1 00:00:00,360 --> 00:00:17,800 Speaker 1: Welcome to zero. I am Akshatrati the summer of heat. 2 00:00:18,320 --> 00:00:22,040 Speaker 1: That's what protesters outside City Group's headquarters are calling it. 3 00:00:23,079 --> 00:00:27,280 Speaker 1: But some activists prefer to work from the inside, especially 4 00:00:27,360 --> 00:00:30,880 Speaker 1: when it comes to changing the financial system. And what 5 00:00:30,920 --> 00:00:35,800 Speaker 1: does that look like. Today's guest has the answer. Lucy 6 00:00:35,840 --> 00:00:39,320 Speaker 1: Finson is the director of the Paris based climate nonprofit 7 00:00:39,640 --> 00:00:46,839 Speaker 1: Reclaim Finance. She doesn't march or picket corporate headquarters. Instead, 8 00:00:47,560 --> 00:00:51,640 Speaker 1: Reclaim Finance gets to know the power centers inside big finance, 9 00:00:52,720 --> 00:00:57,800 Speaker 1: from sustainability chiefs to investment officers. Lucy has been at 10 00:00:57,800 --> 00:01:00,600 Speaker 1: it for a decade now, pushing big back to move 11 00:01:00,640 --> 00:01:04,840 Speaker 1: away from financing fossil fuels, and her efforts have led 12 00:01:04,880 --> 00:01:09,800 Speaker 1: to some of France's largest banks and insurance companies, including AXA, 13 00:01:09,880 --> 00:01:14,760 Speaker 1: to stop funding co In May, thanks to pressure from 14 00:01:14,800 --> 00:01:18,080 Speaker 1: Reclaim Finance, B and P, Pariba announced that it would 15 00:01:18,160 --> 00:01:22,840 Speaker 1: no longer underwrite bonds for oil and gas producers. Now, 16 00:01:22,880 --> 00:01:25,319 Speaker 1: there is still a long way to go, but these 17 00:01:25,480 --> 00:01:28,440 Speaker 1: are not small wins. So I caught up with Lucy 18 00:01:28,560 --> 00:01:31,600 Speaker 1: when she visited London earlier this summer and we talked 19 00:01:31,600 --> 00:01:35,040 Speaker 1: about how to break through on climate with finance. 20 00:01:35,120 --> 00:01:46,280 Speaker 2: Wonks. 21 00:01:49,480 --> 00:01:52,160 Speaker 1: We know we need to transition the global economy, including 22 00:01:52,240 --> 00:01:58,080 Speaker 1: companies and financial institutions that back them, to clean energy. However, 23 00:01:58,400 --> 00:02:03,360 Speaker 1: in the capitalist economy, short term profits outweigh long term risks. 24 00:02:04,160 --> 00:02:07,160 Speaker 1: But now that many of these long term risks aren't 25 00:02:07,200 --> 00:02:12,160 Speaker 1: really long term, climate impacts are happening now, many companies 26 00:02:12,160 --> 00:02:14,519 Speaker 1: are having to pay huge sums out to deal with them. 27 00:02:14,800 --> 00:02:18,680 Speaker 1: Insurance companies are sometimes going bankrupt not having enough money 28 00:02:18,680 --> 00:02:22,280 Speaker 1: to pay for these damages. Do you think it's finally 29 00:02:22,400 --> 00:02:26,600 Speaker 1: forcing financial institutions to focus on climate risk rather than 30 00:02:26,800 --> 00:02:28,360 Speaker 1: just short term profits. 31 00:02:29,600 --> 00:02:33,079 Speaker 3: Not really, because I believe what you say is true, 32 00:02:33,120 --> 00:02:37,040 Speaker 3: but only to a specific extent. It's true that the 33 00:02:37,160 --> 00:02:41,679 Speaker 3: insurance companies especially are already filling the heat and are 34 00:02:42,280 --> 00:02:46,200 Speaker 3: paying a lot every year to pay for the damage 35 00:02:46,280 --> 00:02:50,359 Speaker 3: cause by climate change. However, to another extent, there's still 36 00:02:50,400 --> 00:02:52,560 Speaker 3: a lot of money to be made into fussy fuels 37 00:02:52,919 --> 00:02:56,720 Speaker 3: in the very short terms. Before the invasion of Ukraine, 38 00:02:56,800 --> 00:03:01,200 Speaker 3: a positive fuelds company had been underperforming the market for 39 00:03:01,280 --> 00:03:06,520 Speaker 3: many years, and there was relatively broad consensus that FOSSi 40 00:03:06,560 --> 00:03:10,120 Speaker 3: fuels company future lies into a rapid transition away from 41 00:03:10,160 --> 00:03:13,880 Speaker 3: fossil fuels. But there has been a spike in oil 42 00:03:14,040 --> 00:03:18,480 Speaker 3: gas prices after the invasion of Ukraine, and there is 43 00:03:18,520 --> 00:03:23,400 Speaker 3: a general perception that geopolitical risk which are increasing, will 44 00:03:23,440 --> 00:03:28,000 Speaker 3: maintain this price is high and has made a pump 45 00:03:28,120 --> 00:03:32,679 Speaker 3: it fast strategy look attractive again in the very short term. 46 00:03:32,919 --> 00:03:36,040 Speaker 3: And we can see it also is the profits made 47 00:03:36,120 --> 00:03:39,920 Speaker 3: by the Olias majors. There's still a lot of money 48 00:03:39,920 --> 00:03:44,480 Speaker 3: to be made by these companies and their shareholders into 49 00:03:44,520 --> 00:03:50,120 Speaker 3: FOSSi fuels. So I don't think the broad situation changed 50 00:03:50,200 --> 00:03:52,520 Speaker 3: to a big extent. I also think, like a lot 51 00:03:52,560 --> 00:03:56,920 Speaker 3: of investors and other financial institutions, they are aware that 52 00:03:56,960 --> 00:04:01,119 Speaker 3: they are using models that under sti made the damage 53 00:04:01,240 --> 00:04:05,920 Speaker 3: caused by climate change to the economy and undervalue the 54 00:04:06,040 --> 00:04:10,520 Speaker 3: financial impacts that it will have on their books, and 55 00:04:10,560 --> 00:04:13,520 Speaker 3: they're aware of it, but they are not adapting from 56 00:04:13,600 --> 00:04:18,520 Speaker 3: models to make up with the inconsistencies and limitation. 57 00:04:19,120 --> 00:04:19,320 Speaker 2: Yeah. 58 00:04:19,320 --> 00:04:21,080 Speaker 1: So it's been a little bit of a messy picture. 59 00:04:21,200 --> 00:04:24,960 Speaker 1: But one thing that perhaps has been going in one direction, 60 00:04:25,279 --> 00:04:29,320 Speaker 1: especially since signing the Paris Agreement, is that the measurement 61 00:04:29,760 --> 00:04:35,080 Speaker 1: of how financial institutions are responsible for funding activities that 62 00:04:35,160 --> 00:04:39,320 Speaker 1: increase emissions has been improving. So when we think of 63 00:04:39,600 --> 00:04:42,520 Speaker 1: companies that are responsible for emissions, you know, a fossil 64 00:04:42,560 --> 00:04:45,799 Speaker 1: fuel company producing oil, that oil is burned, emissions are produced. 65 00:04:46,120 --> 00:04:50,760 Speaker 1: But the banks that fund these fossil fuel companies are 66 00:04:50,800 --> 00:04:54,159 Speaker 1: also now starting to count those emissions in their books. 67 00:04:54,880 --> 00:04:56,960 Speaker 1: More recently, there have been a few bodies that have 68 00:04:57,040 --> 00:05:01,000 Speaker 1: come together and created a standard for how these emissions 69 00:05:01,240 --> 00:05:06,039 Speaker 1: that banks have through their financing is counted. So could 70 00:05:06,040 --> 00:05:07,880 Speaker 1: you just talk us through these terms that are being 71 00:05:07,920 --> 00:05:11,600 Speaker 1: created to count these emissions, so called financed emissions and 72 00:05:11,760 --> 00:05:15,479 Speaker 1: facilitated emissions. What do they measure and how has that 73 00:05:15,839 --> 00:05:16,799 Speaker 1: changed your work? 74 00:05:18,080 --> 00:05:21,159 Speaker 3: Yeah, it's true like more and more information is available 75 00:05:21,440 --> 00:05:25,680 Speaker 3: to track specifical financing. However, having this information does not 76 00:05:26,120 --> 00:05:31,160 Speaker 3: necessarily mean that there will be action on it. These 77 00:05:31,200 --> 00:05:34,160 Speaker 3: being said, a lot of banks after the launch of 78 00:05:34,200 --> 00:05:37,880 Speaker 3: the Glasgow Financial Alliance for net zero during the Cup 79 00:05:37,920 --> 00:05:44,839 Speaker 3: at Glasgow, they communicate to publish decabonization targets for specific sectors. 80 00:05:45,560 --> 00:05:49,400 Speaker 3: Many of them do publish targets for the awning gas industry, 81 00:05:49,880 --> 00:05:54,080 Speaker 3: which means that they published finance emissions, and some of 82 00:05:54,120 --> 00:05:57,720 Speaker 3: them have commedy to publish facilitated emissions. So let's have 83 00:05:57,760 --> 00:06:00,440 Speaker 3: a look at the two of that. Finance mission is 84 00:06:00,520 --> 00:06:05,040 Speaker 3: really the missions that are related to the loans that 85 00:06:05,279 --> 00:06:09,920 Speaker 3: a bank provides to the olingas industry. So if you 86 00:06:10,040 --> 00:06:14,640 Speaker 3: finance total energies or any or shale as a bank, 87 00:06:15,200 --> 00:06:18,240 Speaker 3: you will have to report a certain amount of the 88 00:06:18,360 --> 00:06:22,520 Speaker 3: missions attributed to this loan to an orang gas company. 89 00:06:23,080 --> 00:06:27,119 Speaker 3: Finance emissions are so about the exposure of a bank 90 00:06:27,200 --> 00:06:31,200 Speaker 3: to the olingas industry, meaning that the finance emissions will 91 00:06:31,240 --> 00:06:35,320 Speaker 3: also got down or disappear from the portfolio as soon 92 00:06:35,360 --> 00:06:39,640 Speaker 3: as the loan is being paid back. Facilitated missions is 93 00:06:39,720 --> 00:06:44,360 Speaker 3: about another very important type of financial services provided by 94 00:06:44,400 --> 00:06:48,279 Speaker 3: banks to the energy sector and to the oling gas industry, 95 00:06:48,640 --> 00:06:54,120 Speaker 3: which is the issuance the structurations of bonds. It's when 96 00:06:54,200 --> 00:06:58,720 Speaker 3: a company get access to capital not from a bank directly, 97 00:06:58,839 --> 00:07:02,599 Speaker 3: but from investors thanks to the intermediation of a bank. 98 00:07:02,960 --> 00:07:06,920 Speaker 3: That's why we call it if facilitated emissions. Here's a 99 00:07:06,960 --> 00:07:12,640 Speaker 3: lot of issues attributing these emissions. As for the finance emissions, 100 00:07:12,760 --> 00:07:15,760 Speaker 3: it's these emissions will disappear from the portfolio of a 101 00:07:15,800 --> 00:07:18,240 Speaker 3: bank as soon as the loan is being paid back. 102 00:07:18,640 --> 00:07:22,040 Speaker 3: For facilitated emissions, the bank needs to report on these 103 00:07:22,040 --> 00:07:26,160 Speaker 3: emissions the year it helps a company to issue this 104 00:07:26,280 --> 00:07:30,600 Speaker 3: specific bond. So there is an issue of responsibility here 105 00:07:30,680 --> 00:07:33,080 Speaker 3: because it means that the banks will report maybe four 106 00:07:33,160 --> 00:07:35,480 Speaker 3: years for a loan, maybe one year for a bond, 107 00:07:35,880 --> 00:07:39,080 Speaker 3: while actually the financing that has been raised by the 108 00:07:39,160 --> 00:07:43,920 Speaker 3: company thanks to the support of the bank, might actually 109 00:07:43,960 --> 00:07:48,040 Speaker 3: contribute to the development of a new fosssual project in 110 00:07:48,080 --> 00:07:52,760 Speaker 3: the real world that will emit greenhouse gas emissions for decades. 111 00:07:53,320 --> 00:07:56,160 Speaker 3: So there is a lock in effex supported by the 112 00:07:56,200 --> 00:08:00,160 Speaker 3: bank which is not fully taken into account by the 113 00:08:00,560 --> 00:08:05,960 Speaker 3: metrics Awaver these metrics remain important for banks to manage 114 00:08:06,120 --> 00:08:10,320 Speaker 3: climate related financial risk, it does not necessarily help them 115 00:08:10,680 --> 00:08:14,520 Speaker 3: stop contributing to climate change, especially in the short term 116 00:08:14,920 --> 00:08:18,880 Speaker 3: when we can see that facilitated emissions targets or finance 117 00:08:18,880 --> 00:08:24,720 Speaker 3: emission targets leave room for banks to provide new support 118 00:08:24,760 --> 00:08:27,680 Speaker 3: to companies despite the fact that these companies might be 119 00:08:27,760 --> 00:08:31,520 Speaker 3: at the forefront of the forcifual expansion, so in the 120 00:08:31,600 --> 00:08:35,440 Speaker 3: short term they are not effective enough to make sure 121 00:08:35,640 --> 00:08:39,280 Speaker 3: that a bank is not contributing to the warthening of 122 00:08:39,520 --> 00:08:43,320 Speaker 3: climate change a waver it's one way for banks to 123 00:08:43,360 --> 00:08:47,240 Speaker 3: manage climate related finance risk. The show that for banks 124 00:08:47,280 --> 00:08:51,400 Speaker 3: that really wants to play an active role fighting climate 125 00:08:51,480 --> 00:08:55,439 Speaker 3: change and managing the risk related to climate change, they 126 00:08:55,480 --> 00:08:58,360 Speaker 3: will have to adopt targets, but it won't be enough. 127 00:08:58,400 --> 00:09:01,080 Speaker 3: They will also need to adopt others as our measures. 128 00:09:01,320 --> 00:09:04,120 Speaker 1: And so let's come to your work with Reclaim Finance, 129 00:09:04,240 --> 00:09:07,600 Speaker 1: because your goal is to try and get banks to 130 00:09:07,640 --> 00:09:13,040 Speaker 1: stop financing fossil fuels. If just having new ways to 131 00:09:13,200 --> 00:09:17,679 Speaker 1: measure their financing or their facilitation of these emissions is 132 00:09:17,679 --> 00:09:21,320 Speaker 1: not enough, then are there other things that have come 133 00:09:21,840 --> 00:09:26,160 Speaker 1: to your toolbox that are helping you hold these banks 134 00:09:26,480 --> 00:09:28,120 Speaker 1: accountable for their emissions. 135 00:09:28,200 --> 00:09:32,199 Speaker 3: Sure, At Reclaim Finance, we love data. We focus more 136 00:09:32,320 --> 00:09:35,439 Speaker 3: on financial flows and less on the exposure of financial 137 00:09:35,480 --> 00:09:38,679 Speaker 3: institutions to fossil fuels because what they have in the 138 00:09:38,800 --> 00:09:42,400 Speaker 3: book is really the result of past financial services and 139 00:09:42,480 --> 00:09:44,560 Speaker 3: what is done is done. It cannot be changed. So 140 00:09:44,640 --> 00:09:46,960 Speaker 3: we are more interested in what we can do to 141 00:09:47,000 --> 00:09:51,480 Speaker 3: prevent banks from worsening the climate situation in the future. 142 00:09:51,640 --> 00:09:53,600 Speaker 3: And for that we have access to a lot of 143 00:09:53,600 --> 00:09:58,040 Speaker 3: financial data to track on a daily basis. What type 144 00:09:58,040 --> 00:10:02,000 Speaker 3: of financial services do the big banks provide to the 145 00:10:02,160 --> 00:10:07,880 Speaker 3: energy industry, and these provide, in our view, a very 146 00:10:07,920 --> 00:10:12,959 Speaker 3: fair image of the responsibility of banks in supporting climate change, 147 00:10:12,960 --> 00:10:18,960 Speaker 3: but also it allows us to identify new trend changes 148 00:10:19,240 --> 00:10:22,480 Speaker 3: in a way a bank is supportive of a specific sector. 149 00:10:22,920 --> 00:10:27,679 Speaker 3: For example, BNP Pariba publicly said that the bank abstained 150 00:10:27,760 --> 00:10:33,720 Speaker 3: from supporting conventional bonds in the lingas industry. We actually 151 00:10:33,760 --> 00:10:38,360 Speaker 3: identify this a year ago in their portfolio. It started 152 00:10:38,400 --> 00:10:42,200 Speaker 3: with a transaction for PP, a bond being issued by 153 00:10:42,320 --> 00:10:47,520 Speaker 3: BP in last twenty twenty three. BNP has been one 154 00:10:47,559 --> 00:10:50,520 Speaker 3: of the main banker of BP, so we were expecting the 155 00:10:50,520 --> 00:10:53,959 Speaker 3: bank to support this company. The banks didn't. Then there 156 00:10:54,040 --> 00:10:58,280 Speaker 3: was bond by or loan by ANY and banks didn't 157 00:10:58,280 --> 00:11:02,000 Speaker 3: support it neither. So we were wondering despite the five 158 00:11:02,080 --> 00:11:04,160 Speaker 3: being also one of the main bankers of ANY, so 159 00:11:04,200 --> 00:11:07,720 Speaker 3: we're wondering, that's interesting, something may be happening here, and 160 00:11:07,760 --> 00:11:12,240 Speaker 3: so we keep tracking the financial flows from BNP to 161 00:11:12,679 --> 00:11:16,079 Speaker 3: the awning as industry to figure out that really that 162 00:11:16,320 --> 00:11:20,880 Speaker 3: is something happening, and we add the conclusion recently with 163 00:11:21,000 --> 00:11:23,959 Speaker 3: the banks saying that it does abstain from this type 164 00:11:24,160 --> 00:11:27,480 Speaker 3: of transaction. So that's our way of working. We are 165 00:11:27,600 --> 00:11:31,240 Speaker 3: tracking on a daily basis what all financial transitions are doing. 166 00:11:31,679 --> 00:11:34,920 Speaker 3: And when we see such deals, it allows us to 167 00:11:34,960 --> 00:11:39,600 Speaker 3: go public about a specific bank having pledged to net zero, 168 00:11:39,920 --> 00:11:43,200 Speaker 3: having pledged to contribute to keep global warming at one 169 00:11:43,240 --> 00:11:48,079 Speaker 3: point five, yet keeping some financial services to direct for 170 00:11:48,200 --> 00:11:52,440 Speaker 3: the fuel projects or to companies that are still building 171 00:11:52,480 --> 00:11:57,839 Speaker 3: these projects, in contradiction with every IPCC report but also 172 00:11:57,880 --> 00:12:01,040 Speaker 3: with the projections of the International Energy Agency. 173 00:12:01,320 --> 00:12:01,560 Speaker 2: Right. 174 00:12:01,640 --> 00:12:03,280 Speaker 1: So the data is giving you a chance to be 175 00:12:03,320 --> 00:12:06,240 Speaker 1: able to hold these banks accountable and then sometimes you 176 00:12:06,320 --> 00:12:10,120 Speaker 1: do see banks change their behavior as a result. Can 177 00:12:10,160 --> 00:12:13,360 Speaker 1: you talk us through a few other success stories from 178 00:12:13,360 --> 00:12:17,320 Speaker 1: the work that you've done, where because of this push 179 00:12:17,440 --> 00:12:20,480 Speaker 1: to try and tell the world you know, here is 180 00:12:20,520 --> 00:12:23,439 Speaker 1: a promise that's made, but here's the reality, the bank 181 00:12:23,440 --> 00:12:25,040 Speaker 1: has then changed its behavior. 182 00:12:25,960 --> 00:12:28,440 Speaker 3: Yeah. I have a lot of examples. I started working 183 00:12:28,440 --> 00:12:32,440 Speaker 3: on banks ten years ago, so, and ten years ago 184 00:12:32,480 --> 00:12:35,480 Speaker 3: it was like really new as a topic. Like my 185 00:12:35,559 --> 00:12:39,800 Speaker 3: first campaign was against Society General, which was advising a 186 00:12:39,880 --> 00:12:42,640 Speaker 3: company for the development of a coal mine, a massive 187 00:12:42,679 --> 00:12:46,240 Speaker 3: coal wine in Australia, so Alpha Coal Projects, which was 188 00:12:46,280 --> 00:12:48,439 Speaker 3: not only a bad project for climate, but it was 189 00:12:48,480 --> 00:12:52,240 Speaker 3: also a bad project for biodiversity, considering the coal was 190 00:12:52,520 --> 00:12:56,400 Speaker 3: planned to be exported through the Great Berry Reef and 191 00:12:56,520 --> 00:13:00,280 Speaker 3: at that time climate was not on the agenda of 192 00:13:00,480 --> 00:13:04,360 Speaker 3: financial institutions. Coup twenty one had not happened yet, and 193 00:13:04,559 --> 00:13:08,079 Speaker 3: in France people didn't even know that coal was still 194 00:13:08,320 --> 00:13:11,800 Speaker 3: presented still a big share of the energy mix globally 195 00:13:12,120 --> 00:13:15,240 Speaker 3: because for French people, call was like the nineteenth century, 196 00:13:15,360 --> 00:13:19,600 Speaker 3: like Zola, So we had a lot of educations to 197 00:13:19,720 --> 00:13:23,360 Speaker 3: make and communication to make to teach people about the 198 00:13:23,600 --> 00:13:27,960 Speaker 3: reality that their money maybe was financing the development of 199 00:13:28,240 --> 00:13:31,800 Speaker 3: climate change, and it took us more than a year 200 00:13:31,880 --> 00:13:36,840 Speaker 3: to push Society General to withdrew from his mandate. Consequently, 201 00:13:37,040 --> 00:13:40,480 Speaker 3: the mind has never been developed, and we have a 202 00:13:40,520 --> 00:13:45,480 Speaker 3: couple of stories like that about how the public mobilization 203 00:13:45,840 --> 00:13:49,480 Speaker 3: had an impact and convinced some banks not to finance 204 00:13:49,520 --> 00:13:52,320 Speaker 3: specific projects because of their impact on climate. 205 00:13:58,400 --> 00:14:01,840 Speaker 1: After the break you see pushes beyond the limits of 206 00:14:01,920 --> 00:14:12,480 Speaker 1: corporate social responsibility. Like you, there are a number of 207 00:14:12,559 --> 00:14:16,800 Speaker 1: organizations around the world trying to do similar things. One 208 00:14:16,840 --> 00:14:20,600 Speaker 1: place where there has been perhaps the most success, is 209 00:14:20,680 --> 00:14:25,760 Speaker 1: to get these big financial institutions international ones to stop 210 00:14:25,800 --> 00:14:30,640 Speaker 1: financing coal. Now, the theory goes that As more and 211 00:14:30,720 --> 00:14:34,000 Speaker 1: more banks exit the financing of coal, the pool of 212 00:14:34,040 --> 00:14:38,680 Speaker 1: capital available for developing coal projects goes down, which means 213 00:14:38,760 --> 00:14:41,240 Speaker 1: the cost of capital, which is either interest rate or 214 00:14:41,280 --> 00:14:44,640 Speaker 1: some other form of payment that a company has to 215 00:14:44,720 --> 00:14:48,000 Speaker 1: make to build a coal project, goes up, and that 216 00:14:48,080 --> 00:14:53,080 Speaker 1: means it becomes less profitable versus already cheaper green technologies. 217 00:14:54,360 --> 00:14:56,760 Speaker 1: But if that's the case, and that is a success story, 218 00:14:57,280 --> 00:15:00,800 Speaker 1: then how come we hit a record level of coal 219 00:15:00,840 --> 00:15:03,760 Speaker 1: consumption in twenty twenty three and will likely hit another 220 00:15:03,840 --> 00:15:05,080 Speaker 1: record in twenty twenty four. 221 00:15:05,280 --> 00:15:09,000 Speaker 3: That's a very good question. It is true that the 222 00:15:09,080 --> 00:15:13,320 Speaker 3: adoption of coal policies or banks did have an impact. 223 00:15:13,400 --> 00:15:15,840 Speaker 3: It did have an impact on the companies that testified 224 00:15:15,880 --> 00:15:19,280 Speaker 3: that they have trouble accessing capital. And also there is 225 00:15:19,440 --> 00:15:23,880 Speaker 3: like a fantastic research by our Vard Business School which 226 00:15:24,560 --> 00:15:29,680 Speaker 3: demonstrated that companies that are exposed to banks exclusion policy 227 00:15:30,360 --> 00:15:34,560 Speaker 3: change of business faster than others, and that banks policy 228 00:15:34,600 --> 00:15:39,560 Speaker 3: can be associated with greenhouse gas emissions reductions because of 229 00:15:39,600 --> 00:15:44,560 Speaker 3: the closure of coal assets. So CaAl policies are effective, 230 00:15:45,040 --> 00:15:47,760 Speaker 3: but they need to be well made. And what we 231 00:15:47,960 --> 00:15:51,040 Speaker 3: know at Reclaim Finance and we are tracking hundreds of 232 00:15:51,080 --> 00:15:54,600 Speaker 3: policies adopted by financial institutions and fossil fuels. Is that 233 00:15:54,880 --> 00:15:59,400 Speaker 3: for coal we have hundreds and hundreds of policies, but 234 00:15:59,520 --> 00:16:03,440 Speaker 3: they are not all as good as the others. We 235 00:16:03,560 --> 00:16:06,400 Speaker 3: got a lot of policies that are really weak, that 236 00:16:06,480 --> 00:16:10,720 Speaker 3: are more like window dracing, and we got around less 237 00:16:10,720 --> 00:16:14,840 Speaker 3: than one hundred policies. It's more round fifty policy that 238 00:16:15,240 --> 00:16:19,600 Speaker 3: stop the expansion of new coal. So the policies are 239 00:16:19,640 --> 00:16:22,840 Speaker 3: not all good enough. They deal have an impact, but 240 00:16:22,880 --> 00:16:25,960 Speaker 3: they are not good enough. Secondly, and we will have 241 00:16:26,040 --> 00:16:29,640 Speaker 3: the same issue with the awning as industry in general, 242 00:16:29,960 --> 00:16:34,920 Speaker 3: that private financial institutions are not the only maker in 243 00:16:34,960 --> 00:16:38,880 Speaker 3: this story. We also need to think about public subsidies 244 00:16:39,280 --> 00:16:44,080 Speaker 3: and all the regulations that keep the fossil fuel industry afloat, 245 00:16:44,680 --> 00:16:47,960 Speaker 3: especially if you go to Indonesia, for example, where the 246 00:16:48,040 --> 00:16:51,280 Speaker 3: average year for a coal plant might be thirteen years. 247 00:16:51,840 --> 00:16:56,280 Speaker 3: So these coal plants on a macroeconomic stand they are 248 00:16:56,520 --> 00:17:03,440 Speaker 3: more expensive to operate than developing new renewable capacity. But 249 00:17:03,520 --> 00:17:06,280 Speaker 3: if you take only one of these plants, it's very 250 00:17:06,359 --> 00:17:10,280 Speaker 3: valuable for the company operating it that sign a purchase 251 00:17:10,359 --> 00:17:15,000 Speaker 3: power agreement with a power purchase agreement with the government. 252 00:17:15,800 --> 00:17:18,879 Speaker 3: So it's profitable for the OPEOO, it doesn't mean it 253 00:17:18,920 --> 00:17:23,600 Speaker 3: doesn't cost more for society. So if we really want 254 00:17:23,640 --> 00:17:27,119 Speaker 3: to transition out of fossil fuels we need to tackle 255 00:17:27,240 --> 00:17:30,960 Speaker 3: not only private financial institutions flows, we also need to 256 00:17:31,080 --> 00:17:34,560 Speaker 3: tackle public support. We need to stop to tackle the 257 00:17:34,560 --> 00:17:38,320 Speaker 3: world regulation. And this is why at Reclaim Finance we 258 00:17:38,400 --> 00:17:43,600 Speaker 3: pay particular attention to some regulation. For example, what's the 259 00:17:43,680 --> 00:17:48,320 Speaker 3: role of central banks. Central banks could help redirecting money 260 00:17:48,440 --> 00:17:52,919 Speaker 3: to the right place. For example, we believe that indiscriminately 261 00:17:53,000 --> 00:17:58,399 Speaker 3: raising interirace rates does harm investment into like capex and 262 00:17:58,480 --> 00:18:01,680 Speaker 3: low opex renewer and clean energies. 263 00:18:01,400 --> 00:18:04,600 Speaker 1: Right because the upfront cost of building a solar plant 264 00:18:04,720 --> 00:18:07,600 Speaker 1: and one farm is high at the start, but over 265 00:18:07,680 --> 00:18:11,280 Speaker 1: its lifetime of operations it's lower than for a fossil 266 00:18:11,320 --> 00:18:13,040 Speaker 1: fuel power plant exactly. 267 00:18:13,200 --> 00:18:17,160 Speaker 3: So it should be very important if central banks keep 268 00:18:17,240 --> 00:18:22,160 Speaker 3: increasing the interest rate that they differentiate between green investment 269 00:18:22,720 --> 00:18:27,680 Speaker 3: and pouring investment. They should keep them low for green 270 00:18:27,760 --> 00:18:33,200 Speaker 3: investment to incentive banks to drive more capital to this sector, 271 00:18:33,880 --> 00:18:36,720 Speaker 3: and on the other rays, they would need to make 272 00:18:36,760 --> 00:18:42,600 Speaker 3: them high to these incentive banks from supporting polling sectors, 273 00:18:42,600 --> 00:18:43,840 Speaker 3: including fossil fuels. 274 00:18:44,119 --> 00:18:47,800 Speaker 1: Yeah, so if I'm hearing you right, you're saying that 275 00:18:48,200 --> 00:18:52,000 Speaker 1: coal policies, they are varied and they can mean different things. 276 00:18:52,600 --> 00:18:57,439 Speaker 1: But if those policies hadn't existed, then the peak of 277 00:18:57,520 --> 00:18:59,680 Speaker 1: coal could have been even higher. So there has been 278 00:18:59,760 --> 00:19:03,320 Speaker 1: some reduction because of the work that you've done, but 279 00:19:03,680 --> 00:19:07,920 Speaker 1: obviously it's not enough. What I do find interesting, though, 280 00:19:07,960 --> 00:19:10,200 Speaker 1: is that there are many actors now trying to get 281 00:19:10,280 --> 00:19:13,880 Speaker 1: financial institutions to back off from financing. There are activists 282 00:19:13,880 --> 00:19:16,399 Speaker 1: who will go and glue themselves to banks. There are 283 00:19:16,400 --> 00:19:18,600 Speaker 1: people who will make a noise outside the bank, not 284 00:19:18,840 --> 00:19:23,000 Speaker 1: do any disruptive activity. Then there are people who will 285 00:19:23,040 --> 00:19:25,600 Speaker 1: go and talk to regulators about pressuring banks to do 286 00:19:25,640 --> 00:19:29,399 Speaker 1: the right thing. You are at Reclaim Finance sort of 287 00:19:29,520 --> 00:19:32,280 Speaker 1: inside the system. You are tracking them, but you're also 288 00:19:32,359 --> 00:19:35,040 Speaker 1: talking to the people inside the bank and explaining to 289 00:19:35,080 --> 00:19:38,720 Speaker 1: them why what you're doing matters and how it might 290 00:19:38,800 --> 00:19:41,040 Speaker 1: be something that they have to think about in the future. 291 00:19:42,000 --> 00:19:46,040 Speaker 1: You join shareholder conferences, you ask questions of banks when 292 00:19:46,440 --> 00:19:49,320 Speaker 1: they come up with a policy and it's not clear enough. 293 00:19:49,880 --> 00:19:53,679 Speaker 1: You're also getting to know the bank employees. And you 294 00:19:53,760 --> 00:19:56,240 Speaker 1: told me when we met last time in Paris, that 295 00:19:56,640 --> 00:20:00,680 Speaker 1: sometimes you find these bank employees aren't able to make 296 00:20:00,720 --> 00:20:03,040 Speaker 1: the change from the inside, so they come and join 297 00:20:03,080 --> 00:20:05,680 Speaker 1: Reclaim Finance or they go and join the regulator. You 298 00:20:05,800 --> 00:20:08,600 Speaker 1: talked me through some of these stories and how this 299 00:20:08,800 --> 00:20:11,040 Speaker 1: is over the past ten years of your work had 300 00:20:11,080 --> 00:20:11,640 Speaker 1: an impact. 301 00:20:12,600 --> 00:20:16,680 Speaker 3: So there's several things in your question. So we need 302 00:20:16,720 --> 00:20:21,879 Speaker 3: people who talk to us who understand the specificities of 303 00:20:22,080 --> 00:20:24,479 Speaker 3: who are the companies that needs to go, which are 304 00:20:24,560 --> 00:20:28,000 Speaker 3: the companies that can be supported in that transition, what 305 00:20:28,080 --> 00:20:31,960 Speaker 3: type of financial services needs to be adapted in this context, 306 00:20:32,600 --> 00:20:36,439 Speaker 3: and this change depending whether you are a bank on 307 00:20:36,560 --> 00:20:39,600 Speaker 3: intro and an investors. So our job as Reclaim Finances 308 00:20:39,680 --> 00:20:42,480 Speaker 3: to talk to these people to make sure that they 309 00:20:42,560 --> 00:20:49,479 Speaker 3: are fully equipped to adopt good policies. What we need 310 00:20:49,520 --> 00:20:54,120 Speaker 3: to understand is that the people we try to identify 311 00:20:54,359 --> 00:20:58,760 Speaker 3: with whom we can work with internality, they're not necessarily 312 00:20:58,760 --> 00:21:02,040 Speaker 3: convinced about the importance of fighting climate change. 313 00:21:04,160 --> 00:21:04,600 Speaker 1: We need to. 314 00:21:04,640 --> 00:21:08,520 Speaker 3: Understand that before the CSR department was really the last 315 00:21:08,520 --> 00:21:12,760 Speaker 3: office at the bottom of the corridor, with no importance 316 00:21:12,840 --> 00:21:15,359 Speaker 3: and no weight in a bank. Today's not the case, 317 00:21:15,359 --> 00:21:18,280 Speaker 3: and people are being hired to make change happen internally, 318 00:21:18,560 --> 00:21:21,360 Speaker 3: so they are in a complicated situation where they are 319 00:21:21,520 --> 00:21:23,920 Speaker 3: asked to make this change happen, and they are asked 320 00:21:23,960 --> 00:21:28,560 Speaker 3: also to manage reputational risk and protect the brand of 321 00:21:28,640 --> 00:21:31,280 Speaker 3: the banks the walkway, So they need to make sure 322 00:21:31,359 --> 00:21:34,360 Speaker 3: that people like me don't make too much damage publicly. 323 00:21:34,720 --> 00:21:36,879 Speaker 3: But at the same time they also have to listen 324 00:21:36,920 --> 00:21:42,480 Speaker 3: to me to also feed the discussion about sustainability inside 325 00:21:42,480 --> 00:21:46,000 Speaker 3: the financial institutions. It doesn't necessarily mean that people are 326 00:21:46,160 --> 00:21:48,960 Speaker 3: going to listen to them. It is part of their 327 00:21:49,040 --> 00:21:53,320 Speaker 3: job now if they decide to take on board one 328 00:21:53,320 --> 00:21:56,480 Speaker 3: of the issues represent to them, it's not necessarily because 329 00:21:56,480 --> 00:22:01,000 Speaker 3: they think it's important to act against climate change. They 330 00:22:01,080 --> 00:22:03,320 Speaker 3: might do it only because it's what they are paid for. 331 00:22:03,840 --> 00:22:06,160 Speaker 3: They might do it because they are ambitious. They might 332 00:22:06,200 --> 00:22:08,840 Speaker 3: do it because they want to say, this is a policy. 333 00:22:08,880 --> 00:22:12,600 Speaker 3: I made it up, I made it happen. So my 334 00:22:12,840 --> 00:22:17,320 Speaker 3: job is also to identified what are the different motivations 335 00:22:17,320 --> 00:22:21,679 Speaker 3: of the people I took to to play with this 336 00:22:21,800 --> 00:22:25,920 Speaker 3: motivation to push them to act, and I prefer them 337 00:22:26,000 --> 00:22:29,560 Speaker 3: to be convinced that it's important. But I can also 338 00:22:30,119 --> 00:22:31,000 Speaker 3: work without that. 339 00:22:31,280 --> 00:22:35,280 Speaker 1: Right and the CSR Department, the Corporate Social Responsibility Department, 340 00:22:35,480 --> 00:22:38,560 Speaker 1: was really a branding exercise to ensure just that the 341 00:22:38,640 --> 00:22:41,760 Speaker 1: reputation of the company is protected. But you're right, this 342 00:22:41,840 --> 00:22:44,520 Speaker 1: is not just true in financial institutions. It's also true 343 00:22:44,560 --> 00:22:48,760 Speaker 1: in major corporations that now because of pressure is coming 344 00:22:48,760 --> 00:22:53,359 Speaker 1: from many different directions, from investors, from governments, from people, 345 00:22:53,400 --> 00:22:56,800 Speaker 1: if they have customers. There is now a push not 346 00:22:56,920 --> 00:23:00,000 Speaker 1: just to have a reputational push to try and be green, 347 00:23:00,640 --> 00:23:03,720 Speaker 1: but a real push to try and be green because 348 00:23:03,760 --> 00:23:06,280 Speaker 1: there are other pressure points acting on the system. 349 00:23:07,480 --> 00:23:11,199 Speaker 3: Definitely, and this is why you're sorry. Also, try to 350 00:23:11,280 --> 00:23:17,800 Speaker 3: mobilize as many stakeholders as possible, cities, companies, employees that 351 00:23:18,040 --> 00:23:22,280 Speaker 3: can also collectively take a stent to change not only 352 00:23:22,400 --> 00:23:25,159 Speaker 3: likes a few thousands of a few hundred books that 353 00:23:25,280 --> 00:23:28,600 Speaker 3: a on on the own bank account, but to change 354 00:23:28,600 --> 00:23:30,800 Speaker 3: really like big digits. 355 00:23:32,160 --> 00:23:34,840 Speaker 1: But despite all this progress, you know, you talked about 356 00:23:34,880 --> 00:23:38,159 Speaker 1: Cop twenty six in Glasgow and how banks committed to 357 00:23:38,240 --> 00:23:42,359 Speaker 1: try and get to net zero. Then we've seen the 358 00:23:42,640 --> 00:23:45,320 Speaker 1: invasion from Ukraine as you mentioned, and how that's been 359 00:23:45,440 --> 00:23:48,520 Speaker 1: used by fossil fuel companies but also the banks that 360 00:23:48,560 --> 00:23:51,480 Speaker 1: finance them. As a way to slow down this transition. 361 00:23:52,520 --> 00:23:57,280 Speaker 1: Then there's been political attack on ESG environmental social governance 362 00:23:57,320 --> 00:24:01,000 Speaker 1: in the US which has forced other financial institutions to 363 00:24:01,040 --> 00:24:03,479 Speaker 1: reverse their stunts. So, if you were to look at 364 00:24:03,520 --> 00:24:08,359 Speaker 1: the endgame, which is to start banks from financing fossil fuels, 365 00:24:09,040 --> 00:24:11,520 Speaker 1: do you think that's feasible and if so, how does 366 00:24:11,520 --> 00:24:12,040 Speaker 1: that play out? 367 00:24:13,200 --> 00:24:15,960 Speaker 3: I do think it's feasible if we do a knowledge 368 00:24:15,960 --> 00:24:18,479 Speaker 3: that there is no transition to be expected from the 369 00:24:18,480 --> 00:24:21,040 Speaker 3: oling gas industry. When I say oling gas industry, are 370 00:24:21,040 --> 00:24:26,080 Speaker 3: really mean the upstream industry industries are the corduct extracting 371 00:24:26,200 --> 00:24:29,960 Speaker 3: fox sale fuels. And I think we got that very 372 00:24:30,000 --> 00:24:33,720 Speaker 3: clear is on the letters changes even coming from the 373 00:24:33,800 --> 00:24:38,560 Speaker 3: oling gas major in Europe that were display These companies 374 00:24:38,560 --> 00:24:41,880 Speaker 3: were displayed as the best in class company, the companies 375 00:24:41,880 --> 00:24:45,360 Speaker 3: that were building the transition investing in local on activities. 376 00:24:45,720 --> 00:24:49,399 Speaker 3: But in the past months, Shell, BP and Total Energy 377 00:24:49,600 --> 00:24:53,440 Speaker 3: all backtracked on the climate commitments, the increase the forsificial 378 00:24:53,520 --> 00:24:58,040 Speaker 3: production projections, and they still invest like a tiny share 379 00:24:58,119 --> 00:25:02,480 Speaker 3: of their capex into local activities. So, and I think 380 00:25:02,520 --> 00:25:05,880 Speaker 3: the financial industry is realizing that we see a lot 381 00:25:05,920 --> 00:25:10,040 Speaker 3: and lot many more investors, starting with pension funds divesting 382 00:25:10,080 --> 00:25:13,760 Speaker 3: fully from the industry. We see the banks like BNP saying, 383 00:25:13,840 --> 00:25:18,720 Speaker 3: like undedicated bonds, I'm not gonna do that anymore because 384 00:25:18,760 --> 00:25:24,080 Speaker 3: i know it's only worsening the situation. However, what is 385 00:25:24,280 --> 00:25:28,320 Speaker 3: problematic is that on THG trend has been slowing down action, 386 00:25:28,520 --> 00:25:33,800 Speaker 3: which actually increase the need for regulation. But what worries 387 00:25:33,880 --> 00:25:37,720 Speaker 3: me that we are not in the situation Like after 388 00:25:39,040 --> 00:25:43,600 Speaker 3: Trump's election in twenty seventeen, the industry took a stand 389 00:25:43,920 --> 00:25:47,600 Speaker 3: to say it's non negotiable. The Paris Agreement is going 390 00:25:47,680 --> 00:25:51,199 Speaker 3: to be kept. We are mobilized collectively behind it. Today 391 00:25:51,240 --> 00:25:54,439 Speaker 3: we see a lot of financial institutions and others that 392 00:25:54,520 --> 00:25:57,760 Speaker 3: are saying that their concerned and worried about this on 393 00:25:57,840 --> 00:25:59,960 Speaker 3: TG trend, but none of them is taking a star 394 00:26:00,080 --> 00:26:02,440 Speaker 3: and to say I remain commedity to one point five 395 00:26:02,520 --> 00:26:04,440 Speaker 3: and it's non negotiable. 396 00:26:04,200 --> 00:26:06,760 Speaker 1: And there is a chance that Trump does get elected 397 00:26:06,800 --> 00:26:08,200 Speaker 1: and then comes to power next. 398 00:26:08,080 --> 00:26:11,919 Speaker 3: Year exactly, so that's really worried. We hope that it 399 00:26:11,960 --> 00:26:14,320 Speaker 3: might be actually a wake up call for some financial 400 00:26:14,359 --> 00:26:16,959 Speaker 3: institutions that really realize, like we need to do it. 401 00:26:17,440 --> 00:26:20,480 Speaker 3: If not, nobody will do it. But here we see 402 00:26:20,480 --> 00:26:24,040 Speaker 3: a clear divisions between what's happening in the EU and 403 00:26:24,320 --> 00:26:27,919 Speaker 3: in the US. Like in the EU, financial transtitions know 404 00:26:28,040 --> 00:26:30,920 Speaker 3: that change isn't available. Inavailable, they will need to change. 405 00:26:30,920 --> 00:26:34,399 Speaker 3: The question is how the question is when in the 406 00:26:34,600 --> 00:26:39,000 Speaker 3: US they still think it might be okay, that it's 407 00:26:39,040 --> 00:26:44,760 Speaker 3: something optional, which is obviously scientifically not optional. But that's 408 00:26:44,880 --> 00:26:48,240 Speaker 3: rories me like that. The financial sector in North America 409 00:26:48,520 --> 00:26:51,720 Speaker 3: is really really far behind, not on in terms of actions, 410 00:26:51,760 --> 00:26:54,600 Speaker 3: but also in terms of understanding of what we are facing. 411 00:26:54,960 --> 00:26:57,120 Speaker 1: So you've got a big job on your hand. 412 00:26:57,240 --> 00:27:07,480 Speaker 4: Good luck, thank you, thank you for listening to Zero. 413 00:27:08,240 --> 00:27:10,000 Speaker 4: And now for the sound of the week. 414 00:27:22,040 --> 00:27:25,440 Speaker 1: That is the sweet, sweet sound of money coming out 415 00:27:25,520 --> 00:27:28,280 Speaker 1: from an ATM or a cash machine. The counting of 416 00:27:28,320 --> 00:27:30,680 Speaker 1: those notes is done by the use of a beam 417 00:27:30,720 --> 00:27:34,680 Speaker 1: of light and a sensor that sees how many times 418 00:27:34,800 --> 00:27:39,360 Speaker 1: a passing note blocks it. If you liked this episode, 419 00:27:39,400 --> 00:27:41,520 Speaker 1: please take a moment to rate and review the show 420 00:27:41,520 --> 00:27:45,000 Speaker 1: on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Share this episode with a 421 00:27:45,040 --> 00:27:48,399 Speaker 1: friend or with a bank teller. You can get in 422 00:27:48,440 --> 00:27:52,440 Speaker 1: touch at zero pod at Bloomberg dot Net. Zero's producer 423 00:27:52,560 --> 00:27:56,240 Speaker 1: is Mike Lee. Roud. Bloomberg's head of podcast is Sage 424 00:27:56,240 --> 00:28:00,400 Speaker 1: Bauman and head of Talk is Brendan Newnan. Our theme 425 00:28:00,480 --> 00:28:03,480 Speaker 1: music is composed by Wondering. Special thanks to keer up 426 00:28:03,520 --> 00:28:08,600 Speaker 1: Beyindraim Matthew Griffin, Natasha White and Alastair marsh I am 427 00:28:08,600 --> 00:28:10,159 Speaker 1: Akshatrati I'm back, so