WEBVTT - Ariel Investments Chairman John Rogers Talks Paramount

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio News.

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:10.280
<v Speaker 2>Want to get to a key long term investor in Paramount,

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:12.880
<v Speaker 2>who's been in the name since two thousand and six,

0:00:12.920 --> 0:00:16.000
<v Speaker 2>who believes in the streaming opportunity and the value of

0:00:16.040 --> 0:00:20.160
<v Speaker 2>its content. It's John Rogers, a real investments founder co CEO.

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:24.279
<v Speaker 2>You've been throughout this business in its many iterations, and

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:28.240
<v Speaker 2>I just want to focus first John, on yesterday growth

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 2>being born out being shown by the business, particularly in

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:33.240
<v Speaker 2>its streaming, thanks in many ways to the Super Bowl,

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 2>but it was overshadowed by the departure of Bob Backish.

0:00:35.760 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 2>What did you make of the move?

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:39.920
<v Speaker 1>It was pretty shocking to us.

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 3>I've been Ariel's been in business for forty one years.

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:46.239
<v Speaker 1>We've not seen anything remotely like this.

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 3>It's just extraordinary, and it can't be good for shareholders

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 3>to be able to have all this uncertainty and earning season.

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 3>You're in the middle of a merger and acquisition transaction,

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 3>negotiating with Charter Communications. All these important things are happening

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 3>all at once, and you need.

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 1>The CEO in place.

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 3>So this has just been very very disappointing, disheartening, and

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:16.559
<v Speaker 3>also in the context of what you said business has.

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Been getting better.

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 3>A lot of the initiatives that Bob and Bob and

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 3>his executive team have worked on are really starting to

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 3>show fruition. So the timing just seems extremely, extremely problematic.

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 2>Let's just talk about probably why Bob Backish has exited,

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 2>and is because he felt that the negotiations reportedly underway

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 2>with Skuydance were not within his agreement. Now, Sherry Redstone

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 2>is a controlling shareholder at the moment with Plus National Amusements.

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 2>It seems to be the deal that she's looking for

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 2>with Skuydance. How are you currently dealing with the reports

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 2>of a so called sweetened deal? What would you make

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 2>of a combination of paramount with s guidance?

0:01:56.680 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, we don't know enough.

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 3>We've read all the same you know pieces that have

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 3>been written about this, and institutions like PUCK have had

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:08.920
<v Speaker 3>really good information that we've had confirmed. And so if

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 3>this transaction is really is focused on Skydance, we think

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 3>that that may possibly.

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Have a chance to work.

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:19.080
<v Speaker 3>But we really would much rather see the Apollo deal

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:21.919
<v Speaker 3>with Sony that's been so rumored to be out there

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 3>to get certainty of a you know, Apollo's a world

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 3>class firm with extraordinary resources. Sony has proven to be

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 3>so successful, you know, in this industry that seems like

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 3>a marriage made in heaven, and so we wouldn't rush

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 3>to the altar with a smaller company that's not as

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 3>proven as the Apollo and Sony.

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 4>John, Good morning, it's ed in San Francisco. Do you

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 4>get any sense because you've held this idea that we

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:51.080
<v Speaker 4>should look at other offers on the table for a while.

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 4>Do you still hold that belief but actually the hope

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 4>that other offers will be looked at, Well.

0:02:57.120 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 1>That's we hear. We have.

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:00.919
<v Speaker 3>You know, we had a lot of confidence in management

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 3>that's been nothing but straightforward and can do with us.

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 3>That they cared about all shareholders and as you know,

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 3>the employee bases all own the secondary shares. So we

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 3>really have been very, very hopeful that they were going

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 3>to do the right thing for shareholders and that's been

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:22.799
<v Speaker 3>something that's been committed to us consistently, and we believe them,

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:25.639
<v Speaker 3>and we just continue to think that you don't need

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 3>to rush when things are getting going well. This is

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:30.639
<v Speaker 3>not a melting ice cube. This is a company in recovery,

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:33.120
<v Speaker 3>in a turnaround mode. We want to make sure that

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 3>all shareholders get to be able to take advantage of that.

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 3>And the price that Skydance is suggesting seems to us

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 3>what we've read, much lower than what we would get

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 3>from the Apollo Sony deal and many others that could

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 3>possibly be out there if this company was truly shopped around.

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 3>And the final thing I would say is the directors.

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 3>We know several as independent directors, and we know that

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 3>they're committed to doing what's fair for all shareholders, So

0:03:56.320 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm hoping they'll be able to get to the finish line.

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 4>What does a change of ownership structure or this m

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 4>and a path fix to Paramount?

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think that with Apollo and Sony you would

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 3>end up with enormous resources that would help them with

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:16.480
<v Speaker 3>their balance sheet that has you know, gotten higher.

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Than we would have hoped. You'll be able if you're

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>working with Sony.

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:21.479
<v Speaker 3>Sony has been an expert of being an arms dealer,

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:24.479
<v Speaker 3>being able to use content and ways to generate cash

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 3>flow and profits, and have the extraordinary library that Paramount brings.

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:31.360
<v Speaker 1>The history of Paramount's.

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:34.920
<v Speaker 3>You know lot where they have been able to make

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 3>movies for generations, and there will be enormous synergies. You know,

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 3>I think the synergies between Sony and Paramount Paramount are

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:47.719
<v Speaker 3>much much greater than you can imagine with a smaller

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 3>company like sky Dance.

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 1>So we're really hopeful that you'd.

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:54.040
<v Speaker 3>Be able to get great synergies, higher cash flow, and

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 3>experienced management team that will be able to make those

0:04:56.800 --> 0:05:00.160
<v Speaker 3>tough calls of what happens with Pike Paramount plus, do

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 3>you use content there? How do you use it in

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:04.920
<v Speaker 3>selling into other competing services like Netflix.

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 1>We want that kind of.

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 3>Experience leadership that has been proven, and I know there

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 3>are some other large streamers out there they could possibly

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:14.279
<v Speaker 3>also get into the mix.

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 2>We are, of course with John Rogers of Aerial Investments

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:20.920
<v Speaker 2>found of Coco to our radio and TV audience. John.

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:25.039
<v Speaker 2>Regulatory issues though with both potential tie ups. Is that

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 2>a concern for you?

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 3>I think it's a modest concern for the real large

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:33.720
<v Speaker 3>guys that are out there. I understand that people would

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:37.840
<v Speaker 3>be worried if Netflix, for example, was to buy Paramount Global,

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:41.800
<v Speaker 3>But ultimately I think if people are really looking this

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 3>for the long run, you know, there's been lots of

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 3>litigation around some of the regulatory constraints that are out

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:51.799
<v Speaker 3>there in today's economic system. I think ultimately rational people

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 3>will see do you want to see Paramount Plus collapse?

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 3>Do you want to see all those jobs lost? Do

0:05:57.600 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 3>you want to see a world class American company in disarray?

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:03.360
<v Speaker 3>Where do you want to see it find a great

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 3>parent where they can merge and have a successful, growing

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:08.799
<v Speaker 3>business over the over the next.

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Decade or so.

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 3>So I think I'm hopeful that regulators will be able

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 3>to make the right decision, have an open mind about

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 3>all the various different possible combinations that are out there,

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:20.359
<v Speaker 3>And I certainly think to Apollo a Sony deal should

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:22.720
<v Speaker 3>not have any significant regulatory concerns.

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 2>John, You've written to your own investors in your Q

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 2>one report really saying, look, you're not an activist investor,

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:31.160
<v Speaker 2>but you feel it's your fiduciary duty to raise concerns,

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 2>particularly from a corporate governance perspective here. And I want

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:35.599
<v Speaker 2>to go back to the fact that you have held

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 2>this stock throughout these iterations, and you've seen the fact

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 2>that there was this controlling shareholder. Did you sort of

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:46.920
<v Speaker 2>worry this might ever evolve from this corporate governance structure?

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:50.039
<v Speaker 2>That particularly you're worry was the fact that three independent

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:52.800
<v Speaker 2>board members have recently stepped down amid this m and

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:53.480
<v Speaker 2>A speculation.

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 3>You know, over the years that mentioned, you know, the

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:01.040
<v Speaker 3>forty one years, we've not seen anything like this. I've

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:03.599
<v Speaker 3>never in all the years of owning stocks that have

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 3>dual class shares, I've never seen a scenario where the

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 3>A shareholders were going to get a significantly larger premium

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 3>than the B shareholders. And that's just something we've never

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 3>seen before. And there's been a lot of smart investors,

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 3>it'seno factual over the years. You know, Warren Buffett's been

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 3>a shareholder. We know Mario Gabelli, my friend Mario has.

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Been a shareholder. We had other several.

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 3>Good, smart people looking at this, and we've always felt

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 3>that people would do the rational thing and do the

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 3>right thing for all shareholders. That's what management's told us. Frankly,

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 3>that's what sharey has said over time. And so we

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 3>think that this is something that came as a real

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 3>true surprise, and it's something again like we've never seen before.

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 4>John, I watched The Masters on Paramount Plus. I get

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 4>my Champions League Football two Paramount Plus.

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 1>I liked Halo.

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 4>What is it that you like about paramounts existing portfolio

0:07:58.040 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 4>and offering.

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, you started at the right place.

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 3>They have extraordinary content.

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>That you must see.

0:08:06.280 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 3>The super Bowl, you know, had great, great ratings, Grammys

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:10.119
<v Speaker 3>were great.

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned the Masters.

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 3>They've got great scripted shows, the CSI franchise, the news franchise,

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 3>CBS Sunday Morning sixty Minutes, CBS Evening News.

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>And this is robust history. But then you put on

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 1>top of it this.

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 3>Extraordinary library with the paramount greats, Mission Impossible, and The Godfather.

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 1>You could go on and on and on.

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:36.840
<v Speaker 3>They've got Pluto, which is an extremely successful streaming service.

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 3>You've got worldwide assets the Bob Backish used to run

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:42.839
<v Speaker 3>that are extremely valuable and seem to get ignored by

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:46.079
<v Speaker 3>the analyst community and the value that's there. So they

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 3>have a well diversified group of assets, many hidden assets,

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 3>real estate that it hasn't completely been utilized, institutions like

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 3>Showtime and BT that I wish they had found a

0:08:56.880 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 3>way to have sold earlier. But these are real, true

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 3>assets to this company. And I think sometimes people get

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 3>into the group think of the moment, they're worried about

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 3>the cord cutting, and they're forgetting to value all of

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 3>the assets that Paramount Global has.

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 2>You're a value investor, you look at the value. John,

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 2>you also say you don't sell into chaos. What do

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 2>you do though, if a deal with Skuydance goes ahead.

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, we have been looking at all of our options.

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 3>We did write a letter to the board of directors

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 3>explaining our position. We've been, of course talking to expert

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 3>legal counsel, and our general counsel is terrific and she's

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:36.679
<v Speaker 3>been on top of those issues. So we're looking at

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:39.959
<v Speaker 3>all of our alternatives and we'll see how this all

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 3>plays out.

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>But we would like to.

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 3>See this play out in a way that's very constructive

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:46.719
<v Speaker 3>because it would be not a good thing for a

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 3>sky Dancer trying to buy a company where you're in

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 3>litigation with all of your shareholders or many of your shareholders,

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:54.720
<v Speaker 3>I should say many of your shareholders, and at the

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 3>same time, your senior management is not going to be

0:09:56.800 --> 0:09:59.959
<v Speaker 3>happy if the deal isn't fair for the b shareholders

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 3>the management team owns.

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 1>And we all know M and.

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:06.720
<v Speaker 3>A is difficult in the best of circumstances, getting all

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 3>the synergies done and all the tough calls that have

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 3>to be made, and it would be a difficult environment

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 3>I think for them to be able to be successful,

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:16.640
<v Speaker 3>while you could have such a cleaner deal with an

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 3>extraordinary company like Apollo and Sony.

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 4>John Rogers Aerial Investments Founder and co C grateful for

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 4>your time.

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Thank you,