WEBVTT - Why Is It So Difficult to Overturn a Guilty Verdict?

0:00:07.040 --> 0:00:09.559
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to brain Stuff, a production of I Heart Radio,

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey brain Stuff Lauren Vogelbaum. Here in the United States,

0:00:15.880 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 1>a person accused of a crime is innocent until proven guilty,

0:00:19.840 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>and this is one of the guiding legal principles of

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the U s criminal justice system. But the flip side

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:28.120
<v Speaker 1>of the presumption of innocence is that once a person

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>is found guilty by a jury, the burden of proof

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>to overturn that conviction falls completely on them, and it's

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>extremely difficult. It's so difficult that even if an attorney

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:42.600
<v Speaker 1>discovers overwhelming evidence, that still might not be enough to

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 1>garner the person's release. That means, for a wrongfully convicted person,

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the uphill legal battle towards exoneration might prove impossible. Netflix

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>series like Making a Murderer and podcasts like Serial demonstrate

0:00:57.560 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 1>just how difficult it can be to even get a

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 1>new tra aisle. That's where the work and legal expertise

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 1>of organizations like The Innocence Project becomes so important. These

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 1>organizations are dedicated to providing free legal services to innocent

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:14.279
<v Speaker 1>people behind bars so that they have a fighting chance

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>of gaining their freedom in The Innocence Project was founded

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 1>in New York City to exonerate the wrongfully convicted through

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 1>DNA testing, and the nonprofit organization works to reform the

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>criminal justice system. By two four more organizations formed and

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>began meeting at an annual conference. The association shifted to

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 1>a loosely affiliated network with fifteen initial members and an

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>executive board the following year. Today, the Innocence Network includes

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 1>sixty seven member organizations around the world, fifty five of

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>which are located in the United States, mostly housed in

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>law schools. The organizations provide pro bono, that is, free

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>legal services to people who have been convicted of crimes

0:01:56.400 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and are seeking to prove their innocence. Additionally, these organizations

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>work to redress the causes of wrongful convictions and make

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 1>improvements to the way the criminal justice system functions. You

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 1>might think that if new DNA evidence is found even

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:14.360
<v Speaker 1>after a person is convicted, it's automatically tested to be

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 1>sure the right person is behind bars. But that's not

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the case at all. When someone who's already convicted of

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 1>a crime wants to have new DNA tested, they must

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>request permission from the prosecutor. If the prosecutor won't agree,

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>the defendant must file a motion to have it tested,

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 1>and in that case, it must fit certain requirements of

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the state statute. That means questions must be answered, like

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 1>would favorable DNA results create a reasonable probability that the

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 1>defendant would not have been convicted at their original trial. However,

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 1>because the defendant is already convicted and in prison, they

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:53.639
<v Speaker 1>no longer have the right to a court appointed attorney,

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and so any incarcerated person trying to prove their innocence

0:02:57.040 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 1>must pay for an attorney to file that motion or

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>help from an organization like the Innocence Project. If and

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:08.080
<v Speaker 1>when DNA gets tested, it doesn't always immediately exonerate the innocent,

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 1>even if it's in their favor. Obtaining exoneration is a

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 1>lengthy two step process. First, the original conviction must be

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>vacated if DNA or other evidence comes back in favor

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 1>of the defendant, and that means that the judge sets

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 1>aside the original guilty verdict, and then the defendant returns

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>to pre trial status, so it's as if they had

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>never been tried and the original accusation remains. Before the

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 1>wrongfully accused to be completely exonerated, either the district attorney

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>or the court has to dismiss the indictment altogether. Usually

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>that's the result when there's new evidence of their innocence.

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>But we spoke with Vanessa Potkin, director of post conviction

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>litigation at The Innocence Project, and she said in rare occasions,

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>clients are brought to another trial and officially vindicated by

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>a jury who acquits them. This is what happened in

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the case of an Any Right, who was retried after

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>DNA testing in excluded him and implicated someone else rape

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 1>and murder. He was convicted for in a new eleven

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 1>day trial in twenty sixteen, found Right not guilty on

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:18.360
<v Speaker 1>all charges. The jury deliberated for less than an hour.

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:22.039
<v Speaker 1>It took three years between Rights DNA results and the

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 1>new trial, which seems like a long time to wait,

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:28.160
<v Speaker 1>but it's not extensive in these type of cases. An

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 1>average wrongful conviction case takes about seven years, according to Potkin.

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>She said it's relatively easy to be wrongfully convicted and

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 1>extraordinarily difficult to be exonerated from a wrongful conviction. Other

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 1>wrongfully convicted people don't have time to wait for a

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 1>new trial. Take the case of Elvis Brooks. Brooks, a

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 1>black man, was sentenced to life in prison in nineteen

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:54.040
<v Speaker 1>seventy seven, when he was just a teenager, for murder

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>and for armed robbery of a bar in New Orleans.

0:04:56.920 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>The conviction was based only on the eyewitness testimony of

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:03.280
<v Speaker 1>three white strangers who had been inside, but there was

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>other evidence fingerprints left on two beer cans on the

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>bar by the real perpetrators. This evidence was suppressed by

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>the prosecutors who convicted him. It was never provided to

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:17.919
<v Speaker 1>Brooks or his attorneys. When the Innocence Project New Orleans

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 1>learned of the fingerprint evidence, they filed an application for

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 1>post conviction relief in January of twenty nineteen, alleging Brady violations,

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:28.839
<v Speaker 1>which means the government failed to disclose evidence favorable to

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the accused. The state objected, but the Orleans Parish District

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Attorney's office gave Brooks two choices, plead guilty to the

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 1>lesser offenses of manslaughter and three counts of armed robbery

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and be immediately freed or remain in prison awaiting a

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:47.840
<v Speaker 1>new trial that could take years. Brooks, who was sixty

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>two at the time, chose the plea and was released.

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Many of the exonerated except these deals with the devil

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 1>just to be freed, but in exchange they can never

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>receive compensation from the state or five al civil suits

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 1>for wrongful convictions. Some plea deals also protect the prosecutors

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 1>from disciplinary action, and in the eyes of the law,

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Brooks is still guilty of crimes he adamantly denies committing.

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 1>In a statement, one of brooks attorneys at Innocence Project

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans, Shrell Arnold, said Elvis Brooks was wrongfully convicted

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and it is wonderful that he is being reunited with

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>his family after forty two years. Mr Brooks never sought

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:29.280
<v Speaker 1>a plea agreement. It is deeply unfair that an innocent

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 1>man would be forced to choose between entering a plea

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:34.720
<v Speaker 1>to secure his immediate freedom and waiting years more in

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:38.480
<v Speaker 1>prison to prove his innocence through litigation. The situation is

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 1>particularly unfair given that the state has known about the

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>new evidence presented in this case since nineteen seventy seven.

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Both Brooks and Wright have told the lawyers that the

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:50.919
<v Speaker 1>Innocence Projects that worked with them that they are the

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:55.120
<v Speaker 1>fortunate ones right told the Innocence Project people have been

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>so kind and so warm toward me, so gracious towards me.

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm grateful to all those bowl Even on the street,

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>wherever I go, people hug me or they want to

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>shake my hand. It's so humbling to me because I'm

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:09.359
<v Speaker 1>no different from anybody else. When I tell people that

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm the luckiest guy in the world, they look at

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 1>me like, yeah, right, and they laugh. People don't have

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 1>an idea. Man, I am the luckiest man in the world,

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and not just for one reason, but for a whole

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of reasons. Unlike Brooks, who can't seek compensation for

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>his wrongful incarceration, some exonorees can receive financial reimbursement and

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 1>services to help them adjust to a life of freedom.

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Whether they are entitled to a financial reward and how

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 1>much varies by state. But what none of them can

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 1>ever get back are the years of missing out on

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>their lives and those of their family and friends. As

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 1>of January, the Innocence Project has documented more than three

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 1>hundred and sixty five DNA exonerations in the United States alone,

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty one we're on death row. Nearly all were wrongfully

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 1>convicted of sexual assault and or murder, and despite being

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:04.120
<v Speaker 1>innocent of the crimes. Approximately to confessed an eleven percent

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 1>had pleaded guilty. These innocent people spent an average of

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 1>fourteen years in prison. Today's episode was written by Kerry

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Whitney with thanks to Keith Finley, and was produced by

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Clang. For more on this and lots of other

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 1>legal topics, visit how stuffworks dot com. Brain Stuff is

0:08:24.920 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>production of Our Heart Radio or more podcasts. For my

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>heart Radio, visit the our Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows