WEBVTT - Surveillance: Fed Day with Zentner

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane. Along

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>with Jonathan Ferroll and Lisa Brownwitz. Daily we bring you

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>insight from the best and economics, finance, investment, and international relations.

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcast, Suncloud, Bloomberg dot Com,

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>and of course on the Bloomberg Terminent Laurence Somers was

0:00:30.360 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>with us the other day, the Secretary of Treasury and

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 1>obviously from Harvard University, and he wrote a blistering essay

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 1>today in the Washington Post, and we will begin with

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>that with the wonderful Ellen Setner of Morgan Stanley. The

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:49.480
<v Speaker 1>FETE is not internalized, the magnitude, the magnitude of its

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>errors over the past year, is operating with an inappropriate

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>and dangerous framework. Professor Somers, with alan Stonemash, goes on

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 1>to say, there can be no reliable progress against inflation

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:06.759
<v Speaker 1>without substantial increases in real interest rates, which means temporary

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>increases in unemployment. Mazentner is with Morgan Stanley. Ellen, you

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 1>know that the word magnitude is used differently by people

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 1>like Xanner, people like Summers. How hard is it right

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>now to gauge the magnitude of this moment, this march magnitude.

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>How hard is it to gauge the how muchness forward

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:31.760
<v Speaker 1>for you? The how much of nous? I love it?

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, look the the It's easy to get on

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the train of saying the feed is behind the curve.

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:42.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think there are folks on the FO m

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:46.040
<v Speaker 1>C that would agree that they're probably behind the curve. UM.

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 1>But there are enough risks in the economy still and

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 1>with renewed geo new geopolitical concerns, um, that does make

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 1>sense to start off with the basis point hike. You

0:01:57.760 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>don't want to add to the volatility that's already in

0:01:59.840 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the markets. I think what we're going to see is

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>that Chair Pal is going to leave the door open

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 1>to the door. Then markets know that they can go

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:09.800
<v Speaker 1>in bigger increments at any time. But to say that

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the FED is operating under the wrong framework, I think

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:17.959
<v Speaker 1>it's just absolutely uh inconsistent with what we've heard from

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the FED. I think it was pretty quickly that they

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 1>abandoned the new framework when they went solely to focusing

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 1>on UH inflation. Uh. I don't think they're operating on

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the under that old framework. The old twenty framework framework,

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and the headline there is Zentor pushing back against somers Ellen.

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to stay on magnitude, which goes to the

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>reaction functions of the Fed. Can we have any predictable

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:47.919
<v Speaker 1>reaction functions given the mix of economic data the dynamics

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of the American system? Are we literally with Chairman Powell

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>flying blind out of this pandemic with the overlay of

0:02:55.480 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>war in Ukraine? Yeah? So, uh, I mean flying blind?

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>There is a good way to put it. Uh. You know,

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I think under this environment, it's absolutely appropriate to expect

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>high volatility to continue. Um Volatility equals uncertainty, and it

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 1>means that you have monetary policy makers that are going

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:17.640
<v Speaker 1>to have to make decisions meeting by meeting based on

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the data that they have in hand and where they

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>think it is likely going. You know, when you're when

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:26.639
<v Speaker 1>you're following financial conditions so closely, and when those are

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 1>being impacted uh, not just by your own communication, but

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 1>uh of late by external sources. You know, it's it's

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 1>out of your control and you just really have to

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>watch and take it step by step, feel your way

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 1>in the sand with your toes. Uh. And that's what

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the FED is going to be doing, and so I

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 1>think Chap is going to underscore that in his Q

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>and A session uh today, um. And that means that

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 1>markets are going to have to really be nimble as

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the FED is going to be nimble. That you could

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>see twenty five basis points fifty fifty or all twenty

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 1>five or what we do know is that they're hiking.

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>The hiking cycle has begun, and there is a lot

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 1>of room for them to get far in rate hikes

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>without impacting the economy. And I think that's what is

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 1>most misunderstood by the market. Well, Ellen to that point,

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 1>let's put some numbers on that that you expect we're

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:25.279
<v Speaker 1>going to end the year of three with a base

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 1>of FED funds rate of two point six to five,

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:31.160
<v Speaker 1>well above where the tenure and frankly the thirty year

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:34.599
<v Speaker 1>are at this point. And you also expect quantitative tightening,

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:38.600
<v Speaker 1>not just a cessation of purchases of bonds, but actually

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the shrinking of the balance sheet to begin in May.

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 1>So here's what I'm struggling with, struggling with Ellen. If

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 1>this is actually going to be effective FED tightening, why

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>will that not translate to a slower growth paradigm that

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:56.359
<v Speaker 1>could potentially slow the trajectory of their rate hikes. Yeah,

0:04:56.400 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 1>so it's it's a great question, Lisa, So they do.

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:04.159
<v Speaker 1>So here's the part of Summer's uh op ed that

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I do agree with. The Basically, he's laying out in

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>a way that the Fed can um that their other

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 1>job is to raise the unemployment rate. Um. Now, it

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:15.839
<v Speaker 1>doesn't sound very good for policymakers to stand in front

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 1>of the public and say, hey, we're we need to

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>raise the unemployment rate, but that's part of their job.

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 1>They have to create slack, and to create slack, you've

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 1>got to slow the economy. So we do have the

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>economy slowing. Uh And we've taken growth forecast down for

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 1>this year and significantly raised inflation forecast, but the economy

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:35.480
<v Speaker 1>is still growing well beyond its potential, which is in

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the one and a half to one point eight percent range.

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Uh And, so you are still gonna put downward pressure

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>on the unemployment rates. At the very least towards the

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:46.599
<v Speaker 1>end of the year, we should start to see the

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:49.600
<v Speaker 1>unemployment rate flat and out. If it doesn't, as policymakers

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:52.920
<v Speaker 1>have warned, then you could see an unemployment rate in

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the high twos, and that's still going to mean as

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:57.159
<v Speaker 1>the Fed has a lot more to do, so I

0:05:57.160 --> 0:06:01.559
<v Speaker 1>think in order to slow the economy and help inflation cool,

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 1>they are going to have to hike as much as

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:08.920
<v Speaker 1>we believe in Again, you all mentioned the market is

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 1>expecting seven rate hikes this year is a basis point equivalent.

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:19.719
<v Speaker 1>We're expecting six basis point equivalent. It's really in three

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 1>where we expect four additional hikes to get UH in

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>that range of two and a half to two and

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:29.920
<v Speaker 1>three quarters per cent. That's where the market has it wrong.

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 1>This economy is less sensitive to hire interest rates UH,

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:36.600
<v Speaker 1>and so the Feed is going to have to hike

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:39.279
<v Speaker 1>further in order to slow the economy enough and raise

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the unemployment rate enough. And we have to leave in

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 1>that ammon center of Morgan Stanley, thank you right now.

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>We got to get to this and there's like eight

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>ways to go here, including the news out of Chelsea

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:57.599
<v Speaker 1>and football. But on a serious note, we talked Abob

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Michael right now see I oh at JP Morgan Investment

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>management of the note and Bob, I just want to

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 1>tell you I have completed my bracket. And Gorgonzola is

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>who I have going all the way to the finals.

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:11.119
<v Speaker 1>That's what I'm looking forward to. Put too much money

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 1>on Gorgons. Not go with Yale, folks, I had to

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 1>go with Purdue because the woman from Produce signs my

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:23.239
<v Speaker 1>paycheck is as simple as that, Bob. On a serious note,

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Chairman Powell faces serious consequences of the decisions today and

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 1>may fourth, what's his biggest focus to get to the

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>autumn of this year. Well, it's interesting to me if

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 1>you go back to January, who walked into this year

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>surprisingly hawkish and that that caught the market off guard.

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking for three things from the FETE today. I

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>want to see if they're opening the door to fifty

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 1>basis point hikes and how soon they'll do it. I'm

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>also looking at um the quantitative tightening. How fast will

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 1>they roll that forward? I think they should bring that

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 1>forward to June. And then lastly, I want to see

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:04.120
<v Speaker 1>that trade off between growth and inflation. For sure, growth

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>will slow down in the back end of the year,

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 1>but if inflation is still high, I think the market

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>expects they may back off a bit. I think the

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 1>market will be surprised how hawk as she is today

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 1>and how focused on inflation he is today. Let's go

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 1>through that point by point, Bob, and let's start with

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the dot plot and then we'll go to the news conference.

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 1>The DOP plot for twenty three right now about six,

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 1>just a little north of two. What kind of shift

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 1>are you expecting that? Well, it's throwing darts today given

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:36.320
<v Speaker 1>where all the data is. But what I'd like to

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 1>see is I'd like to see the dots for the

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:41.679
<v Speaker 1>end of this year at two percent, and I want

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:44.440
<v Speaker 1>to see if anyone has the courage to put them

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 1>at three percent at the end of That's that's what

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>you want to happen. What do you think will happen? Oh,

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I think they'll do it. I'm certain they'll do it.

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I think they'll throw in a fifty at the main

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>meeting and they'll do uh six basis point hikes at

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the other six meetings this year. So, Bob, where does

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 1>quantitative tightening fit into this? How much can they really

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 1>execute a shrinking of the balance sheet? Oh? I think

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:14.440
<v Speaker 1>they'll announce it at the main meeting and do it

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 1>in June. I think all of it gets pulled forward. Look,

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>they've already made one policy error so far by letting

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 1>inflation get to where it is. We're looking at the

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Dallas trim mean personal consumption expenditures, it's close to seven percent.

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 1>And that's without all the inflation that's going in the

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 1>pipeline now that we're going to see over the next

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:37.960
<v Speaker 1>three to six months. So they've got a lot to

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 1>do to lean into inflation. And I think what you're

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 1>going to hear from them is that's their focus, even

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 1>if it means sacrificing growth at the end of the year. Well,

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 1>but Bob, that's exactly where I wanted to go, because

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>you're saying that they've already made a huge policy error.

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 1>But a lot of the inflationary inputs are far out

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:57.680
<v Speaker 1>of their control. Their commodity driven. They also are driven

0:09:57.960 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 1>by some of the pandemic era distortion. So at this point,

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 1>is that the only tool they have to materially slow

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the economy even further than inflation will do naturally, nonsense.

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:12.439
<v Speaker 1>Not everything has been out of their control. There have

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>been an awful lot of things that have been in

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 1>their control. Look at the price of new homes, look

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 1>at the cost of shelter, the cost of housing that's

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 1>gone through the roof. Why because if it costs more,

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:27.079
<v Speaker 1>but the cost to finance it remains close to zero.

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Guess what you can pay more. They should have hiked

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:34.320
<v Speaker 1>rates and stop purchasing mortgages six to twelve months ago,

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and that would have slowed down the housing market a bit.

0:10:38.320 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I think they've got a tough summer ahead because there's

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:44.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of pent up demand yet to be satiated.

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 1>That's going to happen over the summer. I see the

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:50.560
<v Speaker 1>toughest month for them to get through as July. Well, Michael,

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 1>you know this works. You do one, Mike, We've got

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:54.199
<v Speaker 1>a ton of money to put some work. What do

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 1>you tell them now? What'd you put it? Well? As

0:10:56.760 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, we walked into this year somewhat conservative thinking

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 1>at things, have gotten a bit of themselves ahead of

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 1>themselves in the credit market and raise cash. Now we're

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 1>putting it back to work. I think over the course

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 1>of a couple of months, we've got a year's worth

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:14.679
<v Speaker 1>of repricing. We're looking at high yield for example, that

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>we came into this year at an all in yield

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>around four percent, we're now at over six percent. You

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 1>look at investment grade credit spreads have gone up from

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 1>eighty or ninety basis points to a hundred and fifty

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 1>basis points. Yields are up one point three, so there's

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of concern about what's going to happen to

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 1>corporate America. In corporate Europe, we think they'll be more

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:41.680
<v Speaker 1>resilient than a lot of investors anticipate. And there's a

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of cash on the sidelines. There was a lot

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:46.600
<v Speaker 1>coming into this year because of the d risking. More

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:49.080
<v Speaker 1>has built off build up. I think you're going to

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 1>see that put to work in the second quarter. But

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Michael Friday evening seven pm, you're gaming Liverpool's next victory.

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:59.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm reading Kasman and Faroli cover to cover and Weekly Prospect.

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 1>As you read your colleagues Kasmin and Faroli, what does

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 1>it tell you, given higher yields, what foreign flows will do?

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 1>My problem with the dooming gloom of moving out to

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:14.839
<v Speaker 1>higher yields lower fixed ingram prices is the foreigners always

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:19.079
<v Speaker 1>show up, don't they? Yeah, they do, And you'll probably

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:23.560
<v Speaker 1>see some of that in the coming quarter. Because for sure,

0:12:23.679 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to see the Bank of Japan raise

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:28.440
<v Speaker 1>rates in here. For sure, the e c B, I

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:31.560
<v Speaker 1>think they'll still hike this year. But they'll talk it

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 1>down until the back end of the year, so that

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:37.080
<v Speaker 1>money will look at the higher yields and come in.

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 1>That's probably why you don't get to three ten years

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:43.679
<v Speaker 1>treasuries over the next couple of months. Can you get

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 1>there by the end of the year. I think with

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the inflationary pressures in the pipeline, you will get there.

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 1>What would you like to see the cops at Chausea?

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Just as a Red Sox Liverpool man, would you like

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 1>to see that happen? There are so many bad things

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:57.839
<v Speaker 1>in that question. First of all, I'm a Philadelphia guy,

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>so it's the Phillies and now I'm a Liverpool supporter.

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:04.600
<v Speaker 1>This is just a bridge too far from me. How

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:08.599
<v Speaker 1>did it happen? How did the Liverpool thing happen? Bob Um,

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's a very long story, but we have time.

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 1>We I spent nine years in London. We landed in

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:22.320
<v Speaker 1>London the year that England beat Germany five one. Michael

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Owen scored a hat trick. We all looked at Michael Evan,

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:27.679
<v Speaker 1>who did he play for Liverpool? And that became our

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>club and that was that. But Michael, thank you, sir,

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:40.679
<v Speaker 1>our goal here for this invasion. This war, or as

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Mr Putin says, this special operation is to bring you

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:48.719
<v Speaker 1>guests of authority and earned expertise. Georgia is to the

0:13:48.760 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 1>southern side, think Joseph Stalin. And it was one of

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Mr Putin's first wars in Russia. It was violent, in brutal,

0:13:56.720 --> 0:14:00.480
<v Speaker 1>with courage. Ian Kelly is the former US Ambassador Georgia,

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:03.679
<v Speaker 1>served in a very tenuous time, and he joins US

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 1>now with his brilliant academics out of Colombia and his

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>academics out of Northwestern this day, Professor Kelly, Ambassador Kelly,

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Bloomberg. Wonderful to have you today. My book

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 1>of the year is Angelus Stents Putin's World. You use

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 1>it in class. What does Putin's world look like right now?

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Putin's world looks very, very circumscribed right now. He started

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 1>out telling the Russian people that they were going to

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 1>be able to become fully participatory in international financial systems,

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>be able to travel, be able to use UH and

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 1>and hold in their banks foreign currency, be able to

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 1>use H worldwide credit cards. And of course that has

0:14:54.560 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 1>now come crashing down and UH. The Putin's world, as

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I say, is now very small. Let's let's go to

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 1>your expertise. And I don't want to make allusions here

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 1>to Hitler and Putin and that that would be inappropriate,

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 1>but I will suggest that all of his work, including

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 1>his battles in Georgia, is with a Slavic certitude. You

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 1>study the Slavic nations culture in language. Is that breaking

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 1>down for Mr Putin right now? That certitude of the

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Russian Slavic experience. Well, I think that he made a

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>serious mistake in thinking that the that the Ukrainians would

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 1>welcome their Eastern Slavic brothers. I think what he's trying

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 1>to do in in Ukraine and what he has been

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>doing with UH, with Yellow Rouse and to a certain

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 1>extent Kazaks down where are many Russian speakers, is to

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:55.200
<v Speaker 1>try and create a Russian world, to create a Moscow

0:15:55.400 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 1>centric community. UH. I don't think he wants to build

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the Soviet Union, but he does want to restore in

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Eastern Slavic homeland or or community. The idea that there

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 1>are borders between Russia and Ukraine UH pains him. And

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 1>what even more pains him is the idea that the

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Ukrainians would want to orient themselves towards the West and

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 1>not towards Moscow, Ambassador. As we sit here today, we

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 1>are still getting a series of headlines saying that talks

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 1>are ongoing and seem more realistic between Ukraine and Russia.

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Do you buy that, given that we cannot reset the

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 1>clock and go back to where we were, that it

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 1>means more NATO troops on the borders of Russia, that

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 1>it means a Ukraine that's living with this scarred history. Well,

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's it was impossible for anyone, really, I

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 1>think to see how there could be a diplomatic solution

0:16:56.400 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 1>based on Putin's initial maximalist goal goals, which was the

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>decapitation of the Ukrainian government and what he called the

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 1>demilitarization of the Ukrainian armed forces, which he said, falsely,

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 1>we're being controlled by the US and NATO. It's interesting

0:17:16.200 --> 0:17:20.119
<v Speaker 1>that you're starting to see UM a change in the

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 1>rhetoric in terms of their goals. They're not talking about

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the de nazification of the government. They're talking more about

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine becoming neutral, in other words, not joining NATO. Uh

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 1>So that I think is significant UM. But whether or

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 1>not it leads to a cessation of hostilities because uh,

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:49.119
<v Speaker 1>the the other the new demand that they put in

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:53.680
<v Speaker 1>as a recognition of Crimea and the eastern Ukraine enclave

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:56.960
<v Speaker 1>of of dom Bas And I can't see the Ukrainians

0:17:58.000 --> 0:18:01.359
<v Speaker 1>giving up the sovereignty over a chunk of their territory.

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Ambasta can I just jumped in just quickly slightly off

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 1>track where we just got a headline about how to

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:08.440
<v Speaker 1>get Ukraine more military help. We've been trying to figure

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:11.159
<v Speaker 1>out why sending them mix would be considered an escalation.

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:14.439
<v Speaker 1>Why has the US declared that as an escalation if

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 1>they were to do so. I think what it is

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 1>is uh uh, the uh Poles wanted to send the

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the planes to uh Ramstein air Base and US air

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:29.760
<v Speaker 1>base in Germany and then have the planes flown in

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:33.880
<v Speaker 1>from a US base in Germany. I think it's that particular,

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:37.639
<v Speaker 1>Uh you know, it's it's it's the origin of the planes,

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I think, which is giving UH Washington pause and I uh,

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I I think that they're they're overestimating the possible risk

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:52.200
<v Speaker 1>of flying from me from a US base. But it

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:54.720
<v Speaker 1>is my understanding of it. And thank you just for

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 1>that clarification at the end there as well. In Kelly

0:18:56.760 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 1>that the former US Ambassador to Georgia. If you are

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 1>a gentleman from North Carolina state, you know the distance

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 1>from my seventy five from Knoxville down to Chattanooga. Yes,

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Dennis Gartman, in my bracket, I've got Knoxville playing Chattanooga.

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go for the romance of a South there

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:23.360
<v Speaker 1>in basketball. But the backdrop here in America, across our

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 1>agricultural complex is the planting season. In the serious moment

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 1>for Ukraine and their agriculture. We speak to the younger.

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:35.719
<v Speaker 1>The younger Dennis Gartman of the Kansas Kansas Board of Trade,

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Chairman of the University of Akron and Domin. Dennis, I

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 1>don't want to buy stocks today. I don't want to

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 1>go long short. I want to talk to you from

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 1>your ute and the Kansas Board of Trade about the

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 1>planting season. How serious is that for Ukraine? Very serious, Tom,

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:53.719
<v Speaker 1>It's it's something that we have to pay very much

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:56.639
<v Speaker 1>attention to. Ukraine and Russia are about eight percent of

0:19:56.640 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the world's exports of wheat. The fact is the winner

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:02.119
<v Speaker 1>wheat crop, which is in the ground now is probably

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>deteriorating something fierce. Nobody's paying attention to it, nobody's being

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:07.879
<v Speaker 1>able to get into the fields to take care of it.

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:09.679
<v Speaker 1>It's coming out of dormancy, and it's going to be

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 1>a greatly reduced crop. There will be a corn crop

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 1>of some size, but it'll be demonstrably smaller than in

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the past. And the question shall be, well they get

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 1>next year's winter weak crop planted in September and October

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:23.160
<v Speaker 1>November when that crop has to go on the ground.

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>So the wheat crop prices here in the United States

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:28.160
<v Speaker 1>have been on an absolute tear from the lower left

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:30.119
<v Speaker 1>of the upper right. They've dropped a little bit in

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the past several days, but it's been just a demonstrative,

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 1>monstrous bull market led by week. Dennis, you and I

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 1>have said in the boardroom of the New York Stock

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Exchange and talked about this. Can we monitor the Ukraine

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:47.159
<v Speaker 1>planting season by whether or are there other factors we

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>can't observe, including the danger of Russian troops? Well, clearly,

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the danger of Russian troops is one thing. That the

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:55.919
<v Speaker 1>ability to get the crop out of the ground and

0:20:55.960 --> 0:20:59.680
<v Speaker 1>shift is another thing. Completely. Whether the port facilities that

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 1>are so will be operative is is another question. Entirely.

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Will the rail facilities that have to move the crop

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 1>from from the interior of the country to the to

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the ports is another question entirely. It's one question after another,

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and confusion breeds contempt. Confusion breeds uh higher prices under

0:21:16.160 --> 0:21:19.280
<v Speaker 1>most circumstances for a while, and then suddenly you see

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:22.200
<v Speaker 1>an increase in the planet acreage here in the United States,

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 1>will probably see a big increase in spring weed planting

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:27.000
<v Speaker 1>here in the US to take advantage of the fact

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 1>that wheat prices have gone so high. So it's a

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 1>real question that it's something people are not paying much

0:21:32.520 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 1>attention to. The other thing we paid we need to

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 1>pay attention to, is that here in the States, how

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:40.200
<v Speaker 1>high soybean prices are, and the fact that you're gonna

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:43.119
<v Speaker 1>have and how high fertilizer prices are, which means you're

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:45.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna have a huge shift probably three four or five

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 1>million acres out of corn into soybeans because you need

0:21:49.320 --> 0:21:51.600
<v Speaker 1>you don't need fertilizer for the bean prop and you

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 1>need fertilizer for the for the corn crop. This this

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 1>could be the first time in twenty years that we

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:58.879
<v Speaker 1>actually plant more acreage to soybeans that we do to corn.

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Strange during strange circumstances. Indeed, Dennis, do you feel like

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the market is underestimating the elasticity of some of these

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:13.160
<v Speaker 1>agricultural commodities. Yes, yes, I think the market is underestimating.

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that we can still see demonstrably higher prices

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:18.120
<v Speaker 1>over the course of the next year or two. As

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:20.640
<v Speaker 1>as I always tell people, watch what the term structures

0:22:20.640 --> 0:22:24.440
<v Speaker 1>are doing in storable commodities. When the backwardations widen on

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:27.440
<v Speaker 1>on updates and then backwardations widen on down days, Also

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:30.119
<v Speaker 1>it tells you that the market still wants to go higher.

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:33.719
<v Speaker 1>So the answer to your question, yes, Dennis, has been

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a while, it's gonna catch up, particularly in this environment,

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Dennis countyman that on this commonity market. What we're gonna

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:47.920
<v Speaker 1>do here is have a bit of a different conversation

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 1>with David Rubinstein. This morning we celebrate his interview here

0:22:51.960 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>with Mr Chesky. Let's do that quickly as we can.

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Who is Mr Chesky and why is he ger Main

0:22:57.440 --> 0:23:00.400
<v Speaker 1>right now? Brian Chesky is one of the three people

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:04.439
<v Speaker 1>that started Airbnb, which is a phenomenon among young people

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 1>but also middle aged people now. And it's relevant now

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:09.960
<v Speaker 1>because as the world is changing, and people aren't coming

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>to the office quite the much as much they used to.

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:15.480
<v Speaker 1>They're working remotely. More and more people are using Airbnb

0:23:15.680 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 1>to kind of relocate themselves. And in fact, roughly of

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 1>all the people that use air and B and B

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:24.680
<v Speaker 1>do it for thirty days or more, and half the

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:26.240
<v Speaker 1>people use it for a week or more. It's not

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 1>like a one night kind of overnight thing like a

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 1>hotel might be. So it's changed completely the perception of

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:34.920
<v Speaker 1>what you do with your time when you're away from

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:36.920
<v Speaker 1>your home. You can stay a much longer period of

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:39.439
<v Speaker 1>time than you did before. And his company is doing

0:23:39.560 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 1>quite well well. And the future of Airbnb in some

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:45.679
<v Speaker 1>ways hinges on the future of work from home, on

0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:48.199
<v Speaker 1>the future of the ability to take a month and

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 1>go to Hawaii and spend it there. How much on

0:23:51.160 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street is that really going to be the story

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 1>when you see the likes of Goldman, Sachs and even

0:23:55.640 --> 0:24:00.040
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgan really emphasizing working in the office, well, J P.

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Morgan and Morgan's uh. JP Morgan and others are saying,

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 1>come to the office. But these are very unique and

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:08.359
<v Speaker 1>unusual firms are centered in New York to financial service

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:11.399
<v Speaker 1>kinds of organizations. The average person doesn't work at Goldman

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Sacks and JP Morgan. The average person might be can

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 1>work from home, work can work from very remote sources.

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 1>So it's changed the way people live and work. I

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:23.680
<v Speaker 1>don't think after the pandemic that we've gone through, people

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:25.560
<v Speaker 1>are going to come back to the office five days

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:27.919
<v Speaker 1>a week in the same pattern that we've had before.

0:24:28.160 --> 0:24:30.920
<v Speaker 1>And Airbnb is gonna, uh, I think capitalize on that

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:33.920
<v Speaker 1>it already has. It's done quite well despite the fact

0:24:34.000 --> 0:24:36.639
<v Speaker 1>that initially, when when the pandemic came about, all of

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, Airbnb was in big trouble. People weren't traveling

0:24:39.520 --> 0:24:42.080
<v Speaker 1>at all. Now it's rebounded and it's doing quite well.

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 1>It's got a market value of about ninety two billion

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 1>dollars now go ahead. So honestly, this has been a

0:24:47.840 --> 0:24:50.360
<v Speaker 1>really interesting moment because we're talking about these work from

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:53.720
<v Speaker 1>home trends. We're talking about the return to offices amid

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:56.960
<v Speaker 1>a new backdrop of crisis, right, and I wonder, as

0:24:57.080 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 1>as the head of a company and trying to figure

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:03.680
<v Speaker 1>out as an investment company talking to other heads of companies,

0:25:03.920 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 1>how are people rethinking their business plans on the prospect

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 1>of more prolonged commodity prices of more prolonged disruption even

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:14.920
<v Speaker 1>beyond the pandemic. I think all employers are learning it's

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:16.880
<v Speaker 1>not as easy to get your people back to work

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:19.360
<v Speaker 1>as you once thought. You just can't say come back

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:21.560
<v Speaker 1>to work and they all come back exactly five days

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 1>a week the way they used to. So you also

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:26.400
<v Speaker 1>have a hard time getting employees now and many many companies,

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:28.879
<v Speaker 1>so you have to be more tolerant of what employees

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:32.199
<v Speaker 1>want to do. And employees have now tasted the idea

0:25:32.240 --> 0:25:34.000
<v Speaker 1>that you can work at home a couple of days

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 1>a week, or you can work remotely and in the whole.

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 1>I think this is changing the way people will work

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:42.320
<v Speaker 1>for quite some time in the future. Airbnb is taking

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 1>advantage of that because it's providing homes or other apartments

0:25:46.160 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 1>to people who can take away a week or a

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:51.679
<v Speaker 1>month or more from their place where they actually supposed

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:54.679
<v Speaker 1>to be in the office working. David yesterday, the announcement

0:25:54.680 --> 0:25:57.960
<v Speaker 1>of the death after I believe a tenure battle, real

0:25:58.040 --> 0:26:01.680
<v Speaker 1>illness for Michael Price, the great value investor. He used

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:05.399
<v Speaker 1>to wear his Yankees ring just to aggravate me on set.

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:10.439
<v Speaker 1>Tell our audience worldwide this complete class act. Michael Price.

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:13.879
<v Speaker 1>Michael Price is one of the best value investors the

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:16.399
<v Speaker 1>country has ever seen. Obviously, Warren Buffett is probably the

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:19.040
<v Speaker 1>class of all value investors. Michael Price was trained by

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 1>somebody else. Michael Price took over a firm many years

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 1>ago from a mentor and built it into a powerhouse,

0:26:25.160 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 1>and became not only a great philanthropist, but a good

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:30.159
<v Speaker 1>sports fan, as you know from his stake in the

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 1>New York Yankees. And what was important here was the

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 1>grace of it in this modern day. The snark of

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the modern day, we've we've lost the grace that you

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:43.040
<v Speaker 1>would see of a Michael Price or John Templeton and

0:26:43.080 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the others. Both John Templeton and Michael Price didn't brag

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 1>about themselves very much. Relatively modest people, and Michael Price

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a headline person. Most people in the investment world

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:56.120
<v Speaker 1>probably didn't even know him, and outside the investment world

0:26:56.160 --> 0:26:58.159
<v Speaker 1>probably very few knew him. But he was seen as

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:00.719
<v Speaker 1>a class act, a smart person, and he was very

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:03.840
<v Speaker 1>very philanthropic. David Rubinstein, thank you for joining us. Look

0:27:03.840 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 1>forward to sting your particularly on Russia. This is the

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Thanks for listening, Join us live weekdays

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 1>from seven to ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio and

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:19.359
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Television each day from six to nine am

0:27:19.400 --> 0:27:23.199
<v Speaker 1>for insight from the best in economics, finance, investment, and

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:29.840
<v Speaker 1>international relations. And subscribe to the Surveillance podcast on Apple podcast, SoundCloud,

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, and of course, on the terminal. I'm

0:27:33.600 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Tom Keene, and this is Bloomberg