Speaker 1: You're in the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast. Get more from Buck by following him on
Speaker 1: social media at buck Sexton on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.
Speaker 1: Welcome friends to the Buck Sexton Show. It is dawning
Speaker 1: upon more people than ever that the mass hysteria aided
Speaker 1: and embedded, if not created, by the mass media around
Speaker 1: COVID nineteen has a lot of really negative consequences. We've
Speaker 1: known about the pain and frustration for a while, but
Speaker 1: all along you've been told that it was because you
Speaker 1: were making a necessary trade off. Right, the overreach, the
Speaker 1: tyrannical mandates, all of these things that I've been complaining
Speaker 1: about from the very beginning. They told you. The consensus
Speaker 1: opinion that was forced upon you was that all of
Speaker 1: this is fine because it's necessary, because you're getting more
Speaker 1: than you give in this process. It's about protecting your
Speaker 1: very life, they say. But if that's really the approach
Speaker 1: someone takes, if they say that whatever their mandates are,
Speaker 1: whatever the rules are they're coming up with on the fly,
Speaker 1: whatever the ad hoc regulations are that they create out
Speaker 1: of thin air, it is saving not just your life,
Speaker 1: but the lives of those around you, And therefore you're
Speaker 1: not even allowed to say I'm willing to take risks
Speaker 1: that these regulations are meant to protect me from. You're
Speaker 1: never able to stop them. You can't push back effectively.
Speaker 1: What can you do? If you look, I mean, you'll
Speaker 1: see the insanity is on display. I mean, you can
Speaker 1: actually find things in the mainstream press that really go down,
Speaker 1: really go down into the depths of a form of
Speaker 1: massisteria mental illness. I mean, the COVID lockdown or mentality
Speaker 1: is a form of massisteria for sure, and it can
Speaker 1: quickly transform into mental illness. Detroit Free Press has a
Speaker 1: piece here. COVID has turned breathing into a deadly event
Speaker 1: and all of us into potential serial killers. That's the
Speaker 1: Detroit Free Press. Now that's a relatively serious publication. That's
Speaker 1: taking the position that by breathing, you could be murdering people. Now,
Speaker 1: this is insane, and it's time that we tell everybody
Speaker 1: who's going, oh, I'm so terrifoticide and all anybody breathing
Speaker 1: stop it enough. We all live with uncertainty, we all
Speaker 1: live with the constant risk of disease. You can cut
Speaker 1: yourself shaving and dive a staff infection, but it doesn't
Speaker 1: mean that you refuse to get out of your bed
Speaker 1: in the morning. There are reasonable changes we make to behavior,
Speaker 1: There are reasonable trade offs, and then there are unreasonable ones.
Speaker 1: And what we see with COVID nineteen policy in this
Speaker 1: country is a lot of unreasonable mandates, a lot of
Speaker 1: choices that are made for us that do not bring
Speaker 1: the promised benefits. An excellent example of this shutting down schools.
Speaker 1: There was never there was never reason based on the
Speaker 1: numbers and the data, to believe that shutting down schools
Speaker 1: was necessary. And yet during an election year, we all
Speaker 1: know that this was fraught with politics all along, infused
Speaker 1: with partisanship. During an election year, we were told that
Speaker 1: it was necessary to protect our children. Nancy Pelosi last summer.
Speaker 1: It's for the children. No, it wasn't as for the
Speaker 1: teachers unions. It was so that people who are adults
Speaker 1: could stay at home and receive paychecks, and the union
Speaker 1: could say, see what we did for you guys. Now
Speaker 1: we're going to keep taking those union dues and you're
Speaker 1: going to be even happier about it, or that's angry
Speaker 1: about it. There was never a basis for this, There
Speaker 1: was never data to show and this is what I
Speaker 1: want to start with that issue. There are others as well.
Speaker 1: There was never data to show that children were at
Speaker 1: risk from this disease. There was never data to show
Speaker 1: that they were likely to spread it to adults. Didn't exist.
Speaker 1: It was all just a fear and panic response. Where
Speaker 1: was the great sainted doctor Fauchee during all of this, Well,
Speaker 1: sometimes he wanted schools to close. Maybe sometimes he goes in, sure,
Speaker 1: look at the data, look at the data. The data
Speaker 1: was obvious, but he didn't want the worship of faucheat
Speaker 1: to change. And he's one of many of these public
Speaker 1: health experts who have completely failed us. I mean, they
Speaker 1: are the equivalent now of the democracy spreaders in the
Speaker 1: Middle East, the think tank armchair warriors who thought, oh,
Speaker 1: if we invade Iraq, then there'll be a flowering of
Speaker 1: democracy throughout the region and it's going to be this
Speaker 1: whole great new future. Wasn't true? Catastrophically wrong. Our public
Speaker 1: health class in this country, who are really bureaucrats, many
Speaker 1: of whom barely even practice medicine anymore, and having for decades,
Speaker 1: they have been stunningly, shockingly, irreparably wrong. And schools is
Speaker 1: just one of the best examples. Do you think they
Speaker 1: apologize to the people who were right on this. Do
Speaker 1: you think they say, wow, maybe you're not just some
Speaker 1: COVID denier because you thought, hold on a second, if
Speaker 1: Europe has kept schools open the whole time and children
Speaker 1: are fine, maybe we could do the same thing. Where
Speaker 1: did they have schools shutdowns and show that it was necessary?
Speaker 1: And then it was a good policy director of nowhere.
Speaker 1: But you see, it was the choice that allowed the
Speaker 1: left and the lockdowners to say that they were the
Speaker 1: serious ones about this issue. They were the ones that
Speaker 1: were taking the necessary action. And Trump, who wanted schools
Speaker 1: open as a last summer was an evil buffoon who
Speaker 1: wanted to inject bleach into veins or whatever it is. Right,
Speaker 1: this the usual garbage, and there's a real consequence from
Speaker 1: all of this. Children have been left behind, children are
Speaker 1: suffering developmental damage, psychological stress, loneliness, separation from peers. There's
Speaker 1: a lot of child abuse that will not be caught
Speaker 1: because usually the number one place for child abuse to
Speaker 1: be seen and stop is by teachers in school. That's
Speaker 1: while they have automatic reporting mandates. So there's a tremendous
Speaker 1: amount of downside. What was the upside? Oh, that's right,
Speaker 1: no sense of normality returning in the fall for millions
Speaker 1: of families and helpful to Joe Biden's election prospects. Let's
Speaker 1: be honest about this. You know, the petrified weirdo hiding
Speaker 1: in the basement for most of the summer needed all
Speaker 1: the help he can get. We know that. I'm not
Speaker 1: even talking about the election fraud stuff. We'll get into that.
Speaker 1: But this was useful to him. Therefore they pretended it
Speaker 1: was the better decision, and of course it wasn't. Small businesses,
Speaker 1: if you look right now, you won't see a lot
Speaker 1: of reporting on this, which is fascinating because it's affecting
Speaker 1: millions and millions of people. Small businesses in major cities
Speaker 1: in particular across America have been decimated. In fact, really
Speaker 1: worse than decimated, because it's more than one tenth of
Speaker 1: them that have been destroyed. Small businesses in New York
Speaker 1: City that have closed permanently, they estimate it's about a
Speaker 1: third of them, and over the course of this winter,
Speaker 1: it'll be more like half. If this continues. In New
Speaker 1: York City alone, that's thousands, if not tens of thousands
Speaker 1: of businesses that employ people, that people have worked years,
Speaker 1: sometimes even decades to build up. They're gone. But you
Speaker 1: see our media class and the elites. They live in large,
Speaker 1: comfortable homes with plenty of delicious food brought to them
Speaker 1: via these delivery services. They can skype and sit on
Speaker 1: social media all day, do whatever they've got to do.
Speaker 1: It's not their problem. They don't need these small businesses
Speaker 1: to be open, they don't need a small business to
Speaker 1: pay their rent, and they get to feel like they're
Speaker 1: the great heroes of the battle against COVID. Meanwhile, all
Speaker 1: of these regulations, the ones that have shut down schools,
Speaker 1: the ones that have shut down businesses, the ones that
Speaker 1: tell you aren't allowed to leave your home, all of
Speaker 1: them should be questioned on constitutional grounds for sure. And
Speaker 1: that was what I was talking about mostly yesterday. I
Speaker 1: think this is disgraceful government overreach. Certainly, shutting down churches
Speaker 1: is plane letter of the law, constitutional violation. I don't
Speaker 1: know where the government gets the authority to tell you
Speaker 1: you can't leave your home because there's some risk of
Speaker 1: some virus out there somewhere. But there are millions of
Speaker 1: not very freedom conscious Americans who don't seem to care,
Speaker 1: but does this stuff even work before we get drawn
Speaker 1: deeper into the winter, before we have more of these
Speaker 1: negative outcomes, the destruction wrought by bad decision making, Can
Speaker 1: we at least have an open discussion, because we have
Speaker 1: a lot of data that shows we've done this in
Speaker 1: the past and it did not have the intended effect.
Speaker 1: At what point are we allowed to say, if it
Speaker 1: doesn't have the intended effect, maybe we shouldn't still be
Speaker 1: doing this thing. I would say it's now. I would
Speaker 1: say it's long past the point where we should be
Speaker 1: taking that approach. Doctor ran Paul. Also, remember the United
Speaker 1: States Senate certainly agrees play clip five. Well, really, what
Speaker 1: we should do with doctor Valci is sitting down and
Speaker 1: showing the evidence on lockdowns. When you look at lockdowns,
Speaker 1: you look at the mandates, whether they're masks or whether
Speaker 1: they're how many people could do a restaurant or how
Speaker 1: many people can gather, And you look at when the
Speaker 1: mandates were instituted around the world, country after country. Guess what,
Speaker 1: the virus rises exponentially after the mandates. Right now, we
Speaker 1: have more mandates in place than we've ever had. We
Speaker 1: have more mask wearing than we've ever had, and yet
Speaker 1: the incidence of the disease is exploding, really maybe showing
Speaker 1: us that what we're doings not what we're doing out
Speaker 1: to be open minded. At a minimum, the mandates are
Speaker 1: not working, and people that are arguing that are just
Speaker 1: living in a fantasy. Theoretically it could, could you claim.
Speaker 1: You know, in science will often talk about with different
Speaker 1: medical devices, and you know, people who take drugs or
Speaker 1: certain things, you'll talk sometimes about perfect usage versus normal
Speaker 1: human error. There is no perfect usage of a mandate
Speaker 1: that has to do with locking down and mask wearing
Speaker 1: and all this stuff. People are always going to be
Speaker 1: making miss either intentional or accidental. There is no perfect usage.
Speaker 1: But even within that, we have pretty damn good compliance
Speaker 1: with all this, And yet there's really no case to
Speaker 1: be made based on the data that it's working. And
Speaker 1: shouldn't that be enough for us to at least reevaluate
Speaker 1: what's happening here? Shouldn't that be enough for us to say,
Speaker 1: hold on a second, why continue to do these things
Speaker 1: that have real costs? And I haven't even gotten into
Speaker 1: the drug abuse and the suicides and the depression and
Speaker 1: the massive weight gain which makes you more vulnerable to COVID,
Speaker 1: all these things that are happening across the nation, and
Speaker 1: we're told, Oh, but don't worry about it, that doesn't matter.
Speaker 1: Listen to doctor Fauci, He'll keep you safe. It's a lie.
Speaker 1: These morons are wrong. Accept it, think about it on
Speaker 1: your own, and you will come to that conclusion. They
Speaker 1: cannot protect you. Their annoying rules are just the lathering
Speaker 1: of bureaucrats. It's not going to help, and it's going
Speaker 1: to for sure. And that's why I want to lead
Speaker 1: with this, create a whole lot of problems and stress
Speaker 1: and misery and damage all across the country. The time
Speaker 1: for this fight is now, not in sixty or ninety days.
Speaker 1: This isn't Oh, let's give them another shot. Maybe it'll
Speaker 1: work this time. We have to shut down the lockdowners
Speaker 1: or they're going to destroy millions of lives. That's what's happening. Oh.
Speaker 1: I know they think they'll turn around and then the
Speaker 1: government will make everything better. Do you believe that? You
Speaker 1: think if your business is shut down forever, the government's
Speaker 1: gonna make your life better. They're going to come in
Speaker 1: and fix everything for you. I'm gonna pay all the
Speaker 1: backrant going to deal with all the lost inventory, the
Speaker 1: lost sales employees that have gone to other jobs. Now
Speaker 1: I understand the false choice that we've been given here
Speaker 1: is well, Buck, yes, those are bad things, but think
Speaker 1: of all the lives we're saving. We're not saving lives.
Speaker 1: People are still going to stories, they're still seeing other
Speaker 1: human beings, they're still intrafamilial transmission. There's no reason to
Speaker 1: believe that these policies are doing anything that helps us.
Speaker 1: Where's the data said, What are they going to show us?
Speaker 1: All you see everywhere are mask mandates and lockdowns and
Speaker 1: more and more cases. It's obvious. But the people that
Speaker 1: demanded this stuff and called you a serial killer for breathing,
Speaker 1: like the true psychopaths they are. You think they're going
Speaker 1: to admit what a bunch of morons they are at
Speaker 1: this stage, and of course not. They believe the science.
Speaker 1: Some of us have seen this for what it is
Speaker 1: all along. Others continue to peddle the consensus science delusion,
Speaker 1: because science is not about consensus. It's about what is
Speaker 1: provable and factual and real and repeatable. Unfortunately, where we're
Speaker 1: about to repeat are the same mistakes of the past.
Speaker 1: Let's go into another lockdown, another freeze, as they call
Speaker 1: it in some places, suffer all of the downside. What's
Speaker 1: the upside, We don't know, but they just tell you
Speaker 1: shut up and do what you're told. I'd rather not
Speaker 1: not this time. Thanks for listening to The Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast. Get the latest news and information from Buck
Speaker 1: by heading to Bucksexton dot com. It's astounding how many
Speaker 1: people in certain parts of the country still thinks this
Speaker 1: is a host or this is fake news. When you
Speaker 1: have a quarter of a million people in this country,
Speaker 1: more than a quarter of a million who've already died,
Speaker 1: and more than thirteen million have been infected, and yet
Speaker 1: there's still people who believe this is not an important issue.
Speaker 1: How much would you want to bet that doctor Fauci's
Speaker 1: homepage for his computer at CNN dot com, you know,
Speaker 1: for his personal computer. What would you want to bet?
Speaker 1: I can tell you that much. How much you want
Speaker 1: to bet that he reads ABC News, CNN and probably
Speaker 1: PBS a hundred times more often than he does Fox
Speaker 1: News or anything on the right. We know who this
Speaker 1: guy is, Okay, he's a government bureaucrat. He's the James
Speaker 1: Coomy of the National Institute for allergy and infectious disease.
Speaker 1: That's who he is, So we should come to the
Speaker 1: obvious conclusion here. We should stop trying to delay and
Speaker 1: hope and maybe he's not that guy. He is that guy.
Speaker 1: That's who he is, and that's why he says things.
Speaker 1: It sounds like I'm watching some of the semiliterate morons
Speaker 1: who go on CNN all the time to just give
Speaker 1: their opinions on things. These people are not smart, but
Speaker 1: they do what they're told. They do what the bosses
Speaker 1: want them to do. They're not intellectually curious, they're not
Speaker 1: intellectually rigorous, but they present to somebody who maybe knows
Speaker 1: something because of all the hair and makeup and lighting,
Speaker 1: and we're supposed to listen to them. Fauci might as
Speaker 1: well be sitting among them, like, yeah, you're right. Yeah.
Speaker 1: All those Trump voters who deny COVID say it's a hoax.
Speaker 1: I've never met anybody who thinks that COVID nineteen, meaning
Speaker 1: the virus that call is all of these terrible problems,
Speaker 1: is not real. And yet you will you hear this
Speaker 1: from CNN. They'll even put a nurse on TV who
Speaker 1: will trash a now dead patient saying that you know,
Speaker 1: he or she was claiming there was no COVID as
Speaker 1: she was dying from COVID. But this gets him a
Speaker 1: lot of praise from the Libs who watch CNN. Oh,
Speaker 1: look at doctor Fauci. He knows all those Trump people
Speaker 1: who are denying COVID. Yeah have you met Have you
Speaker 1: met anybody that thinks that there's no such thing as
Speaker 1: COVID nineteen? I have not. Yes. Are there people that
Speaker 1: believe the media used it for political reasons? I'm one
Speaker 1: of them. Other people who believe that it's exaggerated as
Speaker 1: a The data shows that people who listen to Fouci
Speaker 1: and watch CNN who are under the age of fifty
Speaker 1: have about a thirty times the actual rate sense of
Speaker 1: what the death what the mortality numbers are for this. So,
Speaker 1: if you're a forty five year old who watches CNN
Speaker 1: and thinks he's he's really smart and yeah Anderson Cooper,
Speaker 1: fake Tapper, these are the really good journals. According to polling,
Speaker 1: you basically overestimate the death rate of COVID nineteen by
Speaker 1: thirty times. But that's normal. That's a really well informed person. No,
Speaker 1: I don't think so. Why does why does this guy
Speaker 1: fount you think Trump should fire him at this point
Speaker 1: once he got to lose, fire him, Fire him with prejudice.
Speaker 1: Say this guy was a disaster, and put out all
Speaker 1: the things he said that were not true and that
Speaker 1: we all agree now are not true, all the decisions
Speaker 1: he made that were wrong, all the bad guidance, and
Speaker 1: the reason the left was obsessed with this guy. The
Speaker 1: reason libbs who haven't read a book, never mind believe
Speaker 1: the science, think he's some kind of a genius is
Speaker 1: because he was useful for being a thumb in the
Speaker 1: eye of the Trump administration all the time. That's it.
Speaker 1: You're in the freedom hunt. This is the buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast from more buck Head to Bucksexton dot com
Speaker 1: and remember to subscribe to the podcast. All right, we're
Speaker 1: now all happy and cheery, and we're going to come
Speaker 1: together and we're doing gift buying, and we're going to
Speaker 1: do holiday celebrations. We're going to start to have meals together,
Speaker 1: the families coming back together for the holiday season. Students
Speaker 1: are all coming home religious celebrations during the holiday season. Yeah,
Speaker 1: Covid is the Grinch. Think of it that way. The
Speaker 1: Covid Grinch is an opportunist. The COVID Grinch sees this
Speaker 1: as the season of viral transmission. All those things at
Speaker 1: the holiday season brings, they all increase social activity, they
Speaker 1: all increase mobility, and they will all increase viral transmission.
Speaker 1: This is the season of the COVID Grinch. Also, when
Speaker 1: you hear that holiday music, Marcia, think think covidn be alert,
Speaker 1: because that is part of this holiday season. The COVID
Speaker 1: Grinch is coming for you. Cuomo says, be scared of
Speaker 1: the COVID Grinch. But I have another thought here for you.
Speaker 1: I think it's important for you to know that it's
Speaker 1: really the Cuomo Grinch. What do I mean by the
Speaker 1: chromo Cuomo Gridge. The Cuomo Grinch is a very dumb
Speaker 1: but power mad politician who takes it upon himself to
Speaker 1: destroy a wonderful state like New York, but then write
Speaker 1: a book about how terrible he is, but says that
Speaker 1: he's good. That's the Cuomo Grinch. I think Cuomo is
Speaker 1: the Grinch. In case I didn't come across, I think
Speaker 1: the people that have been wrong all along here and
Speaker 1: know that they'll be never taken seriously again if they
Speaker 1: reverse course. At this point, so what do they do.
Speaker 1: They double down, more restrictions, more lockdowns. It's like I've
Speaker 1: told you all along, just go back a week or
Speaker 1: so if you want to listen to some of the
Speaker 1: shows I did right before Thanksgiving. It wasn't going to
Speaker 1: be just Thanksgiving, right, So why do they pretend? Why
Speaker 1: do they keep doing this? Two more weeks? They say,
Speaker 1: just this day, just this holiday, don't see anyone, don't
Speaker 1: do anything, almost because if they told us what they
Speaker 1: really want, which is, don't do anything for at least
Speaker 1: the next ninety days, don't see anybody. Only go for
Speaker 1: the bare essentials the grocery store. If you can send
Speaker 1: somebody else in your place. And that's for the whole country.
Speaker 1: That's not placed by place, area by areas for everybody.
Speaker 1: New York City had effectively zero COVID risk to folks
Speaker 1: over the summer. I mean close to zero. I should say,
Speaker 1: it was not really a problem healthwise, and everyone was
Speaker 1: still run around masks on. We had all these mandates
Speaker 1: and all these challenges. So, okay, what does that tell us?
Speaker 1: Tells us that this is not based in what's really happening.
Speaker 1: It's based in a narrative that there are people who
Speaker 1: believe quite clearly that the more they do in terms
Speaker 1: of the extreme responses to this, the better they are
Speaker 1: as people. But they also don't really do it themselves.
Speaker 1: They just want to make sure you do it right.
Speaker 1: So they're on board for the extreme stuff. But behind
Speaker 1: closed doors we find out again and again they're not
Speaker 1: really going to do these things right. They just want
Speaker 1: you to do it. This is a perfect example of it.
Speaker 1: Just hours after La County Supervisor Sheila Cool I don't
Speaker 1: know how you say her name, Quel Cool, banned outdoor diner.
Speaker 1: She voted to ban outdoor dining in Los Angeles County
Speaker 1: and she described it as a quote most dangerous situation.
Speaker 1: Hours after she voted to cancel outdoor dining because it
Speaker 1: was so dangerous, the Fox affiliate in La found out
Speaker 1: and has proof that she dined outdoors at Ilforno Trattoria
Speaker 1: in Santa Monica. It's a nice place. That's what you're dealing.
Speaker 1: That's the essence of the lockdowner. Give a big speech
Speaker 1: about how, oh it's so dangerous, don't go outside to eat,
Speaker 1: don't see your loved ones, don't hug anybody, and we're
Speaker 1: gonna bring the state down on your head. We're gonna
Speaker 1: arrest you if you try. And then they go, hmm, pasta,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna go get some spaghetti, and they sit outdoors
Speaker 1: and they ignore all of it. That's what happens. And
Speaker 1: how many times you have to see this occur before
Speaker 1: everyone just realizes this is our reality. There is no
Speaker 1: other reality. There's no other way that these individuals are
Speaker 1: dealing with this. They want rules for you that they
Speaker 1: do not want for themselves. Simple, simple, just like exists. Right. Oh,
Speaker 1: it's all about the redistribution of wealth and people don't
Speaker 1: need more than exactly what they need. We're going to
Speaker 1: take from you to give it to others. But I mean,
Speaker 1: the people who run that system are always getting better healthcare,
Speaker 1: living in big houses, have NEU unlimited power. Right, that's
Speaker 1: the way, that's the real way. I mean, they're the elite.
Speaker 1: The elite has to be living a better life than you.
Speaker 1: You're supposed to sacrifice for the greater good. They're supposed
Speaker 1: to be the greater good. They live the greater good. Ah.
Speaker 1: So yeah, just another one. I mean, I've never heard
Speaker 1: of this LA County supervisor before, but I thought you
Speaker 1: should hear it that this is. We could sit here
Speaker 1: all day and just talk about all the examples. I've
Speaker 1: been Gavin Knewsom that the French laundry, and that's just
Speaker 1: in California. Countless times we've seen this play out. You
Speaker 1: know how many funerals were all out for John Lewis
Speaker 1: when the pandemic was really raging through Georgia. But you know,
Speaker 1: you don't need to quarantine. If you went to that,
Speaker 1: you're safe from the virus if you went to that. No,
Speaker 1: the virus doesn't care about government business. The virus doesn't
Speaker 1: care about someone's legacy. But you're seeing all the hypocrisy. Really,
Speaker 1: all of the dysfunctions of the liberal mind are on
Speaker 1: display during this whole thing. Their inability to think for themselves,
Speaker 1: their rejection of universally applied principle, their embrace of hypocrisy,
Speaker 1: their obsession with virtue signaling. You're seeing everything you need
Speaker 1: right now on this one issue from Libs to understand
Speaker 1: how they approach everything. It's a mindset. It's their view
Speaker 1: of the world. It's what their political philosophy mixed with
Speaker 1: their cultural influences, mixed with their sense of self, all
Speaker 1: put together gives you this people who act like there
Speaker 1: wasn't a big debate over whether to close schools or not,
Speaker 1: and act like they weren't wrong. The school closers were wrong,
Speaker 1: full stop, period, as Joe Biden likes to say. But
Speaker 1: now the gonna go to the other side of this
Speaker 1: as well and start to say, fine, you think you're
Speaker 1: going to live your life irrespective the mandates, think again,
Speaker 1: We're gonna shame you now, and you continue to obeys
Speaker 1: even though a rational view of this would tell you
Speaker 1: that we don't know what the hell we're doing. Play sixteen.
Speaker 1: You want to be a tough guy guy being gender neutral,
Speaker 1: I'll tell you what a tough guy does. Go volunteer
Speaker 1: in a field hospital in Staten Island and help COVID patients.
Speaker 1: If you're a tough guy, you want to celebrate Thanksgiving,
Speaker 1: bring your whole family, in your extended family, and go
Speaker 1: volunteer in a hospital and help COVID people. That's how
Speaker 1: you celebrate Thanksgiving. Don't create more COVID positive people and
Speaker 1: then expect other people to come to your rescue. That's
Speaker 1: not the spirit of Thanksgaring. Oh so we should all
Speaker 1: then go and add to the people exposed to COVID
Speaker 1: in a no socomial setting, a hospital infection setting hospital infection. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's a that's a brilliant idea, right, And I'll also
Speaker 1: point out to you. You see what those you see
Speaker 1: what healthcare providers who are really dealing with COVID patients.
Speaker 1: You see how they're all suited up and the procedures
Speaker 1: they go through. You'll notice it's not a bandanna around
Speaker 1: their face. Yeah. Almost like the people that really have
Speaker 1: to make the calls about this, that really have to
Speaker 1: get it right. Understand that wearing that gator around your
Speaker 1: nose in mouth, if you're going to be in close
Speaker 1: contact with people who have COVID on a regular basis,
Speaker 1: is insufficient. But that's so strange because I thought that
Speaker 1: they were more effective even than a vaccine according to
Speaker 1: the head of the CDC, And no intelligent person if
Speaker 1: they get a vaccine that's over ninety five percent effective
Speaker 1: is going to be going around particularly worried about COVID anymore. Right.
Speaker 1: But they're not just wearing the masks. M you see,
Speaker 1: it's it's all it's all just this fun house mirror
Speaker 1: existence we're dealing with. Now, nothing is what it seems.
Speaker 1: What they tell you is not true. What they tell
Speaker 1: you is false is true. They are just they're so
Speaker 1: used to having a society that is politicized and emotional
Speaker 1: and angry and disoriented that we'll just do whatever, We'll
Speaker 1: do whatever they say. We'll do whatever they say. See,
Speaker 1: what Cuomo never factors in. What none of these people
Speaker 1: that are telling you what to do factor in, is
Speaker 1: that for every person that their mandates might prevent from
Speaker 1: being around other people, there are thousand people, maybe ten
Speaker 1: thousand people who are healthy can't get that to anyone,
Speaker 1: no risk whatsoever, and their lives are being infringed on.
Speaker 1: So this is why the quarantine, the healthy plan, that
Speaker 1: which is at the essence of lockdown, was such a
Speaker 1: travesty from the very beginning, because now it's we live
Speaker 1: in a society where everyone has to act like they
Speaker 1: have COVID all the time. That's the polo. It's not
Speaker 1: if you're sick, if you get a test that's positive.
Speaker 1: It's everybody. We're all acting like we have COVID all
Speaker 1: the time. Doctor Burke said, if you travel, and she
Speaker 1: kind of let this one out. By the way, she's
Speaker 1: not really any better than Fauci. Disappointed in her too
Speaker 1: act like you have COVID if you traveled. Yeah, that's
Speaker 1: really helpful right now, isn't it. That's really helpful. Act
Speaker 1: like you have COVID, if you traveled. I'm gonna tell
Speaker 1: you something. I traveled to North Carolina, was at a
Speaker 1: large event with hundreds of people. I told them I
Speaker 1: was willing to wear a mask because there are a
Speaker 1: lot of senior citizens there and I didn't want anyone
Speaker 1: to feel uncomfortable and uncomfortable. I didn't want anyone to
Speaker 1: be in a position where they could be at risk.
Speaker 1: So I came back though, and they said, Okay, we're
Speaker 1: going to send you for a COVID test. I went
Speaker 1: went to my GP, send me for a COVID test,
Speaker 1: and they wanted me to be in this very long
Speaker 1: line of people, including a line that stretched indoors, full
Speaker 1: of people getting tested for COVID. I'm just gonna put
Speaker 1: this out there. Being in a line with people worried
Speaker 1: about having COVID when I'm pretty damn sure I don't
Speaker 1: have COVID isn't exactly a great COVID prevention strategy, is it.
Speaker 1: But whatever you do, they don't want you to think
Speaker 1: for yourself. They don't want you to do anything other
Speaker 1: than what you're told. Obey is the sum total now
Speaker 1: of their COVID policy. Obey people like Governor Cuomo and
Speaker 1: Governor Newsom and Whitmer. Listen to Nancy Pelosi, who last
Speaker 1: summer was saying that shutting down schools was about the children.
Speaker 1: I mean she is. She's a conniving moron, successful in
Speaker 1: what she does because she's so dumb and ruthless that
Speaker 1: she'll do whatever it takes. You're in the freedom hunt.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Get more from
Speaker 1: Buck by following him on social media at buck Sexton
Speaker 1: on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. Yeah, what's latest is Joe
Speaker 1: Manson needs to go have a discussion with Nancy Pelosi,
Speaker 1: who has been fundamentally unserious in a way that's irresponsible
Speaker 1: and quite frankly disgusting that she resumes the House, puts
Speaker 1: the House back in session, and one of the bills
Speaker 1: she puts forward about legalizing marijuana, about going after tiger
Speaker 1: king and regulating the use of tigers, instead of focusing
Speaker 1: on the American people and the relief that's needed. Her
Speaker 1: stimulus bill was chock full of guess what mail in
Speaker 1: voting regulations to try to secure Democrat power in the
Speaker 1: halls of Congress. While this president said, Nancy Pelosi, you
Speaker 1: won't negotiate with me, Well, guess what I'll do protections
Speaker 1: from evictions. I'll do more funding for unemployment insurance, be
Speaker 1: an executive order. He's been serious, while Nancy Pelosi has
Speaker 1: been derelicting in her duty to choose and not deserve
Speaker 1: to be speaker. Ever, again, it's true she doesn't deserve
Speaker 1: to be speaker, but in the Democrat circles. Unfortunately, all
Speaker 1: of Pelosi's perfidious conduct, all of her disgraceful actions, are
Speaker 1: actually a selling point. She'll do whatever to get what
Speaker 1: her side wants, whatever suffering is necessary. Those of you
Speaker 1: who haven't gotten checks, despite the fact that your business
Speaker 1: has suffered, that you may be out of a job
Speaker 1: because of government policy, not because of you, because of
Speaker 1: what the government decided for you. No different than if
Speaker 1: they sent in FBI agents. It said, sorry, too dangerous
Speaker 1: for you to be running this lawnmower store, got to
Speaker 1: shut it down, right, So the government owes you. But
Speaker 1: if you haven't gotten a check in quite a while,
Speaker 1: and if you've been waiting for that assistance and haven't
Speaker 1: received it. I think it's important that you understand that.
Speaker 1: It's because Nancy Pelosi has priorities and you are not
Speaker 1: one of them. Any American not one of them. She
Speaker 1: wants things for her side, She has power in her sights,
Speaker 1: and anything that would get in the way of that,
Speaker 1: anything that would slow that down, is a problem. It's
Speaker 1: something that she views as well. It must it must
Speaker 1: be removed from the equation. And that's why we don't
Speaker 1: have a COVID relief bill. That's why we don't have
Speaker 1: the funding going out there that should have already happened,
Speaker 1: but it's not. And because they're they're also so focused
Speaker 1: on trying to break Trump and his supporters. Now, this
Speaker 1: is a whole other component of our discussion today. You know,
Speaker 1: there's there's the realities of the voter fraud and the
Speaker 1: irregularities and just the shock of what we're supposed to
Speaker 1: accept here from this Biden, this alleged Biden victory. And
Speaker 1: then there's also the we remember twenty sixteen, and not
Speaker 1: just for a few weeks after the election. We remember
Speaker 1: what they did for the entirety of Trump's time in office.
Speaker 1: So you know, they can say all of these things,
Speaker 1: and they're doing it now, and they're you know, the
Speaker 1: the viewers, the lib viewers of these moron shows on
Speaker 1: CNN and an ABC. I mean the view really, you know,
Speaker 1: it would be really fun to play like a game
Speaker 1: of not even trivial pursuit. Just let's give everyone on
Speaker 1: the view a fifth grade Civics test and see how
Speaker 1: they do that. That would be something I'd really like
Speaker 1: to see. But they still weigh in on all this,
Speaker 1: and they tell the left, they tell the Democrats what
Speaker 1: they want to hear. Here's one of the hosts, Sonny Houston,
Speaker 1: with the usual play thirteen. They really attacked black constituents,
Speaker 1: black voters. That was that was the plan, and it
Speaker 1: just didn't work, probably because of people like Latasha Brown
Speaker 1: and Stacy Abrams, Right, So I think that's where some
Speaker 1: of this surprise is coming from. And I think, you know,
Speaker 1: it's also fascinating. He just needs to go to Losers Anonymous,
Speaker 1: Like he is really in a psychosis right now, and
Speaker 1: I'm surprised that the people around him, like his daughter,
Speaker 1: like Jared Kushner, who somehow is on his way to
Speaker 1: the Middle East. I don't understand why he has to
Speaker 1: go to the Middle East today, but or this week.
Speaker 1: I think that they need to stage some sort of
Speaker 1: intervention at this point because he is now damaging the
Speaker 1: Republican Party even further with all of this rhetoric. We're
Speaker 1: not worried about that. Thanks, thanks for the advice. First
Speaker 1: of all, she says that there was an attack on
Speaker 1: black voters from Trump. Trump just set the sixty year
Speaker 1: GOP record for black support in a presidential election. Okay,
Speaker 1: so I don't think that the media. You notice, they
Speaker 1: were saying something before clearly was dumb analysis. They don't
Speaker 1: know what they're talking about, and now they just stay
Speaker 1: with the same thing. Why I admit you were wrong
Speaker 1: when you can just keep telling your idiot viewers the
Speaker 1: same thing, but that Trump needs to go to losers Anonymous?
Speaker 1: Do they think we don't remember that they did so
Speaker 1: much worse than claim fraud in election? They used deep
Speaker 1: state Hillary Clinton acolytes operatives, and they then ran a
Speaker 1: cooperation against the president from within his own government, and
Speaker 1: they got the establishment of this Special Council. At all
Speaker 1: of this, they really think we don't remember, They really
Speaker 1: think that we're going to forget that. As far as
Speaker 1: I'm concerned, the more of these lawsuits and the more
Speaker 1: of these challenges aggravate the Libs, you know, annoy them,
Speaker 1: make them feel like their victory wasn't as clean as
Speaker 1: they want to pretend it was. Good. Deal with it, Libs,
Speaker 1: We're dealing with the fact that you want us to
Speaker 1: believe Biden won eighty million votes. Thanks for listening to
Speaker 1: the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Get the latest news and
Speaker 1: information from Buck by heading to Bucksexton dot com. A
Speaker 1: lot of what the media insists you believe is in
Speaker 1: direct opposition to what you observe. You have to remember this, Yeah,
Speaker 1: you have to keep this in the back of your mind.
Speaker 1: We'll use the term gas lighting for this, which is
Speaker 1: a good one. It's accurate. But you should remember that
Speaker 1: they have a particular fondness for trying to get liberals
Speaker 1: people on the left to believe things that no person
Speaker 1: who's paying attention to what they actually notice and observe
Speaker 1: could think is true. But what a great way to
Speaker 1: establish your control over individuals. What a great way to
Speaker 1: mobilize when you have them pretending that their own senses
Speaker 1: cannot be trusted, that whatever you tell them is what's
Speaker 1: most important. And I know this is a little thing.
Speaker 1: I know this is not some major national security issue,
Speaker 1: but I thought it was worth taking a break for
Speaker 1: a second from all these intense COVID issues and everything
Speaker 1: else to talk about it. There was this kicker at Vanderbilt.
Speaker 1: You know, I almost went to Vanderbilt. It probably should have.
Speaker 1: I think it would have had a much better time there,
Speaker 1: a little bit less of a left wing. I know
Speaker 1: it's liberal, all these colleges are, but I mean Amherst.
Speaker 1: Amherst pretends to be Amherst College, pretends to be a
Speaker 1: traditional enough New England college, and it's really just comiville.
Speaker 1: I mean, just Marxist running the whole place. It's absurd.
Speaker 1: The identity politics, diversity obsession, the hatred of America that
Speaker 1: we're basically hitler because of our foreign policy, all that stuff.
Speaker 1: It's all at Amherst. It's all there. So I would
Speaker 1: hope that Vanderbilt probably, I don't know, maybe it's just
Speaker 1: as bad now. Anyway, there's this kicker, Sarah Fuller, and
Speaker 1: she was the first. I don't even know. I'm just
Speaker 1: gonna tell you this, and people get mad at me.
Speaker 1: I don't watch college football. It's not because maybe because
Speaker 1: I went to a small school with a terrible football team,
Speaker 1: so nobody cares. But I don't understand if I'm gonna
Speaker 1: watch football. I watch professional football, but that's me. Look,
Speaker 1: you want to watch college that's great. I know a
Speaker 1: lot of people love college football. But this woman, Sarah Fuller,
Speaker 1: was the first female kicker to take part in a
Speaker 1: producer mark. What was it? A big pack five, Big
Speaker 1: eight or something? What is it called? The Power five?
Speaker 1: A Power five conference game? Power five? Thank you? Power five?
Speaker 1: Is that? Is it? How good is that? As a conference?
Speaker 1: The Power five means the top five conferences in college football? Okay, okay,
Speaker 1: so in one of the five best conferences. Okay, which
Speaker 1: doesn't sound that impressive me, but I mean, I guess
Speaker 1: it's pretty good. So I know. Vanderbilt's not a particularly
Speaker 1: good school for football, that I do know. And they
Speaker 1: lost the game I think forty something to nothing. I mean,
Speaker 1: it was not not a good uh you know, not
Speaker 1: not a good moment. So we're supposed to celebrate this now.
Speaker 1: I watched the video of the and I'm not a
Speaker 1: huge football fan, but I know enough about football. I
Speaker 1: watched the video of the kick, and the truth is
Speaker 1: that you could have picked a person at random, an
Speaker 1: able bodied male at random from the crowd, who I
Speaker 1: think would have kicked it further. That's just fair. And
Speaker 1: I don't mean a person who is a football player
Speaker 1: or even an athlete. I think if you picked your average,
Speaker 1: you know, forty five year old dad with a little
Speaker 1: bit of a beer belly who loves football, I think
Speaker 1: he would have kicked it further. Now, this isn't a
Speaker 1: surprise to me at all, because I also understand that
Speaker 1: maile male and female. Biology, physicality, strength, bone density, all
Speaker 1: of these things are different. We are different, we are
Speaker 1: biologically distinct. I know the left wants to try to
Speaker 1: erase these things. I know the left wants to pretend
Speaker 1: that gender is just an idea, it's a social construct.
Speaker 1: This is lunacy, but it's necessary for a lot of reasons.
Speaker 1: And the Marxists have always waged war on the idea
Speaker 1: of a traditional family, and they've waged war on the
Speaker 1: idea of the separation of genders and also the bond
Speaker 1: between the genders that men and women. I mean, if
Speaker 1: you go into the the early Marxist literature, first of all,
Speaker 1: a lot of these guys conducted their own lives and
Speaker 1: horrible fashion to start with that. But they don't like
Speaker 1: the idea of a close familial bond because as much
Speaker 1: as I may be a patriot, as much as I
Speaker 1: may love the state, I love my family more. And
Speaker 1: that's unacceptable to a radical Marxist. No, that you can't.
Speaker 1: You can't have a closer bond with your family or
Speaker 1: your spouse than you do with the States. So they've
Speaker 1: been waging this long term war on gender and on family,
Speaker 1: and it's not new. But also they like to use
Speaker 1: the difference between the sexes as though there's almost a
Speaker 1: kind of wealth inequality that has to be addressed. Right,
Speaker 1: any inequality must be addressed by the state. That's a
Speaker 1: I guess you could call it a value, it's a
Speaker 1: it's a concept certainly within Marxism. Right, any inequality must
Speaker 1: be addressed. Men and women are not in the aggregate.
Speaker 1: There's some exceptions to this. And I know people like say, oh,
Speaker 1: but I know this woman. Who I mean, if you're
Speaker 1: an able bodied two hundred pounds six foot tall male
Speaker 1: or even you know whatever, five ten, one hundred, I
Speaker 1: think the average American male is like five ten, one
Speaker 1: hundred and eighty pounds something like that. I don't know
Speaker 1: I'm making that up, but you would, if you have
Speaker 1: some basic athletic skills, be able to play female college
Speaker 1: athletics pretty easily. Right. That's that's just the fact. I mean,
Speaker 1: I never oh no, that's terrible. It's I mean, I remember,
Speaker 1: you know, men's and men's and women's crew. For example,
Speaker 1: I rode crew in college, and that's very straightforward. It's
Speaker 1: like track. I mean, you see the differences in the times,
Speaker 1: you see the differences in the boat speed, and you know,
Speaker 1: if you're a decent high school rower for a man,
Speaker 1: you would be a you know, top D one female
Speaker 1: rower just based on times. Okay, this is again objective reality.
Speaker 1: It's not it's not making a judgment. I think women's
Speaker 1: sports are great. Women's head is amazing. You know, women's
Speaker 1: volleyball's fun to watch. I don't like the w NBA
Speaker 1: very much, but it doesn't matter, right, I think it's great.
Speaker 1: I think women should play sports. I'm all in favor
Speaker 1: of that. That's fine, And I think that great female
Speaker 1: athletes should be celebrated as great female athletes. But they
Speaker 1: are not male athletes. And this idea that we're going
Speaker 1: to be able to combine these two things and everything's
Speaker 1: going to be normal. Is crazy, And I'm what I
Speaker 1: was starting out with here by telling you that we're
Speaker 1: supposed to not observe what is so obvious and observable
Speaker 1: when you have a woman who kicks the ball maybe
Speaker 1: thirty yards and we're all supposed to stand up and
Speaker 1: clap for this, and this became some big thing in
Speaker 1: the media. Oh, the first ever woman to play it. Okay,
Speaker 1: she had one kick and it wasn't very good, but
Speaker 1: we're all supposed to stand in clap. I mean, you
Speaker 1: could put me in a World Cup match and give
Speaker 1: me a penalty kick, and believe it or not, I'd
Speaker 1: probably score penalty kicks. Not very hard to score penalty kick.
Speaker 1: And I played a lot of soccer growing up. That
Speaker 1: doesn't mean I'm a great soccer player. It doesn't mean anything.
Speaker 1: I mean, these days I could barely move up and
Speaker 1: down the field. So why do we have to go
Speaker 1: through this? Why can't we just be honest? An objective here,
Speaker 1: which is that they allowed a woman to play in
Speaker 1: a game where clearly she was not particularly additive, is
Speaker 1: that people can't handle this. Why the broader the broader
Speaker 1: theme here, or the more important takeaway from this, because
Speaker 1: again I don't even really care about college football, and
Speaker 1: so it's not like I have some issue with that.
Speaker 1: But the bigger theme that I wanted to get to
Speaker 1: is merely that don't trust people who won't let you
Speaker 1: trust yourself. Don't listen to the media when they tell
Speaker 1: you that what you see and what you know to
Speaker 1: be true is not true. You can be open to persuasion,
Speaker 1: but don't allow yourself to be browbeaten. Don't allow yourself
Speaker 1: to be coerced or pushed into rejecting things that you
Speaker 1: can tell are true, or to accepting things that you
Speaker 1: know are false. Men are not women and women are
Speaker 1: not men. For example, you can get in trouble for
Speaker 1: saying that on social media. You can get in trouble now,
Speaker 1: just socially in general, a whole lot of places. I
Speaker 1: don't even know how this works out in a workplace situation. Now,
Speaker 1: I mean, if you say that, is that is that
Speaker 1: considered an offensive or who knows? But it's crazy that
Speaker 1: anybody has a problem with that. It's a statement of
Speaker 1: the most objective of facts. It's like saying two pless
Speaker 1: two equals four no, the mainstream media wants you to
Speaker 1: say it's five. And if you won't say it's five
Speaker 1: or point three or a million, there's something wrong with you.
Speaker 1: You're a bad person. If you won't stand in cheer
Speaker 1: and clap for a woman who played in a football
Speaker 1: game for for kicking a football one time, not well,
Speaker 1: there's something wrong with you. You're a misogynist. You're a
Speaker 1: bad person. There is a real war on objective reality
Speaker 1: that the liberal media and the left is engaged in,
Speaker 1: because if there is no objective reality, it's all then
Speaker 1: just a question of what they're able to control, what
Speaker 1: they're able to make you do. It doesn't matter what actually,
Speaker 1: it doesn't matter what the results are, it doesn't matter
Speaker 1: how it all plays out. They just get to tell
Speaker 1: you and your response is, yes, I will do that
Speaker 1: thing because you tell me too. If you read memoirs
Speaker 1: of some of the great dissidents in totalitarian states, I
Speaker 1: mean souls anets In is my favorite from within the
Speaker 1: Soviet Union, but there are many others, you'll see that
Speaker 1: this is one of the one of the hallmarks of
Speaker 1: a totalitarian system that you accept as truth something that
Speaker 1: you objectively know is false. The moment that they break
Speaker 1: you down in that way, the moment that all of
Speaker 1: a sudden you find yourself saying, well, I don't see
Speaker 1: it that way, and I know that that's not true,
Speaker 1: but they're all saying it, so it must be. Now,
Speaker 1: then they've got you. Then you'll say, yeah, school lockdowns
Speaker 1: are a good idea. Yeah, your mask protects you and
Speaker 1: my mask protects me. Or is it just now my
Speaker 1: mask protects you. I can't remember, but I'll forget about
Speaker 1: what Fauci used to say. I'll forget about these studies
Speaker 1: that come out the question all of this. I'll forget
Speaker 1: about the old pandemic playbooks that all these same public
Speaker 1: health bureaucrats were signing off on for decades that said
Speaker 1: that what we're doing now is crazy. I forget all
Speaker 1: of it. That's right, friends. All you have to do
Speaker 1: for the left to embrace you and for you to
Speaker 1: be a member in good standing is to say that
Speaker 1: a female football kicker who shanks the ball thirty yards
Speaker 1: and give it to the other team on their forty
Speaker 1: yard line is some huge step forward for women. Just
Speaker 1: sign on to that. Just start with that, and everything
Speaker 1: else will follow.