WEBVTT - Stock Slip Before Powell as Yields Rise

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. This is Bloomberg business

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Weekdaily reporting from the magazine that helps global leaders stay

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:18.799
<v Speaker 1>ahead with insight on the people, companies, and trends shaping

0:00:18.800 --> 0:00:23.760
<v Speaker 1>today's complex economy. Plus global business, finance and tech news

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>as it happens. The Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast with

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Carol Masser and Tim Stenebeck on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:34.560
<v Speaker 2>All Eyes on Jackson holl As the FED kicks off

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 2>its Economic Symposium. It's the flagship event for the US

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 2>Central Bank. Vetcher J Powell set to speak tomorrow. Before that,

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 2>former Federal Reserve Governor Betsy Duke was on Bloomberg Surveillance

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 2>earlier today. She gave her expectations for the chair speech

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 2>Friday at the symposium.

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 3>Jay Powell, in terms of his legacy, is looking at

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 3>what happens to his mandate, what happens to inflation, what

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 3>happens to employment, and how well does he manage that.

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 3>It's not any single speech. He's one of fos focus

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 3>primarily on the decision framework and not give any indication

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 3>of where he's leaning for September. Inflation expectations are going

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 3>to be the key over the next year.

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:16.479
<v Speaker 4>Or two.

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 3>If inflation expectations get out of line, then the FED

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:20.560
<v Speaker 3>will be very concerned.

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 2>That's Betsy Duke, former FED governor on Bloomberg Surveillance earlier today.

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 2>Joining us now from Jackson Hole, Wyoming is Bloomberg Surveillance

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:31.560
<v Speaker 2>co host Tom Keen. Tom the event it's supposed to

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 2>be about policy, about economics, about this economy, but happening

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 2>at the same time the Justice Department signaling possible plans

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:41.680
<v Speaker 2>to investigate Federaliser of Governor Lisa Cook.

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 5>How is that hanging over the event?

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:47.120
<v Speaker 6>Oh, it's hanging over to exec correct language, There's no

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 6>question about it. You still have the normal cadence of

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 6>Jackson Hole. For example, there's six, seven, eight papers that

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 6>come out. Michael McKee prints them out perfectly, and he

0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 6>reads every page of the academic papers. Guess what I

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 6>don't do that. I'm talking to the reporters here gathered,

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 6>and you're right at the top of a pile of topics.

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 6>Here is Lisa Cook.

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 2>So what's what's she's I spoke to Mike earlier. He

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:17.080
<v Speaker 2>said she's expected to arrive. She hasn't arrived yet. Does

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:21.360
<v Speaker 2>it does it take away from FED chair Powell's message tomorrow.

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:24.920
<v Speaker 2>Does it distract from what he says about this economy

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 2>and what he indicates or not about September.

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 6>It's a really fair question. I don't think so. I

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 6>think Michael McHugh is better at this than I am

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 6>would say exactly the same thing. What is different here,

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 6>and our Simon Flint in Singapore absolutely nails it in

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 6>an essay today. What's different here is the hard facts

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 6>of the moment are catching up with the Chairman. I

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:50.120
<v Speaker 6>don't know if they're rewriting the speech tonight with the

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 6>stars out above the tetons, or maybe they're writing it

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 6>on the airplane. But what is very clear here is

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 6>the hard facts, as mister Flint says, have caught up.

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 6>You have the economic today, you got concern about inflation

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 6>and tim The number one thing I'm launching off the

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 6>Bloomberg year is the thirty year bend. Once again we're

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 6>making a dash up near five percent. That's the kind

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:15.800
<v Speaker 6>of inflation whispers that have to change the speech.

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:18.919
<v Speaker 7>Tom Of course, you mentioned the Chairman will speak tomorrow

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 7>at Jackson Hole. Can you just tell us a bit

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 7>more about what attendees are really looking to hear from him.

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 6>It varies every year. There was one year here I'm

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 6>going to say three years ago. I can't remember where

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:32.800
<v Speaker 6>we were prepared for a fifteen minute twenty minute speech,

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 6>and I believe he spoke for eight minutes. So every

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 6>year is different. I think the pageantry will be here,

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 6>there'll be an international audience here, Christin mcguartier, mister Nagel

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 6>of Germany is here. Bailey of the Bank of England

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 6>scheduled as well. But what's interesting is within the pageantry,

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 6>what do you expect from a speech? And the answer

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 6>is they'll be looking for certain nuances and certain single

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 6>sentences that will be different. You're not going to get

0:04:00.960 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 6>a lot of is what's he going to do in September?

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 6>That would be rude. He's not going to do that.

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 8>Here.

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 7>You mentioned a lot of those international voices, I mean

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 7>the ECB, We've got Bank of Japan, Emerging Markets. How

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 7>are they playing a part of the conversation this year?

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 5>In particular, Nora, you know my theme.

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 6>You're already stealing my theme as we go to tomorrow

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 6>with Lisa A. Bramo. It's to me the international angle

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:26.159
<v Speaker 6>here is the importance point.

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 5>William Rhodes Bill Rhoads.

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:31.919
<v Speaker 6>Of City Group Iconic at City Bank, it's called City

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:35.479
<v Speaker 6>Bank back then had this great phrase central banker to

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 6>the world. He took it from academics. This is a

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:43.159
<v Speaker 6>Jackson hole where Jerome Powell is the central banker to

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:47.839
<v Speaker 6>the world is he defends delicately the way we've done

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 6>banking for years, pushing against President Trump. The theme internationally

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 6>here of central bank independence will be key.

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 2>I think also the theme of labor tom and it's

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 2>something that we've spent a lot of time I'm talking

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 2>about in recent weeks, especially since that shocking report came

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 2>out earlier this month about those numbers for the month

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 2>of July, and it's really shifted the conversation about what

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 2>employment in the United States and what healthy employment numbers

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:17.159
<v Speaker 2>look like in the United States where borders are closed,

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 2>immigration legal and illegal is down, and growth among American

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 2>families is not what it was a couple generations ago.

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:28.719
<v Speaker 2>What does that picture look like in terms of reshaping

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:30.480
<v Speaker 2>the American workforce.

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 6>Well in reshaping the speech as well. It's a movable

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 6>feast right now. Tim. The number one thing is we've

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:39.040
<v Speaker 6>seen a trend in the data. The conceit is labor

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:42.599
<v Speaker 6>data always lags. Okay, fine, and we've seen this trend,

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 6>including continuing claims. Today Bramo put out on Twitter, I

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 6>was stuck in an airport somewhere. Bramo put out on

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:56.039
<v Speaker 6>Twitter that great continuing claims chart which shows this explosion

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:59.839
<v Speaker 6>up in the weekly data. That's the kind of tea

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 6>leaves that gets have fed the shift. President Trump wants

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:05.359
<v Speaker 6>them to shift quicker. And let's remember we've got that

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:09.719
<v Speaker 6>jobs report early September before Mike McKee's in that press

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 6>conference September seventeenth.

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:14.719
<v Speaker 7>Well, I want to just talk about the energy. I mean,

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:16.919
<v Speaker 7>you've been to so many of these symposiums. What's the

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 7>energy like on the ground this year? In particular?

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 6>Quiet? First thing I noticed when I walked in. There's

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:27.279
<v Speaker 6>a whole new quiet tone to the Mike McKinnon. I remember,

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:30.360
<v Speaker 6>I remember August of seven, which was I think i'll

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 6>say seven days after libor or Ois went out four

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:37.600
<v Speaker 6>standard deviations. This place was chaos.

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 5>My guess is a lot.

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 6>Of people are coming in tomorrow morning, and tomorrow morning

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:46.239
<v Speaker 6>here at the Jackson Lake Lodge will not be quiet.

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:49.280
<v Speaker 6>There'll be a real turnout for the speech. With that said,

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 6>it's one party, academic, but it is one part about

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 6>this attack on the Central Bank by President Trump.

0:06:56.160 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 2>Tom'm gonna have to leave it there. We're gonna speak

0:06:58.279 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 2>to you throughout in the next couple of time days.

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 2>Appreciate your time, and we're glad you arrived safely. I

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 2>know it was a long journey to get there. Tom Keen,

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Surveillance co host out there at the Jackson Hole

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 2>Economic Symposium.

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 5>Stay with us.

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 2>More from Bloomberg Business Week Daily coming up after this.

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Catch

0:07:22.600 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 1>us live weekday afternoons from two to five eas during

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 1>listen on Apple Karplay and Android autto with the Bloomberg

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Business app, or watch us live on YouTube well.

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 2>Also watching the economics imposium in Jackson is Ali McCartney,

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 2>Managing director of wealth management and private wealth advisor with

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 2>Alignment Partners at Ubs. She and the team managed just

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 2>over one billion dollars in assets. She joins us from

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 2>Rehoboth Beach, Delaware this afternoon. Ali, good to have you

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 2>back on the program. What do you think Fed Chair

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 2>Jay Powell will communicate tomorrow?

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 9>I think, as usual, you will probably not communicate exactly

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 9>the things that the market is looking for. But I

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 9>think that what he will communicate you just spoke about briefly,

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 9>which is this tension between the dual mandate, specifically that

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 9>they are now looking more at weakening softening data in

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 9>a labor market than they are at long term inflation expectations,

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 9>which although Tom talked about the movement in the thirty year,

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 9>seemed to be quite consistent. The last thing I'll leave

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 9>you with is to remember that last year was in

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:32.199
<v Speaker 9>a sense of quite an epic meeting, and that that

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:36.360
<v Speaker 9>was the beginning of the long awaited pivot. I think

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 9>that this meeting will be in a sense less revelatory

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 9>than that one.

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 7>When we look at the market performance this past year

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 7>thus far, it's we have the S and P five hundred,

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:50.079
<v Speaker 7>that's up about eight percent. Of course, that's a bit

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 7>different from what we saw in the past couple of

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 7>years where we were seeing double digit gains to end

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 7>the year here. So what do you think the market

0:08:57.280 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 7>really needs to hear to maintain this moment some here

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:02.840
<v Speaker 7>as we go into the second half of this year.

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 9>So I think we are at we're a bit in

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 9>a bit of a waiting game, right, that's a normal thing.

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 9>In late August, volumes are really low. You know, people

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 9>are on vacation less trading. We also happen to be

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:20.439
<v Speaker 9>awaiting Jackson Hole on Friday and in video earnings next week,

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:24.200
<v Speaker 9>in video being the largest contributor from a market cap

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 9>and from an earnings perspective to the S and P

0:09:27.200 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 9>five hundred, and that being the conversation that is being

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:35.960
<v Speaker 9>you know, discussed now about you know, has AI pulled

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 9>back which have been driving the market. My sense is

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 9>that from an equity perspective, as you said, we've had

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 9>two twenty plus year return two years of twenty plus

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:50.199
<v Speaker 9>year returns. We you know, are up thirty percent from

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 9>the tariff day low and ten percent as you said,

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 9>a couple of days ago year to date, and we're

0:09:56.920 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 9>at multiples that we really have only seen twice in

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 9>my trading life, the first being one very unique day

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 9>during the pandemic and the other during the height of

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 9>the Internet bubble. So you know, what we need, I

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 9>think is stability to keep us in this range and

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:16.959
<v Speaker 9>going higher. And I think the bull market will remain

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 9>in tac I think it will likely be driven by

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 9>a continued expansion in the AI trade, both in terms

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 9>of infrastructure buys and builds, data and power picks and shovels.

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:34.560
<v Speaker 9>Both margins going up and productivity going up. And I

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:37.840
<v Speaker 9>think it will also be very much supported by a

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 9>decreasing interest rate cycle. But we're certainly in a more

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:43.839
<v Speaker 9>precarious position than we have been in a number of

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 9>years from a multiple perspective.

0:10:45.920 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 2>Ali, I'm trying to figure this out and I'm hoping

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 2>you can help help out with this. It's something I've

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:52.200
<v Speaker 2>been thinking a lot about lately, and it's this idea

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 2>of a weakening consumer. And in just a few minutes

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 2>were actually gonna speaking with the CFO of Kava Trisia Tolliver.

0:10:58.800 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 2>So Cabstock Film, you know, more than twenty percent in

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 2>a single day last week because the company pulled back

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:10.560
<v Speaker 2>its guidance, essentially talking about a fogginess with the American

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 2>consumer out there. At the same time, you have these

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 2>high margin AI companies that are essentially just printing money,

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:20.559
<v Speaker 2>whether we talk about it from an Nvidia perspective, from

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 2>a meta platforms perspective, with margins such as those, what's

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:26.960
<v Speaker 2>the tension there in a world with a weakening consumer?

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:31.560
<v Speaker 9>I think you nailed it. I think that bifurcation and

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 9>that tension really exists. I think it exists in terms

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 9>of goods and services. I think it exists in terms

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:42.679
<v Speaker 9>of consumer discretionary ver staples, and I think it exists

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:46.439
<v Speaker 9>in terms of, you know, the vast difference in wealth

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:49.199
<v Speaker 9>and earning potential in this country. So what I am

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:51.920
<v Speaker 9>seeing in my high end clientele, who are looking at

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 9>portfolios that are the highest they've ever been, and what

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 9>I'm seeing in my own neighborhood is the same. People

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 9>are definitely more reticent to spend, both simply the cost

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 9>of goods and the tiriff implications which we're starting to

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 9>get wind of, are real, and people are going to

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 9>have to make choices and decisions. The consumer has managed

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 9>on all levels to hold up extraordinarily well. It's like

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 9>the little engine that could, but it cannot last forever.

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:25.200
<v Speaker 9>And so I think that the next number of quarters

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 9>there is going to continue to be exactly what you

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 9>said with this bifurcation. In many ways that you slice

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:36.680
<v Speaker 9>the data, whether it's demographics, whether it's earnings, whether it's

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:40.440
<v Speaker 9>sector between the haves and the have nots.

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 7>What are the opportunities here in the market. How are

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 7>you advising your clients? What's the safe have in trade

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 7>right now?

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 9>Yeah? So look, I think all of this year it

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:53.680
<v Speaker 9>has paid to be diversified, which have not been the

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 9>case in a very long time. So you see right now,

0:12:57.040 --> 0:13:00.959
<v Speaker 9>you see equities that have recovered and gone up no

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 9>matter which area you're looking at and which geography. Largely

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 9>you see gold, which has done its job at protecting

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:12.120
<v Speaker 9>but also continues to provide upside. And you see fixed

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 9>income you know, ig in the US trading at twenty

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:18.199
<v Speaker 9>five year tights as people try to get ahead of

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 9>the FED moving down. So there are a lot of opportunities. However,

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 9>each is very expensive. So I think the first is

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:32.320
<v Speaker 9>to continue to be diversified and even though it feels

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 9>like things are expensive, to continue to be invested. The

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 9>second is to look for areas that still have room

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 9>to grow from a relative perspective, whether that's healthcare, whether

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:48.719
<v Speaker 9>that's utilities which can also provide some defense, whether that's financials,

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 9>which again are trading high but have a number of

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 9>tailwinds from a regulatory and an interest rate perspective. So

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:58.720
<v Speaker 9>there most certainly are opportunities out there, but you know

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:01.680
<v Speaker 9>what we've been finding and especially finding this week, is

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:05.120
<v Speaker 9>it may not be the time to play all beta

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:08.320
<v Speaker 9>or buy the SMP. This may be a time to

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:11.199
<v Speaker 9>be much more discreete and disciplined about what you buy

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 9>and when you buy it.

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:14.839
<v Speaker 5>We only have about a minute left.

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 2>But I was talking to a colleague a little earlier

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 2>and she sort of explained the sense out in Silicon

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 2>Valley right now when it comes to the AI and

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 2>the AI race and what private companies are doing. And

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 2>she described it as being on this roller coaster, but

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 2>there's this lack of understanding about where we are on

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 2>the roller coaster on the way up, if we're close

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 2>to the top or not are we.

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 9>It's a really great question. And I have found in

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 9>my career, being both on the East Coast and the

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 9>West Coast, that there is always a difference in opinion,

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 9>o bulliance and understanding of various technologies that are coming

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 9>out of Silicon Valley. I think that we probably remain

0:14:55.520 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 9>in the second early third inning. We are not even

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 9>close to there yet. What I think the major difference

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 9>is by people that live, traffic and work out there,

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 9>is that they are thinking many steps ahead in storms

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 9>of large scale effects on data on businesses, whereas I

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 9>find that my clients and the people that I work

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 9>with on Wall Street, outside of let's say the analyst community,

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 9>are much more focused on sort of large language models

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 9>chat GPT, and that's why I think there is extreme

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 9>room to run in the next decade.

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 2>Alan McCartney, Managing director, Wealth Management and private wealth Advisor

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 2>at Alignment Partners at UBS.

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 5>This is Bloomberg. Stay with us.

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 2>More from Bloomberg Business Week Daily coming up after this.

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Listen live

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:54.480
<v Speaker 1>each weekday starting at two pm Eastern on Apple Cocklay

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 1>and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You can

0:15:57.360 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 1>also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 1>York station, Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 2>There's been this renewed interest on rare earths and critical

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 2>minerals as trade attentions between the US and China have

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 2>flared up. On that We've spent quite a bit of

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 2>time over the last few months talking about them with

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 2>CEOs of companies in the space. Jim Litinski over at

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 2>MP Materials, whose company is set to have the Defense

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 2>Department take a four hundred million dollar preferred equity stake.

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 2>For more on rare earths, we're joined by Oliver Friesen,

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 2>CEO at Guardian Metal Resources. It's a London based metals

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 2>exploration and development company. It's looking to bring production of

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 2>tungsten back to the US. Oliver joins US from Toronto. Oliver,

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 2>we've been learning a lot about rares lately. I think

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 2>my geology one oh one professor would be very happy

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 2>with what we've been talking about. We Gary Evans from

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 2>US antimony on last week talking about the importance of

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 2>antimony when it comes to ballistics. That was something that

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 2>was new to me. Your focus is tungsten. Why is

0:16:56.760 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 2>tungsten important because it's not classified as a rare earth.

0:17:00.640 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, well, first of all, thanks for having me on, Tim,

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 8>It's great to be here to talk more about tungsten.

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:07.640
<v Speaker 8>Funny enough, you mentioned antimony in the use within munitions

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:10.640
<v Speaker 8>and ballistics. It's the same reason you need tungsten. Tungsten

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 8>is one of the most dense metals on the planet

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 8>and also has the highest melting point, so it's been

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:17.679
<v Speaker 8>used in the production of munitions for decades and decades

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 8>and decades. Now that's just one small use case, but effectively,

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:23.400
<v Speaker 8>when you look at the entire critical metals supply chain,

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:25.960
<v Speaker 8>if even one of those metals isn't there, that can

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:28.199
<v Speaker 8>shut down manufacturing in the United States of America. So

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 8>it's important that we focus on not only just rare earths,

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:33.920
<v Speaker 8>which as you mentioned, are very important antimony, but tungsten

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 8>is definitely up there, considering the fact that we're very

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 8>reliant on unfriendly adversaries for global tungsten supplies.

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 7>So I want to talk a bit more about your

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:46.639
<v Speaker 7>company in particular here which end markets you know, maybe

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 7>eves defense renewables are really driving the most urgency for

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:51.120
<v Speaker 7>your business right now?

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I would say probably the most urgent use cases

0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:58.639
<v Speaker 8>is a cross defense because of that density, it's ubiquitous,

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 8>and it's very important in the productions and ammunitions and

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 8>things like tank armers as well. So really, right now,

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 8>given the geopolitical landscape, we're seeing a huge amount of

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:10.680
<v Speaker 8>a surgeon demand and increasing demand across the defense industry

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:13.199
<v Speaker 8>for this metal. But as you pointed out, you know,

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 8>it's not just a defense metal. This is a metal

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 8>that's used in a lot of other industries. Some that

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 8>come to mind aerospace, automotive, green energy is another one.

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 8>It's a really important metal. It's almost irreplaceable in a

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 8>lot of these technologies. So Defense is driving the narrative

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:30.639
<v Speaker 8>right now. But the same time, you know, we're hearing

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 8>major manufacturers in the United States of America are actually saying,

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:35.919
<v Speaker 8>we can't get this tungsten. If we don't get it,

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:36.920
<v Speaker 8>we're going to be shutting down.

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 2>So the Pentagon in July provide it as six point

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 2>two million dollar ward to Golden Metal Resources. It's the

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 2>US unit of your company to perform a pre feasibility

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 2>study for a tungsten mind near Hawthorne, Nevada. Is this

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 2>is this all the financing that you will need? Will

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 2>you need more from the DoD, Will you need more

0:18:56.080 --> 0:18:58.440
<v Speaker 2>from the government? Will you need to raise more?

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:02.160
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, So it's it's part of the puzzle for sure.

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 8>So that six point two million dollar award that we've

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:08.240
<v Speaker 8>received from the Department Defense, which obviously we're very grateful

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 8>to the current administration for that award, will cover some

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 8>of the key engineering workstreams as part of that PFS study.

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 8>But you're right, there are other expenditures associated with bringing

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:22.640
<v Speaker 8>that project and our projects into production. But concurrently with that,

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 8>with that award from the Department of Defense, we raised

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:29.720
<v Speaker 8>twenty one million dollars US dollars, predominantly with existing shareholders,

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:32.720
<v Speaker 8>almost all institutional. So we use those funds to then

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:35.880
<v Speaker 8>cover the other additional costs and all the funding combined.

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:39.639
<v Speaker 8>Really the focus is on delivering two key tungus and

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:41.680
<v Speaker 8>minds to the US market, of which it's a metal

0:19:41.720 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 8>the US has not mined for over a decade.

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 2>Do you need government support when it comes to this project.

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:50.359
<v Speaker 5>We don't.

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:53.640
<v Speaker 8>And you know, for instance, we acquired Pilot Mount, which

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 8>is a project that's received the award from the Department

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:58.640
<v Speaker 8>Defense almost five years ago, so it was a much

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 8>different market than the land Escape was much different. And

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:03.920
<v Speaker 8>even at that time, we acquired it because we felt

0:20:03.920 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 8>like it would be an economic tungsten operation. At previous

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:10.920
<v Speaker 8>pricing norms, which is around three hundred dollars, what's called

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 8>an metric ton unit are about thirty thousand dollars a ton.

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:17.200
<v Speaker 8>That being said, the price, you know, fast forward five years,

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:20.880
<v Speaker 8>China has completely banned the exports of all tunks into

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 8>the US market. The price is closer to fifty thousand

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 8>dollars a ton right now. But even at historic norms,

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:28.680
<v Speaker 8>you know, this project in our projects, we believe makes sense.

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:31.439
<v Speaker 8>But obviously you know the tailwinds we're seeing now across

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 8>the federal funding landscape, but also permitting gives us that

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:37.880
<v Speaker 8>much more confidence to push these projects forward and deliver

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:41.240
<v Speaker 8>minds in America to the US industrial base and defense partners.

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:43.920
<v Speaker 7>Oliver, let's talk a little bit about China.

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 9>You brought it up here.

0:20:44.880 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 7>How do you see China's dominance in the rare earth

0:20:47.680 --> 0:20:50.360
<v Speaker 7>processing cheaping your strategy here?

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, No, it's a really good point, Noraen. I'm glad

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:56.200
<v Speaker 8>you brought it up, because what what sort of sets

0:20:56.280 --> 0:20:59.200
<v Speaker 8>tungsen apart from you know, the antimonies and the rarest

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:02.720
<v Speaker 8>says we've discussed, is the fact that the downstream processing

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 8>capacity actually fully exists on US soil. It's one of

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:09.160
<v Speaker 8>the kind of the very few critical metals of which

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 8>the US has the ability to actually take what's called

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 8>a tungsten concentrate and turn it into actual usable finished

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 8>products for defense and for industry. So the benefit that

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 8>we have is that the only thing missing in the

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:24.359
<v Speaker 8>US right now is a domestic mind source. You know,

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 8>we import in the US, all of our concentrates from

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:32.320
<v Speaker 8>other countries, and just to give you a data point, China,

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 8>Russian North Korea combined represent ninety percent of total global

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 8>supply of tungsen. I'm mean, just let that kind of

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:41.439
<v Speaker 8>data point sit in. But the thing that's missing right

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:44.639
<v Speaker 8>now in the US is the mind supply. The processing

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:46.399
<v Speaker 8>is there. So as soon as we can plug in

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 8>R two Nevada based tungs and minds, you have a

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:53.639
<v Speaker 8>fully circular tungsten supply chain that exists within the bounds

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 8>of the United States of America.

0:21:56.480 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 7>So where do you see demand for rare earth materials

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:01.640
<v Speaker 7>and all of that, just more broadly over the next

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 7>say five to ten years.

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:08.880
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, So tungsten specifically, we're seeing very very healthy compound

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 8>and annual growth rates across the different sectors.

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 5>That need it.

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 8>Defense is certainly leading the charge right now. You know,

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:18.200
<v Speaker 8>we're seeing we're seeing the EU and NATO and the US.

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:20.600
<v Speaker 8>You know, defense budgets up or up across the board,

0:22:20.640 --> 0:22:23.119
<v Speaker 8>So that drives the demand for tungsten, as you can

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 8>probably imagine. But also you know, we mentioned automotive, aerospace,

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 8>these are all other other sectors that are the demand

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:34.439
<v Speaker 8>for tungsten is increasing quite considerably, so we're seeing healthy

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:37.920
<v Speaker 8>growth across the different growth areas. And another use case

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 8>that many of your listeners probably are not aware of

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 8>is nuclear fusion, so not to be completely confused with

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 8>nuclear fission, but effectively trying to harness the energy of

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 8>the sun here on Earth. And the only metal with

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:51.679
<v Speaker 8>a high enough melting point to contain a nuclear fusion

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:56.159
<v Speaker 8>reactor is tungsten. So we see longer term considerable demand

0:22:56.240 --> 0:23:02.239
<v Speaker 8>growth from this this very important energy supply excuse me,

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 8>technology that should be come in line in the next

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:06.879
<v Speaker 8>couple of years here in next maybe decade.

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:09.359
<v Speaker 2>One of the most read stories on the Bloomberg Terminal

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:12.399
<v Speaker 2>this week was about the Trump administration, or President Trump's

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 2>new brand of economic state craft deals like you know

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:18.120
<v Speaker 2>we might see with Intel, for example, or the Department

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 2>of Defense deal with MP materials. I mean you could

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:26.240
<v Speaker 2>throw other companies into that as well, AMD and Nvidia.

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:29.439
<v Speaker 2>With fifteen percent of certain ship sales in China going

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:32.159
<v Speaker 2>to the government, maybe even US steal with that so

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 2>called golden share that the US government has with US steel.

0:23:36.840 --> 0:23:39.439
<v Speaker 2>What's in your view, because you've taken some money from

0:23:39.480 --> 0:23:42.400
<v Speaker 2>the government this year what's the difference between a deal

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 2>like the one that MP Materials got in which the

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 2>DoD will take a stake and the stake that the

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:50.240
<v Speaker 2>Trump administration is contemplating taking an intel. Do you see

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:51.359
<v Speaker 2>a difference in those deals?

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, for sure. So the MP Materials deal is pretty

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:59.440
<v Speaker 8>groundbreaking for this sector. And I think this is really

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 8>a strong signal to the US critical medals industry that that,

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 8>you know, the administration is serious about mind in America,

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 8>which is really encouraging to see. So the MP Materials deal,

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:13.040
<v Speaker 8>there's lots of different parts to that. One of them

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 8>is the price floor of the direct investment and also

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:19.240
<v Speaker 8>the federal award as well. So we've received just an award,

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 8>So this is that this is money that we can

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:23.800
<v Speaker 8>go and use to fast track key engineering steps as

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:26.359
<v Speaker 8>part of our project. But what I'll say is that

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:29.480
<v Speaker 8>you know, there there's you know, there's there's speculation that

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:33.920
<v Speaker 8>some of these unique uh and new sort of benefits

0:24:33.920 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 8>that MP has had with this deal could could be

0:24:36.040 --> 0:24:39.320
<v Speaker 8>applied across the sector. So effectively, the doors have opened

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 8>up for this this this type of deal to be

0:24:41.560 --> 0:24:43.919
<v Speaker 8>done across the defense supply chain, but also the critical

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:46.239
<v Speaker 8>metal supply chain. So anyways, I think that all in all,

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 8>it's it's a really strong signal to the market. It's

0:24:48.359 --> 0:24:50.399
<v Speaker 8>a really strong signal to myself as a CEO of

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:53.959
<v Speaker 8>a critical metals company that the US administration is serious

0:24:54.000 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 8>about minds in America and that obviously means that we

0:24:56.800 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 8>have these projects at exactly the right time and trying

0:24:59.840 --> 0:25:01.920
<v Speaker 8>to over this key metal to the US market.

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 2>We're speaking with Oliver Freesa and the CEO at Guardian

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 2>and Metal Resources, to London based metals exploration and development company.

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:11.879
<v Speaker 2>It's looking to bring production of tungskin back to the US. Oliver,

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:14.960
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned the door is open. Is your door open

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 2>for an investment from the US government where the government

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:21.080
<v Speaker 2>or the Department of Defense would actually take an equity

0:25:21.119 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 2>stake in the company.

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:23.159
<v Speaker 5>Would you welcome that?

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 8>Of course, yeah, we'd be We'd more than welcome that.

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 8>Like I said, we all we have right now is

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 8>the award from the Deity, which is incredibly important for

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 8>the business. But you know, we're we're we're Our goal

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 8>here is to deliver these minds to the US market.

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 8>So anything that we can do to help get support

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:44.320
<v Speaker 8>from the current administration and across the industry. We will

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:47.639
<v Speaker 8>absolutely have that conversation, but the time is so critical

0:25:47.760 --> 0:25:50.120
<v Speaker 8>right now. Like I said, the US has no domestic

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 8>mind supply, and we believe that we are the leading

0:25:53.400 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 8>company when it comes to tungsten expression development. So we're

0:25:56.000 --> 0:25:58.639
<v Speaker 8>absolutely looking to have any conversation that will help us

0:25:58.640 --> 0:25:59.360
<v Speaker 8>get to our goal.

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:02.479
<v Speaker 7>Quicker, are you having conversations right now about that?

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:06.239
<v Speaker 8>I can't speak to that. What I can say is that,

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:08.399
<v Speaker 8>you know, the award that we received from the Department

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 8>of Defense was only about three weeks ago, so we're

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 8>now really focused on getting that money and focusing it

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:17.959
<v Speaker 8>in the ground and towards towards creating US jobs at

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 8>our projects. So that's the focus right now. But obviously,

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 8>you know, we're looking to tap into anytail ones that

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:26.639
<v Speaker 8>can be available to defense and critical metals companies that

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:28.240
<v Speaker 8>are focused on US projects.

0:26:28.440 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 7>Oliver, how do you navigate trade tensions and resource nationalism

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:33.439
<v Speaker 7>and markets where you operate?

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean we try to get too focused on that.

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 8>You know, it's uh, there's a lot of noise out there.

0:26:39.640 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 8>There's a lot of movement across tariffs and and and

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 8>you know trade relationships. Right now, I think the main

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 8>signal to to to our company and to myself is

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:51.639
<v Speaker 8>the CEO is that there's a huge push for minds

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:54.679
<v Speaker 8>in America. We want to see these metals actually being

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 8>mined on American soil. So we try not to get

0:26:58.000 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 8>too kind of caught up in the day to day.

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 8>You know, we have a job here, which is to

0:27:01.119 --> 0:27:05.360
<v Speaker 8>deliver these projects to the US market. But it's encouraging

0:27:05.359 --> 0:27:06.920
<v Speaker 8>to see some of these things that I think really

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 8>once again point to the fact that the current administration

0:27:10.119 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 8>is very focused on mind in America and nowhere else

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 8>in the world. So that's obviously a huge benefit benefit

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 8>to us as owners of two key tunks and projects

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 8>that are both on US soil and also in the

0:27:21.359 --> 0:27:23.919
<v Speaker 8>great state of Nevada, which is a very mining friendly

0:27:23.960 --> 0:27:24.880
<v Speaker 8>place to be operating.

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:28.399
<v Speaker 2>Oliver, Yes or no, how quickly? Or can I should

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:30.639
<v Speaker 2>say the US become rare with independent from China?

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:33.400
<v Speaker 8>Oh man, it's a good question. I mean, yes, we can.

0:27:33.520 --> 0:27:35.960
<v Speaker 8>I mean there's some great geology here. We need a

0:27:36.119 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 8>huge amount of support from the administration, which we're seeing now.

0:27:39.200 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 8>We have to carry through. That's the biggest thing. We

0:27:41.119 --> 0:27:43.640
<v Speaker 8>can't stop start, stop start if we have this same

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:46.480
<v Speaker 8>sort of support push forward over five, ten, fifteen years,

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:49.440
<v Speaker 8>the landscape will look a lot different and the US

0:27:49.480 --> 0:27:51.800
<v Speaker 8>will become a lot less reliant on unfriendly countries. For

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:53.159
<v Speaker 8>these key input medals.

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:58.360
<v Speaker 2>Oliver Fries and CEO at Guardian Metal Resources, stay with us.

0:27:58.440 --> 0:28:01.399
<v Speaker 2>More from Bloomberg Business Weekday coming up after this.

0:28:05.440 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Catch

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 1>us live weekday afternoons from two to five eas during

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Listen on Alvacarplay and Android Atto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:18.680
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:28:19.359 --> 0:28:21.679
<v Speaker 7>It's been a big week of retail earnings and it's

0:28:21.720 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 7>telling us a lot about the state of the US

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 7>consumer Home depot sales, missed expectations, Walmart reporter rere miss

0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:31.880
<v Speaker 7>on profit expectations, Target delivered a discouraging full year sales outlook,

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:34.400
<v Speaker 7>and the list goes on and on. But we've got

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 7>two wonderful reporters here to shed light on this and

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 7>a lot more this afternoon. Janette Newman, Bloomberg News Consumer reporter,

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:46.240
<v Speaker 7>and Jennifer Bartasha's Bloomberg Intelligence Consumer team leader and senior

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 7>retail staples and packaged foot food analysts are here to

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 7>discuss that is a long title. Sounds like she does

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 7>a lot here, But Jeanette, I'll start with you one

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 7>of the latest retail earnings telling you about the state

0:28:57.560 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 7>of the US consumer right now.

0:28:59.240 --> 0:29:02.120
<v Speaker 10>I think over all that the US consumer is actually

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:06.480
<v Speaker 10>doing okay. I think there's there's a note of caution

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:09.360
<v Speaker 10>looking forward because a lot of what's been you know,

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:13.000
<v Speaker 10>sold in the in the last couple quarters, price price

0:29:13.000 --> 0:29:16.080
<v Speaker 10>increases has not hit those goods, and so there's concern

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:19.040
<v Speaker 10>about when price increases really do start to flow through,

0:29:19.480 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 10>what how consumers will will react. But despite some of

0:29:22.760 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 10>the you know what you what you mentioned Noura with

0:29:24.560 --> 0:29:27.360
<v Speaker 10>the results, I mean, Walmart did have a profit miss

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:30.120
<v Speaker 10>that's very rare. That had to do with some claims,

0:29:30.280 --> 0:29:33.000
<v Speaker 10>but they actually raised their sales guidance for the year,

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:35.080
<v Speaker 10>which was already which was already pretty high. So that

0:29:35.120 --> 0:29:37.480
<v Speaker 10>shows that there they do have some confidence in the

0:29:37.480 --> 0:29:39.040
<v Speaker 10>consumer in the year in the year ahead.

0:29:39.160 --> 0:29:41.480
<v Speaker 2>A Jen come on in here, because we spoke earlier

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 2>with the CFO of KAVA, Tricia Toliver joined us and

0:29:46.480 --> 0:29:48.480
<v Speaker 2>she said last week and she kind of reiterated today

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 2>that there's this fluid macroeconomic environment that these are her words,

0:29:52.360 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 2>she said, it creates a fog for consumers and during

0:29:55.200 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 2>those times they tend to step off the gas. Would

0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 2>you say that that the view you have at Bloomberg

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:04.480
<v Speaker 2>Intelligence about the consumer, that it's foggy and as a

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 2>result of that fog, consumers are pulling back a little bit.

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. I think that's a pretty good insight. You know,

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 4>when we look at the consumer and you look at

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:17.760
<v Speaker 4>sort of the bigger numbers in terms of the economy,

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:21.840
<v Speaker 4>the consumer is hanging in there. But the consumer has

0:30:21.880 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 4>been conservative for a long time. It really started when

0:30:25.400 --> 0:30:28.440
<v Speaker 4>we had high food inflation, and as soon as that

0:30:28.560 --> 0:30:31.600
<v Speaker 4>started to roll back, we had pressure from tariffs, and

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 4>there's just uncertainty. And when that consumer is uncertain, they

0:30:35.720 --> 0:30:37.600
<v Speaker 4>still buy the things that they need to buy. They're

0:30:37.640 --> 0:30:40.160
<v Speaker 4>still going on vacation, but they're just being a little

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 4>bit more prudent. And until we have a little bit

0:30:42.720 --> 0:30:45.080
<v Speaker 4>more clarity, we're not expecting that to really change.

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:48.160
<v Speaker 2>Jen, what is the bifurcation that you're seeing at Bloomberg

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 2>Intelligence when it comes to consumers, those at the higher

0:30:53.600 --> 0:30:55.920
<v Speaker 2>end of the income spectrum versus what those at the

0:30:55.960 --> 0:30:57.720
<v Speaker 2>lower end of the income spectrum are doing and We've

0:30:57.720 --> 0:30:59.800
<v Speaker 2>talked a lot for years about the K shaped recovery.

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:02.600
<v Speaker 2>Kind of sounds like we're still there. Maybe it's even

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:03.200
<v Speaker 2>more pronounced.

0:31:04.280 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 4>It's pretty pronounced. You know, lower income consumers continue to

0:31:08.360 --> 0:31:11.960
<v Speaker 4>be pressured when you look at retailers that really have

0:31:12.120 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 4>a lot of those customers in their base, and that

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 4>would be the Walmart's of the world, it would be

0:31:16.160 --> 0:31:19.440
<v Speaker 4>Dollar Generals of the world. You know, you see that

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:23.200
<v Speaker 4>the spending and the average ticket and the traffic into

0:31:23.280 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 4>those stores in some instances is a little bit pressured.

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:30.040
<v Speaker 4>At the same time, you know, higher income households are

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:33.960
<v Speaker 4>almost kind of going along as normal. They're still seeking value,

0:31:34.000 --> 0:31:36.360
<v Speaker 4>but they're taking advantage of all the value that's being

0:31:36.400 --> 0:31:40.520
<v Speaker 4>offered out to the broader economy and they're saving money

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:43.800
<v Speaker 4>that way. So it's an interesting thing to track and

0:31:43.840 --> 0:31:48.200
<v Speaker 4>how those two different parts of the consumer base are

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:49.960
<v Speaker 4>really behaving a little bit differently.

0:31:50.520 --> 0:31:54.200
<v Speaker 10>And everybody loves a deal, right and Walmart has actually,

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 10>you know, to what Jen's saying, Walmart has has benefited

0:31:57.600 --> 0:32:00.680
<v Speaker 10>from everyone loving a deal and is attracting increasingly more

0:32:00.760 --> 0:32:04.120
<v Speaker 10>higher income consumers and that's part of what's helped boost

0:32:04.160 --> 0:32:06.880
<v Speaker 10>its its sales and that's been a strategy. You know

0:32:06.960 --> 0:32:09.560
<v Speaker 10>a lot of those consumers went to Walmart during the

0:32:09.600 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 10>pandemic to get groceries and then have increasingly kind of

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:14.760
<v Speaker 10>bought more and more. Walmart is stepping up. You know,

0:32:14.840 --> 0:32:18.600
<v Speaker 10>it's clothing offering, and so that's also you know, that's helping,

0:32:18.600 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 10>that's helping Walmart.

0:32:19.560 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 5>Are those consumers sticky with Walmart?

0:32:22.200 --> 0:32:24.480
<v Speaker 10>Yes, they are, They are sticky, and that's been that's

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:27.080
<v Speaker 10>been part of the that's been part of Walmart's success

0:32:27.360 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 10>because they go to the grocery, they go and they

0:32:29.040 --> 0:32:31.360
<v Speaker 10>get the groceries, and then they see, actually, like Walmart

0:32:31.360 --> 0:32:34.160
<v Speaker 10>has great genes. Now Walmart has knows that these consumers.

0:32:34.160 --> 0:32:36.800
<v Speaker 5>Well, that was an American Eagle reference, wasn't it.

0:32:37.240 --> 0:32:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Know.

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:39.560
<v Speaker 2>We're not going to definitely, we're not going to get

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:44.200
<v Speaker 2>We're not aget talking Sidney.

0:32:45.880 --> 0:32:49.240
<v Speaker 5>Not moving on. Sorry, go ahead, chapter, next chapter.

0:32:49.400 --> 0:32:52.239
<v Speaker 10>And that that also is you know, Walmart has been

0:32:52.280 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 10>seizing on that and Target has been missing out. Target

0:32:54.600 --> 0:32:56.600
<v Speaker 10>has not been doing well. They obviously just appointed a

0:32:56.640 --> 0:32:58.480
<v Speaker 10>new CEO. He's an insider.

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:01.160
<v Speaker 5>It's an amazing story.

0:33:01.400 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 10>It is an amazing story. It is an amazing story.

0:33:03.560 --> 0:33:05.400
<v Speaker 10>But the market's not that impressed.

0:33:05.040 --> 0:33:08.240
<v Speaker 7>Though, that's what we're seeing. But I mean you also

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:11.040
<v Speaker 7>come for companies like Sday Latter. We talked about Walmart.

0:33:11.040 --> 0:33:12.520
<v Speaker 7>Of course, we know that has a lot of those

0:33:12.520 --> 0:33:15.560
<v Speaker 7>consumers staples opportunities there. But when we look at Esta

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:17.360
<v Speaker 7>Latter and a lot of competitors like that on the

0:33:17.400 --> 0:33:21.560
<v Speaker 7>more luxury end, what are the contours of consumer spending

0:33:21.560 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 7>in that space right now?

0:33:23.080 --> 0:33:26.760
<v Speaker 10>You know, beauty overall is doing okay again, kind of

0:33:26.840 --> 0:33:29.120
<v Speaker 10>still slowing down a little bit, but still writing a

0:33:29.520 --> 0:33:32.120
<v Speaker 10>post pandemic boom when we all got into you know,

0:33:33.120 --> 0:33:35.840
<v Speaker 10>lots of different lots of different beauty products at one

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 10>at one time. But Stay Latter is not doing that well.

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 10>So that's kind of like even though the consumer right

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:43.960
<v Speaker 10>now is okay, a little bit conservative, like like Jen said,

0:33:44.000 --> 0:33:46.640
<v Speaker 10>but Walmart is doing overall really well. Target is not

0:33:46.680 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 10>doing great. That's also because of differences with the two

0:33:49.200 --> 0:33:53.680
<v Speaker 10>companies and how they're run. Similarly, Loreal, huge beauty company,

0:33:53.680 --> 0:33:56.360
<v Speaker 10>obviously is actually doing really well. Stay Latter. No, their

0:33:56.400 --> 0:33:58.360
<v Speaker 10>sales in the most recent fiscal year that just ended,

0:33:58.400 --> 0:34:01.040
<v Speaker 10>we're down eight percent, and those are kind of internal

0:34:01.200 --> 0:34:04.560
<v Speaker 10>internal problems that they've been that they've been dealing with Jennifer.

0:34:04.560 --> 0:34:06.920
<v Speaker 10>I want to bring you back into the conversation here.

0:34:07.440 --> 0:34:10.759
<v Speaker 10>Are we seeing any sense of consumer fatigue right now,

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:12.759
<v Speaker 10>especially when we know inflation is super high and if

0:34:12.800 --> 0:34:14.879
<v Speaker 10>you were to ask the average person, they do think

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:16.759
<v Speaker 10>that things are kind of tight right now.

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:20.440
<v Speaker 4>I don't know that we're seeing a lot of fatigue.

0:34:20.520 --> 0:34:23.000
<v Speaker 4>I think people have sort of adjusted to what is

0:34:23.040 --> 0:34:26.319
<v Speaker 4>sort of almost a new normal, and that's a little

0:34:26.360 --> 0:34:30.040
<v Speaker 4>bit post food inflation. They've seen prices come down in

0:34:30.160 --> 0:34:33.359
<v Speaker 4>different ways, especially on the grocery side and some of

0:34:33.400 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 4>the general merchandise, like entry level fashion, and so I

0:34:38.200 --> 0:34:40.840
<v Speaker 4>think that gives the perception of a little bit of relief.

0:34:41.239 --> 0:34:44.000
<v Speaker 4>So I don't think people are really pulling back anymore,

0:34:44.000 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 4>but they're not also simultaneously really loosening the purse strings.

0:34:48.280 --> 0:34:50.279
<v Speaker 4>It seems like we've sort of settled into kind of

0:34:50.320 --> 0:34:55.080
<v Speaker 4>this new normal, this new normal range. One other note

0:34:55.120 --> 0:34:57.239
<v Speaker 4>on Walmart that I think is pretty interesting. When you're

0:34:57.239 --> 0:35:01.680
<v Speaker 4>talking about retention, you can't you can't not talk about

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:05.879
<v Speaker 4>Walmart Plus, which is a huge loyalty program and they're

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:08.719
<v Speaker 4>generating a lot of incremental revenue off of it, and

0:35:08.800 --> 0:35:11.239
<v Speaker 4>people who get in there, they keep renewing and it

0:35:11.360 --> 0:35:14.399
<v Speaker 4>just locks in loyalty and locks in spending, and we're

0:35:14.400 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 4>seeing that across all income cohorts.

0:35:16.719 --> 0:35:18.799
<v Speaker 2>Wait wait, wait, can you talk a little bit more

0:35:18.800 --> 0:35:20.560
<v Speaker 2>about that? And I think, I think what this is

0:35:20.600 --> 0:35:23.440
<v Speaker 2>not an ad for American Express, but I will say,

0:35:23.480 --> 0:35:25.600
<v Speaker 2>if you have a certain American Express card, you can

0:35:25.600 --> 0:35:28.200
<v Speaker 2>get a free membership to the program.

0:35:28.480 --> 0:35:29.560
<v Speaker 7>Which one do you want to.

0:35:29.840 --> 0:35:33.040
<v Speaker 5>I think it's the Platinum card. I believe, Yeah, I

0:35:33.120 --> 0:35:35.960
<v Speaker 5>believe that's what it is. Thanks for calling you.

0:35:36.040 --> 0:35:40.760
<v Speaker 4>Actually just completed a survey of one thousand Walmart Plus subscribers,

0:35:41.480 --> 0:35:44.480
<v Speaker 4>and what's really interesting is that eighty three percent of

0:35:44.520 --> 0:35:48.080
<v Speaker 4>Walmart Plus subscribers also have an Amazon Prime membership, but

0:35:48.120 --> 0:35:52.600
<v Speaker 4>that doesn't stop them from maximizing their Walmart Plus value.

0:35:53.160 --> 0:35:56.000
<v Speaker 4>And so I think that it really illustrates how Walmart

0:35:56.000 --> 0:36:01.000
<v Speaker 4>has very uniquely carved out a survey and a recurring

0:36:01.040 --> 0:36:05.239
<v Speaker 4>revenue stream that is really pretty remarkable. And that the

0:36:05.280 --> 0:36:06.920
<v Speaker 4>fact that a lot of the people who are in

0:36:06.960 --> 0:36:10.880
<v Speaker 4>that program are making digital orders, that's driving their digital

0:36:10.920 --> 0:36:14.600
<v Speaker 4>revenue for advertising, and it's really adding to just the

0:36:14.640 --> 0:36:18.520
<v Speaker 4>overall flywheel of Walmart. So there's a lot of really

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:22.120
<v Speaker 4>interesting things happening that are really stemming from some of

0:36:22.160 --> 0:36:25.120
<v Speaker 4>these intelligent decisions they made maybe five years ago to

0:36:25.200 --> 0:36:27.080
<v Speaker 4>introduce that Walmart Plus program.

0:36:27.480 --> 0:36:29.840
<v Speaker 2>That's a fascinating thing to hear because it was always

0:36:29.840 --> 0:36:31.560
<v Speaker 2>sort of an out also ran when it comes to

0:36:31.680 --> 0:36:36.760
<v Speaker 2>Amazon Prime, So it's interesting to hear that. Jen Janette,

0:36:36.760 --> 0:36:38.200
<v Speaker 2>I want to bring you back in here and talk

0:36:38.239 --> 0:36:41.479
<v Speaker 2>a little bit about Target. You mentioned the CEO change

0:36:41.480 --> 0:36:43.280
<v Speaker 2>the news we got earlier this week. You said investors

0:36:43.320 --> 0:36:47.120
<v Speaker 2>didn't love it. A lot of the conversation around Target

0:36:47.160 --> 0:36:49.120
<v Speaker 2>over the last couple of years, well, actually really over

0:36:49.160 --> 0:36:51.560
<v Speaker 2>the last year or so has had to do with

0:36:51.600 --> 0:36:55.399
<v Speaker 2>backlash against DEI efforts and to what extent, in your view,

0:36:56.320 --> 0:36:59.359
<v Speaker 2>that actually affected company sales or the image of what

0:36:59.400 --> 0:37:00.759
<v Speaker 2>that looked like for consumers.

0:37:00.800 --> 0:37:01.640
<v Speaker 5>What do we know about this?

0:37:02.320 --> 0:37:06.319
<v Speaker 10>The company executives at Target have said that the backlash,

0:37:06.440 --> 0:37:09.839
<v Speaker 10>like black, black consumers not shopping at Target, has had

0:37:09.840 --> 0:37:12.799
<v Speaker 10>an impact on sales. They have not quantified that, and

0:37:12.840 --> 0:37:16.439
<v Speaker 10>so we don't really know. These kinds of boycotts don't

0:37:16.480 --> 0:37:18.680
<v Speaker 10>often have a huge effect, but they have said that

0:37:18.719 --> 0:37:20.719
<v Speaker 10>it had that it had an effect, and I think

0:37:20.760 --> 0:37:24.000
<v Speaker 10>also more more importantly, even in some of the analyst notes,

0:37:24.160 --> 0:37:27.320
<v Speaker 10>and you hear investors talking about the staff at Target.

0:37:27.880 --> 0:37:32.200
<v Speaker 10>We've had some reporting it's nearly sixty percent of staff

0:37:32.239 --> 0:37:35.400
<v Speaker 10>at Target are people of color, and so the staff

0:37:35.440 --> 0:37:38.960
<v Speaker 10>itself has been upset by everything that's been going on

0:37:39.080 --> 0:37:43.920
<v Speaker 10>with Target pulling back on DEI and that is that

0:37:44.080 --> 0:37:46.400
<v Speaker 10>is something that some people think is kind of behind

0:37:46.719 --> 0:37:49.440
<v Speaker 10>some of this tumult with with staff. Job in retail

0:37:49.560 --> 0:37:52.799
<v Speaker 10>is so difficult, and you need especially now, and you

0:37:52.840 --> 0:37:54.480
<v Speaker 10>need great staff, and you need people who are going

0:37:54.520 --> 0:37:55.719
<v Speaker 10>to stick around and they know how.

0:37:55.640 --> 0:37:56.399
<v Speaker 2>The stores work.

0:37:56.560 --> 0:37:59.520
<v Speaker 10>So that has also been a problem, whereas you don't

0:37:59.560 --> 0:38:03.800
<v Speaker 10>hear those same complaints from staff at Walmart, for example.

0:38:03.800 --> 0:38:07.439
<v Speaker 10>Excuse me. They've also been increasing the salaries that they're

0:38:07.440 --> 0:38:10.279
<v Speaker 10>paying their their top employees, so that is also an

0:38:10.280 --> 0:38:12.480
<v Speaker 10>issue at Target. Is the issue with staff.

0:38:12.719 --> 0:38:14.879
<v Speaker 2>Well, we love talking retail and the consumer with both

0:38:14.920 --> 0:38:17.520
<v Speaker 2>of you. Thank you so much for joining us. Jene Newman,

0:38:17.520 --> 0:38:21.640
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg News Consumer reporter and Jennifer Bartasha's Bloomberg Intelligence Consumer

0:38:21.719 --> 0:38:25.160
<v Speaker 2>Team leader and senior Retail Staples and Package of Food analysts.

0:38:25.400 --> 0:38:28.839
<v Speaker 2>Check out Janette's reporting on the Bloomberg terminal and Jennifer's

0:38:28.960 --> 0:38:32.640
<v Speaker 2>research on the Bloomberg Terminal, also, of course, at bloomberg

0:38:32.719 --> 0:38:33.440
<v Speaker 2>dot com.

0:38:34.320 --> 0:38:39.759
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Businessweekdaily podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:38:39.920 --> 0:38:44.000
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday

0:38:44.000 --> 0:38:48.160
<v Speaker 1>afternoons from two to five pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:38:48.320 --> 0:38:52.120
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:38:52.320 --> 0:38:55.120
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:38:55.400 --> 0:38:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal