1
00:00:00,040 --> 00:00:03,840
Speaker 1: President Donald Trump took executive action yesterday to give churches

2
00:00:03,840 --> 00:00:07,560
Speaker 1: and religious groups greater leeway to engage in politics without

3
00:00:07,680 --> 00:00:11,440
Speaker 1: risking their tax exempt status. The order directs the Internal

4
00:00:11,480 --> 00:00:14,560
Speaker 1: Revenue Service to use its discretion in the enforcement of

5
00:00:14,560 --> 00:00:17,639
Speaker 1: the law known as the Johnson Amendment, a decades old

6
00:00:17,640 --> 00:00:20,720
Speaker 1: provision of the tax code that bars many tax exempt

7
00:00:20,800 --> 00:00:25,680
Speaker 1: organizations from directly endorsing candidates for office. But what does

8
00:00:25,680 --> 00:00:29,040
Speaker 1: this order really do well? The Americans Civil Liberties Union

9
00:00:29,040 --> 00:00:31,800
Speaker 1: tweeted that we thought we'd have to sue Trump today,

10
00:00:31,840 --> 00:00:34,640
Speaker 1: but it turned out the order signing was an elaborate

11
00:00:34,680 --> 00:00:39,440
Speaker 1: photo op with no discernible policy outcome. Our guest is

12
00:00:39,479 --> 00:00:42,639
Speaker 1: Douglas Lacock. He's a professor at the University of Virginia

13
00:00:42,720 --> 00:00:46,440
Speaker 1: School of Law. Doug, what does this order do As

14
00:00:46,479 --> 00:00:50,120
Speaker 1: far as destroying the Johnson Amendment, which Trump has vowed

15
00:00:50,159 --> 00:00:55,720
Speaker 1: to do, the c U Rights doesn't do anything. Um.

16
00:00:56,680 --> 00:01:01,080
Speaker 1: The issue in the Johnson Amendment is Canada taxa exempt organization.

17
00:01:01,280 --> 00:01:05,520
Speaker 1: It's not just churches. Can a tax exempt organization endorse

18
00:01:05,560 --> 00:01:13,840
Speaker 1: the political candidate? And and the reality is if churches

19
00:01:14,080 --> 00:01:16,920
Speaker 1: endorsed candidates with some frequency in the I R S.

20
00:01:17,520 --> 00:01:19,360
Speaker 1: Job bones about it. It It tells him not to, but

21
00:01:19,480 --> 00:01:23,520
Speaker 1: it never actually tries to enforce the law. I don't

22
00:01:23,520 --> 00:01:28,040
Speaker 1: think it has any confidence that it's constitutional. The sensor sermons, UH,

23
00:01:28,080 --> 00:01:30,400
Speaker 1: if they spend money, they buy a full page ad,

24
00:01:30,840 --> 00:01:33,679
Speaker 1: they can lose their tax exemption. There's one case like that.

25
00:01:34,360 --> 00:01:39,919
Speaker 1: UM nothing in its executive border says that UM churches

26
00:01:39,959 --> 00:01:42,679
Speaker 1: can endorse candidates. It says they should be treated the

27
00:01:42,720 --> 00:01:46,440
Speaker 1: same way as other secular nonprofits, which they uh pretty

28
00:01:46,480 --> 00:01:49,760
Speaker 1: much already are. So there's nothing there's nothing new here.

29
00:01:50,400 --> 00:01:53,920
Speaker 1: So well, so what would it take though to really

30
00:01:54,040 --> 00:01:56,920
Speaker 1: change the Johnson Amendment? And if you're gonna do it,

31
00:01:57,080 --> 00:01:59,000
Speaker 1: would it you know, would it just be focused on

32
00:01:59,080 --> 00:02:02,920
Speaker 1: churches or where you felt isn't? Well, if you're gonna

33
00:02:02,960 --> 00:02:04,560
Speaker 1: do it, you ought to focus on all not for

34
00:02:04,640 --> 00:02:07,360
Speaker 1: profits because if you do it only for churches thing

35
00:02:07,400 --> 00:02:10,240
Speaker 1: you get an argument that it's a preference from religion

36
00:02:10,240 --> 00:02:14,440
Speaker 1: and it's an establishment close violation. UM. You know, there's

37
00:02:14,480 --> 00:02:16,480
Speaker 1: a bill in Congress to repeal it, which would be

38
00:02:16,480 --> 00:02:21,840
Speaker 1: a mistake. UM. In general, political contributions are not tax

39
00:02:21,840 --> 00:02:26,480
Speaker 1: deductible political contributions that churches are. So if churches could

40
00:02:26,480 --> 00:02:31,079
Speaker 1: spend money on politics. That would be a huge, huge loophole. UM.

41
00:02:31,120 --> 00:02:33,880
Speaker 1: But there's also a bill to say, look, apply to

42
00:02:33,960 --> 00:02:39,160
Speaker 1: Johnson Amendment only when the church spends money on politics,

43
00:02:39,280 --> 00:02:42,160
Speaker 1: and don't apply it to things like a sermon that

44
00:02:42,200 --> 00:02:44,600
Speaker 1: are in the ordinary course of the church's activity and

45
00:02:44,639 --> 00:02:48,000
Speaker 1: don't cost any money. Um. That's pretty much what the

46
00:02:48,000 --> 00:02:51,000
Speaker 1: i R S and force and policy has been. And

47
00:02:51,000 --> 00:02:53,120
Speaker 1: and I don't think that bill is gonna pass, but

48
00:02:53,120 --> 00:02:57,320
Speaker 1: but it could and and and that would codify the

49
00:02:57,320 --> 00:03:00,400
Speaker 1: the existing practice. But it takes congressional action to change

50
00:03:00,919 --> 00:03:05,080
Speaker 1: the Johnson Amendment. UM. The most the present could do

51
00:03:05,120 --> 00:03:09,040
Speaker 1: by executive border is UM tell the I R s

52
00:03:09,120 --> 00:03:12,080
Speaker 1: to use enforcement discretion not to enforce it. And they've

53
00:03:12,080 --> 00:03:15,480
Speaker 1: been doing that for years, Doug. What does the order do,

54
00:03:15,560 --> 00:03:19,080
Speaker 1: if anything, As far as the contraception mandate, which is

55
00:03:19,120 --> 00:03:22,920
Speaker 1: the provision of the Obamacare Act that requires health plans

56
00:03:22,919 --> 00:03:28,320
Speaker 1: and insurers to provide contraception to women, Well, it does.

57
00:03:28,960 --> 00:03:34,000
Speaker 1: It does very little there either. It it UM instructs

58
00:03:34,040 --> 00:03:39,240
Speaker 1: the secretaries of the three relevant Cabinet agencies to consider

59
00:03:39,360 --> 00:03:47,000
Speaker 1: issuing amended regulations UH to address conscience based objections. UM.

60
00:03:47,040 --> 00:03:52,960
Speaker 1: So hobby Hobby already exempts employers who don't want to

61
00:03:53,000 --> 00:03:58,920
Speaker 1: pay for contraception. UM. The only thing left is the

62
00:03:58,960 --> 00:04:01,800
Speaker 1: employers who don't want their second insurance companies to pay

63
00:04:01,840 --> 00:04:03,680
Speaker 1: for it either. That's what the Little Sisters of the

64
00:04:03,680 --> 00:04:07,400
Speaker 1: Poor case was about. UM. And maybe the three cabinet

65
00:04:07,480 --> 00:04:12,480
Speaker 1: agencies will do something about that. UM. Maybe the administration

66
00:04:12,520 --> 00:04:16,560
Speaker 1: will settle those cases on terms favorable to the religious employers.

67
00:04:16,600 --> 00:04:20,440
Speaker 1: But this executive order doesn't do anything. And and of

68
00:04:20,480 --> 00:04:23,159
Speaker 1: course the President doesn't need an executive order to ask

69
00:04:23,200 --> 00:04:26,520
Speaker 1: his cabinet officers to consider something. And that's all this

70
00:04:26,560 --> 00:04:29,520
Speaker 1: says they should consider it. So and about the thirty

71
00:04:29,560 --> 00:04:31,400
Speaker 1: seconds we have left in it, you know, some people

72
00:04:31,440 --> 00:04:35,760
Speaker 1: say that, uh, some conservative religious groups were unhappy with

73
00:04:35,800 --> 00:04:37,719
Speaker 1: this order because it didn't do that much. What is

74
00:04:37,720 --> 00:04:41,800
Speaker 1: it they'd like to see President Trump do. Well. They

75
00:04:41,839 --> 00:04:46,919
Speaker 1: would like to see a sweeping declaration to protect conscience

76
00:04:46,960 --> 00:04:53,000
Speaker 1: on all the hot button social issues, particularly discrimination against

77
00:04:53,080 --> 00:04:58,039
Speaker 1: case and transgender for federal contractors and federal employees. UM.

78
00:04:58,920 --> 00:05:01,200
Speaker 1: The wedding vendor case is the Forest and the Bakers.

79
00:05:01,200 --> 00:05:03,320
Speaker 1: Those are all state law cases. The President can't do

80
00:05:03,360 --> 00:05:07,800
Speaker 1: anything about those. But the draft back in February. Uh,

81
00:05:08,279 --> 00:05:11,440
Speaker 1: seemed to say, and nobody working for the federal government

82
00:05:11,440 --> 00:05:14,680
Speaker 1: has to serve anybody has a religious objection to and

83
00:05:14,680 --> 00:05:17,080
Speaker 1: and there's not a hint of that in this executive quarter.

84
00:05:17,680 --> 00:05:21,440
Speaker 1: Thanks for being on Bloomberg Law. That's Douglas Laycockey is

85
00:05:21,600 --> 00:05:24,560
Speaker 1: a professor at the University of Virginia School of Law.

86
00:05:24,920 --> 00:05:28,719
Speaker 1: Coming up on Bloomberg Law. It's perhaps their most popular song,

87
00:05:29,200 --> 00:05:32,440
Speaker 1: and the Eagles are protecting it and their trademark, suing

88
00:05:32,440 --> 00:05:35,520
Speaker 1: a hotel for calling itself the Hotel California