WEBVTT - Trump Losing Support From Key Conservatives

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:03.280
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser. Every day

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:05.200
<v Speaker 1>we're bringing you the latest news from the worlds of

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>business and finance, plus technology, politics. So much going on

0:00:09.000 --> 0:00:12.160
<v Speaker 1>in the world of politics, economics, and it's all harnessing

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the power of Business Week reporters and editors. You can

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>download Bloomberg Business Week on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:21.200
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:21.200 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio and be sure to watch

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>us too on YouTube by searching Bloomberg Global News. So

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>let's get into it. So many headlines delighted to have

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 1>with us. Dr William Moss, Executive Director of the International

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Vaccine Access Center, Professor in the Departments of Epidemiology, International Health,

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:42.839
<v Speaker 1>and Molecular Microbiology and Immunology at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 1>School of Public Health, and of course the Johns Hopkins

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg School of Public Health, supported by Michael R. Bloomberg,

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:51.559
<v Speaker 1>founder of Bloomberg LP and Bloomberg Philanthropies. Dr Moss with

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:53.959
<v Speaker 1>us on the phone in Baltimore. I wanted to lay

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 1>it all out for everyone. Dr Moss. First of all,

0:00:56.560 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for being here, Um, I do

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 1>feel like there's so much going on, and I feel

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 1>like it's it's some optimism and yet again a reminder

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>that we are still in a global pandemic. That's worrisome.

0:01:08.640 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Yes it is, and thank you for having me, Carol. Um.

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:15.559
<v Speaker 1>We are seeing record numbers of cases in the United States.

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:20.680
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing high numbers of deaths, hospitals that are really

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:24.480
<v Speaker 1>being stretched to the limits, and that that pattern is

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>going to continue for the next couple of months as

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:31.680
<v Speaker 1>we head into winter, more more people being indoors, more

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:35.399
<v Speaker 1>people interact indoors into the holiday season. But as you

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>said there, we also have some optimism with the reports

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 1>of the vaccine efficacy from the fist or vaccine being

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 1>much higher than people expected, recognizing that we only know

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>about this through a press release presumably from a review

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 1>of the data by an independent day if they monitoring board.

0:01:57.480 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>But well, we still do not know right as as

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 1>these headlines come out from a fiser. We're anticipating some

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 1>news from Maderna as well. That's promising. We don't know

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>what how long protection lasts. We don't know exactly what

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 1>these vaccine ultimately will do. Right, that's right there, are

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 1>still a number of outstanding questions. Then I have a

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 1>confidence will be able to answer these questions. But what

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 1>we know now is that in this late stage of

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>these phase three clinical trials, with the results from the

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Fiser vaccine demonstrating showing you know, high protection of people

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>who got the vaccine were protected compared to the placebo group. UM.

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 1>But as you said, there's still a number of outstanding questions.

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:50.639
<v Speaker 1>For example, we don't know what the vaccine efficacy is

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>in older adults or people with underlying medical conditions that

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>place them at higher risk for severe disease of COVID

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:01.960
<v Speaker 1>nineteen that come out of the trial results, But we

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:05.079
<v Speaker 1>don't know that now. We don't know how long this

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:09.959
<v Speaker 1>protection is gonna last. We hope it's gonna last a year,

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 1>years or more UM, but we just don't know, and

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:17.080
<v Speaker 1>that's going to take further follow of these participants in

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:21.919
<v Speaker 1>the trials Until we really know how long the protection lasts.

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 1>We also won't know whether they're the long term side effects. UM. Again,

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>we need the longer follow up, We need the full

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:32.240
<v Speaker 1>trial data to be able to see that. But right now,

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 1>what we'll be able to say is in the short term,

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:39.119
<v Speaker 1>this these vaccines look protective, vaccines look safe. At least

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 1>that's what I'm hoping for. Well, yes, fingers crossed, right,

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Dr Mossa. What happens next? Um? You know, I do

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>feel like we are all learning about I've said it before,

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>how the sausage is made in terms of vaccine development, right,

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and we're all talking about it so much. And I

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>know that there's some nervousness about the rapidity of the process,

0:03:56.960 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>but we are learning about how it all happens. So

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 1>what's kind of next year, whether it's the Fiser vaccine,

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 1>whether it's Maderna's vaccine. What are you anticipating how things

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 1>play out over the next few weeks, a few months. Yes,

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 1>and you're exactly right. I don't think there's ever been

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>such public scrutiny of the vaccine development and evaluation products.

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>What we anticipate happening next is that a company such

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>as Fiser Maderna will need to put admit an application

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:32.119
<v Speaker 1>to the Food and Drug Administration for emergency use authorization

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 1>so that these vaccines could be made available to high

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:41.720
<v Speaker 1>risk individuals as early as possible. What the Food and

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Drug Administration has put forth as guidelines is that the

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:50.719
<v Speaker 1>trials need to wait until at least half of the

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:54.600
<v Speaker 1>participants have had two months of follow up uh. Fiser

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 1>anticipates that that's going to happen later this month or

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:02.280
<v Speaker 1>fourth week of November, and then they will be able

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:06.719
<v Speaker 1>to submit their application for an emergency use authorization to

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the f d A. The the all the trial data

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 1>will then be reviewed by an independent body. Hopefully data

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>will be made public. Hopefully this whole process will be transparent.

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:22.039
<v Speaker 1>We need that for the public's trust UM and they

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:26.679
<v Speaker 1>would anticipate shortly after the application and this review process

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>that there would be, assuming the safety and efficacy data

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:34.160
<v Speaker 1>hold up UM, that will have an emergency use authorization.

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Fiser says that they'll have forty fifty million doses ready

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>to go UM by the end of this year. That's

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:46.279
<v Speaker 1>been one of the things that's allowed this process to

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 1>be accelerated, that the manufacturing has has gone on with

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:54.280
<v Speaker 1>the studies and nothing changes. Right. The drug is the drug,

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 1>so it's not like wait a minute, up, so we

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 1>have to tinker with the vaccine a little bit, right

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:00.839
<v Speaker 1>what it is, and that's why they've been all to vaccine,

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean to manufacture the vaccine exactly, so you know,

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:09.279
<v Speaker 1>there would have not be any any kind of changes

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:12.680
<v Speaker 1>to the vaccine that was used during the trials. They have,

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 1>but they have scaled up that manufacturing. So bottom line,

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 1>emergency use, Dr Moss, you anticipated by the end of

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the year, especially for those who really need it. I

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 1>think so. Again, assuming that the safety and efficacy data

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:30.160
<v Speaker 1>hold up that we're hearing about through this press release,

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:32.919
<v Speaker 1>I would expect by the end of this year, and

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:36.280
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps earlier in December, that we would have an

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>emergency use authorization and begin to h Then then we

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:43.279
<v Speaker 1>could begin to provide the vaccine to the high risk

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 1>individuals that may be healthcare workers and older adults. So

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 1>one of the things I wanted to ask you is

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>there was a story, Doctor Moss that talked specifically and

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>let me just find it. It had to do with

0:06:56.440 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I think MINX and just what that meant the COVID explosion. Mink.

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:06.119
<v Speaker 1>Our headline was that it's a dangerous sign for vaccines. Um,

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>tell me what we need to know and what this

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>might mean. Well, what what we want to know it

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 1>is a fascinating story, is whether this virus can be

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>transmitted among animals? Uh that are you know, potentially introduced

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>from humans to animals. We know that that this virus

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 1>probably started in animals, perhaps bats uh, and then was

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>transmitted to humans UM. But finding the virus circulating in

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 1>other wild animals UM makes it, you know, raises concerns

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 1>about our ability to really rid ourselves of this virus.

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 1>UM would the virus can mutate and change its genetic

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 1>structure within animals UM, but it also animals wild animals

0:07:56.960 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 1>can also serve as a reservoir of the virus, potentially

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 1>sending the virus back into human populations. That's what we

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 1>would be concerned about. We don't have evidence of that yet,

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>but that's why that was such a important news. So

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 1>if that was the case, that animals can serve as

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 1>a reservoir to send the virus back to humans, it

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 1>just sounds terrible. Does that mean that we could potentially

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 1>have a world where we are just constantly dealing with

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 1>this Yes, and even without an animal reservoir, you know,

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>another a new animal reservoir or another animal reservoir, we

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:37.840
<v Speaker 1>still maybe living with this virus for a long time.

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:41.439
<v Speaker 1>It's clear that we're going to be able to eradicate

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 1>this virus from human transmission. But if we're able to

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:51.599
<v Speaker 1>achieve and and we you know that's potentially possible with

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 1>a highly effective vaccine that that stops transmission um. Having

0:08:57.080 --> 0:09:02.080
<v Speaker 1>an animal reservoir just that's so much more difficult because

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 1>potentially we could have new human infections. Okay, I'm just

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 1>sitting with that. So what I'm trying to yeah, right,

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 1>just just kind of like layer it on. You know.

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>The other thing I guess I've been trying to get

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 1>my head around is I mean the virus that we

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 1>deal with, the seasonal flu virus that we deal with, right,

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 1>it mutates, right, and we're constantly trying to come up

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 1>with new vaccines. You can alter it and kind of

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:29.559
<v Speaker 1>keep ahead of it. As a COVID nineteen, Well it's

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:32.560
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen because of when it started getting you know,

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:36.679
<v Speaker 1>coming in. But this particular strain of coronavirus, as it mutates,

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 1>how quickly is it or how easily is it to

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 1>adapt an existing vaccine to keep up with the mutations. Right,

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:48.439
<v Speaker 1>That's a really important question. And you know, influenza is

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 1>a very different type of virus. Um. It has the

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 1>ability to kind of swap out pieces of itself. Uh,

0:09:56.800 --> 0:10:00.720
<v Speaker 1>it's it's genetic it's genome um and that allows it

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>to make big changes. That's why we get pandemic influenza.

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 1>But even smaller changes are are why we need to

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:13.680
<v Speaker 1>have a different vaccine each year. Corona the Stars coronavirus

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 1>two does mutate. All viruses mutate, all all viruses change

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>their genetic structure, but we we haven't seen that. We

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 1>don't see the degree of mutation and change, uh, certainly

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 1>that we see with influenza viruses. And just to give

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:33.600
<v Speaker 1>you another example, the measles the measles vaccine that we

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 1>use in most of the world in the United States

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 1>that came from a wild type measles virus isolate from

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen fifties, and we have not needed to change

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 1>our measles vaccines over time. So I think that the

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>coronavirus will be closer to measles than to influenza in

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 1>terms of our need to uh constantly update or reinvent

0:10:57.000 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>our our coronavirus vaccines. So that's a good thing, right, Yes,

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:05.359
<v Speaker 1>that's a good thing. Yes. So what do you anticipate,

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:07.559
<v Speaker 1>I mean, do you feel like you have some visibility?

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:09.839
<v Speaker 1>I felt like the world got some visibility Monday because

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>of Fiser and we felt a little bit more confident.

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:14.679
<v Speaker 1>UM just got about fifty seconds left. You feel like

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:18.840
<v Speaker 1>a year from now we're able to open up society

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 1>more than you know, than we have been. Or is

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:24.680
<v Speaker 1>it a shorter time frame or a longer time frame?

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 1>What do you think? Yes, I'm optimistic that we'll be

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 1>able to data vactors will be able to have enough vaccine,

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 1>probably different types of vaccines, and be able to get

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 1>these to the general public probably in mid to late one,

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and that that will help us begin open up. But

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's very important for people to know that

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 1>that's not going to happen in January. In February and March,

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have We're facing a very difficult winter,

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I think here in the United States and i'm sure

0:11:57.800 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>in Europe, UM, and we're gonna need to continue to

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 1>to wear masks and and distance and wash our hands

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and all those met those public health measures until later year.

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you said that masks and social distancing because

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I just want everyone to remember, UM and we've been

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 1>talking to a lot of folks right it's multifaceted and

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 1>getting this under control, UM, Dr Moss Brilliant, executive director

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 1>of the International Vaccine Access Center at Johns Hopkins, joining

0:12:24.080 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 1>us on the phone from Baltimore. This is Bloomberg Business

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:30.959
<v Speaker 1>Week with Carol Messer from Bloomberg Radio. All right, do

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>you want to get into something that kicks off on Monday.

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:36.199
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about the Bloomberg New Economy Form. It kicks

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 1>off virtually four days of incredible global, global programming with

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 1>a blockbuster lineup of leaders, and they cover kind of

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 1>all the global concerns that we need to be talking about.

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 1>It's also, by the way, our cover story this week.

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:53.439
<v Speaker 1>Let's get into it with Business Week Economics editor Christina

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Lynn Blatch. She's in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio, and

0:12:56.600 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 1>also with us Bloomberg Business Week Editor Joel Webber, he

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 1>is on the phone in Brooklyn. Until you have an

0:13:01.880 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 1>array of stories in the magazine that relate to the

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg New Economy Forum, that's right, And and really Christina

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 1>was the architect of this little package of stories and

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and she did a great job. And that was one

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons that um I wanted to have around

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the show today. And obviously we talked about Zel yesterday,

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 1>which is um, I thought just a phenomenally interesting one,

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 1>UM in regards to Venezuela and sort of how people

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:31.080
<v Speaker 1>they are making use of it to do something that

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, the company and you know Zell never intended

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 1>to have happened. Um. And that's just sort of an example.

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:39.679
<v Speaker 1>I think of the approach that Christina used throughout the

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:41.960
<v Speaker 1>issue is sort of like, how do we tap into

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:45.440
<v Speaker 1>some of these biggest challenges that that we face, that

0:13:45.600 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 1>humanity faces, And obviously that kind of starts with the

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:51.440
<v Speaker 1>pandemic since that is the you know, one of the

0:13:51.480 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 1>stories of the year for sure. UM, Christina can that

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and kind of lay out, um, what what you learned

0:13:57.240 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 1>about this story by Jason Galen and Longhaulers. Yeah, thanks

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Carol for having me on. I've been interested in the

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 1>long haulers for a while because I think we were

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:11.080
<v Speaker 1>also focused for every day still on infection rates and

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 1>hospitalizations and and and that, but also to understand that

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 1>there are people who some of them have symptoms that

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>are so bad that they're almost disabled, they cannot go

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>back to work and it's been several months, and and

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 1>that the scientific and health community can't answer the questions

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 1>that they have about whether they're ultimately going to be

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 1>done with this, you know, how long are they going

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 1>to have these symptoms? Well, and it's interesting Christina, considering um,

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think there's sometimes some populations being kind

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>of cavalier about COVID nineteen. And you have to remember that,

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, some people get it, they don't have a

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of um, you know, leftover effects if you will,

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and then other people get it and it stays with them,

0:14:56.640 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 1>as you just said, for a really long time. It's

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>just a reminder that this virus packs us all in

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 1>very different ways. That's right. Actually, one of the things

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:08.119
<v Speaker 1>that we found is that sometimes people who had no symptoms,

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:12.120
<v Speaker 1>are very light symptoms actually had the biggest problems with

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, the sort of long term viral um hangover

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 1>you would say, hm, and you know the other hangover

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>that um we're all going to kind of be faced with.

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Here is the economic implications of this, because COVID can

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 1>have multi organ impacts and implications, and we're also starting

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 1>to see that there will be an impact in terms

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 1>of disability. What does that mean for all of us? Christina? Well,

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 1>that's I think we talked to several researchers who are

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 1>trying to answer just that question, and something that's starting

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 1>to grapple with I mean, there have been comparisons to polio,

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 1>for instance, to try to have long range estimates. So

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>what would it be like if there had been no

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 1>vaccines that you know, they came in at the right time.

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's going to be important here. Obviously

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine, you know, not to have more infected population,

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 1>but we still will have to answer the questions of

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 1>how we help people who UM have damaged their organs,

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:17.040
<v Speaker 1>their hearts UM and sometimes need UM not just pulmonary rehabilitation,

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 1>but they're also having people describe brain fogs. M. So

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Christine and I want to talk to about Tom or

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 1>like a Bloomberg economic story which sort of talks about

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 1>how they've done. They crunch a bunch of numbers to

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 1>try and figure out sort of what the path of

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 1>global economies is going to look like over the next

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 1>couple of years and decades, and they go so far

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 1>as to say, right about, we're going to see a

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:50.359
<v Speaker 1>shift in terms of UM free market economies being overtaken

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 1>by by state driven ones. UM. Can you talk about

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 1>what where else he goes in that story and what

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 1>it means for for us. Can I just say to

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 1>this is a must read. Everybody has to read this

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>to kind of understand, I think where our world is going. Christina, Yeah,

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:07.679
<v Speaker 1>I think he did a good job of laying out

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 1>where where we're going to be at mid century and

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 1>to put numbers to something that we've been tracking for

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 1>a while, which is the sort of some people said

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the Asian century, you know, like that this the century

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 1>belongs to Asia and so overall emerging markets. Um at

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the start of the century where about of GDP, but

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, through by twenty fifty, there will be more

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:35.680
<v Speaker 1>than half, almost six, and China will be by far,

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:40.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, the biggest um the biggest part of that.

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 1>And we have this great graphic that sort of shows

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the reordering of the top ten economies, you know, and

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:50.479
<v Speaker 1>basically China bumps the US off the number one slot,

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:54.239
<v Speaker 1>India bumps Japan out of number three slot, and you know,

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and you see sort of the kind of youthful developing markets,

0:17:57.640 --> 0:17:59.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, moving up and the sort of aging econom

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 1>me is moving down. I gotta I have to say,

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 1>like I said, this is a mustery, but there's a

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 1>line in the story. It's optimistic to assume that all

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 1>these transitions will be smooth. Ha, Like it's going to

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:13.160
<v Speaker 1>be uncomfortable right as these changes happen globally, well we've

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:16.400
<v Speaker 1>seen in the last four years and even now when Biden,

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:22.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, will assume office that that, um, the big

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 1>power struggles that are going on right there, going on

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:27.679
<v Speaker 1>in the fields of trade of I P, you know,

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and all these different dimensions. I mean, there's this idea

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:33.919
<v Speaker 1>that you know that it's there's bound to be conflict

0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 1>when there are these these sort of disruptions in the

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:42.680
<v Speaker 1>in the sort of established order. Christian. I also want

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the other elephant in the room, which

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:49.920
<v Speaker 1>is climate change. And I know Eric Crosston was on

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 1>program yesterday talk about the story the wildfire story uh

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 1>in California, which is this, you know, really a case

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 1>in how bad wildfires can get and as climate change

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 1>amplifies these things to make it worse. It's it's it

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 1>means millions of people find themselves with fires at the

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 1>front door, when you know, just a few decades ago

0:19:14.880 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't a problem. Uh. And want to talk about

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the angle that was really in that story around insurance

0:19:21.840 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 1>and what it means for that industry. Well, I think

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 1>what was really interesting about that stories is to focus

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 1>on the modeling of risk, which is integral to the

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:35.679
<v Speaker 1>insurance industry. So for flooding, for example, there's been years

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 1>um of work already done on what areas and homes

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 1>are at risk. But for fire, this is a much

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:47.399
<v Speaker 1>more emerging field. Maybe not so much emerging, but that

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:51.720
<v Speaker 1>there's so many factors, more factors at work. UM that

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:54.160
<v Speaker 1>we talked, for example, to people who are building these

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 1>models and saying, oh, I can never actually finish building

0:19:56.960 --> 0:19:59.239
<v Speaker 1>this model because then we realized, you know, there's this

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:02.680
<v Speaker 1>other factor that we didn't account for properly. Well, this

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:07.680
<v Speaker 1>these models formed the foundation of kind of of how

0:20:07.720 --> 0:20:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the insurance industry looks at the risk that it faces

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:15.919
<v Speaker 1>in that state. And we have this great anecdote about

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 1>one UM scientists who delivered a presentation and in the

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:23.199
<v Speaker 1>audience where several people representative from the insurance industry. His

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:26.199
<v Speaker 1>presentation was about what happens in fires that breakout in

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:30.040
<v Speaker 1>canyons um and and the people after came up to

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>him and said, that's it. We're done, Like we're getting

0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:34.439
<v Speaker 1>out of the state. It's like, if you know what

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if the just such crazy scary scenarios that yeah,

0:20:39.440 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 1>it's just you know, things that we've never thought we'd

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 1>be dealing with. But right, and there's so many implications

0:20:43.760 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 1>of it. Um great stuff as always Bloomberg Business Week,

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:49.359
<v Speaker 1>Economics that are Christina Lynn Blad and of course our

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business we get it, or Joel Weber joining us,

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg New Economy form. It does kick off on Monday.

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:58.680
<v Speaker 1>It's virtually it's four days of global programming, a blockbuster agenda,

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 1>a lineup of leaders in business, government, finance, the market's, healthcare, climate,

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 1>you name it. And they are dealing with everything from

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:10.159
<v Speaker 1>the coronavirus to climate change, really the biggest challenges humanity faces.

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking forward to a panel I'm doing later in

0:21:12.040 --> 0:21:14.359
<v Speaker 1>the week that's all about how did we get here

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:16.880
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to a virus. It's amazing in terms

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 1>of the lineup. This is Bloomberg Business Week with furo

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Master on Bloomberg Radio. Yes, indeed, you are listening to

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:27.399
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week. We're gonna stay with politics from a

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:30.400
<v Speaker 1>We just talked with Jonathan Bernstein about Joe Biden's pick

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:33.959
<v Speaker 1>uh for his White House chief of staff. But we

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:36.760
<v Speaker 1>want to get to what seems to feel like some

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a political shift in uh the

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 1>horror should say, a shift in the political wins. Yeah,

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:44.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll get that out, um, at least when it comes

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:47.439
<v Speaker 1>to President Trump support from some key conservatives. Back with

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 1>us on what's going on and why, Bloomberg News Politics

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:53.199
<v Speaker 1>editor Wendy Benjaminson. She is back with us on the

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:55.439
<v Speaker 1>phone from d C. I'm just trying to keep up

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 1>with the headlines. I'm just gonna tell you, um, what's

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 1>going on with the conservatives and kind of coming out

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 1>like it's time to call this election. Basically back off.

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 1>It's at least that's what it feels like, Wendy. It

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:11.439
<v Speaker 1>feels like that Carol High and yet it's not quite

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 1>that yet. What they're saying is that he should be

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 1>getting an intelligence briefing every day, which every president elect gets, um,

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:23.639
<v Speaker 1>a secure intelligence briefing what's going on in the world,

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 1>because he's going to take over on January twenty, and

0:22:27.320 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 1>they sort of like to know what's going on before

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 1>they get into the Oval office. Because the Trump administration

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 1>is blocking his access to the normal transition activities. Joe Biden,

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:41.160
<v Speaker 1>who even though he's a former vice president, is now

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:45.119
<v Speaker 1>a private citizen yet president elect um, he doesn't have

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 1>access to classified information and they will not make those available.

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 1>So some conservative senators, especially those on the Senate Intelligence Committee,

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 1>are saying, come on, at least give him the intelligence

0:22:56.760 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 1>briefings in case he's president. We think it's better for

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the war old that he has, you know, deep inside

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 1>into what's going on. Well, we as Americans, should we

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 1>be concerned that he's not? I don't think terribly concerned.

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Biden himself said that at a news conference that he

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:15.680
<v Speaker 1>held on Wednesday Tuesday. Excuse me, he said he would

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:17.639
<v Speaker 1>it would be nice if he was getting it, but

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:20.680
<v Speaker 1>he's confident that he'll be able to catch up. Of course,

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 1>that's him trying to create a contrast. Biden has been

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 1>very careful lately to project this calm, everything's okay, a

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:32.679
<v Speaker 1>worry sort of attitude, while Trump is um. While President

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Trump is rage tweeting. So it's um. It's it's a strategy,

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:38.360
<v Speaker 1>of course, Well, what's going on in the White House?

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I gotta ask you. I think one of our top

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:43.200
<v Speaker 1>red stories is about kind of Fox News or Fox

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:46.399
<v Speaker 1>The shares are down because there's concerns about, you know,

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:49.119
<v Speaker 1>President Trump, what he's going to do next and maybe

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 1>create a competing network or be part of a competing network.

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:55.880
<v Speaker 1>What's going on here? I even saw some betting markets

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 1>are suggesting he's going to replace Alex Trebek as host

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:01.920
<v Speaker 1>of Jeopardy. I don't think that happen either. That wasn't

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:05.119
<v Speaker 1>an official official prediction. Um. What's going on in the

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:08.160
<v Speaker 1>White House? Anyone's guess as good as mine. We UM.

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 1>No one has seen I mean, no one outside the

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:13.480
<v Speaker 1>White House has seen the president, um, except for that

0:24:13.520 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 1>golf outing over the weekend or and he went to

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the memorial. But he hasn't had any public statements, He

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:22.720
<v Speaker 1>hasn't had any public activities or invited reporters and photographers

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:26.359
<v Speaker 1>into the Oval office like he normally does. So you know,

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:29.480
<v Speaker 1>we all we know about what he's thinking and doing

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 1>is from is from his tweets, UM, and a few

0:24:32.600 --> 0:24:36.919
<v Speaker 1>executive orders that he's been putting out. UM. But otherwise, yeah,

0:24:36.960 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 1>he's UM, he's just quietly doing his job. Yeah right, yeah, exactly. Well,

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 1>what's interesting going back to you know some of the

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Republicans I do under Wendy, I mean, do they want essentially,

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 1>can they get an assist? Do they need an assist

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>from President Trump? When it comes to those outstanding Georgia

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Senate races? Can he help them in terms of winning

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 1>no seats? Oh? I think he could. I think he could.

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:06.399
<v Speaker 1>And there are there is a lot of money on

0:25:06.480 --> 0:25:09.479
<v Speaker 1>both sides going down to Georgia. Um, there is a

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of the Democrats will be fighting for those seats

0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:16.960
<v Speaker 1>very hard. Um, and so will the Republicans. Whether Donald

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:21.119
<v Speaker 1>Trump himself will go down to Georgia and help them campaign,

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:24.160
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to tell if he has decided that he's

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 1>lost the election. I mean, if he comes to the

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:29.560
<v Speaker 1>realization that he's lost the election before, then he might

0:25:29.640 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 1>not bother. It's not really in his personality to work

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 1>for the good of the party when it doesn't benefit

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:38.479
<v Speaker 1>him personally. I'm not trying to be subjective. I just

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:42.439
<v Speaker 1>after observing him for four years, UM, so I'm not

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:46.120
<v Speaker 1>sure he would he would bother trying to help form

0:25:46.160 --> 0:25:50.400
<v Speaker 1>a Republican Senate if he's not going to be president. Um. Well,

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and then, and then what's kind of the role of

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Mitch McConnell and all of this right, because I think

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:56.159
<v Speaker 1>I was, I don't know. I think I was surprised

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:58.439
<v Speaker 1>initially when Mitch McConnell, who had been quiet, you know,

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:00.679
<v Speaker 1>and then came out and basically said, you know, the

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 1>president has a right to a recount. And I think

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:05.120
<v Speaker 1>that's fair right. Anybody who says a close race has

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 1>has the right. But where's Mitch McConnell. What's going on

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:11.399
<v Speaker 1>behind the scenes, What are you guys hearing? Well? The

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:14.919
<v Speaker 1>sun of Majority Leader is UM. He is right that

0:26:15.040 --> 0:26:18.639
<v Speaker 1>the president has a right to a recount. Anyone does UM.

0:26:18.680 --> 0:26:22.879
<v Speaker 1>I think you know that he is. He's also saying

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:26.119
<v Speaker 1>there has to be evidence. He's saying there shouldn't be

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:30.480
<v Speaker 1>any you know, far fetched claims, UM. And I think privately,

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:32.639
<v Speaker 1>my guess is, and it's just a guess, is that

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:35.679
<v Speaker 1>behind the scenes, he's thinking it's over and he's making

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 1>plans to UM. But he's making plans to have a

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Republican Senate then will stop UM? President elected Biden's most

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 1>progressive instincts. But it's still up in the air right

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:49.359
<v Speaker 1>until those races happen. It's up in the air until

0:26:49.359 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 1>those races happen. Right there. They right now. I think

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:56.160
<v Speaker 1>it's in the Senate pretty well. If if the Democrats

0:26:56.280 --> 0:27:00.399
<v Speaker 1>get one more, then Vice President Kamala Harris could be

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:03.359
<v Speaker 1>the tiebreaker. If they get two more than they wouldn't

0:27:03.359 --> 0:27:07.880
<v Speaker 1>even need her. But Republicans get one more, then um,

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:10.159
<v Speaker 1>they have the majority. You know. It is interesting too,

0:27:10.200 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 1>as you said, the president being kind of quiet. But

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, we had a headline we just mentioned a

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:17.160
<v Speaker 1>little whiles ago, a little while ago, excuse me, about

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:20.199
<v Speaker 1>the president banning investment in some Chinese companies, so you know,

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:22.120
<v Speaker 1>and he's talking about a military type So he's still

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 1>doing things and we do guys and your team put

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:27.119
<v Speaker 1>out that there are things he will do can do

0:27:27.280 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 1>that will upset certainly the global community or upset financial markets.

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh absolutely, Carol. I mean he is president until noon

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 1>on January twentie, so he can do a tremendous number

0:27:39.600 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 1>of things that he's and and any president he can

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 1>do whatever that he would normally do until January twenty.

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Normally they begin to work sort of in concert with

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:52.879
<v Speaker 1>each other. They try not to just mess things up

0:27:52.920 --> 0:27:56.199
<v Speaker 1>before the other guy comes there. But um, you know,

0:27:56.359 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what happens this year. All right, So, Wendy,

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:00.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're in a COVID world sets like you

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:02.160
<v Speaker 1>can jump on a plane after all this is over

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:04.119
<v Speaker 1>and things calm down and go to the Caribbean. But

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:06.359
<v Speaker 1>I do wonder when do you guys and your team

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:10.160
<v Speaker 1>anticipate that things start to slow down? Is it after

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 1>we get through these senate races? When is it ultimately?

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know we're gonna have a new administration,

0:28:14.840 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 1>but I mean once we get through still kind of

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:20.399
<v Speaker 1>these outstanding races, right, I think really it will be

0:28:20.440 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 1>when the president concedes, that concedes the race. Um, you know,

0:28:25.040 --> 0:28:29.600
<v Speaker 1>President elect Biden is Um, he's having called the foreign leaders,

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:32.280
<v Speaker 1>but he's gone to his house on the beach for

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the weekend. Um. You know, he's he's taking he's making appointments,

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:40.000
<v Speaker 1>but he's moving in such a sort of deliberate, traditional

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 1>um way that we can already see the pace of

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the next administration will be much more like what we're

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:51.920
<v Speaker 1>used to before. A little normalcy would be okay, a

0:28:51.920 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 1>little calm. Right. I'm assuming she would have said yes,

0:28:56.640 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 1>all right. Bloomberg News Politics editor Wendy Benjamin soon joining

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 1>us on the phone from Washington, d C. Check it

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 1>all the political coverage. Uh, you can just go to

0:29:05.480 --> 0:29:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg terminal or check out Bloomberg dot com room

0:29:11.960 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 1>journal now, but you let me drive? No, no, no,

0:29:16.440 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 1>drive home, honey please, I'll do the riding drivel Let

0:29:20.960 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 1>me I want to drive, Just drive baby, good question trying.

0:29:36.760 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 1>This is the drive to the globe. Give me thanks,

0:29:40.040 --> 0:29:44.120
<v Speaker 1>we'll drying us down on Bloomberg radio. Is indeed time

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 1>for the drive to the close. Quick check on where

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 1>we are just with about thirteen minutes left to today's

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 1>trading session, are about twelve minutes actually SNP five hundred,

0:29:53.400 --> 0:29:56.760
<v Speaker 1>we're down fifty one points, down one point at twenty one.

0:29:56.880 --> 0:30:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Now at fifteen, that's such a line of four hundred

0:30:00.760 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 1>eighty points, down one point six percent. And you've got

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the nasdack the outperformer, but still down, but down only

0:30:07.080 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 1>about nine tenths of one percent, a loss of a

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:11.080
<v Speaker 1>hundred and nine points. Do also want to get a

0:30:11.160 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 1>check on the treasury trade. We've got equities pretty much

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 1>near the loads of the session. Big moves and equities

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:18.880
<v Speaker 1>we've all also seen some big moves when it comes

0:30:18.960 --> 0:30:21.600
<v Speaker 1>to uh, the yields and all along the yield curve,

0:30:21.880 --> 0:30:24.000
<v Speaker 1>you've got that tenuere note with the yield of point

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 1>eight seven nine, you've got the five year note yielding

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 1>point thirty nine and taking a look at the shorter

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 1>end of the yiel curve that two year notes, specifically,

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 1>UH down with the yield um I should say, actually up,

0:30:34.680 --> 0:30:37.240
<v Speaker 1>but the yield down to point one seven. All right,

0:30:37.320 --> 0:30:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's bring in Leslie Falconio. She runs the Tactical Asset

0:30:40.320 --> 0:30:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Allocation UH team within US Fixed Income over at UBS

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Wealth Management, senior strategist at UBS. UH there and joins

0:30:48.240 --> 0:30:50.280
<v Speaker 1>us on the phone from Florida. It is good to

0:30:50.320 --> 0:30:52.000
<v Speaker 1>have you here, Leslie, and I feel like it's really

0:30:52.000 --> 0:30:56.240
<v Speaker 1>timely in topical because we're watching equity sell off investors

0:30:56.240 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 1>moving into treasuries. This trade, it was a very different

0:30:59.600 --> 0:31:02.440
<v Speaker 1>trade or earlier in the week, Which one is right?

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, over the long term, the earlier one of

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the week is right. I mean there's no question that

0:31:08.560 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, we saw this a little bit large of

0:31:10.640 --> 0:31:14.040
<v Speaker 1>a bear steep. Every industrates rose the long and underperformed

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:16.840
<v Speaker 1>for two reasons. One, we had historic supply this week

0:31:16.920 --> 0:31:19.800
<v Speaker 1>right in the tenure in the bond and also from

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the news from Fiser too which really pushed out and

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:24.640
<v Speaker 1>had the hopes of the end of the pandemic, which

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 1>pushed out this growth and inflation outlook. So I do

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:30.320
<v Speaker 1>think that over the longer term, this bear steeper is

0:31:30.360 --> 0:31:33.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be the right allocation. Right now is expected

0:31:33.960 --> 0:31:36.120
<v Speaker 1>because the yields moved so high and you are going

0:31:36.160 --> 0:31:38.960
<v Speaker 1>into the winter months, it's expected to have a temporary pullback,

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 1>right exactly. So what's your advice to investors? Just kind

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 1>of sit tight, just believe in that earlier the trade,

0:31:45.160 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 1>earlier in the week, and just understand that we're going

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:50.960
<v Speaker 1>to see some volatility. I think that's absolutely true. I mean,

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 1>I think I think that the point is is that

0:31:52.960 --> 0:31:56.080
<v Speaker 1>even though we don't know the exact amount of statophysical

0:31:56.120 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 1>simul Savada and a lot of headlines on that today,

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:00.560
<v Speaker 1>you do believe that it will come. It will mostly

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:03.240
<v Speaker 1>come in you know, the first quarter. It's very difficult

0:32:03.280 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 1>to say the amount, But just understand that, as we know,

0:32:06.160 --> 0:32:08.840
<v Speaker 1>we've had a lot of monetary and fiscal stimulus in

0:32:08.880 --> 0:32:11.240
<v Speaker 1>this system. There's a lot of liquidity in the system.

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:13.960
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing things like such as corporate spreads, high yield

0:32:14.000 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 1>and invest in grade corporate tighten well to pre pre

0:32:17.280 --> 0:32:20.680
<v Speaker 1>COVID level. So again there's gonna be the short term

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:23.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of you know, pockets of vulnerability as the headline

0:32:23.600 --> 0:32:25.880
<v Speaker 1>risk comes across with COVID, particularly as we enter the

0:32:25.880 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 1>winter months. But just so it's long term, it's still

0:32:28.160 --> 0:32:31.320
<v Speaker 1>for rising growth, it's still for our outlook that over

0:32:31.360 --> 0:32:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the first half of you will have a vaccine that's

0:32:34.880 --> 0:32:38.120
<v Speaker 1>hopefully widely dissemin it. And I just want to mention,

0:32:38.160 --> 0:32:41.560
<v Speaker 1>forgive me headline crossing the Bloomberg terminal. Uh, this seems

0:32:41.560 --> 0:32:44.920
<v Speaker 1>to be coming from the Wall Street Journal specifically and

0:32:44.960 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 1>has to do with TikTok, and let me just bring

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:51.040
<v Speaker 1>it up here again the Commerce Department announcing a stay

0:32:51.160 --> 0:32:54.560
<v Speaker 1>of the TikTok shut down order. So again the Commerce

0:32:54.600 --> 0:32:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Department announcing a stay the TikTok shut down order. So

0:32:56.960 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 1>basically not looking to necessarily imp who's that specifically, because

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:04.880
<v Speaker 1>this was kind of a doomsday uh, I guess day

0:33:04.880 --> 0:33:09.040
<v Speaker 1>in terms of potentially what could happen to TikTok. So

0:33:09.360 --> 0:33:11.240
<v Speaker 1>look for a little bit more of a right through

0:33:11.280 --> 0:33:14.360
<v Speaker 1>on that on the Bloomberg. So um getting back to

0:33:14.440 --> 0:33:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the fixed income trade here, Leslie, So where are you

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:22.960
<v Speaker 1>finding the best opportunities within the market right now, well,

0:33:22.960 --> 0:33:25.520
<v Speaker 1>you knows, as I said, because of the FED backs

0:33:25.560 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 1>up and by the way, they have a lot of

0:33:26.800 --> 0:33:28.320
<v Speaker 1>dry powder and left right, they have a lot of

0:33:28.320 --> 0:33:30.360
<v Speaker 1>purchasing power. Left you know, they haven't used a lot

0:33:30.400 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 1>of facilities that they have the ability to use. So

0:33:33.080 --> 0:33:35.000
<v Speaker 1>given the fact that you know how yields investor grade

0:33:35.000 --> 0:33:37.520
<v Speaker 1>corporates have compressed so much to pre COVID levels, we

0:33:37.680 --> 0:33:39.560
<v Speaker 1>like the senior loan side. We'd like to see a

0:33:39.600 --> 0:33:42.560
<v Speaker 1>low side. And for truss one is because we think

0:33:42.600 --> 0:33:45.080
<v Speaker 1>of the floating word, asset is going to be definitely

0:33:45.160 --> 0:33:47.200
<v Speaker 1>value added as we had to twenty twitter one and

0:33:47.280 --> 0:33:50.440
<v Speaker 1>yields rise. And secondarily that as the classes really lad

0:33:50.920 --> 0:33:52.840
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of this liquidity, a lot of some

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 1>of the recovery that we've seen has started to push demand.

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:57.080
<v Speaker 1>So that's one of the asset class that we like

0:33:57.160 --> 0:33:59.760
<v Speaker 1>in fixed income. Secondarily as well, we also like the

0:33:59.760 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 1>tips market. You know, we think that break even inflation

0:34:02.760 --> 0:34:07.080
<v Speaker 1>rates will will rise into one We're not expecting, you know,

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:10.360
<v Speaker 1>large amounts of inflation because there are structural changes that

0:34:10.440 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 1>are not going away anytime soon, whether it's demographics or technology.

0:34:14.880 --> 0:34:17.360
<v Speaker 1>But we do think inflation expectations should rise as the

0:34:17.360 --> 0:34:20.080
<v Speaker 1>economy reopens and the fence stays out hoold for loose?

0:34:20.120 --> 0:34:22.640
<v Speaker 1>The next one, do you really believe inflation is going

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:25.440
<v Speaker 1>to start to finally tick higher? Are you just talking

0:34:25.480 --> 0:34:30.080
<v Speaker 1>about from where it's been. I think inflation expectations will

0:34:30.080 --> 0:34:31.880
<v Speaker 1>tip higher, and that's that's the difference. I mean, we

0:34:31.880 --> 0:34:34.400
<v Speaker 1>don't think there's going to be this hyper inflation. But however,

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:36.879
<v Speaker 1>with that said, I mean the savings rates very high.

0:34:37.000 --> 0:34:39.759
<v Speaker 1>We do think consumer spending will hit greater demand as

0:34:39.800 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 1>we head into the second farm We are a little

0:34:41.640 --> 0:34:44.200
<v Speaker 1>bit negative on the dollar. I mean, all these aspects

0:34:44.280 --> 0:34:47.879
<v Speaker 1>lead to higher inflation, but not necessarily high inflation. It's

0:34:47.880 --> 0:34:50.560
<v Speaker 1>just that the expectation right now is still fairly low.

0:34:50.680 --> 0:34:53.359
<v Speaker 1>So that's why we like tips as a diversifier. Hey,

0:34:53.400 --> 0:34:57.480
<v Speaker 1>when your team gathers around the virtual table there at UBS,

0:34:57.960 --> 0:35:00.799
<v Speaker 1>I do wonder when you think about a by administration,

0:35:00.800 --> 0:35:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the policies that might come down, whether it's economic policies,

0:35:04.480 --> 0:35:07.560
<v Speaker 1>whether it's tax policies. You know, what are you guys

0:35:07.960 --> 0:35:10.360
<v Speaker 1>thinking that, you know, the policies that might become a

0:35:10.360 --> 0:35:15.200
<v Speaker 1>reality that might impact you know, your university fixed income universe. Well,

0:35:15.239 --> 0:35:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you know when on the six income side. I mean,

0:35:17.040 --> 0:35:19.279
<v Speaker 1>listen what we know and what we saw. We saw

0:35:19.320 --> 0:35:21.240
<v Speaker 1>this on election date when you had this twenty basis

0:35:21.280 --> 0:35:23.560
<v Speaker 1>point turn and in tenure yields, which is the biggest

0:35:23.600 --> 0:35:26.239
<v Speaker 1>voluctility we have seen since Marge, the blue wave and

0:35:26.239 --> 0:35:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the momentum traders that such a blue wave priced in

0:35:28.480 --> 0:35:32.640
<v Speaker 1>with this whole physical stimulus that was large, therefore larger deficits,

0:35:32.680 --> 0:35:35.799
<v Speaker 1>therefore larger more supply into the drudgury market. You saw

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the spike and raids in it reversed. I mean on

0:35:37.960 --> 0:35:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the fixed income side, given the fact we could have

0:35:40.080 --> 0:35:43.000
<v Speaker 1>this divided government, you know, which is expected. You know,

0:35:43.040 --> 0:35:45.759
<v Speaker 1>obviously corporate taxes aren't this bunch of an issue. You know,

0:35:46.360 --> 0:35:49.399
<v Speaker 1>large amounts of supply into the treasure market, although are

0:35:49.440 --> 0:35:53.120
<v Speaker 1>still large, are just gonna be rising by less. So

0:35:53.200 --> 0:35:56.239
<v Speaker 1>therefore you have more of a sort of gradual rising

0:35:56.360 --> 0:35:59.080
<v Speaker 1>interest rates. You have the ability for corporations to spend

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:02.400
<v Speaker 1>more on kept effects that worry about, you know, tax recality,

0:36:02.480 --> 0:36:05.280
<v Speaker 1>because all these taxes that would have gone through possibly

0:36:05.360 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the blue wave will sort of be shut down now,

0:36:07.440 --> 0:36:10.440
<v Speaker 1>So it's more of the gridlocks of Goldilocks type of

0:36:10.480 --> 0:36:12.520
<v Speaker 1>scenario in the sense that you know, you get a

0:36:12.560 --> 0:36:15.520
<v Speaker 1>small rise but not a lot of necessarily headwards in

0:36:15.640 --> 0:36:18.520
<v Speaker 1>terms of look things like taxer. So listen, today three

0:36:18.560 --> 0:36:21.719
<v Speaker 1>of the world's top central bankers warned that the prospect

0:36:21.880 --> 0:36:24.560
<v Speaker 1>of a COVID nineteen vaccine is just not enough to

0:36:24.600 --> 0:36:27.360
<v Speaker 1>put an end to the economic challenges created by the pandemic.

0:36:27.400 --> 0:36:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean this is Federal Reserve Chief Jerome Powell. We

0:36:31.000 --> 0:36:33.520
<v Speaker 1>also had the Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey and

0:36:33.600 --> 0:36:38.880
<v Speaker 1>ECB President Christine legarde Um speaking at an event, and

0:36:39.160 --> 0:36:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, listen, we've heard this before from central bankers.

0:36:42.440 --> 0:36:46.239
<v Speaker 1>Do you have faith in global policy makers that they're

0:36:46.239 --> 0:36:48.720
<v Speaker 1>going to get this right? Not global policymakers, I'm talking

0:36:48.719 --> 0:36:54.400
<v Speaker 1>about you know, policymakers, legislators, whether it's our US Congress

0:36:54.440 --> 0:36:58.800
<v Speaker 1>and the equivalent around the world. Well, there's no question

0:36:59.040 --> 0:37:00.880
<v Speaker 1>that it has to come to the fiscal side, and

0:37:00.880 --> 0:37:03.400
<v Speaker 1>we do need more fiscal side. List I mean, you know,

0:37:03.520 --> 0:37:05.879
<v Speaker 1>having follow lower interest rates at the levels that we

0:37:05.920 --> 0:37:07.960
<v Speaker 1>have been added, not going to incrementally make them into

0:37:08.000 --> 0:37:09.879
<v Speaker 1>the difference. Right we have we have a mortgage rate

0:37:10.239 --> 0:37:12.000
<v Speaker 1>at a at a fifty year low, so on the

0:37:12.040 --> 0:37:15.440
<v Speaker 1>consumer side that's creates loring interest rates any further is

0:37:15.480 --> 0:37:17.200
<v Speaker 1>not going to have a huge impact. It really needs

0:37:17.239 --> 0:37:20.800
<v Speaker 1>to come from a fiscal stimulus. And I do believe

0:37:20.840 --> 0:37:23.200
<v Speaker 1>that what the policy makers will do, you know, it's

0:37:23.200 --> 0:37:25.400
<v Speaker 1>not sort of hike too early like they did in

0:37:25.440 --> 0:37:28.279
<v Speaker 1>December of two thousand fifteen. So I think that having

0:37:28.320 --> 0:37:30.440
<v Speaker 1>this lower for longer reason will be the benefit. But

0:37:30.480 --> 0:37:32.520
<v Speaker 1>there's no question that it has to come from the

0:37:32.560 --> 0:37:35.719
<v Speaker 1>fiscal side, because the incrementcial benefit of loring interest rates

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:37.400
<v Speaker 1>given the level we are right now, is just not

0:37:37.480 --> 0:37:39.719
<v Speaker 1>gonna have no matter that much. Yeah, there's a point

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:42.479
<v Speaker 1>where I mean it's like, come on, guys, Umm, gonna

0:37:42.520 --> 0:37:44.880
<v Speaker 1>leave it there. Leslie, Thank you so much, Really appreciate it.

0:37:44.960 --> 0:37:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Leslie Focconio. She is senior strategist at UBS Global Wealth Management,

0:37:48.560 --> 0:37:50.600
<v Speaker 1>on the phone from Florida. Thanks so much for listening

0:37:50.600 --> 0:37:54.160
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud

0:37:54.280 --> 0:37:56.359
<v Speaker 1>or at Bloomberg dot com, and be sort of check

0:37:56.400 --> 0:37:58.719
<v Speaker 1>out our daily radio show at two pm Eastern on

0:37:58.800 --> 0:38:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Blueberg Radio. Be sure to watch us to on YouTube

0:38:01.840 --> 0:38:08.520
<v Speaker 1>by searching Bloomberg Global News MHM