WEBVTT - Hunter Biden's Laptop

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Here's a relatable question. You ever get a job that

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:06.000
<v Speaker 1>you weren't totally qualified for? I know I have turns

0:00:06.000 --> 0:00:08.479
<v Speaker 1>out not everyone's cut out to be a thoracic surgeon,

0:00:08.800 --> 0:00:11.040
<v Speaker 1>but maybe things would have turned out differently for me

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:13.560
<v Speaker 1>if I had a famous dad, like if my dad

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:16.000
<v Speaker 1>was the President of the United States. This is the

0:00:16.000 --> 0:00:19.520
<v Speaker 1>focal point of the Republican conspiracy theory around Hunter Biden,

0:00:19.760 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 1>that he used his connection to his dad, Joe Biden,

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:25.960
<v Speaker 1>to make money and overseas deals. And yes, obviously this

0:00:26.040 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 1>is coming from the people who supported Donald Trump and

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:32.200
<v Speaker 1>his family as they milked every government connection they could

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 1>for four years, like in Oceans eleven movie if it

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:38.519
<v Speaker 1>took place during a Nickelodeon shopping spree. Now, if that

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 1>reference is too far removed for you, then apologies in advance.

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Because the Hunter Biden story has so many references to

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 1>things that seem fake Kafe Milano, Sinohawk, the secret Willard

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Hotel breakfast, that we probably should have made a Hunter

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Wiki ahead of time just to help you through it.

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>This Jordan Klepper fingers the conspiracy. We gotta packed episode today.

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 1>We're going to walk through the fariracy theory known as

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:04.959
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Biden's Laptop with a Fox News expert. Then Democratic

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Congressman Jerry Connolly will discuss the House of Strategy responding

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:11.959
<v Speaker 1>to an investigation, and then Tippany Cross will talk the

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:15.959
<v Speaker 1>media's responsibility. Before we even start, you should know that

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>it's not even proven there is a laptop. There is

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:22.480
<v Speaker 1>a hard drive copied from what a Trump supporter who

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:25.319
<v Speaker 1>owns a computer repair shop in Delaware says was a

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:28.400
<v Speaker 1>laptop that he handed over to the FBI. But nobody's

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 1>seeing a picture of it, and what the hell, let's

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 1>just take his word for it. The Hunter Biden laptop

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 1>saga is a fantastical right wing reverie concocted during the

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty campaign by Rudy Giuliani, Donald Trump, and of

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>course Fox News, which means it's inevitable that I heard

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the words hunter Biden laptop constantly at Trump rallies, even

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 1>if the people there didn't exactly know what it is.

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>You can see on Fox and One American News about

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the laptop, Hunter Biden's laptop, and then all the Crumpton

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>taking money from the different countries, you know, from Russian.

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Then Joe Biden would do whatever these countries needed. Did

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>oh he what? Either what he did or did not do?

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:14.360
<v Speaker 1>What didn't? What did he do? You have to be

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 1>determined exactly what he did. I saw pedophilia and China

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:22.240
<v Speaker 1>something like that. Do you believe it? I don't know.

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>We see about like the Hunter Biden scandal. What exactly

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>happened with that? I think they found a laptop that

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:31.399
<v Speaker 1>had you know, emailed and um there was an FBI.

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>They found a laptop with like emails and pictures of

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, Biden talking with like Ukraine and China about

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:39.360
<v Speaker 1>business deals and stuff like that. Which Biden, Hunter Biden

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:42.679
<v Speaker 1>did it? Something happened? I mean the conspiracy theorists would

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 1>say that it's Joe Biden and Hunter Biden communicating with

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, outside countries on business deals and stuff like that.

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Are you calling him a conspiracy theorist? That's just what

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:54.919
<v Speaker 1>he said, right. Okay, let's help these private investigators out

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:57.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. Joining me today is Andrew Lawrence, the

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 1>deputy director of Rapid Response at ME It Matters for America. Basically,

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 1>that means he watches Fox News all day. Andrew, thanks

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 1>for being here to talk about the laptop from Hell. Yeah,

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:09.920
<v Speaker 1>of course, thank you for having me. I'm excited to

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:12.919
<v Speaker 1>finger this conspiracy with you. Oh it sounds sexy when

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>you say thank you. Hunter Biden is sexy. It's a

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>sexy top he is. He is a sexy man. He's

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>all over. If you're into pin up dudes and Fox News,

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 1>he's your guy. I want to jump into it because

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 1>House Republicans are about to become the majority, and they've

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:32.639
<v Speaker 1>announced that they're going to investigate Hunter Biden. So let's

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>start with just establishing who Hunter Biden is, because some

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 1>of the things Hunter Biden has done are probably not

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 1>very becoming of a son of a public official, like

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>using the Biden family name to make foreign business deals done.

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 1>A good place to start. Yeah, I mean, I think

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it's fair to say that, Um, Hunter Biden is,

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's essentially a fail son. Um. I think, Um,

0:03:57.240 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>he's He's had a lot of tough things happen into

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 1>him in his life. You know. I think that it's

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 1>it's fairly well known Joe Biden's history of tragedy with

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I believe it was his wife dying in a in

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 1>a car accident. I know Hunter was involved in that,

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 1>and Um, and you know that's something that's going to

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 1>affect you. And then his brother Bo Biden as well,

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:21.600
<v Speaker 1>passing from from cancer not all that long ago. Um,

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and that's sort of when, according to what I've seen,

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:28.360
<v Speaker 1>his tailspin really began. Um. But you know, I think,

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 1>like you're right, Like it is fair to say that

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that there is there's some questionable things there that Republicans

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>and right wing media are trying to to glom onto

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:39.920
<v Speaker 1>this as some sort of giant scandal that's going to

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 1>bring down Joe Biden and the Democratic Party is is

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit ridiculous. And I mean, there's so much

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 1>to get into the weeds here. Uh. You know, you

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 1>got into it a little bit with that that nobody's

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 1>really even seen this laptop yet. Um. And here we

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:56.680
<v Speaker 1>are with months and months. What's it been like two

0:04:56.760 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 1>years now since this first came up. I mean, I

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:01.280
<v Speaker 1>think it is fast. Part of the reasons we wanted

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 1>to cover it one, I'm running into people on the

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:06.039
<v Speaker 1>road and it's always a go to hunter Biden And

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 1>more often than not, the stuff that I run into

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:09.839
<v Speaker 1>with people on the road, what is the dodge? What

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:12.279
<v Speaker 1>is the quickest thing you can grab a hold onto.

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:15.039
<v Speaker 1>It's easy to say Hunter Biden laptop. It's harder to

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 1>say what Hunter Biden's laptop contains. But I think it's

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:22.920
<v Speaker 1>fascinating because I also think on the left, the left

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:25.160
<v Speaker 1>is trying as hard as they can not to address

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>what is potentially on this laptop and some of the allegations,

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:32.840
<v Speaker 1>which are some dire allegations. Now I need a download

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 1>on what I need to know about this, where the

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 1>reality is, where we should be suspicions and what is

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the bullshit people are slinging at the board to try

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 1>to distract you from something else. So so you're helping

0:05:44.120 --> 0:05:45.480
<v Speaker 1>me out here with Hunter Biden, and I do think

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:47.840
<v Speaker 1>it is it's important to point out it is true.

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:50.040
<v Speaker 1>He's gone through a lot of tragedy in his life.

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 1>We've seen images. He's dealt with drug addiction publicly, He's

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>written about that in a book. A lot of these

0:05:56.320 --> 0:05:59.239
<v Speaker 1>things are things that he verifies and talks openly about.

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:04.040
<v Speaker 1>He himself is an attorney and he's been a foreign lobbyist.

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Is that correct? Yes, And that's where some of this

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:10.839
<v Speaker 1>this drama starts too. And he's currently under investigation in

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Delaware as well. For I believe it's tax fraud. I'm

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:15.600
<v Speaker 1>not one hundred percent sure on that, but it's something

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:17.280
<v Speaker 1>like that. And I think that's that's an important thing too.

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:20.239
<v Speaker 1>When they talk about Hunter bid being under investigation, it's

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 1>one of the little tax fraud God bless investigate that

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>tax fraud. Not for me though, I and all of

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 1>my tax fraud comes from imbecility. I really don't know

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the difference between W nin and W four, So so

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:37.159
<v Speaker 1>don't come at me. That's just that's my naivete. But

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 1>so Hunter Biden is under investigation, but not exactly for

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the stuff that Republicans are arguing. So we got nepotism,

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 1>and we got corruption, we got hardware repair, we got

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:49.799
<v Speaker 1>Ukrainian gas companies. What does that say about the nature

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:54.039
<v Speaker 1>of this conspiracy theory? Well, I think you know, we

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>can take this. The Hunter Biden laptop is like the

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>latest thing, right, and so you had in this every

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>elect and it seems the Republican Party and conservative media

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>are looking for something to grab hold of. And you

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 1>said it yourself earlier that that people are fired up

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 1>about this, but they don't really know why. Right, they

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>know Hunter Biden's laptop is something that they should be

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 1>they should be upset about and that that there's something

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 1>nefarious there. But you can take a look back at

0:07:18.480 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, the her emails, same thing. You know, nobody

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 1>really knew what was what was wrong with that, but

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 1>they knew that there was something wrong with it. Um

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 1>it proved her untrustworthiness, the same thing with you can

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>go back to. It's also it also proves how little

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 1>people know about technology. The fact that you can say

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 1>emails and laptop. It's as if America is just a

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>bunch of seventy four year old grandparents who lost for

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 1>remote and they're like, I don't know, it's cinches and devils, right,

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 1>that's your controls, the magnets. It's the magnets who could

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 1>ever figure these things out. But you just describe the

0:07:51.520 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Republican base right there, right for the most part. I

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 1>mean that's and and so they they hear Hunter Biden,

0:07:57.080 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>they hear laptop and it just sounds it just sounds nefarious.

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>And then all right, and then you throw into this

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 1>was uncovered by a laptop repairman who contacted the FBI

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 1>and talked to the FBI, and you know it, all

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the Deep States involved in this now and it's all though,

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 1>these little buzzwords that they've they've spent years, you know,

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 1>making these into buzzwords, making these into things that Republican

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 1>voters just have a reaction to, a visceral reaction just

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>hearing these words, you know, at this point, and I

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>know we're going to get into the investigations and stuff

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:32.679
<v Speaker 1>like that, but if you remember back with Benghazi, I

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:35.440
<v Speaker 1>believe it was Kevin McCarthy, he was bragging about how

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:38.959
<v Speaker 1>there would not have been her emails without the Benghazi investigations.

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:43.439
<v Speaker 1>Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right, but we put

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 1>together a Benghazi special committee, a select committee. What are

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping? Why because she's untrustable.

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 1>But no one would have known any of that had happened,

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 1>had we a great And that's really the point of this.

0:08:58.800 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>They want to investigate this laptop just so they can

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:04.320
<v Speaker 1>find something to go after Joe Biden and by extension,

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:07.679
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic Party with fun exciting. So let's figure out

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 1>what they're gonna what they're gonna find. So, so let's

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:15.080
<v Speaker 1>break this down. Twenty nineteen. There's three water damage laptops

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 1>that allegedly Hunter Biden brings to a Delaware computer repair shop,

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:24.439
<v Speaker 1>and the shop owner, who's a Trump supporter, sees the receipt.

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>It's from Hunter Biden allegedly. He starts going through some

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 1>of these files, notices some pictures. He's also legally blind to.

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 1>The shopkeeper is a bright and he can't he can't

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 1>confirm that it was actually Hunter that dropped it off,

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, but there is a receipt with what books

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>to be Hunters Hunter's signature, so you know, give them

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the benefit of the doubt. So okay, yes, there's a receipt,

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>and supposedly Hunter doesn't pay for the repair, and therefore

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:54.680
<v Speaker 1>this is where things get legal. Now there's a moral

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:58.320
<v Speaker 1>question here too. But that laptop, multiple laptops are left

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:02.200
<v Speaker 1>there for past ninety day, so they become the owner

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 1>of the repair shop. It's now his laptop. Yes it's

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:07.440
<v Speaker 1>it's it's his property by law. So he starts going

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:10.320
<v Speaker 1>through this stuff and he starts fighting pictures, he starts

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 1>fighting emails like what happens next after he he sort

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:17.440
<v Speaker 1>of connects the dots of whose whose laptop this supposedly

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 1>is and what he might have on it. Okay, so

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 1>this guy's name is John mac Isaac and like you said,

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 1>he's he's a conservative Trump supporter. This is all like

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:28.160
<v Speaker 1>you said, you know, twenty nineteen. It's important to sort

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:31.440
<v Speaker 1>of set the time frame as well. This is a

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 1>month I think maybe three weeks before the election something

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 1>like that. So he's, uh, he's deep into this world

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:41.839
<v Speaker 1>of right wing politics, conservative media. He's very worried about

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the deep state, but decide he talks to his dad

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:47.199
<v Speaker 1>about it, who I believe was formerly in the army.

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 1>I believe I might be wrong about that, but his

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:52.439
<v Speaker 1>dad recommends any contacts the local FBI field office. UM.

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:56.840
<v Speaker 1>So so he does that. The FBI comes by and

0:10:57.160 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 1>apparently they seize the laptop and that's it. That's the

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 1>last time that the laptop was ever actually seen. Um.

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Mister Isaac made copies of the laptop and put it

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 1>onto a hard drive. Um. And then at that point,

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:13.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's just him handing it off trying to

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 1>contact Juliani. I know Steve Bannon ended up with with

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 1>a copy of it. Um. And and then you end

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 1>up with Bannon contacting the New York Post. And that's

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of how this became a thing. What does he

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:29.840
<v Speaker 1>think he has to begin with he's got a laptop.

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>It's Hunter Biden. But what what what does he thinks

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 1>on the laptop that's worthy of getting it to Steve Bannon. Now,

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:39.959
<v Speaker 1>according to him, he pretty much ignored the salacious pictures,

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the salacious details, things like that. He they say, they

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:46.080
<v Speaker 1>say that this thing's got a ton of that, right

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:50.080
<v Speaker 1>that all years and years of of of pictures of

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Hunter with UH and sexually compromising positions UH doing, using drugs,

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:01.199
<v Speaker 1>using drugs, things of that nature like that that's on there.

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 1>So he claims he's not interested in that. He's not

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:05.960
<v Speaker 1>interested in that. He says, what he's interested in more

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:11.120
<v Speaker 1>is the emails, particularly about foreign policy type stuff. Hunter

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 1>stealings with agents of say China. Um and there was

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Barismo was the one thing that he was really focused on,

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 1>according to Isaac. According to the repairman, and Barismo was

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:28.559
<v Speaker 1>was an energy company where Hunter received I mean it's

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 1>basically a no show job a million dollars a year,

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:33.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, a no show job, which again which is

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:37.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, look that sucks, um and and I mean

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:40.320
<v Speaker 1>not for not for him, you know, for him it's great.

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:43.679
<v Speaker 1>But that's like I mean, welcome to America, right, Like

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yeah, like like the sons of politicians get

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 1>million dollars a year, no show jobs, and so it's

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 1>not really that big of a scandal, but that's what

0:12:51.360 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to turn it into, you know. Um, and

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:57.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm not too much into like what about what about?

0:12:57.400 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 1>But I mean we're talking about a few months after

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Ivanka gets those those trademarks in China for whatever it was,

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty million dollars, you know, things like that. So at

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>that point, it's it becomes barisma. And honestly, before this interview,

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:13.560
<v Speaker 1>before I started researching this stuff again, I totally forgot

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:17.200
<v Speaker 1>about barisma, but this was like a huge thing. That

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 1>was the big talking point that they're trying to get

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:21.439
<v Speaker 1>stick before stick before that. I think it is. It's

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 1>a good point. It shows just how broken this system is,

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:25.599
<v Speaker 1>and I think it is true. I think folks on

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the left need to look at this. And there's some

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 1>shady stuff that happens, but it didn't look like there

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:35.680
<v Speaker 1>was a connection between Joe Biden having influence and the

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 1>money that was paid to his son. Correct, that's sort

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:41.560
<v Speaker 1>of where it stood. Yes, yeah, and it doesn't show that.

0:13:41.600 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 1>But so now what they're doing is they need a thing, right,

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Conservatives just need a thing that they can repeat and

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:48.560
<v Speaker 1>what they can say. And you know, I don't know

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 1>if you remember. I think there was only one presidential debate,

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 1>but in that debate, Donald Trump kept yelling asking Biden

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:56.959
<v Speaker 1>who was the big guy? Who was the big guy?

0:13:57.000 --> 0:13:58.679
<v Speaker 1>And that's because there was there was an email where

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Hunter said, I'm going to set up a meet with

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the big guy. And conservatives are just like, all right,

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 1>that proves that's Joe Biden. Joe Biden is meeting with

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:08.560
<v Speaker 1>this business partners, Joe Biden is taking money. You know,

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 1>they say, that's what all of this proves, and like

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:13.600
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't, you know, I mean, all the proves is

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>that Hunter Biden like was connected and got a bunch

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 1>of money, and like there's there's there's a scandal there.

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>But it's not like we're impeaching Joe Biden over this stuff,

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, And yeah, yeah, we're probably going to be

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 1>impeaching Joe Biden over all of this stuff. Yeah yeah.

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 1>So at that point is that the smoking gun when

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 1>people are talking about what is there are they putting

0:14:35.400 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 1>to this this email that says and maybe am I

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 1>correct that there's maybe a couple of emails that reference

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 1>one the big guy, a meeting with the big guy

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 1>that perhaps Hunter could have was that with because there's

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 1>there's Barizma uh, which is Ukraine U created gas company. Yes, right,

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 1>but then we also had there's a Chinese there's Chinese

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 1>money in there. There's Chinese there was there was a

0:14:57.160 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Chinese company as well. Yeah, that was in there as well,

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese company. And they're paying money to to Hunter

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and also Joe's brother is that correct? And yeah, I

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 1>mean the whole family is kind of mixed up. I mean,

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>this is shitty. This is it is what are we

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 1>doing where we're are a good we're a good, clean politician.

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 1>So so Joe's brothers maybe getting money from China, Hunters

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe getting money from China. I think the timeline is

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 1>important here too, because they're maybe getting money after Joe's

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 1>out of power, when he when he wasn't in office. Right,

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 1>So so technically, even if Joe's getting money at that point,

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 1>not illegal, but not ideal. No, not illegal and certainly

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 1>not ideal. I mean I think that's that's definitely fair.

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I mean we're talking about this, it's like,

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 1>all right, if you want to make make that type

0:15:42.320 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 1>of stuff illegal, like make it illegal. But it's just

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not right now. Um. And so that's like

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 1>that's the world we live in, you know, and it

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 1>sucks like it sucks, but that's that's where we're at

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 1>right now. Talk to me how the how Fox and

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of the Meca the Medio echo chambers started to

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 1>elevate this story. Yeah, so you know there was when

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 1>this four story first broke, This had been shopped around

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot by ilieve. I'm pretty sure it was Giuliani,

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 1>I guess at that point shopping this around. Wall Street

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Journal turned it down, So they turned it They went

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 1>with the New York Post, who ended up running the story.

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:21.240
<v Speaker 1>And so why are they turning it down because you

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 1>can't even I mean, at that point, you can't verify

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 1>that it's even actually the laptop. Right. And again, like

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 1>we we got to remember like what we're coming off

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 1>from in twenty sixteen with just the flood of misinformation

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 1>and nonsense. And you know, I've worked on on some

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty big political campaigns and in the last few weeks

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 1>of the election, the press isn't going to just take

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>something like out of the blue that hasn't been vetted

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 1>or verified, or at least most of the press isn't.

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, well, the press at this point was spooked

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 1>because of what happened with Hillary and Trump just weeks before.

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Correct exactly, yeah, yeah, and and this type of thing,

0:16:57.680 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>there's just no way to vet it. I mean, you

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 1>need time to verify that this is true, that there's

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 1>actually a scandal here. And you know, we're three weeks

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:06.360
<v Speaker 1>three weeks in, so I'm pretty sure that's why Wall

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:09.199
<v Speaker 1>Street Journal didn't didn't run. So the major media outlets

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:11.440
<v Speaker 1>are not running with this. They're scared to run with it.

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>But now here we are a couple of years later,

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 1>looking back at this, even this week, CBS News has

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 1>verified parts of information that's on the hard drive. They

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:30.159
<v Speaker 1>still don't have a laptop. Correct. Yes, it seems as

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:33.440
<v Speaker 1>if there is some verification of what was potentially there,

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:38.119
<v Speaker 1>and there's already criticism of At the time, Facebook was

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 1>limiting the amounts of stories that were showing up around hundreds.

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:45.639
<v Speaker 1>Nobody could share it, I think. I don't know anybody

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 1>could share. You couldn't share, right, I think, And that

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 1>was Zuckerberg at the at that point had been told

0:17:49.880 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 1>by the FBI, Uh, careful because Russian misinformation is all

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:56.960
<v Speaker 1>over the campaign or there's a potential for it, so

0:17:57.119 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 1>be on the lookout for it. Like in hindsight, they're

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 1>more there there than the media gave credit to. All right,

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe there was more there there, but what like just

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:12.439
<v Speaker 1>looking back at twenty sixteen, the firestorm that would have

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 1>come out, there was no controversy known at that time

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 1>other than like just Hunter Biden has a laptop, right,

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and the way that that conservative media and right wing

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>media works in Unison, it would have drowned out everything else,

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>you know. But it's about that that Steve Bannon flood

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:30.439
<v Speaker 1>the zone was shit uh strategy. You know, you just

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:33.680
<v Speaker 1>keep throwing stuff out there. And I mean you got

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:35.679
<v Speaker 1>to give conservative media credit for the way that they

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 1>all reply in Unison and they can make a thing

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:41.119
<v Speaker 1>out of nothing. Yeah, I mean yeah, the flood the

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:44.640
<v Speaker 1>zone with the shit Bannon strategy, this feels like this

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 1>was this had so much shit you could put into

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 1>that zone. Yeah, yeah, and that's you know, that's something

0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 1>that he actually admitted. He said, Um, Hunter Biden's laptop,

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:56.919
<v Speaker 1>you put your own obsessions into it, you know. So

0:18:57.080 --> 0:18:59.440
<v Speaker 1>for For Bannon, it was China, you know, he went

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 1>he went after and the China thing. For other people,

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 1>it was the drugs and the women, you know, and

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:06.119
<v Speaker 1>for others, and you just put whatever it is that

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 1>you that is your obsession. You you channel that into like, oh,

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:13.199
<v Speaker 1>that Hunter Biden's laptop proves that that's real. I love it.

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:16.639
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a Maga Rorschach test. Yeah, yeah, exactly, stare

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 1>into it. See see your peccadillo staring right back at you.

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:24.879
<v Speaker 1>I think that's fascinating. When Bannon has talked about it correctly.

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:27.640
<v Speaker 1>If I'm wrong, he had some moral issues with the

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 1>idea of putting out some of these pictures of Hunter.

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is some man's privacy. It's it's his

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:37.960
<v Speaker 1>personal pictures. For all the pictures of him with illicit

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 1>drug use, there's pictures of like his brother's grave site.

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 1>There's all these personal emotional moments that this person put

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:47.400
<v Speaker 1>on their laptop, and then now somebody else has They

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:49.639
<v Speaker 1>have their search histories, they have all these types of things,

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:55.200
<v Speaker 1>and and I believe Ben encountered that with but we're

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:57.359
<v Speaker 1>at war, yes, so you do it. And I think

0:19:57.440 --> 0:20:01.639
<v Speaker 1>that's what's so fascinated and where we're so fucked right now,

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:05.680
<v Speaker 1>because there are legitimate things to be curious about with

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 1>this information, and we should be critical of people who

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:12.560
<v Speaker 1>have close connections to powerful people. But when it's approached

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:16.359
<v Speaker 1>by operatives who treat this not as an investigation towards

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 1>justice but as war, then what you have is people

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>acting with warlike tendencies who will stop at nothing to

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 1>only win that benefits their side, and that doesn't benefit justice,

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:29.959
<v Speaker 1>it benefits the person who is fighting, and that general

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:32.440
<v Speaker 1>at that point, that's somebody like Steve Bannon, who's trying

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:35.119
<v Speaker 1>to rip people off for building a new wall on

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the Mexico border at the same time, right well, and

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 1>you have to understand, they're not just demanding that the

0:20:40.119 --> 0:20:43.120
<v Speaker 1>press cover Hunter Biden's laptop. They're demanding that they cover

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>it right now the way that I want you to,

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, and like these outlets, they do have a

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:50.719
<v Speaker 1>responsibility to vet this stuff and make sure that it's

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:53.119
<v Speaker 1>true before putting it out there, especially you know, and

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:54.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to repeat myself, but especially when this

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 1>is something that would be used in an attempt to

0:20:57.600 --> 0:21:01.880
<v Speaker 1>sway the election. Fast forward a couple of months from now, uh,

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:06.399
<v Speaker 1>investigations into the laptop. Is that a good idea for Republicans?

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean yeah, I mean why wouldn't you. That's just

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 1>like targeting this one guy who is just taking advantage

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:16.879
<v Speaker 1>of the system that like we have created. Right, but

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:20.120
<v Speaker 1>that guy, but that guy is the president's son. Yes,

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>is there are connections there to say we should know

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 1>there's no we should know there's no corruption, right, we

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 1>absolutely should. Um. At the same time, this is a

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 1>system that we've got. And like, if you don't want

0:21:30.640 --> 0:21:34.960
<v Speaker 1>nepotism babies or or or the children of wealthy and

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:38.359
<v Speaker 1>powerful politicians to get wealthy and powerful jobs, then like

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 1>we need to change the way that we do things overall. Um.

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 1>And it's it's not just him, and it's not just

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:46.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's not just the Trump kids either. I

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 1>mean look at the way look at the you know,

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:50.879
<v Speaker 1>the way that people the Democrats buy stocks, you know,

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:55.159
<v Speaker 1>and and then pass legislation like this is it's everywhere,

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 1>and and so that's why like I feel just going

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:02.360
<v Speaker 1>after this one guy is is um, it's so disingenuous,

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:04.919
<v Speaker 1>you know. Um. And but yes we should know if

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 1>there's corruption, Yeah, we should know. And if he did

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:09.399
<v Speaker 1>anything Elial, we should be in jail. Of course, if

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 1>America is going to look into the Rorschach test, that

0:22:12.880 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 1>is Hunter Biden's laptop, what do you think America begins

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:19.880
<v Speaker 1>to see and begins to pull out, it's gonna be

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>it is. I mean, what we're gonna see. There might

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:24.360
<v Speaker 1>be something there, but what I think is that we're

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 1>just going to see bullshit from Republicans. Um, they're gonna

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 1>look for meetings that Hunter tried to set up with

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:32.880
<v Speaker 1>his dad, you know. And then and then do those

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:35.679
<v Speaker 1>companies well do they do they have do they have

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:39.159
<v Speaker 1>connections to Zelenski or do they have connections to Fauci

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 1>or you know, I mean you had the guy who

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:47.120
<v Speaker 1>found the laptop, Isaac. He thinks that it shows it

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:50.399
<v Speaker 1>might show proof that Hunter Biden is responsible for the

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 1>COVID pandemic, that he was involved in the Wuhan Institute

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:58.919
<v Speaker 1>of Virology, and that that that he was he was

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 1>responsible for creating COVID and on leashing it. Like this

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 1>is fun. Now we're talking, Yeah, can we tie him

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:08.640
<v Speaker 1>to COVID. It's gonna become a fun parlor game. Pretty soon.

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:10.480
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna be playing this at Christmas where it's like,

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:13.679
<v Speaker 1>can you connect Hunter Biden to COVID? Okay, can you

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 1>connect it to the nets having a subpar season this year.

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure there will be caravan, there will be immigration connections.

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 1>You know that it's ten degrees of separation. All they

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:28.359
<v Speaker 1>need is to find something that maybe connects to George Soros,

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:30.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, and then all of a sudden, like, oh,

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Biden is involved in the Great Replacement theory. You know.

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:36.359
<v Speaker 1>It's it's things like that. So like, I don't really

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:38.359
<v Speaker 1>know where it's gonna go, but I can tell you

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a lot of bullshit, you know.

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 1>I like what it's done to the Trump family, specifically

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the kids. I mean, it's amazing to watch Don Junior

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:54.919
<v Speaker 1>criticize Hunter Biden for saying, like how he wishes his

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:57.480
<v Speaker 1>name was Hunter Biden so he could make money off

0:23:57.520 --> 0:24:00.439
<v Speaker 1>his father's name, Which is it's a beautiful thing for

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 1>somebody like down Junior to yearn for, as if that

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 1>wasn't already the game plan from day one. Make a

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:11.200
<v Speaker 1>ton of money and do absolutely nothing except that, hey,

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:13.719
<v Speaker 1>you can meet my dad. That's a disgusting trade, right

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:15.880
<v Speaker 1>to just use your father's name to make money off

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:19.920
<v Speaker 1>of that. Absolutely, nepotism needs to be looked into big time. Yes,

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 1>what do you think about Avonka? Oh, she's so gracious. Yeah, yeah,

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 1>totally amazing. I mean it's just the hypocrisy is amazing.

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:30.920
<v Speaker 1>But like that's never bothered them before, you know, And

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:35.399
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing reports of the foreign government spending one hundred

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:37.639
<v Speaker 1>and fifty thousand dollars at Trump hotel, you know, and

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 1>things like that, and it's like, that's why, that's why

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:43.159
<v Speaker 1>I have an issue with just like going after this

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:45.680
<v Speaker 1>one person, you know, a hunter, you know, just targeting

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:48.879
<v Speaker 1>him because he's the president's son essentially, and like, um,

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's that it shouldn't happen. But like we

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:54.880
<v Speaker 1>need to be consistent here as well. I guess how

0:24:54.920 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 1>should the media responsibly cover this as as we move forward? Essentially,

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 1>what this is and what they need is you said,

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:04.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you go to a Trump rally, people

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:07.400
<v Speaker 1>are upset about hunter Biden's laptop and they're not sure why.

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 1>That's all they need. They need people to be upset

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:12.000
<v Speaker 1>about this, you know, And that's that's really all it's about.

0:25:12.080 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>And the investigations. You asked, what they're gonna uncover. I mean,

0:25:14.960 --> 0:25:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Lord only knows where this is going to go, But

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:19.439
<v Speaker 1>where it's really going to go is just keeping that

0:25:19.480 --> 0:25:23.240
<v Speaker 1>drum beat, going to keep that buzz those buzzwords hunter

0:25:23.280 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Biden's laptop to get that reaction from from the base.

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 1>You know that you're seeing it at Rally's right now. Well,

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:31.679
<v Speaker 1>if Fox News has been pushing this story for a

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:35.160
<v Speaker 1>couple of years now and recently did a mocked trial

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 1>of Hunter Biden, what the hell was that all about?

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:41.600
<v Speaker 1>At what point did you decide, sir, to contact the

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Federal Guard of Investigation about this matter? When the laptop

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 1>became my property and late July, I proceeded to kind

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 1>of research what was on it to make sure that

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:58.160
<v Speaker 1>what I had seen was what I perceived as criminal activity. God,

0:25:58.200 --> 0:26:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I forgot about that. Oh my god, it was so funny.

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 1>It was so funny. Um. Yeah, And they had like

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:10.159
<v Speaker 1>a whole jury and everything, and Judge Joe Brown was

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:12.439
<v Speaker 1>the judge. We'll tell me before we let you go,

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:14.360
<v Speaker 1>like walk me through a little bit as somebody who

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 1>watches this for folks who aren't watching Hannity cover this

0:26:18.680 --> 0:26:22.520
<v Speaker 1>and amplify this story. How has Hannity taken to this

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:25.360
<v Speaker 1>in the last few years. It is I mean, it's

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:27.879
<v Speaker 1>just the NonStop drumbeat, you know. And I think what

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 1>you have to understand about Sean Hannity is his show

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:32.960
<v Speaker 1>is just like a stream of right wing consciousness. It

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 1>is just these buzzwords. It's Nelly or it's the FBI

0:26:36.960 --> 0:26:39.879
<v Speaker 1>love birds, it's I mean, he still talks about Hillary

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Clinton's emails, you know, and so he is he really is,

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:45.320
<v Speaker 1>more so than anybody else on that network. I think

0:26:45.480 --> 0:26:48.679
<v Speaker 1>he is the king of these these bullshit conservative buzzwords,

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 1>you know. And one of the buzzwords he's one are

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:52.879
<v Speaker 1>the ones he's creating for the Hunter Biden story. Well

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 1>it was Bizma, you know a couple a couple of

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:58.680
<v Speaker 1>years ago. Was now he just calls him zero Experience

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Breese Oil and Gas Company, and zero Experience Hunter

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:09.399
<v Speaker 1>is fifty year old son Barisma. Zero Experience Hunter got millions.

0:27:09.440 --> 0:27:11.959
<v Speaker 1>And that's not all. The report even found evidence linking

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 1>zero Experience Hunter to allege human trafficking quid pro quote

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:19.879
<v Speaker 1>Joe zero Experience Hunter Barisma. Now, if you're not if

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:23.080
<v Speaker 1>you're not in that bubble, in that conservative bubble, what

0:27:23.160 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 1>that refers to is he got the Barizma deal, you know,

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 1>a million dollars a year, No show all the other

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 1>boards that he said on, you know, but zero zero

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 1>experience Hunter. That's Sean Hannity's thing. You know, he just

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 1>keeps saying it over and over again, and then he

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 1>uses this as as an example of the FBI being

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 1>out of control, the DJ targeting conservatives and not going

0:27:42.880 --> 0:27:46.480
<v Speaker 1>after Democrats. How there's no such thing as equal justice

0:27:46.560 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 1>under the law in America. I mean, I could I

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:51.159
<v Speaker 1>could do an entire Sean Hannity monologue right now, like

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 1>just based off of Hunter's laptop, because it's the same

0:27:54.560 --> 0:27:58.320
<v Speaker 1>it's the same thing every single night. But what Hannity

0:27:58.400 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 1>understands is that it's that repetition. It's that repetition that

0:28:01.840 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 1>leads to the people outside the Trump rallies being upset

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:07.399
<v Speaker 1>about Hunter Biden's laptop. You know, you say this stuff

0:28:07.440 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 1>over and over and over and over again, it just

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:13.439
<v Speaker 1>becomes accepted as truth. Um, same thing that that you know,

0:28:13.560 --> 0:28:15.679
<v Speaker 1>crime and inflation are going to be the top issues

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:18.440
<v Speaker 1>in the election. You know, it's just they keep saying

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:22.560
<v Speaker 1>that stuff and it becomes the reality and and uh yeah, yeah,

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:25.960
<v Speaker 1>zero experience. Hunter would definitely be Handedy's favorite buzzword though

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:27.880
<v Speaker 1>on this and you know I deal with this as well.

0:28:27.880 --> 0:28:30.400
<v Speaker 1>It's it's that balance between like this is hilarious, this

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:33.040
<v Speaker 1>is so funny versus like this is dangerous and like

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 1>actually scary that so many people believe it. Um And

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:39.560
<v Speaker 1>and it's you know, it's about the conservative movement taking

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:41.840
<v Speaker 1>advantage of those people. I think more than anything else.

0:28:42.520 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 1>How much is that an element in the Hunter Biden's story,

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 1>because again, what does get glossed over is this is

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 1>a man's private cache of his his communications, his search histories,

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:59.239
<v Speaker 1>and his relationship with his family and his his his

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:04.600
<v Speaker 1>loved ones. It is something to just dub out everything

0:29:04.600 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 1>that was on your phone run your laptop for the

0:29:06.640 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 1>world to see. It feels like we don't even grapple

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 1>with the idea of whether or not we should. We

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 1>just jump right to whether or not that we could right. Yeah, exactly,

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 1>And it's um, you know, as far as I know that,

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:21.920
<v Speaker 1>like you said, this laptop if if it is his laptop,

0:29:21.960 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 1>it seems to be acquired legally, you know, but it's

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 1>it's horrifying and we saw this, We've seen them do

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:31.600
<v Speaker 1>this quite a bit actually, if you remember Peter Strock

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and it was at least a page. I think they're

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:37.560
<v Speaker 1>like they're they're sexty and like became public and was

0:29:37.760 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 1>thrown up on Fox News every single night. You know,

0:29:40.880 --> 0:29:42.920
<v Speaker 1>they will do this if they have an opportunity. I

0:29:42.920 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 1>think there was also, and I don't know if you

0:29:44.280 --> 0:29:48.000
<v Speaker 1>were aware of this, but Biden's daughter's diary was stolen

0:29:48.160 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and that never came out because there's serious legal implications

0:29:51.440 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 1>into that right now. But Tucker Carlson has seen it

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:57.200
<v Speaker 1>and he sits there and he regurgitates parts of it

0:29:57.240 --> 0:29:59.080
<v Speaker 1>and stuff like that. I mean, this is I think

0:29:59.080 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 1>she was pretty young, maybe late teens, early teens when

0:30:02.400 --> 0:30:04.560
<v Speaker 1>when she was writing this. And you know, if you

0:30:04.560 --> 0:30:06.800
<v Speaker 1>watch Tucker, he'll throw in every single once in a while,

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:10.600
<v Speaker 1>he'll throw in that Hunters Joe used to shower with

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 1>his daughter because apparently there's a passage in there about

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:15.960
<v Speaker 1>about that when she was younger, which you know, um,

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 1>but it's yeah, it's that type of stuff. It's that's

0:30:17.840 --> 0:30:19.920
<v Speaker 1>what they don't care. They don't have morals, and that's

0:30:19.920 --> 0:30:23.200
<v Speaker 1>why it's so silly for you know, when when Steve

0:30:23.200 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Bannon said like, yeah, it kind it kind of feels gross,

0:30:25.840 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 1>but like we're at war, Like, no, that's just your

0:30:28.720 --> 0:30:30.760
<v Speaker 1>justification for doing it. Like, I don't think it feels

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:33.680
<v Speaker 1>gross to Bannon. You know, he's a gross, disgusting guy

0:30:33.840 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 1>made of you know, spores and loose skin. I don't know.

0:30:37.320 --> 0:30:40.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, the Bannons and the Tuckers and the Hanna days,

0:30:40.520 --> 0:30:44.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, they really speak towards family values and bringing

0:30:44.080 --> 0:30:47.560
<v Speaker 1>back the morality to America and civility. And how are

0:30:47.600 --> 0:30:49.920
<v Speaker 1>you going to smash the pedophiles if you don't go

0:30:50.000 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 1>through the diary of a teenager? Thank God that they're

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:56.680
<v Speaker 1>all very normal people. Well, Andrew, thank you for talking

0:30:56.720 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 1>to it. Yeah, of course, short. This was so much fun, man,

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I really appreciate it. After the break, I'll be joined

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:04.040
<v Speaker 1>by Congressman Jerry Connolly. We'll be talking about his role

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 1>on the House Oversight Committee and how he plans to

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 1>approach the investigation on Hunter Biden's laptop. Welcome back to

0:31:14.080 --> 0:31:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Klepper Fingers the conspiracy. We're talking about Hunter Biden's

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:21.600
<v Speaker 1>laptop because Republicans won the House and apparently that's the

0:31:21.720 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 1>issue that they think Americans care about the most. To

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 1>be clear, Joe Biden is the big guy. This evidence

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 1>raises troubling questions about whether President Biden is a national

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:40.560
<v Speaker 1>security risk and about whether he is compromised by foreign government.

0:31:41.360 --> 0:31:43.760
<v Speaker 1>That was James Comer, the incoming chairman of the House

0:31:43.800 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Oversight Committee, announcing the upcoming investigation into Hunter, Biden and

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the laptop. For those of you who think government committee

0:31:51.520 --> 0:31:54.680
<v Speaker 1>hearings are dry and sterile, I have one word for you,

0:31:55.120 --> 0:31:57.800
<v Speaker 1>ben Ghazi. You can bet all your crypto that House

0:31:57.840 --> 0:32:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Republicans will use the Hunter hearings to make it seem

0:32:01.400 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 1>like an explosive scandal worthy of impeachment. So we're gonna

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:07.000
<v Speaker 1>talk to a Democrat who sits on that committee right

0:32:07.080 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 1>now to see what that's going to be like. How fun,

0:32:10.680 --> 0:32:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Congressman Jerry Connelly and Virginia thanks for joining the podcast,

0:32:13.960 --> 0:32:17.880
<v Speaker 1>My pleasure, Jordan. So, Congressman, it's a guarantee that these

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:20.880
<v Speaker 1>hearings are going to get coverage in the mainstream media,

0:32:20.960 --> 0:32:23.800
<v Speaker 1>which means there's gonna be a lot of baseless allegations

0:32:23.800 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 1>coming from Republicans that will be aired on news channels,

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:31.080
<v Speaker 1>and there's only so much fact checking that journalists can do.

0:32:31.080 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Do you see your role on this committee as part

0:32:34.040 --> 0:32:37.840
<v Speaker 1>fact checker. Oh yeah, we've been through this before, and

0:32:37.880 --> 0:32:39.719
<v Speaker 1>I think I think it's really important joy to put

0:32:39.760 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 1>it in context. Right, So, when the Republicans were in

0:32:43.240 --> 0:32:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the majority last time, and we had a Democrat in

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the White House, President Obama for six years, they breathlessly

0:32:50.280 --> 0:32:54.480
<v Speaker 1>presented and the media, unfortunately, was complicit in giving them

0:32:54.520 --> 0:33:01.160
<v Speaker 1>exactly what they wanted headlines, endless, breathless stories or Clinton's emails.

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned Benghazi, Lois Lerner and the irs, fast and

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:15.600
<v Speaker 1>furious Obamacare, Uh, you know, uh, funding solar solar energy

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and the great scandal of the waste of all of that.

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Not one of those so called investigations led to anything anything,

0:33:25.400 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 1>not an indictment, not a trial. I mean, it was

0:33:29.240 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 1>all uh you know, sound and fury, all done for

0:33:34.520 --> 0:33:38.880
<v Speaker 1>one purpose to undermine two political figures, President Obama and

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Hillary Clinton. And unfortunately, the mainstream media, as you point out,

0:33:44.600 --> 0:33:49.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't spend much time doing fact checking itself. And you

0:33:49.640 --> 0:33:52.520
<v Speaker 1>know they'll ask people like me, well, yeah, well, Congressman,

0:33:52.640 --> 0:33:57.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, they they assert, they allege, and I'm thinking, well,

0:33:58.120 --> 0:34:01.160
<v Speaker 1>even framing a question that way, it gives it credence

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:05.640
<v Speaker 1>when there may be none. The supposition behind that question

0:34:05.840 --> 0:34:12.799
<v Speaker 1>is completely false, based on either fabrication, distortion, insinuation, or

0:34:12.840 --> 0:34:17.759
<v Speaker 1>no facts whatsoever, And that doesn't seem to matter, and

0:34:17.840 --> 0:34:20.000
<v Speaker 1>so it kind of puts us in a disadvantage when

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:24.200
<v Speaker 1>we even get asked those questions. It's not unfair to

0:34:24.239 --> 0:34:26.080
<v Speaker 1>ask them, but it sure would be nice that the

0:34:26.120 --> 0:34:29.719
<v Speaker 1>media took a little responsibility now and then, instead of

0:34:29.760 --> 0:34:37.080
<v Speaker 1>absolving itself and allowing the insinuation that there's something to this. So,

0:34:37.200 --> 0:34:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know what's coming. What is your strategy?

0:34:40.480 --> 0:34:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Are you going to attempt to discredit the very nature

0:34:44.280 --> 0:34:47.560
<v Speaker 1>of this investigation itself? Do you call attention to the

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Fox News fever dream that this whole thing is or

0:34:52.200 --> 0:34:54.360
<v Speaker 1>or do you admit that there are some elements of

0:34:54.480 --> 0:34:59.399
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Biden's activity that is of itself worth investigating. I'm

0:34:59.440 --> 0:35:03.759
<v Speaker 1>certainly not in advance going to conceive anything they're asserting

0:35:04.000 --> 0:35:06.920
<v Speaker 1>is worth investigating, and I AM going to spend a

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:10.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of time talking about what should be investigated that

0:35:10.480 --> 0:35:13.799
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to talk about. For example, in the

0:35:13.840 --> 0:35:18.080
<v Speaker 1>same press conference where you cided, you know, James Comer said, well,

0:35:18.080 --> 0:35:20.760
<v Speaker 1>why don't we just stop, you know, stick with Hunter Biden.

0:35:20.800 --> 0:35:22.759
<v Speaker 1>That's what I wanted. That's really what I want to

0:35:22.800 --> 0:35:26.839
<v Speaker 1>focus on. If we can keep it about Hunter Biden.

0:35:26.880 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 1>This is kind of a big deal. We think if

0:35:28.680 --> 0:35:30.760
<v Speaker 1>we can keep it about Hunter Biden, that would be great.

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:34.080
<v Speaker 1>He admitted he didn't want to focus on the fact

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:40.879
<v Speaker 1>that illegally President Trump has kept classified documents in moral

0:35:40.960 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 1>lago against the law and lied about it and is

0:35:44.680 --> 0:35:49.360
<v Speaker 1>being investigated as we speak, for criminal behavior with respect

0:35:49.360 --> 0:35:54.320
<v Speaker 1>to that. Well, uh, I thought you wanted genuine oversight.

0:35:54.880 --> 0:35:58.479
<v Speaker 1>That's a genuine oversight issue. Now. Of course, the world

0:35:58.640 --> 0:36:02.040
<v Speaker 1>is replete with similar genuine overside issues when it comes

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:05.600
<v Speaker 1>to Trump and his acolytes and his administration, not one

0:36:05.640 --> 0:36:08.560
<v Speaker 1>of which, not one of which Republicans want to look at.

0:36:08.840 --> 0:36:12.120
<v Speaker 1>They never supported a single subpoena when they were in

0:36:12.160 --> 0:36:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the majority and Trump was in the White House for

0:36:14.600 --> 0:36:17.879
<v Speaker 1>anything having to do with oversight of the Trump administration,

0:36:18.040 --> 0:36:20.760
<v Speaker 1>not one. Well, we may need to elect an entire

0:36:20.840 --> 0:36:24.799
<v Speaker 1>House of representatives to deal with the issues and investigate

0:36:24.880 --> 0:36:28.000
<v Speaker 1>all of those Trump era issues. But I guess I'm curious,

0:36:28.080 --> 0:36:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Like it's always easy for us to for both sides

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:33.200
<v Speaker 1>to point out what the other side should be looking

0:36:33.320 --> 0:36:35.440
<v Speaker 1>into and I think this is it's pretty clear in

0:36:35.480 --> 0:36:38.759
<v Speaker 1>a situation like this. However, there are details within this

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Biden story that do rub people the wrong way.

0:36:42.000 --> 0:36:45.600
<v Speaker 1>People on both sides of the aisle are skeptical of

0:36:45.680 --> 0:36:47.520
<v Speaker 1>somebody who is this close to the president of the

0:36:47.600 --> 0:36:51.839
<v Speaker 1>United States being close to foreign governments at a time

0:36:51.880 --> 0:36:55.200
<v Speaker 1>where the details are sketchy, although we know it's going

0:36:55.239 --> 0:36:57.960
<v Speaker 1>to be weaponized and you know the show that is

0:36:57.960 --> 0:37:00.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be put on. What do you say to

0:37:00.360 --> 0:37:03.120
<v Speaker 1>those people who are like, I'm still I'm still nervous

0:37:03.160 --> 0:37:06.880
<v Speaker 1>about this situation and do think we should investigate that?

0:37:07.440 --> 0:37:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Do you say, yes, we should, but this is not

0:37:09.880 --> 0:37:12.239
<v Speaker 1>the place whether they will get a fair investigation, or

0:37:12.280 --> 0:37:15.520
<v Speaker 1>do you just discredit that idea on its surface? Well,

0:37:15.560 --> 0:37:18.800
<v Speaker 1>anyone who thinks that this would be a fair investigation,

0:37:19.200 --> 0:37:22.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, balanced there. Let the truth come out. It's

0:37:22.840 --> 0:37:26.240
<v Speaker 1>smoking something, because that is not the motor stop runde.

0:37:26.360 --> 0:37:29.520
<v Speaker 1>It is very clear. The Republicans have already and been

0:37:29.560 --> 0:37:32.960
<v Speaker 1>saying this for several years. Right, don't forget it was

0:37:33.040 --> 0:37:37.359
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump who committed a criminal act, we felt, and

0:37:37.560 --> 0:37:41.600
<v Speaker 1>he was impeached for it with respect to Hunter, because

0:37:41.600 --> 0:37:47.080
<v Speaker 1>he was extorting a foreign leader with our military assistance,

0:37:47.160 --> 0:37:50.880
<v Speaker 1>which now we know was badly needed in the Ukraine

0:37:51.760 --> 0:37:54.880
<v Speaker 1>in order to get political dirt on hunter By. So

0:37:56.480 --> 0:38:01.759
<v Speaker 1>the whole so called investigation is tainted going back to

0:38:01.840 --> 0:38:07.200
<v Speaker 1>that what Trump called perfect phone call. And so I'm

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:11.239
<v Speaker 1>not going to provide any legitimacy to that line of

0:38:11.280 --> 0:38:16.160
<v Speaker 1>inquiry unless something is presented to me that would qualify

0:38:16.360 --> 0:38:19.040
<v Speaker 1>for yeah, all right, that's troubling. We have to look

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:20.560
<v Speaker 1>at it. So I'm not going to concede that at

0:38:20.560 --> 0:38:23.600
<v Speaker 1>all in advance. And I am going to point out that,

0:38:23.800 --> 0:38:26.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, what little fact checking has been done in

0:38:26.400 --> 0:38:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the press about this, and I cite Glenn Kessler, the

0:38:29.640 --> 0:38:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Washington Post is sort of their official fact checker. You know,

0:38:32.920 --> 0:38:35.359
<v Speaker 1>they're looking at one email out of something like one

0:38:35.440 --> 0:38:39.320
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty two thousand that is subject to interpretation.

0:38:39.960 --> 0:38:45.359
<v Speaker 1>They're looking at some great scandal about keys to an

0:38:45.400 --> 0:38:49.480
<v Speaker 1>office in Spain that und divided in fact never picked up,

0:38:49.520 --> 0:38:53.359
<v Speaker 1>but that somehow that's a big conspiracy. I would say,

0:38:53.400 --> 0:38:57.480
<v Speaker 1>there's really thin rule here so far, and the idea

0:38:57.520 --> 0:39:00.040
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to put the entire weight of the

0:39:00.200 --> 0:39:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Oversight Committee of the United States Congress behind such anemic evidence,

0:39:05.520 --> 0:39:09.640
<v Speaker 1>and then Gruel worries me greatly. But as part of

0:39:09.640 --> 0:39:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the pattern of my friends on the other side of

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the aisle, going back to Dan Burton and Clinton, I mean,

0:39:15.719 --> 0:39:18.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe this shows that it is a dying fire and

0:39:18.160 --> 0:39:20.520
<v Speaker 1>these are the embers if we've gone from but her

0:39:20.640 --> 0:39:26.400
<v Speaker 1>emails too, but his email singular, maybe that showing progress

0:39:26.400 --> 0:39:29.640
<v Speaker 1>in some way. You bring up something interesting. You've been

0:39:29.640 --> 0:39:33.360
<v Speaker 1>on this committee for years. Some of these Republicans Jim Jordan,

0:39:33.600 --> 0:39:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Andy Biggs, Andrew Clyde, they love a good conspiracy. They've

0:39:37.120 --> 0:39:40.319
<v Speaker 1>denied the twenty twenty election was real. Spread January sixth

0:39:40.400 --> 0:39:45.400
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy theories. How can you use your platform on the

0:39:45.440 --> 0:39:50.200
<v Speaker 1>committee to help a viewer who maybe doesn't know their context.

0:39:50.440 --> 0:39:52.799
<v Speaker 1>How do you let them understand the full context of

0:39:52.840 --> 0:39:56.280
<v Speaker 1>where they're coming from. The good news about our process

0:39:56.400 --> 0:39:59.759
<v Speaker 1>is when we have a markup of legislation or when

0:39:59.800 --> 0:40:05.560
<v Speaker 1>we a hearing, we Democrats get equal time. And you

0:40:05.600 --> 0:40:07.839
<v Speaker 1>know that's why the leadership of our committee is going

0:40:07.880 --> 0:40:12.840
<v Speaker 1>to really matter. Can we cohere and forge our voice

0:40:13.000 --> 0:40:16.919
<v Speaker 1>as one to push back, get the facts out, tell

0:40:17.000 --> 0:40:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the truth, and puncture their false narrative in an effective way.

0:40:22.000 --> 0:40:24.799
<v Speaker 1>That is critical when you're in the minority and you're

0:40:24.840 --> 0:40:28.600
<v Speaker 1>defending a democratic white House, and if you don't do that,

0:40:29.000 --> 0:40:32.920
<v Speaker 1>you know they controlled the narrative. So fighting for control

0:40:32.960 --> 0:40:37.120
<v Speaker 1>of the narrative and making sure that you repeat, rent,

0:40:37.320 --> 0:40:41.480
<v Speaker 1>and repeat when it comes to facts, do not assume that,

0:40:41.600 --> 0:40:44.880
<v Speaker 1>having said it once, it's in everybody's head. That's not

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:49.240
<v Speaker 1>how human beings work. And in our media market today,

0:40:49.400 --> 0:40:53.680
<v Speaker 1>given the multiplicity of sources of news, accurate and falls

0:40:54.560 --> 0:40:58.680
<v Speaker 1>and everything in between, you've got to really spend time

0:40:59.360 --> 0:41:05.920
<v Speaker 1>making sure or that the truth penetrates consciousness and public opinion.

0:41:06.040 --> 0:41:07.560
<v Speaker 1>What does that look like? What are some of the

0:41:07.600 --> 0:41:10.600
<v Speaker 1>tactics there? I think I think about the January six hearings,

0:41:11.000 --> 0:41:14.880
<v Speaker 1>which many people would say are have been effectively communicated.

0:41:15.200 --> 0:41:17.279
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps the lesson there is just don't invite the other

0:41:17.320 --> 0:41:18.839
<v Speaker 1>side of the table. It's really easier to get your

0:41:18.880 --> 0:41:21.960
<v Speaker 1>point across. UH. Perhaps it's the use of video. Perhaps

0:41:22.000 --> 0:41:25.720
<v Speaker 1>it's just the repetition of baseline facts, like are there

0:41:25.760 --> 0:41:29.040
<v Speaker 1>are there elements that you could draw from uh from

0:41:29.040 --> 0:41:31.520
<v Speaker 1>from from those hearings that you'd like to bring to

0:41:31.560 --> 0:41:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the forefront here. I think we talk about Benghazi, we

0:41:34.600 --> 0:41:38.080
<v Speaker 1>talk about those things. You know, you know the machine

0:41:38.120 --> 0:41:40.040
<v Speaker 1>that is going to be behind this narrative. So how

0:41:40.040 --> 0:41:41.359
<v Speaker 1>do you get out ahead of it? How do you

0:41:41.440 --> 0:41:44.719
<v Speaker 1>change what Democrats did six years ago to be more

0:41:44.760 --> 0:41:47.640
<v Speaker 1>effective in the upcoming year. I don't think there's any

0:41:47.719 --> 0:41:51.400
<v Speaker 1>one tactic, but there are a lot of tools in

0:41:51.440 --> 0:41:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the kit bag, and one of them is humor. I

0:41:54.040 --> 0:41:56.600
<v Speaker 1>remember once they were you know, you got the Democrats

0:41:56.600 --> 0:42:00.319
<v Speaker 1>are going to rely on humor. Oh my god, what

0:42:00.400 --> 0:42:03.480
<v Speaker 1>are we doing, congressman. I'll give you an example six

0:42:03.520 --> 0:42:06.359
<v Speaker 1>of your sweet spot. I'm sorry, I'm irish, and how

0:42:06.400 --> 0:42:09.120
<v Speaker 1>to use humor. I'll give you an example. We had

0:42:10.920 --> 0:42:14.440
<v Speaker 1>a career civil servant from i RS and the Republicans

0:42:14.480 --> 0:42:17.000
<v Speaker 1>hauled her before our committee. They were in the majority,

0:42:17.200 --> 0:42:21.320
<v Speaker 1>and her job was to enforce the Provision and Affordable

0:42:21.320 --> 0:42:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Care Act that you would be fine if you didn't

0:42:24.880 --> 0:42:27.200
<v Speaker 1>have health insurance, by the way, a provision that was

0:42:27.239 --> 0:42:31.920
<v Speaker 1>a Republican idea that was enshrined in Romney Care in

0:42:31.960 --> 0:42:37.239
<v Speaker 1>Massachusetts that we took on. But they just excoriated her,

0:42:37.280 --> 0:42:40.479
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I was getting agitated waiting my turn,

0:42:40.560 --> 0:42:42.120
<v Speaker 1>and I thought, you know, there's another bit of which

0:42:42.120 --> 0:42:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to say that, And then I thought, you know,

0:42:44.080 --> 0:42:46.799
<v Speaker 1>that's not the effective way of making the point. And

0:42:46.840 --> 0:42:49.560
<v Speaker 1>they're looking for a headline tomorrow that's going to say

0:42:49.760 --> 0:42:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Republicans accused I RS official love, you know, subverting American

0:42:55.200 --> 0:42:59.080
<v Speaker 1>freedom or something. And so I when it came down

0:42:59.120 --> 0:43:02.359
<v Speaker 1>to my turn, I said to her, so you're under oath.

0:43:02.640 --> 0:43:05.080
<v Speaker 1>She went yes. I said, I want to remind you

0:43:05.280 --> 0:43:08.360
<v Speaker 1>you're under oath. She went okay. I said, have you

0:43:08.440 --> 0:43:12.960
<v Speaker 1>been consorting with the devil? Not? To my knowledge, sir,

0:43:13.880 --> 0:43:19.319
<v Speaker 1>are reports that you can fly accurate, greatly exaggerated? Sir?

0:43:20.320 --> 0:43:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Have you been involved in any way and trying to

0:43:23.040 --> 0:43:28.320
<v Speaker 1>pervert our youth in Salem or anywhere else? I certainly

0:43:28.320 --> 0:43:36.560
<v Speaker 1>hope not, sir. You're sure, yes, sir. The looks on

0:43:36.600 --> 0:43:38.879
<v Speaker 1>their faces like, what is it? Oh my god God,

0:43:39.239 --> 0:43:43.720
<v Speaker 1>because people were now lapping. Well, the next day the headline,

0:43:43.760 --> 0:43:47.759
<v Speaker 1>instead of the one the Republicans wanted was I R.

0:43:47.880 --> 0:43:52.360
<v Speaker 1>S Officials denies consorting with devil. People were howling with laughter.

0:43:52.719 --> 0:43:56.600
<v Speaker 1>It completely punctured their narrative. So sometimes humor can be

0:43:56.640 --> 0:43:59.839
<v Speaker 1>a tool too, But a lot of this is too serious.

0:44:00.040 --> 0:44:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, honestly, what's so interesting? Because I hear you

0:44:03.440 --> 0:44:07.279
<v Speaker 1>on that, and I do think it's almost in an

0:44:07.280 --> 0:44:09.399
<v Speaker 1>example like that, we've been talking a little bit about

0:44:09.400 --> 0:44:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the Steve Bannon flood, the flood, the narrative with bullshit,

0:44:14.800 --> 0:44:17.040
<v Speaker 1>get it out there, like how much of it of

0:44:17.080 --> 0:44:19.839
<v Speaker 1>it is that? Are we? Are we using humor in

0:44:19.880 --> 0:44:22.160
<v Speaker 1>that sense to be like, we know what people are

0:44:22.200 --> 0:44:23.680
<v Speaker 1>going to click on, we know what people are going

0:44:23.719 --> 0:44:26.200
<v Speaker 1>to talk about, and if we can be outlandish in

0:44:26.200 --> 0:44:30.880
<v Speaker 1>our approach from a satirical point of view, that can

0:44:31.080 --> 0:44:34.600
<v Speaker 1>trump somebody else being outlandish from perhaps a more politically

0:44:34.640 --> 0:44:38.960
<v Speaker 1>advantageous point of view. Absolutely. There was another time they

0:44:39.000 --> 0:44:43.080
<v Speaker 1>had an FBI official who had privately expressed support for

0:44:43.200 --> 0:44:47.240
<v Speaker 1>demo for I'm sorry, had privately expressed criticism of Donald Trump.

0:44:47.320 --> 0:44:50.839
<v Speaker 1>This is early in Trump's tenure, and they were just

0:44:50.960 --> 0:44:54.040
<v Speaker 1>again excoriating him. So when it came down to my turn,

0:44:54.160 --> 0:44:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I started reading criticisms of Trump without identifying who said it,

0:44:59.400 --> 0:45:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and I said, so, that was you, right, And before

0:45:02.040 --> 0:45:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the witness could answer, I went, oh, no, I'm sorry,

0:45:04.239 --> 0:45:07.000
<v Speaker 1>that was Mark a Rubio, Republican senator, and then I

0:45:07.040 --> 0:45:09.040
<v Speaker 1>just went to you know, and of course by the

0:45:09.120 --> 0:45:13.280
<v Speaker 1>time I was finished, people again we're, you know, snidely chuckling.

0:45:13.640 --> 0:45:19.640
<v Speaker 1>But it completely exposed the hypocrisy of the Republicans for

0:45:19.680 --> 0:45:22.759
<v Speaker 1>attacking this guy for criticizing Trump when at the same

0:45:22.840 --> 0:45:26.560
<v Speaker 1>time they were doing it too. Congressman, I got I

0:45:26.560 --> 0:45:29.880
<v Speaker 1>gotta say, using hypocrisy as a stand in for humor,

0:45:30.480 --> 0:45:35.320
<v Speaker 1>that's my lane. So back off. You're gonna use Rubio's

0:45:35.360 --> 0:45:38.719
<v Speaker 1>words against him and the whole GOP. What else do

0:45:38.760 --> 0:45:41.920
<v Speaker 1>we have out there? It's dangerous business. But you know,

0:45:42.000 --> 0:45:44.680
<v Speaker 1>it goes to the old line a friend of mine,

0:45:44.880 --> 0:45:47.480
<v Speaker 1>humorous Jim Borne wants, used to say, if you're going

0:45:47.520 --> 0:45:52.120
<v Speaker 1>to be a phony, at least be sincere about it.

0:45:52.120 --> 0:45:55.480
<v Speaker 1>It feels like a lot of the Republican strategy is

0:45:55.520 --> 0:45:58.640
<v Speaker 1>to work the refs, bully the mainstream media into covering

0:45:58.680 --> 0:46:01.040
<v Speaker 1>it as a legitimate man of scandal. Do you think

0:46:01.040 --> 0:46:04.560
<v Speaker 1>that's working. I think it works all too well, all

0:46:04.560 --> 0:46:08.200
<v Speaker 1>too often, and that's why we have to be much

0:46:08.520 --> 0:46:12.680
<v Speaker 1>better at our game. And that's why we have to

0:46:12.719 --> 0:46:16.000
<v Speaker 1>be discipline and coordinated. I mean, you can't this can't

0:46:16.000 --> 0:46:18.520
<v Speaker 1>be one off. This can't be one rogue member who

0:46:18.560 --> 0:46:21.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe is effective, but everybody else is doing that thing.

0:46:21.600 --> 0:46:25.520
<v Speaker 1>And that's why you know, in the minority especially, our

0:46:25.560 --> 0:46:30.759
<v Speaker 1>committee is going to have to be organized, strategic, and

0:46:30.840 --> 0:46:34.080
<v Speaker 1>as I said, discipline, both in messaging and in the

0:46:34.440 --> 0:46:38.760
<v Speaker 1>attack of their narrative. You know what's the best way

0:46:38.840 --> 0:46:41.760
<v Speaker 1>to do that to get the truth to the American

0:46:41.800 --> 0:46:44.240
<v Speaker 1>people and through the media. Have you thought about starting

0:46:44.280 --> 0:46:48.640
<v Speaker 1>an improv group if you're going to utilize both humor

0:46:48.719 --> 0:46:51.880
<v Speaker 1>and teamwork with a coherent message, perhaps some sort of

0:46:51.960 --> 0:46:55.920
<v Speaker 1>yes and exercise some trust falls. I know a lot

0:46:55.960 --> 0:46:57.920
<v Speaker 1>of out of work people in Chicago right now who

0:46:57.960 --> 0:47:00.120
<v Speaker 1>could come, get on a plane and teach you guys

0:47:00.120 --> 0:47:04.160
<v Speaker 1>some basics of improv to save democracy. I have enjoyed

0:47:04.200 --> 0:47:08.000
<v Speaker 1>improv in Chicago myself for many years, and it can

0:47:08.160 --> 0:47:11.880
<v Speaker 1>be It can be very useful, but it's not a

0:47:11.920 --> 0:47:17.919
<v Speaker 1>substitute though, for discipline, narrative discipline, lines of questioning and

0:47:18.000 --> 0:47:21.000
<v Speaker 1>taking the fight to the other side. When they are

0:47:21.160 --> 0:47:28.520
<v Speaker 1>propounding fabricated narratives, when they are distorting facts, peddling conspiracy

0:47:28.560 --> 0:47:32.600
<v Speaker 1>theories that are without foundation, and sometimes just flat out

0:47:32.680 --> 0:47:35.560
<v Speaker 1>making it up. They don't they don't have a compunction

0:47:35.600 --> 0:47:39.839
<v Speaker 1>about that. We do, which is sometimes to our disadvantage.

0:47:40.040 --> 0:47:42.839
<v Speaker 1>Although I'd rather be where we are than they are.

0:47:43.280 --> 0:47:46.000
<v Speaker 1>But that means we've got to be doubly more effective

0:47:46.400 --> 0:47:49.799
<v Speaker 1>in puncturing what they're doing. What Congressman, you sound like

0:47:49.840 --> 0:47:54.319
<v Speaker 1>my parents. Improv, although valid, is no substitute for real

0:47:54.360 --> 0:47:57.000
<v Speaker 1>hard work and fact checking. I get it. I should

0:47:57.000 --> 0:47:59.759
<v Speaker 1>be a doctor or an architect. I think we can

0:47:59.800 --> 0:48:03.440
<v Speaker 1>both degree. If the fate of our democracy lies on improv,

0:48:03.600 --> 0:48:06.680
<v Speaker 1>we might be in a bad place. Um, I'm curious.

0:48:06.760 --> 0:48:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you think House Republicans are planning on using this

0:48:10.120 --> 0:48:13.960
<v Speaker 1>investigation as a basis to impeach President Biden. I mean,

0:48:14.000 --> 0:48:16.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a crowd of them that's already decided that's what

0:48:16.560 --> 0:48:20.000
<v Speaker 1>they want to do. I think I think they would

0:48:20.040 --> 0:48:25.520
<v Speaker 1>have trouble right now selling that to enough people in

0:48:25.560 --> 0:48:28.800
<v Speaker 1>their own caucus to have the votes. Frankly, there is

0:48:28.880 --> 0:48:34.399
<v Speaker 1>a there is a dwindling group of more common sense

0:48:34.480 --> 0:48:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Republicans and modern Republicans who are very uneasy about the

0:48:40.280 --> 0:48:44.799
<v Speaker 1>hard ideological tilt of the Freedom Caucus and their accolytes

0:48:45.360 --> 0:48:50.880
<v Speaker 1>and would like to find a way to reassert themselves

0:48:50.960 --> 0:48:55.200
<v Speaker 1>and what they believe is what's going to be necessary

0:48:55.200 --> 0:48:58.680
<v Speaker 1>if the Republicans are really ever gonna be successful again

0:48:58.960 --> 0:49:03.360
<v Speaker 1>in American political life. In terms of a real serious,

0:49:03.400 --> 0:49:06.799
<v Speaker 1>working majority. I think that there are some built in

0:49:06.920 --> 0:49:11.960
<v Speaker 1>breaks on that, And what I predict is that the

0:49:12.040 --> 0:49:15.879
<v Speaker 1>Republicans on our committee will do what they always do,

0:49:15.920 --> 0:49:19.359
<v Speaker 1>which is overreach, right, And when they do that, they

0:49:19.520 --> 0:49:24.080
<v Speaker 1>lose public support and they lose credibility, and in this

0:49:24.120 --> 0:49:28.879
<v Speaker 1>particular case, they're likely to alienate some of those more

0:49:28.920 --> 0:49:32.680
<v Speaker 1>moderate numbers of their caucus, albeit and dweling numbers they

0:49:32.760 --> 0:49:35.400
<v Speaker 1>need to get to eighteen. Do you think that you

0:49:35.480 --> 0:49:38.240
<v Speaker 1>really think they will alienate It feels like there's there's

0:49:38.360 --> 0:49:45.919
<v Speaker 1>rarely any pushback or political repercussions for appearing hawkish and overstepping. Yes,

0:49:46.040 --> 0:49:49.080
<v Speaker 1>but you asked about impeachment. Impeachment is a different matter,

0:49:50.160 --> 0:49:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and you do think that is a line for most Americans?

0:49:52.480 --> 0:49:54.880
<v Speaker 1>You think they will see that just as a craven

0:49:55.520 --> 0:50:01.479
<v Speaker 1>partisan overreach. Yeah. I don't think anybody in America. Well,

0:50:01.920 --> 0:50:05.160
<v Speaker 1>let me with I simply don't think that's a majority

0:50:05.200 --> 0:50:08.719
<v Speaker 1>opinion at all, not even close. That there's something unseemly

0:50:08.760 --> 0:50:11.440
<v Speaker 1>about Joe Biden that desperately needs to be investigated. And

0:50:11.719 --> 0:50:14.919
<v Speaker 1>we just had a midterm election. They tried out that theme.

0:50:14.960 --> 0:50:19.000
<v Speaker 1>It didn't work, you know, Americans did not vote to

0:50:19.680 --> 0:50:24.759
<v Speaker 1>have hard line accountability for Joe Biden because he's getting

0:50:24.800 --> 0:50:28.040
<v Speaker 1>away with stuff, and that's why we need a Republican majority.

0:50:28.080 --> 0:50:30.279
<v Speaker 1>They barely got a majority, they and they didn't get

0:50:30.360 --> 0:50:33.120
<v Speaker 1>one in the US Senate. They lost governor seats net,

0:50:33.120 --> 0:50:37.200
<v Speaker 1>they lost legislative seats net, and they barely won the House.

0:50:37.560 --> 0:50:40.799
<v Speaker 1>So I hardly think that's a mandate to go at it.

0:50:42.000 --> 0:50:45.080
<v Speaker 1>And that says something about I'm not saying that Americans

0:50:45.080 --> 0:50:48.400
<v Speaker 1>don't want accountability. They're not persuaded that Joe Biden has

0:50:48.440 --> 0:50:59.960
<v Speaker 1>done anything that merits that kind of you know, which, Huntsman,

0:51:00.040 --> 0:51:04.160
<v Speaker 1>are you optimistic going into this next year that the

0:51:04.200 --> 0:51:07.520
<v Speaker 1>American public will be able to sift through and see

0:51:07.520 --> 0:51:11.640
<v Speaker 1>through the bs. We live in a world with so

0:51:11.760 --> 0:51:14.800
<v Speaker 1>much in front of us, right, you know, we don't

0:51:14.840 --> 0:51:17.440
<v Speaker 1>live anymore where in a world where you know, I

0:51:17.480 --> 0:51:21.200
<v Speaker 1>get my news in the evening broadcast for thirty minutes

0:51:21.200 --> 0:51:24.279
<v Speaker 1>on one of three choices. Those days are long gone, right,

0:51:24.280 --> 0:51:29.240
<v Speaker 1>So there's this fog of news and data being presented

0:51:29.280 --> 0:51:33.360
<v Speaker 1>to me an opinion, and I'm somehow expected to separate

0:51:34.040 --> 0:51:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the truth from the non truth or the half truth,

0:51:36.520 --> 0:51:39.799
<v Speaker 1>and the facts from the fiction. So that's why it's

0:51:39.840 --> 0:51:42.280
<v Speaker 1>so important we do our jobs and do them well

0:51:42.640 --> 0:51:49.719
<v Speaker 1>that we help the American listener, viewer, voter separate what's

0:51:49.719 --> 0:51:55.320
<v Speaker 1>true from what is not true. And that's, as I said,

0:51:55.320 --> 0:51:57.200
<v Speaker 1>why I think our committee is going to be on

0:51:57.239 --> 0:52:01.279
<v Speaker 1>the front line of this this struggle, and it's a

0:52:01.360 --> 0:52:04.640
<v Speaker 1>struggle as much for the truth as it is for

0:52:04.719 --> 0:52:11.359
<v Speaker 1>political advantage or partisan gang. Well, Congressman Jerry Connelly, thank

0:52:11.360 --> 0:52:14.080
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining the podcast, and let me

0:52:14.120 --> 0:52:16.120
<v Speaker 1>know if you need any punch ups on jokes. I

0:52:16.200 --> 0:52:18.920
<v Speaker 1>work for cheap and I'd like to help this democracy.

0:52:19.000 --> 0:52:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll come back to you on an improv Thank you.

0:52:22.960 --> 0:52:24.920
<v Speaker 1>After the break, we're going to be joined by author

0:52:24.960 --> 0:52:27.759
<v Speaker 1>and journalist Tiffany Cross. We're going to dive even more

0:52:27.800 --> 0:52:31.439
<v Speaker 1>into media coverage behind Hunter Biden's laptop. We'll be right back.

0:52:36.640 --> 0:52:39.479
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to Jordan Clepper Fingers. The conspiracy we're talking

0:52:39.520 --> 0:52:43.040
<v Speaker 1>about Hunter Biden's laptop basically the right wing fever dream

0:52:43.080 --> 0:52:45.400
<v Speaker 1>that a MacBook Pro that was left at a computer

0:52:45.440 --> 0:52:48.600
<v Speaker 1>repair shop in Delaware proves that the Biden family was

0:52:48.640 --> 0:52:51.880
<v Speaker 1>doing corruption in Ukraine. And that was before it was

0:52:52.040 --> 0:52:56.240
<v Speaker 1>cool to know about stuff in Ukraine and also China

0:52:56.320 --> 0:52:59.759
<v Speaker 1>is involved. Obviously, if you watch Fox News or Newsmax

0:52:59.880 --> 0:53:04.160
<v Speaker 1>or Max News or Real American Truth or any other

0:53:04.280 --> 0:53:06.560
<v Speaker 1>right wing media that sounds like it was created by

0:53:06.560 --> 0:53:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a Steve Bannon word generator, you're probably extremely familiar with

0:53:10.600 --> 0:53:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the weird details of the Hunter Biden saga. But if

0:53:14.000 --> 0:53:16.480
<v Speaker 1>you get your news from real places, you might only

0:53:16.560 --> 0:53:19.800
<v Speaker 1>know some of it, and that creates a minor dilemma.

0:53:20.000 --> 0:53:23.120
<v Speaker 1>House Republicans are about to start investigating Hunter Biden, and

0:53:23.200 --> 0:53:25.560
<v Speaker 1>that means it's probably going to get a lot of

0:53:25.600 --> 0:53:29.080
<v Speaker 1>coverage on mainstream outlets. So if the role of the

0:53:29.120 --> 0:53:32.400
<v Speaker 1>news media is to cover what's happening but also to

0:53:32.520 --> 0:53:36.520
<v Speaker 1>stop the spread of misinformation, what are journalists supposed to

0:53:36.560 --> 0:53:39.239
<v Speaker 1>do here? To help us answer that question, we're going

0:53:39.280 --> 0:53:43.360
<v Speaker 1>to talk to Tiffany Cross, an author, journalist, cable news veteran,

0:53:43.520 --> 0:53:45.720
<v Speaker 1>and until recently she was the host of The Cross

0:53:45.760 --> 0:53:49.239
<v Speaker 1>Connection on MSNBC. Tiffany, thanks so much for talking to

0:53:49.320 --> 0:53:51.719
<v Speaker 1>us here today. Thanks for having me Jordan, It's great

0:53:51.760 --> 0:53:55.400
<v Speaker 1>to be connected today. Yes, So, this Hunter Biden laptop

0:53:55.440 --> 0:54:00.160
<v Speaker 1>story poses an interesting problem for the news media. On

0:54:00.160 --> 0:54:03.840
<v Speaker 1>one hand, it's an obsession fanned by right wing trolls

0:54:03.880 --> 0:54:06.719
<v Speaker 1>who most of the time can be ignored. But on

0:54:06.760 --> 0:54:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, Republicans are taking over the House of

0:54:10.040 --> 0:54:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Representatives and they're going to launch congressional investigations into it,

0:54:13.760 --> 0:54:16.839
<v Speaker 1>hoping for media coverage that makes the investigation look like

0:54:16.880 --> 0:54:20.839
<v Speaker 1>a legitimate process. So I guess the big question is

0:54:21.360 --> 0:54:25.399
<v Speaker 1>can you have a legitimate investigation into something run by

0:54:25.400 --> 0:54:30.640
<v Speaker 1>the people who think January sixth was antifa? Right, I

0:54:30.680 --> 0:54:32.920
<v Speaker 1>would say no, And I wish that more people in

0:54:32.960 --> 0:54:35.399
<v Speaker 1>the news media would be so direct and honest about that.

0:54:36.040 --> 0:54:38.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, when we talk about corruption in this whole

0:54:38.040 --> 0:54:41.319
<v Speaker 1>incident with a Hunter Biden campaign or the Hunter Biden

0:54:41.400 --> 0:54:44.279
<v Speaker 1>laptop rather in Ukraine, I think it's really important to

0:54:44.320 --> 0:54:47.680
<v Speaker 1>remember what the Ukraine story is, and that is that

0:54:47.800 --> 0:54:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump was trying to hold up hundreds of millions

0:54:50.360 --> 0:54:53.560
<v Speaker 1>of dollars in support for Ukraine because he wanted President

0:54:53.640 --> 0:54:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Zelinsky to investigate his political rivals. That is the story.

0:54:57.840 --> 0:55:01.719
<v Speaker 1>The counterpoint to that story was Republicans trying to institute

0:55:01.719 --> 0:55:06.160
<v Speaker 1>this laptop storyline. And so when you have people who

0:55:06.440 --> 0:55:11.759
<v Speaker 1>employ the logic of bad actors like Lauren Berberd or

0:55:11.800 --> 0:55:15.319
<v Speaker 1>Marjorie Taylor Greene, who will have committee assignments. You know,

0:55:15.360 --> 0:55:18.359
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans have taken over the House. Now we don't

0:55:18.400 --> 0:55:20.279
<v Speaker 1>know what leadership looks like. We don't know who the

0:55:20.320 --> 0:55:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Speaker of the House will be. Kevin McCarthy is quite

0:55:22.600 --> 0:55:25.879
<v Speaker 1>embroiled in his own battles. I think it is very

0:55:26.000 --> 0:55:30.040
<v Speaker 1>dangerous to pretend that these are intellectual people, that these

0:55:30.040 --> 0:55:32.160
<v Speaker 1>are people acting in good faith, or that these are

0:55:32.160 --> 0:55:34.879
<v Speaker 1>people who give a damn about democracy, because they don't

0:55:34.920 --> 0:55:38.200
<v Speaker 1>see your point. They said January sixth was Antifa. We

0:55:38.280 --> 0:55:44.000
<v Speaker 1>have seen quite blatantly these folks lie. They have said that,

0:55:44.080 --> 0:55:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, they were like tourists walking through the Capitol,

0:55:46.120 --> 0:55:49.200
<v Speaker 1>even though we saw Republican members of Congress themselves helping

0:55:49.200 --> 0:55:51.840
<v Speaker 1>to barricade a door. And so it seems to be

0:55:52.040 --> 0:55:54.960
<v Speaker 1>yet again a lesson that the news media has not learned,

0:55:55.160 --> 0:55:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and they make such great overtures to this right wing

0:55:59.040 --> 0:56:02.680
<v Speaker 1>extremist Republican Party, and they have not yet accepted what

0:56:02.760 --> 0:56:06.200
<v Speaker 1>we as all Americans, have witnessed, and that is there

0:56:06.239 --> 0:56:10.279
<v Speaker 1>are no right wing extremists and a separate group of Republicans.

0:56:10.360 --> 0:56:13.399
<v Speaker 1>These two factions have merged. And so if you're going

0:56:13.440 --> 0:56:17.960
<v Speaker 1>to turn over political investigations to right wing extremists, then

0:56:18.000 --> 0:56:23.680
<v Speaker 1>you're going to essentially waive the white flag on democracy

0:56:23.840 --> 0:56:26.600
<v Speaker 1>and say goodbye. This is feels like the series finale

0:56:27.200 --> 0:56:30.080
<v Speaker 1>of the Great American Experiment, and as you can see,

0:56:30.120 --> 0:56:33.279
<v Speaker 1>it ain't going so well. Tune in everybody, I guess

0:56:33.280 --> 0:56:35.719
<v Speaker 1>it brings in interesting questions. Though you're right they they

0:56:35.719 --> 0:56:40.400
<v Speaker 1>may not believe in the tenets of democracy, But is

0:56:40.400 --> 0:56:42.560
<v Speaker 1>there a point of view in and of itself news

0:56:42.640 --> 0:56:44.880
<v Speaker 1>which should be covered because people will look at this

0:56:44.920 --> 0:56:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Biden laptop story and it is in many way

0:56:48.520 --> 0:56:51.560
<v Speaker 1>you used as a distraction, But there is news to

0:56:51.640 --> 0:56:54.600
<v Speaker 1>be made in there. There is perhaps an investigation that

0:56:54.680 --> 0:56:57.520
<v Speaker 1>could happen around this, whether or not it's a legitimate one,

0:56:58.080 --> 0:57:00.640
<v Speaker 1>who knows. But you bring up people like Bobert a

0:57:00.640 --> 0:57:04.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of times. The news doesn't have to report on

0:57:04.239 --> 0:57:06.400
<v Speaker 1>all of the wilder things that perhaps somebody like a

0:57:06.440 --> 0:57:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Bobert will say. But then you'll have people like Kevin McCarthy,

0:57:09.800 --> 0:57:11.760
<v Speaker 1>who very well could be the Leader of the House,

0:57:11.920 --> 0:57:14.480
<v Speaker 1>who will repeat those talking points. So what do you

0:57:14.480 --> 0:57:17.080
<v Speaker 1>say to a journalist who says, if Kevin McCarthy is

0:57:17.120 --> 0:57:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the Speaker of the House, and he says something that

0:57:19.800 --> 0:57:22.760
<v Speaker 1>means that it is news that must be reported. I

0:57:22.800 --> 0:57:25.560
<v Speaker 1>think it's fine to report that through the proper context.

0:57:25.600 --> 0:57:27.919
<v Speaker 1>I think what we have seen is the news media

0:57:28.000 --> 0:57:31.880
<v Speaker 1>goes out of its way to present something that is

0:57:31.920 --> 0:57:34.480
<v Speaker 1>factual or something that is at least based in some

0:57:34.600 --> 0:57:37.480
<v Speaker 1>level of intellect, and then they will take something asinine

0:57:37.520 --> 0:57:39.520
<v Speaker 1>and present both of these things as though they are

0:57:39.600 --> 0:57:43.080
<v Speaker 1>equal in thought. So if I say, hey, Jordan, it's

0:57:43.160 --> 0:57:47.440
<v Speaker 1>raining outside, and it's in fact raining outside, and you say, well,

0:57:47.480 --> 0:57:50.520
<v Speaker 1>there are purple unicorns falling from the sky outside, the

0:57:50.760 --> 0:57:53.680
<v Speaker 1>answer to that is not, well, some say it's raining outside,

0:57:53.720 --> 0:57:56.680
<v Speaker 1>and some say there are purple unicorns, you know, falling

0:57:56.720 --> 0:57:59.240
<v Speaker 1>from the sky. We'll let you decide. We're fair and balance.

0:57:59.320 --> 0:58:01.480
<v Speaker 1>That's bullsit and we ought to be honest about that.

0:58:01.520 --> 0:58:03.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think, you know, I think why you have

0:58:03.920 --> 0:58:06.000
<v Speaker 1>so much of that is because again one of my

0:58:06.040 --> 0:58:10.440
<v Speaker 1>big passions, um to my my career has been newsroom diversity.

0:58:10.480 --> 0:58:13.400
<v Speaker 1>And so when you have people in these newsrooms who

0:58:13.520 --> 0:58:16.760
<v Speaker 1>make these overtures to Trump fanatics, you know, to these

0:58:16.800 --> 0:58:22.160
<v Speaker 1>cult members who are believers um of the Maga doctrine,

0:58:22.320 --> 0:58:26.080
<v Speaker 1>that you've so brilliantly highlighted um in your comedic reporting

0:58:26.080 --> 0:58:28.600
<v Speaker 1>for the Daily Show. You've done better reporting the most

0:58:28.680 --> 0:58:31.080
<v Speaker 1>journalists out there, Um, and just let these people talk

0:58:31.120 --> 0:58:34.640
<v Speaker 1>and say what they believe. Make no mistake, we have

0:58:34.760 --> 0:58:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the guns and we are now in the streets. Can

0:58:38.160 --> 0:58:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I ask why're carrying a pitchfork? Well, pitchfork is a

0:58:42.280 --> 0:58:46.040
<v Speaker 1>just iconic representation of how of what people over time

0:58:46.040 --> 0:58:49.280
<v Speaker 1>have done in this cart it field rulling a weapon's

0:58:49.320 --> 0:58:51.360
<v Speaker 1>farm equipment, and it's legal in this, in this in

0:58:51.400 --> 0:58:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the city. Yeah, are you farming today? It's it's it's

0:58:54.720 --> 0:58:57.440
<v Speaker 1>a representation. We're not asking for violence right now. I

0:58:57.440 --> 0:59:00.160
<v Speaker 1>gotta tell you from the movies I've seen the the

0:59:00.320 --> 0:59:02.520
<v Speaker 1>hordes of people with pitchforts are usually the bad guy.

0:59:02.800 --> 0:59:04.760
<v Speaker 1>And when you have people who say, well, you know,

0:59:04.800 --> 0:59:07.960
<v Speaker 1>all these people aren't so bad because my grandmother is

0:59:08.000 --> 0:59:11.120
<v Speaker 1>a Trump supporter and she's my nanna and she's so sweet,

0:59:11.200 --> 0:59:13.360
<v Speaker 1>or my dad supports Trump. I try to talk him

0:59:13.400 --> 0:59:14.960
<v Speaker 1>out of it, but he still believes that. But they're

0:59:15.000 --> 0:59:17.240
<v Speaker 1>not bad people. Me on the other side, I'm saying,

0:59:17.240 --> 0:59:19.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry to tell you, but they actually are pieces

0:59:19.320 --> 0:59:21.360
<v Speaker 1>of shit. You know, these are horrible people. Who are

0:59:21.360 --> 0:59:26.640
<v Speaker 1>supporting a horrible man who says horrible, racist, xenophobic, misogynistic things.

0:59:26.680 --> 0:59:28.800
<v Speaker 1>And if you can't call your family out on that,

0:59:29.240 --> 0:59:32.160
<v Speaker 1>then that is a problem because now you're penetrating the

0:59:32.200 --> 0:59:36.600
<v Speaker 1>atmosphere where it's supposed to be truthful information and not

0:59:36.760 --> 0:59:39.320
<v Speaker 1>a you know, a sympathy fest for people who would

0:59:39.320 --> 0:59:43.200
<v Speaker 1>see folks who look like me oppressed. And that has

0:59:43.240 --> 0:59:46.800
<v Speaker 1>created such a chasm in media Jordan. It is two

0:59:47.040 --> 0:59:49.840
<v Speaker 1>people have now tuned out media. I mean you look

0:59:49.880 --> 0:59:52.400
<v Speaker 1>at cable news and it's really a melting ice cube

0:59:52.400 --> 0:59:56.320
<v Speaker 1>at this point. And when people do not trust that

0:59:56.360 --> 0:59:58.640
<v Speaker 1>there is no reputable outlet where they can get this

0:59:58.720 --> 1:00:01.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of information, they find their news and information from

1:00:01.600 --> 1:00:04.560
<v Speaker 1>other sources, and those sources are not always reputable. And

1:00:04.560 --> 1:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>we saw what happened with that in twenty sixteen. A

1:00:06.800 --> 1:00:09.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of people felt like their lived experience was reflected

1:00:09.640 --> 1:00:12.000
<v Speaker 1>in an Internet meme. What we later learned that was

1:00:12.040 --> 1:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the you know, Internet Russia agency, who also did not

1:00:15.080 --> 1:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>care about American democracy. And when they looked at this

1:00:17.560 --> 1:00:20.160
<v Speaker 1>country and said how can we mess with American democracy?

1:00:20.440 --> 1:00:22.120
<v Speaker 1>It took them all of two months to say, oh,

1:00:22.120 --> 1:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>white supremacy, that's it. That's how that's their greatest weakness

1:00:25.120 --> 1:00:26.760
<v Speaker 1>and we will tap into that. And this is really

1:00:26.800 --> 1:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>an extension of that philosophy. I can't wait for the

1:00:30.760 --> 1:00:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Tiffany Cross How to Do Thanksgiving with Relatives book, Call

1:00:36.440 --> 1:00:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the pieces of shit out and move on, Belise my Thanksgiving.

1:00:40.520 --> 1:00:42.480
<v Speaker 1>We don't have that problem, but a lot of people's

1:00:42.480 --> 1:00:44.480
<v Speaker 1>tables they do. And I think that is the you know,

1:00:44.640 --> 1:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>with allies and people who you know want to get

1:00:47.440 --> 1:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>in this fight. It's like, yes, start in your own home,

1:00:50.560 --> 1:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>challenge your own family, because it is not my job

1:00:53.680 --> 1:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to convince the you know, willfully ignorant people to not

1:00:58.080 --> 1:01:00.920
<v Speaker 1>believe in a man who's lying to them. And it

1:01:01.040 --> 1:01:04.200
<v Speaker 1>is not my job to extend empathy or sympathy to

1:01:04.320 --> 1:01:06.320
<v Speaker 1>people who feel that way. I don't know how to

1:01:06.360 --> 1:01:08.320
<v Speaker 1>meet a bigot in the middle. So if that is

1:01:08.320 --> 1:01:11.800
<v Speaker 1>how people feel, it's start there, Start there, at your

1:01:11.800 --> 1:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>own table. And that brings up an interesting question, because

1:01:14.360 --> 1:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I do think that's a question I get on the

1:01:15.920 --> 1:01:18.640
<v Speaker 1>road a bunch. Are you ever able to change somebody's

1:01:18.640 --> 1:01:20.960
<v Speaker 1>mind or what have you? And that's not the intention

1:01:21.040 --> 1:01:23.040
<v Speaker 1>of the pieces that we go out to do. I

1:01:23.080 --> 1:01:25.800
<v Speaker 1>think more often than not, it's to confront people with

1:01:26.160 --> 1:01:28.680
<v Speaker 1>logical fallacies that we see back home and see what

1:01:28.800 --> 1:01:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the reality is in the field. But I do think

1:01:31.600 --> 1:01:34.439
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting it's somebody a member of the media. There

1:01:34.520 --> 1:01:36.760
<v Speaker 1>is this chasm here. There's a chasm also a bad

1:01:36.800 --> 1:01:39.560
<v Speaker 1>information that people are getting, And I do think you

1:01:39.600 --> 1:01:41.480
<v Speaker 1>want to have empathy for those people who have been

1:01:41.520 --> 1:01:46.080
<v Speaker 1>getting given such misinformation. How do you balance the deliverance

1:01:46.280 --> 1:01:51.720
<v Speaker 1>of real news with the idea of showing a certain

1:01:51.760 --> 1:01:56.160
<v Speaker 1>amount of empathy and an outreache towards perhaps voices and

1:01:56.280 --> 1:01:59.919
<v Speaker 1>people who who who aren't willing to meet in the middle. Well,

1:02:00.160 --> 1:02:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I would challenge the first part of empathy. UM. I

1:02:03.200 --> 1:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>think if you do have empathy, um, Jordan, for some

1:02:06.120 --> 1:02:08.919
<v Speaker 1>of the folks you have spoken with, that's not such

1:02:08.920 --> 1:02:12.120
<v Speaker 1>a bad thing. Um. You know, perhaps I can understand that,

1:02:12.600 --> 1:02:15.520
<v Speaker 1>as long as you're not asking me to have empathy. UM.

1:02:15.840 --> 1:02:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I do not have empathy for people who have bought

1:02:18.680 --> 1:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>into um a lie or a myth or a system

1:02:22.720 --> 1:02:26.200
<v Speaker 1>that means my oppression. I don't have any empathy for

1:02:26.600 --> 1:02:30.520
<v Speaker 1>such people at all. I actually think the country would

1:02:30.520 --> 1:02:35.080
<v Speaker 1>be better off without those people having an influence on

1:02:35.120 --> 1:02:37.800
<v Speaker 1>what this democracy looks like or how this government works.

1:02:37.840 --> 1:02:40.160
<v Speaker 1>But that is not the way American democracy was designed.

1:02:40.480 --> 1:02:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I think when it comes to reporting these things, UM,

1:02:43.280 --> 1:02:46.920
<v Speaker 1>and in the media landscape, UM, you run the risk

1:02:47.120 --> 1:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>of having a large number of the population I would

1:02:50.400 --> 1:02:53.200
<v Speaker 1>call the rising majority. UM. Tune you out when you're

1:02:53.320 --> 1:02:56.240
<v Speaker 1>when your perspective, when the starting point is we have

1:02:56.360 --> 1:02:59.000
<v Speaker 1>empathy for these people who feel this way because you

1:02:59.040 --> 1:03:02.080
<v Speaker 1>do not hear people. Well, look, the Nazis were fed

1:03:02.120 --> 1:03:04.360
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of bad information. We have to have empathy

1:03:04.400 --> 1:03:06.160
<v Speaker 1>for them. Get the fuck out of here, like we

1:03:06.200 --> 1:03:08.640
<v Speaker 1>would never say that, we would never believe that, you know.

1:03:08.720 --> 1:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>And so why am I being asked to have empathy

1:03:11.440 --> 1:03:13.920
<v Speaker 1>for the people who would see me staying in a

1:03:14.000 --> 1:03:18.480
<v Speaker 1>dilapidated community, sending my children to dilapidated schools, living in

1:03:18.560 --> 1:03:21.640
<v Speaker 1>rundown neighborhoods and say, well, that's just how it goes

1:03:21.680 --> 1:03:23.680
<v Speaker 1>because they can't win, because if they win, that means

1:03:23.680 --> 1:03:27.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm losing. I have no empathy tivity. I gotta see.

1:03:27.320 --> 1:03:29.800
<v Speaker 1>If you don't think people are showing empathy towards Nazis,

1:03:29.800 --> 1:03:33.080
<v Speaker 1>you're just not on Twitter anymore. You're right, and elon

1:03:33.240 --> 1:03:35.440
<v Speaker 1>not Twitter. It is the land of empathy for Nazis.

1:03:35.680 --> 1:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I would say it's a surprisingly popular opinion that's really

1:03:39.280 --> 1:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>somehow coming back in vogue. I guess I have a

1:03:42.080 --> 1:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>question who makes those decisions about what gets covered and

1:03:45.480 --> 1:03:49.320
<v Speaker 1>what doesn't get covered at a network level. Is its anchors,

1:03:49.400 --> 1:03:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Is it producers, news executives. Is there a conversation that

1:03:53.000 --> 1:03:55.880
<v Speaker 1>happens in the newsroom. Well, it's a variety of things,

1:03:55.920 --> 1:03:57.320
<v Speaker 1>and I think it all depends on the news room.

1:03:57.360 --> 1:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, broadcast has a different set of rules in print.

1:04:00.080 --> 1:04:02.640
<v Speaker 1>When I was in cable news, I made the decisions

1:04:02.720 --> 1:04:05.040
<v Speaker 1>about what I covered on my show, but I did

1:04:05.040 --> 1:04:08.040
<v Speaker 1>not do so without a fight. Um. You know, there

1:04:08.120 --> 1:04:11.840
<v Speaker 1>are assignment desk assignment editors, and there are people who

1:04:11.880 --> 1:04:14.720
<v Speaker 1>oversee and people who oversaw my show. And it was

1:04:14.800 --> 1:04:19.320
<v Speaker 1>always a fight because you know, it's like the echo chambers, right,

1:04:19.360 --> 1:04:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Like the three news networks are covering mostly the same things.

1:04:22.840 --> 1:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, now, you know Fox would be an outlier

1:04:24.720 --> 1:04:27.200
<v Speaker 1>and you know, still cover Hillary's emails, But for the

1:04:27.240 --> 1:04:30.160
<v Speaker 1>most part, people were covering the same stories throughout the day.

1:04:30.320 --> 1:04:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I was very intentional about disrupting that and um, talking

1:04:33.760 --> 1:04:39.400
<v Speaker 1>about stories that impacted community's color policy, you know, people

1:04:39.440 --> 1:04:41.720
<v Speaker 1>who live below the poverty line. I wanted to have

1:04:41.760 --> 1:04:45.040
<v Speaker 1>conversations that were being had in the corner office, as

1:04:45.040 --> 1:04:47.200
<v Speaker 1>well as the barbershop, as well as the beauty salon,

1:04:47.880 --> 1:04:49.640
<v Speaker 1>as well as on the block, you know, for the

1:04:49.880 --> 1:04:51.720
<v Speaker 1>old men who sit outside in front of the you know,

1:04:51.760 --> 1:04:54.160
<v Speaker 1>convenience store all day. I wanted everyone to feel like

1:04:54.160 --> 1:04:56.280
<v Speaker 1>they had a home, and I wanted to reflect the

1:04:56.280 --> 1:04:58.560
<v Speaker 1>lived experience of everyone. But we talked a lot on

1:04:58.560 --> 1:05:01.600
<v Speaker 1>this show about the tragedy of America's maternal mortality rates,

1:05:01.720 --> 1:05:05.120
<v Speaker 1>especially the disparity that claims black and Indigenous women at

1:05:05.160 --> 1:05:07.960
<v Speaker 1>three times the rate as white women. Imagine being without

1:05:08.000 --> 1:05:11.280
<v Speaker 1>clean water for six straight days. Well, that's the reality

1:05:11.360 --> 1:05:14.560
<v Speaker 1>right now for the one hundred and fifty thousand residents

1:05:14.600 --> 1:05:18.800
<v Speaker 1>of Mississippi's largest city, all right after centuries of genocide

1:05:18.800 --> 1:05:23.040
<v Speaker 1>and oppression. Imagine seeing your ancestors stolen belongings sit in

1:05:23.080 --> 1:05:25.640
<v Speaker 1>a museum and you're told you can't have them, you

1:05:25.640 --> 1:05:28.439
<v Speaker 1>can't touch them or even photograph them. You take something

1:05:28.480 --> 1:05:31.000
<v Speaker 1>even as simple as the economy, right. You know a

1:05:31.080 --> 1:05:33.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of people you know in these morning news shows

1:05:33.480 --> 1:05:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and they say, oh, look, the economy is doing well,

1:05:36.160 --> 1:05:37.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, the market is up, and it's like the

1:05:37.960 --> 1:05:39.920
<v Speaker 1>market is not the economy. And if you go and

1:05:39.920 --> 1:05:42.400
<v Speaker 1>talk to people in my pre gentrified neighborhood, they would

1:05:42.440 --> 1:05:44.520
<v Speaker 1>not say the economy is doing well. You take labor

1:05:44.560 --> 1:05:46.680
<v Speaker 1>reports and they're like, oh, we added x amount of

1:05:46.720 --> 1:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>new jobs and here's the unemployment numbers. Well, that's the

1:05:49.360 --> 1:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>overall unemployment numbers. But when you disaggregate that data and

1:05:52.120 --> 1:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>look at unemployment for black people, for Latino people, we

1:05:56.000 --> 1:05:58.640
<v Speaker 1>build disrespected when you say, oh, the job of reports

1:05:58.680 --> 1:06:02.600
<v Speaker 1>numbers are great. And so the more that people kind

1:06:02.600 --> 1:06:06.600
<v Speaker 1>of centralize white perspective and white voices, it leaves so

1:06:06.720 --> 1:06:08.920
<v Speaker 1>many people out. And so when you talk about newsroom

1:06:08.920 --> 1:06:11.600
<v Speaker 1>diversity and who makes these decisions, don't come tell me

1:06:11.680 --> 1:06:14.520
<v Speaker 1>that you just hired you know, you know fifty percent

1:06:14.560 --> 1:06:16.840
<v Speaker 1>of people of color and women, and they're all entry

1:06:16.920 --> 1:06:19.680
<v Speaker 1>level employees or mid level management. Put those people in

1:06:19.720 --> 1:06:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the c suite. Put those people in decision making positions

1:06:22.800 --> 1:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>so they can disrupt the echo chambers in a meaningful way.

1:06:26.000 --> 1:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Because what is it twenty five year old to do

1:06:28.280 --> 1:06:30.280
<v Speaker 1>When a fifty five year old is in charge of

1:06:30.320 --> 1:06:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the entire newsroom and they're making a decision that runs

1:06:32.960 --> 1:06:36.720
<v Speaker 1>contrary to the lived experience or belief system or you know,

1:06:36.760 --> 1:06:41.120
<v Speaker 1>experiences of the rising majority. They don't always have or

1:06:41.160 --> 1:06:44.040
<v Speaker 1>feel the sense of agency to challenge that, and so

1:06:44.080 --> 1:06:46.360
<v Speaker 1>when they don't have that, they either exit the business

1:06:46.760 --> 1:06:49.960
<v Speaker 1>or they become a part of this machine that keeps

1:06:49.960 --> 1:06:51.840
<v Speaker 1>doing the same thing over and over and it never

1:06:51.880 --> 1:06:55.080
<v Speaker 1>gets disrupted or changed forever. Those battles that you're having

1:06:55.120 --> 1:06:58.360
<v Speaker 1>in the newsroom with your show on MSNBC, the Cross Connection,

1:06:58.960 --> 1:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>how much did you have to split your time being

1:07:02.440 --> 1:07:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the host of that show, helping create the narrative of

1:07:06.000 --> 1:07:09.000
<v Speaker 1>that show, the stories you wanted to cover, and also

1:07:09.160 --> 1:07:13.680
<v Speaker 1>what sounds like a teacher of this experienced did you

1:07:13.720 --> 1:07:16.080
<v Speaker 1>find yourself having put on those two hats? Were you

1:07:16.120 --> 1:07:19.640
<v Speaker 1>surprised by that culture at MSNBC. Yes, I put on

1:07:19.680 --> 1:07:22.160
<v Speaker 1>those hats out every day, and so what I found

1:07:22.160 --> 1:07:24.240
<v Speaker 1>on my show is I would have to do something

1:07:24.520 --> 1:07:27.960
<v Speaker 1>to please network executives, and then I would have to

1:07:28.000 --> 1:07:30.240
<v Speaker 1>do the rest of my program to please the viewers.

1:07:30.480 --> 1:07:33.040
<v Speaker 1>And those things often went like this. You know, if

1:07:33.040 --> 1:07:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I was going to please the executives, fine, I will

1:07:35.080 --> 1:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>do two segments on Trump, because that's what everybody wanted,

1:07:38.240 --> 1:07:42.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, the networking executives wanted to talk about Trump. However,

1:07:43.200 --> 1:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>if you know, you know, one of the members of

1:07:46.960 --> 1:07:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the group Migos was murdered, well that was something that

1:07:49.440 --> 1:07:51.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people were talking about, especially on the

1:07:51.280 --> 1:07:53.880
<v Speaker 1>hills of so many other hip hop artists being murdered.

1:07:54.000 --> 1:07:55.920
<v Speaker 1>So that was going to be something to please viewers.

1:07:56.720 --> 1:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>If there was a story about indigenous communities, you know,

1:08:01.000 --> 1:08:03.520
<v Speaker 1>having to travel over two hours to vote, that was

1:08:03.560 --> 1:08:05.360
<v Speaker 1>something that was going to please viewers. If we were

1:08:05.360 --> 1:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>going to do something on the Asian American Pacific Islander

1:08:07.880 --> 1:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>community being the fastest growing demographic in the country but

1:08:11.440 --> 1:08:13.720
<v Speaker 1>yet no political parties are reaching out to them, that

1:08:13.800 --> 1:08:16.080
<v Speaker 1>was something that was going to please viewers. And so,

1:08:16.479 --> 1:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, the way my bank account was set up,

1:08:18.520 --> 1:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I had to at least do something to please network executives.

1:08:22.200 --> 1:08:25.680
<v Speaker 1>But it was always my mission, you know, and I

1:08:25.680 --> 1:08:28.240
<v Speaker 1>would encourage you know, anybody who wants to pursue any

1:08:28.240 --> 1:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>career when you are mission driven, and I was mission driven,

1:08:31.960 --> 1:08:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and my mission was for the equality and liberation of Black,

1:08:35.040 --> 1:08:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Indigenous and people of color, the rising majority of the country.

1:08:38.240 --> 1:08:40.880
<v Speaker 1>That was my mission. And so nothing was going to

1:08:40.920 --> 1:08:43.120
<v Speaker 1>sway me from that mission, and I knew if I

1:08:43.160 --> 1:08:47.040
<v Speaker 1>ever fell out of favor with network executives, that would

1:08:47.080 --> 1:08:50.680
<v Speaker 1>have to be okay, because my mission was to elevate

1:08:50.880 --> 1:08:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the lived experiences and to hold the line for the

1:08:55.000 --> 1:08:57.720
<v Speaker 1>people who were very much architects of this country and

1:08:57.960 --> 1:09:00.679
<v Speaker 1>very much deserve to have their voices and actives heard,

1:09:01.160 --> 1:09:05.800
<v Speaker 1>particularly after centuries of being so violently silenced. No, I

1:09:05.840 --> 1:09:10.880
<v Speaker 1>mean your your show was canceled days before the midterms,

1:09:10.880 --> 1:09:13.200
<v Speaker 1>four days before the mid terms, an important voice in

1:09:13.200 --> 1:09:16.760
<v Speaker 1>this conversation and made a lot of news. And there

1:09:16.760 --> 1:09:19.479
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of questions how much how much did

1:09:19.520 --> 1:09:22.719
<v Speaker 1>you find that your personal mission was out of touch

1:09:22.840 --> 1:09:27.240
<v Speaker 1>with whatever MSNBC's mission was. Um, well, I felt that

1:09:27.360 --> 1:09:30.959
<v Speaker 1>pretty early on UM. Every week I had to defend

1:09:31.080 --> 1:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>and fight for segments that we did. Uh you know,

1:09:34.320 --> 1:09:36.800
<v Speaker 1>did that feel? Did that feel contrary to what other

1:09:36.840 --> 1:09:40.880
<v Speaker 1>hosts at MSNBC we're having to do with their own shows? Yeah? Um,

1:09:41.080 --> 1:09:42.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, I would say my colleague Joy Read and

1:09:43.000 --> 1:09:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I probably had the most UM pushback on our shows. Um.

1:09:47.120 --> 1:09:49.320
<v Speaker 1>But there were also things that other hosts would do

1:09:49.360 --> 1:09:52.479
<v Speaker 1>that would make it easier for us, which again is problematic. Um.

1:09:52.479 --> 1:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>My colleague Ari melbur Um. You know it's a big

1:09:55.400 --> 1:09:57.639
<v Speaker 1>hip hop fan. If you watch five minutes of his show,

1:09:57.760 --> 1:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>you know that he quotes rapp lyrics all the time time.

1:10:00.880 --> 1:10:02.479
<v Speaker 1>And it was fine when the white man did it.

1:10:02.600 --> 1:10:04.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, when the white man didn't, it made it

1:10:04.040 --> 1:10:05.600
<v Speaker 1>easier for everybody else to do it. But let the

1:10:05.640 --> 1:10:07.400
<v Speaker 1>black woman start out doing that, and they would have

1:10:07.479 --> 1:10:10.280
<v Speaker 1>made a major problem, a major problem. But he was

1:10:10.320 --> 1:10:13.360
<v Speaker 1>celebrated for doing that, Tippy. It was it was never

1:10:13.439 --> 1:10:16.360
<v Speaker 1>fine when a Melbourne did that. It was never fine.

1:10:16.439 --> 1:10:20.439
<v Speaker 1>That was never accepted amongst the audience members. Well, he

1:10:20.760 --> 1:10:22.960
<v Speaker 1>could get rap artists on his show, and you know

1:10:23.760 --> 1:10:26.360
<v Speaker 1>they they seem to you know, play into it. But

1:10:26.920 --> 1:10:29.920
<v Speaker 1>either way, Um, you know, you look at Morning Joe,

1:10:30.479 --> 1:10:33.080
<v Speaker 1>my former colleagues Joe and Mika. I mean we got

1:10:33.120 --> 1:10:37.599
<v Speaker 1>the term moscow Mitch from Joe Scarborough. Um. But if

1:10:37.720 --> 1:10:40.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know, if if Joy or I you know,

1:10:40.640 --> 1:10:42.639
<v Speaker 1>were to to say something similar, it was like, hey,

1:10:42.680 --> 1:10:45.160
<v Speaker 1>we don't really want name calling. Um. But even if

1:10:45.200 --> 1:10:46.920
<v Speaker 1>you take it out of MSNBC and just look at

1:10:46.920 --> 1:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the media landscape in general, um, and some of the

1:10:49.400 --> 1:10:53.200
<v Speaker 1>more colloquial conversations that happened. When it comes to voters,

1:10:53.240 --> 1:10:55.960
<v Speaker 1>they were so often in the media landscape that you

1:10:55.960 --> 1:11:00.720
<v Speaker 1>would hear terms like um, soccer moms, Nascar ads. Well,

1:11:00.800 --> 1:11:03.760
<v Speaker 1>those were all euphemisms for white voters. And it's not

1:11:03.800 --> 1:11:06.360
<v Speaker 1>that black people could not you know, have that same

1:11:06.720 --> 1:11:10.040
<v Speaker 1>um moniker as well. But we understood what that to me,

1:11:10.560 --> 1:11:13.200
<v Speaker 1>that what those terms meant. It did not feel inclusive

1:11:13.640 --> 1:11:17.160
<v Speaker 1>of the black experience, which is the biggest voting block

1:11:17.320 --> 1:11:20.000
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to Democratic to the Democratic Party. And

1:11:20.040 --> 1:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>so even when they did voters of the heartland. Um,

1:11:23.520 --> 1:11:27.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, you go to these diners in the middle

1:11:27.080 --> 1:11:29.760
<v Speaker 1>of nowhere where apparently no Black people have ever been

1:11:29.880 --> 1:11:32.280
<v Speaker 1>or ever eaten, and that was voters of the heartland.

1:11:32.439 --> 1:11:35.720
<v Speaker 1>But why not go to a basketball game in southwest

1:11:35.720 --> 1:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta after it let out and talk to the parents there?

1:11:37.760 --> 1:11:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Are they not voters of the heartland in a purple state,

1:11:40.600 --> 1:11:44.320
<v Speaker 1>I'd add, um, why can't we have like basketball dads

1:11:44.439 --> 1:11:47.320
<v Speaker 1>or you know, the untie voting block or something that

1:11:47.360 --> 1:11:51.200
<v Speaker 1>reflects my lived experience. Even when you have UM candidates

1:11:51.200 --> 1:11:54.479
<v Speaker 1>on and you'd have you know, these Democratic candidates and

1:11:54.520 --> 1:11:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the anchor would always press them, how are you going

1:11:56.840 --> 1:11:58.680
<v Speaker 1>to appeal to these red state voters. How are you

1:11:58.720 --> 1:12:00.920
<v Speaker 1>going to, you know, get these voters who's at home?

1:12:00.920 --> 1:12:02.120
<v Speaker 1>It's how are they going to come over to you?

1:12:02.360 --> 1:12:06.519
<v Speaker 1>I have yet to see somebody ask a Republican MAGA voter,

1:12:06.760 --> 1:12:08.719
<v Speaker 1>how are you going to appeal you want to penetrate

1:12:08.760 --> 1:12:10.679
<v Speaker 1>Democratic part How are you want to appeal the bass vote?

1:12:10.680 --> 1:12:13.519
<v Speaker 1>Are black voters your party seems to outstand for a

1:12:13.520 --> 1:12:16.599
<v Speaker 1>lot of things that runs contrary to what black voters want.

1:12:16.640 --> 1:12:18.479
<v Speaker 1>How are you going to appeal to them? How are

1:12:18.479 --> 1:12:20.600
<v Speaker 1>you going to appeal to the changing demographics? People of

1:12:20.640 --> 1:12:24.000
<v Speaker 1>color are increasingly becoming the base vote. What are your

1:12:24.040 --> 1:12:27.200
<v Speaker 1>policies that speak to that demographic? Those things never happened.

1:12:27.240 --> 1:12:29.240
<v Speaker 1>I was never able to get Republicans to come out

1:12:29.280 --> 1:12:31.400
<v Speaker 1>on my show because they did not want to answer

1:12:31.479 --> 1:12:35.200
<v Speaker 1>those types of questions. But access journalism would grant you

1:12:35.280 --> 1:12:39.320
<v Speaker 1>an interview with Ted Crews or Marjorie Taylor Green, or

1:12:41.120 --> 1:12:44.439
<v Speaker 1>the guy, the Senate guy, the Senate candidate Ron Johnson,

1:12:44.680 --> 1:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the Trump accolyte who was running for Senate in Wisconsin.

1:12:48.200 --> 1:12:50.280
<v Speaker 1>He would happily go on those shows if he knew

1:12:50.280 --> 1:12:52.920
<v Speaker 1>it was going to be an easy interview. And that

1:12:53.000 --> 1:12:56.040
<v Speaker 1>does not serve anybody but the anchor itself. It certainly

1:12:56.120 --> 1:12:59.240
<v Speaker 1>does not serve viewers or voters. And you bring up

1:12:59.240 --> 1:13:03.200
<v Speaker 1>an energy point is in twenty sixteen, after the media

1:13:03.280 --> 1:13:08.520
<v Speaker 1>landscape was quote unquote surprised by the red wave the Trumpism,

1:13:08.560 --> 1:13:12.960
<v Speaker 1>there there was all you saw was anchors in these

1:13:13.000 --> 1:13:15.759
<v Speaker 1>small little diners. And now we have this midterm election

1:13:16.160 --> 1:13:20.720
<v Speaker 1>where everybody's shocked by the blue whether whether you call

1:13:20.760 --> 1:13:23.679
<v Speaker 1>it the blue pushback right there, we're not seeing anybody

1:13:23.760 --> 1:13:26.799
<v Speaker 1>go to these other democratic areas and try to figure

1:13:26.960 --> 1:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>them out. I guess I think you're you're you're hitting

1:13:30.439 --> 1:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>on something that there are a lot of perhaps progressives

1:13:35.640 --> 1:13:37.640
<v Speaker 1>out there who look at a place, who look at

1:13:37.640 --> 1:13:41.519
<v Speaker 1>the media landscape. Everybody's picking their own media outlets to

1:13:41.600 --> 1:13:43.519
<v Speaker 1>try to tell them perhaps the story that they think

1:13:43.680 --> 1:13:46.799
<v Speaker 1>one elucidates the world that they see, or the story

1:13:46.840 --> 1:13:49.479
<v Speaker 1>that makes them feel better about themselves. More often than not,

1:13:50.600 --> 1:13:53.640
<v Speaker 1>there are those places in the mass media market that

1:13:53.680 --> 1:13:55.519
<v Speaker 1>people look at and we don't have to go all

1:13:55.560 --> 1:13:57.320
<v Speaker 1>in on MSNBC, but I do know that as a

1:13:57.320 --> 1:13:59.040
<v Speaker 1>place for a lot of people who look at that

1:13:59.160 --> 1:14:02.599
<v Speaker 1>as having a left leading perspective, who will take in

1:14:02.840 --> 1:14:05.439
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these considerations, and I think hearing some

1:14:05.520 --> 1:14:09.439
<v Speaker 1>of your stories here is depressing to hear that even

1:14:10.160 --> 1:14:12.760
<v Speaker 1>even these ideas of being inclusive in the stories that

1:14:12.800 --> 1:14:17.479
<v Speaker 1>we tell is meeting such resistance at at these levels.

1:14:17.520 --> 1:14:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Like where do you see these stories being able to

1:14:20.800 --> 1:14:22.479
<v Speaker 1>be told? Clearly we know where they need to be

1:14:22.520 --> 1:14:24.800
<v Speaker 1>able to be told. Where are you seeing examples of

1:14:24.840 --> 1:14:27.800
<v Speaker 1>them being told? Well, I think social media has really

1:14:27.840 --> 1:14:30.240
<v Speaker 1>democratized who has a voice in this space, which has

1:14:30.280 --> 1:14:33.280
<v Speaker 1>come with great benefits to democracy but also to some

1:14:33.360 --> 1:14:35.120
<v Speaker 1>of our demise. Right, Like we talked a little bit

1:14:35.160 --> 1:14:38.400
<v Speaker 1>about Twitter, which you know, you have superstars on Twitter

1:14:38.520 --> 1:14:40.559
<v Speaker 1>who we really don't know who they are, We just

1:14:40.600 --> 1:14:43.120
<v Speaker 1>know their avatar. You know, you have people who just

1:14:43.160 --> 1:14:46.799
<v Speaker 1>create these YouTube shows who can just declare themselves journalists

1:14:46.840 --> 1:14:50.439
<v Speaker 1>who might not have the journalistic acumen to really interview.

1:14:51.000 --> 1:14:53.439
<v Speaker 1>The podcast Drink Champs, you know when they had Kanye

1:14:54.080 --> 1:14:56.439
<v Speaker 1>on that podcast, Well that wasn't a journalist, you know,

1:14:56.520 --> 1:14:58.599
<v Speaker 1>that was somebody having a drink with Kanye. So there

1:14:58.680 --> 1:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>wasn't the space to challenge some of the things that

1:15:01.920 --> 1:15:05.760
<v Speaker 1>he said. And so, you know, I think the good

1:15:05.760 --> 1:15:08.080
<v Speaker 1>thing about it is their space and it has made

1:15:08.080 --> 1:15:11.000
<v Speaker 1>everybody wake up and say, well, wait a second. You

1:15:11.040 --> 1:15:13.320
<v Speaker 1>know a lot of people are getting their news from

1:15:13.760 --> 1:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>other places, like the Daily Show, quite honestly, and I

1:15:17.080 --> 1:15:19.679
<v Speaker 1>have been a long, long time fan of the Daily Show,

1:15:19.880 --> 1:15:21.840
<v Speaker 1>but I do think, well, that should not be your

1:15:21.920 --> 1:15:24.559
<v Speaker 1>only news outlet. You know, you do have to supplement

1:15:24.600 --> 1:15:26.280
<v Speaker 1>that even my show. And people would say, I don't

1:15:26.280 --> 1:15:28.360
<v Speaker 1>watch any news except for your show. It would make

1:15:28.400 --> 1:15:29.960
<v Speaker 1>me a little nervous because it's like, well, I'm a

1:15:30.000 --> 1:15:32.919
<v Speaker 1>perspective host, and you know I'm giving you my perspective.

1:15:32.960 --> 1:15:34.840
<v Speaker 1>It would be helpful if you had some of the

1:15:34.880 --> 1:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>baseline stuff. And you and I both know print drives broadcast.

1:15:38.600 --> 1:15:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Print journalism drives broadcast journal room. Everybody starts out reading

1:15:42.000 --> 1:15:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the paper, read six seven, eight papers. But even there

1:15:45.240 --> 1:15:47.519
<v Speaker 1>there's a lack of newsroom diversity. So I don't know

1:15:47.560 --> 1:15:53.120
<v Speaker 1>that I can say where news should be consumed. I

1:15:53.120 --> 1:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>would say the best answer I could give to that

1:15:55.240 --> 1:16:02.960
<v Speaker 1>is stay tuned to where I am. A final question

1:16:03.000 --> 1:16:05.080
<v Speaker 1>in here, do you think the media is glad Trump's

1:16:05.120 --> 1:16:09.240
<v Speaker 1>running again? I do? I do. I think Trump gave

1:16:09.320 --> 1:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the cable news network such a boom that they salivated, um,

1:16:14.160 --> 1:16:16.200
<v Speaker 1>and that's why. I think they were always constantly trying

1:16:16.200 --> 1:16:17.600
<v Speaker 1>to get me to do tum tum, tump tump, you

1:16:17.640 --> 1:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>have to talk about Trump um. But I think they're

1:16:20.000 --> 1:16:23.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be disappointed. I have seen some in the

1:16:23.160 --> 1:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>news media a day late and a dollar short be

1:16:25.960 --> 1:16:29.519
<v Speaker 1>a little more mindful about how they cover him. But

1:16:29.560 --> 1:16:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I also think that the American body politic has lost

1:16:34.000 --> 1:16:37.120
<v Speaker 1>their appetite for the reality TV show that was cable

1:16:37.200 --> 1:16:40.519
<v Speaker 1>news for a brief moment in time. People love to

1:16:40.560 --> 1:16:43.680
<v Speaker 1>see you know, this throwdown, this battle, this kind of

1:16:43.800 --> 1:16:48.280
<v Speaker 1>gutter back and forth between opposing viewpoints, and you know,

1:16:48.520 --> 1:16:50.680
<v Speaker 1>it was like the anchor would do all but say,

1:16:50.760 --> 1:16:53.160
<v Speaker 1>let's get ready to rumble, and then you bring in

1:16:53.200 --> 1:16:55.960
<v Speaker 1>this you know segment. Um. You know, I think post

1:16:56.040 --> 1:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>pandemic and being overly sensationalized by this level of yellow

1:17:00.040 --> 1:17:04.280
<v Speaker 1>journalism from print to broadcast has left people a bit

1:17:04.360 --> 1:17:08.200
<v Speaker 1>apathetic towards consuming news at all. Yeah. No, well, Tiffany,

1:17:08.240 --> 1:17:09.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited to see where you land. That is definitely

1:17:10.000 --> 1:17:12.439
<v Speaker 1>going to be the place to check out. Thank you

1:17:12.479 --> 1:17:15.000
<v Speaker 1>for coming on, and thank you everybody else for checking out.

1:17:15.000 --> 1:17:17.920
<v Speaker 1>This episode of Jordan Clapper figures the conspiracy whether you're

1:17:17.920 --> 1:17:20.719
<v Speaker 1>listening on your phone or watching on your laptop, especially

1:17:20.960 --> 1:17:23.200
<v Speaker 1>if it's a laptop at a repair shop in Delaware.

1:17:23.439 --> 1:17:28.200
<v Speaker 1>We'll see you next time, Thanks Tony. Listen to Jordan

1:17:28.240 --> 1:17:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Clapper figures the Conspiracy from The Daily Show on Apple Podcasts,

1:17:31.880 --> 1:17:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio, Apple, or wherever you get your podcasts.