WEBVTT - 2026 MLB Trade Deadline Recap & Analysis (Ep. 1358)

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:08.960
<v Speaker 1>What's a Friends, are welcome into Fantasy Pros m LB.

0:00:09.200 --> 0:00:13.280
<v Speaker 1>This is the MLB Trade Deadline Breakdown Show. I am

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Chris Welsh. That is Joe Rico, and we just went

0:00:17.520 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>through the gauntlet of MLB trade deadline little behind the scenes.

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:25.759
<v Speaker 1>I was not to this matters, but I wanted to

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 1>do this. I scheduled this together. I was like, we

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>gotta do a trade deadline thing, not something we usually

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 1>do here on Fantasy Pros. And I'm talking with Rico,

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 1>and Rico's like, you know, we're gonna talk a lot

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:38.880
<v Speaker 1>about the trades, Like do you think there's gonna be enough?

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 2>And I was like, I don't know, Joe. I'm like

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:41.520
<v Speaker 2>that's a good point, Like.

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:45.520
<v Speaker 1>We'll have to see. Hey, Rico, was that enough trades

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 1>for you? From leading off until this in a five

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 1>hour span? My god, what's up, buddy?

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:53.159
<v Speaker 3>The baseball gods laughed in my face today, as they

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 3>usually do. The baseball gods more than any other sport

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 3>gods laugh at the different fan bases, and today they did.

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 3>For sure. It was like thirty semidd trades. I want

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 3>to stay at the top of my head. Between the

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 3>time we stopped recording, I saw you like, what two

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 3>hours ago, it's already this chaos. But I think, honestly

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 3>thinking about it, it might be the most exciting deadline

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 3>in recent memory.

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:20.559
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And what's really interesting about it is like it's

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>tough because we had the I'm going to talk about

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 1>it in just one second and we're gonna get to

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 1>your questions. But you have the Scooball trade that happened

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:28.959
<v Speaker 1>over the weekend that was kind of the big one,

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 1>but it never really let you know, it never stopped.

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Like obviously, I don't think we got like the groundbreaking

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:39.200
<v Speaker 1>blockbuster trade of insanity or anything like that, you know

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 1>what I mean, Like, we didn't have Like it doesn't

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>look like we are three minutes. I mean we literally

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:46.959
<v Speaker 1>started this up as as well. I guess six Eastern

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>hit three o'clock my time, as everything stopped, we hit records.

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 1>We might get a couple of late stragglers, but for

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the most part, we did not see a zach netto go.

0:01:57.440 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm seeing one Klly is putting in that might have

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 1>just got and through right at the deadline. I'm not

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent sure. And that's actually funny enough. He's

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the guy that's like the graphic of our thing of

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Casey Mines. We have to confirm it, but like we

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:13.519
<v Speaker 1>didn't see like the block blockbusters, but we saw volume.

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:15.920
<v Speaker 1>We saw teams get in it, and I gotta be

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>honest with you, we saw some.

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:19.920
<v Speaker 2>Big prospect trades as well.

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give a cheap plug. I am going to

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 1>be doing a full breakdown on my Prospect one podcast

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:29.359
<v Speaker 1>focusing on all of the prospects that were traded and guys,

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:33.360
<v Speaker 1>there were some big prospects that are lowered, you know,

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:37.639
<v Speaker 1>its names to people, Alexander Frios, Henry Lalani, like, there

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:40.519
<v Speaker 1>were some big ones that got traded. But this is

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:42.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be a hyper focus on the major league

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>trades here and that the pure volume. I mean, if

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:47.920
<v Speaker 1>someone could pull it, if someone could pull like in

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 1>a twenty four hour span from when the trade deadline

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>ends before that, this has to be on sheer volume,

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:56.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the heaviest trade deadline days for sure.

0:02:56.919 --> 0:03:00.799
<v Speaker 3>I think so. And it is confirmed Kelly was Casey

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 3>Maiz is a member of the Padres.

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 1>That's a brutal one too, because the Diamondbacks were We're

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 1>looking at him, all right, So that's gonna be near

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the top. We got our boy Thunderstud that's in here.

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:14.240
<v Speaker 1>We'll like like other random fantasy questions too. But I'm

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna be uh, we're gonna kind of break through what

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>all the trades were, and I'm gonna leave some space

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 1>if you guys have questions, if you guys whatever it is,

0:03:22.560 --> 0:03:25.640
<v Speaker 1>like to keep it specifically trade deadline, like the Big Dance,

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 1>just put a great one in that's gonna be one

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 1>of the top ones. So Thunderstud, hold tight here, You're

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna be the first up because you did a super

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>chat and then the Big Dance. That's the exact type

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>of stuff I'm talking about. So I'd love to get

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>very trade deadline specific things, whether it's buying into players,

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 1>new situations, whatever it is. So we're gonna leave some

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 1>space to answer some questions. Maybe you need to vent.

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I know some Brewers fans are pretty upset, and I

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 1>think there's you know, some people out there that aren't

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>loving all of those and some players that didn't get traded.

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>So definitely put those questions in. Our boy sal behind

0:03:58.240 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the scenes will be highlighting some of those and we'll

0:03:59.920 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>ge have some space for it as we're going to

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>get into this. Want to remind you guys before we

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 1>start up that you guys can catch leading off right

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 1>here on this hat, which we both have, both of

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 1>our hats. We have different hats. By the way, you've

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>got more of the like, I don't know what you

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>call it. Mine's embroidered. It's very embroidered. It's very nice.

0:04:16.120 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 1>We've got the new merch there. But you can catch

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Leading Off live on Twitch. It's now Monday, Wednesday, Friday,

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:23.800
<v Speaker 1>and then it comes over to YouTube just a couple

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 1>hours or an hour or so after, so make sure

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to check that out Twitch dot Tv, Slash Fantasy Pros.

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:30.719
<v Speaker 1>I will be on the Wednesday show. If we have

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 1>any other like further reactions, I think we'll have had

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:35.839
<v Speaker 1>the schooble start that's happened in there, so make sure

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 1>you're hanging out with us. So the thing I want

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:41.040
<v Speaker 1>to start with real quick, because this happened over the weekend.

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>We already talked about this on today's Leading Off, so

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing to break down with it. But I thought

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>this was really interesting kind of setting the stage to

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:48.680
<v Speaker 1>see for how many of you are hanging out with us,

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>what questions come in when we break down the trades, but.

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 2>If we could pull this up. This was Trek Scuble.

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Talking today and I thought this was really interesting because

0:04:57.040 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 1>he is scheduled, I believe to pitch tomorrow quickly on Tuesday,

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 1>and there's a lot of controversy around the trade. We

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 1>talked about it in that like you really we neither

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:09.360
<v Speaker 1>one of us really blamed the Dodgers, by the way,

0:05:09.400 --> 0:05:11.240
<v Speaker 1>because like a lot of teams had the ability to

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 1>do it. It just looks for bad for baseball. Well, Trek

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Scuble decided to weigh in after being traded to the Dodgers,

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 1>and he said, quote, every team could trade for me.

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't sympathize with people that blame the Dodgers for

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:23.040
<v Speaker 1>anything they've done. It's a winning org. I really don't

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:26.240
<v Speaker 1>sympathize it. Sympathize with people that are complaining because the

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Dodgers do all the right things. Quite the quote from

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:33.599
<v Speaker 1>Terrek Scouble defending his new team here, that was Yahoo Sports.

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 1>I think had put that out and that's their graphic

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:38.039
<v Speaker 1>as far as the tweet goes. But I just wanted

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 1>to get your quick take on seeing Trek Scouoble kind

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 1>of come to that early defense. And since we're not

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna fully get into all this business talking about him here,

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 1>any last thoughts before we start talking about.

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:51.039
<v Speaker 3>These didn't take long for the mask to come off,

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 3>missus Schooble. You've been a Dodger for all of five

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 3>minutes and you're already embracing the culture. But I said

0:05:56.960 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 3>it on leading off earlier, I'll say it again. I

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:01.440
<v Speaker 3>can't really blame the Dodge. The rules are allowing them

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 3>to do what they're doing. Why wouldn't they Why wouldn't

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 3>they take advantage of all the other owners sitting on

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 3>their hands and doing absolutely nothing. You got the Brewers

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 3>setting legitimate package after Dustin May and not trying to

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:16.359
<v Speaker 3>go get Trek Scoogle, So why wouldn't the Dodgers do this?

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:18.200
<v Speaker 3>Hard to blame them at this point.

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and we're gonna get to see him right out

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the gates. And by the way, I saw that you

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>reference to tweet or some people some chatter in the internet.

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:28.279
<v Speaker 1>I saw it after we got them with the show

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 1>of someone being like so based off of Baseball America,

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 1>they're saying that the Angels got a better return, and

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:38.159
<v Speaker 1>it was like, well, dude, that's what we're talking about.

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't agree with the ranking, and I don't care

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>what the ranking says. But also there's a side thing.

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Two years of control versus two months of control is different,

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Like you do have to consider the amount of control

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:52.800
<v Speaker 1>you have on a player that equals the return. That's

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:55.039
<v Speaker 1>why Schooble was so complicated. He's one of the best

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:57.279
<v Speaker 1>players in all of baseball, but it is a two

0:06:57.320 --> 0:07:00.840
<v Speaker 1>month rental. And on top of everything that Scooba wanted

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:02.360
<v Speaker 1>to play with the Dodgers and was going to come

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:05.359
<v Speaker 1>back after how likely did any team really feel that

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 1>they were going to be competitive in re signing when

0:07:07.320 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the CBA comes in. So it's like, I actually kind

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:11.800
<v Speaker 1>of don't blame a lot of the teams. But then

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>that gets back into a weird scenario of like, you know,

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 1>competitive sides of baseball and stuff. As they they gave

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 1>up Zay or Hope, which I said, I think from

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 1>a fantasy perspective, Hope Overnamala.

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Like hands down, and they got River Ryan.

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 1>But I understand, you know, all.

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 2>Of the chaos sits with it, but he is already.

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>In the streets defending those Dodgers. Man.

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't know the JJ Cooper thing is interesting,

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 3>and I'm not sure how much stock I want to

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 3>put into it, given that we are a fantasy show

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 3>and it's probably more of a real life take based

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 3>on the fact that he's a shortstop, et cetera, et cetera.

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 3>But it also just feeds into me being a self

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 3>loathing Blue Jays fan, So I will take every opportunity

0:07:47.000 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 3>that I can to poop poove my franchise. But the Jays,

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 3>we'll talk about it that Jay's made a couple of

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 3>decent moves today. It was it was a crazy deadline Wels,

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 3>So I'm still trying to process it all. There's still

0:07:56.880 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 3>so much going through my head right now.

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 2>It was it was so oh so crazy.

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 1>It really really was. And we're going to kind of

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 1>go through some of these trades and I'll tie in Thunderstuds.

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 1>So what I'm gonna do is I'm going to go

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>in little buckets of the trade deadline, because, like I said,

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 1>I want to leave some breathing room for some trades,

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and specifically if you guys have trades centered around some

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 1>of the guys we talk about. But let's kind of

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 1>so again, there were some trades that happened earlier this

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 1>morning that we're not necessarily talking about. This is essentially

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>trades that happened after leading off, So a five hour

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>span of like I swear to god, like thirty plus trades,

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 1>a gajillion players traded. So Scoogle can come off because

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:36.440
<v Speaker 1>we've talked enough about him, and let's start up with

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:39.560
<v Speaker 1>what is probably the biggest blockbuster of the day, Adlei Rutchman.

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Ali Rutchman was traded to the Boston Red Sox. And

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 1>what was a pretty big trade because there were a

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:50.320
<v Speaker 1>multitude of huge prospects. I told you we're not going

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:52.560
<v Speaker 1>to talk a ton about prospects here, but that is

0:08:52.600 --> 0:08:57.319
<v Speaker 1>the key here. The Orioles acquired five players, three prospects,

0:08:57.480 --> 0:09:01.200
<v Speaker 1>all three high end guys in the top five if

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 1>you care about what Baseball America or like MLB pipeline

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 1>has to say, probably Baseball America two in that respect.

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 1>They got Carlos Navarez and a player to be named later,

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 1>all for Atlei Richman, who has an extra year of eligibility.

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:17.319
<v Speaker 1>The prospects involved was the big deal. Anthony Einsen and

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Kyson Witherspoon are two high high end pitchers. Now, there

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>was an interesting thing. I don't even know if we

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 1>pulled anything from it, but I highly suggest going to

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 1>listen to it. Lance Brasdowski was on foul Territory and

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:30.959
<v Speaker 1>he had this kind of I think he might have

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:32.680
<v Speaker 1>thought it was a throwaway common at the end, but

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:36.559
<v Speaker 1>it ends up being what foul Territory clipped where he said,

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, he goes through. He was shocked about the

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:40.560
<v Speaker 1>trade and said he ended up speaking he had one

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 1>what was it, one GM or one person in baseball

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:47.520
<v Speaker 1>that said the Orioles got fleeced because they took on

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:50.560
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of broken pieces, essentially saying maybe they were

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:53.320
<v Speaker 1>just talking about Witherspoon because Witherspoon's been kind of broken,

0:09:53.480 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 1>but really tearing apart this trade. But I think every

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:57.840
<v Speaker 1>other human being besides that guy looks and goes wow,

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 1>that is a huge trade for Adley Ruchman, who does

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:03.319
<v Speaker 1>have an extra year of control. He goes in to

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Boston gets he's going to be their catcher. He's part

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 1>of that offense. I guess I will just stop on

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>this one for a second. This was a huge, a

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 1>huge overall trade, but the fantasy impact for this season

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 1>is solely around what Adley Ruchmand can do in Boston.

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 1>This kind of feels like this could be a plus.

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 3>Joe, Yeah, I think the Red Sox probably did pretty

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 3>well here. And as you guys know, I'm not the

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 3>biggest prospect guy, but it seems like a heck of

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:29.960
<v Speaker 3>a return. But you have to pay up to acquire

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 3>game changing type of players, and that's where people will

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 3>probably shut off the stream and say it's Adley Rutchman.

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 3>He hasn't done anything, and that seems to be the

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:39.079
<v Speaker 3>prevailing sentiment that Adley Rutchman has been a bust and

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 3>he's not lived up to the hype, and he's not

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 3>very good and he's injury prone. Since Adley Rudchmand debuted

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:46.079
<v Speaker 3>in twenty twenty two, there are only two catchers who

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 3>have a higher fangrafs wins by replacement. It's Cal Rawley

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 3>and it's William Contreras. I think Adli Rutchman is really

0:10:52.679 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 3>good and this is a position of need for the

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 3>Red Sox. Maybe they overpaid slightly, but locking in a

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:00.200
<v Speaker 3>catcher who is still just twenty eight years old, who

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 3>is going to be your backstop for the next probably

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:06.720
<v Speaker 3>six seven years, most likely, you have to assume that

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:09.319
<v Speaker 3>there will be some talks of extension, but it is

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 3>a weird trade. I will say this, like trading your

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 3>franchise one of your franchise cornerstones within the division is

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:18.559
<v Speaker 3>not something you see very often. The Orioles progression over

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 3>the last couple of years of like, you know, we

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:23.719
<v Speaker 3>have this upcoming group of prospects, and they're going to

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 3>change our team and change the organization, and it's been

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 3>so disappointing. It's really they have not lived up to

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 3>the hype even a little bit.

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Thunderstood. Getting to his question again, I'm gonna leave more

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:37.560
<v Speaker 1>time for it, but might intertwine them. He had said,

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I've got a rule of no socks players. So the

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Retchmen trades killing him Alvarez or Stevenson as a replacement.

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Stevenson was pretty heavily Another aside here,

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I just realized the Reds were this team that we're

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna sell off all these pieces, and they just traded

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 1>what low that was it. They we're gonna trade off

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Green and they were gonna trade off Tyler Stevenson.

0:11:58.080 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 1>And there were a ton of rumors about it, and

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 1>they didn't do much of it. Anything but I mean

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I would not, by the way, follow this rule th understood.

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I would stick with Retchmond over these guys. But if

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 1>you had to pick one, who would you.

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 3>Go with, I mean it's ro it would be Richmond,

0:12:12.160 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 3>but I would say Alvarez if you get that hard line.

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:16.719
<v Speaker 3>I like what Alvarez has done this year. Another guy

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 3>that feels like because he's missed some time, he doesn't

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 3>get the dew he's probably deserved. But I take Alvarez,

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 3>and I say that as a guy who's been a

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 3>pro Stevenson guy for years. But I'm kind of over

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 3>it and can over it at this point.

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I would probably also do the same. So the

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Adlai Richmond trade kind of a big deal. I think

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 1>that's a big plus in fantasy. They also made another

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 1>big trade. This was shocking to me because my first

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:38.719
<v Speaker 1>reaction was like, they didn't do anything with this. They

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:41.320
<v Speaker 1>traded Marcelo Mayer, And there was a time we thought

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Marcelo Mayer was going to potentially be a piece that

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:45.959
<v Speaker 1>could you know, be a part of like a Zach

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 1>neetto trade or maybe even with the Diamondbacks, and they

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 1>traded him for Eric Miller. I mean Eric Miller's a

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 1>solid lefty reliever, and I think they did maybe want

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:57.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit that more in the bullpen, So I

0:12:57.559 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 1>think maybe from like a complete baseball perspective, but like,

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:03.080
<v Speaker 1>how do we not look at this as being like

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:07.320
<v Speaker 1>you just did not give the runway for a guy

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 1>to mature and become a full time player.

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 2>This is the type of trade that reeks the.

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Criticism of Breslo and their team where they do not

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 1>know how to properly wait and or develop some of

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 1>their players. And this I don't know if San Francisco

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 1>is the best environment, but you just could feel it

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>like he goes over there, he's going to be a

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:27.680
<v Speaker 1>worthwhile player. I don't know if it'd be like this

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:30.719
<v Speaker 1>big fantasy guy or anything like that, but he goes

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 1>out and hits like two seventy and is like at

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:35.200
<v Speaker 1>least in the high teens of homers. Like maybe he's

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 1>a better real life player than not. But this one

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 1>had my head scratching.

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 3>Dude, I don't I don't really get it, and I was,

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, I praise the Red Sox for the Retchmen deal,

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:48.840
<v Speaker 3>and then in the next breath, I'll criticize them for

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 3>this one because I don't know what you're doing trading

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 3>a guy in Marcello Mayer, who granted has struggled to

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 3>this point, but we're talking three hundred and sixty four

0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 3>played appearances. We're talking about just over a half season

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 3>worth of plate appearances, and you're giving up on him

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:08.320
<v Speaker 3>for a guy in Miller who's a pretty serviceable reliever,

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 3>but also with his wartz as well. We're talking about

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 3>a guy who has a fifteen percent walk rate, a

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:16.599
<v Speaker 3>one forty whip. I mean, just a year ago he

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 3>had a seventeen percent strikeout rate. I know it was

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 3>only a thirty inning season for him last year, but

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 3>there are definitely some head scratching elements to this trade.

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 3>Paul Sport says something a lot, and it's been drilled

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 3>into my head that you can't really judge a player

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 3>until they have a thousand plate appearances in the big leagues,

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 3>and Jordan Walker is the huge example of that this year.

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 3>Every now and then, you can make a judgment before that,

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 3>but until you get to at least like two full seasons,

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 3>you don't really know what you have. And they're trading

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 3>Mayor without really knowing what he is. He's a guy

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 3>who could develop into a really good defensive player, probably

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 3>not at short but second or third. I could really

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 3>see it, and you've just abandoned the bat And what

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 3>is he twenty three? Twenty three, maybe twenty four years old.

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 3>It's a head scratching for sure.

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I didn't understand it. Whatsoeverything is a great move

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 1>by the Giants, and you know, future team building. They've

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 1>got all these guys that like have these ridiculous contracts,

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's like you could build around Marcela Mayer, especially

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 1>if you can fix them. Hopefully they can. I thought

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 1>this was a this is a great real life baseball move,

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 1>but you know that doesn't necessarily you know, turn the

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 1>dial a bunch. I do want to talk about this.

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we had a graphic because it literally

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 1>happened as soon as we started up. But I want

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the Ksey Mice thing for a second,

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 1>so we can go back to two box unless we

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>did have a graphic. But the Casey Mize trade to

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 1>San Diego is pretty shocking. Their's in the Diamondbacks. We're

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 1>trying like crazy to go and get Casey Mice. He

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 1>was a good rental starting pitcher and This kind of

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 1>just said that this team is gonna they're gonna make

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 1>a run for it, like they want to be competitive.

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 1>What was the other move that they made. Didn't they

0:15:56.040 --> 0:15:58.520
<v Speaker 1>make another move that am? I like just forgetting about it.

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, they got a Robbie so we can jump in.

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 1>You're welcome to throwing Robbie Ray as well. Since we're

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 1>just talking about the Padres for a second, they acquired

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Robby Ray, which, by the way, I'm just gonna throw out.

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Joniel Hernandez is actually kind of a dude. This might

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 1>be one of those trades long term. We go back

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 1>and look and we're like, wow, the Padres gave up

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 1>a dude, so this is actually a good return for

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the Giants. Miguel Mendez is also kind of interesting. But

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Robbie Ray goes from a really good pitching environment too,

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 1>a really good pitching environment, and they were able to,

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, bring in two starting pitchers to fill out

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 1>that rotation. I'm actually thoroughly impressed that the Padres Casey Maiz,

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Robbie Ray, that's paired with what Michael King or yeah,

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Michael King one of the best bullpen pieces out there,

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 1>an incredible bullpen overall, there was a Morione rumor that

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 1>was floating out there. Talk to me about Fantasy repercussions

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>and thoughts on Robbie Ray and Casey miz both going

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 1>This was the biggest starting pitching acquisition of impact of

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 1>any team was the Padres, and they became aggressive buyers.

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so I'll start with Casey Miz. He's somebody that

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:05.639
<v Speaker 3>I've really come into loving this year. I did a

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:07.440
<v Speaker 3>show of there across a couple of weeks ago, going

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:10.359
<v Speaker 3>through stat Cast leader boards, and Casey Mees was up

0:17:10.400 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 3>there on a couple different ones, but I think the

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 3>main one that we discussed him on was the ex

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:17.440
<v Speaker 3>wOBA allowed and he was one of the top ten

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:20.199
<v Speaker 3>or top fifteen pitchers in terms of the opposing x wOBA.

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:22.440
<v Speaker 3>He has a sub one whip, he has a sub

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 3>three ERA, all the supporting metrics are in that two

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:29.160
<v Speaker 3>and a half to three type of range, really good command,

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:31.720
<v Speaker 3>He's up the strikeouts this year. This is a legitimate

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 3>starting pitcher, Casey mice is.

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:35.960
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not just I just want to throw out.

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I had not seen the return, and my reaction with

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:42.440
<v Speaker 1>if anyone just saw that was just seeing the return

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Casey Meies, by the way, is an undersearch a free

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:48.200
<v Speaker 1>agent after this year. This is a rental. Yeah, they

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 1>gave up cash Mayfield. Cash Mayfield was the top prospect

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:54.679
<v Speaker 1>in their system. Looks like, you know, maybe he's not

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 1>like a high high high end like elite fantasy ace.

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I am shocked they gave up cash Mayfield for a rental.

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:07.199
<v Speaker 1>But then I'm also not shocked because it's Preller And

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:09.479
<v Speaker 1>now I see why the Diamondbacks could not get Casey

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Mice because holy crap, that's a huge return. Casey miz

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:15.400
<v Speaker 1>is the type of guy that you would have used

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 1>if you were trying to go get like a Zach Nedo.

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean we were talking like again, like he's not

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:21.119
<v Speaker 1>like a top twenty five overall prospect or anything like that,

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:22.640
<v Speaker 1>but that's like in the line of like a top

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:25.919
<v Speaker 1>one hundred overall pitcher. Also, Jackson Wolf is a decent

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 1>piece that kind of took me by here because I

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:32.400
<v Speaker 1>agree with you. I actually think if we'll briefly kind

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 1>of do this, because you know, we're only here for

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 1>a short period of time doing this, if we had

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 1>to start picking like who the biggest biggest beneficiaries, I

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 1>think This is one of the beneficiaries Casey Mice Like,

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:42.920
<v Speaker 1>this is probably in my top five. The next guy

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:44.640
<v Speaker 1>we're going to talk about, it's probably like my number one,

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 1>But this is one of I like Robbie Ray, I

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 1>think this is actually a solid place. But Casey Miz

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 1>specifically to me, is like an extra little boost.

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:54.919
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he's had good luck with the home run suppression

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:56.919
<v Speaker 3>this year, but last year it was a little bit

0:18:56.920 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 3>of a problem for him. It was twenty one homers

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 3>last season, up a lot of fly balls. So being

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 3>in San Diego, I think that's a big boost for

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:07.400
<v Speaker 3>his profile. But I was able to pull up that leaderboard.

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:10.200
<v Speaker 3>I was expected wOBA for pitchers, and he ranks thirteenth

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:13.399
<v Speaker 3>among all pitchers who have thrown at least two hundred

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:15.639
<v Speaker 3>or who have faced at least two hundred balls in

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:18.160
<v Speaker 3>play this year. So he has a better expected wOBA

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:23.200
<v Speaker 3>than guys like Drew Rasmussen, Yoshinobu Yamamoto, Chase Burns, Christopher Sanchez.

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 3>He's been a dude. He really has been an underrated

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:29.919
<v Speaker 3>ace this season and this is a really good pickup.

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if Robbi Ray is as impactful at

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 3>this stage of his career. Drakeout's kind of down. We

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:35.920
<v Speaker 3>did a video I think it was with you, maybe

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 3>with Bubba selling Robbie Ray a few weeks ago, just

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 3>because I'm not sure the strikeouts are coming back the

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:43.680
<v Speaker 3>way that we need them to. But as rotation depth

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 3>for a team like again, I said this, maybe it

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 3>was on the show actually with Peter a couple days ago,

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:50.399
<v Speaker 3>that the Padres. You know, if you look at their

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 3>whole team, the only real glaring weakness is the starting rotation.

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:55.360
<v Speaker 3>That lineup is pretty good, and they've had a really

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:58.879
<v Speaker 3>good July too. Machado pulled it around, Merrill has been great,

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:01.679
<v Speaker 3>and Jake Cronaworth as well. Well. They filled their biggest need.

0:20:01.760 --> 0:20:02.360
<v Speaker 3>So good for them.

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:05.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, not really anymore. I mean they've created depth. I

0:20:05.680 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 1>think they did a good job. Let's keep a running

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 1>tally as we roll through here of our favorite, like

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:12.679
<v Speaker 1>most impactful changes, and I think Casey Miis is the

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:16.199
<v Speaker 1>first one that's gonna jump up here. I am gonna

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:18.200
<v Speaker 1>be I want to do one more main one, and

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:19.719
<v Speaker 1>then I want to burn through some others, and then

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to get your questions. So again, we've got

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 1>a couple questions in here, but feel free. If you've

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 1>got any questions related to the trade deadline, that's important,

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:29.400
<v Speaker 1>put them in the chat right now. Sal will star

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:33.119
<v Speaker 1>them and we'll get going. But before we do, before

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:35.159
<v Speaker 1>we move on, I want to remind you guys the

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:37.640
<v Speaker 1>reason we can do stuff like this and of our sponsor,

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 1>because today's show is sponsored by our friends over at

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 1>hard Rock Bet sportsbook where everybody feels everybody it feels

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:47.639
<v Speaker 1>like it's the slow season. No, my friends, it's the

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 1>baseball season. People get to get introduced to the wonderful

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:54.880
<v Speaker 1>world of baseball betting, and hard Rock Bet is introducing

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the ten cent summer sale, big juice fee, whatever you

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:03.480
<v Speaker 1>call it. They're cutting their cut on winter spreads over

0:21:03.600 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 1>under pregame baseball bets, same bets, better odds, you name it.

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:09.120
<v Speaker 1>It's hooked up there. If you're ready to step into

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the batter's box, sign up with hard Rock Bets today.

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:13.040
<v Speaker 1>In place a five dollars bet. If it wins, you

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 1>get one hundred and fifty and bonus bets on top

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:17.679
<v Speaker 1>of your winnings. That's an extra one to fifty in

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:21.720
<v Speaker 1>your account. And yes, Florida's only legal sportsbook. But you

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:26.880
<v Speaker 1>don't have to be in just Florida, Arizona, Ohio, New Jersey, Indiana, Tennessee, Virginia, Illinois, Colorado,

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:28.960
<v Speaker 1>and Michigan, with more states on the way. So grab

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:31.160
<v Speaker 1>your bat and swing for the fences all August long

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 1>during hard Rock Bets ten cent Summer Sale, download the

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 1>hard Rock Bet app today, roll with.

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 3>Us payable and bonus bets not a cash offer offered

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:41.959
<v Speaker 3>by the Seminol Tribe of Florida. In Florida offered by

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:45.120
<v Speaker 3>Seminole hard Rock Digital LLC and all other states, must

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:49.840
<v Speaker 3>be twenty one plus and physically present in Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan,

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:53.000
<v Speaker 3>New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee, or Virginia to play. Terms and

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:56.159
<v Speaker 3>conditions apply. Concerned about gambling and Florida, call one A

0:21:56.240 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 3>three to three play wise. In Indiana. If you are

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 3>someone who knows a gambling problem in one help, call

0:22:00.840 --> 0:22:03.320
<v Speaker 3>one eight hundred and nine with it. In Arizona, Ohio

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:06.480
<v Speaker 3>and Virginia, call one eight hundred My reset gambling problem

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 3>called one eight hundred gambler.

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:11.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's get back to these. The other one

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:14.959
<v Speaker 1>I think of big importance here and then well, there's

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:17.200
<v Speaker 1>like a couple in here, but I'm trying to stick

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 1>with us because I want to answer questions. Is let's

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:24.119
<v Speaker 1>roll out the Luke Weaver one, because in my mind,

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:28.120
<v Speaker 1>this is the most impactful trade from where they were

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 1>to where they are now. Erico and I just did

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:32.879
<v Speaker 1>a trade video, and I'll tell you right now, I

0:22:32.880 --> 0:22:35.840
<v Speaker 1>put Luke Weaver on there. I understand people now understand

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 1>he's a closer, but I think Luke Weaver has the

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:40.240
<v Speaker 1>potential to be a top ten closer in baseball. Given

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 1>this opportunity, one of him or Devin Williams is going

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:46.640
<v Speaker 1>to get traded. He's the guy that goes. He goes

0:22:46.680 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to Pittsburgh should instantly become their closer. They gave up

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:52.160
<v Speaker 1>a kind of big give. By the way, Sammy Stefferr

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 1>was having an absolute Berserko season in the month of July.

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:59.160
<v Speaker 1>No prospect had more home runs the entire minor league

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:02.159
<v Speaker 1>system of any team than Sammy Steffura, So he was

0:23:02.200 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>going off. So this is a big piece. But Luke Weaver,

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:08.639
<v Speaker 1>to me, goes in his like twenty seven percent K percentage.

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:11.200
<v Speaker 1>He's been locked down. You're going to be closing out

0:23:11.200 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 1>games now for guys like schemes. Hopefully Devall doesn't keep

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:15.879
<v Speaker 1>blowing them. They've got to put themselves in positions to

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 1>keep winning. But I think this is one of the

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 1>most impactful. So I'm gonna put this in our our

0:23:21.000 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 1>big boost with Casey Maiz here. Do you agree with me?

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:25.120
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about the Luke Weaver trade.

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:28.160
<v Speaker 3>I do agree that he should be the closer. I'm

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 3>not one hundred percent sure that he'll just be handed

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 3>the reins, and I'm still kind of going back and

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:35.480
<v Speaker 3>forth on Soda Well Sodo. I'm just looking at his

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 3>numbers for the year. He has a three sixty ninety RA,

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:40.639
<v Speaker 3>he has a one zero six whip, he has a

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:43.479
<v Speaker 3>seventeen percent strikeout to Walker, he's done his job at

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:46.880
<v Speaker 3>fourteen saves. He's blown a couple of them, but he's

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:49.480
<v Speaker 3>pretty much been doing what they've asked him to do.

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 3>You have Luke Weaver, you have Timilla Devall, who they

0:23:52.480 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 3>also picked up, and then you have Kirby Yates, who

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 3>they also grabbed at the deadline. A lot of guys

0:23:56.560 --> 0:23:58.760
<v Speaker 3>with closing experience are around there. I do think that

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:01.399
<v Speaker 3>it should be Luke Weaver. I'm not a one hundred

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 3>percent sure that they will give him the rains though.

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:06.359
<v Speaker 3>That's my worry. Mason Montgomery is also in contention there.

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:08.680
<v Speaker 3>They're just a lot of guys that could get saves.

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm not one hundred percent sure if they will just

0:24:11.960 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 3>hand the rains over immediately to the new guy.

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I think Montgomery's great, but I think there's a specific

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:19.719
<v Speaker 1>reason you brought in Luke Weaver. Now here is your

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:22.160
<v Speaker 1>worst case. This is what I will relent if he's

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 1>a fireman. Fireman's the worst because then that's the high

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:26.920
<v Speaker 1>leverage guy, and that's what he has done a ton

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 1>in his career. He was doing that with the Yankees.

0:24:28.800 --> 0:24:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Sum if he's one of those guys. If the most

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:32.560
<v Speaker 1>important part of the lineup is there in the eighth,

0:24:32.600 --> 0:24:34.119
<v Speaker 1>then they might bring in Luke Weaver and then a

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:37.400
<v Speaker 1>guy like Sodo gets the save. So that is definite possibility.

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 1>But you know what, let those question marks be the

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 1>reason that I get to go buy him. You know,

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 1>that's the reason that I want to go and buy

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:47.040
<v Speaker 1>on Luke Weaver. I think he's there's a very specific

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:48.720
<v Speaker 1>reason why you go make that move you trade a

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 1>high end prospect, is you let him be the guy

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:54.160
<v Speaker 1>that closes out games. The problem that the pirates have,

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:56.159
<v Speaker 1>and now that you're actually talking me into it a

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 1>little bit, is sometimes they'll put them in, they'll put

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:00.880
<v Speaker 1>themselves in the position where you getting to that win.

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:02.639
<v Speaker 1>So they might need a Luke Weaver to be in

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 1>those higher leverage spots. So I actually hope I'm wrong

0:25:05.119 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 1>about that, but I think he has a potential to

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:09.680
<v Speaker 1>be a top ten closer. I'm not sure where everybody

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:10.639
<v Speaker 1>else is on that.

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 3>Anything else, No, skill wise, I agree. I just the

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:16.240
<v Speaker 3>usage will be interesting to see, and for a lot

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 3>of my leagues, it's a Sunday night fab, so we'll

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 3>have a whole week to see how the usage goes

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:23.199
<v Speaker 3>over the next week, so we will have a good

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:25.480
<v Speaker 3>little sample size for sure before we actually have to

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 3>make fids.

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, one more of the big breakdowns I'm gonna do,

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 1>and then I'm going to go a little bit quicker

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 1>to just get through the rest, and then we are

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:36.400
<v Speaker 1>going to start bringing up your questions. I've been targeting

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:41.119
<v Speaker 1>some as well. The next trade up was Foster Griffin.

0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I was actually very surprised that this trade went down

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 1>because I don't know the Nationals. I know they traded

0:25:46.000 --> 0:25:47.960
<v Speaker 1>away Luis Garcia. I guess there was just a weirdness

0:25:48.000 --> 0:25:49.399
<v Speaker 1>to me of like why did they trade off some

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>of these pieces? They took advantage of the insane season

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:56.040
<v Speaker 1>that Foster Griffin was having. It was a sub three

0:25:56.040 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 1>e are I think, really good shapes, lots of pitch,

0:25:58.600 --> 0:26:01.640
<v Speaker 1>mixed stuff. He's been incredible whole year. I will say,

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:05.880
<v Speaker 1>when you look at them taking advantage of it, I'm

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 1>not really sure they got four prospects back. I don't not.

0:26:08.680 --> 0:26:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Josh Hartle's interesting. It might be a guy,

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 1>but I'm kind of shocked that you make this move

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:14.919
<v Speaker 1>and then you just got depth. You didn't get like

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:18.680
<v Speaker 1>a good, really good piece to it. But Griffin goes

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 1>in with the Guardians, and I think this was a

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:23.159
<v Speaker 1>great play the Guardians. We talked about it earlier. Did

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:25.160
<v Speaker 1>they got Joe Adell? They got a power bat, He's

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:27.480
<v Speaker 1>going to lead you to the top of Homers. And

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>then now they got a guy that they get to

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:31.880
<v Speaker 1>pair with Parker Messik and with Gavin Williams who's been nuts.

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:35.439
<v Speaker 1>So this is another one of those I mean, do

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:37.199
<v Speaker 1>you view this as like a plu I kind of

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:39.120
<v Speaker 1>think I do view this as a plus. I don't

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 1>know if I think this is one of the biggest

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:42.720
<v Speaker 1>changes of the deadline, but this is a plus. Him

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>going to the Guardians.

0:26:44.080 --> 0:26:46.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I guess he's thirty one years old, he's a

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 3>free agent at the end of the year, and I

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:51.080
<v Speaker 3>guess they'd probably had some internal discussions that led them

0:26:51.119 --> 0:26:53.160
<v Speaker 3>to believe he wasn't going to come back, and this

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 3>is their chance to cash in. And I mean, he's

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:57.560
<v Speaker 3>done about everything he can to cash in. He's won

0:26:57.640 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 3>twelve of his twenty two starts. He has a three

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 3>h six er, he's a one zero seven whip. He's

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:03.960
<v Speaker 3>saved a couple of my fantasy teams this year, for sure.

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:08.680
<v Speaker 3>I just I don't love it from a front office

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:12.640
<v Speaker 3>that seems to be more forward thinking, and they had

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 3>the best offense in all of baseball and they traded

0:27:15.240 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 3>one of the major pieces for that, and now they've

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 3>traded their ace. So I'm not sure what the direction

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:21.880
<v Speaker 3>is long term, but I guess if they don't think

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 3>that they could resign them, this is probably the thing

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:25.600
<v Speaker 3>that they should have done. It's just I can't speak

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:27.439
<v Speaker 3>to the quality of these prospects. You don't see him

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 3>blown away by it.

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Though, no, not at all. Like Josh Hartle definitely could

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 1>be a guy, but that's not what I'm trading. Like

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Nick Mitchell's kind of interesting, like this is just not

0:27:36.840 --> 0:27:39.159
<v Speaker 1>a package that does anything for me. This is almost

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:42.040
<v Speaker 1>this is like a fantasy trade where someone's like, you know,

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 1>he's like four guys, you know, and it's just like

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:46.440
<v Speaker 1>volume doesn't make me feel better about this. I would

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:49.280
<v Speaker 1>have much rather had some quality, get two guys one

0:27:49.320 --> 0:27:51.199
<v Speaker 1>of a little better quality, and I just don't think

0:27:51.240 --> 0:27:54.199
<v Speaker 1>they ended up doing that. So I didn't love that

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:57.640
<v Speaker 1>at all. All right, So the next few trades here,

0:27:58.000 --> 0:27:59.439
<v Speaker 1>so I know, we got some graphics for them and

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:01.199
<v Speaker 1>we can definitely back you guys can put them up

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 1>as I go. But my Arizona Diamondbacks picked up Lars Nutbar.

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:07.359
<v Speaker 1>I definitely love this trade. It's very funny, just because

0:28:07.400 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 1>like my association with Lars Nutbar over the years, I

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of gave up on him this year, of course,

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:14.439
<v Speaker 1>and he's got an arbitrational year next year, so the

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:18.359
<v Speaker 1>Diamondbacks actually have some control. They traded Daniel Egan, which

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 1>is a little bit of a dude. Rub and Santana

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:21.879
<v Speaker 1>had kind of fallen out of favor and a player

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to be named. My worry is that's probably going to

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:26.679
<v Speaker 1>be like a guy in the long term. But I

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:29.160
<v Speaker 1>don't hate this. I don't hate them getting some depth there.

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 1>They were tied to Alec Burlson, they were tied to

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 1>some pitchers. They didn't make any of it happen, but

0:28:33.880 --> 0:28:36.680
<v Speaker 1>they got some more depth. So that was a decent one. Also,

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the biggest thing, and I'm going to put this is

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:43.760
<v Speaker 1>number three on our list of beneficiaries. Joshua Bias has

0:28:43.760 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 1>clearly got to be coming up. This is making room

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 1>for Joshua Bias if I've ever seen it in my life.

0:28:48.520 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 1>So one, uh go and pick him up. This should

0:28:52.680 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 1>lead to him being up like instantly. So Joshua Bias

0:28:56.160 --> 0:28:57.720
<v Speaker 1>is a big one. I'm gonna just do a couple

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 1>more and then we'll jump in. The Chicago Cubs made

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:05.720
<v Speaker 1>a handful of trades. The Cubs acquired Braxton Garrett from

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the Marlins. The Cubs then acquired Clay Holmes and Tyrone Taylor,

0:29:10.240 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 1>which by the way, they ended up trading Jefferson Rojas,

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:15.920
<v Speaker 1>which is a big name prospect. And then they acquired

0:29:16.000 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Zephyrjan from the Angels, and they traded away Mois's ballasteros.

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 1>That was actually some big moves. So they made three

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:27.440
<v Speaker 1>big moves, two to their rotation or yeah, two to

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:30.600
<v Speaker 1>their rotation, one on the bullpen, and they gave away

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 1>a ton of pieces out there. So we can stop

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:35.280
<v Speaker 1>there for a second. Cubs moves.

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:38.000
<v Speaker 2>I threw the diamondback one in there. Anything of note

0:29:38.000 --> 0:29:38.240
<v Speaker 2>for you.

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 3>I've loved Lars Noubar going back to probably his first

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:44.960
<v Speaker 3>season in the Bigs. I've just always been really drawn

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 3>to the high end base profiles. He's got some good

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 3>power speed. He was a leadoff hitter there for a while.

0:29:49.760 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 3>Last couple of years have not been terribly kind to him,

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:54.160
<v Speaker 3>mostly in terms of injuries, but a lot of the

0:29:54.160 --> 0:29:56.560
<v Speaker 3>skills are still there. Fifty one percent heart hit rate

0:29:56.600 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 3>this year best of his career. Ninety two mile an

0:29:59.160 --> 0:30:01.719
<v Speaker 3>hour average exit velocity best of his career. Still got

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 3>a good barrel rate, still a really good on bass.

0:30:04.040 --> 0:30:08.280
<v Speaker 3>Guy doesn't chase lots of contact. He's a data darling

0:30:08.320 --> 0:30:10.840
<v Speaker 3>if you're into the going through the fangrause stackcast page.

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 3>Has always been a fan of his, and the other

0:30:14.720 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 3>thing I was gonna mention that just totally slipped my mind.

0:30:16.960 --> 0:30:18.640
<v Speaker 3>The other deal all the Cubs, right, the.

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Cubs, the cub the crazy.

0:30:20.000 --> 0:30:22.600
<v Speaker 3>One we always talk about, you know, the Dodgers stockpiling

0:30:22.640 --> 0:30:25.640
<v Speaker 3>starting pitching. I tweeted this out earlier on the Fantasy

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 3>Pros account. These are the starting pitchers that the Cubs

0:30:27.800 --> 0:30:30.440
<v Speaker 3>currently have on the roster, both healthy and injured. Matthew

0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:33.840
<v Speaker 3>Boyd showed at Imanaga, David Peterson, Clay Holmes, Colin Ray,

0:30:34.360 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 3>Kevin Gosman, Ben Brown, Edward Cabrera, Kate Horton, Justin Steele,

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:42.280
<v Speaker 3>Braxton Garrett, and Happy Erasade. They have like twelve viable

0:30:42.320 --> 0:30:44.560
<v Speaker 3>starting pitchers, and now some of them are injured. A

0:30:44.600 --> 0:30:46.360
<v Speaker 3>couple of these guys are probably gona leave a free agency.

0:30:46.360 --> 0:30:47.959
<v Speaker 3>But I don't think I've ever seen a collection of

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:50.800
<v Speaker 3>like twelve guys who could legitimately be starting pitchers all

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 3>on one major league roster at the same time.

0:30:53.720 --> 0:30:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Also an interesting note, they essentially may have traded for

0:30:56.520 --> 0:30:59.240
<v Speaker 1>more than half of their rotation moving forward. I forgot

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:05.440
<v Speaker 1>about that. Goss Men, Holmes, and Braxon Garrett, So that's

0:31:05.520 --> 0:31:07.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of a that's a big one. The Giants made

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:10.440
<v Speaker 1>a big move. They acquired Helio Ramos, and they traded

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 1>two big pieces. I think it's oh god, it's Kent.

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:17.280
<v Speaker 1>It's jeff Kin's son, Keaton Kent. I'm forgetting his first

0:31:17.320 --> 0:31:20.200
<v Speaker 1>name now, but jeff Kin's son. And Henry Lallani was

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the big one. Yeah, Kayden Kent there, Kayden Kent and

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Henry Laalani, who's a big time prospect, Helio Ramos. This

0:31:27.240 --> 0:31:29.320
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a beneficiary in New York. I

0:31:29.800 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 1>don't even want to go. I mean, the only thing

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:33.360
<v Speaker 1>that could be bad is if there's like a rotational

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:38.720
<v Speaker 1>thing that the Yankees didn't have trading Spencer Jones or Dominguez.

0:31:38.800 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 1>So it just feels like there's a little bit of

0:31:40.120 --> 0:31:41.960
<v Speaker 1>a log jam. But this is a good one. We'll

0:31:41.960 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 1>come back to that. The Rays acquired Liam Hicks with

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 1>from the Marlins, and Marlins ended up trading Braden Taylor,

0:31:48.080 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Adrian Santana, and Jacob Kissing. The Brewers acquired Dustin May

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 1>and Jojo Romero. At the end, I do want to

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:59.959
<v Speaker 1>talk about the biggest disappointments and biggest winners for a second.

0:32:00.040 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of Brewers fans are like, this

0:32:01.720 --> 0:32:04.360
<v Speaker 1>is a disappointment. They also got Antonio Sinzitela to help

0:32:04.400 --> 0:32:08.040
<v Speaker 1>in their bullpen. The big to do and this would

0:32:08.040 --> 0:32:10.240
<v Speaker 1>be on my prospect pod. It was the Prospects that

0:32:10.280 --> 0:32:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the Brewers gave up for Dustin May. Alexander Friaz specifically

0:32:13.520 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 1>got people up in arms. The Astros acquired Dalton var

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Show from the Blue Jays Your Blue Jays. The Blue

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Jays then acquired they were super weird in the moves

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:26.560
<v Speaker 1>they were making, Josh Stephen and Josh Smith, and they

0:32:26.600 --> 0:32:31.440
<v Speaker 1>traded Adam Maco and the Dodgers traded for Chris Bubitch.

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I think there's maybe a trader two that I've forgotten,

0:32:35.400 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 1>and there Kirby Gates has mentioned. I forgot he was

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 1>also traded to the Pirates. I think we got all

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:41.560
<v Speaker 1>of them?

0:32:41.680 --> 0:32:42.080
<v Speaker 3>Are we go?

0:32:42.280 --> 0:32:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I think all of them? So any quick notes on

0:32:44.440 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 1>and then I'm going to go to questions on the

0:32:46.480 --> 0:32:50.120
<v Speaker 1>You got Hicks to Tampa Bay, Hellio Ramos to New York.

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Dustin May is going to go into that Brewers rotation,

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:56.120
<v Speaker 1>var show. Any quick notes on any of those guys.

0:32:56.280 --> 0:32:59.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, the Jays getting a controllable starter in Eric Gatty,

0:32:59.480 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 3>who has showed own some upside in exchange for two

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:03.720
<v Speaker 3>months of Dalton var Show. I think is a really

0:33:03.720 --> 0:33:06.160
<v Speaker 3>good piece of business. And I criticized the Blue Jays

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 3>a lot, but I think they did well in that

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:11.640
<v Speaker 3>trade there. Jeff Hoffman also gone.

0:33:12.080 --> 0:33:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Cannot Oh, yes, Jeff Hoffman thinks he cannot hurt me anymore.

0:33:15.360 --> 0:33:18.480
<v Speaker 3>Thank you. He's gone finally, But I do think there's

0:33:18.480 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 3>a chance that he ends up getting some saves in

0:33:20.280 --> 0:33:25.280
<v Speaker 3>Minnesota out there now. Their current closer Gomez Joandris Gomez.

0:33:25.320 --> 0:33:28.000
<v Speaker 3>I believe his first name is pronounced. He's been pretty

0:33:28.000 --> 0:33:32.120
<v Speaker 3>good for them, but Hoffman definitely has more closer type stuff,

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:35.200
<v Speaker 3>so I would imagine that Hoffman is probably a decent

0:33:35.240 --> 0:33:39.280
<v Speaker 3>pickup there. Elliott Ramos goes from the twenty sixth ranked

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:42.840
<v Speaker 3>park for right handed power to the second ranked park.

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:46.240
<v Speaker 3>So a guy who's already shown twenty plus home run upside,

0:33:46.520 --> 0:33:48.480
<v Speaker 3>this could be a thirty home run bat next year

0:33:48.720 --> 0:33:53.520
<v Speaker 3>if things go right for him. I think that's mostly

0:33:53.960 --> 0:33:58.479
<v Speaker 3>it in terms of my thoughts on the big stuff. No,

0:33:58.520 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 3>it's perfect.

0:33:59.240 --> 0:34:00.920
<v Speaker 1>We don't need to go through We got questions from

0:34:00.960 --> 0:34:04.960
<v Speaker 1>people that we'll talk about. That's I mean. And by

0:34:05.000 --> 0:34:08.239
<v Speaker 1>the way, those are the trades from when we ended

0:34:08.320 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 1>leading off until the deadline ended. That is not mentioning.

0:34:12.600 --> 0:34:14.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, when we started the show the Joe Adell

0:34:14.800 --> 0:34:16.960
<v Speaker 1>The Morning Trades, there were quite a few that was

0:34:17.080 --> 0:34:20.839
<v Speaker 1>a lofty and heavy day of trades with a ton

0:34:20.840 --> 0:34:24.320
<v Speaker 1>of fantasy impact. I've got four here and we'll review

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:26.600
<v Speaker 1>it at the very end, and we'll also kind of

0:34:26.640 --> 0:34:29.360
<v Speaker 1>talk about, you know, who we thought were maybe the

0:34:29.400 --> 0:34:32.200
<v Speaker 1>losers of the trade deadline. But let's go through some questions.

0:34:32.200 --> 0:34:34.160
<v Speaker 1>So again, this is your chance for probably the next

0:34:34.200 --> 0:34:36.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, five to ten minutes. Any questions that you've

0:34:36.640 --> 0:34:39.319
<v Speaker 1>got based around these trade deadline guys, please put them

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:41.800
<v Speaker 1>in the big dance, says Luke Weaver or Grant Taylor

0:34:41.880 --> 0:34:44.680
<v Speaker 1>rest of season. I've clearly stated it's Luke Waiver for me.

0:34:45.360 --> 0:34:47.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna go Taylor just because I think the path

0:34:47.120 --> 0:34:49.439
<v Speaker 3>is a lot clearer to him getting saves. There's gonna

0:34:49.480 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 3>be no question about him being the closer, Whereas I

0:34:51.600 --> 0:34:54.279
<v Speaker 3>do have some questions with Waiver, So I'll take Grant

0:34:54.280 --> 0:34:54.839
<v Speaker 3>Taylor there.

0:34:56.080 --> 0:34:57.239
<v Speaker 1>John said, what's up?

0:34:57.280 --> 0:34:58.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, what's up? John?

0:34:58.360 --> 0:35:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm shocked the Rockies didn't trade any Well, they did.

0:35:01.040 --> 0:35:03.480
<v Speaker 1>They traded Briton Doyle that was one that we that

0:35:03.600 --> 0:35:05.920
<v Speaker 1>was covered in leading off. But to your point, they

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:08.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't do anything else. Hunter good That's that's a big one.

0:35:08.440 --> 0:35:09.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you want to talk about the big

0:35:09.640 --> 0:35:11.600
<v Speaker 1>names that weren't traded, who were the big names that

0:35:11.640 --> 0:35:15.800
<v Speaker 1>weren't traded? Hunter Goodman and Zach Netto were probably the

0:35:15.840 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 1>two most prolific ones. I think there were smaller versions

0:35:19.640 --> 0:35:24.160
<v Speaker 1>of like Sandy al Contra. I mean, Abrams has taken

0:35:24.200 --> 0:35:28.280
<v Speaker 1>off the board, Joe Ryan had kind of been taken

0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:30.440
<v Speaker 1>off the board, But like going into this, Netto and

0:35:30.440 --> 0:35:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Goodman were the two big ones we thought could get traded.

0:35:33.040 --> 0:35:35.560
<v Speaker 1>And not only did the Rockies not trade Goodman, they

0:35:35.600 --> 0:35:41.279
<v Speaker 1>only traded Doyle. So that outfield, what is it? It's like McCarthy, Moniac,

0:35:41.800 --> 0:35:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Carrig and who am I forgetting? I know, I'm forgetting.

0:35:45.200 --> 0:35:48.239
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I'm forgetting somebody. It is Beck, but

0:35:48.280 --> 0:35:48.799
<v Speaker 1>he's hurt.

0:35:48.960 --> 0:35:52.799
<v Speaker 3>I guess Marthy moniac and Carrig, isn't it.

0:35:53.520 --> 0:35:56.239
<v Speaker 1>Troy Johnston is out there. And but the problem is

0:35:56.239 --> 0:35:58.600
<v Speaker 1>is the they traded one less guy to make me

0:35:58.640 --> 0:36:00.920
<v Speaker 1>feel comfortable that Charlie Condon could come up, so that

0:36:01.000 --> 0:36:03.480
<v Speaker 1>one kind of you know that does kind of suck.

0:36:04.080 --> 0:36:05.880
<v Speaker 1>So well, it's a good question. It is weird that

0:36:05.920 --> 0:36:08.520
<v Speaker 1>they did it. Surprise Bieber wasn't moved. I could probably

0:36:08.520 --> 0:36:10.359
<v Speaker 1>answer that what market somebody wanted?

0:36:10.640 --> 0:36:11.320
<v Speaker 3>Nobody wanted.

0:36:11.400 --> 0:36:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the Savannah Bananas were calling maybe, but I don't

0:36:14.600 --> 0:36:15.560
<v Speaker 1>think anybody else would have.

0:36:15.600 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, they already traded for Anthony Volpi today, so they

0:36:17.680 --> 0:36:18.520
<v Speaker 3>were busy already.

0:36:19.239 --> 0:36:19.799
<v Speaker 1>I saw that.

0:36:19.880 --> 0:36:20.719
<v Speaker 3>I saw that.

0:36:20.719 --> 0:36:23.200
<v Speaker 1>That was funny. This was in relation to the Marcela

0:36:23.239 --> 0:36:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Mayer stuff that the Red Sox believe in Christian Campbell

0:36:25.360 --> 0:36:27.319
<v Speaker 1>as their future second Baseman laughing, you know.

0:36:27.320 --> 0:36:29.239
<v Speaker 2>You laugh, But he did really pick it up as of.

0:36:29.200 --> 0:36:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Recent I think that's the one that like they didn't

0:36:31.960 --> 0:36:33.840
<v Speaker 1>want to give up on Campbell and they want to

0:36:33.840 --> 0:36:37.520
<v Speaker 1>try to develop. But again, just for them to trade

0:36:38.080 --> 0:36:40.200
<v Speaker 1>that level, you know what, it feels like, it's not

0:36:40.320 --> 0:36:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the same. It feels very much like when the Diamondbacks

0:36:43.360 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 1>were like, we should trade Dansby Swanson for Shelby Miller,

0:36:46.800 --> 0:36:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and that's what they did. It was different because the

0:36:49.360 --> 0:36:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Diamondbacks weren't in a space where they were like giving up,

0:36:51.640 --> 0:36:54.319
<v Speaker 1>like like it is here, but it's just like you

0:36:54.360 --> 0:36:57.719
<v Speaker 1>guys couldn't develop anymore like Eric. It caught like the

0:36:58.040 --> 0:37:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I will never not be shocked at the ice of

0:37:00.360 --> 0:37:02.840
<v Speaker 1>what relief pitchers cost. It's insane to me. Like that

0:37:02.960 --> 0:37:05.400
<v Speaker 1>rumor today. Did you see where it was the Yankees?

0:37:05.680 --> 0:37:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Everyone refuted it and whatever, but that the Yankees offered

0:37:08.680 --> 0:37:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Will Warren for Adrian Morion. I saw that, and then

0:37:11.360 --> 0:37:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the Padres instantly rejected it. The market for controllable relief

0:37:15.840 --> 0:37:18.440
<v Speaker 1>pitching is absolutely absurd, Padre. I can't if that's real.

0:37:18.480 --> 0:37:20.640
<v Speaker 3>The Padres are kind of crazy for rejecting that.

0:37:20.719 --> 0:37:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I think I agree, but I don't. I don't know.

0:37:24.880 --> 0:37:26.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, don't understand nothing. Not me.

0:37:27.520 --> 0:37:30.960
<v Speaker 3>Aj Preller does what aj Preller wants. He's who can

0:37:31.000 --> 0:37:32.920
<v Speaker 3>get inside of that, and nobody can get inside that.

0:37:33.120 --> 0:37:33.880
<v Speaker 3>Nobody would want to.

0:37:34.040 --> 0:37:36.839
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I've actually been around. I'm gonna record it next time,

0:37:36.880 --> 0:37:38.799
<v Speaker 1>because you know, I go to the Padres facility like

0:37:38.960 --> 0:37:41.600
<v Speaker 1>all the time, and I've seen it in definitely in

0:37:41.640 --> 0:37:43.759
<v Speaker 1>spring training, but in some other spots when he's out

0:37:43.760 --> 0:37:45.560
<v Speaker 1>there and he's just walking around the fields and it's

0:37:45.560 --> 0:37:47.319
<v Speaker 1>like a trippy thing like those videos you see.

0:37:47.320 --> 0:37:48.000
<v Speaker 2>He just does it.

0:37:48.000 --> 0:37:49.960
<v Speaker 1>He just walks around the fields. I was there when

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Michael King was throwing in spring training and he was

0:37:53.120 --> 0:37:56.040
<v Speaker 1>just watching him, and I was like, oh, like Michael King,

0:37:56.080 --> 0:37:58.399
<v Speaker 1>better be careful and better watch out. The Big Dance

0:37:58.440 --> 0:38:00.319
<v Speaker 1>also dialed in here Braves are going to head in

0:38:00.360 --> 0:38:04.759
<v Speaker 1>October with Sale and Martine Perez Elder and Holmes, and

0:38:04.840 --> 0:38:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I think they didn't they get somebody some low named pictures.

0:38:09.120 --> 0:38:11.799
<v Speaker 3>They got Tyler Complete, they got Tyler Molly, They got Tyler.

0:38:12.040 --> 0:38:14.880
<v Speaker 1>That's what it is, dude. Trades that happened on Sunday

0:38:14.920 --> 0:38:16.919
<v Speaker 1>feel like they have. They happened like three months ago.

0:38:17.239 --> 0:38:20.359
<v Speaker 3>Yes, especially with the the flurry of activity we've had.

0:38:20.400 --> 0:38:21.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean there's probably a couple of things that have

0:38:22.040 --> 0:38:24.680
<v Speaker 3>fallen through the cracks, just because it was like damn bam.

0:38:24.719 --> 0:38:26.400
<v Speaker 3>We were trying, like behind the scenes. You should have

0:38:26.440 --> 0:38:28.239
<v Speaker 3>seen us in the twenty minutes leading up to the show,

0:38:28.400 --> 0:38:29.960
<v Speaker 3>just like, oh, we have a graphic for this, We've read,

0:38:30.120 --> 0:38:32.719
<v Speaker 3>we've read, Oh this happened now, It's like it's madness.

0:38:33.400 --> 0:38:36.120
<v Speaker 1>I was recording a football show and I was like,

0:38:36.200 --> 0:38:38.640
<v Speaker 1>behind the scenes, like respond I had were our boy

0:38:38.800 --> 0:38:41.719
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Wormley messaging me the the adlete trade and he

0:38:41.800 --> 0:38:43.680
<v Speaker 1>met He's the one that broke the prospects to me

0:38:43.719 --> 0:38:45.160
<v Speaker 1>and I'm like in the middle of football show, and

0:38:45.160 --> 0:38:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I was like, is this for real? Like it's been

0:38:48.160 --> 0:38:51.279
<v Speaker 1>three hours of Arico and I and by the way,

0:38:51.440 --> 0:38:54.879
<v Speaker 1>not just us Callie and our boys Sal those two

0:38:54.920 --> 0:38:57.680
<v Speaker 1>were working their butts off just getting cool graphics.

0:38:57.680 --> 0:39:00.440
<v Speaker 3>And so that'll be fun. Absolutely when that show comes out.

0:39:00.480 --> 0:39:02.640
<v Speaker 3>I think it's the Bold Prediction show that you were taping.

0:39:02.680 --> 0:39:05.200
<v Speaker 3>It'll be fun for somebody to try and pick up

0:39:05.320 --> 0:39:07.640
<v Speaker 3>when exactly you got that message, just to see if

0:39:07.640 --> 0:39:09.280
<v Speaker 3>they could see your eyes. Possibly.

0:39:09.280 --> 0:39:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't even remember. I was just like a little bit,

0:39:11.040 --> 0:39:13.160
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, shout out to them. Make sure to put

0:39:13.200 --> 0:39:15.560
<v Speaker 1>some love in the in the chat for those guys.

0:39:15.600 --> 0:39:16.000
<v Speaker 3>For sure.

0:39:17.960 --> 0:39:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Barry had said didn't have netto and debtmer staying with

0:39:20.040 --> 0:39:22.239
<v Speaker 1>the Angels on my Bengo card. Yeah, why would you

0:39:22.600 --> 0:39:25.799
<v Speaker 1>actively go and move Joe adell In Jose Soriano and

0:39:25.840 --> 0:39:28.160
<v Speaker 1>then you don't make these move I mean I think

0:39:28.200 --> 0:39:30.759
<v Speaker 1>it would. The telling piece would be the offers just

0:39:30.880 --> 0:39:33.799
<v Speaker 1>simply weren't there, And they probably will entertain it in

0:39:33.840 --> 0:39:35.719
<v Speaker 1>an off season whenever there's baseball again.

0:39:35.840 --> 0:39:38.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but I think they tried to trade Deptmers to

0:39:38.400 --> 0:39:40.160
<v Speaker 3>the Cubs because there was a lot of reporting that

0:39:40.200 --> 0:39:42.000
<v Speaker 3>he was a CUB and it looked official, and then

0:39:42.000 --> 0:39:44.120
<v Speaker 3>it was pulled back, So I think they had something there,

0:39:44.160 --> 0:39:46.920
<v Speaker 3>But I think the Cubs just they already had twelve

0:39:46.920 --> 0:39:49.200
<v Speaker 3>fricking starting pitchers, so they had no more room for

0:39:49.239 --> 0:39:51.440
<v Speaker 3>anymore of them. The homes deal, I guess, was better,

0:39:52.120 --> 0:39:55.080
<v Speaker 3>and I just I don't know. It seemed like he

0:39:55.160 --> 0:39:56.680
<v Speaker 3>was a cub there for like an hour, but I'm

0:39:56.680 --> 0:39:59.640
<v Speaker 3>surprised that something didn't materialize. I wish that Jay's got

0:39:59.640 --> 0:40:02.040
<v Speaker 3>Deptors instead of Soriano, but I won't lead us down

0:40:02.040 --> 0:40:02.680
<v Speaker 3>in that rabbit hole.

0:40:03.680 --> 0:40:06.799
<v Speaker 1>I one hundred percent only read this as sarcasm, so

0:40:06.800 --> 0:40:08.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to assume that he's being sarcastic to me,

0:40:08.880 --> 0:40:10.719
<v Speaker 1>but shout out and if not, you can tell me.

0:40:10.840 --> 0:40:13.640
<v Speaker 1>But shout out to Van Rod, who doubled down and says,

0:40:13.800 --> 0:40:16.960
<v Speaker 1>w the behind the scenes peeps. Absolutely, Van Rod's our cheerleader.

0:40:17.080 --> 0:40:19.960
<v Speaker 1>But I only read things like this in absolute sarcasm,

0:40:20.040 --> 0:40:22.120
<v Speaker 1>like yeah, it's a good story, Welsh like you hate me,

0:40:22.239 --> 0:40:26.560
<v Speaker 1>so okay, thanks, Pete, love you. Am I smart to

0:40:26.640 --> 0:40:29.359
<v Speaker 1>snag Zephyr Jan and Brasa band looking for saves. Yeah,

0:40:29.400 --> 0:40:31.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it's great. I think it's good and speculative.

0:40:31.960 --> 0:40:33.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it's going to be long term

0:40:33.440 --> 0:40:35.880
<v Speaker 1>because I don't I just don't know if they're going

0:40:35.920 --> 0:40:38.520
<v Speaker 1>to go to either one of those guys. But I

0:40:38.520 --> 0:40:41.799
<v Speaker 1>think this is the speculative time. Why wouldn't you so

0:40:42.320 --> 0:40:43.600
<v Speaker 1>if you had a lean, where would you go?

0:40:44.600 --> 0:40:48.279
<v Speaker 3>M so Zephyr John is going to be compete Dana

0:40:48.280 --> 0:40:50.359
<v Speaker 3>Polentsi is going to be back pretty soon.

0:40:50.520 --> 0:40:52.279
<v Speaker 1>That's what I was. Yeah, I kind of a lose.

0:40:52.360 --> 0:40:55.000
<v Speaker 3>And then bras a band. Did he get traded? He

0:40:55.040 --> 0:40:56.799
<v Speaker 3>didn't get traded? Did he? Yeah?

0:40:56.800 --> 0:40:57.400
<v Speaker 1>He got traded.

0:40:57.520 --> 0:40:58.600
<v Speaker 3>Brase band get traded.

0:40:58.640 --> 0:41:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Where I think was the U? Was that the Cubs?

0:41:02.960 --> 0:41:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it was the Cubs.

0:41:03.760 --> 0:41:04.439
<v Speaker 3>Did he go to the Cubs?

0:41:04.480 --> 0:41:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I didn't mention him.

0:41:06.480 --> 0:41:09.200
<v Speaker 3>No, he went to the he went to the White Sox.

0:41:09.239 --> 0:41:10.799
<v Speaker 3>He went to the White Sox. Sorry, he went to

0:41:10.800 --> 0:41:11.360
<v Speaker 3>the White Sox.

0:41:11.400 --> 0:41:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't that's what it is. Oh, yeah, that was

0:41:13.000 --> 0:41:15.040
<v Speaker 1>for Gabe Davis. I forgot about that trade. That was

0:41:15.080 --> 0:41:17.560
<v Speaker 1>for Gabe Davis. So Zephyr Jam would be I think

0:41:17.760 --> 0:41:19.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe the better speculative ad than Brasaman.

0:41:20.640 --> 0:41:23.680
<v Speaker 3>I think I would agree there. When you said Gabe Davis,

0:41:23.680 --> 0:41:25.360
<v Speaker 3>I went, like my brain thought, the football player. I

0:41:25.360 --> 0:41:26.239
<v Speaker 3>don't know what's wrong with me.

0:41:26.600 --> 0:41:29.120
<v Speaker 1>A lot's going on the wide receiver. YEA gave Davis

0:41:30.360 --> 0:41:31.640
<v Speaker 1>starting pitcher for the White Socks.

0:41:31.680 --> 0:41:34.760
<v Speaker 3>I think Zephyr Jhon probably has a better chance because Polentzia,

0:41:34.800 --> 0:41:36.160
<v Speaker 3>there has been a lot of stuff going on with him.

0:41:36.160 --> 0:41:37.560
<v Speaker 3>I just really think Grant Taylor is the guy for

0:41:37.600 --> 0:41:39.319
<v Speaker 3>the White Sox. I don't think anybody's taking that job

0:41:39.360 --> 0:41:40.080
<v Speaker 3>from Grant Taylor.

0:41:41.960 --> 0:41:43.400
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you, So that's why I would go

0:41:43.480 --> 0:41:45.759
<v Speaker 1>with Zephyr Jenn. All Right, we'll do a couple more here,

0:41:46.000 --> 0:41:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Ben Joyce, Ben Joyce Worth Stashing. I've done a lot

0:41:49.120 --> 0:41:52.719
<v Speaker 1>of speaking today and I'm suffering. Yeah, I think that's

0:41:52.760 --> 0:41:55.719
<v Speaker 1>a I mean he's a I think what did he

0:41:55.880 --> 0:41:58.719
<v Speaker 1>just pitching like triple A recently? Like, I think that's

0:41:58.719 --> 0:42:00.520
<v Speaker 1>a decent one down the line, I pick up a

0:42:00.560 --> 0:42:01.560
<v Speaker 1>couple saves.

0:42:01.920 --> 0:42:03.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean you got to wonder how many saves

0:42:03.680 --> 0:42:05.640
<v Speaker 3>the Angels are going to have and if he is

0:42:05.719 --> 0:42:08.279
<v Speaker 3>actually the guy. Maybe he is, maybe he's not. And

0:42:08.640 --> 0:42:10.719
<v Speaker 3>for a bad team like that, you're probably looking at

0:42:10.880 --> 0:42:13.400
<v Speaker 3>just a handful of saves. If you're desperate, then I

0:42:13.400 --> 0:42:14.880
<v Speaker 3>don't have a big problem with it, though.

0:42:15.480 --> 0:42:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I like the job one the job if you're looking

0:42:17.640 --> 0:42:21.040
<v Speaker 1>for starting pitching help, like, there's a couple open spots,

0:42:21.120 --> 0:42:22.080
<v Speaker 1>a couple of yeah.

0:42:21.920 --> 0:42:25.160
<v Speaker 3>And actually that's the perfect time. Actually we don't have

0:42:25.200 --> 0:42:27.719
<v Speaker 3>to do it. But Jack Flaherty posted this hilarious like

0:42:27.800 --> 0:42:30.279
<v Speaker 3>Fresh Prince of bel Air meme where he's just like, oh,

0:42:30.320 --> 0:42:33.839
<v Speaker 3>we're standing in the everybody else everybody else is gone.

0:42:33.840 --> 0:42:35.399
<v Speaker 3>It's funny because he was the one guy who got

0:42:35.400 --> 0:42:37.440
<v Speaker 3>traded a couple of years ago and got himself a

0:42:37.480 --> 0:42:38.760
<v Speaker 3>ring out of it and went back to Detroit.

0:42:39.480 --> 0:42:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, peace out. Should I drop Antonaci in favor of Ramos? I?

0:42:43.400 --> 0:42:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't love the idea, but I think I would.

0:42:46.040 --> 0:42:48.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm very much about Ramos, I am. I. I guess

0:42:48.960 --> 0:42:50.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little bit worried maybe it gets super platoony.

0:42:50.840 --> 0:42:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Someone also asked the question, is Luis Garcia gonna sit?

0:42:54.160 --> 0:42:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Kind of seems like he might that he's gonna be

0:42:57.200 --> 0:43:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the strong side platoon guy and Go is going to

0:43:00.680 --> 0:43:03.520
<v Speaker 1>be the short side platoon. I'm I kind of feel

0:43:03.560 --> 0:43:05.399
<v Speaker 1>like they might try to get him more playing time.

0:43:05.440 --> 0:43:05.799
<v Speaker 2>In there.

0:43:05.880 --> 0:43:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I kind of want to feel that helly O Ramas

0:43:08.200 --> 0:43:10.040
<v Speaker 1>is not going to be positioned where he's going to

0:43:10.080 --> 0:43:12.200
<v Speaker 1>be in a super rotation. But you know the send

0:43:12.200 --> 0:43:14.839
<v Speaker 1>down Spencer Jones. But when Stanton's healthy, it does make

0:43:14.840 --> 0:43:17.799
<v Speaker 1>it complicated. All that being said, I think I really

0:43:17.880 --> 0:43:19.160
<v Speaker 1>like hell Ramos in New York.

0:43:19.960 --> 0:43:23.120
<v Speaker 3>Uh. Yeah, Ramos is going to be really good, but

0:43:23.760 --> 0:43:26.919
<v Speaker 3>Antonacci has also been such a consistent force this year.

0:43:27.000 --> 0:43:30.759
<v Speaker 3>I guess if it doesn't matter for position and the

0:43:30.800 --> 0:43:32.759
<v Speaker 3>fact that Ramos is on the waiver wire, I mean

0:43:32.800 --> 0:43:34.719
<v Speaker 3>it's probably a more of a shallow league. I think

0:43:34.760 --> 0:43:36.359
<v Speaker 3>you can make that swap and see if it works out.

0:43:36.400 --> 0:43:38.480
<v Speaker 3>Ramos is going to get a big boost in that lineup.

0:43:38.480 --> 0:43:41.359
<v Speaker 3>But something else of note, The Yankees lineup has been

0:43:41.440 --> 0:43:43.719
<v Speaker 3>really bad for a couple months now without Judge, so

0:43:43.800 --> 0:43:47.399
<v Speaker 3>it's not as big of a lineup. It's just when

0:43:47.400 --> 0:43:49.600
<v Speaker 3>we think of the Yankees, like they're not like a

0:43:49.640 --> 0:43:51.480
<v Speaker 3>top three lineup right now, like they've been a bottom

0:43:51.480 --> 0:43:52.600
<v Speaker 3>five lineup for a while.

0:43:53.560 --> 0:43:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Dan are going to cover your question here in

0:43:57.040 --> 0:43:58.440
<v Speaker 1>a second. We already kind of did. The last one

0:43:58.480 --> 0:44:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I want to hit. This is interesting is Kate Anderson

0:44:00.800 --> 0:44:05.359
<v Speaker 1>worth a pick up in ten team. He is, But

0:44:05.360 --> 0:44:08.160
<v Speaker 1>but I know where you're going with this. Emerson Hancock

0:44:08.239 --> 0:44:10.760
<v Speaker 1>not getting traded does make this a little bit wonky

0:44:10.840 --> 0:44:13.560
<v Speaker 1>in that they've got their five pitchers. Now I'm a

0:44:13.560 --> 0:44:15.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit worried this is going to feel way more

0:44:15.640 --> 0:44:17.200
<v Speaker 1>piggy I mean, they did tell us it was gonna

0:44:17.200 --> 0:44:19.839
<v Speaker 1>be piggyback, but we were dreaming it wouldn't be in

0:44:19.880 --> 0:44:22.000
<v Speaker 1>a ten team. Yeah, let me retract that ten team.

0:44:22.000 --> 0:44:23.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I am picking him up in a

0:44:23.880 --> 0:44:26.399
<v Speaker 1>twelve team. I would speculate, But even in a twelve team,

0:44:26.440 --> 0:44:28.359
<v Speaker 1>I am a little bit worried that Kate Anderson might

0:44:28.400 --> 0:44:32.719
<v Speaker 1>be more like piggyback on Emerson Hancock. And if Hancock

0:44:32.760 --> 0:44:35.360
<v Speaker 1>goes five and kid comes in, what is he getting

0:44:35.400 --> 0:44:38.560
<v Speaker 1>to about? Some ratios and stuff? So the prospects of

0:44:38.600 --> 0:44:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Kate Anderson look a little bit less exciting.

0:44:41.040 --> 0:44:43.160
<v Speaker 3>Actually, I might retract that again. I might go in

0:44:43.200 --> 0:44:46.000
<v Speaker 3>the opposite direction here, because I think Bryce Miller is

0:44:46.000 --> 0:44:48.560
<v Speaker 3>somebody that we need to be a little bit worried about,

0:44:49.000 --> 0:44:51.160
<v Speaker 3>and maybe not like full blow and worry at all.

0:44:51.200 --> 0:44:53.520
<v Speaker 3>But the last few starts have been really bad for him.

0:44:53.520 --> 0:44:55.799
<v Speaker 3>He started the year when he was pitching middle of

0:44:55.840 --> 0:44:57.920
<v Speaker 3>May at ninety seven miles an hour. His most recent

0:44:57.920 --> 0:45:01.200
<v Speaker 3>start was ninety five to seven. Over his last four starts,

0:45:01.440 --> 0:45:04.960
<v Speaker 3>Bryce Miller has a five forty eight ERA, He has

0:45:05.120 --> 0:45:08.680
<v Speaker 3>a thing is freezing, a twelve percent strikeout rate. He

0:45:08.680 --> 0:45:11.200
<v Speaker 3>has a one to fifty five WHIP. They might piggyback

0:45:11.200 --> 0:45:13.799
<v Speaker 3>Bryce Miller, and if they do that, Ben Anderson might

0:45:13.840 --> 0:45:14.280
<v Speaker 3>be viblent.

0:45:15.040 --> 0:45:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Maybe, but it still feels like the exact same thing

0:45:17.000 --> 0:45:17.160
<v Speaker 1>to me.

0:45:17.160 --> 0:45:17.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:45:17.520 --> 0:45:19.960
<v Speaker 1>He's got a two ADRA and he's got a lower

0:45:20.000 --> 0:45:23.000
<v Speaker 1>expected ERA with a twenty six percent k percentage on

0:45:23.040 --> 0:45:25.359
<v Speaker 1>the year. It's been bad lately, But my problem is

0:45:25.360 --> 0:45:27.040
<v Speaker 1>is the same thing. I don't care who they piggyback.

0:45:27.040 --> 0:45:29.480
<v Speaker 1>If they're piggybacking, I don't feel good about that. If

0:45:29.480 --> 0:45:32.600
<v Speaker 1>they piggyback with Bryce Miller and Bryce starts, if he

0:45:32.680 --> 0:45:34.880
<v Speaker 1>goes four and Kid could come in and steal a

0:45:34.920 --> 0:45:37.000
<v Speaker 1>win away, that's good. But if Bryce goes five and

0:45:37.040 --> 0:45:39.840
<v Speaker 1>they pull him and Kid comes in, unless Kate is

0:45:39.880 --> 0:45:42.160
<v Speaker 1>going the whole way through, I don't know if I

0:45:42.200 --> 0:45:44.040
<v Speaker 1>love that. So ten team, I just think it's more

0:45:44.080 --> 0:45:46.960
<v Speaker 1>dicey than anything. Twelve team I understand the struggle and

0:45:47.000 --> 0:45:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the push, so it's fair, all right. So the last

0:45:49.000 --> 0:45:52.120
<v Speaker 1>thing these are mine. You tell me my big four

0:45:52.520 --> 0:45:55.680
<v Speaker 1>winners for this trade deadline, and I might just not

0:45:55.760 --> 0:45:57.439
<v Speaker 1>be thinking it through and there might be some more.

0:45:57.480 --> 0:46:00.640
<v Speaker 1>But my biggest like fantasy winners is Casey Mei is

0:46:00.640 --> 0:46:04.120
<v Speaker 1>going to San Diego. Luke Weaver's probably number one, actually Pittsburgh.

0:46:04.120 --> 0:46:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I think he's going to be the closer. Joshua Baiaz

0:46:06.960 --> 0:46:08.879
<v Speaker 1>because of the large neup Bar trade, and I think

0:46:08.920 --> 0:46:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Helly O Ramos in New York. I know that's kind

0:46:10.960 --> 0:46:12.800
<v Speaker 1>of a weird. Usually you do like your top five.

0:46:13.160 --> 0:46:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I could probably I stare at this thing here. I

0:46:16.640 --> 0:46:19.799
<v Speaker 1>can maybe say Robbie Ray would be the other one

0:46:19.840 --> 0:46:22.160
<v Speaker 1>of this list. If I'm going through Foster Griffin, you know,

0:46:22.200 --> 0:46:24.759
<v Speaker 1>and I'll say Foster Griffin he has an opportunity to

0:46:24.840 --> 0:46:27.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of maintain his goodness. What is your top five

0:46:27.760 --> 0:46:29.960
<v Speaker 1>or what changes out of that top five beneficiaries?

0:46:31.040 --> 0:46:36.600
<v Speaker 3>So I would say Casey Myz is definitely right up there.

0:46:37.520 --> 0:46:42.719
<v Speaker 3>Adley Ruchman getting out of one dysfunctional organization and going

0:46:42.719 --> 0:46:44.880
<v Speaker 3>to another one. It feels like a win, but it

0:46:44.920 --> 0:46:47.400
<v Speaker 3>might be a little more neutral good ballpark upgrade, though

0:46:49.600 --> 0:46:51.880
<v Speaker 3>Pdter Norby is kind of a low key one who

0:46:52.000 --> 0:46:54.520
<v Speaker 3>might end up being a little bit interesting. I know

0:46:54.560 --> 0:46:57.200
<v Speaker 3>it's been struggle busts for him, but going to Colorado

0:46:57.560 --> 0:46:59.680
<v Speaker 3>is always something that's kind of interesting for hitters. And

0:46:59.680 --> 0:47:02.520
<v Speaker 3>then on the other side, Victor Vadnik is a pitcher

0:47:02.520 --> 0:47:05.040
<v Speaker 3>that I've liked going back three years. Actually the guy

0:47:05.040 --> 0:47:07.560
<v Speaker 3>who put me onto him was Jesse Severe, our good

0:47:07.560 --> 0:47:10.759
<v Speaker 3>friend Jesse Severe. There's been some struggles in Colorado, but

0:47:10.920 --> 0:47:13.920
<v Speaker 3>the skills are there for Victor Vadnick to eventually, I

0:47:13.960 --> 0:47:16.200
<v Speaker 3>think be a closer. I don't think it'll be this year.

0:47:16.640 --> 0:47:18.839
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Pete Fairbanks has struggled a lot, so maybe

0:47:18.840 --> 0:47:20.200
<v Speaker 3>they do give him a chance. But I think that,

0:47:20.640 --> 0:47:23.279
<v Speaker 3>like looking ahead to next season, Victor Vadnik being out

0:47:23.280 --> 0:47:26.040
<v Speaker 3>of Colorado feels like a huge victory, like as a

0:47:26.120 --> 0:47:29.000
<v Speaker 3>cheap closer option that you can draft next year, something

0:47:29.040 --> 0:47:32.200
<v Speaker 3>that I'd really be interested in. And that's kind of it.

0:47:32.280 --> 0:47:34.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I'm still kind of processing everything that happened.

0:47:34.880 --> 0:47:37.600
<v Speaker 3>Antonio Senzetela not so much for fantasy, but a really

0:47:37.600 --> 0:47:41.279
<v Speaker 3>good middle reliever pick up there for Milwaukee, and I

0:47:41.280 --> 0:47:43.240
<v Speaker 3>think as much as I've bagged on him. Jeff Hoffman

0:47:43.800 --> 0:47:45.680
<v Speaker 3>probably will be the closer in Minnesota if you need

0:47:45.680 --> 0:47:48.960
<v Speaker 3>a closer and you've missed out on the tailors and

0:47:49.000 --> 0:47:52.000
<v Speaker 3>the weavers. I know that on the surface things have

0:47:52.080 --> 0:47:54.959
<v Speaker 3>been bad for Hoffman, but the strikeout to walk rates

0:47:54.960 --> 0:47:57.680
<v Speaker 3>have been excellent. He's got a sub three FIP. It

0:47:57.760 --> 0:48:00.400
<v Speaker 3>really was the early season struggles that have loan up

0:48:00.440 --> 0:48:03.720
<v Speaker 3>the entirety of Hoffman's line. But it's a two forty

0:48:03.800 --> 0:48:07.239
<v Speaker 3>nine FIP here, it's a twenty six percent strikeout minus walk. Great.

0:48:07.640 --> 0:48:09.480
<v Speaker 3>I think he will end up getting States for Minnesota.

0:48:10.920 --> 0:48:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I will say if I put Adley in there too.

0:48:13.160 --> 0:48:15.839
<v Speaker 1>I just think that Boston lineup is just hot hot.

0:48:15.880 --> 0:48:18.000
<v Speaker 1>He's going to just be injected right into the middle

0:48:18.040 --> 0:48:20.839
<v Speaker 1>of it. And whether he's hitting, you know, right in

0:48:20.880 --> 0:48:23.759
<v Speaker 1>front of like William and Sedanna, like I just I

0:48:23.920 --> 0:48:27.360
<v Speaker 1>like that spot winners and losers.

0:48:28.840 --> 0:48:30.839
<v Speaker 2>Let's focus on the losers here for a second. What's

0:48:30.880 --> 0:48:31.800
<v Speaker 2>the if you could pick.

0:48:31.680 --> 0:48:34.520
<v Speaker 1>One team that you are disappointed or really surprised that

0:48:34.600 --> 0:48:37.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't make the moves that should have been expected. What's

0:48:37.040 --> 0:48:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the one team you would pick on. I think there's

0:48:38.600 --> 0:48:41.480
<v Speaker 1>a couple of candidates. I think the Brewers are a candidate.

0:48:42.239 --> 0:48:46.719
<v Speaker 1>I think the Braves are a candidate for that. I

0:48:46.760 --> 0:48:49.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know. The Yankees maybe to a smaller degree, kind

0:48:49.200 --> 0:48:52.280
<v Speaker 1>of seem like they could have done more and they didn't. Really,

0:48:53.400 --> 0:48:54.040
<v Speaker 1>who do you got?

0:48:54.400 --> 0:48:56.560
<v Speaker 3>It's got to be the Brewers. I think it has

0:48:56.600 --> 0:48:59.560
<v Speaker 3>to be the Brewers's. It was a shameful, shameful deadline

0:48:59.560 --> 0:49:03.239
<v Speaker 3>for them. Zenzetella was a good pickup Jojo Romero's kind

0:49:03.239 --> 0:49:05.839
<v Speaker 3>of whatever. Dustin May I think is actually pretty good.

0:49:05.840 --> 0:49:08.040
<v Speaker 3>And if you look from outside of his first two

0:49:08.080 --> 0:49:09.799
<v Speaker 3>starts for the year, he's got like a mid three

0:49:09.880 --> 0:49:12.759
<v Speaker 3>z era. He's been pretty serviceable. The fact that you

0:49:12.800 --> 0:49:16.520
<v Speaker 3>didn't even try to get Scoobale, Like, why wouldn't you

0:49:16.560 --> 0:49:18.640
<v Speaker 3>at least make a go for it, You know, you

0:49:18.680 --> 0:49:20.879
<v Speaker 3>don't have to trade made necessarily, might not have even

0:49:20.880 --> 0:49:24.920
<v Speaker 3>had to trade Laura. You traded legitimate prospects to get

0:49:24.960 --> 0:49:28.000
<v Speaker 3>Dustin May, who two deadlines in a row is traded

0:49:28.040 --> 0:49:30.439
<v Speaker 3>for like legitimate prospects, And maybe it ends up working

0:49:30.480 --> 0:49:33.600
<v Speaker 3>out for them, but I don't think it will in

0:49:33.640 --> 0:49:36.520
<v Speaker 3>the long run, just given the entire history of Dustin May,

0:49:36.560 --> 0:49:38.879
<v Speaker 3>like we've seen good stretches. We've seen bad stretches, We've

0:49:38.880 --> 0:49:41.440
<v Speaker 3>seen unusable stretches from him, and they gave away two

0:49:41.520 --> 0:49:44.399
<v Speaker 3>legitimate prospects. That was probably the most angry I saw

0:49:44.480 --> 0:49:49.279
<v Speaker 3>Twitter today about Alexander Fries and let's see, is it Ferguson?

0:49:49.560 --> 0:49:50.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? J just siyah raq.

0:49:51.160 --> 0:49:53.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't know where I got Ferguson from. These are

0:49:53.040 --> 0:49:56.240
<v Speaker 3>both legitimate hitters. Ragsdale is a one sixty one WRC

0:49:56.360 --> 0:49:59.680
<v Speaker 3>plus this year across all levels of the miners, nineteen homers,

0:49:59.680 --> 0:50:03.319
<v Speaker 3>thirty one stolen bases, hitting three sixteen Well free.

0:50:03.280 --> 0:50:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Us is the next guy that moved off a complex

0:50:05.440 --> 0:50:08.160
<v Speaker 1>into a ball super young like people want to do

0:50:08.200 --> 0:50:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the Painia made comps.

0:50:09.880 --> 0:50:12.680
<v Speaker 2>It's not that big, but it was a huge give

0:50:12.960 --> 0:50:13.680
<v Speaker 2>for those guys.

0:50:13.719 --> 0:50:16.040
<v Speaker 1>And you know what, I'm gonna agree with you. If

0:50:16.040 --> 0:50:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I want to be a little parody, I could say

0:50:17.560 --> 0:50:20.719
<v Speaker 1>the Braves, but I think the Brewers were massively disappointing.

0:50:21.040 --> 0:50:23.840
<v Speaker 1>They should have gotten more rotation help. I think the

0:50:23.880 --> 0:50:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Braves had an opportunity as well. I just think those

0:50:26.120 --> 0:50:29.520
<v Speaker 1>two teams were locked into everything. You know, I don't

0:50:29.520 --> 0:50:32.000
<v Speaker 1>know if the Phillies one hundred percent of did what

0:50:32.040 --> 0:50:34.719
<v Speaker 1>they needed to do in what Bryce was asking. But

0:50:34.760 --> 0:50:36.800
<v Speaker 1>they did get one big piece that kind of helped

0:50:36.920 --> 0:50:38.520
<v Speaker 1>move around. But I think they were looking at trying

0:50:38.520 --> 0:50:40.600
<v Speaker 1>to get some starting pitching help. But it's hard for

0:50:40.640 --> 0:50:42.960
<v Speaker 1>me to not look at the Brewers and just be like,

0:50:44.040 --> 0:50:46.399
<v Speaker 1>what were we doing? Like everybody else made the move,

0:50:46.440 --> 0:50:49.120
<v Speaker 1>The Cubs made all the moves right around you, and

0:50:49.160 --> 0:50:51.840
<v Speaker 1>they kind of depleted their systems some in the Brewers

0:50:51.960 --> 0:50:54.520
<v Speaker 1>just bagg of riches they kept in and they just

0:50:54.560 --> 0:50:56.719
<v Speaker 1>feel that they can go down the stretch with the

0:50:56.760 --> 0:50:58.640
<v Speaker 1>pitchers that they had. I just don't love it. I mean,

0:50:58.680 --> 0:51:00.920
<v Speaker 1>if they went at all, great, you know, record and everything,

0:51:00.960 --> 0:51:03.520
<v Speaker 1>but I just don't feel like this is sustainable for them.

0:51:03.760 --> 0:51:06.279
<v Speaker 3>No, I would blame owners of the teams like the

0:51:06.280 --> 0:51:08.360
<v Speaker 3>Brewers a lot more than I would of the owners

0:51:08.360 --> 0:51:10.160
<v Speaker 3>of the Dodgers for what's going to happen next year.

0:51:11.000 --> 0:51:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, you guys can drop your comments below on the

0:51:12.960 --> 0:51:15.919
<v Speaker 1>YouTube side after this is all done for whatever. You guys,

0:51:15.960 --> 0:51:18.160
<v Speaker 1>who are your winners? Who were the guys you hated?

0:51:18.640 --> 0:51:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Who are the trades you love to make? Like I said,

0:51:21.040 --> 0:51:23.600
<v Speaker 1>I got my four that I thought were really big beneficiaries.

0:51:23.640 --> 0:51:27.080
<v Speaker 1>But you guys can drop your comments below. Also, we

0:51:27.160 --> 0:51:29.359
<v Speaker 1>will not be on leaning off on Tuesday, but we'll

0:51:29.400 --> 0:51:31.759
<v Speaker 1>be back on Wednesday, where I will be there and

0:51:31.840 --> 0:51:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm with Bubba. I'm not sure if it's

0:51:33.400 --> 0:51:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Bubba or Bogman, but I will be back on Wednesday.

0:51:36.360 --> 0:51:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Do you look like you know?

0:51:37.719 --> 0:51:40.360
<v Speaker 3>I am off on Wednesday because I'm going to go

0:51:40.400 --> 0:51:42.440
<v Speaker 3>see the food Fighters, so Wednesday, so.

0:51:42.400 --> 0:51:43.960
<v Speaker 1>You just know it's not yet it'll be that's all

0:51:43.960 --> 0:51:44.160
<v Speaker 1>you know.

0:51:44.239 --> 0:51:46.040
<v Speaker 3>I know it would know it will be Bubba. It'll

0:51:46.080 --> 0:51:48.359
<v Speaker 3>be Bubba. I will be singing along to ever Long

0:51:48.440 --> 0:51:49.920
<v Speaker 3>and all the other songs, and you guys will be

0:51:49.960 --> 0:51:50.880
<v Speaker 3>talking baseball.

0:51:51.640 --> 0:51:53.919
<v Speaker 1>We'll do it, Okay, Yeah, Bubba the Bogman's in the chat,

0:51:53.920 --> 0:51:55.440
<v Speaker 1>so he said it's Bubba, so official, So me and

0:51:55.440 --> 0:51:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Bubba on Wednesday. Make sure you guys are subscribed to

0:51:58.120 --> 0:52:00.239
<v Speaker 1>the YouTube channel. We've got a trade video that's to

0:52:00.239 --> 0:52:02.480
<v Speaker 1>be coming out this also on the audio as well,

0:52:02.520 --> 0:52:04.560
<v Speaker 1>giving you this little extra aside. But come and hang

0:52:04.640 --> 0:52:07.560
<v Speaker 1>with us and maybe we'll see some prospect stuff that changes.

0:52:07.560 --> 0:52:09.759
<v Speaker 1>If you want more prospect stuff, check out my show

0:52:09.800 --> 0:52:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Prospect One. I'm going to be talking about all the

0:52:11.680 --> 0:52:15.400
<v Speaker 1>prospects that we're traded, specifically talking them on that show,

0:52:15.680 --> 0:52:17.239
<v Speaker 1>and I'm also going to be doing some stuff with

0:52:17.280 --> 0:52:19.799
<v Speaker 1>Bogman talking more about the trade deadline. So that is it.

0:52:19.800 --> 0:52:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for hanging out with us for

0:52:21.440 --> 0:52:24.080
<v Speaker 1>this little trade deadline special. Thank you to Calli and

0:52:24.160 --> 0:52:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Sal doing the ones and twos and doing all the

0:52:26.080 --> 0:52:28.040
<v Speaker 1>craziness in the background. Thank you guys so much for

0:52:28.040 --> 0:52:30.399
<v Speaker 1>hanging out with us. Enjoy the rest of your day.

0:52:30.480 --> 0:52:31.040
<v Speaker 3>We're out of here.

0:52:31.040 --> 0:52:32.880
<v Speaker 1>That's show riek on Chris Welsh. We'll talk to you

0:52:32.920 --> 0:52:35.440
<v Speaker 1>next time right here on Fantasy Pros MLBE.

0:52:36.440 --> 0:52:39.680
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for listening to the Fantasy Pros Fantasy Baseball podcast.

0:52:39.920 --> 0:52:42.680
<v Speaker 2>If you love the show, the best freeway to support.

0:52:42.360 --> 0:52:45.279
<v Speaker 4>Us is by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts

0:52:45.320 --> 0:52:49.040
<v Speaker 4>or Spotify. Follow us on x, Instagram, and TikTok at

0:52:49.040 --> 0:52:52.000
<v Speaker 4>Fantasy Pros, and subscribe to our YouTube channel at YouTube

0:52:52.000 --> 0:52:54.320
<v Speaker 4>dot com slash Fantasy Pros MLB.