WEBVTT - Bloomberg Businessweek Weekend - September 23rd, 2022

0:00:01.040 --> 0:00:05.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week inside from the reporters and

0:00:05.600 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine Plus

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Global Business, finance and Tech News. As it happened. Miss

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes

0:00:16.520 --> 0:00:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg radio. Hi Everyone, welcome to the

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:24.440
<v Speaker 1>weekend edition of Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Tim Stanovic. Carol

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Master will be back next week. The Federal Reserve firing

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 1>its latest salvo in the fight against inflation on Wednesday,

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:34.839
<v Speaker 1>announcing a third consecutive jumbo interest rate hike. The FMC

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 1>raised its policy interest rate by three quarters of a

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 1>percentage point, and we anticipate that ongoing increases will be appropriate.

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>We are moving our policy stance purposefully to a level

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 1>that will be sufficiently restrictive to return inflation to two that,

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 1>of course, was the voice of Fed share j Powell.

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 1>The question is whether continued tightening will prove to be

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>too much too soon. We'll discuss that prospect with our

0:00:57.720 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>business week team. Also ahead on the program optimism about

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the Labor picture at a critical US trade hub. We'll

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:06.960
<v Speaker 1>talk with the executive director at the port of Long Beach,

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:09.399
<v Speaker 1>and then we'll go beyond our borders for a look

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 1>at China's decades long effort to build the ultimate surveillance state,

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>and a business week reveals its annual ranking of the

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 1>world's top NBA programs, and our cover story explores the evil,

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 1>genius and incredible success of Apple's air pods. All of

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:25.760
<v Speaker 1>that to come, though. We begin with the Global Monetary

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Policy Picture. The economic section this week has a piece

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 1>about the big gamble that central banks around the world

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 1>are following the Fed's lead and raising rates. For More

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:37.119
<v Speaker 1>Carol and I spoke with Business Week editor Joe Weber

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg's rich Miller. You know, it's incredible. When you

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:42.760
<v Speaker 1>look through it. It's like nineties central banks of you know,

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 1>hiked and you know like more than half of them

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:46.759
<v Speaker 1>have hiked by pre court as some of the more

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>more than that, as you say, like everybody's trying to

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 1>out Haaulk each other, right, and there are some people worried,

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, with everybody going in the same direction, the

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 1>boat's going to tip over into global recession. Right. So

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 1>that's one thing and the other thing is when the

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>raise rates, you first see it in the stock market,

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 1>stock market weekends. Then you sort of see it in,

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, the housing market, the Housing Market Solce, and

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>it comes at the very end, it comes into inflation. But,

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:15.919
<v Speaker 1>as you say, if they're myopically, you know, focusing on inflation,

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>that means they're probably going to Overdo it and that's

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna push us into a recession, maybe your recession. You know,

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:25.800
<v Speaker 1>all all around the globe rich and we're talking millions

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:27.920
<v Speaker 1>of jobs here. As you write in your piece, analysts

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>at black rock reckon that bringing inflation back to the

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>feds two goal would mean a deep recession and three

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 1>million more unemployed, and then also hitting the ECBES target

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:39.960
<v Speaker 1>would require an even bigger contraction. All that, right now

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>is is spelling out a global recession, something that affects

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the entire globe. So what does this look like when

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 1>it comes to economic growth? Translating that three million unemployed

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:53.079
<v Speaker 1>into like growth, you you probably have two, two, and

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:57.800
<v Speaker 1>a contraction in the economy, in the U S economy. Uh,

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 1>an actual contraction as opposed to sort of, you know,

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the sort of phony contraction that we got earlier this

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>year when it was mainly because we were importing more.

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 1>But you know, this would be actual contraction and you

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:10.360
<v Speaker 1>know pain, the pain would be in the labor market.

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 1>And you know, one of the questions is, you know,

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 1>you know the politicians now, with the most part except

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:20.080
<v Speaker 1>for UH senator war, and they're sort of cheering the

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Fed on. Yeah, inflations bed. Go ahead, fed, raise the race.

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:26.680
<v Speaker 1>But you know, once, once you start seeing some pain,

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 1>j Powell has promised us, you you wonder whether the

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>politicians will change their tune, which were already saying pain.

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 1>And it made me want to ask you about lag effect.

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 1>What is it really I mean we're seeing it already

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 1>on housing, but the successive and cumulative interest rate hikes

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>by global central banks right all of a sudden, I

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 1>feel like it's like when you know you've got a

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 1>clog and you're pushing through, nothing's happening and then all

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden it comes flying through. I'm waiting for that.

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Is that what's going to happen? I mean, that is

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>the danger and that's in the past why the central

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>banks would when they did race rates, they'd go in

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>small steps, like basis points. So you go, you go

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 1>slowly and you see that you know you have a

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 1>little more time to see what they impact your rates

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 1>were having. You know so, but when you're going and

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 1>when you're galloping ahead in like seventy five basis point chunks,

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, you don't have as much time to sort

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 1>of gauge how how the earlier hikes were are affecting growth. And,

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 1>as you say, housing is kind of in the crosshairs here.

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>But you know, if housing weekends and you know, people

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:35.919
<v Speaker 1>are buying lesser appliances, people Um feel that their house

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>prices are going down and they're gonna save more and

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:42.719
<v Speaker 1>that just has ripples. So it just takes time. But

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:46.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, as you say, it could sort of be like,

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:51.039
<v Speaker 1>you know, an exploding toilet right could splash right into

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:53.799
<v Speaker 1>our faces. But I don't want to be graphic here.

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Joe was known for some gracy. No, I know the

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:04.360
<v Speaker 1>bar bag was the favorite. Might need to dust that

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 1>one off. Look for the you know, your passenger next

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 1>to you. You can get there. Back to Um rich.

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that I thought was a little

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 1>bit frightening, that I hadn't totally appreciated was um the

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:21.679
<v Speaker 1>growth forecast charts in your story US goes down pretty

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:25.039
<v Speaker 1>dramatically when you start to look out euro area worse.

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>UK Man, that looks really bad from the sense of

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:31.159
<v Speaker 1>the folks that you talked to in the daddy that

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at it is it starting to feel like

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 1>there's that pit in the stomach that's like, Oh God,

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:37.799
<v Speaker 1>this is going to get really bad. Truth be told,

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the U S we you know, we've held up surprisingly well.

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 1>The Labor markets held up pretty well. The problem in

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the US is we've got this you know, embedded inflation problem.

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:50.479
<v Speaker 1>That the strongest the economy is, it means probably the

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Fed's going to have to work that much harder to

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>slow things down, and that's when you know, you you

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 1>get risk that they slow it down too much and

0:05:57.440 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 1>we go slip in into a recession rich real quickly.

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Just Kinda at here. Is Inflation still a supply problem

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>or is it now kind of more demand problem, and

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>that's where the Fed can do something. I think in

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the US it's probably becoming more and more demand problem,

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 1>particularly in the labor market with, you know, wages are

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>going up about five six percent a year and to

0:06:21.760 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 1>be consistent with the Fed's target they have to be

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>going up three and a half percent. So I got

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>a long way Togo that's why people think unemployment's gonna

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 1>have to go up a lot. So workers finally get

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>a break and now it's like, yeah, I'm sorry about that,

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 1>it's not a good thing. We won't blame you, rich

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:40.479
<v Speaker 1>or we can all started here, because the rich Miller

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:43.600
<v Speaker 1>is excellent reporting. He's in DC, so there's nothing you

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:48.359
<v Speaker 1>can do directly. That was Bloomberg Economic Editor Rich Miller,

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>along with business week editor Joel Weber, and coming up

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 1>optimism on the Labor front and on supply chains at

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:59.039
<v Speaker 1>America's second busiest port. Mario Cordero, executive director of the

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 1>port of Long Beach, joins US next. You're listening to

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week. This is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Business

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim stinnoby

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg radio. It's the second busiest port in North America,

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 1>generating some two point six million jobs across the US,

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 1>with some seventy five shipping lines connecting long beach to

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and seventeen seaports. So just how healthy do

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 1>our supply chains look right now, with a smaller backlog

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 1>and fading concerns about potential work stoppages at our docks

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and on the nation's rail system. With more on the

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 1>state of our shipping in cargo industry, we welcome back

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the executive director of the port of Long Beach, Mario Cordero.

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 1>When you look at the metrics here, currently we have

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 1>in the San Peter Bay Complex twelve vessels backed up

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to get into the ports. So if you go

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 1>back to January, that number was one hundred and nine.

0:07:57.560 --> 0:08:00.120
<v Speaker 1>So just on that alone it's a tremendous progress is

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>being made. Is Any of that seasonal? You know we're

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>in peak season right now and I think we're at

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the peak, so to speak. Again you're looking at the

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>numbers of the consumer demand or some softening on that.

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 1>So for the third and fourth quarter of the year,

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I think we're looking to diminish demand turns on the

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 1>consumer front. I feel like you have such a great

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 1>vantage point when it comes to you what's going on

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 1>on an economy and we're all kind of on pins

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:24.240
<v Speaker 1>and needles trying to figure out what comes next. What

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 1>is your read on the state of the U S

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 1>economy right now? I think we have a strong economy.

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 1>We certainly have a strong labor market and keep in

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:35.560
<v Speaker 1>mind where we were two years ago. I think part

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 1>of the two years was terrible, right, the outlier. So

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 1>are we pre pandemic levels? Are Like? How do you

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:44.400
<v Speaker 1>in terms of in terms of the job market? I

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:46.679
<v Speaker 1>think we're approaching pre pandemic levels in terms of the

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:49.719
<v Speaker 1>jobs that have been added since then. But I think

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the point is we've had a very fast recovery from

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 1>a worse scenario that we experience. So in that regard

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the economy was real hot and now, of course, what

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to do as a nation is kind of

0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:03.079
<v Speaker 1>soften that. When you look at the activity at the port,

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's really just fascinating about just the the amount

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:11.079
<v Speaker 1>of flow through there and what the imports of the

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>exports moving through your port. Largest trading partner country is China,

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 1>which accounts for so much of it. Does recession come

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 1>to your mind a lot in terms of the activity

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:24.560
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing? A good friend of mine, economist Paul Bingham,

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:27.320
<v Speaker 1>who has been following this industry for many, many years,

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:29.840
<v Speaker 1>once said tell me how many containers go through the

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Poort Long Beach and I'll tell you how good the

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 1>economy is. So so far good. Is Inflation a concern? Yes. However, again,

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the latest plan of action by

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve, they believe they may be able to

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 1>control this. Will wait to see what that decision is, uh,

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 1>in the coming week, whether that's point seven, five or one,

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:52.200
<v Speaker 1>oh increase. But I think it's safe to say that

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 1>again we went through an unusual quick recovery. The consumer

0:09:56.880 --> 0:09:59.599
<v Speaker 1>demand has really been extraordinary in the last year and

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>a half. Energy prices have gone down. Admittedly, grocery prices

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:06.320
<v Speaker 1>have gone up. So I think what we're looking to

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>is again a very good job market, good consumer demand, considerably, uh,

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 1>considerable in terms of what we experienced puriously. But again

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 1>we are looking at some economic growth, certainly in the

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 1>global arena and at the United States. I think we're

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 1>going to feel some of that also. So it sounds

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>like you're saying we're not in a recession right now. Today.

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 1>We're not. I mean, you know, is it removing towards

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 1>your recession? Fore? I mean there's a debate. I know

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 1>that all this is uh highlights. How many like do

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:40.840
<v Speaker 1>people book? Help me out with, like the shipping understanding shipping,

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 1>having recently been at the Panama Canal fascinating to just

0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:47.119
<v Speaker 1>understand it. Same thing with your report. Do our companies

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:50.559
<v Speaker 1>booking for December? Are they booking for November? Like, how

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 1>much visibility or how much forward looking visibility do you

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:56.080
<v Speaker 1>actually have to get an idea of? Wow, things are

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:58.320
<v Speaker 1>going to slow down. Well, what I can tell you

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 1>is part of the problem that we variance here in

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the nation's largest, most strategic gateway is the advancing of

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 1>that inventory. So, looking forward, some of these companies were

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:10.080
<v Speaker 1>advancing the inventory, but they certainly didn't want to put

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:12.840
<v Speaker 1>us back to where we were in the second half

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 1>of uh so I think, uh, it's interesting to watch.

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's some bigger company to start looking at

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 1>their labor force. Uh. But at this point I will

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:26.960
<v Speaker 1>say that in terms of the coming holiday Christmas season,

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be very well established in terms of that

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:34.319
<v Speaker 1>inventory because much of that has been advanced already. It's

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:36.679
<v Speaker 1>already it's already where it needs to be. Right I

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 1>mean for the poor lamumage. If you look at the

0:11:38.200 --> 0:11:41.640
<v Speaker 1>first eight months of this year, we've superseded the numbers

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:44.439
<v Speaker 1>of our record year last year at this point by

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:47.559
<v Speaker 1>four point six percent. So that's kind of an indicator

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 1>in terms out of continued volume. But again, it's gonna

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 1>be interesting to see how we end the third and

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 1>approach the fourth quarter, because it doesn't make me feel

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 1>like people are pulling a lot of stuff forward because

0:11:56.480 --> 0:11:58.200
<v Speaker 1>they just don't want to be caught off guard like

0:11:58.240 --> 0:12:00.560
<v Speaker 1>things can get it more expensive, so they're buying now. Yeah,

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 1>or empty shelves, and you don't want that in Christmas rights,

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:06.680
<v Speaker 1>but especially if you're a retailer. Correct, and I firmly

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:09.079
<v Speaker 1>believe we're not going to see that scenario for sure. Hey,

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:11.120
<v Speaker 1>tell us a little bit about what you're saying based

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:14.200
<v Speaker 1>on where poor traffic is coming from and what that

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 1>says about economies around the world. I know you guys

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 1>have a really good view on Asia. Is there any

0:12:19.400 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 1>softness there? What we see in Asia, more specifically China?

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>You are seeing a slowdown there. UH, in China. So

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:28.320
<v Speaker 1>that is the domino effect. But is that? Is that

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 1>based on lockdowns in China? Is it based on the

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:33.840
<v Speaker 1>covid zero policy, or is it is it all tied

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:37.679
<v Speaker 1>to that? It's all tied to what precipitated these times,

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 1>that is, the covid nineteen pandemic. So I think again, Um,

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:44.319
<v Speaker 1>we'll see how China handles this. I mean the good

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:45.680
<v Speaker 1>news is I don't think you're going to see the

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of lockdowns in China and we saw in the

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 1>past because they're also watching their numbers in terms of

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 1>their economic growth. So there'll be a softening and as

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:57.720
<v Speaker 1>we approach three I believe that the good news the

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:00.840
<v Speaker 1>supply change. Certain United States. I think we're now seeing

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:05.080
<v Speaker 1>some semblance of normalization and moderation and supply change, so

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:07.840
<v Speaker 1>that's very good news. Why is it still such a

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:10.680
<v Speaker 1>lag or such a problem and not back to what

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:12.839
<v Speaker 1>it should be? I think a lot has to do

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 1>at the congestion in the inland in the model yards.

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean this goes back to Chicago in the hubs there.

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>I think the class one railroads have been rather challenge.

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:24.679
<v Speaker 1>They have their own challenges, would be regard to shortage

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 1>of labor and equipment issues. So I think unfortunately we've

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 1>been the victims of the lack of that rail car

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 1>which in my view, should not happen at the world's

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 1>most strategic, significant gateway. I am disappointed on that point

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:40.960
<v Speaker 1>that it's happened. We're talking with Mario Coudero. He's executive

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:42.959
<v Speaker 1>director of the port of Long Beach. As we said,

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 1>it is the second busiest port in North America and

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:47.840
<v Speaker 1>so a great way to get a feel of what's

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 1>going on in the economy. Do you feel like, based

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>on what happened and the supply chain problems and just

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:57.320
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't just port issues, but it was trucking, it

0:13:57.360 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 1>was just kind of all along the line, that we

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 1>will ultimately see in some ways, more automation potentially come

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:04.840
<v Speaker 1>into this industry? I think the good news for those

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 1>of us in this industry people finally saw the importance

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>and witness the importance of a supply chain. We all

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 1>found out that the supply chain is not as resilient

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:17.080
<v Speaker 1>as some people may have thought. We took it for granted.

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:20.239
<v Speaker 1>We took it for granted. So you know, the essential workforce,

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 1>which includes obviously our safety officers, are people in the

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 1>health industry during this pandemic, but also are people who

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 1>work in goods movement, people who work, men and women

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 1>who work on the docks, the truckers, the railroad workers,

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 1>essential workers who moved commerce, which has a great impact, obviously,

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 1>on our GDP, our economy. So I think the good

0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 1>news for us is. It's not just about talk of

0:14:41.440 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 1>how importance this industry is. We've seen it, particularly from

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 1>this administration, in terms of the investment, the funding in

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 1>this industry in America Sports. That was Mario Cordero. He's

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the executive director at the port of Long Beach. Still

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 1>had on Bloomberg Business Week. We go from ships to

0:14:55.760 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 1>cars and the US auto giant playing the long game

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to winning the race to the top

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 1>of the E V food chain. This is Bloomberg Broadcasting

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 1>from the financial capital of the world, Bloomberg Eleven, trio

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>in New York, to Washington, D C, Bloomberg to Boston,

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg one, Oh six one, to San Francisco, Bloomberg nine,

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 1>six to the country Sirius Xm, Channel One ninety and

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 1>around the globe the Bloomberg business and Bloomberg radio DOT COM.

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 1>quick takes. Tim Stenovan on Bloomberg Radio. The iconic American

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 1>automaker General Motors wants to be the tortoise, not the hair,

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 1>in the great electric vehicle race. That's according to Bloomberg News.

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Detroit Bureau Chief David Welch the story in the business

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 1>section of this week's issue of the magazine, and it's

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 1>adapted from David's newly released book charging ahead. GM, Mary

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Barra and the reinvention of an American icon. And the

0:15:56.960 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>company is betting that a slew of e V models

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 1>due next year will prove the wisdom of its deliberate pace.

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 1>So Business Week editor Joe Webber, Carol and I asked

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 1>David White. GM has trailed the competition despite being an

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 1>early mover in the e V space. GM at its

0:16:11.440 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 1>heart is a really pragmatic company and one thing people

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 1>forget about Mary Barrow, because they see her as the

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 1>first email CEO, is she's an engineer and her sidekick,

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Mark Royce is also an engineer. So for the first

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 1>time since the sixties the company is run by engineers.

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 1>They don't go for buzz. They don't try to jam

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 1>a battery in an existing vehicle to get on the

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 1>cover of business week, although that lightning cover was really,

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 1>really well done by my tellings. They you know, they decide, okay,

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:43.080
<v Speaker 1>we're going to build a battery pack that can host

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 1>everything from a little Chevy Equinox and actually even smaller

0:16:45.840 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 1>they're working on subcompacts for global markets all the way

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 1>up to this huge nine thousand pound Hummer and everything

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 1>in between. And they're going to build their battery plants. So,

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 1>other than Tesla, GM has the only battery plant making

0:16:56.640 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 1>battery packs and sells. It's in Orangetown, Ohio. It's going

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 1>right now. The second one is going to open in

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Spring Hill, Tennessee, near the old Saturn plant, next year. Again,

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 1>engineering mindset. Get your building blocks in place, get your

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:11.160
<v Speaker 1>plants up, then you spawn this huge family of evs.

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:14.880
<v Speaker 1>What your story really injes on is this ultium, which

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 1>is the battery platform. So what is Jim Hoping to

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:20.399
<v Speaker 1>accomplish there and where does this potentially allow them to go?

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Right now they've got too luxury electric vehicles in production.

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:27.240
<v Speaker 1>They've got the Big Hummer and they've got a cadillac lyric,

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:31.639
<v Speaker 1>and this is sort of historic. GM goes back to Alfredson.

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Start off with your coolest stuff in your luxury brands

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 1>and then slowly got down the scale. And next year

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:40.159
<v Speaker 1>they'll have chevy silverado pickup, which the year behind, but

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 1>we'll compete with the fine fifty lightning. Then they have

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the Chevy bloody midsize. That should be family car for

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people. Not Super Cheap but pretty cheap.

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:51.679
<v Speaker 1>Then about this time next year the Chevy Equinox. The Equinox,

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:54.119
<v Speaker 1>now that no one buys families and dams anymore, equinox

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 1>is really Chevy's family car. And they're going to start

0:17:56.600 --> 0:17:58.879
<v Speaker 1>this thing at thirty thousand which, other than the bold,

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:02.040
<v Speaker 1>which again compact, are Americans still like complex, will be

0:18:02.040 --> 0:18:04.359
<v Speaker 1>the cheapest on the market. And it really to me

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 1>that is it's two things. It's really the fruit of

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 1>this whole Al team thing. They believe they've got the

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:13.200
<v Speaker 1>scale and the platform where they can democratize electric vehicles

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 1>by bringing mass market family card to people who don't

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 1>have three other four expensive vehicles in their garage. And

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the other thing is it really is a litmus test

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:23.679
<v Speaker 1>or how ready Middle America is to go with battery

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 1>powered vehicles and charge up the secret sauce. Seems to

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 1>be this ultimum about it, and you write that it's

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:32.359
<v Speaker 1>really about changing the way cars are made. So what's different? Ultimate? Basically,

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:34.159
<v Speaker 1>it's a battery pack that makes up the floor of

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the vehicle. This is way over simplification of the guys

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and the factories. And you're not doing that because I'm

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:42.200
<v Speaker 1>a girl, are you? I am the daughter of an engineer,

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:45.640
<v Speaker 1>so you can. You can go with it. I'm doing

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:49.879
<v Speaker 1>it because assembly board, but you're basically bolting whatever vehicle

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 1>it is on top of that skateboard kind of platform.

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 1>It's not quite a skateboard, but close enough, so you

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 1>can and it's also sort of a Lego set. So

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 1>if you need to build it longer or wider or

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:03.679
<v Speaker 1>shorter or whatever, you can do that. The other thing

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 1>they can do, and this is what they've done with

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the Hummer, you can actually stack them on top of

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:10.119
<v Speaker 1>each other. So if you have a big, heavy vehicle

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 1>that has a thousand horse power, which the Hummer does,

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 1>so you need a lot of power on board, you

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 1>can just add more battery, which we have more electricity

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:19.879
<v Speaker 1>by stacking these cells on top of each other. She

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 1>can have a big and wide and you can stack

0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:24.719
<v Speaker 1>them up for more energy. There's just really is kind

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 1>of like a Lego said, but this really is. This

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:30.119
<v Speaker 1>is commercializing electric the battery itself doesn't have any special

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:33.200
<v Speaker 1>chemistry or special sauce. It's a commercialization and an industrial

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:35.919
<v Speaker 1>plan and you know, always interesting. We also had this

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:38.199
<v Speaker 1>hurts knows that. Hurts is going to get into this.

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 1>So so clearly to have the scale and bring the

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:43.120
<v Speaker 1>cost down. You know hurts is liking what they see

0:19:43.160 --> 0:19:45.119
<v Speaker 1>out of GM. But so how does how does that

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of fit into bars master plan here? GM's plan

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:52.399
<v Speaker 1>is to sell a million evs in the US and

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I think really the only one who would be probably

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:58.399
<v Speaker 1>doing that by then Tesla and some Manoa sta. GM

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 1>could be ahead by then because dog fleet. But it

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:04.399
<v Speaker 1>gives them, it gives gm a lot of different vehicles

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of potential, a lot of production in

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 1>their for potential sales line. So hurts likes what they

0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 1>see because they're saying they're going to buy vehicles from

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:17.440
<v Speaker 1>five different GM brands, so Buick, Cadillac, Chevy, GMC and

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:20.359
<v Speaker 1>also bright drop, which is GM's commercial band business. And

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 1>so clearly hurts seas enough that GM has got enough

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:27.200
<v Speaker 1>production in their plan where over the next five years

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:30.439
<v Speaker 1>they can buy a hundred and seventy five vs. that

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 1>was Bloomberg News. Detroy Bureau chief David Welch. David's new

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:37.200
<v Speaker 1>book charging ahead GM, Mary Barra and the reinvention of

0:20:37.240 --> 0:20:40.359
<v Speaker 1>an American icon is out now. Jill Leber there with

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:42.720
<v Speaker 1>us as well, and we should note that David helped

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>to break the news from this past week that hurts

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:47.959
<v Speaker 1>plans to buy as many as one seventy thousand evs

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 1>from General Motors over the next five years. So a

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 1>big win for GM on that front. You're listening to

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week. Up next the story about China's Communist

0:20:56.560 --> 0:20:59.359
<v Speaker 1>Party is building a new kind of political control and

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 1>shaping the will of the people through the sophisticated and

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:05.960
<v Speaker 1>often brutal harnessing of data. This is Bloomberg Business Week

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:16.399
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg radio. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovik from Bloomberg radio.

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:25.359
<v Speaker 1>Last week's Business Week cover story profile a Chinese spy

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 1>who wanted general electrics trade secrets, and he ended up

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:31.159
<v Speaker 1>giving the U S Intel on China instead. We know

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:34.400
<v Speaker 1>espionage and the surveillance of other countries or nothing new,

0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 1>but when it comes to domestic surveillance, China is taking

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the practice to an entirely new level. Wall Street Journal

0:21:40.920 --> 0:21:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Reporters Josh Chen and Liza Lynn are out with a

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:47.159
<v Speaker 1>new book surveillance state, inside China's quest to launch a

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>new era of social control. Carol and I began our

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:53.119
<v Speaker 1>conversation by asking Josh about the situation on the ground

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:56.480
<v Speaker 1>for the average citizen in the People's Republic. If you're

0:21:56.680 --> 0:22:00.240
<v Speaker 1>walking down the street in China, especially these days with Covid,

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:02.600
<v Speaker 1>you're being you're being tracked in any number of ways.

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 1>There are cameras with, you know, facial recognition capabilities that

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 1>can they can pick your face out of a crowd.

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Cameras can can identify you by the way you walk.

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 1>There are microphones that can grab your voice and these days,

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, everyone's walking around with a covid health tracking

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:20.359
<v Speaker 1>APP in their pocket that tracks where they've been and

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:23.200
<v Speaker 1>how they've been exposed, whether their their level of exposure

0:22:23.240 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 1>to uh to covid. A lot of things being tracked and, Lisa,

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 1>both you and Josh like kind of cover this world

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:32.959
<v Speaker 1>and the different aspects of the book. I want to

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:36.400
<v Speaker 1>get into what was the story and the reality that

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:39.399
<v Speaker 1>you were looking to tell in terms of the area

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 1>that that you really cover, and you cover a lot

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 1>of US business and Chinese topics. You look at Silicon Valley.

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 1>So what is it that you wanted to tell when

0:22:47.760 --> 0:22:49.880
<v Speaker 1>you guys set out to do this book together? Yeah,

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:52.800
<v Speaker 1>on on my part, you know. Um, I guess I

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:55.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't set out to tell this, but in the process

0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 1>of research I had some really interesting findings and one

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:01.879
<v Speaker 1>of the findings was really how you know, US tech companies,

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 1>particularly those in Silicon Valley, pioneers, such as like Sun

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Microsystems and Cisco. They were one of the first building

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 1>blocks of the Chinese surveillance stage back in like the

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:16.960
<v Speaker 1>year two thousand, when China helped one of its first

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:20.200
<v Speaker 1>security public security expos and the police was there to

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 1>basically look at what companies had on offer. Like it

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:27.680
<v Speaker 1>was mainly Western companies that were selling the systems there

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:31.679
<v Speaker 1>to them. I guess, to kind of summarize like how impactful,

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 1>like some of the U s companies were, like Sun Microsystems,

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 1>ended up selling China it's first fingerprint database, which is

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 1>a sizable project for a country the size of China.

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Fast forward to today. Um, what Josh and I did

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 1>was we poured through several Chinese government contracts, particularly those

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:54.120
<v Speaker 1>looking at the surveillance systems bought by police, and what

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 1>we realized was U s companies now weren't selling systems,

0:23:57.800 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 1>but they were selling components, like part that built the

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 1>surveillance day. There was selling everything from low end hardware

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:11.080
<v Speaker 1>like heart described, because video surveillance requires a lot of storage,

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:15.920
<v Speaker 1>to things like cutting edge chips, you know graphic processing

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 1>units sold by nvidia gpus, which originally were built to

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>power like gaming, but actually we found that they're great

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:28.639
<v Speaker 1>for deep learning and all the ai applications, like facial recognition,

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 1>for example, that can recognize like readers or people interests

0:24:32.119 --> 0:24:35.400
<v Speaker 1>in China. So the limits right that the US has

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 1>been imposing on the likes of Nvidian a m D

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 1>to prevent them from selling into China, Lisa. So this

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:45.360
<v Speaker 1>is something that could ultimately impact China's ability in terms

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 1>of surveillance of those folks that are in the country. Yes, Um,

0:24:50.119 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 1>in theory, you know, the supply chain is very opaque.

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Um that there are all sorts of ways and means

0:24:57.080 --> 0:25:00.439
<v Speaker 1>that Chinese companies can get around like being on a

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 1>trade black list, for example, or, you know, buying restrictions.

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:07.399
<v Speaker 1>And I'll probably point you to an example of a

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Chinese company called since time. Since time is China's large

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 1>as AI surveillance company and since time it's both on

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the entity list, the Commerce Department trade blacklist, and it

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:23.719
<v Speaker 1>is on the investment black list. So US investors cannot legally,

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 1>they're not allowed to be trading on investing in sense

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:29.960
<v Speaker 1>time shares. What we know, though, from the start of

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:32.440
<v Speaker 1>this year, when since time tried to list in Hong Kong,

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 1>they actually told investors like they weren't impacted by the

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 1>entity list at all, and that was because, since times,

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 1>when since time was put on the entity list, it

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:44.040
<v Speaker 1>was one it was one entity. It was its paging

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:47.640
<v Speaker 1>entity that was put on the list. So since time

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:51.399
<v Speaker 1>has multiple entities in like Shanghai, Um Hong Kong, and

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:54.880
<v Speaker 1>these entities were free to buy the type of high

0:25:54.960 --> 0:25:57.640
<v Speaker 1>end US technology that the entity list was supposed to block.

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 1>And in addition to that, when since time tried to

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I P O, since time it's a company that has

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:06.160
<v Speaker 1>a ton of US investors making up its investor base,

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:10.880
<v Speaker 1>like people like fidelity capital, Silver Lake. When the when

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:13.359
<v Speaker 1>they were put on the investment blacklist again, there was

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 1>a legal loophole. Essentially, the entity that was put on

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the investment blacklist with the Hong Kong entity and the

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 1>entity listed in Hong Kong was a Cayman Islands one.

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 1>So true, very smart maneuvering of where the entities a base.

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:31.280
<v Speaker 1>They managed to get get true um or get over

0:26:31.560 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 1>get around these restrictions. These are Lyne China correspondent for

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the Wall Street Journal, who joins us on the phone

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:39.880
<v Speaker 1>from New York, and also Josh Chen, deputy China Bureau chief,

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:42.359
<v Speaker 1>on the phone from Park City, Utah. Hey, Josh, I

0:26:42.359 --> 0:26:44.920
<v Speaker 1>want to get into how this is all playing out

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:49.520
<v Speaker 1>in Shinjang, which a remote Asia frontier, of course, where

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 1>we know that the country is oppressing the weaker population.

0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:55.879
<v Speaker 1>What does it look like they're j John, is that

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:58.439
<v Speaker 1>it's a massive, massive area about twice the size of

0:26:58.480 --> 0:27:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Texas or northwestern and very rich in resources. Um and

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:05.680
<v Speaker 1>has also long been a sort of typical place for

0:27:05.720 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the Communist Party to control, and that's because it has

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:11.560
<v Speaker 1>a large population of weakers and other Turkic Muslims who

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 1>really chafe at Chinese rule and so Um. You know,

0:27:15.480 --> 0:27:18.360
<v Speaker 1>for about the past five years or so the Communist

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Party has been running what you know, what is best

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:24.359
<v Speaker 1>described as a sort of campaign of forcible assimilation, using

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:29.879
<v Speaker 1>surveillance technology and a network of internment camps. Um, and

0:27:29.920 --> 0:27:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I first went there discovered some of this in seventeen Um.

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 1>At the time, no one really knew what was happening there. Um,

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:41.159
<v Speaker 1>and you know I mean that's been a China correspondent

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:44.560
<v Speaker 1>at that point for for more than a decade. And Uh,

0:27:44.840 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and what I saw that was just one of the

0:27:46.040 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 1>most shocking things that I've seen in China. And you know, essentially,

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:53.520
<v Speaker 1>if you were a weaker Um in Sxinjiang, you are

0:27:54.160 --> 0:28:00.439
<v Speaker 1>subject to constant, pervasive, um suffocating surveillance. Right. So, if

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:03.240
<v Speaker 1>you go to a bank or a market or a hotel,

0:28:03.280 --> 0:28:05.199
<v Speaker 1>any public place, you have to scan your face and

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 1>your ID card. If you want to buy gasoline, you

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:10.720
<v Speaker 1>have to make everyone get out of the car again,

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 1>stand your face and I d cards so they can

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:14.879
<v Speaker 1>track how much gasoline you're buying in one place. If

0:28:14.920 --> 0:28:16.640
<v Speaker 1>you want to buy a knife, they would they would

0:28:16.640 --> 0:28:19.040
<v Speaker 1>take your I d information, all of your your home

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 1>address and they would laser etch it into the knife

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:25.000
<v Speaker 1>in the form of a Qr Code. Uh. And then

0:28:25.000 --> 0:28:26.920
<v Speaker 1>we collect date on things like how often you pray,

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, how far you go to the mosque? Do

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:31.520
<v Speaker 1>you own a Kuran? Um, what sort of movies and

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:33.880
<v Speaker 1>music and Apps do you have on your phone? And

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 1>they sent you collect all of this data to track

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 1>and then sort weakers according to how much of a

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:43.400
<v Speaker 1>risk they might potentially pose to the Communist Party's rule

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:45.960
<v Speaker 1>in the future. Um, and then those, you know, those

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:48.840
<v Speaker 1>who are considered risky, are sent to camps to be

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:51.680
<v Speaker 1>subject to re education. Um, and so it really is

0:28:51.720 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 1>a pervasive, just sort of unprecedented campaign that they're running

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 1>out there. We are in this really critical phase of

0:28:57.120 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 1>major disruption innovation that we don't see off in our world,

0:29:00.520 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and maybe that's explaining also some of the kind of

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:06.600
<v Speaker 1>discomfort within the financial markets overall. But I do wonder about,

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, what is the next phase for China? Present,

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:12.520
<v Speaker 1>G very much out there front and center, you know,

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 1>wants to lead on higher tech. Doesn't seem to care

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 1>who he maybe ticks off in particular, something like the

0:29:19.600 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 1>United States and the process. But I mean it's a

0:29:22.080 --> 0:29:25.560
<v Speaker 1>complicated relationship between the two. But I do wonder, you know,

0:29:25.720 --> 0:29:29.920
<v Speaker 1>what is the next phase of China, one that obviously

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:33.480
<v Speaker 1>will surveil its population very closely. I mean, Josh, how

0:29:33.480 --> 0:29:35.600
<v Speaker 1>do you see it? How do we need to think

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:40.840
<v Speaker 1>about China going forward, when many people, feel like investors included,

0:29:40.880 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 1>will say that's going to be one of the big

0:29:43.120 --> 0:29:49.240
<v Speaker 1>macro themes overall for the world, geo politically, market wise, economically,

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:52.280
<v Speaker 1>what's happening in China? I think you're already seeing sort

0:29:52.320 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 1>of the future of China with the with the covid

0:29:54.200 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 1>pandemic Um, you know, with essentially you know in the

0:29:58.120 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 1>past kind of that that pervasive, applicating surveillance was pretty

0:30:01.600 --> 0:30:04.800
<v Speaker 1>much limited to Shinja. Now, with the COVID pandemic, that

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 1>those systems and those those approaches and those technologies have

0:30:07.600 --> 0:30:10.520
<v Speaker 1>all spread to basically covered the entirety of China. Um,

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:13.360
<v Speaker 1>and it's clear that Jent Ping is willing and able

0:30:13.400 --> 0:30:16.320
<v Speaker 1>to use those technologies to exert a tremendous amount of

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 1>social control, very tight control. Earlier this year you had

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:22.280
<v Speaker 1>you had the Shanghai lockdown, for example. You know, the

0:30:22.320 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 1>wealthiest in China not used to not used to experiencing

0:30:26.160 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 1>this sort of thing Um, and they were outraged. But

0:30:28.800 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Communist Party has persisted with Zero Covid

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:33.120
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's partly because they're confident that these

0:30:33.200 --> 0:30:38.080
<v Speaker 1>new tools give them the ability to control the situation

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:40.400
<v Speaker 1>and the economy of society in China in ways that

0:30:40.440 --> 0:30:43.240
<v Speaker 1>they haven't before. Still is a con in and layer

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:45.280
<v Speaker 1>on top of what Josh said. I mean, how do you,

0:30:45.720 --> 0:30:47.680
<v Speaker 1>how does the world kind of need to think about

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:50.640
<v Speaker 1>China in the next I don't know, ten fifty years?

0:30:50.960 --> 0:30:52.840
<v Speaker 1>This is already happening. We're not going to have to

0:30:52.840 --> 0:30:55.360
<v Speaker 1>wait ten or twenty years to see this happen. I

0:30:55.360 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 1>would put it this way. In in the past two decades,

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:03.640
<v Speaker 1>US and Western companies have had very blind optimism on

0:31:04.600 --> 0:31:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the operating in the Chinese market. Right. So, ten twenty

0:31:08.880 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 1>years ago, China was seen as this easy place or profit.

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Commercial priorities overshadow any sort of deep thinking about the

0:31:15.280 --> 0:31:18.920
<v Speaker 1>possible human rights abuses that could happen. In the boardrooms

0:31:18.920 --> 0:31:21.240
<v Speaker 1>you'd be hearing people talk about how far you could

0:31:21.240 --> 0:31:23.960
<v Speaker 1>expand in China, what was the best way to get

0:31:23.960 --> 0:31:26.680
<v Speaker 1>your product out in the market? In the last five

0:31:26.760 --> 0:31:30.400
<v Speaker 1>years we've actually seen more like a paradigm shift in

0:31:30.440 --> 0:31:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the way US companies are approaching China. We're seen in

0:31:34.280 --> 0:31:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the last few years more and more reporting about the

0:31:36.200 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 1>atrocities and seeing jail and now that the US government

0:31:39.680 --> 0:31:42.240
<v Speaker 1>is actually trying to react to China's human rights issues

0:31:42.320 --> 0:31:46.400
<v Speaker 1>with like trade policy, not just foreign foreign policy. We're

0:31:46.440 --> 0:31:50.000
<v Speaker 1>definitely seeing US companies become more cautious about the risk

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 1>and less bushy, mush tailed and starry eyed about the

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:58.000
<v Speaker 1>potential of China. Are thanks to Josh Chen and Lesa

0:31:58.080 --> 0:32:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Lynn of the Wall Street Journal. Check out their new

0:32:00.520 --> 0:32:03.960
<v Speaker 1>book surveillance state, inside China's quest to launch a new

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:07.080
<v Speaker 1>era of social control. And that wraps up the first

0:32:07.120 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 1>hour of the weekend edition of Bloomberg Business Week from

0:32:09.560 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg radio. I'm Tim Stanovic. Ahead in our next hour

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:16.120
<v Speaker 1>a dispatch from the Earth Shot Prize Innovation Summit. We

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:19.600
<v Speaker 1>hear from the Executive Chairman of Fortescue on the company's

0:32:19.680 --> 0:32:23.800
<v Speaker 1>multibillion dollar decision to move away from fossil fuels. Plus,

0:32:23.840 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 1>our Business Week team reveals its annual ranking of the

0:32:26.440 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 1>world's best business schools, and our cover story on the

0:32:29.360 --> 0:32:37.360
<v Speaker 1>stunning success of Apple's tiniest accessory. This is Bloomberg. This

0:32:38.040 --> 0:32:42.200
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Business Week inside from the reporters and editors

0:32:42.200 --> 0:32:46.440
<v Speaker 1>who bring you America's most trusted business magazine. Plus Global Business,

0:32:46.480 --> 0:32:50.120
<v Speaker 1>finance and Tech News as it happened. Bloomberg Business Week

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:53.840
<v Speaker 1>with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on

0:32:54.120 --> 0:32:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg radio. Plenty ahead in our second hour of the

0:32:57.440 --> 0:33:00.040
<v Speaker 1>weekend edition of Bloomberg Business Week, including our cup a

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:03.920
<v Speaker 1>story on the sneaky genius of Athol's Airpod's empire, plus

0:33:04.000 --> 0:33:07.880
<v Speaker 1>key conversations from the Earth Shot Prize Innovation Summit. FORTESCUS

0:33:07.920 --> 0:33:12.600
<v Speaker 1>executive chairman explains the massive investment being made into decarbonizing

0:33:12.640 --> 0:33:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the miners iron ore operations, and the CEO of the

0:33:16.080 --> 0:33:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Earth Shot Prize tells us how innovation can affect climate change.

0:33:20.040 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 1>First up this hour. It's at that time of the

0:33:21.840 --> 0:33:25.440
<v Speaker 1>year again, Bloomberg Business Week unveiling its annual ranking of

0:33:25.480 --> 0:33:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the world's top NBA programs. Bloomberg Business Week Senior Editor

0:33:29.400 --> 0:33:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Dimitro Cassinidis joined Carol and me to discuss the best

0:33:32.520 --> 0:33:36.920
<v Speaker 1>b schools and, of course, reveal the top program drumroll please.

0:33:37.120 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Stanford is the number one school year second. Wait, this

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:45.440
<v Speaker 1>is not last year, this is two. Stanford has been

0:33:45.480 --> 0:33:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the number one school for a few years running now,

0:33:47.640 --> 0:33:50.200
<v Speaker 1>so no surprise. You know it's got a lot going

0:33:50.280 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 1>for it. That is very much about what people are

0:33:53.040 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 1>looking for today. The classic industry draws, the proximity to

0:33:57.080 --> 0:34:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the tech industry, very strong programs, very entrepreneurial programs. On

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:05.280
<v Speaker 1>every point it's really hitting the marks. So it's doing great.

0:34:05.360 --> 0:34:08.440
<v Speaker 1>And then tie for second place, She University of Chicago

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:11.920
<v Speaker 1>and Harvard UH and the top five get rounded out

0:34:11.960 --> 0:34:15.000
<v Speaker 1>with northwestern and Dartmouth. How often does like the top

0:34:15.080 --> 0:34:18.160
<v Speaker 1>five kind of stay the same? I mean I would

0:34:18.200 --> 0:34:21.480
<v Speaker 1>say that it stays the same for a few years running,

0:34:21.520 --> 0:34:25.239
<v Speaker 1>with some minor shifts among, you know, among the schools.

0:34:25.880 --> 0:34:28.880
<v Speaker 1>This year, the top ten, we're all the same schools.

0:34:29.000 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Is last year one or two went down one, one

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:34.200
<v Speaker 1>or two one up one. You know, that's what you're

0:34:34.239 --> 0:34:38.040
<v Speaker 1>dealing with. There are also very minor differences, I want

0:34:38.040 --> 0:34:40.960
<v Speaker 1>to say, at those levels in this ranking, like even

0:34:40.960 --> 0:34:43.240
<v Speaker 1>though your number one or number two or number five,

0:34:43.920 --> 0:34:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the points that are separating you from that next school

0:34:47.200 --> 0:34:50.560
<v Speaker 1>are small and few unless it's one between number one

0:34:50.560 --> 0:34:53.120
<v Speaker 1>and numbers two, three, four and five. Right, that is

0:34:53.200 --> 0:34:55.520
<v Speaker 1>always very far ahead of well, that's what's so interesting. Eight.

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Eight is the score that Stanford got. Um, I'm wondering,

0:34:58.280 --> 0:35:00.960
<v Speaker 1>when it came to diversity, what the this looks like, because,

0:35:01.440 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, you click on that. And, by the way,

0:35:03.200 --> 0:35:04.719
<v Speaker 1>this is the type of thing to go check out

0:35:04.719 --> 0:35:06.120
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg DOT COM or look at it on the

0:35:06.160 --> 0:35:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg terminal, because it's a great interactive feature here. It's

0:35:09.520 --> 0:35:11.400
<v Speaker 1>so funny because our producer would be like, should we

0:35:11.400 --> 0:35:13.160
<v Speaker 1>put off the story? And that's what we said. It's

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:15.719
<v Speaker 1>so interactive because you really want to go online with it.

0:35:15.880 --> 0:35:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Exactly it is. Um, I think they've I just want

0:35:18.440 --> 0:35:20.839
<v Speaker 1>to say first, not the one. There's a huge team

0:35:20.880 --> 0:35:24.560
<v Speaker 1>behind this and the real people who are actually doing this,

0:35:24.600 --> 0:35:27.280
<v Speaker 1>with the ones compiling, you know, looking at the data

0:35:27.320 --> 0:35:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and building these amazing interactive tools. So definitely go to

0:35:30.480 --> 0:35:34.399
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, slash business hyphen schools, and you will

0:35:34.480 --> 0:35:38.200
<v Speaker 1>have an incredible experience. But diversity, yeah, well, it's you know,

0:35:38.239 --> 0:35:40.239
<v Speaker 1>and Deversity is measured in different ways here and you

0:35:40.239 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 1>can you can actually filter it in different ways here.

0:35:42.640 --> 0:35:44.480
<v Speaker 1>But what does the rank look like when it comes

0:35:44.520 --> 0:35:48.160
<v Speaker 1>to diversity? Well, you know, I mean I would say

0:35:48.320 --> 0:35:52.640
<v Speaker 1>it's it's uh, it's mixed. So we're looking at diversity

0:35:52.719 --> 0:35:56.359
<v Speaker 1>in terms of gender diversity and then breakdowns with Um,

0:35:56.760 --> 0:36:00.279
<v Speaker 1>black students and Hispanic students, and we say this in

0:36:00.320 --> 0:36:03.600
<v Speaker 1>our overview, to the schools have and if there's one

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:05.839
<v Speaker 1>area where, you know, we feel like there's a little

0:36:05.880 --> 0:36:08.240
<v Speaker 1>bit of work to be done, it's in working towards

0:36:08.280 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 1>that parody. So parody is when you're trying to sort

0:36:11.560 --> 0:36:17.080
<v Speaker 1>of reach relative equality among certain groups. You have seven

0:36:17.120 --> 0:36:20.080
<v Speaker 1>schools only where there was gender parody. That was met

0:36:20.120 --> 0:36:24.319
<v Speaker 1>this year, eleven where black students had parody with, you know,

0:36:24.640 --> 0:36:29.240
<v Speaker 1>other groups, and Um, eight schools for Hispanics. So it's

0:36:29.280 --> 0:36:32.640
<v Speaker 1>it's not really you know, there's a ways to go

0:36:32.719 --> 0:36:35.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think in some ways now we're starting to

0:36:35.719 --> 0:36:39.000
<v Speaker 1>talk about how b schools, you know, are they not

0:36:39.320 --> 0:36:41.839
<v Speaker 1>even reflective of what's happening out in the world? There's

0:36:41.920 --> 0:36:47.400
<v Speaker 1>so much talk and pressure, you know, e. s, G. Equality, diversity, Um,

0:36:47.520 --> 0:36:50.760
<v Speaker 1>in the ranks of the C suites, and so that pressure,

0:36:50.800 --> 0:36:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I think, is trickling over to the schools now to

0:36:53.160 --> 0:36:56.200
<v Speaker 1>ensure that they are focused on getting those numbers up there.

0:36:56.360 --> 0:36:58.840
<v Speaker 1>I am curious about the pandemic, as it was tricky right, obviously,

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic. Anybody in Academian and how that has at

0:37:02.920 --> 0:37:07.120
<v Speaker 1>all impacted rankings or how you guys are looking at

0:37:07.120 --> 0:37:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the different schools in the program I don't think. I

0:37:09.239 --> 0:37:12.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know that they've meaningfully affected the rankings, especially this year.

0:37:12.239 --> 0:37:14.520
<v Speaker 1>We did come back with the rankings after a year off.

0:37:14.680 --> 0:37:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Last year. Right one for but I think the pandemic

0:37:20.000 --> 0:37:22.640
<v Speaker 1>has affected a lot of things on campus as we're

0:37:22.640 --> 0:37:25.799
<v Speaker 1>talking to people, hearing about the priorities of students, the

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:29.880
<v Speaker 1>interests that are starting to emerge career wise, the classics

0:37:29.880 --> 0:37:35.120
<v Speaker 1>are always there, UH, consulting, finance, technology, but now e

0:37:35.320 --> 0:37:37.480
<v Speaker 1>S G is a big one. Climate change is a

0:37:37.520 --> 0:37:41.120
<v Speaker 1>big one. Um The pandemic and being home and experiencing

0:37:41.160 --> 0:37:43.480
<v Speaker 1>life for two years in very different ways has focused

0:37:43.480 --> 0:37:47.960
<v Speaker 1>people on different things. Interest in certain healthcare careers and

0:37:48.000 --> 0:37:50.680
<v Speaker 1>how we're going to move forward from this age of

0:37:50.800 --> 0:37:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Covid Um, maybe other pandemics, and what kind of opportunities

0:37:54.520 --> 0:37:57.160
<v Speaker 1>are out there. I also think it's really focused the

0:37:57.200 --> 0:37:59.359
<v Speaker 1>schools and the students on how they teach and how

0:37:59.400 --> 0:38:03.480
<v Speaker 1>they learn. So everybody values in person. I don't think

0:38:03.520 --> 0:38:07.160
<v Speaker 1>that's ever going away, but now people know that flexibility

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:09.840
<v Speaker 1>is possible and there are really many different ways that

0:38:09.880 --> 0:38:12.239
<v Speaker 1>you can fashion how learning is going to happen. When

0:38:12.239 --> 0:38:13.799
<v Speaker 1>you say in person too, and I know we have

0:38:13.840 --> 0:38:16.160
<v Speaker 1>to wrap up, and I do highly recommend people go

0:38:16.239 --> 0:38:18.120
<v Speaker 1>online because it's just so cool to kind of click

0:38:18.160 --> 0:38:20.200
<v Speaker 1>through the different schools and get their rankings and just

0:38:20.239 --> 0:38:21.759
<v Speaker 1>break it down so many different ways. But I do

0:38:21.840 --> 0:38:24.440
<v Speaker 1>think in school, especially when you think about business schools,

0:38:24.440 --> 0:38:27.960
<v Speaker 1>so much of it is outside entrepreneurs, successful entrepreneurs, business

0:38:27.960 --> 0:38:30.520
<v Speaker 1>people who come into to speak and you get facetime

0:38:30.840 --> 0:38:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Tim you know at firsthand when you're up at Columbia

0:38:33.480 --> 0:38:35.800
<v Speaker 1>how important that is. That was Bloomberg Business Week senior

0:38:35.880 --> 0:38:38.840
<v Speaker 1>editor Demitra a CASSIDI's on the top of business schools.

0:38:39.400 --> 0:38:42.359
<v Speaker 1>Go online to Bloomberg dot com slash business week, where

0:38:42.360 --> 0:38:45.040
<v Speaker 1>you can check out the full ranking. Coming up next

0:38:45.040 --> 0:38:47.320
<v Speaker 1>we'll take you to the Earth Shot Prize Innovation Summit

0:38:47.520 --> 0:38:50.839
<v Speaker 1>and learn about an ambitious renewable energy goal announced by

0:38:50.880 --> 0:38:53.680
<v Speaker 1>one of the world's top producers of iron ore. We're

0:38:53.680 --> 0:38:58.080
<v Speaker 1>not moving away or curbing, where stopping all fossil fuel use.

0:38:58.160 --> 0:38:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I've been up to my site. So I've said to

0:38:59.880 --> 0:39:03.520
<v Speaker 1>my major rights of these huge industrial sites says, ok,

0:39:03.600 --> 0:39:06.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm coming up in and I'm going to switch off

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the diesel, I'm gonna switch off the oil and gas

0:39:09.239 --> 0:39:12.239
<v Speaker 1>labor and if you guys do not have plans where

0:39:12.320 --> 0:39:14.600
<v Speaker 1>I can keep them off, I'm probably gonna shut you down.

0:39:14.640 --> 0:39:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Fortescue medals founder and Executive Chairman, Dr Andrew Forrest, joins

0:39:18.520 --> 0:39:21.040
<v Speaker 1>us on the other side. He'll explain why now and

0:39:21.080 --> 0:39:23.320
<v Speaker 1>how much the initiative is going to cost. You're listening

0:39:23.360 --> 0:39:40.239
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Business Week. This is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg

0:39:40.320 --> 0:39:43.919
<v Speaker 1>Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim

0:39:43.960 --> 0:39:49.279
<v Speaker 1>Stinovan from Bloomberg radio. Bloomberg News reported this past week

0:39:49.320 --> 0:39:52.120
<v Speaker 1>that fortescue medals group will spend more than six billion

0:39:52.160 --> 0:39:56.520
<v Speaker 1>dollars over the next decade to decarbonize it's iron ore operations.

0:39:57.120 --> 0:39:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Carol and I were in attendance at the Earth Shot

0:39:59.160 --> 0:40:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Prize innovations sime it held in New York's Plaza Hotel

0:40:01.800 --> 0:40:05.480
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesday. The event is geared towards spotlighting climate innovations

0:40:05.480 --> 0:40:09.040
<v Speaker 1>to address the world's most pressing environmental challenges, and we

0:40:09.080 --> 0:40:11.120
<v Speaker 1>had the chance to speak with Ford excuse founder and

0:40:11.200 --> 0:40:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Executive Chairman, Dr Andrew Forrest, about the Australian miners pricey

0:40:15.360 --> 0:40:19.680
<v Speaker 1>pivot toward renewable energy. So we're not moving away or curbing,

0:40:19.760 --> 0:40:23.200
<v Speaker 1>where stopping all fossil fuel use. I've been up to

0:40:23.239 --> 0:40:25.640
<v Speaker 1>my site. So I've said to my major operators of

0:40:25.760 --> 0:40:28.640
<v Speaker 1>these huge industrial sites, says will come coming up in

0:40:30.160 --> 0:40:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and I'm going to switch off the diesel, I'm gonna

0:40:33.000 --> 0:40:35.480
<v Speaker 1>switch off the oil and gas lever and if you

0:40:35.560 --> 0:40:39.080
<v Speaker 1>guys do not have plans where I can keep them off,

0:40:39.520 --> 0:40:42.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm probably going to shut you down. And they've come

0:40:42.920 --> 0:40:46.040
<v Speaker 1>up with these most brilliant, practical plans because they're now

0:40:46.160 --> 0:40:48.400
<v Speaker 1>part of the problem and they're fourth part of the solution.

0:40:48.880 --> 0:40:52.520
<v Speaker 1>And for six point two billion we can step beyond

0:40:52.680 --> 0:40:56.200
<v Speaker 1>fossil fuel and return almost to billion dollars a year

0:40:56.360 --> 0:40:58.920
<v Speaker 1>to share holders. It's got to be a good investment, right,

0:40:59.480 --> 0:41:03.240
<v Speaker 1>all right. So help me out, Andrew. Why Now? Because

0:41:03.440 --> 0:41:06.560
<v Speaker 1>we have the technology now. I mean, I'm an investor

0:41:06.760 --> 0:41:09.799
<v Speaker 1>in breakthrough energy. I'm invested in this, in that. But

0:41:10.120 --> 0:41:13.080
<v Speaker 1>why wait? I mean, everyone's sticking around waiting. The planet,

0:41:13.120 --> 0:41:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I promise you, is cooking. I'm a ecologist. What's happening

0:41:17.080 --> 0:41:19.319
<v Speaker 1>in the oceans is way worse than what's happening on land.

0:41:19.880 --> 0:41:22.040
<v Speaker 1>But it's blowing up on a soil on land. You know,

0:41:22.280 --> 0:41:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the youth across the world can see it. Carbon credits, fuel,

0:41:26.320 --> 0:41:32.440
<v Speaker 1>everything's getting way more expensive. Yet renewable energy is free, okay,

0:41:32.520 --> 0:41:37.239
<v Speaker 1>and it's infinite. Why wait? It's it's not always free

0:41:37.239 --> 0:41:40.160
<v Speaker 1>and infinite, though. It's not infinite in the sense of okay, well,

0:41:40.160 --> 0:41:42.840
<v Speaker 1>if you're using solar, there's SNA time, if using wind,

0:41:42.960 --> 0:41:46.040
<v Speaker 1>there are ideas that are not windy. And if you're

0:41:46.120 --> 0:41:49.920
<v Speaker 1>using hydro power, but there are sometimes that water levels.

0:41:49.920 --> 0:41:52.239
<v Speaker 1>So how are your accounting from? You've heard of fossil fuel, right.

0:41:52.560 --> 0:41:54.879
<v Speaker 1>They spend so much time pumping their gas down into

0:41:54.880 --> 0:41:56.960
<v Speaker 1>these salt domes so they can draw it out later.

0:41:57.239 --> 0:41:58.880
<v Speaker 1>We're not a lot different. I mean we don't have

0:41:58.960 --> 0:42:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to throw it down for months. We'll have batteries. We

0:42:02.680 --> 0:42:05.600
<v Speaker 1>have pumped Hydra, you know, water, up to the top

0:42:05.640 --> 0:42:07.319
<v Speaker 1>of the hill in the day and run it down

0:42:07.360 --> 0:42:11.200
<v Speaker 1>at night. We have gravitational energy which runs these trades

0:42:11.239 --> 0:42:14.000
<v Speaker 1>of ours. We've got the biggest heaviest trains on earth, right,

0:42:14.480 --> 0:42:18.239
<v Speaker 1>five kilometer trains. They take forty tons of vinyl on

0:42:18.280 --> 0:42:21.560
<v Speaker 1>their backs down to sea level. It's more than enough

0:42:21.600 --> 0:42:24.840
<v Speaker 1>parabolical gravity energy than you'll ever need to send that

0:42:24.920 --> 0:42:28.000
<v Speaker 1>train back up the hill and you how much of

0:42:28.120 --> 0:42:30.719
<v Speaker 1>it is also though, in terms of the timing. What's

0:42:30.760 --> 0:42:33.160
<v Speaker 1>going on in terms of the macro environment? Obviously we're

0:42:33.160 --> 0:42:35.160
<v Speaker 1>all talking a lot more about energy and the energy

0:42:35.200 --> 0:42:37.880
<v Speaker 1>crisis that we're seeing over in Europe, specifically because of

0:42:37.880 --> 0:42:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the Russian invasion in Ukraine. Everybody all of a sudden

0:42:40.680 --> 0:42:43.400
<v Speaker 1>is putting their foot on the gas pedal when it

0:42:43.400 --> 0:42:47.360
<v Speaker 1>comes to alternative energy. It's been there and yet the

0:42:47.520 --> 0:42:50.120
<v Speaker 1>ramp up has taken longer. You talk about the technology

0:42:50.160 --> 0:42:52.399
<v Speaker 1>being there, but how much of the macro forces are

0:42:52.400 --> 0:42:55.839
<v Speaker 1>also use? I'm seeing a ramp up the talk. I'm

0:42:55.880 --> 0:42:59.719
<v Speaker 1>saying hang a ramp up a panic, and there should be,

0:42:59.719 --> 0:43:03.840
<v Speaker 1>because we've never had a drying event this year around

0:43:03.880 --> 0:43:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the world, not in the last hundred years in history,

0:43:08.560 --> 0:43:13.520
<v Speaker 1>record temperatures in history. So there's a sense of panic now.

0:43:13.600 --> 0:43:17.640
<v Speaker 1>But we are reacting to what is great for our shareholders.

0:43:17.680 --> 0:43:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Six point two billion in one off, nearly a billion out,

0:43:22.040 --> 0:43:26.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty million out every single year forever, and it does

0:43:26.200 --> 0:43:29.560
<v Speaker 1>not take into account the three billion we earned on

0:43:29.640 --> 0:43:31.359
<v Speaker 1>the way through. So we're gonna build this thing up

0:43:31.400 --> 0:43:35.000
<v Speaker 1>in the next several years, not in ten years, next

0:43:35.000 --> 0:43:37.520
<v Speaker 1>several years. On the way through we start saving money.

0:43:37.560 --> 0:43:40.600
<v Speaker 1>We saved eighty million last year. On the way through

0:43:40.640 --> 0:43:43.279
<v Speaker 1>we will save a further three billion dollars. You take

0:43:43.280 --> 0:43:46.839
<v Speaker 1>that three billion off the six point two. You don't

0:43:46.840 --> 0:43:52.440
<v Speaker 1>have quite ray to return anymore. You have six rate

0:43:52.480 --> 0:43:55.480
<v Speaker 1>to return. That kind of beats Warren Buffett's miracle of

0:43:55.560 --> 0:43:59.440
<v Speaker 1>nine percent. Right, and we're greed. So it's a business

0:43:59.520 --> 0:44:02.760
<v Speaker 1>decision or business and you're also just looking at the environment.

0:44:02.960 --> 0:44:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I am an ecologist, I am a scientist. Yes, I'm

0:44:05.200 --> 0:44:09.560
<v Speaker 1>a business person, but my shareholders will not tolerate filanthby

0:44:10.040 --> 0:44:13.120
<v Speaker 1>for a business. You do filanthy your dividends, Andrews, but

0:44:13.200 --> 0:44:16.800
<v Speaker 1>our business must make money. This is a fabulous business decision.

0:44:17.400 --> 0:44:20.759
<v Speaker 1>So do the other miners, the real tenders of the world,

0:44:20.760 --> 0:44:23.839
<v Speaker 1>and more do they follow your lead? Look, they're good guys.

0:44:23.960 --> 0:44:26.200
<v Speaker 1>I've been in touch with the chief executives all the

0:44:26.239 --> 0:44:28.359
<v Speaker 1>big miners. What have they told you? And I've said

0:44:28.440 --> 0:44:30.600
<v Speaker 1>how you do? Please tell us. Would you share? So,

0:44:30.920 --> 0:44:35.160
<v Speaker 1>of course we'll have full present full how to presentations.

0:44:35.800 --> 0:44:38.120
<v Speaker 1>You get your senior leadership, I'll get my senior leadership.

0:44:38.320 --> 0:44:41.879
<v Speaker 1>Will break down, dollar by dollar, piece by piece, time

0:44:41.920 --> 0:44:43.400
<v Speaker 1>in the full by time and of all, how we

0:44:43.640 --> 0:44:47.759
<v Speaker 1>are doing, not will do it. Are Doing. Are there

0:44:47.800 --> 0:44:51.200
<v Speaker 1>any obstacles that will come into play? At this point

0:44:51.360 --> 0:44:53.279
<v Speaker 1>you've already worked it all out, because they do think

0:44:53.280 --> 0:44:56.480
<v Speaker 1>about as people transition it's not always so fluid and

0:44:56.520 --> 0:44:59.520
<v Speaker 1>smooth because there is such an establishment out there and

0:44:59.560 --> 0:45:02.920
<v Speaker 1>push look, I think because it has not been done before,

0:45:03.040 --> 0:45:06.240
<v Speaker 1>there's another company in the heavy manufacturing, heavy industry world

0:45:06.640 --> 0:45:10.200
<v Speaker 1>that has done it. So I need the disbelief to

0:45:10.239 --> 0:45:13.160
<v Speaker 1>go away. I mean we started as a timely little

0:45:13.200 --> 0:45:16.840
<v Speaker 1>company and we challenged the biggest industry and the resources world,

0:45:16.880 --> 0:45:20.640
<v Speaker 1>which is iron know, it's like a closed shot, totally protected.

0:45:21.040 --> 0:45:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Now we've busted it open, where one of the biggest

0:45:23.640 --> 0:45:25.480
<v Speaker 1>players in the world two under billion tons a year.

0:45:25.719 --> 0:45:29.200
<v Speaker 1>That's not chopped liver right spread around the world. Now

0:45:29.239 --> 0:45:34.400
<v Speaker 1>we're taking that huge manufacturing center and stopping it using

0:45:34.640 --> 0:45:38.200
<v Speaker 1>any fossil fuel and people are saying, yeah, if you

0:45:38.239 --> 0:45:40.640
<v Speaker 1>can do it, wise in everyone. Well, that's the question.

0:45:40.960 --> 0:45:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Don't question that. We can do it. Question why isn't

0:45:44.120 --> 0:45:48.040
<v Speaker 1>everyone else? Well, not everyone else has a background as

0:45:48.080 --> 0:45:50.840
<v Speaker 1>in a college. That's part of it perhaps, but I

0:45:50.880 --> 0:45:52.839
<v Speaker 1>also wonder if you can take us more into your

0:45:52.840 --> 0:45:54.960
<v Speaker 1>thinking behind this, because you know, I spoke years ago

0:45:55.000 --> 0:45:57.480
<v Speaker 1>and you were on the forefront of thinking about the

0:45:57.520 --> 0:46:00.279
<v Speaker 1>environmental concerns when it comes to mining. But something that

0:46:00.280 --> 0:46:02.279
<v Speaker 1>I've been thinking about is, and I mean this with

0:46:02.280 --> 0:46:04.399
<v Speaker 1>all due respect, if there's any sort of like a

0:46:04.400 --> 0:46:07.680
<v Speaker 1>tournament that you're thinking about here, because, with all due respect,

0:46:07.719 --> 0:46:13.600
<v Speaker 1>mining is is something that is not coherent. Okay, well, unfortunately,

0:46:13.680 --> 0:46:16.160
<v Speaker 1>if we were to stop mining, we wouldn't be sitting here,

0:46:16.160 --> 0:46:19.640
<v Speaker 1>this building, wouldn't exist, you know, everything would stop. So

0:46:20.160 --> 0:46:22.920
<v Speaker 1>we have to do mining. Mining is not the problem.

0:46:23.320 --> 0:46:27.520
<v Speaker 1>How we minded. That's the problem. We have to mind brain,

0:46:27.640 --> 0:46:30.440
<v Speaker 1>we have to mind zero emissions. The mining industry can

0:46:30.520 --> 0:46:34.120
<v Speaker 1>step beyond fossil fuel. Now I have a sense of

0:46:34.120 --> 0:46:39.080
<v Speaker 1>a tonement to my kids and to everybody because I'm

0:46:39.120 --> 0:46:41.919
<v Speaker 1>part of a fossil fuel era. But I don't put

0:46:41.960 --> 0:46:45.240
<v Speaker 1>coal in my iron. All My product has zero carbon

0:46:45.320 --> 0:46:47.680
<v Speaker 1>in it. There's nothing in it. So if I can

0:46:47.719 --> 0:46:50.239
<v Speaker 1>persuade my customers to put hydrogen, not coal, in it,

0:46:51.080 --> 0:46:55.520
<v Speaker 1>then I'm super happy. But I haven't exported carbon. Ok,

0:46:55.719 --> 0:46:58.960
<v Speaker 1>that's not my business. I've exported iron and then carbon

0:46:59.000 --> 0:47:01.040
<v Speaker 1>goes into the iron. I want to stop that. I

0:47:01.080 --> 0:47:04.839
<v Speaker 1>want to La Saint to all my customers. We're gonna

0:47:04.880 --> 0:47:09.000
<v Speaker 1>give you green iron first time in your lot. You've

0:47:09.000 --> 0:47:13.520
<v Speaker 1>got green iron ore. Replace the call with hydrogen and

0:47:13.600 --> 0:47:16.960
<v Speaker 1>you've got grain steele. That was fortescue founder and Executive Chairman,

0:47:17.040 --> 0:47:19.399
<v Speaker 1>Dr Andrew Forrest. We'll have more from the Earth Shot

0:47:19.400 --> 0:47:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Prize Innovation Summit just a little bit later in the

0:47:21.640 --> 0:47:24.839
<v Speaker 1>program you're listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Coming up next.

0:47:24.960 --> 0:47:27.360
<v Speaker 1>The world's biggest company in terms of market cap is

0:47:27.400 --> 0:47:30.879
<v Speaker 1>just raking in the cash on its smallest accessory. Our

0:47:30.920 --> 0:47:34.560
<v Speaker 1>cover story looks at the genius of Apple's airpods. This

0:47:34.840 --> 0:47:42.880
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Broadcasting from the financial capital of the world,

0:47:42.960 --> 0:47:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Eleven, Rio in New York, to Washington D C,

0:47:46.600 --> 0:47:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg to Boston, Bloomberg one, Oh six, one to San Francisco,

0:47:51.400 --> 0:47:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Nine, to the country Sirius Xm Chamber one nine

0:47:55.480 --> 0:47:58.959
<v Speaker 1>and around the globe the Bloomberg business in Bloomberg radio

0:47:59.120 --> 0:48:03.200
<v Speaker 1>DOT COM. This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer

0:48:03.440 --> 0:48:08.640
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg quick takes, Tim Stinovian on Bloomberg radio. For

0:48:08.800 --> 0:48:12.240
<v Speaker 1>anybody scoffing at the idea of buying Apple's forthcoming augmented

0:48:12.280 --> 0:48:15.480
<v Speaker 1>in virtual reality goggles. Just remember that the company has

0:48:15.520 --> 0:48:19.759
<v Speaker 1>already enjoyed a massive windfallen items that had been similarly

0:48:19.800 --> 0:48:22.719
<v Speaker 1>overlooked in their early days on the market. This week's

0:48:22.719 --> 0:48:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week cover story looks at perhaps the quietest

0:48:25.680 --> 0:48:28.880
<v Speaker 1>smash hit of the Tim Cook era. We're talking about

0:48:28.920 --> 0:48:31.839
<v Speaker 1>air pods. For more on how a cooking company turned

0:48:31.840 --> 0:48:35.120
<v Speaker 1>a lost leader into a cash machine, Bloomberg new senior

0:48:35.120 --> 0:48:38.000
<v Speaker 1>markets reporter Katie Graidfeld and I turned to magazine columnist

0:48:38.040 --> 0:48:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Max Chafkin and the editor of business week, Joel Weber.

0:48:41.520 --> 0:48:46.120
<v Speaker 1>It's actually just an amazing success story, and when Max

0:48:46.360 --> 0:48:49.279
<v Speaker 1>first started talking about this, it was like, you know,

0:48:49.400 --> 0:48:51.000
<v Speaker 1>we we might not be able to break out the

0:48:51.040 --> 0:48:54.200
<v Speaker 1>revenue on its own because of how apple kind of

0:48:54.239 --> 0:48:57.520
<v Speaker 1>does its numbers, but like wow, if air pods were

0:48:57.600 --> 0:49:01.600
<v Speaker 1>its own company, it would be massive. How massive, Max?

0:49:02.000 --> 0:49:05.880
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, as you said, Joel, that apple like considers

0:49:05.920 --> 0:49:08.440
<v Speaker 1>air pods to be so irrelevant that it doesn't doesn't

0:49:08.440 --> 0:49:11.080
<v Speaker 1>report this, but when you look at third party estimates,

0:49:11.080 --> 0:49:14.120
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about probably twenty million or so pairs sold

0:49:14.200 --> 0:49:17.240
<v Speaker 1>last year. That works out to, you know, roughly twenty

0:49:17.520 --> 0:49:20.040
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars. So if air pods were its own company,

0:49:20.080 --> 0:49:22.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, would be, you know, one of the large

0:49:22.440 --> 0:49:25.520
<v Speaker 1>companies in America. But and the fact that it's considered

0:49:25.560 --> 0:49:27.759
<v Speaker 1>to be this kind of sideline thing is partly just

0:49:27.800 --> 0:49:32.040
<v Speaker 1>a testament to apple's, you know, utter dominance. Does Tim

0:49:32.080 --> 0:49:34.799
<v Speaker 1>Cook get enough credit for this, because you write in here,

0:49:34.800 --> 0:49:38.400
<v Speaker 1>and I love this line, that basically critics are saying

0:49:38.440 --> 0:49:43.279
<v Speaker 1>that he's been managing the extremely lucrative decline of Apple. Well,

0:49:43.320 --> 0:49:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I would argue that in general people are too you know,

0:49:47.320 --> 0:49:49.279
<v Speaker 1>don't give enough credit to him cook, because I mean,

0:49:49.320 --> 0:49:52.919
<v Speaker 1>obviously the market cap has gone up, you know, dramatically

0:49:53.080 --> 0:49:55.759
<v Speaker 1>over over the last ten years. Um, there have been

0:49:55.800 --> 0:49:58.200
<v Speaker 1>all these successes. Each time the apple does something, everyone

0:49:58.239 --> 0:49:59.600
<v Speaker 1>makes fun of it. You know, we had that with

0:49:59.640 --> 0:50:01.719
<v Speaker 1>the way, we had that with beats. Um, we even

0:50:01.760 --> 0:50:04.359
<v Speaker 1>had that with airpods where, Um, you know, the big

0:50:04.400 --> 0:50:06.600
<v Speaker 1>story was how dumb they looked, and they do look dumb.

0:50:06.600 --> 0:50:09.120
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, they're they've been very successful. Okay,

0:50:09.239 --> 0:50:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. Speaking of things that looked dumb, Google glass.

0:50:13.560 --> 0:50:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Did I hold on? I'm sorry, no offense, Google glass.

0:50:16.719 --> 0:50:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I remember when these things came out, okay, like a

0:50:18.960 --> 0:50:21.160
<v Speaker 1>decade ago, and there's this great picture of mark injuries

0:50:21.160 --> 0:50:23.400
<v Speaker 1>and wearing them because they raised this fund at injurase

0:50:23.440 --> 0:50:25.600
<v Speaker 1>in horror. What's totally focused on Google glass. Here we are,

0:50:25.640 --> 0:50:28.560
<v Speaker 1>a decade later. We're all walking around wearing Google oh no,

0:50:28.600 --> 0:50:31.240
<v Speaker 1>we're not. We're not all walking around wearing google glass.

0:50:31.760 --> 0:50:34.600
<v Speaker 1>But the reason I'm bringing this up is because this

0:50:34.680 --> 0:50:36.600
<v Speaker 1>is what your story is also about. Max. It's like,

0:50:36.920 --> 0:50:38.879
<v Speaker 1>what are VR ambitions for apple and what can air

0:50:38.880 --> 0:50:41.160
<v Speaker 1>pods tell us about those? Well, I do think that

0:50:41.640 --> 0:50:44.600
<v Speaker 1>if Google had tried to do what apple do with

0:50:44.600 --> 0:50:46.360
<v Speaker 1>air pods, it wouldn't have been a successful and one

0:50:46.400 --> 0:50:49.200
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons it was successful is both because apple

0:50:49.239 --> 0:50:50.759
<v Speaker 1>is really good at marketing stuff, but also because it

0:50:50.760 --> 0:50:54.840
<v Speaker 1>has this ecosystem and they effectively have locked, you know,

0:50:54.960 --> 0:50:57.080
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of more than a hundred million people into this,

0:50:57.239 --> 0:50:59.640
<v Speaker 1>into their system, so that once you're once you've got

0:50:59.680 --> 0:51:01.360
<v Speaker 1>an eye phone, once your family has an iphone, it

0:51:01.320 --> 0:51:02.920
<v Speaker 1>becomes very hard to leave it. And I think we

0:51:02.920 --> 0:51:05.719
<v Speaker 1>can see a similar dynamic with the VR headset. I mean,

0:51:05.960 --> 0:51:08.680
<v Speaker 1>I think we're it's for sure that people will be

0:51:08.680 --> 0:51:12.200
<v Speaker 1>disappointed when that thing comes out. Um. But but we've

0:51:12.200 --> 0:51:15.600
<v Speaker 1>seen that over and over again with Tim Cook's Apple,

0:51:15.640 --> 0:51:18.560
<v Speaker 1>where people the watch was kind of mocked. Air Pods

0:51:18.600 --> 0:51:20.759
<v Speaker 1>are kind of mocked and I'm guessing this one will

0:51:20.800 --> 0:51:24.400
<v Speaker 1>be too. And yet, like, insofar as VR is a

0:51:24.440 --> 0:51:27.800
<v Speaker 1>category which people could debate, I think, if it is

0:51:27.840 --> 0:51:31.800
<v Speaker 1>a category, will be significant for Apple. Okay, so this category,

0:51:31.920 --> 0:51:36.600
<v Speaker 1>that air pods, is part of wearables, home and accessories,

0:51:36.960 --> 0:51:40.799
<v Speaker 1>fastest growing line of business. One reason for that might

0:51:40.840 --> 0:51:43.319
<v Speaker 1>be because you know what happens when you lose your

0:51:43.360 --> 0:51:45.400
<v Speaker 1>air pod, Max. What do you have to do? Well,

0:51:45.680 --> 0:51:49.160
<v Speaker 1>as I've written the story, I've had three pairs of

0:51:49.200 --> 0:51:50.759
<v Speaker 1>air pods. I don't even really like them, but I

0:51:50.800 --> 0:51:53.120
<v Speaker 1>just keep buying them because, you know, they break or

0:51:53.160 --> 0:51:55.080
<v Speaker 1>they fall out. And even this morning I was I was,

0:51:55.239 --> 0:51:57.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, riding the train to work and one fell

0:51:57.040 --> 0:51:59.000
<v Speaker 1>out and I did not notice that had fallen out.

0:51:59.080 --> 0:52:04.160
<v Speaker 1>And and so that's another seventy. Yeah, actually ordered that

0:52:04.200 --> 0:52:09.200
<v Speaker 1>on you. He said, a little vibration uh to Um.

0:52:09.200 --> 0:52:11.680
<v Speaker 1>So within that category. Just talked to us about why

0:52:11.760 --> 0:52:15.919
<v Speaker 1>that category has been growing so fast. Well, it's really

0:52:15.960 --> 0:52:19.000
<v Speaker 1>it's it's two products. It's the Apple Watch, Um and

0:52:19.080 --> 0:52:21.520
<v Speaker 1>it's and it's air pods and air pods about half

0:52:21.520 --> 0:52:24.040
<v Speaker 1>of it. The Watch is a pretty significant chunk as well.

0:52:24.600 --> 0:52:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Um and, and I do think it's kind of weird.

0:52:28.200 --> 0:52:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street loves to to create this diconomy between services

0:52:31.760 --> 0:52:34.400
<v Speaker 1>and products. That's that's such economy that apple likes, because

0:52:34.680 --> 0:52:37.520
<v Speaker 1>services are growing very fast and they're very profitable. But

0:52:37.680 --> 0:52:40.160
<v Speaker 1>it's not totally clear to me why you would consider,

0:52:40.200 --> 0:52:43.759
<v Speaker 1>for instance, iicloud a separate business when when really what

0:52:43.800 --> 0:52:46.239
<v Speaker 1>it is is like an add on thing you buy

0:52:46.320 --> 0:52:48.840
<v Speaker 1>with your iphone. Your iphone doesn't work without it, and

0:52:48.880 --> 0:52:51.280
<v Speaker 1>I think in a lot of cases like these businesses

0:52:51.320 --> 0:52:53.839
<v Speaker 1>have sort of merged where where they're all just sort

0:52:53.840 --> 0:52:57.480
<v Speaker 1>of part of this overall iphone subscription that we're all paying,

0:52:57.840 --> 0:52:59.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, close to a thousand dollars a year. Four

0:52:59.719 --> 0:53:02.440
<v Speaker 1>that business week columnist Max Chafkin, along with the editor

0:53:02.520 --> 0:53:05.160
<v Speaker 1>of the magazine, Joe Webber, on this week's cover story.

0:53:05.480 --> 0:53:08.279
<v Speaker 1>Katie Kraffeld with us there as well. You're listening to

0:53:08.280 --> 0:53:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week coming up, we're turning our attention back

0:53:11.560 --> 0:53:14.719
<v Speaker 1>to the environment and the groundbreaking innovations being funded to

0:53:14.719 --> 0:53:18.439
<v Speaker 1>help mitigate the threat of climate change. Carol Masser goes

0:53:18.480 --> 0:53:21.000
<v Speaker 1>one on one with Hannah Jones, CEO of the Earth

0:53:21.040 --> 0:53:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Shot Prize. Next this is Bloomberg. To protect his family

0:53:28.480 --> 0:53:34.000
<v Speaker 1>from disaster, Steve used his camera phone by taking pictures

0:53:34.000 --> 0:53:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of its important documents. Steve can always set them stored online.

0:53:37.560 --> 0:53:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Learn more simple disaster prep tips at ready DOT Gov.

0:53:40.320 --> 0:53:47.239
<v Speaker 1>a message from female in the Idcount you're listening to

0:53:47.360 --> 0:53:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and Bloomberg. Quick Takes

0:53:51.320 --> 0:53:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Tim stinovy from Bloomberg radio. This past Wednesday, Carol Masser

0:53:56.680 --> 0:53:59.359
<v Speaker 1>and I broadcast our daily Business Week Program from the

0:53:59.440 --> 0:54:03.080
<v Speaker 1>first ever Earth Shot Prize Innovation Summit. The event was

0:54:03.120 --> 0:54:05.400
<v Speaker 1>hosted by Michael R Bloomberg, the founder and owner of

0:54:05.400 --> 0:54:08.799
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg LP, the parent company of Bloomberg Radio, and the

0:54:08.920 --> 0:54:12.839
<v Speaker 1>U N Secretary General's special envoy on climate ambition and solutions.

0:54:13.480 --> 0:54:16.440
<v Speaker 1>The summit brought together heads of state, government and civil

0:54:16.480 --> 0:54:21.239
<v Speaker 1>society leaders, philanthropists, business executives and grassroot climate activists from

0:54:21.239 --> 0:54:25.719
<v Speaker 1>around the world. They spotlighted emerging innovations that are needed

0:54:25.760 --> 0:54:30.000
<v Speaker 1>to address the world's most pressing environmental challenges. His Royal

0:54:30.080 --> 0:54:32.879
<v Speaker 1>Highness Prince William is the driving force behind the Earth

0:54:32.880 --> 0:54:36.480
<v Speaker 1>shot program he delivered remarks remotely due to the recent

0:54:36.520 --> 0:54:39.600
<v Speaker 1>passing of his grandmother, Queen Elizabeth the second. Just as

0:54:39.640 --> 0:54:42.760
<v Speaker 1>President John F Kennedy so famously said as he challenged

0:54:42.800 --> 0:54:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the United States of America to unite behind the goal

0:54:45.719 --> 0:54:48.600
<v Speaker 1>of putting man on the moon, we choose to do

0:54:48.640 --> 0:54:51.600
<v Speaker 1>these things not because they are easy, but because they

0:54:51.600 --> 0:54:54.240
<v Speaker 1>are hard. I know that the world is an uncertain

0:54:54.280 --> 0:54:57.719
<v Speaker 1>place right now that many families and communities across the

0:54:57.760 --> 0:55:02.480
<v Speaker 1>globe are facing unimaginable challenge us, from conflicts to energy

0:55:02.520 --> 0:55:07.200
<v Speaker 1>crisis and food shortages. While addressing these in the short term,

0:55:07.360 --> 0:55:11.240
<v Speaker 1>we must also remain resolutely focused on tackling the greatest

0:55:11.320 --> 0:55:15.040
<v Speaker 1>challenges that threatened or tomorrow. The Earth Shot Prize awarded

0:55:15.080 --> 0:55:18.279
<v Speaker 1>its first five prizes of one million pounds each last year.

0:55:18.760 --> 0:55:22.080
<v Speaker 1>It aims to recognize individuals with solutions for tackling the

0:55:22.120 --> 0:55:27.040
<v Speaker 1>world's most pressing climate related problems or earth shots. With

0:55:27.080 --> 0:55:28.960
<v Speaker 1>more on the work that the team is doing, carol

0:55:29.000 --> 0:55:31.839
<v Speaker 1>cut up with Earth Shot Prize CEO Hannah Jones at

0:55:31.840 --> 0:55:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the summit. The energy, by the way, in these places

0:55:34.560 --> 0:55:37.239
<v Speaker 1>off the charts, which is exactly what we need. This week.

0:55:37.560 --> 0:55:40.320
<v Speaker 1>We need urgent optimism and we need people feeling totally

0:55:40.400 --> 0:55:43.879
<v Speaker 1>energized by the possibility. And that really takes me back

0:55:43.920 --> 0:55:48.080
<v Speaker 1>to our founder, Prince William P um. He founded the

0:55:48.080 --> 0:55:52.040
<v Speaker 1>earth shot prize after having two insights. He was in

0:55:52.040 --> 0:55:55.719
<v Speaker 1>a conservation project that was really successful in Namibia, but

0:55:55.760 --> 0:55:59.719
<v Speaker 1>he felt terribly frustrated that this successful solution wasn't going

0:55:59.760 --> 0:56:02.680
<v Speaker 1>to scale, it wasn't going to be replicated around the world.

0:56:03.560 --> 0:56:07.120
<v Speaker 1>And yet it was helping poachers become conservationists, it was

0:56:07.239 --> 0:56:10.799
<v Speaker 1>changing the entire landscape. So why wasn't anyone scaling it?

0:56:11.280 --> 0:56:14.759
<v Speaker 1>The second insight was that the dialogue at the time

0:56:14.800 --> 0:56:17.920
<v Speaker 1>back in t was so full of fear and anger

0:56:18.280 --> 0:56:20.800
<v Speaker 1>that he was worried that we wouldn't get to action

0:56:20.840 --> 0:56:24.359
<v Speaker 1>and change if we didn't inject optimism into the conversation.

0:56:24.880 --> 0:56:27.719
<v Speaker 1>So we married those two insights and he created the

0:56:27.760 --> 0:56:30.239
<v Speaker 1>Earth Shot Prize. And the Earth Shot Prize is meant

0:56:30.239 --> 0:56:34.040
<v Speaker 1>to be a beacon for urgent optimism and putting the

0:56:34.080 --> 0:56:37.960
<v Speaker 1>spotlight on solutions that, if scaled, could repair and regenerate

0:56:38.000 --> 0:56:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the planet. And you've got five different categories. Checking me

0:56:40.880 --> 0:56:42.839
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about we do. So we did a

0:56:42.880 --> 0:56:45.239
<v Speaker 1>lot of research into how we should do this and

0:56:45.280 --> 0:56:49.359
<v Speaker 1>we've set up five earth shot challenges. One is oceans, which,

0:56:49.400 --> 0:56:51.200
<v Speaker 1>by the way, I'm so in love with the innovation

0:56:51.239 --> 0:56:55.960
<v Speaker 1>happening in oceans. One is in biodiversity, one is around

0:56:55.960 --> 0:57:00.560
<v Speaker 1>waist cleaner and climate change, and if you think about it,

0:57:00.880 --> 0:57:02.799
<v Speaker 1>all of those things are the things that we need

0:57:02.880 --> 0:57:06.440
<v Speaker 1>to see repaired and restored and regenerated for the Earth

0:57:06.600 --> 0:57:11.920
<v Speaker 1>to be livable, equitable sustainable. So we award one million

0:57:12.080 --> 0:57:15.000
<v Speaker 1>pounds each to a winner in each of the categories

0:57:15.160 --> 0:57:18.840
<v Speaker 1>each year. But Prince William is very clear with us

0:57:18.880 --> 0:57:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the team. We're going to have fifteen finalists as a

0:57:21.760 --> 0:57:24.400
<v Speaker 1>whole and they are our family and we are here

0:57:24.400 --> 0:57:27.640
<v Speaker 1>to support them all, irrespective of who ultimately wins the

0:57:27.680 --> 0:57:30.840
<v Speaker 1>big money, and we see the money as catalytic. So

0:57:30.920 --> 0:57:35.040
<v Speaker 1>we have this incredible partnership and collective of partners, of

0:57:35.080 --> 0:57:38.720
<v Speaker 1>which Bloomberg Philanthropy's is obviously a key one. And so

0:57:39.000 --> 0:57:42.720
<v Speaker 1>when we bring the finalists out into the spotlight, we're

0:57:42.760 --> 0:57:45.760
<v Speaker 1>also looking at how we can give them access to talent,

0:57:46.400 --> 0:57:50.160
<v Speaker 1>access to advice, access to networks of power and ultimately

0:57:50.200 --> 0:57:53.520
<v Speaker 1>to blended capital, because we want them to go from

0:57:53.560 --> 0:57:57.000
<v Speaker 1>being a great working prototype that, if they were scaled,

0:57:57.560 --> 0:58:00.000
<v Speaker 1>could make a huge impact. Let's do that fast, everybody.

0:58:00.920 --> 0:58:02.480
<v Speaker 1>You know what was interesting too, as you guys reached

0:58:02.520 --> 0:58:05.440
<v Speaker 1>out around the globe right people renominating a lot that

0:58:05.480 --> 0:58:06.960
<v Speaker 1>you had to go through. What was it that made

0:58:07.000 --> 0:58:09.600
<v Speaker 1>somebody stand out that you said, I want these people

0:58:09.640 --> 0:58:12.320
<v Speaker 1>to be a finalist and an ultimately, a winner? It's

0:58:12.320 --> 0:58:14.919
<v Speaker 1>a great question and it's the hardest part of our job.

0:58:15.280 --> 0:58:17.680
<v Speaker 1>We have a price council that are made up of

0:58:17.920 --> 0:58:23.560
<v Speaker 1>some incredible people. Christianity forget is we have Hindu Ibrahim,

0:58:23.800 --> 0:58:27.240
<v Speaker 1>we have Sir David Attenborough, the prince, the list goes on,

0:58:27.440 --> 0:58:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Queen Bran, and they have to actually get to a

0:58:30.120 --> 0:58:32.320
<v Speaker 1>place where they have to make the final five. Let

0:58:32.400 --> 0:58:36.520
<v Speaker 1>me tell you, this is a terrible conversation. But before

0:58:36.560 --> 0:58:39.120
<v Speaker 1>there we have a very rigorous process. So we have

0:58:39.200 --> 0:58:43.880
<v Speaker 1>official nominators that bring in nominations every year and from

0:58:43.920 --> 0:58:47.320
<v Speaker 1>that we're looking for, first of all, are these diverse?

0:58:47.520 --> 0:58:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Do they represent really all of the countries in the world?

0:58:51.680 --> 0:58:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Do they bring women to the four? Do they bring

0:58:53.680 --> 0:58:56.200
<v Speaker 1>indigenous communities to the four? How do we make sure

0:58:56.200 --> 0:58:59.920
<v Speaker 1>that we have representation? Secondly, I think do they have

0:59:00.000 --> 0:59:02.600
<v Speaker 1>a potential to make an impact? So right now they're

0:59:02.640 --> 0:59:05.240
<v Speaker 1>working prototype, but how are they going to impact? If

0:59:05.240 --> 0:59:11.280
<v Speaker 1>they went to scale, carbon or biodiversity or sustainable livelihood creation,

0:59:11.680 --> 0:59:13.800
<v Speaker 1>how will they make an impact and do we see

0:59:13.840 --> 0:59:16.640
<v Speaker 1>a pathway to helping them? And if so, they get

0:59:16.680 --> 0:59:19.600
<v Speaker 1>to the next stage, which is how can they inspire

0:59:19.640 --> 0:59:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the world? And really that's a very complicated process. We

0:59:23.320 --> 0:59:25.840
<v Speaker 1>have technical experts we really bring in. We have an

0:59:25.840 --> 0:59:29.040
<v Speaker 1>ex external group that helps us, Deloitte, so that we

0:59:29.080 --> 0:59:32.400
<v Speaker 1>make sure it's fair, objective and consistently. We wanted to

0:59:32.440 --> 0:59:33.840
<v Speaker 1>ask you is I do feel like there's a lot

0:59:33.880 --> 0:59:36.000
<v Speaker 1>of momentum, certainly the investment world when it comes to

0:59:36.040 --> 0:59:37.880
<v Speaker 1>the E S G space. Right a lot of money

0:59:37.880 --> 0:59:42.320
<v Speaker 1>going into sustainability environment. Um. What is it that set

0:59:42.360 --> 0:59:45.880
<v Speaker 1>to you guys, apart with what you're doing at Earth Shot? Well,

0:59:45.920 --> 0:59:48.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's not a day when I don't meet

0:59:48.360 --> 0:59:51.080
<v Speaker 1>with a philanthropist or a VC, with an e s

0:59:51.120 --> 0:59:54.360
<v Speaker 1>g fund or an impact investor and after an initial

0:59:54.400 --> 0:59:57.400
<v Speaker 1>conversation they look at me and say, can I tell

0:59:57.440 --> 1:00:01.880
<v Speaker 1>you a secret? Could you be ideal pipeline? I don't

1:00:01.880 --> 1:00:05.000
<v Speaker 1>have enough things that I know what to invest in interesting.

1:00:05.120 --> 1:00:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Now we are sitting on this incredible we've got already

1:00:08.080 --> 1:00:12.080
<v Speaker 1>over two thousand nominations just in eighteen months and we're vetting,

1:00:12.480 --> 1:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, to get through a different stage. We're looking

1:00:14.880 --> 1:00:17.760
<v Speaker 1>at them and we're saying, but how can we match make?

1:00:18.040 --> 1:00:21.600
<v Speaker 1>How can we match make er ECO innovators with blended capitals?

1:00:22.640 --> 1:00:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Talking to some of your finalists, they say there's a

1:00:24.640 --> 1:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of things having a seen at the table, but capital.

1:00:27.120 --> 1:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>It's crucial for scale with ability. Imagine that you are

1:00:30.880 --> 1:00:34.480
<v Speaker 1>any one of these finalists or innovators. You're not walking

1:00:34.520 --> 1:00:37.880
<v Speaker 1>down Sands Hill road and bumping into a VC every day. Right.

1:00:37.960 --> 1:00:40.440
<v Speaker 1>You're living in Nigeria thinking of how you do a

1:00:40.480 --> 1:00:43.600
<v Speaker 1>low cost solar leasing program to help people in the

1:00:43.640 --> 1:00:47.480
<v Speaker 1>local slums to have access to green electricity. But you

1:00:47.520 --> 1:00:50.280
<v Speaker 1>need funding, but you have no access to those networks

1:00:50.280 --> 1:00:53.800
<v Speaker 1>of privilege. Prince William was very clear. I want to

1:00:53.960 --> 1:00:57.320
<v Speaker 1>use my privilege and my platform to convene and make

1:00:57.360 --> 1:01:01.480
<v Speaker 1>that funding conversation happening faster. But having worked so much

1:01:01.480 --> 1:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>with entrepreneurs, what I'll also tell you this. When you

1:01:03.760 --> 1:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>go on that journey from being a prototype to being scale,

1:01:07.360 --> 1:01:10.520
<v Speaker 1>you don't just need money, right. You need advice, you

1:01:10.600 --> 1:01:13.400
<v Speaker 1>need to support, you need compassion and kindness, you need

1:01:13.480 --> 1:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>leadership training, storytelling training. So that's something that we're also

1:01:17.600 --> 1:01:21.040
<v Speaker 1>really supporting and our Global Alliance of partners. They're not

1:01:21.080 --> 1:01:24.640
<v Speaker 1>just putting capital and they're putting staff in, they're putting

1:01:24.640 --> 1:01:27.560
<v Speaker 1>expertise in their opening up their supply chains, you know.

1:01:27.640 --> 1:01:29.439
<v Speaker 1>And what's interesting is, you know, when we think about

1:01:29.440 --> 1:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the world capitals and entrepreneurs, they're are doing some really

1:01:32.160 --> 1:01:34.960
<v Speaker 1>cool things, but we're talking literally about saving the world,

1:01:35.560 --> 1:01:38.560
<v Speaker 1>saving the planet, Earth Shot. We talk about moon shots right,

1:01:38.600 --> 1:01:41.800
<v Speaker 1>like doing the unthinkable. This is about existence for everyone,

1:01:42.000 --> 1:01:44.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's where you talk about oceans and earth and energy.

1:01:44.800 --> 1:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is what we're talking about. It is

1:01:47.320 --> 1:01:49.920
<v Speaker 1>and you know, one of the things to think about

1:01:50.120 --> 1:01:52.760
<v Speaker 1>is this is the sixtieth anniversary of the Moon Shot

1:01:53.320 --> 1:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>and Prince William was really influenced by President Kennedy's Moonshot

1:01:58.480 --> 1:02:01.640
<v Speaker 1>challenge to the American people because it did two things.

1:02:02.320 --> 1:02:05.000
<v Speaker 1>He didn't just challenge them to land a man on

1:02:05.040 --> 1:02:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the moon and bring them home safely when we knew

1:02:07.400 --> 1:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>none of the answers to how to do that. What

1:02:09.920 --> 1:02:13.680
<v Speaker 1>actually happened was it unleashed a wave of innovation that

1:02:13.840 --> 1:02:18.720
<v Speaker 1>shaped economic and social progress and, maybe more importantly, he

1:02:18.840 --> 1:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>unleashed a new mindset in the American people, which was

1:02:21.520 --> 1:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>we can turn the seemingly impossible possible. We have to

1:02:25.480 --> 1:02:27.400
<v Speaker 1>make this be a short decade and we have to

1:02:27.480 --> 1:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>unleash that mindset again. We have innovation all over the

1:02:31.200 --> 1:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>world happening. We've got to believe we can do this

1:02:33.920 --> 1:02:36.160
<v Speaker 1>and change the trajectory of the planet, and it will

1:02:36.160 --> 1:02:39.000
<v Speaker 1>take all of us. That was Hannah Jones. She's chief

1:02:39.000 --> 1:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>executive officer at the Earth Shot Prize. She spoke with

1:02:41.840 --> 1:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Carol at the Earth Shot Prize Innovation Summit this past Wednesday.

1:02:45.480 --> 1:02:47.880
<v Speaker 1>The event was hosted by Michael R Bloomberg, the founder

1:02:47.880 --> 1:02:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and owner of Bloomberg LP, the parent company of Bloomberg Radio,

1:02:51.520 --> 1:02:54.280
<v Speaker 1>and the U N Secretary General's special envoy on climate

1:02:54.280 --> 1:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>ambition and solutions. The summit brought together heads of state,

1:02:58.280 --> 1:03:03.040
<v Speaker 1>government and civil society, Les Philanthropists, business executives and grassroot

1:03:03.080 --> 1:03:07.520
<v Speaker 1>climate activists from around the world. They spotlighted emerging innovations

1:03:07.560 --> 1:03:10.960
<v Speaker 1>that are needed to address the world's most pressing environmental challenges.

1:03:11.600 --> 1:03:14.200
<v Speaker 1>And that wraps up the weekend. Edition of Bloomberg Business

1:03:14.200 --> 1:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Week from Bloomberg radio. Thanks so much for joining us.

1:03:17.040 --> 1:03:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tim Stanovik. Carol Masser will be back with US

1:03:19.520 --> 1:03:22.280
<v Speaker 1>next week. Be sure to tune into Bloomberg Business Week.

1:03:22.280 --> 1:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>It's Monday through Friday. It starts at two PM Wall

1:03:24.560 --> 1:03:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Street time on Bloomberg radio. You can also watch our

1:03:27.880 --> 1:03:32.160
<v Speaker 1>daily broadcast on YouTube. Just search Bloomberg Global News and

1:03:32.240 --> 1:03:34.640
<v Speaker 1>check out our Bloomberg Business Week podcast. You can find

1:03:34.640 --> 1:03:37.360
<v Speaker 1>that at Bloomberg dot com, apple or wherever you get

1:03:37.400 --> 1:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>your podcasts. Bloomberg Business Week is available on newstands now

1:03:41.200 --> 1:03:44.040
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg Dot Com and on the Bloomberg terminal, and

1:03:44.080 --> 1:03:46.480
<v Speaker 1>you can also see me on Bloomberg quick take, available

1:03:46.480 --> 1:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg Dot com, slash qt and streaming platforms like Roku,

1:03:50.480 --> 1:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Apple TV, Samsung TV and more. Have a great weekend everyone.

1:03:54.560 --> 1:04:03.160
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. What is dedication? The thing that drives

1:04:03.160 --> 1:04:05.560
<v Speaker 1>me every day as a dad is dairy on him.

1:04:05.680 --> 1:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>We call him UH data. For sure. Every day he's

1:04:09.480 --> 1:04:15.240
<v Speaker 1>hungry for something, whether it's attention, affection, knowledge, and there's

1:04:15.320 --> 1:04:19.000
<v Speaker 1>this huge responsibility in making sure that when he's no

1:04:19.080 --> 1:04:23.800
<v Speaker 1>longer under my wing, that he's a good person. I

1:04:23.880 --> 1:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>think the advice I would give is you don't need

1:04:27.200 --> 1:04:30.600
<v Speaker 1>to know all the answers. The craziest thing was believing

1:04:31.160 --> 1:04:33.840
<v Speaker 1>that your dad knew everything. So as a dad, you

1:04:33.840 --> 1:04:35.440
<v Speaker 1>felt like you had to know everything, you had to

1:04:35.480 --> 1:04:38.960
<v Speaker 1>get everything right. It's okay to make mistakes as long

1:04:39.000 --> 1:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>as it's coming from love. Then you know it kind

1:04:42.080 --> 1:04:44.880
<v Speaker 1>of starts to work itself out. I want him to

1:04:44.920 --> 1:04:46.840
<v Speaker 1>be able to sit back one day and go we

1:04:46.920 --> 1:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>worked together, we did a good job. That's dedication. Find

1:04:51.640 --> 1:04:54.880
<v Speaker 1>out more at Fatherhood Dot Gov. brought to you by

1:04:54.920 --> 1:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the U S Department of Health and Human Services and

1:04:56.960 --> 1:04:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the Ad Council.