WEBVTT - 1141 | Burning Questions for Every NL Team + Chase Burns Extended

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Tis League records bring.

0:00:21.760 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 2>We will sue you to.

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:35.560
<v Speaker 3>The Gunner.

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome, Haut, Welcome to the Just Baseball Show. It is

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Thursday July sixteenth. That's Arm Lighton and I am Peter

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Apple and today one burning question for every team in

0:00:51.080 --> 0:00:54.280
<v Speaker 1>the National League post All Star Break. We're also going

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the Lance mc cullers junior trade from

0:00:57.040 --> 0:01:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the Astros to the Brewers and Chase Burns of the

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati Reds just got extended seven years, one hundred and

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 1>five million, and Arm and I are here to break

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 1>it down. And it's all brought to you by bet

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>MGM and bet MGM is officially live at Alberta, Canada.

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Remember to use code just Baseball when you make an account,

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>because if your first pick loses, you'll get it all

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>back in bonus bets up to fifteen hundred bucks. And

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 1>everyone who has a bet MGM account can use this

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 1>MLB no Sweat home Run token. You don't have to

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>worry if your bet didn't clear the fences. Just activate

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the token either today Thursday, July sixteenth or tomorrow Friday,

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 1>July seventeenth, when you bet on any player to hit

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>a home run in an MLB game, and if that

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 1>player fails to go yard, you will get your stake

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 1>back in bonus bets. Remember code just baseball on bet

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>mgm arm. We got a lot to discuss today. I

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 1>say we get straight into it. What do you say,

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Let's do it because we've been in Philly for a while.

0:01:58.280 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Had to take a little bit of an off day

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>yesterday just because of travel. But we are back with

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 1>a banger episode and just a reminder. Part two will

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:09.080
<v Speaker 1>be live tomorrow, so we'll do the entire American League tomorrow.

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Thank you everybody joining us live here on YouTube. Best

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 1>way to support the stream smash the like button and

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 1>subscribe button For all those audio folks, Leaving a five

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:19.360
<v Speaker 1>seur review is the best way to support the show.

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Ar Lance mccullus junior got traded. So the trade is

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:27.359
<v Speaker 1>mccullus junior and Colton Gordon to the Brewers for minor

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:31.640
<v Speaker 1>league outfielder Jaden Fielder and cash. The Brewers will be

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 1>absorbing the two and a half million dollars remaining on

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 1>mcculler's contract, only.

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:39.920
<v Speaker 4>Two and a half of the much larger number remaining

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 4>on the contract, which is the interesting part.

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I wrote it wrong, Yeah, break that down for.

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 4>Us, because it's a lot of like there's a relatively

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 4>decent amount of money left on the contract for Lance

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:54.079
<v Speaker 4>mccohor's junior, and hey, that was a sunken deal, right,

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:55.920
<v Speaker 4>Like you're not going to be able to offload that money.

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 4>But the fact that with Colton Gordon decent depth arm

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:01.959
<v Speaker 4>that I left that now, I think the Brewers could

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 4>have an interesting opportunity to try to, like Shane Drohan,

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 4>try to unlock a little bit more out of and

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 4>the fact that like they're only taking on two and

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 4>a half, like the Astros are only really removing two

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:15.799
<v Speaker 4>and a half million dollars of this deal. I thought

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:19.640
<v Speaker 4>it was kind of surprising to attach like a decent

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 4>pitching prospect. I know Gordon has him been great, just

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 4>for two and a half million dollars he gets you

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:27.079
<v Speaker 4>have Jaden Fielder coming back the other way. He's gonna

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:28.960
<v Speaker 4>be twenty two years old at low A s having

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 4>a nice year, but ultimately like not even really a

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 4>top thirty prospect. Maybe in the Astro system will be

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 4>a top thirty prospect, like at the thirty range, like

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 4>twenty eight to thirty range. But it was interesting the

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:42.120
<v Speaker 4>astros who always talk about we always talk about every

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 4>dollar matters up against that CBT.

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 3>Seems like they're trying to make, you know.

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 4>Just create a little bit of wiggle room, also open

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 4>up a forty man spot to potentially, you know, go

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:53.840
<v Speaker 4>make another move.

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 1>What interests me most is why the Brewers would do

0:03:56.920 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 1>this because Lance mc coll is junior, he's thrown thirty

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>nine innings this year to a six eight six ERA.

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 1>In the year before that it was only fifty five

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 1>innings at a six y five one ERA, and all

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the underlying metrics put him at four or five sometimes

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>even six when we're looking at expected era phip X

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 1>FIP sierra, and he's been striking out north of a

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 1>batter per inning. But the walks, I mean walking five

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 1>per nine this year, walked over six per nine last year. Now,

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>when his three rehab starts in the minor leagues, because

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:33.840
<v Speaker 1>he is close to returning, he's looked okay, right two

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 1>four five ERA is nice, striking out eleven and eleven innings,

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:38.600
<v Speaker 1>But of course it's such a small sample and it's

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 1>in the minor league, so it's tough to really know.

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:46.600
<v Speaker 1>What about mccullar's junior profile. Do you think the Brewers

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:51.280
<v Speaker 1>saw and said, that's the guy that we want to target.

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's the big question. I don't know.

0:04:56.960 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 4>Obviously, he can spin a break and ball and I

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:01.720
<v Speaker 4>think that's something that you know has always been there

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 4>for him.

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:03.599
<v Speaker 3>You'll get some of the rehab outings.

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:07.840
<v Speaker 4>They've been brief, like three rehab appearances, eleven innings. He's

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 4>pitched to a two four five era and it looks

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 4>solid overall. I think maybe they want to weaponize the

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:17.160
<v Speaker 4>Brewers McCullers and kind of a shorter one to two.

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 3>Winning relief role. And we've seen like.

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:22.920
<v Speaker 4>They they have different plans for guys that sometimes can

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 4>just work. So I think they're looking at just a

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:28.480
<v Speaker 4>low cost edition and a guy that maybe they can

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 4>try to unlock something with and and you know, for

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 4>for really nothing.

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 3>And at the same time they also bring in Colton Gordon.

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 4>I think that might be the more interesting part of

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 4>it for them, is that they may see something in

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 4>a lefty in Colton Gordon, who uh, maybe they have

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 4>a little bit more of a plan for who they

0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:45.720
<v Speaker 4>can develop and if they think there's an off chance

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 4>that mccollors can be a decent you know, middle reliever

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 4>with some tweaks. Maybe that's it, but I do wonder

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:52.599
<v Speaker 4>if it's this is kind of more of a larger

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 4>effort to just go grab Colton Gordon and continue to

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:57.160
<v Speaker 4>stockpile that they're pitching depth.

0:05:57.200 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 3>Gordon is throwing to a three six nine e RA

0:05:59.320 --> 0:05:59.919
<v Speaker 3>in the PCL.

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:02.720
<v Speaker 4>The strikeout numbers aren't great, but the command is really good.

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 4>I only walked fourteen and seventy and two thirds innings,

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:08.839
<v Speaker 4>So I think it's more about Colton Gordon here, and

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 4>I think that's a guy that they're willing to take

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 4>on two and a half million of you know whatever,

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 4>the five to six million that was left on this

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:18.840
<v Speaker 4>deal to be able to acquire a Colton Gordon. I

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 4>think is maybe the part of the deal that is

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:22.919
<v Speaker 4>really motivating the Brewers.

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 1>That makes sense, but I'm sure a lot of baseball

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:29.040
<v Speaker 1>fans can relate when a pitcher like Lance mccully's junior

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 1>or even Colton Gordon gets traded could be to twenty

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 1>eight different teams. I we'd say, okay, nice, he goes

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 1>to the Brewers, And I'm sure baseball fans like myself

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 1>are thinking what do they know? And McCulloch Junior obviously

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:46.599
<v Speaker 1>has been a big time name for a while, just

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been able to stay healthy. Colton Gordon is kind

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 1>of bounced up and down between the miners and the majors,

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>and he's filled, you know, a decent role for the Astros,

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:57.719
<v Speaker 1>whether that be starting games in a pinch, pitching in

0:06:57.760 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the bullpen.

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:00.279
<v Speaker 3>What do they know?

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:02.839
<v Speaker 1>And I know I already asked you that question, and

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think either of us can answer. I don't

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 1>think anybody can answer outside of the Brewers, But I

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 1>am just asking, what the hell do they know here?

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think that's gonna be the fun part.

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 4>I think Gordon is going to be interesting to see

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 4>what kind of arsenal tweaks they can make, because again,

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 4>and especially with lefties of late, and he's not as

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 4>talented as a Kyle Harris or anything like that, but

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 4>you get a six four, two hundred twenty five pound

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 4>lefty here that can throw out of strikes, and I

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 4>think that's a guy that the Brewers are interested in

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 4>being able to maybe make some arsenal tweaks with and

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 4>see what they can get out of him.

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 3>And then, yeah, I mean, maybe there's some.

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 4>Short sort of specific plan with mccollher's. But I do

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 4>think when you look at Gordon's arsenal, where he's got

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 4>all these different offerings that he can attack you with,

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 4>there's usually a little bit more wiggle room to make

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 4>some adjustments there and lean into one pitch more than

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 4>the other.

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 4>It's again, I believe we got like five or six

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 4>different pitches that Gordon can attack you with, four seamer

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 4>sweep or two seamer changeup, curveball, a cutter as well.

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 4>Like I'm I'm sure the the Brewers are excited to

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 4>kind of mess around with this template and see what

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 4>they can get. Also another guy that gets, you know,

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 4>above average extension down the mound.

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, the Reds certainly feel like they know that they

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>have a top ten pitcher in house. Chase Burns was

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 1>just extended seven years one hundred and five million dollars.

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 1>It's the largest ever for a pitcher without four years

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 1>of service, and it ties Homer Bailey for the largest

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 1>contract given out to a Reds pitcher, tied for the

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 1>third largest in team history, behind Vado and Griffy. There

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>are no clock club options in it, and it runs

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 1>through twenty thirty three, and this is, you know, right

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:41.680
<v Speaker 1>after Burns was just named an All Star after posting

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>a two five four ERA so far this season in

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and two innings with one hundred and eighteen

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 1>strikeouts and ranks top ten and f war per fangrafts war.

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>So what are your thoughts on the extension. I was

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit surprised, considering the Reds are clearly not

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 1>a team to normally do this. Right. They did give

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Green that six year, fifty three million dollar deal, but

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 1>it's not a front office known for spending big time money.

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 1>But here it is seven years, nine figure deal to

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Chase Burns.

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean it's it's awesome. I think it's good

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 4>for baseball anytime this happens. I mean I was just

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:17.680
<v Speaker 4>at the Baseball Writers Association brunch, and you know, we

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 4>heard from Bruce Meyer, the the MLBPA director, and then

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 4>we also heard from from Rob Manford, and you know,

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 4>two different perspectives on these types of things.

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 3>I think Meyer saying that this is happening more and more,

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:31.960
<v Speaker 3>and I do agree with that.

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 4>Rob Manfred implying that players like Chase Burns typically have

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 4>limited options, citing New.

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 3>York in LA as the typical option.

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 4>So anytime this happens, I just think it's good for

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 4>baseball in general and for a guy like Chase Burns,

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 4>Like he gives up two years of free agency, but

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 4>he's still going to be able to go hit free

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:54.319
<v Speaker 4>agency and get his bag as well. You buy out

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 4>the arbitration at this point, like agents and the teams

0:09:58.360 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 4>like they can model it.

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:01.439
<v Speaker 3>They got a pretty good idea of what.

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 4>Chase Burns is going to cost through arbitration, even if

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 4>he's a little bit better than expected, a little bit

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:08.680
<v Speaker 4>a little bit worse, So you model that out. Maybe

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 4>you got to pay a little bit extra through those

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 4>our years to be able to convince him to give

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:15.440
<v Speaker 4>up to free agent years. But at the same time,

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:17.439
<v Speaker 4>like I think it's a no brainer for both sides

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 4>because Chase Burns is still gonna be able to hit

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 4>free agency I think, just on the right side of

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:25.440
<v Speaker 4>thirty or right around thirty years old. And he also

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 4>guarantees himself one hundred million dollars. The Reds, who have

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:31.959
<v Speaker 4>been really frustrating disappointing this year, lock in a piece

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:35.200
<v Speaker 4>here to continue to build towards next year and beyond

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 4>and say Hey, like, we still have a really good core.

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:39.439
<v Speaker 4>We still have Ledo Cruz for several more years. That

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 4>might be an extension that's hard to pull off, and

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 4>that would probably skew back towards Manfred's argument, right, But hey,

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 4>we have solid pieces, solid players, south Stort's playing well,

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 4>Abbot's really bounce back.

0:10:50.080 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 3>We have all these young pieces. It's just not all

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 3>coming together.

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 4>Here's another statement, and I think another reason to you know,

0:10:56.720 --> 0:10:59.080
<v Speaker 4>get these fans to in a disappointing year, be able

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 4>to believe that, hey, this Red front office and ownership

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 4>is still trying to find ways to win and invest

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:06.200
<v Speaker 4>a little bit more into this team.

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:09.480
<v Speaker 1>We've seen a lot of pre ARB extensions with hitters,

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 1>but we rarely see them with pictures. And I want

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 1>to bring up this question from our YouTube live chat

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>from Big E nine to seven two seven. I wonder

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 1>if we will see more teams making this deal with

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:23.439
<v Speaker 1>their young pitchers. An example, could the Pirates lock up

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:27.439
<v Speaker 1>Brax and Ashcraft to this contract next. Do you think

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see a run potentially on these young

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 1>starters getting extended or do you think this is more

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 1>of a one off type of scenario.

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 4>I mean I think teams are that's a more interesting

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:42.560
<v Speaker 4>situation because I think with pictures there's always the risk

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 4>of extending those guys and just being stuck if they

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 4>get injured. I mean, look, we just talked about Lance

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 4>mc colors, right, and like that that contract obviously tied

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 4>the Astros up a little bit, to the point that

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:56.720
<v Speaker 4>they're attaching another arm on their forty man roster to

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 4>clear up a couple million dollars so that they can

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 4>have a little bit more wiggle room, you know, at

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:02.959
<v Speaker 4>the trade deadline, which I also think, by the way,

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:04.680
<v Speaker 4>with the Astros very much implies that they're going to

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:08.080
<v Speaker 4>be buying. But I think we'll see it here and there,

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 4>especially for the teams that are nervous about being able

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 4>to retain talent but also won't be able to go

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 4>out and sign a Terek Schooble, right, Like the Reds

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:17.559
<v Speaker 4>are never going to be in the hunt for a

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:21.440
<v Speaker 4>Terrek Scooble or oftentimes just any of those top top

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 4>flight arms and free agency a Dylan Ce's like, they're

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 4>not going to get it into the two hundred and

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 4>fifty plus million dollar bidding for a free agent most

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 4>of the time. So this is the way to be

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:34.199
<v Speaker 4>able to keep and secure, you know, an elite arm especially,

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 4>And I think it's a little bit different with the

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:38.719
<v Speaker 4>Reds because very few top flight pitchers are going to

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 4>want to sign in Cincinnati. Very few are going to

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:43.680
<v Speaker 4>want to go play in Great American Ballpark. We've already

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:45.840
<v Speaker 4>seen that. So if you have a guy there that's

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 4>proven that he can throw there and proves that he

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 4>doesn't care about throwing there, I think that's the guy

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:54.439
<v Speaker 4>that you've got to go outside of what you're typically

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:56.679
<v Speaker 4>used to doing and make sure you keep him. Because

0:12:56.679 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 4>this is an uncharacteristic deal for the Reds. It's one

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 4>of the biggest contracts they've ever given it out, and

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 4>I don't think it's a coincidence that it's a pitcher

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 4>who can throw in Great American and is fine, you know,

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 4>consistently pitching in Great Americans. So I think it's a

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:10.839
<v Speaker 4>little bit more of a deviation from other what we'll

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:11.720
<v Speaker 4>see from other teams.

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I think you're totally right on that, and it kind

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 1>of answers our next question. But this came to us

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 1>in the discord, and you know, in our discord, which

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>you can find a link to join in the episode description,

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 1>whenever anything happens in Major League Baseball, we go to

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the best basebook group chat in the world to talk

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 1>about it. And at Big Red Analytics brought this up

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and he thinks that because of it, we might see

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:37.440
<v Speaker 1>a salary floor. And let me just bring it up

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 1>to you real quick. So he says, salary cap and

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>floor almost a guarantee. No chance Red's owners make this

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 1>move unless they think there's a floor. I assume you disagree.

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I assume that just it's hard to find pictures this

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 1>good to pitch in great American bullpark.

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 3>I think it's one hundred percent.

0:13:57.679 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, yeah, that it's just difficult to find an arm

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 4>that's to stay there. And like, this is a rare

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:04.439
<v Speaker 4>opportunity to be able to retain a guy like that.

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:06.560
<v Speaker 4>You were gonna pay all through his arbiers anyway, So

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 4>it's like it's not like you were going from zero

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 4>to one hundred and five million. You're going from like

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 4>forty to fifty to now or maybe like thirty. I

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:17.679
<v Speaker 4>I haven't modeled out the arbiers, but from a decent

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 4>chunk of change to a little bit more by buying

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 4>out two years, those two years that.

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 3>You bought out would have been what.

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 4>You were trying to get, you know, mid level arms,

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 4>like they would have been in the market for like

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 4>better than mid level, but like a Michael King like

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 4>look about Michael King costs in the free agent ranks,

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 4>a qualifying offer is twenty two million dollars, So like that,

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 4>that's why the Reds did this, is you're just buying

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 4>out two years of free agency, maybe paying a little

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 4>bit extra through the arbiers to be able to do that,

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 4>But it's not like a full fledge like oh, instead

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 4>of spending zero dollars or spending one hundred and five,

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 4>they were gonna pay him through those ar beers. Anyways,

0:14:57.200 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 4>those arbers were gonna get very expensive because of how

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 4>good Burns has been right away, and you would have

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 4>offered him the qualifying offer, he would have turned it down,

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 4>but if he had accepted it, you would be jumping

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 4>up and down for twenty two million dollars.

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 3>So no, it has nothing to do with that.

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 4>I think that's something that especially from hearing from both

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 4>sides this past week at all start week, like, I

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 4>think fans are putting a little bit too much into

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 4>what each of these teams are doing.

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 3>And like what that might mean about the CBA.

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 4>No one knows what's going to happen with the CBA

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 4>yet both sides like it is still so early in

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 4>the entire process. I don't think it guarantees anything, and

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 4>I don't think teams are making decisions based on that

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 4>as much as as people want to think that they are.

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree with you. I don't think anything has

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 1>been decided yet. So for these decisions to come down

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the pipeline when even these teams and even on the

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 1>owner side too, they don't know exactly what's going to

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>happen yet. There hasn't been a ton of discussions. There's

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>been the league bringing up proposal, the MLBPA immediately saying

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>we will not accept that proposal. Then the MLBPA comes

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 1>around and send something over and the owners go absolutely not.

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 1>So nothing has really happened yet. So to think that

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 1>these teams are making decisions because of a guess, I

0:16:13.600 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 1>just don't see that happening. Now. I think it's time

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 1>to transition over to one burning question for every team

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 1>in the National League post All Star Break going forward

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of the season. But real quick, I

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 1>want to shout out our friends at Lidds. We just

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 1>had that incredible event with Ryan Howard. He was a

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 1>blast and you could see it on our last episode.

0:16:33.040 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 1>We had a little ten minute spot with him. But

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:40.120
<v Speaker 1>if you text code baseball to two nine zero one seven,

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 1>you will get fifteen percent off your first purchase at Lidds.

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 1>And if you want to pick up any of the

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 1>great All Star merch or any other merch we were there.

0:16:49.760 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 1>They have everything. Couldn't recommend our friends at lids more.

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Remember to text baseball to to nine zero one seven

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 1>to get fifteen percent off a LIDZ. All right, Arm,

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 1>let's start at the top. One burning question. We'll start

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:09.400
<v Speaker 1>with the Dodgers. So I have one and you have

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 1>one and we can kind of go back and forth

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:15.640
<v Speaker 1>for who goes first. All started off my burning question

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:20.119
<v Speaker 1>for the Dodgers. Can Kyle Tucker turn it around in

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:23.639
<v Speaker 1>the second half? And because I look at the Dodgers

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:25.919
<v Speaker 1>right now and I say, yeah, they could probably win

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the World Series right odds on favorite. But if Kyle

0:17:29.680 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Tucker is the Kyle Tucker we know he can be.

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they could sweep anybody. It won't even be closed,

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:40.399
<v Speaker 1>right because if they aren't firing on all cylinders, Like

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they were necessarily in the World Series

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 1>when the Blue Jays took them to seven. But if

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 1>you're telling me we can get peak astros Kyle Tucker

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:50.439
<v Speaker 1>here in the second half, I just don't know how

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 1>they lose. But so far in the first half, I mean,

0:17:54.040 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the numbers are incredibly disappointing for a guy making sixty

0:17:57.119 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 1>million dollars a year, over a million a week, he's

0:18:00.359 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>hitting two forty four, three forty one, three seventy five

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:06.680
<v Speaker 1>for a seven to sixteen OPS with only seven homers

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 1>and six deals. And what's I know, the bat hasn't

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:14.200
<v Speaker 1>been great, But what worries me as well is the defense.

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I Mean, what makes Kyle Tucker a sixty million dollar

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 1>player is not only can he be a bat that's

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 1>forty percent above league average while being a thirty thirty

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 1>threat with elite play discipline, but he's a good base runner.

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 1>He was a really good defender. But ever since he

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 1>left Houston, like even with the Cups, he was negative

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 1>one defensive run saved, negative two outs above average, and

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:41.680
<v Speaker 1>now this year with the Dodgers, it's negative three defensive

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:45.119
<v Speaker 1>run saved and negative five outs above average, and his

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 1>average eggs of velocity is below ninety for the first

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 1>time in his career. So again burning questions for the Dodgers.

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 1>There aren't many now, but this is an area where

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 1>we could see Kyle Tucker return to form. We might

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:05.359
<v Speaker 1>as well stop the podcast for the rest of the

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:07.240
<v Speaker 1>season because it's over. Yeah.

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 4>I mean, that's the one area too where you'll get

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:12.880
<v Speaker 4>the Dodgers and you're just like, what's going on over there.

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:16.880
<v Speaker 4>I think that's very specific too, because I think when

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 4>when you had the inconsistency of what Kyle Tucker did

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 4>last year at the end of the day with the

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 4>frustrations and I know Cubs fans weren't thrilled with Tucker

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 4>in a Cub's uniform.

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 3>He walked as much as he struck out.

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:33.399
<v Speaker 4>He was a four and a half, a f four player,

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 4>twenty two homers, twenty five packs. So you follow that

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:42.680
<v Speaker 4>up with the Dodgers paying him the ridiculous AAV deal

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:44.480
<v Speaker 4>that they're paying him, and he say, all right, he's

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:46.720
<v Speaker 4>gonna be fine this year, right, like the Dodgers see

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 4>something positive. Ultimately, as ugly as it got through that

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 4>year with the Cubs, he was banged up. He still

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:55.639
<v Speaker 4>gave you a four win season. He still showed you

0:19:55.760 --> 0:19:57.919
<v Speaker 4>enough shades to Kyle Tucker. So to follow it up

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:00.879
<v Speaker 4>with a worse year in a better hitting environ both

0:20:01.280 --> 0:20:06.159
<v Speaker 4>lineup wise and field wise, uh yeah, that's definitely just

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 4>a head scratcher. And I'm still trying to figure out

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:11.360
<v Speaker 4>what exactly is going on there. And you really hope

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:14.680
<v Speaker 4>it gets better soon because I know other people don't

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:16.399
<v Speaker 4>want to see that, but like I just I like

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:18.159
<v Speaker 4>seeing Kyle Tucker play at high level. As you know,

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 4>he's always been one of my favorite players to watch.

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 4>But right now, it's just it's sluggish. It just looks sluggish.

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:27.679
<v Speaker 1>And speaking about sluggish, look at his slugging percentage just

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the last handful of games or so,

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:34.159
<v Speaker 1>because lately, right he's hitting two eighty six in the

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 1>month of July. I know it's you know, only really

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 1>two weeks of action, but it's a lot of singles

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and he's walking, but he's slugging three forty three. It's

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:44.639
<v Speaker 1>just there seems to be no juice. And it's not

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:47.400
<v Speaker 1>even just the eggs of alat cities or the slugging percentage.

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:49.920
<v Speaker 1>It's you know, the base running, it's everything that makes

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:52.399
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Tucker powerful just hasn't been there, which is just

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:55.200
<v Speaker 1>shocking to me. Yep and mine.

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:58.440
<v Speaker 4>You know, I wanted to go to the Schooble route, like, no,

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 4>well they go get Schoogle, But you know, I think

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:03.399
<v Speaker 4>that's already like a pretty common place question.

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 3>I think the other aspect when he'll get this rosters,

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 3>can Will Smith.

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:10.880
<v Speaker 4>Get healthy, because it's beyond what you get from Will

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:15.959
<v Speaker 4>Smith offensively. Obviously Shoho Tani prefers to throw to wil Smith. Now,

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:18.080
<v Speaker 4>I think the Dalton rushing stuff is over blow, and

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 4>I think rushing is is going to be and it

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:21.080
<v Speaker 4>is already a.

0:21:21.080 --> 0:21:22.480
<v Speaker 3>Really good major league baseball player.

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:24.399
<v Speaker 4>So you know, he was a top ten prospect for

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:27.880
<v Speaker 4>me pre debut, and I think he's gonna have a long.

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:28.639
<v Speaker 3>And successful career.

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:31.640
<v Speaker 4>But as it pertains to this year specifically, I still

0:21:31.680 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 4>think there's a sizeable gap in terms of what you're

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 4>going to get day in and day out, working with

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 4>the pitching staff, working with a pitching staff full of

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 4>vets that have thrown to Will Smith a ton versus

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:45.399
<v Speaker 4>you know, a rookie catcher that's still learning how to

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, regulate his emotions, carry himself in a way

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 4>that is a little bit more even keeled for a

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 4>team that's trying to win their third straight championship.

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:54.680
<v Speaker 3>Like, if you're trying to win three straight championships, even

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:55.880
<v Speaker 3>keeled is the name of the game.

0:21:55.960 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 4>And I know Rushing is already making that progress, is

0:21:57.920 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 4>very self aware he's gonna have it a really, really

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:03.400
<v Speaker 4>good career. But for this year to try to three

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:05.159
<v Speaker 4>peete and the pressure that comes with that, and the

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:08.359
<v Speaker 4>pressure that's only gonna mount, you need your catcher back there.

0:22:08.400 --> 0:22:11.679
<v Speaker 4>You need Will Smith and he's been out since the

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 4>beginning of June, and I just think there might be

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:16.680
<v Speaker 4>a little bit more going on there than you know,

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 4>whatever the reports are, just like neck inflammation, whatever that means.

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:23.879
<v Speaker 4>So Smith, Like, of course you need his bat, but

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:25.919
<v Speaker 4>I just think that guy being the steward of your

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:29.160
<v Speaker 4>pitching staff as well is vital to this team being

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:31.399
<v Speaker 4>able to make their you know, their run for a

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 4>third straight.

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Title, no doubt about it. And I'm curious too if

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:37.119
<v Speaker 1>the Dodgers feel like Will Smith is going to be

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:39.440
<v Speaker 1>back sooner rather than later and he'll be perfectly healthy.

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Could Dalton Rushing be on the move right. We've talked

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 1>about the Dodgers making huge splashes at this deadline, and

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:47.439
<v Speaker 1>Dalton Rushing is a piece where you know, maybe you

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:50.679
<v Speaker 1>could convince a team that's not even necessarily selling to

0:22:50.720 --> 0:22:53.160
<v Speaker 1>give one of their best pieces in order to get

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:55.480
<v Speaker 1>a major league talent. Kind of one of those big

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>league swaps where again maybe it's not on the it's

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 1>not on our brain of a team that could sell,

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:03.480
<v Speaker 1>but they send a pitcher over to the Dodgers, and

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the Dodgers give them a catcher, and both teams stay

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 1>really competitive and just address needs. So I think beyond

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:13.119
<v Speaker 1>just Will Smith coming back, what that then means for

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Adalton Rushing and two more quick ones that I had.

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm really curious what's going to happen with Shoe Hao

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Toanni's knee because he got an injection right he didn't

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 1>play in the All Star Game, and it was something

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:26.160
<v Speaker 1>that he was kind of dealing with, and the Dodgers

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:28.639
<v Speaker 1>scratched him from his start that was supposed to be

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 1>before the All Star Game. Do they start to slowly

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 1>shut him down as we get closer to October and

0:23:34.080 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 1>they get back guys like Blake Snell and Tyler Glass

0:23:36.840 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 1>now into the rotation, or is show heo TONI totally

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 1>fine and he rattles off a season with an ERA

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:45.480
<v Speaker 1>below two and he's in the Cy Young race. That's

0:23:45.520 --> 0:23:47.719
<v Speaker 1>again a burning question. I don't have the answer to that.

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 1>And my last one is just what version of Mookie

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:52.119
<v Speaker 1>Betts do they get? Because in June Mookie Bets had

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 1>his best month of the season, and then he turned

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:56.400
<v Speaker 1>round in the two weeks leading up to the break

0:23:56.720 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and put up a four to eighty two OPS. And

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 1>for anyone who's watched more than one game of Dodger

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 1>baseball in their life, they know that when you get good,

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:09.239
<v Speaker 1>the good version of Mookie Bets, the Dodgers are an

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:14.360
<v Speaker 1>unstoppable force. When Mooki is not hitting, or not defending,

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:17.439
<v Speaker 1>or just not playing well, the Dodgers are vulnerable. And

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 1>there are plenty of great teams in the National League,

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:22.960
<v Speaker 1>which is again why I brought up Kyle Tucker. Nobody

0:24:23.000 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 1>in the ALE can hang with him. Mookiy Bets could

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 1>stink and Kyle Tucker could stink, and I still think

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 1>they gentlemen sweep anybody in the American League. But it's

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 1>about getting to the World Series. And to get to

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the World Series. I think the Dodgers are going to

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 1>have to be firing on all cylinders in order to

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 1>beat the Brewers, in order to beat the Phillies, in

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:43.639
<v Speaker 1>order to beat the Braves. Right as the dimback sneak in,

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:45.639
<v Speaker 1>Dimonback's already beating the hell out of them in the

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 1>regular season and are not afraid of them. So again,

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 1>this is the one team where I don't think any

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:56.320
<v Speaker 1>of the questions are actually burning, but I will say

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 1>they have a lot of them, though I think that's

0:24:58.119 --> 0:24:58.680
<v Speaker 1>fair to say.

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:00.719
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I say, what happens, they have a bunch of

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 4>high expectation players exactly.

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's go over to the Diamondbacks. And since I went

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 1>first for the Dodgers, you're up. What's your burning question

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:10.280
<v Speaker 1>for the for Arizona?

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:13.639
<v Speaker 3>Has Mike hasn't seen enough with this team? You know?

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 4>I and by enough, just is this enough for him

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 4>to go out and buy and continue to try to

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:25.880
<v Speaker 4>bolster this team Because a big part of the equation

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:30.200
<v Speaker 4>for me being bullish on the Diamondbacks, you know, months ago,

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 4>was the returns of the presumed returns of Corbyn Burns

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:39.639
<v Speaker 4>and AJ Puck and Justin Martinez and Martinez is trending

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 4>to get back sooner rather than later, and oh my gosh,

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 4>it's not going to help this team in their bullpen.

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:46.360
<v Speaker 4>But you know they have more more questions than that.

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:48.480
<v Speaker 4>Even though Lord of Scurriel was they're going to get

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:51.679
<v Speaker 4>him back. Like, there's just a lot of different options

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:53.560
<v Speaker 4>that can continue to make this team better.

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 3>And especially when you saw e Rod.

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:56.919
<v Speaker 4>Throwing the ball well out of the gate and some

0:25:56.920 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 4>of the other things that were going well, there was

0:25:58.600 --> 0:26:00.880
<v Speaker 4>a lot of reasons to be optimistic if they could

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 4>just weather the storm until July.

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 3>But then Corbyn Burns is a setback.

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:06.879
<v Speaker 4>AJ Puck has a setback, and all of a sudden

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 4>you're like, oh, where the reinforcements. Lord of Courriel couldn't

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:14.160
<v Speaker 4>be worse since returning from injury, and it's been tough.

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 4>I do think though, with the way the team is

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 4>hung around, they sweep the Dodgers going into the break,

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 4>they're two games over. Mike Haysen, we talk about Preller

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:26.640
<v Speaker 4>being a madman, no one, no one's on Prewer's level,

0:26:26.760 --> 0:26:32.200
<v Speaker 4>but on the spectrum of like conservative and aggressive GMS,

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 4>Haysn skews well into the aggressive side of things right,

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 4>Like he is well over there, probably in the ninetieth

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:42.119
<v Speaker 4>percentile of like he's ready to go, And I'm just

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 4>curious if the flaws in this team will be hanging

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 4>over his head too much, or if he's gonna feel like, hey,

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:49.440
<v Speaker 4>we've hung around despite this, We're gonna get some of

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:51.679
<v Speaker 4>our guys back. Burns might still come back, you know,

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:53.640
<v Speaker 4>in September, Let's go for it.

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>My burning question is actually along those same lines, because

0:26:57.560 --> 0:27:00.679
<v Speaker 1>I've I feel like if they had a couple of

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:04.280
<v Speaker 1>bats to step up from five to nine, it'll make

0:27:04.359 --> 0:27:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Mike Hayson's job a little bit easier because we expect,

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, the catel Martes to bounce back. Corbyn Carrol

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 1>has already been awesome. Gabby Moreno is having a really

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:17.360
<v Speaker 1>good season, right, But then you look five through nine,

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and of course I forgot about Heraldo Perdomo, who's still

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 1>providing value defensively and you know on the bases. He's

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:25.640
<v Speaker 1>just got to get that ops up a little bit.

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:27.040
<v Speaker 1>But I think we have faith that he's going to

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:28.919
<v Speaker 1>do so I don't have any burning questions about the

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:33.240
<v Speaker 1>top four. It's the Ildemorrow Vargases of the world. The

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Nolan Arnado's the Lord is Gurriel Juniors. I mean these

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:40.760
<v Speaker 1>are not I mean Vargas, you know, kind of caught fire.

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:44.560
<v Speaker 1>But Lord of Curiel Junior is not a forty nine

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 1>percent below league average offensive player by WRC plus Nolan Aaronado.

0:27:50.400 --> 0:27:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I know he's at the tail end of his career,

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 1>but he's not this bad. Ryan walshmid is a prospect

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 1>that you love. I love. I drafted him in the

0:27:58.119 --> 0:28:00.879
<v Speaker 1>rookie draft at the beginning of the season. He's better

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:03.960
<v Speaker 1>than being twenty percent below league average. And I think

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:06.920
<v Speaker 1>if one of those guys or two hopefully or three,

0:28:07.000 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 1>why not because they got him, can step up until

0:28:11.080 --> 0:28:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the August third trade deadline, help them win some more games.

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 1>It'll make Mike Haysen's job a little bit easier because

0:28:18.080 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to ask in the Diamondbacks rotation who's

0:28:20.520 --> 0:28:24.159
<v Speaker 1>going to step up. They've lost so many pieces, like

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:28.920
<v Speaker 1>you lost Ryan Nelson, you lost Michael Soroka. Gallon just

0:28:29.000 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 1>hit the il. Corbyn Burns hasn't returned, so that's more

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:37.880
<v Speaker 1>of just I hope someone does. Injuries are They're not

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 1>having so many injuries in the bottom half of their lineup.

0:28:40.160 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 1>These are the guys they brought in and they should

0:28:42.400 --> 0:28:45.120
<v Speaker 1>be better. So my burning question for the Diamondbacks is

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 1>who from five to nine in the lineup is going

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 1>to step up and help the front four? Yeah?

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, And I think you know you're hoping when they

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 4>brought in cap wlare that as he just kind of

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:56.640
<v Speaker 4>shakes the rust off. If he's in a ninety five

0:28:56.800 --> 0:28:59.000
<v Speaker 4>WRC plus for them, I think they're happy with that.

0:28:59.040 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 4>They just need the bottom half for the lineup to

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 4>not just be a crater. And I think Walschmid is

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 4>the big variable day that I'm looking at because his

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:07.040
<v Speaker 4>first one hundred and thirty Big League play appearances they

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 4>send him back down the trip away. Now he's back

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 4>up demolished Triple A of course, and if he can

0:29:12.280 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 4>settle in and be a solid piece for them, I

0:29:14.600 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 4>think that really helps length in this lineup one hundred percent.

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's move over to the San Diego Padres and I'll

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:23.959
<v Speaker 1>go first this time around. Can Jackson Merrill turn it

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 1>around in the second half, because I think when you

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:31.360
<v Speaker 1>look at the Padres offense, you know people immediately go, well,

0:29:31.360 --> 0:29:36.920
<v Speaker 1>what went wrong? And the big name is Fernando tacI Junior, right,

0:29:36.960 --> 0:29:40.920
<v Speaker 1>we saw the home run downturn, but at the end

0:29:40.920 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 1>of the day, he's been two percent abovely gaverage. It's

0:29:43.440 --> 0:29:45.360
<v Speaker 1>not like he's been a hole. He just hasn't provided

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 1>much power. And Manny Machado, his name has certainly been

0:29:48.600 --> 0:29:50.840
<v Speaker 1>floated around there for one of the most disappointing players

0:29:50.840 --> 0:29:54.280
<v Speaker 1>in Major League Baseball. But by WRC plus, he's been

0:29:54.280 --> 0:29:56.760
<v Speaker 1>a better hitter than Jackson Merrill has this season. And

0:29:56.800 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 1>this one's just shocking to me. Now, he has some

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 1>decent counting numbers. He's got ten homers, he's got nineteen steals,

0:30:03.080 --> 0:30:06.480
<v Speaker 1>the Man's Batten two nineteen arm obpad two seventy eight

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 1>slug at three point fifty, he's been twenty four percent

0:30:09.720 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 1>worse than a league average hitter by WRC plus, sitting

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:16.640
<v Speaker 1>at just seventy six. The strikeout rate has jumped all

0:30:16.680 --> 0:30:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the way to twenty five percent. Now, I know he's

0:30:19.120 --> 0:30:21.160
<v Speaker 1>still twenty three years old, and I know you and

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:24.880
<v Speaker 1>I there is no he could literally hit zero this year,

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 1>and you and I are not giving up on him.

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 1>But for the Padres to turn it around, especially offensively,

0:30:30.720 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 1>like Jackson Merrill, has to be better, he simply does

0:30:34.280 --> 0:30:36.160
<v Speaker 1>so that's my burning question for the Padres.

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:38.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, Meryl, it's it's one of the more

0:30:38.640 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 4>shocking struggles we've seen. You know, I know that he

0:30:41.760 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 4>had this the frustrations last year and struggle last year,

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 4>but you had a concussion and other injuries to justify it. Like,

0:30:47.800 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 4>I don't know what's going on now, and it's it's puzzling,

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:53.600
<v Speaker 4>and you know, we saw it kind of be contagious

0:30:53.600 --> 0:30:55.800
<v Speaker 4>through this team, but now you've seen Machado really pick up.

0:30:56.480 --> 0:30:58.880
<v Speaker 4>As you mentioned, Tatista has at least started to pick

0:30:58.920 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 4>it up. Maryl was the one. He's not shown the

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:04.480
<v Speaker 4>signs of life yet at all. And like, even if

0:31:04.480 --> 0:31:06.760
<v Speaker 4>he was just showing signs of life to be close

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:09.640
<v Speaker 4>to a league average hitter or just even having an

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:12.000
<v Speaker 4>upward trajectory over the last month, I think.

0:31:11.880 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 3>I'd be less concerned. But right now I'm pretty darn concerned.

0:31:16.600 --> 0:31:19.360
<v Speaker 4>And and it just is a I don't know, it's

0:31:19.360 --> 0:31:22.200
<v Speaker 4>a weird spot for him to be in because I

0:31:22.240 --> 0:31:25.640
<v Speaker 4>think he's such a glue guy for this team, especially

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:27.760
<v Speaker 4>with some of the older pieces that they have to

0:31:27.800 --> 0:31:29.880
<v Speaker 4>be able to impact the game in so many different ways.

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 3>And mine is more just just kind of broad because

0:31:34.440 --> 0:31:35.400
<v Speaker 3>I think it's still.

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:38.160
<v Speaker 4>Kind of inevitable that this team is going to buy,

0:31:38.280 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 4>so long as they don't just legitimately drop eight to

0:31:42.600 --> 0:31:43.480
<v Speaker 4>the next ten.

0:31:43.520 --> 0:31:44.320
<v Speaker 3>Or something like that.

0:31:44.360 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 4>Like I think if they're within three to five games

0:31:47.600 --> 0:31:49.440
<v Speaker 4>of five hundred, I think they're still going to go

0:31:49.520 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 4>for it.

0:31:51.600 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 3>How do they buy this year?

0:31:53.000 --> 0:31:54.320
<v Speaker 4>I know we feel I feel like we say this

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:59.960
<v Speaker 4>every year, but last year, they you know, went out

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:02.360
<v Speaker 4>and with the Mason Miller deal, like they went out

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:05.240
<v Speaker 4>and traded one of the best prospects in Major League Baseball.

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:07.960
<v Speaker 4>Now there wasn't a lot behind that, but then he

0:32:08.040 --> 0:32:11.000
<v Speaker 4>just went probably went quantity over like for all the

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 4>deals and basically traded all of their quantity. You know,

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:16.840
<v Speaker 4>people are gonna say, oh, we say this every year,

0:32:16.880 --> 0:32:17.840
<v Speaker 4>how is probably gonna do it?

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 3>He literally traded everything everything. So there are some pieces here.

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:24.520
<v Speaker 4>And I think for Rentals, yeah, Prower can make trades happen,

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:28.680
<v Speaker 4>but Preller as aggressive as he likes to be, and

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 4>we have seen.

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:31.440
<v Speaker 3>Him go nuts for Rental, Tanner, Scott and things like that.

0:32:31.480 --> 0:32:32.680
<v Speaker 3>But that team was really good.

0:32:33.160 --> 0:32:35.280
<v Speaker 4>Like that Danner's got had the chance to like actually

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:37.360
<v Speaker 4>pushed that team into another Acheloon.

0:32:37.600 --> 0:32:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Just that team almost beat the Dodgers in twenty twenty four,

0:32:40.800 --> 0:32:43.560
<v Speaker 1>who then beat the shit out of the Yankees in five.

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Like the Prodgers were ahead in that series. It's totally

0:32:46.240 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 1>understandable to go all in at the twenty twenty four deadline. Absolutely,

0:32:49.600 --> 0:32:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and then in twenty twenty five, this is a playoff team.

0:32:51.560 --> 0:32:53.960
<v Speaker 1>They got there, it's just they lost in the playoffs

0:32:54.320 --> 0:32:55.200
<v Speaker 1>and should happen that.

0:32:55.840 --> 0:32:58.800
<v Speaker 4>And that buying was a little bit more control based,

0:32:58.880 --> 0:33:01.560
<v Speaker 4>like you had Ramon Loreano with o Hearne was a rental,

0:33:01.560 --> 0:33:03.920
<v Speaker 4>but it came with Loreana with control. Mason Miller was

0:33:03.960 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 4>a bunch of control. And I think with that, I

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 4>don't know if we see Preller go mad Man for

0:33:11.040 --> 0:33:13.840
<v Speaker 4>rentals like because then I think that's also all that

0:33:13.840 --> 0:33:16.400
<v Speaker 4>they can do. So this is where I'm most fascinated,

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:18.400
<v Speaker 4>like how does Preller make this happen?

0:33:18.600 --> 0:33:21.280
<v Speaker 3>And the immediate answer could be Ethan Salas.

0:33:21.560 --> 0:33:23.760
<v Speaker 4>They could go, but I don't think you trade that guy,

0:33:23.760 --> 0:33:27.200
<v Speaker 4>and I don't even think Preller trades that guy. And

0:33:27.240 --> 0:33:29.240
<v Speaker 4>I don't think that one hundred at bats of Louis

0:33:29.280 --> 0:33:31.440
<v Speaker 4>Campusano swinging at a really high level is gonna be

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:35.200
<v Speaker 4>enough for him to do that either. I think school Craft,

0:33:35.240 --> 0:33:37.040
<v Speaker 4>a couple other guys maybe they can make it happen.

0:33:37.200 --> 0:33:40.400
<v Speaker 4>I'm just really curious to see this. This is the

0:33:40.440 --> 0:33:44.800
<v Speaker 4>most hand tied aj Preller has ever been going into

0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:46.640
<v Speaker 4>a deadline, and it might be the worst team he's

0:33:46.640 --> 0:33:47.800
<v Speaker 4>had going into the deadline.

0:33:47.840 --> 0:33:50.000
<v Speaker 3>So I'm just I just can't wait to see what

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:50.360
<v Speaker 3>he does.

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:53.320
<v Speaker 1>That's why I'm just not sold that day. By I'm

0:33:53.360 --> 0:33:55.040
<v Speaker 1>really not, I mean, out of the break, they have

0:33:55.080 --> 0:34:00.320
<v Speaker 1>a pretty relatively easy schedule until the deadline. Right they

0:34:00.320 --> 0:34:03.080
<v Speaker 1>face the Royals, that's their first series out of the break,

0:34:03.360 --> 0:34:06.840
<v Speaker 1>they theoretically should take care of business, but it's not

0:34:06.880 --> 0:34:08.879
<v Speaker 1>like the Putters are that good, so who's to say

0:34:08.880 --> 0:34:11.120
<v Speaker 1>that they do. Then they're going to go face teams

0:34:11.120 --> 0:34:13.480
<v Speaker 1>like the Braves and the Marlins, which are going to

0:34:13.520 --> 0:34:15.840
<v Speaker 1>be tough. But then you got like the Rockies and

0:34:15.880 --> 0:34:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the Giants. So I think if they struggle in this stretch,

0:34:21.360 --> 0:34:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I would be surprised if Pereller buys because if you're

0:34:24.239 --> 0:34:27.600
<v Speaker 1>telling me like this team is not catching a second

0:34:27.680 --> 0:34:33.239
<v Speaker 1>wind and they're not handling Rockies, Giants and Royals, that

0:34:33.280 --> 0:34:35.239
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem like a team that you want to add

0:34:35.280 --> 0:34:37.960
<v Speaker 1>on to and trade from. This farm system that you

0:34:38.000 --> 0:34:41.800
<v Speaker 1>said to yourself is now quite barren because Preller sold

0:34:41.800 --> 0:34:44.439
<v Speaker 1>off a lot. What makes Preller such an incredible GM

0:34:44.520 --> 0:34:46.399
<v Speaker 1>is that he's able to replenish the system. And I'm

0:34:46.440 --> 0:34:48.680
<v Speaker 1>sure now that they have a couple of key names,

0:34:48.760 --> 0:34:51.319
<v Speaker 1>but at what point is enough enough?

0:34:51.680 --> 0:34:53.480
<v Speaker 4>Well, and that's where I think maybe they go to

0:34:53.480 --> 0:34:55.959
<v Speaker 4>the bullpen and say, okay, well, if we trade you,

0:34:55.960 --> 0:34:58.319
<v Speaker 4>you know they're gonna get Jeremiah strawa back relatively soon.

0:34:58.360 --> 0:35:02.000
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, if we send you more a hone and

0:35:02.040 --> 0:35:03.760
<v Speaker 4>I know, I know that's your your your best lefty.

0:35:03.840 --> 0:35:05.799
<v Speaker 4>But if we send you more a hoone and and

0:35:05.880 --> 0:35:08.879
<v Speaker 4>a prospect or something like that for a team that

0:35:09.040 --> 0:35:11.319
<v Speaker 4>is is competitive as well, and we do the big

0:35:11.400 --> 0:35:13.759
<v Speaker 4>leaguer for big leaguer thing that could make some sense.

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Be could teams.

0:35:14.440 --> 0:35:16.439
<v Speaker 4>You know, if David Morgan is healthy in the next

0:35:16.440 --> 0:35:19.080
<v Speaker 4>couple weeks, Morgan in a prospect like I think I

0:35:19.080 --> 0:35:22.080
<v Speaker 4>could see Prower getting creative and leverage the bowl, leveraging

0:35:22.120 --> 0:35:23.600
<v Speaker 4>the bullpen arms that they have too. So I just

0:35:23.600 --> 0:35:24.640
<v Speaker 4>can't wait to see what he does.

0:35:24.920 --> 0:35:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no doubt about it. Let's go over to the

0:35:27.200 --> 0:35:30.200
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco Giants and you're up first your one and

0:35:30.280 --> 0:35:31.799
<v Speaker 1>burning question for.

0:35:31.760 --> 0:35:33.719
<v Speaker 4>A team that's already out of it, it's just can

0:35:33.760 --> 0:35:35.600
<v Speaker 4>they offload one of these big contracts?

0:35:35.719 --> 0:35:37.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? That was that was mine too, I said, I

0:35:37.920 --> 0:35:39.799
<v Speaker 1>just real quick, I said, can they commit to a

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:40.520
<v Speaker 1>full teardown?

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:41.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:35:41.440 --> 0:35:44.960
<v Speaker 4>And I think they wheel up to Logan Web and

0:35:45.000 --> 0:35:47.919
<v Speaker 4>like can they Can they be convinced on Logan Web?

0:35:48.440 --> 0:35:53.040
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, but I'm just curious about the financial side,

0:35:53.120 --> 0:35:55.120
<v Speaker 4>because look, you're not gonna be able to move the

0:35:55.400 --> 0:35:58.920
<v Speaker 4>Devers deal and if you somehow do incredible And.

0:35:58.880 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Speaker 3>That's this part of the big question.

0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Hey, can we give dev some credit? Though he's he's

0:36:03.239 --> 0:36:05.680
<v Speaker 1>really turned it up lately, got his WRC plus up

0:36:05.680 --> 0:36:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to one eighteen. Like, you know, he's a ton of

0:36:09.080 --> 0:36:12.279
<v Speaker 1>national media on his you know, really rough start to

0:36:12.320 --> 0:36:14.759
<v Speaker 1>the season, but ever since then, he's been a really,

0:36:14.800 --> 0:36:16.800
<v Speaker 1>really good bat. Of course, he's still crazy expensive and

0:36:16.840 --> 0:36:19.520
<v Speaker 1>he can't defend, but the bat has returned.

0:36:19.840 --> 0:36:21.879
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and I think he's gonna hit for a long time.

0:36:21.920 --> 0:36:23.359
<v Speaker 4>I do, Like, I think he's gonna be a good bat,

0:36:23.400 --> 0:36:26.080
<v Speaker 4>but I just don't as.

0:36:25.880 --> 0:36:27.640
<v Speaker 3>We both know, like, no one's going to be lining

0:36:27.760 --> 0:36:31.880
<v Speaker 3>up to take that deal on. So you're you're you're

0:36:31.960 --> 0:36:32.799
<v Speaker 3>kind of strapped with that.

0:36:33.520 --> 0:36:36.480
<v Speaker 4>You know they're gonna move Awrise, it seems like, and

0:36:36.520 --> 0:36:38.680
<v Speaker 4>there's been reports I think John Hayman had reported too.

0:36:38.640 --> 0:36:41.480
<v Speaker 3>Like they aren't necessarily eager to move Jong Houli.

0:36:41.600 --> 0:36:43.719
<v Speaker 4>So like if they're not able to move Chapman, they're

0:36:43.719 --> 0:36:45.960
<v Speaker 4>not able to move devs. Like do they just say, hey,

0:36:46.040 --> 0:36:47.960
<v Speaker 4>maybe maybe this is some money that we clear off.

0:36:48.480 --> 0:36:49.960
<v Speaker 3>I just look at a Damis.

0:36:49.920 --> 0:36:51.960
<v Speaker 4>And I look at Matt Chapman, and I just say, like,

0:36:52.480 --> 0:36:55.279
<v Speaker 4>can you somehow figure it out? Could you swap not

0:36:55.360 --> 0:36:58.800
<v Speaker 4>a bad contract, but take on some maybe slightly underwater money?

0:36:59.000 --> 0:37:01.960
<v Speaker 3>Like how how creative can Buster Posey get here?

0:37:02.280 --> 0:37:06.239
<v Speaker 4>And we've seen Buster Posey just add and sign and

0:37:06.600 --> 0:37:07.680
<v Speaker 4>you know, do kind of.

0:37:07.600 --> 0:37:10.719
<v Speaker 3>The easy MLB the show type of things. Let's see

0:37:10.719 --> 0:37:11.719
<v Speaker 3>Buster Posey.

0:37:11.480 --> 0:37:14.080
<v Speaker 4>Try to get himself out of a situation that you know,

0:37:14.280 --> 0:37:16.040
<v Speaker 4>is created by some of the moves not going the

0:37:16.040 --> 0:37:18.040
<v Speaker 4>way that he wanted them to. And that happens, and

0:37:18.280 --> 0:37:20.480
<v Speaker 4>that happens to a lot of gms, but and executives,

0:37:20.480 --> 0:37:24.360
<v Speaker 4>but the good executives and the unemployed executives. The difference

0:37:24.360 --> 0:37:27.279
<v Speaker 4>between those twos, they maneuver their way out of these situations.

0:37:27.440 --> 0:37:28.520
<v Speaker 3>So I'm hungry to see.

0:37:28.480 --> 0:37:30.800
<v Speaker 1>One hundred percent. And that's why I chose my words

0:37:30.800 --> 0:37:33.080
<v Speaker 1>carefully when I wrote down, do they commit to a

0:37:33.120 --> 0:37:36.400
<v Speaker 1>full teardown? Because I think they'll do a pretty good

0:37:36.480 --> 0:37:40.359
<v Speaker 1>job at selling off these, you know, contracts that are

0:37:40.400 --> 0:37:42.000
<v Speaker 1>going to end at the end of the year, these

0:37:42.040 --> 0:37:45.319
<v Speaker 1>expiring deals. But will they be able to move bad

0:37:45.440 --> 0:37:49.480
<v Speaker 1>contracts or will they be able to move pretty good contracts?

0:37:50.200 --> 0:37:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Like is this a full teardown? Is Web gone? Is

0:37:53.640 --> 0:37:57.120
<v Speaker 1>jung Huli gone? Right? Because if they're unable to move

0:37:57.520 --> 0:38:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the Chapman's the damas the Devers contracts, which appear to

0:38:02.360 --> 0:38:05.080
<v Speaker 1>be pretty much underwater at this point, I guess outside

0:38:05.080 --> 0:38:07.240
<v Speaker 1>of Matt Chapman, I still feel like that's a fine deal,

0:38:07.840 --> 0:38:09.800
<v Speaker 1>but the other two not so much. If they aren't

0:38:09.800 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 1>able to move but they really need to move money

0:38:11.680 --> 0:38:14.440
<v Speaker 1>off the books, are they then forced to trade a

0:38:14.480 --> 0:38:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Web and a Jung hou Lee. That's why I want

0:38:17.600 --> 0:38:20.080
<v Speaker 1>a step further, and I feel like that's the burning question,

0:38:20.239 --> 0:38:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and it might just be a plane no right. If

0:38:22.160 --> 0:38:24.680
<v Speaker 1>they're not able to move the bad contracts. They don't

0:38:24.719 --> 0:38:27.040
<v Speaker 1>want to move the webs or the junghu Lei's of

0:38:27.080 --> 0:38:29.799
<v Speaker 1>the world. But I am certainly curious because I could

0:38:29.840 --> 0:38:31.919
<v Speaker 1>see it happening one dick.

0:38:31.960 --> 0:38:34.280
<v Speaker 4>Are they willing to pay it down Toeah? It happened

0:38:34.320 --> 0:38:36.759
<v Speaker 4>like Chapman, Like you got to pay that guy twenty

0:38:36.840 --> 0:38:39.719
<v Speaker 4>five a year until he's thirty seven. He has a

0:38:39.719 --> 0:38:43.239
<v Speaker 4>full no trade cost too. So this is this is

0:38:43.280 --> 0:38:46.040
<v Speaker 4>a big test for Buster. I want to see how

0:38:46.080 --> 0:38:47.319
<v Speaker 4>he works his way through it.

0:38:47.719 --> 0:38:49.960
<v Speaker 1>We will see. Let's go over to the Colorado Rockies.

0:38:50.719 --> 0:38:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Mine is more of a fun one. I'm curious what

0:38:53.280 --> 0:38:56.239
<v Speaker 1>you brought up. But can Hunter Goodman become the eighth

0:38:56.400 --> 0:38:59.920
<v Speaker 1>catcher ever to hit forty plus home runs? And I

0:39:00.160 --> 0:39:03.040
<v Speaker 1>think that right when you look at Goodman's year and

0:39:03.080 --> 0:39:06.160
<v Speaker 1>you see twenty seven home runs by the break, it's awesome,

0:39:06.520 --> 0:39:10.600
<v Speaker 1>but almost like cal Raley hurt this narrative last year

0:39:10.640 --> 0:39:14.120
<v Speaker 1>by hitting sixty with how rare it is for a

0:39:14.200 --> 0:39:17.640
<v Speaker 1>catcher to hit forty plus home runs like this is

0:39:17.680 --> 0:39:20.520
<v Speaker 1>a feat that the Mike Piazzas of the world, the

0:39:20.680 --> 0:39:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Roy Campanella's of course cal Raley, I mean cal Rawley

0:39:25.520 --> 0:39:28.680
<v Speaker 1>was the first player to hit forty homers since Salvi

0:39:28.840 --> 0:39:30.839
<v Speaker 1>did it back in twenty twenty one to forty eight,

0:39:30.920 --> 0:39:34.120
<v Speaker 1>and forty eight was the previous record. I mean, he's

0:39:34.200 --> 0:39:36.719
<v Speaker 1>right there. Like you see the list Johnny Bench in

0:39:36.800 --> 0:39:40.879
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventy, Hobby Lopez in twenty twenty three already mentioned

0:39:40.960 --> 0:39:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Roy Campanella, Todd Hunley forty one in nineteen ninety six,

0:39:44.760 --> 0:39:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Johnny Bench did it again, Mike Piazza did it twice.

0:39:48.000 --> 0:39:51.040
<v Speaker 1>That's it and he is on pace to do so.

0:39:51.120 --> 0:39:54.120
<v Speaker 1>You look at the Fangrafts projections, the highest for the

0:39:54.120 --> 0:39:57.279
<v Speaker 1>rest of the season is sixteen, the lowest is twelve,

0:39:57.400 --> 0:40:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and they're generally a bit more conservative. I think this

0:40:00.960 --> 0:40:02.160
<v Speaker 1>is an awesome story.

0:40:02.640 --> 0:40:03.759
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no, it is.

0:40:03.880 --> 0:40:06.880
<v Speaker 4>It is, and I think there's the fact that there's

0:40:07.040 --> 0:40:09.799
<v Speaker 4>something worth following there, like can a Rockies player have

0:40:09.840 --> 0:40:13.239
<v Speaker 4>a historic season? Is yeah, in itself just exciting and

0:40:13.560 --> 0:40:16.280
<v Speaker 4>hopefully brings keeps fans coming out to the ballpark, which.

0:40:16.080 --> 0:40:18.040
<v Speaker 3>They do a great job of there at Cores.

0:40:18.080 --> 0:40:20.640
<v Speaker 4>But at the same time, like you've seen a little

0:40:20.719 --> 0:40:23.360
<v Speaker 4>bit of a dip in frustration and understandably so, I

0:40:23.400 --> 0:40:24.920
<v Speaker 4>can't believe that they've stuck it out as long as

0:40:24.920 --> 0:40:26.560
<v Speaker 4>they have, and I think it's just because the vibes

0:40:26.560 --> 0:40:28.880
<v Speaker 4>are so high and it's in a great location. But

0:40:29.600 --> 0:40:31.880
<v Speaker 4>there's reasons to go to the ballpark now with the Rockies,

0:40:31.880 --> 0:40:34.239
<v Speaker 4>and I think Hunter Goodman's a big part of that.

0:40:34.960 --> 0:40:36.399
<v Speaker 3>The other part of it is just that this team

0:40:36.440 --> 0:40:38.399
<v Speaker 3>is like actually functioning, and I talk about that a lot.

0:40:38.400 --> 0:40:39.719
<v Speaker 4>I think I bring it up all the time on here,

0:40:39.719 --> 0:40:42.440
<v Speaker 4>But my question is just what does a functional Rockies

0:40:42.480 --> 0:40:44.600
<v Speaker 4>front office look like with assets to cash in on.

0:40:45.440 --> 0:40:47.880
<v Speaker 4>In the past, we've literally seen the Rockies not trade

0:40:47.920 --> 0:40:50.640
<v Speaker 4>rentals and let them walk in free agency for no

0:40:50.760 --> 0:40:52.160
<v Speaker 4>reason other than maybe.

0:40:51.960 --> 0:40:52.839
<v Speaker 3>We could get them back.

0:40:53.360 --> 0:40:54.839
<v Speaker 2>You can also get it back if you trade him,

0:40:54.840 --> 0:40:57.600
<v Speaker 2>you can still sign them and he's equally a free

0:40:57.600 --> 0:41:00.480
<v Speaker 2>agent if you trade him before or if you just

0:41:01.040 --> 0:41:04.120
<v Speaker 2>let them walk like you're not gonna qo brent Souter, Do.

0:41:04.080 --> 0:41:07.239
<v Speaker 1>You think they know that? Like you're joking rod As

0:41:07.280 --> 0:41:09.040
<v Speaker 1>if they know that, I don't know if they know that.

0:41:09.239 --> 0:41:11.680
<v Speaker 1>They know that now, Yeah they do now, but I'm saying.

0:41:11.480 --> 0:41:13.319
<v Speaker 3>Did Deepadesta knows that now?

0:41:13.560 --> 0:41:17.000
<v Speaker 4>So back then they did it like they literally didn't

0:41:17.000 --> 0:41:20.040
<v Speaker 4>pick up the phone. So I just want to see

0:41:20.080 --> 0:41:21.120
<v Speaker 4>what they do now, because I think this is a

0:41:21.120 --> 0:41:24.960
<v Speaker 4>front office that actually operate and actually is a little

0:41:24.960 --> 0:41:29.040
<v Speaker 4>bit more innovative and actually is is actively trying to

0:41:29.080 --> 0:41:32.399
<v Speaker 4>improve this team. And also you have Charlie Condon, who

0:41:32.400 --> 0:41:34.080
<v Speaker 4>we just talked to, you know on the call up

0:41:34.160 --> 0:41:36.080
<v Speaker 4>a bunch of fun interviews from the Futurist Game.

0:41:36.120 --> 0:41:37.799
<v Speaker 3>By the way, check that out on the call up,

0:41:37.840 --> 0:41:38.799
<v Speaker 3>like twenty.

0:41:38.520 --> 0:41:41.120
<v Speaker 4>Top prospects that we talked to two different episodes going

0:41:41.120 --> 0:41:44.839
<v Speaker 4>out today and tomorrow. But Condon's did ten home runs

0:41:44.840 --> 0:41:47.160
<v Speaker 4>in twenty games in Triple A six and five games,

0:41:47.200 --> 0:41:48.480
<v Speaker 4>like he's ready to go at the big league level.

0:41:48.480 --> 0:41:49.320
<v Speaker 3>You got to care up some space.

0:41:49.640 --> 0:41:53.560
<v Speaker 4>They've got rentals, they've got pieces, they've got bullpen arms,

0:41:53.600 --> 0:41:57.960
<v Speaker 4>they've got pieces. In a market where no one's selling,

0:41:59.040 --> 0:42:01.680
<v Speaker 4>a lot of teams are going to be interested, Like Maniac,

0:42:01.840 --> 0:42:03.800
<v Speaker 4>a lot of teams want a left handed hitting outfielder,

0:42:03.960 --> 0:42:06.040
<v Speaker 4>a lot of teams need a hard throwing bullpen arms.

0:42:06.360 --> 0:42:09.319
<v Speaker 4>I think there's plenty of different ways where this team

0:42:09.360 --> 0:42:13.200
<v Speaker 4>can get creative and really recoup a punt as one

0:42:13.239 --> 0:42:16.640
<v Speaker 4>of the few sellers in this market. So I want

0:42:16.680 --> 0:42:20.080
<v Speaker 4>to see what a competent Rockies front office can do

0:42:20.560 --> 0:42:23.840
<v Speaker 4>being one of the teams with the most assets to

0:42:23.880 --> 0:42:24.319
<v Speaker 4>part with.

0:42:25.120 --> 0:42:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I do hope they don't go full board, though, and

0:42:27.080 --> 0:42:29.560
<v Speaker 1>trade a guy like Hunter Goodman. Selfishly, yeah, I don't

0:42:29.560 --> 0:42:32.160
<v Speaker 1>think they trade Goodman. Yeah. Selfishly. As a Yankee fan,

0:42:32.160 --> 0:42:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I would love to see him in pinstripes. But I

0:42:34.280 --> 0:42:36.640
<v Speaker 1>just I think it's better for the Rockies long term.

0:42:36.680 --> 0:42:39.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you have a guy who hit thirty one

0:42:39.560 --> 0:42:42.640
<v Speaker 1>home runs last year, really broke onto the scene and

0:42:42.800 --> 0:42:45.160
<v Speaker 1>is saying, hold my beer, let me do it again,

0:42:45.239 --> 0:42:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and do it better this time, twenty six years old,

0:42:48.239 --> 0:42:51.200
<v Speaker 1>years of control, cheap. There is no reason to trade him.

0:42:51.280 --> 0:42:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I just hope they don't use this opportunity to just

0:42:54.239 --> 0:42:57.160
<v Speaker 1>wipe the sleep clean and trade everyone. I think you

0:42:57.160 --> 0:42:59.200
<v Speaker 1>should keep Hunter Goodman, and I think they will do that.

0:42:59.239 --> 0:43:01.120
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted to put it out there that I

0:43:01.160 --> 0:43:03.920
<v Speaker 1>hope they don't for the sake of the Rockies and

0:43:04.000 --> 0:43:06.080
<v Speaker 1>for the sake of the fans. Right, moving into the

0:43:06.080 --> 0:43:08.480
<v Speaker 1>second half of the MLB season, all right, we're going

0:43:08.520 --> 0:43:13.080
<v Speaker 1>to move over to the National League Central. One burning

0:43:13.200 --> 0:43:16.560
<v Speaker 1>question for every team in the National League. We move

0:43:16.719 --> 0:43:19.840
<v Speaker 1>over to the National League Central with the Brewers, the Cubs,

0:43:19.840 --> 0:43:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals, the Pirates and the Reds. We're going to

0:43:22.440 --> 0:43:25.600
<v Speaker 1>start up top at the division with the Milwaukee Brewers.

0:43:25.680 --> 0:43:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I went first for the Rockies Arms, so you're up first.

0:43:28.400 --> 0:43:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Your one burning question for the Brewers.

0:43:30.560 --> 0:43:31.439
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to keep my.

0:43:31.360 --> 0:43:35.759
<v Speaker 4>Theme going of just more team wide front office type

0:43:35.760 --> 0:43:38.840
<v Speaker 4>of questions, and is this the one year they actually

0:43:38.880 --> 0:43:41.440
<v Speaker 4>swing for the fences, because if the Brewers don't do

0:43:41.480 --> 0:43:44.040
<v Speaker 4>it this year, I'm just going to embrace that they're

0:43:44.080 --> 0:43:45.960
<v Speaker 4>never ever, ever ever ever going to do it. And

0:43:46.000 --> 0:43:47.759
<v Speaker 4>I'm already kind of embraced that they're never going to

0:43:47.840 --> 0:43:51.000
<v Speaker 4>do it, but now I will fully embrace that they

0:43:51.000 --> 0:43:51.800
<v Speaker 4>will never.

0:43:51.680 --> 0:43:54.719
<v Speaker 3>Ever ever ever ever ever ever buy because I just

0:43:54.800 --> 0:43:58.200
<v Speaker 3>don't know if you don't do it this year. This

0:43:58.360 --> 0:43:59.640
<v Speaker 3>is such a good team.

0:44:00.400 --> 0:44:03.799
<v Speaker 4>You have so much talent in your farm system. It's

0:44:03.840 --> 0:44:06.280
<v Speaker 4>actually it's actually gross.

0:44:06.000 --> 0:44:09.440
<v Speaker 3>Like it is. It is greed. It is greed.

0:44:09.520 --> 0:44:11.920
<v Speaker 4>How much talent that the brig is greedy farm system

0:44:12.080 --> 0:44:15.600
<v Speaker 4>they don't have room for all of these guys that

0:44:15.680 --> 0:44:20.800
<v Speaker 4>the Biloxi Shuckers are are better than entire farm systems.

0:44:20.800 --> 0:44:21.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm not kidding.

0:44:21.360 --> 0:44:24.840
<v Speaker 4>By like, by talent, I would take that team over

0:44:25.520 --> 0:44:28.520
<v Speaker 4>some other entire farm systems. In Major League Baseball, and

0:44:29.160 --> 0:44:32.080
<v Speaker 4>I mean you just your recently extended prospects.

0:44:32.080 --> 0:44:34.000
<v Speaker 3>Aolie Laura is up there playing a few times a week.

0:44:34.080 --> 0:44:36.080
<v Speaker 4>Like you've got Cooper Pratt up there as well, Like

0:44:36.200 --> 0:44:37.560
<v Speaker 4>you also have some of the guys alread up at

0:44:37.560 --> 0:44:41.360
<v Speaker 4>the big league level, and you still have a trillion prospects.

0:44:42.160 --> 0:44:46.960
<v Speaker 4>Go for something crazy, do something nuts for once, please,

0:44:47.680 --> 0:44:49.360
<v Speaker 4>like you don't even have to feel it. I'm not

0:44:49.360 --> 0:44:53.400
<v Speaker 4>saying you have to, like fully just just like unplug

0:44:53.480 --> 0:44:57.560
<v Speaker 4>the model, but defy it a little bit. Do something

0:44:57.800 --> 0:45:02.360
<v Speaker 4>that shakes up the league for one ever ever, because yes,

0:45:02.520 --> 0:45:06.080
<v Speaker 4>you don't want to, you know, compromise sustainable winning to

0:45:06.120 --> 0:45:09.319
<v Speaker 4>push all your chips in in one season. That's why

0:45:09.320 --> 0:45:11.759
<v Speaker 4>the Brewers are what they are, like, that's why they

0:45:11.760 --> 0:45:14.160
<v Speaker 4>have all of this is because they have been steadfast.

0:45:14.360 --> 0:45:17.520
<v Speaker 4>They have accumulated talent, they have never pushed the chips forward,

0:45:17.640 --> 0:45:19.840
<v Speaker 4>and they have built the layers of talent that they have.

0:45:20.360 --> 0:45:22.880
<v Speaker 4>I'm not saying you need to go absolutely nuts and

0:45:23.719 --> 0:45:28.200
<v Speaker 4>just unravel that, but I do think you could trade

0:45:28.239 --> 0:45:29.960
<v Speaker 4>a couple of top one hundred type of prospects. You

0:45:29.960 --> 0:45:33.000
<v Speaker 4>could trade a couple a couple pieces here and go

0:45:33.080 --> 0:45:35.319
<v Speaker 4>get one of the top players available, you know, in

0:45:35.360 --> 0:45:35.800
<v Speaker 4>the market.

0:45:36.120 --> 0:45:37.359
<v Speaker 3>I don't see why you can't do that.

0:45:37.960 --> 0:45:40.799
<v Speaker 1>Use two words never and ever a lot in that

0:45:40.840 --> 0:45:43.920
<v Speaker 1>statement that you just made. On a scale of one

0:45:43.960 --> 0:45:46.799
<v Speaker 1>to ten evers, what are they at now? And if

0:45:46.840 --> 0:45:49.160
<v Speaker 1>they don't do anything of this trade deadline in terms

0:45:49.200 --> 0:45:52.160
<v Speaker 1>of big time buying, how many evers does that move

0:45:52.239 --> 0:45:52.440
<v Speaker 1>up to.

0:45:52.920 --> 0:45:57.239
<v Speaker 4>I think they're at about they're at an eight of

0:45:57.600 --> 0:46:00.520
<v Speaker 4>never ever and if they don't do it, it's ten

0:46:00.600 --> 0:46:01.120
<v Speaker 4>doors shut.

0:46:01.160 --> 0:46:02.759
<v Speaker 3>I'm never gonna bring it up on the show again.

0:46:02.800 --> 0:46:03.480
<v Speaker 3>I promise you.

0:46:03.960 --> 0:46:07.480
<v Speaker 1>We're moving past nine. So let's say they make small moves.

0:46:07.520 --> 0:46:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Does it move up to nine or does it move

0:46:09.760 --> 0:46:10.480
<v Speaker 1>down to seven?

0:46:10.840 --> 0:46:12.319
<v Speaker 3>It's just the same. Yeah.

0:46:12.560 --> 0:46:14.719
<v Speaker 4>If anything, if they just don't make any big move

0:46:14.760 --> 0:46:16.400
<v Speaker 4>this year, it's it's just gonna stay. If anything, it

0:46:16.440 --> 0:46:20.680
<v Speaker 4>will go yeah, up to nine, because I just I

0:46:20.680 --> 0:46:23.920
<v Speaker 4>think this is the year to do it. Really, this

0:46:23.960 --> 0:46:26.160
<v Speaker 4>is such a good freaking team.

0:46:26.200 --> 0:46:29.560
<v Speaker 3>The Cubs are vulnerable, yes, of course you and.

0:46:29.920 --> 0:46:33.600
<v Speaker 4>If you if you look at the Dodgers and say, well,

0:46:33.640 --> 0:46:37.000
<v Speaker 4>we can't do it because because of them, like then yeah,

0:46:37.520 --> 0:46:38.960
<v Speaker 4>some of the things that the league is saying is

0:46:39.000 --> 0:46:40.160
<v Speaker 4>probably a problem then.

0:46:40.080 --> 0:46:43.080
<v Speaker 3>Because you're two games worse in the regular season.

0:46:43.440 --> 0:46:46.440
<v Speaker 4>You have one of the most dominant you have probably

0:46:46.480 --> 0:46:48.400
<v Speaker 4>the most dominant pitcher in the league right now in

0:46:48.480 --> 0:46:51.680
<v Speaker 4>Jacob Mazerowski, and you've got plenty of talent behind them,

0:46:51.960 --> 0:46:55.360
<v Speaker 4>always a good bullpen like you can win any given series.

0:46:57.040 --> 0:47:00.200
<v Speaker 3>Assuming Kyle Harrison comes back and is okay. I just

0:47:00.280 --> 0:47:00.680
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't.

0:47:00.680 --> 0:47:04.080
<v Speaker 4>I wouldn't understand not making a decently aggressive move. I

0:47:04.080 --> 0:47:05.799
<v Speaker 4>don't even think it needs to be the craziest move ever.

0:47:05.840 --> 0:47:08.120
<v Speaker 4>I'm not saying, you know, trade Leo Devrees.

0:47:08.600 --> 0:47:09.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm not Tonguy's.

0:47:09.600 --> 0:47:11.560
<v Speaker 4>I'm not saying trade Hazers today, and I'm not saying

0:47:11.600 --> 0:47:15.080
<v Speaker 4>trade payin you. None of those blue chip guys Jet

0:47:15.120 --> 0:47:18.560
<v Speaker 4>Williams can go. You just got him for you know,

0:47:19.560 --> 0:47:23.719
<v Speaker 4>Freddy Feralta. Those guys can go. And I don't think

0:47:23.719 --> 0:47:24.239
<v Speaker 4>you feel it.

0:47:24.719 --> 0:47:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I think your question bleeds into mind and you said

0:47:27.560 --> 0:47:33.560
<v Speaker 1>something about Kyle Harrison like he should bounce back. That's

0:47:33.640 --> 0:47:37.920
<v Speaker 1>my one burning question is who steps up as the

0:47:38.040 --> 0:47:41.560
<v Speaker 1>number two pitcher with Harrison injured, Because I don't think

0:47:41.560 --> 0:47:44.719
<v Speaker 1>it's a foregone conclusion that Kyle Harrison, once he returns

0:47:44.719 --> 0:47:48.359
<v Speaker 1>from this strained left forearm. His throwing arm comes back

0:47:48.760 --> 0:47:52.280
<v Speaker 1>looking like the picture that we've seen early on right

0:47:52.400 --> 0:47:55.200
<v Speaker 1>to end. In his last two starts in July, it

0:47:55.239 --> 0:47:59.000
<v Speaker 1>was three innings, four innings, did not look good. Stuff

0:47:59.040 --> 0:48:01.439
<v Speaker 1>didn't look good, and then he's the IL or maybe

0:48:01.440 --> 0:48:04.520
<v Speaker 1>he hit the IL beforehand, or regardless, wasn't a great

0:48:04.560 --> 0:48:06.960
<v Speaker 1>situation there. And you got a twenty four year old

0:48:07.000 --> 0:48:09.120
<v Speaker 1>pitcher who's never thrown more than one hundred and twenty

0:48:09.120 --> 0:48:12.799
<v Speaker 1>four innings in his big league career so far. To

0:48:12.960 --> 0:48:15.439
<v Speaker 1>think that this guy just comes back and bounces back

0:48:15.520 --> 0:48:19.680
<v Speaker 1>to the basically ace that he was, I just don't

0:48:19.680 --> 0:48:23.680
<v Speaker 1>think it's likely. So then I say, well, Brandon Woodriff

0:48:23.760 --> 0:48:25.680
<v Speaker 1>is likely not going to be there to save you either,

0:48:26.280 --> 0:48:28.920
<v Speaker 1>because in his last start, before he hit the IL,

0:48:29.400 --> 0:48:33.000
<v Speaker 1>he was sitting eighty six. So I think to myself,

0:48:33.840 --> 0:48:39.040
<v Speaker 1>who's coming in as the game two starter behind Jacob Azarowski,

0:48:39.400 --> 0:48:41.280
<v Speaker 1>and I like some of the arms they still have left.

0:48:41.520 --> 0:48:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Logan Henderson is just whenever he gets the call to

0:48:44.440 --> 0:48:47.120
<v Speaker 1>come up, five innings, one run, there you go, here

0:48:47.120 --> 0:48:50.640
<v Speaker 1>you go? Is that number two? Though? You got Brandon Sproude,

0:48:50.640 --> 0:48:54.000
<v Speaker 1>who looks all right, but you know they lost Quinn

0:48:54.040 --> 0:48:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Priester for a lot of the season. I am curious

0:48:57.440 --> 0:49:00.960
<v Speaker 1>who's going to step up there. Maybe it's Kyle Harrison.

0:49:01.440 --> 0:49:03.239
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted to note that it is not a

0:49:03.280 --> 0:49:06.920
<v Speaker 1>foregone conclusion that he bounces back with the innings that

0:49:07.000 --> 0:49:09.759
<v Speaker 1>he's got to throw coming back from a four arm

0:49:09.840 --> 0:49:13.960
<v Speaker 1>injury when he didn't look good to end the first half. Again,

0:49:14.600 --> 0:49:17.520
<v Speaker 1>we don't know. So my burning question is who steps

0:49:17.600 --> 0:49:19.600
<v Speaker 1>up as that number two? And is it a trade,

0:49:19.640 --> 0:49:23.759
<v Speaker 1>like you said, And that might be where you go, Yeah,

0:49:23.840 --> 0:49:26.040
<v Speaker 1>go get a guy outside of the org to help

0:49:26.080 --> 0:49:26.640
<v Speaker 1>you do that.

0:49:28.040 --> 0:49:29.720
<v Speaker 4>I could see the other side and this is probably

0:49:29.760 --> 0:49:33.120
<v Speaker 4>what the Brewers will do, is well, Harrison's hurt. You know,

0:49:33.600 --> 0:49:37.799
<v Speaker 4>our chances went down from x percentage to y percentage.

0:49:38.640 --> 0:49:40.719
<v Speaker 3>We just can't do it, you know.

0:49:40.920 --> 0:49:45.200
<v Speaker 4>And I think skepticism is embedded in the very data

0:49:45.280 --> 0:49:48.480
<v Speaker 4>driven front offices. And it makes sense because technically speaking,

0:49:48.520 --> 0:49:51.319
<v Speaker 4>every single time you start a season off, the odds

0:49:51.360 --> 0:49:53.160
<v Speaker 4>are stacked against you, no matter how good you are.

0:49:54.080 --> 0:49:58.520
<v Speaker 3>But you know, I would just like to see them again.

0:49:58.560 --> 0:50:02.719
<v Speaker 4>Doesn't need to be anything crazy, but just make a

0:50:02.719 --> 0:50:04.399
<v Speaker 4>more impactful move than what we're used to.

0:50:04.680 --> 0:50:06.760
<v Speaker 1>One hundred percent. Let's go over to the Chicago Cubs

0:50:07.880 --> 0:50:12.920
<v Speaker 1>and mine is player focused. Is Nico Horner gonna bounce

0:50:12.960 --> 0:50:17.400
<v Speaker 1>back in the second half. Nico Horner has been a

0:50:17.560 --> 0:50:23.120
<v Speaker 1>problem this season offensively. He's hitting two thirty three Nico

0:50:23.320 --> 0:50:29.080
<v Speaker 1>what six thirty one ops, four homers, thirty eight RBIs

0:50:29.160 --> 0:50:32.560
<v Speaker 1>well below average and we're talking about WRC plus. Now

0:50:32.560 --> 0:50:35.760
<v Speaker 1>we still got his fourteen steals. He's still playing elite defense,

0:50:35.800 --> 0:50:39.480
<v Speaker 1>which is great. But for the Cubs to really compete

0:50:39.480 --> 0:50:43.240
<v Speaker 1>in the National League, they need Nico Horner to step

0:50:43.320 --> 0:50:48.400
<v Speaker 1>up and against righties this year arm five eighty ops.

0:50:48.440 --> 0:50:53.239
<v Speaker 1>He's hitting two eleven. In July, he ended this two

0:50:53.280 --> 0:50:57.040
<v Speaker 1>week stretch going five for thirty six for a three

0:50:57.280 --> 0:51:01.760
<v Speaker 1>seventy three OPS. Now, the Cubs they need this offense

0:51:01.800 --> 0:51:03.840
<v Speaker 1>to click on all cylinders if they really want to

0:51:03.840 --> 0:51:07.239
<v Speaker 1>compete in October. I think that they'll make it right.

0:51:07.280 --> 0:51:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that this is a playoff team. Fangrafts would agree,

0:51:09.600 --> 0:51:11.920
<v Speaker 1>giving them an eighty percent shot. The Cubs have been

0:51:11.920 --> 0:51:14.080
<v Speaker 1>a playoff team. They want to go far in the

0:51:14.080 --> 0:51:17.680
<v Speaker 1>playoffs and it can't just be PCA and friends. I'm

0:51:17.719 --> 0:51:20.359
<v Speaker 1>also looking at you. Alex Bregman needs to be better

0:51:20.360 --> 0:51:24.239
<v Speaker 1>in the second half, But Nico Horner's production is so

0:51:24.560 --> 0:51:29.439
<v Speaker 1>important to the fabric of the Cubs. Right, Bregman is new, Right,

0:51:30.040 --> 0:51:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Nico has been their guy. And when Nico's at his

0:51:32.760 --> 0:51:36.280
<v Speaker 1>best in pcight is at his best, this Cub's offense

0:51:36.280 --> 0:51:40.239
<v Speaker 1>can look unstoppable. But when PCA is at his best

0:51:40.239 --> 0:51:43.920
<v Speaker 1>without Nico and Nico's at his worst, they just won't

0:51:43.920 --> 0:51:46.480
<v Speaker 1>be able to compete against the Dodgers of the worlds

0:51:46.600 --> 0:51:48.920
<v Speaker 1>or even the Braves of the world, or I think

0:51:49.000 --> 0:51:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the Brewers of the world. So Nico has to step

0:51:53.920 --> 0:51:56.400
<v Speaker 1>up if the Cubs want to do anything, because the

0:51:56.480 --> 0:51:59.399
<v Speaker 1>Cubs and Jed Hoyer can go out and go get

0:51:59.400 --> 0:52:02.879
<v Speaker 1>a starter or two. But if Nico is still this bad,

0:52:03.800 --> 0:52:06.239
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to buy in on the cubs chances in October.

0:52:06.600 --> 0:52:08.120
<v Speaker 4>Well, Bregman's getting a lot of hate, and I know

0:52:08.160 --> 0:52:10.280
<v Speaker 4>he's getting paid big time, but he's been twenty percent

0:52:10.360 --> 0:52:14.440
<v Speaker 4>better than Nico Horner offensively, exactly. And it's not like

0:52:14.560 --> 0:52:15.839
<v Speaker 4>Nico Horner's playing for free.

0:52:15.880 --> 0:52:16.120
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:52:17.160 --> 0:52:19.279
<v Speaker 4>I know it's a lot less in terms of av

0:52:19.440 --> 0:52:21.840
<v Speaker 4>but they they're not a lot less.

0:52:21.880 --> 0:52:24.640
<v Speaker 3>It's decently less. They extended him. He's gonna be paid

0:52:24.680 --> 0:52:25.480
<v Speaker 3>for a long time.

0:52:25.680 --> 0:52:28.000
<v Speaker 4>They made a major financial commitment to him, so I

0:52:28.040 --> 0:52:30.320
<v Speaker 4>think horners should be kind of held to the same

0:52:30.840 --> 0:52:33.359
<v Speaker 4>standard or close to it, especially if he's a guy

0:52:33.360 --> 0:52:35.560
<v Speaker 4>that again has been there for a while comfortable.

0:52:35.600 --> 0:52:39.040
<v Speaker 3>It's just been a down year for me. It's who's

0:52:39.080 --> 0:52:39.520
<v Speaker 3>your ace?

0:52:40.680 --> 0:52:43.840
<v Speaker 4>Who's the guy that when he takes the ball for you,

0:52:44.640 --> 0:52:47.200
<v Speaker 4>the Cubs have a better chance of winning than the

0:52:47.200 --> 0:52:49.520
<v Speaker 4>other four days And I just don't know who that is,

0:52:49.560 --> 0:52:53.120
<v Speaker 4>and I think they really need that. Matthew Boyd would

0:52:53.120 --> 0:52:56.840
<v Speaker 4>probably be my answer right now. I know Shoda, depending

0:52:56.880 --> 0:52:59.200
<v Speaker 4>on what day it is, looks like you could be

0:52:59.280 --> 0:53:01.120
<v Speaker 4>him and then sometimes not. But that's like what comes

0:53:01.120 --> 0:53:03.279
<v Speaker 4>with the territory with SHOWDA anyways, which is why he's

0:53:03.320 --> 0:53:06.960
<v Speaker 4>not your your number one starter. And they don't have

0:53:07.160 --> 0:53:10.800
<v Speaker 4>an ace by the definition, But like who is theirs?

0:53:11.280 --> 0:53:13.200
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, And I feel like they need that

0:53:13.239 --> 0:53:16.640
<v Speaker 4>guy that when he takes the ball, that lineup knows, hey,

0:53:16.640 --> 0:53:19.120
<v Speaker 4>this is this is our day, Like we definitely have

0:53:19.160 --> 0:53:21.920
<v Speaker 4>our advantage today And I just feel like every single day,

0:53:21.960 --> 0:53:25.040
<v Speaker 4>all five even when they're healthy, like I know Edward

0:53:25.040 --> 0:53:27.279
<v Speaker 4>Cabrera like is coming back and we'll see how long

0:53:27.320 --> 0:53:30.960
<v Speaker 4>he's out from the strained hamstring. But since he got

0:53:30.960 --> 0:53:34.080
<v Speaker 4>carted off with that, it's been a sod plugging in

0:53:34.360 --> 0:53:37.480
<v Speaker 4>and he's been solid for him. You know, they went

0:53:37.520 --> 0:53:40.279
<v Speaker 4>out and acquired Peterson, Like, who do you trust? And

0:53:40.280 --> 0:53:42.520
<v Speaker 4>who's the guy that's going to be the dude for you?

0:53:42.560 --> 0:53:44.719
<v Speaker 4>The equalizer? You're on a three game skid. Who do

0:53:44.760 --> 0:53:47.239
<v Speaker 4>you want to take the ball right now? It's just like, Ah,

0:53:47.320 --> 0:53:49.920
<v Speaker 4>we really need the offense to just go crazy and

0:53:49.960 --> 0:53:52.000
<v Speaker 4>get us this win. And I think it's a really

0:53:52.000 --> 0:53:54.640
<v Speaker 4>hard way to go into the second half and play

0:53:54.680 --> 0:53:56.840
<v Speaker 4>through and forget the playoffs. I think they're going to

0:53:56.880 --> 0:53:58.960
<v Speaker 4>make it, but like, if you don't have that guy

0:53:59.000 --> 0:54:01.960
<v Speaker 4>in the playoffs, what are you gonna do?

0:54:01.960 --> 0:54:03.439
<v Speaker 1>Do you think the Cubs are going to be the

0:54:03.440 --> 0:54:05.480
<v Speaker 1>most aggressive team at this trade deadline?

0:54:06.480 --> 0:54:09.640
<v Speaker 4>No, because they're never that aggressive. It's similar like I

0:54:09.719 --> 0:54:14.319
<v Speaker 4>think they're gonna make moves, but I can never see

0:54:14.320 --> 0:54:17.680
<v Speaker 4>them being the most aggressive. Jed Hoyer is just so calculated.

0:54:18.040 --> 0:54:22.120
<v Speaker 4>It felt like Casey for Cabrera was kind of out

0:54:22.160 --> 0:54:22.640
<v Speaker 4>of character.

0:54:22.680 --> 0:54:27.360
<v Speaker 3>And even that, like there was a trade that everybody

0:54:27.520 --> 0:54:30.359
<v Speaker 3>was waiting for them to do. Yeah, and just kind

0:54:30.400 --> 0:54:32.360
<v Speaker 3>of putting on the table for it felt like a

0:54:32.440 --> 0:54:33.080
<v Speaker 3>year plus.

0:54:33.280 --> 0:54:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Remember at the last deadline they needed starters and they

0:54:36.000 --> 0:54:39.040
<v Speaker 1>decided let's just go get Michael Soroka. Yep, and that

0:54:39.160 --> 0:54:42.759
<v Speaker 1>wasn't enough. So we'll see, let's go over to the

0:54:42.800 --> 0:54:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Saint Louis Cardinals. What's your burning question?

0:54:46.560 --> 0:54:49.200
<v Speaker 4>But the Saint Louis Cardinals, I'm gonna copy paste the

0:54:49.239 --> 0:54:54.759
<v Speaker 4>Diamondbacks question because has I'm Bloom seen enough? Is he

0:54:54.800 --> 0:54:57.480
<v Speaker 4>seen enough to say, let's keep this team together forget

0:54:57.920 --> 0:55:01.319
<v Speaker 4>sustainable win and winning like bolstering the farm system. This

0:55:01.400 --> 0:55:03.600
<v Speaker 4>was supposed to be a bridge year blah blah blah

0:55:03.600 --> 0:55:08.520
<v Speaker 4>blah blah, and let's go for it like and building

0:55:08.520 --> 0:55:10.560
<v Speaker 4>off of that. What does go for it mean? Does

0:55:10.600 --> 0:55:12.160
<v Speaker 4>go for it mean we just don't cash in on

0:55:12.239 --> 0:55:15.520
<v Speaker 4>Dustin May and Riley O'Brien, or does go for it

0:55:15.560 --> 0:55:17.200
<v Speaker 4>mean we add?

0:55:17.480 --> 0:55:19.680
<v Speaker 3>I struggle to imagine that they add.

0:55:20.120 --> 0:55:22.239
<v Speaker 4>But as we record this, as we get ready for

0:55:22.280 --> 0:55:25.680
<v Speaker 4>games tomorrow, Cardinals are one game out of the wild

0:55:25.920 --> 0:55:29.640
<v Speaker 4>one game out of the wild card, Like, it's wide open,

0:55:30.280 --> 0:55:35.000
<v Speaker 4>and That's where I'm fascinated. Heim Bloom, very careful, very

0:55:35.040 --> 0:55:39.280
<v Speaker 4>much likes to bolster the farm system, and in instances

0:55:39.320 --> 0:55:41.480
<v Speaker 4>of trying to buy in the past or be aggressively,

0:55:41.560 --> 0:55:45.040
<v Speaker 4>we've seen some if he you know decisions. When he

0:55:45.080 --> 0:55:48.080
<v Speaker 4>was with the Red Sox, I think his hands were tied,

0:55:48.440 --> 0:55:51.280
<v Speaker 4>But now in a way they're kind of tied because

0:55:51.480 --> 0:55:53.400
<v Speaker 4>he can't really really swing for the fences.

0:55:53.400 --> 0:55:54.080
<v Speaker 3>But could he make some.

0:55:54.000 --> 0:55:56.400
<v Speaker 4>Savvy additions, like how does he go about this deadline?

0:55:56.800 --> 0:56:00.640
<v Speaker 4>And at the very least, has he seen anough to

0:56:00.680 --> 0:56:04.080
<v Speaker 4>not subtract some of the rentals and some of the

0:56:04.080 --> 0:56:06.279
<v Speaker 4>pieces that they have that would probably be popular trade

0:56:06.320 --> 0:56:07.239
<v Speaker 4>deadline candidates.

0:56:07.800 --> 0:56:10.759
<v Speaker 1>My question is along the same lines, but it's more

0:56:10.800 --> 0:56:14.160
<v Speaker 1>about what happens before the deadline, because I think it's

0:56:14.200 --> 0:56:16.560
<v Speaker 1>easy to forget that last year the Cardinals were fifty

0:56:16.560 --> 0:56:19.080
<v Speaker 1>one to forty six of the deadline or excuse me,

0:56:19.239 --> 0:56:22.000
<v Speaker 1>after the All Star break, and then they went one

0:56:22.040 --> 0:56:27.640
<v Speaker 1>in five and they sold. Does this Cardinals team which

0:56:27.960 --> 0:56:31.120
<v Speaker 1>does look better than last year's team. Their first series

0:56:31.160 --> 0:56:34.839
<v Speaker 1>is against the d Backs in Arizona, winnable series, then

0:56:34.840 --> 0:56:38.640
<v Speaker 1>against the Angels, very winnable series, then against the Dambecks

0:56:38.680 --> 0:56:42.520
<v Speaker 1>again it's a makeup game at home, winnable game, and

0:56:42.560 --> 0:56:45.200
<v Speaker 1>then they face the Reds at home, and then of

0:56:45.239 --> 0:56:48.080
<v Speaker 1>course they have a series against the Cups. But can

0:56:48.120 --> 0:56:52.200
<v Speaker 1>they rattle off a hot streak be a wild card

0:56:52.239 --> 0:56:56.480
<v Speaker 1>team and him Bloom goes, I think I got to

0:56:56.560 --> 0:56:59.120
<v Speaker 1>unplug the model, and I think we got to go

0:56:59.200 --> 0:57:01.440
<v Speaker 1>for it a little bit, not saying anything crazy like

0:57:01.480 --> 0:57:04.640
<v Speaker 1>you said, but at least go for it and not sell. Right.

0:57:05.360 --> 0:57:11.440
<v Speaker 1>But if they stumble against some below average teams or

0:57:11.440 --> 0:57:15.640
<v Speaker 1>even average teams, and I'm Bloom goes, oh shit, now

0:57:15.680 --> 0:57:18.040
<v Speaker 1>we're at five hundred. Let's say by the time they

0:57:18.040 --> 0:57:22.840
<v Speaker 1>face the Cubs at the end of July, they probably sell,

0:57:22.880 --> 0:57:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and they might sell big. So my question is how

0:57:26.080 --> 0:57:28.560
<v Speaker 1>do they respond post All Star Break because they were

0:57:28.560 --> 0:57:31.000
<v Speaker 1>at a similar record last year. Do they stumble like

0:57:31.040 --> 0:57:33.120
<v Speaker 1>they did last year or do they do the complete

0:57:33.160 --> 0:57:36.880
<v Speaker 1>opposite and win seven of nine games and now they're

0:57:36.920 --> 0:57:40.200
<v Speaker 1>a prohibitive wild card favorite. Then what do they do?

0:57:40.320 --> 0:57:45.560
<v Speaker 1>So I think actually these next four series are as

0:57:45.600 --> 0:57:48.600
<v Speaker 1>important for any team as there is in this entire

0:57:48.640 --> 0:57:51.800
<v Speaker 1>episode in the National League. What do the Cardinals do

0:57:51.880 --> 0:57:54.720
<v Speaker 1>against those either average or below average teams?

0:57:54.960 --> 0:57:58.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Cardinals Diamondback's two teams that in that series can

0:57:58.960 --> 0:58:00.840
<v Speaker 4>prove a lot one way, and I'm sure that's why

0:58:01.160 --> 0:58:03.160
<v Speaker 4>It'll just go two to one one way or the other,

0:58:03.240 --> 0:58:05.000
<v Speaker 4>and it'll be close games and no one will have

0:58:05.040 --> 0:58:08.360
<v Speaker 4>any definitive idea there. But I think two teams that

0:58:08.440 --> 0:58:12.000
<v Speaker 4>very much can determine their direction in the next two weeks.

0:58:12.200 --> 0:58:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's go over to the Pittsburgh Pirates, and mine is

0:58:14.200 --> 0:58:18.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty simple. Does Paul Skins regain fastball spin rate? Because

0:58:18.200 --> 0:58:20.760
<v Speaker 1>we've seen drops and spin rate that can often be

0:58:20.800 --> 0:58:24.560
<v Speaker 1>associated with potential injuries. So is this just a blip

0:58:25.800 --> 0:58:28.280
<v Speaker 1>and he comes back throwing fuel and being the Paul

0:58:28.360 --> 0:58:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Skins that we know who just recently had an ERA

0:58:32.760 --> 0:58:38.200
<v Speaker 1>above three, or is this going to be a tough

0:58:38.240 --> 0:58:41.760
<v Speaker 1>season for Paul Skiings and he either continues to perform

0:58:41.800 --> 0:58:46.560
<v Speaker 1>poorly based on his own standards, or the worst case scenario,

0:58:46.600 --> 0:58:49.120
<v Speaker 1>he gets injured. I think that's huge for the Pirates.

0:58:49.120 --> 0:58:52.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the Pirates have about twelve burning questions. Yeah,

0:58:52.120 --> 0:58:54.120
<v Speaker 1>like I think we could do an entire episode on them.

0:58:54.160 --> 0:58:56.240
<v Speaker 1>But that's the one at top of mind for me.

0:58:56.640 --> 0:58:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Your horse at the top, because we talk about guys

0:58:59.600 --> 0:59:03.360
<v Speaker 1>like Mitch Heller needs to be better. He does, but like,

0:59:03.400 --> 0:59:05.360
<v Speaker 1>how much better. Is he going to get Jared Jones

0:59:05.400 --> 0:59:07.400
<v Speaker 1>needs to be better. He did just rattle off a

0:59:07.440 --> 0:59:10.840
<v Speaker 1>six inning perfect game, right, Bubba Chandler needs to be better.

0:59:11.520 --> 0:59:13.880
<v Speaker 1>He's just so inconsistent that it's hard to know if

0:59:13.920 --> 0:59:17.120
<v Speaker 1>he will be. Ashcraft has already been great, There's no

0:59:17.160 --> 0:59:20.880
<v Speaker 1>real questions about him. But Paul Skeins can absolutely turn

0:59:20.920 --> 0:59:22.760
<v Speaker 1>it around and be the best pitcher in the National

0:59:22.840 --> 0:59:24.720
<v Speaker 1>League in the second half. Again, this comes to us

0:59:24.760 --> 0:59:27.600
<v Speaker 1>from Code five. Paul Skins in twenty twenty six average

0:59:27.640 --> 0:59:31.160
<v Speaker 1>four seamer spin rate on April first, twenty three hundred

0:59:31.200 --> 0:59:36.280
<v Speaker 1>dor pms on July first dip below two thousand, and

0:59:36.360 --> 0:59:40.360
<v Speaker 1>you see a gradual decline start overstart. So that is

0:59:40.400 --> 0:59:44.120
<v Speaker 1>my biggest question. Can Paul Skins return to form?

0:59:44.520 --> 0:59:44.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:59:44.760 --> 0:59:46.920
<v Speaker 4>I think mine is actually what you briefly touched on

0:59:47.000 --> 0:59:50.400
<v Speaker 4>there is is can Jared Jones be that clear cut

0:59:50.400 --> 0:59:53.480
<v Speaker 4>three for them? Because what we saw from Jared Jones

0:59:53.480 --> 0:59:58.640
<v Speaker 4>in that final start was also following up an abbreviated outing,

0:59:58.840 --> 1:00:02.000
<v Speaker 4>but a really sharp one against the Phillies in Citizens Bank,

1:00:02.000 --> 1:00:05.200
<v Speaker 4>where he struck out six allowed one run over four innings.

1:00:05.280 --> 1:00:08.479
<v Speaker 4>Then he followed with the six perfect eight strikeouts Jared

1:00:08.520 --> 1:00:11.080
<v Speaker 4>Jones one of the more talented arms in the league. Like,

1:00:11.360 --> 1:00:15.479
<v Speaker 4>it's a fastball slider combination that is disgusting, and since

1:00:15.480 --> 1:00:18.160
<v Speaker 4>he's returned, has had a better feel for the change

1:00:18.240 --> 1:00:20.479
<v Speaker 4>up in the curveball than when we saw him first

1:00:20.560 --> 1:00:23.000
<v Speaker 4>break into the big leags. But the fastball slider combination

1:00:23.120 --> 1:00:24.840
<v Speaker 4>was good enough where he could just overwhelm with that.

1:00:26.120 --> 1:00:29.560
<v Speaker 4>I think that Jared Jones has the pieces and the

1:00:29.600 --> 1:00:33.560
<v Speaker 4>talent to be, you know, the top thirty arm in

1:00:33.560 --> 1:00:35.880
<v Speaker 4>this game if it all clicks. So when you have

1:00:36.560 --> 1:00:40.200
<v Speaker 4>a guy like that in this rotation where we already

1:00:40.240 --> 1:00:42.480
<v Speaker 4>know Brax n Ashcraft is great and Skeens is a

1:00:42.520 --> 1:00:43.840
<v Speaker 4>big question too, like in terms.

1:00:43.640 --> 1:00:45.560
<v Speaker 3>Of just can he get back to what he was?

1:00:45.600 --> 1:00:47.800
<v Speaker 4>But to me, I'm like, I'm just gonna I'll die

1:00:47.840 --> 1:00:50.240
<v Speaker 4>on the hill of like if Skeens, if it doesn't

1:00:50.240 --> 1:00:50.880
<v Speaker 4>work with him, the.

1:00:50.840 --> 1:00:52.240
<v Speaker 3>Season's over, Like it is what it is.

1:00:52.280 --> 1:00:55.720
<v Speaker 4>But I'm going to always have the optimism that Skeens

1:00:55.760 --> 1:00:57.840
<v Speaker 4>is going to get himself right and if he doesn't,

1:00:57.840 --> 1:01:01.240
<v Speaker 4>it's because of an injury most likely. So if Jared

1:01:01.320 --> 1:01:04.640
<v Speaker 4>Jones can pitch to his abilities, and I think just

1:01:04.640 --> 1:01:06.840
<v Speaker 4>getting further removed from TJ will help him do that.

1:01:07.520 --> 1:01:10.120
<v Speaker 4>I mean, and Skens is anything close to what we've

1:01:10.160 --> 1:01:12.280
<v Speaker 4>been accustomed to seeing with him. That is one of

1:01:12.320 --> 1:01:15.120
<v Speaker 4>the better three headed monsters that you have in Major

1:01:15.200 --> 1:01:17.040
<v Speaker 4>League Baseball. Like, that's how good I think Jared Jones

1:01:17.040 --> 1:01:19.560
<v Speaker 4>can be. So he's a huge variable here because yeah,

1:01:19.600 --> 1:01:22.400
<v Speaker 4>Bubba chan where Mitch Keller? Like, I think Bubba can

1:01:22.440 --> 1:01:24.200
<v Speaker 4>be a lot better And I think Mitch Keller can

1:01:24.280 --> 1:01:25.920
<v Speaker 4>be less bad.

1:01:26.480 --> 1:01:28.480
<v Speaker 3>If those are your four and five, you're fine.

1:01:28.880 --> 1:01:32.280
<v Speaker 4>If the top three guys are what they could what

1:01:32.320 --> 1:01:34.960
<v Speaker 4>they're you know, possible of being able to do. So

1:01:35.640 --> 1:01:39.280
<v Speaker 4>that's where I go, And I think that can really be,

1:01:39.440 --> 1:01:41.080
<v Speaker 4>you know, a shot in the arm for them.

1:01:41.480 --> 1:01:44.360
<v Speaker 1>The only thing that you said that I disagree with

1:01:44.560 --> 1:01:47.320
<v Speaker 1>is can Mitch Keller be less bad? We haven't even

1:01:47.320 --> 1:01:50.240
<v Speaker 1>seen second half Mitch Keller yet. He had been a

1:01:50.320 --> 1:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>disaster and basically every single season this time around, he

1:01:53.920 --> 1:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>had a bad first half. Is he going to right

1:01:55.680 --> 1:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>those wrongs this time or have we not even seen

1:01:58.360 --> 1:02:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the worst of Mitch Keller? And Big E brings up

1:02:01.400 --> 1:02:04.360
<v Speaker 1>another good point in the YouTube comments section, ben Cherrington

1:02:04.360 --> 1:02:07.840
<v Speaker 1>buying in the deadline season bring back I kf, Jalen

1:02:07.880 --> 1:02:10.479
<v Speaker 1>Beeks and Brian day La Cruz. That's another burning question

1:02:10.520 --> 1:02:12.920
<v Speaker 1>that I have for the Pirates, like do they just

1:02:12.960 --> 1:02:15.600
<v Speaker 1>bring in supplemental pieces that are really boring and do

1:02:15.760 --> 1:02:20.000
<v Speaker 1>absolutely nothing, or do they actually buy here? Because I

1:02:20.080 --> 1:02:22.800
<v Speaker 1>think even if Paul Skeens is good not great, and

1:02:22.880 --> 1:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>let's say Jared Jones is good not great, this team

1:02:25.800 --> 1:02:28.480
<v Speaker 1>can still hit, this team can still play. I mean,

1:02:28.480 --> 1:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>they're right in the thick of it, and they've sustained

1:02:30.720 --> 1:02:33.640
<v Speaker 1>injuries to Connor Griffin, sustained the injuries to O'Neil Cruz

1:02:33.680 --> 1:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>and Spenser Horowitz, and their entire rotation has not been

1:02:36.640 --> 1:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>healthy all year, and yet they are still in the

1:02:38.560 --> 1:02:42.240
<v Speaker 1>wild card race. So does Ben Charrington actually buy I

1:02:42.240 --> 1:02:44.120
<v Speaker 1>don't want crap, you.

1:02:44.080 --> 1:02:45.880
<v Speaker 3>Know, I don't want I would want to move.

1:02:46.320 --> 1:02:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't want them to pick up things from Lost

1:02:48.600 --> 1:02:51.160
<v Speaker 1>and Found. I want them to actually spend money.

1:02:51.520 --> 1:02:53.880
<v Speaker 4>Well, the move that the move that he made to

1:02:53.960 --> 1:02:56.760
<v Speaker 4>go get Jacob Gonzalez and Brett and Eyert, I think

1:02:56.800 --> 1:02:58.240
<v Speaker 4>is more aggressive than anything he's.

1:02:58.120 --> 1:03:00.880
<v Speaker 3>Done in years. Yeah, that's a good point that Compey pick.

1:03:01.000 --> 1:03:03.400
<v Speaker 3>So hope hopefully it's a sign of more to.

1:03:03.360 --> 1:03:07.959
<v Speaker 1>Come absolutely, let's go over to the Cincinnati Reds. And

1:03:08.760 --> 1:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I went first, last time, go ahead.

1:03:11.000 --> 1:03:16.120
<v Speaker 3>With the Cincinnati Reds. Who goes? Who do they move?

1:03:16.800 --> 1:03:18.840
<v Speaker 3>Because this is a team that is a clear cut

1:03:18.960 --> 1:03:20.400
<v Speaker 3>seller at this point.

1:03:20.280 --> 1:03:25.000
<v Speaker 4>I think, and like, barring a crazy run over the

1:03:25.040 --> 1:03:28.840
<v Speaker 4>next few weeks, they're sellers. So you're not trading Allie,

1:03:29.120 --> 1:03:32.240
<v Speaker 4>You're not trading sal You're obviously not trading Hunter Green

1:03:32.400 --> 1:03:37.800
<v Speaker 4>Chase Burns. Then I think it's wide open, right like

1:03:39.240 --> 1:03:41.560
<v Speaker 4>could you cash in on a JJ ble day?

1:03:42.280 --> 1:03:45.160
<v Speaker 3>Do you does anybody bite on Genos Whare has no chance?

1:03:45.160 --> 1:03:48.840
<v Speaker 3>I don't think do you cash in on? Cash in

1:03:48.920 --> 1:03:50.800
<v Speaker 3>is a strong word on the Tyler Stevenson. I think

1:03:50.800 --> 1:03:52.480
<v Speaker 3>Spencer Steer a lot of teams.

1:03:52.480 --> 1:03:54.880
<v Speaker 4>With how many teams need right handed bats, I think

1:03:54.920 --> 1:03:57.320
<v Speaker 4>Spencer Steer is going to attract teams. He could play

1:03:57.360 --> 1:03:59.240
<v Speaker 4>like every position. They're not going to play that well.

1:03:59.240 --> 1:04:01.840
<v Speaker 4>He's kind of like well Castro, but you play almost

1:04:01.920 --> 1:04:04.560
<v Speaker 4>every position. I think a lot of teams would love

1:04:04.640 --> 1:04:10.080
<v Speaker 4>to bring Spencer's hearing. I'm just curious what the retooling

1:04:10.120 --> 1:04:13.600
<v Speaker 4>looks like for this Reds team. If Nicodolo comes back

1:04:13.600 --> 1:04:17.560
<v Speaker 4>and rattles off a few sharp, healthy starts could he go.

1:04:18.560 --> 1:04:20.280
<v Speaker 4>I think the Reds need to shake this thing up

1:04:20.320 --> 1:04:24.000
<v Speaker 4>a little bit. I think Nick Crawl has not done

1:04:24.000 --> 1:04:26.400
<v Speaker 4>a very good job obviously, even over the last couple

1:04:26.400 --> 1:04:29.920
<v Speaker 4>of years. But I'm just very, very curious to see

1:04:30.240 --> 1:04:33.360
<v Speaker 4>who they do end up moving, assuming that they are

1:04:33.360 --> 1:04:34.240
<v Speaker 4>definitive sellers.

1:04:34.560 --> 1:04:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if Abbot could be on the move too.

1:04:36.880 --> 1:04:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I agree. I think that that is kind of the

1:04:38.840 --> 1:04:42.120
<v Speaker 1>one burning question. Another one that I had is more

1:04:42.160 --> 1:04:45.480
<v Speaker 1>team related, and I feel like we should start having

1:04:45.560 --> 1:04:48.400
<v Speaker 1>some real second half auditions for a couple of players.

1:04:49.640 --> 1:04:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Matt McLean has simply been bad ever since his short stint.

1:04:54.760 --> 1:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Is a rookie, and how much longer is Matt McClain

1:04:58.680 --> 1:05:01.360
<v Speaker 1>just going to get consistent every day run in this lineup.

1:05:01.920 --> 1:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think Noelvie Martes he had the eighty game

1:05:05.400 --> 1:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>PD suspension. He's had short spurts where you're like, holy shit,

1:05:09.720 --> 1:05:14.919
<v Speaker 1>Noelvie Barte is awesome, and then it's awful spurts, right,

1:05:15.240 --> 1:05:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's too early to have a real second

1:05:17.120 --> 1:05:20.320
<v Speaker 1>half edition. For Edwin Arroyo, you got called up recently.

1:05:20.400 --> 1:05:23.600
<v Speaker 1>He's not even twenty three yet. That one is more

1:05:23.640 --> 1:05:25.200
<v Speaker 1>just I'm excited to see what he does in the

1:05:25.200 --> 1:05:28.480
<v Speaker 1>second yeah, like play him, yeah, exact round an audition.

1:05:28.800 --> 1:05:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I think McLain and Weelvie Marte are like, if you

1:05:33.360 --> 1:05:35.840
<v Speaker 1>can't turn it around, now, we got to make some changes, yep,

1:05:36.080 --> 1:05:38.720
<v Speaker 1>because they have just been consistently bad for now a

1:05:38.800 --> 1:05:42.040
<v Speaker 1>long time and they're getting consistent run here and you

1:05:42.080 --> 1:05:44.160
<v Speaker 1>know there's a couple other guys too, and they have

1:05:44.280 --> 1:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>good prospects that could come up and potentially help them.

1:05:47.560 --> 1:05:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I just think those two I got my eyes on you,

1:05:49.960 --> 1:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure the Reds do too, because at this point,

1:05:52.360 --> 1:05:53.840
<v Speaker 1>how much longer can we go about this?

1:05:54.520 --> 1:05:56.600
<v Speaker 4>I agree, and I think this is the final, Like

1:05:56.680 --> 1:05:58.960
<v Speaker 4>this is where you get your clarity to go into

1:05:59.000 --> 1:06:00.600
<v Speaker 4>next offseason and say this is.

1:06:00.680 --> 1:06:02.960
<v Speaker 3>We got we got to change something, and we got

1:06:02.960 --> 1:06:04.120
<v Speaker 3>we got to shake some things up.

1:06:04.680 --> 1:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>And even Cabrian Hayes, what do you do? Because I think,

1:06:10.000 --> 1:06:12.400
<v Speaker 1>funny enough, Armle, Let's say he has a decent second half,

1:06:14.240 --> 1:06:17.600
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna start a third next year, right, If he

1:06:17.720 --> 1:06:21.280
<v Speaker 1>has a bad second half, he won't. So I think

1:06:21.320 --> 1:06:24.480
<v Speaker 1>that's technically a audition, even though I feel like we

1:06:24.520 --> 1:06:27.120
<v Speaker 1>know the answer to him more than the other guys.

1:06:27.480 --> 1:06:30.680
<v Speaker 4>Oh my gosh, it's just it's crazy when you got

1:06:30.680 --> 1:06:32.720
<v Speaker 4>Souths start playing third base in the All Star Game

1:06:32.760 --> 1:06:35.480
<v Speaker 4>and then you went out, you know and traded for

1:06:35.600 --> 1:06:37.920
<v Speaker 4>Kybrian Hayes a year ago. Like it's it's one of

1:06:37.960 --> 1:06:40.919
<v Speaker 4>more head scratching moves. And that's another. I have no

1:06:40.960 --> 1:06:42.760
<v Speaker 4>idea what they're gonna do with him. For those who

1:06:42.760 --> 1:06:45.479
<v Speaker 4>may not be keeping track, he is under contract until

1:06:45.480 --> 1:06:48.440
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty nine oh seven million, seven million, eight million,

1:06:48.520 --> 1:06:50.880
<v Speaker 4>eight million, then a club option for twelve million that,

1:06:51.200 --> 1:06:53.760
<v Speaker 4>barring a miracle, will be declined in twenty thirty.

1:06:54.400 --> 1:06:58.200
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I don't I don't know what Cabrian Hayes

1:06:58.280 --> 1:07:00.680
<v Speaker 1>is going to do. What I do know is I'm

1:07:00.720 --> 1:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be eating some Hampton Farms peanuts after this

1:07:03.520 --> 1:07:07.680
<v Speaker 1>podcast refuel seven grams of protein per serving before we

1:07:07.720 --> 1:07:10.760
<v Speaker 1>get to the National League East podcast. P let's hear

1:07:10.800 --> 1:07:12.920
<v Speaker 1>one more time from our friends at Hampton Farms.

1:07:13.320 --> 1:07:16.520
<v Speaker 4>Just Baseball's number one ranked peanut prospect is none other

1:07:16.560 --> 1:07:19.920
<v Speaker 4>than the Hampton Farms in shell peanut hit tool plus

1:07:19.960 --> 1:07:23.640
<v Speaker 4>plus that crack of the shell is elite power easy

1:07:23.720 --> 1:07:27.840
<v Speaker 4>plus seven grams of protein per serving makeup great source

1:07:27.840 --> 1:07:31.440
<v Speaker 4>of fiber in America's number one in shell brand. This

1:07:31.560 --> 1:07:35.240
<v Speaker 4>is a five tool snack future value eighty grade. Get

1:07:35.240 --> 1:07:38.280
<v Speaker 4>the top peanut prospect in the produce aisle or twenty

1:07:38.280 --> 1:07:42.400
<v Speaker 4>five percent off at Hamptonfarms dot Com with code just Baseball.

1:07:42.400 --> 1:07:45.480
<v Speaker 4>That's one word, just baseball for twenty five percent off

1:07:45.640 --> 1:07:47.400
<v Speaker 4>at Hamptonfarms dot Com.

1:07:48.080 --> 1:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>One burning question for every team in the National League.

1:07:51.840 --> 1:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>We move over to the National League East, which features

1:07:54.840 --> 1:07:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the Braves, the Phillies, the Marlins, the Nationals, and the Mets.

1:07:58.560 --> 1:08:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll go first arm with the Atlanta Braves atop the division.

1:08:02.840 --> 1:08:07.840
<v Speaker 1>What does Spencer Schwellenbach look like when he comes back?

1:08:08.280 --> 1:08:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Because when you look at the Braves right now, I

1:08:11.560 --> 1:08:15.600
<v Speaker 1>have no questions about Chris Sale. Chris Sale is freaking awesome.

1:08:16.520 --> 1:08:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Then everybody else, I got questions about Owen Murphy. They

1:08:19.280 --> 1:08:21.639
<v Speaker 1>just got called up. He threw four innings, looked pretty good.

1:08:21.680 --> 1:08:24.840
<v Speaker 1>They got Grant Holmes, who's been kind of that stable

1:08:25.120 --> 1:08:28.120
<v Speaker 1>arm in the rotation, has given them eighty seven innings,

1:08:28.160 --> 1:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>but he's not really a top end guy. And then

1:08:30.320 --> 1:08:34.599
<v Speaker 1>you have Rainaldo Lopez, who you know, who knows what

1:08:34.720 --> 1:08:36.839
<v Speaker 1>he can give you. I know he's given you solid productions.

1:08:36.840 --> 1:08:40.320
<v Speaker 1>So if our underlying metrics say, don't expect that for

1:08:40.360 --> 1:08:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the season. And then you have Bryce Elder,

1:08:42.280 --> 1:08:44.360
<v Speaker 1>who again can be an innings eater, but you don't

1:08:44.400 --> 1:08:47.240
<v Speaker 1>expect him to be at the top of the rotation.

1:08:47.520 --> 1:08:50.880
<v Speaker 1>And Spencer Strider, of course, is dealing with elbow inflammation,

1:08:51.320 --> 1:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>and even when he was on the field, he did

1:08:53.320 --> 1:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>not prove he can be a really, really solid number two.

1:08:56.280 --> 1:09:00.320
<v Speaker 1>But Spencer Schwellenbach should be back in August. And when

1:09:00.360 --> 1:09:03.679
<v Speaker 1>Spencer Schwellenbach is on, he is one of the best

1:09:03.720 --> 1:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>young arms in Major League Baseball. I know Podcast P

1:09:06.439 --> 1:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>is in love with Spencer Schwellenbach considers him one of

1:09:09.280 --> 1:09:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the better overall pitchers in Major League Baseball. I know

1:09:12.160 --> 1:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>you're a huge fan. I'm a huge fan. How could

1:09:14.280 --> 1:09:17.040
<v Speaker 1>you not be? You know, he started thirty eight games

1:09:17.080 --> 1:09:19.000
<v Speaker 1>in his career. He's thrown two hundred and thirty four

1:09:19.000 --> 1:09:22.000
<v Speaker 1>innings to a three two three ERA with a three

1:09:22.160 --> 1:09:26.200
<v Speaker 1>two seven fit, doesn't walk anybody, strikes out a batter

1:09:26.240 --> 1:09:30.719
<v Speaker 1>per inning command, top of the line, really really good pitcher.

1:09:32.000 --> 1:09:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Do the Braves have their number two back or do

1:09:34.920 --> 1:09:37.240
<v Speaker 1>they not? That's my burning question for them.

1:09:37.640 --> 1:09:40.120
<v Speaker 4>Mine was the same thing, just kind of extrapolated or

1:09:40.240 --> 1:09:42.400
<v Speaker 4>just like extended out a little bit more, which was just,

1:09:42.760 --> 1:09:46.200
<v Speaker 4>you know, how did the injured arms return? Because I

1:09:46.200 --> 1:09:48.000
<v Speaker 4>look at Arson Waldrip and I think he plays a

1:09:48.000 --> 1:09:51.280
<v Speaker 4>big part in their their whole deal as well, because

1:09:51.680 --> 1:09:53.840
<v Speaker 4>I think what Waldrop showed prior to injury in the

1:09:53.960 --> 1:09:56.680
<v Speaker 4>end of last year and just talking to him about that,

1:09:56.720 --> 1:09:59.320
<v Speaker 4>like the arsenal tweaks and what he had been able

1:09:59.320 --> 1:10:01.880
<v Speaker 4>to develop, to be able to more ground balls pitched

1:10:01.880 --> 1:10:04.719
<v Speaker 4>a week contact, still have that splitter in his back pocket,

1:10:04.720 --> 1:10:07.559
<v Speaker 4>but not be so one dimensional where it's just fastball

1:10:07.600 --> 1:10:10.919
<v Speaker 4>splitter and it's a flat fastball. Now it's a detailed

1:10:11.000 --> 1:10:13.240
<v Speaker 4>arsenal with the sinker, with the cutter, with the slider

1:10:13.280 --> 1:10:16.800
<v Speaker 4>at the curveball to all work around. Still an elite

1:10:16.880 --> 1:10:20.479
<v Speaker 4>splitter has made him really good. And we saw two

1:10:20.560 --> 1:10:23.000
<v Speaker 4>a to Adra in fifty six and the thirds innings

1:10:23.040 --> 1:10:25.920
<v Speaker 4>last year. And is he that good? Probably not, but

1:10:25.960 --> 1:10:28.120
<v Speaker 4>I think he's a mid threes guy and it can

1:10:28.160 --> 1:10:31.240
<v Speaker 4>be really effective for them. And you pair that with

1:10:31.360 --> 1:10:35.160
<v Speaker 4>Schwellenbach with whatever you get from Strider, and this team's

1:10:35.160 --> 1:10:38.160
<v Speaker 4>outlook is a whole lot different, and their deadline needs

1:10:38.439 --> 1:10:41.360
<v Speaker 4>are a whole lot more attainable, and you don't have

1:10:41.400 --> 1:10:44.799
<v Speaker 4>to go as crazy trying to abid with everybody on arms,

1:10:45.000 --> 1:10:46.479
<v Speaker 4>and you can maybe go get some of the bats

1:10:46.479 --> 1:10:49.519
<v Speaker 4>that you need, or just allocate all those resources to

1:10:49.760 --> 1:10:52.519
<v Speaker 4>one big arm that you want. It makes things easier

1:10:52.640 --> 1:10:55.719
<v Speaker 4>when you've got more pieces, obviously, And I think that's

1:10:55.960 --> 1:10:57.479
<v Speaker 4>the name of the game here with the Braves, and

1:10:57.479 --> 1:10:59.920
<v Speaker 4>it's a couple guys coming back from the same thing,

1:11:00.120 --> 1:11:04.479
<v Speaker 4>right loose bodies. We've seen arms come back and be

1:11:04.600 --> 1:11:07.559
<v Speaker 4>successful pretty quickly, so I think it's a fair fair question.

1:11:08.240 --> 1:11:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I also think it makes alex Anthopas alex Anthopolis's life

1:11:12.760 --> 1:11:17.599
<v Speaker 1>difficult considering the timing of when Schwellenbach returns is going

1:11:17.640 --> 1:11:20.719
<v Speaker 1>to be post deadline. So do you run the risk

1:11:20.760 --> 1:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>of not adding a big time starting pitcher expecting that

1:11:24.200 --> 1:11:27.400
<v Speaker 1>to be Schwellenbach when he returns, and then let's say

1:11:27.439 --> 1:11:32.639
<v Speaker 1>he falters, then what or does he say Let's pretend

1:11:32.720 --> 1:11:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Schwellenbach is not returning at all. Of course he is,

1:11:35.880 --> 1:11:37.880
<v Speaker 1>but we need to add a really strong number two.

1:11:37.960 --> 1:11:40.080
<v Speaker 1>We've seen them linked with the Red Sox with Sonny Gray.

1:11:40.240 --> 1:11:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Now we have no idea if the Red Sox sell

1:11:41.800 --> 1:11:45.320
<v Speaker 1>at all, but clearly they are in the market looking

1:11:45.320 --> 1:11:48.200
<v Speaker 1>for a strong number two. So it's not even just

1:11:48.200 --> 1:11:53.240
<v Speaker 1>about Schwellenbach. It's what Alexanthopolis does. Considering his return is

1:11:53.320 --> 1:11:56.040
<v Speaker 1>after the break or after the deadline? Excuse me, I

1:11:56.040 --> 1:11:57.640
<v Speaker 1>think that makes it difficult.

1:11:57.960 --> 1:12:00.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and Waldrop comes back I think before that. So

1:12:00.240 --> 1:12:02.200
<v Speaker 4>like you have one maybe kind of answer. But the

1:12:02.240 --> 1:12:04.360
<v Speaker 4>bigger question with the best, you know, the more talented

1:12:04.479 --> 1:12:07.479
<v Speaker 4>arm is you gotta wait and see. And yeah, there's

1:12:07.479 --> 1:12:09.479
<v Speaker 4>gonna be a lot to try to decide and sift through.

1:12:10.400 --> 1:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's go over to the Philadelphia Phillies. I started with

1:12:12.800 --> 1:12:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the Braves. You're up first, what do you what do

1:12:15.000 --> 1:12:15.320
<v Speaker 1>you got?

1:12:16.040 --> 1:12:19.479
<v Speaker 4>But the Phillies can Dave Dombrowski find his right handed bat,

1:12:20.040 --> 1:12:22.320
<v Speaker 4>and a lot of teams out there want that right

1:12:22.320 --> 1:12:22.880
<v Speaker 4>handed bat.

1:12:23.040 --> 1:12:24.200
<v Speaker 3>I think you could argue.

1:12:23.920 --> 1:12:28.160
<v Speaker 4>That the the Phillies needed as bad as anybody. Yeah,

1:12:28.439 --> 1:12:32.960
<v Speaker 4>you don't like Abillies Garcia, if he's even available, I

1:12:33.200 --> 1:12:34.320
<v Speaker 4>still don't like him.

1:12:34.360 --> 1:12:37.800
<v Speaker 3>So I just don't know. I don't know when you'll

1:12:37.800 --> 1:12:38.439
<v Speaker 3>get that lineup.

1:12:40.320 --> 1:12:43.519
<v Speaker 4>There's not much to get excited about from the right side.

1:12:43.600 --> 1:12:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Right.

1:12:44.120 --> 1:12:46.559
<v Speaker 4>Trey Turner. We've talked about how frustrating he's been. He's

1:12:46.560 --> 1:12:47.280
<v Speaker 4>gonna get the.

1:12:47.280 --> 1:12:48.639
<v Speaker 3>Run all your one.

1:12:48.840 --> 1:12:52.040
<v Speaker 4>Alcolm has been a lot better, but it's still a

1:12:52.040 --> 1:12:53.760
<v Speaker 4>seventy three WRC plus on the year.

1:12:54.280 --> 1:12:54.479
<v Speaker 1>J C.

1:12:54.640 --> 1:12:59.360
<v Speaker 4>Real muteso he's his seventy six WRC plus the right

1:12:59.400 --> 1:13:02.920
<v Speaker 4>he's in that line up. I'm not gonna I can't

1:13:02.960 --> 1:13:05.040
<v Speaker 4>do the math immediately, but I'll estimate when it's a

1:13:05.080 --> 1:13:07.160
<v Speaker 4>seventy six, seventy three and seventy four, it's going to

1:13:07.200 --> 1:13:10.439
<v Speaker 4>be somewhere around the seventy four range right, so that

1:13:10.640 --> 1:13:12.479
<v Speaker 4>all of the righting's in that lineup around seventy four

1:13:12.479 --> 1:13:16.760
<v Speaker 4>to seventy five WRC plus. Hey, that's the starters. Like

1:13:16.800 --> 1:13:19.439
<v Speaker 4>you know who's raising that number, Derek Hill since he's

1:13:19.439 --> 1:13:23.120
<v Speaker 4>put on a Phillies uniform. So it's really rough from

1:13:23.160 --> 1:13:24.720
<v Speaker 4>the right side here, and you run into a good

1:13:24.800 --> 1:13:26.439
<v Speaker 4>left handed arm, you're gonna be in trouble, especially in

1:13:26.479 --> 1:13:28.479
<v Speaker 4>the postseason, which is where we expect this team to

1:13:28.479 --> 1:13:31.280
<v Speaker 4>be able to be as good as If Zak Wheeler

1:13:31.400 --> 1:13:33.960
<v Speaker 4>gives you a seven shutout, doesn't matter if the lefty

1:13:33.960 --> 1:13:36.920
<v Speaker 4>opposite of him also does. So they got to find

1:13:36.920 --> 1:13:39.360
<v Speaker 4>that right handed back I think more than anybody, and

1:13:39.439 --> 1:13:41.680
<v Speaker 4>knowing that a lot of teams also need need that,

1:13:42.000 --> 1:13:44.200
<v Speaker 4>I'm just curious to see if if Dobrawski can pull

1:13:44.240 --> 1:13:44.799
<v Speaker 4>it off.

1:13:44.800 --> 1:13:48.120
<v Speaker 1>One hundred percent. And my question is along those lines.

1:13:48.160 --> 1:13:50.160
<v Speaker 1>It's about a right handed hitter in the Phillies lineup.

1:13:50.360 --> 1:13:52.680
<v Speaker 1>And we've been asking this question all season long. And

1:13:52.720 --> 1:13:55.479
<v Speaker 1>the reason we've been asking this question is, don't expect

1:13:55.479 --> 1:13:57.439
<v Speaker 1>the Phillies to really dominate in the playoffs if this

1:13:57.439 --> 1:14:00.440
<v Speaker 1>guy doesn't bounce back in the second half. Can Turner

1:14:00.520 --> 1:14:03.439
<v Speaker 1>bounced back and not be a complete traffic cone like

1:14:03.520 --> 1:14:05.599
<v Speaker 1>he's been for the first half of the MLB season,

1:14:05.880 --> 1:14:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Because we're not just talking about the offensive numbers where

1:14:08.240 --> 1:14:10.360
<v Speaker 1>he's got a six thirty nine ops and he's hitting

1:14:10.360 --> 1:14:13.080
<v Speaker 1>two thirty six. We're talking about being a traffic cone

1:14:13.080 --> 1:14:16.519
<v Speaker 1>defensively as well up the middle at shortstop. You know,

1:14:16.560 --> 1:14:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Hembo came on and says he doesn't think that he's

1:14:18.720 --> 1:14:22.360
<v Speaker 1>a true shortstop. Well, whether you agree or disagree with Mbo,

1:14:22.600 --> 1:14:24.760
<v Speaker 1>he's got a play shortstop right. I don't think they're

1:14:24.760 --> 1:14:26.519
<v Speaker 1>going to be in the market adding a big time

1:14:26.600 --> 1:14:29.880
<v Speaker 1>shortstop in order to replace Trey Turner. Trey Turner is

1:14:29.920 --> 1:14:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the shortstop for the rest of the season. And if

1:14:32.200 --> 1:14:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Trey Turner continues to play like this, like a below

1:14:35.240 --> 1:14:38.840
<v Speaker 1>average player, don't expect much from the Phillies in October.

1:14:39.200 --> 1:14:42.519
<v Speaker 1>I know that Wheeler, you know, could maybe within the

1:14:42.560 --> 1:14:44.800
<v Speaker 1>cy Young this season if he gets to one hundred

1:14:44.800 --> 1:14:46.559
<v Speaker 1>and seventy egs, which I know is going to be really,

1:14:46.560 --> 1:14:49.240
<v Speaker 1>really hard, But that's just how well he's pitching. I

1:14:49.280 --> 1:14:53.639
<v Speaker 1>know Christopher Sanchez is awesome. I do worry about him slightly.

1:14:54.360 --> 1:14:57.679
<v Speaker 1>We'll be honest with you. I still think he's awesome,

1:14:57.920 --> 1:15:00.960
<v Speaker 1>But is he the lead of the elite that he

1:15:01.080 --> 1:15:04.120
<v Speaker 1>was at the beginning of the season. We'll see. And

1:15:04.160 --> 1:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Lozardo is great, like they have a three headed monster

1:15:07.400 --> 1:15:11.479
<v Speaker 1>in the rotation presumably, and they have Schwarper, and they

1:15:11.520 --> 1:15:15.000
<v Speaker 1>have Harper, and you even have Boone playing better. But

1:15:15.439 --> 1:15:18.360
<v Speaker 1>if Trey Turner at the top of your lineup is

1:15:18.439 --> 1:15:22.920
<v Speaker 1>an auto out, the Phillies are an auto out. He's

1:15:22.920 --> 1:15:26.320
<v Speaker 1>not important to the Philly success, so they need him

1:15:26.320 --> 1:15:29.639
<v Speaker 1>to pick it up or else it'll be another year

1:15:30.240 --> 1:15:34.400
<v Speaker 1>of or Wheeler pitching well and Sanchez pitching well, and

1:15:34.400 --> 1:15:37.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe even Lozardo pitching well, but then the offense scores

1:15:37.280 --> 1:15:40.679
<v Speaker 1>a run and they lose and the pitching won't matter.

1:15:41.200 --> 1:15:42.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and then the other one for me was just

1:15:42.720 --> 1:15:45.600
<v Speaker 4>Brandon Marsh, Like, can the bab at God continue to

1:15:45.640 --> 1:15:47.639
<v Speaker 4>just do what he's doing because they need I mean,

1:15:48.280 --> 1:15:51.880
<v Speaker 4>we talked about lineup length concerns. That's with Brandon Marsh

1:15:51.920 --> 1:15:55.280
<v Speaker 4>having a breakout season, so they need Marsh to continue

1:15:55.280 --> 1:15:56.719
<v Speaker 4>to do what he's doing this year too.

1:15:57.360 --> 1:16:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's go over to the Miami Marlins. I'll go first,

1:16:00.280 --> 1:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>because my guess is you've been doing a lot of

1:16:02.240 --> 1:16:07.040
<v Speaker 1>more team related ones. Mine is more player focused. I

1:16:07.080 --> 1:16:10.639
<v Speaker 1>am just fascinated to see what ury Perez's second half

1:16:10.680 --> 1:16:16.439
<v Speaker 1>looks like because at the end of May right leading

1:16:16.479 --> 1:16:19.760
<v Speaker 1>into June, he only allowed two earn runs. I know,

1:16:19.840 --> 1:16:22.479
<v Speaker 1>his ten innings, but he only allowed two earned runs.

1:16:22.840 --> 1:16:25.559
<v Speaker 1>And then at his first start in June he throws

1:16:25.600 --> 1:16:30.519
<v Speaker 1>a seven inning perfect game, and then or excuse me,

1:16:30.560 --> 1:16:32.320
<v Speaker 1>this is in July, so the other ones were ending.

1:16:32.360 --> 1:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>But basically, over his last four starts, he's looked great. Like.

1:16:35.320 --> 1:16:37.120
<v Speaker 1>He gave up two earned runs in his last start

1:16:37.160 --> 1:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>before the break, and that was one of his worst starts.

1:16:40.240 --> 1:16:43.519
<v Speaker 1>In a while, all the talent in the world, Like,

1:16:43.560 --> 1:16:46.280
<v Speaker 1>I feel good about Sandy at least being above average, right,

1:16:46.320 --> 1:16:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I think he's gonna give you his classic seven innings

1:16:49.040 --> 1:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>three runs every start. I feel really good about Max

1:16:51.680 --> 1:16:53.519
<v Speaker 1>s Meyer, who is named an All Star, Like feel

1:16:53.560 --> 1:16:57.599
<v Speaker 1>better about him. Eury Prez has shown he could either

1:16:57.680 --> 1:17:02.240
<v Speaker 1>be a four inning, five walk for earn run guy

1:17:02.400 --> 1:17:06.639
<v Speaker 1>or the most talented pitcher in the division in terms

1:17:06.640 --> 1:17:10.120
<v Speaker 1>of just raw tools from a guy that young. What

1:17:10.160 --> 1:17:13.320
<v Speaker 1>do we get from him? Because also the Marlins they

1:17:13.360 --> 1:17:17.439
<v Speaker 1>need him, right, you look at everyone beyond Ury not

1:17:17.520 --> 1:17:20.040
<v Speaker 1>a loot to hang your hat on. I think he's

1:17:20.240 --> 1:17:22.840
<v Speaker 1>massive for the Marlins success moving forward in the second half.

1:17:23.400 --> 1:17:26.360
<v Speaker 4>Well, if he's throwing the way that he's been throwing,

1:17:26.479 --> 1:17:29.479
<v Speaker 4>I mean that now, all of a sudden, your three

1:17:29.479 --> 1:17:32.760
<v Speaker 4>guys at the top, Like that's that's as good as

1:17:32.880 --> 1:17:35.160
<v Speaker 4>as just about any team like you if you have

1:17:35.240 --> 1:17:37.200
<v Speaker 4>Max Meyer continuing to throw the way that he's throwing,

1:17:37.760 --> 1:17:40.400
<v Speaker 4>with what Yuri can do when he's on, like Sandy's

1:17:40.439 --> 1:17:43.840
<v Speaker 4>your three, Yeah, And if Sandy's your three, you're in

1:17:43.880 --> 1:17:46.800
<v Speaker 4>a pretty good spot. And I think that's that's the

1:17:46.840 --> 1:17:48.920
<v Speaker 4>exciting part there with the Marlins. I think that's a

1:17:48.920 --> 1:17:50.439
<v Speaker 4>big one. I think the other part of it is

1:17:51.120 --> 1:17:52.880
<v Speaker 4>for a team that you know has been able to

1:17:52.880 --> 1:17:55.000
<v Speaker 4>maneuver the bullpen this year, the way that they have,

1:17:55.400 --> 1:17:59.240
<v Speaker 4>it's pretty shocking considering that they have arguably the worst

1:17:59.240 --> 1:18:01.000
<v Speaker 4>closer in Major League is Fall so far this year

1:18:01.000 --> 1:18:03.759
<v Speaker 4>and Pete Fairbanks, And so for me, it's can.

1:18:03.600 --> 1:18:04.920
<v Speaker 3>Pete Fairbanks figure it out?

1:18:05.600 --> 1:18:07.240
<v Speaker 4>I just don't see how you can be a playoff

1:18:07.240 --> 1:18:11.000
<v Speaker 4>team with your closer having a six' eight THREE, era

1:18:11.640 --> 1:18:14.519
<v Speaker 4>and even in the saves that he does pull, off

1:18:15.200 --> 1:18:19.400
<v Speaker 4>it's like, strikeout warning track, flyout warning track fly, out

1:18:19.439 --> 1:18:21.080
<v Speaker 4>like oh my, gosh that was a close, one or

1:18:21.080 --> 1:18:24.519
<v Speaker 4>it's a two run lead solo, shot warning track, flyout

1:18:24.520 --> 1:18:27.559
<v Speaker 4>warning track fly, out ground. Ball it's been rare to

1:18:27.600 --> 1:18:30.720
<v Speaker 4>see a clean save From Pete, fairbanks even when he

1:18:30.760 --> 1:18:33.640
<v Speaker 4>does do. THAT i think that's going to catch up

1:18:33.640 --> 1:18:36.200
<v Speaker 4>to this team at a certain. POINT i JUST i

1:18:36.240 --> 1:18:40.519
<v Speaker 4>don't know how you can survive as a team that

1:18:40.560 --> 1:18:43.920
<v Speaker 4>needs to do everything right on the margins when your,

1:18:44.000 --> 1:18:48.920
<v Speaker 4>closer you, know is a liability and a significant.

1:18:48.920 --> 1:18:50.439
<v Speaker 3>One and it also gets to a point.

1:18:50.240 --> 1:18:53.680
<v Speaker 4>Where if he continues to be a, liability do you

1:18:53.760 --> 1:18:54.559
<v Speaker 4>relegate him from that.

1:18:54.640 --> 1:18:55.640
<v Speaker 3>Role who's the?

1:18:55.720 --> 1:18:59.360
<v Speaker 4>Closer Calvin fauche is As jackal And hyde as anybody

1:18:59.400 --> 1:19:00.960
<v Speaker 4>in majoraguase because you walk six per.

1:19:01.040 --> 1:19:03.840
<v Speaker 3>Nine Michael peterson's probably your.

1:19:03.840 --> 1:19:07.439
<v Speaker 4>Closer HE'S ao If Pete fairbanks goes, down WHICH i

1:19:07.520 --> 1:19:11.360
<v Speaker 4>love What i've seen From Michael, peterson but this guy's

1:19:11.400 --> 1:19:12.840
<v Speaker 4>just figuring it out at thirty two years.

1:19:12.880 --> 1:19:14.639
<v Speaker 3>Old you're going to thrust him into the closing role for.

1:19:14.600 --> 1:19:16.799
<v Speaker 4>A team that's in the you, know in a, Playoff,

1:19:16.840 --> 1:19:20.120
<v Speaker 4>haunch that's a big one for. Me they Need bender.

1:19:20.200 --> 1:19:21.800
<v Speaker 4>Back you, know he's been banged, up AND i think

1:19:21.840 --> 1:19:25.160
<v Speaker 4>that even only adds to. It bender's, Hurt king's. Hurt

1:19:26.240 --> 1:19:28.120
<v Speaker 4>you Need Pete fairbanks to be the guy that you

1:19:28.200 --> 1:19:30.439
<v Speaker 4>paid thirteen million dollars, for which The marlins don't. Do

1:19:31.080 --> 1:19:34.479
<v Speaker 4>so that's my biggest one with them is you, know

1:19:34.520 --> 1:19:37.439
<v Speaker 4>how does he? Look and, yeah And Big mike is

1:19:37.520 --> 1:19:39.000
<v Speaker 4>banged up even. TOO i don't know how long he's

1:19:39.000 --> 1:19:40.920
<v Speaker 4>gonna be, out if he's gonna be, Out so there's

1:19:41.000 --> 1:19:41.840
<v Speaker 4>a lot of wrinkles to.

1:19:41.880 --> 1:19:44.000
<v Speaker 1>It and what The marlins are going to do with the.

1:19:44.000 --> 1:19:47.200
<v Speaker 1>DEADLINE i, mean let's say they play five hundred baseball until, then,

1:19:47.320 --> 1:19:49.559
<v Speaker 1>right they're fifty two and forty. Five right, now over

1:19:49.600 --> 1:19:51.679
<v Speaker 1>the next ten games they go five and. Five there's

1:19:51.680 --> 1:19:55.479
<v Speaker 1>still seven games above five. Hundred how can you constitute.

1:19:55.560 --> 1:19:57.920
<v Speaker 1>SELLING i canna understand buying in selling at the same,

1:19:57.960 --> 1:20:01.240
<v Speaker 1>time but how can you do that to the? Fans

1:20:01.560 --> 1:20:05.200
<v Speaker 1>if you're seven games above five hundred and you have

1:20:05.320 --> 1:20:08.320
<v Speaker 1>one of the best records in The National, league how

1:20:08.360 --> 1:20:10.720
<v Speaker 1>can you then tell your fans like what needs to

1:20:10.760 --> 1:20:13.600
<v Speaker 1>happen for you to finally? Buy AND i understand that

1:20:13.640 --> 1:20:17.440
<v Speaker 1>they're a head of, schedule but, Again i'm just fascinated

1:20:17.479 --> 1:20:18.280
<v Speaker 1>to see what they do with the.

1:20:18.280 --> 1:20:22.080
<v Speaker 4>Deadline, YEAH i don't think they sell unless they, completely

1:20:22.120 --> 1:20:24.439
<v Speaker 4>like the wheels completely completely completely fall.

1:20:24.479 --> 1:20:26.639
<v Speaker 3>Off but even their.

1:20:26.560 --> 1:20:29.479
<v Speaker 4>Buying is going to be just it's not going to be.

1:20:29.520 --> 1:20:33.120
<v Speaker 4>Buying it's it's like trading like it's it's it's going

1:20:33.200 --> 1:20:35.800
<v Speaker 4>to be big league and maybe a filler prospect for

1:20:35.840 --> 1:20:38.840
<v Speaker 4>big league because they want to preserve this farm system

1:20:39.080 --> 1:20:43.880
<v Speaker 4>that admittedly like they have, talent but IT'S i don't

1:20:43.920 --> 1:20:45.400
<v Speaker 4>think it's as good as they want it to. Be

1:20:45.560 --> 1:20:47.920
<v Speaker 4>the farm, System SO i think that's part of their.

1:20:47.960 --> 1:20:51.240
<v Speaker 4>Apprehension you got to be really careful that when you're

1:20:51.280 --> 1:20:53.920
<v Speaker 4>subtracting from a big league team that has a really

1:20:54.320 --> 1:20:58.479
<v Speaker 4>good thing going right now to try to also improve

1:20:58.560 --> 1:21:01.960
<v Speaker 4>that big league. Team and that's where it becomes. Fascinating

1:21:02.040 --> 1:21:04.040
<v Speaker 4>SO i think that's the other big question. TOO A,

1:21:04.120 --> 1:21:06.840
<v Speaker 4>matins who have been pretty transparent about the fact that

1:21:06.840 --> 1:21:12.080
<v Speaker 4>they are open to moving big league pieces to address

1:21:12.080 --> 1:21:15.600
<v Speaker 4>a need on the big league. Team you gotta be

1:21:15.640 --> 1:21:18.599
<v Speaker 4>careful with that because sometimes you can disrupt something that's

1:21:18.640 --> 1:21:19.160
<v Speaker 4>working really.

1:21:19.160 --> 1:21:22.759
<v Speaker 1>Well moving over to The, nationals what's your one burning

1:21:22.840 --> 1:21:23.240
<v Speaker 1>question for?

1:21:23.320 --> 1:21:27.200
<v Speaker 4>Him CAN c J abrams sprint through the finish?

1:21:27.240 --> 1:21:31.599
<v Speaker 3>Line Because James wood's a. SUPERSTAR i feel good About.

1:21:31.479 --> 1:21:34.400
<v Speaker 4>James wood being what he, is right and then you're

1:21:34.400 --> 1:21:37.960
<v Speaker 4>gonna have your turbulence with a player Like James. Wood

1:21:38.400 --> 1:21:40.679
<v Speaker 4>but at the end of the, DAY i think everyone's

1:21:40.720 --> 1:21:44.599
<v Speaker 4>pretty comfortable that this is a superstar type of. Player

1:21:45.439 --> 1:21:49.519
<v Speaker 4>Cj abrams is on pace to do some really special

1:21:49.560 --> 1:21:51.960
<v Speaker 4>things this. Year he was on pace to do some

1:21:52.000 --> 1:21:54.400
<v Speaker 4>really impressive things last year as. Well now he is

1:21:55.479 --> 1:21:58.800
<v Speaker 4>comfortably better than he was even through the really good

1:21:58.800 --> 1:22:00.400
<v Speaker 4>stretch that he had last. Year, ready he has more

1:22:00.400 --> 1:22:03.840
<v Speaker 4>homers this year than he had last, year but we

1:22:03.880 --> 1:22:07.920
<v Speaker 4>saw him be great and then fall off a cliff

1:22:07.920 --> 1:22:10.280
<v Speaker 4>a little. Bit right he's on pace to driving one

1:22:10.360 --> 1:22:13.599
<v Speaker 4>hundred and twenty, Runs he's on pace to hit thirty five,

1:22:13.640 --> 1:22:18.360
<v Speaker 4>homers he's on pace to steal almost thirty. Bags this

1:22:18.400 --> 1:22:20.720
<v Speaker 4>could be a really special year for a guy in

1:22:20.720 --> 1:22:22.920
<v Speaker 4>his age twenty five. SEASON a lot of indications could

1:22:22.920 --> 1:22:26.479
<v Speaker 4>just point towards him being just growing into himself and

1:22:26.479 --> 1:22:29.200
<v Speaker 4>reaching and starting to tap into the prime right forgot

1:22:29.240 --> 1:22:32.120
<v Speaker 4>that was rushed to the major. LEAGUES i think this

1:22:32.240 --> 1:22:35.880
<v Speaker 4>is important BECAUSE i don't. KNOW i think that at

1:22:35.880 --> 1:22:37.040
<v Speaker 4>this point they're just going to ride it out with.

1:22:37.080 --> 1:22:39.240
<v Speaker 4>Him because this national, team at, first my question was

1:22:39.280 --> 1:22:41.160
<v Speaker 4>going to be, like you, know how close are they

1:22:41.200 --> 1:22:43.320
<v Speaker 4>to be in Competitive and then that's another big part of,

1:22:43.320 --> 1:22:45.040
<v Speaker 4>it like do they struggle in the second half and

1:22:45.080 --> 1:22:47.200
<v Speaker 4>maybe makes us realize that they're further away than maybe we'd.

1:22:47.200 --> 1:22:51.000
<v Speaker 4>HOPED i think they're closer than than a lot of

1:22:51.000 --> 1:22:52.680
<v Speaker 4>people with, thought AND i think they've proven. That and

1:22:52.840 --> 1:22:54.320
<v Speaker 4>no matter how the second half, GOES i think they'll

1:22:54.320 --> 1:22:55.920
<v Speaker 4>slow down a little bit And i'll probably trim some

1:22:55.920 --> 1:22:58.320
<v Speaker 4>pieces and That i'll only encourage the. SLOWDOWN i think

1:22:58.320 --> 1:22:59.880
<v Speaker 4>we've seen enough to say that this is a team

1:23:00.200 --> 1:23:04.080
<v Speaker 4>that could absolutely be wild card contenders next year and

1:23:04.160 --> 1:23:06.559
<v Speaker 4>have a lot of reasons to make. Additions but With,

1:23:06.640 --> 1:23:09.840
<v Speaker 4>abrams it's like if he sprints through the finish, line

1:23:09.840 --> 1:23:12.000
<v Speaker 4>it doesn't have the first half second half situation he

1:23:12.040 --> 1:23:14.400
<v Speaker 4>had last year where he was an eight forty three

1:23:14.439 --> 1:23:16.439
<v Speaker 4>ops in the first half and a six thirteen in

1:23:16.479 --> 1:23:19.680
<v Speaker 4>the second half in his, career like that's something that

1:23:19.720 --> 1:23:21.559
<v Speaker 4>he's done in his whole. Career it's just been a first,

1:23:21.600 --> 1:23:23.960
<v Speaker 4>half second half. Thing twenty twenty four to twenty twenty

1:23:23.960 --> 1:23:26.559
<v Speaker 4>Six Thank You podcast P eight forty three ops in

1:23:26.600 --> 1:23:29.280
<v Speaker 4>the first, half six thirteen ops in the second. Half

1:23:30.479 --> 1:23:32.360
<v Speaker 4>this is a guy THAT i think can solidify himself

1:23:32.400 --> 1:23:34.040
<v Speaker 4>as a star in this game.

1:23:33.840 --> 1:23:38.160
<v Speaker 1>As, well no doubt about. It my one burning question

1:23:38.200 --> 1:23:40.960
<v Speaker 1>is about another player on The nationals who has not

1:23:41.120 --> 1:23:44.439
<v Speaker 1>had a good first half and he really hasn't played

1:23:44.439 --> 1:23:47.439
<v Speaker 1>well at, all but he's going to continue to get,

1:23:47.520 --> 1:23:50.559
<v Speaker 1>run AND i he should continue to get more, run

1:23:50.760 --> 1:23:53.560
<v Speaker 1>but at some point you have to start asking questions

1:23:54.000 --> 1:23:57.519
<v Speaker 1>and that and my question is what Does Dylan cruz's

1:23:57.560 --> 1:24:01.080
<v Speaker 1>second half look? Like it might be prize to learn

1:24:02.080 --> 1:24:04.960
<v Speaker 1>That Dylan cruz has played one hundred and sixty THREE mlb.

1:24:05.080 --> 1:24:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Games he's played a full. Season, now what do the

1:24:08.280 --> 1:24:11.880
<v Speaker 1>numbers look? Like nineteen homers and thirty four steals sounds?

1:24:11.920 --> 1:24:13.439
<v Speaker 1>Great is?

1:24:13.479 --> 1:24:13.599
<v Speaker 3>It?

1:24:14.120 --> 1:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>No twenty five percent below league average? Offense so he's

1:24:17.360 --> 1:24:20.080
<v Speaker 1>getting to your accounting numbers make it seem a little

1:24:20.080 --> 1:24:22.680
<v Speaker 1>bit better than it. Is but it's not like he's

1:24:22.680 --> 1:24:25.639
<v Speaker 1>playing all world. Defense he's not this all world base runner.

1:24:25.680 --> 1:24:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Either and at this point he's twenty four years. Old

1:24:29.080 --> 1:24:33.240
<v Speaker 1>there's still. Time not saying giving up on, him but

1:24:33.320 --> 1:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>WHAT i will say is if he has a bad

1:24:36.160 --> 1:24:39.320
<v Speaker 1>second half and keeps sitting to a seventy FIVE wrc

1:24:39.439 --> 1:24:45.320
<v Speaker 1>plus and racks up two HUNDRED mlb, games Does Paul

1:24:45.360 --> 1:24:48.479
<v Speaker 1>taboni start to ask what do we got? Here is it?

1:24:48.560 --> 1:24:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Anything AND i think that in the second half of The. Nationals,

1:24:53.640 --> 1:24:56.559
<v Speaker 1>AGAIN i said it last, year AND i still think

1:24:56.640 --> 1:24:58.400
<v Speaker 1>that's part of the equation right now is who's a

1:24:58.400 --> 1:25:01.160
<v Speaker 1>part of the. CORE i think clearly they've Found James

1:25:01.160 --> 1:25:03.840
<v Speaker 1>wood is a part of the. Core, yeah they clearly found. C.

1:25:04.040 --> 1:25:06.880
<v Speaker 1>J abrams is a part of the. CORE i think

1:25:06.920 --> 1:25:09.680
<v Speaker 1>there's still it's up in the air Whether Dalen lyle is,

1:25:11.120 --> 1:25:15.599
<v Speaker 1>yeah And Dylan, cruz you hope, is but hasn't. Been

1:25:16.720 --> 1:25:19.080
<v Speaker 1>that's my burning question IS i, mean you guys drafted

1:25:19.120 --> 1:25:22.519
<v Speaker 1>him number two, overall you've given him run and nothing has.

1:25:22.560 --> 1:25:26.519
<v Speaker 1>Transpired can it transpire in the second half or does it?

1:25:26.600 --> 1:25:26.680
<v Speaker 3>Not?

1:25:27.280 --> 1:25:30.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, WELL i Think lyle is he's starting to get,

1:25:30.200 --> 1:25:34.600
<v Speaker 4>going and just that the cruise, situation it's just he's

1:25:34.640 --> 1:25:35.560
<v Speaker 4>got to show you some signs of.

1:25:35.600 --> 1:25:37.519
<v Speaker 3>Life he didn't need to be, great just some signs of.

1:25:37.520 --> 1:25:42.040
<v Speaker 4>LIFE i think that's probably the biggest question, mark AND

1:25:42.120 --> 1:25:45.720
<v Speaker 4>i think could be the biggest shifter of like how

1:25:45.800 --> 1:25:47.760
<v Speaker 4>much more optimistic we could be about The nationals next

1:25:47.800 --> 1:25:49.439
<v Speaker 4>year if If Dylan cruz is starting to play at

1:25:49.439 --> 1:25:50.680
<v Speaker 4>a higher level and settle into the big.

1:25:50.760 --> 1:25:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Leaks did you see that report that was put out

1:25:53.160 --> 1:25:56.760
<v Speaker 1>today by The Red sox guy who does the radio

1:25:56.800 --> 1:25:59.840
<v Speaker 1>In spanish for, Them he said that The Red sox

1:26:00.080 --> 1:26:05.920
<v Speaker 1>The nationals are having conversations About James Wood AND i

1:26:05.960 --> 1:26:09.160
<v Speaker 1>saw the report and first of, all it was, like hold,

1:26:09.200 --> 1:26:11.880
<v Speaker 1>on wait a, minute it's early in the. MORNING i

1:26:11.880 --> 1:26:16.040
<v Speaker 1>haven't even had my coffee. Yet first of, all The

1:26:16.040 --> 1:26:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Red sox are trading for a left handed.

1:26:17.439 --> 1:26:19.479
<v Speaker 3>Outfielder, yeah WELL i don't think.

1:26:19.520 --> 1:26:23.519
<v Speaker 1>So and then number, two The nationals are considering Trading James.

1:26:23.560 --> 1:26:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Wood both shocked. Me but it did come out from

1:26:29.000 --> 1:26:33.720
<v Speaker 1>a guy who conceivably is in the. Know i'm not

1:26:33.720 --> 1:26:35.320
<v Speaker 1>saying it's going to, happen BUT i did want to

1:26:35.320 --> 1:26:36.559
<v Speaker 1>bring it up to see if he saw, it if

1:26:36.560 --> 1:26:37.000
<v Speaker 1>you had any.

1:26:37.000 --> 1:26:41.200
<v Speaker 3>THOUGHTS i didn't see. It there's there's no.

1:26:41.240 --> 1:26:42.160
<v Speaker 1>SHOT i.

1:26:42.200 --> 1:26:43.800
<v Speaker 3>AGREE i don't think there's absolutely no.

1:26:43.880 --> 1:26:46.479
<v Speaker 4>CHANCE i don't even think it's being. DISCUSSED i don't

1:26:46.479 --> 1:26:49.120
<v Speaker 4>think that makes any. Sense that's pretty shocking to even

1:26:49.720 --> 1:26:51.840
<v Speaker 4>come out. With to be, HONEST i JUST i hope

1:26:51.840 --> 1:26:55.920
<v Speaker 4>Maybe i'm, wrong BUT i just it doesn't seem. Fathomable

1:26:56.439 --> 1:26:58.559
<v Speaker 4>there's your segment On James wood to the boss Of Red.

1:26:58.560 --> 1:27:03.599
<v Speaker 4>Sox all, right let's let's end with The. Mets i'll end.

1:27:03.640 --> 1:27:07.519
<v Speaker 1>It i'll go. First my burning question for them is

1:27:08.840 --> 1:27:10.880
<v Speaker 1>which of these young pitchers is going to step up

1:27:10.920 --> 1:27:13.880
<v Speaker 1>in the second Half Because Zach, THORNTON i, think has

1:27:13.920 --> 1:27:16.559
<v Speaker 1>looked pretty good so, far really ended the first half

1:27:16.560 --> 1:27:20.080
<v Speaker 1>on a high, note going Seven shutty And Nolan McLean

1:27:20.200 --> 1:27:22.479
<v Speaker 1>is kind of an up and down, overall though he's

1:27:22.479 --> 1:27:24.720
<v Speaker 1>had a good season with a three five to two,

1:27:24.840 --> 1:27:27.680
<v Speaker 1>era BUT i think both you AND i arm can

1:27:27.720 --> 1:27:30.200
<v Speaker 1>agree that he could be better than. That Freddy peralt

1:27:30.320 --> 1:27:34.080
<v Speaker 1>is as good as, gone so Can Christian scott continue

1:27:34.080 --> 1:27:37.720
<v Speaker 1>to look? Good you, Know sean And iah? Gone then

1:27:37.720 --> 1:27:40.400
<v Speaker 1>who steps up Is Clay holmes? Gone then who steps

1:27:40.520 --> 1:27:43.240
<v Speaker 1>up is A Jonah tong when he makes his return

1:27:43.280 --> 1:27:45.840
<v Speaker 1>to the. ROTATION i think The mets have to start

1:27:45.840 --> 1:27:47.920
<v Speaker 1>to kind of figure out who of these young starters

1:27:48.000 --> 1:27:50.280
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a part of their core next,

1:27:50.360 --> 1:27:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Year like how do they build out a? Rotation because

1:27:53.360 --> 1:27:56.000
<v Speaker 1>one thing about The, mets even in that eighty nine

1:27:56.320 --> 1:27:58.400
<v Speaker 1>win season where they went to the playoffs and took

1:27:58.439 --> 1:28:01.719
<v Speaker 1>The dodgers even to six, games it wasn't really because

1:28:01.760 --> 1:28:04.280
<v Speaker 1>of the. Rotation it was because it kind of breakouts from,

1:28:04.439 --> 1:28:07.240
<v Speaker 1>veterans right with The Sean maniah's of the, world The

1:28:07.320 --> 1:28:10.760
<v Speaker 1>David peterson's of the, World like those pitchers were never

1:28:10.840 --> 1:28:13.200
<v Speaker 1>really a part of their long term. Plan they just caught.

1:28:13.240 --> 1:28:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Fire i'd like to see some arms in The mets

1:28:16.280 --> 1:28:19.320
<v Speaker 1>rotation that are a part of the long term, plan

1:28:19.760 --> 1:28:22.719
<v Speaker 1>AND i feel like outside Of nolan, McLain they haven't

1:28:22.800 --> 1:28:25.639
<v Speaker 1>figured it out. Yet SO i think this second half

1:28:25.680 --> 1:28:28.519
<v Speaker 1>when they trade Away, parlton maybe they trade Away. Mania

1:28:28.600 --> 1:28:31.840
<v Speaker 1>they've already traded Away. Peterson these guys that they call

1:28:31.880 --> 1:28:34.479
<v Speaker 1>it from the minor, leagues and even the guy's currently

1:28:34.560 --> 1:28:38.800
<v Speaker 1>on the big league, roster who starts to establish themselves

1:28:39.000 --> 1:28:40.800
<v Speaker 1>as a rotation piece for next.

1:28:40.840 --> 1:28:44.679
<v Speaker 4>Year, yeah mine was Actually Christian scott as, well because

1:28:44.960 --> 1:28:47.400
<v Speaker 4>there you, Go i've loved this guy as a, prospect

1:28:47.520 --> 1:28:51.719
<v Speaker 4>AND i think that you look at the struggles in

1:28:51.760 --> 1:28:55.400
<v Speaker 4>The mets system right. Now Jonah tongue has been bad

1:28:55.520 --> 1:29:00.360
<v Speaker 4>In TRIPLE. A you've Traded brandan's, Broke, Right you're gonna

1:29:00.360 --> 1:29:03.960
<v Speaker 4>Lose Freddie peralta in free. Agency you're probably gonna trade

1:29:04.000 --> 1:29:05.559
<v Speaker 4>him before that, Anyways, right you are going to trade

1:29:05.600 --> 1:29:05.960
<v Speaker 4>him before that.

1:29:06.000 --> 1:29:08.439
<v Speaker 3>Anyways nolan McLain is your guy at the.

1:29:08.479 --> 1:29:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Top but then WHO.

1:29:11.360 --> 1:29:14.080
<v Speaker 4>I even look at some of the pieces that they

1:29:14.120 --> 1:29:17.759
<v Speaker 4>have just just throughout the farm system THAT i was excited,

1:29:17.760 --> 1:29:19.840
<v Speaker 4>about Like Jack WENNINGER i thought would have debuted by

1:29:19.920 --> 1:29:20.680
<v Speaker 4>now command his.

1:29:20.640 --> 1:29:23.839
<v Speaker 3>Regrets At TRIPLE. A so they really need a guy.

1:29:23.640 --> 1:29:25.519
<v Speaker 4>To grab onto a spot and, say, Hey i'm a

1:29:25.600 --> 1:29:29.240
<v Speaker 4>rotation piece for next. Year And Christian scott's provided plenty

1:29:29.240 --> 1:29:31.920
<v Speaker 4>of flashes this, year reminding me why he was a

1:29:31.920 --> 1:29:35.240
<v Speaker 4>top one hundred prospect FOR us and why he's a

1:29:35.560 --> 1:29:38.200
<v Speaker 4>very important PIECE i think for The mets moving forward

1:29:38.560 --> 1:29:40.280
<v Speaker 4>coming back from. Injury there was gonna be some rush

1:29:40.320 --> 1:29:42.360
<v Speaker 4>to shake off after, surgery BUT i think the further

1:29:42.400 --> 1:29:44.160
<v Speaker 4>he's been removed from, that the sharper he has. Looked

1:29:44.160 --> 1:29:45.960
<v Speaker 4>AND i do think this is a guy that could

1:29:45.960 --> 1:29:47.760
<v Speaker 4>be a solid rotation piece for.

1:29:47.720 --> 1:29:50.639
<v Speaker 3>Them and they, sorely sorely need it as they get

1:29:50.680 --> 1:29:51.559
<v Speaker 3>ready for twenty twenty.

1:29:51.560 --> 1:29:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Seven and then if they trade lindor just, KIDDING i

1:29:56.200 --> 1:29:57.720
<v Speaker 1>don't think they're going to do. THAT i really am

1:29:57.760 --> 1:29:59.960
<v Speaker 1>looking at this rotation BECAUSE i think it could be,

1:30:00.080 --> 1:30:02.960
<v Speaker 1>good right If Christian scott steps, up If Jonah tong

1:30:03.080 --> 1:30:05.800
<v Speaker 1>takes a next step and finds, it If thornton ends

1:30:05.880 --> 1:30:08.559
<v Speaker 1>up being an arm for. THEM i, mean we got

1:30:08.600 --> 1:30:11.600
<v Speaker 1>pieces here outside Of Noelan, McLean WHICH i think is

1:30:11.600 --> 1:30:17.519
<v Speaker 1>the obvious. One but if none of them do, yikes yeah,

1:30:17.600 --> 1:30:19.800
<v Speaker 1>right or if one of them, do LIKE i just

1:30:19.880 --> 1:30:22.919
<v Speaker 1>want to, know AND i Think mets fans are pleading

1:30:23.000 --> 1:30:26.360
<v Speaker 1>to know who is our rotation because if none of

1:30:26.400 --> 1:30:28.639
<v Speaker 1>the young guys step. Up we got to go grab

1:30:28.880 --> 1:30:32.519
<v Speaker 1>three arms in free agency next. Year, YEAH i don't

1:30:32.520 --> 1:30:34.439
<v Speaker 1>think they want to do, that but we got a,

1:30:34.520 --> 1:30:38.840
<v Speaker 1>trade so The mets are in an interesting. Spot and then,

1:30:38.920 --> 1:30:40.960
<v Speaker 1>YEAH i think they got a lot to figure. Out

1:30:41.920 --> 1:30:44.479
<v Speaker 1>and those are our burning questions for the second half

1:30:44.479 --> 1:30:47.320
<v Speaker 1>for every team of The National. League don't Forget American

1:30:47.400 --> 1:30:52.080
<v Speaker 1>league tomorrow again with arm AND. I hopefully everybody enjoyed

1:30:52.080 --> 1:30:54.719
<v Speaker 1>this episode of The Just Baseball. Show thank you everybody

1:30:54.760 --> 1:30:57.519
<v Speaker 1>who joined us here live on. YouTube the best way

1:30:57.560 --> 1:31:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to support these YouTube live streams is to make sure

1:31:00.120 --> 1:31:02.880
<v Speaker 1>to like and, subscribe and then for all those listening

1:31:02.880 --> 1:31:05.479
<v Speaker 1>on audio after the, fact best way to support the

1:31:05.560 --> 1:31:08.280
<v Speaker 1>show is by leaving a five star. Review the trade

1:31:08.280 --> 1:31:12.040
<v Speaker 1>deadline is coming up and the discord is going to

1:31:12.040 --> 1:31:14.240
<v Speaker 1>be a. Blast i'm also setting out SOME nfl future,

1:31:14.320 --> 1:31:19.240
<v Speaker 1>soon so for anybody who's into the betting, space, prospects, trades,

1:31:20.000 --> 1:31:23.599
<v Speaker 1>cards we got it all in the best baseball group

1:31:23.680 --> 1:31:25.360
<v Speaker 1>chat in the. World if you want to sign, up

1:31:25.600 --> 1:31:27.680
<v Speaker 1>you can find the link in the episode. Description if

1:31:27.720 --> 1:31:29.880
<v Speaker 1>you want to get yourself Some Just baseball, Merch i'm

1:31:29.960 --> 1:31:33.080
<v Speaker 1>rocking the. Hat go get yours at our Merch store,

1:31:33.160 --> 1:31:34.799
<v Speaker 1>again which you can find the link in the episode.

1:31:34.800 --> 1:31:38.439
<v Speaker 1>Description special shout out to PODCAST p for brilliant producing

1:31:38.520 --> 1:31:41.600
<v Speaker 1>once again for Arm. Layton I'm Peter, apple see you

1:31:41.640 --> 1:31:44.080
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow for The American. League and with, that thank you,

1:31:44.120 --> 1:31:51.720
<v Speaker 1>everybody