WEBVTT - White House Tracking Apple Watch Case, ByteDance Sales Top $110 Billion

0:00:01.760 --> 0:00:05.400
<v Speaker 1>From the heart where innovation, money and power Collie in

0:00:05.519 --> 0:00:10.479
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley, NBN. This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde

0:00:10.480 --> 0:00:11.879
<v Speaker 1>and Ed Ludlove.

0:00:25.000 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 2>And Caroline Hein and Bloomberg's multi quarters in New York

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 2>and Ludlow He's off. This is Bloombog technology coming up

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 2>as Apple's smart watch ban it looms. The White House

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 2>is tracking the case for the potential to overall the

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 2>import Holt decision. Will break down the latest from Washington

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 2>plus Byte Dance sales reportedly surged this year to more

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 2>than one hundred and ten billion dollars, potentially overtaking competitor

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 2>ten Cent. Will break down what it says about the

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 2>state of TikTok's e commerce business. And we'll discuss how

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 2>hot or not the private secretary market is while start

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 2>up employees and investors they seek to sell shares of

0:00:57.240 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 2>their red hot companies. The first let's check on these markets,

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 2>because still relatively hot. When you're looking at the NASDAK,

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 2>we're still managing to push up about a quarter of

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 2>a percentage point. In fact, that's that one hundred and

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 2>another record high mom markets. They're also manage at rally

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:13.759
<v Speaker 2>that everything rallies back upon us. We're still feeling that

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:15.760
<v Speaker 2>some of the economic data is coming in strong, that

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 2>consumer confidence building, and indeed maybe the macro picture means

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 2>that we'll be able to tame some of that interest

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 2>rate hikes and indeed some interest rate cuts coming some

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty four, just think about what's happening over in

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 2>the UK, great British pound actually sinking as that inflation

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 2>data shows two there we're seeing caoling in inflation.

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:33.960
<v Speaker 3>Look at what's.

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:36.319
<v Speaker 2>Happening on the individual movers and case by case basis.

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:39.039
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking at number one, China didn't see the moon

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:41.319
<v Speaker 2>music of buying that we've seen currently here in the

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:43.679
<v Speaker 2>United States. And then as that Golden Dragon just on

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:46.039
<v Speaker 2>the downside by one point two percent. This is that

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 2>we see maybe some of the big e commerce players

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 2>feel the pain coming from one particular bike dance.

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 3>We'll dig into that in a little bit later. I'm

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 3>also look at what's.

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 2>Happening with alphabet though of course Google, we're going to

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 2>be digging into what really the changes at Google play

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 2>Store are going to be you would see in terms

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 2>of a business model impact. So the investor base likes that,

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 2>and I'm also looking at what's happening with Apple, because

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:08.639
<v Speaker 2>this is the key story upon us. Will they indeed

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 2>see a ban being enacted on the import of their watches?

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 3>What does that mean? And how much of the moment

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 3>is the Biden.

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 2>Administration currently tracking the impending US band We understand they

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 2>are of nearly all Apple watch sales.

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 3>They're due to, of course, all surrounding.

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 2>A pattern dispute with the power to veto the decision

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 2>wrestling in the US trade representative.

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:31.519
<v Speaker 3>Now, we discussed this with the CEO of Massimo.

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 2>Of course, this is the company that is currently feeling

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 2>that its patterns are being infringed, and the CEO there

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:40.240
<v Speaker 2>told us that look, thus far, the administration has been

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 2>in touch.

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:41.079
<v Speaker 3>Take a listen.

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 4>So I don't expect the administration to step in here.

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 4>And every time Apple contacts them, I guess by a

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:51.240
<v Speaker 4>law they have to call us to get our response. So, yes,

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 4>we've been in contact with them, and we don't think

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 4>they will intervene. I think there are a recent stunt

0:02:57.080 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 4>to pull the products off the market. A few days

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 4>earlier than that, itc decided it should be pulled off

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 4>the market. They're trying to get the public to force

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 4>the Biden administration to do something they don't think they

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 4>should do. But I don't think it's going to work.

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 3>And pleased to save New Megs.

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 2>Linda and who really helps drive the coverage for the

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 2>team here in New York Technology joins us remind us

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 2>go back to basics. We're thinking that some sort of

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 2>import ban will be enacted because Almasimo thinks this pattern's

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:25.799
<v Speaker 2>being infringed here.

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 5>Well, first, Caroline, thank you for having me.

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 3>It's nice to be with you.

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 5>So this all stems from this big International Trade Commission

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 5>case in which the agency ruled that Apple had violated

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 5>two very important health technology patterns in developing some of

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 5>its most recent Apple Watch series. And as a part

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 5>of that ruling, they impose not only a US ban

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 5>on the equipment that Apple needs to assemble its watches

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 5>here in the US, but also an injunction that will

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 5>essentially block Apple from directly selling those series of Apple

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 5>Watches here in the US. And as you noted, we're

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 5>counting down the days to that actual band. I mean

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 5>we're talking about like right after Christmas that that band

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 5>takes effect. And you know, as the CEO of Masimo

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 5>just characterized as a stunt. Apple is deciding to sort

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 5>of wind down the sales ahead of that end of

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 5>Christmas Day injunction and.

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:24.920
<v Speaker 2>Of course a key selling time, a key issue when

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 2>you think about what's over in the UK, A Boxing

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:29.279
<v Speaker 2>day sale, the idea everyone goes out and starts purchasing

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:33.480
<v Speaker 2>like they do after Thanksgiving here in the US. What therefore,

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 2>here in the US does it mean when a fix

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 2>could or could not be enacted, Because most CEO was

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 2>saying that he didn't think this could be some sort

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 2>of software update.

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 5>Ultimately, yeah, I mean he was saying that it would

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:45.480
<v Speaker 5>have to be a hardware change, right.

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:47.280
<v Speaker 3>He was telling us that for days, and.

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 5>If a fix cannot be enacted, if there is no

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:56.039
<v Speaker 5>deal that has reached between Apple and Massimo, if the

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 5>White House doesn't step in because it has had almost

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 5>few months to decide on a veto, then you do

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:07.040
<v Speaker 5>see the sales directly from Apple affected. Now, one thing

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:11.040
<v Speaker 5>that I wanted to clarify. You said all Apple watches

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:12.479
<v Speaker 5>will stop in sales.

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:14.359
<v Speaker 3>That's not necessarily the case.

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:18.040
<v Speaker 5>That is Apple's direct sales from its own retail stores.

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 5>So I just want to point out that you can

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 5>still go get your Apple watches at Best Buys at Walmarts,

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:27.280
<v Speaker 5>not to give them any you know, uh, free marketing,

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 5>but they have said, these other third party retailers have said,

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 5>we will continue selling these watches. What remains a question

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 5>is what happens if the inventories at these third party

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 5>box retail shops end up drawing down.

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 3>Where did they get the rest of it?

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:45.479
<v Speaker 5>Can they still bring in those devices from Asia or

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 5>other manufacturing centers by Apple and keep those sales going

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:50.600
<v Speaker 5>for Apple?

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 3>Like, we don't know, and I wonder whether it cake

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 3>stops some sort of rush.

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, well, I'm just I was saying the other day

0:05:56.839 --> 0:05:58.560
<v Speaker 5>that I'm glad that I got my Apple watching. Before that,

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 5>we have been checking said reporters that to Apple stores

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 5>to see if there has been a rush. No rush yet,

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 5>but you never know.

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 2>Okay, see not that on the ground reporting. And they're

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:12.280
<v Speaker 2>also no marketing for Apple here, but just the odd

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 2>perspective on where on indeed if you can still purchase it.

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 3>Let's just continue the anti trust.

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:19.360
<v Speaker 2>Side of all of this and ultimately what it means

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 2>for patterns in the longer term. Let's bring in Nicholas

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:26.160
<v Speaker 2>Matter's principal at McCaul Smith's intellectual property practice, and how

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 2>often have you seen this sort of tactic being used?

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 2>Nicholas really with Apple sort of getting ahead of an

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 2>ultimate potential ban and trying to force consumers perhaps hand here.

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 6>They've actually have been very rare in recent years, primarily

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:45.280
<v Speaker 6>because injunctions or exclusionary relief like a ban on importation,

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 6>have been pretty rare in patent litigation since a Supreme

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 6>Court decision in about two thousand and six, So they

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:55.920
<v Speaker 6>just haven't been occasions where a major player like Apple

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 6>would frequently face this kind of situation.

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 2>We were just debating as to whether the US Trade

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 2>Representative or indeed the administration would in any way step

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:08.720
<v Speaker 2>in here. Overall, just give us your perspective on what

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 2>the pros are doing that and what the cons are

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 2>of ultimately a government weighed in here.

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 6>Well, I mean, the pros are obviously people like Apple watches,

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 6>and it would be a politically popular decision. The cons

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 6>are that it doesn't, you know, it doesn't promote innovation

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 6>in the US because that's why patent rights are important,

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 6>and a company like Massimo is entitled to either license

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 6>its patents to Apple on you know, the terms that

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 6>they think are appropriate or to you know, use their

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 6>exclusivity from the technology they developed to you know, gain

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 6>market share. And if Apple, you know, the if Apple

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 6>doesn't want to do a deal with them or come

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 6>up with its own solution to the technical problems Massimo solved,

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 6>then you know, then the Apple is going to face

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 6>a bandal like this, or at least have to offer

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 6>products that don't have this feature.

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 2>We were speaking with the CEO of Massimo you this

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 2>time yesterday, and his points were clear. He felt that

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:04.240
<v Speaker 2>his chief technology officer, his chief medical officer had been

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 2>lured over to Apple. There was nothing he could have

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 2>done in terms of paying it. Even further, they just

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 2>had the resources that couldn't be matched by a smaller

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 2>companies such as Masimo. And I'm interested as to the

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 2>other clients that you serve, the conversations you have, how

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 2>much is this sort of behavior happening if indeed it

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 2>is exactly what occurred.

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 6>So I hear that that kind of story all the

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 6>time from clients. The large technology company taking you know,

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:32.720
<v Speaker 6>their intellectual property via trade secrets or patents and then

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 6>you know, using their other market advantages to beat the

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 6>smaller guy. Patents are fundamentally a tool of small companies,

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 6>and that's and we need them to incentivize small companies

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:47.200
<v Speaker 6>to invent the next technology because small companies are where

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:52.680
<v Speaker 6>the groundbreaking innovation tends to occur. And if the bigger guys,

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:56.080
<v Speaker 6>they're always going to win if they're allowed to copy,

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:59.560
<v Speaker 6>because they have you know, the pre existing you know,

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:02.680
<v Speaker 6>market advantages, they've got a well known brand, the consumer

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:06.840
<v Speaker 6>based distribution channels, and what the small guys have is

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 6>their innovative technology. And so that's that's why it's so

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 6>important for uh, you know, to be able to enforce

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 6>intellectual property rights the way Masimon is.

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:21.079
<v Speaker 2>To that end, do you anticipate that I mean a

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 2>fewer to put probabilities on it, some sort of deal

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:28.079
<v Speaker 2>will ultimately be reached here. Massive has been spending millions, yes,

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 2>to ultimately potentially prove a point here and to fight

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:34.840
<v Speaker 2>for the smaller companies, but also because it thinks it

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 2>could win a lucrative deal ultimately.

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 6>Well, no, I mean I don't know what Mass and

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 6>those business objectives are. They have said they're willing to

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:45.600
<v Speaker 6>do a license. You know, the question is always at

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:48.679
<v Speaker 6>what price? And isn't a price that they're willing to

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 6>take in Apple's willing to pay, you know, And it

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 6>also probably turns a lot on what happens on the

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 6>twenty fifth or the twenty sixth, when the President has

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 6>to issue its decision. We see vetos are extremely rare.

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 6>In fact, I think there's only been one in history.

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 6>Now Apple was the beneficiary of that one veto, So

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 6>it may be feeling a little bit of invincibility here

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 6>because it has such a well known brand and such

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 6>political cloud. But we'll have to see what happens, and

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:22.839
<v Speaker 6>if the President doesn't veto it, that may bring Apple

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 6>to the table.

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 2>Nicholas, it's great to get your expertise. Thank you for

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 2>spending some time with us. Nicholas Massage of McCool smith.

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:40.200
<v Speaker 2>TikTok owner byte Dance saw sales surge in twenty twenty

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 2>three to over one hundred and ten billion dollars, and

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 2>that's all according to people familiar with the matter, that

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 2>would put the company ahead of rivals like Tencent. And

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 2>of course it says byte Dance is seeking to expand,

0:10:50.080 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 2>particularly in the area of e commerce. For more, let's

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:55.440
<v Speaker 2>bring in Bloomberg's Henry Wren joining us from London and Henry.

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:57.680
<v Speaker 2>When you're looking at what the driving force of this

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:00.319
<v Speaker 2>sales pick up, I mean it is phenomenal percentage point

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:03.439
<v Speaker 2>growth here is it at the expense of market competition.

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 7>So as we our Asian colleagues broke this story. So

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 7>as you said, so by done, its revenue is on

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:16.239
<v Speaker 7>track to exceed one hundred and ten billion US dollars

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:19.199
<v Speaker 7>and its growth driver really comes from e commerce. As

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 7>you mentioned, it's not just overseas but also at home.

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 7>So at home it's expanding rapidly into areas such as

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 7>helping people to book restaurant tables, helping people to book

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 7>restaurant takeouts, but also selling clothes online, but also overseas.

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 7>For example, just earlier this month, it bought Indonesia's Toclopedia,

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 7>which is one of the major e commerce platforms in Indonesia.

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 7>And remember Indonesia is one of the biggest e commerce

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 7>markets in Southeast Asia. So as you said, it's expanding

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 7>rapidly overseas in e commerce offering, but also at home

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 7>as well, but it can be at the cost of

0:11:57.360 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 7>some other competitors. For example, mayitwe another food delivery platform

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 7>in China, but also Ali BABA, which is which is

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 7>under pressure by not only a PDD but also by

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:11.959
<v Speaker 7>dance in e commerce offerings front.

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:16.440
<v Speaker 2>Talking about pressure, we're seeing it managing to scale at

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 2>home despite a weakening economy. We're seeing it particularly showing

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:22.439
<v Speaker 2>strength in e commerce now having done that one and

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 2>a half billion dollar deal in Indonesia. But here in

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 2>the US there is still some political anxiety. Are we

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 2>likely to see that continue into twenty twenty.

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:33.319
<v Speaker 7>Four exactly, especially when you think of twenty twenty four

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 7>it's an election year and the climax was really in

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 7>March this year, right, So when you remember the TikTok

0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 7>ceo show to appeared in Congress, has testified before Congress

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:47.960
<v Speaker 7>when some lawmakers threaten to ban this app completely in

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 7>the US. And I would want to point out that

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:52.959
<v Speaker 7>the regulatory pressure is not just in the US, because

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 7>when you look at India, which is another big country,

0:12:57.160 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 7>and remember this year India surpass China is the most

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 7>part this country in the world. The TikTok app is

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 7>actually banned in India, and there's no promise said to

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 7>those regulatory pressure want for us in China as well,

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:11.560
<v Speaker 7>because what we've been seeing Chinese governments has been cracking

0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 7>down severely on platform companies domestically as well, so as

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 7>you said, regulatory pressures could be coming, but also on

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 7>multiple fronts.

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:22.720
<v Speaker 2>For now, it seems as though the growth is still

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 2>about thirty percent year over year, so revenue really managing

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:28.680
<v Speaker 2>to rise up amid some of that pushback here in

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 2>the US, Henry w Ren. Great to catch up with

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:32.960
<v Speaker 2>you as always, Thank you so much. Meanwhile, let's stick

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:37.199
<v Speaker 2>with byte Dance and ultimately, how we're seeing brands companies,

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:41.320
<v Speaker 2>Will you launch themselves in popularity using the power of influence?

0:13:41.600 --> 0:13:45.439
<v Speaker 2>Jacob Cooks with us WPIC Marketing Technologies co founder and CEO.

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 3>You are staying up late over there in China, and

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm interested, Jacob.

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:52.840
<v Speaker 2>Ultimately, the sort of sales growth that you hear reporting

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:55.320
<v Speaker 2>of thirty percent year on year, is that what you

0:13:55.920 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 2>are seeing bear out with your own data.

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:02.839
<v Speaker 8>Domestically, we're seeing it in line or actually even a

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 8>little bit higher with what we were not surprised by

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:08.680
<v Speaker 8>that number at all. We would have actually seen it

0:14:08.720 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 8>coming in mid thirties, maybe thirty six, thirty seven. It

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 8>really is, you know, the platform of the younger generation.

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 8>As we're seeing these consumers. You know, really the gen

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 8>z really come into their own right now. This is

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 8>what they're using to shop and it's you know, it's

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 8>an interesting transition. It's happened very quickly, and we're pretty

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 8>excited about it. You know, everything that was in the

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 8>Bloomberg article and has been released day is right in line,

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 8>if not low quite frankly, from what we've seen on

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 8>the ground over here.

0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 2>And talking of what you see on the ground and

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 2>do on the ground, you're basically helping perhaps Western companies

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 2>brands access Asian buyers, whether or not it's in China, Japan.

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 3>South Korea.

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 2>How much are they leading with being on doing being

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 2>on these sorts of e commerce and meets content platforms

0:14:57.600 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 2>at the moment.

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, the what is that we're dealing with in China? Certainly,

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 8>you know, this isn't new, This has been going on

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 8>for a couple of years now. They're definitely better fitting

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 8>a lot from these growth numbers. And you know, when

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 8>we talk about you know, you mentioned before about you know,

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 8>a week in consumer over here, we really look at

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 8>different categories, right so that you know, large durables and

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 8>things like that that have shown weakness Dullion's really not

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 8>exposed to. So what they're seeing you know, fashion, health

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 8>and wellness and these other categories that you know, the

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 8>younger consumers are really engaging with. You know, Byte Dances

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 8>is really well positioned for that. So these growth numbers

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:39.000
<v Speaker 8>that we're seeing coming out today again right in line

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 8>with what we're expecting. And you know, next year, I

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:44.000
<v Speaker 8>think we're going to see this again, if not better.

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, sort of ROI is a brand getting when they

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 2>invest in putting content on the platform but also selling

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 2>via it because well they must have to pay in

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:56.440
<v Speaker 2>up front fee to certain influences they work with for example.

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, it's definitely a different model for Bye Dance. Bite

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 8>Dance has a really easy platform and a back end

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 8>to engage with influencers. Now you know there's a lot

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 8>of them out there, but they can be charging you know,

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 8>thirty forty fifty percent commissions, which isn't unheard of.

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 5>We go back to.

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 8>Sort of what you know, the big influencers were doing

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:19.680
<v Speaker 8>on Team Mall a couple of years ago as well,

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 8>or Tabel Live. It was about the same rates. Now

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 8>Byte Dance is getting a much larger percentage of that,

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 8>which you know leads us to believe they're in a

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 8>much better financial shape. But you know, brands are willing

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:34.360
<v Speaker 8>to pay that because again you can put your product

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 8>or service and again restaurants, dental cleaning, you name it,

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 8>in front of millions of people, very very quickly, and

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 8>you've got to have a little bit of faith in

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 8>your product too that you know that second or third

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 8>purchase they're going to come back to the brand directly.

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 8>We're not going to have to pay that fee. So

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 8>again it doesn't work for large durables which are one off,

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:55.200
<v Speaker 8>but it does work for cosmetics, nutraceuticals, ath leisure and

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 8>things that can be repeated again and again and again.

0:16:57.800 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 8>So we're seeing, you know, brands do very very well

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 8>that are engaging in that model. Here.

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 2>Always great, Jacob, to stay up with you, for you

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 2>to give us your time when it's late. I'm ready

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 2>to get your on the ground expertise as well. Jacob

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:14.160
<v Speaker 2>Cook of WPIC stay well. Meanwhile, coming up, we've got

0:17:14.160 --> 0:17:15.119
<v Speaker 2>some breaking news for you.

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 3>This is as the FTC.

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:18.880
<v Speaker 2>We understand, of course, the Federal Trade Commission. It's proposing

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 2>changes to children's online privacy protection rules. They're saying that

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 2>they're going to place new restrictions on the use and

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:28.399
<v Speaker 2>disclosure thereof of children's personal information. This according to a

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 2>statement coming from the FTC. Of course, this is as

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:34.200
<v Speaker 2>we see ongoing concern about well the access of data

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:36.920
<v Speaker 2>and children's interpretation and use of some of these social

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 2>media companies and will use more broadly the Internet. Let's

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 2>talk a little bit about well where else we're seeing

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:45.919
<v Speaker 2>some changes. Alphabet's agreement, for example, to end abuse of

0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:48.680
<v Speaker 2>market power on its Google Play store.

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:50.000
<v Speaker 3>May come with a catch.

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:52.480
<v Speaker 2>We're going to delve more into that in a moment. Meanwhile,

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:54.359
<v Speaker 2>let's just check in on the shares of Zoom today.

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:57.159
<v Speaker 2>That Wells Fargo's securities analyst, Michael Truran. He's out with

0:17:57.280 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 2>a recommendation to cut ultimately the price target on Zoo

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 2>is also saying go underweight from equal weight. We're seeing

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 2>a price target now with seventy dollars currently training at

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:07.359
<v Speaker 2>seventy one forty eight. We're off by one point three percent.

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 2>This is BLOEMBG technology time now for talking tech first up.

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 2>While the FTC has been busy through Federal Trade Commission

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 2>on this part, is also saying that right Aid must

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:33.359
<v Speaker 2>stop using facial recognition for surveillance. According to the FTC,

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:36.399
<v Speaker 2>right Aid system generated thousands of false matches off an

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 2>involving race and without notifying customers. Right Aid can't use

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:42.879
<v Speaker 2>the system for the next five years, which was to

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 2>be allegedly spotting shoplifters. Meanwhile, Chinese internet company Alibibura is

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 2>in the midst of an executive shake up, replacing commerce

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:53.679
<v Speaker 2>chief Truly Die after a roughly twenty year stint.

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 3>Now I will instead help set up a.

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Holding firm for managing some of Vali Baba's global assets.

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:03.359
<v Speaker 2>Claims on bankrupt crypto exchange FTX are soaring training at

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:05.399
<v Speaker 2>fifty sevent to seventy three cents on the dollar depending

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:07.320
<v Speaker 2>on the size, and this is according to data from

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:11.960
<v Speaker 2>Cheroki acquisition. Still unclear whethern distributions will actually be made

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 2>or how much customers and creditors will ultimately received. Meanwhile,

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:19.639
<v Speaker 2>let's talk about well, rather a little amount the customers

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:21.720
<v Speaker 2>are going to be receiving from the Alphabet case with

0:19:21.840 --> 0:19:24.359
<v Speaker 2>seven hundred million deal, of course, was agreed to alter

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:27.879
<v Speaker 2>it's Google Play app store, and many are now pointing

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 2>out some of the loopholes around developers' service fees. Let's

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 2>get more context Fremeline News reporter Multi Nayaks here and

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 2>before we get into the fact that a consumer in

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 2>this case would get about two dollars potentially back from

0:19:41.200 --> 0:19:44.679
<v Speaker 2>Google from the seven hundred million dollars settlement. But ultimately

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:46.880
<v Speaker 2>what people are nippicking here is the fact that they're

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:48.400
<v Speaker 2>probably not going to have to change their business model

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:50.360
<v Speaker 2>or that much the amount that they charge a developer.

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 9>That's right. So Google has made a concession here with

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:58.639
<v Speaker 9>this deal where they are going to allow developers to

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:03.720
<v Speaker 9>give users access to alternate payment options, like they could

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 9>use paper or anything else, have their own billing system

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 9>instead of going through the Google Pay billing Google Play

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 9>billing system. But you know, they should previously charge thirty percent.

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:18.399
<v Speaker 9>Now they're offering a discount a four percent to you know,

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 9>twenty six percent. A developer is still paying a hefty

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:26.199
<v Speaker 9>service fee, and I'm not sure whether you know the

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 9>four percent discount will actually sort of go down to

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:32.160
<v Speaker 9>a consumer where they'll actually benefit a consumer. So there

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:35.440
<v Speaker 9>have been some folks who have been sort of watching

0:20:35.480 --> 0:20:38.120
<v Speaker 9>what Google has been doing over the years with its

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:43.960
<v Speaker 9>Google Plate policies, and it seems like they are concerned

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:48.400
<v Speaker 9>that this settlement doesn't go far enough to benefit developers

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 9>and consumers.

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:53.160
<v Speaker 2>For example, Epic, which actually just won against Alphabet last

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:56.679
<v Speaker 2>week in court. In particular, Corey Wright, the VP of

0:20:56.680 --> 0:21:00.200
<v Speaker 2>Public Policy, is saying, ultimately this doesn't in any way

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 2>help consumers in terms of overpaying. So will we see

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:06.480
<v Speaker 2>any change to the business model if it's not forced

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:07.119
<v Speaker 2>by the courts.

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 9>So I think it'll be interesting to see what will

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:14.359
<v Speaker 9>happened in court because Epic won a case against Google

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 9>Place policies, which they challenged on anaturst grounds, and next

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:21.520
<v Speaker 9>year the judge is going to actually think about how

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 9>Google Play policy should be revamped. You know, should there

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:28.919
<v Speaker 9>be this standard you know, thirty percent commission fee or

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 9>you know at a even at a four percent discount,

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 9>you know, should developers have.

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 1>To pay Google this service fee?

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 9>And Google in its defense is, you know, we have

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:41.919
<v Speaker 9>to keep our Android system going. We've got best in it,

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 9>so we've got to change the fee. So we'd love

0:21:44.119 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 9>to see what happens in court next year.

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:46.880
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much.

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 2>Maltinak has been all over these court rulings. Coming up,

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:53.040
<v Speaker 2>we'll get a read on liquidity in the private markets

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 2>with oceanic stick with us. It's a bally Boy technology.

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:06.439
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to Bluemotechnology. I'm Karen Hide in New York.

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:08.440
<v Speaker 2>Let's get a quick check on these markets because we're

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 2>managing to power on higher. Maybe it's still this optimism

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:13.920
<v Speaker 2>that we'll start to see rate cuts as soon as March.

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 3>Of next year.

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 2>Federal Reserve Bank, Philadelphia president, that's Patrick Harker actually making

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:20.399
<v Speaker 2>some headlines, says we currently speak this all on the

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:22.840
<v Speaker 2>back of whether or not we will indeed see a

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 2>need to pull back in terms.

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 3>Of the rate hiking cycle.

0:22:25.960 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 2>Arkas saying, you don't need to raise rates anymore, you

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 2>should hold steady. We're currently up three tens percent on

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:33.159
<v Speaker 2>the NASDA. We're seeing bonds managing to rally on the

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 2>back of hopes that we'll see consumer optimism as it

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:38.679
<v Speaker 2>currently hits a high today also be fed into the

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:40.399
<v Speaker 2>fact that we can get some sort of soft landing

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 2>here in the US. Remember there's a twenty year auction.

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:44.359
<v Speaker 2>A little bit later, Bitcoin actually getting a bit of

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 2>a bid as well. We're up three point three percent,

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 2>having been sold off a little bit of late. It's

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 2>getting crazy out there, and of course it's not just

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:50.640
<v Speaker 2>Bitcoin doing well.

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 3>The old coins are back.

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 2>Doc who with hat as it's called yet a dog

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 2>pictured we're wearing a hat seems to be doing particularly

0:22:57.080 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 2>well at the moment, But so too is the NASDAD

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 2>more broadly, at fifty four percent. Let's call it here

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 2>today in a rally and today we'll once again and

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:07.879
<v Speaker 2>a new record high for the big tech benchmark. But

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 2>what does the public market feed into the private market

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 2>at the moment?

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 3>How much are we.

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 2>Seeing valuations still under pressure or indeed rallying on higher.

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:17.160
<v Speaker 2>Let's focus in on that secondary market now and whether

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 2>it's a good time to buy into some of the

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 2>hottest startups such as open Ai, SpaceX mid those tender

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 2>offers from employees joining us now is an expert Tim Sullivan,

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 2>Oceanic Partner's ceo Oceanic, your venture capital company, your levisory firm,

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:32.120
<v Speaker 2>and you really focus on ensuring liquidity is there within

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:35.120
<v Speaker 2>the investments that you make in the private markets. And ultimately, Tim,

0:23:35.520 --> 0:23:38.560
<v Speaker 2>are we seeing decent liquidity for some of these hottest names.

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:42.879
<v Speaker 10>We definitely are seeing liquidity coming back, I would say

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:46.920
<v Speaker 10>in some of the names like open ai and Ai

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:49.239
<v Speaker 10>in general, those cap tables are pretty small, and so

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:53.120
<v Speaker 10>there is not a lot of liquidity. But in most

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 10>of the other big names that are transferable, we are

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:58.159
<v Speaker 10>seeing liquidity coming back, and we are seeing pricing at

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 10>much lower levels, and we've seen it over the past

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 10>two years.

0:24:01.040 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 2>And so is that why there's now this anticipation of

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 2>rates coming down, risk tolerance coming back and wanting to

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:10.119
<v Speaker 2>buy in at these cheaper prices. Who are the sort

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 2>of people putting in those bets at the moment, tim.

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:15.760
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I think to some degree, you know, risk is

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:19.920
<v Speaker 10>coming back on. And at the same time, a lot

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 10>of the shareholders that have been waiting for liquity for

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 10>the past two years, waiting for the markets to rebound,

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:28.360
<v Speaker 10>are somewhat running out of air. You know, they need

0:24:28.400 --> 0:24:33.720
<v Speaker 10>liquidity without companies going public, individuals literally you know, they

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 10>need capitals to survive for renovations, for taxes, for mortgage

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 10>rates going up, for emergencies, et cetera. And so at

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:43.960
<v Speaker 10>some point they are going to start looking for liquidity.

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:46.879
<v Speaker 10>And the reality is that the buyers who have been

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 10>primarily institutional for the past couple of years, they have

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 10>not moved their bids. They have remained low based on

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 10>fundamentals and sellers are now coming down to bridge that gap.

0:24:58.200 --> 0:25:02.520
<v Speaker 2>Those sellers primarily being employee. Are we seeing any early

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 2>investors wanting to liquid data as well, needing to perhaps

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:07.640
<v Speaker 2>satisfy some LP demands.

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 10>Absolutely, there are plenty of early investors that are looking

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 10>for liquidity. You know, no one knows how long this

0:25:14.960 --> 0:25:16.919
<v Speaker 10>current situation is going to last. You know, is it

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:20.119
<v Speaker 10>a rational exuberance that we're experiencing right now. Will we

0:25:20.200 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 10>see the rate cuts next year and will that have

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:25.720
<v Speaker 10>a material difference in the markets. It's hard to say,

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:28.680
<v Speaker 10>and some people can wait for another two to five

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 10>years and other people can't.

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:32.399
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to ask you to pick a favorite child,

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 2>but are their names you're seeing time and time again

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 2>being analyzed being brought up, and are they the ones

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:40.680
<v Speaker 2>that we're still talking about ipoing in the near future?

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:42.240
<v Speaker 6>Oh?

0:25:42.280 --> 0:25:46.400
<v Speaker 10>Absolutely, I think you know, there's there's rumors movement around

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:48.720
<v Speaker 10>right now that open dot ai may do a raise

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 10>or an IPO in first quarter next year just to

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:56.720
<v Speaker 10>beat out XAI. You know, there's companies like Data Bricks

0:25:56.760 --> 0:25:59.880
<v Speaker 10>and SpaceX that have been pretty resilient throughout this meltdown,

0:26:00.640 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 10>and they you know, who knows. I think you know,

0:26:03.800 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 10>if the market conditions are appropriate, we'll move their IPOs up.

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:10.719
<v Speaker 10>Not sure about SpaceX, They're probably a few years out,

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 10>but companies like Data, Bricks and Stripe and some others

0:26:13.840 --> 0:26:15.399
<v Speaker 10>may maybe sooner than you think.

0:26:15.560 --> 0:26:18.679
<v Speaker 2>And there's always been this hope for democratization, Tim the

0:26:18.760 --> 0:26:21.200
<v Speaker 2>idea we saw Kathy Wood with Arc offering up a

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 2>sort of vc ETF allowing normal people be able to

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:29.920
<v Speaker 2>have access to some of these pre IPO names. Are

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:33.119
<v Speaker 2>we seeing syndicates come in? Are you seeing sort of

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:36.440
<v Speaker 2>angel teams coming in to buy in on this stock

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 2>and allow still allowed investors, but perhaps not people with

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 2>billions under management?

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:48.119
<v Speaker 10>We are, and I have mixed feelings about that. I

0:26:48.160 --> 0:26:52.439
<v Speaker 10>think without legitimate information, without ques and k's being filed,

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 10>regular normal people as you call them, are not equipped

0:26:56.640 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 10>to do the diligence necessarily to necessarily to invest in

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 10>in these names. There is a lot of risk and

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 10>a lot of downside, so it's not for the faint

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 10>of heart. If you have access to information, either directly

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 10>or indirectly, I think, do your work and make the

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 10>most educated decision that you can. But if you don't

0:27:16.040 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 10>have access, it may be best to stay away.

0:27:19.200 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 2>Tim can I ask, therefore, some of the institutions that

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 2>you say have stood firm still standing wanting to take

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:26.400
<v Speaker 2>a bid but wanting it to be a lower valuation.

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 3>Are they all US institutions? Largely? Are we getting foreign

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 3>buyers coming in?

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:34.879
<v Speaker 10>We are definitely getting more and more foreign buyers in,

0:27:35.000 --> 0:27:37.639
<v Speaker 10>but by and large it's still a US market.

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:41.159
<v Speaker 2>And I'm interested is to ultimately whether you do think

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:43.000
<v Speaker 2>the IPO market's going to pick up. You were just

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:46.080
<v Speaker 2>talking about whether there's rumors, indeed swirling of an early

0:27:46.359 --> 0:27:49.200
<v Speaker 2>initial public offering even from an open AI. But there

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 2>has been this drum beat that will start to see

0:27:51.119 --> 0:27:52.800
<v Speaker 2>more names come in twenty twenty four.

0:27:53.000 --> 0:27:54.880
<v Speaker 3>Is that likely to happen with the exits be there?

0:27:57.480 --> 0:27:59.640
<v Speaker 10>I look at it from two different perspectives. Number one,

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:03.320
<v Speaker 10>think if the market does come back and irrational exuberance

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 10>wins the day, then absolutely we'll see IPOs in twenty

0:28:06.880 --> 0:28:11.680
<v Speaker 10>twenty four, you know, maybe as soon as late key one. However,

0:28:11.880 --> 0:28:15.880
<v Speaker 10>I see things like inflation and unemployment CPI and real

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 10>macro factors that have not changed as much as maybe

0:28:18.640 --> 0:28:23.399
<v Speaker 10>they need to to support that ongoing next phase of

0:28:23.440 --> 0:28:27.640
<v Speaker 10>the market. And if you know, the irrational exuberance phades.

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:30.280
<v Speaker 10>I think we're out into late twenty twenty four orarly

0:28:30.359 --> 0:28:31.240
<v Speaker 10>twenty twenty five.

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:35.159
<v Speaker 2>We have, of course had open AI SpaceX tender offers

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 2>and boosting their valuations.

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 3>How rare has that been?

0:28:40.400 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 10>That has been extremely rare, And I think I hate

0:28:44.240 --> 0:28:47.720
<v Speaker 10>to say it, but a lot of the valuation talk

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:51.960
<v Speaker 10>around those specific companies is driven in the media. You know,

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 10>I don't know that the numbers still support those valuations.

0:28:56.160 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 10>Those are a couple of companies where the valuations are

0:28:59.840 --> 0:29:02.960
<v Speaker 10>now based on fundamentals, and at some point I'm sure

0:29:03.000 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 10>they can grow into those valuations. But most of the

0:29:05.560 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 10>companies out there today are trading more along the lines

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 10>of fundamentals. And when I say that, they're trading at

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:15.840
<v Speaker 10>discounts of fifty to seventy plus percent of where they

0:29:15.840 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 10>were trading in late twenty twenty one.

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:21.960
<v Speaker 2>Wow. And is there any sort of well great themes

0:29:22.000 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 2>we can see as to whether it's the fintech space

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:27.040
<v Speaker 2>that's taken the most hit, whether it's the companies exposed

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:29.360
<v Speaker 2>to a consumer, or really isn't Just across the board,

0:29:29.400 --> 0:29:31.600
<v Speaker 2>you've generally seen a clip or lower of fifty to

0:29:31.600 --> 0:29:32.160
<v Speaker 2>seventy percent.

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 10>It's absolutely across the board, with as I mentioned, a

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:38.200
<v Speaker 10>couple exceptions.

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:42.040
<v Speaker 3>Tim, it's great to catch up with you. Thank you

0:29:42.080 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 3>so much.

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 10>Thank you, Caroline.

0:29:43.200 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 2>My Navanceanic partner CEO is going to be busy in

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty four.

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 3>While coming up.

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Look, Telephonica shares over in Spain surging after the government

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 2>announced plans to take ten percent steak. We'll have the

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 2>details next. Meanwhile, let's just take a look at Tesla.

0:29:58.400 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 2>We're seeing actually well of maybe managers being told that

0:30:02.440 --> 0:30:06.440
<v Speaker 2>some salaried employees aren't going to be being offered merit

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:09.280
<v Speaker 2>based equity awards this year. The company didn't give a

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 2>reason for the change, but four employees from different departments

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:15.040
<v Speaker 2>told Bloomberg that they believe the mover is pretty widespread.

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Workers that they still get a modest cost of living increase,

0:30:17.600 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 2>they get adjustments to their base salaries, but perhaps some

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 2>of those stock options just being dialed back a little bit.

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:30.200
<v Speaker 2>We're off by six tens of percent. This is BLUEBG Technology,

0:30:35.840 --> 0:30:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Sony's Insomniac Games division. It's just seen a massive leak

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 2>as hackers released from one point three million files detailing

0:30:43.000 --> 0:30:46.160
<v Speaker 2>footage road maps for upcoming games tied particularly with Marvel.

0:30:46.560 --> 0:30:49.280
<v Speaker 2>For more, let's bring in Bloomerg's Margie Murphy who joins

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 2>US now and for many go go back to twenty

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:54.640
<v Speaker 2>fourteen and Sony Pictures. This is a games division of

0:30:54.680 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 2>Sony And what sort of details are being leaked here, Margie?

0:30:58.720 --> 0:31:01.240
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, so as you say, one went three million files,

0:31:01.280 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 11>it was a really big leak.

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:08.960
<v Speaker 1>We can see employees' personal details, which is pretty bad.

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 1>So lots of passports, social security numbers, addresses, and lots

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 1>of HR documents, financial documents about budgets, banking details, wire transfers,

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:26.440
<v Speaker 1>and then kind of the more sensational stuff, which is

0:31:26.520 --> 0:31:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the footage from games that are slated to be released

0:31:31.400 --> 0:31:32.200
<v Speaker 1>in the coming years.

0:31:32.240 --> 0:31:34.880
<v Speaker 11>So Wolverine you had, you can see.

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:34.920
<v Speaker 1>All the.

0:31:36.400 --> 0:31:39.840
<v Speaker 12>Material for all the Marvel scenes.

0:31:39.400 --> 0:31:45.200
<v Speaker 11>That are coming up, upcoming missions, trainings. So really a

0:31:45.320 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 11>huge leak for this development studio.

0:31:48.600 --> 0:31:52.840
<v Speaker 2>And actually the video game industry has been pretty prevalent

0:31:53.240 --> 0:31:55.720
<v Speaker 2>since twenty twenty two, some of the big hacks occurring.

0:31:55.720 --> 0:31:59.280
<v Speaker 2>I just think what's happened with Grand Theft Auto six

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 2>as well, getting leaked ahead of its official launch. I'm

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:06.320
<v Speaker 2>interested in who's behind this particular attack. And what we

0:32:06.360 --> 0:32:07.800
<v Speaker 2>know about them.

0:32:08.000 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, so this group is called Rysia and we've known

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 11>about them since about May of this year.

0:32:15.760 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 12>They are a ransomware as a furthest group, So they

0:32:19.840 --> 0:32:22.440
<v Speaker 12>will people will come to them, they will give them

0:32:22.480 --> 0:32:25.720
<v Speaker 12>a target and they provide the malware that is used

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:27.520
<v Speaker 12>to attack their target, and.

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:31.480
<v Speaker 11>Then they share out the ransom demandands with their affiliates.

0:32:31.520 --> 0:32:36.480
<v Speaker 11>So we understand that probably around twenty fifth of November,

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:40.720
<v Speaker 11>the group was able to infiltrate Insomniac and then Risiter

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:44.480
<v Speaker 11>would have basically be told them, we've stolen all your files,

0:32:45.000 --> 0:32:47.400
<v Speaker 11>we've encrypted them all, and if you don't give us

0:32:48.040 --> 0:32:51.280
<v Speaker 11>two million worth of bitcoin, we're going to release them.

0:32:51.920 --> 0:32:54.080
<v Speaker 11>And we know that subsequently they sold some of the

0:32:54.080 --> 0:32:57.680
<v Speaker 11>files on the criminal market and leaked to the rest

0:32:57.800 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 11>this week.

0:32:59.360 --> 0:33:03.720
<v Speaker 2>Predominantly, who does right sort of tend to give malware

0:33:03.800 --> 0:33:05.959
<v Speaker 2>to hack? I mean, is it the gaming industry more

0:33:06.000 --> 0:33:07.600
<v Speaker 2>broadly or is it a cross industry.

0:33:08.520 --> 0:33:11.160
<v Speaker 3>So they seem to be targeting.

0:33:12.400 --> 0:33:15.160
<v Speaker 11>I'll call it lower hanging fruits. So they've been going

0:33:15.200 --> 0:33:23.480
<v Speaker 11>after smaller companies and organizations that maybe their security isn't

0:33:23.520 --> 0:33:27.440
<v Speaker 11>as tight, so they went for they've hacked Sony essentially,

0:33:27.520 --> 0:33:29.800
<v Speaker 11>but through a kind of subdivision of Sony.

0:33:30.400 --> 0:33:31.200
<v Speaker 3>The last.

0:33:32.640 --> 0:33:35.720
<v Speaker 11>Their most recent by profile hack was the British Library,

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:40.920
<v Speaker 11>and they target manufacturing and they've been targeting healthcare and

0:33:41.000 --> 0:33:47.280
<v Speaker 11>schools as well. So these smaller organizations are normally forgotten

0:33:47.280 --> 0:33:51.720
<v Speaker 11>by the big time hacking ransomware groups, but they've been

0:33:51.840 --> 0:33:54.080
<v Speaker 11>They've been going after these smaller groups and having some

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:57.400
<v Speaker 11>success with them, but it means that their extortion demands

0:33:57.400 --> 0:34:01.040
<v Speaker 11>are normally lower, and it normally hates that the hackers

0:34:01.040 --> 0:34:06.920
<v Speaker 11>themselves aren't that sophisticated. So the malware is it can

0:34:07.800 --> 0:34:11.359
<v Speaker 11>infiltrate lesser secured systems as well.

0:34:12.200 --> 0:34:15.480
<v Speaker 2>Still, the need for cybersecurity ever present. Margi Murphy, thank

0:34:15.480 --> 0:34:17.960
<v Speaker 2>you so much for bringing us that news on Sony. Meanwhile,

0:34:18.120 --> 0:34:20.280
<v Speaker 2>let's just shift gears a little bit and go to Europe.

0:34:20.320 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 2>With the Spanish government planning to buy a stake in

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:25.239
<v Speaker 2>Telefonica worth as much as two point two billion dollars. Look,

0:34:25.280 --> 0:34:27.360
<v Speaker 2>this isn't a bit to safeguard one of the nation's

0:34:27.360 --> 0:34:28.480
<v Speaker 2>most strategic assets.

0:34:28.760 --> 0:34:31.040
<v Speaker 3>Massa, Saudi Arabia builds up its own.

0:34:30.960 --> 0:34:33.719
<v Speaker 2>Position in the company who most commas Seal joins US

0:34:33.760 --> 0:34:36.160
<v Speaker 2>now from London, and it is interesting that this has

0:34:36.200 --> 0:34:38.280
<v Speaker 2>been a company that for years is trying to distance

0:34:38.320 --> 0:34:40.640
<v Speaker 2>itself from the government and now well it has to

0:34:40.680 --> 0:34:41.840
<v Speaker 2>go to them a little bit closer.

0:34:43.640 --> 0:34:48.040
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, it's fascinating. As the government moved out, Middle Eastern

0:34:48.080 --> 0:34:51.480
<v Speaker 13>governments have moved in on European telecoms and this isn't

0:34:51.480 --> 0:34:56.480
<v Speaker 13>the first example. Vodaphone, one of the biggest telecom groups

0:34:56.480 --> 0:35:00.480
<v Speaker 13>in Europe, had a UAE backed company buy up almost

0:35:00.520 --> 0:35:02.920
<v Speaker 13>fifteen percent of its shares in the last couple of years.

0:35:02.960 --> 0:35:04.360
<v Speaker 13>So this is somewhat of a trend.

0:35:04.920 --> 0:35:05.600
<v Speaker 3>It's a trend.

0:35:05.960 --> 0:35:10.840
<v Speaker 2>Ultimately, how much are they concerned about foreign ownership? More broadly,

0:35:10.960 --> 0:35:13.279
<v Speaker 2>is it particular Middle Eastern names that they seem to

0:35:13.360 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 2>be pushing back against and ultimately what's their vindication, what's

0:35:16.520 --> 0:35:17.560
<v Speaker 2>their reasoning for it?

0:35:18.920 --> 0:35:22.200
<v Speaker 13>Well, certainly on the second question, telecom firms, you know,

0:35:22.239 --> 0:35:25.160
<v Speaker 13>they're a bit dry but dull sometimes, but they underpin

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:28.160
<v Speaker 13>everything we do, and COVID showed that. Obviously we were

0:35:28.200 --> 0:35:31.880
<v Speaker 13>all dependent on them to do everything. But beyond that, defense,

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:37.440
<v Speaker 13>government cables, big business, banking, transactions, these are all reliant

0:35:37.840 --> 0:35:41.040
<v Speaker 13>on a handful of often in the case of Telefonica

0:35:41.120 --> 0:35:44.040
<v Speaker 13>in the case of in the UK BT these formerly

0:35:44.239 --> 0:35:46.960
<v Speaker 13>state backed companies and now you know the state is

0:35:46.960 --> 0:35:50.520
<v Speaker 13>stepping in once again. It's also interesting, I mean other

0:35:50.920 --> 0:35:54.160
<v Speaker 13>rivals Telephonica still have government stakes, so it is sort

0:35:54.160 --> 0:35:57.920
<v Speaker 13>of a return to that status quo. Deutsche Telecom has

0:35:57.920 --> 0:36:01.360
<v Speaker 13>a big government stake, and or in France formerly France

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:03.239
<v Speaker 13>Telecom has a government stake as well.

0:36:03.360 --> 0:36:06.279
<v Speaker 2>What's interesting though, of course, is that Telephonica isn't just

0:36:06.360 --> 0:36:09.120
<v Speaker 2>all about Spain. It's also about Latin America part of

0:36:09.120 --> 0:36:09.879
<v Speaker 2>its business there.

0:36:09.920 --> 0:36:12.600
<v Speaker 3>So what does it mean for well building businesses abroad.

0:36:14.560 --> 0:36:17.600
<v Speaker 13>Well, I don't know if the Saudi Telecom company backed

0:36:17.600 --> 0:36:21.520
<v Speaker 13>by the Saudi government has explicitly gone through its plans

0:36:21.920 --> 0:36:24.400
<v Speaker 13>if they have them for for Telefonica, but there's a

0:36:24.440 --> 0:36:27.840
<v Speaker 13>lot of pressure on the telecom's industry generally to maximize

0:36:27.840 --> 0:36:29.880
<v Speaker 13>the value of assets. It's been a terrible sector for

0:36:29.920 --> 0:36:34.279
<v Speaker 13>share prices, one of the worst globally, and so there's

0:36:34.280 --> 0:36:36.480
<v Speaker 13>been lots of carve outs of infrastructure and lots of

0:36:36.520 --> 0:36:39.759
<v Speaker 13>sales of local units. So possibly the Spanish government is

0:36:39.760 --> 0:36:41.440
<v Speaker 13>stepping in to make sure it has a voice in

0:36:41.480 --> 0:36:42.279
<v Speaker 13>those discussions.

0:36:43.040 --> 0:36:47.719
<v Speaker 2>Telephonica big player with market capitalization twenty one billion. Over

0:36:47.719 --> 0:36:49.000
<v Speaker 2>there in Spain, we thank you for bring us the

0:36:49.040 --> 0:37:00.239
<v Speaker 2>latest common seal on all things Telephonica. UK based tech

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:02.440
<v Speaker 2>firm Revolute let's on track to generate more than one

0:37:02.440 --> 0:37:04.640
<v Speaker 2>point nine billion dollars in revenue for the year. It's

0:37:04.640 --> 0:37:07.800
<v Speaker 2>actually Europe's most valuable startup and it's benefiting from rising

0:37:07.800 --> 0:37:10.600
<v Speaker 2>interest rates across the continent. Of course, Revolute is now

0:37:10.640 --> 0:37:12.879
<v Speaker 2>adding as many as three hundred thousand users a week,

0:37:13.200 --> 0:37:15.840
<v Speaker 2>qulling to people familiar with the matter. However, the startup,

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:18.479
<v Speaker 2>which was most recently valued at thirty three billion dollars

0:37:18.520 --> 0:37:21.080
<v Speaker 2>back in twenty twenty one funding round, still has yet

0:37:21.120 --> 0:37:25.879
<v Speaker 2>to receive its banking license from UK regulators. Meanwhile, we're

0:37:25.920 --> 0:37:29.520
<v Speaker 2>sticking with fintech. We're talking about perhaps the holiday season.

0:37:29.560 --> 0:37:31.960
<v Speaker 2>Within it, we're in full swing. While many of you

0:37:32.080 --> 0:37:34.880
<v Speaker 2>and clearing me shop online, you're also going to be

0:37:34.920 --> 0:37:37.040
<v Speaker 2>seeing bricks and more to come into their own and

0:37:37.120 --> 0:37:39.279
<v Speaker 2>a New York based fintech startup is focused on that

0:37:39.320 --> 0:37:40.400
<v Speaker 2>traditional part of retail.

0:37:40.400 --> 0:37:42.319
<v Speaker 3>Bondside is a company that's looking to.

0:37:42.280 --> 0:37:45.440
<v Speaker 2>Offer passive income to investors willing to bet on traditional

0:37:45.480 --> 0:37:49.040
<v Speaker 2>bricks and water and pleased to say that Nehar Govindrad

0:37:49.239 --> 0:37:52.960
<v Speaker 2>is with us one side founder CEO, and the passive

0:37:53.040 --> 0:37:58.040
<v Speaker 2>income play here is come on board, help lend to

0:37:58.239 --> 0:38:01.080
<v Speaker 2>a company that's growing, and you will get a nice return.

0:38:01.120 --> 0:38:03.800
<v Speaker 2>Mean while the company what doesn't have to sell equity

0:38:03.880 --> 0:38:05.160
<v Speaker 2>is that's kind of the win for them.

0:38:05.680 --> 0:38:06.520
<v Speaker 3>That's exactly right.

0:38:06.680 --> 0:38:09.799
<v Speaker 14>So our intention is to provide a passive income opportunity

0:38:09.840 --> 0:38:13.640
<v Speaker 14>to investors and they provide their capital in exchange for

0:38:13.680 --> 0:38:16.400
<v Speaker 14>a percentage of sales rather than a percentage of the business,

0:38:16.880 --> 0:38:19.040
<v Speaker 14>and so as a result, they start seeing their repayments

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:22.000
<v Speaker 14>from the business in month one versus waiting for a

0:38:22.120 --> 0:38:24.920
<v Speaker 14>year seven to ten outcome before they see the returns

0:38:24.920 --> 0:38:25.640
<v Speaker 14>from their investment.

0:38:25.920 --> 0:38:28.120
<v Speaker 2>And all of this, I'm sure, is to give more

0:38:28.160 --> 0:38:31.440
<v Speaker 2>options and optionality to a retail investor who's looking for yield.

0:38:31.840 --> 0:38:34.280
<v Speaker 2>How much have you had to focus in on ultimately

0:38:34.400 --> 0:38:36.440
<v Speaker 2>education here? There is a lot of concern about the

0:38:36.440 --> 0:38:39.320
<v Speaker 2>democratization of finance. Meaning basically, we got showered with confetti

0:38:39.360 --> 0:38:40.320
<v Speaker 2>every time we brought a stock.

0:38:40.560 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 3>How have you thought about educating a consumer on this?

0:38:43.560 --> 0:38:46.480
<v Speaker 14>Education has been incredibly important in what we do. So

0:38:46.680 --> 0:38:49.520
<v Speaker 14>we actually we went to market coining our agreement as

0:38:49.560 --> 0:38:52.799
<v Speaker 14>the repeatable revenue agreement, and the intention behind that was

0:38:52.920 --> 0:38:55.319
<v Speaker 14>we wanted to shape the investor's perspective of what we

0:38:55.400 --> 0:38:58.759
<v Speaker 14>do versus relying on their existing understanding, and so it

0:38:58.760 --> 0:39:01.320
<v Speaker 14>gave us a new opportunity to actually educate the investor

0:39:01.360 --> 0:39:03.640
<v Speaker 14>base and say, hey, this is how we do things,

0:39:03.680 --> 0:39:05.680
<v Speaker 14>and here's every piece of the fundamental that you need

0:39:05.719 --> 0:39:08.319
<v Speaker 14>to understand about our agreement before you get involved. As

0:39:08.320 --> 0:39:11.040
<v Speaker 14>a result, we've kept the product just for accredited investors,

0:39:11.560 --> 0:39:13.440
<v Speaker 14>but we think about that as we expand how we

0:39:13.440 --> 0:39:14.239
<v Speaker 14>can broaden the base.

0:39:14.719 --> 0:39:16.879
<v Speaker 2>And it's coming an expansion at a time when maybe

0:39:16.880 --> 0:39:20.680
<v Speaker 2>the moon music around the consumer and the economy gets

0:39:20.680 --> 0:39:24.239
<v Speaker 2>a little bit better. How have you managed to see

0:39:24.440 --> 0:39:27.920
<v Speaker 2>companies perform and show resilience? I mean you're lending to

0:39:28.440 --> 0:39:32.040
<v Speaker 2>really well known restaurant groups, but then some individual names

0:39:32.080 --> 0:39:35.000
<v Speaker 2>that might be a yoga studio for example, than a

0:39:35.040 --> 0:39:38.960
<v Speaker 2>store which have done well. Has anyone had problems servicing?

0:39:39.760 --> 0:39:44.200
<v Speaker 14>So we exclusively focus on brick and mortar services businesses,

0:39:44.760 --> 0:39:48.080
<v Speaker 14>and we define that as food and beverage as you referenced.

0:39:48.440 --> 0:39:53.359
<v Speaker 14>Then the second category is wellness, So think medical spas, gyms, salons,

0:39:53.600 --> 0:39:56.319
<v Speaker 14>and then the third category is more traditional care, either

0:39:56.360 --> 0:39:58.239
<v Speaker 14>provided in clinics or something like.

0:39:58.200 --> 0:39:59.120
<v Speaker 3>A car wash.

0:39:59.320 --> 0:40:02.480
<v Speaker 14>And our belie especially coming out of the pandemic, is

0:40:02.560 --> 0:40:05.399
<v Speaker 14>that brick and mortar services is very much here to stay,

0:40:05.440 --> 0:40:07.799
<v Speaker 14>and if anything, is on the rise, because we all

0:40:07.840 --> 0:40:10.480
<v Speaker 14>lived in a world where we weren't experiencing services and

0:40:10.920 --> 0:40:12.480
<v Speaker 14>we all decided that's not the world that we want

0:40:12.480 --> 0:40:15.440
<v Speaker 14>to live in. And so we've seen consistently across our

0:40:15.440 --> 0:40:18.560
<v Speaker 14>portfolio really strong performance, and of course that's aided by

0:40:18.560 --> 0:40:20.520
<v Speaker 14>the rise in consumer spending that we're seeing as well.

0:40:20.680 --> 0:40:24.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking at sort of JS Andres Group, Why did

0:40:24.120 --> 0:40:27.279
<v Speaker 2>they need to access money from you? Why not go

0:40:27.360 --> 0:40:30.080
<v Speaker 2>to a normal bank compartner when you're that big a name,

0:40:30.120 --> 0:40:30.960
<v Speaker 2>that bigger player.

0:40:31.360 --> 0:40:32.200
<v Speaker 3>It's a great question.

0:40:32.360 --> 0:40:35.759
<v Speaker 14>So we really think about our source of financing, not

0:40:35.880 --> 0:40:39.239
<v Speaker 14>necessarily for those that are in need of financing. When

0:40:39.239 --> 0:40:42.359
<v Speaker 14>we look at the brick and mortar services sector, we

0:40:42.440 --> 0:40:45.440
<v Speaker 14>believe that the capital stack and the options in their

0:40:45.440 --> 0:40:48.600
<v Speaker 14>capital stack haven't actually innovated in the way that multi

0:40:48.680 --> 0:40:51.200
<v Speaker 14>unit retail has really innovated in the last decade. And

0:40:51.280 --> 0:40:53.400
<v Speaker 14>so when we look at that, we think about what

0:40:53.520 --> 0:40:56.520
<v Speaker 14>we're providing here at Bondside with our repeatable revenue agreement

0:40:56.560 --> 0:40:59.960
<v Speaker 14>as expanding their capital stack. And so it's not necessary

0:41:00.000 --> 0:41:02.399
<v Speaker 14>really meant to replace the equity on your cap table

0:41:02.480 --> 0:41:04.799
<v Speaker 14>or replace traditional debt that you have in place, but

0:41:04.880 --> 0:41:06.879
<v Speaker 14>to just give you one more tool in your belt

0:41:06.920 --> 0:41:09.360
<v Speaker 14>that you can leverage as you think about growth and scale.

0:41:09.440 --> 0:41:12.040
<v Speaker 14>And so we see businesses as large as Hose andres

0:41:12.080 --> 0:41:14.920
<v Speaker 14>Group adopting us, as well as the younger players that

0:41:15.040 --> 0:41:17.359
<v Speaker 14>are being a lot more sensitive to dilution than they

0:41:17.360 --> 0:41:18.719
<v Speaker 14>were maybe three to five years ago.

0:41:18.840 --> 0:41:20.040
<v Speaker 3>What about your cap table?

0:41:20.440 --> 0:41:23.520
<v Speaker 2>You're going out pitching yourself as a fintech business with

0:41:23.960 --> 0:41:25.200
<v Speaker 2>a technology evaluation.

0:41:25.680 --> 0:41:28.080
<v Speaker 3>How have you raised funds? Has been hard? Easy to

0:41:28.080 --> 0:41:29.480
<v Speaker 3>tell your story?

0:41:29.560 --> 0:41:31.879
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, So, you know, I really came at building bond

0:41:31.880 --> 0:41:34.560
<v Speaker 14>Side out of a personal need. I prior to building Bondside,

0:41:34.560 --> 0:41:37.719
<v Speaker 14>built a brick and mortar business and felt that we

0:41:37.719 --> 0:41:40.520
<v Speaker 14>were really underserved in the capital options that existed. Nothing

0:41:40.640 --> 0:41:43.880
<v Speaker 14>quite fit what I was looking for. And so it

0:41:43.920 --> 0:41:46.200
<v Speaker 14>was very easy to then translate that into a story

0:41:46.200 --> 0:41:48.200
<v Speaker 14>and really sort of paint the picture for the need there.

0:41:48.239 --> 0:41:51.160
<v Speaker 14>And so as we think about our cap table at Bondside,

0:41:51.320 --> 0:41:53.880
<v Speaker 14>when we think about our roadmap ahead. Our first product

0:41:53.920 --> 0:41:56.160
<v Speaker 14>is the repeatable revenue agreement, which you're right, is a

0:41:56.160 --> 0:41:58.879
<v Speaker 14>financial vehicle. But when we think about the future, there's

0:41:58.880 --> 0:42:00.640
<v Speaker 14>a lot of opportunity to start of brick and orders

0:42:00.680 --> 0:42:01.040
<v Speaker 14>beyond that.

0:42:01.960 --> 0:42:03.960
<v Speaker 2>Nah, it's great to have you in the show. Thank you,

0:42:04.120 --> 0:42:08.440
<v Speaker 2>Thanks Carol, Nea Govrindaje. There once I founder CEO talking fintech.

0:42:08.480 --> 0:42:10.960
<v Speaker 2>To end what is of course this edition of bloombag Technology.

0:42:11.040 --> 0:42:13.000
<v Speaker 2>Do not forget to check out our podcast though, get

0:42:13.080 --> 0:42:15.760
<v Speaker 2>up to speed wherever you listen of course on Apple, Spotify.

0:42:15.920 --> 0:42:20.040
<v Speaker 3>iHeart Bloomberg dot com too. This is Blombo Technology.