WEBVTT - Trump Tariffs Roil Markets, Musk's DOGE In Action

0:00:01.200 --> 0:00:05.480
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power collide

0:00:05.760 --> 0:00:11.040
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 2>Live from New York and Caroline.

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 3>Hyde and I'm Jackie Devalas in San Francisco. This is

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Technology coming up.

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 4>All eyes on President Trump's tariffs on Mexico, Canada and

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:40.639
<v Speaker 4>China roiling global markets. Plus another big week for tech

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 4>earnings coming up with Panete kicking it off after the

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 4>closing bell today, and a look at Elon Musk's doge

0:00:46.520 --> 0:00:50.199
<v Speaker 4>drive as he claims to cancel payments to federal contractors.

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 4>For first the story of the day, we move markets

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 4>on the back of tariff. There is talk now coming

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 4>that potentially those tarifs arelayed by a month, coming from

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 4>the President of Mexico. We're off of our lows eight

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 4>ten percent on the Nastak one hundred. We're nowhere near

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:05.759
<v Speaker 4>the sell off of this time last week in reverberations

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 4>to deep seek, but we are down nonetheless as a

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 4>global story unfolds. Move on, Look at what happened to

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 4>the world of crypto over the course of the weekend.

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:14.759
<v Speaker 4>This was your liquid ascid of choice. We fell hard

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 4>on Sunday. We're now off by three percent over the

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 4>last three training days, but we climb back off of

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 4>today's lows. Move on and have a look at what's

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 4>happening on individual movers. I bring you the biggest points

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 4>drivers to the downside. Currently Tesla off by more than

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 4>four percent. We think of the repercussions to auto's, the

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:31.959
<v Speaker 4>repercussions to phone sales, Apple or by three point four percent.

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 4>In video is currently off by one point eight percent.

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 4>As we think about the semiconductors in the overall concerns

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 4>around global tariffs, Let's get right to it.

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 2>Who most Kaylee Lines joins us for more.

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:43.679
<v Speaker 4>And maybe they don't come in for a month, but

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 4>still the shockwaves from a twenty five percent tariff on Canada,

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 4>Mexico and slightly less to China.

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 5>Well in Caroline. It's only Mexico that the president has confirmed.

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 5>The US President, that is, Donald Trump will see the

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 5>tiarifs toll lead for a month. After speaking with Mexican

0:01:58.120 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 5>President Claudia Scheinbaum, an agreement had been reached in order

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 5>to have this delay in place for Mexico to send

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 5>ten thousand troops to its northern border with the US

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 5>in order to help stem the flow of fentanyl and migrants.

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 5>That is the route of the issue that Donald Trump

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 5>really has here that he is using tariff's leverage to

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 5>try to extract concessions from and it does seem that

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 5>he did indeed get those. And in the interim one

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 5>month period where the extension will be in place, Mexican

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:25.639
<v Speaker 5>officials will be negotiating with officials from the Trump administration

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 5>Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Treasury Secretary Scott Besstt, and

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 5>ultimately who is presumed to be confirmed as Commerce Secretary,

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:36.119
<v Speaker 5>Howard Lutnik. They will all be leading those negotiations. As

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:38.120
<v Speaker 5>for the other two countries that tariffs are set to

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:40.640
<v Speaker 5>go into effect at midnight tonight, no news yet as

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 5>to whether Canada can avoid its twenty five percent levies,

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 5>ten percent on energy imports specifically a lower level, and

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:49.800
<v Speaker 5>of course ten percent on all imports coming in from China.

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 5>President Trump has already spoken to Canadian Prime Minister Justin

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 5>Trudeau once today today he is scheduled to do so

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 5>again at three pm Eastern time, so we'll see if

0:02:57.520 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 5>they too can reach some kind of agreement to stave

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 5>these off for a period of time. If not, these

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 5>tariffs will go into effect it at midnight in Canada

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 5>and Return will be placing retaliatory tariffs on thirty billion

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 5>Canadian dollars worth of US goods at midnight. We're seeing

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 5>other ripple effects as well. The Premiere of Ontario, that

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:17.080
<v Speaker 5>province has announced today a cancelation of a contract with

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 5>Starlink valued in nearly seventy million dollars. It was set

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 5>to go into effect in June of this year. That

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 5>has been a put on pause and the provincial government

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:27.640
<v Speaker 5>says no US companies will be getting provincial contracts so

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 5>long as tariffs are in place. The question is going

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 5>to be will they go in place just hours from now?

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 6>Kayleie.

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 3>What else do we know about the reaction from the

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 3>business community kind of on the back of these Mexico

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 3>and Canada terriff escalations.

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 5>Well, the business community has had a bit of a

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 5>mixed reaction, Jackie, mostly by enlarged companies are are hesitant

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 5>to embrace the notion of tariffs and echoes for things

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 5>like the Chamber of Commerce represented here in DC and

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 5>other business leaders as well, who have warned about the

0:03:57.400 --> 0:04:00.920
<v Speaker 5>potential inflationary impacts. Obviously, this administration has pushed back on

0:04:00.960 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 5>the notion that these would be inflationary, saying, if anything,

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 5>it would bring a one time price increased rather than

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 5>a sustained period of inflation. You're also seeing some reaction

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 5>here in Washington with questions raised around.

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 6>The legality of all of this.

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 5>The powers that Donald Trump is using here to enact

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 5>these levees are the nineteen seventy seven International Emergency Economic

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:23.360
<v Speaker 5>Powers Act that traditionally is applied when it comes to sanctions,

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 5>not import tariffs, and there is a question as to

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 5>whether or not this authority would actually stand up in

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 5>court if challenged legally when it is being used in

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:35.279
<v Speaker 5>this way, whether this is actually a national security oriented

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:37.440
<v Speaker 5>emergency or not, as the President contends that it is.

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 5>Again talking about the flow here a fentanyl and migrants.

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Over the borders.

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 6>Bloomberg's Kaylee lyons, thank you.

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:46.159
<v Speaker 3>Now, Let's get to the tariff's impact on the chip

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:49.480
<v Speaker 3>world and Asia. With TSMC shirts stumbling by the most

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:52.719
<v Speaker 3>in nearly six months, as trading resumed on Monday, playing

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 3>catchup to a global AI sell off with Trump's new

0:04:55.360 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 3>tariffs Bloomberg's peerrelst joins us to discuss Peter through what

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 3>we know about Trump's discussion with and Nvidia CEO Jensen

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 3>Wang and what he has signaled regarding tariffs on chips

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:08.920
<v Speaker 3>so far.

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:13.039
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, well, what we've seen really is you, as you

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 7>were laying out just before this, the rules of the

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:18.480
<v Speaker 7>game are changing almost by the hour. Here, many many

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 7>changes for these companies to deal with both Nvidia, TSMC,

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 7>on Hi some of the other companies that we've seen

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 7>move in the markets these days. TSMC is an interesting example.

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:30.600
<v Speaker 7>They're the most advanced chip maker out there. It takes

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 7>them years and tens of billions of dollars to build

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 7>these factories, so their timeframe for making decisions from a

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:38.719
<v Speaker 7>business standpoint is quite a bit different than some of

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:41.159
<v Speaker 7>these policy changes that have been made. They make most

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:43.600
<v Speaker 7>of their advanced chips right now in Taiwan. They make

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:45.800
<v Speaker 7>them for Apple, and they make them for Nvidia, and

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:48.719
<v Speaker 7>they ship them into the United States and into other markets.

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:51.280
<v Speaker 7>So with Trump's tariffs, this idea that maybe they would

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:53.840
<v Speaker 7>move production into the United States, it's a little bit

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:56.039
<v Speaker 7>of a different timeframe. They are building a factory in

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 7>the United States, but that's going to take some time

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 7>for them. So we're seeing both this depression on the

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 7>stock price catching up with what happened with deep Seak

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 7>last week, and on top of that, now we have

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 7>these tariff concerns, whether they are delayed or not.

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 4>It's interesting Bernstein actually putting out a note still having

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:15.679
<v Speaker 4>in Video and an outperform saying they see little impact

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 4>from taris on slocks like in Video right now in

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:19.799
<v Speaker 4>the overall industry.

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:22.679
<v Speaker 2>So how to investors gain this out more broadly?

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 7>Peter, Well, there are a couple of concerns layered on

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 7>top of each other. There's the deep seat concerns that

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:31.239
<v Speaker 7>we saw last week that knocked almost six hundred billion

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 7>dollars off the market cap of Invidia. Of course, that

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 7>was more around the idea that this Chinese company had

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:39.479
<v Speaker 7>been able to build an AI model it was competitive

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 7>with the best in the West, including open AIS model,

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 7>for a much much lower cost. There's still a lot

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:46.679
<v Speaker 7>of things that we don't know about how that model

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:49.719
<v Speaker 7>was built, exactly what chips they used. They did say

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:51.719
<v Speaker 7>that they used a bunch of Invidia chips there too,

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:54.359
<v Speaker 7>But I think that primary concern is that perhaps some

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:56.159
<v Speaker 7>of these AI companies are going to try to do

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:59.160
<v Speaker 7>things more cheaply rather than trying to invest. The tens

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 7>of billions of dollars are hundreds of billions of dollars

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:04.279
<v Speaker 7>that we've heard from open Ai and Microsoft and most

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:08.160
<v Speaker 7>recently Soft Bank in this Stargate venture. On top of that,

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 7>you have the tariff concerns that President Trump has talked

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 7>about he may layer tariffs on top of computer chips too.

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 7>That would hit some of these companies, including TSMC, probably Samsung,

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 7>some of the other players, Asian players that have been

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 7>very active in this market.

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 4>Thank you an eye across all of it, Peter Elstrom me,

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 4>thank you. Let's bring in Silvia Jablonski, now CEO CIO.

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 2>Of Defiance CTS, to discuss the broader market impact.

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 4>How you, as someone who needs to be assessing your

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:37.040
<v Speaker 4>overall exposure here, does.

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 2>Try to game out what is a very fluid situation.

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 8>Higen warning, Well, it is a very fluid situation. And

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 8>I think you know the only thing you can kind

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 8>of do as an investor, what are your retail investor

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 8>institutional investors just kind of keep an eye on what's

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 8>going on with these negotiations, right, I think that. Hearing

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 8>from mister Hassett this morning, it sounded like all of

0:07:57.160 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 8>this was around the idea of not important you know,

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:02.679
<v Speaker 8>drugs fund and all into the US immigration types of issues,

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 8>border control issues, and if that's really the case and

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 8>we see, you know, kind of what happened with Mexico,

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 8>that the delay of this and ongoing conversations is probably

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 8>a positive thing and maybe it feels like it won't

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 8>go into an effect.

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 9>But of course we have that.

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 8>Backdrop of you know, domestication bringing everything back online to

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 8>the US to be produced in the US and things

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 8>like that, so you kind of have to see where

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 8>all of this lands and you know, kind of adjust accordingly.

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 3>So we have some companies coming up or later this

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 3>week and into the month that are reporting earnings. What

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 3>do you expect will be covered as it relates to

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 3>tariffs and perhaps that looming threat. What do you want

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 3>to hear from management and some of those conference calls.

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 8>I think it's too soon. I think it's it's very

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 8>difficult for them to address the situation because we don't

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 8>know whether or not the tech, you know, whether the

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 8>tariffs will be you know, going into a factor or not. Right,

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:58.839
<v Speaker 8>I think there will be some comments along the lines of,

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 8>you know, we're keeping an eye on this, and it's

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:04.560
<v Speaker 8>a moving target and food situation similar to you know,

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 8>similarly to how you phrased it. The difficulty is, you know,

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 8>if we get these tariffs and these companies arguably will

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 8>probably raise prices, it probably will impact future earnings and

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:16.719
<v Speaker 8>SHEP growth and things like this. But I don't think

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:19.199
<v Speaker 8>anybody wants to touch it this week until we get

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 8>a little bit more color. We might get that, you know,

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 8>today or within the next twenty four to forty eight hours,

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 8>and I think that'll kind of help the situation. What

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 8>I think everybody's looking for from earnings, particularly this week

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 8>when you have you know, some of the big tech

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 8>giants coming out with their earnings, is talk of AI.

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 6>Right, are we monetizing this?

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 8>What are the top and bottom lines going to look like?

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 10>What kind of.

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:42.439
<v Speaker 8>Revenue generations should we expect, you know, how is it

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 8>going to start filtering into the you know, XMG four

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 8>hundred and ninety three other names that aren't the you know,

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:49.679
<v Speaker 8>kind of providers of all this stuff. I think that's

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 8>really what the market's out to see. And if that's

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:55.160
<v Speaker 8>the case, and you know, the tariff thing becomes more

0:09:55.200 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 8>of a benign event, Well, then you have a great

0:09:57.679 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 8>buying opportunity here, right, But we need a little more

0:09:59.840 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 8>time to shake that out.

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 3>There's kind of two stories that are playing out right now.

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 3>You have this need to invest in more AI infrastructure,

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 3>but at the same time, you have investors who are

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 3>really wary of overspending on that front as well. How

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 3>do you think companies are going to kind of weigh that,

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 3>especially as we're seeing more of a bigger push coming

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:20.839
<v Speaker 3>out of Washington to really build out infrastructure.

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 8>I think it's, you know, to the letter of your point.

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 8>I think there's this you know, big push from Washington

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:29.200
<v Speaker 8>to participate in the build out of AI infrastructure. You know,

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 8>the US has been left behind so many times when

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 8>it comes to tech and tech advancements, and I think

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 8>that's why Deep Sea kind of read all the markets

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:38.960
<v Speaker 8>right like, uh oh, look look what they just did, right,

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 8>And so I think that there will be a lot

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 8>of investment and focus out in building out AI infrastructure,

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 8>making sure it's you know, the best infrastructure in the

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:49.559
<v Speaker 8>world and also the most cost efficient infrastructure in the

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 8>world for what it's actually providing. And so I think

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 8>that's been will continue and AI is just the beginning

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 8>of it, right. I think we're stage one of AI right.

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 8>Stage two will be how it impacts drug companies, pharmaceutical companies,

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 8>aerospace and defense, you know, hearing that on the earnings

0:11:05.559 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 8>calls from.

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Again those x mag names.

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:10.200
<v Speaker 8>And then I think step three is like, well what

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 8>else is there?

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:11.200
<v Speaker 10>Right?

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:14.680
<v Speaker 8>And that could arguably be quantum computing, the you know,

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 8>next fourth Industrial revolution of technology and supercomputing there and

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 8>so there's a lot of spend that will probably continue

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 8>to go into AI. I think it's just early days still.

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 4>And you've ben providing exposure to quantum in particular silvia,

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:29.239
<v Speaker 4>but you also provide.

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:29.959
<v Speaker 2>Exposure to crypto.

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:33.679
<v Speaker 4>Crypto was the asset to sell in an a liquid

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 4>market over the weekend. How do you think that crypto

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:38.960
<v Speaker 4>is exposure is going to be to volatile markets but

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:41.199
<v Speaker 4>still an administration that is process space.

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 8>So crypto has this funny the market has a funny

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 8>relationship with crypto, right. I think sometimes we think of

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:50.079
<v Speaker 8>it as as gold, right, digital gold and an inflation hedge,

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 8>and then other times we view it as a risk

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 8>asset like a semiconductor stock. Or a high growth tech

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 8>stock or something like this. And so I think that

0:11:57.600 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 8>right now it's just behaving like the latter. Investors are

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:02.080
<v Speaker 8>spooped to about tariffs, what that means for the broader

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:05.559
<v Speaker 8>economic picture. And so crypto is something that's easy to

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:09.080
<v Speaker 8>buy and sell, and so it suffers along with you know,

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 8>the stocks that we see being hit the hardest today,

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:12.719
<v Speaker 8>particularly those.

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 10>In the NASDAC.

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:15.720
<v Speaker 8>But again, you know, we think crypto is going to

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 8>be one of the best, you know, opportunities to have

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:23.480
<v Speaker 8>in a portfolio, specifically bitcoin, specifically names like micro Strategy

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 8>that track Bitcoin, and so I think you're going to

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 8>see some dip buyers here, and you know, we see

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 8>crypto moving around today right to that effect. So let's

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 8>see put positive news on.

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 6>Tariffs and crypto.

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:36.080
<v Speaker 8>You know, it'll be an asset to class to watch,

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:37.439
<v Speaker 8>I think in a favorable sense.

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:42.439
<v Speaker 3>Sylvia Deblonsky of Defiance ATFS Thank you. Now coming up,

0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 3>Elon Musk's Doowe's team demand access to sensitive government information

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:51.560
<v Speaker 3>and start shutting down payments to federal contractors. This is Bloomberg.

0:13:01.880 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 4>Elo Musk's gohog team is shutting down payments to some

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 4>federal contracts, singling out the US Agency of International Development

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 4>as a criminal organization and appears to access to sensitive

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 4>systems used.

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 2>At the US Treasury Department. Springing bloemgs Max Schafkin for

0:13:15.480 --> 0:13:19.560
<v Speaker 2>more and is this not the remit of government efficiency?

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 11>We are in some crazy territory right now where we

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 11>have a billionaire who's running you know, six companies, who

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:30.959
<v Speaker 11>has some kind of affiliation with the White House, but

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 11>it's not entirely clear, but is very very close, of course,

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 11>to President Trump. Is kind of running around Washington disrupting

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 11>in i'd say, in both the positive and negative sense

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 11>of that word, the operations of.

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 6>The federal government.

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:47.559
<v Speaker 11>We saw over the weekend reports that Musk had taken

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:50.720
<v Speaker 11>over Treasury in the Department of Treasury's payment system, that's

0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:53.320
<v Speaker 11>like the money that the US government has to pay

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:54.559
<v Speaker 11>all of its contractors.

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 2>That was a pretty crazy action.

0:13:57.360 --> 0:14:00.480
<v Speaker 11>Then last night Musk got on a Twitter faces and

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 11>essentially said he was shutting down USAID.

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:05.599
<v Speaker 2>Congress created a USAID.

0:14:05.720 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 11>It's not clear that that's something that Elon Musk is

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 11>allowed to do. So a lot of questions and just

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 11>a ton of chaos in the federal government right now.

0:14:16.600 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 3>Max what do we know about who's aiding Trump, who's

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 3>aiding Elon Musk at this point in some of these efforts.

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean, this isn't the first time that he's stormed

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 3>into an organization and taken it over. Can you talk

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 3>to us a little bit about the parallels perhaps that

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 3>Twitter has and what we can kind of expect on

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 3>this front. Granted it is government, absolutely, yeah.

0:14:35.760 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 11>I mean this is very similar to the period immediately

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 11>following Elon Musk's purchase of Twitter, where he brought in

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 11>this very small crew of loyalists, a combination of people

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 11>who've sort of worked with him for a real, really

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 11>long time, as well as you know, like twenty year

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 11>old intern types who are doing all sorts of stuff.

0:14:56.400 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 11>The email that went out to federal workers last week,

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 11>last week so object line quote fork in the road,

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 11>Musk sent a nearly identical email to Twitter employees before

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 11>laying off many of them. Now, I will say there

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 11>are huge differences again between it, It's pretty obvious say this,

0:15:14.840 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 11>but between the federal government and a forty four billion dollar,

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 11>you know, private company that Elon Musk controlled, And that's

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:24.480
<v Speaker 11>why you're seeing, you know, a lot of criticism from

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 11>from Democrats as well as groups that are concerned about

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 11>funding me cut off. And of course there will be

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 11>political implications of this as well.

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 4>Senator of Oregon Ron Wyden most vocal out there saying

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 4>you can't do this. All of us have been so

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 4>close to doze and the birth of it. Can't be

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 4>surprised in the least that he's running roughshild No.

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 11>I mean, I think it's somewhat surprising how quickly this

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 11>has moved. But you're right, this is what Trump and

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 11>Elon Musk said when they were running, when Trump was

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 11>running for president, and so in that sense, it's not

0:15:59.280 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 11>a surprise.

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 10>Do you think there were a lot of people, a

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 10>lot of sort.

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 11>Of moderates who supported Trump who were hoping for something different.

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 11>It's kind of similar to the tariff story, right, there's

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 11>I hope that you know, this would all be bluster

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 11>or something, and and and you know, this is what

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 11>what they said they were going to do.

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 2>And and one difference though here again.

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 11>Is that Elon Musk doesn't work for the government, or

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 11>it's it's not clear what is what his authority is.

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 11>He hasn't he hasn't been subject to a confirmation hearing

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 11>he hasn't put his financial stuff in it in a trust.

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 11>He's also very erratic. Right, this is probably more extreme

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 11>than it would have been if it were just were

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 11>a different Trump appointee.

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 2>He was doing this, but.

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 11>Having somebody with musks temperament and reputation and just frankly

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 11>energy levels, uh, sort of takes us to another level.

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 6>Bloomberg's mass Chapkin, thank you.

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 4>Open Ai and self back deepening their relationship further, joining

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 4>forces and a joint venture to say AI services to

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 4>businesses across Japan. Now, Sulfa Bank founder Masoshi Sun and

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:07.200
<v Speaker 4>open Ai CEO Samalmon took to the stage in Tokyo

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:10.879
<v Speaker 4>to outline this new venture with hiring one thousand people

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 4>to market open ai products to arrange Japanese industries. Sam

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 4>Almond also talked about the company's next AI agent.

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:19.440
<v Speaker 2>It's called deep Research, which.

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:21.639
<v Speaker 4>Can conduct online research on a user's behalf and is

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 4>powered by chatbot chatchubt Jakimore and AI Developments.

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:29.440
<v Speaker 3>Now, let's discuss AI safety and how USAI policy could

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:32.920
<v Speaker 3>be shaped by China's advances. Following Deep Seek were joined

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:36.159
<v Speaker 3>by Doug Caladis from the group Americans for responsible.

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:38.960
<v Speaker 6>Innovation, Doug, it seems like we have a.

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:42.879
<v Speaker 3>Different narrative going now after deep sea developments last week.

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:47.120
<v Speaker 3>It's kind of sparking this renewed escalation in arms race

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:49.199
<v Speaker 3>in AI. But at the same time, you know, you

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 3>have the Biden Administration's Executive Order on AI being rescinded

0:17:53.560 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 3>in Trump's first week in office. Where does this leave

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:59.399
<v Speaker 3>any kind of priority for AI safety in the US.

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 12>That's a very good point, And these are a lot

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 12>of the arguments that we're hearing. We believe that step

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:08.439
<v Speaker 12>one is understanding what the problem is.

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 10>Now.

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:10.440
<v Speaker 6>What you'll often hear people say.

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 12>Is that the problem is that China is going fast

0:18:12.880 --> 0:18:16.040
<v Speaker 12>and the US needs to go faster. Sure, but why

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 12>is China going fast. It's China going fast because they're

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:23.440
<v Speaker 12>independently developing their own technology that can rival US technology. No,

0:18:23.480 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 12>and I don't think anyone believes that they're piggy backing

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:30.160
<v Speaker 12>off of US efforts. They're using US chips or US

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 12>design chips, and they're using US design algorithms. So if

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:36.639
<v Speaker 12>we're serious about keeping our lead over China, we have

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:39.359
<v Speaker 12>to understand how they're getting access to the technology and

0:18:39.400 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 12>act quarterly. If we simply run faster and they're holding

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:43.920
<v Speaker 12>onto our back. We are not going to run them.

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 4>So you have worked for senators. When you're going in

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 4>advising government, do you just say, look, fast follows the

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 4>way forward, but from China.

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 2>But here's what we do to protect ourselves. What is

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 2>the response?

0:18:56.920 --> 0:18:59.360
<v Speaker 12>It's difficult, and I think the understanding is that they're

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:02.199
<v Speaker 12>different policy tools that the US government has used to

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:06.119
<v Speaker 12>try to prevent China from fast following, and we understand

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 12>them as as chip controls, export controls, concerns about security

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:14.160
<v Speaker 12>of both closed weight and open weight models, and these

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 12>things are very technical. But I do think that a

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 12>lot of what you're hearing about how none of these

0:19:19.480 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 12>things are working and we just need to throw it

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:23.200
<v Speaker 12>all away or think about what we're doing.

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 10>Missus the mark.

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 12>We know that a lot of the chip export controls

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 12>have time delay, so what China was using to train

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:33.320
<v Speaker 12>their models was based off of chips that they are

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:35.879
<v Speaker 12>no longer able to get in large part, so we

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 12>needed to give the export controls time to work. There's

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:41.160
<v Speaker 12>also a very good argument to be made about expanding

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 12>the export controls and covering trips that probably should have

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 12>been covered the first time around, but weren't for whatever reason.

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:50.119
<v Speaker 12>So there's a number of things that we can do

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:51.640
<v Speaker 12>instead of simply throwing our hands in the air.

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:56.280
<v Speaker 4>But does that not choke the golden goose that has

0:19:56.280 --> 0:19:56.919
<v Speaker 4>been in Vidio?

0:19:57.040 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 2>How do you ensure that they prosper?

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 4>At the same time, Asktailing there been a it's up.

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 12>What's really interesting is that if you looked at Nvidia's

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 12>reaction to what the Biden administration did, they certainly complained

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 12>about what was called the diffusion rule, which limited some

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 12>of our exports. However, the diffusion rule really didn't have

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 12>much impact on Nvidia's stock price. It was pretty minimal,

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:18.960
<v Speaker 12>and if you look at what happened with deep Seek,

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:21.680
<v Speaker 12>that obviously had a major impact on Nvidia's stock price.

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 12>So we would make the argument that Nvidia actually does

0:20:24.840 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 12>well if you prevent some of these non US companies

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 12>from simply using tools to more or less steel technology

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 12>from the US, particularly the algorithms, by using Nvidia chips.

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:38.879
<v Speaker 12>So in the long run, I believe this would actually

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:40.360
<v Speaker 12>benefit companies like Nvidia.

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 6>Doug pivoting to Washington a bit.

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 3>When you were on the show in November, you mentioned

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:48.440
<v Speaker 3>that you were actually a fan of one of President

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 3>Trump's executive orders from his first administration, and the man

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 3>behind that order was Michael Kratzio's, who was just appointed

0:20:56.800 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 3>to be the director for the Office of Science and

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 3>Technology do to be confirmed at the end of the month,

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:06.360
<v Speaker 3>And I'm curious, what, knowing about Kratzios and his approach

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:09.200
<v Speaker 3>in the past as former White House Chief Technology Officer,

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:11.680
<v Speaker 3>what kind of approach to policy are you expecting from

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 3>this office.

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 12>So Kratios is a very serious person and he understands

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:19.160
<v Speaker 12>the technology well. And I would put in the same

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:23.359
<v Speaker 12>can Howard Lutnik, Who's Trump's designed to be the Commerce Secretary.

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:26.240
<v Speaker 12>So Kratzio's and Lutnik are going to be two of

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:29.200
<v Speaker 12>the people who have the biggest influence on AI policy

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 12>than Trump administration. And we saw Lutnik at his most

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 12>recent hearing, his confirmation hearing, saying that he believes in

0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:37.120
<v Speaker 12>the expert controls. He believes we need to be serious

0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 12>about clamping down on Chinese access to US technology, and

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:44.199
<v Speaker 12>he's going to see it through. And I think that

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 12>he and Cratsios together will really want to do whatever

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:49.520
<v Speaker 12>they can to maintain the US lead in innovation.

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 4>An interesting day for the EU's ai AC to be

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 4>going into force as well. Doug Kaladis's great test some

0:21:55.359 --> 0:22:05.640
<v Speaker 4>time with you from American's for Responsible Innovation, Welcome back

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 4>to Blue Meg Technology.

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm Caroline Hide in New York and.

0:22:08.400 --> 0:22:10.160
<v Speaker 6>I'm Jackiedavils from Pan Francisco.

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:11.119
<v Speaker 2>Yess I have quite check on.

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:14.479
<v Speaker 4>These markets because boy, volatility the name of the game today.

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:18.919
<v Speaker 4>The reverberations of tariffs that were initially going to be

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 4>twenty five percent Canada, Mexico, ten percent China may be

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 4>delayed by a month. That's what the Mexican president says

0:22:25.160 --> 0:22:27.400
<v Speaker 4>in the latest rebounce off. Our lows are up now

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 4>offer the lows down still eight ten percent, nowhere near

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:32.439
<v Speaker 4>the wipeout we had this time last week on the

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:33.919
<v Speaker 4>back of deep seak anxiety.

0:22:33.920 --> 0:22:35.840
<v Speaker 2>But tariff anxiety is clear.

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:38.920
<v Speaker 4>And let's just think about some of the other feed

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:40.719
<v Speaker 4>across other angles that we're watching.

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 2>President Trump's tariffs is in.

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 4>Fact there's a plan to eliminate in long held tariff

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 4>exemption for packages worth less an eight hundred dollars, Jackie.

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:51.119
<v Speaker 4>This is allowing Chinese e commerce retailers like She and

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 4>like Tamu to ship cheap products directly to the US

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:57.880
<v Speaker 4>consumer without tariffs. It's given them an advantage over homegrown Amazon.

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 2>Of course, Spencer Soper can give us the read through look.

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 4>Some of the bouncing off of the low is happening

0:23:02.840 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 4>with the Chinese companies as well after that Mexican headline.

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:10.000
<v Speaker 4>But this is all surrounding how they're able to bypass

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 4>costs at.

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:12.120
<v Speaker 2>The moment, and that's going to come to an end.

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:17.360
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, it's clear as mud right now exactly how it's

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:20.480
<v Speaker 13>going to play out. The key question is Trump imposed

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 13>this new ten percent tariff on goods from China and

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:28.120
<v Speaker 13>then eliminating this Deminimus loophole. The big question now is

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:30.840
<v Speaker 13>does that apply just to the new ten percent or

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 13>to the old tariffs as well. And we're still kind

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 13>of getting clarity, you know, minute by minute on that.

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:42.919
<v Speaker 13>Either way, it's going to hurt these Chinese firms like

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 13>t Mood, you know, which is owned by PDD in

0:23:46.440 --> 0:23:49.440
<v Speaker 13>China as well as she In because they've been able

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:54.080
<v Speaker 13>to send items one package at a time to US consumers,

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 13>you know, slipping in under that eight hundred dollars threshold

0:23:56.960 --> 0:24:00.919
<v Speaker 13>for d Minimus where they're eluding the tariffs whereas bigger retailers,

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 13>including Amazon, will generally bring in big cargo containers by

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:07.239
<v Speaker 13>ship and they're paying the tariff on all of the

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:11.640
<v Speaker 13>inventory in those containers. Because the threshold is measured by

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:15.760
<v Speaker 13>each particular shipment. So if you're sending one individual shipment,

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 13>you're below the eight hundred, but if you have a

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:21.640
<v Speaker 13>larger shipment of lots of inventory, you're above the threshold.

0:24:22.800 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 3>Spencer, do you have any sense of just how much

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 3>of an impact potential tariffs could actually mean for Timu

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 3>and she In? I mean, they've seen a huge run

0:24:32.600 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 3>up over the last couple of years. Can they afford

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:38.440
<v Speaker 3>to basically bear some of the brunt of this or

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:41.120
<v Speaker 3>are they more sensitive to a disruption?

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, that's the million dollar question they've all been kind.

0:24:44.800 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 9>Of bracing for.

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:49.680
<v Speaker 13>This team of particular is already you know, sourcing more

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:53.159
<v Speaker 13>inventory in the US. You know, the down side of

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 13>their model of shipping to consumers direct from China's that

0:24:55.840 --> 0:24:58.440
<v Speaker 13>it takes a long time, and so they've been trying

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 13>to source more inventory within the US to be close

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 13>to customers just like Amazon and get it to them

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 13>more quickly. The downside of that is they don't have

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:10.640
<v Speaker 13>this tariff savings, and if that tariff safe savings completely

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:13.880
<v Speaker 13>goes away, the million dollar question is do these companies

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 13>actually survive? And that's you know, that's where there's just

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:19.679
<v Speaker 13>going to be a lot of debate and we'll have

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 13>to see what happens. But they've already been positioning expecting

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:25.359
<v Speaker 13>some change like this to happen.

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg, Spenser Sober, thank you. Let's get more on the

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:32.800
<v Speaker 3>impact of US tariffs on China. We're joined now by

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:35.399
<v Speaker 3>Amy Seligo, partner at Albright Stone Bridge Group.

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:37.960
<v Speaker 6>Amy, let's talk about what we know.

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 3>About Trump's previous approaches to tariffs and what we can

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 3>learn perhaps from his past escalations on China.

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:46.879
<v Speaker 6>What does it mean kind.

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 3>Of going into this new administration and are you seeing

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:53.640
<v Speaker 3>kind of similar tactics or new ones perhaps being employed now.

0:25:55.520 --> 0:25:56.399
<v Speaker 9>Great to be with you.

0:25:56.800 --> 0:26:00.439
<v Speaker 14>I think what's so interesting is, as he's threaten to do,

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 14>President Trump imposed tariffs almost immediately, and so he almost

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 14>had to rely on IEPA on this International Emergency Economic

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 14>Powers Act to justify immediate tariffs against of course Canada,

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 14>Mexico and China. And that is novel for this president.

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 14>And so the way that he deals with justifying lifting

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 14>the tariffs will be novel as well, very different from

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:33.639
<v Speaker 14>how he deployed tariffs in the past after investigations that

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 14>demonstrated harm through Section two thirty two Section three oh

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:41.919
<v Speaker 14>one of US trade laws. This use of IEPA to

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:45.840
<v Speaker 14>justify tariffs I think gives him a little more or

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 14>a lot more bargaining power and leverage on the one hand,

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 14>but also justification to pull the tariffs back. He under

0:26:54.640 --> 0:26:58.159
<v Speaker 14>IEPA talked about the flows of fentanyl coming into the

0:26:58.200 --> 0:27:02.680
<v Speaker 14>United States from China, going through Canada and Mexico, as

0:27:02.720 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 14>well as of course illegal immigration. But in talking about

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 14>the tariffs that he's about to impose, he also talks

0:27:10.119 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 14>about the trade imbalance, and that I think gives China

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:19.640
<v Speaker 14>the justification to challenge the use of IIPA to put

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:22.200
<v Speaker 14>these tariffs on China in the first place. And that's

0:27:22.320 --> 0:27:27.160
<v Speaker 14>exactly what China has already done. Rather than threatened immediate retaliation,

0:27:27.280 --> 0:27:31.359
<v Speaker 14>they've been very vague about that. They have said, is

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:34.399
<v Speaker 14>this even legal what the President is doing? And so

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:37.719
<v Speaker 14>really I do think we're in a different place in

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:40.880
<v Speaker 14>the second Trump administration than we were in Trump one

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 14>point zero and how he used.

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 9>Tariff's last time.

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:46.720
<v Speaker 4>I'm looking at the market reaction to something that has

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 4>been well signaled, and it was shocked. Apple is still

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:53.399
<v Speaker 4>the biggest drag on the downside to the Nasdaq was

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:55.440
<v Speaker 4>seeing in video and Tesla. So we're trying to work

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 4>out what it means for phone shipments, for ship shipments,

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:01.440
<v Speaker 4>for autoshipments, which are so globally dependent.

0:28:01.480 --> 0:28:03.160
<v Speaker 2>Aiming, what do you think the ripple effect is going.

0:28:03.080 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 14>To be incredibly disruptive, without a doubt, And so I

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:11.439
<v Speaker 14>think the reason that so many are shocked are not

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:14.679
<v Speaker 14>because the President hasn't said it all along on the

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 14>campaign trail and since since his election, but because of

0:28:19.560 --> 0:28:23.359
<v Speaker 14>these profound consequences that you just mentioned, Caroline, It is going.

0:28:23.119 --> 0:28:24.360
<v Speaker 2>To be significant.

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:28.159
<v Speaker 14>I will say, however, the President is looking for a

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 14>deal here. He is looking to use this leverage of

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:36.040
<v Speaker 14>this thread of these tariffs in order to justify likely

0:28:36.680 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 14>maybe pulling them back, I shouldn't say likely, maybe pulling

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:45.800
<v Speaker 14>them back quickly if he sees progress from China, more

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:49.960
<v Speaker 14>progress on the fenteryel trade flows, and of course on

0:28:50.000 --> 0:28:53.880
<v Speaker 14>the illegal immigration, two issues that during the transition period,

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:57.240
<v Speaker 14>it sounds like the US government and the Chinese government

0:28:57.560 --> 0:29:01.040
<v Speaker 14>have been making progress, and I think again that is

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 14>why we're so surprised this is happening so quickly.

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 9>We shouldn't be.

0:29:04.880 --> 0:29:07.680
<v Speaker 14>The President promised it, but I think he's doing this

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 14>in order to have some leverage to make some kind

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 14>of deal. Yeah, and my final point, Caroline, just the

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:17.760
<v Speaker 14>Chinese government has been much more reluctant to be vehement

0:29:17.880 --> 0:29:24.160
<v Speaker 14>in its opposition than Canada and the Mexican governments because,

0:29:24.160 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 14>of course the tariff raid is much smaller, even though

0:29:27.000 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 14>the threat President elect Trump had made was a much

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 14>larger tariff levy. And so we are early in the

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:38.240
<v Speaker 14>Chinese government is going to play a long term game

0:29:38.320 --> 0:29:40.160
<v Speaker 14>in negotiating with this new team.

0:29:40.200 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 4>What was way more show came was actually deep seek

0:29:43.160 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 4>that did come completely by surprise, and that adds another

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:48.960
<v Speaker 4>layer of complexity. What do you think that means for

0:29:49.040 --> 0:29:50.360
<v Speaker 4>chip exports going forward?

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:55.000
<v Speaker 14>It's going to be a real challenge, as we all saw.

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 14>Of course, the Nvidia CEO for the first time, I

0:29:58.880 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 14>met President Trump on Friday and of course is talking

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 14>about this. The Trump administration very early on, through an

0:30:05.560 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 14>executive order, has said we are really going to promote

0:30:09.640 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 14>AI dominance by the United States by putting in place

0:30:13.440 --> 0:30:17.240
<v Speaker 14>more restrictions, and so I do think that the Deep

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:21.720
<v Speaker 14>seek arrival on the scene, coinciding with the inauguration of

0:30:21.760 --> 0:30:26.320
<v Speaker 14>President Trump, necessitated a response from the Trump team. I think,

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:29.120
<v Speaker 14>as you were just talking about with Spencer, the new

0:30:29.160 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 14>team is still coming into shape that is going to

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:36.400
<v Speaker 14>be directing these policies. But I anticipate we're going to

0:30:36.440 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 14>see more export controls. We're going to see more threats

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 14>of tariffs in order to deal with that. That is

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:47.040
<v Speaker 14>going to have some real ramifications for the American company,

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 14>these technology companies that continue to rely on China. President Trump,

0:30:51.640 --> 0:30:54.960
<v Speaker 14>I think Robert Leittheiser many have said, this is going

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:58.560
<v Speaker 14>to cause some pain because we do need to we

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:02.320
<v Speaker 14>need to transform the way that our country maintains its

0:31:02.360 --> 0:31:05.800
<v Speaker 14>economic leadership role. Not going to be easy in the

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:06.479
<v Speaker 14>short term.

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 3>Amy, you mentioned that China here is playing the long game.

0:31:10.960 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 3>Help us map out some potential scenarios for what retaliation

0:31:14.600 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 3>could look like.

0:31:16.920 --> 0:31:21.080
<v Speaker 14>Well, I think that the Chinese government wants to take

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:25.960
<v Speaker 14>it slow in retaliation that could have broad based impact

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:29.840
<v Speaker 14>because of course we know that the government is talking

0:31:29.880 --> 0:31:33.040
<v Speaker 14>to the new team in the White House now of course,

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:36.600
<v Speaker 14>the Vice president of China was here for the inauguration.

0:31:37.200 --> 0:31:40.920
<v Speaker 14>He met with his counterpart prior to the inauguration. So

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:44.960
<v Speaker 14>Vice President Elect at the moment JD. Vance and Vice

0:31:45.000 --> 0:31:48.680
<v Speaker 14>President Han Jung sat down together talked about a whole

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 14>host of issues. The Vice President of China stayed in

0:31:52.120 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 14>the US through the inauguration and then flew.

0:31:54.680 --> 0:31:56.080
<v Speaker 9>Right back to China.

0:31:56.480 --> 0:32:00.280
<v Speaker 14>But what this means is the two sides clearly.

0:32:00.120 --> 0:32:01.840
<v Speaker 9>Or are already talking.

0:32:02.240 --> 0:32:06.240
<v Speaker 14>President Frump himself has intimated that he wants to go

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:08.800
<v Speaker 14>to China early. He wants to have some kind of

0:32:09.160 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 14>a deal. And so to answer your question, I think

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 14>the Chinese government is very much keeping that in mind

0:32:15.800 --> 0:32:18.920
<v Speaker 14>as it thinks about retaliation. Of course, they don't want

0:32:18.960 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 14>to adversely impact the Chinese government still struggling in its

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:27.920
<v Speaker 14>economic recovery, but they have to respond somehow, and so

0:32:28.040 --> 0:32:34.200
<v Speaker 14>will likely take a very targeted retaliatory measure, likely targeting

0:32:34.280 --> 0:32:37.840
<v Speaker 14>some US company. And so that's not good news for

0:32:37.600 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 14>the American business community that absolutely is concerned about the

0:32:42.280 --> 0:32:46.040
<v Speaker 14>prospect of retaliation. But I foresee that retaliation will be

0:32:46.080 --> 0:32:47.720
<v Speaker 14>quite measured for the time being.

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:50.800
<v Speaker 4>Amy Seliko deep expertise on China and US or Wright

0:32:50.840 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 4>Stonewridge Group.

0:32:51.560 --> 0:32:52.000
<v Speaker 2>We thank you.

0:32:52.480 --> 0:32:55.320
<v Speaker 4>Coming up Palantaires set to report results after the closing bell.

0:32:55.640 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 4>Ken earnings live up to the explosive stop run for

0:32:59.160 --> 0:33:09.400
<v Speaker 4>software John and last year. That's next, This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:33:10.480 --> 0:33:13.120
<v Speaker 2>It's another big week for tech earnings. First up Paleteer.

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:16.280
<v Speaker 4>Its extraordinary valuation is going to be in focus with

0:33:16.360 --> 0:33:18.600
<v Speaker 4>the stock trading at levels some see is just difficult

0:33:18.600 --> 0:33:22.880
<v Speaker 4>to maintain. Bloomberg's common ranicky is with us a phenomenal

0:33:22.960 --> 0:33:26.880
<v Speaker 4>run up, a valuation that is two hundred times the

0:33:26.920 --> 0:33:28.880
<v Speaker 4>price is two hundred times future earnings.

0:33:29.040 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 2>Can twenty eight percent growth and revenue do it?

0:33:31.440 --> 0:33:33.040
<v Speaker 10>I mean, it remains to be seen.

0:33:33.120 --> 0:33:35.800
<v Speaker 15>I think something that's so interesting about Palneer stock is

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:38.880
<v Speaker 15>just how bullish investors are. Obviously, we saw an incredible

0:33:38.960 --> 0:33:39.960
<v Speaker 15>run last year.

0:33:39.880 --> 0:33:41.320
<v Speaker 10>And even in the last few weeks.

0:33:41.360 --> 0:33:43.760
<v Speaker 15>You know, the shares slumped at the beginning of the year,

0:33:43.880 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 15>but have rallied nearly thirty percent just in the last

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:49.440
<v Speaker 15>two weeks to a record high just before this earnings report.

0:33:49.560 --> 0:33:52.040
<v Speaker 10>So investors are excited about this company.

0:33:52.080 --> 0:33:54.880
<v Speaker 15>I think they're excited about the long term potential here

0:33:55.280 --> 0:33:57.440
<v Speaker 15>and I mean Pounteers a lot to prove in this

0:33:57.520 --> 0:33:58.280
<v Speaker 15>earnings report.

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:02.440
<v Speaker 3>There's an AI arms race that just seems to be

0:34:02.600 --> 0:34:07.200
<v Speaker 3>intensifying in recent weeks. I'm curious what Palenteer's edge is here.

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:11.440
<v Speaker 3>We're very familiar with its contracts with the Defense Department,

0:34:11.560 --> 0:34:14.319
<v Speaker 3>but what else is there too their business model that

0:34:14.400 --> 0:34:17.720
<v Speaker 3>perhaps could benefit from this AI arms race we're seeing.

0:34:18.200 --> 0:34:20.239
<v Speaker 15>So I think one of the biggest growth places for

0:34:20.440 --> 0:34:23.480
<v Speaker 15>Palenteer going forward is actually in commercial contracts. So, as

0:34:23.520 --> 0:34:26.520
<v Speaker 15>you said, we know that it's a big like it

0:34:26.600 --> 0:34:28.560
<v Speaker 15>has a lot of business with the US government with

0:34:28.680 --> 0:34:32.000
<v Speaker 15>globally with other governments, and it's also really building out

0:34:32.320 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 15>the private side, so commercial contracts and especially bringing its

0:34:36.719 --> 0:34:38.399
<v Speaker 15>AI to the table and saying this.

0:34:38.400 --> 0:34:40.440
<v Speaker 10>Is how this could help you in your businesses.

0:34:40.520 --> 0:34:42.760
<v Speaker 15>So I think that's something that people are really wanting

0:34:42.800 --> 0:34:43.160
<v Speaker 15>to see.

0:34:43.200 --> 0:34:44.880
<v Speaker 10>They want to see continued.

0:34:44.360 --> 0:34:47.640
<v Speaker 15>Growth in the commercial side of Palenteer's business, And you're right,

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:51.239
<v Speaker 15>it's really coming out on top as a big AI outperformer.

0:34:52.560 --> 0:34:57.960
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's Carmen Ryanicky thank you now. Airsprace drone monitoring technology

0:34:58.000 --> 0:35:00.759
<v Speaker 3>startup Hidden Level has announced it to and its role

0:35:00.800 --> 0:35:04.120
<v Speaker 3>in national security with one hundred million dollars in investment.

0:35:04.440 --> 0:35:07.120
<v Speaker 3>Joining us now to discuss is Jeff cole In Level

0:35:07.160 --> 0:35:11.640
<v Speaker 3>CEO and co founder Jeff. The defense industry and Silicon

0:35:11.719 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 3>Valley have not typically had the most seamless of relationships,

0:35:16.640 --> 0:35:20.000
<v Speaker 3>especially when you think about just how slow the Pentagon moves.

0:35:20.239 --> 0:35:21.760
<v Speaker 6>Why don't you talk to us a little.

0:35:21.560 --> 0:35:24.799
<v Speaker 3>Bit about how your technology actually works and what it

0:35:24.840 --> 0:35:28.960
<v Speaker 3>took to really get this kind of massive contract you

0:35:29.040 --> 0:35:30.160
<v Speaker 3>know in the books for you.

0:35:31.840 --> 0:35:33.840
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, no, thank you for having me. It's wonderful to

0:35:33.880 --> 0:35:34.239
<v Speaker 9>be here.

0:35:35.040 --> 0:35:35.279
<v Speaker 10>You know.

0:35:35.560 --> 0:35:38.360
<v Speaker 16>As a company, we're based in upstate New York and Syracuse.

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:41.399
<v Speaker 16>A team we founded the company in twenty eighteen out

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:43.640
<v Speaker 16>of a basement, but we're a team that's been together

0:35:43.760 --> 0:35:46.120
<v Speaker 16>for almost twenty years doing this type of tech with

0:35:46.200 --> 0:35:49.279
<v Speaker 16>the defense industry, with the commercial industry, and we really

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:51.880
<v Speaker 16>saw what we needed to do was bring to life

0:35:52.280 --> 0:35:55.399
<v Speaker 16>next generation sensing technology at a cost effective manner, make

0:35:55.440 --> 0:35:58.200
<v Speaker 16>it available not only through our hardware sales, but through

0:35:58.440 --> 0:36:02.560
<v Speaker 16>our infrastructure where we l airspace awareness data on small

0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:07.279
<v Speaker 16>drones large aircraft. This made it ultimately much easier for

0:36:07.320 --> 0:36:11.160
<v Speaker 16>the end users. So combining a mixture of dual use

0:36:11.280 --> 0:36:16.359
<v Speaker 16>commercial applications, defense national security. Our focus was making sure

0:36:16.400 --> 0:36:20.040
<v Speaker 16>we have fun while addressing a safer and smarter world.

0:36:20.080 --> 0:36:22.680
<v Speaker 16>So that's what really made this, I'll say, a journey

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:26.480
<v Speaker 16>that was really supported by our venture capitalist is not

0:36:26.520 --> 0:36:29.280
<v Speaker 16>just that we were addressing DoD national security, but also

0:36:29.400 --> 0:36:31.280
<v Speaker 16>the commerciality of a safer world.

0:36:31.440 --> 0:36:34.600
<v Speaker 4>Strategic investors like Lockheed, Martin Ventures as well as DFJ

0:36:34.920 --> 0:36:38.279
<v Speaker 4>supporting this one hundred million dollar RAYS now worth more than.

0:36:38.360 --> 0:36:39.120
<v Speaker 2>Half a billion.

0:36:39.920 --> 0:36:42.720
<v Speaker 4>I'm interested as to how you compete against the Lockheed,

0:36:42.719 --> 0:36:46.239
<v Speaker 4>how you can ensure that you're getting under the new administration,

0:36:46.560 --> 0:36:48.880
<v Speaker 4>new contracts to startups such as yourself.

0:36:50.120 --> 0:36:50.359
<v Speaker 10>Yeah.

0:36:50.480 --> 0:36:53.360
<v Speaker 16>So not only have we brought in incredible vestors like Lockheed,

0:36:53.400 --> 0:36:56.880
<v Speaker 16>BOOZL and DFJ and so many others, but part of

0:36:56.920 --> 0:36:59.480
<v Speaker 16>the reason we did that with folks like Lockey, Martin

0:36:59.520 --> 0:37:03.399
<v Speaker 16>and Booze Allen was strategic partnerships. We have a very

0:37:03.440 --> 0:37:07.040
<v Speaker 16>different business model. We sell hardware directive firm, fixed price.

0:37:07.120 --> 0:37:11.440
<v Speaker 16>We have this data infrastructure that's available to DoD, federal, state, local,

0:37:11.480 --> 0:37:13.080
<v Speaker 16>and enterprise commercial users.

0:37:13.800 --> 0:37:15.600
<v Speaker 9>So rather than trying to.

0:37:15.719 --> 0:37:20.480
<v Speaker 16>Replace, we're a new feature, something that the defense industry

0:37:20.520 --> 0:37:23.560
<v Speaker 16>is able to integrate into existing solutions very quickly.

0:37:24.040 --> 0:37:26.440
<v Speaker 9>This is shown by our recent deployments all.

0:37:26.280 --> 0:37:29.400
<v Speaker 16>Throughout the Northeast to support a wide array of drone

0:37:29.520 --> 0:37:32.480
<v Speaker 16>concerns and issues, and then also our involvement in the

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 16>inauguration and through our budding partnership most recently with Palenteer.

0:37:38.800 --> 0:37:41.160
<v Speaker 3>Jeff, can you give us a sense of where your

0:37:41.160 --> 0:37:45.040
<v Speaker 3>technology is actually being deployed any regions, or perhaps the

0:37:45.160 --> 0:37:47.160
<v Speaker 3>scale of prototypes out there currently.

0:37:48.440 --> 0:37:51.720
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, one of our largest deployments is in the DC area.

0:37:51.719 --> 0:37:55.720
<v Speaker 16>It's been live since twenty twenty one. It was actually

0:37:56.040 --> 0:37:59.120
<v Speaker 16>a natural progression for us, after supporting the US government

0:37:59.480 --> 0:38:02.920
<v Speaker 16>in deployments throughout the Northeast, that they asked us to

0:38:02.960 --> 0:38:04.719
<v Speaker 16>help assist with the inauguration.

0:38:04.880 --> 0:38:06.920
<v Speaker 9>So on support of Northcom and Joint.

0:38:06.719 --> 0:38:11.040
<v Speaker 16>Task Force National Capital Region, and with our partnership with Palenteer,

0:38:11.480 --> 0:38:15.520
<v Speaker 16>we expanded our capabilities by putting our passive RDAR technology

0:38:15.560 --> 0:38:18.439
<v Speaker 16>in that infrastructure we already had out, and we're able

0:38:18.480 --> 0:38:21.760
<v Speaker 16>to provide an extremely comprehensive low altitude to high altitude

0:38:21.800 --> 0:38:24.360
<v Speaker 16>picture on everything from small drones demand aircraft.

0:38:25.360 --> 0:38:28.439
<v Speaker 4>Many will be thinking about New Jersey, Jess, but many

0:38:28.480 --> 0:38:31.120
<v Speaker 4>will also be thinking of the context of this race,

0:38:31.160 --> 0:38:33.880
<v Speaker 4>whether it's an AI race versus US China, whether it's

0:38:33.880 --> 0:38:36.520
<v Speaker 4>a drone race versus US China, What do you make

0:38:36.560 --> 0:38:38.439
<v Speaker 4>about the risk levels right now?

0:38:40.320 --> 0:38:45.400
<v Speaker 16>The complexities of our airspace are immense, adding small drones,

0:38:45.560 --> 0:38:48.560
<v Speaker 16>adding AI, the things that you could do with drones

0:38:48.600 --> 0:38:52.600
<v Speaker 16>ten years ago versus right now is just rapidly changing.

0:38:52.719 --> 0:38:56.839
<v Speaker 16>And the complexities of our airspace. All the folks that

0:38:56.880 --> 0:39:01.120
<v Speaker 16>are involved, the stakeholders, not just dud in state and local,

0:39:01.160 --> 0:39:03.880
<v Speaker 16>but it's also our commercial users as a power grade,

0:39:03.960 --> 0:39:08.000
<v Speaker 16>everything this just adds for challenge and difficulty. It was

0:39:08.040 --> 0:39:11.680
<v Speaker 16>a big reason for starting in Level was with our infrastructure,

0:39:12.200 --> 0:39:15.400
<v Speaker 16>we were able to integrate all these users simultaneously for

0:39:15.440 --> 0:39:17.640
<v Speaker 16>the first time ever where they can all work off.

0:39:17.520 --> 0:39:18.640
<v Speaker 9>The same air picture.

0:39:19.200 --> 0:39:21.920
<v Speaker 16>This gave them the ability to have very rapid response

0:39:21.960 --> 0:39:25.239
<v Speaker 16>and quick decision making, which is needed as a complexity

0:39:25.239 --> 0:39:27.160
<v Speaker 16>of the airspace is just getting worse.

0:39:27.640 --> 0:39:31.120
<v Speaker 4>And nothing brings that into sharper relief than the tragicy

0:39:31.320 --> 0:39:33.000
<v Speaker 4>that occurred last week in Washington.

0:39:33.120 --> 0:39:35.160
<v Speaker 2>Jeff Cole hidden Level CEO, We Thank You.

0:39:42.960 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 4>Oh.

0:39:43.120 --> 0:39:44.480
<v Speaker 2>It was a big night for Beyonce.

0:39:44.719 --> 0:39:47.040
<v Speaker 4>She won her first Album of the Year at the

0:39:47.080 --> 0:39:50.400
<v Speaker 4>Grammys last night for her album Country Album Calwoodkater and

0:39:50.440 --> 0:39:53.400
<v Speaker 4>again the first black artist to win Best Country Album

0:39:53.800 --> 0:39:56.799
<v Speaker 4>for moll Bloemmeggs. Ashley Carmen joins us she would say

0:39:56.840 --> 0:39:59.000
<v Speaker 4>it's a lost time coming. Her husband would say it's

0:39:59.000 --> 0:39:59.800
<v Speaker 4>a long time coming.

0:40:00.239 --> 0:40:01.799
<v Speaker 2>What are the viewers to make that?

0:40:03.120 --> 0:40:05.800
<v Speaker 17>I mean, I think this was a moment that everyone

0:40:06.040 --> 0:40:09.000
<v Speaker 17>has been waiting for. Last year, jay Z talked to

0:40:09.040 --> 0:40:13.400
<v Speaker 17>the Grammys about basically saying like, Beyonce's won more Grammys

0:40:13.440 --> 0:40:16.000
<v Speaker 17>than any artist in history, and yet she has not

0:40:16.080 --> 0:40:18.080
<v Speaker 17>one Album of the Year. So it was kind of,

0:40:18.160 --> 0:40:20.160
<v Speaker 17>I don't want to say an ultimatum, but it felt

0:40:20.160 --> 0:40:21.960
<v Speaker 17>like it sort of put the pressure on of like

0:40:22.520 --> 0:40:26.239
<v Speaker 17>she's up again. Is she gonna get snubbed again? Is

0:40:26.320 --> 0:40:30.360
<v Speaker 17>Taylor gonna take it home? And this year, finally.

0:40:30.880 --> 0:40:31.480
<v Speaker 7>She's got it.

0:40:31.680 --> 0:40:35.520
<v Speaker 3>Ash Ashley not to bring it back to technology all

0:40:35.560 --> 0:40:38.560
<v Speaker 3>the time, but I am curious, given you can do.

0:40:38.520 --> 0:40:40.080
<v Speaker 4>That, You can do that, Jackie, you can bring it

0:40:40.080 --> 0:40:41.359
<v Speaker 4>back to technology all the time.

0:40:42.840 --> 0:40:47.040
<v Speaker 3>We'll give every big artist and music labels in the

0:40:47.120 --> 0:40:51.240
<v Speaker 3>room tonight or last night. I'm curious what the relationship

0:40:51.280 --> 0:40:53.800
<v Speaker 3>between AI and the music industry.

0:40:53.800 --> 0:40:55.719
<v Speaker 6>Where does that stand right now? Did you get kind

0:40:55.760 --> 0:40:58.200
<v Speaker 6>of a vibe for where that is at the moment.

0:40:58.680 --> 0:41:01.920
<v Speaker 17>So actually this was a story that I would say

0:41:01.880 --> 0:41:04.920
<v Speaker 17>it hasn't really been picked up much. But the Beatles

0:41:05.080 --> 0:41:09.520
<v Speaker 17>won for their song Now and Then, which used AI

0:41:09.640 --> 0:41:12.400
<v Speaker 17>to actually clean up the vocals from John Lennon some

0:41:12.520 --> 0:41:14.759
<v Speaker 17>tape that had been left over that just without AI

0:41:15.040 --> 0:41:15.640
<v Speaker 17>really would.

0:41:15.480 --> 0:41:16.080
<v Speaker 2>Have been difficult.

0:41:16.120 --> 0:41:18.320
<v Speaker 17>It was very muddy and difficult to get the lyrics

0:41:18.320 --> 0:41:21.040
<v Speaker 17>and the song out of it. And so they actually

0:41:21.280 --> 0:41:25.120
<v Speaker 17>won for that track, which is kind of a historic

0:41:25.239 --> 0:41:28.080
<v Speaker 17>moment because they've been very open about the AI use there.

0:41:28.400 --> 0:41:31.120
<v Speaker 17>And as you might recall, last year, there was sort

0:41:31.120 --> 0:41:34.959
<v Speaker 17>of a debacle around that artist ghostwriter who had made

0:41:35.120 --> 0:41:38.560
<v Speaker 17>and used AI to make a track featuring quote unquote,

0:41:38.600 --> 0:41:42.000
<v Speaker 17>you know, Fake Drake and Fake the Weekend. So he

0:41:42.480 --> 0:41:45.440
<v Speaker 17>wasn't allowed to submit that song last year, and so

0:41:45.520 --> 0:41:48.840
<v Speaker 17>this year this was sort of the officially sanctioned AI

0:41:48.960 --> 0:41:49.480
<v Speaker 17>use case.

0:41:50.200 --> 0:41:52.400
<v Speaker 4>I meanwhile, there's going to be some smarting dung by

0:41:52.480 --> 0:41:55.480
<v Speaker 4>Drake as Kendrick Lamar RUMs home. I'm also interested in

0:41:55.520 --> 0:41:57.439
<v Speaker 4>what this little spells close and Kia and Exist week

0:41:57.440 --> 0:41:59.960
<v Speaker 4>we got Spotify coming off, and this is that Bendon Batta.

0:42:00.400 --> 0:42:02.600
<v Speaker 10>Yes, totally, I mean Spotify.

0:42:02.760 --> 0:42:06.359
<v Speaker 17>You mentioned the Kendrick Lamar or the Drake lawsuit over

0:42:06.440 --> 0:42:07.880
<v Speaker 17>the Kendrick Lamar distrack.

0:42:09.000 --> 0:42:11.120
<v Speaker 2>Drake had tried to bring Spotify.

0:42:10.680 --> 0:42:14.239
<v Speaker 17>Into this previously. He ended up not doing anything with

0:42:14.280 --> 0:42:15.080
<v Speaker 17>that ensuing.

0:42:15.360 --> 0:42:15.760
<v Speaker 6>UMG.

0:42:17.120 --> 0:42:21.200
<v Speaker 17>But I think you know, Spotify's already had a hell

0:42:21.280 --> 0:42:23.920
<v Speaker 17>of a year. They are their stock is doing very,

0:42:24.040 --> 0:42:27.719
<v Speaker 17>very very well, so I can't imagine that anything about

0:42:27.800 --> 0:42:28.920
<v Speaker 17>last Night changes.

0:42:28.640 --> 0:42:30.200
<v Speaker 2>That for them. Spotify.

0:42:30.320 --> 0:42:33.400
<v Speaker 4>We wait for earnings tomorrow, and indeed we are expecting

0:42:33.840 --> 0:42:35.360
<v Speaker 4>some revenue growth of thirteen percent.

0:42:35.440 --> 0:42:37.120
<v Speaker 2>Ashley Common, great to have you with us.

0:42:37.160 --> 0:42:39.040
<v Speaker 4>That does it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology. You

0:42:39.080 --> 0:42:41.360
<v Speaker 4>do not want to forget to check out our own podcast.

0:42:41.680 --> 0:42:43.800
<v Speaker 4>You can find it on Spotify or indeed on Apple

0:42:43.840 --> 0:42:45.120
<v Speaker 4>and ihow as a Bloomberg