WEBVTT - Twitter Surges After Activists Seek to Replace Dorsey

0:00:00.440 --> 0:00:02.960
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Jason Kelly. We're here every day bringing you the latest

0:00:05.519 --> 0:00:09.800
<v Speaker 1>news from the world's of business and finance, plus technology, politics, economics,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>all harnessing the power of Bloomberg Business Week reporters and editors,

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:16.759
<v Speaker 1>not to mention our journalists and analysts more than a

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:19.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty countries. You can download Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:19.560 --> 0:00:22.439
<v Speaker 1>on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com. You can also

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:24.919
<v Speaker 1>listen to our radio show weekdays at two pm Eastern

0:00:25.000 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 1>only on Bloomberg Radio. Let's turn to Scott to vote. Now,

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>he's got a great, great scoop on the terminal, moving

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>shares and getting people interested all around this potential or

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:41.240
<v Speaker 1>I guess it actually is a transaction to the extent

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:45.519
<v Speaker 1>that we've had Elliott Management, well known investor Paul Singers

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Shop going into Twitter pushing for changes, including saying Jack Dorsey,

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:52.159
<v Speaker 1>maybe he shouldn't be the CEO. Scott's with us in

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 1>our Bloomberg Interactor brokerst here. First of all, congrats, great

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 1>scoop moving the shares, a green b as we call

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 1>it here. In turn, it's a big deal, so what's

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>going on. So I think for the longest time people

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 1>were kind of looking at Jack Dorrisey at Twitter and

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:12.040
<v Speaker 1>wondering how he could divide his time between the Twitter

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 1>and then his other job, which is the CEO of Square.

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>They're both, um, you know, thirty five billion dollar company.

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:24.039
<v Speaker 1>Twitter is a six billion dollar company, and he's also

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 1>came out and said that he was, you know, looking

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 1>to spend about six months of the year working in Africa. Now, um, so,

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 1>I think the alarm bell started going off for a

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of investors. And then when that happens, it doesn't

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 1>take too long for somebody like Elliott to show up.

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 1>So how big a holding do they have and what

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 1>are they pushing for? And tell us about this meeting

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>where Twitter executives were there but Jack Dorsey was not. Yeah,

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 1>so they own a more than a billion dollar stake

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>in the company. Um and on Friday night they had

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>a meeting with the chairman and the lead director. Elliott

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 1>did uh to discuss some of their concerns. And I

0:01:57.840 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>mean it's not uncommon that did not have the ce

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 1>OH in the room. If you're going to be talking

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>about the CEO and in the future of the CEO.

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 1>So I wasn't too surprised that Dorsey wasn't there, but

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, it makes it a lot easier to facilitate

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 1>a conversation about some of your concerns about Dorsey if

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 1>he's not actually there, And so how likely, how feasible

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:23.639
<v Speaker 1>is it that they'll get something satisfactory out of all this.

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that it comes as a surprise to

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the board that there are increasing concerns about the level

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 1>of UM involvement Dorsey has in his divided attention. So

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I think this has got to be something that they

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 1>were thinking of already. UM. And I don't know that

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 1>for a fact, but I do know that the conversations

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 1>between Elliott and uh, the chairman and the lead director

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>were cordial, uh constructive. They were described to me as

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:54.080
<v Speaker 1>and that UM, there is some hope that maybe there

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:56.960
<v Speaker 1>will be some some way, some path forward that they

0:02:56.960 --> 0:03:01.080
<v Speaker 1>can work together. I also want to ask you about

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:04.639
<v Speaker 1>sort of Elliott right now and policing. I mean, this

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 1>is the second time we've talked to you in in

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:08.920
<v Speaker 1>as many weeks, I believe, because we were talking to

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>you about soft I mean, yeah, this guy's going for it.

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 1>It feels like yeah, I mean, it's a forty billion

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>dollar fund now, and it's it's you know, you've got

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:21.080
<v Speaker 1>to deploy that capital somehow. Um, you've got the clout

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:23.679
<v Speaker 1>um and there's these targets that are just out there,

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, Massa Son's soft Bank. You know, we're all

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about all the problems they're having with the Vision

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:32.079
<v Speaker 1>Fund and not the kingmaker that are the guaranteed kingmaker

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 1>in terms of startups that I think everyone assumed it

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>was right. And I think that so as soon as

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 1>that happens in a public realm, there's only a few

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 1>people that have the capital that can go into a

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 1>company like soft Bank or Twitter and say, you know, hey,

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>look this isn't right, like this shouldn't be running this way,

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 1>And Eliot's one of those people. I do if I

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>can be sorry, I just go back to Twitter for

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>a second. Is it is it likely that the Dorsey

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>era of Twitter is going to come to an end? Look,

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm not good at predicting things. I'm terrible at deciding

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>who's going to win an election or a primary or whatever.

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>But I would say that the writings on the wall

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 1>if he wants to continue to run both companies and

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 1>moved to Africa for six months of the year. There's

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 1>absolutely no way that somebody running a you know, twenty

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 1>six billion dollar companies should be having those side jobs.

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a full time job. There's a U S

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>election coming up, there's Summer Olympics coming up. There spread

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:31.159
<v Speaker 1>a coronavirus. That's when all the users start turning to Twitter,

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:34.479
<v Speaker 1>That's when all the advertisers start turning to Twitter. And

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>that requires somebody's full time attention. Well, and there's so

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>many big existential questions and we've talked about them on

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>this show a lot around you know, Twitter's role in

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the world of politics, in the world of misinformation and

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:50.920
<v Speaker 1>information and all of those things. And yet, as you

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:54.719
<v Speaker 1>alluded to Scott, at least so far as it was

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>with soft Anchor, as it has been with softing fairly

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:02.720
<v Speaker 1>friendly at this moment. This isn't sort of storming the gates. Yeah,

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean to be clear, Elliott has nominated for directors

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the board. Um, and you know that's just a precaution.

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:11.159
<v Speaker 1>If things don't go well, then you know they have

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the people there because there was a deadline for nominating.

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:16.600
<v Speaker 1>They have those directors there. So if things don't go well,

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:19.159
<v Speaker 1>then they can push for changes in a in a

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 1>proxy fighter. I do feel like the Twitter story, how

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 1>many conversations have we had, you know, I think their

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:25.479
<v Speaker 1>numbers may have been I have to go back and

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:27.360
<v Speaker 1>look at the most recent earnings, but I do think

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 1>people wonder about, like kind of what is this business

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:32.159
<v Speaker 1>going forward? Right? It's well, if you look at the

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:35.600
<v Speaker 1>numbers since Doris came back in July, the shares are

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:38.599
<v Speaker 1>down six percent over that same period of time. Facebooks

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 1>are up one um. So you do the math, right, Yeah. Well,

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 1>and just to point out, Twitter shares you know, really

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:51.160
<v Speaker 1>based on your reporting, up about seven percent today. So

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:55.440
<v Speaker 1>clearly investors excited about the idea that Mr Singer and

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 1>his cohorts getting in there, and a kind of timeline

0:05:58.120 --> 0:05:59.719
<v Speaker 1>that we can expect that we might start to see

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 1>something happening here. I'm hearing that things are moving fast.

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, stay tuned and you might lose another weekend.

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Sorry for just a week, all right, Scott Devote, thank

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:13.920
<v Speaker 1>you so much. Feel's report of fantastic scoop one of

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the most read on the Blottolberg. People certainly talking about

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:21.280
<v Speaker 1>this amid a very very busy week in politics and

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 1>global economics and central banks and coronavirus. This is capturing

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of attention. A lot of pet shop boys

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>these days. Pet shop boys takes me back. Oh yeah,

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the hund pig. Uh. Nick Parrish is here with us,

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 1>managing director of Crescent Partners based out in Chicago, here

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:52.359
<v Speaker 1>with us in New York City today talking opportunity zones.

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>That's the subject of the story. So tell us what's

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 1>going on out there, because we've heard a lot about

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:03.480
<v Speaker 1>them sort of in theory, but I feel like less

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>in practice. What are you seeing? Yep, So I think

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's a good point, right, this is

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 1>a relatively new piece of legislation. It's fifteen months old

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:15.240
<v Speaker 1>in practice, a little bit older in legislation, and it

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 1>caught a lot of excitement early on. Right, It's you know,

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the magnitude of these tax breaks,

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 1>there's a huge opportunity for investors. But it's new, and

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 1>it's been largely untested, and so you know, initially you

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 1>sell a lot of people talking about it, but not

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of activity. And I think now you know,

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 1>you're fifteen months in and you know, while that's only

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>the early innings of the program, you know, you're starting

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>to see some of that activity, whether it be in

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the fundraising side or actual deployment of capital. Um And

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>so now I think there's a you know, there's a

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a subset of folks in the market. They're actually

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 1>getting things done, and I think we're you know, we're

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>starting to see that that percolate. All right, so you've

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:55.679
<v Speaker 1>got money, I know. So so give me an idea

0:07:56.560 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 1>of the types of projects were costing. You know that

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 1>we're talking at Nike that where the money is going

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 1>to go. Because you know that there's a fair amount

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>of controversy surrounding opportunity zones. Are they really an opportunity

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 1>zone or is it a zone that's already turning and

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>it's just a great opportunity for wealthy investors to kind

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 1>of tap into. Yeah, So so you know, the government

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 1>designated where we could invest. Right, So there's finger point

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 1>I should point at the government. And I don't mean

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 1>to point fingers, but you know it it is, you

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 1>know they and and by the way, you know it's

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>not all um necessarily you know, political in terms of

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:33.319
<v Speaker 1>how those got selected. So one of the biggest disconnects

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 1>in the program. They used UM. They used employment statistics

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and these income levels from the last census. Do you

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:42.080
<v Speaker 1>remember from your high school Civics class, WEDE a census

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 1>every ten years, and so you had opportunity zones that

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 1>were selected based on income and poverty levels in two

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:52.079
<v Speaker 1>thousand ten. If you think of really high growth markets

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 1>and especially just coming off the crisis, so those numbers

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 1>are in particular particularly kind of skewed correct. And so

0:08:57.920 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 1>if you look at where a lot of the capital

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:01.319
<v Speaker 1>is flowing today, a lot of these are high growth

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 1>markets in places where nine years, ten years makes a

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:08.560
<v Speaker 1>world of difference. You think about markets like Portland, like Nashville,

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 1>like Denver. You know, there are areas that ten years

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 1>ago might have been very much on the periphery of

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 1>these of these cities that now today are very much

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 1>in the center of that economic development curve UM. And

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:22.680
<v Speaker 1>so that's where you're seeing a lot of the capital today.

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:25.080
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I like to remind people we're fifteen

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:28.080
<v Speaker 1>months into a ten year program. You know, you're only

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:31.320
<v Speaker 1>starting to see that capital get deployed. What our hope

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 1>is is that it will create a path to progress

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>where if you build on the periphery of these areas,

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 1>that will give the next developer a little more license

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 1>to go a little bit further out, and that will

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>give capital kind of a natural path to follow. And

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:45.679
<v Speaker 1>what could get in the way of this? I mean,

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 1>is it macro economic concerned? Is it further legislation? Is

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>at local? Like, what do you worry about? I think,

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, the further legislation piece that that ebbs and flows.

0:09:56.920 --> 0:10:00.120
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we're in an election cycle, so we're

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:03.200
<v Speaker 1>is there a presidential election, so we get you know,

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 1>we might fall. I don't want to say fall a

0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 1>victim to that. I think that the likelihood that any

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 1>of that changes before the next election is pretty slim

0:10:09.960 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 1>to knell. You will see some local elections that we

0:10:12.800 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 1>need to be mindful of, you know, around housing and

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 1>zoning that that I think, uh, you know, by and large,

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:21.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the local municipalities have actually been supportive

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:24.679
<v Speaker 1>of this because they see this as an opportunity to

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 1>attract capital to the zones located in their cities and

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 1>UH and states. And so we've seen a number of

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>of UM political entities get very involved in kind of

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 1>advertising that UM you know, I think macroeconomic fundamentals are

0:10:38.320 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 1>certainly of note though. That's one of the benefits of

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 1>this program. It's a ten year old so it's very

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 1>much designed for a long term investment horizon, and so

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:51.080
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to be as mindful of the you know,

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 1>daily and weekly dips in the market. It's much more

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:56.439
<v Speaker 1>long term. Is it safe to say, um that even

0:10:56.480 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 1>without the tax breaks, these are areas you would have

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>been investing in any way. Yeah, I mean, I think

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>that's the real magic or the real challenge in this program,

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>right that the way the whole legislation is designed is

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 1>it allows you to own assets for a long period

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:12.680
<v Speaker 1>of time and then to sell them without capital gains tax.

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:16.959
<v Speaker 1>That only does you good if you have generated gain. Right,

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 1>So this is not a program where you can go

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:21.360
<v Speaker 1>out and you get a participant medal for trying. Right,

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 1>you have to make a good investment. But if you

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 1>make a good investment and then layer the benefits on

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:29.960
<v Speaker 1>top of it, that's when this becomes interesting. So that's

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the real challenges. You have to find opportunities to invest

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense, that kind of pencil to a normal

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:40.079
<v Speaker 1>you know, investment return that exists within these defined zones.

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:42.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, Nick Parish, thank you so much, Managing director

0:11:42.520 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 1>for Crested Partners based out in Chicago, working on opportunity zones.

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 1>We're forgiving the fact that he is a Marquette guy

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:51.320
<v Speaker 1>and his basketball team is better than mine. We're just

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 1>going to leave that to the exactly. We're all neutral here,

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:57.560
<v Speaker 1>especially because we're gonna be the host of the Big

0:11:57.600 --> 0:11:59.719
<v Speaker 1>East Tournament and you know, we'll see what happens then,

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:02.320
<v Speaker 1>just saying I'm just saying, I'm just saying, all right, Nick,

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:10.439
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. All right. So, certainly the big

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:13.080
<v Speaker 1>players when it comes to the housing mortgage market, we're

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 1>talking about Fannie May and Freddie mac um. These two

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:20.200
<v Speaker 1>um companies. I don't even know what you call them

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>because their government sponsored enterprises. Uh, yes, companies. Well, they're

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:30.320
<v Speaker 1>publicly traded, you know what I'm saying. They're publicly traded. No, no, no,

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 1>no, no no, come on, you guys aren't being fair. They've

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 1>trade publicly, although they've been taken over by the government,

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 1>but they have a lot of government oversight. Uh and

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 1>their keeper is still the US government. So let's get

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:43.080
<v Speaker 1>into this story. It's going to be the upcoming issue

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 1>of the magazine. Elizabeth Dexheimer is financial regulation and congressional

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 1>reporter at Bloomberg News. She's on the phone in Washington.

0:12:49.320 --> 0:12:52.319
<v Speaker 1>You have to help me out here, Elizabeth. Also without you,

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 1>you've hit it on the head of these companies are

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:59.959
<v Speaker 1>two of the weirdest sagas in modern finance. And Freddy

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Mac two very important companies at the heart of the

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 1>mortgage market. They buy mortgages from lenders, they package them

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:09.960
<v Speaker 1>into securities and sell them to investors. And this whole

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 1>process really makes it possible for the thirty year mortgage

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:16.680
<v Speaker 1>to exist. It has bearing on everything from mortgage rates

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>to home prices. And during the financial crisis, um these

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 1>companies were about to fail, US taxpayers had to step

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>in bail them out, and since then they've operated in

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 1>this really weird place where yes, they have shareholders and

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 1>have earnings, they've returned to profitability and otherwise look like

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 1>normal publicly traded companies, But on the other hand, they

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 1>are completely controlled by the government. And where we're at

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 1>now is the Trump administration has promised to fix all

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 1>of this, and uh in more than sort of at

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the core of this, to free them from government control

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:54.079
<v Speaker 1>and they've promised to do it without help of Congress,

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:56.440
<v Speaker 1>and so that's really put a lot of eyeballs in

0:13:56.480 --> 0:14:00.439
<v Speaker 1>certain places on Wall Street focused on markla Riot. He

0:14:00.520 --> 0:14:03.120
<v Speaker 1>is the director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 1>is their chief regulator. And that's and that's the story. Say,

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:08.679
<v Speaker 1>the fate of it all largely hines that one man,

0:14:08.720 --> 0:14:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I know, Bloomberg Business we get it or Jil Webber

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 1>also here. So um uh deck Nimer has done a

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 1>great job on this. And I guess the thing that

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm really interested in, like the people that come up

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 1>in the article, it's really the hedge fund world, right,

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 1>So how do they factor into all of this? Right?

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 1>So that is one really in a big group on

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 1>on Wall Street right now. The shareholders in these companies themselves,

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 1>which do include some pretty prominent hedge funds UH and

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:39.480
<v Speaker 1>investors like John Paulson and Bill Ackman. They made a

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 1>big bet on these companies a long time ago and

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:44.640
<v Speaker 1>they've yet to really see it payoff. And so depending

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 1>on what happens and sort of the details on how

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 1>these companies are freed from US control, there's a lot

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 1>of money riding among shareholders, whether or not they're going

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 1>to be able to see that and sort of how much.

0:14:57.240 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 1>And quite frankly, I can tell you after spending a

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of time with Mark Collabora and it really is unclear. Um.

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 1>He does play a big role in this, as does

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the Treasury Department, but it's really unclear where they're where

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 1>they're going to go on this shareholder question. You can

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>just look at the shares of these companies the past

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 1>few months that have been surging on sort of optimism

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:18.120
<v Speaker 1>that this is going to go their way. But I

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 1>can tell you that it's it's really unclear whether or

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 1>not they are going to see the pay day that

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 1>they're hoping for. And tell us about this guy, I mean,

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 1>because as you point out, I mean, it's all it's

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 1>all to him, like what do we know? Well, right,

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 1>him and the Treasury Secretary and Nuan play a big um.

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 1>But not only is the power in his hands, but

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 1>he's also been making a lot of really ambitious promises

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 1>about how it's not a question of if it's when

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 1>this you know these companies are free, and how quickly

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 1>that's going to happen. I mean, he's saying in my

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 1>interview with him, may Or June of next year, we

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 1>could be seeing a huge I p O of of

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Fannie and Freddie and UM. Yeah, so collabora is is

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 1>is a well known sort of entity here in Washington. Um.

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 1>He was uh Republican staff around the Hill for many years.

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 1>He was at the conservative thing tank Cato Institute, and

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 1>he most recently served as Mike Pence's Jesus economist. UM.

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 1>So he's definitely in a lot of sort of what

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 1>he's done. Um. He has had some controversial views on

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 1>on housing reform in the past, and as he even

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 1>puts it, a lot of what he's done the past

0:16:22.440 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 1>few months since taking this job is sort of reassuring

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the different people, um, that have a

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of stake in the decisions he makes. That Um,

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, his role as a regulator is different from

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 1>that as a conservative writer. What what what was the controversy? Uh, Well,

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 1>he's he's made some comments in the past, including about

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 1>around shareholders, this issue around the hedge funds. Um. He

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 1>believes that the hedge funds should have been wiped out

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>or any of the shareholders in Fannie and Freddie when

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 1>they were when the government bailed them out. Um. He

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 1>has said that no circumstances right now would indicate that

0:16:56.040 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>they shareholders should be wiped out again. Um, if they

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 1>were facing another on the brink of failure again, he

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:06.160
<v Speaker 1>believes the shareholder should be wiped out. So it seems

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:09.280
<v Speaker 1>like that that um, you know, is part of this

0:17:09.359 --> 0:17:11.439
<v Speaker 1>narrative and trying to understand where he's really going with

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 1>all of this, which, if you're an investor or anybody

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:16.720
<v Speaker 1>else watching this stuff, it's just like you get this

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of cloudy picture that you know, markets don't always

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 1>like um and so what what does all this mean

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 1>for me and my mortgage? Well, that's remains to be seen.

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:30.679
<v Speaker 1>I think part of the reason why it has taken

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:32.919
<v Speaker 1>so long to sort of fix this and the and

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the company sort of remain in this weird state that

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:39.720
<v Speaker 1>they're at is because politically, no politician, Republican or Democrat,

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 1>wants to do anything that would really mess with the

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:45.480
<v Speaker 1>mortgage market or mess with your ability or anyone's ability

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:48.960
<v Speaker 1>to buy a home. And uh and quite frankly, there's

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the housing market is booming right now.

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:53.640
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot that's working in this system right now,

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:56.679
<v Speaker 1>and uh so I think that that is sort of

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the biggest question that how do you do all these

0:17:58.720 --> 0:18:02.679
<v Speaker 1>things and not sort of mess with anything that is

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 1>currently going well. And that's where I think urgency there's

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:09.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time. Like the whatever they do UM,

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:12.399
<v Speaker 1>there's not only an election coming up where the people

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:15.399
<v Speaker 1>that UM are going to decide this may change with

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:18.679
<v Speaker 1>a new administration, but it's also if the markets, you know,

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:21.879
<v Speaker 1>if the public markets UM take a change, at the

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:24.440
<v Speaker 1>housing market takes a turn for the worst, it's gonna

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 1>be a lot harder to make changes. So I have

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 1>a question, billion dollar question, Elizabeth UM. Has the government

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:33.720
<v Speaker 1>that was the bail out UM that the government did

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 1>for Fannie and Freddie? Has that been paid back? Yes,

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 1>it's been paid And since then, the terms of the

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 1>bailout agreement were changed a few years ago, and Fanny

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and Freddie have been sending all of their profits to

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:49.119
<v Speaker 1>the government. Collabora and Secretary Minution made a slight tweak

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>to that UM in September, So now Fanny and Freddie

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:55.679
<v Speaker 1>are retaining more of their profits. Once they reached a

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:58.120
<v Speaker 1>certain amount, they send the rest to Treasury. So yes,

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:02.160
<v Speaker 1>treasury has been repaid. Alright, final thought to you, Mr

0:19:02.160 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Webber well, I think to me, it speaks to like

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:08.119
<v Speaker 1>how these things get messy? Right? Are they companies? Are

0:19:08.160 --> 0:19:11.440
<v Speaker 1>they not companies? To Carol's exact question at the top,

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 1>that we gave a hard time and who's the person

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>behind this? Because ultimately it's he's going to be uniquely

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 1>put in into a position that's going to test him.

0:19:19.800 --> 0:19:22.159
<v Speaker 1>So TBD what comes out of that? But you know,

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I'm a little better off, thinks Elizabeth.

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 1>It really mapped it out really well. Elizabeth Dexheimer joining

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:33.399
<v Speaker 1>us from Washington on the phone, financial regulation and congressional reporter.

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Her story on the Bloomberg and on Bloomberg dot com

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 1>right now will be the upcoming issue of Bloomberg this week.

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Our thanks to to the editor of the magazine, Joe Webber.

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:44.639
<v Speaker 1>Just a reminder that we're not all done with the

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 1>financial crisis, right We keep talking about everything or so

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:49.360
<v Speaker 1>many things that have made their way back, but we're

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:51.680
<v Speaker 1>still figuring out Fanny and Freddy, which is why this

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:55.160
<v Speaker 1>is a really smart story. This is Bloomberg Business Week

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:59.400
<v Speaker 1>with Carol Messer and Jason Kelly on Bloomberg Radio. First

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:00.919
<v Speaker 1>of all, we have the U. S HINNA trade war,

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:03.720
<v Speaker 1>now we've got the coronavirus. Global supply chains, they have

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 1>no doubt about it been attacked and in many ways

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 1>for some stopped, causing many to rethink and reverse the

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>great globalization trend from west to east. Andy Brown writes

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 1>about it. He is Bloomberg New Economy Editorial director. He

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:20.359
<v Speaker 1>joins us you, Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio. You know, I

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:22.399
<v Speaker 1>do feel like, right, all of this started with the

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:24.399
<v Speaker 1>trade war, but it's really picked up some momentum as

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 1>a result of the virus. Andy, can I just bring

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:30.920
<v Speaker 1>one headline that just across the Bloomberg Pete Blotch, former

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 1>mayor of South Bend, Indiana, to endorse former Vice President

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden at a rally tonight. That is according to

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:41.399
<v Speaker 1>the AP, so not shocking, especially given the phone calls

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:43.600
<v Speaker 1>that we understand were made last night by the former

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:47.919
<v Speaker 1>vice president and the former President Obama. So um, some

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>interesting momentum building on that side. So watching politics this

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 1>week and obviously watching the virus. So Andy, you write

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 1>about this and you talk about deglobalization in particular how

0:20:57.040 --> 0:21:00.240
<v Speaker 1>it's accelerating. Yeah, you know, I feel I have a

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:04.440
<v Speaker 1>personal connection to this story because over the last couple

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 1>of years, I spent a lot of time in Donguan,

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:11.440
<v Speaker 1>a manufacturing hub in southern China, just across the border

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 1>from Hong Kong, and about a decade or fifteen years

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:18.360
<v Speaker 1>ago something like that. In the in the early mid nineties,

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:26.199
<v Speaker 1>Donguan was a sleepy, agricultural backwater, rice paddies, village temples,

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:31.359
<v Speaker 1>clan based government. And then suddenly it started sprouting factories,

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and it goes from a population of you know, hundreds

0:21:34.920 --> 0:21:37.919
<v Speaker 1>of thousands to one of the great cities in the

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:41.359
<v Speaker 1>world with more than ten million people. And there is

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:46.120
<v Speaker 1>this huge misconception around the world, particularly in the United States,

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:50.959
<v Speaker 1>how this process came about. People say China stole American jobs.

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 1>It was nothing of the sort. American industrialists and industrialists

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:59.959
<v Speaker 1>from all over the world decided to relocate their manufacturing

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 1>to Donguan and places around Donguan for two reasons. One price,

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:10.120
<v Speaker 1>but far more important in price efficiency, the coronavirus. That's

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 1>really the process of globalization. The coronavirus has really blown

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 1>those calculations out of the water. So that if you

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 1>are now a global CEO and you're asking a question,

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 1>where should I build my next factories, and the only

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:28.359
<v Speaker 1>question on your mind is am I going to go

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 1>for price? Am I gonna go for efficiency? Is the

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:33.720
<v Speaker 1>wrong question, or at least it's it's not. There are

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 1>other more important questions to ask, of which the most

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 1>important now is how can I make my business, my

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 1>global business, resilient to shocks coming out of China. And

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 1>so as you sort of take a step back for

0:22:48.840 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 1>from all of this, I mean, you look at the

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:54.960
<v Speaker 1>new economy. It's literally your job. So I mean, what

0:22:55.040 --> 0:22:57.159
<v Speaker 1>do you make of this at this point in terms

0:22:57.200 --> 0:23:00.119
<v Speaker 1>of the near term but maybe more importantly the long

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 1>term effectiveness. So it's going to have a profound effect

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:09.120
<v Speaker 1>on the Chinese economy. So the aggregation of supply chains

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 1>in China was seen as a great strength of the

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 1>global economy, and it's now seen as a liability. So

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've spoken to uh managers of companies or

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 1>managing or managers who are managing the operation in China.

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 1>They're talking about relocating, not not just about relocating production

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 1>at the margins sort of where am I going to

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:33.280
<v Speaker 1>build my next factory? But how do I take manufacturing

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:37.200
<v Speaker 1>capacity that's already in China and move it offshore? We're

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about shocks now, trade shocks, uh, US China trade war.

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:46.159
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about tech shocks. The technology decoupling between the

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:48.720
<v Speaker 1>United States and China. We've discussed on this show a lot,

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and now we're talking about black swan events. You know,

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 1>of course, most notably right now, coronavirus. How much do

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:59.880
<v Speaker 1>you think Andy China knew that this? I mean, obviously

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 1>people companies, global companies started to shift some of their

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:06.399
<v Speaker 1>operations to other lower cost providers, whether it's Vietnam or

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:08.399
<v Speaker 1>so and so forth. Right, we started to see that trend.

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>How much of you know, China seeing this, and that's

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 1>why they've been so much focusing on being more of

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:18.119
<v Speaker 1>a high tech provider, right, you know, much more sophisticated

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 1>industries and moving They're focused to that because they saw

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of the writing on the wall. Well they did

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 1>what What what happened was, I mean exactly the same

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:32.479
<v Speaker 1>reasons that industry moved from the Massachusetts and Connecticut and

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 1>moved down south and then moved to the you know,

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:39.159
<v Speaker 1>over to Asia in you know, the nineteen sixties and

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventies. Uh, you know, those are the same forces

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:45.120
<v Speaker 1>that have been at work for the last several days

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:48.720
<v Speaker 1>in Dongwa, several years in Dongwan, right, So labor intensive

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:52.199
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing is shipping out. That's very natural. That's a natural,

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 1>normal process of of globalization. So that shipped to Vietnam,

0:24:56.920 --> 0:25:00.359
<v Speaker 1>some of it has gone to Bangladesh, even Ethiopia, parts

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 1>of Africa. What's different now is the driver of this

0:25:04.680 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 1>what what looks like deglobalization, and it's fear. It's fear

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:12.480
<v Speaker 1>of over reliance on China. It is amazing. I mean,

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:14.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, as you say, just sort of synthesizing everything

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:18.880
<v Speaker 1>that's happened over the past year or so, how much

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the story related to China's change. You think about the protests,

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 1>you think about the trade war, you think about the

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:26.920
<v Speaker 1>coronavirus dramatic, what a difference. There's a line that you wrote,

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:30.480
<v Speaker 1>deglobalization is driven by the disc comfitting am I saying

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 1>it right? Discomforting? Discomforting? Oh sorry, maybe there's a type

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:37.320
<v Speaker 1>of discomforting realization that the entire system now has a

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>single point of failure China. That is just like to

0:25:40.040 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>get your head around it, Like so many people have

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 1>placed their bets right in terms of the supply chains

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 1>in China, and um being our workforce for something, right. So,

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 1>and those those bets are not going to have to

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:52.879
<v Speaker 1>be on Wow. And the question now is where is

0:25:52.880 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 1>some of this production gonna go? We're gonna go to right,

0:25:55.640 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, so you know it's going to go to

0:25:57.960 --> 0:26:02.200
<v Speaker 1>countries that actually upper tected because they have the least

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:04.840
<v Speaker 1>amount of connection to the Chinese economy. They have their

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 1>own supply chains. If you're in if you're a country

0:26:07.560 --> 0:26:10.480
<v Speaker 1>in Eastern Europe, Europe, now you're looking actually to benefit

0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 1>from all this. Mexico is in a terrific position right

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 1>now because they take it all up. Yeah, all shifts around. Uh,

0:26:18.040 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 1>that's why they call it the new economy, all right.

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Uh Andrew Brown, Andy Brown, thank you so much. I'm

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:34.440
<v Speaker 1>broc a journal But you let me drive. Oh no, no, no, no, honey, please,

0:26:34.560 --> 0:26:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll do the riding drivels me. I want to drive,

0:26:40.680 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Just drive, baby, good questions trying. This is the drive

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 1>to the Globe community. Thanks well, drying us on Bloomberg Radio.

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:01.760
<v Speaker 1>It is time for the drive to the close on

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:03.840
<v Speaker 1>this money back with us is Charlie Smith, co founder,

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:07.200
<v Speaker 1>chief investment officer at Fort Pitt Capital Group. They've got

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 1>three point four billion in assets under management on the

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 1>phone from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and I say this, and Charlie

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Pello just talked about it, because investors are definitely buying

0:27:16.680 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 1>into the clothes right now. Up four point two on

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the Dow, up one thousand, sixty two points, nastacks up

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 1>almost three point four percent, up two points, and you've

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 1>got the SMP with a percentage gain of roughly three

0:27:28.040 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 1>point seven up a hundred and nine points. But no

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 1>doubt about it, we're at our best levels of the day.

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Smith, Um, is this all because everybody expects the

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 1>FED to cut rates? I'm not sure that's the reason.

0:27:39.200 --> 0:27:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the the idea that this issue with the

0:27:42.000 --> 0:27:44.920
<v Speaker 1>coronavirus is going to be behind us within the next

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 1>four months, I think is starting to wait. Stop right there,

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:50.680
<v Speaker 1>that the issue of the coronavirus is going to be

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:52.959
<v Speaker 1>behind us in four months. We still have four months though,

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:55.479
<v Speaker 1>to get through. We're talking about you know, more than

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 1>a quarter of well, I mean, that's an impact. Well

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:02.879
<v Speaker 1>markets are a discounting mechanisms and uh, you know, we

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:04.920
<v Speaker 1>may have a quarter here in the U S where

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 1>we get a negative print for g d P um

0:28:08.040 --> 0:28:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and the third quarter maybe flat year over year, but uh,

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:13.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that would imply a pretty strong rebound in

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the fourth quarter, and markets are always looking, you know,

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:19.119
<v Speaker 1>six to nine months ahead. So UM, I think the

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:21.639
<v Speaker 1>idea that uh, that this problem is not going to

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:23.960
<v Speaker 1>be any sort of a permanent one is going to

0:28:24.080 --> 0:28:26.640
<v Speaker 1>take hold of here very quickly and even more importantly,

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 1>potential bownside even if we do get uh, maybe one

0:28:30.960 --> 0:28:35.199
<v Speaker 1>or two quarters of of flat to negative GDP. Uh.

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:38.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, the the impairment of SMP earnings this year

0:28:38.560 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 1>might be three or four percent. That would get you

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 1>a two a hundred and fifty eight dollar number for

0:28:43.400 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 1>SMP earnings for the year. You put an eight team

0:28:45.680 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 1>multiple on that that gives you a fair value around fifty,

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 1>And we were at fifty on Friday, So I think

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:56.640
<v Speaker 1>we've pretty much discounted the problem. Wow, that is it?

0:28:57.120 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, does that surprise you that the the market

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:04.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of digested this as quickly as it did and

0:29:04.520 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 1>now is moving on. I mean, this feels fast to me,

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:10.080
<v Speaker 1>at least well to me, it seems as if the

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 1>entire um presentation of the problem has been overblown. UM.

0:29:15.680 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, I understand that that the number of cases

0:29:19.800 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 1>is going to rise exponentially in the US. But the

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:25.680
<v Speaker 1>final outcome of this is going to be what I

0:29:25.760 --> 0:29:30.000
<v Speaker 1>believe to be amounts to a hyper severe flu season.

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Um and the sorts of sort of outcome that if

0:29:33.640 --> 0:29:36.920
<v Speaker 1>we really hadn't been so sort of hyper attuned to

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 1>it due to the way it's been presented in the media,

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:42.960
<v Speaker 1>we might have missed it. Um. So I I just

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:47.800
<v Speaker 1>really think that that the markets are smarter than that. So, okay,

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 1>that's interesting. So you think the markets are already discounting

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 1>this even though it might get substantially worse. What might

0:29:54.000 --> 0:29:57.320
<v Speaker 1>change your tunes? Tune on that. What's the outcome of

0:29:57.360 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the virus that would make you say, all right, wait

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 1>a minute, I und estimated this. Well, let's talk about

0:30:03.680 --> 0:30:05.800
<v Speaker 1>what we see as is going to happen in the

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:08.520
<v Speaker 1>next three to four months. We could see, uh, you know,

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:12.440
<v Speaker 1>big public events canceled flat out, you know, just canceled,

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know where there's talk here recently of

0:30:15.520 --> 0:30:18.480
<v Speaker 1>potential for the the n c A basketball tournament to

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:21.640
<v Speaker 1>be played in front of empty gymnasiums. That could certainly happen.

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 1>It could wreck the second quarter for GDP. But uh,

0:30:24.760 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I think once we get beyond the early summer July,

0:30:28.600 --> 0:30:31.560
<v Speaker 1>we'll be at the point where the problem has begun

0:30:31.680 --> 0:30:34.960
<v Speaker 1>to fade. Now people will begin to worry about the

0:30:35.040 --> 0:30:37.840
<v Speaker 1>return of the flu season for next year. But there

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 1>may be at some point where we've come up with

0:30:39.880 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 1>some some some drugs that that will be able to

0:30:42.440 --> 0:30:46.160
<v Speaker 1>help lessen the impact. But I think it's gonna work

0:30:46.200 --> 0:30:48.800
<v Speaker 1>its way through the system. It may be, you know,

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the headlines may be awful for the next month and

0:30:50.920 --> 0:30:52.840
<v Speaker 1>a half in terms of the growth in cases, but

0:30:53.600 --> 0:30:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I think the marks are gonna gonna see right through that.

0:30:56.040 --> 0:30:57.800
<v Speaker 1>All right, So talk to us in the midst of

0:30:57.840 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 1>all this about some names that you because you know,

0:31:01.560 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 1>this is not an easy market to to get your

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:07.360
<v Speaker 1>arms around. Uh what are you uh, what are you

0:31:07.400 --> 0:31:12.000
<v Speaker 1>recommending here? Well, we have sort of an eclectic list here.

0:31:12.480 --> 0:31:15.680
<v Speaker 1>We're we've owned Verizon for over a decade. We like

0:31:15.880 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the strong yield of you know, four point six percent yield.

0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Their people are gonna not gonna give up their cell phones.

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:24.720
<v Speaker 1>They may give up an overseas trip, but they're they're

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:26.680
<v Speaker 1>never going to give up their cell phones. And uh,

0:31:27.640 --> 0:31:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the the idea that Verizon has a excess cash flow,

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:34.800
<v Speaker 1>highest quality network in the in the country. We think

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:37.800
<v Speaker 1>they're a nice conservative play here. We also like Western

0:31:37.880 --> 0:31:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Digital UM, the big player in hard disk drives and

0:31:41.880 --> 0:31:46.600
<v Speaker 1>nan flash memory. Flash memory prices are rebounding pretty aggressively. UM.

0:31:47.200 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 1>We think they could earn as much as seven dollars

0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:52.320
<v Speaker 1>in their fiscal year ending next September. So they're selling

0:31:52.360 --> 0:31:54.080
<v Speaker 1>it about eight times earnings with a three and a

0:31:54.080 --> 0:31:57.000
<v Speaker 1>half percent yield. So it's a reasonably cheap stock with

0:31:57.120 --> 0:32:00.720
<v Speaker 1>some decent earnings momentum to look forward to. Uh. Finally,

0:32:00.840 --> 0:32:02.920
<v Speaker 1>we like a little firm here in Pittsburgh called to

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:06.840
<v Speaker 1>six incorporated, the Symbols I I v I. They make

0:32:07.080 --> 0:32:11.480
<v Speaker 1>uh uh equipment for optical switching from both communications and

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 1>industrial uses. Um. The optical switch is a is a

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:17.840
<v Speaker 1>is a reality, and they make the gear that makes

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:21.560
<v Speaker 1>those which is work. The Pride of Saxonburg p a

0:32:22.000 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 1>interesting absolutely about thirty miles from downtown Pittsburgh. There you go, Uh,

0:32:26.720 --> 0:32:28.560
<v Speaker 1>what don't you like in in this market? What are

0:32:28.560 --> 0:32:32.480
<v Speaker 1>you avoiding in a market like this? Well, um, we

0:32:32.560 --> 0:32:35.720
<v Speaker 1>would stay away from the utilities and the the the

0:32:35.840 --> 0:32:41.080
<v Speaker 1>whole household products. Uh. Segment. Really, we think the the

0:32:41.320 --> 0:32:45.320
<v Speaker 1>huge spike we've seen in rates are in yields collapsing

0:32:45.400 --> 0:32:49.120
<v Speaker 1>here in the last six weeks really obviates any real

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 1>attractiveness to the bond market. Uh. And so the household

0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:55.920
<v Speaker 1>names and the and the utilities are ones that we

0:32:55.960 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 1>would be staying away from right now. I do wonder, um, Charlie,

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 1>if you think that. Okay, so here we are up

0:33:02.120 --> 0:33:04.360
<v Speaker 1>almost five percent of the Dow Jones Industrial ouite, I

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:08.400
<v Speaker 1>mean there's a bunch of investors chasing these games right now. Um,

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:12.040
<v Speaker 1>as we head to our highs, we're now about on

0:33:12.040 --> 0:33:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the Dow Jones Industrial average. How much of what we lost, uh,

0:33:16.400 --> 0:33:19.800
<v Speaker 1>in this ten percent correction ten percent more than ten

0:33:19.880 --> 0:33:22.600
<v Speaker 1>percent correction? How much do we get back? Because it's

0:33:22.640 --> 0:33:24.320
<v Speaker 1>safe to say that most folks thought the market was

0:33:24.400 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 1>overvalued based on the earnings outlook and the fundamentals. Um,

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:30.320
<v Speaker 1>So how much of it do you think we ultimately

0:33:30.400 --> 0:33:33.360
<v Speaker 1>get back? If, as you say, investors are looking past

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:37.680
<v Speaker 1>beyond the virus at this point. Yes, So I always

0:33:37.720 --> 0:33:39.520
<v Speaker 1>put it in terms of what we think we might

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 1>earn this year. As I said, if we get a

0:33:41.960 --> 0:33:44.600
<v Speaker 1>negative g D print in the GDP print in the

0:33:44.640 --> 0:33:47.000
<v Speaker 1>second quarter, we get a flat number in the third,

0:33:47.480 --> 0:33:49.680
<v Speaker 1>we could we could get back to a flat earnings

0:33:49.800 --> 0:33:52.880
<v Speaker 1>number for the year UM. So you know, you put

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 1>in eighteen eighteen and a half multiple on that, which

0:33:55.440 --> 0:33:59.680
<v Speaker 1>would be actually slightly up from year end um because

0:33:59.760 --> 0:34:02.520
<v Speaker 1>in straits have fallen so much in the interim. UM,

0:34:02.960 --> 0:34:05.360
<v Speaker 1>you could get to basically back where we were at

0:34:05.360 --> 0:34:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the year, maybe up two or three

0:34:07.280 --> 0:34:13.040
<v Speaker 1>percent for the year. Interesting. Alright, great conversation. Thank you

0:34:13.120 --> 0:34:15.719
<v Speaker 1>so much. Charlie Smith, co founder at chief investment officer

0:34:15.800 --> 0:34:18.480
<v Speaker 1>of Fort pitt Capital Group, looking after about three point

0:34:18.640 --> 0:34:21.720
<v Speaker 1>four excuse me billion dollars joining us on the phone

0:34:22.200 --> 0:34:26.480
<v Speaker 1>from Pittsburgh. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week. You

0:34:26.560 --> 0:34:29.680
<v Speaker 1>can subscribe to the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg

0:34:29.719 --> 0:34:31.879
<v Speaker 1>dot com. You can also listen to our radio show

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:35.080
<v Speaker 1>every weekday at two pm Eastern only on Bloomberg Radio