WEBVTT - Ep 145: Charli XCX archive interview revisited – not as bad as we originally thought

0:00:08.360 --> 0:00:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Evening. Everyone, Welcome to Midnight Chats. I'm Greg. I'm here

0:00:11.960 --> 0:00:14.920
<v Speaker 1>with Stuart and Stu. Now, I think I could very

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:17.960
<v Speaker 1>easily say to you, this week's podcast is a cynical

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:21.119
<v Speaker 1>move to revisit an interview from the defining artist of

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:24.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four. Now that this artist and our podcast

0:00:24.200 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 1>have much bigger audiences. What would you say to that

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 1>scandalous accusation. I don't think I could argue with it.

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 2>I think we need to just be upfront with our

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 2>listeners and say we're bringing you an old interview right now.

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>But that old interview is with Charlie XCX, currently the

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:42.560
<v Speaker 1>world's biggest artists.

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 2>Exactly, and she did come on the podcast years ago

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:47.839
<v Speaker 2>in twenty eighteen. We'd love to have her back on.

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure Charlie's listening. Charlie, You're welcome anytime. Actually, let

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 2>me just defend our cynical move. I think this is

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 2>an interesting exercise. We've never played an old interview before,

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 2>but this one is so far back that you know,

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 2>people probably aren't aware it's there. You'd have to troll

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:06.560
<v Speaker 2>through the timeline forever to get to it. And as

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 2>you say, it's with an artist who's having a crazy year.

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 2>I cringed at the idea of listening back to this

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:14.120
<v Speaker 2>because it was so long ago, but I was pleasantly

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:17.400
<v Speaker 2>surprised at the finished product.

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I think first and most important question, where is all

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:22.039
<v Speaker 1>of your Brat merch? By the way, you know you're

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:23.959
<v Speaker 1>not wearing the T shirt and your hat and your

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of temporary tattoos and stuff.

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:27.400
<v Speaker 2>I've got a room for it. Look like that room

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:32.039
<v Speaker 2>in Alan Partridge. Excellent. I'm the biggest fan. I've got

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:33.199
<v Speaker 2>the tattoo on my chest.

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, exactly. Can't see it here, but yeah, yeah

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:39.120
<v Speaker 1>it is there. Obviously. Like by this point, Bratt has

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 1>transcended being an album, hasn't it. It's like turned into

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:47.199
<v Speaker 1>this like seemingly unstoppable cultural phenomenon from the Apple Dance,

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>which you've obviously done a version of. I know that

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 1>on TikTok to Kamela Harris getting the nods to be

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the presidential candidate for the Democrats, and then like changing

0:01:57.200 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 1>all of our social channels to like the Brat a

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>setting all the kind of like artwork and everything else.

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, we thought it'd be fun to revisit this

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>this time that Charlie XCX came on Midnight Chats. I'm

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>sure she is still thinking about it, as you say.

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 2>This is a career highlight. One thing I would just

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:16.400
<v Speaker 2>ask you, Craig, do you think do you think we're

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 2>bratted out? Do you think it's I know everyone was

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 2>quick to say Brad Summer's over, yeah quickly. I there

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 2>are lots of opinion pieces about that, but do you

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 2>think generally speaking, because you know we are, we are

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 2>bringing this out and we're talking a bit, We're talking

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 2>about this episode on this podcast. We're going to play

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:37.639
<v Speaker 2>the episode. We're going to come back at the end

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:40.240
<v Speaker 2>and talk a little bit about our findings on it.

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 2>But are we in danger of just people being like,

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 2>for fux sake, not brat again. I'm over it. I'm

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 2>sick of it because I feel like maybe we are

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 2>getting to that point and maybe we have passed. Maybe

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 2>there's just a bad decision.

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:59.679
<v Speaker 1>What you're saying, we're sharing our Charlie XCX interview when

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 1>it's all about to disappear, Well maybe, but like, yeah,

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 1>we aren't we at the start of bratt Autumn. Like

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Charlie XX said, there's going to be like another remix

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 1>she's just had the biggest song off this whole campaign,

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the guest remix with Billie Eilisch. Obviously that's like been

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the biggest, sort of highest charting. So she's going to

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:21.400
<v Speaker 1>be thinking of ideas to try and keep it going, right,

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>She's not going to just kind of like let it,

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 1>let it fizzle off. Yeah, So I don't know. Yeah,

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:29.359
<v Speaker 1>I would say that like Bratt's summer is definitely over.

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:32.800
<v Speaker 1>But what's the next for the Bratt era? I'm not

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>quite sure? Can you, like, before we play this out too,

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 1>can you remind us so like set the scene, like

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>when was it that you went to go and meet Charlie,

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Like where was it and what was happening in her

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 1>world at this point?

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 2>So this is in twenty eighteen, around October early November time.

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:53.840
<v Speaker 2>It was that it was at her record label, which

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 2>is Warner Records. I think it was at Atlantic at

0:03:56.920 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 2>their office, and it was quite stress. That's what I

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 2>remember it. This is why I didn't want to listen

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 2>back to it, because when we do this podcast, we

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 2>say to the artists and to their teams that we

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 2>need about an hour really to talk to them, to

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 2>get into it and to be able to edit it

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 2>into something where we're not losing too much of it,

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 2>and that was sort of agreed, and I got there.

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:18.720
<v Speaker 2>It was quite early in the morning. That's quite rare

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 2>as well. We don't tend to do these first thing

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 2>in the morning. But I got to Atlantic Records, a huge,

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:27.039
<v Speaker 2>sort of glossy mainstream label.

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Big glass, funky building.

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:30.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, lots of TVs in the walls and ed sheer

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 2>and post us.

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Up a bit like your bedroom.

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's already quite you know, an alien and intense

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 2>environment anyway, But she had all of her team around her.

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 2>She was in between albums. Her self titled album wasn't

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:48.159
<v Speaker 2>going to come out for another year yet, but she

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 2>had just released a song called nineteen ninety nine. We

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 2>were being crushed on time because she was about to

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 2>go to Radio one to do an interview on whatever

0:04:56.520 --> 0:05:00.080
<v Speaker 2>the show is after the breakfast show, I guess. So

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 2>it was all a little bit rushed and there were

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:07.479
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people buzzing around. Normally, when we do

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 2>these interviews, it's normally just us and the artist, isn't it.

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:11.839
<v Speaker 2>They come to us or we go to them, and

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 2>it's just us in a room, and that way we

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:18.360
<v Speaker 2>can just get into it. There's no pressure, no one's

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 2>feeling a bit self conscious or weird. And I think

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 2>Charlie is probably used to loads of her team being

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:25.599
<v Speaker 2>in the room when she gives interviews, but I wasn't.

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 2>And we were sat opposite each other in a very

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 2>corporate but trendy room that made this room in a

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 2>big class office look a bit like a club, like

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:39.839
<v Speaker 2>a lounge, just like a place. It's I think it

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:43.040
<v Speaker 2>was called the artist's lounge, right, So it's where artists

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 2>when they come in they can play on a PlayStation

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:50.720
<v Speaker 2>and they's so and it was in there we were

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:54.600
<v Speaker 2>sat opposite each other, and I distinctly remember I presume

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 2>it was her manager at the time. I'm not sure

0:05:56.240 --> 0:05:58.679
<v Speaker 2>if she's got the same manager. I'm not all lovely people,

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 2>I should say that, but her manager was sat over

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 2>her shoulder in my eyeline. So I'm talking to I'm

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 2>talking to her, and behind is a dude sat there

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 2>sort of looking at me, sometimes looking away on his phone.

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:18.479
<v Speaker 1>So it was weird. It was weird, okay, So, and

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 1>what did you make of Charlie? More importantly, that's where

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:23.040
<v Speaker 1>you were and when it happened. But what did he

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:23.479
<v Speaker 1>make of it?

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:26.719
<v Speaker 2>I think she's quite intimidating. You know, she's very cool, Like,

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 2>she's an extremely cool person. She's a fair bit younger

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:32.800
<v Speaker 2>than me. She's had ten years younger than me, so

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 2>I was probably aware of that. I was getting the

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 2>feeling of being like, oh, you don't want to be

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 2>doing this, you don't want to be talking to me.

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 2>But then when I listened back to it, I realized that,

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:47.839
<v Speaker 2>actually she doesn't sound as bored as I thought she

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 2>was during it.

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, listen, I think there's a lot of interesting stuff

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 1>on this. In reflection, like you said, we dug this

0:06:57.240 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>out of the archive, and we before we even decided

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:01.280
<v Speaker 1>to share it, we were like, let's go back and

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 1>listen to it, figure out, you know, what was going

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 1>on there. And I actually think it's really interesting and

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 1>quite revealing. So we're going to talk about that afterwards.

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>But here it is. This is Stuart Stubbs in conversation

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>with Charlie XCX, with a note saying this was from

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:16.239
<v Speaker 1>twenty eighteen.

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 3>I live half in la half in London, but I've

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 3>been over in the States a lot, just because I've

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 3>been on this tour with Taylor swift, sure, and we

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 3>were doing the US leg so it's easier for me

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 3>to be based out of the US right now. And

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:41.280
<v Speaker 3>when I write, I tend to write a lot in La, right, Yeah.

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 2>What side of the city do you live in there?

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 3>I live in Beechwood Canyon, which is sort of right

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:50.600
<v Speaker 3>underneath the Hollywood sign, so nice. Yeah, it's very green

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 3>around there, and you can actually walk a lot and

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 3>you can do hiking, and there's quite a lot of.

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 4>Europeans who live up there, which is nice, a lot

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 4>of Swedes.

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 2>I was in La this summer on holiday. I stayed

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 2>in Silver Lake.

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 4>Very cool.

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:11.680
<v Speaker 2>But that's the cool side, isn't it the hipside?

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 2>But we I'd never been to Beverly Hills, so we

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 2>drove around Beverly Hills for the first time. What did

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 2>you think it's weird? Right?

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean I don't go there that often, but yeah,

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 3>it is a bit odd.

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 2>I felt it was. It's kind of creepy because there's

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 2>no pavements, right, because they didn't want anyone there, right, No,

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 2>So it's really I'd always wanted to go and see

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 2>what it was like, and it actually made me think

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't want to live here. If I could live anywhere,

0:08:37.840 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't think I would live there.

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, I think the thing with la is

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:46.080
<v Speaker 3>like it's a great city when you know a lot

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 3>of people and when you have a lot of friends

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 3>there and when you're actually like doing stuff. But I

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 3>think if you're not doing anything and you don't really

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 3>know anyone, it can be quite isolating and lonely, just

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:02.440
<v Speaker 3>because you can't really walk around places. There isn't really

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 3>that much like history there. I mean, there's a lot

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:09.439
<v Speaker 3>of Hollywood history and a lot of very interesting and

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 3>fun things have happened there, but in terms of like,

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 3>you know, you're not like walking around and seeing the

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 3>sights because you can't really walk, and also there aren't

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:19.600
<v Speaker 3>that many sites, do you know what I mean?

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, sure, That's what I felt was weird about.

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 2>What I thought was strange about Beverly Hills and bell

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:28.560
<v Speaker 2>Air was how isolated those people must fill in their

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:31.320
<v Speaker 2>massive houses because they probably.

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:33.320
<v Speaker 4>Don't care though, because they're like, oh, I'm in my

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 4>nice house.

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah I suppose.

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:37.840
<v Speaker 3>But I think that it's a city where you can

0:09:37.880 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 3>really make what you want of it. Like when I

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:44.320
<v Speaker 3>started going there when I was sixteen to record, and

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 3>I was so lonely when I went there because I

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:51.559
<v Speaker 3>couldn't party. There was no uber, so everything was such

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:54.720
<v Speaker 3>a nightmare to get to and I didn't really know anyone.

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:58.840
<v Speaker 3>And now I really really enjoy it there, just because

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 3>I've built up such an amazing group of friends and

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 3>most of them work in music, so it's like very

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:07.840
<v Speaker 3>collaborative and really fun.

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 4>And I found like a nice little.

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 3>Kind of space there that feels really homely and creative.

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:18.680
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, I think it's really a place where it's

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:21.200
<v Speaker 3>like you can make it into something really amazing if

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 3>you like avoid all the kind of scary scary like

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:25.840
<v Speaker 3>Hollywood hell holes, you know.

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, yeah, What do you miss from each place?

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:31.680
<v Speaker 2>When you're in LA What do you miss about London?

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:33.079
<v Speaker 2>And when you're when you're here, what do you miss

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 2>about La?

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 3>When I'm here, I definitely miss being able to go

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 3>into a restaurant and literally order anything.

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 2>Even if it's off menu.

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:46.479
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I mean, I think the best thing about America

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 3>is you can, and especially La is you can go

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 3>into a restaurant and you can say, can I get

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 3>the burger please? But can I get it with avocado?

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 3>With bacon. Can I get it with no bun? Can

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 3>I sub the fries for a salad? And can I

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:06.080
<v Speaker 3>get like you just changed the whole thing.

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:07.960
<v Speaker 2>Did it take your while to get used to that?

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:11.119
<v Speaker 4>Because no, because I'm greedy. I was like in there straight.

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:17.559
<v Speaker 2>Away everything the kind of the Brita and me wouldn't

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:19.840
<v Speaker 2>do that, do you know what I mean? Too polite

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:22.319
<v Speaker 2>even if I'm like allergic to nuts and it comes

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 2>to can I just take the hit on it?

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 2>No, I just got embraced. I didn't realize it was

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 2>actually a real thing. We can do that.

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 4>It's really easy to do. So I missed that.

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 3>And I also, this is weird, This is very La

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:41.440
<v Speaker 3>of me.

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 4>I miss that. So in La it's like.

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 3>A genuine conversation people will have that is a real

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:56.719
<v Speaker 3>conversation that people really care about is talking about restaurants.

0:11:56.920 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 3>Like people love to talk about restaurants in La.

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:03.320
<v Speaker 4>But it's like not just small talk, it's like they care.

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 3>It's like they'll be like, have you been to that

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:08.320
<v Speaker 3>restaurant on blah blah blah or in Lah Lah La Lah,

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 3>And did you get the thing? Did you get the

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 3>Brussels spouts? And they'll be like, Oh, I haven't tried

0:12:12.160 --> 0:12:13.959
<v Speaker 3>the Brussel spouts. Oh you should try the Brussels spouts.

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:15.840
<v Speaker 3>Did you try the Brussel spouts at this restaurant? And

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 3>it's like a genuine conversation that people really care about

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:22.080
<v Speaker 3>and it's so stupid and pointless, but I kind of

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:23.959
<v Speaker 3>really like it. But if you did that in London,

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 3>people would be like, what the fuck are they talking?

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 2>It's like their equivalent of us talking about the weather

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 2>all the time.

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 3>But it's not because I feel like weather chat is

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:32.960
<v Speaker 3>a bit yah, it's a bit like oh what do

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 3>we do?

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 4>Let's talk about the weather.

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 3>This is like an in depth conversation that can go

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:38.680
<v Speaker 3>on for half an hour and it's a real like

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 3>and people really care about it. People are like, oh,

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:43.199
<v Speaker 3>like that's I will check out that restaurant.

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 4>So I kind of miss that. It's so stupid and

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 4>pointless though, But.

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:49.559
<v Speaker 3>Then when I'm in LA I really you know what,

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 3>Like I came back yesterday to the UK from New

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:55.440
<v Speaker 3>York and I was standing in an elevator this morning

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:58.560
<v Speaker 3>and I was just like listening to two guys talking

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:02.080
<v Speaker 3>the lift, and I missed like people being really British

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 3>British accents. I miss like the crispness of the air here.

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 3>I miss the sarcasm a lot. Like people in la

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 3>are not sarcastic. They are so like hay, like yeah,

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 3>it's really annoying. Like I just I miss like a

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:24.080
<v Speaker 3>sarcastic British like dark sense of humor.

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 2>You know, because you grew up in Essex.

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 4>Yes, whereabouts?

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:33.199
<v Speaker 2>I grew up in South End?

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:36.520
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I grew up in Bishop Staltford. I've been to

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 3>South End Peter Pan Ride, Yeah, did.

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 2>You go when it was still I think they've changed

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 2>the name now.

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 4>Have they. I haven't been for a while, long time,

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 4>long time.

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:46.559
<v Speaker 2>What do you think of South End?

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 4>I mean I loved it.

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of it's kind of it's gone down here,

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:52.199
<v Speaker 2>I think.

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 4>Has it?

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 3>I mean when I was younger, so I lived I

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 3>lived in I lived actually out just outside of Bishop Stalford,

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 3>but like Bishop Stalford.

0:13:59.880 --> 0:14:01.200
<v Speaker 4>Was in my town or whatever.

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 3>But I couldn't really like walk anywhere from my house,

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 3>so it was like I was just like in my

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 3>house until I could like drive. So that's why I

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 3>really enjoyed like going to South End, going to Brighton

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 3>and it was fun because you could like walk around

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 3>or you can do stuff. It was like magical, magical places,

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:18.080
<v Speaker 3>you know.

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 2>So what were you up to? Where As you say

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 2>you were pretty much housebound? Is that when you started

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 2>making music because you were I did?

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:28.400
<v Speaker 4>You know?

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:31.080
<v Speaker 3>I started making music not because I couldn't like go out,

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 3>but more because I think I just wanted to, Like

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 3>I just wanted a creative outlet, and this felt most natural.

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 4>And music was a way of me being cool kind of.

0:14:49.080 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 3>Like I made music because it was like escapism and

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 3>I felt cool doing it and I wasn't really that cool,

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, so making music was like wow, like it's cool,

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 3>I can do this. And I think when I was younger,

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 3>I was really just trying to like emulate people who

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 3>I admired, which I think, you know, I think we

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 3>do a lot when we were younger, in any sort

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 3>of field or walk of life. But yeah, it just

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:22.720
<v Speaker 3>felt like escapism and it felt good.

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Because you also went to Slade Fine Art College.

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 4>I did.

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 2>That's a hard college to get into, right, Yes, what

0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 2>was your what was your medium? Your art medium?

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 4>So my time at Slade was very it was.

0:15:43.720 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 3>It was hard, like I because I didn't do a foundation.

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 3>So I didn't really understand art school at all. I

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 3>didn't have the language, I didn't really have the skill set.

0:15:56.960 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 3>I didn't know how to talk about art, and I

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 3>also didn't really understand any of the bullshit, like art

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 3>is so much bullshit and chat, you know, And now

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 3>knowing that now I think I would have had I

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 3>would have so much more fun there. But honestly, when

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 3>I was younger, I was just very intimidated by people

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 3>and scared.

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 4>And that is like number one red flag of art school.

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 4>You can't show.

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 3>Your fear, you know, because then they just eat you alive.

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 3>So I didn't really understand that it was all just

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 3>one big game. So I went and I dropped out

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 3>after like a year and a half actually because my

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 3>music started happening for me.

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 2>Were you painting or were you a sculpture?

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 4>I was sort of.

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 3>So when I went and I interviewed there, my portfolio

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 3>was really heavy on video art and installations and photography

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 3>not really that I'd done, but the picture's pictures of me, And.

0:16:57.320 --> 0:17:00.040
<v Speaker 4>It was mainly like it was mainly I was making.

0:16:59.880 --> 0:17:02.640
<v Speaker 3>A videos and I was making installations, but it was

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:05.120
<v Speaker 3>funny like I did this photo shoot with Rankin and

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 3>the Supposo shoot with David Bailey, and I put it

0:17:07.320 --> 0:17:10.719
<v Speaker 3>in my portfoilio, which was like really stupid, and they

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 3>were like, oh wow, and yeah, I was like, it's

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 3>but I said it was them. I was like, this

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:18.359
<v Speaker 3>is a collaboration that I'd done with David Bailey. Like

0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:22.639
<v Speaker 3>I totally lied. But then the video, art and the

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:25.359
<v Speaker 3>installations were all made by me. But then when I

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 3>got in I just sort of like suddenly decided that

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:31.159
<v Speaker 3>I wanted to paint, which I'd never done before. I

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 3>was terrible at didn't know anything about painting. I didn't

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:35.919
<v Speaker 3>know how to stretch canvas, I didn't know how to

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:38.199
<v Speaker 3>didn't know what primer was, like the whole I was

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:42.400
<v Speaker 3>just such a rookie and so I'm not really sure

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 3>why I didn't. I think it's because I had a

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:48.120
<v Speaker 3>friend in who was doing painting, and I was like, oh, okay,

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:49.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm really afraid of everyone.

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:51.359
<v Speaker 4>I'm just going to stick with you, which wasn't really

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:52.399
<v Speaker 4>the best idea.

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 3>In hindsight, I think if I'd gone and done video

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 3>and installations, I probably would have had more fun.

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, I didn't.

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:07.160
<v Speaker 2>So how did you set up a shoot with Rankin

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 2>and David Bailey. How does that come about?

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:09.160
<v Speaker 4>Oh?

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 3>Well that was because I was so I went to

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:17.399
<v Speaker 3>Slade when I was like nineteen eighteen maybe, and so

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:19.679
<v Speaker 3>I'd been making music since I was sixteen, so I

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:23.879
<v Speaker 3>was already doing shoots and I'd signed my deal, so

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 3>I was always already doing like press and things, you know.

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 3>So it was just the David Bailey the Ranking shoot

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 3>was the first shoot I ever did, and that.

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:35.199
<v Speaker 4>Just came about.

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 3>Hit his team or whatever contacted me directly, and he

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 3>was making this book called Destroy where he basically shot

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 3>a load of artists and then we had to destroy

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:51.440
<v Speaker 3>the image, whether that was like cutting it up or

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 3>editing it or burning it or whatever. I made mine

0:18:55.000 --> 0:19:00.040
<v Speaker 3>into a college and then it got printed in the

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:03.199
<v Speaker 3>book alongside the original. So that was that kind of

0:19:03.280 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 3>was a collaboration.

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:06.439
<v Speaker 4>So I kind of didn't lie about that one that counts.

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 3>And then the David Bailey one was just a shoot

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 3>for Interview magazine and Vogue.

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 4>That sort of lie.

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 2>It was a good, good lie. Yeah, well yeah, I.

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:14.840
<v Speaker 4>Mean it was.

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:17.159
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I guess if I hadn't been there, the

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:18.360
<v Speaker 3>image wouldn't have happened.

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 4>So it's a collaboration in that sort of way.

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:24.359
<v Speaker 2>It I think that counts. Is it true that you

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 2>were playing warehouse parties from like fourteen?

0:19:28.680 --> 0:19:28.920
<v Speaker 3>Yes?

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 2>Is that true?

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:30.160
<v Speaker 4>It's true.

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Wow, what can you remember from that? That must have

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 2>been intense, because I raised intense when you're twenty four.

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:40.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it was like the coolest thing that had

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 3>ever happened to me. Like I was so like excited

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 3>to go and play, and I was so kind of.

0:19:47.720 --> 0:19:50.399
<v Speaker 4>Awe struck by all of the people.

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:53.240
<v Speaker 3>There and the clothes they were wearing, and the drugs

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:56.920
<v Speaker 3>they were taking and the music that was being played.

0:19:57.080 --> 0:20:02.440
<v Speaker 3>Like it was so exciting and so cool. I honestly like, Mike,

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 3>because you know, this was happening when I was fourteen.

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:08.960
<v Speaker 3>My main reference point was Skins, So I was like,

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:10.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm in an episode of Skins.

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 4>This is crazy, you know. And my other reference point

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 4>was sort of watching.

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 3>MySpace and looking at all of the profiles of artists

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 3>I liked, particularly like a lot of artists signed to

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:26.399
<v Speaker 3>ed Banger, and like looking at like pictures of ed

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:27.680
<v Speaker 3>Banger parties and stuff.

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:30.880
<v Speaker 4>I was like, whoa, Like I'm in that in London.

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:33.119
<v Speaker 3>But the only thing that was sort of like getting

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 3>my buzz was like my parents would come with.

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 4>Me right sore.

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:39.200
<v Speaker 2>They cool though, Yeah, they were. They didn't like kind

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:39.960
<v Speaker 2>of no they.

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 4>I mean they were around, but they weren't like smothering,

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:42.720
<v Speaker 4>you know.

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:44.880
<v Speaker 3>They were very supportive and I think they also really

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 3>enjoyed it as well, because my dad was kind of

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 3>like reliving his youth and my mum was just sort

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 3>of like what the fuck is going on?

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:56.600
<v Speaker 4>But it was cool. Yeah, they were, they were supportive.

0:20:56.960 --> 0:20:59.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we would stay till late. We would stay at all,

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:01.120
<v Speaker 3>like six am. It was kind of what I old.

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:03.520
<v Speaker 2>Actually you were trying to drag them home.

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:05.200
<v Speaker 4>You're like, yeah, I was like, guys.

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 2>We've got to go now. Yeah, and do you always?

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean that kind of all makes sense with what

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:14.440
<v Speaker 2>your your music is now and like ed banger and

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 2>that you can hear that in your in your music,

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 2>but your music is also kind of unapologetically pop music.

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:24.240
<v Speaker 2>The fact that you're definitely a pop star, but you're

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 2>you've been embraced by the pitchforks of the world who

0:21:27.080 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't necessarily write about Taylor Swift, but they will write

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 2>about you. Why do you think that is that that

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:33.920
<v Speaker 2>hip for want of a better word, world has kind

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 2>of loves loves your music.

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:39.640
<v Speaker 4>I don't know really honestly.

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:43.359
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think I'm a very good creator, and

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 3>I always try my best to work with people who

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:54.679
<v Speaker 3>are you know, new and exciting and people who are

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 3>really pushing the sounds in the field that they work in,

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 3>you know. And I never want to work with anybody

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 3>just because somebody's telling me there the newest, coolest thing,

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 3>or they've got a number one or anything like. I'm

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 3>not interested in that. I'm really interested in building like

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 3>a community of people around me who are all very

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:22.959
<v Speaker 3>like minded in the way that we think about music

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 3>and the way that we create things. And I've always,

0:22:26.840 --> 0:22:28.679
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, I've just been true to myself in

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:33.160
<v Speaker 3>that sense, especially over the past three years. And I

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 3>think that audiences now more than ever, really love authenticity,

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 3>and I'm always very authentic to myself. So maybe that's

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:47.359
<v Speaker 3>why some people gravitate towards it. I don't really know,

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 3>but I think also like in general.

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 2>Like pop is cool, yeah it is now.

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah it wasn't.

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 3>It wasn't like ten years ago or whatever, but like

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:01.880
<v Speaker 3>pop's cool now, Like Taylor Swift is cool you know,

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 3>like nineteen eighty nine is, like I would say, like

0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:09.440
<v Speaker 3>a very cool record, Like a lot of my friends

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:17.320
<v Speaker 3>who make like very weird like electronic noise.

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 4>Music love that.

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:22.359
<v Speaker 3>Love Taylor Swift and love that album so much because

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 3>I think it's it's great. It's excellent pop music with

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:31.120
<v Speaker 3>great production and great lyrics and yeah, so I think

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:34.159
<v Speaker 3>pops just considered cool now as well, you know, so

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 3>people are less afraid to attach themselves to it.

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:39.200
<v Speaker 2>How was the Taylor Swift tour? Is it finished?

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:42.280
<v Speaker 3>Now? It's not finished. It's actually the US leg is

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:45.199
<v Speaker 3>finished and the UK leg is done. So we go

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:50.640
<v Speaker 3>to Australia for like a couple of weeks, three weeks,

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 3>and New Zealand and then Japan and then we're done.

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 2>And then you're done. How's it been?

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:59.680
<v Speaker 4>It's been long. We started in May and we ended

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 4>that of November. It's been really good though.

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's like she's very welcoming and we knew

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:08.639
<v Speaker 3>each other beforehand, and Kamila and I are close and

0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 3>have written together and know each other quite well. So

0:24:10.560 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 3>it feels it feels like, you know, sometimes you do

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:18.080
<v Speaker 3>big tours where you don't really like see each other

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:19.119
<v Speaker 3>and you don't really speak.

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 4>You just kind of like do the show and that's it.

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 3>But it feels like a kind of group of friends

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 3>like on tour, which is nice.

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:30.440
<v Speaker 2>YEA, Because you've done other big ones, you know, did

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 2>you tour with cole Play or you opened a show.

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 4>I did a tour with them a long time ago.

0:24:35.920 --> 0:24:38.440
<v Speaker 2>Because I mean that's as big. I mean, that's big. Yeah,

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 2>that's big, Katie Perry, that's big. Do you like the

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:44.360
<v Speaker 2>big ones honestly?

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:47.199
<v Speaker 3>Like A, No, I actually, I mean I don't not

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 3>like them, otherwise we wouldn't do it. But I do

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:52.440
<v Speaker 3>prefer you know, I think anyone prefers playing their own show.

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:52.920
<v Speaker 2>Sure.

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:57.400
<v Speaker 3>So I actually have sort of decided now after this

0:24:58.240 --> 0:25:02.440
<v Speaker 3>tour with Taylor, I won't open for anyone again.

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:03.640
<v Speaker 2>Really, this is the last one.

0:25:03.720 --> 0:25:04.480
<v Speaker 4>This is the last one.

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:07.400
<v Speaker 3>And it's not because any of the tours I've opened

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 3>for people and have been bad experiences. They've actually all

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:12.959
<v Speaker 3>been really great experiences. It's just like I'm I feel

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:16.879
<v Speaker 3>like I'm that's just I'm done with that now, you know,

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:20.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm ready. Whilst I've been on Taylor's tour, I've also

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 3>done some of my own shows and they felt more

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:29.199
<v Speaker 3>exciting than ever, and I feel like I really just

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:31.120
<v Speaker 3>want to put the time into that now.

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 2>That's the thing. I guess if you're going on tour

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 2>for the whole year with somebody else, it's taking time,

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:37.320
<v Speaker 2>isn't it.

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:41.400
<v Speaker 4>It takes time. It really does take time, and it's hard.

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 3>To be motivated to do other things because you're very tired,

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:51.880
<v Speaker 3>and you're often in like Buffalo or like Minneapolis where

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:52.960
<v Speaker 3>they're maybe aren't.

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:54.159
<v Speaker 4>Like the best studios.

0:25:54.160 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 3>They are a great There are good studios, but it's

0:25:56.040 --> 0:25:58.920
<v Speaker 3>not like the same and their producers are in la

0:25:59.200 --> 0:26:02.359
<v Speaker 3>or in Sweden, and you're sending stuff back and forth,

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 3>which I'm into, like I've made a lot of pop

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 3>two like that, But yeah, it's hard to sometimes it's

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:12.359
<v Speaker 3>hard to be like creative when you're kind of like

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:19.200
<v Speaker 3>moving around the middle of America.

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:21.399
<v Speaker 2>Because you write a lot for a lot of people

0:26:21.440 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 2>as well. Is that something you can do on the road.

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 4>It depends really.

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 3>If it depends if someone's like sending you a track

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 3>to write over, then yes. But if it's like it's hard,

0:26:35.080 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean, yeah, you need to sort of go into

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 3>the studio sometimes for that kind of thing.

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 4>So it is it's not always easy?

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:46.120
<v Speaker 2>You wrote two songs for the last Blondie record. Yes,

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:48.679
<v Speaker 2>what was that like? Well, is that entailed? Does that

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:50.880
<v Speaker 2>entail like you're just submitting a song?

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 3>Well?

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:55.159
<v Speaker 3>Actually, basically Chris reached out to me and was like,

0:26:55.280 --> 0:26:59.199
<v Speaker 3>we love you and your stuff and we're making this

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:03.360
<v Speaker 3>album and sent me this like list of like mad

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 3>references and was like, do you have anything, and I

0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:13.199
<v Speaker 3>sent two songs. God, it was honestly so broad. It

0:27:13.320 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 3>was like the most broad list of references ever. It

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:17.240
<v Speaker 3>was like they were like, we're.

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 4>Working with CEA, but we're also interested in like Latin.

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:23.400
<v Speaker 3>Songs, and like Debbie's favorite song is lean On by

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 3>Major Laser, and then like you know, referencing some of

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 3>their stuff. It was like just really crazy.

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:33.400
<v Speaker 4>And I was like, ah, like what is happening?

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:37.719
<v Speaker 3>And so I just sent these two songs that i'd

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:41.000
<v Speaker 3>actually made when I was fourteen, and I just sent

0:27:41.040 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 3>them through and they were like, we really like these

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:47.080
<v Speaker 3>and we want to kind of mess with them and.

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:48.720
<v Speaker 4>Make them our own. So they did that.

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:51.159
<v Speaker 3>We never actually went to the studio together, right, but

0:27:51.240 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 3>I've met Debbie and Chris numerous times and they've always

0:27:56.080 --> 0:28:01.359
<v Speaker 3>been really supportive of me, and and I was just

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:04.720
<v Speaker 3>really happy when they did their thing with.

0:28:04.720 --> 0:28:06.680
<v Speaker 4>The songs, and I went to their show at the

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:07.480
<v Speaker 4>Roundhouse in.

0:28:07.400 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 3>London with my mum and dad, and my mom was

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 3>like freaking out, Oh my god.

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:17.920
<v Speaker 4>You know what. Debbie actually came to my Pop two.

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 3>Show in New York and she came backstage she met

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:23.320
<v Speaker 3>my parents and my.

0:28:23.320 --> 0:28:24.920
<v Speaker 4>Dad was like freaking out.

0:28:25.040 --> 0:28:27.199
<v Speaker 3>It was really funny because my dad's met like a

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:29.159
<v Speaker 3>lot of artists through me, but I've never seen him

0:28:29.160 --> 0:28:30.760
<v Speaker 3>really kind of like lose his shit before.

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:33.879
<v Speaker 4>And he was like, oh my god, like I'm such

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:35.879
<v Speaker 4>a huge fan. I was like, all right, Dad, play it.

0:28:35.840 --> 0:28:40.120
<v Speaker 2>Cool man, come on, you like stuff embarrassing. Yeah, that's

0:28:40.120 --> 0:28:41.560
<v Speaker 2>amazing though that they've got a song on the record

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:42.880
<v Speaker 2>that you wrote when you were fourteen.

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:45.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's nuts. It's cool.

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 2>And the other thing I just wanted to quickly ask

0:28:47.120 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 2>you about was you have synesthesia, which, for listeners who

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 2>might not know what that is, it's seeing music in colors. Correct,

0:28:56.160 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 2>And there are some colors that you that you like

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:01.239
<v Speaker 2>more than others. Right, Yes, so you like songs that

0:29:01.280 --> 0:29:05.160
<v Speaker 2>are like pinks and purples, yes, but you hate greens

0:29:05.160 --> 0:29:05.680
<v Speaker 2>and browns.

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I've changed my opinion on green though, Okay, just

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 3>because my whole new single is like based around the

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 3>color green.

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:17.000
<v Speaker 2>So what for reference? What is what? To you? Is

0:29:17.000 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 2>a what is a what is a pink and purple song?

0:29:19.560 --> 0:29:21.360
<v Speaker 2>Then what what kind of Okay?

0:29:21.400 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 4>So pink and purple song to me is like the Cure?

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:29.560
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Like Boys Don't Cry would be very like pinky

0:29:29.640 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 3>purple song.

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 4>Or Pictures of You.

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:37.480
<v Speaker 3>Also, like Blackout by Britney Spears, that whole album is

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 3>kind of like pink and purple R.

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:42.960
<v Speaker 4>But then like brown and green.

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:48.320
<v Speaker 3>And this is like tough because I've kind of changed

0:29:48.320 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 3>my opinion on this, but like Pitbull would be brown

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:55.280
<v Speaker 3>and green. But I actually really love Pitbull now, I

0:29:55.360 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 3>kind of think he's great. Ag Cook really like turn

0:29:58.240 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 3>me onto Pitbull. He was like, you need to like

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 3>get over this and like really think about how good

0:30:02.400 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 3>Pitbull is, and I kind of agree.

0:30:05.040 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, I guess.

0:30:06.920 --> 0:30:10.600
<v Speaker 2>It's really hard because it's probably impossible to describe this.

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 2>But what is it that makes Pitbull green and brown?

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 3>I think it's like the tonality and like there's certain

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:21.440
<v Speaker 3>like production.

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 4>Choices and the chords.

0:30:23.200 --> 0:30:26.600
<v Speaker 3>Okay, it's it's hard for me to explain because I'm

0:30:26.680 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 3>actually not that good at music theory.

0:30:29.320 --> 0:30:31.240
<v Speaker 4>So there probably is like a very.

0:30:31.320 --> 0:30:36.160
<v Speaker 3>Obvious reason to what I see and hear, but I

0:30:36.240 --> 0:30:36.960
<v Speaker 3>just don't know how.

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 4>To explain it.

0:30:37.680 --> 0:30:39.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, how's your year been? If you had a good year,

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:41.479
<v Speaker 2>We're at the end of the year pretty much.

0:30:41.520 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this year has gone so fast. It feels like, honestly, yeah,

0:30:46.400 --> 0:30:47.760
<v Speaker 3>I have had a good year. I mean I've been

0:30:47.800 --> 0:30:49.840
<v Speaker 3>on tour from May.

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:55.640
<v Speaker 4>It's been good. I just I'm excited to like release music.

0:30:57.200 --> 0:31:00.800
<v Speaker 3>With like the support of everybody around me, which is cool,

0:31:02.680 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 3>and I really just want to be in the studio

0:31:05.360 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 3>get off the road. Yeah, like it's been fun, don't

0:31:08.080 --> 0:31:10.080
<v Speaker 3>get me wrong. But I think, you know, like anything,

0:31:10.120 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 3>you have too much of something and then you want

0:31:11.840 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 3>something else. So that's how I feel right now.

0:31:18.440 --> 0:31:21.200
<v Speaker 2>And there it is Charlie speaking to me back in

0:31:21.400 --> 0:31:25.360
<v Speaker 2>twenty eighteen. What was your impression of her from hearing that.

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I thought she was very in control. I don't think

0:31:29.680 --> 0:31:32.240
<v Speaker 1>she sounded bored like you thought that she might have

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 1>at the time. I actually remember you coming back from

0:31:34.680 --> 0:31:39.320
<v Speaker 1>doing this saying like, I don't know how that went. Sure, yeah,

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:43.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think like sometimes these interviews are like cheese, right,

0:31:44.040 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 1>like they sort of mature and in time they get better,

0:31:48.400 --> 0:31:51.400
<v Speaker 1>they go off. I think this one gets better. I

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:54.560
<v Speaker 1>don't think this one goes off. Yeah, So I thought yeah,

0:31:54.600 --> 0:31:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I thought she Yeah, she's really cool. She's got such

0:31:57.960 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 1>a kind of like collected sort of v I think

0:32:01.080 --> 0:32:04.000
<v Speaker 1>she's pretty single minded about like what she's doing and

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:06.320
<v Speaker 1>where she's going basically, and it's really impressive.

0:32:06.640 --> 0:32:10.680
<v Speaker 2>I think it's also always worth remembering that this is

0:32:10.880 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 2>someone who has been doing this since she was fourteen

0:32:13.360 --> 0:32:16.000
<v Speaker 2>years old. You know, she you know, a young woman

0:32:16.080 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 2>in the music industry who she says there at the

0:32:18.800 --> 0:32:21.240
<v Speaker 2>end that those songs that she gave to Blondie for

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:23.800
<v Speaker 2>their album she wrote when she was fourteen.

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:24.440
<v Speaker 1>I know.

0:32:24.800 --> 0:32:26.720
<v Speaker 2>I think it's interesting that she went to art college

0:32:26.760 --> 0:32:29.600
<v Speaker 2>because I think maybe that's something that has been missed

0:32:29.600 --> 0:32:33.480
<v Speaker 2>out of the Charlie XX story, Like people think she's

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:36.520
<v Speaker 2>just a sort of pop disruptor who comes along and

0:32:37.120 --> 0:32:39.200
<v Speaker 2>has made these pop songs that sound a bit kind

0:32:39.240 --> 0:32:43.760
<v Speaker 2>of hyper pop. But she's clearly she's got this background

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:46.600
<v Speaker 2>at a very prestigious like Slade is a very prestigious

0:32:46.720 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 2>art college here in the UK, and it's just wild

0:32:50.200 --> 0:32:55.320
<v Speaker 2>that she was her you know, her work there included

0:32:55.400 --> 0:32:58.400
<v Speaker 2>shoots Vogue, shoots she had done with David Bailey, Like

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:02.560
<v Speaker 2>such a strain, like such a such a weird two worlds.

0:33:02.600 --> 0:33:04.520
<v Speaker 2>Like she's a young woman at at Art college, but

0:33:04.560 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 2>she's also in parallel being a pop star on a

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:11.600
<v Speaker 2>major label doing shoots with world class musicians, and she's

0:33:11.680 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 2>using that within her work. But it just went to

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:16.200
<v Speaker 2>show that she's been doing this a very long time,

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:18.520
<v Speaker 2>and she's been doing it since she's a kid, so

0:33:19.680 --> 0:33:22.160
<v Speaker 2>of course she's going to just have a different approach

0:33:22.200 --> 0:33:23.840
<v Speaker 2>to the world than your.

0:33:23.760 --> 0:33:27.880
<v Speaker 1>I yeah, totally. I mean I think it's six years ago, right,

0:33:28.000 --> 0:33:30.240
<v Speaker 1>so I think like there are certain things now that

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:32.760
<v Speaker 1>you can sort of unpick that wouldn't have you wouldn't

0:33:32.760 --> 0:33:35.120
<v Speaker 1>have noticed at the time, but are sort of not

0:33:35.240 --> 0:33:38.280
<v Speaker 1>obvious now, but are underlying, for example, that sort of

0:33:38.320 --> 0:33:41.719
<v Speaker 1>sense of outsiderhood that she talks about being Art college

0:33:41.720 --> 0:33:44.000
<v Speaker 1>and just growing up in general, just kind of feeling like,

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, not quite the fit, feeling different. That is

0:33:47.920 --> 0:33:50.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of like the seeds of what Bratt is right,

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:54.160
<v Speaker 1>like that, in an essence, that's what this whole Brat

0:33:54.280 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of era is about of just kind of just

0:33:56.440 --> 0:33:59.360
<v Speaker 1>being like of imperfection, of kind of a bit of outsiderhood,

0:33:59.360 --> 0:34:02.800
<v Speaker 1>a bit of kind of messiness. And so it's sort

0:34:02.800 --> 0:34:05.400
<v Speaker 1>of like, ah, well, maybe she was having those ideas

0:34:05.400 --> 0:34:07.520
<v Speaker 1>back then, Like maybe she would even thought of like

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the brat concept back there. Maybe it was formulating, Maybe

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:13.400
<v Speaker 1>it was formulating whilst she was speaking to her for

0:34:13.440 --> 0:34:16.880
<v Speaker 1>this podcast. I think that's probably the most bratt. I

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:21.080
<v Speaker 1>think you might have invented Brat. I think there's another

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:22.840
<v Speaker 1>thing going on at the moment where people are like,

0:34:24.080 --> 0:34:27.760
<v Speaker 1>how intentional has this all been? Right? Like how Charlie's

0:34:27.760 --> 0:34:30.839
<v Speaker 1>This is the release of Charlie's sixth album, so she's,

0:34:30.960 --> 0:34:32.520
<v Speaker 1>as you've already pointed out, she's been doing this for

0:34:32.640 --> 0:34:35.080
<v Speaker 1>quite a long time, Like is it just you know?

0:34:35.440 --> 0:34:37.520
<v Speaker 1>And I saw people early on sort of saying I

0:34:37.600 --> 0:34:40.279
<v Speaker 1>heard people early on saying, you know, this is kind

0:34:40.320 --> 0:34:42.120
<v Speaker 1>of amazing, like she's hit a sixth album and then

0:34:42.160 --> 0:34:44.560
<v Speaker 1>she just hit this like really steep ascent, Like is

0:34:44.920 --> 0:34:47.880
<v Speaker 1>that just kind of like luck? Is it by design?

0:34:48.560 --> 0:34:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it's listening to Charlie speak, it is so

0:34:51.320 --> 0:34:54.720
<v Speaker 1>by design? Like she's she really has kind of gone

0:34:54.719 --> 0:34:58.239
<v Speaker 1>for it with this whole concept, this whole album, and

0:34:58.560 --> 0:35:00.719
<v Speaker 1>you heard it there she was as you spoke to us,

0:35:00.800 --> 0:35:02.600
<v Speaker 1>she was like in the middle of a support tour

0:35:02.680 --> 0:35:05.200
<v Speaker 1>with Taylor Swift, Like it doesn't get much bigger than that,

0:35:05.400 --> 0:35:08.000
<v Speaker 1>But there she was saying, I'm done with this, like

0:35:08.120 --> 0:35:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to support any other artists anymore, Like

0:35:10.600 --> 0:35:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to do my own thing. So in a way,

0:35:13.400 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 1>it sort of feels like she's been building towards this

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:19.320
<v Speaker 1>brat point for maybe longer than we all thought.

0:35:19.680 --> 0:35:22.080
<v Speaker 2>And she was talking back even in this interview. She's

0:35:22.080 --> 0:35:25.359
<v Speaker 2>talking about authenticity, and that's the thing that everyone's been

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:30.279
<v Speaker 2>picking up on on this album, is that we are

0:35:30.320 --> 0:35:33.560
<v Speaker 2>in an era where authenticity is the biggest currency within

0:35:33.600 --> 0:35:36.960
<v Speaker 2>pop music and it's about people being themselves and telling

0:35:38.280 --> 0:35:39.440
<v Speaker 2>putting it all out there.

0:35:39.560 --> 0:35:42.319
<v Speaker 1>Is there any other reflections on the actual content of

0:35:42.360 --> 0:35:43.799
<v Speaker 1>what you spoke to her about that you think you're

0:35:43.840 --> 0:35:46.480
<v Speaker 1>interesting now with this passage of time that's gone by,

0:35:46.600 --> 0:35:50.239
<v Speaker 1>I suppose the obvious thing is, like the Taylor Swift stuff, which.

0:35:51.239 --> 0:35:53.680
<v Speaker 2>Is it going to be? It might be conspiracy theorists

0:35:53.680 --> 0:35:55.440
<v Speaker 2>for us to get into that. Back then she was

0:35:55.440 --> 0:35:58.200
<v Speaker 2>supporting Taylor Swift. They were obviously got on to a

0:35:58.239 --> 0:36:01.440
<v Speaker 2>certain extent, or there was a mutual it was mutually

0:36:01.480 --> 0:36:04.080
<v Speaker 2>beneficial for them to be on tour together, and now

0:36:04.080 --> 0:36:06.120
<v Speaker 2>they're just in a very different place where that pitted

0:36:06.200 --> 0:36:08.400
<v Speaker 2>against each other. I'm not sure how much of that

0:36:08.560 --> 0:36:14.400
<v Speaker 2>is true, how much of that is media sensationalism, but

0:36:15.160 --> 0:36:18.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you can't deny that some that lyric on

0:36:18.120 --> 0:36:22.240
<v Speaker 2>Sympathi is a Knife on the new album is clearly

0:36:22.280 --> 0:36:26.439
<v Speaker 2>aimed at Taylor Swift. I mean it's clearly aimed at

0:36:26.480 --> 0:36:29.000
<v Speaker 2>the lyric. Let me get that lyric. There's a lyric

0:36:29.120 --> 0:36:32.440
<v Speaker 2>in that track that says, don't want to see her

0:36:32.440 --> 0:36:35.880
<v Speaker 2>backstage at my boyfriend's show, fingers crossed behind my back.

0:36:36.200 --> 0:36:44.560
<v Speaker 2>I hope they break up quick. Allegedly about Swift going

0:36:44.560 --> 0:36:49.920
<v Speaker 2>out with crazy Man Matt Heay, front man of nineteen

0:36:49.920 --> 0:36:53.040
<v Speaker 2>seventy five. Charlie's boyfriend is the drummer George from nineteen

0:36:53.040 --> 0:36:57.040
<v Speaker 2>seventy five, and so last year they would have been

0:36:57.200 --> 0:36:59.439
<v Speaker 2>around each other a lot because she, you know, Taylor

0:36:59.480 --> 0:37:02.040
<v Speaker 2>Swift was was going to those shows and being backstage

0:37:02.080 --> 0:37:04.520
<v Speaker 2>with her boyfriend, who's the singer in the band But

0:37:04.680 --> 0:37:10.240
<v Speaker 2>what I find in the whole Swift Charlie Xx battle

0:37:10.719 --> 0:37:15.520
<v Speaker 2>is this whole thing about Taylor Swift releasing a special

0:37:15.680 --> 0:37:20.240
<v Speaker 2>edition of her album the week Bratt came out going

0:37:20.280 --> 0:37:23.080
<v Speaker 2>to number one, when Bratt was pretty much nailed on

0:37:23.120 --> 0:37:28.479
<v Speaker 2>to go to number one, and blocking Charlie Xx having

0:37:28.480 --> 0:37:33.840
<v Speaker 2>her first number one album. Oh, it's just too juicy,

0:37:34.000 --> 0:37:36.760
<v Speaker 2>isn't it to like for people to not get into

0:37:36.840 --> 0:37:42.080
<v Speaker 2>that because it's pretty juicy. I mean, even if let's

0:37:42.080 --> 0:37:44.680
<v Speaker 2>say you're the Taylor Swift camp and it's not true

0:37:44.960 --> 0:37:46.720
<v Speaker 2>you were going to release it. I mean, Taylor Swift

0:37:46.800 --> 0:37:50.520
<v Speaker 2>release is a new, different colored final every other week

0:37:51.040 --> 0:37:54.200
<v Speaker 2>to take advantage of her fans. And you know, let's

0:37:54.239 --> 0:37:57.000
<v Speaker 2>say that was all planned, it was in the factory line,

0:37:57.000 --> 0:38:02.040
<v Speaker 2>it was they couldn't pull it. Even so you should

0:38:02.080 --> 0:38:03.839
<v Speaker 2>just admit. You should just lean into it and say

0:38:03.880 --> 0:38:05.840
<v Speaker 2>that you did do it for that reason, because it's

0:38:06.040 --> 0:38:08.799
<v Speaker 2>it's not standing up in court that it's just not

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:12.160
<v Speaker 2>is it. Someone releases a record that slags you off,

0:38:12.239 --> 0:38:16.240
<v Speaker 2>and then you happen to put out your album again

0:38:16.480 --> 0:38:18.440
<v Speaker 2>and that goes to number one instead of their album,

0:38:18.520 --> 0:38:22.400
<v Speaker 2>Like you can't. You've just got to say this is unfortunate.

0:38:24.160 --> 0:38:26.680
<v Speaker 2>I may as well own this and say, yeah, I

0:38:26.680 --> 0:38:29.560
<v Speaker 2>did that, fuck you for slagging me off. I loved

0:38:29.560 --> 0:38:35.800
<v Speaker 2>Matt Healy. He's a misunderstood soul. That's what the Swift

0:38:35.840 --> 0:38:36.799
<v Speaker 2>Camp should have done.

0:38:37.320 --> 0:38:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Listen st you before we go. I want to shout

0:38:39.080 --> 0:38:41.319
<v Speaker 1>out that you did an interview with ag Cook not

0:38:41.400 --> 0:38:45.520
<v Speaker 1>that long ago on midnight Chats. If anybody's listening to this,

0:38:45.600 --> 0:38:49.200
<v Speaker 1>but they haven't listened to that. Ad Cook's long time

0:38:49.239 --> 0:38:52.160
<v Speaker 1>collaborated with Charlie XCX has worked. You know, it was

0:38:52.160 --> 0:38:55.239
<v Speaker 1>a major player on this Brat album. Anything in there

0:38:55.280 --> 0:38:57.520
<v Speaker 1>that you sort of thought was particularly interesting people. If

0:38:57.520 --> 0:38:59.600
<v Speaker 1>you recommend people go back and check out and who

0:38:59.640 --> 0:39:01.600
<v Speaker 1>is it you Cook? Iive somebody it doesn't know who

0:39:01.680 --> 0:39:02.040
<v Speaker 1>he is.

0:39:02.560 --> 0:39:07.800
<v Speaker 2>I loved talking to Age Cook, brilliant producer, popularized hyper

0:39:07.800 --> 0:39:10.280
<v Speaker 2>pop and these crazy beats that you can hear across

0:39:10.280 --> 0:39:13.200
<v Speaker 2>the whole of BRAT. He was talking about the way

0:39:13.239 --> 0:39:15.480
<v Speaker 2>he works with Charlie's. They don't really talk to each

0:39:15.520 --> 0:39:20.080
<v Speaker 2>other very much. They just get in the studio and

0:39:20.120 --> 0:39:23.520
<v Speaker 2>they're almost telepathic. But he did say in that interview

0:39:23.520 --> 0:39:25.160
<v Speaker 2>actually that it was a bit different with Bratt and

0:39:25.200 --> 0:39:27.000
<v Speaker 2>they thought about it a bit more, and they did

0:39:27.200 --> 0:39:30.000
<v Speaker 2>sort of plan things a bit more, but I got

0:39:30.000 --> 0:39:32.000
<v Speaker 2>the sense from what he was saying that was more

0:39:32.040 --> 0:39:36.640
<v Speaker 2>about the campaign rollout, like you know, the remixes, the artwork,

0:39:37.360 --> 0:39:40.840
<v Speaker 2>the aesthetic of it, more than the actual tunes themselves,

0:39:40.880 --> 0:39:42.759
<v Speaker 2>I think. But it's a really interesting interview. We get

0:39:42.800 --> 0:39:45.120
<v Speaker 2>into a lot of stuff, all the PC music stuff,

0:39:45.760 --> 0:39:51.600
<v Speaker 2>working with Charlie and his bonkers growing up, like his

0:39:51.680 --> 0:39:54.240
<v Speaker 2>childhood as well, which is which is all interesting here?

0:39:54.719 --> 0:39:58.000
<v Speaker 2>That's been one of our most popular episodes on this

0:39:58.080 --> 0:40:01.680
<v Speaker 2>new series, but not as popular Greg as Grim Chatton.

0:40:03.719 --> 0:40:05.640
<v Speaker 2>Isn't it very popular? Listen?

0:40:05.880 --> 0:40:08.759
<v Speaker 1>It's been great kind of replaying out that conversation with

0:40:08.840 --> 0:40:11.719
<v Speaker 1>Charlie XCX. I mean, she's come a long way since

0:40:11.719 --> 0:40:14.800
<v Speaker 1>playing like that boiler room set in February and Brooklyn

0:40:14.840 --> 0:40:16.520
<v Speaker 1>where that was like the start of all of this,

0:40:16.640 --> 0:40:19.440
<v Speaker 1>wasn't it? And like twenty five thousand people are SVP

0:40:19.680 --> 0:40:22.680
<v Speaker 1>to try and like get on board with that. Where

0:40:22.680 --> 0:40:24.480
<v Speaker 1>does this go next? You asked before, like is this

0:40:24.520 --> 0:40:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the end of like Brat's summer? Is it the beginning

0:40:26.960 --> 0:40:29.439
<v Speaker 1>of bratt autumn winter spring twenty twenty five?

0:40:30.000 --> 0:40:31.399
<v Speaker 2>Like is there?

0:40:31.560 --> 0:40:35.200
<v Speaker 1>It kind of feels plausible to me that in terms

0:40:35.239 --> 0:40:38.800
<v Speaker 1>of what happens next, Charlie releases another like huge remix

0:40:38.880 --> 0:40:42.719
<v Speaker 1>with Chapel Roone or like Troy Savan or something, then

0:40:43.080 --> 0:40:45.239
<v Speaker 1>she's going to win the Mercury Prize, which you've we've

0:40:45.239 --> 0:40:48.680
<v Speaker 1>both already agreed is nailed on right in September. She's

0:40:48.680 --> 0:40:52.840
<v Speaker 1>probably going to perform at the Victory celebrations when Kamela

0:40:52.920 --> 0:40:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Harris becomes the next President of America in November. Then

0:40:57.000 --> 0:40:58.480
<v Speaker 1>she's going to be named album of the Year by

0:40:58.520 --> 0:41:01.560
<v Speaker 1>basically everybody on the planet. And is she going to

0:41:01.600 --> 0:41:05.480
<v Speaker 1>headline Glastonbury next year? What's What's where's this all going?

0:41:05.520 --> 0:41:08.600
<v Speaker 2>Stew Well? I heard whilst I was at Glastonbury this

0:41:08.719 --> 0:41:12.960
<v Speaker 2>year from a reliable source that because Charlie was booked

0:41:13.000 --> 0:41:15.200
<v Speaker 2>to play, she did a DJ set on a very

0:41:15.200 --> 0:41:18.359
<v Speaker 2>small stage there yeah called Levels, which no one could

0:41:18.360 --> 0:41:21.520
<v Speaker 2>get into and everyone was upset about because everything was

0:41:21.560 --> 0:41:24.520
<v Speaker 2>peaking and you couldn't get into the area. It was

0:41:24.640 --> 0:41:27.560
<v Speaker 2>very small. And when asking the question of like, why

0:41:27.640 --> 0:41:30.680
<v Speaker 2>isn't she playing a full set, the response I got

0:41:30.880 --> 0:41:34.879
<v Speaker 2>was she is booked to headline the other stage next

0:41:34.960 --> 0:41:36.600
<v Speaker 2>year at Glastonbury.

0:41:37.680 --> 0:41:41.319
<v Speaker 1>But that was then, Yeah, the optics had changed on that, right,

0:41:41.320 --> 0:41:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean there could be there could certainly be an

0:41:44.160 --> 0:41:46.360
<v Speaker 1>upgrade on that. I think it probably does depend a

0:41:46.400 --> 0:41:51.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit on what happens between now and then. She's

0:41:51.200 --> 0:41:53.960
<v Speaker 1>definitely going to be at Glastonbury, and I'd say that

0:41:54.080 --> 0:41:56.960
<v Speaker 1>headline headlining the other is probably an absolute bare minimum.

0:41:57.000 --> 0:42:00.279
<v Speaker 1>I think it could very easily become the pier amid

0:42:00.880 --> 0:42:05.200
<v Speaker 1>for sure. I do wonder what the public appetite for

0:42:05.560 --> 0:42:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Charlie is now, just in the sense that everybody gets

0:42:09.000 --> 0:42:11.840
<v Speaker 1>bored of everything. That's That's one of Taylor's fift's biggest

0:42:11.920 --> 0:42:14.520
<v Speaker 1>problems is the fact that she's everywhere all the time,

0:42:14.960 --> 0:42:16.960
<v Speaker 1>so it's so easy to get fed up with it,

0:42:17.000 --> 0:42:19.120
<v Speaker 1>like it's just it's boring at this point, isn't it,

0:42:19.160 --> 0:42:23.520
<v Speaker 1>whether you love the music or not. And the time

0:42:23.560 --> 0:42:25.440
<v Speaker 1>that it takes for people to get bored is getting

0:42:25.440 --> 0:42:29.040
<v Speaker 1>shorter and shorter and shorter, and Bratt has been so huge,

0:42:29.160 --> 0:42:35.279
<v Speaker 1>it's been so big that it's it's I think she'd

0:42:35.360 --> 0:42:37.080
<v Speaker 1>do good to maybe like go away, and I think

0:42:37.080 --> 0:42:40.839
<v Speaker 1>she's been very smart in I don't feel like she's

0:42:40.840 --> 0:42:43.840
<v Speaker 1>done much press. She's done like interviews with influencers online,

0:42:43.840 --> 0:42:46.840
<v Speaker 1>but she's not done lots of mainstream press for a

0:42:46.840 --> 0:42:50.680
<v Speaker 1>good reason, I think, and I think now she'll probably

0:42:51.600 --> 0:42:54.240
<v Speaker 1>take the rest of the summer off, win the Mercury,

0:42:54.320 --> 0:42:56.759
<v Speaker 1>do all those things you said. It'll be Britts, she'll

0:42:56.760 --> 0:42:57.680
<v Speaker 1>win all the Brits.

0:42:57.880 --> 0:43:00.400
<v Speaker 2>It's probably. We've probably got another year of Charlie being

0:43:00.760 --> 0:43:05.960
<v Speaker 2>the thing, the thing, haven't we unless Dodgy reform.

0:43:06.760 --> 0:43:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and then then there's under gets stolen. You know, we

0:43:11.160 --> 0:43:14.080
<v Speaker 1>have heard rumors about a britpop band reforming. But more

0:43:14.120 --> 0:43:15.400
<v Speaker 1>on that on next week's podcast.

0:43:15.520 --> 0:43:17.880
<v Speaker 2>Yes, next week we will be back. It will not

0:43:17.920 --> 0:43:20.319
<v Speaker 2>be an old interview. We will not be making a

0:43:20.440 --> 0:43:22.680
<v Speaker 2>habit of dragging out with the old interviews. They're all

0:43:22.719 --> 0:43:25.479
<v Speaker 2>there though, and we've got some incredible guests, so rather

0:43:25.560 --> 0:43:28.200
<v Speaker 2>than us just dragging them out, scroll back through the feed.

0:43:28.239 --> 0:43:31.800
<v Speaker 2>We've got everyone from tam In Parlor, Mark Ronson.

0:43:32.840 --> 0:43:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Karen O personal favorite.

0:43:34.680 --> 0:43:41.160
<v Speaker 2>Karen O, so many, they're all there, so listen to those.

0:43:41.239 --> 0:43:44.760
<v Speaker 2>We'll be back with a brand new episode next week.

0:43:44.840 --> 0:43:48.160
<v Speaker 2>But thank you for listening to this archive interview of

0:43:48.239 --> 0:43:51.560
<v Speaker 2>us just talking a little bit more about Bratt. If

0:43:51.560 --> 0:43:54.800
<v Speaker 2>you hadn't hand enough of it yet, I'll.

0:43:54.719 --> 0:43:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Let you go and sit in your brat rooms to

0:43:56.320 --> 0:43:58.040
<v Speaker 1>banks mate, go and get in the bratmobile.

0:43:58.160 --> 0:44:01.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:44:02.800 --> 0:44:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Midnight Chats is a joint production between Loud and Quiet

0:44:05.760 --> 0:44:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and Atomized Studios for iHeartRadio. It's hosted by Stuart Stubbs

0:44:09.960 --> 0:44:13.279
<v Speaker 1>and Greg Cochrane, mixed and mastered by Flow Lines, and

0:44:13.480 --> 0:44:17.200
<v Speaker 1>edited by Stuart Stubbs. Find us on Instagram and TikTok

0:44:17.200 --> 0:44:19.719
<v Speaker 1>to watch clips from our recordings at much much more.

0:44:19.800 --> 0:44:23.560
<v Speaker 2>We are Midnight Chats Pod. For more information, visit loudan

0:44:23.719 --> 0:44:31.120
<v Speaker 2>Quiet dot com.