WEBVTT - Week 9, Episode 1:  Rams issues? Browns statement win and moving on from OBJ, Can Ravens play include Lamar Jackson running?

0:00:03.960 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to a brand new football week here on te Pez.

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Babo Schusen, longtime radio voice the Jets, ESPN College Football.

0:00:11.320 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Of course, dan Or Lobsky, longtime NFL quarterback you see

0:00:14.680 --> 0:00:16.920
<v Speaker 1>him all the time at the touch screen on ESPN,

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:18.840
<v Speaker 1>and my partner on college football, one of the best

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 1>of breaking down tape. And of course Scott Pioli, part

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:24.239
<v Speaker 1>of the architect group to put together a dynasty in

0:00:24.239 --> 0:00:27.480
<v Speaker 1>New England, longtime NFL general manager as well. We try

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>to take you behind the xos and os here on

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:33.600
<v Speaker 1>this podcast and give you football from the nerd perspective,

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 1>which we all proudly are. And guys, it was an

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:41.159
<v Speaker 1>ugly week for the Ramps. Gotta drip back into the shotgun.

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Now put Henderson put, He's right here, gotta throw it

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 1>fires right, So intercepted fired twenty ten five in the

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 1>zone cabin fired the a FC defective player. I'm the

0:00:57.160 --> 0:01:04.400
<v Speaker 1>one for October starts November when a bag touchdown Titan. Alright, gentlemen,

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:07.600
<v Speaker 1>how I opening was this result? All I heard last

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>week was Derrick Henry's gone. Titans have no chance. Their

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:14.960
<v Speaker 1>entire team is built around him. And now you're going

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 1>up against a team that many of us thought might be,

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 1>if not a maybe the Super Bowl favorite to start

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the year coming out of the NFC. So, Dan, how

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I opening was this performance? I guess on both sides.

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Where would you start? Yeah, not all to eye opening

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:32.399
<v Speaker 1>for me. Um, I'll start with the Rams offense. So

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>going into the game, I thought that the Rams offense

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 1>strength wise was when they got into their empty personnel sets,

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:41.839
<v Speaker 1>meaning five man protection. They do it more and better

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 1>than anybody in the NFL. And Tennessee defensively had struggled

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 1>up until that point defending the empty sets that teams

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:53.279
<v Speaker 1>had given them. The caveat that I had talked about

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 1>was their defensive line was coming. You know that the

0:01:57.240 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 1>defensive line that has started to show up for Tennessee

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 1>over the last month five weeks is a different one

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>than was in the first month of the season. And

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:08.800
<v Speaker 1>I thought the game would come down to when the

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Rams got into empty which they do again more than

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 1>anybody in the NFL. Who won that matchup good offensive

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:18.680
<v Speaker 1>line one on one essentially in protection versus a really

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>good and oncoming defensive line, and it was the ladder.

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:27.640
<v Speaker 1>The defensive line for Tennessee was so dominant in those situations.

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 1>And it really what it did was it minimized the

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:34.640
<v Speaker 1>strengths of the Los Angeles Rams, It minimized their identity,

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>It minimized the thing that they feel most comfortable with.

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 1>And you saw it early on in the game. The

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 1>third play of the game is a five man empty

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:47.679
<v Speaker 1>protection and the coverage is okay, and Matthews going to

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 1>pull back and hit Cooper Cup on our crosser and

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:52.639
<v Speaker 1>the rush gets home. And then the second time they

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 1>go to it, which is the very next play, five

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>man protection, the rush gets home. And that was really

0:02:57.520 --> 0:03:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the difference of the ballgame for me, was how dominant

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the four man rush with Autry and Landry and Simmons

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 1>was against the five man protection plan by the Los

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:09.799
<v Speaker 1>Angeles Rams. Obviously, the pick six is a huge part

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:12.679
<v Speaker 1>of it, and then the backed up interception was a

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:16.800
<v Speaker 1>huge part of it. So Tennessee defensively, the way they

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 1>rotate and disguise their coverage then tied to their pass

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 1>rush in that game was a huge deal. And I

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 1>for Tennessee's offense, I think the word that I would

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>say in relation to Ryan Tannehill right now would be clutch.

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>He has become a very clutch quarterback, third best QBR

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 1>in the last month of football and the second half

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>of games. Last month of football. They had a tough

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>schedule in the NFL as well. So you know, the

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 1>play that I love is they got third and ten.

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 1>It's twenty one nine. It was about twelve minutes to

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 1>go in the ten minutes to go in the third quarter,

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and excuse me, in the fourth quarter, and he had

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Julio Jones on a ten yard hook route against three

0:03:56.240 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 1>buzz Week where the safety drops down and he moves

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>his eyes to get the safety to come to middle

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 1>of field and Julio is one on one back side,

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and he plays with such great timing, vision and anticipation

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 1>with ball placement and he gets it out right as

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Julio comes out of the top of his break, Julio

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:13.840
<v Speaker 1>catches spins and it converts that third and ten. And

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I just thought that play was so emblematic of how

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:21.040
<v Speaker 1>clutch Ryan Tinnehill has become when they're gonna need him

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>to continue to be without Derrick Henry. Yeah, Dan, just

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 1>comment on a couple of things that you said, and

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 1>to follow up on them. You know, you talk about

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 1>what the defensive line and the defensive front of the

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee Titans needed to do. And you know, when I

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:38.320
<v Speaker 1>was getting into coaching, and I had played defensive line

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>in college, moved to offensive line, and George di Leon,

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:43.600
<v Speaker 1>who was a terrific offensive line coach and coordinator up

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>at Syracuse University, I remember one of the things he

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 1>used to say all the time was we got to

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>get a hat on a hat. And I heard that phrase,

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 1>and I heard offensive line coaches say that for the

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 1>longest time, hat on a hat. We we We've got

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:57.600
<v Speaker 1>man covered up. But then when I got to the NFL,

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:02.239
<v Speaker 1>I remember Bill Parcels saying, Okay, Scott, that sounds great,

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 1>But what happens when that hat is better than the

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 1>other hat? And that's exactly what have They had a

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 1>hat on a hat all day long, you know in

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the protection But the hat of Jeffrey Simmons was extraordinary

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the other day, you know. So it goes back to

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>again one of the other sayings, which is, you know,

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>in critical situations, think of players, not plays. So you

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>always have to take into account how good the players are.

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:29.479
<v Speaker 1>And Dan, you said it, that defensive line is on

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the come. Harold Lanley, Landry is playing well. You know,

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Simmons showed up in a big way this week. So

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:38.160
<v Speaker 1>to me, that was one of the factors. The other

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:39.919
<v Speaker 1>thing that was happening going into this game, you know,

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 1>I did a piece on CBS HQ before we before

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 1>that game and one of the things that was standing

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 1>out to me was the Rams and their opponents. And

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>and I am a firm believer that once again, your

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:57.040
<v Speaker 1>record is who you are, or your record says who

0:05:57.080 --> 0:05:58.600
<v Speaker 1>you are. And there were seven and one going into

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the game. Every game that they played, they had gone into,

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:03.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, needing to win, and they won. They won

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:06.279
<v Speaker 1>the games that they had to play. But with that,

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:10.279
<v Speaker 1>they had only played three teams with a winning record,

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 1>or up to this point, they've played three teams with

0:06:13.000 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>a winning record, and they're one and two against those teams.

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:17.600
<v Speaker 1>They had had this four game win streak, but that

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:20.480
<v Speaker 1>four game win streak was against Seattle, the Giants, Detroit,

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:25.039
<v Speaker 1>and Houston. The overall record of the teams that they

0:06:25.080 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>have faced and beat this year is twenty and forty.

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>So again, their record is what their record is. They're

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:34.479
<v Speaker 1>one of the best teams in football. But when you

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:37.280
<v Speaker 1>go out and you've got hats that are better than

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the other hats. You have twelve penalties for a hundred

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:41.920
<v Speaker 1>and fifteen yards. Again, you know how I love to

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>talk about clean football. Then you have the mistakes and

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the turnovers that were so uncharacteristic for Matthew Stafford. You know,

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:51.919
<v Speaker 1>you know him far better than me, Dan, But what

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 1>I know from an outside observer, as a scout, as

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:58.279
<v Speaker 1>an evaluator, he is a smart player that rarely makes

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 1>bad decisions under direct us. The other night he did it.

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:04.160
<v Speaker 1>He did things that were so un characteristic. And those

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:08.039
<v Speaker 1>two interceptions, they were costly interceptions. And then again you

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 1>add on the penalties, where this was the least penalized

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 1>team in the National Football League coming into this week

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and they just bombeded with twelve penalties. I wasn't so

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 1>surprised as we were watching the game unfold, saying if

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 1>they don't clean this hot mess up in a hurry,

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to end well. And it didn't. And Scott,

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I would say that the most surprising aspect of the game,

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 1>and I would really say Tennessee as a football team

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>right now is how good their secondary has become at

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of their late rotation, changing the picture that they're

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 1>showing a quarterback, and it's it's a rollo dex of coverage.

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>You very rarely see the same coverage two situations in

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 1>a row, second and long or third and obvious passage.

0:07:57.360 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 1>You don't see the same coverage. And I don't care

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 1>how many snaps you have played as a quarterback or

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 1>how many play games you have called as a play caller,

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 1>you are trying to constantly anticipate in guests the coverage

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 1>that you're gonna get from Tennessee as a play caller

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Todd Downing or excuse me, a Sean McVeigh. And then

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 1>as a quarterback, you're constantly trying to see because here's

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the thing. You get covered three and it's three carry, Well,

0:08:24.920 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 1>your read is different and it's three buzz and you

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>read is different, and it's three match and you're reading

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>it's different, and Tampa two and you're read is different

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 1>and it's too carry and it's different, it's too Tampa invert.

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:38.440
<v Speaker 1>So all those different coverages that you're getting thrown at,

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to figure out which one am I getting?

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 1>And then when I get it, what happens is that

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 1>two tents or three tents of a second that it

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:49.560
<v Speaker 1>takes for you to confirm which type of coverage it

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:52.680
<v Speaker 1>is that you're getting post snap. In the rotation of disguise,

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>that front has an extra two tents of a three

0:08:55.440 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>seconds to work and that's an eternity. That's an eternity

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:02.680
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. And and one other thing that that

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 1>specific pick six what you're talking about the coverages and

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:09.439
<v Speaker 1>how they're changing coverages and things that they're doing. You know,

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Byard said after the game that he had a

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 1>pre snap communication. He just felt something and he communicated.

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 1>So the coverage that they showed pre snap and then

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:25.320
<v Speaker 1>the conversation or the communication right at the snap was

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 1>something completely different because he felt something and that's you know,

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:31.200
<v Speaker 1>so he he kind of went rogue, but didn't go

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:34.719
<v Speaker 1>rogue because he communicated it and it looked like one thing,

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:37.720
<v Speaker 1>it became something else, and in that split second it

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:40.439
<v Speaker 1>created a problem. And that's one of the things when

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 1>you have smart defensive backs that can communicate well and

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:48.079
<v Speaker 1>linebackers and they can cover for one another when they're

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>going to do something pre snap just because they're sensing

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:52.679
<v Speaker 1>something that they're seeing something in a formation or they

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 1>see the eyes of a receiver or of a back.

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 1>They can make those adjustments in game and they will

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:01.200
<v Speaker 1>work out. It doesn't always happened, but that was one

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 1>of the cases where that was a really tough one

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:07.319
<v Speaker 1>for Matthew Stafford. And just a quick thirty second thought, guys,

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 1>can I throw one more thing out there about Ryan

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Tannehill back to the thought that Dan had about him

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 1>being clutch? You know, I was watching that game and

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 1>it looked like the Rams offense was starting to get

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>into a rhythm in the second half. It looked like

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 1>they were gonna start to make, you know, put that

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 1>comeback together. And I'm sitting there going all right, well,

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 1>at this point, now Derrick Henry not being there is

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:29.440
<v Speaker 1>going to come back and burn the Titans, right and

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 1>to that point. And I'm looking also, like midway through

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the third quarter, I think Ryan Tannehill had like a

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred and five yards passing. So I'm sitting there saying,

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 1>all right, well, now, the fact that Ryan Tannehill all

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 1>of these years has just leaned on Derrick Henry and

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 1>lived in play action, it's gonna And then he threw

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:49.440
<v Speaker 1>that ball to Julio. I remember the exact Paul you're

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:51.440
<v Speaker 1>talking about and and that was the thought that came

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 1>through my mind. He seems to be the kind of

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>guy that makes a throw at the moment it needs

0:10:57.440 --> 0:11:00.599
<v Speaker 1>to be made, and I'm just during it. Both of

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:03.560
<v Speaker 1>you guys have just a thirty second thought going forward

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 1>with this offense, Like Schematically, do you keep on doing

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:11.719
<v Speaker 1>what you've always done even with Derrick Henry gone? Or

0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:14.199
<v Speaker 1>Hey I've got Julio, Hey I've got a j Brown.

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Hey I've got these tight ends, Like Scott, what do

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 1>you do? Like do do you change the way that

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 1>you play? Or do you still run the Derrick Henry

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:22.959
<v Speaker 1>offense with just without Derrek. You know, we talked a

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:25.680
<v Speaker 1>little bit about this last week and Dan brought up

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 1>a great point. There passed first defense. I'm the offense right,

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:32.480
<v Speaker 1>they passed its play action. My big concern was gonna

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:34.559
<v Speaker 1>be can they have the threat of the play action

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:37.959
<v Speaker 1>without Derrick Henry? Is there going to be enough fear

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:42.080
<v Speaker 1>instilled or the object of a running back that would

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:45.959
<v Speaker 1>hold the linebackers into or safety for a split second.

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:48.599
<v Speaker 1>So I think we decided last week they need to

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:50.679
<v Speaker 1>stick with what they've got. And here's the other thing.

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:52.679
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned his numbers and what he was doing in

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 1>that game. You know, there were a couple of really

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 1>really big drops by A. J. Brown and the Titans.

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 1>His numbers would have been better, meaning Ryan Tannehills, what

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:03.080
<v Speaker 1>they need to do is make sure that they hold

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:06.079
<v Speaker 1>onto the ball because some of that lack of production

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 1>on paper didn't show up because they were flat out

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:12.080
<v Speaker 1>drops by A. J. Brown. I would say that you

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>keep the identity of your offense. That is who you are.

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 1>That's not only who you are with Derrick Henry. It's

0:12:19.400 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 1>who your offensive line is, It's who your receivers are,

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:25.200
<v Speaker 1>it's your quarterback is. So it's it's not you know,

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 1>you've got to do everything that's best for all the

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 1>pieces of your offense. I think with the way their

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:34.440
<v Speaker 1>defense is playing and the way that their front is playing,

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 1>their identity can't change because they've built their roster around

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 1>trying to get a lead via the air or throwing

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:44.559
<v Speaker 1>the ball early and then salting games away with the

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>run game and you know, the defense. So I think

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 1>that's the way that the roster is constructed, and you

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 1>just got to continue to trust Ryan Tannhill that if

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 1>games come into the second half, he's good enough along

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 1>with those receivers to make plays and then dropped that game. Yep,

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:00.559
<v Speaker 1>well it was a really really us have win. And

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 1>you're right. He made the big throws when he had

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 1>to make them, and another guy that made huge throws

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>when he had to make them was Baker Mayfield. Are

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the Browns better without Odell Beckham? That's something we're gonna

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 1>talk about and we come back. And also where might

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Odell Beckham land? What teams make the most sense for him,

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 1>and what type of structure do you have to have

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 1>in place to bring him in. We're gonna talk about

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 1>that and we come back on Tapeds. Welcome back to

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:30.319
<v Speaker 1>tap its Bobo Schus him along with Scott Pioli and

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:33.199
<v Speaker 1>Dan Orlovsky want to win. It was for the Browns.

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Here's what Kevin Stefanski had to say about the perseverance

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 1>of his guys after their victory over the Bengals. I

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 1>would tell you, Nate, that's our guys are pros and

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>in this game, they're gonna be things that come up

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 1>week to week, uh, that you have to address and

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:49.840
<v Speaker 1>deal with and and move on. And that's what we did.

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:52.679
<v Speaker 1>And I felt like the focus was there all week. Well,

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:55.400
<v Speaker 1>they did have tremendous focus and there was a lot

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 1>to draw their focus away. Obviously, Dan, you you talked

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:02.320
<v Speaker 1>about us this past week that you can make an

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 1>argument that Baker Mayfield just looks better out there without

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Odell Beckham. Is that the cases their offense better when

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:12.199
<v Speaker 1>you remove Beckham based on what you saw on Sunday. Yes,

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:14.680
<v Speaker 1>that's been the case for years. It's two years now,

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:17.439
<v Speaker 1>and I think Sunday was just an emphatic one because

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 1>it came after the week that was so noisy and

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 1>loud in relation to Odell Beckham. So there's a couple

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 1>of parts of this game that stood out to me. Bob.

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 1>I know, we only focus on Baker Mayfield, right. I

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 1>think first of all, Kevin Stefanski, their head coach and

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 1>play caller, is a better head coach and play caller

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 1>without Odell Beckham Jr. My comments have nothing to do

0:14:38.640 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 1>with the negative aspect of Odell or any negative aspect

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 1>of Odell. It's just breaking down why they're better. Kevin Stefanski,

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 1>as a play caller, learned cut his teeth and grew

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 1>in the coaching world because he learned how to attack

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:59.520
<v Speaker 1>defenses with scheme rather than people. Okay, so that's the

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 1>biggest thing to understand when it comes to Kevin Stefenski,

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 1>and when you have a player comes in like Odell Beckham,

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 1>that becomes deviated because you tried to think of Okay,

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 1>I really want to design this play to attack this

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 1>coverage the donophin people's Jones play. But where do I

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 1>play so'dell on this because if I have O'Dell is

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the receiver, I might not get the coverage I want.

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 1>It's always about Kevin Stefanski designing plays to attack defenses,

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:28.480
<v Speaker 1>and then Baker Mayfield when it comes to playing quarterback

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 1>in this offense. I've heard people say, well, just put

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 1>O'Dell at number one. When I've tried to get people

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 1>to understand your relation to a lot of offenses and

0:15:36.760 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 1>specifically this one is number one is dependent on what

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the defense is. You know, if I call a play

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's covered two, well number one might be this guy.

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>And if it's covered four, number one might be this guy.

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 1>And it's covered if it's man coverage, number one might

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 1>be this guy. And when Baker plays without O'Dell, he

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 1>just runs the play. Okay, the play call is X,

0:15:56.680 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 1>what's the defense? Where's my guys? And stead when O'Dell

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 1>is on the field, he often gets play called is X.

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Where is my guys? What's the defense? And that's where

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the difference between Baker is and you saw it. You know,

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I did a breakdown on get up this week. You

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 1>know Anthony Schwartz on an end route out of empty

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, just because it's man coverage, he becomes number

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 1>one and bang, you know, Baker sees it and Tom

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 1>hits it, or the ball in the fourth quarter to

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Donovan People's Jones on a go route. Well, it's just

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 1>because the type of coverage that he got made him

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 1>number one. He's not looking for people anymore. He's looking

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 1>for what the defense is giving him. And I think

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the reality is scott about like the Browns best personnel

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 1>group candidly is thirteen personnel, one back, three tight ends.

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 1>That's their best one because they can play in their

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 1>physical run game and they could also throw the ball

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 1>really well out of it. So when you know, like

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>this team is just better because they're best players, they're

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>they're tight hands well as at a Nick Chubb and

0:16:56.160 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 1>so there that that's when they're at their best so

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of reasons why the team, a quarterback

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 1>in the coach are better without Odell. Yeah. Dan, you

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:06.640
<v Speaker 1>talk about the thirteen personnel, it's absolutely We've talked about that,

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, weeks ago when they go to three tight

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 1>ends and they bring in the threat of running the ball.

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean with the two backs that they have, Nick

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Chubb and I know Kareem Hunt has been injured, but

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:20.159
<v Speaker 1>they have that one to threat, but also Kareem Hunt

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 1>in terms of throwing the ball out of that personnel

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 1>grouping and the tight ends, they have so many things

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 1>they can do it and and and here's the only

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:29.159
<v Speaker 1>thing I want to add, and in terms of what

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:32.800
<v Speaker 1>they become as a running team, and and just up

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:35.240
<v Speaker 1>from because I think their offensive line is outstanding. Everyone

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:38.239
<v Speaker 1>talks about the Cowboys. Their offensive line has played and

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>produced so well, you know, last year, and they brought

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 1>in Bill Callahan to be their offensive line coach. And

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:47.199
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people that look at Bill Callahan in

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 1>his past, they remember those moments of when he was

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:53.119
<v Speaker 1>a head coach or an interim head coach at different

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:57.880
<v Speaker 1>stations and different stops. I remember Bill Callaghan, the offensive

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:01.359
<v Speaker 1>line coach who has consistently been one of the best

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 1>offensive line coaches in the National Football League in college

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 1>when he was there, and you know, part of my background,

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I got very spoiled with some of the offensive line

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 1>coaches that I was around, and I saw how important

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:17.720
<v Speaker 1>they would become in terms of the production of the offense.

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, when I first got into the National Football

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I got to mention earlier working for George Dileone, who

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:25.720
<v Speaker 1>was a fantastic offensive line coach. Then I get into

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the NFL and our offensive line coach at the Cleveland

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Browns is Kirk Ferren's. The assistant offensive line coach is

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:34.399
<v Speaker 1>Pat Hill, who goes on to be, you know, the

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:36.360
<v Speaker 1>head coach of Fresido State. And Pat in his own

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:38.640
<v Speaker 1>in his own way when he was at the University

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 1>of Arizona under coach Tomy when they had a really

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:44.400
<v Speaker 1>good offense. So Pat was the assistant offensive line coach.

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Go to the Ravens, they're still both there. Then when

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I get to the New York Jets and we have

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Bill Muir, who was an incredible offensive line coach. Then

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 1>I go to the you know, up to New England

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and we've got Dante Scarneckie and I keep mentioning these names,

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:00.880
<v Speaker 1>that are these premier offensive line coach and they had

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 1>so much to do with the success of the offense

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 1>because what they could do and what they would do

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 1>is identify along with the genius offensive coordinator. Minds is Okay,

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 1>this is where my limitations are on the offensive line.

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:15.639
<v Speaker 1>We need to find a way to protect the quarterback.

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna have to chip, we're gonna have to keep

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:18.920
<v Speaker 1>it tight in, We're gonna have to mix certain things

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 1>up in terms of our protection. We need more play action,

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:24.520
<v Speaker 1>you know. And then I as a career continued Dante

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Scarnetti up at up A New England, then having Bill

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Muir out in Kansas City, so I got very spoiled

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and understand the importance of a really really good offensive

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:35.919
<v Speaker 1>line coach and how they can help the entire offense.

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 1>And again, getting Bill Callahan was really important for the

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland Browns in and he's doing a terrific job. Now. Yeah,

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I also think the Browns defense played so well. I

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 1>mean and totality, this was the Brown's football team that

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:53.959
<v Speaker 1>I certainly thought we were going to get this season.

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, you correct, this just could be a jumping

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:00.880
<v Speaker 1>off point for them where once they kind of clear

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the drama out that they were having to deal with.

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:06.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they they looked like a team that has

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the capability to go out and now maybe go on

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 1>a run. Now you're you're that You're totally right, Bob,

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>that's a fair point. Is there's a lot of season left,

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>huge game coming this week against the Patriots, but this

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 1>was by far the best performance defensively, the most complete performance,

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 1>John Johnson creating a turnover their safety that they brought over.

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:27.399
<v Speaker 1>Miles Garrett right now looks like the defensive player of

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the year. When their secondary is healthy, Newsom's healthy and

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Denzel Ward is healthy, they they're really good. And there

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:38.920
<v Speaker 1>a zone based defense right now. But what I saw

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:43.120
<v Speaker 1>against Cincinnati was a team that when they're healthy and

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 1>locked in playing man coverage. Goodness gracious, they can play

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:49.639
<v Speaker 1>man coverage. And that's the difference maker for for defense

0:20:49.680 --> 0:20:51.400
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL right now, if you can do that,

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 1>because playing zone is what everybody's doing, but if you

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:56.199
<v Speaker 1>can lock teams up in man, so you know, I

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:58.360
<v Speaker 1>think that I don't Again, I don't want to pin

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 1>everything on Odell was the reason why I love this

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 1>isn't that. But you know, sometimes when you remove X,

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:06.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, less is more type of thing that they've

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:08.440
<v Speaker 1>decided to move on, and their quarterback played well and

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:11.199
<v Speaker 1>their head coach, you know, it's it's it's not that

0:21:11.359 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 1>just that the quarterback gets free. It's the head coach

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:16.880
<v Speaker 1>gets free. And it's maybe not just with play calling either.

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, if again, if we get this

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 1>version of the Browns moving forward, this would be a

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:25.200
<v Speaker 1>huge game against the Patriots this weekend and then the

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 1>rest of this season. This could be a a springboard

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:30.400
<v Speaker 1>type of effect. I gotta see them do it two

0:21:30.400 --> 0:21:32.639
<v Speaker 1>times in a row. Well. And the other aspect of

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the story, of course, is where does Odell Beckham go

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 1>now and what team might be a fit for him

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and Scott I think, you know, kind of a fascinating parallel.

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, you were in the room back when your

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 1>group was deciding. Is Randy Moss the right fit. Here's

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 1>an extremely talented player, perceived to have some baggage. We

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:50.119
<v Speaker 1>bring him in. Can we make it work? Well? I

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 1>think it's probably safe to say you guys made it

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 1>work right. All Tom Brady did was for a fifty

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:55.960
<v Speaker 1>touchdown passes. You guys almost had a perfect season, So

0:21:56.280 --> 0:22:00.160
<v Speaker 1>obviously you figured out the right formula to make it. Mark.

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 1>So if you're in and I don't know if you

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:05.359
<v Speaker 1>have maybe particular teams in mind that you think might

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:08.399
<v Speaker 1>be the right fit for a talent like Odell Beckham,

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 1>but take us inside that room. What's that conversation like

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:13.880
<v Speaker 1>and what do you think is the structure that needs

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to be in place to bring Odell Beckham in? And

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:18.679
<v Speaker 1>haven't be the right fit for what team? Yeah? You know,

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to make that prediction. And I also

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:24.159
<v Speaker 1>I want to be clear on on the Randy Moss

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 1>thing um. People keep drawing this comparison in this this

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 1>parallel and and and I think it's unfair and I

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:33.280
<v Speaker 1>don't want people to do it because I know Randy

0:22:33.280 --> 0:22:37.359
<v Speaker 1>Moss and we knew Randy Moss. Randy moss Um was

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:41.719
<v Speaker 1>very misunderstood and had some unfair labels. He also had

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:47.119
<v Speaker 1>a life path that he you know, he has had

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:51.440
<v Speaker 1>said himself that he started to mature. So I don't

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 1>know where O. B J. Was. I know that when

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 1>we met with Randy, we knew where Randy was at

0:22:55.840 --> 0:23:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and we didn't think Randy was the again the mal

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 1>content that he was being labeled. We didn't think he

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 1>was any of those things. There was this public image

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:06.639
<v Speaker 1>of him because of some of the things that he

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 1>had done. But again without getting into all the reasons

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:12.880
<v Speaker 1>that I believe, um, he was made out to be

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:16.159
<v Speaker 1>a worse person than he ever was. Randy was never

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:18.679
<v Speaker 1>a bad person. And and and and I don't know

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:20.440
<v Speaker 1>if O b J is or not. I'm not saying

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:22.919
<v Speaker 1>he is. So I I always want to tap the

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:25.119
<v Speaker 1>brakes when people they talk about what we did with

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:27.879
<v Speaker 1>Corey Dillon, what we did with Randy Moss. And you know,

0:23:27.920 --> 0:23:30.719
<v Speaker 1>we met those players where they were. And I know

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 1>that's a common phrase, but I will say this, where

0:23:34.080 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 1>those players were, they were all in. We didn't have

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 1>to manage Randy Moss, We didn't have to manage Corey Dillon.

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:44.919
<v Speaker 1>They were fine. Again, their reputations that preceded them was

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 1>nothing of what we got. So it wasn't really us

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:51.639
<v Speaker 1>making them better people are better players. They were what

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>they were. Now. You know what I do want to

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about Bobs is the situation in Cleveland,

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:01.439
<v Speaker 1>because I have been a part of circumstances similar um

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:04.920
<v Speaker 1>to that, and you're sitting there in a situation and

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>you know that you've got this distraction. It's not a

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:10.680
<v Speaker 1>full blown thing, but you're starting to see week by

0:24:10.720 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 1>week there's these drips of information getting out, and then

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, you get the video that came out UM

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 1>that I think allegedly was his his Odell Beckham Senior.

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Believe again, I don't know what that what the truth

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:27.879
<v Speaker 1>of that was, but there was clear there was a

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:31.360
<v Speaker 1>problem because then the Cleveland Browns made sure that they

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 1>got out publicly that listen and then no one had

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:38.720
<v Speaker 1>a name attached to it, but a number of of

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 1>reporters UM started speaking about well, you know, he's an

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:46.479
<v Speaker 1>undisciplined route runner. He's open, but he's in the wrong spot.

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 1>So both sides started to leak their truth out. Again,

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter who's wrong and who's right. Both sides were

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:56.159
<v Speaker 1>starting linkout. And what happens in a situation like that is, Okay,

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:59.680
<v Speaker 1>we've got a distraction. The players unhappy, we're unhappy. Both

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:02.359
<v Speaker 1>side need to make a business decision. You have to

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:06.919
<v Speaker 1>understand with every decision there's going to be unintended consequences.

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:09.400
<v Speaker 1>So as the Browns are getting ready to make this decision.

0:25:09.800 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 1>They understand that they've got someone who's demanding their way

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 1>out and trying to force their way out. If they

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:18.479
<v Speaker 1>would have just let him go and get what he wanted,

0:25:18.920 --> 0:25:21.159
<v Speaker 1>they would have been setting a precedent that becomes a

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:23.679
<v Speaker 1>problem in the future that the next time that a

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:27.359
<v Speaker 1>player wants out, they know that, hey, if I just

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:30.879
<v Speaker 1>act and do what O'Dell did, I can get out.

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:33.040
<v Speaker 1>And that's not a good way to learn your business

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:35.919
<v Speaker 1>because there's always going to be unhappy employees. And the

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:38.440
<v Speaker 1>other thing is is we had a situation is where

0:25:38.440 --> 0:25:41.399
<v Speaker 1>a player wasn't doing the right thing. Um he was

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 1>being public or his agent was being public. We were

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 1>trying to manage the situation. He started doing things, so

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 1>we had to start finding the player. We had to

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 1>suspend the player. You start this back and forth, but

0:25:52.160 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 1>here's what happens when you as a club start treating

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:57.959
<v Speaker 1>a player that way, where you either find the player

0:25:58.119 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 1>or suspend the player, or or do things. What happens

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:04.720
<v Speaker 1>is the players have a union and the nfl p

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 1>A will come at you and file a grievance that

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:11.160
<v Speaker 1>you are inconsistent in your treatment of players. Why did

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:13.439
<v Speaker 1>you suspend this player for being late for meetings, but

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:16.080
<v Speaker 1>you didn't suspend this player. Why did you find this

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:19.040
<v Speaker 1>player the max but not this player the max? So

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 1>when you start moving forward in in situations and circumstances

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 1>like that, there's so much that you need to think

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 1>of big picture, and one of those big picture things

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:30.679
<v Speaker 1>is setting precedent and how you're going to handle not

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:35.239
<v Speaker 1>only that situation but other situations moving forward, because you

0:26:35.320 --> 0:26:39.399
<v Speaker 1>may lose in the NFL's court of law. And the

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:43.119
<v Speaker 1>other thing I'll say about about this is when situations

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:47.120
<v Speaker 1>like this are going on, your entire locker room is watching.

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>They're watching what the head coach does, they're watching what

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the front office does, they're watching what the owner does. Because,

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 1>regardless of what fans think, players like Obi J can

0:26:56.560 --> 0:26:59.160
<v Speaker 1>be polarizing and there's a ton of people who are

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 1>allowed and speaking bad things about him, and there's a

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of people that love him. And the people that

0:27:05.400 --> 0:27:08.359
<v Speaker 1>love him are in that locker room, there, in the

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 1>training room, they are in the video room, there, in

0:27:11.040 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 1>different places. So it's going to be everyone is paying

0:27:15.280 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 1>attention to how you handle that situation. And if you

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 1>scorch the earth by embarrassing the player, or mistreating the

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 1>player publicly, you have other problems and seeds that are

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:29.200
<v Speaker 1>planted to have future problems with players. That's awesome, that's

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:31.720
<v Speaker 1>just awesome perspective. And you're right because the fans of

0:27:31.760 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the media get rid of them, move on from ob J,

0:27:34.720 --> 0:27:36.760
<v Speaker 1>just dump them. And it just goes to show you

0:27:36.840 --> 0:27:40.680
<v Speaker 1>how many different, like you know, branches to that tree

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:43.480
<v Speaker 1>there are that a general manager and a coach has

0:27:43.520 --> 0:27:46.879
<v Speaker 1>to think through before you just out and say, okay,

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 1>so just get out the door and hey, look there's

0:27:49.080 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 1>another quarterback out there that is making plays at an

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:54.119
<v Speaker 1>m v P level for his team, and that is

0:27:54.200 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson. Can they keep living the way they're living

0:27:57.280 --> 0:27:59.720
<v Speaker 1>and winning the way they're winning? Though huge win for

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the ray Evens survive against the Vikings. How they did it,

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:08.879
<v Speaker 1>that's something we're gonna talk about. We come back on tapeds. Well,

0:28:09.000 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 1>it was a back and forth, wild slingshot affair between

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the Minnesota Vikings and the Baltimore Ravens. As we returned

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:17.800
<v Speaker 1>here on tapeds, Bobo Shoes and dani Orlovsky Scott p

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Oli twenty one rushing attempts in the game for Lamar Jackson.

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 1>That was something coach Hardball was asked about after the game,

0:28:24.840 --> 0:28:30.280
<v Speaker 1>and he gave a pretty pointed response. We won. Whatever.

0:28:30.760 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 1>It's no long term, no long term sustainability observations. It's

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:37.240
<v Speaker 1>not it's not even relevant. Would you rather not run

0:28:37.280 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty one times today and lose the game? Crazy to

0:28:39.320 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 1>even suggest that, So it's not even a relevant question

0:28:42.520 --> 0:28:45.040
<v Speaker 1>to be answered. We don't plan on running any number

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 1>of times. We plan on wearing running as much, throwing

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 1>as much, handing it off as much, blitzing as much,

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 1>playing his own coverage as much as you think it

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:56.320
<v Speaker 1>takes to win the game in the game, and that's

0:28:56.320 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 1>really what you do. So the sustainability questions are like

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:01.880
<v Speaker 1>man life, short run to the ball, trying to win

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the game, and we can certainly understand why the coach

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:07.640
<v Speaker 1>feels that way. Having said that, guys, though, is there

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 1>an expiration date on a player like Lamar Jackson playing

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 1>the way he has to play to win games? Right?

0:29:15.440 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you if you have to run him

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty times or more in a game, is that a

0:29:20.880 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 1>world you can live in? As elusive as he is,

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 1>at some point, is he not going to get hit

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:26.720
<v Speaker 1>with a kill shot? And now all of a sudden

0:29:26.760 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 1>your season falls apart. How you balance that, Scott, when

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 1>you're you know, putting together your roster. You got a

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 1>backup quarterback. Can he run the same stuff? I mean,

0:29:34.520 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 1>obviously can't do the same things Lamar does. It's just

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 1>that balancing act when you're having the discussion during the

0:29:40.240 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 1>week game planning for a game of what you want

0:29:43.440 --> 0:29:45.680
<v Speaker 1>to do with a player that plays the way Lamar does,

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:48.360
<v Speaker 1>knowing how important he is to your team. Yeah, and again,

0:29:48.400 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you want to make that your general practice,

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:55.760
<v Speaker 1>right that that's anything. Coach Hardball was saying that this

0:29:55.840 --> 0:29:57.600
<v Speaker 1>is not how we want a game plan for games,

0:29:57.640 --> 0:30:00.320
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think you can or should. That's what

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:02.480
<v Speaker 1>they had to do to win that particular game. And

0:30:02.520 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I think Lamar is also much smarter than that, where

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 1>he knows that he that doesn't have a very long

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 1>shelf life because the game is different. Now. Yes, they

0:30:11.880 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 1>protect the quarterback in the pocket. Yes we've got rules

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:19.240
<v Speaker 1>that that protect ball carriers a little bit differently, but

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:21.400
<v Speaker 1>there's still a lot of issues that can come with that.

0:30:21.440 --> 0:30:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Because the other thing that you think about from a

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:26.080
<v Speaker 1>front office standpoint, at some point in time that rookie

0:30:26.120 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 1>contract runs out, and the quarterback, if he's as good

0:30:29.840 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 1>as Lamar, is going to be your team's highest paid player,

0:30:32.160 --> 0:30:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and he should be your highest paid player. So when

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:38.080
<v Speaker 1>you see activity like that on the field, there is

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:40.640
<v Speaker 1>this little bit of discomfort. You're scoming in your chair

0:30:40.640 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, just like the coaches are scorming on

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the sidelines. But again, if you try to take that

0:30:45.720 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 1>away from him too much, it's part of his gift,

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 1>it's part of his magic, it's part of the team's success,

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 1>it's part of what the team is depending on him doing.

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think that you can live knowing that

0:30:57.400 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 1>your quarterback or go into it in game plan runs

0:31:01.160 --> 0:31:03.920
<v Speaker 1>and you don't want your quarterback running twenty times a

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 1>game because it will have a short shelf life moving forward. Yeah,

0:31:09.320 --> 0:31:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I agree in many aspects, Scot. Let's say, first of all, Um,

0:31:13.800 --> 0:31:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I used to think that Lamar this wasn't sustainable because

0:31:17.440 --> 0:31:20.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, what quarterback do we have evidence of running

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 1>this much and being able to play a really long

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:25.800
<v Speaker 1>period of time. The only guy that I could think

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 1>of would be Cam Newton. Now, the difference between Cam

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:33.720
<v Speaker 1>and Lamar is Cam was an absolute battering ram And

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the kind of the difference with Lamar is, you know, honestly,

0:31:38.080 --> 0:31:41.960
<v Speaker 1>watch the games. He doesn't take big hits and he's

0:31:42.000 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 1>got this incredible ability I call it spidy sense in

0:31:45.080 --> 0:31:47.920
<v Speaker 1>a way of avoiding big hits. You know, he's always

0:31:48.160 --> 0:31:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Kyler is very similar in that aspect as well. Um

0:31:51.840 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 1>And so I think that while I've in the past

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 1>been it's so hesitant to have a guy run like

0:31:57.680 --> 0:32:03.240
<v Speaker 1>this until the run and in him taking unnecessary big hits,

0:32:03.880 --> 0:32:06.920
<v Speaker 1>then then my concern of it has wavered. The second

0:32:06.960 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 1>thing I would say is this twenty runs. Yes, only

0:32:09.160 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 1>nine of them were designed runs, eleven of them were

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:16.800
<v Speaker 1>creative dropped back past there down fourteen at halftime, essentially

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 1>with the kickoff return in the second half. So they're

0:32:19.360 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 1>in a much more throw heavy situation and Lamar is

0:32:22.360 --> 0:32:24.880
<v Speaker 1>just going to be a playmaker. So I can't crush

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens. They're going well gossh, you can't keep doing

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 1>this guy. Lamar had the ball in his hands and

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:34.720
<v Speaker 1>was making plays, so that was more him being a scrambler. Um.

0:32:34.880 --> 0:32:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I thought Lamar was remarkable in the second half. Bad

0:32:37.520 --> 0:32:39.400
<v Speaker 1>in the first half. I don't want to say bad

0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 1>in the first half. I think the Ravens offense has

0:32:41.880 --> 0:32:44.840
<v Speaker 1>gotten a little drunk with throwing the football downfield. You know,

0:32:44.920 --> 0:32:48.120
<v Speaker 1>it's it's they They had more twenty plus attempts in

0:32:48.160 --> 0:32:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the last two weeks coming into this game than anybody

0:32:51.080 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 1>in football. That's just not who they are. And that

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:55.040
<v Speaker 1>was really the case in the first half. And you

0:32:55.080 --> 0:32:57.120
<v Speaker 1>saw the interception at the end of the first half

0:32:57.160 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 1>that kind of showed that. What I liked in the

0:32:59.480 --> 0:33:03.360
<v Speaker 1>second half was two things. Rashad Bateman, their first round

0:33:03.440 --> 0:33:06.000
<v Speaker 1>rookie out of Minnesota, has become the hands catch guy.

0:33:06.320 --> 0:33:08.560
<v Speaker 1>The I gotta get a throw into a tight window,

0:33:08.560 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 1>a contested catch, It's an important conversion. Bateman has become

0:33:12.360 --> 0:33:15.400
<v Speaker 1>my guy. And while Lamar was great, so was Rashad Bateman.

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:17.440
<v Speaker 1>And then Hollywood Brown is a guy that I have

0:33:17.520 --> 0:33:21.080
<v Speaker 1>been incredibly critical of. And one of the reasons was

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:23.560
<v Speaker 1>is he was a one trick pony, so to speak.

0:33:23.600 --> 0:33:25.240
<v Speaker 1>All you all you can do is run down the

0:33:25.280 --> 0:33:27.520
<v Speaker 1>field and then two out of every ten times you

0:33:27.600 --> 0:33:30.640
<v Speaker 1>drop it. And I like the fact that they used

0:33:30.640 --> 0:33:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood on the perimeter almost the way the Chiefs used

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Tyreek Hill. We're gonna get the ball in his hands

0:33:35.360 --> 0:33:37.360
<v Speaker 1>out in the perimeter, and so it went from throwing

0:33:37.400 --> 0:33:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the football down the field so much too, We're gonna

0:33:39.960 --> 0:33:42.280
<v Speaker 1>get the ball to the perimeter. Bateman is gonna make

0:33:42.280 --> 0:33:45.000
<v Speaker 1>contested catches. Hollywood, go make something happen. I thought Hollywood

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:48.040
<v Speaker 1>did that three or four times of turning something into

0:33:48.080 --> 0:33:49.960
<v Speaker 1>nothing or a little into big, and I wanted to

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 1>give those guys their props in relation to how great

0:33:53.760 --> 0:33:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Lamar has been. I think the Ravens have issues um

0:33:57.240 --> 0:34:00.920
<v Speaker 1>their defense. If their defensive line does not dominate, you

0:34:00.960 --> 0:34:03.959
<v Speaker 1>can get after that secondary, specifically if they don't get

0:34:03.960 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 1>hands on you at the line of scrimmage. So I

0:34:05.840 --> 0:34:09.400
<v Speaker 1>think Lamar was amazing. Those two receivers stepped up, but

0:34:09.640 --> 0:34:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm still hesitant that the team can sustain this play

0:34:13.520 --> 0:34:16.399
<v Speaker 1>given how dependent on the d line the defenses. And

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:18.960
<v Speaker 1>then just to follow up one thing that you said

0:34:18.960 --> 0:34:20.680
<v Speaker 1>that it was part of Bob's question, which was a

0:34:20.680 --> 0:34:23.720
<v Speaker 1>great question. How sustainable is this? You know you mentioned

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:27.080
<v Speaker 1>how he doesn't take direct hits, meaning Lamar, and I

0:34:27.120 --> 0:34:30.040
<v Speaker 1>go back to a phrase I heard early on in

0:34:30.120 --> 0:34:34.040
<v Speaker 1>my scouting career was a scout talking about how the

0:34:34.120 --> 0:34:37.920
<v Speaker 1>quarterback didn't take hits like a good boxer. He didn't

0:34:37.920 --> 0:34:41.440
<v Speaker 1>take direct punches. And I remember this scout talking to

0:34:41.480 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 1>me about Mohammad Ali and his greatness early in his career.

0:34:45.120 --> 0:34:48.320
<v Speaker 1>How because of his quickness and his ability and his movement,

0:34:48.800 --> 0:34:51.479
<v Speaker 1>he was able to knock guys out because he could

0:34:51.480 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 1>slip punches as well as any boxer in in the sport.

0:34:56.000 --> 0:34:59.919
<v Speaker 1>Then came Sugar Ray Leonard, who never really took many

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:02.720
<v Speaker 1>hard hits. Could they just have that ability to slip punches?

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson has that ability to slip punches, slip hits,

0:35:06.560 --> 0:35:09.360
<v Speaker 1>but again as the career goes on, that ability to

0:35:09.440 --> 0:35:13.399
<v Speaker 1>slip those punches made deteriorate. Well, they will kick off

0:35:13.440 --> 0:35:15.719
<v Speaker 1>Thursday night because that is the start of week ten.

0:35:15.800 --> 0:35:19.520
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be after a twenty one carry overtime kind

0:35:19.520 --> 0:35:21.719
<v Speaker 1>of slugfest with the Vikings, right back at it on

0:35:21.719 --> 0:35:24.719
<v Speaker 1>the short week for the Ravens on Thursday night in

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Miami against the Dolphins. So that'll be again we're gonna

0:35:27.600 --> 0:35:29.960
<v Speaker 1>talk about. We'll also we come back on Thursday be

0:35:30.000 --> 0:35:33.600
<v Speaker 1>talking about was how Eyebrow raising a loss? Was this

0:35:33.680 --> 0:35:36.440
<v Speaker 1>for the Cowboys and a quarterback that we could be

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:39.640
<v Speaker 1>overlooking this season? There's a guy that's not getting a

0:35:39.640 --> 0:35:42.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of publicity, that's kind of under the radar, keeping

0:35:42.520 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 1>his team in the conversation, and having a great year.

0:35:45.920 --> 0:35:48.239
<v Speaker 1>Those are things we're gonna be talking about. We come

0:35:48.280 --> 0:35:52.080
<v Speaker 1>back with another episode coming up on Thursday. We love

0:35:52.160 --> 0:35:54.840
<v Speaker 1>for you to rate, comment and subscribe. We'll talk to

0:35:54.840 --> 0:36:00.520
<v Speaker 1>you Thursday. Thanks for being a tape. Tape is a

0:36:00.560 --> 0:36:04.000
<v Speaker 1>production of iHeartMedia and the NFL. You can download the

0:36:04.000 --> 0:36:07.319
<v Speaker 1>tape Heeds podcast on the i Heart app, Apple Podcasts,

0:36:07.440 --> 0:36:09.040
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you get your podcasts.