WEBVTT - Tesla's Slower Growth Rate and ServiceNow's Strong Results

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.560
<v Speaker 1>From the heart where innovation, money and power.

0:00:04.680 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Collie in Silicon Valley, NBN.

0:00:07.400 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 4>I'm Caroline Heidel Bloomberg's world headquarters in New York.

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Ed Ludlow in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:33.560
<v Speaker 5>Coming up full. Earning's coverage ahead.

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 4>Tesla shares they slum after warning about a notably slower

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 4>growth rate.

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 5>Details ahead, Plus.

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:42.600
<v Speaker 1>We stick with earnings and sit down with the CFO

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 1>of service now as the company hits a record high

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>on strong results.

0:00:46.720 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 4>And Microsoft cunning nearly two thousand jobs in its gaming division,

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 4>including Activision, will bring in the latest as the tech giant,

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 4>slash is eight percent of its video game workforce, with

0:00:55.200 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 4>key personnel leaving well a.

0:00:57.520 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 2>Pretty ferocious news cycle.

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Intel is out with Ernie after the bell, but a

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>deal announced this morning with UMC, the Taiwanese chip maker. Basically,

0:01:06.120 --> 0:01:10.760
<v Speaker 1>UMC gets access to twelve nanometer technology. On the manufacturing side, Intel,

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:15.040
<v Speaker 1>in the context of its Arizona facilities, gets utilization of

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>some prior gen hardware. This is a great win for

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 1>onshoring manufacturing capacity in the US. You think the commerce

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 1>department is pretty happy about it. We will look into

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>that deal for Intel's foundry business later in the program.

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:29.480
<v Speaker 2>IBM up twelve percent.

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Touching a ten year high after a strong outlook in

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:37.039
<v Speaker 1>the sales context. They're warning about some workforce reduction, but

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the market likes the outlook on the enterprise side from IBM.

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:43.600
<v Speaker 1>And then there's Microsoft up nine tens one percent, cutting

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 1>nineteen hundred jobs at both Activision and Xbox units. This

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 1>happens though in M and A, doesn't it. Sometimes. We

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 1>will go to Jason Schreier, our video games correspondent later

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 1>in the program to really understand what's happening with Microsoft Activision.

0:01:56.840 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 2>There is one single name the world's.

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Paying attention to today, and that is Tesla. Tesla is

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 1>down significantly more than ten percent on an inch dai

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:08.639
<v Speaker 1>basis biggest drop since October. If it closes down now

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 1>eleven and a half percent, that will be the biggest

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 1>drop in more than a year. It's trading at its

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 1>lowest level since May. Why, well, the market is zeroed

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 1>in on the guidance Tessa gave that production or output

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:23.920
<v Speaker 1>growth in twenty twenty four will be significantly lower than

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:25.680
<v Speaker 1>it was in twenty twenty three, and at the same

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:29.639
<v Speaker 1>time they dropped this pretty long standing guidance of fifty

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 1>percent compound annual average growth, which goes all the way

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:35.800
<v Speaker 1>back to the end of twenty twenty. Now, within that,

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:39.519
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of optimism about AI, about Optimus, the

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 1>robot FSD, and Elon Mask's role within the company, a

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 1>lot to digest. Let's break it down with Tasha Kini,

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>director of Investment Analysis in Institutional Strategies at ARC Invests,

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>and Loatasha, I know you're super bullish on this name.

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's focus on what the market's looking at in the

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 1>first instance, which is a next generation EV platform is coming.

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>We're coming out the back of the Model.

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 2>Three and why era.

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:09.799
<v Speaker 1>So output will be less in twenty twenty four from

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 1>a growth perspective.

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:12.239
<v Speaker 2>Does that worry you?

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, well you said it.

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 7>You know, we're really focused on the long term here

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 7>at ARC invest which really you should be for a

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 7>disruptive name like Tesla. So you know they did mention, yes,

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 7>production growth for this coming year will be slower. You know,

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 7>they are focused on this next generation vehicle platform and

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 7>they're they're attributing you know, the part of the cautiousness

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 7>on production to that and overall that's a great thing, right,

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:43.839
<v Speaker 7>you know as well as anyone that I'm excited about

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 7>the robotaxi opportunity. So the fact that they're building a

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 7>custom robotaxi vehicle is really exciting and shows their confidence

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 7>and their autonomous capability. You know, we have FSD twelve,

0:03:56.200 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 7>their latest version of the autonomous technology software in the

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 7>car rolling out to customers. That again shows confidence and

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 7>their capability. We also heard that Optimists might begin shipping

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 7>next year, So I think, you know, Tesla is this

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 7>behemoth in the AI space. It's going to be one

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 7>of the greatest AI opportunities of our time, and I

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:20.159
<v Speaker 7>think to ignore that is frankly wrong when thinking about

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 7>the stock.

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:21.600
<v Speaker 6>So I'm excited about it.

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, the next gen vehicle platform joins the traditional car

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 1>making side of the story with the AI story, right,

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:31.600
<v Speaker 1>what did we learn? Must say it will be low cost,

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 1>that they're making progress on start of production, which will

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:37.720
<v Speaker 1>start in Texas in the first instance. But he said

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:40.599
<v Speaker 1>take twenty twenty five with a grain of salt. Did

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 1>you learn enough during the call about the next gen

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>platform to fully understand where we go from here on

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:48.799
<v Speaker 1>this future ROBOTAXI concept.

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 6>Yes, well, I'd say.

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 7>You know, overall, I think Elon is a lot more

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 7>cautious than he has been in the past with his forecast.

0:04:57.080 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 7>I mean he said it on the call that he

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 7>has been really optimistic with timelines, and honestly, who can

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 7>blame them, because I think humans in general are pretty

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 7>bad at predicting AI progress. But yes, we heard that

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 7>they can start production next year on the next generation

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:13.279
<v Speaker 7>vehicle platform. You know, I think there's a lot of

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:15.839
<v Speaker 7>cause for optimism, and what they said around margins, so

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 7>we saw automotive gross margins X credits tick up.

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 6>In the quarter.

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 7>You know, we did hear that one they're they're cutting

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 7>costs on a per car basis in a way that's

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:29.040
<v Speaker 7>really unprecedented in the auto industry.

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 6>And they also said.

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 7>That even though you know, on their current vehicle platform

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 7>they're sort of reaching the limits of that cost reduction,

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:38.720
<v Speaker 7>that doesn't mean that they're done right. So we heard

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 7>on the design side, you know, it's commodity prices that

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 7>flows through to.

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 6>The underlying costs of the vehicle. That takes some time.

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 7>So there's still optimismism there, and I think that's amazing.

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 7>I mean, when you look at EV's as a whole,

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 7>traditional automakers are cutting back on their electric vehicle platforms.

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:57.840
<v Speaker 7>I mean that's a bad idea because evs are already

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 7>cost competitive with guess power cars us what, it's.

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 6>Only going to get cheaper. So this is the future

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 6>and Tesla is the leader there your models.

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 4>I mean the last time it was updated, you had

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 4>an expected value for share of two thousand dollars in

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 4>Tesla by twenty twenty seven, predicated on the idea of

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 4>this robotaxi venture on the bull and the bear case.

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:20.280
<v Speaker 4>Where do you stand right now when he is saying

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:22.360
<v Speaker 4>take twenty twenty five with a grain of salt, how

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:26.600
<v Speaker 4>much do you think we will see robotaxis become in use,

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 4>in place, revenue generating by twenty twenty seven.

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:35.040
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, So you know, we're currently updating our model lookout

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:37.040
<v Speaker 7>for let's say, over the next few months, and updated

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:39.599
<v Speaker 7>price target for a master for twenty twenty eight. And

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 7>actually our big ideas deck or annual research presentation on

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:45.159
<v Speaker 7>you know, the technologies that we cover as a whole

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 7>is coming out soon, so that'll give you a little preview.

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 7>But I'd say overall, you know we are on economy, right,

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 7>you think about it in the five year term, So

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:57.279
<v Speaker 7>could they be late a few quarters?

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:01.599
<v Speaker 6>Absolutely? And again humans are bad at predicting AI, right.

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 7>I could have told you comfortably the night before CHATCHBT

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 7>came out and was released to the world the chatbots

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 7>weren't that good.

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:08.920
<v Speaker 6>But guess what had changed overnight?

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 7>And we already see from players like Waimo that robotaxies

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 7>are possible. We actually already see from Tesla that robotaxes

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 7>are possible because you can watch the consumer videos online

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 7>that show people that have virtually no interventions than full point.

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 6>To point rides.

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 7>So it's just a matter of when and do I

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 7>think that'll happen in the next five years? Yeah, And

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 7>I think we've heard again some of the confidence in

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 7>f SD twelve, which is an important milestone for them

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 7>in making the road to full economy.

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 4>On the call, Patasha, your thesis, an ARCS thesis on

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 4>the bet of Tesla is that it is inextricably linked

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 4>with AI, with robotics. Yet we hear Elmask threatening to

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 4>take those two key things that innovation elsewhere if he

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 4>doesn't get the twenty five percent votings control that he

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 4>wants in the company.

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 5>Are you worried by that threat?

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 7>I think that's really overblown the fear about that. I mean, one,

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 7>we are very happy to have. Elon must be incentivized

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 7>to change the world. I mean, this man is clearly

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 7>capable of amazing things when it comes to robotics and AI,

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 7>so we want his incentives to be aligned with the

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 7>future of Tesla. Also, you know, Tesla's been investing in

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 7>this for you know, the past decade or so.

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:23.680
<v Speaker 6>They are years ahead of the competition when it comes

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 6>to AI.

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 7>To give you an example, currently Tesla vehicles are able

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 7>to access over two million miles per day driven in

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 7>full self driving from customers. So that's very important training

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 7>data that you need to make a fully autonomous car.

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 7>You know, way mow in the course of the lifetime

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:47.439
<v Speaker 7>of the project as single digit millions worth of driving data.

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 7>So this is you know, Tesla is so much further

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:53.839
<v Speaker 7>ahead when it comes to scale on a I already

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 7>and again I'm really excited for this coming year.

0:08:58.160 --> 0:08:58.719
<v Speaker 6>Optimists.

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:01.559
<v Speaker 7>We think could be you know, general purpose robots could

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 7>be roughly a tenillion dollar mark market alone in manufacturing.

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 6>Even more, when you look to, say like household tasks,

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:11.560
<v Speaker 6>which could be further down the line. So there's so

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 6>many exciting things ahead for Tesla.

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 7>So I think the focus on you know, demand production

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 7>in the short term is really just that at its

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 7>short term focus when you want to be long term focused.

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 4>With this name, Tasha KINI still saying vilishly thank you,

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:27.319
<v Speaker 4>director of Investment Analysis and Institutional Strategies at ARC invest.

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 5>Meanwhile, we're just talking about it.

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 4>How Musk is pretty much persisting with his pursuit of

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 4>a bigger controlling stake in Tesla, wanting the board to

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 4>approve of an increase of twenty five percent holding from

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 4>the thirteen percent he currently has. Of course, he is

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 4>threatening that without it, Hilbill is ai and robotics products elsewhere.

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:45.320
<v Speaker 4>During the earnings call on Wednesday, he said that with

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:48.200
<v Speaker 4>so little influence at the company at this stage, I

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 4>could be voted out by some random shareholder advisory firm.

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 5>I think about whether.

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:54.839
<v Speaker 4>He could be voted out, whether he should be voted out,

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:57.320
<v Speaker 4>and indeed what is holding should be with kristenhal founder

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 4>and CEO of Near Impact Capital, is a social impact

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 4>fund that's owned about two n eighty two thousand dollars

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:05.439
<v Speaker 4>of Testa stock as on mid year, and has waged

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 4>pressure campaigns against the company for years, including via shareholder resolutions.

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 5>So, Kristin, we know the era with which you come.

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:13.840
<v Speaker 4>In fact, the last time you joined the show, it

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 4>was surrounding the anti Semitic controversy surrounding and Lamask and

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 4>you said, he's got to go.

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 5>What do you think of him?

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:23.200
<v Speaker 4>One and twenty five percent control of the company?

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:23.680
<v Speaker 5>Carline.

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 8>Thanks for having me today. This is such an interesting

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:30.560
<v Speaker 8>and of course complicated CEO. So when we were talking

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 8>about anti semitism, there just isn't any room in corporate

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:36.439
<v Speaker 8>America anywhere for those types of comments, and so that's

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:39.719
<v Speaker 8>where that was coming from. Of course, this CEO is

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 8>very unique both on the innovation, the ability to step

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 8>outside the box and completely go against the status quo,

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 8>and in lots of ways that's really important. That's really

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:53.080
<v Speaker 8>you know, he's not tied to how we've done things

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 8>in the past, and he wants to do things differently

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:59.320
<v Speaker 8>where we're cautious are some of these inflammatory statements. So

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:04.080
<v Speaker 8>he wants twenty five percent ownership, and yet you know

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 8>he had almost that, He's had almost that in the past.

0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 8>I think he's down to about thirteen percent now, having

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:14.079
<v Speaker 8>used some of that money to purchase X And so

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:16.720
<v Speaker 8>what do we mean about incentives. I'd say we're also

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 8>very much in agreement that we want the CEO to

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 8>have incentives for the long term of the company. And

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 8>yet money isn't an incentive to the world's richest man.

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 8>So having those voting rights is going to be really interesting.

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:32.960
<v Speaker 8>He did make some comments in the earnings call yesterday

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 8>about ISS and Glass Lewis. They do make recommendations about

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 8>and many of the institutional investors follow those recommendations as

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 8>far as voting rights, and so we like to have

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:49.200
<v Speaker 8>some of these recommendations coming out so that we can

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 8>rein in a CEO who may need that from time

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 8>to time.

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 2>Kristin.

0:11:54.040 --> 0:11:56.840
<v Speaker 1>What mus said about ISS was that his nickname for

0:11:56.880 --> 0:12:00.960
<v Speaker 1>them was Isis, which clearly is an inflammatory comment. I

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:03.479
<v Speaker 1>know that our audience just want to understand the basics

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:09.720
<v Speaker 1>here from impact investors like NIA on their rationale, right,

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:12.960
<v Speaker 1>if there are many that just say Elon Musk says

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:16.319
<v Speaker 1>things that upset people, he says things that are controversial,

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 1>but at the same time, over a ten year period,

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 1>he has grown Teslas to be the clear market incumbent

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:27.320
<v Speaker 1>in evs. He's changed the game for space technology and

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:29.840
<v Speaker 1>mankind's ability to get to lower orbit.

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 2>Excuse my voice, So.

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 1>How important to you is that you kind of get

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 1>some result here without offsetting you know what? Is quite

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 1>clearly a capable leader.

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 8>And thanks so much for that question. So capable leader

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 8>that I would say that's up for grabs. He's certainly

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:52.960
<v Speaker 8>leading quite a few, and of course he's leading in

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 8>the AI and we actually were really interested in that

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 8>battery play and he's shown that that's a really important

0:12:58.520 --> 0:12:59.959
<v Speaker 8>part of what they want to roll out both into

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:03.839
<v Speaker 8>twenty twenty four, twenty five and beyond. Where we have

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 8>questions and concerns are some of his statements. And so

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:13.080
<v Speaker 8>comparing ISS, which is Institutional Shareholder Services, to ISIS, that's

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:16.120
<v Speaker 8>inflammatory and it doesn't even make any sense. This is

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 8>a group that puts out proxy recommendations based on what

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:23.560
<v Speaker 8>they believe is good for the long term of company.

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:28.840
<v Speaker 8>They have nothing to do with ISIS, so that that's problematic.

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 8>He's also made some comments recently about DEI diversity equity

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 8>inclusion that really do cause concerns, particularly because we need

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 8>Tesla to be to have a really strong brand, both

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:47.559
<v Speaker 8>for the consumer side, because people need to be feel

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 8>really strong and great about purchasing and driving that car

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:57.079
<v Speaker 8>using that battery, also the solar for rooving. And what

0:13:57.120 --> 0:14:00.680
<v Speaker 8>we're concerned about is his ability to attract retained top

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:03.960
<v Speaker 8>talent if people don't see a place for them within

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 8>this innovation.

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Kristen Hall, near Impact Capital, we're grateful for your

0:14:08.720 --> 0:14:11.560
<v Speaker 1>time on the program. Thank you, Caroline. Let's just stick

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 1>a little bit longer with Tesla. We talked about the

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Bingo card yesterday in advance of earnings, and I thought,

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I'm just going to go full send.

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to play the game. This was the end result.

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Look how close I came.

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 5>It's fun. It's also though important.

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 4>Some of the things that perhaps he didn't actually mention

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 4>DEI one of them that you didn't get.

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 5>To cross off.

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 4>He did insult and Ana, did you feel he'd insulted analyst?

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 4>I know he cut off an executive, that was it.

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 4>But I think overall this was an elon that lived

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 4>up to a lot of the anticipation. Dana Hale, we

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 4>give great cutos for that for coming up with this game,

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 4>but I know it's something that themes on Reddit. What

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 4>was the one that took you most by surprise that

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:54.479
<v Speaker 4>he actually.

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 5>Did say.

0:14:56.800 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 2>By surprise, I guess.

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 1>The fed and I was stretching there because he basically

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:05.800
<v Speaker 1>said about interest rates.

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, a fun game. That was my real card.

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 2>Check it out.

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 4>It was a great game that you played along in

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 4>live time. You've always got to follow ed throughout Twitter

0:15:14.320 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 4>x as it currently is when he has his earnings.

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 4>Mean while coming up, we'll continue our and coverage the service.

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 4>Now this is really big technology.

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 5>Service.

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 4>Now let's talk about its own earnings. The results came

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:35.800
<v Speaker 4>after the bell yesterday and provided a revenue outlook for

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 4>the current quarter, topping Wall Street estimates.

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 5>In fact, they beat across the board.

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 4>It's spurring optimism that the enterprise software provider will continue expanding,

0:15:43.720 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 4>even as many peers have reported some slow and growth.

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 4>Let's bring in service now, CFO, Gina Mauston two know

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 4>for more and look, you do manage to outperform the

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 4>rest of the sector, Gina. And what's notable is you

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 4>say you've got one of the few offerings when it

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 4>comes to AI with real product, real use cases, and

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 4>real customers. Now I'm interested, is is there any cannibalization

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:05.320
<v Speaker 4>there when companies are thinking in this economic environment allocate

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 4>towards technology. Does AI come an expense of anything else

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 4>or is it in an addition?

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 9>So great question, Caroline, Thanks so much for having me

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 9>absolutely service. Now closed the year with another exceptional quarter.

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 9>Revenues of twenty five and a half percent in constant

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:26.240
<v Speaker 9>currency CRPO, which is our current backlog basically twenty three percent,

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:29.760
<v Speaker 9>operating margin of twenty nine percent, all beating the high

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 9>end of our guidance by about two hundred basis points,

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 9>renewal rates of ninety nine percent, and large new logo

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 9>growth continuing to accelerate, which is pretty remarkable. We achieved

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 9>which she was super proud of. We achieved our long

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 9>term goal of crossing ten billion in CACV, which only

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 9>eight software companies have ever achieved in the past.

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 5>And you're absolutely right.

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 9>We have incredible Genai products in market, which launched just

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 9>at the end of September, so our first full quarter

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:04.399
<v Speaker 9>of GENA and we basically saw the largest contribution for

0:17:04.480 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 9>our first full quarter of any of our product released

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 9>in our history. So Jennai is resonating with our customers.

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 9>It's early days, but we're absolutely not seeing any cannibalization

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 9>at this.

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Point, Gina, we were just playing bingo with Tesla's earnings call.

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 1>If we had played bingo with your earning school, we

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:26.200
<v Speaker 1>would have had CRPO or in other words, current remaining

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:29.919
<v Speaker 1>performance obligations, and you like, really hit that number. But

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:32.320
<v Speaker 1>let's be honest. The street's looking at it and saying,

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:36.200
<v Speaker 1>why then, is the forward looking stuff so lukewarm. Why

0:17:36.240 --> 0:17:39.919
<v Speaker 1>are you not more bullish about growth across the board

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:40.880
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of the year.

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 9>Well, in fact, we actually raised our full year revenue

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 9>guidance for the twenty twenty four to ten point five

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:52.679
<v Speaker 9>seven five billion from ten point four, so we actually

0:17:52.800 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 9>raised our guidance for the full year given our results.

0:17:55.600 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 9>So we are bullish on our momentum. We're excited about

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 9>what twenty twenty four is going to show. But let's

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:06.119
<v Speaker 9>face it, the macro is still uncertain. So from a

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 9>guide perspective, we want to be prouded in how we're

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 9>thinking about things. We're seeing great demand across the board.

0:18:13.080 --> 0:18:18.120
<v Speaker 9>I talked to investors yesterday. Our pipeline looks strong. Demand

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 9>is there? Jeni is on the forefront of what every

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 9>CEO and CFO are talking about and looking to invest in.

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:29.360
<v Speaker 9>So our platform right now is in a very strong position,

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 9>and our company is in a strong position to continue

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 9>to build on the momentum that you saw in twenty

0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:34.959
<v Speaker 9>twenty three.

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 4>It's such a game of dare I say frenemies, Gina though,

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:41.680
<v Speaker 4>because you, of course have a relationship very much intertwined

0:18:41.680 --> 0:18:43.879
<v Speaker 4>with Microsoft and open Ai when doing your offerings for

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 4>Jenai here of course helping Amazon with its own offerings

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:50.880
<v Speaker 4>over there a ws in terms of it's marketplace, I'm

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:54.240
<v Speaker 4>really intrigued as to how you continue to offer something

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 4>separate and different in comparison to companies that almost want

0:18:58.080 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 4>want to eat your lunch.

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think it's the strength of our platform. It's

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 9>our relationship with our customers, it's our people, it's the

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 9>fast time to value that our platform delivers for our customers.

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 9>We are such a customer centric company, really understanding the

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:20.440
<v Speaker 9>needs of our customers, understanding the outcomes that they're trying

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:23.119
<v Speaker 9>to get and how our platform can help them deliver.

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 9>We're super excited about some of the partnerships that we announced.

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:29.920
<v Speaker 9>One of them you talked about with AWS Service Now

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 9>is now going to be available as a SaaS offering

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:36.119
<v Speaker 9>on the AWS marketplace. This that opens up our whole

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:38.879
<v Speaker 9>new market for US, whole new tam and it's a

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 9>partnership that we're really excited about. We also announced a

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 9>strategic partnership with Visa, which is a five year strategic

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 9>alliance to use our Genai products to help transform payment

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:54.920
<v Speaker 9>services and it's end to end dispute resolution for all

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 9>of their customers. And so excited to continue to partner.

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:00.160
<v Speaker 5>With these great companies.

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 9>No one has to lose for us to win, and

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:04.160
<v Speaker 9>we will continue to.

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Outperform Service Now, CFO, Gina Mastonto no great to have.

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:08.920
<v Speaker 2>You on the show.

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:10.360
<v Speaker 5>Time now for talking tech.

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:13.440
<v Speaker 4>First up, for the first time ever, the iPhone has

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:16.199
<v Speaker 4>ranked as the top selling smartphone series in China Now

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:19.240
<v Speaker 4>according to IDC, Apple's device had the most shipments in

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:21.880
<v Speaker 4>the fourth quarter and overall in twenty twenty three. Now

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:24.920
<v Speaker 4>this comes amid all those concerns from investors about plummeting

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 4>sales in the region. Meanwhile, sales of ASML's chip making

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:32.160
<v Speaker 4>machinery it boomed in China last year. Now this comes

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 4>despite a secret agreement between the US and the Netherlands

0:20:34.640 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 4>to actually curve deliveries to Beijing. Sources say, SML maintains

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 4>that it didn't violate the deal. A spokesperson for the

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 4>US National Security Council to claim to comment.

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 5>Plus, Russia has.

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:47.719
<v Speaker 4>Apparently imported more than one billion dollars worth of advanced

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:50.880
<v Speaker 4>chips made in the US and European companies classified data

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 4>obtained by Bloomberg, but it shows that half of the

0:20:53.000 --> 0:20:57.880
<v Speaker 4>important semiconductors were manufactured by firms like Intel, amdst Microelectronics

0:20:57.920 --> 0:20:58.479
<v Speaker 4>and others.

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 2>Ed going on in the chip space.

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Sticking with st Micro, watching shares with its sales outlook

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:07.440
<v Speaker 1>for the current core to missing estimates assigned that weak

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:10.639
<v Speaker 1>demand for industrial chips continues. Revenue in the first quarter

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:13.880
<v Speaker 1>falling fifteen percent year on year to three point six

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:18.560
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars compared to four point one billion estimated by analysts.

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:20.240
<v Speaker 2>Stock down two tens percent.

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 1>The other big story that is kind of driving markets

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:25.920
<v Speaker 1>is what's happening in video games. Microsoft shares are hired

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:29.159
<v Speaker 1>by a percentage point now you see throughout Thursday's session.

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:33.679
<v Speaker 1>Adding to those games, the story nineteen hundred or so

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:39.680
<v Speaker 1>jobs being cut from across Activision, which Microsoft acquired and Xbox.

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 2>Personnel as well.

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 1>And I mean, how often does this happen in the

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:45.400
<v Speaker 1>context of a big piece of M and A efficiencies.

0:21:45.560 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 2>But what's the real story here. Let's go to.

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's Jason Schreier, our correspondent and all things video games.

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:53.000
<v Speaker 1>What do we know about the details?

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:53.399
<v Speaker 2>Jason?

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we are facing a real chaos all across the company.

0:21:58.080 --> 0:22:00.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm getting texts still right now. I'm getting texts from

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 3>people saying they don't know if they're being laid off.

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 3>Some people are finding out because their slack is deactivated.

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm told by a Blizzard spokesperson that everybody should find

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:11.879
<v Speaker 3>out by the end of the day if they'll have

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 3>jobs or not, all nineteen hundred people. But yeah, it's

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:16.920
<v Speaker 3>just chaos over there right now.

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 5>What took me by surprise.

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 4>And I'm interested to you as well as some of

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 4>the senior executives that are on the out, in particular

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 4>the president Mike Barra, who I think previously said he

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:29.399
<v Speaker 4>wasn't for going and he was going to have to

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 4>be dragged out, and as well as the chief design officer,

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:33.679
<v Speaker 4>who is actually a co founder m.

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:34.959
<v Speaker 8>M Yeah, Alan Adam.

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 3>He's called a co founder technically is, but he's really

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 3>the founder of Blizzard. He's the kind of guy and

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 3>was for a very long time. Yeah, we're talking about

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:46.000
<v Speaker 3>a massive change over there. I think a lot of

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:48.399
<v Speaker 3>people kind of expected that mike Ybarra might be on

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:52.760
<v Speaker 3>the way out for various reasons, and I think that

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:55.960
<v Speaker 3>he kind of, let's say, he ruffled some feathers within

0:22:56.119 --> 0:22:59.160
<v Speaker 3>Blizzard over the course of a couple of disastrous meetings

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 3>last year and couple of decisions that people weren't thrilled about.

0:23:03.240 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 3>But still it's a big surprise. Lilizar also cancelled one

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:08.920
<v Speaker 3>of their big games, a game that was code named Odyssey,

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 3>is kind of a survival game. Comes as crazy timing

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 3>this week, given that Power World, the kind of Pokemon

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 3>with guns survival game that are selling bazillions of copies,

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 3>just came out. But yeah, it's just it's really bloodier.

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:25.239
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I had been hearing rumors that layoffs might

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:28.399
<v Speaker 3>be coming to Blizzard, but even this is way bigger

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:29.720
<v Speaker 3>and bloodier than I expected.

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 1>So I've been mentioning this in any big piece of

0:23:33.680 --> 0:23:36.399
<v Speaker 1>m and A where a very big company joins another

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:39.640
<v Speaker 1>big company is merged into it. There are often layoffs

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:42.920
<v Speaker 1>because there's overlapping roles and they look for efficiencies, etc.

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 1>But that kind of masks Jason the broader idea of

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:51.359
<v Speaker 1>what Microsoft was getting in its purchase of Activision Blizzard.

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Do we have any sense of how that integration is

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 1>going and kind of what the focus of the projects

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:58.680
<v Speaker 1>are on the content and title side.

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:00.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's so.

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:02.840
<v Speaker 3>We still don't know. We're trying to find out. I mean,

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:07.120
<v Speaker 3>it's been about three months since Microsoft officially took over

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 3>Activision Blizzard. When it happened, a lot of people were optimistic.

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 3>Bobby Kodik, the departing chief of Activision Blizzard, was not

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 3>the most popular guy among the company, so people were

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:20.879
<v Speaker 3>excited to see what might happen. Microsoft is still not

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:25.320
<v Speaker 3>communicated publicly what their vision is for Activision Blizzard, for

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 3>the Call It Duty franchise for Warcraft, or Diabo for

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 3>all those big games.

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 2>I do know that there.

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 3>Are still new projects in development within Blizzard. A lot

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:36.879
<v Speaker 3>of people have been theorizing that Microsoft might just double

0:24:36.960 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 3>down on the franchises that are already successful. I don't

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:42.960
<v Speaker 3>believe that is going to be the case, but yeah,

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 3>we don't know. We are hearing my colleague Dina bass

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:48.399
<v Speaker 3>is hearing that a lot of the layoffs are hitting

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:53.200
<v Speaker 3>redundant departments such as marketing and other kind of departments

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:55.360
<v Speaker 3>that you would expect to be hit by an integration

0:24:55.400 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 3>one of another company that does similar sorts of business.

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 5>Teen hundred people is a lot, but in context just.

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 4>Eight percent of Microsoft's gaming workers. Jason Schreyer fascinating. Thanks

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 4>for giving us really the inside track on all of that. Meanwhile,

0:25:09.000 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 4>let's go to another extraordinary scoot coming from Bloomberg, a

0:25:11.600 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 4>group named China Tech Threat. It's been sounding the alarm

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:18.200
<v Speaker 4>on the threat posed by companies vulnerable to Chinese infiltration

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:21.400
<v Speaker 4>or pressure. On the top of the list, laptop maker Lenovo,

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:26.119
<v Speaker 4>for example. Here's the twist, Dell arrival of Lenovo is

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 4>one of the main sponsors of that very group. Let's

0:25:28.720 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 4>bring in Bloomberg's Brodie Ford, who helped bring us to

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 4>attention this particular interesting turn of events. Is not just

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 4>Dell that might be sponsoring this particular company, this particular

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 4>group pressure group, shall we call them?

0:25:42.400 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 10>It's funny so middle school I had Lenovo. I think

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 10>in this building we got Lenovo.

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 2>We're used to hearing.

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 10>About Chinese tech anxieties. But Lenovo is not a name

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:53.680
<v Speaker 10>we're used to hearing. But this group's been walking around

0:25:53.680 --> 0:25:56.439
<v Speaker 10>town telling people, you gotta get rid of these, you

0:25:56.440 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 10>gotta tear them out, you gotta, you know, pass these

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:03.480
<v Speaker 10>state level bands to not use Lenovo. And again it

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:05.720
<v Speaker 10>turns out it was Dell funding it, right, and they

0:26:05.760 --> 0:26:09.679
<v Speaker 10>didn't disclose that. And we see as increasing tensions between

0:26:09.800 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 10>US and China happen, companies are increasingly willing to say, hey,

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:16.680
<v Speaker 10>could this be an opportunity for us? So this is

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:18.639
<v Speaker 10>kind of a nice case study in the way that

0:26:18.680 --> 0:26:20.359
<v Speaker 10>the trade war has been advancing.

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I look at this very detailed Bloomberg BusinessWeek story, fantastic

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 1>reporting and writing, Brodie, and remind myself that Lenovo is

0:26:31.240 --> 0:26:34.919
<v Speaker 1>the biggest maker of personal computers and laptops in the world.

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 1>What did they have to say in response to this reporting?

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 1>But I guess ultimately the question is what is it

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 1>that Dell and Micron want achieved in the end down

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the road?

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, as you said, Lenovo is the world's biggest maker

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 10>of PC's. PC's pretty concentrated market, right, you have HP

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:56.359
<v Speaker 10>del Lenovo. Any loss for Lenovo is going to be

0:26:56.359 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 10>a win for.

0:26:56.920 --> 0:26:57.480
<v Speaker 2>HP and Dell.

0:26:57.760 --> 0:27:00.440
<v Speaker 10>And the backstory here is that HP and Dell really

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:03.960
<v Speaker 10>had thriving, growing businesses in China, but over time they've

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:07.120
<v Speaker 10>been regulated over there. The Chinese government has sent out

0:27:07.119 --> 0:27:09.240
<v Speaker 10>mandates saying you're going to have to start using less

0:27:09.280 --> 0:27:12.440
<v Speaker 10>of these and so that's when Dell and also HP,

0:27:12.640 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 10>but not through the front groups, said that, hey, maybe

0:27:15.040 --> 0:27:18.399
<v Speaker 10>we should start applying similar pressure. And for Micron, I

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 10>mean the semiconductor industry I think is maybe a better

0:27:21.640 --> 0:27:25.920
<v Speaker 10>known example of US China tensions. And so the semiconductor

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 10>companies China Tech Threat has talked about are more of

0:27:28.600 --> 0:27:32.560
<v Speaker 10>these kind of ascendant players who would likely compete with Micron.

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 5>At some point.

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:37.159
<v Speaker 4>Well, see if it does indeed garner any interest from

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:40.959
<v Speaker 4>China as to the actions, well the money being fueled

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:42.160
<v Speaker 4>by these particular companies.

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:45.199
<v Speaker 5>Really for brilliant piece of reporting. Thanks so much, Ed.

0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:45.760
<v Speaker 5>What have you've got?

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, we're going to the world of cars and Porsche

0:27:49.040 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 1>going electric. The car make you just unveiled its own

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:54.680
<v Speaker 1>electric macan. I caught up with timo Resh, the new

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 1>president and CEO of Porsche Cars in North America, in

0:27:57.520 --> 0:27:59.680
<v Speaker 1>an exclusive interview just ahead of the launch and we

0:27:59.680 --> 0:28:02.639
<v Speaker 1>discover his outlook for the company is they try to

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:05.200
<v Speaker 1>tackle the EV market here in the States, have a listen.

0:28:07.400 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 11>We are pretty sure that with the launch of the

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:12.920
<v Speaker 11>McCann electric and we will pretty much not be able

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:15.440
<v Speaker 11>to cope with the demand. And definitely the first year,

0:28:15.840 --> 0:28:18.160
<v Speaker 11>I think there's definitely a lot of demand. A lot

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:20.719
<v Speaker 11>of people are waiting for product like this, and this

0:28:20.840 --> 0:28:23.960
<v Speaker 11>comes at a stage where the Macan as we have

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:26.400
<v Speaker 11>it in the market right now with the combustional lector,

0:28:26.560 --> 0:28:30.240
<v Speaker 11>the combustion engine car has its most successful year in

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 11>its history as of last year, So there's high demand

0:28:33.320 --> 0:28:36.399
<v Speaker 11>for the existing platform, and I think a lot of

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:40.000
<v Speaker 11>people are looking for this new latest edge technology that

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 11>does everything that the McCann already has going for it,

0:28:42.920 --> 0:28:45.960
<v Speaker 11>even to a higher degree. So that for that reason

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 11>I feel positive about it. And then we can really

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 11>see in the year twenty twenty five and upcoming what

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 11>the real relationship between the ICE version and the BEV

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 11>version will be. Right in the first year, I think

0:28:58.080 --> 0:29:01.040
<v Speaker 11>it's just customer demand, realm what we can supply from

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 11>our factory in Germany.

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 1>So well exactly so, so your supply constrained, right Timo,

0:29:06.360 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 1>you know that demand for the electric Macan is going

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:12.920
<v Speaker 1>to outweigh your ability to supply. When you are phoning

0:29:13.000 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 1>your counterparts in Germany, how much supply are they able

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 1>to guarantee you for that first year.

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 11>I can't go into details of numbers, but I think

0:29:23.280 --> 0:29:26.480
<v Speaker 11>we are very much driven by providing usually always just

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:29.560
<v Speaker 11>one car lest and the market is asking for. So

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 11>this is what our flexibility. Also in terms of our

0:29:32.320 --> 0:29:35.280
<v Speaker 11>production pipeline, having both of these cars come out of

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 11>our factory and leipstick in Germany, that gives us this

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:42.920
<v Speaker 11>perfect possibility to custom tailor our supply chain to the

0:29:42.960 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 11>market demands. And for that reason, I'm sure we will

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:50.440
<v Speaker 11>hit the right spot supplying enough Macan overall, and I

0:29:50.480 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 11>assume in the first couple of months there will be

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 11>more demand than we can supply for the McCann Beth.

0:29:56.120 --> 0:29:57.800
<v Speaker 2>Who you worried about out there?

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Is it the cyber truck, highestpec expensive model in the

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 1>first instance that goes to the high networth individual or

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the big spender, or are you worried about the electro

0:30:10.120 --> 0:30:14.720
<v Speaker 1>electrified offerings from some of your German peers like Mercedes

0:30:14.760 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 1>for example.

0:30:16.720 --> 0:30:19.840
<v Speaker 11>I think in terms of design and the Peel and

0:30:20.120 --> 0:30:24.960
<v Speaker 11>technology really being cutting technology. We as Porsche can usually

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 11>have a lot of people that start being convinced and

0:30:27.960 --> 0:30:31.080
<v Speaker 11>being excited about the Porsche brands. So we see that

0:30:31.120 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 11>there will be a lot of opportunities to get the

0:30:34.040 --> 0:30:36.880
<v Speaker 11>Porsche family growing, but at the same time also get

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 11>existing Porsches excited for posha fans excited for the account BEV.

0:30:41.200 --> 0:30:43.320
<v Speaker 11>So there's I think a lot of opportunity in the

0:30:43.440 --> 0:30:47.040
<v Speaker 11>still growing a BEV market where customers will come from

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:50.840
<v Speaker 11>and start joining the Porsche family and start this experiencing

0:30:50.960 --> 0:30:53.880
<v Speaker 11>what the feeling of Posh, the Posher product is all about.

0:30:54.240 --> 0:31:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Timo America was critically important to Porsche in twenty twenty three,

0:31:00.840 --> 0:31:04.600
<v Speaker 1>in part because China's growth was decelerating, and I think

0:31:04.640 --> 0:31:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Porsche is said twenty twenty four is going to be

0:31:07.080 --> 0:31:10.760
<v Speaker 1>difficult in China as well. What kind of pressure are

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:13.520
<v Speaker 1>you under to keep the growth going here in the

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:17.200
<v Speaker 1>United States North America? More broadly, what a key market

0:31:17.320 --> 0:31:19.440
<v Speaker 1>like China is slowing down?

0:31:21.720 --> 0:31:24.280
<v Speaker 11>Being responsible for the North American market, I would like

0:31:24.320 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 11>to focus on these topics, But if you see the

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:29.840
<v Speaker 11>overall balance of distribution of sales of Porsche, I think

0:31:29.880 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 11>the Porsche brand is perfectly balanced in terms of its

0:31:32.760 --> 0:31:36.840
<v Speaker 11>international distribution of sales. So this is a really, let'd say,

0:31:37.080 --> 0:31:40.680
<v Speaker 11>great time to see that there is not such a

0:31:40.760 --> 0:31:43.640
<v Speaker 11>huge dependency on the Chinese market as it might be

0:31:43.760 --> 0:31:46.880
<v Speaker 11>for some other brands, and we see the brand being

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:49.960
<v Speaker 11>in a very good position. I think we have high desirability.

0:31:50.040 --> 0:31:51.800
<v Speaker 11>You can see that in all different kinds of stud

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 11>and for that reason, I also see good possibility to

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:59.720
<v Speaker 11>continue on this growth pattern of sustainable growth also hind

0:31:59.760 --> 0:32:03.120
<v Speaker 11>in saints on the North American market, but also people

0:32:03.440 --> 0:32:06.960
<v Speaker 11>I think, driven by customer demand, continue the success story.

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Timo resh portion North America President CEO Caro on a

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:13.600
<v Speaker 1>car that's long delayed.

0:32:13.920 --> 0:32:16.200
<v Speaker 2>Everyone's excited about. It's good looking as well.

0:32:16.440 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 5>She's pretty, I got to say. Meanwhile, coming up, look,

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:20.840
<v Speaker 5>we're going to sit down with the CEO of Fearless

0:32:20.880 --> 0:32:23.200
<v Speaker 5>Fund ed as as she prepares.

0:32:22.880 --> 0:32:25.960
<v Speaker 4>To go back to court to fight a discrimination lawsuit

0:32:26.080 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 4>against the venture fund for its grant program to black

0:32:29.360 --> 0:32:42.480
<v Speaker 4>female founders. Getting into it. It's a Broomberg technology Atlanta

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:43.720
<v Speaker 4>based venture capital firm.

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:44.920
<v Speaker 5>Fearless Fund and.

0:32:44.960 --> 0:32:47.520
<v Speaker 4>Invests in businesses owned by women of color, and it's

0:32:47.520 --> 0:32:50.840
<v Speaker 4>being sued over a grant program for black women entrepreneurs

0:32:50.840 --> 0:32:53.280
<v Speaker 4>by the American Alliance for Equal Rights. Now that's a

0:32:53.280 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 4>group run by Ever Bloom is a conservative activist who

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:58.400
<v Speaker 4>challenged affirmative action in higher education.

0:32:58.800 --> 0:32:59.280
<v Speaker 5>An he won.

0:32:59.840 --> 0:33:02.160
<v Speaker 4>The case is headed back to the Eleventh Circuit Court

0:33:02.240 --> 0:33:05.240
<v Speaker 4>of Appeals next Wednesday, and joining us to discuss the

0:33:05.280 --> 0:33:08.520
<v Speaker 4>implications this has for hervec for equity more broadly in

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 4>venture And please are welcome Arion Simone, the CEO of

0:33:11.920 --> 0:33:15.080
<v Speaker 4>Fearless Fund. And well, you go back to the Eleventh

0:33:15.160 --> 0:33:18.600
<v Speaker 4>US Circuit Court of Appeals because it's your striver's grant

0:33:19.120 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 4>contest that seems to be being focused on twenty thousand

0:33:21.840 --> 0:33:25.880
<v Speaker 4>dollars grants, and just remind us go back why they

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:27.800
<v Speaker 4>take issue with allocation of money.

0:33:28.600 --> 0:33:34.600
<v Speaker 12>We're being sued for alleged discrimination according to the nineteen

0:33:34.640 --> 0:33:37.520
<v Speaker 12>eighty one section of the Civil Rights Act of eighteen

0:33:37.640 --> 0:33:40.240
<v Speaker 12>sixty six, which is a law that was put in

0:33:40.320 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 12>place for nan wides to enter into contracts. They are

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:47.200
<v Speaker 12>saying that we are discriminating according to that law.

0:33:47.880 --> 0:33:51.719
<v Speaker 4>Your argument is these aren't contracts, these are grants. But

0:33:51.800 --> 0:33:55.200
<v Speaker 4>more broadly, what sort of cooling effect do you think

0:33:55.240 --> 0:33:59.360
<v Speaker 4>this has had on allocation of money to diverse founders

0:33:59.400 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 4>when already, what is it, less just over one percent

0:34:02.240 --> 0:34:05.160
<v Speaker 4>of all venture money was allocated to women of color

0:34:05.200 --> 0:34:05.600
<v Speaker 4>last year.

0:34:05.640 --> 0:34:06.520
<v Speaker 5>I mean even less than that.

0:34:06.560 --> 0:34:08.560
<v Speaker 12>Actually it was less than that. Only a fraction of

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:11.960
<v Speaker 12>a percent last year, zero point thirty nine percent was

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:15.239
<v Speaker 12>allocated to women of color. The cooling effect that is

0:34:15.280 --> 0:34:19.239
<v Speaker 12>taking place is basically the spirit of fear. People have

0:34:19.320 --> 0:34:24.799
<v Speaker 12>been scared to deploy and uphold their diversity initiatives. The

0:34:24.880 --> 0:34:27.840
<v Speaker 12>government has slowed down on minority grants. The eight A

0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:31.600
<v Speaker 12>program even had to pause, and the cooling effect has

0:34:32.200 --> 0:34:35.760
<v Speaker 12>been I got to say, very broad, it's very long reaching,

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 12>the impact that this court case is having without people

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:39.879
<v Speaker 12>even being sued.

0:34:41.560 --> 0:34:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Arian, thank you for joining us on Bloomberg Technology. There's

0:34:45.719 --> 0:34:48.920
<v Speaker 1>a pathway for the litigation potentially to go to the

0:34:48.920 --> 0:34:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court, and I understand that their legal and cost

0:34:54.239 --> 0:34:57.920
<v Speaker 1>considerations for you in the firm if that happens. But

0:34:58.080 --> 0:35:01.320
<v Speaker 1>given this sort of the ultimate goals of Fearless Fund

0:35:01.800 --> 0:35:06.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to support and give capital, access to capital to

0:35:07.360 --> 0:35:11.480
<v Speaker 1>women of color, how do you view the opportunity to

0:35:11.560 --> 0:35:14.600
<v Speaker 1>go to the Supreme Court or on the fundamental issue

0:35:14.880 --> 0:35:16.200
<v Speaker 1>that's being discussed here.

0:35:18.120 --> 0:35:21.520
<v Speaker 12>Ed Well I view, I'm glad you're stating it as

0:35:21.560 --> 0:35:25.720
<v Speaker 12>an opportunity. It will be an opportunity to bring more awareness.

0:35:25.560 --> 0:35:26.760
<v Speaker 5>To these disparities.

0:35:26.920 --> 0:35:29.440
<v Speaker 12>It is unfortunate that anybody would have to go to

0:35:29.480 --> 0:35:32.719
<v Speaker 12>the Supreme Court to defend themselves for the right to

0:35:32.960 --> 0:35:37.719
<v Speaker 12>basically target a disparity that we're targeting. But I'm glad

0:35:37.800 --> 0:35:39.879
<v Speaker 12>you definitely stated it as an opportunity.

0:35:40.200 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 5>I think it's an opportunity.

0:35:41.360 --> 0:35:44.360
<v Speaker 12>For people to realize we need more legislation that protects

0:35:44.400 --> 0:35:45.760
<v Speaker 12>our access to capital.

0:35:47.040 --> 0:35:49.920
<v Speaker 4>At any point, have you been asked to play or

0:35:50.719 --> 0:35:54.880
<v Speaker 4>understand the devil's advocate side of the equation that you

0:35:55.040 --> 0:35:57.840
<v Speaker 4>allocating money to only women of color is in some

0:35:58.040 --> 0:36:02.280
<v Speaker 4>way well discriminate against the women of who want of college,

0:36:02.239 --> 0:36:03.800
<v Speaker 4>who would love to come to you for some money.

0:36:04.120 --> 0:36:06.160
<v Speaker 12>Caroline, I will say it here and I've said it before.

0:36:06.400 --> 0:36:09.400
<v Speaker 12>I actually desire the same thing as Ed Bloom, a

0:36:09.520 --> 0:36:11.080
<v Speaker 12>world where race doesn't matter.

0:36:12.160 --> 0:36:13.680
<v Speaker 5>We have just yet to get there.

0:36:14.880 --> 0:36:18.239
<v Speaker 4>I'm interested in the yet to get their part, and

0:36:18.360 --> 0:36:21.400
<v Speaker 4>ultimately how much you need not just you, your voice

0:36:21.560 --> 0:36:24.720
<v Speaker 4>and those that are supporting you, but what about corporate America.

0:36:24.800 --> 0:36:28.080
<v Speaker 4>More broadly, your fund has been backed and in fact

0:36:28.160 --> 0:36:33.759
<v Speaker 4>got follow on funding just in June from Bank of America, Costco, MasterCard.

0:36:34.280 --> 0:36:36.520
<v Speaker 4>Are they speaking out for you as much as you'd

0:36:36.560 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 4>like to see?

0:36:37.600 --> 0:36:39.600
<v Speaker 12>I would like to see more. I would like to

0:36:39.640 --> 0:36:43.680
<v Speaker 12>see a lot more corporate support. Clearly, if you believe

0:36:43.719 --> 0:36:46.600
<v Speaker 12>in this vision and you've invested your capital into what

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:49.080
<v Speaker 12>we do, your dollars have spoken.

0:36:49.320 --> 0:36:50.760
<v Speaker 5>But we do need your voice.

0:36:51.000 --> 0:36:53.799
<v Speaker 12>So we would love for the CEOs of the corporations

0:36:53.800 --> 0:36:56.440
<v Speaker 12>that have invested in us to take a stay in publicly.

0:36:56.640 --> 0:36:59.960
<v Speaker 4>Correct, Have they in any way signaled they wouldn't be

0:37:00.080 --> 0:37:01.680
<v Speaker 4>willing to commit capital in the future.

0:37:02.719 --> 0:37:05.560
<v Speaker 12>They haven't signaled that they're willing they wouldn't be willing

0:37:05.600 --> 0:37:09.080
<v Speaker 12>to commit capital in the future. But right now we

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:13.160
<v Speaker 12>are in basically the hotspot. Everybody can see us, and

0:37:13.200 --> 0:37:15.880
<v Speaker 12>we do need their voice in addition to the capital.

0:37:16.239 --> 0:37:19.279
<v Speaker 5>I go back to, actually, what it is your funding here?

0:37:19.600 --> 0:37:24.680
<v Speaker 4>The people that are building businesses, what problems are they solving,

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:27.600
<v Speaker 4>What innovations are you seeing what entrepreneurs are making and

0:37:27.640 --> 0:37:28.680
<v Speaker 4>turning your head.

0:37:28.719 --> 0:37:32.520
<v Speaker 12>Oh my gosh, our entrepreneurs are amazing. They're on the

0:37:32.560 --> 0:37:34.719
<v Speaker 12>cover of Ink, They're on the Ink List, They're on

0:37:34.760 --> 0:37:38.040
<v Speaker 12>the Forbes List, They're on everywhere we invest in technology

0:37:38.480 --> 0:37:41.640
<v Speaker 12>as well as we invest in CpG. The problems they

0:37:41.640 --> 0:37:45.200
<v Speaker 12>are solving, the disparities they are meeting, the food as

0:37:45.239 --> 0:37:49.399
<v Speaker 12>they're going into are far long reaching. You're talking about

0:37:49.440 --> 0:37:52.680
<v Speaker 12>women of color. They're social impact isn't bred in the

0:37:52.680 --> 0:37:56.640
<v Speaker 12>fabric of their business in who they are, so from fintech,

0:37:56.920 --> 0:38:00.000
<v Speaker 12>from any type of ad tech to oh my god,

0:38:00.239 --> 0:38:02.800
<v Speaker 12>So this goes on and on to so many products

0:38:02.800 --> 0:38:05.760
<v Speaker 12>that are solving amazing problems. It's like picking a favorite

0:38:05.800 --> 0:38:08.239
<v Speaker 12>child if I would have had like one. But we

0:38:08.400 --> 0:38:11.160
<v Speaker 12>have about ten girls right now that we've invested in.

0:38:11.239 --> 0:38:14.240
<v Speaker 12>They're all in heavy eight figure revenue and they are

0:38:14.280 --> 0:38:15.880
<v Speaker 12>growing by leaps and bounds.

0:38:16.760 --> 0:38:21.359
<v Speaker 4>But access to capital still remains, in theory, far more

0:38:21.400 --> 0:38:24.320
<v Speaker 4>tight and slim than it is for other types of founders.

0:38:24.640 --> 0:38:27.000
<v Speaker 4>Aaron Simone, thank you for coming on and spending time

0:38:27.040 --> 0:38:29.080
<v Speaker 4>with us while in New York. Fill us fun CEO

0:38:29.440 --> 0:38:30.880
<v Speaker 4>as she heads back to Atlanta.

0:38:31.640 --> 0:38:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, she and Becker's are trying to sell shares that

0:38:34.040 --> 0:38:36.839
<v Speaker 1>place the value of the online fashion company as low

0:38:36.880 --> 0:38:39.880
<v Speaker 1>as forty five billion. This is she in confronts mounting

0:38:39.920 --> 0:38:44.000
<v Speaker 1>competition and regulatory scrutiny ahead of a much awaited debut

0:38:44.320 --> 0:38:47.560
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. Boombers Crystal Z joins US with more.

0:38:47.600 --> 0:38:50.200
<v Speaker 1>This is interesting. Go back to May a primary round

0:38:50.239 --> 0:38:53.200
<v Speaker 1>where they valued at sixty six billion. Usually ahead of

0:38:53.200 --> 0:38:55.440
<v Speaker 1>an IPO, you try and get in because you're excited.

0:38:55.760 --> 0:38:58.480
<v Speaker 1>But what we're hearing is that private market deals are

0:38:58.640 --> 0:38:59.960
<v Speaker 1>valuing the company lower.

0:39:00.400 --> 0:39:00.879
<v Speaker 5>That's right.

0:39:00.960 --> 0:39:05.640
<v Speaker 13>Our colleagues in Hong Kong is reporting that the private valuation,

0:39:06.160 --> 0:39:09.600
<v Speaker 13>some of these are minority trades, evaluing the company as

0:39:09.680 --> 0:39:11.160
<v Speaker 13>slow as forty five.

0:39:12.800 --> 0:39:13.680
<v Speaker 5>Forty five billion.

0:39:13.760 --> 0:39:16.960
<v Speaker 13>At a point they were valued at one hundred billion,

0:39:17.080 --> 0:39:20.320
<v Speaker 13>So it's a significant decrease, and I think part of

0:39:20.360 --> 0:39:23.160
<v Speaker 13>it is probably to do with that the IPO prospect

0:39:23.200 --> 0:39:25.839
<v Speaker 13>is looking a little bit more dim than it used to.

0:39:26.520 --> 0:39:29.880
<v Speaker 13>We have seen reports that the company is now subject

0:39:29.960 --> 0:39:34.120
<v Speaker 13>to regulatory scrutiny, not only in China but also in

0:39:34.160 --> 0:39:37.319
<v Speaker 13>the US, So that could make investor a little bit

0:39:37.360 --> 0:39:41.080
<v Speaker 13>more jittery about the prospect of this company's public life.

0:39:41.800 --> 0:39:43.479
<v Speaker 4>They were going to talk it up to ninety billion

0:39:43.520 --> 0:39:45.760
<v Speaker 4>dollars in that IPO, so the fact that they're seeing

0:39:45.760 --> 0:39:48.880
<v Speaker 4>in half of that in secondary market, albeit before the

0:39:48.920 --> 0:39:51.480
<v Speaker 4>turn of this year. More broadly, put it in the

0:39:51.480 --> 0:39:54.200
<v Speaker 4>context of a company that's trying to distance itself from

0:39:54.280 --> 0:39:58.040
<v Speaker 4>China but still manufactures in China, it's headquarters being in Singapore.

0:39:58.080 --> 0:40:00.759
<v Speaker 4>But we're very worried about the Chinese economy right now.

0:40:00.800 --> 0:40:03.200
<v Speaker 4>Is that in any way filtering through more broadly tech

0:40:03.239 --> 0:40:04.320
<v Speaker 4>stocks E and under pressure.

0:40:04.480 --> 0:40:06.880
<v Speaker 13>So they actually do not sell in China. They do

0:40:06.960 --> 0:40:11.040
<v Speaker 13>not generate revenue per se in China. They do manufacture there,

0:40:11.239 --> 0:40:15.319
<v Speaker 13>they also generate use They also gather user data from

0:40:15.360 --> 0:40:17.880
<v Speaker 13>the internet, and that is why the Chinese regulators are

0:40:17.920 --> 0:40:21.759
<v Speaker 13>now looking at this company and be looking at economy

0:40:21.840 --> 0:40:25.800
<v Speaker 13>just globally. You do see some softness in the US

0:40:25.840 --> 0:40:29.080
<v Speaker 13>and the majority of the revenue do. They do focus

0:40:29.120 --> 0:40:31.600
<v Speaker 13>in the US market quite a bit, selling you know,

0:40:31.880 --> 0:40:35.400
<v Speaker 13>crop top five dollars, crop top to teenager, and that's

0:40:35.480 --> 0:40:39.040
<v Speaker 13>the kind of spending that would soften in a market

0:40:39.200 --> 0:40:44.920
<v Speaker 13>where you know, translation could go up and economic prospect

0:40:45.040 --> 0:40:46.440
<v Speaker 13>is not so not.

0:40:46.480 --> 0:40:49.320
<v Speaker 5>So bright anymore. Christ to say, thank you for breaking

0:40:49.360 --> 0:40:50.000
<v Speaker 5>it down for us.

0:40:50.080 --> 0:40:53.560
<v Speaker 4>It is a very popularly right story across the internet

0:40:53.600 --> 0:40:54.040
<v Speaker 4>at the moment.

0:40:54.080 --> 0:40:56.000
<v Speaker 5>We thank you for it. Meanwhile, that does it for

0:40:56.000 --> 0:40:57.160
<v Speaker 5>this edition of Blue Med Technology,