WEBVTT - What's the Science of Anger? 

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Guess what will what's that mango? So this is a

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>weird thing I remember from high school. But I was

0:00:05.440 --> 0:00:08.360
<v Speaker 1>up late one night and I was watching a PBS interview,

0:00:08.720 --> 0:00:10.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, the way all the cool kids did when

0:00:10.680 --> 0:00:13.120
<v Speaker 1>we were in high school when they're up late, of course,

0:00:13.160 --> 0:00:16.880
<v Speaker 1>of course, but the guest was actually Rudy Giuliani, who

0:00:16.960 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>at the time was famously cleaning up New York, and

0:00:19.800 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the interview asked him, how are you so effective? And

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:26.440
<v Speaker 1>he said, well, I just get annoyed by something, then

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I get really angry. Like the way he talked about

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:31.160
<v Speaker 1>it was almost like he hulked out on the topic.

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:33.880
<v Speaker 1>And then he said, I used that anger to work

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 1>like crazy. All right, So you know, I know there

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of economic theories about why New York

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:40.600
<v Speaker 1>got so much safer in the nineties, but the violence,

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:44.280
<v Speaker 1>they're definitely dropped during his term, Like there's no denying that. Yeah.

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:46.479
<v Speaker 1>People used to refer to it like a Disneyland then.

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:48.239
<v Speaker 1>Or around the same time I saw the interview, I

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 1>read this thing about Bill Clinton and apparently he'd get

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 1>insanely angry every morning, like every morning he just unleashed

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 1>on his top staffers and they called it an SMO

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 1>or a standard morning out, and apparently his anger would disappear.

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:05.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, they said it burned clean. But as a kid,

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing made me wonder, if I want to

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 1>be a more effective leader, do I need to be

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>more angry? Because I'm not generally someone who gets that angry,

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:15.679
<v Speaker 1>or at least I wasn't until I had kids. But

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:18.760
<v Speaker 1>that's what today's show is all about, the science of anger.

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 1>And we've also thrown in a little signs of tickling

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to lighten things up. Let's dive in aither podcast listeners,

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Part Time Genius. I'm Will Pearson and as always,

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm joined by my good friend Mangu show ticketer on

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the other side of the soundproof glass sporting this blood

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 1>red face pain, I mean blood red, and the angriest

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>expression I have ever seen. That's our friend and producer

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Tristan mc So. Do we know why Tristan looks so

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>medacine today because we're like a minute into this and

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm already super uncomfortable. Oh, I'm with you on this, Mago.

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:08.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I think it's a new thing he

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>wanted to try. Apparently he'd read about this. You know,

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 1>this constant visual reminder of anger is supposed to help

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:17.799
<v Speaker 1>us stay on topic. But I really I don't think

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:20.239
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have any trouble staying on track today because

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:24.079
<v Speaker 1>today we're talking about all the fascinating science behind anger.

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:26.640
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna look at both the psychological and the

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 1>physiological effects is as well as the common triggers that

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 1>prompted in the first place. And along the way, we're

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna explore a few potential ways to keep those angry

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>feelings in check, you know, the next time somebody cuts

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:40.359
<v Speaker 1>you off in traffic or just does whatever to make

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 1>you angry. All right, mago, So so where do you

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 1>want to start? Well, since Triston literally has us being

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>read this morning, let's start with the idea of the

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 1>angry face. So you know this one. It's when someone

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 1>like lowers their eyebrows. They've got tight lips, flared nostrils,

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 1>all the telltale signs of someone's feeling mad. We're familiar

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>with it because anger is something we've all witnessed and

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>felt firsthand. But the crazy thing is, it's not just

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the feeling that's universal, it's the expression itself. Social scientists

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:10.800
<v Speaker 1>have actually found that the specific muscle contractions that cause

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:14.679
<v Speaker 1>our angry face are recognized across cultures, and in fact,

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:16.960
<v Speaker 1>even children who have been blind since birth make the

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 1>face when they're feeling angry, and that's without ever having

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 1>seen the expression themselves. I find stuff like that just

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 1>so fascinating. So so this isn't a learned behavior then,

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>So does that mean that an angry face is just

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:31.679
<v Speaker 1>like part of our biology or something. Yeah, so many

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 1>researchers think the specific representation of anger is an involved

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>trait that most humans share. So the question then becomes why, Like,

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>what's the advantage of this universal angry face? So do

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>they have like do they have an answer for this? Well,

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean we do have a few good guesses. For

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 1>for example, most psychologists see anger as a way to

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 1>signal that you feel wronged or that you're unhappy about it.

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 1>But researchers that you see Santa Barbara and like Griffith

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>University in Australia have actually gone a step further and

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 1>according to them, anger evolved to serve as kind of

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 1>a bargaining tool during times of conflict, and, as one

0:04:04.520 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 1>professor of psychology put it, the greater the harm and

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:11.559
<v Speaker 1>individual can inflict the more bargaining power he or she wields,

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>And researchers actually called this bargaining through menace. It's a

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 1>specific term. And the idea is that anger is a

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>way to let others know that something is unacceptable to

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 1>you and that there's going to be conflict until the

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 1>offending party acts to make the situation better. All right,

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:29.280
<v Speaker 1>So we've kind of evolved this shared facial expression to

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:31.279
<v Speaker 1>help deliver that message to each other. And that that

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 1>all makes sense. But why this specific expression, like why

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the lowered brows or the flared nostrils. So I looked

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>into this a little as well, and all the features

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that make up the angry face are natural signs of

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:44.919
<v Speaker 1>aggression in their own right. I mean, it's something we

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 1>see in the animal kingdom as well. Right, Like one

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>researcher said, quote, you can think of the anger face

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:53.480
<v Speaker 1>as a constellation of features, each of which makes you

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:56.919
<v Speaker 1>appear physically more formidable. Well that's interesting, though, I do

0:04:57.000 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>have to say, like it's a little unsettling to think

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:01.200
<v Speaker 1>that anytime my kids they're making an angry face, they're

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 1>they're actually kind of threatening physical violence. Well of my kids,

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>it certainly helps their bargaining stance. But one of the

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 1>lead researchers that u CSP John Toby, has actually suggested

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 1>something much more strange. He thinks that angry faces among

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:18.119
<v Speaker 1>friends and family might be a little different. In this case,

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>they're more of a way to emotionally manipulate loved ones

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>into cooperating in the long term. So, for example, if

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:26.280
<v Speaker 1>a friend blows off your plans to hang out and

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 1>instead goes to see a movie, you're likely to feel

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 1>angry because they slighted you and showed less respect than

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 1>you expected. Al Right, So in this case, showing anger

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:37.480
<v Speaker 1>is like a way to guilt trip your friends into

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:40.279
<v Speaker 1>treating you with a little more thoughtfulness or consideration or

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:43.479
<v Speaker 1>something exactly, and to be used as the example of

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 1>each person having a mental cooperation control doll. So the

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 1>anger you express is both an implicit threat to turn

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:52.040
<v Speaker 1>down your own dial and and not so friendly push

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:55.040
<v Speaker 1>for them to turn theirs up and treat you better. Okay, So,

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 1>so my kids aren't exactly physically threatening me. There's there's

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>just emotionally manipulating me. I feel so much better about this, Magno. Right,

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 1>So we we've talked about what happens on the surface

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 1>when we feel angry. So now let's look at what's

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:11.719
<v Speaker 1>actually going on inside our bodies. And it's really comes

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 1>down to the amygdala, which is the part of the

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 1>brain that deals with the emotional responses to, you know,

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 1>to outside stimuli. Now, the amygdala processes whatever anger triggering

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 1>a venture experiencing, and then responds and as little as

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:26.920
<v Speaker 1>a quarter of a second. And so what it does

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>is orders the release of special neurotransmitters that you know,

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of ready you to take physical action. So now

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:35.600
<v Speaker 1>you've got all kinds of chemicals surging through your body.

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>You've got adrenaline and noor adrenaline and epinephrin nor epinephrin,

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and and these quickly drive up your blood pressure and

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>your heart rate. And so this is why people turn

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 1>red into face when they're upset, right, Like all that

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 1>blood is rushing to their extremities. Yeah, that's right. And

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:53.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, thankfully that increased blood flow also heads to

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the prefrontal cortex, and and that's the part of the

0:06:56.360 --> 0:07:00.280
<v Speaker 1>brain that's most associated with reason and judgment. Now, I deally,

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the responses in the amygdala and the frontal lobe, they

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:05.599
<v Speaker 1>kind of balanced each other out, and then we're able

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 1>to regain our composure instead of just you know, punching

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 1>somebody in the face or breaking a window or whatever

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 1>that extreme response might be. So thank God for the

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 1>frontal lobe is basically what you're saying, pretty much. And

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, in fact, one quick example that shows just

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 1>how much we owe to our frontal lobes is is

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 1>that famous story of Phineas Gauge. So he was the

0:07:24.520 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 1>railroad worker in the eighteen forties and he suffered this

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>terrible accident where an iron rod shot through his cheek

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and and out the top of his head. Now, amazingly,

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Gauge survived the incident, but you know, his prefrontal cortex

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 1>wasn't nearly as lucky, and so from then on he

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>developed this reputation for being quote fitful, irreverent, and obstinate,

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 1>and for having quote the animal passions of a strong man. So,

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>in other words, without a functioning frontal lobe to inhibit

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 1>his anger, Gauge was no longer capable of self control.

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 1>And this was such a departure from who he had

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>been before the accident, and his friends actually considered him

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 1>a completely different person. They even started referring to him

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 1>as no longer gauge. So you and I have discussed

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 1>gauged so many times over the years, and it's weird

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 1>how it's still creepy to me. Okay, so we've covered

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the surface expression of anger and what's going on behind

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the scenes, But what about the external factors that make

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 1>us angry in the first place, Like, is there any

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 1>consensus on what sets people off? Well? There is, actually,

0:08:25.240 --> 0:08:27.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it turns out the triggers for our anger

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 1>are pretty much as universal as our expressions of that anger,

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 1>which is a shame because I like to think of

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 1>myself as special and totally individual and unique, but instead

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:39.560
<v Speaker 1>my anger is just so basic. But uh, well, what

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:42.840
<v Speaker 1>are these universal triggers? Don't worry, mengo, You're still pretty unique.

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 1>It's just that that's your anger. Triggers are not unique.

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:48.080
<v Speaker 1>But but you know, any of these incidents that you

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 1>can think of that make people angry, including the ones

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 1>we've mentioned, like being cut off in traffic or you know,

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:56.199
<v Speaker 1>feeling slighted by a friend or whatever it may be,

0:08:56.360 --> 0:08:59.720
<v Speaker 1>these can all be sorted into these broader types. So

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 1>there's neuroscientists at the University of Maryland. His name is R.

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Douglas Fields, and he's identified the triggers and narrowed them

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 1>into nine categories that cover all these potential situations. And

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I can feel your little skeptical on this, So I'm

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 1>just gonna throw a mnemonic device at you, Mango. I know,

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 1>we love nemonics, and that's how you keep track of these.

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 1>And the mnemonic is life morts. Have you ever heard

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 1>of life? Yeah, So here's what it stands for. So

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 1>each letter is something different. So the L is life

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 1>and that's basically like defending yourself against attackers that we've

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 1>got insult, which makes sense. You've got family or you know,

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 1>protecting loved ones, environment, protecting your territory. You've got mate order,

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:43.199
<v Speaker 1>which you know is kind of responding to social injustice,

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 1>resources tribe and stopped as the last one, or that's

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 1>like escaping restraint or imprisonment. So so life morts is

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 1>as simple as that, Mango. So I mean, that does

0:09:55.440 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 1>cover all the bases. But I've got to admit, like

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the acronym lifeboard just makes me ang Like why make

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 1>an acronym that's hard to remember? Like it would be

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:06.960
<v Speaker 1>so much better if it's like Tom's rifle right, which

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 1>actually makes sense, or of like fimber Lows, like when

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 1>you get angry after fimber Lows, but I like Tom's rifle.

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:16.439
<v Speaker 1>Did you come up without yourself? Well, I looked it

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 1>up in an acronym finder. That's that's that's pretty good.

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>But back to life more, it's it's easy to imagine

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>how anger could be completely justified in in like every

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>one of these situations, like the urge to protect your

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:34.320
<v Speaker 1>family or push back against social injustice. Like, there's not

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 1>just relatable feelings, they're also respectable ones, at least in

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 1>most cases. Yeah, definitely. I mean, we tend to think

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 1>of anger as a primarily negative emotion or a destructive

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>influence that needs to be curbed or controlled, but it

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 1>is worth remembering that there can be specific situations where

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 1>it's actually beneficial to react with anger. For example, social

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>psychologist site anger is one of the most powerful motivating

0:10:56.920 --> 0:10:59.440
<v Speaker 1>forces we have. So just think about a time where

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 1>you were angry when things weren't going your way or

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 1>you felt like everybody was out to get you. You know,

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 1>sometimes that desire to turn things around or prove the

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:10.560
<v Speaker 1>world wrong actually can really motivate you, which is a

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 1>good point. And it's funny, like anger motivates me when

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm playing sports. If someone fouls me or tells me

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:19.079
<v Speaker 1>I can't do something, I just concentrate so much harder

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and feel like I have a point to prove. But

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:22.720
<v Speaker 1>it throws me off my game when I'm trying to

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:25.679
<v Speaker 1>do something creative, Like I almost can't think when I'm angry.

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 1>But I've read that for some people, anger can actually

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 1>give you a temporary boost and creativity, Like you know

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 1>that burst of energy you describe when people experience anger. Well,

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:37.440
<v Speaker 1>one side effect of that is a more flexible, freewheeling

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:40.199
<v Speaker 1>thought process, and studies have actually shown that people who

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 1>feel angry tend to take a less systematic approach to

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 1>problem solving and are actually able to see a big

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 1>picture of you more easily. It is a little bit surprising,

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think it comes down to being able to

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:53.800
<v Speaker 1>recognize when it's appropriate to feel angry and and when

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's in your best interest to calm down. And

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:59.199
<v Speaker 1>that's really the whole point behind life marts. I just

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:02.040
<v Speaker 1>wanted to say life sports again, but I mean, you know,

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:04.720
<v Speaker 1>the hope is that by learning to identify these triggers.

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 1>We we then kind of gain a better understanding of

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:09.599
<v Speaker 1>of where our anger is coming from, and you know

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:12.680
<v Speaker 1>whether it's something that should be channeled or suppressed. And

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 1>and that's actually not a new idea. I actually came

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:17.560
<v Speaker 1>across this Aristotle quote while we were doing our research,

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and it sums up this idea of using anger in

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 1>a beneficial way. So here's what he says. Anybody can

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 1>become angry. That is easy. But to be angry with

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the right person, and to the right degree, and at

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:30.679
<v Speaker 1>the right time, and for the right purpose and in

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the right way, that is not within everybody's power. That

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 1>is not easy. Well, I mean that sounds like good advice.

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:39.720
<v Speaker 1>And I know there's more to say about how to

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:41.840
<v Speaker 1>turn your anger to your advantage, as well as how

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:43.840
<v Speaker 1>to shut it down when it's not doing you any favors.

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:45.840
<v Speaker 1>But before we get into that, I thought would be

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>fun to take a little break from anger and lending

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the mood a little. I don't know, Mango, you might

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:51.440
<v Speaker 1>be proving Tristan right. I think we're going off on

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 1>these tangents. He might start painting his face against. But

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I promised we'd go in the opposite direction. Of anger,

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 1>just for a few minutes to talk about the science tickling.

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 1>But first a quick break. You're listening to Part Time

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:18.839
<v Speaker 1>Genius and we're talking about the science of anger, or

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:20.840
<v Speaker 1>at least we were talking about the science of anger.

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:23.199
<v Speaker 1>Now apparently we're talking about tickling. So so what's the

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 1>story here, Mega, Well, this week I was asking myself

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:28.440
<v Speaker 1>all these questions ahead of today's show, like how does

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the body respond to anger? What causes us to get angry?

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:33.719
<v Speaker 1>And for whatever reason, it just reminds me of a

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 1>topic we tackled a few years back at Mental Flass,

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:38.199
<v Speaker 1>which was this question of why do we laugh when

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:40.560
<v Speaker 1>we're tickled? And the more I thought about it, the

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 1>more I realized the two reactions are really two sides

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 1>of the same coin. All right, well that's interesting, so

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:47.560
<v Speaker 1>refresh my memory, Like why do we laugh when we

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:49.320
<v Speaker 1>get tickled? I mean, it has something to do with

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 1>our nerve endings in our skin, right, that's right. So

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 1>when the nerve endings in our epidermists are lightly stimulated

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 1>by touch, they send a signal to the brain's nervous system.

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 1>And there are actually two different of the brain that

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 1>processed the signal. The first is the somatosensory cortex, which

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 1>analyzes all the physical qualities of the touch, such as

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the amount of pressure it exerts. And the second reason

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:14.199
<v Speaker 1>is the anterior singulated cortex, and this is the region

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 1>in charge of pleasurable feelings. All right, So the tickling

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 1>sensation we feel as a result of the combined analysis

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>from those two regions of the brain. And and I

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 1>see the connection between the outside stimulus and the brain's response.

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 1>But besides that, like, what's the connection between anger and

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:32.360
<v Speaker 1>tickling here? Well, there's a study out of Germany where

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 1>they used mri I scanners to see which parts of

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the brain light up when someone laughs, and while laughing

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 1>at a joke activated many of the same areas of

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the brain is laughing while being tickled. The tickling laughter

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 1>also activated the hypothalamus, and that's the part of the

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:48.160
<v Speaker 1>brain that controls our fight or flight response when we

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 1>feel threatened, and well, anger pushes that response in the

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 1>direction of conflict. Tickling actually does the opposite, all right.

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>So you're saying, like, we laugh when we're tickled because

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>because what like because we're giving up or something. Yeah,

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 1>So that's actually one theory that laughter is meant to

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 1>signal submission to whoever is doing the tickling, and I

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 1>guess it's in the hopes that they'll show mercy and

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 1>break off. I. I I mean, when when I'm tickling my kids,

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 1>that's the last thing I want to do. Stop tickling them. So,

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 1>but why would our bodies treat tickling as a threat

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 1>in the first place, Well, it helps to know that

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 1>there are actually two different kinds of tickles. So one

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 1>is the kind that results in laughter whenever sensitive areas

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 1>like our armpits or bellies are tickled, and the other

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 1>is brought by extremely light touches and tends to produce

0:15:31.520 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>an itching sensation rather than laughter. So the second kind

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 1>is the one that you feel when a cat's tail

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 1>brushes your skin or I guess want to bug crawls

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 1>across your arm. And that's led some scientists to conclude

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>that this kind of tickling is an early warning system

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to help us defend against potentially dangerous pests like spiders

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:50.400
<v Speaker 1>or mosquitoes. So it could be something similar with the

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 1>other kind of tickling. When when someone unexpectedly touches you

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:55.880
<v Speaker 1>in in a vulnerable part of your body, the tickling

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 1>kicks in and we can just react as fast as possible,

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 1>which makes a lot of sense. Like you tense up

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 1>so much when this kind of thing happens, and you know,

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 1>instinctively try to shield like whichever part of you is

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 1>being tickled in that moment exactly. And this is also

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 1>why it's pretty much impossible to tickle yourself. So no

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 1>matter how discreet you try to be, your own touch

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:17.040
<v Speaker 1>is never truly unexpected in the way someone else's can be.

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 1>And that's because the cerebellum can predict sensations that arise

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 1>from your own movements, but not from other people's. So basically,

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 1>when the cerebellum knows what's about to happen, that prediction

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 1>overrides the response in your brain that would otherwise lead

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 1>to the tickle. All right, well that's fair enough, but

0:16:32.400 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 1>but I notice you said pretty much impossible to tickle yourself.

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 1>So there are there exceptions to this. Yeah, I was

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 1>surprised to learn this, but there are a couple of

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 1>cases where self tickling is possible, but neither is very

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 1>easy to test for yourself. So the first is if

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 1>you're schizophrenic. For whatever reason. The minds of people with

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 1>schizophrenia aren't really great at predicting the sensory outcomes of

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:55.600
<v Speaker 1>their own movements, and the second case is admittedly kind

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>of cheating. But according to this neuro scientist, David Eagleman,

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 1>he claims, if you build a machine that allows you

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to move a feather, but the feather moves only after

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 1>a delay, like of a second, then you can actually

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:08.880
<v Speaker 1>tickle yourself because the results of your own actions now

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 1>surprise you. I don't know, Mago, I can't say for sure,

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 1>but I'm probably not going to go to the effort

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:16.880
<v Speaker 1>of building a feather tickling machine. But but we'll see.

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, it does make me curious. So, like,

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 1>if you can see that someone else is about to

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:24.160
<v Speaker 1>tickle you, like you're you're watching their hand, Like, why

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 1>does it still tickle when they touch you? So my

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:29.879
<v Speaker 1>guess would be that it's because your brain can't predict

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:32.639
<v Speaker 1>exactly where they're going to touch you or with what

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 1>force or rhythm. But there is a way to suppress

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the ticklers feeling you get from someone else, and it's

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:40.679
<v Speaker 1>only really by taking advantage of the same system that

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 1>prevents you from tickling yourself. So all right, what do

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 1>you mean by that? So you know you can't tickle

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 1>yourself because your brain knows what you're about to do.

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 1>But if you place your hand on top of the

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:53.639
<v Speaker 1>hand of some person trying to tickle you, then you

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 1>can basically trick your brain into thinking it knows where

0:17:56.320 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the touch is coming from, which cancels out the tickling sensation.

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Isn't that Yeah, this whole thing just makes me feel

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 1>so weird, Like like, I don't like somebody tickling me.

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't like the idea of somebody tickling me. I

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:08.680
<v Speaker 1>don't like the idea of putting my hand on top

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 1>of somebody else's hand. Is tickling a bit, but I

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:13.640
<v Speaker 1>feel like something doesn't add up, Like if the feeling

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:17.119
<v Speaker 1>of being tickled is a reflex, like this biological reaction

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:20.439
<v Speaker 1>to this stimulus, then we should be able to tickle

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 1>ourselves like and the hand holding trick you mentioned shouldn't

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:26.640
<v Speaker 1>be able to stifle that reflex. Well, that's another thing

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 1>tickling has in common with anger. Well, there's a biological

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 1>component to both. They're also largely dependent on social cues

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:36.160
<v Speaker 1>and context. So, for example, if you remember that thing

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about earlier about getting angry at a

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:40.960
<v Speaker 1>friend who bailed on plans and went to see a

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:44.359
<v Speaker 1>movie instead. Well, just imagine if you cancel the plans

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 1>because his wife went into labor. The and result is

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:48.680
<v Speaker 1>still the same for you, right, Like you don't get

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 1>to hang out with your friend, but your emotional response

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 1>to each of those scenarios would likely be totally different,

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and because of that context, your natural inclination towards anger

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:00.400
<v Speaker 1>is actually subdued. All right, So you're saying the same

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 1>thing happens when with tickling. Yeah, it's it's true. So

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:08.159
<v Speaker 1>think about Chinese tickle torture, or better yet, Roman tickle torture.

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 1>So ancient Romans would do this thing where they tie

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 1>down a criminal, soak their feet in salt solution, and

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 1>then bring in a herd of goats to lick it off,

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 1>and they just repeat this process over and over. But

0:19:19.480 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 1>the people being tickled weren't laughing. They were screaming or

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:24.880
<v Speaker 1>crying because it was torturous to be in that position.

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah that sounds awful and like the worst form of

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:30.640
<v Speaker 1>torture possible. But I'm curious, like, is there any social

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 1>benefit to tickling or is it all just this psychological torture. Well,

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 1>there is an upside thankfully. And on the positive end

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 1>of the spectrum, tickling can be a bonding exercise. It's

0:19:40.640 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the earliest forms of communication between mothers and babies.

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Like you see a mother tickle, which makes the baby laugh,

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 1>which makes the mother tickle more, which makes the baby

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:50.879
<v Speaker 1>laugh more, and on and on, and it's kind of

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:54.119
<v Speaker 1>a primal conversation. And it's not just humans who do this,

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 1>like chimps, gorillas, orangutans and rats also tickled to the

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:00.640
<v Speaker 1>point of laughter as a way of bonding. And as

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>you probably noticed, rats are definitely the odd men out

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 1>in that group. Yeah, and I know we've talked about

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 1>this fact before, like that rats laugh when they're tickled,

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:10.879
<v Speaker 1>but I actually didn't know that was helping them, you know,

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 1>bond in some way. It does, and and probably my

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 1>favorite example of that comes from this researcher named Jock

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 1>panks Up. He discovered that tickled rats purposely seek out

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the hands of the specific human lab workers who had

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:26.200
<v Speaker 1>tickled them previously, like they remembered who made them laugh

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and they come back from war. Is that crazy? It

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 1>is crazy. I have to say I'm not ready to

0:20:31.000 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 1>talk about tickling anymore, but I am glad that we

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 1>went on that tangent so so nice job on that one.

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:39.040
<v Speaker 1>But now that we're feeling happy and refreshed, I feel

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 1>like we need to talk a little bit more about anger. Uh,

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:44.720
<v Speaker 1>this show is such an emotional roller coaster, But let's

0:20:44.720 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 1>take a quick break and then we'll get back to it. Well,

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 1>so what's left to say about anger? All right? Well,

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:06.040
<v Speaker 1>we were talking earlier about how sometimes we should take

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:08.639
<v Speaker 1>different approaches to our anger, Like, sometimes it can be

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:11.680
<v Speaker 1>beneficial to kind of embrace your anger. Other times it's

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 1>in your best interest to, you know, get it in

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:15.880
<v Speaker 1>check as soon as you can. So, just to keep

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 1>those good vibes rolling from our tickling segment, why don't

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 1>we go back and forth with a few of the

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:23.120
<v Speaker 1>most unusual solutions we came across for dealing with anger. Sure,

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:24.919
<v Speaker 1>but how about we start at the beginning with some

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 1>of the very first anger management advice on record. And

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 1>it's actually pretty good advice because, according to the Greek

0:21:30.640 --> 0:21:34.640
<v Speaker 1>philosopher Plutarch, your best bet for preventing an angry outburst

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 1>is simply to run away and hide, well, like into

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:40.120
<v Speaker 1>a cave or something. What do you mean by this, Yeah,

0:21:40.240 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Plutark's cave, which is I guess a lesser known Greek.

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I can't say I've heard of Plutark's. I think you

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:48.400
<v Speaker 1>meant more like, if you can't calm down, you should

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 1>remove yourself from the situation, which is pretty sage advice, right, Like,

0:21:52.080 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not far off of the techniques you always hear

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 1>about today, like taking a walk to come yourself down,

0:21:56.960 --> 0:21:59.399
<v Speaker 1>or taking a break from stressors that are known to

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:02.239
<v Speaker 1>have set you. But the really interesting part to me

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 1>is why Plutarch things stepping away like that's necessary. He

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:08.159
<v Speaker 1>claimed that when people are angry, we're most likely to

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 1>lash out at those were closest to our loved ones.

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I still can't believe you made a Plutarch's cave joke, Like,

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:16.720
<v Speaker 1>does it get any nerdier than making kind of a

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:19.560
<v Speaker 1>reference to Pluto's cave. But anyway, I mean that that

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 1>actually does hold up pretty well. So you know, you

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 1>lead with that whole run and hide thing, And I

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of thought this was going to be some outdated

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:28.400
<v Speaker 1>wisdom from the ancients, but but I guess not. It does.

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 1>It does seem to hold up well. Don't worry, because

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I've got plenty of outdated wisdom as well. So did

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 1>you know that the Roman stoic Seneca was one of

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:38.880
<v Speaker 1>the first to spread the idea that redheads have fiery tempers,

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and he wrote, the only reason why red haired and

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:44.879
<v Speaker 1>reddy people are extremely hot tempered is that they have,

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:47.880
<v Speaker 1>by nature the color which others are wont to assume

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:52.639
<v Speaker 1>in anger for their blood is active and restless. So

0:22:52.680 --> 0:22:55.399
<v Speaker 1>they're hot tempered because their blood is restless, and that

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:58.720
<v Speaker 1>somehow makes their hair red. Is that right? I guess so.

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean here's the funny part it though. Like as

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:03.719
<v Speaker 1>off base as his thoughts on redhead's work, his advice

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:06.359
<v Speaker 1>for how to minimize the fallout from a redheaded temper

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:11.160
<v Speaker 1>tantrum was actually pretty solid. So he recommended people avoid drinking.

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:14.160
<v Speaker 1>He also wanted them to exercise more and take time

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:17.240
<v Speaker 1>to play games or just relax, which you know really

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 1>are effective ways to manage anger. Yeah that's pretty interesting,

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 1>all right. Well, you know, while exercise might reduce angry feelings,

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:26.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, doing the exact opposite can actually help you

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 1>deal with anger too. There's this research I was reading

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 1>about from Texas A and M that was showing people

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 1>handle anger better when they're lying down than when they're

0:23:34.840 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 1>standing or or or just sitting upright. So explains to me,

0:23:38.160 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 1>like they got a bunch of people to lie down

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 1>in the lab and then they just started getting them

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:44.199
<v Speaker 1>mad on purpose. I mean, this is science. Mangoh, this

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:45.920
<v Speaker 1>is exactly the kind of thing that you do. I

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 1>mean it was a little bit more nuanced than that,

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:51.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, because the researchers actually concocted this whole scheme,

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and they didn't tell the volunteers that they were participating

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:56.879
<v Speaker 1>in an anger study. Instead, they had the student's right

0:23:56.960 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 1>brief essays about controversial topics and and told them that

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 1>someone in the other room was going to critique their work.

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 1>So at this point, the volunteers were all hooked up

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to these e G machines and they got to listen

0:24:09.080 --> 0:24:11.440
<v Speaker 1>to the feedback, and some of them were sitting up,

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:13.840
<v Speaker 1>others were lying down, And of course all of this

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 1>was part of the plan, and there wasn't really a

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 1>person in the other room giving specific feedback for each volunteer. Instead,

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 1>each person heard one of several different recordings of a

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 1>research team member just belittling their intelligence, their logic, even

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the likability of the essays to all these different degrees.

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:33.919
<v Speaker 1>That's awful, it is, but it's also pretty awesome at

0:24:33.920 --> 0:24:36.199
<v Speaker 1>the same time, Like I've had them this but there

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:39.879
<v Speaker 1>was a confusion. It's such an awful awesomeness. But the

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:43.480
<v Speaker 1>results were pretty interesting to just listen to this description

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:45.480
<v Speaker 1>of the outcome. This comes from a report and New

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Scientist quote. Volunteers who heard these insults while on their

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 1>backs felt just as angry as volunteers who were seated,

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>But e e G. Recordings showed that for the upright volunteers,

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:59.520
<v Speaker 1>a brain region called the left prefrontal cortex was more

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:03.359
<v Speaker 1>active than its counterpart in the brain's right hemisphere. Other

0:25:03.400 --> 0:25:06.679
<v Speaker 1>research has linked this lopsided activation to anger and the

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 1>desire to engage that anger. While volunteers who received their

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>digs while lying down, however, exhibited e G patterns no

0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 1>different from the subjects who got slightly positive reviews. You know,

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 1>so both groups felt just as angry, but it was

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 1>easier for the people lying down to move past that anger,

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 1>while the people who were upright they tended to just

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 1>dwell on it. So did the researchers say anything about

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 1>why that might be? Well, they weren't completely sure, but

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:35.119
<v Speaker 1>there was one suggestion that you know, related to the

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:37.880
<v Speaker 1>fact that people are more likely to attack when they're

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 1>in an upright stance, while people in a reclining position

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:44.920
<v Speaker 1>are more prone to just reflect on things. That's interesting,

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 1>And it actually reminds me of this study I read

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 1>about where the psychologists found that taking a quick nap

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 1>can help you work through your anger. So the way

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 1>it worked was researchers took forty volunteers and they had

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 1>them work on these unsolvable computer puzzles that were made

0:25:58.119 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to be intentionally frustrating, and then they had some of

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the participants take a one hour nap while the others

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:06.359
<v Speaker 1>stayed awake and watched the Nature documentary instead, And once

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the hour was up, both groups returned to the maddening puzzles,

0:26:09.800 --> 0:26:12.120
<v Speaker 1>and as you might have guessed, the nappers were more

0:26:12.160 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 1>likely to keep trying to solve them, while the non

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:17.280
<v Speaker 1>nappers were more likely to give up completely. The nappers

0:26:17.359 --> 0:26:20.440
<v Speaker 1>also reported feeling less impulsive, which suggests they were able

0:26:20.480 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 1>to better manage their frustration after getting a little shut at.

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:25.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it really makes a lot of sense, and

0:26:25.760 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we can use this as as evidence

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 1>or an endorsement for adding that formal nap room to

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:32.959
<v Speaker 1>the office. And I know that's something we've been pushing

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 1>for for a while. I know, I'm so sick of

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 1>curling up in that supply closet, and I think everyone

0:26:38.080 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 1>else is pretty sick of you curling up in the

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 1>supply closet. It's just such a passive way to relieve

0:26:43.080 --> 0:26:45.679
<v Speaker 1>that anger. And I know there's some that need to

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of blow off steam a little bit more, and

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:50.240
<v Speaker 1>so for that, you might be better off going to

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 1>an anger room. Now before you invest in your own,

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:56.359
<v Speaker 1>you can actually visit the official one in Dallas, Texas

0:26:57.000 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 1>with I've heard people joke about this, but this is

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:01.680
<v Speaker 1>a real thing, Like it's an actual business. Yeah, it's

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:04.080
<v Speaker 1>a legit establishment. It's in Texas, like I mentioned, and

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 1>you can go and you can book these therapeutic sessions

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:09.479
<v Speaker 1>and while you're there you get to smash up all

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:12.960
<v Speaker 1>kinds of old electronics and office furniture. I don't know

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>why office furniture, like the electronics thing makes sense, but anyway,

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:18.720
<v Speaker 1>So if you're wondering how it works, the first step

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 1>is to choose how long of a session you want.

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:23.720
<v Speaker 1>So there's a five minute what's called an I need

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 1>a break session and that's twenty five dollars. Then there's

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:29.840
<v Speaker 1>a fifteen minute lash out session that costs forty five

0:27:29.840 --> 0:27:33.680
<v Speaker 1>dollars and a twenty five minute total demolition booking that

0:27:34.320 --> 0:27:37.399
<v Speaker 1>actually will set you back seventy five dollars and a

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:40.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of money. It is. I do have to admit though, like,

0:27:40.400 --> 0:27:43.720
<v Speaker 1>even if I wasn't angry, I think five minutes to

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:46.160
<v Speaker 1>go in for twenty five bucks and just be able

0:27:46.200 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 1>to smash a bunch of stuff that I have to

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:51.520
<v Speaker 1>admit like that's a little bit tempting to me. And

0:27:51.560 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 1>so anyway, what you do is you settle on the time.

0:27:54.560 --> 0:27:57.439
<v Speaker 1>You simply pick your ideal soundtrack to Rage two. You

0:27:57.480 --> 0:27:59.760
<v Speaker 1>get to pick music, and then you just go get

0:27:59.800 --> 0:28:03.600
<v Speaker 1>a bit spall that that sounds completely nuts to me,

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 1>And I can definitely think of healthier ways to vent

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 1>your frustration, for instance, like have you heard about all

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:11.240
<v Speaker 1>this research that shows tickling rats and do wonders for

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:13.320
<v Speaker 1>your stress levels? Oh gosh, I feel like we talked

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:16.000
<v Speaker 1>about rats and tickling enough on the show, and I

0:28:16.040 --> 0:28:18.119
<v Speaker 1>think that might be wishful thinking on your part. But

0:28:18.600 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I do know what you mean about finding better avenues

0:28:21.040 --> 0:28:24.160
<v Speaker 1>for releasing anger, you know, more so than outright violence,

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:26.199
<v Speaker 1>and even if that violence happens to be in a

0:28:26.240 --> 0:28:29.040
<v Speaker 1>controlled space, and you know it's mostly directed at old

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 1>TV sets and office furniture, I guess well, it makes

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 1>me think of this Mr. Rogers quote I came across

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:38.360
<v Speaker 1>while researching, and you know, since we're both Slash Rogers fans,

0:28:38.560 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 1>I thought i'd go ahead and read it. So quote,

0:28:42.320 --> 0:28:45.959
<v Speaker 1>confronting our feelings and giving them appropriate expression always takes strength,

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>not weakness. It takes strength to acknowledge our anger, and

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:52.040
<v Speaker 1>sometimes more strength yet to curb the aggressive urges anger

0:28:52.080 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 1>maype ring, and to channel them into non violent outlets.

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 1>It takes strength to face their sadness and to grieve,

0:28:57.760 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and to let our grief and our anger flow into

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:02.120
<v Speaker 1>years when they need to. It takes strength to talk

0:29:02.160 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 1>about our feelings and to reach out for help and

0:29:04.080 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 1>comfort when we need it. That's so well put as

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 1>as always Yeah, well, actually there's a little bit more

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:13.320
<v Speaker 1>to the quote. And if all else fails, tickle some rats, right,

0:29:14.120 --> 0:29:16.200
<v Speaker 1>thank you might just be making some stuff up here, man,

0:29:16.280 --> 0:29:18.080
<v Speaker 1>go And I also think we better move on to

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the fact off before we start ticking off anymore, Mr

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Rogers fans, Let's do it m all right, here's a

0:29:32.000 --> 0:29:35.280
<v Speaker 1>weird fact. Studies have shown that we're actually more optimistic

0:29:35.360 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 1>when we're angry. And I know that sounds completely contradictory,

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 1>but this is because anger makes us feel like we're

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 1>more in control. So there was one study where researchers

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 1>were trying to get people in two very different moods.

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Some they wanted to be angry, some they wanted to

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:52.000
<v Speaker 1>be fearful. And so then they asked a series of

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 1>questions that were mostly focused on, you know, their achievement

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 1>of certain goals. And so the angry set, we're focused

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 1>and determined to do well, but the fearful set, we're

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:05.120
<v Speaker 1>too thrown off by the possibility of failure. That's fascinating.

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 1>So I know you and I have had a few

0:30:07.200 --> 0:30:09.360
<v Speaker 1>co workers over the years who just really wore out

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:11.680
<v Speaker 1>their computer keyboards when they were angry about something. Just

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 1>anger typing. Yeah, I have a few in minds. Well,

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 1>it turns out there's a program developed by researchers at

0:30:17.440 --> 0:30:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the Islamic University of Technology in Bangladesh that's surprisingly accurate

0:30:21.760 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 1>in determining how someone is feeling when they type, So

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:27.120
<v Speaker 1>those being tested were asked to simply type phrases that

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:29.640
<v Speaker 1>popped up on their monitor, and mostly these were phrases

0:30:29.640 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 1>from Alice in Wonderland or other books. And in evaluating

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:35.120
<v Speaker 1>things like the speed and also the rhythm of how

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the participants typed, the program predicted with eighty seven percent

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 1>accuracy when someone was feeling joyful and with accuracy when

0:30:43.200 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 1>someone was angry. Isn't that amazing just from how they type? Yeah,

0:30:46.360 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 1>that is pretty cool. Well, I feel like over the

0:30:48.640 --> 0:30:52.080
<v Speaker 1>past decade, the use of the word hangry has just skyrocket,

0:30:52.120 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and it is a good word, but it's interesting to watch.

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Is even typically easy going people get angry when they're hungry.

0:30:59.200 --> 0:31:00.960
<v Speaker 1>And we've talked a little bit about this before, but

0:31:01.000 --> 0:31:04.239
<v Speaker 1>it's really this survival mechanism that's at play. So if

0:31:04.240 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 1>you think about it, when we're hungry, our bodies are

0:31:06.200 --> 0:31:09.240
<v Speaker 1>programmed to tell us go get food, and what better

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:11.640
<v Speaker 1>way to get food than to be angry and determined

0:31:11.680 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 1>to eat. Well, there's a Texas A and M dietitian

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Brenda Bustillos, and she explains it a bit more about

0:31:17.080 --> 0:31:19.400
<v Speaker 1>what's happening here. You know, what our brains telling us

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 1>that we're low on glucose. So she says, quote, the

0:31:22.720 --> 0:31:25.640
<v Speaker 1>amount of glucose available for the brain declines as more

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 1>time passes between meals. Food is important because when glucose

0:31:29.360 --> 0:31:32.440
<v Speaker 1>levels become too low, our brain triggers the release of

0:31:32.480 --> 0:31:35.239
<v Speaker 1>stress hormones and it's that release that makes it much

0:31:35.320 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 1>more difficult to manage our tempers. Well, let's talk about

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:42.080
<v Speaker 1>a different species, and it's interesting to learn that male

0:31:42.160 --> 0:31:44.440
<v Speaker 1>songbirds in New Zealand have actually been found to get

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:47.360
<v Speaker 1>more angry when other males come into their territory and

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:51.320
<v Speaker 1>sing these more complicated and possibly more beautiful songs. So

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:53.960
<v Speaker 1>perhaps is a jealousy thing or just a threat. But

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 1>during a test, when a new bird started singing these

0:31:56.800 --> 0:32:00.120
<v Speaker 1>longer songs with more syllables, the songbirds would approach were

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 1>quickly and fly closer to intimidate the perceived threat. I

0:32:04.280 --> 0:32:06.480
<v Speaker 1>feel like we should do an entire episode on the

0:32:06.600 --> 0:32:11.280
<v Speaker 1>jealous song birds of New Zealand. That's pretty great, all right, Well,

0:32:11.320 --> 0:32:14.000
<v Speaker 1>you know I don't love the sound of people chewing

0:32:14.200 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 1>or breathing loudly. But and there's actually a name for this,

0:32:17.400 --> 0:32:20.800
<v Speaker 1>It's called miss aphonia, and scientists at Newcastle University in

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:23.479
<v Speaker 1>the UK have done some studies on this. So apparently

0:32:23.520 --> 0:32:26.520
<v Speaker 1>they took twenty people with severe miss aphonia and they

0:32:26.560 --> 0:32:29.680
<v Speaker 1>compare them to a group without it. So first they

0:32:29.680 --> 0:32:32.240
<v Speaker 1>had them listened to common noises that really shouldn't elicit

0:32:32.440 --> 0:32:35.480
<v Speaker 1>any real reaction, like maybe the sound of rain or

0:32:35.520 --> 0:32:37.959
<v Speaker 1>something like that. And then they had them listen to

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:42.080
<v Speaker 1>unsettling noises like babies crying. And then finally they had

0:32:42.080 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 1>them listened to these triggers like breathing loudly or the

0:32:45.560 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 1>sound of chewing. And while both groups reacted the same

0:32:49.040 --> 0:32:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to most of the noises, you know, like they were

0:32:51.040 --> 0:32:54.200
<v Speaker 1>unaffected by the pleasant noises, and both groups were kind

0:32:54.200 --> 0:32:57.240
<v Speaker 1>of thrown off by the babies crying. The chewing made

0:32:57.240 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the missophonic group's heart rate skyrocket, like along with these

0:33:00.640 --> 0:33:03.000
<v Speaker 1>other fight or flight responses from the body. It just

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:07.000
<v Speaker 1>had this very physical effect on them. And that's really interesting.

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 1>So I'm definitely gonna even softer when I'm around you

0:33:09.880 --> 0:33:11.640
<v Speaker 1>from now on. Thank you. That was all. That was

0:33:11.680 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 1>all just a hint. I wanted to make sure you knew.

0:33:14.400 --> 0:33:17.080
<v Speaker 1>So I found this pretty great one. In two thous

0:33:17.440 --> 0:33:21.240
<v Speaker 1>these artists from Scandinavia created an anger release machine. And

0:33:21.400 --> 0:33:23.959
<v Speaker 1>it was basically a vending machine, or you could call

0:33:24.000 --> 0:33:27.840
<v Speaker 1>it a venting machine, and basically was stocked with crystal

0:33:27.840 --> 0:33:31.040
<v Speaker 1>plates and porcelain vases, and you insert a few coins

0:33:31.040 --> 0:33:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and pick your item and then it would slowly get

0:33:34.040 --> 0:33:37.520
<v Speaker 1>pushed off the edge and shadow hopefully you'd feel better

0:33:37.560 --> 0:33:39.680
<v Speaker 1>by the end of it. That is the dumbest thing

0:33:39.720 --> 0:33:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I've ever heard of, but it's also pretty great that

0:33:41.960 --> 0:33:45.200
<v Speaker 1>that existed. So it makes me a little angry to

0:33:45.280 --> 0:33:46.959
<v Speaker 1>say this, but I'm going to have to let you

0:33:47.040 --> 0:33:50.360
<v Speaker 1>take home today's fact Off trophy. Thank you so much,

0:33:50.760 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 1>and thank you guys for listening. I'm sure we've forgotten

0:33:53.320 --> 0:33:56.200
<v Speaker 1>some pretty awesome facts about the science of anger, so

0:33:56.240 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 1>we'd love to hear about those from you. You can

0:33:58.160 --> 0:34:01.040
<v Speaker 1>email us part time Genius and How stuff Works dot com.

0:34:01.080 --> 0:34:03.960
<v Speaker 1>You can also call us on our seven fact hotline

0:34:04.200 --> 0:34:07.000
<v Speaker 1>that's one eight four four pt Genius, or of course

0:34:07.040 --> 0:34:09.480
<v Speaker 1>hit us up on Facebook or Twitter. Thanks so much

0:34:09.520 --> 0:34:25.960
<v Speaker 1>for listening, Thanks again for listening. Part Time Genius is

0:34:25.960 --> 0:34:28.240
<v Speaker 1>a production of How Stuff Works and wouldn't be possible

0:34:28.239 --> 0:34:30.880
<v Speaker 1>without several brilliant people who do the important things. We

0:34:30.920 --> 0:34:34.359
<v Speaker 1>couldn't even begin to understand. Tristan McNeil does the editing thing.

0:34:34.600 --> 0:34:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Noel Brown made the theme song and does the MIXI

0:34:36.600 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 1>mixy sound thing. Jerry Rowland does the exact producer thing.

0:34:40.280 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Gay Bluesier is our lead researcher, with support from the

0:34:42.680 --> 0:34:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Research Army including Austin Thompson, Nolan Brown and Lucas Adams

0:34:46.160 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and Eve. Jeff Cook gets the show to your ears.

0:34:48.080 --> 0:34:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Good job, Eves. If you like what you heard, we

0:34:50.080 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 1>hope you'll subscribe, And if you really really like what

0:34:52.280 --> 0:34:54.319
<v Speaker 1>you've heard, maybe you could leave a good review for us.

0:34:54.520 --> 0:35:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Do we do? We forget Jason? Jason who diddy be