<v Speaker 6>to campus climate change in the whole system. Yeah, in

0:41:51.640 --> 0:41:52.320
<v Speaker 6>the whole system.

0:41:52.880 --> 0:41:53.160
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:41:53.160 --> 0:41:56.400
<v Speaker 6>And actually, when we think about solutions, that's one of

0:41:56.440 --> 0:41:59.240
<v Speaker 6>the biggest ones I think is actually having an academic

0:41:59.280 --> 0:42:03.600
<v Speaker 6>senate committee lends a lot of legitimacy to the climate

0:42:03.920 --> 0:42:08.680
<v Speaker 6>change question. And so then this team, we were approaching

0:42:08.680 --> 0:42:12.719
<v Speaker 6>all sorts of different issues like offsets and climate teaching

0:42:12.840 --> 0:42:15.960
<v Speaker 6>and all sorts of things. And one of the topics

0:42:16.040 --> 0:42:18.440
<v Speaker 6>was then also, of course all the fossil fuel money

0:42:18.719 --> 0:42:22.360
<v Speaker 6>coming in, and so we decided to have an initiative

0:42:22.440 --> 0:42:25.919
<v Speaker 6>on research. And so then I was put in as

0:42:26.239 --> 0:42:29.520
<v Speaker 6>one of the one of the main people thinking about that. So,

0:42:29.920 --> 0:42:31.239
<v Speaker 6>you know, the first thing I did was then look

0:42:31.280 --> 0:42:34.120
<v Speaker 6>at what u SE did with tobacco back in the

0:42:34.320 --> 0:42:38.480
<v Speaker 6>early two thousands, and they tried to ban which would

0:42:38.520 --> 0:42:41.560
<v Speaker 6>be like what the group Fossil Free Research is calling for,

0:42:41.800 --> 0:42:45.280
<v Speaker 6>you know, ban on taking money from fossil fuel industry

0:42:45.719 --> 0:42:49.840
<v Speaker 6>for climate research. Many schools did ban, or many units

0:42:49.880 --> 0:42:54.440
<v Speaker 6>in particularly banned taking tobacco money for medical or health research.

0:42:55.640 --> 0:42:59.440
<v Speaker 6>So surprisingly that failed. That you see, so the University

0:42:59.440 --> 0:43:04.360
<v Speaker 6>of California voted down a tobacco ban by a large

0:43:04.400 --> 0:43:08.960
<v Speaker 6>margin due to worries about academic freedom, but they did

0:43:09.000 --> 0:43:12.080
<v Speaker 6>put in this other policy that we still have that

0:43:12.280 --> 0:43:16.040
<v Speaker 6>mandates a special review of any tobacco money that's accepted,

0:43:16.480 --> 0:43:18.399
<v Speaker 6>and so the chancellor has to form an ad hoc

0:43:18.440 --> 0:43:21.759
<v Speaker 6>committee reviewing it, and I write a public letter if

0:43:21.760 --> 0:43:25.120
<v Speaker 6>it's accepted on why it's justified. And so I thought, well,

0:43:25.160 --> 0:43:27.239
<v Speaker 6>that's not as good as a ban, but you know

0:43:27.360 --> 0:43:30.920
<v Speaker 6>that's if that worked with tobacco, and the fossil fuel

0:43:30.920 --> 0:43:34.520
<v Speaker 6>issue and climate change are even worse, so why not

0:43:34.640 --> 0:43:37.759
<v Speaker 6>just run with this. So it basically just took that

0:43:37.800 --> 0:43:41.799
<v Speaker 6>policy and crossed off the word tobacco and replaced it

0:43:41.800 --> 0:43:45.680
<v Speaker 6>with fossil fuel and then tried to run with that.

0:43:46.160 --> 0:43:47.560
<v Speaker 6>But we were more or less told that that was

0:43:47.600 --> 0:43:49.200
<v Speaker 6>dead on arrival, and.

0:43:49.280 --> 0:43:52.440
<v Speaker 2>Just her timeline like when when did you first get

0:43:52.760 --> 0:43:54.320
<v Speaker 2>involved with the committee itself?

0:43:54.360 --> 0:43:59.560
<v Speaker 6>And like when four years four years ago? Four years ago? Okay? Yeah,

0:43:59.640 --> 0:44:04.319
<v Speaker 6>So then we've switched to a transparency measure because we thought, well,

0:44:04.360 --> 0:44:08.760
<v Speaker 6>transparency seemed to us and it seems to many people,

0:44:09.320 --> 0:44:11.839
<v Speaker 6>you know, all over the place. If I just take

0:44:11.880 --> 0:44:14.880
<v Speaker 6>my dog for a walk and talk to somebody. You know,

0:44:14.920 --> 0:44:19.080
<v Speaker 6>they're all about transparency. So we switched then from this

0:44:19.160 --> 0:44:23.839
<v Speaker 6>kind of special review, not anything bandlike or any kind

0:44:23.840 --> 0:44:25.960
<v Speaker 6>of friction on this. They can still take as much

0:44:26.000 --> 0:44:28.640
<v Speaker 6>money as you want from anyone you want, but it

0:44:28.680 --> 0:44:32.160
<v Speaker 6>would definitely disclose it. And so we pushed this policy

0:44:32.239 --> 0:44:36.239
<v Speaker 6>for about three years and then in May it was

0:44:36.280 --> 0:44:40.520
<v Speaker 6>finally voted on in the Academic Senate UCSD and it

0:44:40.840 --> 0:44:44.800
<v Speaker 6>passed with ninety one percent of the vote, which was great.

0:44:45.760 --> 0:44:48.719
<v Speaker 2>It does it does feel like I think a lot

0:44:48.719 --> 0:44:51.840
<v Speaker 2>of people are just really surprised to hear that that's

0:44:51.920 --> 0:44:55.440
<v Speaker 2>not like a set policy, especially at a public school.

0:44:55.840 --> 0:44:58.759
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so if this policy, which got voted on but

0:44:58.800 --> 0:45:02.600
<v Speaker 6>has not been implemented yet, if it gets implemented, it

0:45:02.640 --> 0:45:06.080
<v Speaker 6>will be by far the most progressive transparency policy in

0:45:06.080 --> 0:45:11.400
<v Speaker 6>the country. I think none of the schools disclose anything

0:45:11.480 --> 0:45:14.439
<v Speaker 6>apart from what they have to more or less so

0:45:14.480 --> 0:45:17.160
<v Speaker 6>that if you take federal money, then the federal government

0:45:17.239 --> 0:45:20.960
<v Speaker 6>insists you disclose. They might encourage you to disclose, but

0:45:21.000 --> 0:45:25.520
<v Speaker 6>you don't have to, and they jealously guard the information.

0:45:26.360 --> 0:45:32.040
<v Speaker 6>So it's not common practice at all. It does surprise

0:45:32.160 --> 0:45:34.480
<v Speaker 6>most people when you talk to them. That, especially a

0:45:34.480 --> 0:45:38.120
<v Speaker 6>big public research university doesn't disclose a lot of this stuff.

0:45:39.160 --> 0:45:41.759
<v Speaker 6>U see does disclose more than most I think, but

0:45:42.640 --> 0:45:47.880
<v Speaker 6>you cannot find if they're like gifts to centers and

0:45:48.400 --> 0:45:51.360
<v Speaker 6>things like that. You cannot find that information anywhere apart

0:45:51.360 --> 0:45:54.680
<v Speaker 6>from a foyer request. So, for instance, the institute I

0:45:54.760 --> 0:45:58.760
<v Speaker 6>co direct, the Institute for Practical Ethics, that would challenge

0:45:58.800 --> 0:46:01.880
<v Speaker 6>you to find out where we get funding. There's no

0:46:01.920 --> 0:46:02.879
<v Speaker 6>way you could find out.

0:46:03.120 --> 0:46:04.920
<v Speaker 2>So I could be talking to you right now, and

0:46:05.000 --> 0:46:08.440
<v Speaker 2>you could be like cashing or your institute could be

0:46:08.520 --> 0:46:12.680
<v Speaker 2>cashing a check from like Chevron, and I just wouldn't

0:46:12.960 --> 0:46:16.960
<v Speaker 2>have any idea unless you chose to disclose. Is that's right?

0:46:17.520 --> 0:46:22.120
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, So the university might disclose some aspects of some grants,

0:46:23.160 --> 0:46:27.120
<v Speaker 6>but not gifts. And if you think about this, I mean,

0:46:27.160 --> 0:46:30.080
<v Speaker 6>if we're going to be now fair and think about

0:46:30.080 --> 0:46:34.799
<v Speaker 6>it from the anti transparency side, you know, from their

0:46:34.840 --> 0:46:38.800
<v Speaker 6>point of view, what's happened is public funding is basically

0:46:38.800 --> 0:46:42.320
<v Speaker 6>plummeted in the universities. They have to make up the gap.

0:46:43.239 --> 0:46:44.520
<v Speaker 6>So a lot of that gap is going to be

0:46:44.520 --> 0:46:48.200
<v Speaker 6>filled by money from industry and then but you have

0:46:48.239 --> 0:46:51.400
<v Speaker 6>other schools. Were not the only school who is funding

0:46:51.440 --> 0:46:55.440
<v Speaker 6>deprived from public funds, they all are, and so then

0:46:55.480 --> 0:46:59.000
<v Speaker 6>it's like a battle against them. And so these donors,

0:46:59.160 --> 0:47:01.640
<v Speaker 6>you know, so they're then it's like a high stakes

0:47:01.719 --> 0:47:06.720
<v Speaker 6>game of poker. And so the idea of disclosing your

0:47:07.239 --> 0:47:10.360
<v Speaker 6>gift funding is like, you know, showing your hand and

0:47:10.400 --> 0:47:13.799
<v Speaker 6>the game of poker from their point of view, of course,

0:47:13.840 --> 0:47:19.600
<v Speaker 6>if everybody showed their hand, you know, then it would

0:47:19.600 --> 0:47:20.520
<v Speaker 6>be we.

0:47:20.440 --> 0:47:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Wouldn't be playing poker, basically playing poker.

0:47:23.560 --> 0:47:27.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, which, Yeah, one of the takeaways that Jeffrey Suprann

0:47:27.440 --> 0:47:30.240
<v Speaker 2>and I were talking about was that there's this robust

0:47:30.320 --> 0:47:34.840
<v Speaker 2>body of research around conflict of interest with regards to

0:47:35.520 --> 0:47:38.400
<v Speaker 2>money from other industries. Like there's a lot around tobacco.

0:47:38.680 --> 0:47:42.759
<v Speaker 2>There's been conversations about fast food funding, but until very

0:47:42.880 --> 0:47:46.200
<v Speaker 2>very recently, the conversation around oil and gas was like

0:47:46.320 --> 0:47:50.240
<v Speaker 2>people noticed it was happening, but it didn't really start

0:47:50.320 --> 0:47:53.360
<v Speaker 2>becoming an issue until like very recently. Does that track

0:47:53.440 --> 0:47:57.040
<v Speaker 2>with your experience in thinking about this and working on this,

0:47:57.120 --> 0:47:59.480
<v Speaker 2>and why do you think it's taken so long for

0:47:59.560 --> 0:48:01.320
<v Speaker 2>folks to kind of start this conversation.

0:48:02.920 --> 0:48:08.080
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, that does track with my understanding. So much of

0:48:08.120 --> 0:48:12.200
<v Speaker 6>the movement and energy was all based around health and

0:48:12.239 --> 0:48:15.360
<v Speaker 6>big pharma, and so you had all of these conflict

0:48:15.400 --> 0:48:20.440
<v Speaker 6>of interest policies and things which were challenged and fought

0:48:20.640 --> 0:48:25.000
<v Speaker 6>step you tooth and nail. From the early seventies, National

0:48:25.040 --> 0:48:29.040
<v Speaker 6>Academy of Science have reports about conflicts of interests with

0:48:29.239 --> 0:48:33.200
<v Speaker 6>big Pharma and so these things. It took decades really

0:48:33.320 --> 0:48:35.040
<v Speaker 6>for a lot of this to all get to the

0:48:35.080 --> 0:48:38.200
<v Speaker 6>where it is now. Even things that you think of

0:48:38.280 --> 0:48:41.640
<v Speaker 6>as like completely consensus, you know, so for instance, that

0:48:41.719 --> 0:48:45.279
<v Speaker 6>there would be internal review board that would review the

0:48:45.320 --> 0:48:48.760
<v Speaker 6>ethics of whether the subjects of an experiment have consent,

0:48:49.280 --> 0:48:52.520
<v Speaker 6>Even that stuff was fought. People are stunned when they hear.

0:48:52.400 --> 0:48:53.760
<v Speaker 1>This, but that's crazy.

0:48:54.719 --> 0:48:57.319
<v Speaker 6>If you just look back a little while, you would

0:48:57.400 --> 0:49:01.040
<v Speaker 6>see that people fought based on that. There like freedom,

0:49:01.440 --> 0:49:04.080
<v Speaker 6>because it's like a restraint on academic freedom. You can't

0:49:04.080 --> 0:49:05.600
<v Speaker 6>do the experiment the way you want it, or you

0:49:05.600 --> 0:49:08.160
<v Speaker 6>have to change the design, maybe you can't even do

0:49:08.200 --> 0:49:12.880
<v Speaker 6>it because it's unethical. And so people thought this. People

0:49:12.920 --> 0:49:15.800
<v Speaker 6>thought all the conflict of interest rules and all the journals,

0:49:15.840 --> 0:49:19.480
<v Speaker 6>they thought everything. I was reading a paper with one

0:49:19.520 --> 0:49:22.440
<v Speaker 6>of the one of the main medical journals, had instituted

0:49:22.480 --> 0:49:26.520
<v Speaker 6>a thing where you couldn't write op ed or editorial

0:49:27.040 --> 0:49:29.359
<v Speaker 6>if you were about a particular drug if you were

0:49:29.360 --> 0:49:31.440
<v Speaker 6>being paid for by the company that made that drug.

0:49:32.200 --> 0:49:35.040
<v Speaker 6>And then the reaction was that this was called the

0:49:35.120 --> 0:49:41.160
<v Speaker 6>new McCarthyism. People are really heated against that sort of thing.

0:49:42.000 --> 0:49:43.960
<v Speaker 6>It's greaz it's so much of the energy. It was

0:49:44.000 --> 0:49:47.360
<v Speaker 6>all there in a big pharma. Yeah, even on like

0:49:47.520 --> 0:49:51.560
<v Speaker 6>core things like just you know, ethical consent forms and

0:49:51.600 --> 0:49:56.840
<v Speaker 6>things like that. This seventies, eighties, nineties, you know, going

0:49:57.320 --> 0:49:59.560
<v Speaker 6>all the way up to eventually you have Obamas the

0:49:59.600 --> 0:50:03.480
<v Speaker 6>Sunshine Act, which most people don't know about. Maybe you

0:50:03.520 --> 0:50:05.799
<v Speaker 6>can go online and then go to a registry and

0:50:05.800 --> 0:50:10.520
<v Speaker 6>then see if your physician is taking money from particular companies,

0:50:10.719 --> 0:50:13.719
<v Speaker 6>and then when the physician recommends a particular drug, you

0:50:13.719 --> 0:50:15.920
<v Speaker 6>can see where they're getting many money from that person

0:50:16.360 --> 0:50:20.520
<v Speaker 6>that that company. So that was actually what the UCSD

0:50:20.880 --> 0:50:22.680
<v Speaker 6>thing was modeled after, is to have a kind of

0:50:22.680 --> 0:50:26.520
<v Speaker 6>public registry like in this Obama Sunshine Act. But that

0:50:26.760 --> 0:50:31.759
<v Speaker 6>was maybe what two thousand, somewhere between two maybe two,

0:50:32.080 --> 0:50:35.160
<v Speaker 6>I guess twenty eleven, But it is around then.

0:50:35.760 --> 0:50:36.680
<v Speaker 2>I feel like that's right.

0:50:36.800 --> 0:50:39.200
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think why it happened there was because you know,

0:50:39.280 --> 0:50:43.080
<v Speaker 6>everyone cares about medicine and health, and there was just

0:50:43.280 --> 0:50:48.160
<v Speaker 6>so much interference. But then as those transparency policies started

0:50:48.160 --> 0:50:52.280
<v Speaker 6>to appear, then you start to see more conflicts of interest,

0:50:52.480 --> 0:50:54.960
<v Speaker 6>and then there's more works now, you know, fast forward

0:50:55.000 --> 0:50:59.640
<v Speaker 6>to the fossil fuel case. You know, have those transparency

0:50:59.680 --> 0:51:03.440
<v Speaker 6>policy and a lot of those journals. It's more theoretical

0:51:03.480 --> 0:51:06.600
<v Speaker 6>and not something the American public cared about as much,

0:51:07.360 --> 0:51:12.000
<v Speaker 6>and so you didn't get as much transparency. The transparency alone,

0:51:12.040 --> 0:51:14.879
<v Speaker 6>of course, doesn't solve the problem at all. Right, it's

0:51:14.880 --> 0:51:17.520
<v Speaker 6>still say you can take the money and be influenced,

0:51:18.360 --> 0:51:21.200
<v Speaker 6>but you know, it's like a necessary condition for finding

0:51:21.239 --> 0:51:24.920
<v Speaker 6>the breadcrumbs that would lead you to serious conflicts of interest,

0:51:25.000 --> 0:51:28.560
<v Speaker 6>and so you need those transparency policies. And we've known,

0:51:29.080 --> 0:51:31.560
<v Speaker 6>really for a long time, but now we know without

0:51:31.719 --> 0:51:34.080
<v Speaker 6>beyond the shadow of the doubt, that there is this

0:51:34.160 --> 0:51:38.960
<v Speaker 6>kind of influence. And that's not just like advertising and

0:51:39.400 --> 0:51:41.960
<v Speaker 6>oh maybe they had to believe the wrong thing or something.

0:51:42.000 --> 0:51:46.880
<v Speaker 6>It's about a deliberate strategy, and that strategy is contrary

0:51:46.920 --> 0:51:48.920
<v Speaker 6>to the mission of the university, which is to produce

0:51:48.920 --> 0:51:54.040
<v Speaker 6>an unbiased knowledge for you know, a democratic republic. So

0:51:54.080 --> 0:51:56.000
<v Speaker 6>you have a lot of people say that money doesn't

0:51:56.040 --> 0:51:59.560
<v Speaker 6>influence our outcomes and things like that, But the scientists

0:51:59.680 --> 0:52:02.960
<v Speaker 6>should be scientific about this. Now we've got a couple

0:52:03.000 --> 0:52:07.399
<v Speaker 6>of decades of evidence, right, it's happening. And so if

0:52:07.400 --> 0:52:13.360
<v Speaker 6>they apply their saying scientific you know, acumen to this problem,

0:52:13.480 --> 0:52:16.839
<v Speaker 6>then you can just see it's a problem. And then

0:52:16.840 --> 0:52:21.320
<v Speaker 6>once you know, now you've got the responsibility of this knowledge.

0:52:21.920 --> 0:52:24.319
<v Speaker 6>And then if you're being used as a weapon, and

0:52:24.360 --> 0:52:26.919
<v Speaker 6>now you know you're being used as what your infrastructures

0:52:27.080 --> 0:52:30.840
<v Speaker 6>allow it you to be weaponized, well, now you have

0:52:30.840 --> 0:52:33.400
<v Speaker 6>a duty to not be a weapon.

0:52:34.719 --> 0:52:36.560
<v Speaker 2>I think everyone kind of thinks they're going to be

0:52:36.560 --> 0:52:40.000
<v Speaker 2>the exception, like, oh, if you know, I wouldn't be

0:52:40.600 --> 0:52:44.719
<v Speaker 2>swayed in my work. And I don't know what you

0:52:44.760 --> 0:52:47.440
<v Speaker 2>think about, but like it's hard to sort of articulate

0:52:47.440 --> 0:52:49.600
<v Speaker 2>where it's like, well, it's kind of not even about you.

0:52:49.719 --> 0:52:52.719
<v Speaker 2>It's just about the fact that this money was delivered

0:52:52.840 --> 0:52:56.560
<v Speaker 2>to the institution you're working at, not out of the

0:52:56.560 --> 0:52:59.880
<v Speaker 2>goodness of this company's heart. You know, it's like a

0:53:00.080 --> 0:53:02.759
<v Speaker 2>tool doesn't know. It's a tool necessarily, it's not a

0:53:02.760 --> 0:53:05.680
<v Speaker 2>comment on the quality of the work even all the time.

0:53:05.840 --> 0:53:09.040
<v Speaker 6>Well, yeah, so have two thoughts about this. What is

0:53:09.080 --> 0:53:12.120
<v Speaker 6>a lot of the work in this area has shown

0:53:12.160 --> 0:53:16.200
<v Speaker 6>that even if you are just the most pure researcher

0:53:16.280 --> 0:53:18.880
<v Speaker 6>in the world, you know, the most innocent, pure research

0:53:18.920 --> 0:53:21.560
<v Speaker 6>in the world, still this money can make it such

0:53:21.600 --> 0:53:24.720
<v Speaker 6>that you're part of a network such that it distorts

0:53:24.800 --> 0:53:28.160
<v Speaker 6>the evidential base. So if you think of when Robert

0:53:28.239 --> 0:53:33.080
<v Speaker 6>Profter showed how he called a distraction science where tobacco

0:53:34.000 --> 0:53:38.880
<v Speaker 6>would fund work on asbesos causing lung cancer, genetics causing

0:53:38.960 --> 0:53:42.680
<v Speaker 6>lung cancer, all that work maybe is perfectly good, and

0:53:42.719 --> 0:53:45.359
<v Speaker 6>all those people are you know, as far as I know,

0:53:45.520 --> 0:53:49.600
<v Speaker 6>there was tobacco funded, but probably weren't doing anything bad science.

0:53:50.840 --> 0:53:54.719
<v Speaker 6>On the other hand, it skews the evidential landscape, you know,

0:53:54.760 --> 0:53:58.560
<v Speaker 6>in a big way. Same thing. I it is probably

0:53:58.560 --> 0:54:01.120
<v Speaker 6>happening now when think of how much money is going

0:54:01.120 --> 0:54:05.319
<v Speaker 6>into carbon capture and storage versus other things. And so

0:54:06.400 --> 0:54:09.600
<v Speaker 6>you as the individual research could rightly say, yeah, it

0:54:09.600 --> 0:54:14.040
<v Speaker 6>hasn't affected my outcomes, But you're part of this social network.

0:54:15.040 --> 0:54:18.319
<v Speaker 6>And when you think about that, so mostly we know

0:54:18.640 --> 0:54:22.319
<v Speaker 6>also that that's not true that it does buy us outcomes.

0:54:22.880 --> 0:54:25.080
<v Speaker 6>I'm saying, even if it didn't buy us outcomes, it

0:54:25.080 --> 0:54:27.680
<v Speaker 6>would still be the case that you could be part

0:54:27.719 --> 0:54:32.400
<v Speaker 6>of this kind of weaponization of the academic structure. And

0:54:32.440 --> 0:54:34.400
<v Speaker 6>then the other thing is, you know, it always reminds

0:54:34.480 --> 0:54:37.279
<v Speaker 6>me of when people say guns don't kill people. People do.

0:54:38.920 --> 0:54:42.200
<v Speaker 6>And you might go to a store later and buy

0:54:42.239 --> 0:54:47.000
<v Speaker 6>a weapon to protect your dogs and cats and have

0:54:47.040 --> 0:54:49.960
<v Speaker 6>only love and peace in your heart. But we still

0:54:50.000 --> 0:54:52.839
<v Speaker 6>know what having like automatic weapons does in the society.

0:54:52.880 --> 0:54:57.200
<v Speaker 6>It changes your incentives, it changes your choices, it changes

0:54:57.400 --> 0:55:01.319
<v Speaker 6>all around you that network, and so it will end

0:55:01.400 --> 0:55:05.359
<v Speaker 6>up leading to more deaths. And so again it's sort

0:55:05.360 --> 0:55:08.800
<v Speaker 6>of failing to appreciate the way the individual and the

0:55:08.880 --> 0:55:10.200
<v Speaker 6>social connect to each other.

0:55:11.040 --> 0:55:15.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, in our society, I think people think

0:55:15.960 --> 0:55:20.399
<v Speaker 2>of professors and researchers as sort of the third leg

0:55:20.480 --> 0:55:25.160
<v Speaker 2>of knowledge, like an informed source. In journalism, we're always

0:55:25.200 --> 0:55:28.400
<v Speaker 2>taught to reach out to academics and confirm studies or

0:55:28.440 --> 0:55:32.920
<v Speaker 2>to talk to you about scientific issues. But the university

0:55:33.560 --> 0:55:37.080
<v Speaker 2>system in the country is so privatized and getting even

0:55:37.160 --> 0:55:41.759
<v Speaker 2>more and more privatized each day, and I'm wondering which

0:55:41.800 --> 0:55:45.239
<v Speaker 2>people should know about the funding system for some of

0:55:45.280 --> 0:55:47.400
<v Speaker 2>these research that they might not know already.

0:55:47.920 --> 0:55:52.200
<v Speaker 6>Yeah. I think people are shocked really when they see

0:55:52.360 --> 0:55:56.920
<v Speaker 6>dependent most researches on getting grants in general, you know,

0:55:57.040 --> 0:55:59.239
<v Speaker 6>most of the grants are from the federal government, but

0:55:59.440 --> 0:56:03.160
<v Speaker 6>still she plays a huge role in many, many different disciplines.

0:56:04.160 --> 0:56:08.240
<v Speaker 6>I think people are shocked. They don't really appreciate that fact.

0:56:09.000 --> 0:56:12.200
<v Speaker 6>It's a big question I think about whether once people

0:56:12.400 --> 0:56:15.680
<v Speaker 6>hear this, whether they'll continue to trust science. Now.

0:56:15.760 --> 0:56:18.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, That's why I think the disclosure is so important,

0:56:18.160 --> 0:56:21.879
<v Speaker 3>because who do you believe, you know, somebody who says, well, OK,

0:56:22.360 --> 0:56:26.080
<v Speaker 3>I have this interest, or somebody who says, no, I'm

0:56:26.160 --> 0:56:26.840
<v Speaker 3>hiding something.

0:56:27.719 --> 0:56:32.400
<v Speaker 2>So the resolution passed in May with ninety one percent support.

0:56:32.600 --> 0:56:35.319
<v Speaker 2>What are the next steps on campus right now?

0:56:35.520 --> 0:56:38.000
<v Speaker 6>Yeah? Good? So I think you know, when we're thinking

0:56:38.000 --> 0:56:40.960
<v Speaker 6>about solutions. The first thing is I think having an

0:56:40.960 --> 0:56:44.360
<v Speaker 6>academic Senate committee to devote to campus climate change was huge

0:56:44.520 --> 0:56:47.919
<v Speaker 6>and so the activist on campus who pushed for that

0:56:48.160 --> 0:56:52.080
<v Speaker 6>were really geniuses. So there was an academic Senate task

0:56:52.200 --> 0:56:55.920
<v Speaker 6>force devoted to climate change in the late twenty teens,

0:56:56.880 --> 0:57:02.399
<v Speaker 6>maybe twenty seventeen or nineteen somewhere around there, and then

0:57:02.480 --> 0:57:04.960
<v Speaker 6>they came up with all these recommendations, and one was

0:57:05.000 --> 0:57:08.520
<v Speaker 6>the formation of this committee, and then it was formed.

0:57:09.600 --> 0:57:12.520
<v Speaker 6>And then having it be a committee meant that it

0:57:12.560 --> 0:57:17.400
<v Speaker 6>gives a legitimacy to the voices on campus who care

0:57:17.440 --> 0:57:20.560
<v Speaker 6>about climate change because now you have a seat at

0:57:20.600 --> 0:57:23.960
<v Speaker 6>the table and can comment on various things that are

0:57:23.960 --> 0:57:27.400
<v Speaker 6>going on. But you could also put forward resolutions and

0:57:27.440 --> 0:57:31.400
<v Speaker 6>then see what the faculty whether they vote on this

0:57:31.520 --> 0:57:35.520
<v Speaker 6>or not. So that was really just a stroke of

0:57:35.560 --> 0:57:39.960
<v Speaker 6>genius and really very unique and right away, you know.

0:57:39.960 --> 0:57:42.600
<v Speaker 6>So we had this memorial go through the whole system.

0:57:42.800 --> 0:57:46.080
<v Speaker 6>It took about a year, but it was basically to

0:57:46.120 --> 0:57:50.000
<v Speaker 6>replace this kind of carbon neutral by whatever date with

0:57:50.280 --> 0:57:55.120
<v Speaker 6>actual emission reduction targets, and implicitly it was it was

0:57:55.400 --> 0:57:59.400
<v Speaker 6>against carbon offsets. You could see we were getting closer

0:57:59.440 --> 0:58:02.640
<v Speaker 6>and closer to carbon neutral, but our missions were going up,

0:58:03.280 --> 0:58:05.440
<v Speaker 6>up and up and up. So how can be getting

0:58:05.440 --> 0:58:08.920
<v Speaker 6>closer to carbon neutral was by buying all these offsets.

0:58:09.760 --> 0:58:13.000
<v Speaker 6>And so we went, we had this memorial go through

0:58:13.000 --> 0:58:17.880
<v Speaker 6>the whole to ten campuses and one resoundingly, I think

0:58:17.920 --> 0:58:21.160
<v Speaker 6>it got about eighty five percent approval. And then we

0:58:21.240 --> 0:58:26.200
<v Speaker 6>have the Climate education requirement that's starting in two weeks

0:58:26.320 --> 0:58:28.680
<v Speaker 6>or three weeks. So already a whole list of courses

0:58:28.720 --> 0:58:31.320
<v Speaker 6>have been approved, so every student will have to take

0:58:31.360 --> 0:58:35.200
<v Speaker 6>this ongoing and then if it spreads to other campuses,

0:58:35.280 --> 0:58:38.080
<v Speaker 6>this could be something that eventually affects hundreds of thousands

0:58:38.080 --> 0:58:40.800
<v Speaker 6>of students. Now I'm off the committee as of just

0:58:41.600 --> 0:58:44.440
<v Speaker 6>a couple of weeks ago, served four years on it.

0:58:44.560 --> 0:58:48.240
<v Speaker 6>I will be very curious to see hopefully the disclosure

0:58:48.360 --> 0:58:51.600
<v Speaker 6>thing will be adopted. You see, like at many schools,

0:58:51.600 --> 0:58:55.040
<v Speaker 6>you have what's called shared governance, and so it's shared

0:58:55.080 --> 0:58:59.720
<v Speaker 6>between the admin and faculty. The admin where I think

0:58:59.720 --> 0:59:02.640
<v Speaker 6>it's to say, we're not fans of the disclosure of policy,

0:59:03.480 --> 0:59:06.280
<v Speaker 6>and so it's been sent to them asking them to

0:59:06.560 --> 0:59:10.040
<v Speaker 6>make a team and to make it happen. So you see,

0:59:10.080 --> 0:59:12.280
<v Speaker 6>has like the president of the whole system, and then

0:59:12.320 --> 0:59:16.480
<v Speaker 6>each each campus has a chancellor, and so the chancellor

0:59:16.520 --> 0:59:20.080
<v Speaker 6>would have to form a team to make this happen.

0:59:21.160 --> 0:59:23.280
<v Speaker 6>So far as I know, I haven't heard of anything

0:59:23.320 --> 0:59:24.320
<v Speaker 6>happening yet.

0:59:24.760 --> 0:59:27.120
<v Speaker 1>So it could sort of sit in limbo.

0:59:28.200 --> 0:59:32.320
<v Speaker 6>Just ask I think, I mean, there would be a

0:59:32.400 --> 0:59:37.320
<v Speaker 6>grave offense to share governance because if ninety one percent

0:59:37.320 --> 0:59:40.320
<v Speaker 6>of the faculty voted in favor of it, it doesn't happen.

0:59:40.800 --> 0:59:43.960
<v Speaker 6>It's about the faculty's own work and money.

0:59:44.080 --> 0:59:48.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so it's it requires like a little bit more implementation,

0:59:48.600 --> 0:59:50.960
<v Speaker 2>but it's it's kind of with the chancellor's.

0:59:50.480 --> 0:59:54.880
<v Speaker 6>Off us now, yeah, and then we'll see what happens.

0:59:54.880 --> 0:59:59.560
<v Speaker 6>Hopefully it happens. But like I said, they weren't fans,

1:00:00.080 --> 1:00:07.120
<v Speaker 6>so I'm not counting my chickens when I talk about

1:00:07.160 --> 1:00:13.400
<v Speaker 6>this with people. The transparency thing opens the doors because

1:00:13.440 --> 1:00:17.480
<v Speaker 6>if you want to give an industrial center money to

1:00:17.520 --> 1:00:20.000
<v Speaker 6>find oil and gas, I'm curious if you agree or not.

1:00:20.040 --> 1:00:22.439
<v Speaker 6>That doesn't seem to have the same ethical layers as

1:00:23.040 --> 1:00:27.360
<v Speaker 6>BP funding a public policy school or Chevron funding.

1:00:28.080 --> 1:00:30.360
<v Speaker 2>You know, I was just looking at numbers for this center.

1:00:30.600 --> 1:00:33.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure you've seen the Columbia Center on Global Energy Policy,

1:00:34.240 --> 1:00:37.160
<v Speaker 2>where their experts are constantly in front of Congress. They

1:00:37.200 --> 1:00:41.000
<v Speaker 2>are doing policy work, and I think that people get

1:00:41.040 --> 1:00:44.280
<v Speaker 2>really defensive, like you said when you mentioned funding, because

1:00:44.280 --> 1:00:46.440
<v Speaker 2>they're like, well, we can't, you know, not take money.

1:00:46.480 --> 1:00:49.120
<v Speaker 2>But it's like, why don't we just start having a

1:00:49.160 --> 1:00:53.439
<v Speaker 2>conversation about where this money is going as a starting point,

1:00:53.440 --> 1:00:55.000
<v Speaker 2>which we're not doing right now.

1:00:55.040 --> 1:00:58.360
<v Speaker 6>You know, I couldn't agree more with what you just said.

1:00:58.360 --> 1:01:02.960
<v Speaker 6>That the money that goes into shaping climate policy and

1:01:03.000 --> 1:01:07.040
<v Speaker 6>that's not disclosed, that's what really bothers me the most.

1:01:07.400 --> 1:01:11.200
<v Speaker 6>So of course, some petroleum engineer gets money from a

1:01:11.240 --> 1:01:15.400
<v Speaker 6>fossil fuel industry, I mean, that's the whole business model,

1:01:15.480 --> 1:01:19.400
<v Speaker 6>and they typically they disclose it all, you know, and that,

1:01:20.160 --> 1:01:23.480
<v Speaker 6>But when you're trying to influence policy, then if even

1:01:23.520 --> 1:01:28.320
<v Speaker 6>our politicians are supposed to reveal their donors, and everyone's

1:01:28.360 --> 1:01:31.920
<v Speaker 6>wanting now the Supreme Court to have to disclose who's

1:01:31.960 --> 1:01:34.880
<v Speaker 6>giving them money and gifts, and we want our doctors

1:01:34.880 --> 1:01:38.120
<v Speaker 6>to disclose money and gifts, whereas everybody have to disclose

1:01:38.640 --> 1:01:43.040
<v Speaker 6>who are trying to influence industry policy except for these

1:01:43.080 --> 1:01:48.200
<v Speaker 6>scientists at these climate centers. That's study by Doug Almon

1:01:48.320 --> 1:01:53.520
<v Speaker 6>at Columbia where he looks at the favorability ratings coming

1:01:53.520 --> 1:01:59.360
<v Speaker 6>out of climate centers comparing natural gas and methane versus renewables.

1:01:59.720 --> 1:02:02.360
<v Speaker 6>I mean, and it's shocking. Really people are under the

1:02:02.400 --> 1:02:05.800
<v Speaker 6>illusion that it doesn't really do anything, but holy moly,

1:02:05.880 --> 1:02:08.040
<v Speaker 6>this money does a lot those centers produce all these

1:02:08.040 --> 1:02:12.680
<v Speaker 6>white papers. Those white papers get used at local level

1:02:12.880 --> 1:02:16.320
<v Speaker 6>to open up an area for fracking, or national level

1:02:16.880 --> 1:02:22.640
<v Speaker 6>congressional evidence dockets just all over the place, and so

1:02:22.720 --> 1:02:27.120
<v Speaker 6>it really does shape national policy and local policy. And

1:02:27.200 --> 1:02:30.400
<v Speaker 6>so it's not the factor I think of why we're

1:02:30.400 --> 1:02:34.000
<v Speaker 6>in the state we're in, but it's definitely a causal factor.

1:02:41.600 --> 1:02:43.920
<v Speaker 1>That's it for this time. We'll be back soon with

1:02:44.040 --> 1:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>another episode in this series. Don't forget to check out

1:02:47.320 --> 1:02:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the print stories that are going along with this series

1:02:50.160 --> 1:02:53.520
<v Speaker 1>as well on our website at Drilled dot Media, and

1:02:53.640 --> 1:02:58.000
<v Speaker 1>of various co publishing partners, including Rolling Stone and Vox.

1:02:58.480 --> 1:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>This episode was mixed and mastered by Peter duff. Our

1:03:02.640 --> 1:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>theme music is Bird in the Hand by Forenoon. Our

1:03:05.960 --> 1:03:09.360
<v Speaker 1>artwork is by Matthew Fleming. You can also check us

1:03:09.360 --> 1:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>out on Twitter we are Drilled, and everywhere else on

1:03:13.880 --> 1:03:17.080
<v Speaker 1>social media at Drilled Media. You can sign up for

1:03:17.120 --> 1:03:20.120
<v Speaker 1>our newsletter on our website as well that comes out

1:03:20.160 --> 1:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>once a week and gives in overview of an important

1:03:23.760 --> 1:03:27.960
<v Speaker 1>story that's happening in the climate universe, plus suggestions for

1:03:28.080 --> 1:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the week's five must read climate stories. It's never more

1:03:32.520 --> 1:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>than a ten minute read, and people tell us it

1:03:34.920 --> 1:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>helps them keep up to date on all things climate