WEBVTT - BrainStuff Classics: How Do Researchers Preserve Smells?

0:00:01.920 --> 0:00:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to brain Stuff, a production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:06.280 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Hey brain Stuff, Lauren Volga bam here with a classic

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:13.120
<v Speaker 1>episode from our previous host, Christian Sager. We here generally

0:00:13.200 --> 0:00:17.040
<v Speaker 1>approve of the cataloging and preservation of things, from films

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:21.080
<v Speaker 1>to recipes, to paintings, to traditional craft methods to bones,

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:26.439
<v Speaker 1>but some things are more ephemeral than others. Today's question

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:33.880
<v Speaker 1>is how might researchers go about preserving smells? Hey, brain Stuff,

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>it's Christian Sagar, pardon me, fragrances your book wearing researchers

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:42.640
<v Speaker 1>at University College London suggests that the nose knows get it.

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>In an extensive study of smells, heritage and historic paper

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:51.559
<v Speaker 1>published in the journal Heritage Science, the authors argue the

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 1>importance of documenting and preserving smells, but why. The researchers

0:00:57.360 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>realized that visitors at St. Paul's Cathedral, Dean and Chapter

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Library in London frequently comment on the aroma of the space,

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:09.960
<v Speaker 1>saying they feel like they can smell history now thanks

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 1>to our limbic system. Odors can make us pretty emotional,

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:18.119
<v Speaker 1>especially when they evoke memories. Sense affect how we experience

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>different cultures and places and help us gain more insight

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>into and engage more deeply with the past. Since smells

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>are a part of our cultural heritage, the researchers posit

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>they have historical value and deserve to be identified, analyzed,

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and archived using chemical analysis and sensory descriptions. The study

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:43.680
<v Speaker 1>authors set about figuring out a way for scientists and

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 1>historians to do so. In one experiment, the researchers asked

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 1>visitors at the historic library to characterize the odors they smelled.

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 1>More than seventy percent of respondents considered the library smell

0:01:57.000 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 1>as pleasant. All the visitors thought it smelled woody, while

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>eighty six percent noticed a smokey aroma. Earthy was seventy

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:11.800
<v Speaker 1>one and vanilla at fort were also descriptors visitors chose often.

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:16.679
<v Speaker 1>Other responses ranged from musty to pungent and floral to

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 1>rancid mmmm. In another experiment, the study authors analyzed the

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>responses of seventy nine visitors to the Birmingham Museum and

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Art Gallery in the United Kingdom to the smell of

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:32.920
<v Speaker 1>a historic book from a second hand bookstore. To capture

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the book smell, a piece of sterile gauze was soaked

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:39.800
<v Speaker 1>in five milli leaders or point one seven ounces of

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:43.239
<v Speaker 1>an extract of the book Odor and placed in an

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:48.520
<v Speaker 1>unlabeled metal canister Scrooge shut to prevent visitors from peaking

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the top three responses when the visitors were prompted to

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 1>describe the smell chocolate, coffee, and old. The team even

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>analyzed the volatile organic compounds also known as v o

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 1>c s in the book and in the library. Most

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 1>odors are composed of v o c s, or chemicals

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 1>that evaporate at low temperatures. V o c s are

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:16.080
<v Speaker 1>often associated with certain smell types, like ascetic acid with sour,

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>for instance. Using the data from the chemical analysis and

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:25.959
<v Speaker 1>visitors smell descriptions, the researchers created the Historic Book Odor

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:31.519
<v Speaker 1>Wheel to document an archive the Historic Library. Smell main

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 1>categories such as sweet or spicy fill the inner circle

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 1>of the wheel. Descriptors such as caramel or biscuits fill

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the middle, and the chemical compounds likely to be the

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 1>smelly source, like for for all, fill the outer circle.

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 1>The researchers want the Book Odor Wheel to be an

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>interdisciplinary tool that untrained noses can use to identify smells

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>and the compounds causing them, which could address conservators concerns

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>about material composition and degradation inform artifact paper conservation decisions,

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:17.039
<v Speaker 1>and benefit Ola Factory Museum experiences. Today's episode was written

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>by Shelley Dancy and produced by Dylan Fagan and Tyler Klang.

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 1>For more on this and lots of other ripe topics,

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>is it how stuff works dot com. Brain Stuff is

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 1>production of iHeart Radio. For more podcasts in my heart Radio,

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>visit the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 1>listen to your favorite shows