WEBVTT - That Toy Is Childish

0:00:01.880 --> 0:00:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio, the George

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong and Show, Getty Armstrong and

0:00:11.000 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 1>Getty and Key Armstrong and Yetty.

0:00:23.200 --> 0:00:25.960
<v Speaker 2>If there is no deal to reopen the government, the

0:00:26.040 --> 0:00:29.479
<v Speaker 2>FAA's mandating airlines reduced flights by up to ten percent

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 2>at forty of the country's busiest airports.

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Multiple airline officials.

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:36.599
<v Speaker 2>Now tell me the Trump administration will start this off

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 2>at about a four percent cut, then ramp this up

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:40.560
<v Speaker 2>to ten percent through next week.

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 3>So, yeah, it's four percent today, a couple hundred flights.

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 3>If the shutdown continues, it'll go up up. By next Friday,

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:48.600
<v Speaker 3>it'll be forty five hundred flights. And so it started today,

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:49.959
<v Speaker 3>and we'll keep our eye on that and have more

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:50.880
<v Speaker 3>on that later.

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:53.239
<v Speaker 4>Here.

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:56.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm strong Eyetty store is open for Christmas season. I

0:00:56.320 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 3>get uncomfortable talking about this.

0:00:57.760 --> 0:00:58.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why.

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 3>Something about having my name on thing you buy for

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 3>Christmas makes me uncomfortable, even though I know a lot

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 3>of you want it, and you get people are fans

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 3>of the show and they would like it. But we

0:01:06.600 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 3>now have Armstrong in Getty pickleball paddles, among things wait

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 3>a minute, all the things in our story. A minute,

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 3>you go to Armstrong and getdy dot.

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:25.759
<v Speaker 1>Com on one of those coffee mugs, water bottles. I'm

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>telling you the Fioliican party t shirts.

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 3>I want a hoodie that says starve the Lazy, That's

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 3>what I yes. So it's Friday. I don't know if

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 3>that means you're more likely to date or wish you

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 3>had a date. Probably, but it seems like a good

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 3>time to check in on hot dating trends with Katie Green.

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Katie Jeez. I set it up like a cable news segment.

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that was great.

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 4>This is from the USA Today talking about dating trends

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:54.920
<v Speaker 4>have reached new lows this year. One of the new

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 4>ones that we haven't talked about is called throning.

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 3>Well, let's let's start with shreking, the one we have

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 3>talked about, just to get it out of the way.

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 3>That is, you intentionally date. It's usually women dating guys.

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 3>Intentionally dated guy you don't find attractive, like he's a

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 3>Shrek looking character, because you think he'll treat you better, right,

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 3>which is one of the worst things I've ever heard

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:21.640
<v Speaker 3>in my life. Because he's so he's feels like he's

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 3>so lucky to have you, he will treat.

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 1>You to hang on to you. Yes, yes, that's a

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 1>great basis for a healthy relationship. Yes, that'll go great.

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:34.360
<v Speaker 3>So the fact that you are god every bit of

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 3>every phrase that comes to mind. I'm horrified by the

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:41.639
<v Speaker 3>fact that you are lowering your standards because you think

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 3>he'll be feel so lucky to have you that he

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 3>treats you better than someone else. Is about as disgusting

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:52.640
<v Speaker 3>a philosophy as I can imagine. But that's shreking. Okay,

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 3>So now what the hell is throwning?

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 4>So throning is when you date someone to raise your

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 4>own social status. So the goal is to land a

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 4>partner with clout so that your own image gets a boost.

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that's all. Every celebrity in the world knows

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:10.360
<v Speaker 1>what that's about, right.

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 3>That's probably well, it's depends on how much if that's

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 3>your main motivation. Obviously that's an odd way to go

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 3>about getting relationships. But I think in general people want

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:29.920
<v Speaker 3>to be in a relationship with somebody that is, you know,

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 3>a good a good example of society, right, I mean,

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 3>isn't that just in general you're hoping you date somebody

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 3>that if your friends or family met them, they think, well,

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 3>they are very they're very you know, contributing member of society.

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 3>Where it's more calculating than that, where that crosses into throning,

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I take this.

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 4>This came from some TikToker who talks about dating says

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 4>if a person seems overly focused on your status or

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 4>your social circle and changes their behaviors towards you, depending

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 4>upon what whether you're in public or private, this can

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 4>indicate throning.

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, many years ago, I was driving a really nice

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 3>car at the time, and I had a girl in

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 3>like the second date or whatever, says something to me.

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 3>I picked her up in a different vehicle than my

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 3>really nice car, and she said, I'd kind of prefer

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 3>to be seen in your.

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Other car when you pick me up.

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:28.720
<v Speaker 3>And I thought, Oki, whoa, this isn't a good idea.

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 4>The next one they have here is bank seeing, which

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 4>derives its name from the elusive street artist Banksy. Like

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 4>a baffling Banksy art piece. Bank seeing in a relationship

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 4>involves slowly withdrawing emotionally from your partner without telling them

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:45.679
<v Speaker 4>what you're doing.

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 3>All right, this is for Dack why are you doing this?

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:51.920
<v Speaker 3>Is this to make them want you more? Or are

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 3>you just trying to get out of the relationship.

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:55.480
<v Speaker 4>This seems like a really elusive way to get out

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 4>of a relationship.

0:04:57.120 --> 0:05:00.840
<v Speaker 1>This is what they're calling bank seeing now only withdrawing

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 1>because the fire is gone. That's called a relationship ending.

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna speak for our listeners. This is ridiculous. Everything

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't need a name. Everything isn't a trend. Slowly deciding

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:14.040
<v Speaker 1>this isn't for me is not a trend. It's been

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 1>a trend since we crawled from the primordial ooze. I'll

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 1>not have this foolishness.

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:21.840
<v Speaker 3>What Joe is doing is called rage talking right popular

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 3>thing now, it's a trend on middle.

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:28.919
<v Speaker 1>Age right cold warrior? Do you mean nothing to do

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 1>with the Cold War?

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 3>When middle aged men get fed up with modern trends,

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 3>they do something called rage talking tread.

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Tread. When someone branded people inhaling, they're exhaling what they're

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>done inhaling its.

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 4>Tread only our listeners to see how red you're getting.

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 4>This is incredible. Yes, just a time for the Christmas

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 4>was supposed to be fun. Yeah, right, you're supposed to

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 4>lighten things up here, when someone employs the bank sying technique,

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:00.599
<v Speaker 4>it says they start destroying the relation and ship before

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 4>the other person even sees it coming, because banksy selfish.

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Again, you know, I'm sorry this this is dumb. Yeah right,

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>I had great promise, Like so many of my schemes

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 1>in life, it had great promise at the beginning. I think,

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I think, I hope. Shreking is not a very popular thing, but.

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:20.599
<v Speaker 4>It's the only one that's stuck around for a while,

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 4>the shreking. I haven't heard any of these until this

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 4>stupid article.

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:27.159
<v Speaker 1>You are such can we just awful? These things under

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the heading here's what shallow stupid people do? You know what?

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:34.720
<v Speaker 1>We're too tolerant as a society. You've got to be

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>less tolerant. That's ugly, it's stupid, it's shallow. I weep

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:42.160
<v Speaker 1>for you that you didn't have a healthy relationship that

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 1>you can use to model what your relationships are going

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 1>to be like. If you're any of those things. Stop

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 1>being it. Michael just stopped calling it a trend. Michael

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 1>or Jack?

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:52.839
<v Speaker 4>Are you guys both getting joy out of the fact

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:54.480
<v Speaker 4>that all of this is happening While Joe is wearing

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 4>his cut the crap T shirt because that is yeah, precisely.

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, man, So.

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:08.040
<v Speaker 3>Everything being online in social media and people communicating with

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 3>each other. I suppose, I suppose it would make sense.

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 3>I hadn't thought about this before. This is just off

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 3>the top of my head. But if our politics has

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 3>gotten dominated by the worst among us, why wouldn't relationship

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 3>trends get dominated by the worst among us for exactly

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 3>the same reasons.

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the worst or dopiest or shallowest among us.

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so there are there are two more on this list,

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 4>but I don't want Joe to explode.

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 1>So I'm just gonna.

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 3>Take one edge of blood pressure pill and then Katie

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 3>will finish this off.

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>The go ahead quickly. They're dumb, like a medical procedure.

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 1>The sooner we started, the sooner. It's over ZIP coding,

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>all right, I can't even take it. Yeah, I see

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the reef version of.

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 4>That, where people on dating apps will either stick only

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 4>to their ZIP codes or stick only outside.

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Of their zip codes. What the hell?

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, I can say see sticking two years zip code

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 3>just because you want somebody near those.

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 4>But there are other people that though, Yeah, but there

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 4>are other people that look specifically away from their own

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 4>zip code, which I would make more sense.

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 3>To me, might fit in with the that might fit

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 3>in with the stat we had a while back of

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:23.239
<v Speaker 3>the percentage of people, particularly men on online dating sites,

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 3>who are freaking married.

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh.

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 3>I was told by a woman the other day, she said,

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:32.079
<v Speaker 3>you would not believe how many married men are on

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 3>the dating.

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Website she's on.

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 3>She meets them and they talk and they're we're gonna

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:39.439
<v Speaker 3>meet forgotty or whatever it is. And she does a

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 3>little research on them and turns out they they're married,

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:44.360
<v Speaker 3>or she comes across husbands.

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Of her friends, Oh gosh, and has to go tell

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 1>their friends.

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:49.720
<v Speaker 3>Hey, you know, I hate to tell you this, but

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 3>your husband's on match dot Com looking for dates claiming

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 3>is single.

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that is so crazy.

0:08:56.360 --> 0:09:01.839
<v Speaker 4>There is an entire dating service dedicated to as Oh yeah,

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 4>sure this, I mean it came this came out years ago.

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:09.200
<v Speaker 4>But Ashley Madison, Yeah, but the well, the idea is

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 4>just gross. You know, life is short have an affair

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 4>as their tagline.

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 3>Practically the oldest thing in the world is the idea

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 3>of an affair. But the idea that you're going on

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:22.080
<v Speaker 3>to a dating website with your picture and everything while

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 3>you're married, claiman your single How do you think that's

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 3>going to end you?

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Moron?

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 3>Not to mention the fact that it's an awful thing

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 3>to do. Yeah, embarrass your spouse horribly publicly.

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I just I can't even believe that. I mean, so,

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>if that's true, and like I said, I know somebody

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:39.960
<v Speaker 1>who's had this specific experience multiple times.

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:42.560
<v Speaker 3>If that's going on, well maybe these other stupid things

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 3>are happening too, zeppelining or whatever we were talking about.

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:51.680
<v Speaker 4>Here's the last one, Jodey deep breath. Okay, monkey barring.

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 4>It alludes to how in dating, people move from one

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 4>partner to the next partner, only letting go of the

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 4>previous once they've once they've sealed the deal.

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>With their next one.

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:09.679
<v Speaker 3>I think that's a common emotional technique. Yeah, unfortunate, unfortunate also,

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 3>but it's called monkey barring. Now that's the trend. Not

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:15.560
<v Speaker 3>a good idea according to any therapist. But monkey barring. Yes,

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 3>not everything needs name. It's not a trend.

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:21.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I promise an hour job until you got another

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:22.760
<v Speaker 1>one lined up.

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:25.480
<v Speaker 3>Okay, all right, okay, well job's okay. I don't know

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 3>about the relationships that now, if you know you're done.

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 3>You gotta tell them you got it. That's true, you

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:35.560
<v Speaker 3>got it. That's not cool. Yeah, I promise an hour

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 3>three to get to this New York Times article about

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 3>people that are in relationships at their AI chatbots. This

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 3>is a serious piece of journalism. It's highly troubling, and

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:47.200
<v Speaker 3>I think it's going to be a huge topic for

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 3>the next several decades, as long as mankind can survive it.

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 3>And that might be just like ten years fifteen, so

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 3>we got about fifteen years. Maybe you're online a lot,

0:10:56.440 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 3>looking up moronic trends that don't exist, and you'll be

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 3>attacked to buy scammers, and that's why we recommend Webroot

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 3>Total Protection. It's lightning fast, anivirus I did any protection,

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 3>dark web monitoring, secure VPN, and unlimited cloud backup, all

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 3>those things in one.

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 3>This doesn't have a clever name. They're just called a thief.

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 3>They want to steal from you, and you can avoid

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:22.960
<v Speaker 3>that with Webroot Total Protection. Protect your whole family, which

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 3>is really cool, even the kids and seniors. It's easy

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 3>to install a no annoying pop ups, and it scans

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:30.200
<v Speaker 3>six times faster than the competition.

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:33.440
<v Speaker 1>And Wowser's listen to this deal. Get CyberSecure with sixty

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:36.079
<v Speaker 1>percent off webroot total protection not only at webroot dot

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 1>com slash armstrong. That's sixty percent off, but only through

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 1>our magical link. Don't wait. Live a better digital life

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 1>at webroot. Go to webroot dot com slash armstrong right now.

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 1>That's webroot dot com slash armstrong. Offer ends soon webroot

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash Armstrong.

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 3>The Secretary of War announced another boat got blowed up

0:11:56.520 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 3>down near by Venezuela. I think that's number fifteen or

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 3>something like that over the last several weeks.

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Yikes, they're serious about it. I got a few details

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 1>on that, A lot of other stuff on the way.

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Stay here. Some more news from Washington today.

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:15.080
<v Speaker 2>Nancy Pelosi announced that she won't seek reelection and plans

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 2>on retiring in two years at the age of eighty six,

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 2>or as it's known in congressional terms your tweens.

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>And no kidding, eighty six. Damn near ninety. That's wild.

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't paying attention wild Nancy Pelosi. She'll be eighty

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 1>six when she's doing eighty six. Yeah. Yeah, So, speaking

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:40.559
<v Speaker 1>of elections and that sort of thing, I've been reading

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>about redistricting lately and how difficult it can be even

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 1>if people are of good conscience, and they're not Gavinusum,

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, shameless partisan jerrymandering. And I've been reading

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 1>about this mathematician whose the gig is her field, is

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out how heck to do redistricting in

0:13:02.280 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 1>a fair and logical way, and she mentioned something that

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I found really intriguing. There are rules that vary by state,

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 1>but they have what they refer to as the Big

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 1>six population balance, compactness, contiguity, meaning your neighbors more or less,

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 1>respect for existing civic boundaries like counties, cities, towns, respect

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 1>for communities of interest, racial fairness, et cetera. So there

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of layers to this. And obviously do

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 1>any of those things in most states, No, we certainly

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 1>don't do them honestly or in a good way. And

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 1>I thought this was really intriguing. I'm not sure it'll happen.

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:50.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it would take a constitutional amendment. But they're

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:56.319
<v Speaker 1>studying what they call proportional ranked ranked choice voting. Proportional

0:13:56.360 --> 0:14:00.360
<v Speaker 1>ranked choice voting also known as single transferable vote method

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 1>or STV in this scenario, you have multi member districts

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:10.840
<v Speaker 1>using ranked choice. For example, because we talked earlier about California,

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 1>it's sixty forty Democrat Republican. Well, if every district is

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 1>sixty forty Democrat to Republican, Republicans will have zero representatives

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 1>in the House, and that's a problem. So this STV,

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 1>for example, not to be confused with STDs, something completely different,

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 1>but rather than one representative per each of nine districts

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>in Massachusetts, reduced the number of districts to three and

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 1>have each elect three representatives by a ranking method. That way,

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Massachusetts would probably get two or three rather than zero

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Republicans in Washington, it's not common. The biggest American city

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 1>that uses STV is Portland, Oregon. It was a great

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 1>success in last November city council election. I'm told all

0:14:56.480 --> 0:14:59.240
<v Speaker 1>kinds of groups were able to elect their preferred candidates

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 1>in proportion the voting numbers, even though in a single

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 1>neighborhood they might be outnumbered. I thought that was intriguing.

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, if you yeah, but you start here, we've had

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 3>four hundred and thirty five members of the House since

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 3>nineteen thirteen.

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 1>That makes no sense. What was the population in the

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 1>United States, then I don't know. Yeah, I remember, I've

0:15:21.160 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 1>seen those numbers that each representative went from representing, you know,

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty five hundred people to now four hundred and fifty

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 1>thousand or whatever it is. Those numbers are not right,

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 1>but you get the idea. Yeah, it's it's a completely

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 1>different situation.

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 3>So in nineteen thirteen, the population of the country was

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 3>ninety seven million people, right, and now it's three hundred

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 3>and forty So that.

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Makes no sense.

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 3>What you start there, right, we need if we wanted

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 3>to do it, if we thought that proportion was correct before,

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 3>we need to have And somebody figured this out.

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I heard it the other day.

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 3>It might be this person you're quoting right here, because

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 3>there's a book out about it. But we should have

0:15:55.520 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 3>something like five hundred and ninety House members, right, yeah,

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 3>and we're not even close, And so that I think

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 3>that's the place to start. Every member would have a

0:16:06.640 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 3>much smaller population, and it'd be a lot easier to

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 3>be fair.

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Have to have Donald Trump blow out of all of

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the capitol and expand it, though, I mean, because you're

0:16:15.360 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 1>not going to fit all those people. Let's paying all

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 1>those damned salaries, although you know, as a fraction of

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the federal government that's placed nothing.

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 3>But well, the original intent or the way it would

0:16:28.240 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 3>have been one hundred years ago, you could have easily

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 3>gotten a hold of your house member, had some sort

0:16:33.040 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 3>of relationship with them if you wanted to.

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Get actual politics. That's impossible now. Yeah, getting back to

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 1>the STV thing, I really like the idea because the

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 1>two states I'm most familiar with politically would be Illinois,

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 1>my home state, in California, where the show is based

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 1>and has been for decades now. And in both of

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 1>those cases, you have populous cities that so dominate the

0:16:56.920 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 1>state politics they can do more or less whatever they want.

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 1>And you've got these enormous swaths of conservatism in both

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:09.919
<v Speaker 1>states that go more or less unrepresentative unrepresented, And I

0:17:09.920 --> 0:17:12.359
<v Speaker 1>think if you add a just a well, you'd have

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 1>to draw those districts too, and that would probably become

0:17:14.880 --> 0:17:17.159
<v Speaker 1>every bit as corrupt and disgusting. But I like the

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 1>idea anyway, Coming up, our friends from the Pacific Legal

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Foundation on the Big Week at the Supreme Court. That's

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 1>next segment. Stay tuned if you can't grab the podcast.

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong and Getty on demand later on.

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 3>It's almost exactly ten times since we first had four

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 3>hundred and thirty five House members back in nineteen thirteen.

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 3>Back then, each House member represented about fifty five thousand people.

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 3>Now each House member represents about five hundred and fifty

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:55.680
<v Speaker 3>thousand people. Wow, that's a completely different structure, right, That's

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 3>the first place to go to fix it, as far

0:17:57.280 --> 0:18:00.640
<v Speaker 3>as I'm concerned. Yeah, Yeah, got a lot of work

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 3>to do. Supreme Court heard some important arguments this week.

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 3>We talked about it a lot with the whole tariff thing.

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:07.879
<v Speaker 3>Is the president got the power to do that or not?

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 3>If it turns out he doesn't, well that's going to

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:11.480
<v Speaker 3>be a big change.

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, big doings at the Scotis. We'll talk about it.

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 5>X stay with us, Armstrong and Getty.

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I think she's an evil woman. I'm glad she's retiring.

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 6>I think she did the country a great service player recheer.

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:29.439
<v Speaker 6>I think she was a tremendous liability for the country,

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:32.680
<v Speaker 6>And I think she was an evil woman who did

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:36.040
<v Speaker 6>a poor job to costs the country a lot in

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:39.680
<v Speaker 6>damages and in reputation. I thought she was terrible.

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:44.879
<v Speaker 3>So that's not the way our politics used to be

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 3>when Elder's graciousness as a leader retires.

0:18:48.280 --> 0:18:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I love to hear that.

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 3>When Elders Statesman used to step down on the other side,

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 3>you would, you know, the dedication to public service, blah

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 3>blah blah, you'd sail this stuff even if you hated him.

0:18:57.359 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 3>But we don't do that anymore, for better or worse.

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 3>And I go back back and forth on whether it's

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 3>better or worse.

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:02.199
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 3>Maybe we're just saying the quiet power up part out

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 3>loud now, but everybody was always thinking. She called him

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 3>the other day vile and the worst thing on Earth.

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:13.440
<v Speaker 3>So right, there you go, that's where we are. That

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 3>pretty much sums up where we are this week he

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 3>had from Nancy and Donald Trump.

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh he's vile.

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 3>He's the worst thing on planet Earth, the worst thing

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 3>on planet Earth, he said, she's even when corrupt.

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 1>There you go, fair enough. So we're trying to connect

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:30.400
<v Speaker 1>with Anastasia Boden of the Pacific Legal Foundation to talk

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>about the Supreme Court this week, and we'll track her

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:36.360
<v Speaker 1>down quickly. But I saw this and was just amused

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:40.400
<v Speaker 1>by it on a couple of different levels. On election night,

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 1>all right, I guess it was late Monday night, Greg Abbott,

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the governor of Texas, tweeted when it was starting to

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 1>look like Mum Donnie was indeed gonna win the election

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 1>from mayor of New York, Abbot tweeted he would impose

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:57.680
<v Speaker 1>a one hundred percent tariff on New Yorker's moving to

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Texas the polls close tomorrow night, I will impose one

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent tariff on anyone moving to Texas from New

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 1>York City, which Jack, you're you're smiling. Obviously it's a joke.

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:13.359
<v Speaker 1>It's it's funny. But here's why it matters. According to

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:16.879
<v Speaker 1>one publication, tariffs are taxes on goods, not people, and

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:20.000
<v Speaker 1>US states are not permitted to impose tariffs on imports

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:23.200
<v Speaker 1>from other states, let alone people who. Further More, of

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:26.479
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court has recognized the constitutional right to travel,

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 1>et cetera, et cetera. And then they go into a

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:34.880
<v Speaker 1>bunch of people breathlessly angry online both you know your

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:38.960
<v Speaker 1>your unwashed masses and New York Governor Kathy hokel her

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:43.359
<v Speaker 1>press office. Well, that's actually kind of a funny response,

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:48.160
<v Speaker 1>political commentator Ed Krasenstein. This is illegal. MAGA has become

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the party of violating the constitution.

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 3>Boy, So there weren't a ton of people just reacted

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:57.239
<v Speaker 3>with you can't put a tariff on a person, so

0:20:57.520 --> 0:20:58.320
<v Speaker 3>let's not offend it.

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Right, it was. It was a joke anyway, oh man,

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:08.879
<v Speaker 1>speaking of tai rage real and manufactured. Yes, speaking of tariffs.

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:12.080
<v Speaker 3>The oral arguments were this week before the Supreme Court

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 3>to whether or not the President has the right to

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 3>by himself up end the world economy the way it is.

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 3>And now we're going to get an expert view on

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:24.200
<v Speaker 3>how that went based on an emergency measure for executive power.

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:25.920
<v Speaker 1>S and d on a stage. Boden is a civil

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 1>rights attorney at the Fabulous Pacific Legal Foundation, where she

0:21:29.760 --> 0:21:33.080
<v Speaker 1>focuses on economic opportunity and equality before the law. On

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 1>a stage. Great to talk to you again. How are

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 1>you likewise?

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 5>I'm doing well? Life from DC.

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh excellent, terrific. Don't let them steal your soul while

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:46.200
<v Speaker 1>you're there. So the oral arguments before the Supreme Court

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 1>lengthy and really interesting on the tariff case. What was

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:51.920
<v Speaker 1>your takeaway?

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:54.719
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, well, it's hard to get a red on the justices.

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:59.439
<v Speaker 5>They had really hard questions for Solicitor General John Sower

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:03.640
<v Speaker 5>and his position on Trump's tariffs. Trump, of course contends

0:22:03.640 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 5>that he can pass these wide reaching tariffs that have

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 5>been crippling American businesses under the International Emergency Economics Powers Act.

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:16.439
<v Speaker 5>The challengers say, there's no emergency, because what's going on

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:19.440
<v Speaker 5>here is Trump has cited the long standing trade deficit,

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 5>which has of course been in effect for years and

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 5>economically is relevant anyway. And he's also cited the OPIIG crisis,

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:27.399
<v Speaker 5>which again long standing for years. So it's not some

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 5>new emergency to say that he can now pass these tariffs.

0:22:30.320 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 5>So the challengers say, hey, no emergency. In any way,

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 5>this statute does not give you that broad of authority

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 5>you can do. You can pass it in regulations, but

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 5>you can't slap tariffs on which tariffs are usually Congress's job.

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 5>And so it was just really surprising that a lot

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:45.159
<v Speaker 5>of the justices had very tough questions for John Sower.

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 5>And it looks like, you know, I think there's three

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:52.200
<v Speaker 5>justices comfortably with the government, three justices comfortably with the challengers,

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 5>and then three who are toss ups at the moment.

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, to me, and I just read this yesterday, to me.

0:22:57.280 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 3>The slam dunk was getting the lawyer arguing for Trump's

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 3>side to admit that the way he's looking at it,

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:11.480
<v Speaker 3>a democratic president could declare a climate emergency and put

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:15.879
<v Speaker 3>all kinds of penalties on all kinds of things in

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:17.840
<v Speaker 3>the same way if you're going to buy his reasoning,

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 3>and nobody, no conservative should want that.

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 5>That's exactly right. That was a mic drop moment, and

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 5>questions came both from Justice Sodomar and from Justice Gorsich.

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 5>So Justice Gorsich, you know, who was a right appointed justice,

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 5>had the same question, like, Hey, didn't we just hear

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:39.840
<v Speaker 5>a case a couple terms ago where Biden declared a

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:43.879
<v Speaker 5>national emergency and then tried to alleviate magically with his

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:46.880
<v Speaker 5>pen student loan debt, and didn't we say that's too much?

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:49.720
<v Speaker 5>And now basically a president could do the exact same

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:50.920
<v Speaker 5>thing under your theory.

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Of the case.

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 5>And so I think that's going to give many justices

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:56.919
<v Speaker 5>a tough time ruling for the president when that's now

0:23:56.960 --> 0:23:57.679
<v Speaker 5>the consequence.

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:01.679
<v Speaker 1>And we also heard Ilina ca in tag teaming with

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Amy Coney Barrett on a different topic, I mean trade,

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:08.359
<v Speaker 1>do you think there are three justices that are comfortably

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 1>with the government at this point? Who are they.

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 5>I think it's Justice Thomas, Justice Alito, and Justice Cavanaugh.

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:18.919
<v Speaker 5>You know, they are traditionally in favor of broad executive

0:24:19.000 --> 0:24:22.720
<v Speaker 5>power and deference to the executive even when there's declared

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:25.440
<v Speaker 5>emergencies that might not really be emergencies, but you kind

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:27.360
<v Speaker 5>of have to defer to the president's assessment that there's

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 5>an emergency.

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:28.359
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:31.919
<v Speaker 5>And they had the easiest questions, I think for for

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:32.560
<v Speaker 5>the government.

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, if you're right, I mean I generally, I generally

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 1>agree with those guys.

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:39.359
<v Speaker 3>But that'd be the end of the country if you

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:41.120
<v Speaker 3>could just declare practically.

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Anything an emergency and start in levy taxes.

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah, right, And that's you know, that is a

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:51.119
<v Speaker 5>difficult thing. I mean, what's what's to stop a present

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:55.399
<v Speaker 5>from going even further? And especially because you know, this

0:24:55.600 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 5>was one of the things the challenger said was, Hey,

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:01.280
<v Speaker 5>Paris raise revenue, So what the difference between even tariffs

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:04.160
<v Speaker 5>and taxes at this point? Can the government just raise revenue?

0:25:04.160 --> 0:25:08.240
<v Speaker 5>Can the president, I mean just raise revenue? And the

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:12.119
<v Speaker 5>attorney for the government said, no, raising revenue is different.

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 5>This actually isn't intended to raise revenue. It's intended to

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:17.439
<v Speaker 5>stimulate the economy. We don't care about revenue coming in.

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:20.399
<v Speaker 5>We care about stopping trade, so our purpose is different.

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:22.880
<v Speaker 5>And usually justices don't want to get in the business

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:25.640
<v Speaker 5>of making, you know, drawing that type of line. They're

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 5>never going to come in and say, well, this one's different.

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:30.639
<v Speaker 5>This time you're not actually raising revenue, or this time

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 5>you didn't mean to raise revenue. So it would effectively

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:35.919
<v Speaker 5>be a blate check to the president. And yet I

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:38.400
<v Speaker 5>think it's I think it's true those justices would rule

0:25:38.440 --> 0:25:40.000
<v Speaker 5>for the president at this point. And then you have

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:45.959
<v Speaker 5>Justice Jackson, Justice Kagan, Justice Soda mayor comfortably against the government,

0:25:46.000 --> 0:25:47.160
<v Speaker 5>and the other three are tossups.

0:25:47.359 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 3>I can come up with so many horrible examples of

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:52.680
<v Speaker 3>the way this could be used. Big school shooting gets

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 3>lots of national attention. The Democratic president declares school shootings

0:25:57.600 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 3>an emergency and puts a five hundred percent tariff for

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 3>tax or whatever on guns, for instance.

0:26:03.800 --> 0:26:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Right right, I you know, I just I believe Americans

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 1>of good conscience should hear the term emergency powers and

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 1>react as if their child had proposed getting a pet chimpanzee.

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:19.040
<v Speaker 1>It's an automatic no unless the case is made with

0:26:19.440 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 1>brilliant clarity and and and bitter necessity, if you know

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 1>what I mean, just the phrase emergency powers should send

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:30.120
<v Speaker 1>every American to grab their gads and flag and wave

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:36.160
<v Speaker 1>it around anyway. Anastasia, Yeah, right, oh my god. Yeah,

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:39.159
<v Speaker 1>executive overreach. It doesn't matter if it's your guy or

0:26:39.200 --> 0:26:40.720
<v Speaker 1>the other guy. Resistant nine to eleven.

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:42.960
<v Speaker 3>All the things that got passed in the Patriot Act

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 3>after that that we didn't even know about. I mean, yeah,

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:47.199
<v Speaker 3>emergency powers are scary.

0:26:47.640 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Anastasia boden is with a pacific legal foundation. Hey, one

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:53.119
<v Speaker 1>question that's been asked a lot about this case, and Anastasia,

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 1>if you have no idea, feel free to stay so

0:26:55.240 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 1>is if the court rules against those tariffs, what happens

0:26:58.359 --> 0:26:59.680
<v Speaker 1>to all the money that was collected?

0:27:01.040 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and that you know, that is a thing that

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:06.119
<v Speaker 5>the statute says it should be repaid. And that's something

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 5>that the challengers are really worried about, right because because

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:12.719
<v Speaker 5>that is going to weigh on the justice's mind. Are

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:14.240
<v Speaker 5>we really going to put the government on the hook

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 5>for you know, millions, if not billions of dollars in

0:27:16.920 --> 0:27:18.480
<v Speaker 5>taxes that now have to be Well.

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:21.360
<v Speaker 3>That's the pay that's one problem. The amount is one problem.

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:24.639
<v Speaker 3>Who gets it the guy who bought the truck that

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 3>costs one thousand dollars more or the Ford dealer. Who

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:30.159
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I can't even imagine how you would unwind that.

0:27:30.600 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, given the fact that we just discussed this Atastasia,

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:34.439
<v Speaker 1>then I'll get out of your way. But we just

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 1>discussed this the other day, that the tariffs, the cost

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:39.679
<v Speaker 1>of the tariffs are being picked up by a variety

0:27:39.720 --> 0:27:43.400
<v Speaker 1>of actors in a variety of levels, depending on what

0:27:43.440 --> 0:27:46.400
<v Speaker 1>product you're talking about. So it's unbelievably complicated.

0:27:47.440 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 5>It's a logistical nightmare. But the answer from the government

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:53.159
<v Speaker 5>or from the challenger at oral argument was, hey, Congress

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:55.360
<v Speaker 5>can fix this later. Kick the can like Congress kind

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:57.639
<v Speaker 5>of you know, sweep that up later. We can all

0:27:57.680 --> 0:27:59.879
<v Speaker 5>fix that. That should not be a reason trule against this,

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 5>and of course it shouldn't. If the law says that

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 5>Trump couldn't do this, it doesn't matter what the consequences are.

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:06.160
<v Speaker 5>You got gotta invalidate the act.

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I keep forgetting we have a Congress. They don't

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:12.119
<v Speaker 1>do much, so you don't notice them on a Stasia,

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 1>a Boden anything else. Of note. At the Supreme Court

0:28:15.280 --> 0:28:18.000
<v Speaker 1>this week, this case kind of grabbed all the spotlights.

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 5>That absolutely overshadowed everything. It was. It was anything, it

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:25.159
<v Speaker 5>was everything anybody was watching. I couldn't even get in.

0:28:25.240 --> 0:28:28.360
<v Speaker 5>People had lined up the day before for oral arguments.

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 5>But as you said, you know, these emergency powers, they're

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:34.600
<v Speaker 5>on everybody's mind. It's one of the most famous statements

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 5>from constitutional law, from a Supreme Court opinion that emergency

0:28:38.400 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 5>powers beget emergencies. You know, the more that you get

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 5>you hand this power over, it will be used not

0:28:43.960 --> 0:28:46.840
<v Speaker 5>just during the administration you favor, but the next administration.

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 5>So it kind of dominated the headlines this week.

0:28:50.680 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know that's great, and I think one of

0:28:52.320 --> 0:28:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the justices actually said that during the oral arguments that

0:28:55.400 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 1>emergency powers beget emergencies. You gotta hammer. You start looking

0:29:00.280 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 1>for something a hammer. It's just human nature on a station.

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Boden of the Pacific Legal Foundation, Hey, thanks for the analysis.

0:29:06.040 --> 0:29:08.320
<v Speaker 1>We really appreciate it and save travels.

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 5>Thanks so much for having me.

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Of course, love the Pacific Legal Foundation. They do great work.

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 1>It is a problem.

0:29:16.960 --> 0:29:20.480
<v Speaker 3>So in my mind it's absolutely one hundred percent clear

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 3>we can't be giving in these emergency powers to Donald

0:29:24.520 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 3>Trump because it'll come back Oh my god, if you're

0:29:27.120 --> 0:29:29.719
<v Speaker 3>if you're the biggest Trump fan in the world, this

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:33.000
<v Speaker 3>will come back to haunt you in so many different ways. Yes,

0:29:33.200 --> 0:29:36.000
<v Speaker 3>with the next Democratic president, you could so see a

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 3>Joe Biden or a Barack Obama, especially when climate change

0:29:39.280 --> 0:29:41.440
<v Speaker 3>was a lot hotter than if you'll pardon the expression,

0:29:41.440 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 3>than it is now of like the prevailing wisdom. Oh

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 3>my god, the taxes and tariffs and penalties you could

0:29:48.680 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 3>have levied across the country with that as an emergency to.

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Reward your cronies in the fake green energy world. I mean,

0:29:55.560 --> 0:29:57.720
<v Speaker 1>not that all of green energy is fake, it's certainly not,

0:29:57.840 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, I mean it could be just, oh my god,

0:30:00.720 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 1>less power, less power, not more. But I'm a little

0:30:04.360 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 1>disturbed to hear the KAVO make go that way.

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 3>But we'll say, but the other side of it being well,

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 3>then you got to unwind this to the tune of

0:30:10.960 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 3>billions of dollars. And there's no fair way you can

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:16.120
<v Speaker 3>do that, because how about businesses who decided, well, I

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:18.760
<v Speaker 3>just ate it. You know, I just made less profits

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 3>because I thought I needed to be more competitive with

0:30:20.880 --> 0:30:23.800
<v Speaker 3>my prices than my opponent who raised the prices.

0:30:23.880 --> 0:30:27.360
<v Speaker 1>So what do I get back right right, And in

0:30:27.440 --> 0:30:30.400
<v Speaker 1>most of these supply chains there are two to five

0:30:30.640 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 1>different entities that absorbed some or all of the cost

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:36.959
<v Speaker 1>from the exporter and the fur and land to the

0:30:37.320 --> 0:30:39.920
<v Speaker 1>domestic consumer. So anyway, So on the other hand, that's

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 1>just that, what are you going to do? What a

0:30:42.640 --> 0:30:45.480
<v Speaker 1>tangled web we weave when first we decided to apply

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 1>illegal terrfs. In my opinion, well.

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:50.600
<v Speaker 3>I think I still don't quite have the answer in this.

0:30:50.640 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 3>Why didn't Supreme Court jump on this, like the day

0:30:53.280 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 3>after Liberation Day?

0:30:57.440 --> 0:31:00.800
<v Speaker 1>We should ask Anastasia she didn't know Tim would know.

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:03.880
<v Speaker 1>You gotta you gotta go through the motions. You gotta

0:31:03.920 --> 0:31:09.200
<v Speaker 1>get standing and have a lawsuit filed, and oh you

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:12.160
<v Speaker 1>need multiple couple of briefs, two or three briefs at

0:31:12.200 --> 0:31:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the list. Everybody knows that. Okay, people are falling in

0:31:18.320 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 1>love with their chatbots. They actually The New York Times

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 1>had a serious article about that. I can't wait to

0:31:22.520 --> 0:31:24.600
<v Speaker 1>get into that. How ur three, What a weird story.

0:31:24.720 --> 0:31:32.240
<v Speaker 3>Among all the things on the way.

0:31:30.400 --> 0:31:31.840
<v Speaker 7>This one is the first one, and it is a

0:31:31.840 --> 0:31:34.360
<v Speaker 7>big deal because battleship has been around for a long time.

0:31:34.400 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 7>This was actually originally played with paper and pencil back

0:31:37.680 --> 0:31:38.960
<v Speaker 7>for a long time ago, and.

0:31:38.840 --> 0:31:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Then slowly came along. This came along, sold one.

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:44.520
<v Speaker 7>Hundred million of these, so very very popular, and became

0:31:44.520 --> 0:31:45.840
<v Speaker 7>one of the first electronic games.

0:31:45.920 --> 0:31:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Here's another one inducted this year. Slime. No, this is

0:31:49.320 --> 0:31:52.560
<v Speaker 1>a post time. Slime is made by a lot of people.

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:57.160
<v Speaker 7>So this is a general toy that got in taper

0:31:57.200 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 7>household growing up right there.

0:31:59.400 --> 0:32:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Pursue.

0:32:00.840 --> 0:32:03.200
<v Speaker 3>So the three toys going into the Toy Hall of Fame,

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:05.720
<v Speaker 3>and I'm surprised the ones that haven't already made it

0:32:05.760 --> 0:32:10.600
<v Speaker 3>in there. But Battleship, you suck my Battleship, Trivial Pursuit

0:32:10.760 --> 0:32:15.320
<v Speaker 3>and Slime. God did I love Slime when it came out. Oh,

0:32:15.400 --> 0:32:17.120
<v Speaker 3>we had so much fun with that in our house.

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:20.160
<v Speaker 3>What a great toy. Did they still make that or

0:32:20.160 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 3>did they? That's probably why I got them.

0:32:26.280 --> 0:32:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, h that toy is childish. That toy that kid

0:32:31.240 --> 0:32:34.480
<v Speaker 1>is playing with us childish. I don't think they should

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:39.400
<v Speaker 1>sell Battleship because it teaches militarism to children. Say, we

0:32:39.440 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 1>got to use suck colonial oppressor ideology. We had we

0:32:44.600 --> 0:32:45.800
<v Speaker 1>got a joke I want to get to but we

0:32:45.840 --> 0:32:47.800
<v Speaker 1>got to use suck text that I want to address,

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:50.720
<v Speaker 1>and we get. We get lots of them, so I

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 1>can't get to them all. But you guys suck.

0:32:54.080 --> 0:32:57.840
<v Speaker 3>Trump is building our economy and returning businesses to America

0:32:57.880 --> 0:33:02.440
<v Speaker 3>through tariffs. That is the other example that forgot to mention.

0:33:02.560 --> 0:33:05.320
<v Speaker 3>That's one of the biggest problems. What if you're a

0:33:05.400 --> 0:33:09.040
<v Speaker 3>company that has already you know, bought the land or

0:33:09.600 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 3>broken ground or dedicated forty million dollars to building a

0:33:13.560 --> 0:33:16.040
<v Speaker 3>plant because you just decided, well, the only way I'm

0:33:16.080 --> 0:33:17.560
<v Speaker 3>going to be able to compete is bring the plant

0:33:17.560 --> 0:33:19.880
<v Speaker 3>here back to the United States, here in Indiana instead

0:33:19.920 --> 0:33:20.920
<v Speaker 3>of in Mexico or whatever.

0:33:20.920 --> 0:33:22.200
<v Speaker 1>But the new terrorists blah blah.

0:33:22.040 --> 0:33:25.360
<v Speaker 3>Blah like like was the point of the tariffs for Trump,

0:33:25.720 --> 0:33:27.760
<v Speaker 3>and then they become it turns out they're illegal, and.

0:33:27.760 --> 0:33:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Your competitor didn't do that. Oh that I would. I

0:33:31.240 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 1>would say, friend, that we're not the ones that suck.

0:33:33.720 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Certainly at making arguments. You just excused a democratic far

0:33:37.760 --> 0:33:42.360
<v Speaker 1>left president from doing anything they want, exceeding their constitutional

0:33:42.400 --> 0:33:46.120
<v Speaker 1>powers if their goal is noble. That's not the way

0:33:46.120 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 1>it works. Brother or sister or neither or both. So

0:33:51.000 --> 0:33:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the thing these days.

0:33:53.600 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 3>Got a joke to play for you from Greg Guttfeld

0:33:55.480 --> 0:33:59.200
<v Speaker 3>last night. This is a pretty damned edgy joke I did.

0:34:00.480 --> 0:34:02.280
<v Speaker 3>I guess it took a quarter of a century before

0:34:02.280 --> 0:34:04.200
<v Speaker 3>you can make this sort of joke. You'll get it

0:34:04.240 --> 0:34:06.080
<v Speaker 3>when you go ahead through.

0:34:06.320 --> 0:34:08.919
<v Speaker 8>Since Zo ran one, there have already been a few

0:34:09.000 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 8>minor changes to the city. And get this, and get this,

0:34:13.280 --> 0:34:16.719
<v Speaker 8>LaGuardia Airport will now be offering direct flights into the

0:34:16.760 --> 0:34:25.399
<v Speaker 8>Freedom Tower.

0:34:26.400 --> 0:34:33.439
<v Speaker 1>Oh, it's a joke. It's a joke. That's an edgy joke.

0:34:34.040 --> 0:34:39.760
<v Speaker 1>That's an edgy joke in New York. I got Ramba. Yeah,

0:34:39.800 --> 0:34:40.480
<v Speaker 1>isn't it something?

0:34:40.480 --> 0:34:44.000
<v Speaker 3>Though, it's like other than that, how did you like

0:34:44.040 --> 0:34:46.560
<v Speaker 3>to play missus Lincoln? I mean, after a certain amount

0:34:46.600 --> 0:34:52.840
<v Speaker 3>of time, a gruesome tragedy becomes something you can joke about.

0:34:53.840 --> 0:34:55.239
<v Speaker 3>But it takes a certain amount of time. I'd say

0:34:55.239 --> 0:34:58.680
<v Speaker 3>with nine eleven it took like two decades. Yeah, that's

0:34:58.760 --> 0:35:03.360
<v Speaker 3>a joke, but not a funny one. It's a surprising

0:35:03.400 --> 0:35:08.600
<v Speaker 3>one and a shocking one. It's making a statement that

0:35:08.600 --> 0:35:12.880
<v Speaker 3>that joke was a statement that many of us are

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:15.879
<v Speaker 3>highly concerned that someone who appears to be an out

0:35:15.880 --> 0:35:18.879
<v Speaker 3>and out Islamist is sympathetic to the people who did

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:24.520
<v Speaker 3>what they did on nine to eleven. Right, almost impossible

0:35:24.520 --> 0:35:26.719
<v Speaker 3>to believe that he wasn't happy about that.

0:35:28.239 --> 0:35:31.640
<v Speaker 1>What nine to eleven? Yeah, it was a tiny child.

0:35:34.480 --> 0:35:38.640
<v Speaker 1>He would at his house he felt like, said, oh yeah,

0:35:38.719 --> 0:35:40.520
<v Speaker 1>if he felt like he was safe, he would explain

0:35:40.560 --> 0:35:46.120
<v Speaker 1>to you how the colonial oppressor US got would it deserved? Yeah, yeah,

0:35:47.680 --> 0:35:48.960
<v Speaker 1>So he'd mentioned this during the week.

0:35:49.040 --> 0:35:53.360
<v Speaker 3>Tesla's shareholders did approve that record setting pay package for

0:35:53.440 --> 0:35:58.560
<v Speaker 3>Elon Musk, granting him one trillion dollars an additional stock

0:35:58.600 --> 0:36:02.200
<v Speaker 3>if he hit certain milestone, the biggest package anybody's ever

0:36:03.120 --> 0:36:05.200
<v Speaker 3>had out there as a bonus package. And I heard

0:36:05.200 --> 0:36:09.200
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of communists yesterday arguing about then. And yet

0:36:09.239 --> 0:36:10.400
<v Speaker 3>people are hungry in the streets.

0:36:10.400 --> 0:36:14.560
<v Speaker 1>You know that. Shut up commies. I think that, honestly,

0:36:14.640 --> 0:36:18.320
<v Speaker 1>that amazing amount of money obscures the more significant development,

0:36:18.320 --> 0:36:22.360
<v Speaker 1>which is they have embraced Elon turning Tesla into a

0:36:22.480 --> 0:36:29.360
<v Speaker 1>robotics company an AI shut Com, Armstrong and Getty