WEBVTT - Jacobsen: save early, save often

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Global business news twenty four hours a day at Bloomberg

0:00:05.920 --> 0:00:09.000
<v Speaker 1>dot com, the Radio plus Mobile Act and on your radio.

0:00:09.280 --> 0:00:13.240
<v Speaker 1>This is a Bloomberg Business Flash and I'm Karen. Moscow

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:16.200
<v Speaker 1>stocks are retreating from nine week highs following the SNP

0:00:16.320 --> 0:00:19.479
<v Speaker 1>five hundred's longest winning streak in five months, after worsening

0:00:19.480 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>economic data from Asia reignited concern over the outlook for

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:25.960
<v Speaker 1>global growth. We check the markets every fifteen minutes throughout

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the trading day on Bloomberg SNP five hundred down eight

0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:32.159
<v Speaker 1>tenths per cent or fifteen points to nineteen eighty five down,

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Jones Industrial Average down six tenths percent or a hundred

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:37.839
<v Speaker 1>eight points to sixteen thousand, nine hundred sixty five, and

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the nastacs down seven tenths percent or thirty four points

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:43.520
<v Speaker 1>to forty six seventy four. Ten year treasury of twenty

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:45.880
<v Speaker 1>three thirty seconds, the yield one point eight two percent

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:48.840
<v Speaker 1>yield on the two year point eight six percent. Nimax

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>screwed oil down two point one percent or seventy nine

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 1>cents to thirty seven on eleven a barrel comax gold

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 1>of three tenths per cent or four dollars to twelve

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>sixty eight announced the euro a dollar ten forty one

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>again one to Wealth points seven zero to United Continental

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Holding shareholders will nominate airline turnaround artists Gordon Bethune to

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>lead a slate of new directors in an effort to

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>overhaul the airline's management. We're in Buffett's Berkshire. Hathaway said

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 1>it will sell bonds and part to repay a ten

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar loan used to finance its purchase of Presision

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:20.319
<v Speaker 1>cast parts, and Senna, Fie and Mark planned to end

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 1>a two decade long joint venture to sell vaccines in

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Europe as revenue from the product's dwindles. And that's a

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg business flash, Tom and Mike Karen, thanks so much.

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Surveillance is Tuesday, but you by marks Paneth l

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:37.840
<v Speaker 1>LP ranked among the top three forensic accounting firms in

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:39.760
<v Speaker 1>New York by the New York Law Journal for the

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 1>sixth year in a row. Visit marks Paneth dot com.

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:46.839
<v Speaker 1>M A r K s pan of P A N

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 1>E t H marks Paneth dot com. We thank them

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 1>looking forward to the seventh year in a row, the

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>sixth year in a row that they work in this

0:01:55.760 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>difficult area forensic accounting. Brian jacobs In is a brave soul.

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 1>He's wells Fargo, and he thinks about what to do

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>with money, particularly in a single digit world. Brian, you

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>beautifully revisit dollar cost averaging, which by definition works within

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 1>greater volatility and a double digit world. Can dollar cost

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 1>averaging work in a lethargic, low return world? Well, thanks

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 1>for having me on, And uh, you know it's not

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 1>that brave to say, let's go with the tried and

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:34.600
<v Speaker 1>true method of saving early and saving often, which entails

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 1>dollar cost averaging. The problems I think everybody's trying to

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>pick a top or pick a bottom as far as

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:44.239
<v Speaker 1>when they're doing their allocations and living in a binary

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 1>world like that can create a lot of volatility with

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:50.640
<v Speaker 1>your portfolio. And in fact, if you have a volatile market,

0:02:50.919 --> 0:02:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the dollar cost averaging can really help you sort of

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>smooth out the cost basis of your portfolio. Yes, ideally

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>we'd like to pick the bottom for getting in, but

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 1>that's somewhat of a pool's errand yeah, but within that

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:08.240
<v Speaker 1>is the new regime we're in. I mean, if we

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 1>can all agree, we've moved from twenty percent a year

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>to twelve percent a year too somewhere self the major

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 1>metric I see as we just have to put aside

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:21.079
<v Speaker 1>more money. I mean that's what we've heard interview after interview,

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:25.799
<v Speaker 1>when there's that desperation to put aside more money. Is

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:28.799
<v Speaker 1>the first order condition to just put it aside? Or

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>does d A really work well? I think that the

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 1>first thing you need to do is to increase the

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>amount that you are saving to reach those long term

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>financial goals because in a low interest rate environment, if

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 1>you think about it's not just a low interest rate environment,

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>but we all face the prospect, thankfully of having longer

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:51.920
<v Speaker 1>life expectancies when we're in retirement, and that increases that

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 1>that liability effectively that you're trying to fund. So you

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 1>have that longer time frame and you have lower interest rates,

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>and that means that now you need to save a

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 1>little bit more, which is I think behaviorally what people

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 1>have been doing. We've seen an uptick in the savings

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 1>rates in the United States, so that's encouraging. But for

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>investors who are looking at how then to enter the market,

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:16.839
<v Speaker 1>I think that dollar cost averaging where you're doing it

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 1>every single month or maybe even every single week, if

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:22.919
<v Speaker 1>you can increase the frequency with which you do it.

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>That can really help. So even if you don't have

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:28.839
<v Speaker 1>a directional market where it's moving up boards moving down,

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:31.839
<v Speaker 1>even if there's just that volatility where you've got lots

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:34.520
<v Speaker 1>of ups and lots of downs. Uh, the dollar cock

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>averaging can cover over a multitude of market timing sins.

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned Save early, save often. Let me bring up

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:44.920
<v Speaker 1>something I was talking about with Jack Boggle a little

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:48.040
<v Speaker 1>while ago, and that's these firms. Now I realize you're

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:53.279
<v Speaker 1>at Wells, but firms that suggest you direct deposits some

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>of your paycheck into stock funds that they manage, you know, passively.

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Um is the market the best place to save for

0:05:05.600 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 1>many people, it might not be the best place to save.

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 1>If you aren't necessarily fully funded with what I refer

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:17.040
<v Speaker 1>to as your your liquidity bucket or your precautionary balance bucket.

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 1>You might want to fill those up first before you

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 1>look at some of those, uh, you know, perhaps riskier

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:24.920
<v Speaker 1>parts of the market. I think that for a lot

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 1>of people it's somewhat uncomfortable to see the volatility in

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 1>their portfolio if they don't first build up that base

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 1>level of savings that they need to weather certain market storms.

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:42.600
<v Speaker 1>One of the old classics in financial economics is almost

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 1>if you think about it as building a pyramid, if

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:48.040
<v Speaker 1>you will, you know, everybody's probably heard of Maslow's hierarchy

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:50.039
<v Speaker 1>of needs. You've got to take care of that base

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>level first, and I think for a lot of people

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 1>you have to have that safety first principle, which is

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 1>make sure you have enough cash balances and precautionary balances

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:01.720
<v Speaker 1>that you don't have to fixate on the daily ups

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 1>and downs of the market. Brian Jacobson where this wells Fargo,

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Brian um I turned to the Center for Retirement Research,

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Boston College, Alicia Minel and the people up there are

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>doing absolutely brilliant, acutely mathematical work on what we're doing

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 1>actually with our money. And one of their great studies

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>of the autumn of last year is the basic idea

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:26.920
<v Speaker 1>as the kids leave home, and it's it's laughable how

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 1>minimal people increase their four oh one case their retirement

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 1>plans when supposedly the tuition bills are done. What is

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 1>your prescription to change retirement savings behavior? Does the government

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 1>have to step in and and just massively increase the

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:48.720
<v Speaker 1>incentives to go to four oh one k. You know,

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>that's a real tricky question because they have increased the

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>incentive to go to the four one k, but that

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really seem to be doing it for a lot

0:06:57.120 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 1>exactly exactly. I think changing the rule us as far

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 1>as you know, they took a big step forward by

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 1>having a default enrollment as being an option, effectively taking

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>care of taking advantage of our laziness. I think that

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 1>might be a good way to perhaps nudge people into

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 1>saving more prudently for their retirement. You can put things

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 1>more on autopilot in terms of having automatic escalations of

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 1>your contributions to your four one K. So I think

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>that just allowing plan sponsors to design plans that better

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>fit the behavior of plan participants will really go a

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>long way to helping people fund their retirements. Otherwise you

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>get into a situation where, like it or not, will

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 1>just all have to work a little bit longer in retirement.

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>My headline on this, and this comes from a lot

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 1>of work. A major shout out to Peter Orzag and

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 1>his time at Brookings is the bottom half, bottom two

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 1>thirds of the country have to be massively incentivized to

0:07:56.600 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 1>get going on this. Well, now we've talked about people

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 1>putting their money in the markets, what are you expecting

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 1>from the markets? You had a fairly aggressive call for

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the SMP five this year, and we've had a fairly

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 1>lousy first couple of months. Are you still sticking with that?

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I am, And actually there was a Bloomberg brief that

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 1>just came out this morning where they did a little

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:22.240
<v Speaker 1>interview a Q and A with me, and that was

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fun to discuss. And unlike a lot

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 1>of people, I haven't really lowered my targets for the

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 1>SMP five hundred for the balance of the year. I

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:34.199
<v Speaker 1>still think we could see the SMP five hundred. I'm

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 1>not saying we're going to end the year at those levels.

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that you know, trying to pick what's the

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:41.199
<v Speaker 1>level of the SMP at, you know, the last day

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 1>of the years, why not just ask me what it's

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:44.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be on you know, June three or some

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 1>other random date. I think that I usually think of

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:50.199
<v Speaker 1>these things in terms of trading ranges, and I think

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 1>that we could move up to if we get UH.

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 1>There's three key things that we need to see. I

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 1>think we need to see additional policy moves out of

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 1>China to stabilize their economy and their currency. I think

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 1>we need to see the ECB instead of having a

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 1>draggy disappointment like we had in December. I think he

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 1>needs to beat expectations when they meet on March tenth,

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>and we need to see the Said be very patient

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to hiking rates. I think that Leo

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:18.079
<v Speaker 1>Brainard when she was speaking yesterday, she did a very

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 1>good job of outlining the reasons for why the Said

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 1>should be very cautious when it comes to hiking rates. Brian,

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Brian Jacobson with Wells Fargo with

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 1>something we don't spend enough time on, which is the

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 1>shaky retirement structure of the nation. Mike, I can't say

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 1>enough about Alicia Minnell's work at Boston College at the

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:41.840
<v Speaker 1>scene our leader on that, and it's it's just it's

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:46.960
<v Speaker 1>just jaw dropping. I will mince no words. The failure

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 1>of Arissa of seventy four is just stark as can be,

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 1>and you know we can't do enough discussion of that.

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Should bring her on and she can give us advice

0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:00.720
<v Speaker 1>for people who have children who will need to be

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>educated and therefore cannot retire. But you know, we came

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:08.439
<v Speaker 1>out of this, folks with Eisenhower and then Jimmy Carter

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and and and President Reagan and others jumped starting ourselves

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 1>in an organized retirement. It was all based on choice

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 1>and freedom. And remember you got toasters and free flags

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 1>and bagels were served. And for I believe the working

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>number Alicia has is of Americans eight out of ten.

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 1>It hasn't worked, and it's just all there is to

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 1>it will somehow. I think we'll be doing more of

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 1>that as we go through two thousand sixteen. Right now

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:40.680
<v Speaker 1>and pausing. The market has been really a good number

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:46.440
<v Speaker 1>of days negative on the down then down thirteen points

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:51.839
<v Speaker 1>in the s, the Doubt under seventeen, the House in

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the Vics eighteen point four zero. One year trailing return

0:10:56.320 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 1>SMP five under negative four, the Doubt negative five looking

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 1>back twelve months. We are produced by y U Yan

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:09.559
<v Speaker 1>ken Folio, our global technical director, as Bloomberg surveys