WEBVTT - China's Private Sector Pressuring Xi For Open Economy (Podcast)

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg P and L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg P M L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:32.959
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot Com. Right now,

0:00:33.000 --> 0:00:36.200
<v Speaker 1>we want to turn our focus to China. Ongoing discussions

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:40.160
<v Speaker 1>between the US and the world's second biggest economy as

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>to how they are going to deal with trade going forward.

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Joining us now, Andy Brown, editorial director for the Bloomberg

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:49.559
<v Speaker 1>New Economy Forum, Joining us here in the Bloomberg Interactive

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Broker's Studios. Andy, thank you so much for being here.

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>You want a really compelling piece about how the US

0:00:56.120 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>may have some allies behind China lines, who are these

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>people and why? Yeah? Well, thanks, Lesa's great to be here. Um.

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:06.839
<v Speaker 1>The the argument is a is A is a pretty simple.

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 1>What China should throw open its economy. It should level

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the playing field. It should dismantle state monopolies. It should

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>stop giving preference to state players in terms of subsidies,

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 1>cheap loans, policy advantages, in terms of licensing, standards setting

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 1>and so on. And it should do all this not

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 1>because Donald Trump is asking for it, but because the

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:35.559
<v Speaker 1>private sector in China is demanding it, and in acceding

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>to that internal pressure rather than external pressure, China can

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:42.959
<v Speaker 1>get its economy out of the funk that it's now in.

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:45.479
<v Speaker 1>And it's actually in a much much worse funk than

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 1>people imagine. So you don't buy the six GDP growth.

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't care what the numbers say. I mean, China's

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 1>economy is slowing, and I think it's stunning the Chinese leadership.

0:01:56.200 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I think they've been surprised at the extent to which

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Trump's pressure are on trade has exacerbated all of these

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>issues structural issues in the Chinese economy. But any some

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 1>of what you're talking about is adopting more Western values

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:14.239
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to markets in China. And how much

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 1>of that is actually on the table with these trade negotiations,

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how much is this ultimately going to come

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 1>down to bushels of soybeans? Well, you see, I don't

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 1>really see it as a clash of values between China

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:28.080
<v Speaker 1>and the United States. You have to remember that all

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>of the things that Trump as many of the things

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 1>that Trump is pushing for and the private sector in

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>China were promised by C. Jim Ping himself. Don't forget

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:39.360
<v Speaker 1>he came in five years ago, right he came. He

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 1>had a long career as a bureaucrat in coastal provinces,

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>which is really where the private sector in China is

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 1>is concentrated. He comes in, he calls a big has buddies,

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Jack mar you know who runs Ali Baba. He's on

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>first name terms with Hank Polson. You know, the business

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>community know him. He throws this big Communist party meeting

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Third Planet, and he says we're moving towards markets, and

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>he lays it all out, sixty point agenda for opening

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:09.359
<v Speaker 1>up the economy. And basically this whole plan has been

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>gathering dust ever since. Not just that the economy has

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>flipped backwards. All of the trade and trends that were

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 1>pointing in it towards markets have gone in the opposite direction.

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 1>He's doubled down on the state. That's right, That's what

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>it might The point I was gonna make you. You

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 1>lay at a very intelligent argument in your piece about

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>what the Chinese economy should do, what the states should do.

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 1>It appears just from my perspective that they're actually, as

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 1>you said, going the opposite way over the last several years.

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>So does the private sector have any influence to really

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>push for these reforms? Well, to the extent that these

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 1>status reforms, which are ideologically politically driven, not driven by economics,

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>are killing the economy. I mean, the facts are very

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:54.839
<v Speaker 1>very clear. The state enterprise is not just bad, it's

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 1>shockingly bad. I mean, private businesses on average have a

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 1>three time is the return on assets as their state competitors, right,

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 1>and yet they suck up fift of all the credit

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 1>in the economy. I don't understand what the problem is then,

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if there's a pressure and if understands the

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 1>need for some of these reforms, and this could actually

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 1>play into what the U S is arguing for why

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:22.360
<v Speaker 1>hasn't there been an agreement? Well, well, you know, I

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:28.479
<v Speaker 1>mean the key here is id is ideology, and that

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 1>she Jimping simply can't bring himself to dismantle a system

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>which he believes is going to protect the Communist Party

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:38.280
<v Speaker 1>and keep it in power. Don't forget the Chinese are

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>constantly looking for lessons to the collapse of the Soviet

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Union and then what happened after the Soviet Union collapsed.

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:48.479
<v Speaker 1>Isn't the same kind of communism as Russia. It's a

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 1>very different one now it's not. But they are very determined.

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:55.600
<v Speaker 1>The Communist Party of China will not go the same

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>way as the Communist Party and Russia, which essentially gave up.

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 1>And they see stay it own enterprises being a bullwark

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 1>uh to communist party rule. So is there any scenario

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:09.159
<v Speaker 1>let's go to let's go to the trade negotiations. Do

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 1>you have how optimistic, if at all, are you about

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:15.479
<v Speaker 1>the U. S And China reaching any kind of meaningful

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:20.280
<v Speaker 1>trade agreement. Um, let's just go there and start there. Look,

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it's really it's gonna be relatively simple to

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:26.840
<v Speaker 1>get an agreement which does something about the trade deficits.

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, China can instructed state companies to buy more

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:33.600
<v Speaker 1>soy beings by US natural gas. Um. You know, we

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 1>saw this big import expo in Shanghai and November see

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 1>jumping instructs. You know, state on ENTERBRASO out. But by

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:43.280
<v Speaker 1>bye for this type of But this is kind of

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 1>nibbling around, this playing around at the edges there talking

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 1>about structural Now, the incentive, the real incentive for him

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:52.160
<v Speaker 1>to give ground is this slowing economy. He's got to

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>pick the economy up and and so just going forward

0:05:56.880 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 1>in thirty seconds, how bad will this be the landing

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:05.279
<v Speaker 1>that people have feared for China. Well, we were already

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:09.160
<v Speaker 1>looking at something that looks a bit like a hard landing.

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:14.359
<v Speaker 1>Growth is growth has come off very badly. Um. The

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the the real key is going to be whether she

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Jimping can use the pressure from the United States uh

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>in or rather use the pressure that's coming from his

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>private sector as an excuse as cover to implement the

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:32.279
<v Speaker 1>type of reforms that are needed to get the economy

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 1>back on track. Andy Brown, thank you so much for

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:37.360
<v Speaker 1>being with us and your insights. A great article, uh

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>and create comments. Andy Brown is editorial director for The

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:44.839
<v Speaker 1>Bloom New Economy. For him, he was formerly China editor

0:06:44.880 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 1>senior corresponding a columnist for The Wall Street Journal. The

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 1>swing has been notable This morning before markets open, City

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Group shares were down two percent immediately after reporting earnings.

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Now shares up by more than three percent as an

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 1>earnings call seems to bolster optimism among investors joining us

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 1>now in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studios to discuss is

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Yellmen Iran. He's senior finance writer for Bloomberg News. So, y'ellmen,

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 1>what happened here on the earnings call? Um, Well, you know,

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the earnings numbers aren't aren't bad either. There's there there's

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 1>good stuff to to see in cities earnings. Um. You know,

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 1>fixed income numbers are bad, and everybody initially focused on that,

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>but you look at other stuff. Actually it's okay. Um,

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 1>loans are up, deposits are up, NIM, the net interest

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 1>margin is up. So on the banking side, the bank

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 1>is still really doing fine. Markets, as we know, have

0:07:53.600 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 1>been all over the place and and they have they

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 1>have heard um and so that has hurt the investment

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 1>banking side, the trading side. But the other part of

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the banking is doing well. So the numbers are good.

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 1>And and on the calls, there was a media call

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 1>with the CFO, the outgoing CFO GARSPAC and then the

0:08:08.880 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 1>annals call is continuing with with CEO started to make

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 1>comments and the CFO is talking now and and there's there.

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 1>They kept saying, both of them kept saying the economy

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 1>in the US and worldwide is not doing bad. The

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 1>real economy has not been impacted. Everything is still on

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 1>four cylinders. It's all really chugging along, and we're not

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 1>seeing client demand go down. So I think that all

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 1>those things maybe you know, people are more optimistic that

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 1>banks are are continuing to do the business for a

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 1>few more quarters. I mean there was one point where

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:44.960
<v Speaker 1>where the outgoing CFO said, well, you know, if we

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 1>start seeing impact of this, only real economy might be

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 1>towards the end of two thousand nineteen. Okay, so that's

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:54.080
<v Speaker 1>a few quarters away. You know, there's still time until then.

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we should be happy. And it's probably what's going on. Well,

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, we can't really push that fixed income performance

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:01.680
<v Speaker 1>under the rug as much as I'm sure management would

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 1>like to. I mean, it's a it's a huge part

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 1>of their capital markets business, and it was the you know,

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the worst quarter they've had in fixed for several years.

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 1>What did they claim as the drivers of that underperformance

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 1>and what is their outlook for twenty nineteen? Like I

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, having been on a trading desk, volatilities, my friend,

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 1>that's how I can generate alpha. That clearly wasn't the

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:24.560
<v Speaker 1>case for city here in the fourth quarter. Well, you know,

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:30.199
<v Speaker 1>the the commentary on whether volatility is good or bad

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:33.559
<v Speaker 1>changes according to the numbers they were quarter by every

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 1>bank official. Um so when when volatility helps the bottom line,

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>everybody loves it and it's a friend, but but it

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't always and and actually in the same quarter, Uh,

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 1>some banks are aided by it and some aren't. Which

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:51.440
<v Speaker 1>is part of the game of fixed income market making.

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:54.200
<v Speaker 1>When you're when you're really buying and selling and the

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 1>spread is where you're making the money, you know you

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:59.840
<v Speaker 1>can you can get caught in the wrong positions so easily.

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:02.559
<v Speaker 1>And markets are going down for three days and then

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 1>going up for three days, so you think it's going

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 1>to go down for three more days and it and

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't. So it's it's tough for these banks. And

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>even even if clients and and the typical commentary they

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 1>give is while clients stayed on the sidelines because of

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 1>a lottilty, I don't know if that's really the case.

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 1>It's just again market making in fixed income you and

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 1>you can lose money as well as make bray and

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:27.400
<v Speaker 1>you just add up those days where you lost sources gain.

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:29.720
<v Speaker 1>One thing that I'm struck by the Okay, so putting

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>market making aside, I'm struck in the first quarter that

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:36.839
<v Speaker 1>trading volumes are down in credit markets, particularly the risk

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:40.839
<v Speaker 1>your credit markets, and debt issuance is also way down,

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 1>especially on the risk your tiers, which is actually where

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 1>these banks make a lot of the money, right, I mean,

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:49.440
<v Speaker 1>risk your deals tend to offer bigger premiums. I'm just

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 1>wondering what gives them confidence that things are turning up, since,

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, from all other empirical data, things are slower

0:10:56.880 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 1>than the first quarter. The issues is going down, and

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:02.439
<v Speaker 1>that actually comes to hur r trading as well as

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 1>you said, so so it's normal. I mean, trading can

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:08.680
<v Speaker 1>be can be better while issuance starts slowing down, but

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 1>eventually the issuance will make a difference. And they do

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:13.000
<v Speaker 1>make a lot of money on the issuance as well,

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:16.600
<v Speaker 1>and the issuance um debt and equity are down, so

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:21.439
<v Speaker 1>so that's being reflected and um so so they kept

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean they they're talking about the financial economy not

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 1>doing as well. That's what markets are reflecting, but the

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 1>real economy still going well. Um. But those cannot be

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:36.320
<v Speaker 1>in in diverging paths. For too long, right, they catch up.

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the real economy does get impacted by what

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the financial economy is doing. Um and and it's a

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 1>sign too. I mean, as as companies are selling less dead,

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>that means they're they're not going to invest in new things,

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>and they're not. The economy is not going in a

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 1>great direction. So it's maybe a matter of time. But

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:55.200
<v Speaker 1>this is you know, markets can be very short term oriented,

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 1>so you know, they could be looking for the next

0:11:57.240 --> 0:11:59.440
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks instead of a couple of months. Right,

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 1>just real, quickly fifteen seconds. When I think City Bank,

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I think a huge consumer franchise. Did they have any

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 1>commentary about how the consumers doing both here in US

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 1>and outside? They were pretty positive. They said they have

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:14.040
<v Speaker 1>not felt the consumers pulling back at all in the

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 1>US or other places. Interesting. That is interesting. We'll see

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 1>whether the rest of the banks say this, yeah, exactly,

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and honestly, in very early trading, the rest of the

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:27.320
<v Speaker 1>banks were declining in sympathy with City Group. It'll be

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 1>interesting to see whether city groups sets odd momentum after

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:34.559
<v Speaker 1>disappointing earnings. Go figure, and it's rare that City Bank

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:36.839
<v Speaker 1>leads off the bank earnings week. Usually that's left for

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgan. That's right, Well, let's see how they do. Yalman, owner,

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:42.839
<v Speaker 1>and so far they're doing okay. Y'alman, owner and senior

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:45.320
<v Speaker 1>finance writer for Bloomberg. Thank you so much for being

0:12:45.360 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 1>with us. Well, the world of sports has transformed from

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>hitting a ball to directing a ball on a computer screen.

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Joining us now, Chris Russo, managing director and ahead of

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:15.080
<v Speaker 1>sports practice at Hula. He and Loki joining us here

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 1>in our Bloomberg directive broker's studios. Chris, let's get a

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:21.839
<v Speaker 1>lay of the land for as you prepare for mergers

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:24.319
<v Speaker 1>and as you try to get a sense of where

0:13:24.360 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the eyeballs are going. Has ears e sports peaked or

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 1>are we just getting started with the adoption of this trend.

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I think we're just getting started with the sports, in

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:37.559
<v Speaker 1>part because the amount of people playing e sports games,

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 1>attending events, watching and streaming on Twitch has just continued

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 1>to grow. And so over the past eighteen to twenty

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 1>four months, you've seen these new e sports teams created

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 1>by the big publishers like Riot and Activision, and those

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 1>teams have been bought by professional sports team owners and

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:56.560
<v Speaker 1>some of those valuations are now a hundred and fifty million,

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 1>two hundred million dollars for these teams, and I see

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 1>them continuing to grow because of the audience, passion and

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the great demographics we have any sports. I just can't

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 1>imagine a sport watching other people play games. But I've

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 1>been told time and time again, and I've seen the numbers,

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and I've seen Jeff Wilson, as you mentioned, to make

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 1>an investment. But let's go back to maybe you know,

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the next big m and a trade involving sports might

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 1>just be the regional sports networks that the Walt Disney

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Company acquired from twenty one century Fox. Big numbers, big markets,

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>big companies involved. What do you expect that to happen

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and what do you how do you expect that to

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 1>play out? Well, I think there's kind of two ways

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 1>of looking at that opportunity, and these are twenty two

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 1>regional sports networks with great teams that they broadcast and

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:44.680
<v Speaker 1>great rights. The sort of negative view would be Cable

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>going forward is going to be a diminishing place because

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 1>of cord cutting and challenges on subscribers. The positive outlook

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 1>would be there's gonna be streaming opportunities. There's going to

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 1>be gambling potentially incorporated into these broadcasts. So I'm actually

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>more bullish on the rs AN opportunity than some other

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 1>folks are. Where the bidding ends up may depend upon

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 1>how many finalists are there and how they drive the price,

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 1>but actually this is a quite uh interesting asset and

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I think ultimately will be be a good one. You know,

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 1>let's see about a little bit, because what you're just

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about, and Paul's really good question, and the concept

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 1>of the sports kind of comes together with this idea

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:21.760
<v Speaker 1>that more people are cutting the cord and that big

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 1>sports companies aren't going with them. They're staying in cable

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and as a result, they're losing some viewers. And perhaps

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 1>this is allowing the sports to take off more because

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 1>that's what's available to people can use. To foresee a

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>time in the near future where big teams move to

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 1>online streaming services as well. I do believe that teams

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 1>and leagues will rely more on streaming rights over time

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 1>than they are today. I think you see some of

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:51.720
<v Speaker 1>that happening now with Amazon having a Thursday Night package

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 1>from the NFL. Other leagues have licensed parts of their

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 1>their packages to the major streaming companies and video companies.

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 1>But I think until the big rights are available, which

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 1>will happen in the next three to five years, you're

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 1>still seeing things around the edges. But with the younger

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 1>viewers spending more time online with mobile devices, I think

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the league's will have to go there and have to

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 1>be robust in those offerings. Let's you know. I know

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Joe Uh Chris worked at the NFL prior to Landlogate

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 1>and nobody uh slices and dices broadcast rites better than

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. So I suspect, as you mentioned in one

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 1>or whenever that is um that the NFL that I'm

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 1>sure the technology companies will be at the table. Is

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 1>that your thought, it is my thought, And I think

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, people that have our

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>companies that have great content will still do well. They

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 1>will just find new ways to exploit the content through

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 1>new platforms doing digital media, and I think it will

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 1>be an opportunity to reach new audiences as this next

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 1>generation of fans evolves. So what do you expect in

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 1>terms of the overall M and A volumes in sports

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>media this year? Well, I think that we there will

0:16:56.120 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 1>be a lot of m and A this year in

0:16:57.640 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the sports space, in part because warts gambling has emerged

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:04.400
<v Speaker 1>and that creates a disruption, and that creates new kinds

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of opportunity. We already saw a lot of them and

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 1>a last year around the sports gambling space, fan Duel

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 1>did a transaction, sport Radar, a sport data company, did

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>a transaction Genus Sports and other sports data company. You

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of companies getting prepared for the advent

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:22.879
<v Speaker 1>of gambling, and as a result, you'll see combinations, new investments,

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:26.360
<v Speaker 1>and new configurations of companies. So we've seen the league's

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:29.680
<v Speaker 1>most notably Major League Baseball, but all the professional leagues

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 1>really really kept the gambling at a a you know,

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 1>more than an arms length for generations. Now they seem

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 1>to be embracing it. So can you give us a

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 1>sense of where gambling is in this country? Now? I

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 1>know I live in New Jersey and it's legal linew

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Jersey sports books. Where are we and how do you

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>think that's gonna play out? Right now, sports gambling is

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:52.160
<v Speaker 1>only legal in six or seven states, but many experts

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 1>believe that will increase to twenty to twenty five states

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 1>over the next couple of years. I think initially, as

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:01.119
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned, the sports leagues were very hesitant and reluctant

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 1>about sports gambling. But now that it is going to

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 1>be legal, they are trying to figure out how they

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:09.119
<v Speaker 1>can make money but be keep the integrity of the

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 1>games and make sure that gambling is done in a

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:15.399
<v Speaker 1>responsible way so they preserve the authenticity and integrity of

0:18:15.400 --> 0:18:18.399
<v Speaker 1>these sports. Do either of you gamble to sports gambling?

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you actually have occasion? When I'm in Las Vegas? Occasion? Yeah?

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:24.719
<v Speaker 1>Would you? I mean, but my question is, you know,

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 1>how much would this with the appetite widen or is

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the field already there? Well? You know, in my opinion,

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:33.120
<v Speaker 1>there are there are a lot of reports out there

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 1>that say the offshore the illegal amount of gambling is

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:38.920
<v Speaker 1>about a hundred and fifty billion dollars. No one knows

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:41.880
<v Speaker 1>if that's really true. I think what could happen over

0:18:41.960 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 1>time is that number gets even bigger because people who

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to bet on an offshore book or go

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 1>to some website, they didn't know if their money was

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:51.360
<v Speaker 1>going to come back, now feel it's safe, it's comfortable.

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 1>You've got brands like Fando on DraftKings which people now

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 1>trust and and understand, I think you have potential to

0:18:56.760 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 1>have this thing get get even bigger than anticipated. And

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:02.159
<v Speaker 1>what did the um? The ratings I guess for the

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:04.640
<v Speaker 1>NFL were up a little bit this year so far,

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>but they've been a you know, kind of a downward trend.

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:11.640
<v Speaker 1>How concerned is the NFL in particular about their ratings

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 1>or do they feel like there there are incillary businesses,

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:16.879
<v Speaker 1>whether it's red zone and other things that might be

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 1>making up for it. Yeah, you know, in my view, um,

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:23.359
<v Speaker 1>the NFL is doing just fine. Uh. Again, they had

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:25.719
<v Speaker 1>a good year in terms of ratings, but as you

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>mentioned earlier, they're continuing to experiment and look at new platforms,

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:32.640
<v Speaker 1>new ways to distribute content, and I think they'll continue

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to be very shrewd about how they slice and dice

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:37.920
<v Speaker 1>rights to let them maximize the opportunity. I think the key, though,

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 1>for the NFL and all of these sort of major

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 1>leagues is to make sure they're serving the next generation

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of fans with the kind of content and on the

0:19:45.040 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 1>platforms that that those fans want to want to consume it.

0:19:47.720 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 1>All Right, Chris, I'm gonna put you on the spot

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 1>fifteen seconds. What's the one surprise deal that you think

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 1>will get done in this space this year. Oh boy,

0:19:57.080 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the one surprise deal. I don't have necessarily one surprise

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 1>a deal. I do think you're going to see a

0:20:01.560 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 1>lot more sports team activity this year. The last three

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 1>or four years that activity has been pretty slow, only

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:09.359
<v Speaker 1>two WISH deals a year. I think this year you

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:11.679
<v Speaker 1>could see four or five deals, in part because I

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:13.439
<v Speaker 1>think some owners want to take some chips off the

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 1>table with the markets being as strong as they are.

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, so so Hedge fun billionaires, get your purses

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:22.680
<v Speaker 1>ready because you can go buy a sports team. Thank

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:24.639
<v Speaker 1>you so much for being with us. Chris Russo at

0:20:24.840 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Hula and Loki's Sports practice. Here with us, we are

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:45.360
<v Speaker 1>in New York City in our cozy when we're gonna

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:48.680
<v Speaker 1>active Broker's studios. David Coudla is in a brisk in

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Detroit where it's twenty six degrees and sunny at the

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 1>auto show. And this is the last North American International

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Auto Show that's going to be held in January. They're

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:00.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of upping their game move thing to a warmer

0:21:01.119 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 1>month in June. David, thank you so much for being

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>with us. David Coudla is founder and chief executive officer

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 1>of Mainstay Capital Management. Before we get into what is

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:13.359
<v Speaker 1>actually being announced and discussed at the auto show, can

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:16.360
<v Speaker 1>you just set the tone for us, how how pessimistic

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:20.879
<v Speaker 1>are different automakers given the overall sort of bleak sales

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:24.480
<v Speaker 1>picture for for the car industry. Well, there had been

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of pessimism coming into with the slowing global

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:34.880
<v Speaker 1>economy and fears by some of a recession and a

0:21:34.920 --> 0:21:38.239
<v Speaker 1>possible recession in the US in twenty nineteen, or at

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:42.960
<v Speaker 1>least a slowing economy in the auto industry is as

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:45.639
<v Speaker 1>cyclical as they come, and that's sent a lot of

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 1>fears for slowing sales in twenty nineteen, which which we

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:52.120
<v Speaker 1>do expect UH in the U s and globally. We've

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 1>already seen that slowing sales in China. China had their

0:21:56.240 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 1>UH first sales decline in over two decades, falling six

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 1>percent last year. We expected to slow this year. That's

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the largest market in the world, and after the four

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:12.639
<v Speaker 1>best years for US sales ever from we expect sales

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:15.720
<v Speaker 1>to slow here. And then on Friday, of course, Mary Bara,

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of GM, came out with some very good

0:22:21.359 --> 0:22:24.880
<v Speaker 1>expectations for Wall Street on what they expect in terms

0:22:24.880 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 1>of sales and profitability this year. So a very good

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 1>picture out of GM. Uh So what we've heard from

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:35.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the CEOs they expect good. We'll see. So, David,

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:39.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, the automobile industry has really evolved into a

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:43.679
<v Speaker 1>technology industry, I mean essentially taken over the CS Consumer

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:48.119
<v Speaker 1>Electronics Show in Las Vegas every year. Um, what what

0:22:48.359 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 1>is really the near term realistic technological innovations that are

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:57.119
<v Speaker 1>creating the most buzz there at the auto show this year? Well,

0:22:57.160 --> 0:23:00.639
<v Speaker 1>it is about electric It is about electrification, It is

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:06.359
<v Speaker 1>about electric vehicles, and it is about autonomous. But you

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:10.640
<v Speaker 1>know those still electric vehicles still represent less than one

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 1>percent of the market globally and in the US. Uh,

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 1>those are still products yet to come. A lot coming

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 1>over the next few model years, but still yet to come. Uh.

0:23:23.320 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 1>You know that what's happening in cars. We see this

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:29.760
<v Speaker 1>at CS and and we've seen a lot of the introductions.

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I T is playing a bigger, bigger and bigger role

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the new introductions and in technology, uh,

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:42.879
<v Speaker 1>in in automotive and in terms of what's new and

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:46.560
<v Speaker 1>vehicles each year. Design is still is still a big deal.

0:23:47.200 --> 0:23:53.119
<v Speaker 1>Improvements in fuel economy, horsepower, uh, transmission, suspension, all those things.

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 1>But what's happening in terms of I T is becoming

0:23:56.800 --> 0:24:00.440
<v Speaker 1>a bigger, bigger deal and is evolving very rapidly. Uh.

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:03.359
<v Speaker 1>You know, the cars and the technology we see today

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:06.680
<v Speaker 1>are our leaps and bounds from just five or seven

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 1>years ago. So David, I know you're big on Michigan

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 1>since that's where you live, but I really and and

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 1>and it rightly, rightfully so, Um, Detroit's Auto Show has

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:22.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of lost some of its relevance. Paul is mentioning

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas, and that really

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:28.520
<v Speaker 1>is kind of taken on a more dominant role in

0:24:28.560 --> 0:24:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the auto industry. Do you think what is the role

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:36.159
<v Speaker 1>for the Detroit Auto Show these days? Well, you know

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 1>that the heritage from you know, from where it comes from,

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and um, you know it is you know, probably the

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 1>move to June makes sense from the standpoint of warmer weather,

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:51.600
<v Speaker 1>being able to actually drive some vehicles, along with coming

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 1>to see them and moving away from h C e

0:24:55.560 --> 0:24:58.880
<v Speaker 1>s which now kind of steals its thunder a week

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 1>ahead of time. Um. The German automakers, except for VW,

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 1>are noticeably absent this year, so it's hopefully that will

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:13.879
<v Speaker 1>bringe some new life into the Detroit Auto Show, the

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:18.399
<v Speaker 1>North American International Auto Show. We hope and UH will

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:21.920
<v Speaker 1>will will help with the resurgence of the show. So David,

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 1>as the automakers continue to ramp up their investment in technology,

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 1>is it too early to maybe gauge who are some

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 1>winners or losers. Who's doing a better job than than

0:25:30.760 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 1>others of some of the majors. It's it's interesting to

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:38.159
<v Speaker 1>see the partnerships that are that are coming together Honda

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:42.320
<v Speaker 1>with General Motors UH the announcement, we expect further announcements

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 1>of Ford and VW UM, you know VW or. We've

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:52.119
<v Speaker 1>seen UH that really I think General Motors has been

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:56.600
<v Speaker 1>in a leadership role in both autonomous and UH E

0:25:56.760 --> 0:26:01.119
<v Speaker 1>v UH. We've seen UH for word, you know, when

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:03.480
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about here in the US, has has has

0:26:03.520 --> 0:26:06.600
<v Speaker 1>been a little bit behind in that game. UM and

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:09.680
<v Speaker 1>those partnerships that we're seeing because of the cost to

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:12.600
<v Speaker 1>move from I, I, C, D E v UH and

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the cost for a Thomas significant cost to make that

0:26:15.800 --> 0:26:19.680
<v Speaker 1>transition from what we call what some people call auto

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:21.720
<v Speaker 1>one point out auto two point oh we call it

0:26:21.760 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 1>from the legacy business to the future of mobility. Uh,

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a very expensive transformation. So these partnerships are going

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:35.720
<v Speaker 1>to going to be very important. But that's where we're

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:39.919
<v Speaker 1>seeing the synergies like that is I think that's going

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:42.880
<v Speaker 1>to be most what will be most important. David Coudla,

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for being with us as always.

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 1>David Coudler is chief executive in chief investments tragist at

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Mainstay Capital Management with two and a half billion dollars

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:55.159
<v Speaker 1>under management. Coming to us from the North American International

0:26:55.200 --> 0:26:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Auto Show in Detroit, it is going to be the

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 1>last one where it's going to be a brisk twenty

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:04.080
<v Speaker 1>five degrees. Since this is the last one being held

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:06.280
<v Speaker 1>in January, it is now going to be moving to

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:08.880
<v Speaker 1>June where it's going to be sunny and people can

0:27:09.119 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 1>drive through the town with a breeze going through their hair.

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast.

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:30.080
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo.

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 1>It's one before the podcast. You can always catch us

0:27:32.840 --> 0:27:34.440
<v Speaker 1>worldwide on Bloomberg Radio