WEBVTT - Aireon’s Space-Based System Tracks Planes In Real Time

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penl podcast. I'm Paul swing you.

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Brahma Wicks. Each day

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you and your money. Whether at the grocery store or

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.959
<v Speaker 1>podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:22.960
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. Well. On April two, a technology

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>company plans to go live with a space based aircraft

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 1>surveillance system which will track plans globally in real time

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:33.000
<v Speaker 1>for the first time ever. Now plans are tracked by radar,

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 1>but sev of the planet is uncovered by radar, which

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:39.199
<v Speaker 1>is especially problematic over oceans. I did not know that

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 1>joining us here to walk us through this new technology

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:46.280
<v Speaker 1>is Don Toma, CEO of Arion, based on McClean Virginia. Don,

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:50.479
<v Speaker 1>this sounds like a game changer technology to me, is it.

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 1>That's great? That's right, Paul, thanks for having having me

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>on the program. Now this is really being hailed as

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:02.319
<v Speaker 1>a major technological advancement in aviation. As you mentioned, your

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:06.479
<v Speaker 1>of the world is not tracked by any any means

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 1>at this point in real time and meaning there's no

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:13.399
<v Speaker 1>surveillance for air traffic controllers. And you know, typically the

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:16.759
<v Speaker 1>world has been using radar technology that has been developed

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>back in the nineteen thirties and forties as the primary

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 1>means of of tracking aircraft for air traffic control. But

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:28.679
<v Speaker 1>the world's air traffic control organizations are in a program

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 1>to upgrade that technology to a g P, a GPS

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 1>based system for tracking the aircraft. And what Arean is

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:38.319
<v Speaker 1>doing is bringing that technology to the entire world. Currently

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 1>it's limited to some certain regions like the continental US,

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:45.679
<v Speaker 1>your parts of Europe, parts of Australia, etcetera. But you know,

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 1>starting next week will begin providing this service to air

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>traffic controllers all over the world immediately. So, John, when

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I first started reading about this, my my initial question

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>was what took so long? Because we've had space satellites

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 1>for a long time that track lot of things, So

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 1>why shouldn't we have some sort of all encompassing surveillance system.

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 1>And then it struck me maybe this is a security

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>issue and international issue, and I'm wondering what that challenge

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>was like getting this up and running in order to

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:16.519
<v Speaker 1>get clearance to surveill areas that were not within the

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 1>United States. Yeah, that's a that's a good question. As

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned, part of this part of the reason why

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:25.960
<v Speaker 1>this is possible now is first that the world's air

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 1>traffic control organizations are making this upgrade. You may have

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 1>heard next gen for the next gen program, the next

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Generation air traffic Control program within the US UM, but

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the US, Europe, Australia, Singapore, a few other countries have

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>mandated that all aircraft by have on board a transponder

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 1>that will broadcast out that GPS information from the aircraft

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 1>at a very frequent, very precise level. So first you

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:54.239
<v Speaker 1>had to have all the aircraft equip with this new

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:56.960
<v Speaker 1>technology to make it possible. But then you you have

0:02:57.040 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the limitations of where you can put towers to receive

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>that information. So, as I mentioned, the US has deployed

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:07.679
<v Speaker 1>six thirty five towers, Australia's air space has covered. Other

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 1>countries have put this this technology in, but it really

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>limits the access to it to roughly thirty percent of

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:16.079
<v Speaker 1>the world that you know that has you know, this

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 1>type of ground based technology. So really the the innovation

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:23.080
<v Speaker 1>came due to the fact that not only were the

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 1>aircraft craft being equipped but a ridium. You know, the

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Satellite Communications Company was in the process of launching their

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>next generation satellite network. So part of that innovation came

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 1>when we said, well why don't we when I would

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 1>used to be at a ridium when we were looking

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>at the plans for the next generation, and we said,

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 1>why don't we use this global satellite based infrastructure two

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>that sees every place on Earth and has connections that

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 1>gets that information back in real time to put these

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>A D s B or these these receivers on board

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the satellites to receive the information being transmitted by the aircraft.

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>So we put the company together, We raised the investment

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 1>with our partners at nav Canada and the air traffic

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 1>control organizations of Italy, Ireland, Denmark and the UK formed

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the company and seven years later we have completed the

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 1>launch of that system and are now ready to go

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:18.480
<v Speaker 1>operational live with it. So it's a lot of different

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 1>components that really drove the you know, the implementation of

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 1>this capability. So come April two, talk to us about

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the adoption. Here do you have to go sell it

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:29.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of country by country? How do you get this

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>technology out into the marketplace? Well, it's a it's a

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>good question, Paul. Then the issue here is that this

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:39.160
<v Speaker 1>is such a game changer, you know, in in you know,

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:41.919
<v Speaker 1>in the aviation that countries have been working with us

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:44.920
<v Speaker 1>for a very long time. So currently, on April two,

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>will go live with the Canadian air traffic control organization

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:52.680
<v Speaker 1>nav Canada and the UK air Traffic control organization called NETS,

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and we'll begin using this service in northern Canada and

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:58.839
<v Speaker 1>in the North Atlantic. Now, the North Atlantic is a

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>very busy set the air space flights a day, you know,

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 1>it's it's running out of capacity because there's so much

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>traffic going back and forth between the Europe, Europe and

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>North America, you know, and this is an innovation that

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:12.920
<v Speaker 1>not only improves the safety of air travel, but also

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>allows them to add additional flight paths for aircraft into

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:18.840
<v Speaker 1>that that airspace. So we'll go live with those two

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 1>right away, but right behind them, we have nine other

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 1>air traffic control organizations representing twenty eight countries around the

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:29.479
<v Speaker 1>world that will be are currently receiving the data, doing

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 1>their own test and valuation validation of the service, and

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 1>we'll begin operationally using it throughout just in thirty seconds.

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 1>How do you make money. Very very easy to think

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 1>of us as a subscription service. So instead of an

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 1>air traffic control organization deploying your radars or ground based infrastructure,

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 1>we basically collect the data and provided to them as

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:52.840
<v Speaker 1>a subscription service, so they pay us a fee for

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 1>providing them the surveillance data for their airspace. Really interesting,

0:05:58.040 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Don Thomas, thank you so much for being with us.

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Don Tom chief executive officer of Arian, which is based

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:09.719
<v Speaker 1>in McLean, Virginia, offering space based aircraft surveillance tracking planes globally,

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 1>which to me, honestly my first impression. Again, I mean,

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:15.359
<v Speaker 1>given how many satellites are up there, it's interesting that

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:28.360
<v Speaker 1>this is the first of its kind. There has been

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 1>a big discussion about how the migration from rural areas

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 1>to urban areas will likely continue in the years to come.

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 1>The question is number one, will it? And number two,

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 1>how does that affect your investments both in real estate

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:45.039
<v Speaker 1>and beyond. Joining us now, Melissa Reagan, head of research

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 1>for New Vine Real Estate, overseeing a hundred billion dollars

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:50.840
<v Speaker 1>of assets in New York, Joining us here in our

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studios. Melissa, thank you so much for

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 1>being with us, Let's just start with this premise that

0:06:56.480 --> 0:07:00.280
<v Speaker 1>there will be increased urbanization where you do see people

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:04.479
<v Speaker 1>moving from urban and suburban areas into cities. How much

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>do you think that will continue? Yeah? Sure, thinks um

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, listen, we believe it will continue. And this

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>is not just in the next couple of years, but

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>really over the coming decades. Uh and and why so

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 1>think about what cities offer. They offer an economic based jobs.

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 1>It's where the vibrancy of these cities, it's where people

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 1>want to live. It's where when you think about what's

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 1>a what's a really growing area right now? Technology right, well,

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 1>we know that that is actually cluster based. Right so

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 1>once you're not in your this technology coming that techno,

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 1>you're like, y'all want to cluster together. And that's happened.

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 1>That happens in cities. And so we think this is

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 1>a decades long trend that will continue. Well, one of

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the things that I think is a concern for some

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 1>people is just infrastructure through cities today. Some of the

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 1>largest cities that are you know, maybe drawing populations, do

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>they have the infrastructure to support it? Uh? Yes, and no,

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>so I would say, but also with that as an opportunity.

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>So when you think about a place like New York

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>and you think about its mass transit, one of the

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:05.239
<v Speaker 1>best probably mess transit systems across the entire world in fact.

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 1>But but it's from a but but but you missed

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the butt. But it's but it's aging. But it's aging,

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and therein is the opportunity kind and therein lies the

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 1>opportunity right when you think about how to how to

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>invest around infrastructure, municipal financing and things like that. So, um,

0:08:24.920 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>I would say there's there's yes and no, and there's

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 1>opportunities within that. I will just say that I was

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>on the train the other day and it was stopped

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:34.319
<v Speaker 1>and my nine year old son called the m t

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 1>A to complain, saying that it was unacceptable. Because yes, anyway,

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:41.320
<v Speaker 1>moving right along, I will say a lot of the

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 1>investing strategy also depends on real estate valuations. And there's

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 1>a question especially is the affordability uh question rises it's

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 1>getting harder for people to buy homes in cities. How

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 1>does that affect your thesis here? Actually pretty well? Uh

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 1>so from a from a commercial real estate person back

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 1>to think about it, I mean, we're not in the home.

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 1>We're not in buying homes, We're buying apartment buildings, right,

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and so the demand for apartments and we've seen this,

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:10.559
<v Speaker 1>I mean, vacancy rates for apartments are your twenty year lows.

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Why is that? Because home prices are are are high

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and so it's an affordability issue and so it's really

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 1>driven demand, particularly in the urban cores for apartments. So,

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>given your urbanization theme, what are some of the markets

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 1>that surprised you were attractive markets? Iman? I know people

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:27.319
<v Speaker 1>think of New York, San Francisco, but what were some

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>of the markets that kind of surprised you as boy

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 1>these are interesting? Yeah, So that's been fascinating in fact,

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and so we have this sort of way we look

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 1>at cities kind of globally and we take that into

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:37.959
<v Speaker 1>the U S and we think about, you know, where

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 1>are people moving to millennials, concentration of wealth and places

0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:43.679
<v Speaker 1>like Salt Lake City pop up Nashville, but even in

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 1>places like Orlando, these are not places that an institutional

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 1>real estate investor would have thought of twenty years ago.

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>It just there was a nope, not interested. But given

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 1>our analysis and the way we see the world moving,

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:57.559
<v Speaker 1>this is where millennials want to be There's a quality

0:09:57.559 --> 0:09:59.959
<v Speaker 1>of life there, there's a connectivity there. And so those

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 1>are the cities that actually and there's I could name

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>ten more of those that would be like, really, that's

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 1>that's really interesting. So this all makes sense. I buy it.

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm buying the picture that you set out there for

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 1>a longer term. Is now the time to be getting

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>in given where we are in the housing cycle. So

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I think there's two components that in terms of the

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's the residential site, there's the residential market.

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Um and and already there there's been softening. But from

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:31.560
<v Speaker 1>a commercial perspective, which is entirely different. Um, we actually

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 1>look at it from a very long term perspective, right,

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:36.719
<v Speaker 1>and so kind of almost outside of a cycle perspective

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and saying that these are the cities people want to

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 1>be in that is not going to end and thereby

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 1>that is the opportunity. Okay, fair enough. Although in New

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 1>York City, which is a very vibrant city, it's the

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:50.840
<v Speaker 1>most populous city in the United States, we have storefront

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 1>after storefront that's empty, that's vacant, that is eating into

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the value of that commercial real estate. So I have

0:10:57.600 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 1>to wonder how this thesis square is worth retail worth

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:05.559
<v Speaker 1>the model is completely shifting. Yeah, absolutely, Listen agreed a

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent that in retail land there are structural shifts

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>under way. Winners and losers there, and so that what

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing when you walk through New York City and

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the vacant storefront losers, but then there's a whole other winner, right,

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 1>But but think about it, there's a winner. But that's

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:23.959
<v Speaker 1>just the world is divided in retail, right, and that's

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:26.079
<v Speaker 1>where it's going. But but here's the hard part of that.

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 1>So you're saying, that's great, there's winners and losers. Who's

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be the winner, right, And so most of

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>my day is spend thinking about who's who is the

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 1>winner in that in retail And so when we think

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:37.719
<v Speaker 1>about it, we think about necessity, think about a single tenant, right,

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 1>or you think about grocery, or you think about what

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 1>serves an urban community from a necessity local sustainable, authentic,

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 1>like what what does the millennial want? And they want

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 1>that authentic, local, sustainable offering. So the winners and losers,

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:56.559
<v Speaker 1>and it's picking the right winner, which is not which

0:11:56.640 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 1>is the day job and is really hard right. Well, Melissa,

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that I've noticed you mentioned Salt

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Lake and I was just kind of going through that

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:08.560
<v Speaker 1>market recently in that airport and they're building a huge,

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 1>brand new airport and it's still there's silicon slopes. I

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:16.680
<v Speaker 1>was just about to say, and it's technology. When I

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 1>think about it, technology Austin, Texas, it was technology. Is

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 1>technology kind of what you look for to see sustainable,

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 1>long term growth. It's certainly that's one component of it.

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't say that's the only component, because there can

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 1>be other things that you know, there's finance and certainly

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:35.320
<v Speaker 1>just business professional jobs. But technology has become at the

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>forefront because I think about it. Used to be when

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 1>you thought about technology, it was really Sanrancisco in Austin,

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:41.719
<v Speaker 1>but that's not true. Today. It's New York, it's it's

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:45.079
<v Speaker 1>Salt Lake City, it's Chicago, it's it's Atlanta, it's natural

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 1>it's everywhere. Um So it is one thing we look

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 1>at it and say it's like the only factor, but

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:52.200
<v Speaker 1>it's definitely one thing we look at. Do you think

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 1>that the interest in warehouses and in uh aging homes

0:12:57.160 --> 0:13:00.319
<v Speaker 1>and facilities that that has gone too far? Are at

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 1>this point. It is now where the opportunity lies anymore

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 1>in the warehouse sector. Yeah, oh no, I think so.

0:13:08.120 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 1>I get that common a lot of seeing well, isn't

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:12.600
<v Speaker 1>warehouse sort of you know, it's it's it's peak pricing,

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:15.560
<v Speaker 1>or isn't all the demand you know, fully baked in um?

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Actually no, I think they're if you believe remember my

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 1>retail comment winners and losers. What is driving that the

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:24.559
<v Speaker 1>e commerce rate of retail sales? And I don't think

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:26.680
<v Speaker 1>that's going away, Like I think people are going to

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 1>continue to shop online. It creates winners and losers in retail,

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:34.200
<v Speaker 1>but it is a long term structural winner behind industrial um.

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:36.560
<v Speaker 1>And I don't see if that tail wind stops then

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 1>then yes, we've got issues we need to look at

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 1>in the industrial space, but I don't see that stopping.

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Interesting Melissa, Thank you so much. Melissa Reagan ahead of

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:47.320
<v Speaker 1>research for Neuvin Real Estate, joining us in our Bloomberg

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Interactive Broker's studio talking about urbanization and it's at least

0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:52.559
<v Speaker 1>it's one of the things you know, you think about it.

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 1>I hear about it in so many different cities, whether

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 1>it's in Atlanta or a Richmond, because you know, not

0:13:57.480 --> 0:14:00.680
<v Speaker 1>necessarily big top ten markets, but if they've got a

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 1>technology hub or maybe healthcare hub, um, that is what

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 1>can drive growth in some of those markets. Look, it's

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 1>for the younger people, it's the jobs. For the older people,

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 1>it's access to healthcare and easy you know, food and transportation.

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:31.360
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of arguments for this. Well, interest rates

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>globally continue to grind lower. We actually have negative interest

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 1>rates and major economies such as Japan, Germany, Switzerland. So

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 1>help us get a sense of how to navigate through

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 1>this unique environment. We welcome Dr Brendan Brown. Dr Brown

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 1>is a Senior fellow at the Hudson Institute and publisher

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 1>of the newsletter Monetary Scenarios UH and he is based

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 1>in London. Dr Brown, thank you so much for joining us.

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 1>So what do you make of this persistent negative yields

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 1>in against some major markets like Switzerland, Germany and Japan. Well,

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the negative rates in Europe and Japan essentially are are

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 1>result of serious monetary manipulation, and the central banks in

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Europe and Japan have made it clear in response to

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the softening of the global economy that we're going to

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 1>go even further into these radical monetary policies um in

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 1>in the total picture. It's difficult to see these negative

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 1>rates is telling you or anything seriously about the real economy,

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 1>because it's a long time since bond markets in those

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 1>countries have had any economic meaning. Well, Brennan, one thing

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 1>that I'm struck by is the fact that, yes, this

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 1>is a symptom of central bank policies in the region.

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 1>True has been for a long time, not necessarily free

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:57.840
<v Speaker 1>market kind of gauge there. That said, the fact that

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the European economy is not taking off, in fact that

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 1>is slowing down in many measurable ways, is raising a

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 1>really existential question. Here are negative rates hurting more than

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 1>they're helping, And so far the e c B is

0:16:09.480 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of saying, well, the jury is sort of out,

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 1>but they're starting to play with the idea that perhaps

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 1>helping out banks in different ways. Can you speak a

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 1>little bit about them and do you think that they

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 1>are addressing the issue of the dutchmental effects of negative

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 1>yields in an expedient way right now? Well, the main

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 1>effect of negative rates on the economies comes through the currency,

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 1>and the yen and the euro have been seriously depressed

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 1>by this negative rate regime. The puzzle here is, given

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the cheapness of the currencies, why investment in the export

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 1>sectors in Germany in particular and Japan has only been

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 1>lukewarm even at the peak of a boom last year.

0:16:57.000 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think what we're seeing there is that businesses

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 1>realize that this is an artificial situation, and so they're

0:17:04.600 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 1>not prepared to rev up fully and haven't been prepared

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 1>to rev up fully on what may be a transitory

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:16.159
<v Speaker 1>manipulated rate. Now, on top of that, we've got the

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 1>position of the banks, and you mentioned Europe. In Japan

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 1>in many ways, I think there's a greater hidden problem there.

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:29.359
<v Speaker 1>The Japanese banks and Japanese financial institutions, to escape negative rates,

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 1>have been involved in more and more risky particularly cross

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:40.199
<v Speaker 1>border lending, and that could create a serious funding is

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:42.960
<v Speaker 1>to particularly in dollar funds, if we get into another

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 1>period of financial market downturnal stress. So Dr Brown, we've

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 1>been talking about the weakness in Europe, and certainly the

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Brexit uncertainty has certainly been a contributor to that weakness.

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 1>I have to ask you, you know you're based in London,

0:17:57.640 --> 0:17:59.920
<v Speaker 1>You're right there in ground zero what is your sense

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:01.920
<v Speaker 1>of how this thing is going to play out in

0:18:02.040 --> 0:18:05.880
<v Speaker 1>terms of Brexit over the next several days. I think

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:09.639
<v Speaker 1>it's leaning more and more towards no deal. But no

0:18:09.800 --> 0:18:12.439
<v Speaker 1>deal doesn't mean crash out or anything else. It probably

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:18.200
<v Speaker 1>means everyone staying where they are until there's a bit

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:21.680
<v Speaker 1>more clarity on the political direction. In particular, I would

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:24.879
<v Speaker 1>imagine that there could be a temporary standstill of the

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 1>clock turned back to allow time for a leadership election

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 1>to take place in the Conservative Party, and then we

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:34.119
<v Speaker 1>see what happens. If I had to plot a central

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:36.960
<v Speaker 1>scenario through all that, it's going to be that we

0:18:37.480 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 1>get a new leader of a Conservative party more in

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the Brexit side, and that new leader will want to

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 1>start negotiations again on a deal rather than just taking

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the May Deal as it is. So there will be

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 1>a period most likely of so called no deal Brexit.

0:18:56.680 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 1>To me, reminds me of like a Monty Python sketch.

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean, as Lee at a certain point, you know,

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:04.119
<v Speaker 1>let's vote on the vote of the vote of maybe

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 1>meeting and maybe we can discuss something that might actually happen,

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and maybe we can extend the deadline a little bit further.

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:12.719
<v Speaker 1>But Brendan. I do have to wonder, especially as German

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 1>bond yields continue to decline. Today they're they're taking a

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:17.920
<v Speaker 1>bit of a breather. But right now ten year bond

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 1>yields in Germany lower than similarly dated bonds in Japan.

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Are we seeing the full on Japanification of the Eurozone,

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:29.600
<v Speaker 1>in particular Germany, and what are the implications for raids

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:34.160
<v Speaker 1>going forward. I don't think with the Japanification, partly because

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that Japanification is a myth. Anyhow, Japan, if

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>you adjusted of a democratic demographic factor, has been doing

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 1>remarkably well and on some measures even better than the

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:46.159
<v Speaker 1>US in terms of employed person per head. But I

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 1>think when you look at the German negative yields, why

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 1>are there minus nor point one zero? I would say

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the critical factor there is that the market has discounted

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 1>consider r or likelihood of Italy leaving European monetary Union

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>at some point in the next few years, if not sooner.

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 1>So what you're seeing in the German bond market is

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 1>in fact an option that what you might have there

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:15.680
<v Speaker 1>if you hold the German government bond at some point

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 1>is a reincarnated Deutsche Mark. Now that that's that's why

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 1>we are where we are. But nonetheless, negative bond deals

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 1>are a huge incentive to real estate speculation in Germany,

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 1>and in a recent note I put out, I do

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:33.240
<v Speaker 1>draw attention to the construction boom and the real estate

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:37.679
<v Speaker 1>boom in Germany as being an important offset all the

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 1>bad news we're getting on the export side. So do

0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 1>you feel well, let's just push it out there. In

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:45.399
<v Speaker 1>terms of the European Union, you talked about Italy maybe

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:48.639
<v Speaker 1>falling out. What is your view of the European Union

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:50.960
<v Speaker 1>in general over the next five to ten years. Is

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 1>it going to look materially different than today? Very much so.

0:20:56.080 --> 0:20:58.440
<v Speaker 1>I think first a lot of that would will turn

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 1>on the key developments in Germany and Italy, and I

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:08.160
<v Speaker 1>would say in particular that any sort of Brexit crisis

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 1>or hard breakout or whatever could accelerate that through leading

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to political quake Germany. In particular, middle sized businesses who

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:23.879
<v Speaker 1>are very dependent on the UK market may take what's

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 1>happening here as a reason to push harder vote against

0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Merkel as soon as the European elections in in late May.

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 1>So I do see a growing divergence coming about between

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:41.199
<v Speaker 1>the German and Italian situation and that being crucial to

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 1>how you pant out. Dr Brendon Brown, thank you so

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 1>much for being with us. Dr Brendon Brown, Senior Fellow

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:51.600
<v Speaker 1>at the Hudson Institute and publisher of the newsletter Monetary Scenarios.

0:21:51.680 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Joining us from London, I want to talk about one

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:12.080
<v Speaker 1>particular financial issue in New York City, and that is

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 1>congestion pricing. It does seem like that plan is moving

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:19.439
<v Speaker 1>closer to reality. Joining us now, Henry Goldman, government importer

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:22.959
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg News. Joining us from New York City Hall. Henry,

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 1>what is the latest on the congestion pricing proposals currently

0:22:26.840 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 1>working its way through state n city legislatures. Well, the

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 1>there's sort of an agreement in principle between the Assembly,

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the Senate, and the governor that this is the way

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:41.879
<v Speaker 1>to go. UH. Why is it the way to go?

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Because New York City UH is facing a twin crisis

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 1>where we've got traffic congestion in Midtown Manhattan. It's costing

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the city economy maybe twenty billion dollars a year according

0:22:57.320 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 1>to the Partnership for New York City. At the same time,

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 1>we've got a matched transit crisis where we need an

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 1>infusion of billions and billions of dollars, and so we

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:13.640
<v Speaker 1>need the revenue that congestion pricing could bring us. So

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:19.639
<v Speaker 1>that's basically why this thing is developed with such urgency. So, Henry,

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:22.440
<v Speaker 1>what is actually the timing here? It seems to have

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 1>been put on the fast track here. What's the timing? Well,

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 1>this the state has a budget that needs to be

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:35.119
<v Speaker 1>approved by the legislature by April one, So April fools

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:39.879
<v Speaker 1>Day is the day when the legislature comes up budget

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 1>that's too much. That's Rich April Fool's Day. We passed

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 1>congestion pricing. Just kidding. Uh, this was a proposal that

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:49.880
<v Speaker 1>has been out there and floated for a long time.

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 1>There are many other cities that have done at Singapore, Stockholm,

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:55.920
<v Speaker 1>London is thinking of expanding or increasing the costs. Why

0:23:56.160 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 1>is the opposition so much less powerful this time around?

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Probably because of the compelling nature of these twin crises.

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>We've got just a city in Manhattan that's just congested

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:13.840
<v Speaker 1>to the point where people can't move, so appointments are

0:24:13.880 --> 0:24:18.160
<v Speaker 1>missed and people are sitting in their cars, and gasoline

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:22.680
<v Speaker 1>is burning and asthma is getting you're making it sound

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 1>like we're living in accessful It's really not that bad.

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:31.000
<v Speaker 1>It is bad. The congestion in midtown Manhattan is costing

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:37.359
<v Speaker 1>the city's economy billions of dollars in missed appointments, in

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:43.159
<v Speaker 1>work that doesn't get done, in UH, wasted fuel, in

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:47.920
<v Speaker 1>medical costs of pollution. That's all on the congestion side.

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Then beyond that, we have a subway system that's a

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred years old. We went through a Summer of Hell

0:24:55.480 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 1>last year where subway breakdowns became the routine. All of

0:25:01.160 --> 0:25:07.639
<v Speaker 1>this has gigantic economic costs and health consequences. So it's

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:12.639
<v Speaker 1>it's not a it's not a minor or trivial thing. So, Henry,

0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:15.399
<v Speaker 1>how does actually work? Am I gonna be paying higher

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:22.160
<v Speaker 1>tolls now? Well? Uh, yes, the details have not been

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 1>worked out, but yes, when you raise revenue, somebody pays.

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Now who pays? People who are entering Manhattan's UH congestion

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 1>zone south of sixty one Street, there will be electronic

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 1>scanners or transponders or some technology that will scan licenses

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 1>or use an easy path like device, and once you

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 1>cross that boundary, you will be told a certain amount

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:52.199
<v Speaker 1>of money that yet to be determined. There was a

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:56.720
<v Speaker 1>study a few years ago that said it at eleven

0:25:56.760 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 1>dollars and fifty two cents that was enough to raise

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:03.680
<v Speaker 1>is maybe a billion dollars in revenue, and that billion

0:26:03.720 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 1>dollars in revenue could then be leveraged in municipal bonds

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 1>to borrow maybe fifteen billion dollars uh and pay the

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 1>debt service on that. So that's the kind of money. Uh,

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:19.439
<v Speaker 1>that's a start. It's only a start in facing the

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:24.239
<v Speaker 1>transit needs of the city and the region because there

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:29.360
<v Speaker 1>are commuter rail needs that must be taken care of. Now,

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 1>So who's paying the people who drive south of sixty

0:26:32.440 --> 0:26:35.119
<v Speaker 1>one Street. Now, let's say you're taking a bus into

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:38.760
<v Speaker 1>New York City. I'm sorry, that's a you're taking a

0:26:38.840 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 1>car and you're gonna cross a bridge into New York City. Uh.

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Those people who are already paying eleven dollars or more

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:51.000
<v Speaker 1>on the bridge, they don't want to pay another eleven

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:55.040
<v Speaker 1>dollars or more to get into Midtown Manhattan. And there

0:26:55.040 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 1>will probably be some system of credits that will allow

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:04.440
<v Speaker 1>them to offset the price of taking that bridge. But

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the bottom line is, Henry, it seems like this is

0:27:07.320 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 1>coming people are gonna pay um one way or the other.

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:13.000
<v Speaker 1>And uh again, it's been tried, as Lisa mentioned, in

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 1>other parts of the world, and so this might be,

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, this might, Lisa, just be the perfect storm.

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 1>So we'll have to see. Henry Goldman, thank you so much.

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:22.199
<v Speaker 1>Henry's a government reporter for Bloomberg News calling us from

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 1>New York City Hall. But it just seems like, you know,

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 1>with what's going on with the mass transit and how

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:28.960
<v Speaker 1>much money Mass Transit needs, this just might be the

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 1>revenue solution. So it might be a perfect storm where

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:33.879
<v Speaker 1>things can actually get done here. Thanks for listening to

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe and

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:39.480
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. Paul Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and Lisa bram Woyd's I'm on Twitter at Lisa Bramwoyit's

0:27:45.600 --> 0:27:48.440
<v Speaker 1>one before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide.

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:49.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bloomberg Radio.